The production of chemical pulp in recent times is 180 million tons per year; while the production of eucalyptus pulp has increased intensively, especially in the southern hemisphere. The pulp and paper industry has long been considered a large consumer of natural resources (wood and water) and one of the largest sources of pollution to the environment (air, water courses and soil). Important efforts are being made to reduce the pollutant levels and water consumption of the industry. The wastewater composition, and therefore, the efficiency of effluent treatments and characteristics of the discharges to water are strongly dependent on the applied technology and raw materials. Despite a large body of literature on softwood-based wastewater, few studies have examined the characteristics of kraft eucalyptus bleaching effluents and their behaviour in the different biological treatments. The largest secondary treatment systems today use the activated sludge process. Sixty to seventy-five per cent of all the biological effluent treatment plants within the pulp and paper industry use this kind of treatment system. This chapter reviews the current pulping technologies at mills and compares the chemical composition and biological treatment of wastewater between softwood and hardwood bleached pulps.
Part of the book: Biological Wastewater Treatment and Resource Recovery
Modern kraft pulp mills generate solid waste of 1–2% of incoming debarked wood. Given the size of these plants, with an annual production capacity of at least 1000,000 tons, each plant generates 20,000–30,000 dry tons of waste per year. The largest current use of these residues is for combustion in biomass boilers for steam and power generation. However, the conversion of biomass into biofuels and chemicals is gaining interest due to increasing demands for energy, limited sources of fossil fuels, and growing concerns about the environmental impact of greenhouse gas emissions. This chapter shows the laboratory-scale results of the use of eucalyptus wood wastes to obtain cellulose pulp by alkali pulping reinforced with hydrogen peroxide to obtain alkaline peroxide mechanical pulp or cellulosic bioethanol. Based on the results, an industrial-scale techno-economic analysis of the processes is presented and compared with current alternatives for energy generation.
Part of the book: Recycling Strategy and Challenges Associated with Waste Management Towards Sustaining the World