Open access peer-reviewed chapter

A Bioaugmentation Strategy for Promoting the Humification Process during Composting by Microbial Inoculants: A Review

Written By

Xiao-Lin Lu, Kai Ding, Xiao-Xia Dong, Gang Li and Jun Ma

Submitted: 26 December 2022 Reviewed: 07 February 2023 Published: 09 April 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1001316

From the Edited Volume

Organic Fertilizers - New Advances and Applications

Khalid Rehman Hakeem

Chapter metrics overview

83 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Stimulating compost humification is an important method to facilitate carbon sequestration, especially against the background of carbon neutrality. However, the disadvantages of traditional composting, including long humification cycles and high environmental risks, restrict its application. Microbial inoculants markedly increase the humus content of compost, and their performance is considerably influenced by the nature of the material, the microbial species, the inoculation dosages, and the inoculation methods. So far, the effects of microbial inoculants on compost maturity and microbial diversity have been widely studied, whereas an overview of their regulatory role in humus formation is still lacking. This review summarizes the promotional effects of microbial inoculants on humification and related biological mechanisms during composting. Further research on the development of microbial inoculants and the optimization of inoculation methods will promote humification and facilitate the production of high-quality compost.

Keywords

  • carbon sequestration
  • microbial inoculants
  • compost humification
  • biological mechanisms
  • high-quality compost

1. Introduction

The problem of solid organic waste is becoming increasingly serious due to the worldwide expansion of different industries [1]. Until some years ago, landfill was still the most commonly used disposition of solid organic waste in many countries [2]. This not only causes bad odors but also creates greenhouse gas emissions and soil pollution [3]. Composting is a more useful way of converting various solid organic wastes into humus-like stable products by microorganisms [4].

The composting process is mainly a result of microbial metabolism [5]. Different microorganisms have different functions during composting. However, traditional composting is characterized by a long humification cycle, which is related to the poor activity of indigenous microbes. Thus, regulating microorganisms is a feasible way to facilitate nutrient transformation and humus enhancement in the composting process. As a biological regulating method, inoculation is an effective way to improve the composting microenvironment and increase microbial activity, which can accelerate compost maturation [6]. The addition of microbial inoculants is also a main bioaugmentation strategy and can markedly increase the levels of humic substances (HS) during composting [3]. However, the efficiency of this approach is sometimes uncertain because of the differences in inoculation methods and the quantity and types of the microbial inoculant [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. Therefore, the improvement of the humification process with microbial inoculants during composting is an important research field.

Given that stimulating compost humification is an important method to facilitate carbon sequestration, especially in the context of carbon neutrality [13], studies identifying the driving mechanisms of humus formation and searching for ways to improve the HS amounts during composting have been performed.

Generally, HS formation is the result of polymerization or condensation of humus precursors, such as phenols, amino acids, and reducing sugars, derived from macromolecule degradation and microbial synthesis under the actions of different metabolic pathways (Figure 1) [14, 15]. As one of important components of HS, humic acids (HA) are heterogeneous complexes with various molecular weights and functional groups. A higher HA content indicates a higher degree of humification, facilitating carbon sequestration and soil remediation [16]. Additionally, HA formation might be influenced by various factors, including the precursors, environmental factors, and functional microbial activities [17]. According to a previous study, thermophilic microbes play a key role in humification [18]. However, few reviews have summarized the mechanisms for improving compost humification by bioaugmentation.

Figure 1.

Formation pathway of humus during the aerobic composting process.

The use of microbial inoculants as a bioaugmentation strategy for the green disposal of solid organic waste is widely recommended. Numerous studies reported the considerable promotion of humification by applying microbial inoculants [19]. At the same time, the mechanisms behind these phenomena have attracted increased attention. Nowadays, with the development of novel analytical techniques, we have gained a deeper understanding of how the addition of functional microorganisms affects humification during composting. In this review, the biological mechanisms of microbial inoculants in promoting compost humification are systematically summarized based on recent studies, with the aim to provide scientific guidance for the efficient application of functional microorganisms to promote the conversion of organic components into humus.

Advertisement

2. Development of microbial inoculants used in composting

According to the principles of classical electromagnetism, charged ions move in a closed-loop circular motion within a uniform magnetic field. Herein, we cite a similar concept (“where it comes from, go there”), namely the “golden closed-loop rule.” It implies that microorganisms are to be selected and domesticated to obtain excellent strains for adapting to the native composting environment as well as facilitating the composting process [20, 21]. Accordingly, composting samples are used as the main sources of microbial inoculants. Specially, composting samples taken during the thermophilic period, as a potential microbial mine, have been favored so far [1722]. These samples are subjected to a series of microbiological experiments, such as dilution separation, colony purification, molecular identification, high-temperature tolerance tests, inter-strain antagonism tests, and degradative enzyme activity assays [23], to obtain candidates for developing compound microbial inoculants to promote the composting process (Figure 2). In high-temperature tolerance tests, temperatures of 45–55°C are frequently selected to identify thermophile microbes [24, 25]. In terms of degradative enzyme activity, cellulase, amylase, laccase, and FPase were investigated [21]. To improve the ability of the microbial inoculants to degrade the composting matrix, enrichment cultures can be adopted for selecting specialized functional strains, following the sole carbon source method. Suitable carbon sources contain wheat straw [26], coffee husk [27], pectin, or sodium carboxy-methylcellulose [28], but the screening and cultivating of microbes from compost are time consuming and laborious [29]. In this context, the efforts needed to develop microbial inoculants can be reduced via appropriate methods. In addition, since composting needs to be carried out throughout the year, in regions at high latitudes or during winter, the lower ambient temperature limits the composting process [30]. To overcome the adverse effects of low temperatures, it is equally necessary to develop psychrophilic functional strains to initiate composting. Based on previous studies, composting samples derived during a warm period (10°C) are ideal [31, 32, 33]. Considering the simple enzymatic performance and high environmental sensitivity of single strains, composite microbial inoculants need to be constructed to accelerate the biodegradation of organic matter in a synergistic manner [3].

Figure 2.

Illustration of the “golden closed-loop rule” for the development of microbial inoculants used in composting.

According to previous studies, while microbial inoculants facilitate fermentation processes, there are drawbacks of unidirectional nutrient conversion and insignificant compost humification [34]. Above all, the development of microbial inoculants for the directional promotion of compost humification has largely been neglected. However, humification is not only critical for product quality but also facilitates the remediation of polluted soil [4]. In recent years, substantial efforts have been made to develop microbial inoculants for enhancing the humification process in composting. According to various publications, the functional microbial inoculants which could significantly promote the humification process have unique nutritional metabolic properties (Table 1). These functional strains were derived from bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes and show similar enzymatic features, such as high cellulase and oxidase activities [3, 17, 21, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38]. Additionally, they can also grow at high temperatures (45–60°C) and under adverse environmental conditions. It is therefore expected that these functional microbial inoculants can considerably promote humification during large-scale composting comparison trials. The next step is therefore the development of commercial products using these microbes [39], which represent an innovation in the field of microbial inoculant technology.

StrainsSourceTolerated temperature (°C)Cultivation time (d)MediumRepresentative enzymatic activityReference
Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Trichoderma longibrachiatumChina General Microbiological Culture Collection Center_7Potato dextrose mediumLigninase, cellulases, chitinolytic, and pectic enzymes[3]
Aeromonas caviae, Shinella sp., Rhizobium sp., Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis, Streptomyces clavuligerus.Rice straw samples of composting in high temperature period454–5Gaoshi No.1 mediumCellulase activity[17]
Bacillus licheniformis, Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus oryzaeDairy manure and sugarcane leaves compost samples503–5Luria Bertani medium and potato dextrose mediumCellulosic enzymatic[21]
Bacillus halmapalus X-2Cattle manure compost55Ammonia-oxidizing bacterial seed medium[34]
Streptomyces sp. and Actinobacteria bacteriumOrganic waste compost from different sources605Gaoshi No.1 mediumCellulose activity[35]
A. caviae, Shinella sp., Rhizobium sp., C. pseudotuberculosis, S. clavuligerus.Rice straw compost samples from the high-temperature period454–5Gaoshi No.1 mediumCellulase activity[36]
Gloeophyllum trabeumForest litter7Potato dextrose mediumOxidase[37]
Lactobacillus amylophilus, Geobacillus thermoleovorans, and Bacillus subtilisChina Center of Industrial Culture Collection1–2De Man Rogosa Sharpe medium and Luria Bertani mediumCellulase[38]

Table 1.

Overview of the suitable microbial inoculants for improving compost humification.

“_”: Not given.

Advertisement

3. Inoculation of microbial inoculants: types, amounts, and time

The inherent recalcitrant nature of raw materials hinders the degradation and transformation of organic fractions, leading to a lower composting efficiency [36]. The addition of microbial inoculants can increase microbial activity, accelerate organic matter degradation, release more precursors, and increase the humification degree of compost products [34, 35, 40]. The type, amount, and inoculation time of microbial inoculants [9, 10, 35, 38, 41, 42] have significant effects on the formation of HS during composting. Thus, it is essential to fully explore the correct use of microbial inoculants to improve the HA levels.

The types of microorganisms used for promoting compost humification are bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes (Table 1). Of these, Bacillus sp [34, 38]., Phanerochaete chrysosporium [3], and Streptomyces sp. [17, 35, 36], can considerably accelerate HS formation. In this regard, actinomycetes have more desirable features than bacteria and fungi, such as thermo-tolerance, adaptability to harsh environments, higher amounts of hydrolytic enzymes that degrade lignocellulose, and a more pronounced response to genetic modification [35, 43]. The formation of HS mainly occurs during the curing period [37], during which actinomycetes are extremely abundant, making them ideal candidates for compost humification bioaugmentation.

The inoculum amount is also a significant factor affecting the humification process during composting [44]. Based on previous findings, inoculation at the level of 4% (in dry weight) is more conducive to the enhancement of HA than that at the level of 2% [9].

Given that various multifunctional microbe populations at different periods drive the composting process [3], it may be justified to inoculate specific microbial inoculants during different periods to reduce competition among microbes [12] and therefore accelerate the humification process. Some studies showed that composting can be considerably promoted by inoculation during the cooling period [35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43]. The multistage inoculation of composite microbial inoculants during the entire composting process also significantly increased the HA level [10, 38, 42]. Accordingly, the addition of microbial inoculants during the cooling period may be a feasible way for improving humification, especially the inoculation of actinomycetes at the level of 4% or higher.

Advertisement

4. Increasing the compost HA levels by adding microbial inoculants

The increase in the HA level indicates the increase in compost humification. As shown in Table 2, the addition of microbial inoculants can considerably promote compost humification and increases the content of HA. Different microbial inoculants have different effects on the HA content at the same inoculum level. For example, at a level of 1%, the inoculation of protein-, starch-, oil-, and lignocellulose-degrading microbes as well as ammonia-oxidating bacteria resulted in a more significant increase in the HA content, with levels being 216.88% higher compared to those of the control [40]. At an inoculation level of 5%, Bacillus clarkii and B. halmapalus significantly increased the compost HA content by 27.58% compared to the control in the composting of wheat straw and cattle manure [34]. As a lower inoculation amount generally results in a greater potential increase in HAs, the development of specific microbial inoculants is more important than the optimization of inoculation amounts in the improvement of the HA content. In the following section, the promotion of biotic processes by microbial inoculants is discussed.

Composting materialsMain inoculant typesInoculation timeDosageEffects on HA contentReference
Chicken manure biogas residue, spent mushroom straw, and rice strawPhanerochaete chrysosporium and Trichoderma longibrachiatumDay 05% (w/w, in fresh weight)Increase by 23.6%[3]
Medicinal herbal residuesB. subtilis, Aspergillus niger, Myceliophthora thermophila, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Streptomyces pratensis, and S. violascensDays 0, 25, and 55, respectively0.1% (w/w, in dry weight)Increase by 12.44%[10]
Wheat straw and fresh cattle manureB. clarkii and B. halmapalusDay 05% (v/w, in fresh weight)Increase by 27.58%[34]
Pig manure and wheat strawGloeophyllum trabeumPrior to compostingIncrease by 17.2%[37]
Biogas residue, sawdust, and food wasteLactobacillus amylophilus, Geobacillus thermoleovorans, and B. subtilisDays 0, 2, and 14, respectively0.5% (w/w, in fresh weight)Increase by 77.78% in humus index[38]
Food waste and sawdustProtein-, starch-, oil-, and lignocellulose-degrading microbes, ammonia-oxidating bacteriaDay 01% (w/w, in fresh weight)Increase by 216.88%[40]
Corn straw dairy manureStreptomyces sp. and ActinobacteriaDay 62% (w/w, in dry weight)Increase by 18.75%[43]
Fresh swine manure and naturally dried corn strawAcinetobacter pittii, B. subtilis subsp. stercoris, and Bacillus altitudinisDay 01% (v/w, in fresh weight)Increase by 5.92%[45]
Fresh cattle manure and dry corn strawB. subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, B. cereus, and Streptomyces nogalaterDay 05% (v/w, in fresh weight)Increase by 46.12%[46]

Table 2.

Overview of the promotion effects of microbial inoculants on compost humification.

“_”: Not given.

Advertisement

5. Bioaugmentation mechanisms and factors related to an increase in compost HA by adding microbial inoculants

The formation of HS is a complex process [21]. Many hypotheses regarding the information of HS include the lignin-protein, phenol-protein, and sugar-amine condensation theories [47]. The core of these theories is that precursors are polymerized to form HS via biotic and abiotic ways [15]. In addition to regulating environmental factors and improving the native microbial community in compost, inoculating exogenous microbial inoculants to increase the humification degree of compost products is the main biological method [34]. Due to the complex interactions among microorganisms, advanced mathematical statistics are needed to accurately reflect the ecological interactions of the humification-associated community in the composting environment. Recent studies revealed the bioaugmentation mechanisms and influencing factors of compost humification, which are summarized in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Conceptual framework summarizing the bioaugmentation mechanisms for the application of microbial inoculants to composting systems. RS, reducing sugars; AAs, amino acids; PP, polyphenol; TCA, tricarboxylic acid.

The variations in precursor types and concentrations during composting are related to the efficiency of humus synthesis. In addition, the humification process includes the production of precursors and the polymerization of HS, both of which occur sequentially during the whole composting process [17, 36, 47]. Therefore, the deep resolution of bioaugmentation mechanisms about microbial inoculants to composting relies on elucidating the dynamic changes in the precursors, microbial activity, and community structure during different composting periods [48]. Many studies have shown that the inoculation of exogenous microbial inoculants can significantly facilitate the enhancement of functional microbial activity during the warming and thermophilic periods of the composting process, accelerate the degradation of cellulose, proteins, and carbohydrates, and release large amounts of precursors [3, 18, 34, 37, 40, 46]. During these periods, the richness and diversity of the microbial community are markedly increased by the addition of microbial inoculants [21]. Moreover, Firmicutes, involved in the degradation of available organic components, are enriched [45]. The higher relative abundances of lignocellulose-degrading microbes (laccase producing microbes, Chloroflexi, Actinomycetes, fungi, and Luteimonas) go along with a decline in pile temperature during the cooling and maturation periods [3, 37, 38, 43], with the synergistic decomposition of lignin [1749]. The effective degradation of lignin can provide more carbon skeletons for humus formation [48]. Additionally, microbial inoculants can also considerably reduce the level of carbon metabolism, which is linked to the tricarboxylic acid cycle [44], and stimulate the microbial assimilation of precursors (polyphenols and quinones) [16, 50]. These processes facilitate HA formation and improve carbon sequestration, resulting in a high-value compost.

Generally, HA and HS formation is affected by environmental factors [46]. Specifically, the suitable C/N ratio and the total organic carbon (TOC) level can increase the richness and activity of microbes, resulting in the accumulation of soluble sugar and amino acids in the early period of composting [36]. The increase in the pH and the decline in the TOC results in the enhanced microbial synthesis of HA at the later period of the composting process [17, 34, 36, 40]. Thus, controlling the environmental factors and functional microbes can accelerate the formation of HAs based on the addition of microbial inoculants.

Advertisement

6. Future perspectives

As described above, the addition of microbial inoculants promotes solid organic waste decomposition, stimulates precursor production, increases the HA content, and alleviates several drawbacks of noninoculated composting systems. However, there are still some uncertainties. We highlight some perspectives for the further exploration of the use of functional microbial inoculants:

  1. The instability effect is one of the main restrictions in the promotion of microbial inoculant use. Some investigations have confirmed the positive effects of microbial inoculants on humification only at a suitable inoculation level [44]. Further works will have to focus on the inoculation levels for functional microbes used to promote humus formation and related mechanisms, especially regarding the interactions among microbial inoculants, humification, and compost microbiota during composting.

  2. Bioaugmentation using multistage inoculation has been well estimated in small-scale composting systems [10]. However, to guide real production, the effectiveness of multistage inoculation remains to be explored, especially regarding the effects of multistage inoculation on humus formation in large-scale composting systems [51]. Efforts will also be made to identify the carbon and nitrogen cycle functional genes related to HA production pathways, using novel analytical methods.

  3. Microbial inoculants are generally cheaper than other compost additives. However, the acquisition of high-efficiency functional strains requires more time. In the near future, in situ selection and omics methods should be used to rapidly develop simple and stable compositive microbial inoculants (including yeast) that can not only adapt to the native compost environment but also degrade novel pollutants.

Advertisement

7. Conclusions

The addition of microbial inoculants to various solid wastes is a potential method for improving the humification process and increasing carbon sequestration. However, further research is needed to gain a deeper understanding of the biotic mechanisms underlying the microbial inoculants’ effect on composting and to explore the relationships among functional microbes, the humification process, and the compost microbiota in large-scale composting systems. A comparison of the influences of different inoculation methods on composting processes and compost quality is also needed. Moreover, the development of multifunctional strains and the optimization of inoculation amounts would further justify the use of microbial inoculants in the compost industry.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This work was supported jointly by the research and development project of company’s inner key technologies (Optimization of the sequestration capacity of beneficial microbes on organic fertilizer medium). The authors would like to express their gratitude to MogoEdit (https://www.mogoedit.com/) for the expert linguistic services provided.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Li W, Liu Y, Hou Q , Huang W, Zheng H, Gao X, et al. Lactobacillus plantarum improves the efficiency of sheep manure composting and the quality of the final product. Bioresource Technology. 2020;297:122456. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122456
  2. 2. Song C, Li M, Qi H, Zhang Y, Liu D, Xia X, et al. Impact of anti-acidification consortium on carbohydrate metabolism of key microbes during food waste composting. Bioresource Technology. 2018;259:1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.022
  3. 3. He J, Zhu N, Xu Y, Wang L, Zheng J, Li X. The microbial mechanisms of enhanced humification by inoculation with Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Trichoderma longibrachiatum during biogas residues composting. Bioresource Technology. 2022;351:126973. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126973
  4. 4. Wu J, Zhao Y, Yu H, Wei D, Yang T, Wei Z, et al. Effects of aeration rates on the structural changes in humic substance during co-composting of digestates and chicken manure. Science of the Total Environment. 2019;658:510-520. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.198
  5. 5. Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Chen Y, Lu Q , Li M, Wang X, et al. A regulating method for reducing nitrogen loss based on enriched ammonia-oxidizing bacteria during composting. Bioresource Technology. 2016;221:276-283. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.057
  6. 6. Sun Q , Wu D, Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Xie X, Wu J, et al. Effect of cold-adapted microbial agent inoculation on enzyme activities during composting start-up at low temperature. Bioresource Technology. 2017;244:635-640. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.010
  7. 7. Chen Y, Wang Y, Xu Z, Liu Y, Duan H. Enhanced humification of maize straw and canola residue during composting by inoculating Phanerochaete chrysosporium in the cooling period. Bioresource Technology. 2018;247:190-199. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122075
  8. 8. Jiang J, Liu X, Huang Y, Huang H. Inoculation with nitrogen turnover bacterial agent appropriately increasing nitrogen and promoting maturity in pig manure composting. Waste Management. 2015;39:78-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.02.025
  9. 9. Liu L, Wang S, Guo X, Zhao T, Zhang B. Succession and diversity of microorganisms and their association with physicochemical properties during green waste thermophilic composting. Waste Management. 2018;73:101-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.12.026
  10. 10. Lu XL, Wu H, Song SL, Bai HY, Tang MJ, Xu FJ, et al. Effects of multi-phase inoculation on the fungal community related with the improvement of medicinal herbal residues composting. Environmental Science Pollution Research. 2021;28:27998-28013. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-12569-7
  11. 11. Wei Y, Zhao Y, Shi M, Gao Z, Lu Q , Yang T, et al. Effect of organic acids production and bacterial community on the possible mechanism of phosphorus solubilization during composting with enriched phosphate-solubilizing bacteria inoculation. Bioresource Technology. 2018;247:190-199. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.092
  12. 12. Xi B, He X, Dang Q , Yang T, Li M, Wang X, et al. Effect of multi-stage inoculation on the bacterial and fungal community structure during organic municipal solid wastes composting. Bioresource Technology. 2015;247:190-199. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.069
  13. 13. Jiang J, Wang Y, Yu D, Hou R, Ma X, Liu J, et al. Combined addition of biochar and garbage enzyme improving the humification and succession of fungal community during sewage sludge composting. Bioresource Technology. 2022;346:126344. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126344
  14. 14. Stevenson FJ. Humic Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions. New York: Reactions. John Wiley and Sons; 1994. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/00010694-198302000-00014
  15. 15. Wu J, Zhao Y, Wang F, Zhao X, Dang Q , Tong T, et al. Identifying the action ways of function materials in catalyzing organic waste transformation into humus during chicken manure composting. Bioresource Technology. 2020;303:122927. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122927
  16. 16. Wei Z, Mohamed TA, Zhao L, Zhu Z, Zhao Y, Wu J. Microhabital drive microbial anabolism to promote carbon sequestration during composting. Bioresource Technology. 2022;346:126577. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126577
  17. 17. Wu D, Wei Z, Qu F, Mohamed TA, Zhu L, Zhao Y, et al. Effect of Fenton pretreatment combined with bacteria inoculation on humic substances formation during lignocellulosic biomass composting derived from rice straw. Bioresource Technology. 2020;303:122849. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122849
  18. 18. Ma F, Zhu T, Yao S, Quan H, Zhang K, Liang B, et al. Coupling effect of high temperature and thermophilic bacteria indirectly accelerates the humifcation process of municipal sludge in hyperthermophilic composting. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2022;166:469-477. DOI: 10.1016/j.pesp.2022.08.052
  19. 19. Rastogi M, Nandal M, Khosla B. Microbes as vital additives for solid waste composting. Heliyon. 2020;6:e03343. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03343
  20. 20. Kang J, Yin Z, Pei F, Ye Z, Song G, Ling H, et al. Aerobic composting of chicken manure with penicillin G: Community classification and quorum sensing mediating its contribution to humification. Bioresource Technology. 2022;352:127097. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127097
  21. 21. Xu J, Jiang Z, Li M, Li Q. A compost-derived thermophilic microbial consortium enhances the humification process and alters the microbial diversity during composting. Journal of Environmental Management. 2019;243:240-249. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.008
  22. 22. Li C, Li H, Yao T, Su M, Ran F, Han B, et al. Microbial inoculation influences bacterial community succession and physicochemical characteristics during pig manure composting with corn straw. Bioresource Technology. 2019;289:121653. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121653
  23. 23. Jurado M, Lopez MJ, Suarez-Estrella F, Vargas-Garcia MC, Lopez-Gonzalez JA, Moreno J. Exploiting composting biodiversity: Study of the persistent and biotechnologically relevant microorganisms from lignocellulose-based composting. Bioresource Technology. 2014;162:283-293. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.145
  24. 24. Chandna P, Nain L, Singh S, Kuhad RC. Assessment of bacterial diversity during composting of agricultural byproducts. BMC Microbiology. 2013;13:99. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/13/99
  25. 25. Lopez-Gonzalez J, Suarez-Estrella F, Vargas-Garcia M, Jurado M, Moreno J. Dynamics of bacterial microbiota during lignocellulosic waste composting: Studies upon its structure, functionality and biodiversity. Bioresource Technology. 2015;175:406-416. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.123
  26. 26. Alessi AM, Bird SM, Oates NC, Li Y, Dowle AA, Novotny EH, et al. Defining functional diversity for lignocellulose degradation in a mcirobial community using multi-omics studies. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2018;11:166. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-018-1164-2
  27. 27. Cerda A, Mejias L, Gea T, Sanchez A. Cellulase and xylanase production at pilot scale by solid-state fermentation from coffee husk using specialized consortia: The consistency of the process and the microbial communities involved. Bioresource Technology. 2017;243:1059-1068. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.076
  28. 28. Wang J, Liu Z, Xia J, Chen Y. Effect of microbial inoculation on physicochemical properties and bacterial community structure of citrus peel composting. Bioresource Technology. 2019;291:121843. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121843
  29. 29. Qi H, Zhao Y, Wang X, Wei Z, Zhang X, Wu J, et al. Manganese dioxide driven the carbon and nitrogen transformation by activating the complementary effects of core bacteria in composting. Bioresource Technology. 2021;330:124960. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124960
  30. 30. Gou C, Wang Y, Zhang X, Lou Y, Gao Y. Inoculating with a psychrotrophic-thermophilic complex microbial agent accelerates onset and promotes maturity of dairy manure-rice straw composting under cold climate conditions. Bioresource Technology. 2017;243:339-346. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.097
  31. 31. Abdellah YAY, Li T, Chen X, Cheng Y, Sun S, Wang Y, et al. Role of psychrotrophic fungal strains in accelerating and enhancing the maturity of pig manure composting under low-temperature conditions. Bioresource Technology. 2021;320:124402. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124402
  32. 32. Jiang G, Chen P, Bao Y, Wang X, Yang T, Mei X, et al. Isolation of a novel psychrotrophic fungus for efficient low-temperature composting. Bioresource Technology. 2021;331:125049. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125049
  33. 33. Shi W, Dong Q , Saleem M, Wu X, Wang N, Ding S, et al. Microbial-based detonation and processing of vegetable waste for high quality compost production at low temperatures. Bioresource Technology. 2022;369:133276. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.133276
  34. 34. Xu Z, Li R, Wu S, He Q , Ling Z, Liu T, et al. Cattle manure compost humification process by inoculation ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Bioresource Technology. 2022;344:126314. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126314
  35. 35. Zhao Y, Zhao Y, Zhang Z, Wei Y, Wang H, Lu Q , et al. Effect of thermo-tolerant actinomycetes inoculation on cellulose degradation and the formation of humic substances during composting. Waste Management. 2017;68:64-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.022
  36. 36. Wu D, Xia T, Zhang Y, Wei Z, Qu F, Zheng G, et al. Identifying driving factors of humic acid formation during rice straw composting based on Fenton pretreatment with bacterial inoculation. Bioresource Technology. 2021;337:125403. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125403
  37. 37. Zhu N, Zhu Y, Liang D, Li B, Jin H, Dong Y. Enhanced turnover of phenolic precursors by Gloeophyllum trabeum pretreatment promotes humic substance formation during co-composting of pig manure and wheat straw. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;315:128211. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128211
  38. 38. Xu M, Yang M, Sun H, Meng J, Li Y, Gao M, et al. Role of multistage inoculation on the co-composting of food waste and biogas residue. Bioresource Technology. 2022;361:127681. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127681
  39. 39. Wang G, Kong Y, Yang Y, Ma R, Shen Y, Li G, et al. Superphosphate, biochar, and a microbial inoculum regulate phytotoxicity and humification during chicken manure composting. Science of the Total Environment. 2022;824:153958. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153958
  40. 40. Zhou X, Li J, Zhang J, Deng F, Chen Y, Zhou P, et al. Bioaugmentation mechanism on humic acid formation during composting of food waste. Science of the Total Environment. 2022;830:154783. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154783
  41. 41. Zhang T, Wu X, Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J, Bolan NS, Ali E, et al. Effects of microorganism-mediated inoculants on humification processes and phosphorus dynamics during the aerobic composting of swine manure. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2021;416:125738. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125738
  42. 42. Lu X, Bai H, Zhang A, Dai C, Ma Y, Jia Y. Effect of multi-stage inoculation of materity and microbial diversity during Chinese medicinal herbal residue composting. Research of Environmental Sciences. 2021;34:439-449. DOI: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2020.08.03
  43. 43. Zhao Y, Lu Q , Wei Y, Cui H, Zhang X, Wang X, et al. Effect of actinobacteria agent inoculation methods on cellulose degradation during composting based on redundancy analysis. Bioresource Technology. 2016;219:196-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.117
  44. 44. Duan M, Zhang Y, Zhou B, Qin Z, Wu J, Wang Q , et al. Effects of Bacillus subtilis on carbon components and microbial functional metabolism during cow manure–straw composting. Bioresource Technology. 2020;303:122868. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122868
  45. 45. Li C, Li H, Yao T, Su M, Ran F, Li J, et al. Effects of swine manure composting by microbial inoculation: Heavy metal fractions, humic substances, and bacterial community metabolism. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2021;415:125559. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125559
  46. 46. Wang X, Tian L, Li Y, Zhong C, Tian C. Effects of exogenous cellulose-degrading bacteria on humus formation and bacterial community stability during composting. Bioresource Technology. 2022;359:127458. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127458
  47. 47. Wu J, Zhao Y, Zhao W, Yang T, Zhang X, Xie X, et al. Effect of precursors combined with bacteria communities on the formation of humic substances during different materials composting. Bioresource Technology. 2017;226:191-199. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.031
  48. 48. Wang YY, Zhao B, Ma LT, Li L, Deng YQ , Xu Z. Humification process and microbial driving mechanism of composting. Biotechnology Bulletin. 2022;38:22-28. DOI: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2022-0134
  49. 49. Qu F, Wu D, Li D, Zhao Y, Zhang R, Qi H, et al. Effect of Fenton pretreatment combined with bacterial inoculation on humification characteristics of dissolved organic matter during rice straw composting. Bioresource Technology. 2022;344:126198. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126198
  50. 50. Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Yang T, Wei Z, Li Y, Wei Y, et al. Effects of exogenous protein-like precursors on humification process during lignocellulose-like biomass composting: Amino acids as the key linker to promote humification process. Bioresource Technology. 2019;291:121882. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121882
  51. 51. Chen L, Chen Y, Li Y, Liu Y, Jiang H, Li H, et al. Improving the humification by additives during composting: A review. Waste Management. 2023;158:93-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.12.040

Written By

Xiao-Lin Lu, Kai Ding, Xiao-Xia Dong, Gang Li and Jun Ma

Submitted: 26 December 2022 Reviewed: 07 February 2023 Published: 09 April 2023