1. Introduction
Although there have been many reports about gene transfer to testicules, the original purpose is to develop more effective and simple methods to obtain transgenic animals than the most widely used method, which is the direct microinjection of foreign DNA into pronuclei of fertilized eggs. In the future, however, this technique has the potential to be the most useful approach for the treatment of testicular disorders such as male infertility and testicular cancer. In addition to whether gene transfer to testis is technically possible, the issues of social acceptance, ethics and safety must be addressed before it could become a clinical option. Germ cell gene therapy is rejected on the grounds that gene transfer to normal germ cells would be possible to affect future generations without precise understanding of the mechanism and control of gene expression. Therefore, at present, we should not make exceptions to the standing ethical rules in future clinical application of gene transfer to normal germ cells and consider appropriate gene therapy that avoids gene transfer to normal germ cells. On the other hand, the basic common consensus throughout the world is that gene transfer to somatic cells and cancer cells can be applied to treat wide range of disorders. Up to now, there has been no report about clinical application of gene transfer to testis. In this chapter, we discuss the current understanding of gene transfer to testes in animals, and the future possibility of clinical application of this technique for human testicular disorders.
2. Normal function and anatomy of testis
The testis has two primary functions: the production of sperm (spermatogenesis), which ensures the survival of our species, and the secretion of steroid hormones (steroidogenesis), which is necessary for male sexual differentiation, male secondary sexual functions, including behavior and spermatogenesis. Three main cells, germ cells (spermatogenic cells) and the somatic cells such as Sertoli cells and Leydig cells play a significant role in maintaining these testicular functions. Germ cells in the testis are composed of spermatogonia, spermatocytes and spermatids. Spermatogenesis can be divided into several processes, including the proliferation and differentiation of spermatogonia, which are stem cells, meiosis of spermatocytes, and their morphological changes to spermatids. Sertoli and Leydig cells support germ cell development, maturation and release into the seminiferous tubule lumen. The cell to cell crosstalk involves an intricate network of paracrine-autocrine systems that support endocrine input to modulate cell function (Saunders, 2003).
3. Possible methods of gene transfer to testis-animal studes
3.1. In vivo gene transfer
Establishment of the efficient methods of gene transfer to testis is important to apply for clinical use in the future. In animal studies, two methods, intratesticular injection and intratubular injection, can be used to perform gene transfer to the testis depending on the target cells. If the target cells are Leydig cells, intratesticular injection may be better, whereas if they are germ cells or Sertoli cells, intratubular injection may be preferable (Kojima, 2008a). These same basic methods will be used for humans.
3.1.1. Intratesticular injection
Intratesticular injection is a simpler method. DNA solution is injected directly into the testis through the scrotal skin using a needle and a disposable syringe. This technique allows the spread of DNA throughout the entire interstitial space of the testis, but not in the seminiferous tublues.
3.1.2. Intratubular injection
For intratubular injection, two injection techniques are available, antegrade injection and retrograde injection. The testis is pulled out and exposed under a dissecting microscope in both techniques. Injection of DNA containing Trypan blue dye is useful way to monitor the accuracy of the testis injection.
3.1.2.1. Antegrade injection
For the antegrade injection, a small incision is made in the tunica, and then DNA solution is directly injected into the seminiferous tubules using an injection glass micropipette. Injection is usually made at several sites in the testis (Kojima, 2003).
3.1.2.2. Retrograde injection
For the retrograde injection, the injection glass micropipette is inserted into the rete testis via the efferent duct to allow direct injection into the seminiferous tubules. (Kurokawa, 2005). This technique enables the more thorough spread of exogenous DNA throughout the entire seminiferous tubule.
3.2. Ex vivo gene transfer
The testicular cell and tissue transplantation system with gene transfer is sometimes a useful procedure for gene transfer to the testis to produce transgenic animals. In this system, transduced donor testicular cells populations are transplanted by efferent duct injection into recipient animals (Nagano, 2001; Orwig, 2002) or transduced donor testicular tissues are transplanted directly into the testis.
4. Vectors
Generally, there are two main types of gene delivery vectors: non-viral and viral. Although several researchers have attempted gene transfer into animal testis using these vectors to produce transgenic animals, the choice of vector is one of the most important issues when applying for clinical trials of gene therapy for male infertility. Since these vectors have their own characteristics, they should be clarified before being used for testis-mediated gene transfer
4.1. Non-viral vector
It has been shown that non-viral vectors have several advantages over viral ones, as they are simple and cheap manufacture, no insert-size limitation, low immunogenicity and, as a result, a good safety profile. On the other hand, the disadvantages are the short duration of expression, inefficient transfection and difficulty in targeting transfection (Navarro, 2008). These techniques are so uncontrollable and unpredictable that they will not be appropriate for use in clinical trials in the short term, although some may be useful to produce transgenic animals. To apply for clinical use in the future, significant modification will be required.
4.1.1. Naked DNA
Sperm cells have the capacity to capture foreign DNA (Brackett, 1971). Several reports have demonstrated that sperm-mediated gene transfer
ability of sperm cells to bind and internalize exogenous DNA and to transfer it into the egg at fertilization, has succeeded in generating transgenic animals (Lavitrano, 1989, 1992, 1997, 2006; Francolini, 1993; Zani M, 1995).
On the other hand, Huguet E et al. (1998) analyzed the uptake of exogenous DNA by mouse and rat spermatozoa using
4.1.2. Liposome
Cationic lipids interact with negatively charged nucleic acid molecules forming complexes in which the nucleic acid is coated by lipids (Felgner, 1987). The positive outer surface of the complex can associate with the negatively charged cell membrane, allowing the internalization of nucleic acid. In this technique, DNA is mixed with cationic lipid just before the addition of this complex to the testis. Several researchers have reported testis-mediated gene transfer using this method. As early as 3–4 days after microinjection of the exogenous gene mixed with cationic lipids into the seminiferous tubules, gene expression was observed within both immature and differentiated germ cells. By 40 days post-injection, the gene expression was restricted to the most immature germ cells in the basal portion of the seminiferous tubules (Celebi, 2002). Although transgene was transmitted to morula, blastocyst and mid-gestational fetuses, the ratio of animals carrying the exogenous gene decreased as they developed. Over 80% of morula-stage embryos expressed the exogenous gene, but only some postpartum progeny were foreign-DNA-positive with a high incidence of mosaicism (Yonezawa, 2001). Repeated injection with linearized plasmid DNA containing the
4.1.3. Electroporation
Electroporation is a widely used technique for enhancing the efficiency of DNA delivery into cells. Application of electric pulses after local injection of DNA temporarily opens cell membranes and facilitates DNA uptake (De Vry, 2010). Electroporation provides more sperm cells to increase DNA uptake than unelectroporated spermatozoa (Gagné, 1991; Horan, 1992).
As a possible alternative and more effective method for generating transgenic mice, several researchers have attempted testis-mediated gene transfer using an
Yomogida et al. (2002) investigated the rescue of spermatogenesis in
4.2. Viral vector
Viral vectors provide the most efficient transfection. Their main disadvantages concern limitations on the size of inserted DNA, difficulty of manufacture and possible immunogenicity (Navarro, 2008).
4.2.1. Adenoviral vector
Adenoviruses are the most commonly used gene-delivery vectors due to the efficiency of their
Several researchers have attempted to perform adenovirus-mediated gene transfer to animal testis
Gene expression patterns by adenovirus-mediated gene transfer to the testis are particularly interesting and important from the viewpoint of gene therapy for male infertility in the future. Since it is not impossible to introduce a foreign gene precisely at specific chromosomal loci, abnormal sperm could be formed if a foreign gene is introduced into germ cells in the testis. This would increase the rate of offspring with anomalies; however, when an adenovirus vector is used, such problems can be avoided because of its biological characteristic of not introducing genes into germ cells in the testis. Fetuses and offspring produced by mating with males for several days after adenovirus-mediated gene transfer to the testis were normal and the number of neonates was not significantly different from that in the control group. None of the fetuses or offspring showed any abnormalities, and the transgene was not detected by RT-PCR and histochemical study (Kojima, 2003, 2008b). These results demonstrate that the risk of germline transmission following adenovirus-mediated gene transfer to the testis is extremely low (Kojima, 2008b).
There are two problems concerning transfection with the adenoviral vector, i.e., cytotoxicity as a general biological characteristic and the immune response (Yang, 1994, 1995; Amin, 1995); however, although apoptosis was detected in some spermatocytes and a slight immune response was observed for a short period, it was temporary. The testis did not become highly atrophic, severe deterioration of the tubules was not detected, sperm motility was not lowered and sperm abnormalities were not observed (Kojima, 2003); therefore, transfection by adenoviral vector was not considered to have any adverse effects on spermatogenic function overall. Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer to the testis has several advantages and can be exploited for the treatment of male infertility in the future; however, to achieve a better therapeutic effect in the future, the different strategies of adenoviral improvement should be combined.
Some studies have reported the effect of gene transfer to an animal model testis on spermatogenesis using an adenoviral vector
4.2.2. Retroviral vector
Retroviral vectors based upon simple gammaretroviruses, complex lentiviruses, or potentially nonpathogenic spumaviruses represent relatively well-characterized tools that are widely used for stable gene transfer (Baum, 2006; Bushman 2007). They transfect by integrating the transgene into the target cell chromosome, but transgene expression ceases within days to weeks and tends to be shorter than adenovirus vectors. Unlike many other types of vectors currently being developed for gene therapy, retroviral vectors are able to genetically modify cells stably without perturbing cell growth (Kim, 2000). In the testis injected with retroviral vector into seminiferous tubules via rete testes, no cells with gene expression could be found (Ikawa, 2002); however, other researchers reported that retroviral vector was a powerful tool to transfer exogenous genes into the germ cell line and spermatogonia
4.2.3. Lentiviral vector
Lentviral vector are being increasingly used in basic and applied research. Human gene therapy clinical trials are currently underway using lentiviral vectors in a wide range of human diseases (Escors & Breckpot 2010). The capacity to efficiently transduce non-dividing cells, shuttle large genetic payloads, and maintain stable long-term transgene expression are attributes that have brought lentiviral vectors to the forefront of gene delivery vehicles for research and therapeutic applications in a clinical setting (Cockrell & Kafri, 2007). Testes transduced with lentiviral vector expressed the trangene without impairing spermatogenesis. Expression patterns were characteristic of Sertoli cells and gene expression was observed over a period of 6 months (Ikawa, 2002). Although spermatogenesis can be restored in
4.2.4. Baculoviral vector
Since the discovery that baculoviruses can efficiently transduce mammalian cells, baculoviruses have been extensively studied as potential vectors for both
5. Future prospects of gene therapy for male infertility
5.1. Abnormal sperm production and male infertility
Normal fertility is defined as achieving a pregnancy within one year by regular coital exposure. On the other hand, infertility is defined as the inability to conceive after one year of unprotected intercourse, which affects approximately 15% of couples trying to conceive in western countries. Worldwide more than 70 million couples suffer from infertility (Ombelet, 2008). It is generally reported that in approximately 30% of cases, infertility is mainly due to a male factor, and 70 to 90% of male infertility arises from impaired spermatogenesis with the clinical presentation of abnormal sperm production, such as oligozoospermia and azoospermia (Greenberg, 1978). The presented cases of male infertility include varicocele, cryptorchidism, obstruction of spermatic ducts, and endocrine disorders; however, most cases continue to be labeled with the diagnosis of “idiopathic infertility” or given descriptive diagnoses that do not provide a cause for their defect, although basic research helps to define the associated genes and the mechanisms responsible for the development, function and regulation of spermatogenesis (Matzuk & Lamb, 2008).
5.2. Present therapeutic options of male infertility and its limitation
Evolving therapies have allowed the use of sperm from men with compromised spermatogenesis, obstructive azoospermia, and sperm functional deficiency, enabling these men to procreate when unable to do so naturally (Oates, 2008). Assisted reproductive technology (ART) is the most appropriate management if a natural pregnancy fails to occur, and this is increasingly used in the treatment of both male and female infertility. Recently, severe male infertility, such as azoospermia, has been treated successfully by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) (Palemo, 1992, 1996). Sperm can be obtained by microepididymal sperm aspiration (MESA), percutaneous sperm aspiration (PESA), and testicular sperm extraction (TESE) from patients with male infertility. ICSI involves the injection of a single sperm directly into the cytoplasm of a mature egg (oocyte) using a glass needle (pipette). ICSI guarantees high fertilization rates and could also theoretically lead to higher implantation rates. Fertilization rates were in the range of 60–90% and the delivery rate per retrieval was 38.5% in the first 560 couples (Palermo, 1996). Although ICSI allows otherwise sterile couples to become parents, there is still only an incomplete picture of the risks associated with the usage of these ART to offspring (Staessen, 1999; Alukal & Lamb, 2008). Several data have indicated a higher risk of congenital malformation (Sutcliffe, 2001; Hansen M, 2002), chromosome aneuploidy (In’t Veld P, 1995; Liebaers, 1995; Loft A, 1999), low birth weight (Schieve, 2002), and imprinting defects such as Angelman syndrome (Cox, 2002) for children conceived by ICSI than for children conceived naturally. Additionally, this technique is not a cure per se for male infertility patients. The empirical treatments used in the past for male infertility patients are probably ineffective, and no effective treatments have been proved to improve spermatogenesis in idiopathic male infertility despite major advances in ART; therefore, additional prospective treatments for male infertility patients are needed to achieve paternity potential.
5.3. Therapeutic potential of gene transfer to tesits for male infertility
Fertilization is better
5.3.1. Appropriate methods and vectors of future gene therapy for male infertility
The basic common consensus throughout the world is that somatic gene therapy can be applied to treat a wide range of disorders, including cancer and inherited disease (Smith, 2003). The ethical issues in somatic gene therapy are primarily concerned with the risk of this procedure, such as vector toxicity and oncogenesis. On the other hand, although germline gene therapy is theoretically possible, it is rejected on the grounds that it would be possible to affect future generations without precise understanding about the mechanism and control of gene expression [(Kojima, 2006a). At present, we should not make exceptions to the standing ethical rules in future gene therapy for male infertility and consider appropriate gene therapy that avoids gene transfer to germ cells.
Within the seminiferous epithelium of seminiferous tubules, spermatogenesis occurs on the surface of Sertoli cells. In other words, Sertoli cells directly support spermatogenesis. They are involved in metabolic exchange with germ cells, as well as in their nutrition and the secretion of tubular fluid into the luminal compartment and the exclusive targets of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), androgens and other hormones within the testis (Brehm & Steger, 2005). On the other hand, Leydig cells are the main source of the androgen hormone, testosterone, which is located in the interstitial space, outside the seminiferous tubules. This function is regulated by luteinizing hormone (LH), paracrine factors secreted by cells within the seminiferous tubules and autoregulatory factors.
Disruption of spermatogenesis, which results in male infertility, can therefore be caused by defects affecting the germ cells or Sertoli cells or sometimes Leydig cell dysfunction. Germ cells are appropriate target cells of gene transfer into the testis to generate transgenic animals, while Sertoli cells and Leydig cells may be appropriate target cells for the clinical application of male infertility treatment on the basis of ethical issues. Viewed from this point, adenoviral-, lentiviral- or baculoviral-mediated gene transfer may be effective for transfecting testicular somatic cells, Sertoli cells or Leydig cells, because they can not introduce exogenous genes into germ cells, and are applicable vectors for
Intratubular injection (antegrade injection or retrograde injection) is a useful technique to introduce genes into Sertoli cells, while intratesticular injection may be useful for Leydig cells.
It is important to choose an appropriate vector for clinical use. The disadvantage of liposome and electroporation methods for clinical application was that they showed potential for gene expression in germ cells and strong adverse effects on spermatogenesis. On the other hand, adenovirus-mediated gene transfer may be a more effective and superior method for transfecting testicular cells among these three methods and may be more applicable for gene therapy for male infertility in the future (Kojima, 2005).
5.3.2. Candidate genes of future gene therapy for male infertility
Spermatogenesis is a complex program of differentiation that takes place within the testicular seminiferous tubules, which are composed of germ cells and somatic Sertoli cells (Brehm & Steger, 2005; Bergmann 2005). Two control mechanisms are involved in the regulation of spermatogenesis; hormone and genetics. Sertoli cells trigger germ cell development by not only mediating hormonal stimuli of FSH and androgen secreted by Leydig cells, but also numerous genes. Understanding the mechanisms by which genes and gene products are expressed or repressed in the testes enables the development of strategies to treat male infertility. A lot of candidate male fertility-associated genes have been revealed from knockout mice phenotypes (Cram, 2001, O'Bryan MK & de Kretser, 2006). It is important to perform detailed phenotypic analysis in order to extract the maximum amount of information from each model; however, despite the identification of an increasing number of candidate genes involved in spermatogenesis, the range of diagnostic genetic tests for male infertility remains extremely limited (Nuti & Krausz, 2008). Normal spermatogenesis and fertility are dependent upon paracrine or autocrine interactions between somatic cells (Sertoli and Leydig cells) and germ cells, and upon endocrine support from the pituitary gland (Saunders, 2003).
Several possible genes may be essential for Sertoli and Leydig cell function to support normal spermatogenesis. Testicular gene therapy for these cells as target cells may be useful to treat male infertility in the future, especially for those who have no spermatozoa in their testes at all, such as pathological maturation arrest or Sertoli cells only. From our viewpoint, Sertoli cells are more appropriate target cells, because they perform crucial functions that initiate, promote and maintain spermatogenesis directly in seminiferous tubules.
Disorders of testicular function may originate as a result of abnormal development or proliferation of Sertoli cells (Sharpe, 2003). Idiopathic male infertility, including pathologically maturation arrest and Sertoli cell-only syndrome, may result in abnormal Sertoli cell function, which disrupts the normal progression of spermatogenesis [Kojima et al. 2006c].
Marker genes of maturity and immaturity of Sertoli cells include anti-Müllerian hormone, vimentin, connexin 26, connexin 43, aromatase, cytokeratin-18, GATA1, laminin α5, M2A antigen, p27kip1, inhibin α, sulphated glycoprotein 2, androgen receptor and WT-1 (Brehm & Steger, 2005; Sharpe, 2003). In addition, alterations of transcription regulation in the testis may cause idiopathic male infertility. Transcription factors include CREB, Sox3, Pem (Rhox5) and DAX1, which are essential for spermatogenesis and are expressed not in germ cells but in Sertoli cells of seminiferous tubules (Hummler, 1994; Yu, 1998; Weiss, 2003; Maclean, 2005a,b; Kojima, 2006c). Clarifying the role of these factors in spermatogenesis may advance the clinical application of gene therapy for patients with male infertility.
On the other hand, Leydig cells may also be target cells of gene therapy. Hypotheses about the underlying mechanism of the depletion of germ cells in Klinefelter syndrome males, which is the most common sex chromosome abnormality and the most frequent genetic cause of male infertility, include Leydig cell insufficiency and disturbed apoptosis regulation of Leydig cells (Aksglaede, 2006). There is also evidence of Leydig cell impairment in a proportion of men treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy for malignant disease (Howell, 2001). Endocrine disruptors can disrupt not only spermatogenesis but also normal endocrine function of Leydig cells, acting directly on Leydig cells to diminish testosterone production by interfering with the expression of specific genes in the steroidogenic pathway (Skakkebaek, 2001). Marker genes, including P450(CYP) steroid hydroxylase, 3β-HSD [143], Androgen receptor [144], LHR [145], Ad4BP/SF-1 [134,146,147] are expressed in Leydig cells (Weiss, 1992, Morohashi, 1993, 1994; Luo, 1994; Xu, 2007; Kojima, 2006c,], which are implicated in steroidogenesis or spermatogenesis. They may also be candidate genes for gene therapy in the future.
6. Future prospects of gene therapy for testicular cancer
6.1. Testicular cancer and germ cell tumor
Testicular cancer is the most frequent solid tumor in young male adults and a disease with elusive pathogenesis. Germ cell tumors (GCTs) represent 95% of all testicular cancers (Diamantopoulos, 2010). Testicular cancer represents the most curable solid tumor, with a 10-year survival rate of more than 95% (Travis, 2010). Especially, clinical stage I testicular cancer is highly curable. Since treatment for testicular cancer directly affects gonadal tissues, fertility rate after treatment for testicular cancer is reduced.
GCTs are divided into two broad group, seminnoma and non-seminoma. Seminoma retains the morphology of spermatogonial GCs. On the other hand, non-seminoma display embryonal and extra-embryonal differentiation patterns which include primitive zygotic (embryonal carcinoma), embryonal-like somatically differentiated (teratoma), and embryonally differentiated (choriocarcinoma and yolk-sac tumor) phenotypes (Chaganti & Houldsworth 2000).
6.2. Present therapeutic options of testicular cancer and its limitation
Treatment strategy is chosen according to the patient stage and prognostic group stratification. The standard therapy is generally considered to be radical orchiectomy even for bilateral testis cancer; however, partial orchiectomy should be undertaken only in selected patients -men with bilateral testicular cancer or GCTs in a solitary testis-if the size and location of the mass are amenable to surgery. Partial orchiectomy provides potential benefits over radical surgery by reducing the need for androgen substitution, lessening psychological stress, and preserving fertility, with a durable cure rate. However, partial orchiectomy is not always appropriate according to tumor size. Although alternative strategies of organ preservation, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy, might be appropriate treatment options in the future, the safety and efficacy of these procedures have not been demonstrated in larger and prospective studies with longer follow-up (Zuniga, 2010). Therefore, gene therapy may be one of the options for testicular cancer in the future.
6.3. Therapeutic potential of gene transfer to tesits for testicular cancer
Several preclinical studies have demonstrated that gene therapy produced antitumor effects, suggesting its feasibility in clinical settings. Actual trials of gene therapy for certain cancers have already been reported; however, to our knowledge, there is no report about gene therapy for GCTs, because of complexity of its pathogenesis. Therefore, which method or vector is useful for clinical application has remained unknown.
A lot of researchers have attempted to identify the candidate genes of GCTs. Cytogenetic and molecular genetic analysis of GCTs has yielded important data relevant to the understanding of the mechanism of GC transformation (Chaganti & Houldsworth, 2000). Virtually 100% of tumors show increased copy number of the short arm of chromosome 12 (12p), as one or more copies of isochoromosome of12p or as tandem duplications of 12p,
Stem cell research has provided new insights on pathogenesis of GCTs. Cancer stem cells may be target for cancer cells (Hombach-Klonisch, 2008). It is becoming increasingly evidence that cancer constitutes a group of diseases involving altered stem cell maturation/differentiation and the disturbance of regenerative process. Previous study showed a substantial overlap in the expression patterns of testicular embryonal carcinomas and embryonic stem (ES) cells. Several candidate genes including
7. Conclusions
Our limited understanding of the complex regulatory mechanisms underlying normal spermatogenesis and pathogenesis of GCTs makes it difficult to identify specific target genes for gene therapy for male infertility and GCTs. Recent remarkable advance in molecular approaches have contributed to find candidate genes and provided new knowledge on molecular genetics of testicular disorders including male infertility and GCTs. Although more genetic information about the molecular basis of spermatogenesis, male infertility and GCTs will be needed to apply gene therapy for male infertility and GCTs patients, these information will lead to new strategies for the clinical management and gene therapy will provides great benefits for the patients with these testicular diseases in the near future.
References
- 1.
Aksglaede L. Wikström A. M. Rajpert De Meyts. E. Dunkel L. Skakkebaek N. E. Juul A. 2006 Natural history of seminiferous tubule degeneration in Klinefelter syndrome.Hum Reprod Update12 39 48 - 2.
Alukal J. P. Lamb D. J. 2008 Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)--what are the risks? (2008) Urol Clin North Am.35 277 288 - 3.
Amin R. Wilmott R. Schwarz Y. Trapnell B. Stark J. 1995 Replication-deficient adenovirus induces expression of interleukin-8 by airway epithelial cells . Hum Gene Ther.6 145 153 - 4.
Appledorn D. M. Seregin S. Amalfitano A. 2008 Adenovirus vectors for renal-targeted gene delivery. Contrib Nephrol.159 47 62 - 5.
Baum C. Schambach A. Bohne J. Galla M. 2006 Retrovirus vectors: toward the plentivirus? (2006) Mol Ther13 1050 1063 - 6.
Bergmann M. 2005 Spermatogenesis--physiology and pathophysiology Urologe A.44 1131 1132 - 7.
Blanchard K. T. Boekelheide K. 1997 Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer to rat testis .Biol Reprod56 495 500 - 8.
Brackett B. G. Baranska W. Sawicki W. Koprowski H. 1971 Uptake of heterologous genome by mammalian spermatozoa and its transfer to ova through fertilization.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A68 353 357 - 9.
Brehm R. Steger K. 2005 Regulation of Sertoli cell and germ cell differentation. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol181 1 93 - 10.
Bushman F. D. 2007 Retroviral integration and human gene therapy. J Clin Invest117 2083 2086 - 11.
Celebi C. Auvray P. Benvegnu T. Plusquellec D. Jégou B. Guillaudeux T. 2002 Transient transmission of a transgene in mouse offspring following transfection of male germ cells. Mol Reprod Dev62 477 482 - 12.
Chaganti R. S. Houldsworth J. 2000 Genetics and biology of adult human male germ cell tumors. Cancer Res.60 1475 82 - 13.
Cockrell A. S. Kafri T. 2007 Gene delivery by lentivirus vectors. Mol Biotechnol.36 184 204 - 14.
Cox G. F. Burger J. Lip V. Mau U. A. Sperling K. Wu B. L. Horsthemke B. 2002 Intracytoplasmic sperm injection may increase the risk of imprinting defects. Am J Hum Genet71 162 16 - 15.
Cram D. S. O’Bryan M. K. de Kretser D. M. 2001 Male infertility genetics--the future. J Androl22 738 746 - 16.
Danno S. Itoh K. Baum C. 1999 Efficient gene transfer by hybrid retroviral vectors to murine spermatogenic cells. Hum Gene Ther10 1819 1831 - 17.
De Miguel M. P. Donovan P. J. 2003 Determinants of retroviral-mediated gene delivery to mouse spermatogonia. Biol Reprod 2003;68 860 866 - 18.
De Vry J. Martínez-Martínez P. Losen M. Temel Y. Steckler T. Steinbusch H. W. De Baets M. H. Prickaerts J. 2010 electroporation of the central nervous system: a non-viral approach for targeted gene delivery. Prog Neurobiol.92 227 44 - 19.
Diamantopoulos N. Kortsaris A. 2010 Testicular germ cell tumors. J BUON.15 421 34 - 20.
Dobashi M. Goda K. Maruyama H. Fujisawa M. 2005 Erythropoietin gene transfer into rat testes by electropo-ration may reduce the risk of germ cell loss caused by cryptorchidism. Asian J Androl7 369 373 - 21.
Lentiviral vectors in gene therapy: their current status and future potential (Escors D. Breckpot K. 2010 Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz).58 2 107 19 - 22.
Felgner P. L. Gadek T. R. Holm M. 1987 Lipofection: a highly efficient, lipid-mediated DNA-transfection procedure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A84 7413 7417 - 23.
Francolini M. Lavitrano M. Lamia C. L. 1993 Evidence for nuclear internalization of exogenous DNA into mammalian sperm cells. Mol Reprod Dev34 133 139 - 24.
Fujisawa M. Shirakawa T. Fujioka H. 2001 Adenovirus-mediated53 gene transfer to rat testis impairs spermatogenesis. Arch Androl 46:223-231. - 25.
Gagné M. B. Pothier F. Sirard M. A. 1991 Electroporation of bovine spermatozoa to carry foreign DNA in oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev29 6 15 - 26.
Goda K. Fujisawa M. Shirakawa T. 2004 Adenoviral-mediated HGF expression inhibits germ cell apoptosis in rats with cryptorchidism. J Gene Med6 869 876 - 27.
Goldstein M. Tanrikut C. 2006 Microsurgical management of male infertility. Nat Clin Pract Urol3 381 391 - 28.
Greenberg S. H. Lipshultz L. I. Wein A. J. 1978 Experience with 425 subfertile male patients. J Urol119 507 510 - 29.
Hansen M. Kurinczuk J. J. Bower C. Webb S. 2002 The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and fertilization. N Engl J Med346 725 730 - 30.
Hombach-Klonisch S. Paranjothy T. Wiechec E. Pocar P. Mustafa T. Seifert A. Zahl C. Gerlach K. L. Biermann K. Steger K. Hoang-Vu C. Schulze-Osthoff K. Los M. 2008 Cancer stem cells as targets for cancer therapy: selected cancers as examples. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz).56 165 80 - 31.
Horan R. Powell R. Bird J. M. Gannon F. Houghton J. A. 1992 Effects of electropermeabilization on the association of foreign DNA with pig sperm.Arch Androl28 105 114 - 32.
Houldsworth J. Korkola J. E. Bosl G. J. Chaganti R. S. 2006 Biology and genetics of adult male germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol.24 5512 8 - 33.
Howell S. J. Shalet S. M. 2001 Testicular function following chemotherapy. Hum Reprod Update.7 363 369 - 34.
Hu Y. C. 2008 Baculoviral vectors for gene delivery: a review. Curr Gene Ther.8 54 65 - 35.
Huguet E. Esponda P. 1998 Foreign DNA introduced into the vas deferens is gained by mammalian spermatozoa. Mol Reprod Dev51 42 52 - 36.
Huguet E. Esponda P. 2000 Generation of genetically modified mice by spermatozoa transfection : preliminary results.Mol Reprod Dev56 243 7 - 37.
Hummler E. Cole T. J. Blendy J. A. 1994 Targeted mutation of the CREB gene: compensation within the CREB/ATF family of transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A91 5647 5651 - 38.
Ikawa M. Tergaonkar V. Ogura A. Ogonuki N. Inoue K. Verma I. M. 2002 Restoration of spermatogenesis by lentiviral gene transfer: offspring from infertile mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A99 7524 7529 - 39.
Ike A. Ohta H. Onishi M. Iguchi N. Nishimune Y. Nozaki M. 2004 Transient expression analysis of the mouse ornithine decarboxylase antizyme haploid-specific promoter using electroporation. FEBS Lett559 159 164 - 40.
In’t Veld. P. Branderburg H. Verhoeff A. Dhont M. Los F. 1995 Sex chromosomal anomalies and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Lancet 346:773 - 41.
Kanatsu-Shinohara M. Toyokuni S. Shinohara T. 2004 Transgenic mice produced by retroviral transduction of male germ line stem cells in vivo. Biol Reprod71 1202 1207 - 42.
Kim S. H. Kim S. Robbins P. D. 2006 Retroviral vectors. Adv Virus Res. 2000;55 545 563 - 43.
Assessing and communicating the risks and benefits of gene transfer clinical trials. Curr Opin Mol Ther.Kim S. Y. 8 384 389 - 44.
Kojima Y. Sasaki S. Umemoto Y. Hashimoto Y. Hayashi Y. Kohri K. 2003 Effects of adenovirus mediated gene transfer to mouse testis on spermatogenesis and next generation. J Urol170 2109 2114 - 45.
Kojima Y. Sasaki S. Umemoto Y. Hashimoto Y. Hayashi Y. Kohri K. 2005 Comparison of characteristics of several vectors to testicular gene transfer system. J Urol 173 (Suppl):407 408 - 46.
Kojima Y. Sasaki S. Kohri K. 2006a Therapeutic options: Current research and future prospects for gene therapy in andrology. In: Eds Hargreave T, Comhaire F and Schill W-B. Andrology for clinician. Heiderberg, Springer;592 598 - 47.
Kojima Y. Sasaki S. Hayashi Y. Umemoto Y. Morohashi K. Kohri K. 2006b Role of transcription factors Ad4BP/SF-1 and DAX-1 in steroidogenesis and spermatogenesis in human testicular development and idiopathic azoospermia. Int J Urol13 785 793 - 48.
Kojima Y. Kurokawa S. Mizuno K. Umemoto Y. Sasaki S. Hayashi Y. Kohri K. 2008a Gene transfer to sperm and testis: future prospects of gene therapy for male infertility. Curr Gene Ther.8 121 34 - 49.
Kojima Y. Hayashi Y. Kurokawa S. Mizuno K. Sasaki S. Kohri K. 2008b No evidence of germ-line transmission by adenovirus-mediated gene transfer to mouse testes. Fertil Steril.89 1448 1454 - 50.
Kost T. A. Condreay J. P. Jarvis D. L. 2005 Baculovirus as versatile vectors for protein expression in insect and mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol23 567 575 - 51.
Kuhlmann K. F. Gouma D. J. Wesseling J. G. 2008 Adenoviral gene therapy for pancreatic cancer: where do we stand? Dig Surg.25 278 292 - 52.
Kurokawa S. Kojima Y. Mizuno K. Nakane A. Hayashi Y. Kohri K. 2005 Effect of epidermal growth factor on spermatogenesis in the cryptorchid rat. J Urol.174 2415 2419 - 53.
Lamb D. J. 2008 Would gene therapy for the treatment of male infertility be safe? (2008) Nat Clin Pract Urol.5 594 595 - 54.
Lavitrano M. Camaioni A. Fazio V. M. Dolci S. Farace M. G. Spadafora C. 1989 Sperm cells as vectors for introducing foreign DNA into eggs: genetic transformation of mice. Cell57 717 723 - 55.
Lavitrano M. French D. Zani M. Frati L. Spadafora C. 1992 The interaction between exogenous DNA and sperm cells. Mol Reprod Dev31 161 169 - 56.
Lavitrano M. Maione B. Forte E. 1997 The interaction of sperm cells with exogenous DNA: a role of CD4 and major histocompatibility complex class II molecules. Exp Cell Res233 56 62 - 57.
Lavitrano M. Busnelli M. Cerrito M. G. Giovannoni R. Manzini S. Vargiolu A. 2006 Sperm-mediated gene transfer. Reprod Fertil Dev18 19 23 - 58.
Liebaers I. Bonduelle M. Van Assche E. Devroey P. Van Steirteghem A. 1995 Sex chromosome abnormalities after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Lancet 346:1095 - 59.
Loft A. Petersen K. Erb K. Mikkelsen A. L. Grinsted J. Hald F. Hindkjaer J. Nielsen K. M. Lundstrom P. Gabrielsen A. Lenz S. Hornnes P. Ziebe S. Ejdrup H. B. Lindhard A. Zhou Y. Nyboe Andersen. A. 1999 Danish cohort of 730 infants born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) 1994-1997. Hum Reprod14 2143 2148 - 60.
Luo X. Ikeda Y. Parker K. L. 1994 A cell-specific nuclear receptor is essential for adrenal and gonadal development and sexual differentiation. Cell 77: 1994;481 90 - 61.
Matzuk M. M. Lamb D. J. 2008 The biology of infertility: research advances and clinical challenges. Nat Med.14 1197 1213 - 62.
Maclean J. A. 2nd Wilkinson M. F. 2005a Gene regulation in spermatogenesis (2005a) Curr Top Dev Biol71 131 197 - 63.
Maclean J. A. 2nd Chen M. A. Wayne C. M. 2005b Rhox: a new homeobox gene cluster. Cell120 369 382 - 64.
Merrihew R. V. Kost T. A. Condreay J. P. 2004 Baculovirus-mediated gene delivery into mammalian cells.Methods. Mol Biol246 355 365 - 65.
Morohashi K. Zanger U. M. Honda S. Hara M. Waterman M. R. Omura T. 1993 Activation of CYP11A and CYP11B gene promoters by the steroidogenic cell-specific transcription factor, Ad4BP. Mol. Endocrinol7 1196 204 - 66.
Morohashi K. Omura T. 1994 Ad4BP/SF-1, a transcription factor essential for the transcription of steroidogenic cytochrome450 genes and for the establishment of the reproductive function. FASEB J 10: 1569-77. - 67.
Muramatsu T. Shibata O. Ohmori Y. Okumura J. 1996 electroporation: A convenient method for gene transfer to testicular cells in mice. Anim Sci Technol67 975 982 - 68.
Muramatsu T. Shibata O. Ryoki S. Ohmori Y. Okumura J. 1997 Foreign gene expression in the mouse testis by localized gene transfer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun233 45 49 - 69.
Nagano M. Brinster C. J. Orwig K. E. Ryu B. Y. Avarbock M. R. Brinster R. L. 2001 Transgenic mice produced by retroviral transduction of male germ-line stem cells.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A98 13090 13095 - 70.
Navarro J. Risco R. Toschi M. Schattman G. 2008 Gene therapy and intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI)- a review. Placenta.29 193 199 - 71.
Nuti F. Krausz C. 2008 Gene polymorphisms/mutations relevant to abnormal spermatogenesis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;16 504 513 - 72.
The genetic basis of male reproductive failure. Urol Clin North Am.Oates R. D. 35 257 70 - 73.
O’Bryan M. K. de Kretser D. 2006 Mouse models for genes involved in impaired spermatogenesis. Int J Androl29 76 89 - 74.
Ogawa S. Hayashi K. Tada N. Sato M. Kurihara T. Iwaya M. 1995 Gene expression in blastocysts following direct injection of DNA into testis. J Reprod Dev41 379 382 - 75.
Ombelet W. Cooke I. Dyer S. Serour G. Devroey P. 2008 Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries. Hum Reprod Update.14 605 621 - 76.
Orwig K. E. Avarbock M. R. Brinster R. L. 2002 Retrovirus-mediated modification of male germline stem cells in rats.Biol Reprod67 874 879 - 77.
Palermo G. Joris H. Devroey P. Van Steirteghem A. C. 1992 Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet.340 17 18 - 78.
Palermo G. D. Cohen J. Rosenwaks Z. 1996 Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a powerful tool to overcome fertilization failure. Fertil Steril65 899 908 - 79.
Park H. J. Lee W. Y. Kim J. H. Kim J. H. Jung H. J. Kim N. H. Kim B. K. Song H. 2009 Interstitial tissue-specific gene expression in mouse testis by intra-tunica albuguineal injection of recombinant baculovirus. Asian J Androl.1 342 50 - 80.
Ryoki S. Park H. Ohmori Y. Shoji-Tanaka A. Muramatsu T. 2001 An integrase facilitates long-lasting foreign gene expression in mouse spermatogenic cells. J Biosci Bioeng91 363 367 - 81.
Sato M. Gotoh K. Kimura M. 1999 Sperm-mediated gene transfer by direct injection of foreign DNA into mouse testis. Transgenics2 357 369 - 82.
Sato M. Ishikawa A. Kimura M. 2002 Direct injection of foreign DNA into mouse testis as a possible gene transfer system via epididymal spermatozoa. Mol Reprod Dev61 49 56 - 83.
Saunders P. T. 2003 Germ cell-somatic cell interactions during spermatogenesis. Reprod Suppl.61 91 101 - 84.
Schieve L. A. Meikle S. F. Ferre C. Peterson H. B. Jeng G. Wilcox L. S. 2002 Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med346 731 737 - 85.
Sharpe R. M. Mc Kinnell C. Kivlin C. Fisher J. S. 2003 Proliferation and functional maturation of Sertoli cells, and their relevance to disorders of testis function in adulthood. Reproduction 2003;125 769 784 - 86.
Shoji M. Chuma S. Yoshida K. Morita T. Nakatsuji N. 2005 RNA interference during spermatogenesis in mice. Dev Biol282 524 534 - 87.
Skakkebaek N. E. Rajpert De Meyts. E. Main K. M. 2001 Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects. Hum Reprod16 972 978 - 88.
Smith K. R. 2003 Gene therapy: theoretical and bioethical concepts (2003) Arch Med Res34 247 268 - 89.
Staessen C. Camus M. Clasen K. De Vos A. Van Steirteghem A. 1999 Conventional in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in sibling oocytes from couples with tubal infertility and normozoospermic semen. Hum Reprod14 2474 2479 - 90.
Sutcliffe A. G. Taylor B. Saunders K. Thornton S. BA Lieberman Grudzinskas. J. G. 2001 Outcome in the second year of life after in-vitro fertilisation by intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a UK case-control study. Lancet357 2080 2084 - 91.
Takehashi M. Kanatsu-Shinohara M. Inoue K. 2007 Adenovirus-mediated gene delivery into mouse spermatogonial stem cells.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104 2596 2601 - 92.
Tani H. Limn C. K. Yap C. C. 2003 and in vivo gene delivery by recombinant baculoviruses. 2003; J Virol77 9799 9808 - 93.
Travis L. B. Beard C. Allan J. M. AA Dahl Feldman. D. R. Oldenburg J. Daugaard G. Kelly J. L. ME Dolan Hannigan. R. Constine L. S. Oeffinger K. C. Okunieff P. Armstrong G. Wiljer D. Miller R. C. Gietema J. A. van Leeuwen F. E. Williams J. P. Nichols C. R. Einhorn L. H. Fossa S. D. 2010 Testicular cancer survivorship: research strategies and recommendations. J Natl Cancer Inst.102 1114 30 - 94.
Umemoto Y. Sasaki S. Kojima Y. 2002 gene transfer to mouse testis and the influence of mouse spermatogenesis. J Urol 2002;167 (Suppl): 322. - 95.
Umemoto Y. Sasaki S. Kojima Y. 2005 Gene transfer to mouse testes by electroporation and its influence on spermatogenesis. J Androl. 2005;26 264 271 - 96.
Gene therapy of cancer. LancetWeichselbaum R. R. Kufe D. 1997 349 10 12 - 97.
Weiss J. Axelrod L. Whitcomb R. W. Harris P. E. Crowley W. F. Jameson J. L. 1992 Hypogonadism caused by a single amino acid substitution in the beta subunit of luteinizing hormone. N Engl J Med326 179 183 - 98.
Weiss J. Meeks J. J. Hurley L. Raverot G. Frassetto A. Jameson J. L. 2003 Sox3 is required for gonadal function, but not sex determination, in males and females. Mol Cell Biol23 8084 8091 - 99.
Xu Q. Lin H. Y. Yeh S. D. 2007 Infertility with defective spermatogenesis and steroidogenesis in male mice lacking androgen receptor in Leydig cells. Endocrine32 96 106 - 100.
Yamamoto H. Ochiya T. Tamamushi S. 2002 HST-1/FGF-4 gene activation induces spermatogenesis and prevents adriamycin-induced testicular toxicity. Oncogene21 899 908 - 101.
Yamazaki Y. Fujimoto H. Ando H. Ohyama T. Hirota Y. Noce T. 1998 gene transfer to mouse spermatogenic cells by deoxyribonucleic acid injection into seminiferous tubules and subsequent electroporation. Biol Reprod59 1439 1444 - 102.
Yamazaki Y. Yagi T. Ozaki T. Imoto K. 2000 gene transfer to mouse spermatogenic cells using green fluorescent protein as a marker. J Exp Zool286 212 218 - 103.
Yang Y. Nunes F. A. Berencsi K. EE Furth Gönczöl. E. Wilson J. M. 1994 Cellular immuninty to viral antigen limits E1-deleted adenoviruses for gene therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA91 4407 4411 - 104.
Yomogida K. Yagura Y. Nishimune Y. 2002 Electroporated transgene-rescued spermatogenesis in infertile mutant mice with a sertoli cell defect.Biol Reprod67 712 717 - 105.
Yonezawa T. Furuhata Y. Hirabayashi K. Suzuki M. Takahashi M. Nishihara M. 2001 Detection of transgene in progeny at different developmental stages following testis-mediated gene transfer. Mol Reprod Dev60 196 201 - 106.
RN Yu Ito. M. Saunders T. L. Camper S. A. Jameson J. L. 1998 Role of Ahch in gonadal development and gametogenesis. Nat Genet20 353 357 - 107.
Zani M. Lavitrano M. French D. Lulli V. Maione B. Sperandio S. Spadafora C. 1995 The mechanism of binding of exogenous DNA to sperm cells: factors controlling the DNA uptake. Exp Cell Res217 57 64 - 108.
Zuniga A. Lawrentschuk N. Jewett M. A. 2010 Organ-sparing approaches for testicular masses. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7 454 64