Values of parameters for LDPE obtained from the plots in Figures 1 and 2
1. Introduction
Die swell is a common phenomenon in polymer extrusion. When a viscoelastic fluid flows out of a die, the extrudate diameter is usually greater than the channel size. This is called die-swell, extrudate swell or the Barus effect. The degree of extrudate swell is usually expressed by the die-swell ratio (B) of extrudate diameter versus die diameter. A better understanding of such flow behavior will be beneficial for the optimization of processing parameters and the design of extrusion equipment, both of which affect product quality and production cost.
Innumerable valuable experimental data of die swell have been published, each focusing on different aspects affecting extrudate swell. There have been various interpretations of the extrusion swell of viscoelastic fluids from the macroscopic view of polymer rheology, such as a normal stress effect, an elastic energy effect, an entropy enlargement effect, an orientation effect and a memory effect. In fact, these interpretations are all related to each other[1,2]. It is generally believed that die swell is an important characteristic of the fluid elasticity during flow. The most common technique used to study rheological properties of polymer melts is capillary rheometry. In a capillary, polymer flows from the reservoir through a die and finally swells out of the exit. Under the action of extension, shear and compression, some molecular chains become disentangled, uncoiled or oriented in the convergent region resulting in an entry effect. During die flow, the resultant stress and strain cannot be relaxed completely. Simultaneously, some chains continue to be sheared and elongated during extrusion. On emerging from the die exit, the molecules are relaxed in elastic deformation by reentanglement and recoiling. The extrudate tends to contract in the flow direction and to grow in the normal direction, leading to extrudate swell[3]. As it does inside the capillary, the swelling evolves with time outside the capillary to reach a maximum at a certain extrusion distance. Graessley et al.[4] have reported that die swell occurs in two steps: (1) a very rapid swelling with a relatively large swell ratio very close to the die exit, which is known as running die swell; (2) a subsequent slow expansion to give an equilibrium die swell. Thus, the extent of the swelling will depend on both external factors as well as the intrinsic characteristics of the polymer[5]. The former include the geometry (contraction ratio and angle, die length and diameter as well as their ratio L/D) of the extrusion system (reservior, entry and die) [6,7] and the capillary operating conditions (the applied shear rate, stress and temperature) [8,9] and the external environment medium[10]. Extrudate swell can be used to assess the polymer viscoelasticity upon melt extrusion. Through rheological characterization, extrudate swell can also be correlated with the molecular structure of the polymer (molecular weight, and extents of crosslinking and long chain branching)[11].
Precise polymer processing requires an adequate quantitative description of flow. The viscous behavior determines the throughput, while the elastic properties are important for dimensional stability. Many theoretical studies have been conducted to improve our understanding and prediction of extrudate swell[12], in which a very critical aspect is the choice of an appropriate constitutive model[13,14]. In simulations, specific values of the model parameters—especially material parameters—must be defined. Some of these parameters can be measured by rheological experiments. Thus, quantitative analyses are able to relate extrudate swell to the viscoelasticity of polymer melts.
Extrudate swell was initially exploited to study the effects of die swell on processability and its correlation with the relevant rheological properties of polymer melts and the early work has been reviewed by Kontos and White[15] and Graessley[4]. In these early studies[16–18], a wide range of experiments on polymer melt swelling were performed. Some workers have reported that die swell varies with temperature[19], pressure during processing[20], molecular weight and its distribution[21–23], as well as molecular structure[24–27] and compounding ingredients[28]. Studies of die swell as a function of length to diameter ratio of die (L/D), entry speed and shape of the die have been reported by Han [29], Cotten[30], Lenk [31] and Vinogradov and Malkin[32]. Recently, the die swell of particle-filled polymers has attracted more attention because of their wider engineering applications[33,34]. These experiments have generated various valuable data of extrudate swell which need to be rationalized by theoretical studies.
Previous examinations of the existing data have identified some semi-empirical correlations relating the swell ratio to rheological parameters. In the 1970s, Bagley and Duffey[35], Graessley et al.[4], Han[36] and Tanner[37] proposed expressions for the relationship between the swell ratio B and the first normal stress difference or shear stress, on the supposition that polymer melt shear flow obeyed a simple law. One of the most famous approaches is that of Tanner[38] based on elastic recovery theory. In this model, the maximum diameter of the extrudate is related to the recoverable shear strain at the capillary wall.
Such continuum mechanics studies have been regularly reported from the early 1980s onwards. Investigations of the swelling phenomenon have been carried out using numerical simulations, especially by using the finite element method when considering complicated boundary conditions[39,40]. Most of the analyses have been conducted for laminar flow or at low Reynolds number, in which the swell ratio is greater than one. However, at higher Reynolds numbers, the dimensions of the extrudate are possibly smaller than those of the die. Few data have been published concerning the effect of Reynolds number on the die swell[41,42]. Han[29] suggested that the equilibrium die swell measurements are independent of rheometer geometry for common extrusion at relatively low flow rate through a capillary where the ratio of reservoir diameter to capillary die diameter is less than 10, and length to diameter ratio of the capillary die is greater than 20. Such a capillary is termed a long capillary, in which the effects of the entry flow from the reservoir on the die exit region flow can be neglected. Most theoretical models have been derived for a long capillary[43–47]. However, there have been few quantitative predictions of die swell in actual polymer processing operations in which the ratio of width to length in the die flow channel is relatively short[48-58]. The die swell behavior of polymeric materials should be very important in short capillary flow. However, entrance effects in the short tube flow of polymer melts are relatively complicated. Thus, it is necessary to extend the theoretical models of the die swell in a long capillary to that in a short capillary. This is one purpose of this paper.
On the other hand, particulate-filled polymer composites are widely used in engineering to improve polymer properties. Their flow properties are important when molding various products. Some swell experiments have been conducted on filled polymers in which it was noticed that the die swell was related to the filler shape, size, dispersion, concentration and interfacial modification of the inclusions in the matrix[59,60]. However, there are few quantitative theories of the swelling in composites, in contrast to the situation for pure polymer melts[37,61]. Thus, it is necessary to explore how the swell behaviors of composites differ from those of a pure polymer. A second aim of this paper is to develop a single unified quantitative extrudate swell model for both pure polymers and their composites.
The following sections first present a unified theoretical equation to describe extrusion swell in both long capillaries and short capillaries. The evolution of the finite distance of extrudate swelling and the particular features of the swelling of filled composites are also detailed. Finally, comparisons are made between the predictions of the model and experimental data.
2. Theoretical model
2.1. The extrudate swell theory for a long capillary
Up to now, most of the extrudate swell models have been established on the basis of the analysis of long capillary flow. The swell ratio B has been related to the recoverable shear strain (SR) or elastic strain energy[62]. One most pertinent systematic theories of extrudate swell of entangled polymeric liquids is that of Tanner, who first based his model on the K-BKZ constitutive equation and the free recovery from Poiseuille flow with the aspect ratio of length
More recently, Wang et al.[64,65] extensively exploited the variations of extrudate swell with both polymer characteristics (
There are three kinds of polymer segments and chains in the extrudates, which have been defined by Song[66] as extending chain, coil chain and entangled polymeric chain. Besides the change in chain conformation and the degree of reorganization of the constituent chains, the extension and flow can also induce the dynamic and reversible disentanglement and reentanglement between polymeric chains, such that the polymeric melts then undergo a partial stress relaxation leading to extrudate swelling at the die exit. The swell ratio is affected by the length to diameter ratio and the residence time. Based on such a viewpoint of dynamics, Song developed a novel molecular theory of such multiple entangled constituent chains in order to analyze non-linear viscoelasticity for the polymeric melts. His derived constitutive equations and material functions in a multiple-flow field were subsequently quantitatively verified[67]. Based on the O-W-F constitutive equation and the multiple transient-network model as well as the double relaxation dynamics of the reentanglement-disentanglement transition (RE-DT) and recoil-uncoil transition (RC-UCT) from the Poiseuille flow, Song proposed that swell evolves in three stages (instantaneous swelling, delayed swelling and ultimate extrudate swelling)[68]. A new set of swelling equations incorporating molecular parameters, operational parameters and growth time in both the steady state and dynamic state were developed. Song’s model successfully described the die swell through a long capillary of both linear polyethylene (HDPE) and linear polybutadiene (PBD) with the different molecular weights and different processing variables[69]. In this paper, Song’s extrudate swell theory will be extended in order to analyze both the die swell out of a short capillary and the swell of polymer composites.
In the steady shear flow, the shear viscosity can be written as
The above expression is verified by experimental data, and can also be deduced from the O-W-F constitutive equation together with molecular dynamics[69]. The coefficient of the first normal-stress difference
From experimental data of
Details of the derivation of the above equations (3) and (4) and their application to the extrudate swell of HDPE and PDB are given by Song[69]. Eq.3 may also be expressed in the form as shown in Eq. (5), where
2.2. Finite extrudate swell distance
As discussed above, the swelling evolves with time after the polymer is extruded from the capillary, during which time the molecules continue to exhibit similar disentanglement-reentanglement transitions and uncoil-recoil transitions to those occurring whilst it is still inside the capillary. To describe this phase, Eq. (3) can be reformulated as Eq. (6) by introducing two parameters
Here
As the swell approaches a maximum at
where
where
Eq. (10) can be rewritten as Eq. (11).
Thus, either Eq. (10) or Eq. (11) can be used to predict the time of maximum swelling and the corresponding swell distance.
2.3. Extrudate swell theory for a short capillary
The above model is based on the assumption that the chain elongation incurred on reservoir entry is fully relaxed in the capillary. This is only approximately true for extrusion in a long capillary and a very poor assumption for a short capillary where the the entry flow is more complicated and the entry effect is more prominent[71]. Liang[72] reported the results of many swelling experiments using a short capillary and some quantitative empirical relations between the swell ratio and the material characteristics and operational parameters have been obtained[37,70,73]. In this paper, we attempt to modify Song’s model in order to describe the swelling behavior in short capillary extrusion.
Liang[74] described the die swell ratio as follows,
where
The total die swell ratio in Eq. (3) can be approximated as Eq. (17), which has the same form as Eq. (12).
Eq. (17) can be modified to describe the extrudate swell out of a short capillary, as shown in Eq. (18),
where
2.4. Extrudate swell theory of filled composites
In particle-filled composites, the filler is distributed in an entangled matrix network and the filling affects the network relaxation[74]. Regardless of the variation in viscoelastic properties, it has been found experimentally that the values of
However, experiments have shown that the die swell is usually weakened with increasing filler concentration [75]. This suggests that the die swell of a composite can be expressed by Eq. (19),
where
where
3. Comparison of die swell given by the model with experiment
3.1. Experimental data
For comparison of the predicted swell ratios using the model described above with experimental data, several sets of raw swell data were taken from the literature and replotted in appropriate formats.
In testing the validity of the model for a system with large L/D, the rheometric and swell data of a pure IUPAC-LDPE standard was used as shown in Figures 1 and 2 [77,78]. The capillary had die diameter
To show whether the model is valid in analyzing the maximum extrusion distance during swelling, we used the data for a semi-dilute polymer solution of a partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide manufactured by Rhone Poulenc (Rhodoflood AD37, Mw= 6 x 106, degree of hydrolysis = 24%)[70]. Purified water containing 20 g/l of NaCl was employed as a solvent for the polymer. The polymer concentration was 3000 ppm. The swell tests were conducted in a stainless steel capillary with length of 51 mm and inner diameter of 0.60 mm.
The swell data for a rubber compound[73] were used to verify the effectiveness of the suggested equations for polymer extrusion in a short capillary. Sample SI was a calcium carbonate (CaCO3) filled natural rubber (NR) compound, in which the content of CaCO3 was 20 phr. Sample SII was a carbon-black (CB)-filled NR/styrene-butadiene rubber SBR) /cis-1,4-butadiene rubber (CBR) compound. The blending ratio of NR/SBR/CBR was 45/10/45, and the content of CB was 56 phr. Both the rubber compounds included some additives. An Instron capillary rheometer (model 3211) was used in the tests. Two capillary dies with different lengths were selected in order to measure the rheological properties of the sample materials. The length of the long die was 40 mm, the length of the short die was 0.2 mm, and the diameter of both dies was 1 mm.
Another set of data was for a polypropylene/glass bead composite[75]. The matrix resin was a common polypropylene (Pro-fax 6331). The melt flow rate (2.16 kg, 230 oC) and density were 12 g/10 min and 0.9 g/cm3, respectively. The glass bead filler had a mean diameter of 219 nm and density of 2.5 g/cm3. Rheological experiments with these samples were carried out using a Rosand capillary rheometer with twin cylinders. Two dies of different length with the same diameter (1 mm) were selected in order to measure the entry pressure losses. The length/diameter of the short die was << 1 and the other was 16. The test temperature was 190 oC, and apparent shear rates were varied from 50 to10–4s–1.

Figure 1.
Plots of
3.2. Comparison of the predicted values of swell ratio with the experimental data
3.2.1. Swelling simulations for pure LDPE extruded from capillaries with different L/D ratios
The dashed curves in Figure 2 present the experimental data[77] of extrudate swell ratio for LDPE for different capillary
In addition, the swell ratio was also fitted by
0.57243 | 3784728 | 0.74712 | 6811860 | ||||||
IUPAC-LDPE | |||||||||
Dashed curves By Eq. (3) ( | Dotted curves by | Solid curves by | |||||||
10 | 0.74 | 0.36 | 1.83 | 0.0021 | 1.573 | 2.4906 | |||
1 | 0.64 | 0.39 | 1.70 | 0.00185 | 1.561 | 1.9614 | |||
0.63 | 0.58 | 0.43 | 1.69 | 0.00125 | 1.557 | 1.6841 | |||
0.1 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 1.38 | 0.00030 | 1.316 | 0.7806 |
Table 1.

Figure 2.
Predicted curves and experimental data of extrudate swell ratio for LDPE with different capillary L/D ratio and shear rates.
The comparisons of swell ratio predicted by Eq. (3),
3.2.2. Extrusion distance giving the maximum swell ratio for semi-dilute polymer solutions
For a capillary with a L/D ratio of 85, the swelling of polyacrylamide solution was observed to reach a maximum at a given time

Figure 3.
Calculated plots of

Figure 4.
Curves of
3.2.3. Verification of the swelling equation for rubber in a short capillary
The recoverable strain can be calculated by Eq. (23) due to Tanner[37].
Eq. (24) can be approximately fitted to give values of
The experimental swell ratios[73] are shown in Figure 5, from which the values of the parameters in Eq. (24) can be obtained by fitting and they are listed in Table 2. Figure 5 also illustrates that the swell ratios predicted by Eq. (24) are in good agreement with the experimental data. It should be noted that the swell ratios reported in the literature[73] were measured when the extrudate was naturally cooled to ambient temperature. The swell ratio is considerably larger for extrusion from a very short capillary than from a long capillary. A larger fraction of the relaxation occurs in the melt state at higher temperature in the longer capillary than in the short capillary. The unrelaxed energy is not easily released from the capillary at low temperature. The fitted value of

Figure 5.
Plots of fitted swell ratio versus shear stress compared with experimental data.
The filler content of sample SI with a matrix of NR rubber is lower than that of sample SII with a matrix of NR/SBR/CBR blend[73]. As seen from Table 2, the average relaxation time
Samples | L/D | ||||
SI | 0.2 | 0.32 | 0.12 | 0.26 | 0.64 |
40 | 0.18 | 0.56 | |||
SII | 0.2 | 0.22 | 0.72 | 0.53 | 0.72 |
40 | 0.48 | 0.70 |
Table 2.
Values of the parameters in Eq. (24) for rubber compounds
3.2.4. Application of the swelling equations for a PP/glass bead composite
As shown in Figure 6, the viscosity of the PP/glass bead composite can be calculated from the experimental data of stress versus shear rate in the literature[75]. Eq. (1) accurately predicts the variation of viscosity with shear rate for composites with different filler percentages. The fitted values of

Figure 6.
Experimental data for variation of viscosity with shear rate and the simulated values for the composites.
Filler content | ||||
5% | 0.2071 | 1.31785 | 1.6011 | 2.2607 |
10% | 0.2175 | 1.47162 | 1.6849 | 2.8496 |
15% | 0.3812 | 1.85625 | 1.7210 | 3.5809 |
Table 3.
Structural parameters for PP/glass bead composites

Figure 7.
Comparison of predicted swell ratio with experimental data for PP/glass bead composites.
Eq. (6) can be used to predict the extrudate swell ratio of the composites with the fitted structural parameters listed in Table 3. Comparison of the predicted data with the experimental values are shown in Figure 7, assuming
Dashed curves given by Eq. (3) | Dotted curves given by | |||
Filler content | ||||
0 | 0.56165 | 0.5137 | 127.51 | 0.16 |
5% | 0.55176 | 0.5003 | 138.73 | 0.1307 |
10% | 0.53287 | 0.4400 | 153.45 | 0.09821 |
15% | 0.49195 | 0.4217 | 169.62 | 0.08876 |
Table 4.
Values of model parameters in the equations for the composite in Figure 7
In addition, it is interesting that the swell is well depicted by one simple equation

Figure 8.
Comparison of plots of
Plots of
In addition, Eq. (21) is also successful in fitting the plots of
Plots of die swell versus filler concentration[75] are shown in Figure 9. Eq. (20) well demonstrates this correlation. In fitting the data with Eq. (20), it is found that with increasing shear rate the critical content

Figure 9.
Extrudate swell ratio of PP/glass bead composites with different filler contents.

Figure 10.
Plots of
4. Conclusions
Two limitations of Song’s polymer extrudate swell theory have been identified for the first time. Song’s model has been modified in order to predict the finite distance at which the swelling reaches a maximum. Furthermore, the model was extended to describe the die swell on extrusion from a short capillary by considering the entry effect in Song’s molecular dynamics model and incorporating Liang’s expression. The resulting modified model can be applied to extrusion swelling for both long and short capillaries, whereas Song’s model is only appropriate for long capillaries. More importantly, the modified model is also suitable for analysis of the swelling of particle-filled composites which cannot be treated by Song’s model. The composite swell ratio can be separated into the product of the matrix swell ratio and the concentration shift factor. The excellent agreements between the values predicted by the modified model and experimental data reported in the literature for a variety of different systems demonstrate its viability for a wide range of materials and experimental conditions.
References
- 1.
Liang J.Z. Plast Rubber Compos Process Appl1991 15 75 79 - 2.
Liang J. Z. J. Mater Process. Technol 1995 52 207 215 - 3.
Lodge A.S. Elastic Liquids, Academic Press, New York,1964 - 4.
Graessley W. W. Glasscock S. D. Crawley R. L. Trans Soc. Rheol 1970 14 519 544 - 5.
Tech.Wong A. C. Y. J. Mater Proc. 1998 79 163 169 - 6. Koopmans R.J. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1992; 32:1755-1762.
- 7.
Liang J. Z. Plast Rubber. Proc Appl. 1995 23 93 96 - 8. Seo Y. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1990;30:235-240.
- 9. Richardson S. Rheol. Acta 1969;9 :193-199.
- 10.
Sci.Koopmans R. J. J. Appl Polym. 1992 32 1750 1767 - 11.
Sci.Koopmans R. J. J. Appl Polym. 1992 32 1741 1750 - 12.
Sci.Swan P. L. Dealy J. M. Polym Eng. 1991 31 705 710 - 13. Larson R.G., Constitutive Equations for Polymer Melts and Solutions, Butterworths, Boston, 1988.
- 14.
Mech.Giesekus H. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid. 1982 11 69 109 - 15.
White J.L. Rubber Chem. Technol. 1977 50 163 185 - 16.
Spencer R. S. Dillon R. E. J. Colloid Sci. 1948 3 163 171 - 17. Schreiber H.P., Rudin A., Bagley E.B. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1965; 9:887-892.
- 18.
Rheol.Metzner A. B. Trans Soc. 1969 13 467 470 - 19.
Brydson J.A. Flow Properties of Polymer melts. London: The Plastic Institute.1981 - 20.
Cogswell F. N. Plast Polym. 1973 41 39 43 - 21.
Shaw M. T. Polym Eng. Sci 1977 17 266 268 - 22. Rogers M.G. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1970;14 :1679-1689.
- 23. Racin R., D.C. Bogue, J. Rheol. 1979;23:263-280.
- 24. Mendelson R.A., F.L. Finger, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1975;19:1061-1078.
- 25. Rokudai M. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1981;26:1427-1429.
- 26. Liang J. Z., Nes J. N. s,Polymer Testing 1999;18:37-46,
- 27.
Sci.Dufrancatel-Veiller L. Lacrampe M. F. Pababiot J. J. Appl Polym. 2001 80 1710 1724 - 28.
Minagawa N. White J. L. J. Appl Poly. Sci 1976 20 501 523 - 29.
Rheology in Polymer Processing; Academic: New York,Han C. D. 1976 - 30.
Cotten G. R. Rubber Chem. Technol 1979 52 187 198 - 31.
Lenk R.S. Polymer Rheology. London: Applied Science Publishers Ltd. Ch.10,101 1978 - 32.
Vinogradov G.V. and Malkin A.Y. Rheology of Polymers: Viscoelasticity and Flow of Polymers, Moscow: Mir Publishers. Ch. 5,355 379 1980 - 33.
TestingRapeephun D. Jimmy Y. Pitt S. Polymer 2005 24 2 11 - 34.
TestingNattaya M. Manit N. Brian P. Gradyb Rathanawan. M. Polymer 2008 27 470 479 - 35.
Bagley E. B. Duffey H. J. Trans Soc. Rheol 1970 14 454 459 - 36.
Rheol.Han C. D. Charles M. Trans Soc. 1970 14 213 218 - 37.
Tanner R. I. J. Polym Sci. Part A-. Polym Phys. 1970 8 2067 2071 - 38.
Mech.Tanner R. I. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid. 1980 6 289 302 - 39. Crochet M.J., Keunings R. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 1980; 7:199-212.
- 40.
Rheol.Barakos G. Mitsoulis E. J. 1995 39 193 209 - 41.
Fundamental of Polymer Processing. New York: Magraw-Hill.Middleman S. 1977 - 42. Georgiou G.C., Papanastasiou T.C. and Wilkes, J.O. AIChE. J. 1988; 34:1559-1562.
- 43.
Utracki L. A. Bakerdjian Z. Kamal M. R. J. Appl Polym. Sci 1975 19 481 501 - 44.
Meissner J. Pure Appl. Chem 1975 42 551 612 - 45.
Macosko C. W. Rheology Principles. Measurements Application New. York-Vch Wiley. Ch . pp 236 260 1990 - 46.
Treloar L.R.G. The Physics of Rubber Elasticity. 3rd Edn., Oxford: Clarendon Press.1975 - 47.
RheologyBarone J. R. Plucktaveesak N. Wang S. Q. J. 1998 42 813 832 - 48.
Polym Eng SciHuang D. White J. L. 1980 20 182 186 - 49.
J.den Doelder. C. F. Koopmans R. J. J. Non-Newt Fluid. Mec 2008 - 50.
Muksing N. Nithitanakul M. Grady B. P. Magaraphan R. Polym Testing. 2008 27 4 470 479 - 51.
Sci.Kumari K. Kundu P. P. Bulletin of. Mater 2008 31 2 159 167 - 52.
Sci.Ayutthaya S. Isarankura N. Wootthikanokkhan J. Appl J. Polym 2008 107 6 3853 3863 - 53.
Mitra S. Chattopadhyay S. Bhowmick A. K. Appl J. Polym Sci. 2008 107 5 2755 2767 - 54.
Rowell R. M. Polym J. Environ 2007 15 4 229 235 - 55.
de Paulo G. S. Tome M. F. Mc Kee S. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid. Mech 2007 147 3 149 174 - 56.
ASMEMitsoulis E. Fluids J. Eng Trans.of. the A. S. M. 2007 129 11 1384 1393 - 57.
Mohanty S. Nayak S. K. Polym Eng. Sci 2007 47 10 1634 1642 - 58.
Polym.Sci.Peng B. Wu H. Guo S. Y. Lai S. Y. Jow J. Appl J. Polym 2007 106 3 1725 1732 - 59.
Liang J. Z. Li R. K. Y. Tang C. Y. Cheung S. W. J. Appl Polym. Sci 2000 76 419 424 - 60.
Sci.Faulkner D. L. Schmidt L. R. Polym Eng. 1977 17 657 667 - 61.
Bush M. B. Polym Eng. Sci 1993 33 950 958 - 62.
Plas.Kamal K. K. Joshua U. O. J. Elast 2001 33 297 336 - 63.
Mech.Tanner R. I. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid. 2005 129 85 87 - 64. Tapadia P., Wang S.Q. Macromolecules 2004;37:9083-9099.
- 65.
Zhu Z Y, Wang S Q, J Rheol.2004 48 3 571 578 - 66.
Song M. S. Hu G. X. Yang Z. H. Xu Q. Wu S. Z. J. Mater Sci. Tech 2006 - 67.
Tech.Song M. S. Xu Q. Hu G. X. Wu S. Z. J. Mater Sci. 2006 22 5 664 686 - 68.
Zhu C. W. Song M. S. Hu G. X. Zhao J. Wu D. M. Chin J. Chem Phys. 2007 20 5 563 581 - 69.
Zhao J. Song M. S. Zhu C. W. Hu G. X. Wang K. J. Wu D. M. Chin J. Chem Phys. 2008 21 1 55 88 - 70.
Allain C. Cloitre M. Perrot P. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid. Mech 1997 73 51 66 - 71.
communicationZheng R. Tang G. J. Polymer 1986 3 161 172 - 72.
Liang J. Z. J. Mater Process. Technol 1996 59 268 276 - 73.
Liang J. Z. Appl J. Polym Sci. 2007 104 70 74 - 74.
Stabik J., Inter Polym Process 2004 19 4 350 355 - 75.
Liang J.Z. Polymer Testing 2002 21 927 931 - 76.
Rheol.Gleissle W. Hochstein B. J. 2003 47 897 910 - 77.
Huang S. X. Lu C. J. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid. Mech 2006 136 147 156 - 78.
Meissner J. Pure Appl. Chem 1975 42 551 612