Comparison with other SOI and polymer-based TO MZI switches.
In recent years it has become evident that the increasing need for huge bandwidth and throughput capabilities in Data Center and High Performance Computing (HPC) environments can no longer be met by bandwidth-limited electrical interconnects. Besides their limited capacity, electrical wiring technologies impose great energy and size limitations originating from the requirements to handle the vast amount of information that needs to be exchanged across all hierarchical communication levels within Data Centers and HPCs, i.e. rack-to-rack, backplane, chip-to-chip and on-chip interconnections. This reality has inevitably led to a clearly shaped roadmap for bringing optics into the spotlight and replacing electrical with optical interconnects, thereby overtaking the bottleneck in traffic exchange imposed by electrical wires . Hence, the optical technology should penetrate into intra-rack and board-to-board transmission links, considering that the optical fiber as a large-bandwidth transmission medium  is used only in commercial systems for rack-to-rack communication .
Nevertheless, data communication and power consumption are still daunting issues in Data Centers and HPCs. According to recent predictions made in , the barrier of 10PFlops computing performance should have been overcome in 2012 by a supercomputer that consumes 5MW of power . In addition,  predicted that exascale supercomputing machines would consume 20MW having a power efficiency of 1mW/Gb/s . Nonetheless, power consumption in such environments has been proven to be even higher than expected: Today’s top-ranked supercomputer, the “K computer”, has already reached the 10PFlops performance benchmark but at the expense of excessive consumed power that is more than twice  the value that was predicted in 2008. All the above imply that the use of optics at inter-rack communication level is not enough for delivering the necessary performance enhancements. Therefore, the optical technology should now be exploited at shrinked networking environments: The penetration of low-energy photonic solutions at board-to-board, chip-to-chip and eventually intra-chip interconnects would yield remarkable savings in energy consumption . The current mainstream photonic route with high integration and low-cost perspectives relies on the Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) photonics platform, whose growing maturity is soon expected to release Tb/s-scale data transmission and switching capabilities in datacom and computercom units ensuring low latency, low power consumption and chip-scale integration credentials .
Even so, photonic devices cannot reach the compactness of their electronic counterparts: the dimensions of traditional optical structures are limited by the fundamental law of diffraction, preventing the way towards high density integration for interfacing with electronics at the nanoscale. This gap in size between photonic and electronic components is called to be bridged by a promising disruptive technology named plasmonics -. The emerging discipline of plasmonics has started to gain ground as the “beyond photonics” chip-scale platform that can enter the interconnect area -, holding a great promise for additional reductions in circuit size and increase in energy efficiency. Plasmonics relies on the excitation of surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) that are electromagnetic waves coupled to oscillations of free electrons in a metal and propagate along a metal-dielectric interface at near the speed of light. These “hybrid” surface waves have transverse magnetic (TM) polarization in nature and their exhibited electromagnetic field intensity reaches its maximum value at the metal surface whereas it decays exponentially while moving away from the metal-dielectric interface . In this way strong intrinsic confinement is feasible even at sub-wavelength scale , breaking the size barriers of diffraction-limited optics and enabling the development of compact integrated nanophotonic circuits . Plasmonic technology does not only succeed in providing light manipulation at sub-wavelength dimensions but at the same time allows for the injection of electrical pulses via the metallic layer, offering thereby a seamless energy-efficient platform for merging light beams with electrical control signals towards “active” operations -.
Among the various plasmonic waveguide structures proposed so far (i.e. band-gap structures , metallic nanowires , V-groove waveguides ), the low-energy credentials of plasmonics has been mainly highlighted in the case of dielectric-loaded SPP (DLSPP) waveguides, where a dielectric (e.g. polymer) ridge is deposited on top of a smooth metallic film. As a result, strong sub-wavelength (DLSPP) mode confinement is achieved at the metal-dielectric interface. Nonetheless, this performance comes at the expense of excessively increased propagation losses compared to conventional dielectric waveguides due to radiation absorption in the metallic stripe, yielding quite short propagation lengths lying in the order of few tens of micrometers ,. Apart from the strong mode confinement, the main advantage of the DLSPP waveguide technology stems from the nature of the chosen dielectric material which, depending on its thermo-optic (TO) ,- or electro-optic , properties, allows for the exploitation of the corresponding effects, enabling in this way the deployment of highly functional active plasmonic elements. Regarding the TO effect, the underlying metallic layer, which is in direct contact with the polymer and therefore with the largest part of the DLSPP mode field, serves as an energy-efficient electrode that yields immediate change of the effective index of the propagating mode at the presence of electric current, leading to fast TO responses. These advantages render the DLSPP waveguides ideal for TO manipulation of the plasmonic waves in various functional circuitry implementations like modulation ,, ON/OFF gating  and switching ,. The progress made so far on active DLSPP-based circuits renders the TO effect as the most mature mechanism for bringing low-energy active plasmonics in true data traffic environments ,.
To this end, the roadmap towards practical employment of active plasmonic circuits in the development of “greener” and faster “Network-on-Chip” (NoC) solutions for Data Centers and HPCs seems to be the following: the synergy between plasmonic, electronic and photonic components for the realization of NoC deployments with minimized power consumption, size and enhanced throughput capabilities, simply by taking advantage of the virtues of each technology. In this perspective, silicon photonics can be used for low-loss optical transmission in passive interconnection components, plasmonics can provide small footprint and low power consumption in active switching modules and electronics can be employed for intelligent decision-making mechanisms. However, considering that plasmonic technology is a premature technology with only a few years of development compared to silicon photonics and with limited functionality so far, the way towards the implementation of such hybrid NoC environments requires priorly: a) the interconnection between silicon and plasmonic waveguide structures in a SOI platform in order to avoid the employment of high-loss plasmonic waveguides for passive circuitry ,, b) the proof of the credentials of plasmonics in wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) applications so as to support the complete portfolio of optics , c) the demonstration of functional active plasmonic circuitries in realistic data traffic environments ,.
This chapter aims to cover all these issues starting from the 4×4 silicon-plasmonic router architecture, where its main building blocks and their principle of operation are described briefly. The chapter continues with the geometrical specifications of the silicon and plasmonic waveguides of the hybrid routing platform as well as with the silicon components and sub-systems, namely the photodiodes (PDs) and the multiplexers (MUXs), respectively. The silicon-plasmonic asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometer (A-MZI) is then presented and analyzed thoroughly since it is the constituent component of the 4×4 switching matrix of the router. Subsequently, the WDM credentials of plasmonics are experimentally confirmed by demonstrating WDM data transmission over a DLSPP waveguide as well as WDM data switching operation via a hybrid Si-DLSPP A-MZI, along with its switching performance metrics. Various optimization procedures are also listed. The chapter concludes with an estimation of the router’s total power consumption and losses.
2. Tb/s-scale hybrid Router-on-Chip platform
Data Center and HPC communication systems require the development of NoC environments with compact size, high-throughput and enhanced power saving capabilities for efficient traffic management. In this perspective, the benefits of silicon photonics and plasmonics can be combined towards realizing a 4×4 “Router-on-Chip” platform  with Tb/s-scale data capacity and ultra-low energy requirements for chip-to-chip and on-chip optical interconnects. This hybrid routing platform employs a silicon motherboard hosting all various optical and electrical circuitry, where the “heart” of this router chip is a hybrid 4×4 switching matrix comprising 2×2 TO Si-DLSPP switches, and exploits the best out of all technology worlds: the low optical loss of Si-waveguide motherboard for its passive interconnection parts, the high energy efficiency of plasmonics in the router’s “active” parts, and the intelligence provided by electronics for its decision-making mechanisms. The following sections describe in detail the Tb/s-scale Si-DLSPP router architecture and its basic building blocks, the experimental evidences of the WDM data transmission and switching capabilities of the DLSPP waveguides, various optimization approaches and finally the performance of the 4×4 router with estimations in power consumption and optical insertion losses.
2.1. 4×4 silicon-plasmonic router architecture
The 4×4 silicon-plasmonic router architecture aims at achieving 1.12Tb/s aggregate throughput with small footprint and low power consumption. Figure 1 illustrates a schematic layout of this hybrid router architecture. The router consists of SOI MUXs, Si PDs, a hybrid Si-DLSPP 4×4 switching matrix and an integrated circuit (IC) microcontroller. Size minimization and power savings are promoted by the employment of four SOI MUXs composed of cascaded Si ring resonators (RRs) placed in parallel at the frontend of the router and four identical thermo-optically addressed Si-DLSPP A-MZIs interconnected in a Beneš topology. The plasmonic components are used only where switching functionality is required in order to achieve both low optical losses and low power consumption. The Si technology is also responsible for coupling light in and out of the platform, the interconnection of all subsystems and the optoelectronic (OE) signal conversion of the incoming packets’ headers. Four 7×1 MUX circuits based on SOI RRs are used to multiplex 28 time-overlapped wavelengths, spaced by 100GHz and modulated with 40Gb/s non-return-to-zero (NRZ) packet traffic, into four optical data streams. Consequently, each one of these multi-wavelength data sequences carries an aggregate traffic of 280Gb/s that will enter one of the four inputs of the plasmonic switching device and will then follow the same route through the entire platform. Apart from the 28 input ports that are utilized for the insertion of the data carrying packets, the router also incorporates 4 additional input ports where they are inserted four discrete low-rate wavelength beams containing the header information of the four incoming data streams. The header for each stream is a two pulse combination within 1
2.2. Silicon and DLSPP waveguides
The different technologies and building blocks involved in the hybrid Tb/s-scale router require the employment of the appropriate waveguide technology in order to merge all of them successfully on the same motherboard. The existence of a slab layer in rib waveguides compared to the strip counterparts facilitates the fabrication process for the hetero-integration of all processing components, namely the PDs, the SOI MUXs and the DLSPP waveguide structures, rendering this waveguide technology suitable for the low-loss Si-based communication links needed in the SOI routing platform. Taking into consideration the intrinsic TM nature of plasmonic waves, the geometrical dimensions of the Si rib waveguides need to be carefully chosen for compatibility with plasmonic waveguides. In this perspective, rib waveguides featuring a cross section of 400nm width by 340nm height with a 50nm-thick remaining slab are the Si waveguide technology of choice for the routing platform in order to support low-loss TM light propagation .
Nevertheless, the coexistence of silicon photonics and plasmonics on the same platform imposes proper formation of the SOI motherboard for efficient hetero-integration of the DLSPP waveguides : By etching the SOI motherboard down to 200nm (Figure 2(a)), the formed recess in the 2
Apart from the geometrical specifications of these two different waveguide technologies, it is necessary to implement an efficient transition from one type of waveguide to the other. In our case, the interface between the silicon and plasmonic waveguides is implemented by a butt-coupling approach, as depicted in bird’s eye and side views in Figure 2(c)-(d), respectively. The design of this approach relies on numerical modeling conducted by means of full vectorial three-dimensional finite element method (3D-FEM) simulations. Towards finalizing the design specifications, various parameters should be examined, i.e., the Si waveguide’s width, the vertical offset between the two types of waveguides, the existence of a longitudinal gap in the metallic stripe as usually exists in fabricated structures, so as to optimize the matching of the optical modes during transition . The validity of the simulation outcomes is achieved by their comparison with cut-back measurements for a variety of fabricated all Si and hybrid Si-DLSPP waveguide samples ,. As a result, a coupling loss per interface variance with a mean value of -2.5dB is feasible for 175nm-wide Si waveguides with 200nm vertical offset and DLSPP waveguides with 0.5
2.3. Silicon photodiodes
Since the silicon-plasmonic routing platform comprises also microelectronics, it is necessary to develop integrated C-band (1530-1565 nm) photodiodes that enable the OE conversion of the optical header pulses into electrical signals. However, a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) -compatible SOI-based integration of a material that absorbs inside this wavelength window is really challenging. One detection scheme within the C-band on a SOI platform is the hybridization of integrated Si structures with other materials (e.g. Ge , InGaAs ) for direct (linear) absorption. This hybrid approach can lead to high-performance but complex devices, requiring complicated and cost-intensive fabrication procedures and modifications compared to the standard CMOS process. For this purpose, monolithical and fully CMOS-compatible detector concepts have been proposed for the development of comparably simple devices with less fabrication costs. In this perspective, two photon absorption detection can be exploited inside a non-resonant or resonant Si device , revealing however non-linear effect and requiring high light intensity. Alternatively, the generation of direct (linear) absorption inside the telecom window can be achieved by the introduction of midgap energy states via Si+-ion implantation . Despite the lower (direct) absorption compared to the hybrid detectors, this type of monolithic Si detector approach, the defect state Si+-ion implanted detector, offers the best compromise for simple integration and low-rate detection.
Taking into account that the 4×4 silicon-plasmonic router architecture employs low-rate optical header pulses, the defect state all-silicon implanted PDs are suitable for the procedure of the OE conversion, pursuing a trade-off between minimum signal distortion during header detection and integration complexity. Schematic illustrations of this type of PD interconnected with a Si waveguide are shown in cross sectional and top views in Figure 3(a)-(b), respectively, whereas the top view of a test chip including fabricated all-Si implanted PDs with different absorption lengths is depicted in Figure 3(c). Figure 3(d)-(e) illustrate the performance of a 0.75mm-long Si+-ion implanted PD, exhibiting linear absorption and sensitivity values of 0.09A/W and 0.11A/W for -6V and -20V bias voltage, respectively. By increasing the device length, the sensitivity is getting higher. However, even for a three times longer device, the dark current is well below 100nA.
2.4. Silicon multiplexers
In order to support Tb/s-scale bandwidth, the hybrid router takes advantage of SOI multiplexing devices. Till now various multiplexing/demultiplexing configurations based on SOI technology have been proposed in the scientific community, such as echelle diffraction gratings (EDGs) and arrayed waveguide gratings (AWGs) , first or higher order RRs - and A-MZIs . In many cases, due to fabrication limits and discrepancies, thermal tuning is performed to attain ideal spectral positioning of the MUX resonances. This controlling technique is adopted for tunability of the second-order SOI RRs employed in the silicon-plasmonic router, aiming at optimized multiplexing performance. Considering that the router is planned to handle 40Gb/s line-rates, the 3-dB passband bandwidth for each data channel should be at least 40GHz and the adjacent channel crosstalk should be kept lower than -15dB. These issues can be met by the 2nd order RRs employed in the router, since such structures enable increased flexibility in the formation of transmission peaks’ spectral shape and bandwidth within the same channel spacing constraints due to the additional coupling stage employed between the two RRs .
A fabricated 2nd order RR featuring the Si waveguide specifications of Section 2.2 is illustrated in Figure 4(a). Indicative experimental spectra obtained at the Drop port of 2nd order ring structures are presented with blue lines in Figure 4(b)-(c). In particular, Figure 4(b) refers to a fabricated 2nd order RR with 9
The aforementioned 2nd order RRs are employed as the building blocks for the design of the 7:1 SOI MUX devices required in the router. Figure 5 depicts a more generic 8:1 multiplexing layout. The MUX design comprises eight cascaded thermo-optically tunable 2nd order RRs clustered in two groups with two different radii (
Following this rationale, the desired spectral responses of the four MUXs are generated within the 1530-1565 nm wavelength window, revealing 100GHz channel spacing, at least -20dB optical crosstalk and 40GHz 3-dB bandwidth, as illustrated in Figure 6. The first three designs rely on rings with 12
2.5. Silicon-plasmonic A-MZIs
Targeting the best compromise between losses, footprint and power consumption, the A-MZI modules of the router rely on a hybrid implementation, where the coupling stages are based on low-loss Si waveguides and only the active phase branches exploit the DLSPP structures. The silicon-plasmonic A-MZI structures play a key role in the accomplishment of routing operation. These are the elements of the router that are capable of performing optical switching by taking advantage of the TO effect at the plasmonic parts. The principle of operation regarding the TO switching is the following: In the 500×600 nm2 PMMA ridge, the DLSPP mode fills practically the whole ridge, while the largest fraction of the mode is concentrated at the metal-dielectric interface. The strong confinement at the metal-dielectric interface renders the mode very sensitive to any temperature variation induced through current injection in the metal; in this way the underlying gold film acts as a heating electrode for the dielectric ridge, modifying in a very efficient way the DLSPP mode effective index via changing the PMMA refractive index -, and requiring only a small amount of consumed power. At the same time, the inherent instantaneous heating of the metal is immediately transferred to the propagating SPP mode, again due to its strong confinement at the metal-dielectric interface, leading to small response times of the TO effect in the DLSPP waveguide. Such low driving powers (~1mW) and response times (~1
Considering operation at telecom wavelengths (~1550nm) and an increase in temperature of about 61K in PMMA loadings (where the thermo-optic coefficient
Taking advantage of the default π/2 phase asymmetry introduced at the lower plasmonic branch, this asymmetric interferometric configuration is capable of performing switching with only a π/2 phase shift compared to all-plasmonic symmetric MZI switches -. The injection of electric current to a MZI arm yields a temperature rise that alters the effective index of the mode propagating on the heated arm, leading to a phase shift via this TO effect ,,. By electrically controlling the upper A-MZI arm, a negative phase shift is experienced by the propagating DLSPP waveguide mode as a result of the PMMA’s TOC. When the induced phase shift equals π/2, the phase difference between the modes travelling through the two MZI branches equals π and therefore the whole mode power is exported to the BAR output of the device. On the contrary, when the same current level applies only to the lower MZI plasmonic branch, the default MZI phase asymmetry is cancelled out due to the –π/2 thermo-optically induced phase shift and, thus, the whole mode power emerges at the CROSS port of the MZI. To this end, the ON switching operation is achieved by electrically driving the upper MZI plasmonic arm, whereas the lower branch has to be driven by the same amount of electric current for the OFF switching operation. Nevertheless, due to the default π/2 phase asymmetry of the MZI, high-performance switching can be reached even if one of the two plasmonic branches is thermo-optically addressed, since the MZI is initially biased at the quadrature point that lies in the linear domain of its output transfer function. Consequently, this asymmetric formation constitutes a simple and passive mechanism for reducing the required energy level and the active plasmonic arm length for a given maximum service temperature.
2.6. WDM data transmission through a DLSPP waveguide
The evaluation of the WDM data transmission capabilities of plasmonics is initially carried out via a 60
The experimental setup used to transmit a 480Gb/s WDM optical stream through the DLSPP waveguide is presented in Figure 8. The transmitter involves twelve continuous-wave (CW) optical signals stemming from distributed feedback (DFB) lasers and spaced by 200GHz within the 1542-1560 nm spectral range. The multiplexing of these individual light beams into a single optical fiber is realized by using AWG and 3-dB couplers. The multiplexed signal is then encoded by a 231-1 pseudo-random bit sequence (PRBS) at 40Gb/s NRZ line rate in a Ti:LiNbO3 Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM). Subsequently, the 480Gb/s WDM signal is amplified by a high-power erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA), providing 24dBm output power towards tackling the high losses induced by the hybrid chip. After ensuring TM polarization conditions for compliance with the inherent TM nature of plasmonics, via a polarization controller, the incoming optical data signal is inserted into the DLSPP waveguide. The multi-wavelength data stream that transmitted through the whole Si-DLSPP waveguide is amplified at the chip’s output by a low-noise EDFA and demultiplexed into individual data channels by an optical bandpass tunable filter (OBPF). Each optical data channel is then converted into an electrical signal by a 40GHz 3-dB bandwidth photoreceiver that is connected to a 1:4 electrical demultiplexer, where each electrical data signal is received by a 10Gb/s error detector for bit error rate (BER) measurements.
The 12-channel data signal is examined, in terms of its spectrum, in three crucial places along the transmission line: just before the Si-DLSPP chip’s input, after the chip’s output and after the receiver’s EDFA, as depicted in Figure 9(a)-(c). The TM grating couplers of the chip reveal a non-flattened spectral response (red dashed line in Figure 9(b)), dictating thereby the chip’s spectral response and resulting in wavelength-dependent fiber-to-fiber transmission losses which range between 40dB and 48dB within the wavelength window of interest. As a consequence, the spectrum of the WDM signal constantly alters, even after the final amplification stage due to the absence of gain flattened filters (GFFs) at the EDFAs. To this end, a wavelength-dependent performance is observed in the receiver with respect to the optical noise-to-signal ratio (OSNR). The performance of the 480Gb/s WDM transmission through the 60
2.7. WDM data traffic switching with a hybrid Si-plasmonic A-MZI
After verifying the WDM data transmission capabilities of plasmonics through the DLSPP waveguide, the next step towards enriching the WDM portfolio of plasmonics is the demonstration of data switching . In this perspective, the TO electrically controlled PMMA-based A-MZI that analyzed in Section 2.5 is employed towards performing switching of a 4×10Gb/s WDM traffic according to the rationale described in the same section. This A-MZI, along with other structures, is included in a Si-plasmonic chip  that is equipped with TM grating couplers, similar to the ones presented in the previous section, in order to couple light in and out of the hybrid chip. At 1542nm TM-polarized light the cut-back measurements reveal 0.1dB/
Before proceeding to the WDM approach, the Si-DLSPP A-MZI is tested in static and single-channel conditions regarding its electrical requirements and switching performance. Figure 10(a) shows the static TO transfer functions for the CROSS and BAR output ports of the A-MZI. The input signal is a 1542nm CW light beam with 6dBm optical power and the control medium is a direct current (DC) that drives the upper MZI arm and takes values up to 40mA. As it is obvious from this figure, the extinction ratio (ER) values for the CROSS and BAR ports are 14dB and 0.9dB when the DC reaches its maximum value. This unbalanced behavior between the two output ports stems from the 95:5, instead of 50:50, Si input/output couplers of the MZI as the result of unfortunate design error. Moreover, by comparing the obtained TO transfer functions with the theoretical transfer functions of a symmetric MZI, the default biasing point of the A-MZI is estimated at ~70o. Following the same procedure, the phase induced by the 40mA DC is ~-90o that corresponds to an increase in temperature by ~60K. These phase conditions in both MZI arms imply a total phase difference of ~160o between the two signal components that travel through the two branches. In terms of power requirements, the hybrid A-MZI consumes ~13.1mW when it is driven by 40mA DC, considering that the resistance of the 60
After the initial static and single-channel switching characterization, the Si-DLSPP A-MZI is evaluated in terms of switching under dynamic and WDM data conditions. This evaluation is realized by using the experimental setup of Figure 10(b). Four CW optical signals emitted by DFB sources at 1545.1nm, 1546.7nm, 1547.7nm and 1549.1nm wavelengths are combined in pairs by 3-dB couplers in a way that channels 1 and 3 constitute the first pair and channels 2 and 4 form the other one. Subsequently, each channel pair is modulated by a 231-1 PRBS at 10Gb/s NRZ line rate in a corresponding Ti:LiNbO3 MZM. The final 4×10Gb/s WDM signal is formed by using a 3-dB coupler to multiplex the two pairs of data sequences and is amplified by a high-power EDFA that provides 31dBm power at the input of the electrically controlled hybrid A-MZI. A polarization controller is used again towards establishing the required TM polarization conditions of the incoming WDM signal. Exploiting the TO effect, the switching state of the A-MZI is controlled dynamically by a pulse generator operating at 20KHz. After its transmission through the A-MZI, the multi-wavelength data signal is amplified by a two stage EDFA that comprises a 5nm midstage OBPF for out-of-band amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise rejection. The amplified WDM stream is then demultiplexed into its constituent channels by a 0.8nm OBPF. Each optical data channel is launched into a photoreceiver with 10GHz 3-dB bandwidth for OE conversion. Subsequently, the electrical signal exiting the photoreceiver is then received by a 10Gb/s error-detector for evaluation via BER measurements.
As depicted in Figure 10(c)-(e), the spectrum of the 4-channel data signal is observed at three places along the transmission line, that is just before the MZI’s input, after the MZI’s output and after the pre-amplifier (EDFA2) in the receiver. The high-power signal propagating in the fiber link between EDFA1 and the A-MZI causes the generation of four-wave mixing (FWM) terms, as it is easily noticeable in these figures. Nevertheless, by selecting unequal channel spacing ranging between 125GHz and 200GHz in the source signals, these terms are out-of-band compared to the data channels, giving the opportunity to be removed by subsequent filters. The energy transfer to the FWM components as well as the absence of GFFs after the transmitter’s EDFA form the unequal power profile of the WDM signal at the MZI’s input, as shown in Figure 10(c). Due to the spectral response of the chip’s TM grating couplers, the WDM spectral power profile at the MZI’s output is now different (Figure 10(d)). The same figure also depicts with red dashed line the spectral response of the chip including the A-MZI and the TM grating couplers, revealing a 3dB loss variation within the 1545-1549 nm spectral band. After the receiver’s pre-amplification stage, different power levels and also different OSNR values between the four channels are observed, as a result of the gain profile of EDFA2 (Figure 10(e)).
The dynamic control of the Si-DLSPP A-MZI is achieved by driving its upper arm with electrical rectangular pulses of 15
The performance of the 4×10Gb/s WDM switching via the 60
2.8. Switching performance metrics
A clear view about the switching credentials and advantages of plasmonics over the SOI and the polymer-based TO waveguide technology platforms can be obtained by comparing performance metrics regarding the power consumption, switching time and active phase arm length. Table 1 provides an overview of the respective performance metrics reported for different SOI and polymer-based TO MZI switches. The power consumption × switching time metric is also included in this table, since it has been commonly used for the comparison of TO switching elements in applications where both low energy and fast operation are a prerequisite for high performance . This table verifies the advantages of plasmonic technology: The Si-DLSPP A-MZI switch attains the shorter active region and the smallest power-time product over every type of undoped thermo-optically addressed MZI switch. These findings come as a natural consequence of the strong confinement of the DLSPP mode at the metal-dielectric interface, the inherent instantaneous heating of the underlying metallic layer and the asymmetric configuration of the MZI. On the contrary, in SOI TO structures, where the electrode is located at certain distance from the Si waveguide, it is very difficult to achieve simultaneously ultra-low power consumption and response time values. The required power can be greatly reduced by using sophisticated waveguide engineering (e.g. suspended waveguides), thereby leading to sub-mW switching but at the expense of increased switching times and poor mechanical stability ,. A very good compromise between power consumption and response time is offered by using integrated NiSi waveguide heaters in single driving SOI-based TO switches . Compared to the latter switches, lower power requirements but higher switching times are observed in polymer-based switches ,. It should be mentioned that TO switches that use the waveguide itself as the resistive heater and exploit differential driving schemes  have been excluded from this study to keep the same conditions for comparison.
|Active waveguide technology [reference]||Phase arm length (active region in ||Power consumption (P in mW)||Switching time|
(P×τ in mW·
|PMMA-loaded SPP [Current work]||60||13.1||3.8||49.78|
2.9. Optimization procedures
The performance of the Si-DLSPP A-MZI switch regarding its BAR and CROSS output ports is determined by the splitting ratio of its Si coupling stages. To this end, the incorporation of 50:50 couplers, instead of the considered 95:5, can greatly improve the switching performance, yielding more than 20dB ER for both output ports. Another aspect that can be optimized is the switching time of this hybrid interferometric element. As it is already mentioned, the adoption of differential driving schemes for actively controlling both of the DLSPP MZI branches has the potential for lower time responses, even in the order of sub-
Apart from the hybrid A-MZI switch, optimization acts should be carried out for the TM grating couplers that are responsible for coupling light in and out of the chips. The grating couplers employed in the WDM data transmission and switching experiments exhibit 24dB overall insertion losses at best that are too high for practical datacom applications where the employment of amplifiers is prohibited. Towards tackling this issue, new TM grating couplers are considered for a far better efficiency. These coupling structures, filled with Spin-on-Glass (SOG) of 800nm height, rely on a fully etched approach with 0.8 filling factor, 0.71
2.10. Router performance in terms of optical insertion losses and power consumption
As a NoC solution for Data Centers and HPC systems, the hybrid Router-on-Chip platform should consume low power towards “greener” computing environments and induce low losses towards intrachip point-to-point connection without using on-chip amplifiers.
Within this framework, an estimation of the total power consumption of the entire 4×4 silicon-plasmonic router is provided here based on the characterization and experimental results obtained from the router’s components and subsystems. Considering 60
The optimization procedures of the previous section could lead to significant reductions in the total power consumption of the silicon-plasmonic router. The usage of Cyclomer, instead of PMMA, loadings in the phase arms of the A-MZIs can bring the IC’s power consumption down to ~600mW. Consequently, the total power consumption is limited to ~1W. Keeping the power consumption in the original level of 2W, the same switching performance in the 4×4 DLSPP switching matrix is expected by employing 20
The total insertion losses of the silicon-plasmonic router can be also estimated. The aggregate losses across an input-to-output route are expected to be ~31dB that are analyzed in 6.5dB for the input and output grating couplers, 2dB for the SOI MUX device, 0.5dB for a 90:10 monitor coupler, ~8dB for the silicon waveguides, 10dB for the four Si-to-DLSPP interfaces and 4dB for the two 20
Power consumption and size appear as the main set of barriers in next-generation Data Center and HPC environments. Within this framework, the penetration of optics into shrinked networking environments for chip-scale interconnects is now more vital than ever. SOI technology has already demonstrated its low-cost and high-integration credentials towards supporting fundamental operations required for optical interconnect applications. At the same time, the emerging discipline of plasmonics appears as a promising candidate for further size minimization and power savings. To this end, the idea of merging plasmonics and silicon photonics into the same platform seems to be a great solution for the implementation of faster and “greener” NoC environments. Deriving the strengths of each technology, a high-throughput, energy efficient and compact hybrid “Router-on-chip” is feasible. In this perspective, we present a 4×4 silicon-plasmonic router architecture for chip-scale applications with 1.12Tb/s aggregate bandwidth. The hybrid router relies on a SOI motherboard that incorporates Si waveguides for low-loss interconnection of SOI MUXs, PDs and the remaining subsystems, low-energy plasmonic waveguides in active A-MZI switches and an IC control unit for intelligent decision-making operations. Towards the demonstration of the router’s functionality, we proceed to experimental evidences that turn the promises of plasmonics into real system-level application benefits: The transmission of a 12×40Gb/s WDM stream through a Si-DLSPP waveguide and the switching of a 4×10Gb/s WDM signal via a Si-DLSPP A-MZI. With the lowest reported power consumption × time response product among undoped SOI and polymer-based TO MZI switches, plasmonic technology becomes suitable for on-chip optical interconnects. According to experimental results, the hybrid router is estimated to consume ~2W with only ~400mW corresponding to the optical parts, yielding a power efficiency of 1.8mW/Gb/s. Moreover, the router is expected to induce about 31dB optical losses. With these power and optical loss characteristics, the Si-DLSPP routing platform seems to be appropriate for NoC environments where fast path establishment and route reconfiguration is necessary for efficient traffic management in Data Centers and HPCs.
Device Requirements for Optical Interconnects to Silicon Chips. Proceedings of the IEEE Miller D. A. B. 2009 97 7 1166 1185
Proceedings of OFC/NFOEC Qian D. et al. 101.7‐ Tb/s. (370×294‐ Gb/s. P. D. M‐1 M‐ Q. A. Transmission O. F. D. M. over 3×55‐km. S. S. M. F. using Pilot‐based. Phase Noise. Mitigation 2011Paper PDPB 5 6 10March 2011, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
High Channel-Count Optical Interconnection for Servers. Proceedings of ECTC 2010; Taira Y. et al. 5490959 1 4June 2010Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Optical Interconnects in Exascale Supercomputers. Proceedings of IEEE Photonics Society 2010, 483-484, 7-11 November Kash J. A. et al. 2010Denver, CO, USA.
- 5. http://www.igigroup.net/download/FFS09/0930_Benner_IBM.pdf.
- 6. http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2011/06/20/new-top-500-champ-the-k-supercomputer/.
Optical Interconnects for High-Performance Computing. IEEE/OSA Journal of Lightwave Technology Taubenblatt M. A. 2012 30 4 448 458
Paniccia M. Integrating Silicon. Photonics Nature. Photonics 2010 4 8 498 499
Surface plasmon subwavelength optics. Nature Barnes W. L. Dereux A. Ebbesen T. W. 2003 424 6950 824 830
The promise of plasmonics. Scientific American Atwater H. A. 2007 296 4 38 45
The case for plasmonics. Science Brongersma M. L. Shalaev V. M. 2010 328 5977 440 441
Materials Today Zia R. Schuller J. A. Chandran A. Brongersma M. L. Plasmonics the. next chip-scale. technology 2006
IEEE/OSA Journal of Lightwave Technology Papaioannou S. et al. A. 3. Gb/s-throughput capable. 2× silicon-plasmonic. router architecture. for optical. interconnects I. E. E. E. O. S. 2011 29 21 3185 3195
Chip-to-chip optical interconnect using gold long-range surface plasmon polariton waveguides. Optics Express Kim J. T. et al. 2008 16 17 13133 13138
Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Surfaces and on Gratings. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; Raether H. 1988
Plasmonics beyond the diffraction limit. Nature Photonics Gramotnev D. K. Bozhevolnyi S. I. 2010 4 2 83 91
Surface plasmon routing in dielectric-loaded surface plasmon polariton waveguides. Proceedings of SPIE 2008, 7033, 70330S-70330S- Grandidier J. et al. 8 10 14August 2008San Diego, CA, USA.
Applied Physics Letters Krasavin A. V. Zheludev N. I. Active plasmonics. Controlling signals. in Au. Ga waveguide. using nanoscale. structural transformations. 2004 84 8 1416 1418
Surface plasmon polariton based modulators and switches operating at telecom wavelengths. Applied Physics Letters Nikolajsen T. Leosson K. Bozhevolnyi S. I. 2004 85 24 5833 5835
Optical modulation processes in thin films based on thermal effects of surface plasmons. Applied Physics Letters Lereu A. L. Passian A. Goudonnet J. P. Thundat T. Ferrell T. L. 2005
All-optical modulation by plasmonic excitation of CdSe quantum dots. Nature Photonics Pacifici D. Lezec H. J. Atwater H. A. 2007 1 7 402 406
Nano Letters Pala R. A. Shimizu K. T. Melosh N. A. Brongersma M. L. A. nonvolatile plasmonic. switch employing. photochromic molecules. 2008 8 5 1506 1510
Mac Donald. K. F. Sámson Z. L. Stockman M. I. Zheludev N. I. Ultrafast active. plasmonics Nature. Photonics 2009 3 1 55 58
Electro-optic switching element for dielectric-loaded surface plasmon polariton waveguides. Applied Physics Letters Krasavin A. V. Zayats A. V. 2010
First demonstration of active plasmonic device in true data traffic conditions: ON/OFF thermo-optic modulation using a hybrid silicon-plasmonic asymmetric MZI. Proceedings of OFC/NFOEC 2012, OW3E. Kalavrouziotis D. et al. 3 4 8March 2012Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Waveguiding in Surface Plasmon Polariton Band Gap Structures. Physical Review Letters Bozhevolnyi S. I. Erland J. Leosson K. Skovgaard P. M. W. Hvam J. M. 2001 86 14 3008 3011
Nanoparticle-mediated coupling of light into a nanowire. Nano Letters Knight M. W. Grady N. K. Bardhan R. Hao F. Nordlander P. Halas N. J. 2007 7 8 2346 2350
Channel plasmon-polariton guiding by subwavelength metal grooves. Physical Review Letters Bozhevolnyi S. I. Volkov V. S. Devaux E. Ebbesen T. W. 2005
Theoretical analysis of dielectric-loaded surface plasmon-polariton waveguides. Physical Review B Holmgaard T. Bozhevolnyi S. I. 2007
Efficient coupling between dielectric loaded plasmonic and silicon photonic waveguides. Nano Letters Briggs R. M. Grandidier J. Burgos S. P. Feigenbaum E. Atwater H. A. 2010 10 12 4851 4857
Data transmission and thermo-optic tuning performance of dielectric-loaded plasmonic structures hetero-integrated on a silicon chip. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters Giannoulis G. et al. 2012 24 5 374 376
Thermo-optic control of dielectric-loaded plasmonic waveguide components. Optics Express Gosciniak J. et al. 2010 18 2 1207 1216
Thermo-optical control of dielectric loaded plasmonic racetrack resonators. Journal of Applied Physics Hassan K. Weeber J. C. Markey L. Dereux A. 2011
Thermo-optic plasmo-photonic mode interference switches based on dielectric loaded waveguides. Applied Physics Letters Hassan K. et al. 2011
Characterization of thermo-optical 2×2 switch configurations made of dielectric loaded surface plasmon polariton waveguides for telecom routing architecture. Proceedings of OFC/NFOEC 2012, OW3E. Hassan K. et al. 5 4 8March 2012Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Performance of electro-optical plasmonic ring resonators at telecom wavelengths. Optics Express Randhawa S. et al. 2012 20 3 2354 2362
Interfacing Dielectric-Loaded Plasmonic and Silicon Photonic Waveguides: Theoretical Analysis and Experimental Demonstration. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics Tsilipakos O. et al. 2012 48 5 678 687
Optics Express Kalavrouziotis D. et al. 0. Tb/s (12×. Gb/s W. D. M. transmission high-quality thermo-optic. switching in. dielectric loaded. plasmonics 2012 20 7 7655 7662
Optics Express Vivien L. Osmond J. Fédéli J. Marris-Morini D. Crozat P. Damlencourt J. Cassan E. Lecunff Y. Laval S. . Hz G. p.i.n Germanium. photodetector integrated. in a. silicon-on-insulator waveguide. 2009 17 8 6252 6257
Optics Express Sheng Z. Liu L. Brouckaert J. He S. Van Thourhout D. In Ga. As photodetectors P. I. N. integrated on. silicon-on-insulator waveguides. 2010 18 2 1756 1761
Ultrafast photodetection in an all-silicon chip enabled by two-photon absorption. Applied Physics Letters Bravo-Abad J. Ippen E. P. Soljačić M. 2009
Silicon waveguide infrared photodiodes with >35 GHz bandwidth and phototransistors with 50 AW-1 response. Optics Express Geis M. W. et al. 2009 17 7 5193 5204
Silicon-on-Insulator Spectral Filters Fabricated With CMOS Technology. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics Bogaerts W. et al. Silicon-on 2010 16 1 33 44
Compact four-channel reconfigurable optical add-drop multiplexer using silicon photonic wire. Optics Communications Geng M. et al. 2009 282 17 3477 3480
Reconfigurable silicon photonic circuits for telecommunication applications. Proceedings of SPIE Barwicz T. et al. 2008Z- 1 12
Reconfigurable optical add-drop multiplexer using microring resonators. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters Klein E. J. et al. 2005 17 11 2358 2360
Low power and compact reconfigurable multiplexing devices based on silicon microring resonators. Optics Express Dong P. et al. 2010 18 10 9852 9858
Multiple-channel silicon micro-resonator based filters for WDM applications. Optics Express Xiao S. Khan M. H. Shen H. Qi M. 2007 15 12 7489 7498
Reconfigurable multi-channel second-order silicon microring- resonator filterbanks for on-chip WDM systems. Optics Express Dahlem M. S. et al. 2011 19 1 306 316
Wavelength Division Multiplexing Based Photonic Integrated Circuits on Silicon-on-Insulator Platform. Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics Liu A. et al. 2010 16 1 23 32
Generalized analysis of multiple ring resonator filters: Modeling by using graphical approach. Optik-Int Journal for Light and Electron Optics Saeung P. Yupapin P. P. 2008 119 10 465 472
IEEE/OSA Journal of Lightwave Technology Pitilakis A. Kriezis E. E. Longitudinal 2×. switching configurations. based on. thermo-optically addressed. dielectric-loaded plasmonic. waveguides I. E. E. E. O. S. 2011 29 17 2636 2646
Three-dimensional numerical modeling of photonic integration with dielectric-loaded SPP waveguides. Physical Review B Krasavin A. V. Zayats A. V. 2008
Computational techniques for the analysis and design of dielectric-loaded plasmonic circuitry. Optical and Quantum Electronics Tsilipakos O. Pitilakis A. Tasolamprou A. C. Yioultsis T. V. Kriezis E. E. 2011 42 8 541 555
Journal of Lightwave Technology Al-Hetar A. M. Mohammad A. B. Supa’at A. S. M. Shamsan-M Z. A. M. M. I. polymer Z. I. thermo-optic switch. with a. high refractive. index contrast. 2011 29 2 171 178
Ultralow power silicon photonics thermo-optic switch with suspended phase arms. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters Fang Q. et al. 2011 23 8 525 527
Submilliwatt thermo-optic switches using free-standing silicon-on-insulator strip waveguides. Optics Express Sun P. Reano R. M. 2010 18 8 8406 8411
Integrated NiSi waveguide heaters for CMOS-compatible silicon thermo-optic devices. Optics Letters Van Campenhout J. Green W. M. Assefa S. Vlasov Y. A. 2010 35 7 1013 1015
IEEE Photonics Technology Letters Xie N. Hashimoto T. Utaka K. Very low-power. polarization-independent high-speed polymer. thermooptic switch. I. E. E. 2009 21 24 1861 1863
Submicrosecond Submilliwatt Silicon-on-Insulator Thermooptic Switch. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters Geis M. W. Spector S. J. Williamson R. C. Lyszczarz T. M. 2004 16 11 2514 2516
Fast and low-power thermooptic switch on thin silicon-on-insulator. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters Espinola R. L. Tsai M. C. Yardley J. T. Osgood R. M. 2003 15 10 1366 1368
Compact and low power thermo-optic switch using folded silicon waveguides. Optics Express Densmore A. et al. 2009 17 13 10457 10465
Thermally tunable silicon racetrack resonators with ultralow tuning power. Optics Express Dong P. et al. 2010 18 19 20298 20304
Hybrid Optoelectronic Router for Future Energy-efficient, Large-capacity, and Flexible OPS Networks. Proceedings of IEEE Photonics Society Summer Topical Meeting Series Takahashi R. et al. 2011July 2011, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Hofmann W. et al. . Gb/s V. C. S. E. L. for optical. interconnects Proceedings. of O. F. C. N. F. O. E. C. 2011Paper PDPB 5 6 10March 2011, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
CMOS-Compatible All-Si High-Speed Waveguide Photodiodes With High Responsivity in Near-Infrared Communication Band. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters Geis M. W. et al. C. M. O. S. 2007 19 3 152 154