Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Soil Salinisation and Salt Stress in Crop Production

Written By

Gabrijel Ondrasek, Zed Rengel and Szilvia Veres

Submitted: November 18th, 2010 Reviewed: May 30th, 2011 Published: September 22nd, 2011

DOI: 10.5772/22248

Chapter metrics overview

8,990 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

For optimal grow and development, cultivated plants require balanced presence of water and dissolved minerals (salts) in their rhizosphere. In that respect, quality and availability of two natural resources, water and soils, are crucial in cultivation. Although Earth abounds in water, an almost negligible portion (~2.5% or 35 million km3) is fresh or with low salt concentration (<1 dS/m) (Shiklomanov & Rodda, 2003, Ondrasek et al., 2010), i.e. water that may be conditionally used for irrigation in crop production, whereas the rest is salty and therefore unsuitable for irrigation. However, irrigated agriculture consumes ~70% (and >90% in many developing countries) of total water withdrawal to produce ~36% of global food (Howell, 2001). According to recent estimates (ICID, 2009), almost 300 million ha in the world are irrigated, with ~2/3 of that in most populated and the fast growing Asian countries. In many irrigated agricultural areas, especially in developing countries, water scarcity is pronounced because of environmental conditions (e.g. arid and semiarid climate zones) and the rising population (i.e. food demand). As a consequence, there is an increasing trend of innappropriate use of restricted water (e.g. over/pumping of salinised aquifers) and continuous degradation of land resources (e.g. salt-affected soils), representing a large burden to human food supply and natural ecosystems.

Some of the most produced and widely used crops in human/animal nutrition such as cereals (rice, maize), forages (clover) or horticultural crops (potatoes, tomatoes) usually require irrigation practices, but are relatively susceptible to excessive concentration of salts either dissolved in irrigation water or present in soil (rhizosphere) solution. In a majority of cultivated plants, yields start declining even at relatively low salinity in irrigation water (ECw>0.8 dS/m) (e.g. Ayers & Westcot, 1994) or soil (ECse>1 dS/m in saturated soil extracts) (see Table 1 in Chinnusamy et al., 2005). Increased soil salinity may induce various primary and secondary salt stress effects in cultivated plants (section 4.3.1). Salt stress as one of the most widespread abiotic constraints in food production may also result in the negative ecological, social and/or economic outcomes. For instance, recent deposition of toxic salt sediments and sea intrusion in tsunami-affected areas of Maldives damaged >70% of agriculture land, destroyed >370,000 fruit trees and affected around 15,000 farmers, with costs estimated at around AU$6.5 million (FAO, 2005). Successful remediation of salt-degraded areas for crop production, besides using relatively salt-tolerant species/genotypes, is highly dependent on sustainable management practices that are usually costly, time consuming and may be difficult or impossible to implement fully in certain ecological situations (e.g. seepage soil salinity; section 3.1). Accordingly, in response to the salinity issue, Australia’s National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality from 2000, resulted in investments of about AU$1.4 billion over 7 years to support actions by communities and land managers in salt-affected regions (Williams, 2010). However, recent advances in plant breeding and molecular biology technologies suggest that increasing salt tolerance in cultivated plants could be one of the most promising and effective strategies for food production in salt-affected environments.


2. Salinisation - A global land degradation issue

Different types of physical, chemical and/or biological land degradation processes (e.g. compaction, inorganic/organic contamination, diminished microbial activity/diversity), mostly under excessive anthropogenic pressures during the last century, have resulted in serious consequences to global natural resources. Among them, soil salinisation, arising from either natural or human-induced causes, led to an increase in concentration of dissolved salts in the soil profile to a level that impairs food production, environmental health and socio-economic wellbeing (Ondrasek et al., 2009a, Rengasamy, 2006). Despite numerous adverse environmental consequences (e.g. crop yield/quality decline, disruption of soil aggregates/structure, desertification), areas already affected by salinity are among the most intensively exploited ones in global agriculture. Salinisation is among the three soil degradation processes [in addition to organic matter (OM) decline and contamination] recognized as the main threats to environmental resources and human health in EU (Ondrasek et al., submitted a) and many other developed (Helal et al., 1999) or developing countries (Rengasamy, 2006), affecting almost 1 billion ha worldwide.


3. Soil salinisation processes

Depending on soils, the extracted solutions differ in the content of dissolved salts (cations/anions); if total salt concentration, i.e. electrical conductivity (ECse), exceeds 20 mM (~2 dS/m), they can be categorised as salt-affected (e.g. Abrol et al., 1988). The underlying salinisation processes may be primary (natural) and secondary (anthropogenic) (Ghassemi et al., 1995). Main driving forces of naturally-induced (inherent) soil salinity are: i) intrusion of highly salinised water in coastal (oceans, sea) or continental (e.g. fossil salt aquifers) regions, ii) aeolian i.e. wind borne salt from salt surface waters (oceans, lakes) deposited inland, and iii) dissolution of soil parent minerals. In contrast, some agricultural practices (fertigation, application of inorganic/organic soil amendments) may contribute to secondary salinisation processes. In contrast to that categorised classification, soils salinisation principally inherent to Australian environmental conditions is different (Biggs et al., 2010, Rengasamy, 2006).

3.1. An Australian example

Australia is the most salt-affected continent with ~1/3 (~260 million ha) of total global salinised area, and ~1/2 of total world’s alkaline area (e.g. Szabolcs, 1989). The most widespread Australian soil salinity (>250 million ha), called subsoil or transient, is present in alkaline (pH >8.5) and Na-enriched soils (e.g. ESP≥6) (Rengasamy, 2002) and specific climatic surrounding, where evapotranspiration demand frequently exceeds rainfall by multi-fold. Transient salinity occurs preferentially in higher ecobiotopes (e.g. slight uplifts and terraces), in illuvial subsoil (B) horizons (20-100 cm from the soil surface) enriched with topsoil-leached Na salts (ECse 4-16 dS/m) and dispersed clay particles (e.g. Rengasamy, 2002, 2006). In such subsoil circumstances, whereby excessive Na+ presence disturbs soil structure and hydraulic properties (e.g. Ondrasek et al., 2010), after watering i.e. during wet season, dissolved salt ions fluctuate over the solum and cause its salinisation. Therefore, subsoil salinity is triggered by water/solute flux and hydraulic conductivity of (sub)pedosphere (e.g. Rengasamy, 2002), rather than by the fluctuation of salinised groundwater that is the main cause of second most abundant type of salinisation in Australian soils.

Groundwater-induced (seepage, dryland) salinity, in contrast to transient salinity, occurs in the lowest positions in the landscape (e.g. base of slopes/valleys). In this type, also called catena form - type 1, water flows relatively easily through the lighter textured soils in upslope locations, but cannot move as quickly through the heavy soils in the footslope, causing waterlogging and seepage (Biggs et al., 2010). It is induced by upwards intrusion and/or capillary rising of highly saline (ECw up to 150 dS/m) and relatively superficial (<2 m from land surface) watertable, even up to topsoils strongly salinising them (ECse up to 80 dS/m) by secondary processes (Rengasamy, 2002). From economical/ecological perspective, soils affected by dryland salinity are more adversely affected than transiently saline subsoils, are highly restricted for cultivation and could be high costly to remediate.

Total annual cost to Australian economy caused by dryland/transient salinity and associated subsoil constraints (e.g. excessive pH, Na, Cl, B, Al, carbonates; see review by Dang et al., 2006) are estimated at more than A$1.6 billion (e.g. Rengasamy, 2002). One of relatively cost-effective and widely used strategies in coping with groundwater salinity in Australia is lowering/controlling of watertables (e.g. around 1 m from soil surface) by withdrawing from underlying salt-affected aquifers and using the water in irrigated agriculture (directly or after mixing with fresh water), thus enables salt leaching and improved permeability in the rhizosphere (e.g. Bethune & Batey, 2002). Also, a short-term use of slightly to moderately salinised water for irrigation of perennial pastures (ECw 0.8-2.4 dS/m) or legume lucerne crops (ECw 2.5 dS/m) would have little effect on their production (e.g. Burrow et al., 2002; Rogers, 2001).

However, over the long-term period, such irrigation practices will most likely induce (among other constrains discussed later) irrigation salinity as a widespread soil degradation problem. In many similar arable, (semi)arid areas around the world, secondary salinisation induced with inappropriate irrigation/drainage practices (e.g. re/using of saline ground/surface waters, using of industrial/municipal waste waters/effluents, over-pumping of coastal aquifers, lacking/improper subsoil drainage, etc) affects ~50% of global irrigated areas, with an annually increment of up to 500,000 ha (e.g. Martinez-Beltran & Manzur, 2005, Ondrasek et al., 2009a), representing a serious threat to sustainable food production and deterioration of natural terrestrial resources.

Recently, ICID (2009) estimated that >20% of water used in Australia is derived from groundwater sources, and out of that the most is used for irrigation of totally ~2.55 million ha irrigated land area. A substantial part of that land is probably exposed to secondary irrigation salinisation because (re)using of saline groundwater for crop irrigation is one of common strategies in Australian soil salinity management (Bethune & Batey, 2002). According to the same authors, irrigated pastures, mostly developed on lands with highly salinised watertables, are spread on around 30% or 0.7 million ha of irrigated land in Australia.

There are many other types of primary/secondary land (water) salinisation processes (see report by Biggs et al., 2010) such as i) closed depression salinity i.e. primary salinity that occurs in natural deep depressions (e.g. lakes, swamps, etc: Figure 1a) with restricted leaching and pronounced surface (10-30 mm) salt encrustation i.e. crystallisation (Figure 1c), and ii) so-called dam-form salinity, occurring in many water storage areas (Figure 1b).

3.2. An European (Croatian) example

Soil degradation processes are widespread in European countries (e.g. wind/water erosion on ~160 million ha or ~15% of total Europe’s area; compaction on ~36% of European subsoils, etc) and have been either driven or exacerbated by human activities

Figure 1.

Closed depression (a, c) and dam (b) type salinity with the white surface salt encrustation (a, b, c) in the Lake Grace area, Western Australia (Photos taken by G. Ondrasek, 2011).

(European Commission, 2006). According to the same source, total annual costs of some of the most important land degradations (erosion, OM decline, salinisation, landslides and contamination) that could be estimated amount to AU$52 billion, and do not include the damage to the soil ecological functions as these are exceedingly difficult to quantify. Among continents, Europe has the lowest portion of degraded soils by excessive salinity (~31 million ha), ~8-fold lower compared to the most salt-affected Australia (e.g. Szabolcs, 1989).

According to General Soil Map of Croatia (1:50,000) permanent halomorphic soil classes (Solonchak and Solonetz) are minor i.e. distributed on <600 ha or 0.01% of total land area (Bogunovic et al., 1998). However, recent multidisciplinary studies, related to environmental salinisation processes (land/water) and their influence on irrigated agriculture and natural ecosystems of intensively agro-exploited costal estuaries (Ondrasek et al., 2010; Romic et al., submitted) suggest potentially large influence of salinisation in Mediterranean areas of Croatia. Also, seems that substantial portion of salinised land areas is still fortunately periodically characterised because of specific geo(pedo)logical and climate interactions. From geological perspective, along coastline of Adriatic Sea there are many fertile and arable karstified fields and alluvial estuaries with similar properties and exposure to salinisation processes as can be explained in case of Neretva River delta (Figure 2).

The geological parent material in down stream of Neretva river consists of: i) Mesozoic and Paleogene carbonates with certain Paleogene flysch materials (creating the basement of the fractured and deeply karstified valley that is very susceptible to sea water intrusion; Figure 2a), and ii) Quaternary sediment and poorly lithified deposits (with heterogeneous water permeability and other hydraulic properties) representing surface of lito(pedo)sphere underlain by clay, sand and/or gravel alluvial (Holocene) fractions as well as Pleistocene conglomerates (Romic et al., submitted). Also, direct sea water intrusion, in the shape of salty wedge, through Neretva river and its natural/artificial tributaries is possible even up to several tens of kilometres upstream, depending on river watertable and seasonal (dry/wet) conditions (Figure 2b). Irrespective of which way seepage of salty water is manifested (directly through porous karstified materials or via river flows, laterally or upwardly through alluvial deposits), salty water is mixing with groundwater, restricting its usage for agriculture or as drinking water (Figure 2c).

As confirmed by chemical analyses of surface and groundwater sources and topsoil saturation extracts, primary and/or potential secondary salinisation processes are present on >2,500 ha of irrigated land in Neretva River estuary, given that ECw/ECse and/or SAR (Sodium Adsorption Ratio) values exceed those recommended for agriculture by FAO (e.g. Abrol et al., 1988, Ayers & Westcot, 1994, Ondrasek et al., 2010). Detected processes of primary salinization caused by the capillary rising of highly salinised groundwater (e.g. ECw>23 dS/m at <4 m depth) may initiate salt accumulation in (sub)soil horizons (Ondrasek et al., 2010). Also, multi-annual monitoring of quality of surface water sources (ameliorative drainage channel network, Romic & Vranjes, 2010) confirmed their periodically strong salinisation and serious restrictions of their irrigation usage (i.e. ECw>3 dS/m) (Ayers & Westcot, 1994). Meanwhile, at most analysed locations, surface water is used in intensive horticultural production employing drip/micro sprinkler fertigation practices (Romic et al., 2008), inducing secondary soil salinisation. However, favourable climate and soil conditions such as i) intensive rainfall (>650 mm) in between two vegetation seasons, ii) relatively homogenous/stable solum structure, and iii) light soil texture and therefore good water permeability of majority of alluvial sediments, enable leaching of accumulated topsoil salts into deeper horizons (below the root zone) and underpin resilience of these agricultural ecosystems (Ondrasek et al., 2010). Finally, recently initiated monitoring of salinisation downstream of Neretva River estuary (Romic & Vranjes, 2010 and references therein) will provide new insights into the subsoil constrains in this area (e.g. salinity/sodicity).

Figure 2.

Salinisation processes in Neretva river estuary, Croatia, adopted fromOndrasek, 2008; Romic et al., submitted and references therein (dashed arrows represent intrusion of sea/salted water, whereas the straight arrows are main flow directions of river/sea)


4. Environmental consequences of soil salinity

4.1. Impact on pedosphere

Soil salinity is often accompanied by a wide range of pedosferic (low soil fertility, high exposure to erosion processes), atmospheric (high air temperature, low precipitation and air humidity) and/or hydrospheric (water scarcity) constrains, which negatively influence agricultural production. However, secondary consequences of salinity, such as those due to long-term usage of salinised water for irrigation, may cause permanent soil degradation because of dispersion of soil aggregates. Sodium (Na+), as the most frequent causative agents of salinity, is the most pronounced destructor (by dispersion) of secondary clay minerals. Dispersion occurs because of Na+ replacement of calcium (Ca2+) and other coagulators (Mg2+, OM) adsorbed on the surface and/or inter-layers of soil aggregates (e.g. Ondrasek et al., 2010 and references therein). The replacement is mainly caused by specific physical characteristics, such as ionic radii, electrical charge and hydratation ability of particular elements, whereas some chemical properties (e.g. increased pH) may facilitate the clay dispersion process.

For instance, 6-co-ordinated Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions have radii of 0.100 and 0.072 nm, respectively, whereas that of Na+ is 0.102 nm (Shannon, 1976). Also, single-charged Na has lower clay-binding ability then double-charged Ca (or Mg), which in turn is not so strongly hydrated as Na (Rashad & Dultz, 2007). Thus, after Ca2+ (Mg2+) replacement by Na+ and its intrusion into secondary clay minerals (e.g. 1:1 or 2:1 phyllosilicate sheets) and watering (i.e. hydratation), interlamellar space increases and may cause decoupling of lamellae (sheets), i.e. clay dispersion. Finally, under alkaline conditions (pH>8) rate of dissolution (dispersion) of silicate minerals increases because excessive OH- interacts with the clay interface and generates strong negative charge (e.g. Rashad & Dultz, 2007).

Dispersed clay particles undergo leaching through the soil and may accumulate and block pores, especially in fine-textured soil horizons (Burrow et al., 2002) i.e. cause pedospheric waterlogging. Furthermore, dispersion of clay usually induces topsoil crusting, thus reducing infiltration, enhancing surface runoff and other related degradation processes (soil erosion/desertification, surface waterlogging, nutrient leaching, etc). Over time, in saline (sodic) soils crusted surface layer (Figure 3b) constrains hydraulic properties (water permeability, infiltration rate, etc) as well as aeration of topsoil horizons and the root zone.

Figure 3.

Surface salt crystallisation (a) and topsoil crusting (b) in a faba bean paddock (Esperance area, W. Australia) (Photos taken by G.Ondrasek, 2010)

During the dry periods, salts accumulated in the soil profile or on the soil surface (Figure 3a) may further affect soil properties. For instance, ground observations and radiometric measurements confirmed that quantity and quality (i.e. mineralogy) of salts, together with soil moisture, colour, and roughness, affect the soil surface reflectance (Metternicht & Zinck, 2003), and consequently influence the topsoil physical properties (e.g. warming). It was shown that abundance of Na2SO4 (puffy crusts) or NaCl (smooth crusts) increases reflectance in the visible and near-infrared wavelengths compared with the nonsaline soil surface (e.g. Metternicht & Zinck, 2003). According to the same authors, the surface of saline soils is brighter compared to sodic (alkaline) soils due to OM dispersion in the latter.

4.2. Impact on hydrosphere

Increased salinity in soil solution, especially increased concentrations of Na+ and Cl- ions, significantly influence solubility i.e. mobility of potentially toxic trace elements (Helal et al., 1999, Khoshgoftar et al. 2004, Khoshgoftarmanesh et al., 2006, Ondrasek et al., 2009a, 2009b, Weggler et al., 2004). Excessive salinity may cause desorption of particular metal and other cations from the soil adsorption matrix, increasing concentration of bioavailable forms in the soil solution. In particular, an exposure to increasing NaCl salinity increased concentration of trace elements (e.g. Cu, Zn, Cr and/or Cd) in the rhizosphere soil solution (Helal et al., 1999, Khoshgoftar et al. 2004, Ondrasek et al., submitted b) or in unplanted humic solution (Lores & Pennock, 1998). Namely, organic (humics, black carbon) and inorganic (clay, hydroxides) surfaces, mostly negatively charged, compete with salt anions (Cl-, SO4 2-) for metal cations (Cu2+, Al3+) via adsorption and complexation reactions (e.g. Adriano et al., 2004). Therefore, under excessive concentrations of Na+, it is really expected displacement of weakly bound metal forms (Cd2+, Zn2+) and their accelerate release from soil solids to solution and enhance their mobility i.e. expose surrounding aquatic ecosystems to increased metals contamination (Ondrasek et al., submitted a).

4.3. Impact on biosphere, particularly plants

In general, bulk and rhizosphere soil, as well surface and subsurface soil profiles, differ in their chemical, physical and biological properties (pH, salinity, redox potential, porosity, water retention, abundance and diversity of microbial species, etc). Increased salinity/sodicity (EC/Na) in the rhizosphere affects root exudation (e.g. of low-molecular-weight organic substances) and biochemical transformations i.e. decomposition of organic matter by microorganisms (Ondrasek et al., submitted b). Contradictory effects of increased EC and Na on soil biological processes (e.g. OM decomposition) have been reported (Li et al., 2006 and references therein). Recently, Ondrasek et al. (submitted a) observed a decrease in dissolved OM (dependent on soil microbe-root interactions) of 5% (at ~4 dS/m and 20 mM Na) and >20% (at ~8 dS/m and 60 mM Na) compared to control (~2 dS/m and 1.5 mM Na). Similar observation were reported by Li et al. (2006), who noticed significant negative correlations between soil EC and total CO2 emission or microbial biomass C, suggesting that salinity had an adverse effect on microbial biomass and activity. Therefore, naturally-occurring soil OM decomposers may be sensitive to salt-induced stress.

4.3.1. Salt stress in crop production Background

A majority of cultivated plant species, especially widely grown horticultural and cereal crops (e.g. Table 1 from Chinnusamy et al., 2005), are glycophytes i.e. susceptible to excessive concentration of dissolved ions (e.g. >30 mM or >3.0 dS/m) in the rhizosphere solution. Depending on salt concentration and the length of exposure, the stage of growth/development and the environmental conditions (e.g. humidity, temperature, insolation, soil moisture, etc), in glycophytes increased salinity may induce different physiological malfunctions, such as osmotic, ionic and different secondary (e.g. oxidative) disorders (Zhu, 2001), generally known as salt stress. Osmotic stress, as primary reaction triggered by relatively low/moderate salinity levels, decreases soil water potential i.e. reduces water uptake and causes possible cell dehydration (Ondrasek et al., 2009a and references therein). For instance, increased concentration of dissolved salts may reduce soil water potential from -1 to -2.5 (-5 in extreme cases) MPa (Flowers & Flowers, 2005), whereas at water field capacity its potential is 0.033 MPa. In saline conditions, osmotic pressure in the rhizosphere solution exceeds that in root cells, influencing water and nutrient uptake. Further plant responses to osmotic stress are stomata closure (partially or fully) i.e. transpiration/C assimilation reduction, decrease in cell growth and development, reduced leaf area and chlorophyll content, accelerated defoliation and senescence i.e. mortality of plant organism (Shannon & Grieve, 1999).

An increase in concentration of certain dissolved ions, such as those in relatively shallow Australian Na-subsoils solution, will enhance their uptake i.e. ionic stress, and ultimately cause phytotoxic effects (e.g. Cl-, B, Al toxicity). Specific ionic stresses disrupt integrity/selectivity of root plasma membrane, homeostasis of essential ions and numerous metabolic activities (e.g. Zhu, 2001). For instance, in rice, as one of the most widely grown cereals, salinity is the main limiting variable of mineral nutrition (Marschner, 1995). Moreover, approximately half of global saline (i.e. alkaline) soils used for cereal production are overlain on soils with low levels of plant-available Zn i.e. Zn-deficient soils, due to Zn complexation/competition with dissolved salts (CO3s, SO4s, Na+) at alkaline pHs (Ondrasek et al., submitted b). Therefore, given that the food crop consumption is the principal route of most essential minerals into the human organism, salinity may indirectly contribute to mineral deficiency in billions of people.

The primary salinity effects give rise to numerous secondary ones such as oxidative stress, characterised by accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS, e.g. H2O2, O2 .-,.OH), potentially harmful to biomembranes, proteins, nucleic acids and enzymes (Gomez et al., 2004) (see 5.2. section). Antioxidative enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalases, peroxidises, etc enhance detoxication of ROS. The relatively salt-tolerant species (e.g. pea genotypes) have increased activities of certain antioxidative enzymes (e.g. SOD; Hernandez et al., 2001), whereas in salt-sensitive species (e.g. cowpea) Na+ causes a stronger inhibition effect on particular SOD forms than Cl- ions (Hernandez et al., 1994). Nutrient uptake under salt stress - Impact on food production

Two most important ions that induce salt stress in plants are Na+ and Cl-. Sodium is nonessential but beneficial element, whereas Cl is essential phytomicronutrient (Marschner, 1995); however, both are potentially toxic in excessive concentrations, triggering specific disorders and causing substantial damages to crops. Under excessive Na+ and Cl- rhizosphere concentration (activity), there are competitive interactions with other nutrient ions (e.g. K+, NO3 -, H2PO4 -) for binding sites and transport proteins in root cells, and thereafter for (re)translocation, deposition and partitioning within the plant (see reviews by Grattan & Grieve, 1999, Tester & Davenport, 2003, White & Broadley, 2001). Significantly enhanced uptake and accumulation of Na and Cl (from 11-fold in radish up to >100-fold in strawberry and muskmelon leaves), accompanied with a decrease in K concentration in the same tissues (from ~30% in strawberry and ~40% in radish to 4-fold in muskmelon) was obtained under moderate (60 mM) NaCl salinity (Ondrasek et al., 2009a, 2009b; unpublished). In the same studies, salinity stress reduced all vegetative parameters (e.g. number of strawberry runners by up to 7-fold and length of the longest runner by 3-fold), decreased total fruit yield (in radish by 35%, muskmelon by 50% and strawberry by 60%), accelerated leaf senescence and reduced the strawberry growing period by up to 22 days i.e. induced plant mortality after 65-day treatment with salinised (60 mM NaCl) nutrient solution.

The high K/Na and Ca/Na ratios are essential for normal plant functioning (e.g. Chinnusamy et al., 2005). The Ca/Na declined under salinity by 13-fold in radish, 113-fold in strawberry and 150-fold in muskmelon leaf tissue (Ondrasek et al., 2009a, 2009b; unpublished). It appears that disturbance of cytosolic Ca2+ homeostases in root cells is one of the fastest signals in glycophytes to increasing salinity; hence, a decrease in Ca/Na could be one of the most reliable salt-stress indicators (reviewed by Rengel, 1992). An addition of Ca may significantly mitigate certain salt stress-induced dysfunctions in crops that may be used as one of management strategies in salt-affected agro-ecosystems (section 5.1).

Crops with perturbed nutrients relations (e.g. Ca/Na, K/Na etc) are more susceptible to invasion of different pathogenic (micro)organisms and/or physiological dysfunctions (e.g. blossom-end root, blackheart), whereas their edible parts have markedly less economic and nutritional value due to reduced fruit size and shelf life, non-uniform fruit shape, decreased vitamin content, etc. (Ondrasek, 2008 and references therein). Consumption of edible crop parts grown in salt-affected and metal contaminated surrounding could pose a high risk of metals intake into the human/animal organisms (Ondrasek et al., submitted b). It was well documented that in rhizosphere/soil solution salinised by Na+, Cl- and/or SO4 2- ions, potentially toxic metals such as Cd, Zn and Cu are taken up and accumulated to a large extent in different horticultural (McLaughlin et al., 1998, Ondrasek et al., 2009a, 2009b, Smolders et al., 1997), cereal (Khoshgoftar et al. 2004, Khoshgoftarmanesh et al., 2006, Weggler et al., 2004) and forage (green manure) crops (Helal et al., 1999), although complete mechanisms are unexplained. Matrix of saline (sodic) soil is naturally poor and/or depleted in metal-binding interfaces (e.g. alumosilicate minerals, organic C), thus predisposes crops to potentially strong metal influence.


5. Options for mitigating salt stress in crop production

A majority of arable salt-affected areas are distributed in the intensively cropped food producing regions such as those in Asia and Australia. The excessive concentration (EC) and ratios (e.g. ESP, SAR) among particular salts (Na, Cl, Ca, Mg) as well pH conditions need to be taken into account when considering appropriate strategies for reclamation of salt-affected soils in crop production. Such salt-affected soils can be categorised into: i) saline (ECe > 4 dS/m, ESP < 15 and pH <8.5), i) saline-sodic (ECe > 4 dS/m, ESP > 15 and pH <8.5) and iii) sodic (ECe >4 dS/m, ESP >15 and pH >8.5), each requiring specific approaches for reclamation (Horney et al., 2005) and sustainable land management practices, that are usually costly and difficult to implement, and may even result in further degradation.

5.1. Sustainable agricultural management in salinised conditions

Sustainable agricultural management in salt-affected conditions is principally based on two main approaches; prevention (with aim to elude further salinisation processes) and remediation management (i.e. reclamation of existing salinised land/water), but they usually overlap (e.g. Biggs et al., 2010). In selecting the most appropriate managing approaches analysis of several critical variables should be taken into account: i) the nature of soil geochemistry (i.e. salt type and concentrations, acidity, alkalinity), ii) groundwater hydrology (e.g. watertable fluctuation), iii) climate conditions (precipitation, evapotranspiration), and iv) plant species selection.

In natural environment, indigenous flora can counteract negative influences of excessive salinity by maintaining salinised groundwater below a harmful level and/or by its genetic predisposition i.e. pronounced salinity resistance. With introduction of cultivated species, many interrelations in natural terrestrial ecosystems were disturbed. Many primary salinised areas, such as those in alluvial floodplains (e.g. section 3.2), after land amelioration by (sub)surface drainage (open channel and pipeline network) had groundwater salinity decreased to a level suitable for agricultural production (Romic et al., submitted). These authors confirmed that with proper selection of modern irrigation systems (e.g. drippers vs. micro sprinklers) and mulch cropping technology, negative ecological consequences (e.g. yield/vegetative growth declining, mortality of cultured crop, increased ECse) arising from usage of salinised water for irrigation (ECw up to 7 dS/m) may be markedly reduced (Romic et al., 2008). Thus, establishing adequate drainage and/or ensuring sufficient volume of good quality (low salinity) water for irrigation and salt leaching from the root zone may be an appropriate strategy for at least partially reclaiming saline soils. Burrow et al. (2002) used channel/rain water (ECw=0.1 dS/m) to leach salts from the topsoil, but not in subsoil where another constraints were detected, i.e. increased clay dispersion and sodicity. Therefore, saline-sodic and/or sodic (sub)soils require an application of appropriate soil amendments for Na replacement to aid in remediation (e.g. Horney et al., 2005).

Application of certain amendments (inorganic or organic fertilisers, lime, gypsum, etc) to pedosphere with excessive concentration of salts/Na has multiple beneficial roles. One is cation exchange of Ca for Na (e.g. with Ca-based amendments) given that the addition of electrolyte such is Ca (also Mg) helps to maintain micro-aggregate integrity in the soil profile (discussed in 4.1). With the application of 12 t/ha of gypsum, Wheaton et al. (2002) markedly decreased the ratio of Na+ to Ca2+ + Mg2+ (i.e. SAR) and reclaimed sodic subsoil (ESP 6-10) to non-sodic. In the same study, gypsum improved physical soil properties i.e. decreased clay dispersion (i.e. increased flocculation), reduced spontaneous dispersion (air-dry aggregates) and dispersion of remoulded aggregates, increased hydraulic conductivity and probably ensured better aeration. Under acidic pHs, CaCO3 application (liming) provides an electrolyte source for ensuring sufficient Ca-for-Na replacement, whereas in naturally CaCO3-sufficient soils, H2SO4 application (or its precursor, elemental S) in reaction with carbonates ultimately produces gypsum i.e. exchangeable Ca (e.g. Horney et al., 2005).

For achieving positive effects of different soil amendments in salt-affected conditions, several critical factors need to be considered, such as: i) uniform soil incorporation (mixing), ii) adequate soil water content for their dissolution, iii) presence of certain microbial population (e.g. sulphuric bacteria for S oxidation), etc. For example, Wheaton et al. (2002) reclaimed moderately sodic subsoils by applying 12 t/ha gypsum and 2,850 mm of water (as irrigation plus rain). To be dissolved, an average gypsum dosage (~10 t/ha) would need ~1,200-1,500 mm water (Greene & Ford, 1985; Wheaton et al., 2002), an amount hardly achievable by natural precipitation in short term in (semi)arid conditions (in contrast, irrigation may be too costly to implement).

Given that excesive Na+/Cl- salinity mostly impairs macro/micronutrient balance (discussed before), the direct practice to recover nutrient uptake and homeostasis is by specific (e.g. Ca, K, P) fertilisation. For instance, it was shown that supplementary application of Ca may result in many benefits (e.g. reduced accumulation of Na and improved K and Ca uptake, dry matter production, yield, etc) for crops grown under saline conditions (Cuartero & Fernandez-Munoz, 1999). Also, the same authors suggested that increasing K (to 10-15 mM) and P (to 10-100 µM) in the rhizosphere solution could be recommendable for saline conditions, although the upper levels of these nutrient concentrations should be further investigated.

Application of Zn fertiliser may be beneficial in saline/sodic environment. It was confirmed that ZnSO4 may improve salt tolerance in cereals and results in several other important benefits such as crop micronutrient enrichment (e.g. by 90% for Zn) and reduced uptake/phytoaccumulation of toxic elements (e.g. by >100% for Cd) (Khoshgoftar et al., 2004). However, Zn fertilisation is not always acceptable because of ecological/economic consequences, whereas cropping of Zn-efficient species/genotypes on such Zn-deficient soils is one possible approach for reducing land degradation and minimizing the use of fertilizers (Khoshgoftar et al., 2006, Rengel & Graham, 1995).

Cropping system adaptation i.e. opportunity cropping, is another possible and widely used strategy in combating salinity and some other accompanied (sub)soil constrains (e.g. low soil fertility and water retention capacity, water deficit, high evaporation, increased pH) or land degradations (e.g. OM depletion, desertification). It assumes implementation of conservation tillage systems to restrict loses of soil moisture, soil erosion, reduce soil compaction, disturbance and energy consumption, i.e. conserve plant-available water and OM (Ondrasek et al., submitted b). Under such land management, at least 30% of the crop residues may remain on the soil surface (e.g. straw residues and stubble between rows, Figure 4). Furthermore, opportunity cropping assumes a wide range of other measures, such as double cropping (consociation of cereals and forages), selection of crop species (e.g. perennial deep rotted, more salt-tolerant, etc.), presence of pasture and tree species (for windbreaks, controlling groundwater level), etc. (see report by Biggs et al., 2010). Lucerne, as relatively salt-tolerant and deep-rooted legume, is shown to be the most effective perennial pasture for controlling groundwater recharge, with the strongest dewatering in the soil profile within the first 18 months of establishment (Powell, 2004).

Figure 4.

Conservation tillage systems in barley (a; Esperance area, W. Australia), and canola and wheat (b, c; Dalwallinu area, W. Australia) (Photos taken by G.Ondrasek, 2010)

Grafting is a widely used technique in horticulture for asexual propagation and may also be helpful in withstand deleterious salinity effects (e.g. Cl toxicity) in crops. It was well documented that certain rootstock-scion combinations can reduce uptake and root-shoot translocation/accumulation of dissolved salts (Na+ and/or Cl) in mango (Schmutz & Lüdders, 1999), citrus (reviewed by Storey & Walker, 1999) and grapevines (Stevens & Walker, 2002).

Several attempts have been made to improve salt tolerance by hydropriming (Basra et al., 2005a), pre-sowing chilling treatment (Basra et al., 2005b), halopriming (Kamboh et al., 2000) and ascorbate priming (Borsani et al., 2001, Afzal et al., 2006). Priming can increase the activity of free radicals scavering enzymes, thus can reduces the damages caused by salt stress. Seed priming (osmoconditioning) with salinised (NaCl) solution prior to sowing is one of possible methods for improving salt tolerance in a wide range of relatively salt-sensitive crops (e.g. tomato, muskmelon, cucumber, etc) (e.g. Sivritepe et al., 2003, 2005). Based on literature review, Cuartero & Fernandez-Munoz (1999) recommended priming in 1 M NaCl for 36 hours in the case of direct sowing, and for seedlings conditioning in moderately saline solution or by withholding water for 20-24 hours, although specific duration and concentrations should be adapted to a particular crop.

Notwithstanding that elucidation of salt tolerance is complex with respect to its quantitative multigenic character (e.g. Flowers & Flowers, 2005), transgenic plants have been produced with high tolerance to salinity (up to 200 mM NaCl or 20 dS/m) (reviewed by Chinnusamy et al., 2005). Therefore, exploitation of genetic approaches (discussed next) in the long-term may achieve some of the most promising and effective outcomes in plant salt tolerance.

5.2. Genetic mechanisms of increasing of salt tolerance in plants

Enhanced salt tolerance in crop plants may be achieved via traditional and molecular breeding and transgenic approaches. However, genetic and physiological complexity of salinity tolerance does not lend itself easily to traditional breeding that may for example use a pedigree approach, which consists of screening germplasm for donors of salt tolerance, crossing a donor with an elite line and advancing the F1 hybrid to about the F8 generation while selecting for an elite trait. While the efficiency of this type of breeding is not sufficient (Ashraf & Akram, 2009), the use of wild relatives for breeding gives useful physiological information about the salt tolerance traits (Colmer et al., 2006). In addition, cell and tissue culture techniques are used to identify somaclonal variants (Zhu et al., 2000) and screen germplasm for salt tolerance in vitro (Arzani, 2008).

Molecular and transgenic breeding is more expensive than conventional, but represents an efficient way to produce salt-tolerant lines. Advances in genomics are underpinning an alternative approach in which a pre-breeding phase is used to pyramid several known genes and finely-mapped major quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for complementary aspects of salt tolerance. DNA-based selection protocols that are used to pyramid these genes are again employed during the breeding phase to transfer the entire set of genes for salt tolerance into any elite line by backcrossing (Benneth & Khush, 2003, Flowers, 2004).

Given the complexity of salt tolerance, only a few QTLs are identified within any given genome (Yeo et al., 2000). The fact that a QTL represents many genes complicates finding key loci within the QTL. Quesada et al. (2002) found five QTLs associated with salinity in Arabidopsis and identified the location of two of them. The other genetic approach currently used to enhance salt tolerance includes generation of transgenic plants to introduce new genes or to alter expression levels of existing genes to affect the degree of tolerance (avoid or reduce deleterious effects, re-establish the homeostatic conditions and maintain active growth in saline environments; Zhu, 2001).

Important deleterious effects under saline conditions might be due to reactive oxygen species (ROS), which cause oxidative stress as one of the most general stress types (Lee et al., 2001). Plants under salt stress produce stress protein and specific osmolytes for scavenging ROS (Xiong & Zhu, 2002, Zhu et al., 1997). Oxidative stress tolerance is genetically controlled; improvements can be provided by conventional breeding and transgenic techniques (Asraf & Akram, 2009) or by adopting physiological approaches (Afzal et al., 2006). Most transgenic improvements in plant salt tolerance are focused on overexpressing enzymes involved in oxidative protection (Allen et al., 1997). In addition, engineering with the regulatory protein NPK1, a nitrogen-activated protein kinase that mediates oxidative stress responses, is also an efficient way for supporting antioxidant defence (Kovtun et al., 2000). Improvements provided via other proteins, like barley late embriogenesis abundant proteins and C-repeat-binding/dehydration-responsive element-binding proteins (CBF/DREBs) in transgenic plants may have ROS detoxifying effects, but are not specific for salt tolerance (Liu et al., 1998, Stockinger et al., 1997).

There are many proteins that appear related to salt stress response in plants. These proteins can directly regulate the levels of osmolytes and control ion homeostasis. Osmolytes, such as mannitol, fructans, proline and glycinebetaine, are also active in scavenging ROS. Genetic engineering of these osmolytes resulted in increasing salt tolerance (Harinasuth et al., 1996, Sahi et al., 2006, Zhu, 2001).

For improved tolerance to salinity, it is important to re-establish homeostasis by controlling Na+, K+, Cl- transporters mediating influx and efflux to fine-tune ion concentrations in the cytoplasm (Zhu, 2001). Nonselective cation channels mediate Na+ entry into the cell, and their molecular identity is becoming clear (Munns & Tester, 2008). Anion and cation transporters are a frequent target of genetic engineering to improve crop salt tolerance (Yamaguchi & Blumwald, 2005). Transcriptome analysis can pinpoint genes associated with regulation of RNA and protein metabolism that have a significant role in regulating salt-stress tolerance (Sahi et al., 2006). Mian et al. (2011) identified a large number of important genes using forward and reverse genetics, yeast complementation and transcriptomics. Microarray analysis has clearly shown that transcripts encoding RNA-binding proteins, helicases, cyclophilins, F-box proteins, dynamin-like proteins, and ribosomal proteins are linked to the salt-stress response in Arabidopsis (Sottosanto et al., 2004).

Earth is a salty planet, the problem of salinity is increasing together with the demand for food; hence, salt-tolerant crops are required. Great efforts have been made to improve salt tolerance of crops by means of conventional and more recently genetic breeding program. However, the genetic complexity of salt tolerance makes the task extremely difficult.


6. Conclusion

Soil salinisation is a widespread soil degradation process, exacerbated by a mismatch between water demands for irrigation in food production and the amount of quality (non-saline) water. Different land, crop and/or water management approaches (e.g. conservation tillage, crop selection/rotation, groundwater level control) have been used to combat salinisation processes in agro-ecosystems and mitigate salt-induced stresses in food/feed production. Although salt resistance in plants is multigenic and thus complex, breeding and transgenic approaches to improve salinity resistance could contribute to enhancing crop production over millions of ha of salt-affected areas worldwide.



This work was supported by the Croatian Science Foundation (Con. O-3510-2010).


  1. 1. AbrolI. P.YadavJ. S. P.MassoudF. I.1988Salt-affected soils and their management,FAO Soils Bulletin,39Italy, Rome, 93 pp
  2. 2. AdrianoD. C.WenzelW. W.VangronsveldJ.BolanN. S.2004Role of assisted natural remediation in environmental cleanup.Geoderma.122121142
  3. 3. Afzali.BasraS. M. A.HameedA.FarooqM.2006Physiological enhancement for alleviation of salt stress in wheat.Pak. J. Bot.,38516491659
  4. 4. AllenR. D.WebbR. P.SchakeS. al.1997Use of transgenic plants to study antioxidant defences.Free Radic. Biol. Med.,23473479
  5. 5. ArzaniA.2008Improving salinity tolerance in crop plants: a biotechnological view.In vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology- Plant,445373383
  6. 6. AsrafM.AkramN. A.2009Improving salinity tolerance of plants through conventional breeding and genetic engineering: an analytical comparison.Advance in Biotechnology,276744752
  7. 7. AyersR. S.WestcotD. W.1994Water qualitiy for Agriculture, FAO Irrig. and Drain. Paper 29, FAO, Rome
  8. 8. BasraS. M. A.AfzalI.RashidR. A.HameedA.2005aInducing salt tolerance in wheat by seed vigor enhancement techniques.Int. J. Biol. Biotech.,2173179
  9. 9. BasraS. M. A.AfzalI.AnwarS.ShafiqueM.HaqA.MajeedK.2005bEffect of seed invigoration techniques on wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) seeds sown under saline and non-saline conditions. J. Seed Technol.,28135141
  10. 10. BennethJ.KhushG. S.2003Enhancing salt tolerance in crops through molecular breeding: A new strategy.Journal of Crop Production,721165
  11. 11. BethuneM. G.BateyT. J.2002Impact on soil hydraulic properties resulting from irrigating saline-sodic soils with low salinity water.Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture,42273279
  12. 12. BiggsA. J. W.WatlingK. M.CupplesN.MinehanK.2010Salinity Risk Assessment for the Queensland Murray-Darling Region. Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management, Toowoomba.
  13. 13. BogunovicM.VidacekZ.HusnjakS.SrakaM.1998Inventory of Soils in Croatia.ACS,633,105112
  14. 14. BorsaniO.ValpuestaV.BotelliM. A.2001Evidence for a role of salycil acid in the oxidative damage generated by NaCl and osmotic stress in arabidopsis seedlings.Plant Physiology,12610241030
  15. 15. BurrowD. P.SurapaneniA.RogersM. E.OlssonK. A.2002Groundwater use in forage production: the effect of saline-sodic irrigation and subsequent leaching on soil sodicity.Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture,42237247
  16. 16. ChinnusamyV.JagendorfA.ZhuJ. K.2005Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants.Crop Science,45437448
  17. 17. ColmerT. D.FlowersT. J.MunnsR.2006Use of wild relatives to improve salt tolerance in wheat.Journal of Experimental Botany,57510591078
  18. 18. CuarteroJ.Fernandez-MunozR.1999Tomato and Salinity.Scientia Horticulturae,7883125
  19. 19. DangY. P.DalalR. C.RoutleyR.SchwenkeG. D.DaniellsI.2006Subsoil constraints to grain production in the cropping soils of the north-eastern region of Australia.Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture,461935
  20. 20. European Commission.2006Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection, COM(2006)231.
  21. 21. FAO.2005Salt-affected soils from sea water intrusion: Strategies for rehabilitation and management. Report of the regional workshop. Bangkok, Thailand, 62 pp
  22. 22. FlowersT. J.FlowersS. A.2005Why does salinity pose such a difficult problem for plant breeders?Agricultural Water Management,781524
  23. 23. FlowersT. J.2004Improving crop salt tolerance.J Exp Bot.,55396307319
  24. 24. GhassemiF.JakemanA. J.NixH. A.1995Salinization of land and water resources. Human causes, extent, management and case studies. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press Ltd.
  25. 25. GomezJ. M.JimenzA.OlmasE.SevillaF.2004Location and effects of long-term NaCl stress on superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase isoenzymes of pea (Pisum sativum cv. Puget) chloroplasts.J Exp Bot.,55119130
  26. 26. GrattanS. R.GrieveC. M.1999Salinity-mineral nutrient relations in horticultural crops.Scientia Horticulturae,781127157
  27. 27. GreeneR. S. B.FordG. W.1985The effect of gypsum on cation exchange in two red duplex soils.Australian Journal of Soil Research,236174
  28. 28. HarinasuthP.TsutsuiK.TakabeT.NomuraM.TakabeT.KishitaniS.1996Exogenous glycinebetaine accumulation and increased salt-tolerance in rice seedlings.Biosci. Biotech. Biocem.,602366368
  29. 29. HelalH. M.UpenovA.IssaG. J.1999Growth and uptake of Cd and Zn by Leucaena leucocephala in reclaimed soils as affected by NaCl salinity.Journal of Plant Nutrition & Soil Scienc,.162589592
  30. 30. HernandezJ. A.FerrerM. A.JimenezA.BarceloA. R.SevillaF.2001Antioxidant systems and O2-/H2O2 production in the apoplast of pea leaves. Its relation with salt-induced necrotic lesions in minor veins. Plant Physiol.,127817831
  31. 31. HernandezJ. A.Del RioL. A.SevillaF.1994Salt stressinduced changes in superoxide dismutase isozymes in leaves and mesophyll protoplasts fromVigna unguiculata(L.) Walp. New Phytol.,1263744
  32. 32. HorneyR. D.TaylorB.MunkD. S.RobertsB. A.LeschS. M.RichardE.2005Development of practical site-specific management methods for reclaiming salt-affected soil.Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,46379397
  33. 33. HowellT. A.2001Enhancing Water Use Efficiency in Irrigated Agriculture.Agron. J.,932281289
  34. 34. ICID.2009International Commission onIrrigation and Drainagein Agriculture. Available from
  35. 35. KambohM. A.OkiY.AdachiT.2000Effect of pre-sowing seed treatment on germination and early seedling growth of wheat varieties under saline conditions.Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr.,46249255
  36. 36. KhoshgoftarA. H.ShariatmadariH.KarimianN.KhajehpourM. R.2006Responses of Wheat Genotypes to Zinc Fertilization Under Saline Soil Conditions.Journal of Plant Nutrition,2915431556
  37. 37. KhoshgoftarA. H.ShariatmadariH.KarimianN.KalbasiM.van der ZeeS. E. A. T. M.ParkerD. R.2004Salinity and Zn application effects on phytoavailability of Cd and Zn.Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,6818851889
  38. 38. KhoshgoftarmaneshA. H.ShariatmadariH.KarimianN.KalbasiM.van der ZeeS. E. A. T. M.2006Cadmium and zinc in saline soil solutions and their concentrations in wheat.Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,70582589
  39. 39. KovtunY.ChiuW. L.TenaG.SheenJ.2000Functional analysis of oxidative stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade in plants.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.,9729402945
  40. 40. LeeD. H.KimY. S.LeeC. B.2001The inductive responses of the antioxidant enzymes by salt stress in the rice (Oryza sativa L.).Journal of Plant Physiology,158737745
  41. 41. LiX.LiF.SinghB.CuiZ.RengelZ.2006Decomposition of maize straw in saline soil.Biol Fertil Soils,42366370
  42. 42. LiuQ.KasugaM.SakumaY.AbeH.MiuraS.Yamaguchi-ShinozakiK.ShinozakiK.1998Two transcription factors, DREB1 and DREB2, with an REBP/AP2DNA binding domain separate two cellular signal transduction pathways in drought- and low temperature-responsive gene expression, respectively, inArabidopsis. Plant Cell,1013911406
  43. 43. LoresE. M.PennockJ. R.1998The effect of salinity on binding of Cd, Cr, Cu and Zn to dissolved organic matter.Chemosphere,375861874
  44. 44. MarschnerH.1995Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2nd ed. Academic Press, London.
  45. 45. Martinez-BeltranJ.ManzurC. L.2005Overview of salinity problems in the world and FAO strategies to address the problem. Proceedings of the international salinity forum, Riverside, California,311313
  46. 46. Mc LaughlinM. J.LambrechtsR. M.SmoldersE.SmartM. K.1998Effects of sulfate on cadmium uptake by Swiss chard: II. Effects due to sulfate addition to soil.Plant Soil,202217222
  47. 47. MetternichtG. I.ZinckJ. A.2003Remote sensing of soil salinity: potentials and constraints.Remote Sensing of Environment,85120
  48. 48. MianA. A.SenadheeraP.MaathuisF. J. M.2011Improving Crop Salt Tolerance: Anion and Cation Transporters as Genetic Engineering Targets.Global Science Books, Plant Stress5(Special16472
  49. 49. MunnsR.TesterM.2008Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.,59651681
  50. 50. OndrasekG.RengelZ.RomicD.SavicR.Salinity decreases dissolved organic carbon in the rhizosphere and increases trace elements phytoaccumulation (submitted a)
  51. 51. OndrasekG.RengelZ.2012. The role of organic matter in trace elements bioavailability and toxicity, In: Abiotic Stress Responses In Plants: Metabolism To Productivity, A. Parvaiz & M.N.V. Prasad (Ed.), Springer, (submitted b)
  52. 52. OndrasekG.RengelZ.RomicD.SavicR.2010Environmental salinisation processes in agro-ecosystem of Neretva River estuary.Novenytermeles.,59223226
  53. 53. OndrasekG.RomicD.RengelZ.RomicM.ZovkoM.2009aCadmium accumulation by muskmelon under salt stress in contaminated organic soil.Sci. Tot. Enviro.,40721752182
  54. 54. OndrasekG.RengelZ.RomicD.PoljakM.RomicM.2009bAccumulation of non/essential elements in radish plants grown in salt-affected and cadmium-contaminated environment.Cereal Research Communications.37912
  55. 55. OndrasekG.2008Salt stress and rhizosphere contamination by cadmium: phytoaccumulation of nutrients and toxic metal. PhD Thesis. Uni. of Zagreb, Croatia
  56. 56. PowellJ.2004Dryland Salinity: On-Farm Decisions and Catchment Outcomes. A guide for leading producers and advisors.Land and Water Australia, Canberra
  57. 57. QuesadaV.Garcia-MartinezS.PiquerasP.PonceM. R.MicolJ. L.2002Genetic architecture of NaCl tolerance in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiology,130951963
  58. 58. RashadM.DultzS.2007Decision Factors of Clay Dispersion in Alluvial Soils of the Nile River Delta- A Study on Surface Charge Properties.American-Eurasian J. Agric. and Environ. Sci.,23213219
  59. 59. RengasamyP.2006World salinization with emphasis on Australia.J Exp Bot.,5710171023
  60. 60. RengasamyP.2002Transient salinity and subsoil constraints to dryland farming in Australian sodic soils.Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture,42351361
  61. 61. RengelZ.GrahamR. D.1995Importance of seed Zn content for wheat growth on Zn-deficient soil. I. Vegetative growth.Plant and Soil,173259266
  62. 62. RengelZ.1992The role of calcium in salt toxicity.Plant Cell Environ.,15625632
  63. 63. RomicD.VranjesM.2010Monitoring of Soil and Water Salinisation in Neretva River delta. Report for 2009. Uni. of Zagreb & Uni. of Split. 85 pp
  64. 64. RomicD.RomicM.RengelZ.ZovkoM.BakicH.OndrasekG.Trace metals in the coastal soils developed from estuarine floodplain sediments in the Croatian Mediterranean region(submitted)
  65. 65. RomicD.OndrasekG.RomicM.JosipB.VranjesM.PetosicD.2008Salinity and irrigation method affect crop yield and soil quality in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.) Growing.Irrigation & Drainage.574463469
  66. 66. RogersM. E.2001The effect of saline irrigation on lucerne production: shoot and root growth, ion relations and flowering incidence in six cultivars grown in northern Victoria, Australia.Irrigation Science,205564
  67. 67. SahiC.SinghA.BlumwaldE.GroverA.2006Beyond osmolytes and transporters: novel plant salt-stress tolerance-related genes from transcriptional profiling data.Physiologia Plantarum,127119
  68. 68. SchmutzU.LüddersP.1999Effect of NaCl Salinity on Growth, Leaf Gas Exchange, and Mineral Composition of Grafted Mango Rootstocks(var.’13-1’ and’Turpentine’).Gartenbauwissenschaft,646064
  69. 69. ShannonM. C.GrieveC. M.1999Tolerance of vegetable crops to salinity.Scientia Horticulturae,78538
  70. 70. ShannonR. D.1976Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides.Acta Crystallographica. Vol.A,32751767
  71. 71. ShiklomanovI. A.RoddaJ. C.2003World Water Resources at the Beginning of the 21st Century, Cambridge University Press,0-52182-085-5UK.
  72. 72. SivritepeH. O.SivritepeN.ErisA.TurhanE.2005The effects of NaCl pre-treatments on salt tolerance of melons grown under long-term salinity.Scientia Horticulturae,106568581
  73. 73. SivritepeN.SivritepeH. O.ErisA.2003The effects of NaCl priming on salt tolerance in melon seedlings grown under saline conditions.Scientia Horticulturae.97229237
  74. 74. SmoldersE.LambrechtsR. M.Mc LaughlinM. J.TillerK. G.1997Effect of soil solution chloride on Cd availability to Swiss chard.J. Environ. Qual.,27426431
  75. 75. SottosantoJ. B.GelliA.BlumwaldE.2004DNA array analyses of Arabidopsis thaliana lacking a vacuolarNa/H antiporter: impact AtNHX1 on gene expression. Plant Journal,40752771
  76. 76. StevensR. M.WalkerR. R.2002Response of grapevines to irrigation-induced saline-sodic soil conditions.Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture,42323331
  77. 77. StockingerE. J.GilmourS. J.ThomashowM. F.1997Arabidopsis thaliana CBF1 encodes an AP2 domain-containing transcriptional activator that binds to the C-repeat/DRE, a cis-acting DNA regulatory element that stimulates transcription in response to low temperature and water deficit.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.,9410351040
  78. 78. StoreyR.WalkerR. R.1999Citrus and Salinity.Scientia Horticulturae,783981
  79. 79. SzabolcsI.1989Salt-affected soils. CRC Press.,0-84934-818-8Raton.
  80. 80. TesterM.DavenportR.2003Na+ Tolerance and Na+ Transport in Higher Plants.Annals of Botany,915503527
  81. 81. WegglerK.Mc LaughlinM. J.GrahamR. D.2004Effect of chloride in soil solution on the plant availability of biosolid-borne cadmium.Journal of Environmental Quality,33496504
  82. 82. WheatonA. D.Mc KenzieB. M.TisdallJ. M.2002Management of a sodic soil for wine grape production.Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture,42333339
  83. 83. WhiteP. J.BroadleyM. R.2001Chloride in Soils and its Uptake and Movement within the Plant: A Review.Annals of Botany,88967988
  84. 84. WilliamsJ.2010Salt in our cities- counteracting the silent flood. Urban Salt Conference, Parramatta, NSW.
  85. 85. XiongL.Zhu-KJ.2002Molecular and genetic aspects of plant responses to osmotic stress.Plant, Cell and Environment,,252131139
  86. 86. YamaguchiT.BlumwaldE.2005Developing salt-tolerant crop plants: challenges and opportunities.Trends in Plant Science,1012615620
  87. 87. YeoA. R.KoyamaM. L.ChintaS.FlowersT.2000Salt tolerance at the whole plant level. In: Cherry, J.H., (Ed.) Plant tolerance to abiotic stresses in agriculture: role of genetic engineering,3Netherlands: Kluwer,107123
  88. 88. ZhuG. Y.KinetJ. M.BertinP.BouharmontJ.LuttsS.2000Crosses between cultivars and tissue culture-selected plants for salt resistance improvement in rice, Oryza sativa.Plant Breeding,119497504
  89. 89. ZhuJ. K.HasegawaP. M.BressanaR. A.1997Molecular aspects of osmotic stress in plants.Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.,16253277
  90. 90. ZhuJ. K.2001Plant salt tolerance.Trends in Plant Science,626671

Written By

Gabrijel Ondrasek, Zed Rengel and Szilvia Veres

Submitted: November 18th, 2010 Reviewed: May 30th, 2011 Published: September 22nd, 2011