Open access

Current Knowledge in Physiological and Genetic Mechanisms Underpinning Tolerances to Alkaline and Saline Subsoil Constraints of Broad Acre Cropping in Dryland Regions

Written By

Muhammad Javid, Marc Nicolas and Rebecca Ford

Submitted: 24 November 2010 Published: 22 September 2011

DOI: 10.5772/23241

From the Edited Volume

Abiotic Stress in Plants - Mechanisms and Adaptations

Edited by Arun Shanker and B. Venkateswarlu

Chapter metrics overview

4,171 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Abiotic stresses are a serious problem to crop production under dryland conditions in arid and semi-arid regions of the world. These abiotic stresses include high and low temperature, water deficit, salinity, sodicity, alkalinity, acidity and ion deficiencies and toxicities. Many Australian agricultural soils accumulate salts under seasonal fluctuations and have multiple subsoil constraints such as alkalinity, acidity, sodicity, and toxic ions (Rengasamy, 2006). Of these, salinity and alkalinity are simultaneously found in soils of southern Australia (Nuttall et al., 2003a, Nuttall et al., 2003b). The simultaneous occurrence of multiple abiotic stresses may result in far greater productivity loss than any single abiotic or biotic factor.

Nearly 800 million ha of land throughout the world is salt affected either by salinity or associated with sodicity (FAO, 2009). The total area under salinity in Australia is estimated to be 32 million ha in arable and permanent cropping land (FAO, 2000). Transient or dryland salinity is probably the biggest factor causing salinity in Australia (Figure 1, Rengasamy 2002). Saline soils are generally defined as those having high concentrations of soluble salt with an electrical conductivity (ECe) of more than 4 dSm-1 . Among the soluble salts, NaCl is the major component contributing to salinity (USSL, 2005).

Yields of important cereal, oilseed and forage crops are limited by soil salinity in broad acre dryland regions. Therefore, genetic crop improvement by conventional and non-conventional methods for salt tolerance is vital to maintain food production. The ability to grow and reproduce in saline soil differs widely between species, due to differences in the ability to control salt uptake from the soil and to compartmentalise it effectively at the cellular level (Munns & Tester, 2008).

Crops grown under dryland conditions on alkaline soils in south-eastern Australia are potentially limited by many factors, especially water supply and nutrition (Incerti & O’Leary, 1990). Alkaline soils are usually categorized by low availability of plant nutrients, high concentrations of HCO3 and CO3 2−, and high pH (Marschner, 1995, Misra & Tyler, 1999). By definition, alkalinity is the concentration of soluble alkalis with the ability to neutralize acids (Bailey, 1996). Bicarbonate (HCO3 ) and carbonate (CO3 2–) are the principal contributors to alkalinity, whereas hydroxide, borate, ammonia, organic bases, phosphates, and silicates are considered minor contributors (Petersen, 1996). This review will discuss how salinity and alkalinity affect plant growth and the different methods used to identify and improve tolerance in various crop species.

Figure 1.

Different types of salinity in Australian landscapes (after Rengasamy, 2002).


2. Salinity effects in plants

The most common effects of salinity on plant growth are smaller and fewer leaves, reduced plant height and poor yield (Kumar, 1995). At the physiological level, salinity imposes an osmotic stress that limits water uptake and ion toxicity can cause nutrition (N, Ca, K, P, Fe, Zn) deficiency and oxidative stress (Munns, 2002). Salinity can differentially affect the mineral nutrition of plants. Nutrient imbalances due to salinity diminish plant growth by affecting the availability, transport, and partitioning of nutrients. Nutrient deficiencies or imbalances result due to competition of Na and Cl with other nutrients such as K, Ca, Mg and NO3 (Hasegawa & Bressan, 2000, Hu & Schmidhalter, 1998, Hu & Schmidhalter, 2005, Munns, 2002, Netondo et al., 2004). These nutrient imbalances due to salinity also cause reduction in plant growth. Plant responses to salinity can vary with the degree and duration of the stress imposed as well as the plant developmental stage (seedling, flowering, maturity) when the stress is applied (Munns, 1993). To identify truly tolerant germplasm, it is important to gain full information regarding the degree of salt tolerance at all growth stages of a crop species. Otherwise selection at one particular growth stage may result in plants that lose their tolerance at other stages.

2.1. Mechanisms of salt tolerance

Plants are generally categorized as either halophytes or glycophytes. Halophytes grow and survive best where salt concentration is 200 mM or more (Flowers & Colmer, 2008). Conversely, glycophytes cannot survive under high saline conditions (Figure 2). A major difference between halophytes and glycophytes is the ability of halophytes to survive salt shock (Braun et al., 1986, Casas et al., 1991, Hassidim et al.,. 1990).

Several mechanisms for tolerance operate in both halophytes and glycophytes and the differences are presented in Figure 3. However, the main adaptive strategies of salt-tolerant glycophytic plants exposed to salinity are: 1) avoidance through ion exclusion, potentially as a result of low membrane ion permeability; 2) tolerance, through ion inclusion and possible compartmentalisation; and 3) osmotic stress tolerance, which enables the plant to remain functional despite internal ionic stress (Blumwald et al., 2004, Munns, 2005, Munns & Tester, 2008).

Figure 2.

Response of glycophytes and halophytes to varying concentrations of NaCl after 3 weeks of treatment (after Munns & Tester, 2008).

Figure 3.

Adaptive strategies for salt tolerance in plants.

2.2. Ion exclusion

Na avoidance is an essential salt tolerance mechanism that operates in several glycophytes such as; wheat (Munns, 2005, Munns & Tester, 2008), Arabidopsis (Moller et al., 2009, Møller & Tester, 2007), B. napus and B. juncea (Ashraf & McNeilly, 2004, Ashraf et al. 2001). To achieve this type of tolerance, plant roots must exclude most of the Na and Cl dissolved in the soil solution, and escape from gradual build-up of salt in shoots to toxic levels (Munns, 2005). Salinity tolerance in cereals is largely contributed by Na exclusion. As plants transpire about 50 times more water than they retain in their leaves, exclusion of 98% (1/50) of the salt in the soil solution results in stable leaf Na concentration (Munns, 2005). For instance, bread wheat excluded > 98% of the Na in the soil solution, and consequently Na concentration build-up in leaves remained less than 50 mM (Husain et al., 2004). Barley, on the other hand, excluded < 98% of the Na in the soil solution, and the concentrations reached up to 500 mM (Rawson et al., 1988).

Salinity tolerance in B. juncea however, is achieved through partial exclusion (Ashraf & McNeilly, 2004, Ashraf et al., 2001). In some members of the Brassicaceae including Arabidopsis, salinity tolerance appears to be mainly achieved by tissue tolerance to accumulated Na rather than by exclusion of Na from the shoot (Møller & Tester, 2007). In two B. napus genotypes, the genotype with the higher Na accumulation in the shoot was more Na tolerant and also accumulated increased amounts of K and proline (Huang & Redman, 1995). These results imply that tissue tolerance to Na and tolerance to osmotic stress are more important than Na exclusion from the shoot in members of the Brassicaceae.

2.3. Ion compartmentation

Salt tolerance by compartmentation is very important mechanism that operates in many glycophytes such as Arabidopsis (Moller et al., 2009, Møller & Tester, 2007), wheat and barley (Munns, 2005, Munns et al., 1995, Munns & Tester, 2008), and B. juncea (Ashraf & McNeilly, 2004, Kumar et al.,2009). Ion specific effects of salinity primarily result in accumulation of higher levels of sodium (Na), usually in the older leaves. Entry of Na into the cell is due to the similarity in hydrated ionic radii between Na and K that makes it difficult for the transporters to distinguish between these two ions (Blumwald et al., 2000). To avoid deleterious Na toxicity in the cytoplasm, it must be compartmentalised into cell vacuoles (Munns & Tester, 2008). This allows maintenance of optimum cellular levels of K and calcium (Ca) as well as Na exclusion by the plant. These two activities are known to operate at the plasma membrane and tonoplast levels, as integral components of the ion transport network. This is one of the key physiological criteria of plant salt tolerance, to maintain optimal K/Na ratio in the cytosol (Singla-Pareek et al., 2003, Singla-Pareek et al., 2008, Tester & Davenport, 2003). A higher K/Na ratio essentially indicates that a plant has not only excluded Na to some extent but has also maintained a healthy level of K for normal metabolic activities and injury avoidance under salinity. Hence, manipulation of the salt overly sensitive (SOS) pathway, Na/H antiporters and/or K transmembrane transporters that are involved in ion homeostasis may be the target of future strategies for salt tolerance improvement in a range of crops including canola quality B. juncea (Benke et al., 2010, Blumwald et al., 2004).

The role of transport proteins such as antiporters, ion channels, ABC-type transporters, Na and K transporters, plasma membrane and vacuolar ATPases is fundamental for salt tolerance in Na+ exclusion, ion homeostasis, and compartmentalization of solutes and amino acids under stress (Apse et al., 2003, Takahashi et al., 2009). The over-expression of vacuolar Na/H antiporter in B. napus greatly diminished the salt-induced oxidative stress in the vacuoles, highlighting the importance of Na homeostasis during salt stress tolerance (Ruiz & Blumwald, 2002, Zhang et al., 2001b). The Arabidopsis thaliana vacuolar alkali cation transporter AtNHX1 has been shown to increase salt tolerance in transgenic plants through the intracellular compartmentation of Na (Apse et al., 1999, Hernández et al.,2009, Venema et al., 2002).

2.4. Osmotic adjustment

Salinity is a common feature of arid and semiarid lands, and plants have evolved mechanisms to tolerate the low soil water potential caused by salinity, as well as by drought, and so some level of tolerance to osmotic stress is a feature of most glycophytes and halophytes (Munns & Tester, 2008). Osmotic adjustment in plants exposed to salt stress helps to maintain turgor pressure, which consequently helps plant to achieve tolerance under saline conditions (Ashraf & McNeilly, 2004). A significant genetic variation within species may exist in the osmotic response under saline stress; however this has not yet been documented (Munns & Tester, 2008). In salt sensitive plants, low water potential caused by salinity stress leads to cell membrane damage causing ion toxicity and cell injury (Chen & Murata, 2002, Sreenivasulu et al., 2000). This primarily results in smaller leaves and reduction in leaf area in many crops. Reduction in leaf area development and relative root growth might decrease the water use by the plant, which allows it to preserve soil moisture and avoid an escalation in the salt concentration in the soil (Munns & Tester, 2008). Osmotic adjustment occurs in plants subjected to saline stress, but particularly to a large extent in salt-tolerant Brassica species (Ashraf & McNeilly, 2004).

This is primarily due to accumulation of different types of organic osmotica such as soluble sugars, free amino acids and free proline in most of the salt-tolerant Brassica species (Ashraf & Akram, 2009, Ashraf & McNeilly, 2004). The relative importance of variation in osmotic tolerance remains unknown for most crop species, due to inherent difficulties in quantifying this parameter. However, a close association is likely exists between osmotic tolerance and tissue tolerance of Na+, because genotypes that tolerate high internal Na+ concentrations in leaves by compartmentalizing it in the vacuole may also be more tolerant of the osmotic stress owing to their elevated osmotic adjustment (Munns & Tester, 2008). However, this theory needs further investigation.

2.5. Molecular control of salt tolerance

The adaptive physiological and biochemical responses of a plant to salinity are controlled by genes that encode salt tolerance mechanisms (Casas et al., 1992). Since salinity tolerance is a complex trait, it is most likely controlled by interactions of hundreds of salt responsive genes (Sahi et al., 2006, Winicov, 1998). Plants recognise a salinity stress and condition adaptive response mechanisms (Hasegawa & Bressan, 2000). Reported responses involve many molecular processes such as ion homeostasis (membrane proteins involved in ionic transport), osmotic adjustment and water regime regulation (osmolytes), as well as scavenging of toxic compounds (enzymes; Benke et al., 2010, Blumwald et al., 2004). The regulatory molecules conditioning these responses have been found to be cellular signal pathway components and transductors of long distance response co-ordination such as hormones, mediators, transcription factors and regulatory genes (Mishra et al., 2006). The expression of such genetic regulators during plant stress has been studied at the transcriptional level (Fernandez et al., 2008, Hasegawa & Bressan, 2000). Consequently, abiotic stress-inducible genes have been classified into two categories; 1) those that directly protect against environmental stress; and 2) those that regulate gene expression and signal transduction against stress response (Hasegawa & Bressan, 2000, Kawaura et al., 2008, Mishra et al., 2006, Popova et al., 2008, Ueda et al., 2002). Some of the major genes/proteins that are activated under salinity might be involved in tolerance (Table 1). Hence, it is imperative to analyse the functions of stress-inducible genes for amplification of the molecular mechanisms of stress tolerance in plants.

Salt tolerance is attained through three interrelated characteristics; the foremost, salt injury must be avoided or alleviated. Second, homeostatic conditions must be re-established in the new stressful environment. Third, growth must resume, even if at a reduced rate (Fig. 4; Zhu, 2001).

Figure 4.

Three avenues of salt tolerance in plants (after Zhu, 2001).

Functionality class Possible role in stress References
Signalling molecules Stress signal transduction and gene expression Cardinale et al. 2002; Pardo et al. 1998; Saijo et al. 2000; Ulm et al. 2002
Transcriptional and post-transcriptional machinery Transcriptional regulation of stress gene expression, transcript stability, turnover, processing Cooper et al. 2003; Lee et al. 2001; Park et al. 2001; Sanan-Mishra et al. 2005
Translational machinery Stress-regulated protein translation, selective translation, transport, localization Wood et al. 2000; Wood and Oliver 1999
Protein folding Maintenance of protein structures, protein folding, preventing protein denaturation, Protein sorting, targeting Sun et al. 2001
Protein turnover Regulation of protein metabolism, targeted protein degradation in response to stress Khedr et al. 2003; Moon et al. 2004
Osmoprotectants Osmotic adjustment, protection of cellular structures and macromolecules Nomura et al. 1998; Tarczynski et al. 1993
Transport protein Ion homeostasis during stress, compartmentalization of solutes and amino acids Apse et al. 1999; Gisbert et al. 2000; Shi et al. 2000; Zhang and Blumwald 2001; Zhang et al. 2001a
ROS scavengers, cell death, senescence and ageing Detoxification of free oxygen radicals, cell death, hypersensitive response Reddy and Sopory 1999; Roxas et al. 1997
Metal-binding proteins Affecting cellular metabolism, metal ion homeostasis, acting as cofactors for critical reactions, signaling, metal toxicity, secondary stress responses, oxidative stress Kawasaki et al. 2001; Sahi et al. 2003
Photosynthesis Regulation of photosynthesis Kawasaki et al. 2001; Sahi et al. 2003
Defense-related proteins Protection against biotic stress including viral, bacterial and fungal infestation Cheong et al. 2002; Dombrowski 2003; Reymond et al. 2000
Hormone-related proteins Hormonal homeostasis and gene expression Kalifa et al. 2004
General metabolism Overall cellular function, housekeeping metabolic pathways carbohydrate, fatty acid and protein synthesis and modifications membrane fluidity, nitrogen metabolism, carbon and nitrogen fixation Hoshida et al. 2000; Jeong et al. 2002

Table 1.

Major categories of genes/proteins related to salt-stress responses/tolerances in plants (After Sahi et al. 2006).

The mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAP kinases), a specific class of serine/threonine protein kinases, play a central role in the transduction of various extra- and intracellular signals for cell division and stress responses in plants. Most of the abiotic stresses; salinity, cold, drought and oxidative stress can induce defence responses in plants through MAP kinase pathways such as osmoregulation, cell growth and differentiation (Mishra et al., 2006, Pitzschke et al., 2009). AtMKK3, AtMPK1, and AtMPK2 genes induced by ABA signalling amplified through MAP kinase-1 or MAP kinase-2 might increase salt tolerance in Arabidopsis (Hwa & Yang, 2008). Similarly, expression of active MKK9 protein enhanced salt tolerance and its loss increased sensitivity of transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings, emphasizing the significant role of MKK9 in salt stress response (Xu et al., 2008b). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengers such as peroxidases and glutathione are known to play a significant role in plant salt tolerance by reducing oxidative damage. For instance, in wild B. napus, glutathione synthesis was induced during salt stress, suggesting a possible protective mechanism against salt-induced oxidative damage (Ruiz & Blumwald, 2002).

In another study, genetic manipulation of carotenoid biosynthesis through over-expression of phytoene synthase gene SePSY in transgenic Arabidopsis increased the photosynthesis rate from 92% to 132% under 100 mM NaCl stress. The transgenic plants also displayed higher activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) and lower concentrations of H2O2 and malondialdehyde (MDA) than the wild plants (Han et al. 2008). Therefore, it is important to understand the genetics of detoxification of free oxygen radicals in order to enhance crop salt tolerance.

2.6. Methods for improving crop salinity tolerance

Several methods such as germplasm selection, marker assisted selection, transcriptional profiling, metabolomics, proteomics and transgenics have been successfully used for crop salinity improvement. This chapter will only discuss gene expression analysis for salinity tolerance with a main focus on microarrays.

2.6.1. Gene expression profiling for crop improvement

Messenger RNAs that are differentially transcribed between tolerant and sensitive genotypes under a particular stress may be targets for selection for future crop improvement. However, the expression of genes involved in stress responses is highly affected by the environment in which they are located, and thus care must be taken to accurately represent the stress environment conditions when seeking differentially transcribed gene responses. The responses may also differ among plant growth stages and among genotypes (Ashraf & McNeilly, 2004, Munns, 2005, Munns & Tester, 2008).

In order to determine key genes that are differentially transcribed for metabolic regulation under stress environments and among genotypes, several techniques have been developed. These rapidly provide gene-specific or genome wide expression patterns with high accuracy through biological and technical replication (Kuhn, 2001). Moreover, the information generated can be integrated within functional genomic processes to aid in understanding relationships between gene expressions and observed phenotypes.

2.6.2. Types of gene expression techniques

The last decade has produced several dynamic transcriptional technologies for measuring and interpreting single and multiple gene expressions. These have facilitated the analysis of mRNA from selected cells/tissues to generate multi-dimensional measurements of differentially expressed genes. Techniques that assess gene expression are grouped into two categories; open and closed systems, based on their architecture. The open system techniques such as AFLP (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism), SAGE (Serial Analysis of Gene Expression), MPSS (Massively Parallel Signature Sequencing), and Real-time RT-PCR can permit the discovery of novel genes; however they might not cover the whole genome (Cheng et al., 2008, Drea et al., 2009, Nakano et al., 2006; Sreenivasulu et al., 2010). On the other hand, closed system techniques such as microarrays rely on already annotated information; therefore they can be used to study several thousand genes from a single experiment (Lee et al., 2005, Seki et al., 2002). Due to the flexibility of microarrays to permit the study of multiple stress situations such as salinity, drought and cold in a single experiment, this technique has become a method of choice for many for assessing differential genes expression studies in molecular biology (Dai et al., 2007, Nakashima et al., 2009, Seki et al., 2002).

2.6.3. Microarray analysis for salt tolerance

Microarrays utilize the preferential binding of complementary single-stranded nucleic acid sequences. Instead of working on individual genes, the aim of a microarray experiments is to examine the profiles of expression of thousands of genes in a single experiment. Microarrays have been extensively used to study global gene expression profiling of plant responses to abiotic and biotic stresses. Studies on gene expression for abiotic stress include; salinity, drought and cold tolerance in Arabidopsis (Do-Young et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2005, Seki et al., 2002, Seki et al., 2010, Zhenxian et al., 2010), rice (Huang et al., 2008, Walia et al., 2009), wheat (Huang et al., 2008, Kawaura et al., 2008), B. napus (Dalal et al., 2009).

Several types of microarray platforms are available for gene expression studies: those that are spotted with known sequences comprised of cDNA or oligonucleotides, and those manufactured by Agilent and Affymetrix using GeneChip® technologies, which involve synthesis of oligonucleotides directly onto the microarray support. The cDNA microarray is a fabrication of spotted PCR products resulting from direct amplification of genomic DNA by using ESTs or gene specific primers (Alba et al., 2004, Scott et al., 2009). A number of cDNA microarrays have been developed for a variety of plant species such as Arabidopsis, rice, maize, petunia and lima bean (Vij & Tyagi, 2007). These have been used to study gene regulation at different developmental stages and in response to both abiotic and biotic stresses. Seki et al., (2002) developed a full length cDNA microarray in Arabidopsis to identify genes transcribed in response to cold, drought and salinity, to examine differences in cross-talk between signalling cascades. Currently there are no specific EST-enriched or cDNA gene libraries from B. juncea in response to the abiotic stresses of high salinity, alkalinity and/or boron. However, limited information is reported for genes involved in stress tolerance in the Brassicaceae. For example, the cDNAs of the BjDHN2 and BjDHN3 genes from B. juncea, a novel subclass of dehydrin genes conferred salt and freezing tolerance in transgenic yeast (Xu et al., 2008a). Similarly, Wang et al. (2003) cloned a new Na+/H+ vacuolar antiporter gene from B. napus using a full-length cDNA. The designated vacuolar antiporter gene BnNHX1 was found to be salt-inducible and its transcript level was abundant after 24 hours treatment with 200 mM sodium chloride shock treatment.


3. Alkalinity

Alkaline soils are usually categorized by low availability of plant nutrients, high concentrations of HCO3 , CO3 2− and high pH (Marschner, 1995, Misra & Tyler, 1999). By definition alkalinity is the concentration of soluble alkalis with the ability to neutralize acids (Bailey 1996). Bicarbonate (HCO3 ) and carbonate (CO3 2–) are the principal contributors to alkalinity, whereas hydroxide, borate, ammonia, organic bases, phosphates, and silicates are considered minor contributors (Petersen, 1996). Although alkaline soils have high pH (more OH than H+), the OH ions contribute to alkalinity only at > pH 11. Below this pH, alkalinity is mainly caused by HCO3 and CO3 2– ions. Hence, the predominant form of carbonates is determined by the soil pH (Whipker et al., 1996). The carbonate system consists mostly of HCO3 at pH 8.34. As pH increases due to the availability of atmospheric CO2 in the system, the proportion of CO3 2– increases and HCO3 declines (Figure 5; Lindsay, 1979). Hence crop growth is mainly inhibited by HCO3 and CO3 2– ions rather than OH ions in alkaline soils. This has been demonstrated by growing maize plants in solution at pH 8.0 with the buffer HEPES, without HCO3 . The high pH due to HEPES buffer did not cause any reduction of root and shoot elongation (Lee & Woolhouse, 1969, Romera et al., 1992).

Figure 5.

Three carbonate species at different pH (after Lindsay, 1979)

3.1. Nutrient availability in alkaline soils

Several essential micro nutrients such as Fe, Zn and Mn become less available to plants under alkaline stress (Guardia & Alcántara, 2002, Valdez-Aguilar & Reed, 2008, 2010). Nitrogen and Phosphorus deficiencies are also caused by alkalinity. Bicarbonate can significantly decrease Fe uptake, accumulation and/or raise internal Fe precipitation (Fernández–Falcón et al., 1986, Bertoni et al., 1992, Alhendawi et al., 1997, Norvell & Adams, 2006). The alkalinization of root tissues due to HCO3 can either inhibit Fe acquisition or cause Fe to precipitate in the root apoplasm (Fernández Falcón et al., 1986,Bertoni et al., 1992 and Römheld, 2000). Alhendawi et al. (1997) found that Fe concentrations in roots of barley, maize and sorghum were significantly reduced when grown in solutions containing 5 to 20 mM HCO3 .

Iron (Fe) chlorosis is a major problem for crops grown in calcareous soils. Soluble bicarbonate has been documented as a contributor to iron (Fe) deficiency and lime–induced chlorosis of crops growing on calcareous soils (Wadleigh & Brown, 1952, Brown, 1978, Coulombe et al., 1984, Marschner, 1995). In bicarbonate buffer, the pH is in the alkaline range and reduces the uptake or utilization of Fe, leading to deficiency that results in leaf chlorosis (Chaney et al., 1992, Parker & Norvell, 1999, Brand et al., 2002, Lucena, 2000, Norvell & Adams, 2006, Valdez-Aguilar & Reed, 2008, 2010).

Besides Fe, other nutrients that become deficient at high pH include calcium (Ca), copper (Cu), phosphorus (P), and zinc (Zn) (Figure 6; Al-Karaki & Al-Omoush, 2002, Chaves et al., 2006, Naidu & Rengasamy, 1993, Valdez-Aguilar & Reed, 2010). Plant response to alkalinity for nutrient uptake varies from crop to crop. For example, Solaiman et al. (2007) found that canola genotypes maintained higher uptake of P and accumulated greater biomass on alkaline soils compared to wheat genotypes. The better growth and P content of the canola genotypes compared to the wheat genotypes was due to the greater root length, leading to exploitation of greater soil volume. However on alkaline soils, P may be rapidly fixed into non plant-labile pools, by precipitation of Ca–P compounds not accessible to plant roots (Bertrand et al., 2006). In a recent study, Valdez-Aguilar & Reed (2008) found that N, K, Ca, Mg and Fe concentrations were higher in roots than shoots of HCO3 treated tomato plants.

Figure 6.

Effect of increasing pH on availability of various nutrients (after Lindsay 1979).


3.2 Effect of alkalinity on plant growth

Plant growth is significantly reduced by alkaline stress mainly contributed by decreased shoot growth with smaller leaves and reduced leaf area as well as reduced root growth and elongation (Pearce et al., 1999). Plants show minor to severe stunting of growth depending on HCO3 concentration in the soil solution. Growth of many commercial crops such as bean (Valdez-Aguilar & Reed, 2008, 2010), cucumber (Rouphael et al., 2010), wheat (Yang et al., 2008c), sorghum, maize barley (Alhendawi et al., 1997, Yang et al., 2009), soybean (Rogovska et al.,2009), sunflower (Alcántara et al., 1988, Shi & Sheng, 2005), tomato (Bailey & Hammer, 1986, Bialczyk & Lechowsk, 1995, Bialczyk et al., 2004, Navarro et al., 2000), pea (Zribi & Gharsalli, 2002), and rice (Hajiboland et al., 2005, Yang et al., 1994) are reported to be considerably affected by HCO3 . Toxic concentrations of bicarbonate can diminish leaf area, leaf length and leaf width, consequently shoot biomass is decreased. This may be due to decreased photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance in bicarbonate-induced leaf chlorosis (Bie et al., 2004). The reduction in photosynthetic rate is due to impaired chlorophyll synthesis as a result of low translocation of Fe (Bavaresco et al., 1999).

Increasing concentrations of bicarbonate inhibit root growth, which varies with crop species and bicarbonate concentration. Higher HCO3 concentrations can inhibit root respiration and may result in reduced root growth (Bingham & Stevenson, 1993; Alhendawi et al., 1997). This inhibitory effect may also be related to high accumulation and compartmentation of organic acids such as malate and citrate in root cells (Lee & Woolhouse, 1969, Yang et al., 1994). A bicarbonate-induced build-up of surplus organic acids, particularly malate, in the elongation zone appeared to be related to inhibition of root elongation by bicarbonate in calcifuge plant species (Lee & Woolhouse, 1969). Abscisic acid (ABA), an important stress-induced hormone, is produced in the roots and leaves, transferred from the roots to the leaves in the xylem and from the leaves back to the roots in the phloem (Wolf et al., 1990). Excessive ABA inhibits shoot growth, but increases root growth especially under stress conditions, thus sustaining root growth in drying soils (Saab et al., 1990). In alkaline soils, ABA may leak from the roots to the soil despite being released into the xylem, thereby causing root inhibition as water becomes less available (Daeter et al., 1993; Slovik et al., 1995). Crop species such as corn that can retain root ABA in the face of its tendency to leach into the more alkaline compartment are better able to tolerate these harmful stresses (Degenhardt, 2000).

Crops such as maize, sorghum, and barley have also shown depressed root growth at elevated levels of bicarbonate stress (Alhendawi et al,. 1997). Whereas some other crops such as sugar beet, sunflower, pea, and rice are considered better able to tolerate bicarbonate stress (Alcántara et al., 1988, Campbell & Nishio, 2000, Yang et al., 1994; Zribi & Gharsalli, 2002). For instance, root thickness, and lateral root production of sugar beet were increased after three days of Fe deficiency and HCO3 treatments (Campbell & Nishio, 2000).

3.3. Molecular responses to alkalinity stress

Most of the studies to date have focussed on the physiological impacts of alkalinity stress. Recently, Yang et al., (2008) constitutively expressed the high affinity bicarbonate transporter gene “IctB” from Cyanobacterium in rice. Under low CO2 or alkaline water conditions, cyanobacteria use bicarbonate transporters to pump in bicarbonate as a major carbon source to survive under unfavourable growth conditions. All transgenic rice lines expressing the transporter exhibited enhanced photosynthetic capacity, growth and grain yield (Yang et al., 2008).

As previously mentioned, Fe deficiency is one of the predicted outcomes of alkalinity, therefore an understanding of how plants acquire this ion under stress is needed. Plants have developed two discrete iron uptake strategies by the roots (Marschner et al., 1987). For most plants, including dicots and non-graminaceous monocots, ferrous ion Fe (II) transport from soil into root cells takes place via a transporter after reduction from ferric ion Fe (III) on the plasma membrane (Eide et al., 1996; Robinson et al., 1999; strategy I). However some graminaceous plants synthesise and release iron-chelating phytosiderophores, hence have a specific iron uptake system, the Fe (III)–phytosiderophore complex (Romheld & Marschner, 1986; strategy II).

Barley is the most tolerant species to iron deficiency among the graminaceous plants and Murata et al. (2006) identified an iron–phytosiderophore transporter “HvYS1” gene which has 72.7% similarity with ZmYS1, the first protein identified as an iron(III)–phytosiderophore transporter in maize. The expression of this gene is linked to iron deficient conditions and is expressed in the epidermal root cells. The localization and substrate specificity of HvYS1 is different from those of ZmYS1, indicating that HvYS1 is a specific transporter involved in primary iron acquisition from soil in barley roots (Namba & Murata, 2010).


4. Conclusions

Further research is required to determine the key genes and molecular pathways that underpin the best tolerance responses of our elite crop genotypes to the common abiotic soil constraints including salinity and alkalinity. Once uncovered and assessed to be stably expressed under varying background environments and genomes, these genetic mechanisms may become central to future tolerance breeding programs through advanced selection methods. Also, full characterisation of shared molecular mechanisms to multiple stresses may uncover strategic selection tools for breeding cultivars that are tolerant to stresses that occur simultaneously.

For example, when alkalinity is combined with salinity in the same soil environment, the negative impact on plant growth is significantly increased (Li et al., 2010; Shi & Sheng, 2005). Saline soils containing CO3 2− and/or HCO3 can cause injury to plants through high salts as well as through carbonates and bicarbonate (Shi & Sheng, 2005). The combined stress (alkaline salinity) leads to Na toxicity due to high concentrations of salt and deficiencies of Fe and Zn. Therefore, future genetic studies and screening for selective breeding should incorporate the interactive nature and impacts of multiple concurrent stresses.


  1. 1. Al-Karaki G. N. Al-Omoush M. 2002 Wheat response to phosphogypsum and mycorrhizal fungi in alkaline soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition 25 873 883 .
  2. 2. Alba R. Fei Z. Payton P. Liu Y. Moore S. L. Debbie P. Cohn J. D’Ascenzo M. Gordon J. S. Rose J. K. C. 2004 ESTs, cDNA microarrays, and gene expression profiling: tools for dissecting plant physiology and development. The Plant Journal 39 697 714 .
  3. 3. Alcántara E. Romera F. J. de la Guardia M. D. 1988 Genotypic differences in bicarbonate-induced iron chlorosis in sunflower. Journal of Plant Nutrition 11 65 75 .
  4. 4. Alhendawi R. A. Römheld V. Kirkby E. A. Marschner H. 1997 Influence of increasing bicarbonate concentrations on plant growth, organic acid accumulation in roots and iron uptake by barley, sorghum and maize. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 20 1731 1753 .
  5. 5. Apse M. P. Aharon G. S. Snedden W. A. Blumwald E. 1999 Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis. Science 285 1256 1258 .
  6. 6. Apse M. P. Sottosanto J. B. Blumwald E. 2003 Vacuolar cation/H+ exchange, ion homeostasis, and leaf development are altered in a T-DNA insertional mutant of AtNHX1, the Arabidopsis vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter. The Plant Journal 36 229 239 .
  7. 7. Ashraf M. Akram N. A. 2009 Improving salinity tolerance of plants through conventional breeding and genetic engineering: An analytical comparison. Biotechnology Advances 27 744 752 .
  8. 8. Ashraf M. Mc Neilly T. 2004 Salinity Tolerance in Brassica Oilseeds. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 23 157 174 .
  9. 9. Ashraf M. Nazir N. Mc Neilly T. 2001+ Comparative salt tolerance of amphidiploid and diploid Brassica species. Plant Science 160 683 689 .
  10. 10. Bailey D. A. 1996 Alkalinity and acidification. 69 91 . In: Reed, D.Wm. (ed.). Water, media and nutrition. Ball Publishing, Batavia, IL.
  11. 11. Bailey D. A. Hammer P. A. 1986 Growth and nutritional status of petunia and tomato seedlings with acidified water. Horticulture Science 21 423 425 .
  12. 12. Bavaresco L. Giachino E. Colla R. 1999 Iron chlorosis paradox in grapevine. Journal of Plant Nutrition 22 1589 1597 .
  13. 13. Benke K. Qiang W. Yujuan G. Zhenfei S. Ningjing L. 2010 Sequence of Ammopiptanthus mongolicus Na+/H+ antiporter NHX1 regulating plant resistance to salt and drought stresses Faming Zhuanli Shenqing Gongkai Shuomingshu CN 101701037 A 20100505.
  14. 14. Bertoni G. M. Pissaloux A. Morad P. Sayag D. R. 1992 Bicarbonate-pH relationship with iron chlorosis in white lupine. Journal of Plant Nutrition 15 1509 1518 .
  15. 15. Bertrand I. MJ Mc Laughlin Holloway. R. E. Armstrong R. D. Mc Beath T. 2006 Changes in P Bioavailability Induced by the Application of Liquid and Powder Sources of P, N and Zn Fertilizers in Alkaline Soils. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 74 27 40 .
  16. 16. Bialczyk J. Lechowski Z. 1995 Chemical composition of xylem sap of tomato grown on bicarbonate containing medium. Journal of Plant Nutrition 18 2005 2021 .
  17. 17. Bialczyk J. Lechowski Z. Dziga D. 2004 Composition of the xylem sap of tomato seedlings cultivated on media with HCO3 - and nitrogen source as 3-or NH4 +. Plant and Soil 263 265 272 .
  18. 18. Bie Z. Ito T. Shinohara Y. 2004 Effects of sodium sulfate and sodium bicarbonate on the growth, gas exchange and mineral composition of lettuce. Scientia Horticulturae 99 215 224 .
  19. 19. Bingham I. J. Stevenson E. A. 1993 Control of root growth: effects of carbohydrates on the extension, branching, and rate of respiration of different fractions of wheat roots. Physiologia Plantarum. 88 149 158 .
  20. 20. Blumwald E. Aharon G. S. Apse M. P. 2000 Sodium transport in plant cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1465 140 151 .
  21. 21. Blumwald E. Grover A. Good A. G. 2004 Breeding for abiotic stress resistance: Challenges and opportunities. "New directions for a diverse planet". Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress 26 Sep-1 Oct 2004, Brisbane, Australia.
  22. 22. Brand J. Tang C. Rathjen A. J. 2002 Screening rough-seeded lupins (Lupinus pilosus Murr. and Lupinus atlanticus Glads.) for tolerance to calcareous soils. Plant and Soil 245 261 275 .
  23. 23. Braun Y. Hassidim M. Lerner H. R. Reinhold L. 1986 Studies on H+-Translocating ATPases in Plants of Varying Resistance to Salinity: I. Salinity during Growth Modulates the Proton Pump in the Halophyte Atriplex nummularia. Plant Physiology 81 1050 1056 .
  24. 24. Brown J. C. 1978 Mechanism of iron uptake by plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 1 249 257 .
  25. 25. Campbell S. A. Nishio J. N. 2000 Iron deficiency studies of sugar beet using an improved sodium bicarbonate-buffered hydroponic growth system. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 23 741 757 .
  26. 26. Cardinale F. Meskiene I. Ouaked F. Hirt H. 2002 Convergence and divergence of stress-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways at the level of two distinct mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases. The Plant Cell Online 14 703 711 .
  27. 27. Casas A. M. Bressan R. A. Hasegawa P. M. 1991 Cell growth and water relations of the halophyte, Atriplex nummularia L., in response to NaCl. Plant Cell Reports 10 81 84 .
  28. 28. Casas A. M. Nelson D. E. Raghothama K. G. D’Urzo M. P. Singh N. K. Bressan R. A. Hasegawa P. M. 1992 Expression of osmotin-like genes in the halophyte Atriplex nummularia L. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 99 329 337 .
  29. 29. Chaney R. Coulombe B. Bell P. Angle J. 1992 Detailed method to screen dicot cultivars for resistance to Fe-chlorosis using FeDTPA and bicarbonate in nutrient solutions. Journal of Plant Nutrition 15 2063 2083 .
  30. 30. Chaves L. A. Garcia J. Jimenez S. Lao M. T. 2006 Influence of the modification of nutritional parameters in Aglaonema commutatum: K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ and Na+. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 37 2927 2937 .
  31. 31. Chen T. Murata N. 2002 Enhancement of tolerance of abiotic stress by metabolic engineering of betaines and other compatible solutes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 5 250 257 .
  32. 32. Cheng L. Huan S. Sheng Y. Hua X. Shu Q. Song S. Jing X. 2008 GMCHI, cloned from soybean [Glycine max (L.) Meer.], enhances survival in transgenic Arabidopsis under abiotic stress Plant Cell Reports 28 145 153 .
  33. 33. Cheong Y. Chang H. Gupta R. Wang X. Zhu T. Luan S. 2002 Transcriptional profiling reveals novel interactions between wounding, pathogen abiotic stress and hormonal responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 129 661 677 .
  34. 34. Cooper B. Clarke J. D. Budworth P. Kreps J. Hutchison D. Park S. Guimil S. Dunn M. Luginbühl P. Ellero C. 2003 A network of rice genes associated with stress response and seed development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100 4945 4950 .
  35. 35. Coulombe B. A. Chaney R. L. Wiebold W. J. 1984 Use of bicarbonate in screening soybeans for resistance to iron chlorosis. Journal of Plant Nutrition 7 411 425 .
  36. 36. Daeter W. Slovik S. Hartung W. 1993, The pH gradients in the root system and the abscisic acid concentration in xylem and apoplastic saps. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 341 49 56 .
  37. 37. Dai X. Xu Y. Ma Q. Xu W. Wang T. Xue Y. Chong K. 2007 Overexpression of an R1R2R3 MYB Gene, OsMYB3R-2, Increases Tolerance to Freezing, Drought, and Salt Stress in Transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 143 1739 1751 .
  38. 38. Dalal M. Tayal D. Chinnusamy V. Bansal K. C. 2009 Abiotic stress and ABA-inducible Group 4 LEA from Brassica napus plays a key role in salt and drought tolerance. Journal of Biotechnology 139 137 145 .
  39. 39. Degenhardt B. 2000 Effect of alkaline and saline substrates on ABA contents, distribution and transport in plant roots. Plant and Soil 225 83 94 .
  40. 40. Do -Young K. Jun-Young J. Santiago A. Enrico M. Youngsook L. 2010 Overexpression of AtABCG36 improves drought and salt stress resistance in Arabidopsis Physiologia Plantarum 139 170 180 .
  41. 41. Dombrowski J. E. 2003 Salt stress activation of wound-related genes in tomato plants. Plant Physiology 132 2098 107 .
  42. 42. Drea S. Derbyshire P. Koumproglou R. Dolan L. Doonan J. H. Shaw J.H. 2009, 2009 In situ Analysis of Gene Expression in Plants. Methods in Molecular Biology, Plant Genomics 513, 229-242.
  43. 43. Eide D. Broderius M. Fett J. Guerinot M. L. 1996 A novel iron-regulated metal transporter from plants identified by functional expression in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93 5624 5628 .
  44. 44. FAO 2009 FAO Land and Plant Nutrition Management Service
  45. 45. FAO 2000 Global network on integrated soil management for sustainable use of salt-affected soils. FAO Land and Plant Nutrition Management Service, Rome, Italy
  46. 46. Fernández-Falcón M. González C. E. A. García V. Báez j. 1986The effect of chloride and bicarbonate levels in irrigation water on nutrient content, production and quality of cut roses’Mercedes’. Scientia Horticulturae 29 373 385 .
  47. 47. Fernandez P. Di Rienzo J. Fernandez L. Hopp H. E. Paniego N. Heinz R. A. 2008 Transcriptomic identification of candidate genes involved in sunflower responses to chilling and salt stresses based on cDNA microarray analysis. BMC Plant Biology 8, 11 .
  48. 48. Flowers T. J. Colmer T. D. 2008 Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytologist 179 945 963 .
  49. 49. Gisbert C. Rus A. M. Bolar n. M. C. López-Coronado J. M. Arrillaga I. Montesinos C. Caro M. Serrano R. Moreno V. 2000 The yeast HAL1 gene improves salt tolerance of transgenic tomato. Plant Physiology 123, 393-402.
  50. 50. Guardia M. D. D.l Alcántara E. 2002 Bicarbonate and low iron level increase root to total plant weight ratio in olive and peach rootstock. Journal of Plant Nutrition 25 1021 1032 .
  51. 51. Hajiboland R. Yang X. Römheld V. Neumann G. 2005 Effect of bicarbonate on elongation and distribution of organic acids in root and root zone of Zn-efficient and Zn-inefficient rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Environmental and Experimental Botany 54 163 173 .
  52. 52. Han H. Li Y. Zhou S. 2008Overexpression of phytoene synthase gene from Salicornia europaea alters response to reactive oxygen species under salt stress in transgenic Arabidopsis Biotechnology Letters 30 1501 1507 .
  53. 53. Hasegawa P. M. Bressan R. A. 2000 Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 51 463 99 .
  54. 54. Hassidim M. Braun Y. Lerner H. R. Reinhold L. 1990 Na+/H+ and K+/H+ antiport in root membrane vesicles isolated from the halophyte Atriplex and the glycophyte cotton. Plant Physiology 94 1795 1801 .
  55. 55. Hernández A. Jiang X. Cubero B. Nieto P. M. Bressan R. A. Hasegawa P. M. Pardo J. M. 2009 Mutants of the Arabidopsis thaliana Cation/H+ Antiporter AtNHX1 Conferring Increased Salt Tolerance in Yeast. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 284 14276 14285 .
  56. 56. Hoshida H. Tanaka Y. Hibino T. Hayashi Y. Tanaka A. Takabe T. 2000 Enhanced tolerance to salt stress in transgenic rice that overexpresses chloroplast glutamine synthetase. Plant Molecular Biology 43 103 111 .
  57. 57. Hu Y. Schmidhalter U. 1998 Spatial distributions and net deposition rates of mineral elements in the elongating wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) leaf under saline soil conditions. Planta 204 212 219 .
  58. 58. Hu Y. Schmidhalter U. 2005 Drought and salinity: A comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 168 541 549 .
  59. 59. Huang J. Redman R. 1995 Physiological responses of canola and wild mustard to salinity and contrasting calcium supply. Journal of Plant Nutrition 18 1931 1949 .
  60. 60. Huang S. Spielmeyer W. Lagudah E. S. Munns R. 2008 Comparative mapping of HKT genes in wheat, barley, and rice, key determinants of Na+ transport, and salt tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany 59 927 937 .
  61. 61. Husain S. von-Caemmerer S. Munns R. 2004 Control of salt transport from roots to shoots of wheat in saline soil. Functional Plant Biology 31 1115 1126 .
  62. 62. Hwa C. M. Yang X. C. 2008 The AtMKK3 pathway mediates ABA and salt signaling in Arabidopsis. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 30 277 286 .
  63. 63. Incerti M. O’Leary G. J. 1990 Rooting depth of wheat in Victorian Mallee. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30 817 824 .
  64. 64. Jeong M. J. Park S. C. Byun M. O. 2002 Improvement of salt tolerance in transgenic potato plants by glyceraldehyde-3 phosphate dehydrogenase gene transfer. Molecules and Cells 12 185 189 .
  65. 65. Kalifa Y. Gilad A. Konrad Z. Zaccai M. Scolnik P. A. Bar-Zvi D. 2004 The water-and salt-stress-regulated Asr1 (abscisic acid stress ripening) gene encodes a zinc-dependent DNA-binding protein. Biochemical Journal 381 373 378 .
  66. 66. Kawasaki S. Borchert C. Deyholos M. Wang H. Brazille S. Kawai K. Galbraith D. Bohnert H. 2001, Gene expression profiles during the initial phase of salt stress in rice. Plant Cell 13 889 905 .
  67. 67. Kawaura K. Mochida K. Ogihara Y. 2008 Genome-wide analysis for identification of salt-responsive genes in common wheat. Functional Integrative Genomics 8 277 286 .
  68. 68. Khedr A. H. A. Abbas M. A. Wahid A. A. A. Quick W. P. Abogadallah G. M. 2003 Proline induces the expression of salt stress responsive proteins and may improve the adaptation of Pancratium maritimum L. to salt stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 54 2553 2562 .
  69. 69. Kuhn E. 2001 From library screening to microarray technology, strategies to determine gene expression profiles and to identify differentially regulated genes in plants. Annals of Botany 87 139 155 .
  70. 70. Kumar D. 1995 Salt tolerance in oilseed brassicas- present status and future prospects. Plant Breeding Abstracts 65 1438 1447 .
  71. 71. Kumar G. Purty R. S. Sharma M. P. Singla-Pareek S. L. Pareeka A. 2009 Physiological responses among Brassica species under salinity stress show strong correlation with transcript abundance for SOS pathway-related genes. Journal of Plant Physiology 166 507 520 .
  72. 72. Lee B.h. Henderson D. A. Zhu J. K. 2005 The Arabidopsis Cold-Responsive Transcriptome and Its Regulation by ICE1. Plant Cell 17 3155 3175 .
  73. 73. Lee H. Xiong L. Gong Z. Ishitani M. Stevenson B. Zhu J. K. 2001 The Arabidopsis HOS1 gene negatively regulates cold signal transduction and encodes a RING finger protein that displays cold-regulated nucleo-cytoplasmic partitioning. Genes and Development 15 912 924 .
  74. 74. Lee J. A. Woolhouse H. W. 1969 A comparative study of bicarbonate inhibitions of root growth in calcicole and calcifuge grasses. New Phytologist 68 1 11 .
  75. 75. Li C. Fang B. Yang C. Shi D. Wang D. 2009 Effects of various salt-alkaline mixed stresses on the state of mineral elements in nutrient solutions and the growth of alkali resistant halophyte Chloris Virgata. Journal of Plant Nutrition 32 1137 1147 .
  76. 76. Li R. Shi F. Fukuda K. 2010 Interactive effects of salt and alkali stresses on seed germination, germination recovery, and seedling growth of a halophyte Spartina alterniflora (Poaceae). South African Journal of Botany 76 380 387 .
  77. 77. Lindsay W.L (1979).’Chemical equilibria in soils.’ (The Blackburn Press, Caldwell, NJ: Caldwell, NJ).
  78. 78. Lucena J. J. 2000 Effects of bicarbonate, nitrate and other environmental factors on iron deficiency chlorosis. A review. Journal of Plant Nutrition 23 1591 1606 .
  79. 79. Marschner H. 1995 Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2nd edition. Academic Press, San Diego. 379 396 .
  80. 80. Marschner H. Römheld V. Kissel M. 1987 Localization of phytosiderophore release and of iron uptake along intact barley roots. Physiologia Plantarum 71 157 162 .
  81. 81. Mishra N. S. Tuteja R. Tuteja N. 2006 Signaling through MAP kinase networks in plants. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 452 55 68
  82. 82. Misra A. Tyler G. 1999 Influence of Soil Moisture on Soil Solution Chemistry and Concentrations of Minerals in the Calcicoles Phleum phleoides and Veronica spicata Grown on a Limestone Soil. Annals of Botany 84 401 410 .
  83. 83. Moller I. S. Gilliham M. Jha D. Mayo G. M. Roy S. J. Coates J. C. Haseloff J. Tester M. 2009 Shoot Na+ Exclusion and Increased Salinity Tolerance Engineered by Cell Type-Specific Alteration of Na+ Transport in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21 2163 2178 .
  84. 84. Møller I. S. Tester M. 2007 Salinity tolerance of Arabidopsis: a good model for cereals? Trends in Plant Science 12 534 540 .
  85. 85. Moon J. Parry G. Estelle M. 2004 The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and plant development. The Plant Cell Online 16 3181 3195 .
  86. 86. Munns R. 1993 Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soils: some dogmas and hypotheses. Plant, Cell and Environment 16 15 24 .
  87. 87. Munns R. 2002 Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell and Environment. 25 239 250 .
  88. 88. Munns R. 2005 Genes and salt tolerance: bringing them together. New Phytologist 167 645 663 .
  89. 89. Munns R. James R. A. 2003 Screening methods for salinity tolerance: a case study with tetraploid wheat. Plant and Soil 253 201 218 .
  90. 90. Munns R. Schachtman D. P. Condon A. G. 1995 The Significance of a Two-Phase Growth Response to Salinity in Wheat and Barley. Functional Plant Biology 22 561 569 .
  91. 91. Munns R. Tester M. 2008 Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology 59 651 681 .
  92. 92. Murata Y. Ma J.F., Yamaji N. Ueno D. Nomoto K. Iwashita T. , (2006) A specific transporter for iron(III)-phytosiderophore in barley roots. The Plant Journal 46, 563-572.
  93. 93. Naidu R. Rengasamy P. 1993 Ion Interactions and Constraints to Plant Nutrition in Australian Sodic Soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 31, 801-19.
  94. 94. Nakano M. Nobuta K. Vemaraju K. Tej S. S. Skogen J. W. Meyers B. C. 2006 Plant MPSS databases: signature-based transcriptional resources for analyses of mRNA and small RNA Nucleic Acids Research 34, D731 -D735.
  95. 95. Nakashima K. Ito Y. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. 2009, Transcriptional regulatory networks in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis and Grasses. Plant Physiology 149 88 95 .
  96. 96. Namba K. Murata Y. 2010 Toward mechanistic elucidation of iron acquisition in barley: efficient synthesis of mugineic acids and their transport activities. The Chemical Record 10 140 150 .
  97. 97. Navarro J. M. Martınez V. Carvajal M. 2000 Ammonium, bicarbonate and calcium effects on tomato plants grown under saline conditions. Plant Science 157 89 .
  98. 98. Netondo G. W. Onyango J. C. Beck E. 2004 Sorghum and Salinity: I. Response of Growth, Water Relations, and Ion Accumulation to NaCl Salinity. Crop Science 44 797 805 .
  99. 99. Nomura M. Hibino T. Takabe T. Sugiyama T. Yokota A. Miyake H. 1998Transgenically produced glycinebetaine protects ribulose 1 5 -bisphosphate carboxylase/ oxygenase from inactivation in Synechococcus sp. PCC7942 under salt stress. Plant and Cell Physiology 39, 425-432.
  100. 100. Norvell W. A. Adams M. L. 2006 Screening Soybean Cultivars for Resistance to Iron-Deficiency Chlorosis in Culture Solutions Containing Magnesium or Sodium Bicarbonate. Journal of Plant Nutrition 29 1855 1867 .
  101. 101. Nuttall J. G. Armstrong R. D. Connor D. J. 2003a Evaluating physiochemical constraints of Calcarosols on wheat yield in the Victorian southern Mallee. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54 487 497 .
  102. 102. Nuttall J. G. Armstrong R. D. Connor D. J. Matassa V. J. 2003b Interrelationships between edaphic factors potentially limiting cereal growth on alkaline soils in north-western Victoria. Australian Journal of Soil Research 41 277 292 .
  103. 103. Pardo J. M. Reddy M. P. Yang S. Maggio A. Huh G. H. Matsumoto T. Coca M. A. Paino-D’Urzo M. Koiwa H. Yun D. J. 1998 Stress signaling through Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein phosphatase calcineurin mediates salt adaptation in plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95 9681 9686 .
  104. 104. Park J. M. Park C. J. Lee S. B. Ham B. K. Shin R. Paek K. H. 2001 Overexpression of the tobacco Tsi1 gene encoding an EREBP/AP2-type transcription factor enhances resistance against pathogen attack and osmotic stress in tobacco. The Plant Cell Online 13 1035 1046 .
  105. 105. Parker D. R. Norvell W. A. 1999 Advances in solution culture methods for plant mineral nutrition research. Advances in Agronomy 65 151 213 .
  106. 106. Pearce R. C. Li Y. Bush L. P. 1999 Calcium and bicarbonate effects on the growth and nutrient uptake of burley tobacco seedlings: hydroponic culture. Journal of Plant Nutrition 22 1069 1078 .
  107. 107. Petersen F. H. 1996 Water testing and interpretation. 31 49 . In: Reed, D.Wm. (Editor). Water, media and nutrition. Ball Publishing, Batavia, IL.
  108. 108. Pitzschke A. Schikora A. Hirt H. 2009MAPK cascade signalling networks in plant defence. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 12 421 426 .
  109. 109. Popova O. V. Yang O. Dietz K. J. Golldack D. 2008 Differential transcript regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana and the halotolerant Lobularia maritima indicates genes with potential function in plant salt adaptation. Gene 423 142 148 .
  110. 110. Rawson H. M. Long M. J. Munns R. 1988 Growth and development in NaCl-treated plants. 1. Leaf Na+ and Cl- concentrations do not determine gas exchange of leaf blades of barley. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 15 519 527 .
  111. 111. Reddy V. S. Sopory S. K. 1999 Glyoxalase I fromBrassica juncea: molecular cloning, regulation and its over expression confer tolerance in transgenic tobacco under stress. The Plant Journal 17 385 395 .
  112. 112. Rengasamy P. 2002 Transient salinity and subsoil constraints to dryland farming in Australian sodic soils: an overview. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42 351 361 .
  113. 113. Rengasamy P. 2006World salinization with emphasis on Australia. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 1017-1023.
  114. 114. Reymond P. Weber H. Damond M. Farmer E. E. 2000 Differential gene expression in response to mechanical wounding and insect feeding in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell Online 12 707 719 .
  115. 115. Robinson N. J. Procter C. M. Connolly E. L. Guerinot M. L. 1999 A ferric-chelate reductase for iron uptake from soils. Nature 397 694 697 .
  116. 116. Rogovska N. P. Blackmer A. M. Tylka G. L. 2009 Soybean Yield and Soybean Cyst Nematode Densities Related to Soil pH, Soil Carbonate Concentrations, and Alkalinity Stress Index. Agronomy Journal 101 1019 1026 .
  117. 117. Romera F. J. Alcántara E. de la Guardia M. D. 1992 Effects of bicarbonate, phosphate and high pH on the reducing capacity of Fe-deficient sunflower and cucumber plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition 15 1519 1530 .
  118. 118. Römheld V. Marschner H. 1986 Evidence for a specific uptake system for iron phytosiderophores in roots of grasses. Plant Physiology 80 175 180 .
  119. 119. Römheld V. 2000 The chlorosis paradox: Fe inactivation as a secondary event in chlorotic leaves of grapevine. Journal of Plant Nutrition 23 1629 1643 .
  120. 120. Rouphael Y. Cardarelli M. Di Mattia E. Tullio M. Rea E. Colla G. 2010 Enhancement of alkalinity tolerance in two cucumber genotypes inoculated with an arbuscular mycorrhizal biofertilizer containing Glomus intraradices. Biology and Fertility of Soils 46 499 509 .
  121. 121. Roxas V. P. Smith R. K. Allen E. R. Allen R. D. 1997 Overexpression of glutathione S-transferase/glutathioneperoxidase enhances the growth of transgenic tobacco seedlings during stress. Nature Biotechnology 15 988 991 .
  122. 122. Ruiz J. M. Blumwald E. 2002 Salinity-induced glutathione synthesis in Brassica napus. Planta 214 965 969 .
  123. 123. Saab I. N. Sharp R. E. Pritchard J. Voetberg G. S. 1990 Increased endogenous abscisic acid maintains primary root growth and inhibits shoot growth of maize seedlings at low water potentials. Plant Physiology 93 1329 1336 .
  124. 124. Sahi C. Agarwal M. Reddy M. Sopory S. Grover A. 2003Isolation and expression analysis of salt stress-associated ESTs from contrasting rice cultivars using a PCR-based subtraction method. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106 620 628 .
  125. 125. Sahi C. Singh A. Blumwald E. Grover A. 2006, Beyond osmolytes and transporters: novel plant salt-stress tolerance-related genes from transcriptional profiling data. Physiologia Plantarum 127 1 9 .
  126. 126. Saijo Y. Hata S. Kyozuka J. Shimamoto K. Izui K. 2000) Over expression of a single Ca2+ dependent protein kinase confers both cold and salt/drought tolerance on rice plants. The Plant Journal 23 319 327 .
  127. 127. Sanan-Mishra N. Pham X. Sopory S. Tuteja N. 2005, Pea DNA helicase 45 overexpression in tobacco confers high salinity tolerance without affecting yield. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 509 514 .
  128. 128. Scott C. P. Van Wye J. Mc Donald M. D. Crawford D. L. 2009 Technical analysis of cDNA microarrays. PLoS ONE 4, e4486.
  129. 129. Seki M. Narusaka M. Ishida J. Nanjo T. Fujita M. Oono Y. Kamiya A. Nakajima M. Enju A. Sakurai T. 2002Monitoring the expression profiles of 7000 Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and high-salinity stresses using a full-length cDNA microarray. The Plant Journal 31 279 292 .
  130. 130. Seki M. Okamoto M. Matsui A. Kim J. M. Kurihara Y. Ishida J. Morosawa T. Kawashima M. To T. K. Shinozaki K. 2010Microarray analysis for studying the abiotic stress responses in plants. Molecular Techniques in Crop Improvement 3 333 355 .
  131. 131. Shi D. Sheng Y. 2005 Effect of various salt-alkaline mixed stress conditions on sunflower seedlings and analysis of their stress factors. Environmental and Experimental Botany 54 8 21 .
  132. 132. Shi H. Ishitani M. Kim C. Zhu J. 2000The Arabidopsis thaliana salt tolerance gene SOS1 encodes a putative Na+/H+ antiporter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97 6896 6901 .
  133. 133. Shi L. Perkins R. G. Fang H. Tong W. 2008 Reproducible and reliable microarray results through quality control: good laboratory proficiency and appropriate data analysis practices are essential. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 19 10 18 .
  134. 134. Singla-Pareek S. Reddy M. Sopory S. 2003 Genetic engineering of the glyoxalase pathway in tobacco leads to enhanced salinity tolerance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100 14672 14677 .
  135. 135. Singla-Pareek S. Yadav S. Pareek A. Reddy M. Sopory S. 2008 Enhancing salt tolerance in a crop plant by overexpression of glyoxalase II. Transgenic Research 17 171 180 .
  136. 136. Slovik S. Daeter W. Hartung W. 1995 Compartmental redistribution and long-distance transport of abscisic acid (ABA) in plants as influenced by environmental changes in the rhizosphere: a biomathematical model. Journal of Experimental Botany 46 881 894 .
  137. 137. Solaiman Z. Marschner P. Wang D. Rengel Z. 2007 Growth, P uptake and rhizosphere properties of wheat and canola genotypes in an alkaline soil with low P availability. Biology and Fertility of Soils 44 143 153 .
  138. 138. Sreenivasulu N. Grimm B. Wobus U. Weschke W. 2000Differential response of antioxidant compounds to salinity stress in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive seedlings of foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Physiologia Plantarum 109 435 442 .
  139. 139. Sreenivasulu N. Sunkar R. Wobus U. Strickert M. 2010Array platforms and bioinformatics tools for the analysis of plant transcriptome in response to abiotic stress. Methods in Molecular Biology, Plant Stress Tolerance 1 71 93 .
  140. 140. Sun W. Bernard C. Van De Cotte B. Van Montagu M. Verbruggen N. 2001 At HSP17. 6A, encoding a small heat shock protein in Arabidopsis, can enhance osmotolerance upon overexpression. The Plant Journal 27 407 415 .
  141. 141. Takahashi R. Liu S. Takano T. 2009 Isolation and characterization of plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter genes from salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant reed plants. Journal of Plant Physiology 166 301 9 .
  142. 142. Tarczynski M. C. Jensen R. G. Bohnert H. J. 1993 Stress protection of transgenic tobacco by production of the osmolyte mannitol. Science 259 508 510 .
  143. 143. Tester M. Davenport R. 2003 Na+ Tolerance and Na+ Transport in Higher Plants. Annals of Botany 91 503 527 .
  144. 144. Ueda A. Shi W. Nakamura T. Takabe T. 2002 Analysis of salt-inducible genes in barley roots by differential display. Journal of Plant Research 115 119 30 .
  145. 145. Ulm R. Ichimura K. Mizoguchi T. Peck S. C. Zhu T. Wang X. Shinozaki K. Paszkowski J. 2002 Distinct regulation of salinity and genotoxic stress responses by Arabidopsis MAP kinase phosphatase 1. The EMBO Journal 21 6483 6493 .
  146. 146. USSL 2005 George E. Brown, Jr Salinity Laboratory. Riverside, CA, USA, USDA-ARS (
  147. 147. Valdez-Aguilar L. A. Reed D. W. 2008 Influence of Potassium Substitution by Rubidium and Sodium on Growth, Ion accumulation, and Ion Partitioning in Bean under High Alkalinity. Journal of Plant Nutrition 31 867 883 .
  148. 148. Valdez-Aguilar L. A. Reed D. W. 2010 Growth and nutrition of young bean plants under high alkalinity as affected by mixtures of ammonium, potassium, and sodium. Journal of Plant Nutrition 33 1472 1488 .
  149. 149. Venema K. Quintero F. J. Pardo J. M. Donaire J. P. 2002 The Arabidopsis Na+ /H+ exchanger AtNHX1 Catalyzes Low Affinity Na+ and K+ transport in reconstituted liposomes. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 277 2413 2418 .
  150. 150. Vij S. Tyagi A. K. 2007 Emerging trends in the functional genomics of the abiotic stress response in crop plants. Plant Biotechnology Journal 5 361 380 .
  151. 151. Wadleigh C. Brown J. 1952 The chemical status of bean plants afflicted with bicarbonate-induced chlorosis. Botanical Gazette 113 373 392 .
  152. 152. Walia H. Wilson C. Ismail A. Close T. Cui X 2009 Comparing genomic expression patterns across plant species reveals highly diverged transcriptional dynamics in response to salt stress. BMC Genomics 10, 398.
  153. 153. Wang J. Zuo K. Wu W. Song J. Sun X. Lin J. Li X. Tang K. 2003, Molecular cloning and characterization of a new Na+/H+ antiporter gene from Brassica napus. Mitochondrial DNA: The Journal of DNA Mapping, Sequencing, and Analysis 14 351 358 .
  154. 154. Whipker B. E. Bailey D. A. Nelson P. V. Fonteno W. C. Hammer P. A. 1996 A novel approach to calculate acid additions for alkalinity control in greenhouse irrigation water. Communications Soil Science and Plant Analysis 27 959 976 .
  155. 155. Winicov I. 1998 New molecular approaches to improving salt tolerance in crop plants Annals of Botany 82 703 710 .
  156. 156. Wolf O. Jeschke W. D. Hartung W. 1990 Long distance transport of abscisic acid in NaCI-treated intact plants of Lupinus albus. Journal of Experimental Botany 41 593 600 .
  157. 157. Wood A. J. Joel Duff. R. Oliver M. J. 2000 The translational apparatus of Tortula ruralis: polysomal retention of transcripts encoding the ribosomal proteins RPS14, RPS16 and RPL23 in desiccated and rehydrated gametophytes. Journal of Experimental Botany 51 1655 1662 .
  158. 158. Wood A. J. Oliver M. J. 1999 Translational control in plant stress: the formation of messenger ribonucleoprotein particles (mRNPs) in response to desiccation of Tortula ruralis gametophytes. The Plant Journal 18 359 370 .
  159. 159. Xu J. Li Y. Wang Y. Liu H. Lei L. Yang H. Liu G. Ren D. 2008b Activation of MAPK Kinase 9 induces ethylene and camalexin biosynthesis and enhances sensitivity to salt stress in Arabidopsis Journal of Biological Chemistry 283 26996 27006 .
  160. 160. Xu J. Zhang Y. Guan Z. Wei W. Han L. Chai T. 2008a Expression and function of two dehydrins under environmental stresses in Brassica juncea L. Molecular Breeding 21 431 438 .
  161. 161. Yang C. W. Wang P. Li C. Y. Shi D. C. Wang D. L. 2008c Comparison of effects of salt and alkali stresses on the growth and photosynthesis of wheat. Photosynthetica 46 107 114 .
  162. 162. Yang C. W. Xu H. H. Wang L. L. Liu J. Shi D. C. Wang D. L. 2009 Comparative effects of salt-stress and alkali-stress on the growth, photosynthesis, solute accumulation, and ion balance of barley plants. Photosynthetica 47 79 86 .
  163. 163. Yang S. M. Chang C. Y. Yanagisawa M. Park I. Tseng T. H. Ku M. S. B. 2008 Transgenic rice expressing cyanobacterial bicarbonate transporter exhibited enhanced photosynthesis, growth and grain yield Photosynthesis. Energy from the Sun, Springer Netherlands 20 1247 1250 .
  164. 164. Yang X. Römheld V. Marschner H. 1994 Effect of bicarbonate on root growth and accumulation of organic acids in Zn-inefficient and Zn-efficient rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.). Plant and Soil 164 1 7 .
  165. 165. Zhang H. Blumwald E. 2001 Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit. Nature Biotechnology 19 765 768 .
  166. 166. Zhang H. Hodson J. Williams J. Blumwald E. 2001a Engineering salt-tolerant Brassica plants: characterization of yield and seed oil quality in transgenic plants with increased vacuolar sodium accumulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98 12832 12836 .
  167. 167. Zhang H. X. Hodson J. N. Williams J. P. Blumwald E. 2001b Engineering salt tolerant Brassica plants: characterization of yield and seed oil quality in transgenic plants with increased vacuolar sodium accumulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98 12832 .
  168. 168. Zhenxian G. Xiaoliang H. Baocun Z. Chunjiang Z. Yingzhu L. Rongchao G. Yinzhu S. Zhanjing H. 2010, Overexpressing a putative aquaporin gene from wheat, TaNIP, enhances salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis Plant and Cell Physiology 51 767 775 .
  169. 169. Zhu J. K. 2001 Plant salt tolerance. Trends in Plant Science 6 66 71 .
  170. 170. Zribi K. Gharsalli M. 2002 Effect of bicarbonate on growth and iron nutrition of pea. Journal of Plant Nutrition 25 2143 2149 .

Written By

Muhammad Javid, Marc Nicolas and Rebecca Ford

Submitted: 24 November 2010 Published: 22 September 2011