Summary of the different ST boost control methods expressions [7]
1. Introduction
In a context of volatile fuel prices and rising concerns in terms of energy security of supply and climate change issues, one of the discussed technological alternatives for the transportation sector are electric based vehicles. Advanced technology vehicles such as hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), plugin hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), fuel cell hybrid electric vehicles (FCHEVs), and electric vehicles (EVs) require power electronics and electrical machines to function. These devices allow the vehicle to use energy from the battery to assist in the propulsion of the vehicle, either on their own or in combination with an engine [1]. Therefore, many research efforts have been focused on developing new converters and inverters suitable for electric vehicles applications. One of the most promising topologies is the Zsource inverter (ZSI). The ZSI, as shown in Figure 1, is an emerging topology for power electronics DC/AC converters. It can utilize the shootthrough (ST) state to boost the input voltage, which improves the inverter reliability and enlarges its application field [2]. In comparison with other power electronics converters, it provides an attractive single stage DC/AC conversion with buckboost capability with reduced cost, reduced volume and higher efficiency due to a lower component number. Therefore, the ZSI is a very promising and competitive topology for vehicular applications [3].
As a research hotspot in power electronics converters, the ZSI topology has been greatly explored from various aspects, such as: ST control methods [2], [4][8], designing of the Znetwork elements [9], modeling of the ZSI [10], [11], feedback control strategies [12][26], motor control algorithms [27][31] and automotive applications [32][37].
This chapter starts by presenting a summary for ZSI operation modes and modeling. Then, a review and a comparison between four ST boost control methods, which are: simple boost control (SBC), maximum boost control (MBC), maximum constant boost control (MCBC), and modified space vector modulation (MSVM) boost control, is presented based on simulation and experimental results. Control strategies of the ZSI are important issue and several feedback control strategies have been investigated in recent publications. There are four methods for controlling the dclink voltage of the ZSI, which are: capacitor voltage control, indirect dclink voltage control, direct dclink control and unified control. A review of the above mentioned control methods with their drawbacks will be presented. Two new proposed control methods, which are dualloop capacitor voltage control and dualloop peak dclink voltage control, will be presented and demonstrated by simulation and experimental results. Then, this chapter presents a comparative study of the most significant control methods, which are: scalar control (V/F), indirect field oriented control (IFOC) and direct torque control (DTC), for an induction motor fed by a ZSI for automotive applications. These control techniques are implemented using PWM voltage modulation. Finally, this chapter proposes three applications of the ZSI for automotive applications.
2. ZSI Operation Modes and Modeling
To design a controller for the ZSI, a proper dynamic model for its switching operation is needed. An accurate small signal model of the ZSI gives not only a global also a detailed view of the system dynamics and provides guidelines to system controllers design since the transfer functions could be derived accordingly. Figure 1 shows the basic ZSI topology, which consists of two inductors (L1 and L2) and two capacitors (C1 and C2) connected in X shape to couple the inverter to the dc voltage source. The ZSI can produce any desired ac output voltage regardless of the dc input voltage. Because of this special structure, the ZSI has an additional switching state, when the load terminals are shorted through both the upper and lower switching devices of any phase leg, which called the shootthrough (ST) state besides the eight traditional nonshoot through (NST) states. General operation of a ZSI can be illustrated by simplifying the ac side circuit by an equivalent RL load in parallel with a switch S_{2} and the input diode D is represented by a switch S_{1}, as shown in Figure 2. Where,
Equations (14) represent: the third order small signal model, the steady state values of the state variables, the control to capacitor voltage
Predicting the right half plane (RHP) zeros of the related transfer functions is one of the major advantages of the smallsignal modeling. By considering the control to capacitor voltage transfer function, given by Eq. 3 as an example, the numerator is a quadratic equation. As known, for a quadratic equation
3. Review of PWM control methods for ZSI
3.1. Simple ST Boost Control (SBC)
The SBC method [2], uses two straight lines equal to or greater than the peak value of the three phase references to control the ST duty ratio in a traditional sinusoidal PWM, as shown in Figure 4. When the triangular waveform is greater than the upper line,
3.2. Maximum ST Boost Control (MBC)
Reducing the voltage stress under a desired voltage gain becomes more important to control the ZSI; this can be achieved by making the ST duty ratio as large as possible. The MBC control, [4], turns all the traditional zero states into ST state. As shown in Figure 5, the circuit is in ST state when the triangular carrier wave is either greater than the maximum curve of the references (
3.3. Maximum Constant ST Boost Control (MCBC)
In order to reduce the volume and the cost, it is important always to keep the ST duty ratio constant. At the same time, a greater voltage boost for any given modulation index is desired to reduce the voltage stress across the switches. The MCBC method achieves the maximum voltage gain while always keeping the ST duty ratio constant [5]. Figure 6 shows the sketch map of the maximum constant ST boost control with third harmonic injection. Using the third harmonic injection, only two straight lines,
3.4. Modified Space Vector Modulation ST Control Method
The space vector PWM (SVPWM) techniques are widely used in industrial applications of the PWM inverter because of lower current harmonics and a higher modulation index. The SVPWM is suitable to control the ZSI. Unlike the traditional SVPWM, the modified space vector modulation (MSVM) has an additional ST time
Table 1 shows a summary of all relations for the different ST boost control methods, where

Efficiency evaluation is an important task during inverter design. The losses of the inverter mainly distributed on the semiconductor devices. The semiconductor device losses mainly include conduction losses and switching losses. The efficiency of the ZSI is greatly affected by the ST control methods. Figure 9 shows the losses distribution of a 10 kW ZSI at nominal input and output power, where the input diode conduction and switching losses are included, which are neglected in most publications, the extra losses of the MSVM boost method mainly come from the switching losses of IGBTs and reverse recovery losses of the input diode which are about three times of other methods [8]. Table 2 presents a comparison between the different four ST control methods. The comparison results show that the MCBC method seems to be the most suitable boost control method for the ZSI [8].





Line voltage harmonic    +  0  + 
Phase current harmonic  0  0  +   
DC link voltage ripples  0    +  0 
Switch voltage stress  0  +  0   
Inductor current ripples  0    +   
Efficiency  0  +  +   
Obtainable ac voltage  0  0  +   
Total    +++  +++++  + 
4. ZSI DC link voltage control
The control strategy of the ZSI is an important issue and several feedback control strategies have been investigated in recent publications [12][23]. There are four methods for controlling the ZSI dclink voltage, which are: capacitor voltage control [12][19], indirect dclink voltage control [19],[20], direct dclink control [21],[22] and unified control [23]. Table 3, presents a review of the above mentioned control methods with their drawbacks.
In all the above mentioned control methods, a singleloop voltage control technique was used. However, in high power converters, a singleloop voltage control has two problems. The first problem is that, the inductor current is not regulated and can be overloaded during transient events and the limited stability limits is the second problem. Therefore, a dualloop voltage control is preferred over a singleloop voltage control in high power converters to overcome the above mentioned problems [24]. Two new control algorithms are proposed by the authors, which are: a dualloop capacitor voltage control [25] and a dualloop peak DClink voltage control [26]. These two control algorithms will be briefly presented as flows.

4.1. Capacitor voltage control
This chapter proposes a dual loop capacitor voltage control of the ZSI. The proposed control generates the ST duty ratio by controlling both the inductor current and the capacitor voltage of the ZSI as shown in Figure 10a, where
Based on the small signal transfer functions
Where
In this chapter, a digital PI controller with antiwindup is designed based on the required phase margin, and critical frequency, using the bode diagram of the system in the Z domain, the transfer function of the digital PI controller in Zdomain is given by:
where
and
Figure 11 shows the bode plots for the current loop gain and voltage loop gain, respectively, with the system parameters listed in Table 4. The plots indicate that the current loop gain has a crossover frequency as high as 1 kHz, with a phase margin of 65° and a gain margin of 10 dB. To avoid interaction between the subsystems, low control bandwidth is used for the voltage loop. The resulting outer voltage loop has a crossover frequency of 100 Hz and a phase margin of 59° and a gain margin of 25 dB. Figs. 1213 compare simulation and experimental results during input voltage step down by 7.5% with the same load, load increasing and decreasing by 50% and steady state operations. It is noticeable that the experimental results match the simulation results very well, which verify the performance of the proposed dualloop capacitor voltage control for the ZSI.


Input voltage  200 V 
Capacitor reference voltage  300 V 
Inductance  650 µH 
Inductance internal resistance  0.22 Ω 
Capacitance  320 µF 
Capacitance internal resistance  0.9 mΩ 
Switching frequency  10 kHz 
AC load inductance  340 µH 
AC load resistance  12.5 Ω 
4.2. Peak DClink voltage control
The capacitor voltage,
5. A comparative study of different control techniques for induction motor fed by a Zsource inverter
This section presents a comparative study of the most significant control methods (Scalar control (V/F), indirect field oriented control (IFOC) and direct torque control (DTC)) for an induction motor fed by a ZSI for automotive applications. The three control techniques are implemented using PWM voltage modulation. The comparison is based on various criteria including: basic control characteristics, dynamic performance, and implementation complexity. The study is done by MATLAB simulation of a 15 kW induction motor fed by a high performance ZSI (HPZSI). The simulation results indicates that, the IFOC seems to be the best control techniques suitable for controlling an induction motor fed by a ZSI for automotive applications.
5.1. Scalar control (V/F) technique
The closed loop speed control by slip regulation, which is an improvement of the open loop V/F control, is shown in Figure 17. The speed loop error generates the slip command
5.2. Indirect Field Oriented Control (IFOC) technique
In the indirect field oriented control method, the rotating reference frame is rotating at synchronous angular velocity,
where
where
By using the rotor speed,
the angle of the rotor flux,
Proportional integral controllers regulate the stator voltages,
5.3. Direct Torque Control with Space Vector Modulation (DTCSVM) technique
The conventional DTC scheme has many drawbacks, such as: variable switching frequency, high current and torque ripples, starting and lowspeed operation problems, in addition to high sampling frequency needed for digital implementation of the hysteresis controllers. To overcome these drawbacks, the space vector modulation is combined with the conventional DTC scheme for induction motor drive to provide a constant inverter switching frequency. In the DTCSVM scheme, as shown in Figure 19, the torque and flux hysteresis comparators are replaced by PI controllers to regulate the flux and torque magnitudes respectively. The motor stator flux and the motor developed torque can be estimated by:
The output of theses PI controllers generates the d and q components of the reference voltage command (
Figure 20 shows the complete block diagram of the closed loop speed controlled IM fed by a high performance ZSI. A dual loop controller is designed to control the average value of the dc link voltage by controlling the magnitude of its peak voltage based on a small signal model of the high performance ZSI. Figure 21, shows the calculated overall system efficiency at different load torque. The three control techniques were compared on a simulated benchmark. The main results of this comparative study are summarized in Table 5.




Dynamic response  Poor  Good  Good 
Torque ripples  Large  Small  Small 
Speed error  Large  Small  Medium 
ZSI performance  Good  Good  Poor 
Complexity  Low  High  High 
Efficiency  Medium  High  Low 
6. ZSource Inverter for vehicular applications
This section proposes three applications of the ZSI in the automotive field. The first application proposes the using of the bidirectional ZSI (BZSI) supplied by a battery to drive an induction motor for hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) applications, by replacing the two stages conversion. The second application proposes the using of the BZSI in plugin hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) applications for replacing the bidirectional battery charger, which composed of two stages conversion. By using the BSZI, the battery can be charged from the grid during night and can be discharged to the grid during peak power demand, which increase the grid stability. The third application proposes the using of the HPZSI for fuel cell hybrid electric vehicle (FCHEV) applications. Where the fuel cell (FC) stack and the supercapacitor (SC) module are directly connected in parallel with the HPZSI. The SC module is connected between the input diode and the bidirectional switch S_{7} of the HPZSI. The SC module supplies the transient and instantaneous peak power demands and absorbs the deceleration and regenerative braking energy. The indirect field oriented control (IFOC) is used to control the speed of the IM during motoring and regenerative braking operation modes in the first and the third proposed applications. While, a proportional plus resonance (PR) controller is used to control the AC current during connecting the BZSI to the grid for battery charging/discharging mode in the second proposed application.
6.1. ZSI applications in HEV
The ZSI is proposed to be used to replace the two stages conversion in HEV, The BZSI can replace the bidirectional DC/DC converter and the traditional VSI as a single stage converter, as shown in Figure 22. The IFOC is used for controlling the speed of the IM during motoring and regenerative braking operations and a dual loop capacitor voltage control algorithm is used to control the BZSI dclink voltage.
6.2. ZSI applications in PHEV
The ZSI is proposed to be used to replace the two stage bidirectional battery charger in a PHEV. Figure 23 shows the entire block diagram of a grid connected BZSI containing: the battery, the BZSI, the capacitor voltage control algorithm and the AC grid current control algorithm during battery charging/discharging modes, where the capacitor voltage control generates the ST duty ratio and the AC grid current control generates the modulation index.
6.3. ZSI applications in FCHEV
In Figure 24, the FC system and the SC module are direct connected in parallel with the HPZSI. The SC module is connected between the input diode D and the bidirectional switch S_{7}. The bidirectional switch S_{7} provides a path for the regenerative braking energy to be stored in the SC module during the ST state. The SC module supplies the transient and instantaneous peak power demands and absorbs the deceleration and regenerative braking energy. In addition, a dual loop control is used to control the Znetwork capacitor voltage by controlling the ST duty ratio and the IFOC strategy is used to control the induction motor speed by controlling the modulation index. The proposed applications improve the vehicle efficiency and reduce its production cost due to a lower its component count, since it is a one stage converter with a reduced volume and easier control algorithm.
References
 1.
Emadi A. Young Joo. Lee Rajashekara. K. 2008 Power Electronics and Motor Drives in Electric, Hybrid Electric, and PlugIn Hybrid Electric Vehicles.  2.
Peng FZ 2003 Zsource Inverter  3.
Peng F. Z. Shen M. Joseph A. 2005 ZSource Inverters, Controls, and Motor Drive Applications.  4.
Peng F. Z. Shen M. Qian Z. 2005 Maximum boost control of the Zsource inverter  5.
Shen M. Wang J. Joseph A. Peng F. Z. Tolbert L. M. Adams D. J. 2006 Constant boost control of the Zsource inverter to minimize current ripple and voltage stress  6.
Poh Chiang. Loh D. Mahinda Vilathgamuwa. Yue Sen. Lai Geok. Tin Chua. Yunwei Li. 2005 PulseWidth Modulation of ZSource Inverters.  7.
Ellabban O. Van Mierlo J. Lataire P. 2009 Comparison between Different ShootThrough PWM Control Methods for Different Voltage Type ZSource Inverter Topologies. The 13th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications.  8.
Ellabban O. Van Mierlo J. Lataire P. 2011 Experimental Study of the ShootThrough Boost Control Methods for the ZSource Inverter  9.
Rajakaruna S. Jayawickrama L. 2010 SteadyState Analysis and Designing Impedance Network of ZSource Inverters  10.
Loh PC, Vilathgamuwa DM, Gajanayake CJ, Lim YR, Teo CW 2007 Transient Modeling and Analysis of PulseWidth Modulated Zsource Inverter.  11.
Liu J. Hu J. Xu L. 2007 Dynamic Modeling and Analysis of ZSource ConverterDerivation of AC Small Signal Model and DesignOriented Analysis  12.
Xinping D. Zhaoming Q. Shuitao Y. Bin C. Fangzheng P. 2007 A PID Control Strategy for DClink Boost Voltage in Zsource Inverter. The Twenty Second Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference. 1145 1148  13.
Rastegar Fatemi. MJ Mirzakuchaki S. Rastegar Fatemi. S. M. J. 2008 WideRange Control of Output Voltage in ZSource Inverter by Neural Network. The International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems. 1653 1658  14.
Tran QV, Chun TW, Kim HG, Nho EC, 2009 Minimization of Voltage Stress across Switching Devices in the ZSource Inverter by Capacitor Voltage Control  15.
Rostami H. Khaburi D. A. 2010 Neural Networks Controlling for Both the DC Boost and AC Output Voltage of ZSource Inverter. The 1st Power Electronic & Drive Systems & Technologies Conference. 135 140 .  16.
Shen M. Tang Q. Peng F. Z. 2007 Modeling and Controller Design of the ZSource Inverter with Inductive Load. The IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference. 1804 1809  17.
Rajaei A. H. Kaboli S. Emadi A. 2008 Slidingmode control of Zsource inverter. The 34th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics. 947 952  18.
Mo W. Loh P. C. Blaabjerg F. 2011 Model predictive control for Zsource power converter. The 8th International Conference on Power Electronics. 3022 3028  19.
Ding X. Qian Z. Yang S. Cui B. Peng F. 2008 A Direct DClink Boost Voltage PIDLike Fuzzy Control Strategy in ZSource Inverter The IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference. 405 411  20.
Tang Y. Xie S. Zhang C. 2009 Feedforward plus feedback control of the improved Zsource inverter.  21.
Ding X. Qian Z. Yang S. Cui B. Peng F. 2007 A Direct Peak DClink Boost Voltage Control Strategy in ZSource Inverter. The Twenty Second Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference. 648 653  22.
Sen G. Elbuluk M. 2010 Voltage and Current Programmed Modes in Control of the ZSource Converter  23.
Yang S. Ding X. Zhang F. Peng F. Z. Qian Z. 2008 Unified Control Technique for ZSource Inverter. The IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference. 3236 3242  24.
Ellabban O. Joeri Van Mierlo. J. Lataire P. 2011 Capacitor Voltage Control Techniques of the Zsource Inverter: A Comparative Study  25.
Ellabban O. Joeri Van Mierlo. J. Lataire P. 2011 Design and Implementation of a DSP Based DualLoop Capacitor Voltage Control of the ZSource Inverter  26.
Ellabban O. Joeri Van Mierlo. J. Lataire P. 2012 A DSP Based DualLoop Peak DClink Voltage Control of the ZSource Inverter.  27.
Peng F. Z. Joseph A. Wang J. Shen M. Chen L. Pan Z. 2005 ZSource Inverter for motor drives  28.
Ding X. Qian Z. Yang S. Cui B. Peng F. 2007 A New AdjustableSpeed Drives (ASD) System Based on HighPerformance ZSource Inverter.  29.
Ellabban O. Van Mierlo J. Lataire P. 2010 A new Closed Loop Speed Control of Induction Motor Fed by a High Performance ZSource Inverter. The IEEE Electrical power and energy conference.  30.
Ellabban O. Van Mierlo J. Lataire P. 2011 Direct Torque Controlled Space Vector Modulated Induction Motor Fed by a Zsource Inverter for Electric Vehicles  31.
Ellabban O. Van Mierlo J. Lataire P. 2011 A Comparative Study of Different Control Techniques for Induction Motor Fed by a ZSource Inverter for Electric Vehicles.  32.
Peng F. Z. Shen M. Holland K. 2007 Zsource Inverter Control for Traction Drive of Fuel Cell Battery Hybrid Vehicles.  33.
Shen M. Hodek S. Fang Z. Peng F. Z. 2007 Control of the ZSource inverter for FCHEV with the battery connected to the motor neutral point.  34.
Dehghan S. M. Mohamadian M. Yazdian A. 2010 Hybrid electric vehicle based on bidirectional zsource nineswitch inverter  35.
Ellabban O. Van Mierlo J. Lataire P. 2010 Control of a Bidirectional ZSource Inverter for Hybrid Electric Vehicles in Motoring, Regenerative Braking and Grid Interface Operations. The IEEE Electrical power and energy conference.  36.
Ellabban O. Van Mierlo J. Lataire P. Hegazy O. 2010 Control of a HighPerformance ZSource Inverter for a Fuel Cell/ Supercapacitor Hybrid Electric Vehicles. The 25th World Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium & Exhibition.  37.
Ellabban O. Van Mierlo J. Lataire P. 2011 Control of a Bidirectional ZSource Inverter for Electric Vehicle Applications in Different Operation Modes