Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Surgery for Sleep-Disordered Breathing

By Ken-ichi Hisamatsu, Hiroumi Matsuzaki, Itsuhiro Kudou and Kiyoshi Makiyama

Submitted: July 9th 2018Reviewed: October 26th 2018Published: December 31st 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.82261

Downloaded: 92

Abstract

We evaluated the outcomes of nasal surgery for sleep-disordered breathing, including obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), respiratory effort-related arousal, and snoring. To reduce pharyngeal negative pressure during sleep, the nasal parasympathetic nerve was resected, and the nasal cavity was enlarged by submucosal inferior turbinectomy and septoplasty if necessary. Of the 45 severe OSAS patients, symptoms were significantly ameliorated in 67%. This low-invasiveness nasal operation effectively reduced excessive daytime sleepiness and bothersome snoring without any pharyngeal operation. In addition, no side effects have been reported to be associated with this treatment regimen.

Keywords

  • nasal surgery
  • sleep-disordered breathing
  • snoring
  • hypersomnia
  • obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

1. Introduction

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) includes mild-to-severe obstructive apnea syndrome (OSAS), respiratory effort-related arousal (RERA), other hypersomnia, and socially unacceptable snoring. The pathophysiology of SDB involves nocturnal pharyngeal negative pressur, collapsibility of the soft palate, and an increased inspired air volume due to obesity, a narrow upper airway, and an oropharyngeal shape with a wide pillar and long uvula.

A number of patients suffer from excessive daytime sleepiness, bothersome snoring, and apnea pointed out by a member of their family or bed partner. Hypersomnia can cause traffic accidents and similar dangerous incidents, so this disorder should be managed quickly when it is noted. Furthermore, snoring affects the quality of life (QOL), especially in people who work in group settings, such as firefighters and police officers.

Septoplasty was reported to improve the QOL [1]. Nasal surgery can enlarge the nasal cavity, resulting in a reduction in the nasal resistance and subsequent amelioration of SDB. Generally, OSAS is managed with CPAP therapy. However, other SDBs are typically not managed this way either for financial reasons or due to the fact that they are not covered for CPAP by the Japanese National Insurance System.

At our institution, we use nasal surgery to reduce nocturnal nasal resistance.

The aim of this study was to clarify the efficacy of nasal surgery for resolving SDB.

2. Material and methods

Active anterior rhinomanometry was performed using a Spirometer HI-801 (Chest Co., Tokyo, Japan). PSG was performed using a PSG amplifier (Embla N7000; Natus Company, Pleasanton, CA, USA). OSAS was diagnosed according to the report of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force [2].

The nasal surgery comprised conventional septoplasty and bilateral submucosal inferior turbinectomy with posterior nasal neurectomy [3] and was performed under local anesthesia. Indications of this operation were unilateral and/or bilateral high nasal resistance (>0.35 Pa/cm3/s), marked septal deviation, and marked protrusion of the inferior turbinate and hypertrophic mucosa. To protect the mucosal from damage, between a gauze coated with kichin (BeschitinF; Nipro Co., Osaka, Japan), sandwiched bet pieces of gelatin sponge, was packed into the nasal cavity for 2 days.

The judging criteria were selected according to the findings of our previous report [4]. Daytime sleepiness was assessed by the Epworth sleepiness scale [5].

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethics committees of Nihon University Hospital. This original retrospective study on the outcomes of nasal surgery for SDB was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (identifier: UMIN 000011997; trial name: Effect of nasal surgery on sleep-disordered breathing).

3. Statistical analyses

The data were analyzed by using Wilcoxon matched-pair signed rank test, and a p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

4. Results

4.1 Subjects

The present study enrolled 52 patients with severe OSAS, 33 with moderate OSAS, 19 with mild OSAS, 45 with RERA, and 41 snorers. Patients’ background details are shown in Table 1. All patients provided their informed consent before undergoing the nasal surgery.

NSexNAge, mean(SD), yearBMI, (SD), kg/m2
Severe OSAS52M4446.22 ± 10.8526.37 ± 4.47
F847.5 ± 7.9325.74 ± 2.79
Moderate OSAS33M2639.54 ± 11.2924.31 ± 3.94
F746.43 ± 5.424.2 ± 5.09
Mild OSAS19M1344.23 ± 8.8924.52 ± 2.74
F645.67 ± 8.2124.88 ± 8.21
RERA45M2438.63 ± 10.9923.35 ± 3.56
F2136.81 ± 11.8922.99 ± 4.46
Snorer41M2639.03 ± 12.7624.53 ± 3.16
F1547.4 ± 10.1920.82 ± 2.61

Table 1.

Patient’s background.

4.2 Operative details

The outcomes of surgery are shown in Tables 2 and 3. Severe OSAS was ameliorated in 28 of the 40 male patients (70%) and 4 of the 5 female patients (80%) by nasal operation without any pharyngeal intervention. Moderate OSAS was ameliorated in 8 of the 10 male patients (80%) and 4 of the 5 female patients (80%) by nasal operation without any pharyngeal intervention (Table 2). The improvement rate of hypersomnia was particularly high in RERA patients (23 of 24 male patients [95.8%] and all 20 female patients [100%]), although the results of many studies remain unclear, and the snoring symptoms substantially improved 127/151 (84.1%) (Table 3). The improvement rate of all SDB was 111/140 (79.2%) for hypersomnia and 127/151 (84.1%) for snoring.

OSAS
Highly effectiveEffectiveIneffective
Sex
Severe OSAS40M127(70%)12
5F41
Moderate OSAS10M82
5F41
Mild OSAS3M21
0F00

Table 2.

Effect of NS on sleep-disordered breathing.

HypersomniaSnoreAllergic rhinitis
EffectiveObscureEffectiveIneffectiveImproved
Sex
Severe OSASM30193166
F35501
Moderate OSASM1311842
F60552
Mild OSASM62632
F01401
RERAM231170
F200911
SnorerM502224
F501032
Total1112912724

Table 3.

global assessment.

4.3 Findings of polysomnography

The preoperative and postoperative values of apnea index (AI), apnea hypopnea index (AHI), and SpO2 < 90% were analyzed, with results shown in Table 4. In the 20 severe OSAS patients the AI, AHI and SpO2 < 90% were significantly improved (p = 0.0002, p = 0.0124, and p = 0.0015, respectively). In the 10 moderate OSAS patients, the AI and SpO2 < 90% were significantly improved (p = 0.0051 and p = 0.0125, respectively); however, the AHI was not significantly changed (p = 0.1394). In the 3 mild OSAS patients, the AI and SpO2 < 90% were significantly improved (p = 0.0051 and p = 0.0125, respectively); however, the AHI was not significantly changed (p = 0.1394).

NAlNAHINSpO2 < 90%
Severe OSASMean ± SD
Preop2031.42 ± 16.342057.49 ± 21.85208.01 ± 7.01
Postop2016.68 ± 14.172031.89 ± 26.02202.61 ± 23.83
Moderate OSAS
Preop1010.04 ± 4.77103.69 ± 4.131014.92 ± 10.24
Postop1020.2 ± 6.08106.73 ± 5.33102.27 ± 2.93
Mild OSAS
Preop310.1 ± 6.8832.43 ± 3.4438.47 ± 5.83
Postop317.63 ± 5.6032.73 ± 2.2732.67 ± 4.44

Table 4.

Effect of NS on PSG parameters in patients with OSAS.

5. Discussion

A low-invasiveness technique is ideal for surgery. In the present study, the nasal operation showed high efficacy in ameliorating OSAS, hypersomnia, and snoring. A number of patients suffering from hypersomnia and snoring cannot undergo nasal CPAP either for financial reasons or due to the fact that this treatment for CPAP is not covered by the Japanese National Health Insurance System. Our low-invasiveness nasal operation is useful for reducing nocturnal pharyngeal negative pressure, thereby resulting in the amelioration of hypersomnia and/or socially unacceptable snoring.

To our knowledge, this is the first report regarding SDB, including OSAS, in which the nasal resistance was measured in consideration of its pathophysiological importance. Recent studies have found that nasal operations were effective in relieving snoring [6] and ameliorating nasal obstruction, which has consequently increased CPAP tolerance and compliance [7]. The degree of nasal resistance before starting CPAP treatment has a significant effect on the acceptance of CPAP by patients, as a high nasal resistance disturbs CPAP performance [8]. The improvement of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) was more significant in the operated group than in the CPAP group [9], although CPAP was observed to ameliorates daytime sleepiness. Robust evidence supports the efficacy of nasal surgery on improving snoring, the subjective sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, sleep-related QOL measures, and other important OSAS outcomes [10]. In patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps, functional endoscopic sinus surgery was shown to significantly ameliorate the sleep pattern and sleep quality [11]. Both the AHI and ESS significantly improved after isolated nasal surgery, but the improvement in the AHI was slightly more significant [12]. Nasal surgery can also effectively improve the subjective symptoms of patients with simple snoring accompanied by nasal blockage as well as those of patients with OSAS [13]. Surgical treatment of nasal obstruction has been shown to improve SDB as well as CPAP. CPAP is considered to be the first line of therapy, but long-term compliance is only about 40%, often because of problems associated with nasal obstruction [14]. Therefore, nasal surgery to reduce nasal resistance during sleep is desirable before starting CPAP. Nasal surgery improved the OSAS severity as measured by PSG, subjective complaints, and three-dimensional reconstructed computed tomography scans [15]. This operation is a cost-effective strategy for improving CPAP compliance in OSAS patients with nasal obstruction [16], although the optimum operative techniques have not been studied. Nasal dilators have shown efficacy in improving nasal breathing but not in improving obstructive sleep apnea outcomes [17], suggesting a need for nasal surgery.

Nasal septum deviation should be investigated in patients with sleep disorders [18]. The most frequent cause of impaired nasal patency was nasal septal deviation, which was found in 82.5% of the patients, including 45% with unilateral impaired patency and 37.5% with bilateral nasal patency [19]. According to our previous study on nasal resistance, even unilateral high resistance affects SDB [4]. Our nasal operation involves septoplasty, submucosal inferior turbinectomy and posterior nasal neurectomy. Measurement of the nasal resistance has proven useful for the treatment of OSAS [20], although the technique used in the cited study was different from that used in ours. Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients have been shown to have a high prevalence of OSAS, and OSAS symptoms are worse in CRS patients than in others [21].

Nasal surgery alone was partially effective in improving the sleep quality and snoring, but it had no effect on obstructive apnea in patients with OSAS and nasal obstruction [22].

The present study underscored the utility of nasal surgery consisted of septoplasty, submucosal inferior turbinectomy to enlarge the nasal cavity, and nasal parasympathetic nerve resection to achieve a nocturnal low nasal resistance for the amelioration of SDB.

Acknowledgments

We thank T. Yamamoto for his helpful assistance with the statistical analysis.

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest and no financial support.

Abbreviation

CPAP

transnasal continuous positive airpressure

SDB

sleep disordered breathing

PSG

polysomnography

ESS

Epworth Sleepiness Scale

© 2018 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Ken-ichi Hisamatsu, Hiroumi Matsuzaki, Itsuhiro Kudou and Kiyoshi Makiyama (December 31st 2018). Surgery for Sleep-Disordered Breathing, Contemporary Rhinoplasty, Sebastian Torres Farr, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.82261. Available from:

chapter statistics

92total chapter downloads

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

Rhinoplasty in Context of Head and Neck Malignancy

By Norhafiza Mat Lazim, Giacomo Spinato and Paolo Boscolo Rizzo

Related Book

First chapter

Cochlear Implant Surgery

By Hakan Soken, Sarah E. Mowry and Marlan R. Hansen

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us