Viral vectors have been widely used to deliver several therapeutic genes in the clinical approach of gene therapy. The lentiviral vector permits stable and efficient gene transfer into non-dividing cells in the central nervous system of neurological and neurodegenerative diseases (Deeks, et al., 2002; Mavilo, et al., 2006; Rossi et al., 2007; Ciceri, et al., 2009; Naldini, 2011). Moreover, long-term expression of delivered gene attributed to genome integration has an advantage not only for clinical application, but also for gene therapy trials in animal models (Naldini et al., 1996; Reiser et al., 1996; Mochizuki et al., 1998; Mitrophanous et al., 1999; Wong et al., 2006; Lundberg et al., 2008). Among many lentiviral vector systems, the most familiar is the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1)-based vector of which molecular biological property has been extensively studied (Rabson and Martin, 1985; Joshi and Joshi, 1996; Nielsen et al., 2005; Pluta and Kacprzak, 2009).
Axonal transport in the retrograde direction, as observed in the case of some viral vectors, has a considerable advantage for transferring genes into neuronal cell bodies situated in regions remote from the injection sites of the vectors (see Fig.1). These viral vectors, for example, injected into the striatum, transfer the genes via retrograde transport into nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons, which are the major target for gene therapy of Parkinson’s disease (Zheng et al., 2005; Barkats et al., 2006). Intramuscular injection of the vectors also delivers retrogradely the genes into motor neurons that are the target for gene therapy of motor neuron diseases (Baumgartner & Shine, 1998; Perrelet et al., 2000; Mazarakis et al., 2001; Sakamoto et al., 2003; Azzouz et al., 2004).
In our previous study, we generated an HIV-1-based vector pseudotyped with a variant of rabies virus glycoprotein (RV-G) gene and tested gene transfer through retrograde axonal transport into several brain regions (Kato et al., 2007). Although this pseudotyped vector showed gene transfer through retrograde transport in the rodent and nonhuman primate brains, higher titer stocks of the vector was required for the application of gene therapy trials. To enhance the efficiency of retrograde gene transfer, we subsequently developed a novel type of lentiviral vector that shows highly efficient retrograde gene transfer (HiRet) by pseudotyping an HIV-1-based vector with fusion glycoprotein B type (FuG-B) composed of parts of RV-G and vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein (VSV-G) (Kato et al., 2011a,b).
More recently, we developed another vector system for neuron-specific retrograde gene transfer (NeuRet) by pseudotyping the HIV-1-based vector with fusion glycoprotein C type (FuG-C) composed of a different set of parts of RV-G and VSV-G (Kato et al., 2011c). Interestingly, the NeuRet vector shows high efficiency of retrograde gene transfer into various neuronal populations, whereas it remarkably reduces gene transduction into dividing cells including glial and nerural stem/progenitor cells around the vector injection sites. One significant issue on the therapeutic use of lentiviral vectors is transgene integration into the host genome in dividing cells, which may lead to tumorigenesis by altering the expression of proto-oncogenes adjacent to the integration sites (De Palma et al., 2005; Themis et al., 2005; Montini et al., 2006). In this context, the NeuRet vector can reduce the risk of vector transduction into dividing cells in the brain and improve the safety of future gene therapy trials for neurological and neurodegenerative disorders.
The viral vectors enter nerve terminals and are retrogradely transported through axons into neuronal cell bodies, resulting in the induction of transgene expression.
In this chapter, we recapitulate gene transduction property of the HiRet and NeuRet vectors, and then describe the application of the NeuRet vector for retrograde gene transfer into the nigrostriatal dopamine system in nonhuman primates.
2. Gene transduction property of HiRet and NeuRet vectors
2.1. HiRet vector
The HiRet vector is a pseudotype of the HIV-1 lentiviral vector with FuG-B, which is composed of the extracellular and transmembrane domains of RV-G (challenged virus standard strain) and the cytoplasmic domain of VSV-G (Fig. 2A) (Kato et al., 2011a). When the HiRet vector encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP) was injected into the dorsal striatum of mice, we observed high efficiency of retrograde gene transfer into the brain regions innervating the striatum, including the primary motor cortex (M1), primary somatosensory cortex (S1), parafascicular nucleus (PF) in the thalamus, and substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) in the ventral midbrain (Fig. 2B). The extent of gene transfer efficiency increased compared with that of the RV-G pseudotype, ranging from 8- to 14-folds dependent on the neural pathways. The high efficiency of gene transfer was also detected in the brain regions that project to the nucleus accumbens or medial prefrontal cortex in mice. In addition, we observed gene transduction of the HiRet vector into glial cells (~75%) and a small number of neuronal cells (~20%) in the striatum around the injection sites (Fig. 2C). Recently, we created a variant of FuG-B (termed FuG-B2), in which the extracellular and transmembrane domains of RV-G derived from the challenged virus standard strain was exchanged with the counterparts of Pasteur virus strain, and the vector pseudotyped with FuG-B2 exhibited a further increase in the retrograde gene transfer efficiency in the rodent brain (Kato et al., 2011b). More recently, Carpentier et al. (2012) reported the increased psudotyping efficiency of an HIV-1 vector by a chimeric envelope glycoprotein composed of RV-G and VSV-G domains, which corresponds to our FuG-B.
The host range of lentiviral vectors is altered by pseudotyping with different envelope glycoproteins (Cronin et al., 2005). Therefore, the possibility arises that some mutations in RV-G shift the efficiency of gene transduction or host cell specificity of the pseudotyped vector. Indeed, substitution of the cytoplasmic domain of RV-G with the corresponding part of the VSV-G enhanced the efficiency of retrograde gene transfer. The cytoplasmic domain differs in length between RV-G (44 amino acids) and VSV-G (29 amino acids), but their amino acid sequences do not show any particular homology (Rose et al., 1982). It appears that the cytoplasmic domain is involved in the mechanism underlying vector entry into synaptic terminals or the transduction level of the vector, resulting in enhanced retrograde gene transfer.
2.2. NeuRet vector
The NeuRet vector is another pseudotype of the HIV-1 lentiviral vector with FuG-C, which is composed of the N-terminal segment of the extracellular domain (439 amino acids) of RV-G and the C-terminal segment of the extracellular domain (16 amino acids) and transmembrane/cytoplasmic domains of VSV-G (Fig. 3A) (Kato et al., 2011c). After injection of the NeuRet vector encoding GFP transgene into the mouse striatum, we found enhanced retrograde gene transfer into the brain regions innervating the striatum, such as the M1, S1, PF, and SNc (Fig. 3B). The efficiency of gene transfer of the NeuRet vector was slightly different with that of the HiRet vector (FuG-B2 pseudo type), depending on the neural pathways (see a review by Kato et al. 2012). In addition, we tested gene transduction of the NeuRet vector surrounding the injection sites. Although the NeuRet vector transduced only a small number of striatal neuronal cells (~6%), its transduction level into striatal glial cells was quite low (~0.3%) (Fig. 3C). The property of gene transduction of the NeuRet vector around the injection sites was quite different from that of the HiRet vector, and in particular, the transduction of glial cells was largely declined in the NeuRet vector. Furthermore, when the NeuRet vector was injected into the subventricular zone, gene transduction of the vector into neural stem/progenitor cells was also inefficient.
FuG-C pseudotyping of the NeuRet vector enhanced the efficiency of retrograde gene transfer into various neuronal populations, whereas it caused less efficiency of gene transduction into glial and neural stem/progenitor cells. The N-terminal segment of the RV-G extracellular domain of 439 amino acids appears to be involved in the retrograde gene transfer, probably by promoting the interaction with synaptic terminals required for retrograde transport. Actually, amino acid residues essential for rabies virus virulence are reported to exist in the RV-G-derived extracellular domain used for FuG-C construction (Prehaud et al., 1988; Coulon et al., 1998). In contrast, pseudotyping with FuG-B (FuG-B2) and FuG-C generates a marked difference in gene transduction into glial and neural stem/progenitor cells around the injection areas. This difference suggests that the C-terminal part of 16 amino acids in the extracellular domain of envelope glycoproteins may be implicated in determining the host cell specificity of vector transduction, and that this C-terminal part may contribute to the interaction with glial and neural stem/progenitor cells.
For gene therapy trials with lentiviral vectors, there is a significant issue that vector insertion into the host genome may lead to tumorigenesis by altering the expression of cellular oncogenes surrounding the integration sites (De Palma et al., 2005; Themis et al., 2005; Montini et al., 2006). One useful approach to protect this issue is to restrict vector transduction to neuronal cells. The NeuRet vector system provides a useful approach for gene therapy trials for neurological diseases through enhanced retrograde gene transfer and improves the safety of gene therapy by profoundly suppressing the efficacy of gene transduction into dividing cells in the brain.
3. Retrograde gene delivery into monkey nigrostriatal pathway by NeuRet vector
The nigrostriatal dopamine system is a major target for gene therapy of Parkinson’s disease. The availability of the HiRet vector for gene transfer via retrograde transport into the nigrostriatal dopamine system in nonhuman primates was described in our previous review (Kato et al., 2011d). To verify the capability of the NeuRet vector for efficient retrograde gene transfer into the nigrostriatal pathway, we injected the NeuRetvector encoding the GFP transgene into the striatum (caudate nucleus and putamen) of crab-eating monkeys (Fig. 4A). Intrastriatal injection of the NeuRet vector produced a larger number of GFP-positive neurons in the SNc (Fig. 4B). These positive signals were in register with immunostaining for tyrosine hydroxylase, a marker of dopaminergic neurons (Fig. 4C), indicating the transgene expression in the nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons. In addition, we assessed the property of gene transduction with the NeuRet vector around the injection sites in the monkey striatum. The vector displayed a low level of gene transfer into neuronal cell bodies (~13%), and the level of vector transduction into glial cells was also quite low in the monkey striatum (~0.6%) (Fig. 4D).The pattern of gene transduction around the injection sites was similar to that obtained from the analysis of the mouse brain sections. Therefore, the NeuRet vector mediates enhanced retrograde gene transfer, whereas it reduces the gene transfer into glial cells around the injection areas in both rodent and monkey brains.
The NeuRet vector system successfully achieved efficient gene transfer through retrograde transport into the nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons in nonhuman primates. Our vector system will provide a powerful strategy for gene therapy of Parkinson’s disease with enhanced retrograde gene transfer in the near future. This system will improve the safety of gene therapy by reducing the risk of gene transduction into proliferating cells (glial and neural stem/progenitor cells) in the brain.
In this chapter, we mentioned the gene transduction property of the HiRet and NeuRet vectors pseudotyped with different fusion envelope glycoproteins. These two vectors showed the enhancement in gene transfer through retrograde axonal transport into various neuronal populations in both rodent and nonhuman primate brains. The HiRet vector transduced prominently glial cells around the injection sites, whereas gene transduction of the NeuRet vector into glial cells was much less efficient. The transduction level of the NeuRet vector into neural stem/progenitor cells was also low. The variation in the structure of envelope glycoproteins shifted the efficiency of retrograde gene transfer and the preference of host range. In addition, we described the application of the NeuRet vector for retrograde gene transfer into the nigrostriatal dopamine system of monkeys. The NeuRet vector, together with the HiRet vector, will offer a promising technology for gene therapy of neurological diseases through enhanced retrograde gene transfer. In particular, the NeuRet vector system will improve the safety of gene therapy by greatly suppressing the risk of gene transduction into dividing cells in the central nervous system.
This work was supported by grants-in aid from Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) of Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST). A part of this work was supported by “Highly Creative Animal Model Development for Brain Sciences” carried out under the Strategic Research Program for Brain Sciences by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. We thank St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital (Dr. A. Nienhuis) and the George Washington University for providing the HIV-1-based vector system. We also grateful to M. Kikuchi, N. Sato, M. Watanabe, and T. Kobayashi for their technical support in the animal experiments.
Azzouz M., Ralph G. S., Storkebaum E., Walmsley L. E., Mitrophanous K. A., Kingsman S. M., Carmeliet P. & Mazarakis N. D. (2004). VEGF Delivery with Retrogradely Transported Lentivector Prolongs Survival in a Mouse ALS Model. Nature, Vol. 429, No. 6900, (May), pp. 413-417.
Barkats M, Horellou P, Colin P, Millecamps S, Faucon-Biguet N, Mallet J. (2006). 1-Methyl-4-phenylpyridinium Neurotoxicity Is Attenuated by Adenoviral Gene Transfer of Human Cu/Zn Superoxide Dismutase. Journal of Neuroscience Research,(February), 83(2), pp. 233-242.
Baumgartner B. J. & Shine H. D. (1998). Permanent Rescue of Lesioned Neonatal Motoneurons and Enhanced Axonal Regeneration by Adenovirus-Mediated Expression of Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor. Journal of Neuroscience Research, Vol. 54, No. 6, (December), pp. 766-777.
Carpentier D. C. J., Vevis K., Trabalza A., Georgiadis C., Ellison S. M., Asfahani R. L. & Mazarakis N. D. (2012). Enhanced Pseudotyping Efficiency of HIV-1 Lentiviral Vectors by a Rabies/Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Chimeric Envelope Glycoprotein. Gene Therapy, Vol. 19, No. 7, (September), pp. 761-774.
Ciceri F., Bonini C., Stanghellini M. T., Bondanza A., Traversari C., SalomoniM., Turchetto L., Colombi S., Bernardi M., Peccatori J., Pescarollo A., Servida P., Magnani Z., Perna S. K., Valtolina V., Crippa F., Callegaro L., Spoldi E., Crocchiolo R., Fleischhauer K., Ponzoni M., Vago L., Rossini S., Santoro A., Todisco E., Apperley J., Olavarria E., Slavin S., Weissinger E. M., Ganser A., Stadler M., Yannaki E., Fassas A., Anagnostopoulos A., Bregni M., Stampino C. G., Bruzzi P. & Bordignon C. (2009). Infusion of Suicide-gene-engineered Donor Lymphocytes after Family Haploidentical Haemopoietic Stem-cell Transplantation for Leukaemia (the TK007 Trial): a Non-randomised Phase I-II Study. The Lancet Oncology, Vol. 10, No. 5, (May), pp. 489-500.
Coulon P., Ternaux J. P., Flamand A. & Tuffereau C. (1998). An Avirulent Mutant of Rabies Virus Is Unable to Infect Motoneurons In Vivoand In Vitro. Journal of Virology, (January), 72(1), pp. 273-278.
Cronin, J., Zhang, X. Y., & Reiser, J. (2005). Altering the Tropism of Lentiviral Vectors through Pseudotyping. Current Gene Therapy, (August), 5(4), 387-398.
Deeks, S. G., Wagner, B., Anton, P. A., Mitsuyasu, R. T., Scadden, D. T., Huang, C., Macken, C., Richman, D. D., Christopherson, C., June, C. H., Lazar, R., Broad, D. F., Jalali, S., & Hege, K. M. (2002). A Phase II Randomized Study of HIV-specific T-cell Gene Therapy in Subjects with Undetectable Plasma Viremia on Combination Antiretroviral Therapy. Molecular Therapy, (June), 5(6), 788-797.
De Palma M., Montini E., Santoni de Sio F. R. S., Benedicenti F., Gentile A., Medico E. & Naldini, L. (2005). Promoter Trapping Reveals Significant Differences in Integration Site Selection between MLV and HIV Vectors in Primary Hematopoietic Cells. Blood,(March), 105(6), pp. 2307-2315.
Joshi S. & Joshi R. L. (1996). Molecular Biology of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type-1. Transfusion Science, Vol. 17, No. 3, (September), pp. 351-378.
Kato S., Inoue K., Kobayashi K., Yasoshima Y., Miyachi S., Inoue S., Hanawa H., Shimada T., Takada M. & Kobayashi K. (2007). Efficient Gene Transfer via Retrograde Transport in Rodent and Primate Brains Using a Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Based Vector Pseudotyped with Rabies Virus Glycoprotein. Human Gene Therapy, Vol. 18, No. 11, (November), pp. 1141-1151.
Kato S., Kobayashi K., Inoue K., Kuramochi M., OkadaT., Yaginuma H., Morimoto K., Shimada T., Takada M. & Kobayashi K. (2011a). A Lentiviral Strategy for Highly Efficient Retrograde Gene Transfer by Pseudotyping with Fusion Envelope Glycoprotein. Human Gene Therapy, Vol. 22, No. 2, (February), pp. 197-206.
Kato S., Kuramochi M., Kobayashi K., Fukabori R., Okada K., Uchigashima M., Watanabe M., Tsutsui Y. & Kobayashi K. (2011b). Selective Neural Pathway Targeting Reveals Key Roles of Thalamostriatal Projection in the Control of Visual Discrimination. Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 31, No. 47, (November), pp. 17169-17179.
Kato S., Kuramochi M., Takasumi K., Kobayashi K., Inoue K., Takahara D., Hitoshi S., Ikenaka K., Shimada T., Takada M. & Kobayashi K. (2011c). Neuron-Specific Gene Transfer through Retrograde Transport of Lentiviral Vector Pseudotyped with a Novel Type of Fusion Envelope Glycoprotein. Human Gene Therapy, Vol. 22, No. 12, (December), pp. 1511-1523.
Kato S., Kobayashi K., Kuramochi M., Inoue K., Takada M. & Kobayashi K. (2011d) Highly efficient retrograde gene transfer for genetic treatment of neurological diseases. Viral Gene Therapy(ed. KeXu) Chapter 17, InTech, Rijeka (Croatia), pp. 371-380.
Kato, S., Kobayashi, K. & Kobayashi, K. (2012). Dissecting Circuit Mechanisms by Genetic Manipulation of Specific Neural Pathways. Reviews in Neurosciences, in press.
Lundberg C., Björklund T., Carlsson T., Jakobsson J., Hantraye P., Déglon N. & Kirik D. (2008). Applications of Lentiviral Vectors for Biology and Gene Therapy of Neurological Disorders. Current Gene Therapy, Vol. 8, No. 6, (December), pp. 461-473.
Mavilio F., Pellegrini G., Ferrari S., Di Nunzio F., Di Iorio E., Recchia A., Maruggi G., Ferrari G., Provasi E., Bonini C., Capurro S., Conti A., Magnoni C., Giannetti A. & De Luca M. (2006). Correction of Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa by Transplantation of Genetically Modified Epidermal Stem Cells. Nature Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 12, (December), pp. 1397-1402.
Mazarakis N. D., Azzouz M., Rohll J. B., Ellard F. M., Wilkes F. J., Olsen A. L., Carter E. E., Barber R. D., Baban D. F., Kingsman S. M., Kingsman A. J., O’Malley K. & Mitrophanous K. A. (2001). RabiesVirus Glycoprotein Pseudotyping of Lentiviral Vectors Enables Retrograde Axonal Transport and Access to the Nervous System after Peripheral Delivery. Human Molecular Genetics, Vol. 10, No. 19, (September), pp. 2109-2121.
Mitrophanous K., Yoon S., Rohll J., Patil D., Wilkes F., Kim V., Kingsman S. Kingsman A. & Mazarakis N. (1999). Stable Gene Transfer to the Nervous System Using a Non-Primate Lentiviral Vector. Gene Therapy, Vol. 6, No. 11, (November), pp. 1808-1818.
Mochizuki H., Schwartz J. P., Tanaka K., Brady R. O. & Reiser J. (1998). High-Titer Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Based Vector Systems for Gene Delivery into Nondividing Cells. Journalof Virology, Vol. 72, No. 11, (November), pp. 8873-8883.
Montini E., Cesana D., Schmidt M., Sanvito F., Ponzoni M., Bartholomae C., Sergi L. S., Benedicenti F., Ambrosi A., Di Serio C., Doglioni C., von Kalle C. & Naldini L. (2006). Hematopoietic Stem Cell Gene Transfer in a Tumor-Prone Mouse Model Uncovers Low Genotoxicity of LentiviralVector Integration. Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 24, No. 6, (June), pp. 687-696.
Naldini, L. (2011). Ex VivoGene Transfer and Correction for Cell-Based Therapies. Nature Reviews Genetics, (May), 12 (5), 301-315.
Naldini L., Blömer U., Gage F. H., Trono D. & Verma, I. M. (1996). Efficient Transfer, Integration, and Sustained Long-Term Expression of the Transgene in Adult Rat Brains Injected with a Lentiviral Vector. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, (October), 93(21), pp. 11382-11388.
Nielsen, M.H., Pedersen, F.S. & Kjems, J. (2005). Molecular Strategy to Inhibit HIV-1 Replication. Retrovirology, (February), 2(10), 1-20.
Perrelet D., Ferri A., MacKenzie A. E., Smith G. M., Korneluk R. G., Liston P., Sagot Y., Terrado J., Monnier D. & Kato A. C. (2000). IAP Family Proteins Delay Motoneuron Cell Death In Vivo. European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 12, No. 6, (June), pp. 2059-2067.
Pluta, K. & Kacprzak, M. M. (2009). Use of HIV as a Gene Transfer Vector. Acta Biochimica Polonica, (November), 56(4), 531-595.
Prehaud C., Coulon P., Lafay F., Thiers C. & Flamand A. (1988). Antigenic Site II of the Rabies Virus Glycoprotein: Structure and Role in Viral Virulence. Journal of Virology, Vol. 62, No. 1, (January), pp. 1-7.
Rabson, A.B. & Martin, M.A. (1985). Molecular Organization of the AIDS Retrovirus. Cell, (March), 40(3), 477-480.
Reiser J., Harmison G., Kluepfel-Stahl S., Brady R. O., Karlsson S. & Schubert M. (1996). Transduction of Nondividing Cells Using Pseudotyped Defective High-Titer HIV Type 1 Particles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, (December), 93(26), pp. 15266-15271.
Rose J. K., Doolittle R. F., Anilionis A., Curtis P. J. & Wunner W. H. (1982). Homology between the Glycoproteins of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus and Rabies Virus. Journal of Virology, Vol. 43, No. 1, (July), pp. 361-364.
Rossi, J.J., June, C.H., & Kohn, D.B. (2007). Genetic Therapies against HIV. Nature Biotechnology, (December), 25(12), 1444-1454.
Sakamoto T., Kawagoe Y., Shen J. S., Takeda Y., Arakawa Y., Ogawa J., Oyanagi K., Ohashi T., Watanabe K., Inoue K., Eto Y. & Watabe K. (2003). Adenoviral Gene Transfer of GDNF, BDNF and TGF, but not CNTF, Cardiotrophin-1 or IGF1, Protects Injured Adult Motoneurons after Facial Nerve Avulsion. Journal of Neuroscience Research, Vol. 72, No. 1, (April), pp. 54-64.
Themis M., Waddington S. N., Schmidt M., von Kalle C., Wang Y., Al-Allaf F., Gregory L. G., Nivsarkar M., Themis M., Holder M. V., Buckley S. M., Dighe N., Ruthe A. T., Mistry A., Bigger B., Rahim A., Nguyen T. H., Trono D., Thrasher A. J. & Coutelle C. (2005). Oncogenesis Following Delivery of a Nonprimate Lentiviral Gene Therapy Vector to Fetal and Neonatal Mice. Molecular Therapy, (October), 12(4), pp. 763-771.
Wong L. F., Goodhead L., Prat C., Mitrophanous K. A., Kingsman S. M. & Mazarakis N. D. (2006). Lentivirus-Mediated Gene Transfer to the Central Nervous System: Therapeutic and Research Applications. Human Gene Therapy, Vol. 17, No. 1, (January), pp. 1-9.
Zheng J. S., Tang L. L., Zheng S. S., Zhan R. Y., Zhou Y. Q., Goudreau J., Kaufman D. & Chen A. F. (2005). Delayed Gene Therapy of Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor is Efficacious in a Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Molecular Brain Research, Vol. 134, No. 1, (March), pp. 155-161.