Abstract
The unique molecular structure of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) endows them with distinctive properties, notably exceptional conductivity. In lithium-ion batteries, CNTs are employed not only as conductive agents but are also incorporated into silicon-carbon anode materials. Beyond serving as conductive media, CNTs also function as buffer agents to mitigate the volumetric expansion of silicon during the charging and discharging cycles. This chapter will demonstrate the role of CNTs as conductive agents not just for the silicon-carbon electrode but also within hybrid particles, integrating CNTs into silicon-carbon anode materials. It will summarize the methods for assembling CNTs and silicon (Si/SiOx) through either external mixing or in situ growth and the resulting battery performance when utilizing silicon-carbon anodes enhanced with CNTs. This chapter aims to offer a reference for the industrial application of CNTs in lithium-ion battery silicon-carbon anodes by analyzing the latest research and applications of CNTs in such anodes.
Keywords
- carbon nanotubes
- lithium-ion batteries
- silicon-carbon anode
- chemical vapor deposition
- in situ growth
1. Introduction
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) can be imagined as one or more layers of graphite (a hexagonal lattice of carbon) rolled into cylinders. This unique structure endows CNTs with special electronic, thermal, and structural characteristics. In the past 30 years, a large amount of research has been dedicated to the preparation, properties, and applications of CNTs [1, 2, 3]. Our previous chapters have already detailed their structural characteristics. In this chapter, we primarily discuss the application of CNTs in the new energy sector, with a particular focus on their use in silicon-based anodes for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs).
In the initial stages of CNT research, many scholars identified CNTs as potential anode materials for LIBs. This is because CNTs consist of single or multiple coaxial layers of carbon sheets, creating a similar structure to graphite layers [4], which facilitates shallow insertion depths, short diffusion paths, and numerous insertion sites for lithium ions. Additionally, the excellent electrical conductivity of CNTs enables superior electron and ion transport capabilities, making them suitable as anode materials for LIBs. However, subsequent research has revealed that during the processes of intercalation/deintercalation, the peeling off of graphite layers of CNTs (typically referring to multi-walled CNTs) is a distinctive phenomenon. This exfoliation increases the surface area of the anode, thereby facilitating the formation of a solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer [5]. This leads to an increase in the irreversible capacity of the anode materials. Moreover, anodes made from CNTs suffer from the absence of a stable voltage plateau and encounter issues such as potential hysteresis [6]. Consequently, current research suggests that while CNTs can act as conductive additives in LIBs, they are not suitable as the sole electrode material for LIBs.
With the increasing popularity of electric vehicles [7], the demand for LIBs with high-energy densities is growing, driven by concerns over driving range [8, 9, 10, 11]. Silicon-based anodes offer significantly larger mass/volume capacities compared to traditional materials. The theoretical specific capacity of crystalline silicon is about 4200 mAhg−1, nearly 11 times that of graphite, which stands at only 372 mAhg−1. Even for silicon dioxide materials, the theoretical specific capacity reaches 2600 mAhg−1, approximately seven times that of graphite. Thus, silicon-based materials emerge as the most promising candidates for the next generation of lithium-ion battery anodes. However, high-capacity silicon-based anodes face two main challenges in real-world applications. For one thing, during the lithiation/delithiation process, silicon anodes exhibit significant volume changes, leading to pulverization, reduced cycling efficiency, and permanent capacity loss. The expansion and contraction of silicon anode materials caused by the insertion and extraction of lithium ions within the silicon crystal during charging and discharging result in a volume change of approximately 320%, while graphite’s volume change is only about 12%. These volume changes can lead to issues such as (i) particle pulverization, resulting in degraded cycling performance; (ii) poor contact between the active material and the conductive agent/binder; (iii) the expansion and contraction of silicon anodes, causing the binder holding silicon particles together to crack, allowing electrolyte to infiltrate between nanoparticles and form an SEI layer on the surface of silicon particles. Since the SEI is non-conductive, it impairs the anode’s ability to collect charges and consumes electrolyte and lithium sources, leading to worsened cycling performance. Second, silicon-based anodes have relatively poor electrical conductivity compared to traditional graphite anodes. To address the issue of poor conductivity, CNTs, with their small diameter, high electrical conductivity, high surface area, and graphite-like structure, offer an ideal scaffold for hosting nanosilicon materials. They can also confine the structure to accommodate volume fluctuations during the cycling process, thereby improving the thermal expansion issues and electrical conductivity of silicon-based anodes [12].
The application of CNTs in silicon anodes can be summarized into three main levels, as illustrated in Figure 1. At the first level, CNTs serve solely as conductive agents within a composite electrode structure that includes silicon nanoparticles, binders, and sometimes graphite. This approach is the simplest but yields the least effective results. The reason behind its limited effectiveness is the inherent tendency of silicon agglomerate. Within these silicon agglomerates, the silicon particles do not make contact with the CNT conductive agents, resulting in a loss of activity. This leads to underperformance in terms of anode capacity. Additionally, the volume expansion of silicon agglomerates is considerable, and the internal stress directions within these agglomerates can vary, making the electrode prone to cracking at the macro level. The second level involves a combination of CNTs, graphite, and silicon into secondary hybrid particles that serve as anode material. Due to the manufacturing process, silicon dispersion within these secondary particles is slightly improved. Moreover, graphite acts as a buffer to mitigate the volume expansion of silicon. Some of the silicon-carbon anode materials currently on the market fall into this category of composite materials. The third level aims to maximize uniformity in the distribution of CNTs and silicon, combining them as evenly as possible via some designed assembly. This strategy seeks to fully utilize the surface area of CNTs, maximize contact between silicon and CNTs, and optimally accommodate the volume changes of silicon during charging and discharging processes. This is the primary focus of our current research. By achieving such uniform integration, it is possible to harness the benefits of CNTs to their fullest extent, improving the overall performance and durability of silicon-based anodes.
2. The application of CNTs in silicon-based anodes
2.1 CNTs as conductive agents
CNTs, known for their high aspect ratio, serve as conductive additives capable of forming extensive conductive networks within batteries. This mitigates issues such as cracking caused by the expansion and contraction of electrode materials to some extent. As conductive agents in battery materials, CNTs effectively reduce impedance. From a physical perspective, traditional carbon black forms point contacts in the conductive system due to its dot-like nature, CNTs form line contacts due to their linear structure, and graphene forms surface contacts. Compared to carbon black, CNTs have a larger specific surface area, allowing for a more thorough mix of active materials and superior conductivity. To achieve the same level of conductivity, the amount of CNTs required is only 1/6 to 1/3 of that of carbon black.
Despite the promising features of CNTs, they face limitations such as severe aggregation and entanglement caused by their low bending stiffness and van der Waals forces. These intrinsic characteristics of CNTs restrict their widespread application. It has demonstrated the formation of a 2D segregated CNT network using CNT dispersion as a conductive agent. The resulting CNT network, formed via van der Waals bonding, showed significant improvements in electrical conductivity (as shown in Figure 2). The formation of a segregated CNT network was validated for specific micron-sized bare active materials, such as silicon microparticles. The issue of silicon agglomeration, alongside the resulting low capacity utilization and problems related to the microscopic volume changes of active materials and macroscopic electrode cracking, has yet to be sufficiently resolved, thereby limiting the allowable silicon content [13].
Compared to multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) consist of a single layer of carbon atoms [14]. The strong carbon-carbon bonds grant them a higher current carrying capacity, with an electrical current density exceeding that of metals such as copper by more than a thousand times. Due to their high conductivity and excellent mechanical reinforcement properties, SWCNTs possess a great elastic modulus and lack inherent twisting characteristics [15]. This allows them to maintain structural stability and prevent collapse even when the volume of the electrode changes, thanks to their mechanical reinforcement effect. Compared to MWCNTs, SWCNTs exhibit stronger van der Waals forces with silicon. As illustrated in Figure 3, SWCNTs can maintain good contact with SiOx@C under tensile stresses up to 6.2 GPa, whereas MWCNTs lose electrical contact under alternating compressive stress up to 8.9 GPa and tensile stress up to 2.5 GPa during long-term cycling. Under such significant stresses, the flexibility of SWCNTs and their stronger van der Waals forces ensure that SiOx@C maintains effective contact with SWCNTs [16].
It is worth mentioning that incorporating SWCNTs into silicon anodes significantly enhances their conductivity and cyclic stability, mitigating the issue of capacity fading. This effectively supports the industrial application of silicon as a high-capacity anode active material. Moreover, the quantity of SWCNTs required is substantially less than that of MWCNTs, while significantly lowering the bulk resistivity. Thanks to SWCNTs, silicon-oxygen anodes can explore using up to 90% silicon materials, aiding in the industrialization of batteries with energy densities reaching or even surpassing 360 kWhkg−1. Therefore, employing SWCNTs as a conductive agent represents a trend. However, the current production cost of SWCNTs is very high. In a market-driven context, MWCNTs remain the most cost-effective option available.
Further, to enhance the contact area and points between CNTs and silicon, numerous academic experiments have adopted spray drying techniques. This involves using nanosilicon, CNTs, and other conductive agents like graphene oxide as precursors, which are then processed through spraying and drying to form composite microspheres. To further minimize the exposure of silicon to the electrolyte, the surfaces of these microspheres undergo a carbon-coating process, as illustrated in Figure 4. The following example clearly describes this process. This method of creating core–shell structured Si-based composite anodes offers a significant advancement in the development of next-generation LIBs with outstanding electrochemical performance. The composite anode of C-Si/CNT/GO (grapheme oxides) demonstrates exceptional electrochemical performance, exhibiting high specific charge and discharge capacities (2921 and 2395 mAhg−1 at 100 mAg−1, respectively), prolonged cycle life (1542 mAh g−1 at 200 mAg−1 after 100 cycles, with a capacity retention of 64%), and high charge/discharge rates (1506 mAhg−1 at 6 Ag−1). The elements of the C-Si/CNT/GO composite anode synergistically enhance its electrochemical performance for LIB applications [18]. The silicon nanoparticles contribute to the high electrochemical capacity; the CNTs and GO facilitate the creation of electrical networks and spherical frameworks, thanks to the dispersibility of the CNTs, thereby improving the electrical conductivity of the 3D architecture and providing adequate buffer space to accommodate the volume expansion of the silicon nanoparticles. By the way, the carbon-coating layer enhances the electrical conductivity and mechanical stability of the composite, prevents electrolyte permeation, and suppresses side reactions and the formation of an SEI [17]. In practical applications, when using composite microspheres obtained through spray drying to make batteries, we noticed that the silicon-carbon microspheres produced in this manner are prone to fragmentation. After breaking, the increased contact area between the active material and the electrolyte leads to a significant decrease in battery capacity. Typically, a certain proportion of silicon-carbon spheres is mixed with commercial graphite anode materials to achieve a commercial silicon-carbon/graphite composite product. Therefore, it is recommended to add an organic compound precursor to the microsphere precursors, since after the microspheres are fragmented, the silicon particles within the fragments remain encapsulated within the carbon-coating layer.
In the industrial sector, some factories producing silicon-carbon anodes have utilized existing graphite manufacturing processes. They directly mix a small amount of nanosilicon and CNTs with small-sized graphite, then go through processes such as granulation to prepare silicon-carbon graphite composite materials (as shown on the left in Figure 5) with a capacity of 500 Ahg−1. However, although this method of producing silicon-carbon materials is straightforward, the cyclic performance of the silicon-carbon anodes remains unstable. As shown on the right in Figure 5, while structurally, the CNTs effectively contact the silicon and graphite materials, enhancing conductivity and buffering effects, the exposed silicon still undergoes side reactions with the electrolyte. This continuously thickens the SEI layer, decreases battery capacity, and deteriorates the battery’s cyclic performance. Industrial technology development is already focused on successfully attempting to coat the entire composite particle, aiming to address these issues.
2.2 Incorporating CNTs and silicon into secondary hybrid particles
To maximize the capacity and buffer the volume changes of Si, one of the most effective techniques is to maximize the contact between Si and CNTs. Academically, there has been extensive research on assembling nanosilicon with CNTs. Generally speaking, there are two methods. One is mixed assembly, where existing CNTs and silicon are used as starting materials and deliberately assembled together, as shown in Figure 6I. The other method involves growing silicon on CNTs or growing CNTs on Si, as shown in Figure 6II. The assembled composite structures of CNTs and silicon can maximize the contact between CNTs and Si, reducing the agglomeration of both silicon and the nanotubes themselves. This effectively increases reactive sites and buffers the volume change of Si.
2.2.1 Mix via assembly
In terms of hybrid assembly, significant academic research has focused on assembling silicon and CNTs through methods such as physical adsorption or chemical bonding. For example, a synthetic route was developed for the creation of a high-energy stable anode material known as Si/CNT@C. This composite material consists of carbon-coated silicon nanoparticles confined in a three-dimensional conductive carbon nanotube matrix. The fabrication process involved
2.2.2 In situ growth
When discussing research on
At present, we have also achieved impressive work in the
Figure 10 illustrates the initial charge–discharge profiles of the prepared samples in coin-type half cells. At a cut-off voltage of 3.0 and 1.5 V, the specific capacity reaches 555 and 530 mAhg−1, respectively, with corresponding first Coulombic efficiencies of 94 and 90%. Remarkably, even with the cut-off voltage set at 0.8 V, a capacity of approximately 490 mAhg−1 can still be maintained, showcasing the significant potential of the Si/CNTS/graphite composite for practical applications. The cycling performance was initially evaluated in half cells. As depicted in Figure 10b, the specific capacity consistently exceeds 500 mAhg−1 over the first 100 cycles, with Coulombic efficiencies surpassing 99.7%. However, the presence of excess lithium metal as the anode and fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) additives in the electrolyte may mask the inherent defects of the Si-based material. To further assess the feasibility of this material, pouch-type full cells were assembled using Si/CNTS/graphite as the anode and LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 (NCA) as the cathode. Concurrently, pouch cells comprising a commercial graphite anode and LiCoO2 (LCO) cathode were prepared for comparison (both electrodes are commercial components used in Samsung Lithium-ion batteries). As demonstrated in Figure 10c, the pouch cell’s capacity (Si/CNTS/graphite vs. NCA) is nearly 1.3 times greater than that of the pouch cell with graphite vs. LCO, despite their similar total mass. Moreover, it is evident that the performance of Si/CNTS/graphite significantly surpasses that of the hybrid Si/graphite with CNTs as the conductive agent. By analyzing the structural information of pouch cells illustrated in Figure 10d, e, it becomes apparent that integrating this Si/CNTS composite as an additive to graphite when paired with NCA can substantially enhance the practical mass-energy density of lithium-ion batteries.
Therefore, the Si/CNT materials show great promise as practical anode additives for high-energy-density batteries. Additionally, this novel synthesis strategy for Si/CNTs, especially the application of CVD in FBR for nano-Si deposition, is poised to significantly reduce costs and facilitate the industrial-scale production of Si-based anode materials. This process holds great promise for industrialization.
3. Conclusions
CNTs have garnered significant attention in enhancing the performance of silicon-based (Si-based) anodes for LIBs, owing to their unique properties, such as high electrical conductivity, exceptional mechanical strength, and excellent flexibility. The integration of CNTs in Si-based anodes serves dual pivotal roles: as conductive agents and as components of material particles. This summary outlines these roles and their implications for improving battery performance.
One of the principal challenges with Si-based anodes is their poor electrical conductivity, which hampers electron transport during the charge and discharge cycles. CNTs, known for their superior electrical conductivity, can effectively bridge this gap. When incorporated into Si-based anodes, CNTs create a percolating conductive network that facilitates rapid electron transfer throughout the electrode. This enhanced electron mobility significantly improves the rate capability of the battery, allowing it to support high-power applications. Furthermore, the incorporation of CNTs helps in maintaining electrical connectivity within the electrode. Silicon undergoes significant volume changes during lithiation and delithiation processes, which can lead to particle pulverization and loss of electrical contact. CNTs, with their flexibility and tensile strength, can accommodate these volume changes and preserve the integrity of the conductive network, thereby ensuring sustained electrical connectivity even under extensive cycling. Apart from acting as conductive bridges, CNTs also play a crucial role as components of material particles in Si-based anodes. They can be used to construct composite materials where CNTs are either coated with silicon or mixed with silicon particles. Such composites leverage the high surface area and the mechanical properties of CNTs to buffer against the detrimental volume expansion of silicon during lithiation. This buffering capability mitigates mechanical stresses and prevents the disintegration of the anode material, enhancing the cycle life of the battery.
In summary, as conductive agents, CNTs enhance the electrical conductivity and resilience of Si-based anodes. As components of material particles, they improve structural stability and energy density. Together, these roles underscore the importance of CNTs in the development of high-performance Si-based anodes for the next generation of LIBs. The synergistic effect of silicon for high capacity and CNTs for structural integrity and conductivity culminates in Si-based anodes that exhibit improved energy density, cycle stability, and rate performance. Finally, let us look forward to the further development of
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the high-end foreign experts project (G2022030071L) and The Guangdong Key Laboratory for Hydrogen Energy Technologies (2018B030322005).
References
- 1.
Lian Y, Yuan M, Zhao H. DNA wrapped metallic single-walled carbon nanotube sensorfor pb (ii) detection. Fullerenes, Nanotubes, and Carbon Nanostructures. 2014; 22 :510-518. DOI: 10.1080/1536383X.2012.690462 - 2.
Zhao H, Fu H, Zhao T, Wang L, Tan T. Fabrication of small-sized silver nps/graphene sheets for high-quality surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2012; 375 :30-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.02.051 - 3.
Zhao H, Zhao T. Highly active carbon nanotube-supported pd electrocatalyst for oxidation of formic acid prepared by etching copper template method. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013; 38 :1391-1396. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.009 - 4.
Popov VN. Carbon nanotubes: Properties and application. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports. 2004; 43 :61-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.mser.2003.10.001 - 5.
Zhao H, Lam W-YA, Wang L, Xu H, Daoud WA, He X. The significance of detecting imperceptible physical/chemical changes/reactions in lithium-ion batteries: A perspective. Energy & Environmental Science. 2022; 15 :2329-2355. DOI: 10.1039/D2EE01020H - 6.
Lam W-YA, Zhao H, Zhang B, Wang L, Xu H, He X. Significance of direct observation of lithium-ion distribution and potential distribution inside batteries through operando analyses. Next Energy. 2024; 2 :100106. DOI: 10.1016/j.nxener.2024.100106 - 7.
Mo T, Lau K-t, Li Y, Poon C-k, Wu Y, Chu PK, et al. Industrial Progress of electric vehicles: A case study in Hong Kong. In: Advances in Energy Research. Telangana, India: VIDE LEAF; 2022. DOI: 10.37247/ADERES3EDN.3.22.25 - 8.
Zhao H, Lam WYA, Sheng L, Wang L, Bai P, Yang Y, et al. Cobalt-free cathode materials: Families and their prospects. Advanced Energy Materials. 2022; 12 :2103894. DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202103894 - 9.
Zhao H, Law H, Liao S, Chen D, Lin P. Novel graphitic sheets with ripple-like folds as an nca cathode coating layer for high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries. Nanotechnology. 2020; 32 :08LT01. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/abc4a1 - 10.
Mo T, Li Y, Lau K-t, Poon CK, Wu Y, Luo Y. Trends and emerging technologies for the development of electric vehicles. Energies. 2022; 15 :6271. DOI: 10.3390/en15176271 - 11.
Mo T, Lau K-t, Li Y, Poon C-k, Wu Y, Chu PK, et al. Commercialization of electric vehicles in Hong Kong. Energies. 2022; 15 :942. DOI: 10.3390/en15030942 - 12.
Hong Z, Ning T, Zhang W, Zhang M, Jian W. Novel synthesis of silicon/carbon nanotubes microspheres as anode additives through chemical vapor deposition in fluidized bed reactors. Scripta Materialia. 2021; 192 :49-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.09.048 - 13.
Cho Y, Lee E, Lee KS, Hwang SJ, Kim CW, Kim T-G, et al. Cnt ink as an electrode additive for an effective hybrid conductive network in silicon microparticle/graphite anodes. Electrochimica Acta. 2023; 447 :142134. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.142134 - 14.
Pettes MT, Shi L. Thermal and structural characterizations of individual single-, double-, and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Advanced Functional Materials. 2009; 19 :3918-3925. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200900932 - 15.
Niyogi S, Hamon M, Hu H, Zhao B, Bhowmik P, Sen R, et al. Chemistry of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2002; 35 :1105-1113. DOI: 10.1021/ar010155r - 16.
He Z, Xiao Z, Yue H, Jiang Y, Zhao M, Zhu Y, et al. Single-walled carbon nanotube film as an efficient conductive network for si-based anodes. Advanced Functional Materials. 2023; 33 :2300094. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202300094 - 17.
Jo AH, Kim SY, Kim JH, Kim YA, Yang C-M. Robust core–shell carbon-coated silicon-based composite anode with electrically interconnected spherical framework for lithium-ion battery. International Journal of Energy Research. 2023; 2023 :1-13. DOI: 10.1155/2023/6874429 - 18.
Joshi Y, Zamani S, Klaassen C, Joo YL. Mitigation and in situ probing of volume expansion in silicon/graphene hybrid anodes for high-capacity, high-rate-capable lithium-ion batteries. Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research. 2021; 2 :2100125. DOI: 10.1002/aesr.202100125 - 19.
Fang H, Liu Q , Feng X, Yan J, Wang L, He L, et al. Carbon-coated si nanoparticles anchored on three-dimensional carbon nanotube matrix for high-energy stable lithium-ion batteries. Batteries. 2023; 9 :118. DOI: 10.3390/batteries9020118 - 20.
An W, Xiang B, Fu J, Mei S, Guo S, Huo K, et al. Three-dimensional carbon-coating silicon nanoparticles welded on carbon nanotubes composites for high-stability lithium-ion battery anodes. Applied Surface Science. 2019; 479 :896-902. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.145 - 21.
Wang W, Kumta PN. Nanostructured hybrid silicon/carbon nanotube heterostructures: Reversible high-capacity lithium-ion anodes. ACS Nano. 2010; 4 :2233-2241. DOI: 10.1021/nn901632g - 22.
Fu J, Liu H, Liao L, Fan P, Wang Z, Wu Y, et al. Ultrathin si/cnts paper-like composite for flexible li-ion battery anode with high volumetric capacity. Frontiers in Chemistry. 2018; 6 :624. DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00624 - 23.
Gao P, Nuli Y, He Y-S, Wang J, Minett AI, Yang J, et al. Direct scattered growth of mwnt on si for high performance anode material in li-ion batteries. Chemical Communications. 2010; 46 :9149-9151. DOI: 10.1039/C0CC02870C - 24.
Qiao Y-j, Zhang H, Hu Y-x, Li W-p, Liu W-j, Shang H-m, et al. A chain-like compound of si@ cnt nanostructures and mof-derived porous carbon as an anode for li-ion batteries. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials. 2021; 28 :1611-1620. DOI: 10.1007/s12613-021-2266-6 - 25.
Zhao H, Sheng L, Wang L, Xu H, He X. The opportunity of metal organic frameworks and covalent organic frameworks in lithium (ion) batteries and fuel cells. Energy Storage Materials. 2020; 33 :360-381. DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.08.028 - 26.
Zhou Y, Guo H, Yan G, Wang Z, Li X, Yang Z, et al. Fluidized bed reaction towards crystalline embedded amorphous Si anode with much enhanced cycling stability. Chemical Communications. 2018; 54 :3755-3758. DOI: 10.1039/C8CC00575C - 27.
Cadoret L, Reuge N, Pannala S, Syamlal M, Rossignol C, Dexpert-Ghys J, et al. Silicon chemical vapor deposition on macro and submicron powders in a fluidized bed. Powder Technology. 2009; 190 :185-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2008.04.083 - 28.
Filtvedt W, Holt A, Ramachandran P, Melaaen M. Chemical vapor deposition of silicon from silane: Review of growth mechanisms and modeling/scaleup of fluidized bed reactors. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2012; 107 :188-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2012.08.014