Open access

The Insular Cortex and the Amygdala: Shared Functions and Interactions

Written By

Rodrigo Moraga-Amaro and Jimmy Stehberg

Submitted: December 1st, 2011 Published: December 19th, 2012

DOI: 10.5772/48495

Chapter metrics overview

5,364 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

The Insular Cortex (IC) is a portion of the cerebral cortex folded deep within the lateral sulcus – in rodents surrounding the rhinal fissure - between the temporal and frontal lobes. The IC was first described by J.C. Reil in 1809 [1], after whom it received the name “the island of Reil”. Historically, the IC has been mentioned with several names, including “the central lobe”, “the fifth lobe”, “intersylvian convolutions” and “intralobular gyri” (reviewed in [2]).

The most accepted subdivisions of the IC are the three regions described by Cecheto and Saper (1987) [3], based on the cytoarchitecture of its layers within the ventrodorsal plane. These include (1) the agranular insular cortex (AI) which surrounds the rhinal fissure and lacks a granular layer, (2) the dysgranular insular cortex (DI) which is located just dorsal to the rhinal fissure and contains a diffuse granular layer, and (3) the granular insular cortex (GI), situated just ventral to the secondary somatosensory cortex with a clear granular layer [3]. Each subdivision is believed to process particular sensory information. For example, the AI is believed to participate in nociceptive [4-6] and autonomic processing [3], the DI plays a role in gustatory processing [7, 8] and the GI has an important role in modulating visceral function [3].

In the rostrocaudal plane, subdivisions of the IC are still controversial. Several studies suggest at least two regions - one posterior and the other rostral. Within the rostral, two more subdivisions are usually described: the posterior rostral (sometimes called “central”) and the anterior rostral.

In rodents, particularly in the rat, the IC runs along the rostral half of the rhinal fissure. There is, to date, no consensus on the exact location of the border between the IC and the perirhinal cortex, which runs along the caudal half of the rhinal fissure. The rostral end of the IC corresponds to 2 mm of the anterior rostral portion, which runs roughly anterior to the bregma – anterior to the genu of the corpus callosum. It is mostly agranular and usually subdivided into 2 strips: dorsal and ventral [9].

This anterior area is connected with the lateral frontal cortices and the motor thalamic nuclei [10] and receives projections mainly from the ventral part of the medial mediodorsal (MD), the parafascicular and central medial (CM) nuclei of the thalamus [11, 12], as well as with the motor-related amygdala regions [10], the locus coeruleus and the nucleus raphe magnus [4].

Posterior to this rostral agranular area is the central or posterior rostral portion, which includes the 3 main dorsoventral subdivisions described above [3].

The rat granular area is connected to the paraventricular [13], the visceral thalamic nucleus (the parvicellular division of the ventroposterior lateral nucleus of the thalamus, VPLpc; [3, 11]), the gustatory thalamic nucleus (the parvicellular part of the ventroposterior medial nucleus of the thalamus, VPMpc;[10]), the reticular nucleus [14], the sustantia innominata [15], the ventromedial parts of somatosensory thalamic nucleus (the ventroposterior medial thalamic nucleus; VPM, [10]), the posterior thalamic complex (Po), and the central medial nucleus (CM) of the thalamus [10, 16] as well as the medial parabrachial nucleus of the mesencephalon (PBN) and the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) [17-19]. Connections with the lateral hypothalamic area and the visceromotor regions in the brainstem including the vago-solitary complex have also been reported [17, 20, 21]. Cortically, it is connected with the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) and the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII), the infralimbic cortex [22], the caudate-putamen, the amygdala [23-27] and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST, [19]).

The dysgranular area is connected to the paraventricular [13] and the gustatory thalamus (VPMpc; [3, 10, 28, 29]), the medial PBN, the rostral NTS [19, 21] reticular nucleus of the thalamus [30], the somatosensory secondary (SII; [23]), the basolateral and central nuclei of the amygdala [23, 29, 31], the BST [20] and the lateral hypothalamic area [29].

The more posterior part, which extends caudally from roughly 2 mm posterior to bregma [23], has been suggested to be involved in somatosensory functions, including pain [16, 32]. For a simplified scheme of IC connections, see Fig. 1.


2. Functions of the insular cortex

Following the reports on intraoperative recordings made by Penfield and colleagues showing that the IC is a viscerosensory and visceromotor region [33, 34], the old James–Lange theory of emotions was revived. The James–Lange theory of emotions states that “bodily changes follow directly the perception of the exciting fact… our feeling of the same changes as they occur is the emotion… we feel sorry because we cry… afraid because we tremble” [35]. In other words, our nervous system responds to emotional experiences with physiological changes (e.g., a rise in the heart rate and dryness of the mouth), primarily mediated by the autonomic system (e.g., sympathetic responses) and the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. Emotions are the feelings that result from these physiological changes. Thus, the insula appears as a possible site where such autonomic responses and general bodily states are represented cortically at any given time.

Figure 1.

Anatomical connections of taste and visceral areas of the insular corex

Damasio´s somatic marker hypothesis suggests that such ever changing representations of bodily states are required for decision making [36], stored in the insula and other somatosensitive areas [36-39] and triggered by the amygdala or prefrontal cortex (as primary or secondary inducers, [39]). Thus, congruent with both the James-Lange theory of emotions and Damasio’s somatic marker hypothesis, the IC is believed to be the brain site where the representations of bodily states are created in response to emotional stimuli and which mediates interoceptive awareness and the subjective experience of feelings [38].

Support for this notion comes from a large number of recent studies in humans, monkeys and rodents, recently reviewed in [40]. Such studies include anatomical, electrophysiological, lesion, pharmacological and imaging studies, as well as operatory stimulation techniques which have yielded plausible roles for the IC in dozens of different functions. Several studies indicate that the IC is involved in taste processing [7, 8, 28, 41], viscerosensory information processing [3, 20, 26, 38, 42, 43], temperature and pain perception [44, 45], olfaction [46] auditory processing [47-49], somatosensory perception [49, 50], drug craving [51], motor tasks [52] and post-stroke motor-recovery functions [53].

Studies in humans have suggested a role for the IC in the ability to feel our own heartbeat [54, 55], negative emotional states including pain [56], social exclusion [57] positive emotional states [58, 59], empathy [60, 61], cognitive control tasks [62] and speech [62, 63-66]. All the above functions may have as a common denominator the IC as a possible correlate of awareness [66], while others have suggested that the role of the IC may be to respond to the perceived salience, novelty or unexpectedness of sensory events mediated by the representation of bodily reactions [67].

In spite of the fact that complex cognitive functions, speech and self awareness are associated with humans and non-measurable in rodents, when IC functional maps of rats and humans are compared, the similarities are striking. In fact, the rat and human insular cortices have common functional areas - as shown in Figure 2 - which suggests a degree of convergence in overall IC functions (compiled from: Rat IC [7, 16, 23, 32, 45, 46, 68-70]; Human IC [71-75]).

Insular dysfunction or hypofunction has also been associated with neurological disorders, such as frontotemporal dementia [76] and spatial neglect [77, 78], as well as with common neuropsychiatric disorders [79] such as schizophrenia [80, 81], depression [82, 83], autism [54, 84], eating disorders [85], anxiety [86, 87], Parkinson´s disease [88, 89] and addiction [90].

Figure 2.

Functional organization of the rat (a) and the human (b) Insular Cortex. Green represents auditory related functions. Yellow represents somatosensory related functions. Purple represents pain associated functions. Red represents cardiac related functions. Blue represents taste related functions. Grey represents cognitive functions and Cyan represents social related functions. Auditory (green), somatosensory (yellow), pain (purple), cardiovascular (red), taste (blue), cognitive (grey) and social (cyan) representations are shown within the insula.


3. The primary viscerosensory cortex within the insular cortex

Visceral sensory information reaches the IC from the lateral parabrachial nucleus, the nucleus of the solitary tract [18, 19, 21, 91] and the visceral thalamus (VPLpc) [68]. Although a clear map of the viscerosensory area of the IC is still missing, areas within both the dysgranular and granular cortices have been identified as viscerosensory responsive [3, 10, 19, 92-94]. In Cechetto and Saper (1987) [3], a viscerosensory area within the Insular cortex was reported while exploring from 2.0 mm anterior to 0.5 mm posterior to the crossing of the anterior commissure (around the bregma) in rats. They found the majority of the baroreceptor-responsive units between +1.00 and -0.5 mm. Yasui and colleagues [27] explored the rat left insula between 3 mm anterior to 1 mm posterior to bregma and found viscerosensory responsive neurons to aggregate 0.5 mm around the anterior commissure. Zhang and Oppenheimer [94] found responsive cells throughout the rat insular cortex, as far rostral as +2.0 mm and as posterior as -1.5 mm from the bregma, with rightward predominance. In contrast, Shi and Casell (1998) found responsive cells throughout the rat insular cortex, but with leftward predominance [10, 23].

Unlike the visceromotor infralimbic cortex, the IC is usually considered viscerosensory [42, 95, 96]. However, extensive evidence suggests that the IC may have direct motor functions. This idea is supported by major efferent projections from the IC to autonomic brain centres, including the lateral hypothalamic area, the parabrachial nucleus [20], the vago-solitary complex, the nucleus of the solitary tract [17, 21] and the central nucleus of the amygdala [24-27, 97, 98]. Yasui and colleagues [27] reported that intrainsular microstimulation of the rostral part of the DI-GI induced increased arterial pressure and tachycardia, while stimulation of the caudal part produced a reduction of arterial pressure and bradycardia. Other studies have reported that electrical stimulation of the IC in mammals (including humans, non-human primates, cats, dogs and rodents) elicits changes in blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory frequency, respiratory arrest, gastric and bowel motility, gastric and abdominal sensations, nausea and vomiting [34, 49, 98-105]. There is evidence suggesting that this effect is direct where identified visceral insular efferents are linked to the autonomic effects of insular electrical stimulation [106], while it has also been reported that the IC is the main projection site of the cardiovascular depressor sites of the lateral hypothalamic area [107].

The lateralization seen in electrophysiological studies has also been described after stroke models using middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Right MCAO-damage to the insula and adjacent frontoparietal cortex in rats, significantly increased blood pressure, renal sympathetic nerve activity and plasma norepinephrine levels was compared with left MCAO and controls [69, 108].


4. Taste–related behaviours

The rat, like all other mammals, displays an innate fear for novel tastes (neophobia, [109]). This spontaneous behaviour limits the consumption of novel food until the rat's brain assesses its gastrointestinal effects. Provided that the tastant does not become associated with toxicosis, the consumption will increase on subsequent exposures to that same taste (attenuation of neophobia, i.e., familiarity). If, however, the consumption of the novel tastant results in visceral malaise, robust aversion specific to that tastant develops (conditioned taste aversion - CTA). This is one of the most robust paradigms used to study learning and is called conditioned taste aversion (CTA) [110, 111]. In the laboratory, a malaise-inducing agent - usually LiCl i.p. - is used to induce transient malaise in controlled CTA training. After a single exposure to a novel taste (conditioned stimulus - CS) and the subsequent injection of LiCl (unconditioned stimulus - US), the animal associates the malaise with the taste and acquires an aversion to it.

In the case that the malaise follows the consumption of a familiar taste, the animal has to relearn that the familiar harmless taste is now associated with a malaise. This involves a process known as latent inhibition (LI - the decreased potency of a pre-exposed CS to be associated with an US) and produces, behaviourally, a lower aversion on a subsequent CTA to that taste [112-114].

A CTA memory can last for months if un-retrieved [115], but after repetitive exposures of the taste in the absence of the negative reinforcer, the animal relearns rapidly that the taste is not noxious and the memory is extinguished (experimental extinction [115-117]).


5. The gustatory system in the rat

Gustatory information arrives from taste buds to the rostral pole of the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) from cranial nerves VII, IX and X [118]. From the NTS, both taste and viscerosensory neurons project to the parabrachial nucleus in the pons (PBN) [118, 119]. Gustatory neurons arrive mainly to the medial PBN (mPBN) [120-122] and visceral neurons to the lateral part (latPBN) [3, 18, 118], with some overlap [123].

The PBN has been shown to be essential for the perception and learning of tastes (reviewed in [123]). Lesions on either the medial or lateral parts of the nucleus disrupt taste preference [120, 124], selective neophobia [125, 126], sodium appetite [127, 128] and CTA [121, 126-130].

From the mPBN the gustatory responsive neurons project to the gustatory thalamus (the VPMpc [3, 131]) and later reach the IC [3, 67, 132]. However, in contrast to other sensory systems (except olfaction) where sensory input reaches the thalamus before getting to the cortex, the gustatory system shows a direct connection between the mPBN and the IC that bypasses the thalamus [21]. The role of each of these connections remains unknown. Besides the PBN and the IC, the VPMpc sends and receives projections from the reticular nucleus of the thalamus [30] and from the amygdala [133], although the cells from the VPMpc that project to the amygdala are different to those that project to the IC [31]. There is still no consensus to date over the role of the VPMpc-IC or the VPMpc-amygdala pathways.

Lesion studies have not been able to shed light into the functions of the VPMpc. Some studies have reported that VPMpc-lesioned animals retain a normal concentration response to preferred and non-preferred tastes [134-137] but may have disrupted [137], impaired [127, 130] or else have no effects on CTA [134, 135, 138, 139]. Current views suggest a role in comparing novel and familiar tastes [140] in more complex gustatory learning tasks or in attention to gustatory function [135, 136, 141].


6. The primary taste cortex within the insular cortex

The gustatory area within the IC is localized in the dysgranular insular cortex [21, 29], roughly between the rhinal fissure and the medial cerebral artery (MCA) - an area that has also been identified in the rat as taste-responsive using intrinsic signal imaging [141] and electrophysiological recordings [7, 28, 69, 140, 142-144].


7. Role of the IC in taste function

Lesions of the IC produce no perceptual deficits [145, 146] or effects on taste discrimination to preferred tastes [146, 147]. Moreover, recent evidence suggests that IC lesions after CTA lead to the original preference of the taste [148], which implies that IC may not have a role in modulating the original taste preference.

Taste neophobia corresponds to the reluctance to try a novel food. IC lesions induce a consistent decrease in taste neophobia when the novel taste is presented in a familiar environment [146, 148-152]. As most studies so far have focused on taste memory, pharmacological interventions into the IC are performed only after taste presentation and very few - if any - pharmacological studies have investigated the neurotransmitters involved in taste neophobia per se.

When it comes to the role of the IC in taste familiarity, reports show an interesting duality. IC lesions appear to produce no effects on animals’ capacity to attain taste familiarity [151], but several reports document a role for the IC in taste familiarity learning as a result of pharmacological manipulations [153, 154], showing that taste familiarity requires cholinergic activity in the IC [155, 156] but that it is independent of NMDA and AMPA channel activity [157-160]. Perhaps this dichotomy can be explained either by compensation from other areas after IC lesions or, given the role of neophobia discussed above, it is possible that IC output per se may modulate familiarity. In the last case, lacking a neophobic/novelty output may not affect familiarity, but altering such output pharmacologically may affect a familiarity trace processed elsewhere, possibly at the PBN.


8. Conditioned taste aversion

A large number of studies using transient pharmacological manipulations of the gustatory IC have shown that the IC has a role in CTA to novel tastes [117, 161], familiar tastes (also known as latent inhibition) [155, 162] and the extinction of CTA [115, 117]. Interestingly, IC lesions only partially affect CTA acquisition [145, 146, 148, 149, 163] but, when performed after CTA learning, IC lesions completely disrupt CTA memory retention [143, 145, 146, 164, 165] leading to the original preference for the taste [148]. This suggests that when an intact IC is present, it is not only involved in CTA acquisition and consolidation, but it may even be the site where CTA memories are stored (or else the capacity to retrieve them). The partial impairments seen when IC lesions are performed before CTA, on the other hand, suggest that such a seemingly crucial role for the IC in CTA can be compensated for when lacking IC. The area that can compensate for the lack of IC remains unidentified, although subcortical structures - including the PBN - have been proposed [166]. How can the IC be the site of memory acquisition and retention and yet be compensated almost completely? It is possible that the IC is part of a complex network of areas involved in aversive taste learning. A role for the amygdala in CTA acquisition (as will be discussed below), the redundancy seen in the direct PBN-IC, the PBN-VPMpc-IC and the PBN-amygdala-IC connections explained above, the possibility of attaining compensation from the olfactory system for the lack of taste proper and the possibility that IC lesions may induce unspecific taste aversion responses such as generalization, are some of the various possible hypotheses that have not been tested to date but which may explain this compensation.

When an animal with an intact IC is CTA trained, CTA memories (or the capacity to retrieve them) are stored in the IC. This role in storage appears to be non-time-dependent [146], unlike hippocampal-dependent learning systems where hippocampal involvement in memory retention lasts for a limited time only [167-171].

Determining whether IC lesions after CTA induce CTA retention deficits or a loss of the capacity to retrieve the memory is difficult to assess. Support for the idea that CTA memories are stored in the IC come from a complete lack of spontaneous recovery in several pharmacological and lesion studies, whereas support for the idea that the IC is involved in retention but not the storage of CTA memory comes from studies by Bermudez-Rattoni and colleagues, showing that foetal implants into the IC can recover the capacity to retrieve previously acquired CTA [172-173].

It must be kept in mind that the perception of flavour requires an interaction between smell and taste [174]. IC lesions have also been shown to impair both CTA learning and taste-potentiated odour aversion (POA) learning, suggesting that the IC may also have a role in the integration of odours, tastes and illness [147].

Congruent with animal studies showing a role for the IC in taste function and taste-odour integration, reports from humans show that electrical microstimulation of the gustatory IC induces changes in gustatory function [175, 176] as well as different olfactory sensations [34].

In conclusion, the IC is not involved in taste perception or basic discrimination. The fact that IC lesions after CTA render complete amnesia implies that an intact IC is crucial for CTA memory retention or retrieval. Pharmacological manipulations affecting CTA memory consolidation, reconsolidation, extinction and latent inhibition, suggest that the IC is also involved in CTA acquisition.

The evidence that IC lesions disrupt taste neophobia leading to the original preference of the taste but have no effect on taste familiarity, together with the fact that pharmacological manipulations of the IC affect familiarity and memory extinction, suggest a role for the IC in novelty and novelty-induced taste rejection. In fact, the IC has been suggested to be involved in reactions to the novelty and associative salience exclusive to taste stimuli [149].

A role for the IC in taste saliency and novelty is congruent with the majority of human studies reported for different IC functions, where a common denominator could be a role in the perceived salience, novelty or unexpectedness of sensory events mediated by the representation of bodily reactions [67], which could lead to self-awareness. In this sense, assuming that the output of the IC will eventually be turned into emotion, it is possible that the visceral and gustatory areas within the IC - together with other IC regions - create a bodily representation of taste perception, odour, autonomic responses, pain and somatosensory activation, visual and auditory stimulation, all of which are integrated to determine the salience of a given combination of sensory inputs and autonomic responses relevant to creating an emotion. One must keep in mind that at any given time a huge amount of sensory information flows to the cortex (visual, auditory, tactile, pain, proprioception, taste and smell) together with a huge amount of information from autonomic functions, most of which change constantly to maintain body homeostasis. Thus, the bodily representation required for an emotion needs to be filtered out to only the most salient, novel and relevant information.


9. The insula-amygdala network

Anatomically, the IC and the amygdala are closely connected, both directly and through their main outputs and inputs (see figure 1). There are massive reciprocal connections between the insular cortex and the amygdala [10, 23, 29, 177, 178] to all amygdalar subdivisions [179]. The ventral agranular insular area projects preferentially to the medial extended amygdala, while the viscerosensory and somatosensory portions of the insular cortex project preferentially to the central extended amygdala [180]. Furthermore, the amygdaloid projections from the posterior insular cortex appear to be organized in a feedforward parallel fashion targeting all levels of the intra-amygdaloid connections linking the lateral, basolateral and central nuclei [10, 23]. It must be noted that the PBN-insular cortex projections pass across the central nucleus of the amygdala [21]. Interestingly, Shi and Cassel (1998) [23] reported that cortical connections from the somatosensory secondary cortex to the IC may convey somatosensory information to the amygdala [23] and relay shock information to the BLA during fear conditioning [181].

All other main areas that are connected to the IC have reciprocal connections to the amygdala. The VPMpc projects to the amygdala [31, 132, 182] although the cells from the VPMpc that project to the amygdala are different from those that project to the IC [31]. The BNST also projects to the amygdala [20, 183], the LHA [20] and the PBN [18].

Within the PBN, the latPBN sends dense afferents to the central nucleus of the Amygdala (CeA) and more sparse afferents to the basolateral nucleus (BLA) and the lateral area (LAA), whilst the mPBN projects more densely to the BLA and LAA, but more scarcely to the CeA [18]. The lateral part of the BNST also receives inputs from the PBN and, from there, the BNST axons join those coming from the PBN and project together to the amygdala [18].

Other PBN subnuclei also project to both the IC and the amygdala. The externo-lateral PBN (elPBN) receives both gustatory and visceral inputs and projects with a calcitonin-gene related peptide (CGRP) into the insular cortex ([184] and to the amygdala ([27, 185]). CGRP microinjections into the amygdala induce fear-like behaviour in absence of aversive stimuli [186] as well as with increased heart rate and arterial pressure [187].


10. The role of the amygdala in taste function

The BLA has a crucial modulatory role in almost all memory tasks that include an emotion-arousing component. For Pavlovian fear conditioning, the BLA is not only the site where memory consolidation takes place but is also the site of long-term memory storage (for a review, see [188, 189]). As for other learning tasks, such as inhibitory avoidance or CTA, the BLA is not the site of memory storage but rather it modulates the memory consolidation of those memories stored in other brain regions (for reviews, see [190-192].

Dunn and Everitt (1988) [149] reported that BLA - but not CeA - lesions impair CTA. Furthermore, BLA lesions may impair taste neophobia [150] and arousal-induced taste neophobia, as well as passive avoidance [149]. Pharmacological BLA manipulations suggest a modulatory role in CTA after novel taste presentation, during visceral malaise and its association with the taste [193-197].

BLA stimulation affects IC neuronal responses [8] whereas BLA tetanic stimulation induces long-term potentiation in the ipsilateral IC [157, 158, 198]. Interestingly, induction of this long-term potentiation in the BLA–IC projection before CTA training enhances memory retention [199].

Other studies have suggested that CTA memory acquisition in the IC requires an intact BLA [200] and combined IC and BLA reversible or permanent lesions induce stronger CTA impairment than IC or BLA lesions alone [130, 193, 201-203].

Lesions in the BLA and LAA impair CTA moderately, but the combination of lesions of the VPMpc and the amygdala completely disrupts CTA [130, 204] and neophobia and induces weight loss [204]. Lesions of the amygdala have also been shown to produce the faster extinction of odour-taste (saccharin) association learning [205]. Moreover, transient pharmacological manipulations of the amygdala have been shown to impair CTA [140, 192, 206-208] and suggest that CTA consolidation depends upon protein synthesis and requires CREB and cfos activation in the CeA [192, 206, 207], whereas extinction depends upon protein synthesis in the BLA [192]. Interestingly, neither amygdalar nucleus is involved in CTA memory reconsolidation [140, 208], which probably suggests that the amygdala is involved in CTA acquisition but not in CTA memory storage.

Interactions of the amygdala with other brain regions have also been shown to be necessary for CTA. One study reported that lesions in the basal forebrain that deplete the neocortical innervation of acetylcholine (ACh), paired with lesions of the BLA, completely disrupt CTA, while each by itself may only impair learning [203, 209].

The amygdala has been well established as subserving fear and other emotional responses (reviewed in [188]). Together with other frontal cortical areas, it constitutes a major part of the so-called limbic system. Thus, it is possible that the role of the amygdala in taste function could be linked to the emotional and hedonic valence of gustatory stimuli in response to the salient bodily representation provided by the IC.

11. Other amygdalar functions shared by the IC

Ample evidence suggests that the amygdala can modulate memory consolidation in different memory systems through its many efferent projections to other brain regions [210]. Several reports show that the amygdala is involved in hippocampus-dependent (spatial or contextual) learning paradigms [211]. The basolateral complex of the amygdala (BLA; consisting of the lateral, basal and accessory basal nuclei) is critical for mediating the effects of stress on memory in several types of learning [212]. BLA also interacts with the IC in regulating taste neophobia [151, 20, 213] and, as mentioned earlier, CTA.

Interestingly, the IC has also been reported to be involved in the memory consolidation of inhibitory avoidance [214] and object recognition memory [215] - both learning systems that have been shown to be modulated by the amygdala [216, 217]. As stated at the beginning of this chapter, in humans insula activation has been correlated to processing threats and seeing emotional images in patients with anxiety disorders [218, 219], contextual fear conditioning [220], negative emotional states, including pain [56, 221], and positive emotions [58, 59]. Interestingly, all of the above conditions have also been reported to activate the amygdala [220-224]. As such, does the IC have shared functions with the amygdala? Do they interact?

12. Insular cortex and amygdala interactions

For learning and memory, extensive evidence suggests that the amygdala interacts with other brain regions, including the BNST, the nucleus basalis, the hippocampus and the entorhinal cortex (reviewed in [190, 225]).

In CTA, studies have shown that learning is modulated by interactions between the amygdala and the IC. Ferreira and colleagues (2005) showed that the glutamatergic activation of the amygdala enhances CTA, an effect that can be blocked by the glutamatergic blockage of the IC [226].

Interactions between the insular cortex and the amygdala have been hinted at in some human studies [227]. In one of these, the over-activation of both areas was reported in patients with anxiety disorder [219], while in another study the ventral agranular frontoinsula was shown to co-activate with the amygdala in social–emotional paradigms [38, 45, 52, 228].

As we have discussed before, IC activity has been correlated with several functions that also recruit amygdala activity. The fact that IC stimulation elicits cardiovascular responses is also not unique for the IC. In fact, electrical stimulation of the amygdala induces stress-related responses, including tachycardia and elevated arterial pressure as well as renal, intestine and skin vasoconstriction [229], while the stimulation of the CeA produces bradycardia, dilation of the pupils and movements of the mouth and tongue [230]. Furthermore, a study using single cell recordings of the amygdala in the cat reported that 46% of cells responded to carotid sinus nerve stimulation and that half of them responded to selective baroreceptor or chemoreceptor activation [231].

Other electrophysiological recordings have also shown that amygdala neurons respond to cardiovascular challenges. Cechetto and colleagues reported that over 23% of all recorded amygdala neurons responded to chemoreceptor activation and 16% to baroreceptor activation in cats [232]. In a different study, a cardiovascular pressure stimulus elicited predominantly inhibitory responses in one-half of amygdalar neurons. Most neurons in the central and basal nuclei responded to carotid chemoreceptor activation with excitation. Moreover, when testing responses to external sensory stimulation, 33% of recorded neurons responded to visual stimulation, 55% to acoustic, 39% to tactile and 59% to olfactory stimuli. Two-thirds of the neurons responded to more than one external sensory stimulus, demonstrating a convergence of sensory processing on single amygdalar neurons. Also, and as expected, 86% of recoded neurons responded to behavioural arousal [233].

So far, evidence seems to indicate that the IC and the amygdala share an enormous number of functions and properties. Although the idea that the IC is involved in creating bodily representations that are used by the amygdala to produce the correct emotional response is attractive, there is to date no real evidence that can distinguish the roles of either area.

Nevertheless, if we were to accept this model, where the role of the IC is to create and convey a bodily representation to the amygdala, which would be used to modulate and coordinate an emotional response to the stimulus, both the IC and the amygdala would be expected to receive direct autonomic and sensory information and to elicit cardiovascular responses. As such, the IC projections to the amygdala, together with the cortical connections from the somatosensory secondary cortex to the IC that convey somatosensory information to the amygdala [23], would relay the salient autonomic and sensory information needed to create an emotional response.

The mode and timing of the IC-amygdala interaction remains elusive and has not been the subject of much research. In an fMRI study in cats, depressor cardiovascular challenges produced a decline of signal-intensity in the right insula and increased signal intensity in the amygdala [234]. By way of contrast, Williams and colleagues reported using fMRI in humans such that the initial perception of fearful faces induced, first, increased activity in the insula, then a greater engagement of the medial prefrontal cortex and, finally, activity in the left amygdala [235]. Does the IC-Amygdala interaction imply synergic activation? Or does it imply inhibition? Is the IC expected to be activated before the amygdala? According to the data so far, the presence of massive feedforward excitatory projections and the electrophysiological studies commented on throughout this chapter suggest reciprocal excitatory connections. Furthermore, according to the IC´s bodily representation-amygdala´s emotional response model, IC activation should precede that of the amygdala. To date, there is no conclusive evidence as to how this interaction takes place. Nevertheless, it is clear that in order to understand emotions we need to comprehend how the two of its major participants interact.


This chapter was supported by the Grant UNAB DI-02-11/N


  1. 1. ReilJ1809Die sylvische Grube. Arch. physiol. (Halle) 9195208
  2. 2. AugustineJ1985The insular lobe in primates including humans.Neurol. Res. 7210
  3. 3. CechettoDSaperC1987Evidence for a viscerotopic sensory representation in the cortex and thalamus in the rat.J. comp. neurol. 2622745
  4. 4. JasminLRabkinSGranatoABoudahAOharaP2003Analgesia and hyperalgesia from GABA-mediated modulation of the cerebral cortex.Nature424316320
  5. 5. BurkeyACarstensEWennigerJTangJJasminL1996An opioidergic cortical antinociception triggering site in the agranular insular cortex of the rat that contributes to morphine antinociceptionJ. neurosci. 1666126623
  6. 6. BurkeyACarstensEJasminL1999Dopamine reuptake inhibition in the rostral agranular insular cortex produces antinociception.J. neurosci. 1941694179
  7. 7. YamamotoTTakahashiTKawamuraY1981Access to the cerebral cortex of extra-lingual taste inputs in the rat.Neurosci. lett. 24129132
  8. 8. YamamotoTYuyamaNKatoTKawamuraY1984Gustatory responses of cortical neurons in rats. I. Response characteristics.Neurophysiol. 51616635
  9. 9. KrettekJPriceJ1978Amygdaloid projections to subcortical structures within the basal forebrain and brainstem in the rat and cat.J. comp. neurol. 178225254
  10. 10. Shi C, Cassell M (1998) Cortical, thalamic, and amygdaloid connections of the anterior and posterior insular cortices. J. comp. neurol. 399 440468 .
  11. 11. GroenewegenH1988Organization of the afferent connections of the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus in the rat, related to the mediodorsal-prefrontal topography.Neuroscience24379431
  12. 12. RayJPriceJ1992The organization of the thalamocortical connections of the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus in the rat, related to the ventral forebrain-prefrontal cortex topography. J. comp. neurol. 323167197
  13. 13. MogaMWeisRMooreR1995Efferent projections of the paraventricular thalamic nucleus in the rat.J. comp. neurol. 359221238
  14. 14. StehbergJAcuna-goycoleaCCericFTorrealbaF2001The visceral sector of the thalamic reticular nucleus in the rat. Neuroscience 106745755
  15. 15. GroveE1988Efferent connections of the substantia innominata in the rat.J. comp. neurol. 277347364
  16. 16. GauriauCBernardJ2004Posterior triangular thalamic neurons convey nociceptive messages to the secondary somatosensory and insular cortices in the rat.J. neurosci. 24752761
  17. 17. ShipleyM1982Insular cortex projection to the nucleus of the solitary tract and brainstem visceromotor regions in the mouse.Brain res. bull. 8139148
  18. 18. SaperCLoewyA1980Efferent connections of the parabrachial nucleus in the rat.Brain res. 197291317
  19. 19. CechettoDSaperC1990Role of the cerebral cortex in autonomic functions. In: Central Regulation of Autonomic Functions, edited by A. D. Loewy and K. M. Spyer. New York: Oxford Univ. 208223
  20. 20. SaperC1982Convergence of autonomic and limbic connections in the insular cortex of the rat.J comp. neurol. 21016373
  21. 21. ShipleyMSandersM1982Special senses are really special: evidence for a reciprocal, bilateral pathway between insular cortex and nucleus parabrachialis.Brain res. bull. 8493501
  22. 22. HurleyKHerbertHMogaMSaperC1991Efferent projections of the infralimbic cortex of the rat.J. comp. neurol. 308249276
  23. 23. ShiCCassellM1998Cascade projections from somatosensory cortex to the rat basolateral amygdala via the parietal insular cortex.J. comp. neurol. 399469491
  24. 24. Van Der KooyDMcgintyJKodaLGerfenCBloomF1982Visceral cortex: a direct connection from prefrontal cortex to the solitary nucleus in rat.Neurosci. lett. 33123127
  25. 25. Van Der KooyDKodaLMcgintyJGerfenCBloomF1984The organization of projections from the cortex, amygdala, and hypothalamus to the nucleus of the solitary tract in rat. J. comp. neurol. 224124
  26. 26. YasuiYItohKMitaniATakadaMMizunoN1985Cerebral cortical projections to the reticular regions around the trigeminal motor nucleus in the cat.J. comp. neurol. 241348356
  27. 27. YasuiYBrederCSaperCCechettoD1991Autonomic responses and efferent pathways from the insular cortex in the rat,J. comp. neurol. 303355374
  28. 28. KosarEGrillHNorgrenR1986Gustatory cortex in the rat. I. Physiological properties andcytoarchitecture. Brain res. 379329341
  29. 29. AllenGSaperCHurleyKCechettoD1991Organization of visceral and limbic connections in the insular cortex of the rat.J. comp. neurol. 311116
  30. 30. HayamaTHashimotoKOgawaH1994Anatomical location of a taste-related region in the thalamic reticular nucleus in rats.Neurosci. res. 18291299
  31. 31. NakashimaMUemuraMYasuiKOzakiHTabataSTaenA2000An anterograde and retrograde tract-tracing study on the projections from the thalamic gustatory area in the rat: distribution of neurons projecting to the insular cortex and amygdaloid complex.Neurosci. res. 36297309
  32. 32. RodgersKBenisonAKleinABarthD2008Auditory, somatosensory, and multisensory insular cortex in the rat. Cereb. cortex 1829412951
  33. 33. PenfieldWRasmussenT1950The cerebral cortex of man. A clinical study of localization of function.New York: Macmillan.
  34. 34. PenfieldWFaulk M Jr (1955The insula; further observations on its function.Brain 78445470
  35. 35. EllsworthP1994William James and Emotion: Is a Century of Fame Worth a Century of Misunderstanding? Psychol. Rev. 101222229
  36. 36. DamasioA R1994Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.
  37. 37. CraigA2002How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the bodyNat. rev. neurosci. 3655666
  38. 38. CritchleyH2005Neural mechanisms of autonomic, affective, and cognitive integration.J. comp. neurol. 493154166
  39. 39. BecharaADamasioA R2005The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decisionGames and Economic Behavior52336372
  40. 40. NieuwenhuysR2012The insular cortex: a review.Prog. brain res. 195123163
  41. 41. KrushelLVan Der KooyD1988Visceral cortex: integration of the mucosal senses with limbic information in the rat agranular insular cortex.J. comp. neurol. 2703954
  42. 42. YaxleySRollsESienkiewiczZ1990Gustatory responses of single neurons in the insula of the macaque monkey.J. neurophysiol. 63689700
  43. 43. SaperC2002The central autonomic nervous system: conscious visceral perception and autonomic pattern generation.Annu. rev. neurosci. 25433469
  44. 44. BiemondA1956The conduction of pain Biemond A (1956) The conduction of pain above the level of the thalamus opticus. AMA Arch. neurol. psychiatry .bove the level of the thalamus opticus.AMA Arch. neurol. psychiatry 75231244
  45. 45. OstrowskyKMagninMRyvlinPIsnardJGuenotMMauguiereF2002Representation of pain and somatic sensation in the human insula: A study of responses to direct electrical cortical stimulation.Cereb. cortex 12376385
  46. 46. KurthFZillesKFoxPLairdAEickhoffS2010A link between the systems: functional differentiation and integration within the human insula revealed by meta-analysis.Brain struct. funct. 214519534
  47. 47. BieserA1998Processing of twitter-call fundamental frequencies in insula and auditory cortex of squirrel monkeys.Exp. brain res. 122139148
  48. 48. BamiouDMusiekELuxonL2003The insula (Island of Reil) and its role in auditory processingLiterature review. Brain res. brain res. rev. 42143154
  49. 49. KimuraAImbeHDonishiT2010Efferent connections of an auditory area in the caudal insular cortex of the rat: anatomical nodes for cortical streams of auditory processing and cross-modal sensory interactionsNeuroscience16611401157
  50. 50. StephaniCFernandez-Baca Vaca G, Maciunas R, Koubeissi M, Luders H (2011Functional neuroanatomy of the insular lobeBrain struct. func. 216137149
  51. 51. ContrerasMCericFTorrealbaF2007Inactivation of the interoceptive insula disrupts drug craving and malaise induced by lithium.Science 318655658
  52. 52. MutschlerIWieckhorstBKowalevskiSDerixJWentlandtJSchulze-bonhageABallT2009Functional organization of the human anterior insular cortex. Neurosci. lett. 4576670
  53. 53. WeillerCCholletFFristonKWiseRFrackowiakR1992Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man.Ann. neurol. 31463472
  54. 54. Di Martino ARoss K, Uddin L, Sklar A, Castellanos F, Milham M (2009Functional brain correlates of social and nonsocial processes in autism spectrum disorders: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysisBiol. psychiatry 656374
  55. 55. XueGLuZLevinIBecharaA2010The impact of prior risk experiences on subsequent risky decision-making: the role of the insulaNeuroimage5070916
  56. 56. PeyronRLaurentBGarcia-larreaL2000Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review, meta-analysis. Neurophysiol. clin. 30263288
  57. 57. EisenbergerNLiebermanMWilliamsK2003Does rejection hurt? An FMRI study of social exclusion.Science 302290292
  58. 58. BartelsAZekiS2004The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love.Neuroimage2111551166
  59. 59. JabbiMSwartMKeysersC2007Empathy for positive and negative emotions in the gustatory cortexNeuroimage3417441753
  60. 60. De VignemontFSingerT2006The empathic brain: how, when and why?Trends cogn. sci. 10435441
  61. 61. SterzerPStadlerCPoustkaFKleinschmidtA2007A structural neural deficit in adolescents with conduct disorder and its association with lack of empathyNeuroImage37335342
  62. 62. ColeMSchneiderW2007The cognitive control network: Integrated cortical regions with dissociable functionsNeuroImage37343360
  63. 63. AfifAMinottiLKahanePHoffmannD2010Anatomofunctional organization of the insular cortex: A study using intracerebral electrical stimulation in epileptic patients.Epilepsia5123052315
  64. 64. AckermannHRieckerA2004The contribution of the insula to motor aspects of speech production: a review and a hypothesis.Brain lang. 89320328
  65. 65. DronkersN1996A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation.Nature384159161
  66. 66. CraigA2009How do you feel--now? The anterior insula and human awareness.Nat. rev. neurosci. 105970
  67. 67. SterzerPKleinschmidtA2010Anterior insula activations in perceptual paradigms: often observed but barely understood.Brain struct. funct. 214611622
  68. 68. ZhangZOppenheimerS2000Baroreceptive and somatosensory convergent thalamic neurons project to the posterior insular cortex in the rat.Brain res. 861241256
  69. 69. OgawaHItoSMurayamaNHasegawaK1990Taste area in granular and dysgranular insular cortices in the rat identified by stimulation of the entire oral cavity.Neurosci. res. 9196201
  70. 70. ButcherKHachinskiVWilsonJGuiraudonCCechettoD1993Cardiac and sympathetic effects of middle cerebral artery occlusion in the spontaneously hypertensive rat.Brain res. 6217986
  71. 71. CechettoDShoemakerJ2009Functional neuroanatomy of autonomic regulationNeuroimage47795803
  72. 72. HendersonLRubinTMacefieldV2011Within-limb somatotopic representation of acute muscle pain in the human contralateral dorsal posterior insula.Hum. brain mapp. 3215921601
  73. 73. KinomuraSKawashimaRYamadaKOnoSItohMYoshiokaSYamaguchiTMatsuiHMiyazawaHItohH1994Functional anatomy of taste perception in the human brain studied with positron emission tomography. Brain res. 659263266
  74. 74. MazzolaLIsnardJPeyronRGuénotMMauguiereF2009Somatotopic organization of pain responses to direct electrical stimulation of the human insular cortex. Pain 14699104
  75. 75. SmallDTaste representation in the human insula. Brain struct. funct. 214551561
  76. 76. SeeleyW2010Anterior insula degeneration in frontotemporal dementiaBrain struct. funct. 214465475
  77. 77. KarnathHFruhmann-bergerMKukerWRordenC2004The anatomy of spatial neglect based on voxelwise statistical analysis: a study of 140 patientsCereb. cort. 1411641172
  78. 78. ManesFParadisoSSpringerJLambertyGRobinsonR1999Neglect after right insular cortex infarction. Stroke 30946948
  79. 79. NagaiMKishiKKatoS2007Insular cortex and neuropsychiatric disorders: a review of recent literatureEur. psychiatry 22387394
  80. 80. FornitoAYucelMPattiJWoodSPantelisC2009Mapping grey matter reductions in schizophrenia: an anatomical likelihood estimation analysis of voxel-based morphometry studiesSchizophr. res. 1081104113
  81. 81. WylieKTregellasJ2010The role of the insula in schizophreniaSchizophr. res. 12393104
  82. 82. SchlundMVerduzcoGCataldoMHoehn-saricR2012Generalized anxiety modulates frontal and limbic activation in major depressionBehav. brain funct. 9; 8:8.
  83. 83. KoenigsMGrafmanJ2009The functional neuroanatomy of depression: distinct roles for ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortexBehav. brain res. 201239243
  84. 84. UddinLMenonV2009The anterior insula in autism: underconnected and under-examined. Neurosci. biobehav. rev. 3311981203
  85. 85. SchienleASchaferAHermannAVaitlD2009Binge-eating disorder: reward sensitivity and brain activation to images of foodBiol. psychiatry 65654661
  86. 86. RotgeJGuehlDDilharreguyBCunyETignolJBioulacBAllardMBurbaudPAouizerateB2008Provocation of obsessive-compulsive symptoms: a quantitative voxel-based meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. J. psychiatry neurosci. 33405412
  87. 87. PaulusMSteinM2006An insular view of anxietyBiol. psychiatry 60383387
  88. 88. TopsM2006Are the insular cortex and cortisol implicated in Parkinsonian features? Parkinsonism relat. disord. 12467471
  89. 89. KaasinenVAaltoSNagrenKRinneJ2004Insular dopamine D2 receptors and novelty seeking personality in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. disord. 1913481351
  90. 90. NaqviNBecharaA2009The hidden island of addiction: the insulaTrends neurosci. 325667
  91. 91. NorgrenRWolfG1975Projections of thalamic gustatory and lingual areas in the rat.Brain res. 92123129
  92. 92. BagaevVAleksandrovV2006Visceral-related area in the rat insular cortexAuton. neurosci. 1251621
  93. 93. KingAMenonRHachinskiVCechettoD1999Human forebrain activation by visceral stimuli.J. comp. neurol. 413572582
  94. 94. ZhangZOppenheimerS1997Characterization, distribution and lateralization of baroreceptor-related neurons in the rat insular cortex. Brain res. 760243250
  95. 95. Hurley-giusKNeafseyE1986The medial frontal cortex and gastric motility: microstimulation results and their possible significance for the overall pattern of organization of rat frontal and parietal cortex.Brain res. 365241248
  96. 96. OngürDPriceJ2000The organization of networks within the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of rats, monkeys and humans.Cereb. cortex 10206219
  97. 97. RossDGlickS1981Lateralized effects of bilateral frontal cortex lesions in rats.Brain res. 210379382
  98. 98. RuggieroDMraovitchSGranataAAnwarMReisD1987A role of insular cortex in cardiovascular function.J comp. neurol. 257189207
  99. 99. KaadaB1951Somato-motor, autonomic and electrocorticographic responses to electrical stimulation of rhinencephalic and other structures in primates, cat, and dog; a study of responses from the limbic, subcallosal, orbito-insular, piriform and temporal cortex, hippocampus-fornix and amygdala.Acta physiol. Scand. suppl. 241262
  100. 100. HoffmanBRasmussenT1953Stimulation studies of insular cortex of Macaca mulatta.J. neurophysiol. 16343351
  101. 101. Von EulerUFolkowB1958The effect of stimulation of autonomic areas in the cerebral cortex upon the adrenaline and noradrenaline secretion from the adrenal gland in the cat.Acta physiol. scand. 42313320
  102. 102. DelgadoJ1960Circulatory effects of cortical stimulation.Physiol. Rev. suppl. 4146178
  103. 103. HoffEKell J Jr, Carrol M Jr (1963Effects of cortical stimulation and lesions on cardiovascular function.Physiol. rev. 4368114
  104. 104. HallAMoossaASkinnerD1977Effect of 50% distal small bowel resection on gastric emptying in Rhesus monkeys. Ann. surg. 185214218
  105. 105. OppenheimerS2006Cerebrogenic cardiac arrhythmias: Cortical lateralization and clinical significance.Clin. aut. res. 16611
  106. 106. CechettoDChenS1990Subcortical sites mediating sympathetic responses from insular cortex in rats.Am. j. physiol. 258: R245255
  107. 107. AllenGCechettoD1993Functional and anatomical organization of cardiovascular pressor and depressor sites in the lateral hypothalamic area. II. Ascending projections.J. comp. neurol. 330421438
  108. 108. CechettoDWilsonJSmithKSilverMHachinskiV1989Autonomic and myocardial changes in middle cerebral artery stroke models in the rat. Brain res.502296305
  109. 109. ReillySTrifunovicR1999Gustatory thalamus lesions eliminate successive negative contrast in rats.Behav. neurosci. 11312421248
  110. 110. BuresJBermudez-rattoniFYamamotoT1998Conditioned Taste AversionOxford Psychology Series N#31. Oxford University Press.
  111. 111. WelzlHDAdamoPLippH (2001Conditioned taste aversion as a learning and memory paradigmBehav. brain res. 125205213
  112. 112. Lubow R (1973) Latent inhibition. Psychol. bull. 79 398407 .
  113. 113. WeissKBrownB1974Latent inhibition: a review and a new hypothesis.Acta neurobiol. exp. (Wars). 34301316
  114. 114. De La CasaGLubowR1995Latent inhibition in conditioned taste aversion: the roles of stimulus frequency and duration and the amount of fluid ingested during preexposure.Neurobiol. learn. mem. 64125132
  115. 115. BermanDHazviSStehbergJBaharADudaiY2003Conflicting processes in the extinction of conditioned taste aversion: behavioral and molecular aspects of latency, apparent stagnation, and spontaneous recoveryLearn. mem. 101625
  116. 116. RescorlaR1973Effect of US habituation following conditioning.J comp. physiol. psychol. 82137143
  117. 117. BermanDDudaiY2001Memory extinction, learning anew, and learning the new: dissociations in the molecular machinery of learning in cortex.Science 29124172419
  118. 118. NorgrenR1978Projections from the nucleus of the solitary tract in the rat.Neuroscience3207218
  119. 119. Di Lorenzo PMonroe S (1997Transfer of information about taste from the nucleus of the solitary tract to the parabrachial nucleus of the pons.Brain res. 763167181
  120. 120. NorgrenRPfaffmannC1975The pontine taste area in the rat.Brain res. 9199117
  121. 121. ReillySGrigsonPNorgrenR1993Parabrachial nucleus lesions and conditioned taste aversion: evidence supporting an associative deficit.Behav. neurosci. 10710051017
  122. 122. GrigsonPReillySScaleraGNorgrenR1998The parabrachial nucleus is essential for acquisition of a conditioned odor aversion in rats.Behav. neurosci. 11211041113
  123. 123. HermannGRogersR1985Convergence of vagal and gustatory afferent input within the parabrachial nucleus of the rat.J. auton. nerv. syst. 13117
  124. 124. ReillyS1999The parabrachial nucleus and conditioned taste aversion.Brain res. bull. 48239254
  125. 125. ReillySTrifunovicR2000Lateral parabrachial nucleus lesions in the rat: long-and short-duration gustatory preference tests.Brain res. bull. 51177186
  126. 126. CoreyDWaltonAWienerN1978Development of carbohydrate preference during water rationing: a specific hunger? Physiol. behav. 20547552
  127. 127. ReillySTrifunovicR2001Lateral parabrachial nucleus lesions in the rat: neophobia and conditioned taste aversion.Brain res. bull. 55359366
  128. 128. FlynnFGrillHSchulkinJNorgrenR1991aCentral gustatory lesions: II. Effects on sodium appetite, taste aversion learning, and feeding behaviors.behav. neurosci. 105944954
  129. 129. FlynnFGrillHSchwartzGNorgrenR1991bCentral gustatory lesions: I. Preference and taste reactivity tests.Behav. neurosci. 105933943
  130. 130. YamamotoTFujimotoYShimuraTSakaiN1995Conditioned taste aversion in rats with excitotoxic brain lesions.Neurosci. res. 223149
  131. 131. BesterHBourgeaisLVillanuevaLBessonMBernardF1999Differential projections to the intralaminar and gustatory thalamus from the parabrachial area: A PHA-L study in the rat.J. comp. neurol. 405421449
  132. 132. NorgrenRLeonardC1973Ascending central gustatory pathways.J. comp. neurol. 150217237
  133. 133. YasuiYItohKMizunoN1984Projections from the parvocellular part of the posteromedial ventral nucleus of the thalamus to the lateral amygdaloid nucleus in the cat.Brain res. 292151155
  134. 134. ScaleraGGrigsonPNorgrenR1997Gustatory functions, sodium appetite, and conditioned taste aversion survive excitotoxic lesions of the thalamic taste area.Behav. neurosci. 111633645
  135. 135. ReillySPritchardT1996Gustatory thalamus lesions in the rat: II. Aversive and appetitive taste conditioning. Behav. neurosci. 110746759
  136. 136. ReillySPritchardT1997Gustatory Thalamus Lesions in the Rat: III. Simultaneous Contrast and Autoshaping. Physiol. behav.6213551363
  137. 137. LasiterP1985Thalamocortical relations in taste aversion learning: II. Involvement of the medial ventrobasal thalamic complex in taste aversion learning.Behav. neurosci. 99477495
  138. 138. ReillySBornovalovaMDenglerCTrifunovicR2003Effects of excitotoxic lesions of the gustatory thalamus on latent inhibition and blocking of conditioned taste aversion in rats.Brain res. bull. 62117128
  139. 139. GrigsonPLyuboslavskyPTanaseD2000Bilateral lesions of the gustatory thalamus disrupt morphine- but not LiCl-induced intake suppression in rats: evidence against the conditioned taste aversion hypothesis.Brain res. 858327337
  140. 140. BaharADudaiYAhissarE2004Neural signature of taste familiarity in the gustatory cortex of the freely behaving rat.J. neurophysiol. 9232983308
  141. 141. ReillySBornovalovaMTrifunovicR2004Excitotoxic lesions of the gustatory thalamus spare simultaneous contrast effects but eliminate anticipatory negative contrast: evidence against a memory deficit.Behav. neurosci. 118365376
  142. 142. AccollaRBathellierBPetersenCCarletonA2007Differential spatial representation of taste modalities in the rat gustatory cortex.J. neurosci. 2713961404
  143. 143. YamamotoTMatsuoRKawamuraY1980Localization of cortical gustatory area in rats and its role in taste discrimination.J. neurophysiol. 44440455
  144. 144. YamamotoTYuyamaNKatoTKawamuraY1985Gustatory responses of cortical neurons in rats. III. Neural and behavioral measures compared. J. neurophysiol. 5313701386
  145. 145. KieferSOrrM1992Taste avoidance, but not aversion, learning in rats lacking gustatory cortex.Behav. neurosci. 106140146
  146. 146. StehbergJSimonF2011Involvement of the insular cortex in retention of conditioned taste aversion is not time dependentNeurobiol. learn. mem. 95148
  147. 147. LasiterPDeemsDOettingRGarciaJ1985Taste discriminations in rats lacking anterior insular gustatory neocortex.Physiol. behav. 35277285
  148. 148. StehbergJMoraga-amaroRSimonF2011The role of the insular cortex in taste functionNeurobiol. learn. mem. 96130135
  149. 149. DunnLEverittB1988Double dissociations of the effects of amygdala and insular cortex lesions on conditioned taste aversion, passive avoidance, and neophobia in the rat using the excitotoxin ibotenic acid.Behav. neurosci. 102323
  150. 150. LinJRomanCSt. Andre J, Reilly S (2009Taste, olfactory and trigeminal neophobia in rats with forebrain lesions. Brain res. 1251195203
  151. 151. RomanCReillyS2007Effects of insular cortex lesions on conditioned taste aversion and latent inhibition in the ratEur J. neurosci. 2626272632
  152. 152. RomanCLinJReillyS2009Conditioned taste aversion and latent inhibition following extensive taste preexposure in rats with insular cortex lesionsBrain res. 12596873
  153. 153. GutierrezRRodriguez-ortizCDe La CruzVNunez-jaramilloLBermudez-rattoniF2003Cholinergic dependence of taste memory formation: evidence of two distinct processes.Neurobiol. learn. mem. 80323331
  154. 154. Figueroa-guzmánYKuoJReillyS2006NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 infused into the insular cortex prevents the attenuation of gustatory neophobia in ratsBrain res. 1114183186
  155. 155. NaorCDudaiY1996Transient impairment of cholinergic function in the rat insular cortex disrupts the encoding of taste in conditioned taste aversion.Behav. brain res. 796167
  156. 156. GutierrezRTellezLBermudez-rattoniF2003Blockade of cortical muscarinic but not NMDA receptors prevents a novel taste from becoming familiarEur. j. neurosci. 1715561562
  157. 157. EscobarMAlcocerIChaoV1998The NMDA receptor antagonist CPP impairs conditioned taste aversion and insular cortex long-term potentiation in vivo.Brain res. 812246251
  158. 158. EscobarMAlcocerIBermudez-rattoniF2002In vivo effects of intracortical administration of NMDA and metabotropic glutamate receptors antagonists on neocortical long-term potentiation and conditioned taste aversionBehav. brain res. 129101106
  159. 159. GutierrezRDe La CruzVRodriguez-ortizCBermudez-rattoniF2004Perirhinal cortex muscarinic receptor blockade impairs taste recognition memory formationLearn. mem. 1195101
  160. 160. JimenezBTapiaR2004Biochemical modulation of NMDA receptors: role in conditioned taste aversionNeurochem. res. 29161168
  161. 161. BermanDHazviSNeduvaVDudaiY2000The role of identified neurotransmitter systems in the response of insular cortex to unfamiliar taste: activation of ERK1-2 and formation of a memory trace.J. neurosci. 2070177023
  162. 162. RosenblumKMeiriNDudaiY1993Taste memory: the role of protein synthesis in gustatory cortex.Behav. neural. biol. 594956
  163. 163. Bermudez-rattoniFMcgaughJ1991Insular cortex and amygdala lesions differentially affect acquisition on inhibitory avoidance and conditioned taste aversion.Brain res. 549165170
  164. 164. BraunJKieferSOuelletJ1981Research note psychic ageusia in rats lacking gustatory neocortex.Exp. neurol. 72711716
  165. 165. KieferSLeachLBraunJ1984Taste agnosia following gustatory neocortex ablation: dissociation from odor and generality across taste qualities.Behav. neurosci. 98590608
  166. 166. YamamotoTShimuraTSakoNYasoshimaYSakaiN1994Neural substrates for conditioned taste aversion in the ratBehavioural brain research652123137
  167. 167. ScovilleWMilnerB1957Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesionsJ. neurol. neurosurg. psychiatry 201121
  168. 168. Zola-morganSSquireL1990The primate hippocampal formation: evidence for a time-limited role in memory storage.Science 250288290
  169. 169. KimJFanselowM1992Modality-specific retrograde amnesia of fear.Science 256675677
  170. 170. SquireLAlvarezP1995Retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation: a neurobiological perspective,Curr. opin. neurobiol. 5169177
  171. 171. TakeharaKKawaharaSTakatsukiKKirinoY2002Time-limited role of the hippocampus in the memory for trace eyeblink conditioning in mice.Brain res. 951183190
  172. 172. EscobarM LRussellR WBoothR ABermúdez-rattoniF1994Accelerating behavioral recovery after cortical lesions. I. Homotopic implants plus NGF.Behav. neural. biol. 617380
  173. 173. OrmsbyC ERamírez-amayaVBermúdez-rattoniF1998Long-term memory retrieval deficits of learned taste aversions are ameliorated by cortical fetal brain implants.Behav. neurosci. 112172182
  174. 174. SherperdG2006Smell images and the flavor system in the human brain. Nature 444316321
  175. 175. BagshawMPribramK1953Cortical organization in gustation (Macaca mulatta).J. neurophysiol. 16499508
  176. 176. SudakovKMacLean P, Reeves A, Marino R (1971Unit study of exteroceptive inputs to claustrocortex in awake, sitting, squirrel monkey.Brain res. 281934
  177. 177. McdonaldAJacksonT1987Amygdaloid connections with posterior insular and temporal cortical areas in the rat.J. comp. neurol. 2625977
  178. 178. SripanidkulchaiKSripanidkulchaiBWyssJ1984The cortical projection of the basolateral amygdaloid nucleus in the rat: a retrograde fluorescent dye study.J. comp. neurol. 229419431
  179. 179. OttersenO1982Connections of the amygdala of the rat. IV: Corticoamygdaloid and intraamygdaloid connections as studied with axonal transport of horseradish peroxidase.J. comp. neurol. 2053048
  180. 180. McdonaldAShammah-lagnadoSShiCDavisM1999Cortical afferents to the extended amygdala.Ann. N. Y. acad. sci. 877309338
  181. 181. ShiCDavisM1999Pain pathways involved in fear conditioning measured with fear-potentiated startle: lesion studies.J. neurosci. 19420430
  182. 182. YasuiYItohKSugimotoTKanekoTMizunoN1987Thalamocortical and thalamo-amygdaloid projections from the parvicellular division of the posteromedial ventral nucleus in the cat.J. comp. neurol. 257253268
  183. 183. FulwilerCSaperC1984Subnuclear Organization of the Efferent Connections of the Parabrachial Nucleus in the rat.Brain res. rev. 7229259
  184. 184. YasuiYSaperCCechettoD1989Calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactivity in the visceral sensory cortex, thalamus, and related pathways in the rat.J. comp. neurol. 290487501
  185. 185. SchwaberJSterniniCBrechaNRogersWCardJ1988Neurons containing calcitonin gene-related peptide in the parabrachial nucleus project to the central nucleus of the amygdala.J. comp. neurol. 270: 416 EOF26%2C EOF
  186. 186. KocorowskiLHelmstetterF2001Calcitonin gene-related peptide released within the amygdala is involved in Pavlovian auditory fear conditioningNeurobiol. learn. mem. 75149163
  187. 187. NguyenKSillsMJacobowitzD1986Cardiovascular effects produced by microinjection of calcitonin gene-related peptide into the rat central amygdaloid nucleus.Peptides7337339
  188. 188. LeDoux J (2000Emotion circuits in the brainAnnu. rev. neurosci. 23155184
  189. 189. LeDoux J (2003) The emotional brain, fear, and the amygdala. Cell mol. neurobiol. 23 727738 .
  190. 190. McgaughJ2002Memory consolidation and the amygdala: a systems perspectiveTrends neurosci. 25: 456 EOF461 EOF
  191. 191. McgaughJMcintyreCPowerA2002Amygdala modulation of memory consolidation: interaction with other brain systems.Neurobiol. learn. mem. 78539552
  192. 192. BaharASamuelAHazviSDudaiY2003The amygdalar circuit that acquires taste aversion memory differs from the circuit that extinguishes itEur. j. neurosci. 1715271530
  193. 193. GalloMRoldanGBuresJ1992Differential involvement of gustatory insular cortex and amygdala in the acquisition and retrieval of conditioned taste aversion in rats.Behav. brain res. 529197
  194. 194. RoldanGBuresJ1994Tetrodotoxin blockade of amygdala overlapping with poisoning impairs acquisition of conditioned taste aversion in rats.Behav. brain res. 65213219
  195. 195. YasoshimaYYamamotoT1997Rat gustatory memory requires protein kinase C activity in the amygdala and cortical gustatory areaNeuroreport813631367
  196. 196. YasoshimaYMorimotoTYamamotoT2000Different disruptive effects on the acquisition and expression of conditioned taste aversion by blockades of amygdalar ionotropic and metabotropic glutamatergic receptor subtypes in rats.Brain res. 8691524
  197. 197. MirandaMFerreiraGRamirez-lugoLBermudez-rattoniF2003Role of cholinergic system on the construction of memories: taste memory encoding.Neurobiol. learn. mem. 80211222
  198. 198. JonesMFrenchPBlissTRosenblumK1999Molecular mechanisms of long-term potentiation in the insular cortex in vivo.J. neurosci. 19: RC36 EOF
  199. 199. EscobarMBermúdez-rattoniF2000Long-term potentiation in the insular cortex enhances conditioned taste aversion retention.Brain res. 852208212
  200. 200. MirandaMMcgaughJ2004Enhancement of inhibitory avoidance and conditioned taste aversion memory with insular cortex infusions of 8-Br-cAMP: involvement of the basolateral amygdalaLearn. mem. 11312317
  201. 201. BuresováO1978Neocortico-amygdalar interaction in the conditioned taste aversion in rats.Act. nerv. super (Praha). 20224230
  202. 202. BielavskaERoldanG1996Ipsilateral connections between the gustatory cortex, amygdala and parabrachial nucleus are necessary for acquisition and retrieval of conditioned taste aversion in rats.Behav. brain res. 812531
  203. 203. GutierrezHGutierrezRSilva-gandariasREstradaJMirandaM IBermudez-rattoniF1999Differential effects of 192IgG-saporin and NMDA-induced lesions into the basal forebrain on cholinergic activity and taste aversion memory formation.Brain res. 834136141
  204. 204. RollinsBStinesSMcguireHKingB2001Effects of amygdala lesions on body weight, conditioned taste aversion, and neophobia.Physiol. behav. 72735742
  205. 205. SakaiNYamamotoT2001Effects of excitotoxic brain lesions on taste-mediated odor learning in the ratNeurobiol. learn. mem. 75128139
  206. 206. LamprechtRDudaiY1996Transient expression of c-Fos in rat amygdala during training is required for encoding conditioned taste aversion memory.Learn. mem. 33141
  207. 207. LamprechtRHazviSDudaiY1997cAMP response element-binding protein in the amygdala is required for long- but not short-term conditioned taste aversion memory.J. neurosci. 1784438450
  208. 208. BaharADorfmanNDudaiY2004Amygdalar circuits required for either consolidation or extinction of taste aversion memory are not required for reconsolidationEur j. neurosci. 1911151118
  209. 209. GutierrezHGutierrezRRamirez-trejoLSilva-gandariasROrmsbyCMirandaMBermudez-rattoniF1999Redundant basal forebrain modulation in taste aversion memory formation. J. neurosci. 1976617669
  210. 210. PhelpsELeDoux J (2005Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: from animal models to human behavior.Neuron48175187
  211. 211. RoozendaalBNguyenBPowerAMcgaughJ1999Basolateral amygdala noradrenergic influence enables enhancement of memory consolidation induced by hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor activationProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 961164211647
  212. 212. McgaughJ2004The amygdala modulates the consolidation of memories of emotionally arousing experiences.Annu. rev. neurosci. 27128
  213. 213. RoozendaalBCoolsA1994Influence of the noradrenergic state of the nucleus accumbens in basolateral amygdala mediated changes in neophobia of rats.Behav. neurosci. 10811071118
  214. 214. FornariRWichmannRAtuchaEDesprezTEggens-meijerERoozendaalB2012Involvement of the insular cortex in regulating glucocorticoid effects on memory consolidation of inhibitory avoidance trainingFront behav. neurosci. 6: 10.
  215. 215. Bermudez-rattoniFOkudaSRoozendaalBMcgaughJ2005Insular cortex is involved in consolidation of object recognition memoryLearn. mem. 12447449
  216. 216. RoozendaalBPortillo-marquezGMcgaughJ1996Basolateral amygdala lesions block glucocorticoid-induced modulation of memory for spatial learning.Behav. neurosci. 11010741083
  217. 217. RoozendaalBSchellingGMcgaughJ2008Corticotropin-releasing factor in the basolateral amygdala enhances memory consolidation via an interaction with the beta-adrenoceptor-cAMP pathway: dependence on glucocorticoid receptor activation.J. neurosci. 2866426651
  218. 218. KlumppHAngstadtMPhanK2012Insula reactivity and connectivity to anterior cingulate cortex when processing threat in generalized social anxiety disorderBiol. psychol. 89273276
  219. 219. ShahSKlumppHAngstadtMNathanPPhanK2009Amygdala and insula response to emotional images in patients with generalized social anxiety disorderJ. psychiatry neurosci. 34296302
  220. 220. AlvarezRBiggsAChenGPineDGrillonC2008Contextual fear conditioning in humans: cortical-hippocampal and amygdala contributionsJ. neurosci. 2862116219
  221. 221. DuerdenEAlbaneseM2012Localization of pain-related brain activation: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging dataHum Brain Mapp. 2011 Dec 1. doi:hbm.21416.
  222. 222. MiskovicVSchmidtL2012Early information processing biases in social anxietyCogn. emot. 26176185
  223. 223. SchneiderFGroddWWeissUKloseUMayerKNägeleTGurR1997Functional MRI reveals left amygdala activation during emotion. Psychiatry res. 767582
  224. 224. PhanKWagerTTaylorSLiberzonI2002Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRINeuroimage16331348
  225. 225. McgaughJ. L2004The amygdala modulates the consolidation of memories of emotionally arousing experiences.Annu. rev. neurosci. 27128
  226. 226. FerreiraGMirandaMDe La CruzVRodríguez-ortizCBermúdez-rattoniF2005Basolateral amygdala glutamatergic activation enhances taste aversion through NMDA receptor activation in the insular cortexEur. j. neurosci. 2225962604
  227. 227. SteinMSimmonsAFeinsteinJPaulusM2007Increased amygdala and insular activation during emotion processing in anxiety-prone subjects. Am. j. Psychiatry 164318327
  228. 228. SingerTCritchleyHPreuschoffK2009A common role of insula in feelings, empathy and uncertaintyTrends cogn. sci. 13334340
  229. 229. TimmsR1981A study of the amygdaloid defence reaction showing the value of althesin anaesthesia in studies of the functions of the fore-brain in cats.Plugers arch. 3914956
  230. 230. ApplegateCKappBUnderwoodMMcnallC1983Autonomic and somatomotor effects of amygdala central N. stimulation in awake rabbits.Physiol. behav. 31353360
  231. 231. SchützeIKnuepferMEismannAStumpfHStockG1987Sensory input to single neurons in the amygdala of the cat.Exp. neurol. 97499515
  232. 232. CechettoDCalaresuF1984Units in the amygdala responding to activation of carotid baro- and chemoreceptors.Am. j. physiol. 246: R832836
  233. 233. KnuepferMEismannASchützeIStumpfHStockG1995Responses of single neurons in amygdala to interoceptive and exteroceptive stimuli in conscious catsAm. j. physiol. 268666675
  234. 234. HendersonLRichardCMaceyPRunquistMYuPGalonsJHarperR2004Functional magnetic resonance signal changes in neural structures to baroreceptor reflex activation.J. appl. physiol. 96693703
  235. 235. WilliamsLBrownKDasPBoucseinWSokolovEBrammerMOlivieriGPedutoAGordonE2004The dynamics of cortico-amygdala and autonomic activity over the experimental time course of fear perception.Brain res. cogn. brain res. 21114123

Written By

Rodrigo Moraga-Amaro and Jimmy Stehberg

Submitted: December 1st, 2011 Published: December 19th, 2012