Open access

Conjugated Linoleic Acid: A Milk Fatty Acid with Unique Health Benefit Properties

Written By

Kathirvelan Chinnadurai and Amrish Tyagi

Submitted: 04 April 2011 Published: 12 September 2011

DOI: 10.5772/19946

From the Edited Volume

Soybean and Health

Edited by Hany El-Shemy

Chapter metrics overview

4,553 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Human diet comprises of milk and milk products in both developed and developing parts of globe. Milk fat is the major energy source in Indian diet but due to the fear of hypercholesterolemia, saturated fats have lead to avoidance of dietary fats especially of animal origin. However, milk contains a number of components with beneficial properties, one such compound associated with the fat phase is Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA) which has potential health benefits towards human beings.

Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA) refers to a mixture of positional and geometric isomers of linoleic acid (cis-9, cis-12, C18:2) with two conjugated double bonds at various carbon positions in the fatty acid chain. It is formed as an intermediate during the biohydrogenation of linoleic acid by linoleic acid isomerase from the rumen bacteria Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens (Kritchevsky, 2000) or from the endogenous conversion of trans-11, C18:1 (Transvaccenic Acid) another intermediate of linoleic or linolenic acid biohydrogenation by ∆9-desaturase in the mammary gland (Corl et al., 2001).

Milk fat is the richest natural dietary source of CLA. Milk contains an average 4.5mg CLA/g of fat (Kelly et al., 1998). Recent studies have shown that the CLA content of milk fat can be markedly enhanced by dietary manipulation especially those involving dietary addition of plant oils which are high in unsaturated fatty acids (Griinari and Bauman, 1999). Dietary increase of linoleic acid (C18:2) and linolenic acid (C18:3) is one of the feeding strategies for increasing the CLA concentration in milk which is the main precursor of CLA. The main sources of linoleic acid for feeding animals are cereals, oil seeds, oils etc (Kelly et al., 1998)

There is an increasing research interest towards the CLA and its potential health benefits such as anticarcinogenic, antiatherogenic, antidiabetic and immunomodulatory effects (Belury, 2002; Tyagi and kathirvelan, 2007). The potential anti-cancer effect of CLA is well documented, with the majority of experimental work conducted in vitro or in animal models (Ip et al., 1994). It has been demonstrated that CLA has the ability to affect mammary cancer, stomach cancer, skin cancer and prostate cancer. Most of the anticarcinogens are of plant origin but CLA is unique, it is present in food from animal sources and its anti-cancer efficacy is expressed at concentrations close to human consumption level. The unique structural and functional properties of CLA appear to modulate cellular process involved in carcinogenesis.

1.1. Chemical structure of CLA

CLA is a term given to a group of positional and geometric isomers of linoleic acid (cis-9, cis-12, C18:2 LA) in which double bonds are conjugated, instead of being in the typical methylene interrupted configuration. Each double bond can be cis or trans configuration giving rise to possible CLA isomers (Kelly et al., 1998). Although conjugation of double bonds occurs as part of free radical mediated oxidation of linoleic acid. CLA is a true isomer of LA, in that it does not possess additional oxygen (Vandenberg et al., 1995).

1.2. Isomers of CLA

CLA therefore, includes 28 positional and geometrical isomers of which only cis-9, trans-11 and trans-10, cis-12 have thus far been proven to have biological activities (Park et al., 2003). Of the two physically important isomers cis -9, trans -11 (rumenic acid) is the most prevalent comprising 80-90% of the total CLA in food products from ruminants where as trans-10, cis-12 is present in small amounts at 3-5% of total CLA (Parodi, 2003). Analysis of cheese using silver ion- high performance chromatography and G-C electron ionization mass spectrometry showed that isomers of CLA present (in fat percent) total CLA were cis-9, trans-11 (78-84%); trans-7, cis- 9 plus trans -8, cis -10 (8-13%); trans-11,cis-13 (1-2%); cis-12,trans-14 (<1%) and the total trans/trans isomers (5-9%) (Parodi, 2003)

1.3. Sources of CLA

CLA occurs in many foods, however, the principal dietary sources are dairy products and other foods derived from ruminants. The CLA content of some common foods is shown in (Table 1).

Foodstuff Total CLA
(mg/g of fat)
Foodstuff Total CLA
(mg/g of fat)
Dairy products Meats
Homogenized milk 4.5 Ground beef 4.3
Condensed milk 7.0 Lamb 5.6
Butter milk 6.1 Pork 0.6
Mozzarella cheese 4.9 Chicken 0.9
Plain yogurt 4.8 Salmon 0.3
Ice-cream 3.6 Ground turkey 2.5

Table 1.

CLA content of common foods (Chin et al., 1992)


2. Biosynthesis of CLA

CLA found in milk and meat of ruminants originates from two sources (Griinari and Bauman, 1999). CLA is formed during ruminal biohydrogenation of linoleic acid and the second source is CLA synthesized by animal tissues from trans-11 C18:1, another intermediate in the biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acid. Hence, the uniqueness of CLA in ruminant edible products relates to incomplete biohydrogenation of dietary unsaturated fatty acids in the rumen.

2.1. CLA synthesis in the rumen

Dietary lipids undergo two important transformations in the rumen (Devillard et al., 2004). First, lipolysis - hydrolysis of ester linkages catalyzed by microbial lipase and second, biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acid.

The first reaction in linoleic acid (cis-9, cis-12) biohydrogenation is isomerization of the cis-12 double bond. Linoleate isomerase is the enzyme responsible for forming conjugated double bonds from the cis-9, cis-12 double bond structure of linoleic as well as α and γ linolenic acids. The enzyme is bound to the bacterial cell membrane and demonstrates an absolute substrate requirement for a cis-9, cis-12 diene system and a free carboxyl group. The second reaction is a reduction in which cis-9, trans-11 CLA is converted to trans-11 C18:1(trans-vaccenic acid). Isomerization of the cis-12 double bond was followed by rapid conversion of cis-9, trans-11 CLA to trans-11 octadecenoic acid. Hydrogenation of the trans-11 monoene occurred less rapidly, and it increased in concentration (Qiu, 2004). Therefore, trans-11 C18:1 reduction seems to be rate-limiting in the biohydrogenation sequence of unsaturated C18 fatty acids. As a consequence, this penultimate biohydrogenation intermediate accumulates in the rumen and is, therefore, more available for absorption.

Similar to biohydrogenation of linoleic acid, biohydrogenation of linolenic acid begins with an isomerization followed by a sequence of reductions and terminates with the formation of stearic acid. Rumen biohydrogenation of α-linolenic acid produces cis-9, trans-11, cis-15 conjugated octadecatrienoic acid as the predominant initial isomerization product, and this is followed by reduction of the cis-double bonds. As a consequence, trans-11 octadecenoic acid is a common intermediate in the biohydrogenation of both α-linolenic acid and linoleic acid (Fig.1)


2.2 Endogenous synthesis

Griinari and Bauman (1999) proposed that a major proportion of CLA in tissue and milk lipids synthesized endogenously from trans vaccenic acid (TVA) by Δ9 – desaturase, in mammary gland (Fig.1). Griinari et al (2000) examined the potential for endogenous synthesis of CLA by infusing TVA abomasally and measuring the changes in milk fat CLA. By day three it resulted in a 31% increase in milk fat CLA indicating that an active pathway for endogenous synthesis existed in the mammary gland.

Griinari et al. (2000) reported that the contribution of endogenous synthesis to the over all CLA content in milk fat was 84%, making it the primary source. Lock and Garnsworthy (2002) estimated the endogenous synthesis of CLA to be more than 80% of total collected duodenal samples and estimated the rumen synthesis of CLA to be 4-7%. Endogenous cis-9, trans-11 CLA would originate from desaturation of trans-11 C18:1 by delta-9 desaturase (Fig. 1). The enzymatic reaction introduces a cis double bond between carbons 9 and 10 of fatty acids.

Figure 1.

CLA Biosynthesis in Ruminants


3. Role of rumen bacteria in CLA synthesis

Ruminants rely on microbial digestion of forages and supplementary feed materials in the rumen to provide nutrients that would otherwise be unavailable to the host animal. Ruminant diets typically contain polyunsaturated fatty acids, which are toxic to many rumen microorganisms (Harfoot and Hazlewood, 1997). However, to protect themselves against these toxic effects, rumen microorganisms have mechanisms to hydrolyse and biohydrogenate dietary lipids (Kemp and Lander, 1984).

Rumen bacteria play a major role in biohydrogenation. They convert C18 unsaturated fatty acids to stearic acid, via a number of intermediates. Biohydrogenation intermediates have received a lot of attention recently because of their potential effects on human health. CLA and trans vaccenic acid are one of the intermediates of fatty acid biohydrogenation in the rumen.

3.1. Biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acid by rumen bacteria

Rumen fluid contains bacteria, fungi and protozoa. Small amount of contribution is made by fungi and protozoa in biohydrogenation. Among which the major source of biohydrogenation is bacteria when compared to fungi and protozoa (Nam and Garnsworthy, 2007). Bacteria involved in biohydrogenation process can be divided into two groups i.e., A and B

Group A bacteria: They hydrogenate linoleic and linolenic acid to trans-11 octadecadienoic acid, and are not able to or incapable of hydrogenating octadecadienoic acid. Examples are Butyrovibrio, Micrococcus, Ruminococcus and Lactobacillus.

Group B bacteria: They are capable of hydrogenating a wide range of octadecadienoic acids, including cis-9 (oleic) and trans-11 (transvaccenic) acids as well as linoleic acid to stearic acid. Examples are Fusocillus Sp and gram negative rods.

More than 250 bacterial strains from 14 genera were examined and strains belonging to the genera Enterococcus, Micrococcus, Propionobacterium and Lactobacillus were found to produce considerable amounts of CLA from linoleic acid.

Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens

CLA formation in rumen has mainly been associated with bacterial activity. The ruminal bacterium Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens has been used as a model for cis-9, trans-11 CLA production (Grinarii et al., 2000). Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens a gram negative curved rod, strict anaerobic bacteria of moderate butyric acid producers with potent linoleic acid isomerase activity by using roll tube technique with ATCC media from rumen of cross bred cattle (Fig 2; Fig 3),has been isolated in our lab and research work is under publication.

Figure 2.

Translucent colony of Butyrivibrio Sp in roll tube.

Figure 3.

Gram – ve, curved/straight rods of Butyrivibrio Sp.

3.2. Bacteria other than rumen origin involved in CLA synthesis

In addition to rumen microflora, microbial CLA production has also been reported in Propionibacteria freudenreichii used as dairy starter cultures (Jiang et al., 1998). Ogawa et al., (2005) reported the production of CLA from free linoleic acid by Lactobacillus acidophilus. Kishino et al., (2002) found that Lactobacillus plantarum formed high levels of CLA from free linoleic acid upon extended incubation. Bifidobacteria also produce CLA, mainly the cis-9, trans-11 isomer (Coakley et al., 2003).


4. Factors affecting CLA content in milk

A cow’s diet, breed, age, non-nutritive feed additives, such as ionophores (Table 2) can affect the CLA content in milk fat. Among these factors, the diet is known to strongly influence the CLA content of milk and includes feedstuffs such as pasture, conserved forages, plant seed oils, cereal grains, marine oils and feeds and animal fat.

4.1. Lipolysis and biohydrogenation in rumen

Any change in the process of lipolysis or biohydrogenation will influence the supply of their intermediate and end products, including CLA, to the small intestine and ultimately their contents in the milk and meat. Replacement of forages with grain in the diet reduced the rates of lipolysis and biohydrogenation (Gerson et al., 1985). Increased proportion of nitrogen in the diet resulted in increased rates of lipolysis and biohydrogenation by rumen contents in vitro (Gerson et al., 1983). Lipolysis and hydrogenation reactions were more rapid with feed particles ranging from 1-2 mm size than from 0.1 to 0.4 mm size and this was due, at least in part, to microbial population density (Gerson et al., 1988). Biohydrogenation of fatty acids averaged 47% in the rumen of cows fed diets containing calcium salts of palm oil and 71% with diets containing fat from animal or vegetable sources (Wu and Palmquist, 1991). Factors affecting ruminal fermentation and microbial population are undoubtedly the keys to control the regulation of biohydrogenation and CLA synthesis.

4.2. Diet, feed to the animal

CLA are highly correlated with either linoleic or alpha linolenic acid intake. It is well known that linoleic and linolenic acid are both indirect precursors of the CLA isomer cis-9, trans-11 (Aii et al., 1999) but the highest concentration of this CLA isomer is generally obtained with linolenic acid rich diets (Dhiman et al., 2000). Dhiman et al., (1999) reported that cows grazing pasture had 500% higher CLA content in milk fat compared to cows fed a diet containing 50% conserved forage (hay and silages) and 50% grain. Tyagi et al (2007) reported that three fold (187 %) increase in total CLA content in milk of cow and buffaloes by feeding berseem fodder than the concenrtae feeding. About 48 to 56% of the total fatty acids in fresh forages consist of C18:3 (Bauchart et al., 1984) and form substrate for ruminal biohydrogenation.

Dietary Factor Effect on CLA Content of Milk Fat
Lipid Substrate
Unsaturated vs saturated fat Increased by addition of unsaturated fat
Type of plant oil Greatest with oils high in C18:2
Level of plant oil Dose dependent increase
Calcium salts of plant oils Increased as with free oils
High oil plant feeds
High oil corn Minimal effect
Soybeans Heat processing will increase
Rapeseed vs soybean Similar effect
Modifiers of Biohydrogenation
Forage: concentrate ratio Increased with high ratio
Fish oils Greater increase than with plant oils
Monensin - ionophore Variable effect
Dietary buffers Little effect
Pasture vs conserved forages Higher on pasture

Table 2.

Source: Bauman et al., (2001)Different substrate (dietary factors) that affect CLA content in milk fat

4.3. Rumen pH

Rumen pH has an important role in maintaining a viable rumen environment suitable for Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens involved in the biohydrogenation of linoleic and linolenic acid. Ruminal pH of 6.0 or above has a positive effect on TVA and CLA content in rumen cultures (Troegeler-Meynadir et al., 2003). Qiu et al. (2004) observed that reduced ruminal pH reduces total and cellulolytic bacterial number and thus reduce biohydrogenation which in turn increase CLA. Martin and Jenkins (2002) from their continuous culture data suggest that culture pH seems to have most influence on the production of trans-C18:1 and CLA isomers by mixed rumen bacteria. When mixed ruminal bacteria were maintained in continuous culture on mixed soluble carbohydrate at a dilution rate of 0.05/hr, concentration of trans-C18:1 were significantly reduced at a culture pH of 5.5. Because trans-C18:1 monoenes serve as a precursor of CLA, to maximize CLA synthesis in rumen diet need to be formulated to maintain ruminal pH above 6.0.


5. Feeding strategies to enhance the CLA content in milk

Milk fat is the richest natural dietary source of CLA. Milk contains an average 4.5 mg CLA/g of fat (range 3-6 mg/g). The level of CLA in milk reflects the quantity, which is available for intestinal absorption (Loor and Herbein 1997). Therefore, there is a need to manipulate the feed in such a way to have higher CLA output in the reticulo-rumen for its increased absorption from the intestinal tract and eventually its secretion in the milk.

Dietary factors that affect CLA content have been grouped into four categories related to the potential mechanisms through which they act (Bauman et al., 2001).

  1. The first category includes dietary factors that provide PUFA substrates for rumen production of CLA and trans-11 18:1. This typically corresponds to increasing the dietary supply of plant and/or fish oils.

  2. The second group consists of dietary factors that affect rumen bacteria involved in biohydrogenation, either directly or via changes in rumen environment. For example, modifying the forage: concentrate ratio of the diet, inclusion of ionophores and fish oil typically alters the biohydrogenation of PUFA.

  3. The third category includes dietary factors that involve a combination of lipid substrates and modification of rumen biohydrogenation. For example, several investigations have demonstrated that feeding fresh grass to dairy cows doubles the CLA content of milk fat (Lock and Garnsworthy, 2002) and this cannot be fully explained in terms of PUFA supply to the rumen. Other factors or components of grass must promote the production of CLA in the dairy cows.

  4. The fourth category is dietary supplements of CLA or trans-11 18:1 fatty acids. These must be protected from rumen biohydrogenation, typically with calcium soaps or formaldehyde.

5.1. Vegetable oil – An effective feeding strategy

Manipulation of animal diet primarily involves supplying linoleic acid or linolenic acid as substrates for rumen biohydrogenation. The vegetable/plant oil rich in these fatty acids seems to be an effective strategy for milk CLA manipulation in ruminants.

Feeding plant seed oils, such as sunflower, soybean, peanut, canola, and linseed also increases CLA content in milk (Dhiman et al., 1999). There are a number of other research reports suggesting that feeding processed soybeans, canola, or flax seeds to dairy cows was more effective in increasing milk CLA content than feeding unprocessed seeds (Stanton et al., 1997; Chilliard et al., 2003).

Kathirvelan (2007) reported that buffaloes fed with three different concentrate mixtures (Table 3) with different fatty acid composition (Fig 4) had different level of CLA (Table 4& Fig 5) and concluded that milk CLA increased 185 percent in buffaloes fed on mustard oil (2%) plus mustard cake containing rations (19.50 mg/g fat) as compared to GNC fed buffaloes (6.84mg/g fat). Tyagi et al. (2006), reported higher level of total CLA (7.12 mg/ g fat) on feeding 30 percent mustard oil cake in concentrate mixture to lactating buffaloes than those fed on GNC based concentrate mixture (6.74 mg/g fat). In another experiment, the same author reported (Table 5) that feeding berseem fodder to goats resulted in high milk CLA content (13.3 mg/g fat) than concentrate plus berseem fed goats (8.5 mg/g fat).

Ingredients concentrate mixture
concentrate mixture
(Mustard cake)
concentrate mixture
(Mustard cake+2% mustard oil)
Groundnut cake (Expeller) 27 - -
Mustard cake (Expeller) - 39 39
Mustard oil - - 02
Maize 50 41 41
Wheat bran 20 17 17
Mineral mixture 02 02 02
Salt 01 01 01

Table 3.

Ingredients in concentrate mixture (parts)

Figure 4.

The levels of C18:1, C18:2 and C18:3 in three different concentrate mixtures

Fatty acid concentrate mixture
concentrate mixture
(Mustard cake)
concentrate mixture
(Mustard cake+2% mustard oil)
C4:0 30.99 ± 0.50 30.95 ± 0.32 30.72 ± 0.26
C6:0 15.63 ± 0.45 16.72 ± 0.45 14.84 ± 0.28
C8:0 8.27± 0.08 9.88 ± 0.64 9.21 ± 0.34
C10:0 16.17± 0.37 18.01± 0.74 17.38 ± 0.52
C12:0 23.13± 0.59 24.21 ± 0.35 22.75 ± 0.50
C14:0 105.20± 0.47 106.82 ± 0.84 105.23 ± 0.41
C14:1 5.36± 0.10 4.87 ± 0.24 5.63 ± 0.32
C16:0 265.12 ± 0.79 265.98± 1.55 271.42 ± 1.75
C16:1 13.40 ± 0.36 13.44 ± 0.34 14.77 ± 0.71
C18:0 144.43a ± 2.19 139.33b ± 0.82 133.06c ± 1.06
C18:1 9-t 1.73 ± 0.17 1.96 ± 6.03 1.94 ± 0.12
C18:1 9-c 238.41 ± 1.68 238.27 ± 0.89 239.98 ± 1.16
C18:1 11-c (VA) 9.55 a± 0.45 13.01b ± 0.06 16.98 c ± 0.04
C18:2 9-c,12-c 11.80± 0.25 11.38 ± 0.28 12.17 ± 0.34
C20:0 11.94 ± 0.43 9.27 ± 0.59 10.1 2 ± 0.20
C18:3 6-9-12-c 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.08 ± 0.04
C18:3 9-12-15-c 3.23 ± 0.16 9.37 ± 0.17 9.09 ± 0.03
Total C18:3 3.23± 0.16 9.37 ± 0.17 9.17 ± 0.01
C18:2 9-c,11-t 6.17a± 0.25 10.51b± 0.23 16.94c± 0.30
C18:2 10-t,12-c 0.67 a ± 0.08 1.61b ± 0.16 2.56 c± 0.05
Total CLA 6.84a ± 0.33 12.12b ± 0.04 19.50c ± 0.32
Total Omega 3 FA 4.12 a ± 0.16 10.36b± 0.25 10.50b± 0.06
Total Omega 6 FA 13.02 ± 0.34 12.64± 0.38 12.47± 0.36
Omega 6 : Omega3 3.18 a ± 0.15 1.22b± 0.02 1.19b ± 0.03

Table 4.

Values are Mean ± SE for n=5 Values with different superscript across a row differ significantly (P<0.05)Fatty acid composition (mg/g fat) in milk

Figure 5.

Total CLA in milk (mg/g of fat) at fort night intervals (Zero day or first sampling after 30 days of adaptation period

Attribute Treatment
Group I Group II
Fat (%) 3.7 ± 0.15 3.8± 0.08
SNF (%) 6.6± 0.19 7.0 ± 0.16
Total solids (%) 10.3 ± 0.43 10.8 ± 0.26
CP (%) 3.5 ± 0.12 3.5 ± 0.19
Fatty acids ( mg per g)
C4-14 203.0a ±7.21 227.8 b ±5.23
C15:0 18.7±0.65 21.4±0.53
C16:0 253.54a ±7.21 255.4 b ±6.14
C18:0 134.0 a ±4.25 148.9 b ±4.28
C18:1 11-trans
50.8 a ±1.52 35.4 b ±0.85
C18:1 9-c 200.1 a ±5.24 231.2 b ±4.56
C18:2 9-c, 11-t 18.5 a ±1.12 10.5 b ±0.98
C18:2 10-t, 12-c
Total CLA 18.9 a ±1.30 10.94 b ±1.15
C18:3 13.3 a ±0.80 8.5 b ±1.30

Table 5.

Values with different superscripts across a row differ significantly (P<0.01)Milk composition of goats fed with berseem and berseem plus concentrate

Besides, the feeding of fish oil has been shown to enhance the CLA contents of milk fat. In some studies, fish oil/ fish meal was more effective at enhancing the CLA content of milk than adding similar amounts of soybean oil or combinations of fish oil and soybean oil through extruded soybeans or soybean meal (Ramaswamy et al., 2001) since fish or marine oils are usually rich in long chain PUFA. The inclusion of marine feeds, such as fish meal or sea algae, into dairy cow diets has also been shown to enhance the CLA content of milk (Abu-Ghazaleh et al., 2002)

5.2. Fatty acid composition of different vegetable oils

Dietary effect on CLA content is related probably more to the fatty acid composition of the diet/ feed used than any other factor. Poly unsaturated fatty acid composition of different oils ( Table 6) and fatty composition of feeds and fodders used at NDRI cattle yard are reported in Table 7 (Kathirvelan, 2007)

Plant oil Oleic acid (%) Linoleic acid (%) Linolenic acid (%)
Sunflower oil 22.8 67.0 0.45
Soybean oil 19.5 53.2 9.1
Corn oil 27.3 57.5 1.0
Cotton seed oil 16.5 57.4 0.33
Mustard oil 24.12 41.16 9.54
Ground nut oil 46.77 35.67 0.58
Linseed oil 17.7 15.4 57.2

Table 6.

Oleic, Linoleic and Linolenic fatty acids concentration in different vegetable oils

Fatty acid Maize
Groundnut cake Mustard
C14:0 1.82 1.26 0.89 0.42 0.53 0.45
C16:0 11.24 10.91 20.12 15.14 14.72 8.33
C16:1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.24
C18:0 5.41 0.00 4.26 3.25 7.28 1.45
C18:1 6.62 7.15 16.35 28.42 46.77 24.12
C18:2 12.69 10.15 48.90 47.07 25.67 41.16
C18:3 45.26 0.00 4.06 1.02 0.96 9.54
C20:0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36
C22:1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.82

Table 7.

Fatty acids composition of feeds and fodders (% of total fatty acids)


6. Effect of milk process on CLA content in dairy products

Processing of milk into a number of dairy products under normal conditions has no influence on the CLA contents (Shantha et al., 1995). Use of different starter culture, processing conditions and aging periods had negligible effect on the total CLA concentration in dairy products (Shantha et al., 1995). Kathirvelan (2007) reported that when milk was converted into ghee by creamery method, similar level of CLA was found in ghee (19.54 mg/g fat) as in milk (19.50mg/g fat). Tyagi et al (2007) reported an increased level of CLA in ghee prepared by the indigenous method of ghee preparation due to lactic culture fermentation but no such increase was found in cheese and paneer (Table 8). However, Aneja and Murthi (1990) reported substantial increase in CLA content in ghee during its clarifying process at 120oC.

Table 8.

*P<0.01 The nutritional requirements of Group-I buffaloes were fulfilled through concentrate mixture, In Group- II concentrate mixture + Berseem and in Group –III, Berseem only.Level of CLA (mg/g) in buffalo milk and the dairy products prepared through different processing treatments


7. Potential health benefits of CLA

The biological properties of dietary CLA are currently attracting considerable interest because of its diverse physiological outcomes in animal studies. Beyond its nutritional value, dietary CLA is effective in suppressing tumor development during initiation, promotion and progression phases of carcinogenesis (Belury, 2002). Not only CLA is a powerful anticarcinogen, but it also has antiatherogenic, immunomodulating, growth promoting, lean body mass enhancing and antidiabetic properties. Hence CLA is considered being a functional food.

Growing evidences suggest that CLA has numerous health benefits towards human being. Milk and meat from ruminants are richest natural source of CLA, which has been shown to have anticancer properties (Parodi, 1994). CLA reduced plasma lipoproteins and early atherosclerosis in animals (Lee et al., 1994). CLA was able to normalize impaired glucose tolerance in diabetic rats (Houseknecht et al., 1998). CLA has been shown to have immunomodulatory properties by enhancing mitogen induced lymphocyte blastogenesis, lymphocyte cytotoxic activity and macrophage killing ability (Wong et al., 1997)

7.1. Anticarcinogenic property of CLA

The recent interest in CLA began with the isolation from hamburger meat as an anticarcinogenic factor. Partially purified extracts from fried ground beef was shown to contain mutagenic modulator activity inhibiting the initiation of mouse epidermal carcinogenesis by 7, 12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene, a pro-carcinogen (Ha et al. 1987). CLA was repeatedly shown to have anticarcinogenic effects in animal models for stomach neoplasia (Ha et al. 1990), mammary tumors (Ip et al., 1997), and skin papillomas (Belury et al. 1997). As low as 0.05% level of CLA is enough to significantly decrease the induced mammary tumors in rodents (Ip et al. 1997). CLA is effective in reducing the size and metastasis of transplanted human breast cancer cells and prostate cancer cells in severely compromised immunodeficient mice. CLA-enriched butterfat was reported to alter mammary gland morphogenesis and also to reduce the risk of cancer in rats (Ip et al., 1997).

Kathirvelan (2007) reported that feeding CLA enriched ghee (composition of rat diet given in Table 9) lowered around 37 percent gross tumors incidence (Table 10) in 7, 12 dimethyl benz (a) anthrazene induced mammary gland carcinogenesis in female Wistar rat than the control (soybean oil based diet) group. The mean tumour weight was high in soybean oil fed group (3.30 g) (Fig 6& Fig 7) than the high CLA ghee fed group (1.29 g) (Fig 8). The common type of tumour (benign) found in the three groups were fibroma, adenoma and fibroadenoma but adenocarcinoma (malignant) type (Fig 9) was found only in soybean oil based diet group. Thus, CLA feeding not only inhibited the benign type tumour but malignant tumour as well.

7.2. Cancer modulation mechanism of CLA

There are various intriguing possibilities regarding its anti-carcinogenic action. However, the concrete anti-carcinogenic mechanism still is unclear.

7.3. CLA acts as an antioxidant

This is the first theory proposed in support of its anticarcinogenic action. CLA through dietary fat gets incorporated into neutral lipids and phospholipids, preferably in the former. They act as free radical scavengers thereby providing an in situ ‘defence mechanism’ against membrane attack by dangerous oxygen free radicals (Ha et al., 1990).

Component Soybean oil based diet Low CLA
(12.12 mg/g fat)
ghee based diet
High CLA
(19.54mg/g fat)
ghee based diet
Bengal gram 540.0 540.0 540.0
Wheat 130.0 130.0 130.0
GNC 60.0 60.0 60.0
Soybean oil 200.0 - -
Low CLA ghee - 200 -
High CLA ghee - - 200
Skimmed milk powder 44.4 44.4 44.4
Mineral mixture 21.6 21.6 21.6
Vitamin mixture 2.0 2.0 2.0
Choline chloride 2.0 2.0 2.0

Table 9.

Composition of rat diets (g/kg of diet)

Groups Percent tumour incidence* Percent Individual tumour incidence Mean tumour weight
Fibroma Adenoma Fibro adenoma Adenoma sarcoma
Soybean oil based diet 83.33
3.30 ± 1.39
(12.12 mg/g fat) ghee based diet
0.00 2.42 ± 0.88
High CLA (19.54mg/g fat)
ghee based diet
0.00 1.29 ± 0.27

Table 10.

Effect of feeding CLA enriched ghee on mammary gland tumour incidence in 7, 12 DMBA administered rats

Figure 6.

Rats were killed 32 weeks after DMBA administration* Includes both palpable and histo pathological examinationRat showing the mammary tumour with the diameter approximately 3.4 cm (Soybean oil based diet)

Figure 7.

Excised tumour showing 3.0 cm diameter (Soybean oil based diet)

Figure 8.

Rats showing tumour with diameter of 1.1 cm (CLA ghee based diet)

Figure 9.

Adenocarcinoma showing stromal invasions with tumor cells

Compared with other antioxidants, CLA has been shown to be more potent antioxidant. It is more potent than alpha-tocopherol and as effective as butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) in inhibiting iron-thiocyanate induced peroxide formation. In addition, CLA was shown to be as effective as vitamin E and butylated hydroxyanisole in inhibiting the formation of thio barbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), as a bio marker often used to assess oxidation in biological systems.

Liver is the major organ in which most of the chemicals, drugs and carcinogens undergo metabolism (Krishnaswamy and Raghuramulu, 1999). Several environmental carcinogens have been reported to elicit hepatic oxidative stress and alter the activities of detoxifying and antioxidant enzymes during extra hepatic tumorigenesis (Aruna and Sivaramakrishnan, 1996). Antioxidant and detoxification enzymes can block carcinogenesis by acting as inhibitors of environmental carcinogens or mutagens (Cunningham and Lokesh, 1983).

Catalase and superoxide dismutase are the primary antioxidant enzymes involved in direct elimination of toxic free radicals which may result in amelioration of oxidative damage. Amelioration of oxidative damage by scavenging of free radicals formed during oxidative stress may protect cell against carcinogenicity and toxicity (Ketterer et al., 1990). Glutothione-S-transferase is a biotransformation enzyme involved in the detoxification of xenobiotics, carcinogens, free radicals and peroxides by conjugating these toxic substrates with GSH (Glutathione reduced) thus ultimately protecting cells and organs against induced toxicity. Hence, enhancement of these enzymes by a natural or synthetic component may result in the amelioration or inhibition of extra hepatic tumorigenesis and CLA acts as chemopreventive agent by counteracting the carcinogen induced oxidative stress and elevating the levels of detoxifying enzymes (Ip et al., 1999). Ip et al. (1999) have clearly established a relationship between dietary CLA, oxidation and mammary carcinogenesis. Dietary CLA 0.25% or higher reduced the formation of TBARS in non initiated mammary tissue in vivo in parallel with CLA inhibition of mammary carcinogenesis. Kathirvelan (2007) observed that feeding CLA enriched ghee resulted in increased antioxidative as well as detoxifying enzymes in liver and mammary gland than the soybean oil based diet fed rats (Table 11).

Liver enzymes Cancer groups
Soybean oil based diet Low CLA
ghee based diet
High CLA
ghee based diet
Catalase (U/mg protein)
479.91a± 11.9 609.60 b±7.62 730.67 c±11.36
SOD (U/mg protein)
9.63 a±0.79 15.86 b±0.84 20.60 c± 1.41
GST (U/mg protein)
0.79 a ± 2.50 1.19 b ± 3.77 1.42 c ± 4.51
Mammary gland
Catalase (U/mg protein)
22.26 a±1.71 35.66 b ± 1.41 47.52 c ± 1.43

Table 11.

Values are Mean ±SE for n=12, One CAT Unit (U) is equivalent to 1μmol of H2O2 consumed /minute/ mg of protein at 25ºC, One SOD unit is equivalent to the amount of enzymes that inhibit the reaction 50%, One GST unit is expressed as mmoles of cDNB conjugated /minute/mg protein.Values with different superscript across a row differ significantly at (P<0.05) Effect of feeding CLA enriched ghee on liver and mammary gland enzymes activities in cancer induced groups

7.4. Inhibit arachidonic acid (C20:4) derived eicosaonoid metabolism in the target organ (Belury et al., 1997)

Many types of cancer cells have an enzyme called cycloxygenase (Cox-2) and use it as a biological fuel to propagate rapidly. CLA inhibits the enzyme thereby modulation the prostaglandin biosynthesis from linoleic acid in normal course (Urquhart et al, 2002). The prostaglandins (PGE2) secreted by cancer cells under the activity of Cox-2 acts as a tumor promoter. Unusual PUFAs (C18:3. C20:3) derived from CLA leads to the formation of arachidonic acid which behaves differently than that of its usual nature when derived from linoleic acid in normal course (Iwakiri et al, 2002). This cerueval behavior leads to eicosaonoid inhibition viz. inhibition of prostaglandins and leukotrienes which further leads to reduction of diacylglycerol (Tumor promoting factor) upto 50% (Kritchersky et al, 2000). The cancer preventive activity of CLA is unlikely to be indicated by interference with the metabolic cascade involved in converting linoleic acid to eicosaonoid.

7.5. Reduce the formation of carcinogen – DNA adducts

CLA leads to a reduced formation of a carcinogen and DNA adducts (Moon et al, 2003) in a similar manner to substrate legend binding. This may be due to CLA check at the initiation point of carcinogenesis further preventing the binding of electrophile intermediates of DNA thereby causing permanent DNA lesion. This DNA containing cell when allowed to proliferate under promotion stage may lead to neoplastic cell.

7.6. Stimulate the lymphocyte proliferation

The lymphocytes had enhanced proliferation when stimulated with CLA, in vivo and in vitro (Miller et al, 1994) when a blend of isomers (cis-9, trans-11 and trans-10 cis-12) in the ratio 80:20 are given through the diet, the lymphocyte proliferation is observed (Majumdar et al, 2002). This in turn enhances cellular immunity by modulating phenotype and effect or functions of CD8+ lymphocytes (cells involved in both adaptive and innate immunity) involving T-cell receptors. The CD8+ lymphocytes are essential for the development of cell mediate protection against neoplastic cells. CLA enhanced the cytotoxic potential of peripheral blood lymphocytes by inducing the proliferation of cytotoxic CD8+ cells. Further, CLA was found to increase CD4 lymphocyte population and NK cell function and number (Ochoa et al, 2004). CD4 cells get differentiated into cytokines TH1 cells and TH2 cells (Thymus responsive cells). The TH1 cells produce interleukin 1, 2 and γ-interferon, activate macrophages and further delayed hypersensitivity reaction whereas TH2 cells produce interleukin -4, 5, 10 induces esinophiles decrease in number (CLA has anti allergic effect) and is more specialized in inducing B cells for immunoglobin production (CLA has immune stimulation effect) interleukin 1, 2 so derived by induction of TH1 responsive cells further stimulate growth of γ-interferon in T-cells and NK cells. The γ-interferon inhibits PGE2 synthesis which acts as a tumor promoter factor. Gamma interferon kill tumour either by usual mechanism of secretion of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) or by activated macrophages mediated selective cellular toxicity. NK cells in addition to direct lysis of tumour cells can also participate in antibody dependant cellular cytotoxicity.

7.7. Modulate the activity of phase-1 enzymes of Mixed Function Oxidase system (Benjamin et al, 2003)

CLA has been found to modulate the activity of Cytochrome-P450 (Cyt.P) and reduce the induction of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) and GTPase activating protein kinase C (PKC). This facilitates the oxidation and reduction of Cyt.P and hydroxylation as a result of which activated toxicant-Cyt.P complex and subsequently hydroxylated toxicant is available in the end of phase-1 reaction. The enzymes ODC+PKC play key roles in the activation of carcinogens and therefore are tumor production indicators.

7.8. Modulate gene expression (Carta et al, 2002)

The potential molecular mechanism by which CLA shows its anti-carcinogenic activity says that CLA acts as a legend for peroxisomes proliferation receptor (PPAR) which is a steroid hormone receptor (nuclear receptor). This binding after the transcription process through sequential steps. The regulatory gene is lost and so the target genes are altered. This activates the endonuclease action; influx of Ca2+ takes place in the cytoplasm which leads to DNA fragmentation. The cell growth and differentiation is arrested and thus induce apoptosis.

7.9. CLA and atherosclerosis

While considerable research has focused on a potential anticarcinogenic effect of CLA, there are few studies indicating that CLA may also reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases in animal models. Unlike linoleic acid, there is a paucity of information regarding the effect of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on plasma lipoproteins and aortic atherosclerosis.

Lee et al.(1994) first tested whether CLA might affect the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis lesions in rabbits through its effect on lipid peroxidation. They reported that rabbits fed an atherogenic diet and supplemented with 0.5g CLA per day for 22 weeks had significantly less plasma triglyceride, plasma LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and LDL-C/HDL-C ratio than control animals. CLA feeding also resulted in fewer aortic fatty lesions. Subsequently, (Nicolosi et al., 1997) reported that hamsters fed CLA collectively had significantly reduced levels of plasma total cholesterol, non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol, (combined very-low and low-density lipoprotein) and triglycerides with no effect on high density lipoprotein cholesterol, as compared to controls. Kathirvelan (2007) reported that low and high CLA feeding reduced total cholesterol by 52.17 and 26.06 percent, triglycerides by 23.00 and 11.00 percent, however, HDL-c increased by 17.82 and 33.26 percent than soybean oil fed rats (Table 12). He concluded that, antiatherogenic property of CLA was proved by decreasing the total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL- cholesterol (Fig 10) and atherogenic index (Fig. 11) and increasing the HDL-cholesterol blood plasma. In addition to this, the level of cholesterol and triglyceride deposition in liver and aorta were lower in CLA fed groups (Table 13).

In the literature, dietary CLA has been reported to have controversial results on atherosclerosis in mice. Noone et al., (2002) reported that CLA actually did not reduce the incidence of atherosclerosis, but increased the incidence of fatty acid streaks in mice compared to control-fed mice. Study conducted by Munday et al. (1999) contradicts the finding of studies conducted in rabbits and hamsters (Lee et al., 1994: Nicolosi et al., 1997). It is possible that dietary CLA has different influences on the fatty acid and cholesterol metabolism in different animal species. More research is necessary to elucidate the effects of dietary CLA on lipid metabolism and atherogenesis in animal models and eventually human beings.

Since it is difficult to study the effect of CLA on atherosclerosis in humans, an indirect approach by measuring various potential heart disease markers is required (Belury and Kempa-steczko, 2000). Lipid atherogenic risk markers were more favorably influenced by cis-9, trans-11 isomer than a mixture of CLA or fish oil (Valeille et al., 2004) when healthy human subjects were used in a double-blind placebo controlled intervention trial. Noone et al. (2002) demonstrated that CLA isomers improved very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and plasma triacylglycerol metabolism suggesting that some of the cardio-protective effects of CLA shown in animal studies were relevant to humans as well.

Parameters Base line levels Groups
Soybean oil based diet Low CLA ghee
based diet
High CLA ghee
based diet
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) 58.09 ± 1.24 81.33a ± 2.91 74.40 b ± 1.68 69.93c ± 1.44
HDL-C (mg/dL) 34.72 ± 0.78 35.51a ± 0.91 41.84b ± 0.54 47.32c ± 0.96
40.87 ± 0.77 73.23a ± 1.08 65.01b± 1.16 56.21c ± 0.42
LDL-C (mg/dL) 14.26 ± 1.72 26.79a ± 3.53 19.57b ± 1.86 14.38c ± 1.62
Atherogenic Index (AI) 0.410 ± 0.06 0.971a ± 0.12 0.570b ± 0.05 0.244c± 0.04

Table 12.

Values are Mean±SE for n=8Values in rows with different superscript differ significantly (P<0.05)Plasma Lipids profile of Wistar rats at baseline and after 16 weeks of CLA enriched ghee feeding.

Figure 10.

Plasma LDL (mg/dL) levels in rats fed on CLA enriched ghee diet

Figure 11.

Atherogenic index in rats fed on CLA enriched ghee diet

Groups Liver Aorta
Cholesterol Triglycerides
Soybean oil based diet 1.05a ± 0.029 10.08a± 0.145 9.46a ± 0.029 7.06a ±0.073
Low CLA ghee
based diet
0.84b ± 0.013 7.12b ± 0.218 6.95b ± 0.015 5.09b ± 0.123
High CLA ghee
based diet
0.53c ± 0.008 4.50c ± 0.143 3.64c ± 0.009 2.49c ± 0.109

Table 13.

Values are Mean ± SE for n=8Values in rows with different superscript differ significantly (P<0.01)Lipid profile (mg/g tissue) in liver and aorta tissue of rats fed on CLA ghee diet

7.10. CLA and lipid metabolism

A major effect of CLA in this respect is the reduction in lipid uptake by adipocytes (Pariza et al., 2003) which leads to the reduction in body fat gain (Kim et al., 2002). Azain et al. (2000) reported that the reduction in body fat mass in rats was the result of reduced adipose tissue size rather than cell number. Similarly Poulous et al. (2001) found a reduction in cell size, but not the cell number in rats which had less body fat in response to CLA supplementation. Carta et al. (2002) concluded that a regular intake of CLA and or TVA as its precursor should work as an excellent preventive agent that would modulates lipid metabolism. Kathirvelan (2007) found that feeding CLA ghee (20 % in the diet) to male wistar rats doesn’t increase the body weight as compared to the control group (Table 14)

week Average weekly body weight (gram)
Soybean oil diet
Low CLA ghee
High CLA ghee
0 131.13 ± 4.70 125.00 ± 2.85 128.57 ± 3.45
2 169.29 ± 5.09 165.01 ± 4.03 163.14 ± 4.68
4 187.86 ± 6.04 185.08 ± 6.22 185.71 ± 7.02
6 203.57 ± 3.45 198.52 ± 5.59 195.29 ± 4.17
8 215.00 ±5.34 214.29 ± 7.58 212.86 ± 4.93
10 231.69 ± 8.55 228.33 ± 7.42 227.51 ± 6.95
12 243.33 ± 7.42 240.00 ± 6.35 239.17 ± 4.47
14 254.00 ± 5.88 257.50 ± 8.14 252.51 ± 6.32
16 263.33 ± 4.81 265.00 ± 6.67 262.12 ± 4.21
Over all mean 211.02 ±13.51 208.81±14.23 207.43 ±13.73

Table 14.

Values are Mean ±SE for n=8Average weekly body weight of rats fed on CLA enriched ghee diet

Studies in rats and mice have shown that feeding CLA at the level of 0.5% in total diet produced small reduction in body fat gain in growing animals (Pariza et al., 1997; Park et al., 1997). Whilst the actions of CLA in inhibiting body fat accumulation have received considerable attention because of increasing concern for marked increases in obesity in western societies, care should be taken in extrapolating these findings to man until more information is available. The specific mechanism by which dietary CLA reduces body fat content is likely to vary from one animal species to another. The results of animal studies are also not conclusive. The mechanism by which CLA alters lipid metabolism and body composition in animals is not fully elucidated. It may be tissue and species-specific. In rodents, CLA-induced alteration of lipid metabolism appears to involve increase in rates of lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation. Support for this mechanism comes from the observation of increased hormone sensitive lipase activity and enhanced carnitine palmitoyl transferase activity in several tissues of mice fed CLA (Pariza et al., 2003).

Peroxisome proliferators activated receptor alpha (PPAR∝), one of the nuclear receptors related to the modulation of environmental and dietary stimuli (Schoonjan et al., 1996), is likely to be involved in the regulation of the gene expression of fatty acid beta oxidation enzymes by dietary CLA. It has been demonstrated that CLA is a potent legend and activator of PPARα (Belury et al., 1997) but Peterson et al. (2003) observed that a mixture of CLA isomers increased the gene expression of hepatic fatty acid beta oxidation enzymes through both PPARα dependent and independent mechanisms. The activity of fatty acid synthatase (FAS), a key enzyme of fatty acid synthesis, was also significantly decreased by dietary CLA as compared to the control diet in the liver of rats.

7.11. CLA and diabetes

Feeding of CLA to rats prone to developing diabetes normalized glucose tolerance and improved hyperinsulinemia as effectively as currently used medications (Houseknecht et al., 1998). CLA was fed at 1.5% (by weight) of the diet for 2 week in diabetes induced rats. The study was short-term and needs to be replicated and extended before the results can be applied to human health. Nonetheless, if CLA can improve glucose homeostasis and inhibit body fat accretion as demonstrated in mice, rats, and pigs, then CLA may be beneficial to humans prone to diabetes (Ip et al., 2003)

7.12. CLA and immune system:

Cook et al (1993) showed that CLA not only enhances immune response, but also protects tissues from collateral damage. Sugano et al (1999) proposed that the immune enhancing effect of CLA was by modulating eicosanoid and immunoglobin production. CLA also diminished lipopolysaccharide induced inflammatory events in macrophages through reduced mRNA and protein expression of nitric oxide synthatase and cyclooxigenase-2 as well as subsequent production of nitric oxide and prostaglandin E2 (Cheng et al., 2004). Kathirvelan (2007) observed that feeding of CLA enriched ghee to mammary gland cancer induced female wistar rats reduced level of plasma nitric oxide than the non CLA fed rats (Table 15).

Days Cancer groups
Soybean oil
based diet
Low CLA ghee
based diet
High CLA ghee
based diet
0 9.25a ±0.31 8.59a ±0.17 8.41a ±0.18
30 18.52a ±0.33 16.45b ±0.41 15.45c ±0.38
60 25.70a ±0.50 19.44b ±0.20 18.38c ±0.23
90 30.28a ±0.49 25.43b ±0.22 23.43c ±0.45
120 38.18a ±0.33 33.16b ±0.53 28.20c ±0.28
150 40.92a ±0.50 35.34b ±0.31 32.54c ±0.25
180 42.46a ±0.46 35.83b ±0.54 32.24c ±0.37
210 43.26a ±0.29 38.50b ±0.28 33.20c ±0.15
240 43.00a ±0.41 37.56b ±0.34 33.07c ±0.47
Over all mean 32.40 ± 3.87 27.81 ± 3.39 24.99 ± 2.86

Table 15.

Values (μmol/ml) are Mean  SE for n=12Values in a row with different superscript differ significantly (P<0.05) Effect of feeding CLA enriched ghee diet on plasma nitric oxide (μmol/ml) level in mammary gland cancer induced rats

Cook et al (1993) suggested that CLA prevents immune associated wasting by protecting nonlymphoid tissues from the adverse effects of cytokines, which are growth suppressants, because CLA influences the immune system by altering the effects of cytokine, interleukin, leukotriene and many immunoglobulin. Sebedio et al., (2000) hypothesized that CLA indirectly affects the function/production of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1 (IL-1). Yu et al. (2002) has shown that CLA exhibits anti-inflammatory effects by negatively regulating the expression of certain pro-inflammatory genes. By inducing the activity of peroxisome proliferators activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) via CLA, there is a decrease in the production of pro-inflammatory products such as nitric oxide and TNF-α (Yu et al., 2002).

7.13. CLA and bone metabolism

Watkins et al (1999) found a higher rate of bone formation in chicks fed butterfat, which was suggested to be due probably to increased CLA intake. Dietary CLA led to differences in CLA enrichment of various organs and tissues, bone marrow and periosteum containing the highest concentration of CLA and brain the lowest. Enrichment of chondrocytes with CLA affected collagen synthesis in a dose dependent fashion (Watkins et al., 1999). Reduced production of arachidonic acid and PGE2 in the chondrocytes was suggested to be the possible mechanism. Such changes in bone biomarkers and bone formation rates in rats were associated with increased cis-9, trans-11 CLA in bone tissue lipids. Mc Donald (2000) suggested that increased ash content in CLA fed animals (Park et al, 1997) is due to protection of bone loss from cytokines. Further investigation is needed as to how bone metabolism is affected by CLA and mechanism of action related with it.


8. Conclusion

Conjugated linoleic acid is unique; unlike the most naturally occurring anticarcinogenic substances found mainly in plants, it is present in food from animal sources. Milk fat is the richest natural source of CLA and could be increased by manipulation of the nutritional regimes of the animals. Diverse biological roles of CLA in mediating cancer, diabetes, lipid metabolism, atherosclerosis, immune function, bone modeling etc. observed in animal models are quite compelling. Although there have been a few attempts at verifying the positive effects of CLA in human health through case control studies, it is not yet possible to clearly state that CLA supports all the those benefits in humans as well. Limited available literature in humans, however also supports the findings observed in animals and tissue culture models even though the results are inconclusive and even conflicting at times. As a result, natural enrichment of food products through manipulation of animal diet may contribute to the overall goal of obtaining the positive health benefits associated with CLA in the immediate future.


  1. 1. Abu-Ghazaleh A. Schingoethe D. J. Hippen A. R. Whitlock L. A. 2002 Feeding fish meal and extruded soybeans enhances the Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA) content of milk. J. Dairy Sci., 85 624 631
  2. 2. Aii T. Tamaki S. Shimabukuru M. Hayasawa H. Shimizu T. Ishida S.1999 Conjugated Linoleic Acid content in milk fat of cows fed a large amount of linseed. Anim.Sci., 70 53 541
  3. 3. Aneja R. P. Murthi T. N. 1990Conjugated Linoleic Acid contents of Indian curds and ghee. Indian J. Dairy Sci., 43 231 238
  4. 4. Aruna K. Sivaramakrishnan V. M. 1996 Anticarcinogenic effects of the essential oils from cumin, poppy and basilPhytoether Res., 10 577 580
  5. 5. Azain K. N. Hausman D. B. Sisk M. B. Flatt W. P. Jewell D. E. 2000 Dietary Conjugated Linoleic Acid reduces rat adipose tissue cell size rather than cell number.J. Nutr., 130 1548 1554
  6. 6. Bauchart D. Verite R. Remond B. 1984 Long-chain fatty acid digestion in lactating cows fed fresh grass from spring to autumn Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64 330 331
  7. 7. Bauman D. E. Corl B. A. Baumgard L. H. Griinary J. M. 2001 Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and the dairy cowIn: Garnsworthy, P.C. and Wiseman, J. (Eds.) Recent Advances in Animal NutritionNottingham university press) 221 250
  8. 8. Belury M. A. Moya C. S. Y. Liu K. L. Vanden H. J. P. 1997 Dietary Conjugated Linoleic Acid induces peroxisome specific enzyme accumulation and ornithine decarboxylase activity in mouse liverJ. Nutr. Biochm., 8 579 584
  9. 9. Belury M. A. Kempa-Steczko A. 2000 Conjugated Linoleic Acid modulates hepatic lipid composition in mice. Lipids 32 199 204
  10. 10. Belury M. A. 2002 Inhibition of carcinogenesis by Conjugated Linoleic Acid: Potential mechanisms of action. J. Nutri., 132 2995 2998
  11. 11. Benjamin C. Barbano M. Bauman D. E. Ip C. 2003 Cis-9, trans-11 CLA derived endogenously from trans-11 18:1 reduces cancer risk in rats. J.Nutri., 133 2893 2900
  12. 12. Carta G. E. Angioni E. Murru M. Melis P. Spada S. Banni S. 2002Modulation of lipid metabolism and vitamin A by Conjugated Linoleic Acid. Prostag. Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acid., 67 187 191
  13. 13. Cheng W.L.,C.K.Lii,H.V.Chen,T.H.Lin and K.L.Liu. 2004Contribution of conjugated linoleic acid to the suppression of inflammatory responces through the regulation of the NF pathway. J.Agric. FoodChem, 52 71 78
  14. 14. Chin S. F. Liu W. Storkson J. M. Ha Y. I. Pariza M. W. 1992Dietary sources of conjugated dienoic isomers of linoleic acid, a newly recognized class of anticarcinogens. J. Food Composition Analysis, 15 185 197
  15. 15. Chilliard Y. A. Ferlay A. Rouel J. Lambert G. 2003A review of nutritional and physiological factors affecting goat milk lipid synthesis and lipolysis. J.Dairy Sci., 86 1751 1770
  16. 16. Coakley M. Ross R. P. Nordgren M. Fitzgerald G. Devery D. Stanton C. 2003Conjugated linoleic acid biosynthesis by human-derived Bifidobacterium species. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 94 138 145
  17. 17. Cook M. E. Miller C. C. Park Y. Pariza M. W. 1993Immune modulation by altered nutrient metabolism: Nutritional control of immune-induced growth depression. Poultry Sci., 72 1301 1305
  18. 18. Corl B. A. Baumgard L. Dwyer H. Briinari D. A. Phillps J. M.and Bauman. E. 2001The role of delta (9) desaturase in the production of cis9, trans11. J.Nutri.BioChem., 12 622 630
  19. 19. Cunningham, M.L and Lokesh, B.R. 1983Superoxide anion generated by potassium superoxide in cytotoxic and mutagenic to Chinese Hamster Ovary cells. Mutat Res., 121 299 304
  20. 20. Devillard E. Mc Intosh F. M. Young K. Castet M. Wallace R. J. Newbold C. J. 2004CLA composition of rumen bacterial and protozoal populations Reproduction Nutrition Development, 44: S60S65.
  21. 21. Dhiman T. R. Anand G. R. Satter L. D. Pariza M. W. 1999Conjugated Linoleic Acid content of milk from cows fed different diets. J.Dairy.Sci., 82 2146 2156
  22. 22. Dhiman T. R. Satter L. D. Pariza M. W. Galli M. P. Albright Tolosa M. X. 2000Conjugated linoleic acid content of milk from cows offered diets rich in linoleic and linolenic acid. J. Dairy. Sci., 83 1016 1027
  23. 23. Gerson T. John A. Sinclair B. R. 1983The effect of dietary N in vitro lipolysis and fatty acid hydrogenation in rumen digesta from sheep fed diets high in starch. J. Agri. Sci. Camb., 101: 97.
  24. 24. Gerson T. John A. King A. S. D. 1985The effects of dietary starch and Fiber on the in vitro rates of lipolysis and hydrogenation by sheep rumen. J. Agri. Sci. Camb., 105: 27.
  25. 25. Gerson T. King A. S. D. Kelly K. E. Kelley W. J. 1988Influence of particle size and surface area on in vitro rates of gas production, lipolysis of triacylglycerol and hydrogenation of linoleic acid by sheep rumen digests or Ruminococcus flavefaciens. J. Agri. Sci. Camb., 110: 31.
  26. 26. Griinari, J.M and Bauman, D.E. 1999Biosynthesis of Conjugated Linoleic Acid and its composition, incorporation into meat and milk in ruminants. In: Advances in CLA research. AOCS Press, Champaign, Il. 180 200
  27. 27. Griinari J. M. Corl B. A. Laly S. H. Chourinard P. Y. Bauman B. E. 2000Conjugated Linoleic Acid is synthesized endogenously in lactating dairy cows by delta 9 desaturase. J.Nutr., 130 2285 2291
  28. 28. Ha Y. L. Grimm N. K. Pariza M. W. 1987Anticarcinogens from fried ground beef: Heat-altered derivatives of linoleic acid. Carcinogenesis, 8: 1881.
  29. 29. Ha L. Strokson J. Pariza W. 1990Inhibition of benzo Ca pyrene-induced mouse fonestomach neoplasia by conjugated dienoic derivatives of linoleic acid. Cancer Res., 50 1097 1101
  30. 30. Harfoot G. C. Hazlewood G. P. 1997Lipid metabolism in the rumen. In: Hobson, P.N. and Stewart, C.S. (Eds.) The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem London: Blackie Academic and Professional. 382 426
  31. 31. Houseknecht K. L. Vanden-Heuvel J. P. Moya-Camarena S. Y. Portocarrero C. P. Peck L. W. Nickle K. P. Belury M. A. 1998Dietary Conjugated Linoleic Acid normalizes impaired glucose tolerance in the Zucker diabetic fatty rat. Biochemical Biopsy. Res. Comm., 244: 678.
  32. 32. Ip C. Chin S. F. Scimeca J. A. Thompson H. J. 1994Conjugated Linoleic acid, a powerful anticarcinogen from animal fat sources. Cancer, 74 1050 1054
  33. 33. Ip C. Jiang C. Thompson H. J. Scimeca J. A. 1997Retention of Conjugated Linoleic Acid in the mammary gland is associated with tumor inhibition during the post initiation phase of carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis, 18 755 759
  34. 34. Ip C. Banni S. E. Angioni G. Carta J. Macginley H. J. Thompson D. Barbano P. Bauman D.1999Conjugated Linoleic Acid enriched butter fat alters mammary gland morphogenesis and reduces cancer risk in rats. J.Nutr. 129 2135 2142
  35. 35. Ip M. M. Massai-Welch P. A. Ip C. 2003Prevention of mammary cancer with Conjugated Linoleic Acid: Role of the stoma and the epithelium. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia., 8 103 118
  36. 36. Iwakiri Y. Sampson D. A. Allen K. G. 2002Suppression of cyclooxygenase-2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase expression by Conjugated Linoleic Acid in murine macrophages. Prostag. Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acid., 67 435 443
  37. 37. Jiang J. Bjorck L. Fonden R. 1998Production of conjugated linoleic acid by dairy starter cultures. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 85 95 102
  38. 38. Kathirvelan C. 2007Influence of mustard cake feeding on conjugated linoleic acid content of buffalo milk and its anticarcinogeneic potency. Ph.D thesis, NDRI (Deemed University), Karnal, India
  39. 39. Kelly M. L. Kolver E. S. Bauman D. E. Van amburgh M. E. Muller l. D. 1998Effect of Intake of Pasture on Concentrations of Conjugated Linoleic Acid in Milk of Lactating Cows. J Dairy Sci 81 1630 1636
  40. 40. Kemp P. Lander D. J. 1984Hydrogenation in vitro of a linolenic acid to stearic acid by mixed culture of pure strains of rumen bacteria. Journal of General Microbiology, 130 527 533
  41. 41. Ketterer B. Meyer D. J. Taylor B. Panble S. Coles B. Fraser G. 1990GSTS and protection against oxidative stress. Taylor and Francis Press, 97 109
  42. 42. Kim M. R. Park Y. Albright K. J. Pariza M. W. 2002Differential responses of hamsters and rats fed high fat or low fat diets supplemented with Conjugated Linoleic Acid. Nutr. Res., 22 715 722
  43. 43. Kishino S. Ogawa J. Omura Y. Matsumura K. Shimizu S. 2002Conjugated linoleic acid production from linoleic acid by lactic acid bacteria. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, 79 159 163
  44. 44. Krishnaswamy K. Raghuramalu N. 1999Bioactive phytochemicals with emphasis on dietary and practices. Indian J. Med. Res., 108 167 81
  45. 45. Kritchevsky D. 2000Antimutagenic and some other effects of Conjugated Linoleic Acid. Br. J. Nutr, 83 459 465
  46. 46. Lee K. N. Kritchevsky D. Pariza M. W. 1994Conjugated Linoleic Acid and atherosclerosis in rabbits. Atherosclerosis, 108 19 25
  47. 47. Lock A. L. Garnsworthy P. C. 2002Independent effects of dietary linoleic and linolenic fatty acids on the Conjugated Linoleic Acid content of cows’ milk. Animal Science., 74 163 176
  48. 48. Loor, J.J and Herbein, J.H. 1997Secretion of cis-9, trans 11-18:2, in milk fat of Holstein cows in response to infusion of Conjugated Linoleic Acid into the abomasum. J. Dairy Sci., 80: 164 (Abstr.).
  49. 49. MacDonald, 2000Conjugated linoleic acid and disease prevention: A review of current knowledge. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 19:111S-118S.
  50. 50. Majumdar B. Wahle K. W. J. Moir S. Schofiled A. Choe S. N. Farquharson A. Grant I. Heys S. D. 2002Conjugated linoleic acids (CLAs) regulate theexpression of key apopototic genes in human breast cancer cells. FASEB J., 10: 1096/fj.01 0720fje.
  51. 51. Martin S. A. Jenkins T. C. 2002Factors affecting Conjugated Linoleic Acid and trans-C 18:1 fatty acid production by mixed ruminal bacteria. J. Anim. Sci., 80 3347 3352
  52. 52. Miller C. C. Park Y. Pariza M. W. Cook M. E. 1994Feeding Conjugated Linoleic Acid to animals partially overcomes catabolic responses due to end toxin injection. Biochemical Biophysical Res. Commun., 198 1107 1112
  53. 53. Moon E. J. Lee Y. M. Kim K. W. 2003Anti-angiogenic activity of Conjugated Linoleic Acid on basic fibroblast growth factor-induced angiogenesis. Oncol. Rep., 10 617 621
  54. 54. Munday J. S. Thompson K. G. James K. A. C. 1999Dietary Conjugated Linoleic Acid promoters fatty streak formation in the C57BL/6 mouse artherosclerosis model. British J. Nutr., 81 251 255
  55. 55. Nam, I.S and Garnsworthy, P.C. 2007Biohydration of linoleic acid by rumen fungi compared with rumen bacteria. Journal of Applied microbiology, 47 1 6
  56. 56. Nicolosi R. J. Rodgers E. J. Kitchevsky D. Scimeca J. A. Huth P. J. 1997Dietary Conjugated Linoleic Acid reduces plasma lipoproteins and early aortic atherosclerosis iin hypercholesterolaemic hamsters. Artery, 22 5 266 277
  57. 57. Noone E. J. Roche H. M. Nugent A. P. Gibney M. J. 2002The effect of dietary supplementation using isomeric blends of Conjugated Linoleic Acid on lipid metabolism in healthy human subjects. British J. Nutr., 88: 243.
  58. 58. Ochoa J. J. Farquharson A. J. Grant I. Moffat L. E. Heys S. D. Wahle K. W. J. 2004Conjugated linoleic acids (CLA’s) decrease prostate cancer cell proliferation: Different molecular mechanisms for cis-9, trans-11, cis-12 isomers. Carcinogenesis (Advance access).
  59. 59. Ogawa J. Kishino S. Ando A. Sugimoto S. Nishara K. Shimizu S. 2005Production of conjugated linoleic acid by lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 100 355 364
  60. 60. Pariza W. Park Y. Kim S. Sugimoto K. Albright K. Liu W. Storkson J. Cook M. E. 1997Mechanism of body fat reduction by Conjugated Linoleic Acid. FASEB J., 11: A139
  61. 61. Pariza M. W. Park Y. Xu X. Ntambi J. Kang K. 2003Speculation on the mechanisms of action of Conjugated Linoleic Acid. In: Advances in Conjugated Linoleic Acid Research. 2Ed. J. Sebedio, W.W. Christie and R. Adolf). AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 251 266
  62. 62. Parodi P. 1994Conjugated Linoleic Acid: an anticarcinogenic fatty acid present in milk. Australian J. Dairy Technol., 49: 93.
  63. 63. Parodi P. 2003Conjugated linoleic acid in food. J.Sebedio, W.W.Christe and R. Adolf (Ed) Advances in Conjugated Linoleic Acid research, 2 101 121
  64. 64. Park S. J. Park C. W. Kim S. J. Kim J. K. Kim Kim Y. R. Y. S. Ha Y. L. 2003Divergent cytotoxic effects of Conjugated Linoleic Acid isomers on NCI-N87 cells, ACS Symp. Series 85:1,113-118
  65. 65. Poulous S. P. Sisk M. Hausman D. B. Azain M. J. Hausman G. J. 2001Pre-and postnatal dietary Conjugated Linoleic Acid alters adipose development, body weight gain and body composition in Sprague-Dawley rats. J. Nutr., 131 2722 2731
  66. 66. Park Y. Albright K. Liu W. Storkson J. Cook M. Pariza M. 1997Effect of Conjugated Linoleic Acid on body composition in mice. Lipids, 32 853 858
  67. 67. Peterson D. G. Matitasvilli E. Bauman D. E. 2003Diet-induced milk fat depression in dairy cows results in increased trans-10, cis-12 CLA in milk fat and coordinate suppression of mRNA abundance for mammary enzymes involved in milk fat synthesis. J. Nutr., 133 3098 3102
  68. 68. Qiu X. Eastridge M. L. Griswold K. E. Firkins J. L. 2004Effects of substrate, passage rate, and pH in continuous culture on flows of Conjugated Linoleic Acid and trans c18:1. J. Dairy Sci., 87 3473 3479
  69. 69. Ramaswamy N. Baer R. J. Schingoethe D. J. Hippen A. R. Kasperson K. M. Whitlock L. A. 2001Consumer evaluation of milk high in ConjugatedLinoleic Acid. J. Dairy Sci. 84 1607 1609
  70. 70. Schoonjan K. Staels B. Auwerx J. 1996Role of the peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor (PPAR) in mediating the effects of fibrate and fatty acids on gene expression. J. Lipid Res., 37 907 925
  71. 71. Sebedio,J.L.,S.H.F.Vermunt,J.M.Chardigny,B.Beaufrere,R.P.Mensink,R.A. Armstrong and R.A. Riemersma, 2000The effect of dietary trans linoleic acid on plasma lipids and platelet fatty acid composition. Eur.J.Clin.Nutr. 54 104 113
  72. 72. Shantha N. C. Ram L. N. O.leary J. Hicks C. L. E. A. E.A.Decker.1995Conjugated Linoleic Acid concentration in dairy products as affected by processing and storage. J.Food.Sci. 60 695 699
  73. 73. Stanton C. Lawless F. Kjellmer G. Murphy J. 1997Dietary influences on bovine milk cis-9, trans-11 Conjugated Linoleic Acid content. J. Food Sci., 62 1083 1086
  74. 74. Tyagi, A.K and C.Kathirvelan, 2006Conjugated linoleic acid in milk and its anticarcinogenic potency. Indian dairy man 58 25 29
  75. 75. Tyagi, Manju Saluja and and K.K.Sjghal, 2006Effect of berseem feeding on nutrient utilization and milk yield in Goats. Indian journal of dairy science 59, (1) 29-32
  76. 76. Tyagi A. K. Kewalramani N. Dhiman T. R. Kaur H. Singhal K. K. Kanawjia S. K. 2007Enhancement of CLA content in buffalo milk through green berseem feeding. Anim. Feed Sci. Techno., 132 15 19
  77. 77. Troegeler-Meynadir A. Nicot M. C. Bayourthe C. Moncoulon R. Enjalbert F. 2003Effects of pH and concentrations of linoleic acids on extent and intermediates of ruminal biohydrogenation in vitro. J. Dairy Sci., 86 4054 4063
  78. 78. Urquohart P. Parkin S. M. Rogers J. S. Bosley J. A. Nicolaou A. 2002The effect of Conjugated Linoleic Acid on arachiodonic acid metabolism and eicosanoid production in human saphenous vein endothelial cells. Biochem. Biophys. Acta., 1580 15 160
  79. 79. Vandenberg J. J. Cook N. E. Tribble D. D.L.1995Reinvestigation of the antioxidant properties of Conjugated Linoleic Acid. Lipids 30 599 605
  80. 80. Valeille K. Gripois D. Blouquit M. P. Souidi M. Riottot M. Bouthegourd J. C. Serougne C. Martin J. C. 2004Lipid atherogenic risk markers can be more favorably influenced by the cis-9,trans-11 octadecadienoic isomar than a Conjugated Linoleic Acid mixture or fish oil in hamsters.Br.J.Nutr., 91 191 199
  81. 81. Watkins B. A. Li Y. Seifert M. F. 1999Bone metabolism and dietary Conjugated Linoleic Acid. In: (Ed. M.P. Yurawecz, M.M. Mossoba, J.K.G. Kramer, M.W. Pariza and Nelson, G.J.). Advances in Conjugated Linoleic Acid Research. Vol. I. AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 253 255
  82. 82. Wong M. W. Chew B. P. Wong T. S. Hosick H. L. Boylston T. D. Shultz T. D. 1997Effect of dietary Conjugated Linoleic Acid on lymphocyte function and growth of mammary tumors in mice. Anticancer Res., 17 987 993
  83. 83. Wu Z. Palmquist D. L. 1991Synthesis and biohydrogenation of fatty acids by ruminal microorganisms in vitro. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 3035.
  84. 84. Yu L. Adams D. Gabel M. 2002Conjugated Linoleic Acid isomers differ in their free radical scavenging properties. J. Agric. Food Chem., 50 4135 4140

Written By

Kathirvelan Chinnadurai and Amrish Tyagi

Submitted: 04 April 2011 Published: 12 September 2011