Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Production of Biochar from Oilseed Residue (Deoiled Cakes): State-of-the-Art

Written By

Mattaparthi Lakshmi Durga, Lalita Pal and Aseeya Wahid

Submitted: 02 August 2023 Reviewed: 27 September 2023 Published: 04 April 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.114228

From Biomass to Biobased Products IntechOpen
From Biomass to Biobased Products Edited by Eduardo Jacob-Lopes

From the Edited Volume

From Biomass to Biobased Products [Working Title]

Dr. Eduardo Jacob-Lopes, Prof. Leila Queiroz Zepka and Dr. Rosangela Rodrigues Dias

Chapter metrics overview

10 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Even today, the generation of chemicals and energy is still reliant on fossil-based resources in industrialized countries. Biomass could be a valuable renewable energy source that could reduce dependence on fossil fuels as well as provide a significant reduction of carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions. In this scenario, residue from natural oil extraction units is uplifted to produce biofuels as replacement of fossil fuels. In the process of bio-refinery, well established technologies were presented. Those are thermochemical treatment (pyrolysis, liquefaction, gasification, etc.), anaerobic digestion, catalysis, etc. Especially, importance is given to pyrolysis as it is the feasible technique to utilize residue and to produce wealthy products. The role of intrinsic bio-polymers in quantity of final pyrolytic products was discussed. Major process parameters were critically elucidated, however, the investigation of advanced pyrolysis technologies requires further research.

Keywords

  • pyrolysis
  • biochar
  • oilseed residue
  • bio-polymers
  • temperature

1. Introduction

The future energy demand is projected to rise further in accordance with ever-growing population. In addition to this, global energy consumption relies on non-renewable sources (like coal, petroleum, and natural gas) and those depleting day by day [1]. Moreover, the growth in greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel usage generates major menace to the climate. Therefore, it is imperative to search for environmentally and sustainable resources and utilize them to their full potential in light of biofuels. Biomass, as a renewable energy source, can be widely viewed as a promising alternative, because of its numerous applications, especially biofuels and bio-fertilizers [2]. There are several bio-refinery platforms that will be capable of processing biomass feed-stocks, which are the key intermediates between biomass feed-stocks and their value-added products. The bio-refineries usually add value to biomass supply chains through the production of various bio-based products. Selection of biomass has numerous advantages such as (a) abundant availability of precursor material; (b) environmentally friendliness; and (c) biodegradability and sustainability. In a typical bio-refinery, by using appropriate technologies, biomass by-products can be processed to generate various high-valued fuels. The bioenergy sector has many major platforms, for example, syngas from gasification, fuel and fertilizer from anaerobic digestion, sugars from starch, extraction of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin from biomass, solid carbon and bio-oil from pyrolysis, etc. A comparative ideology of thermochemical conversion technologies is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Comparison of common thermochemical conversion techniques.

Much research has been conducted on converting industrial and agricultural waste into valuable products [3, 4]. Still, this research topic is emerging because of its abundant scope for future energy demands. However, agricultural residue is prominent in energy conversion policies. Primarily, rice straw, rice husk, wheat straw, sugar cane bagasse, bamboo, areca nut shells, corn cob, coconut shells, etc., were used to produce energy fuels [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Apart from that, a vast range of oilseeds can be grown in India due to its diverse agro-ecological conditions and these all are coming under two major categories, such as edible oil seeds and non-edible oil seeds. The oil seeds are used for extraction of either edible oils or other purposes. In general, extraction of kg oil seeds can produce 250–350 g of oil [7], however, 650 g of residue seed cake is also obtained in the process of oil extraction [8].

Consequently, almost 65% of residue will available at the end of the extraction process. Some portion of extracted residue from edible seeds such as soybean, ground nut, flax seeds, sunflower, and etc., can be used as feed material for animal and the remaining unused. But, the residue from non-edible seeds contains toxic compounds, which limit their utilization as edible material. Hence, the oilseed residue (OSR) especially from non-edible seeds can be a potential material to produce biofuels [9], instead of unused. To convert oil seed residue (OSR) into valuable biofuels, thermochemical or bio-chemical conversion techniques can be used [10].

Thermochemical conversion involves thermal cracking of chemical organic bonds of biomass (OSR) into solids, gases, or liquid form [10]. Possible thermochemical conversion processes are torrefaction, pyrolysis, gasification, and liquefaction. The interest has been increasing day by day toward thermochemical conversion, because it is user friendly and sustainable too. However, in bio-chemical conversion, specified bacteria (yeast) may be used to digest or convert biomass into different biofuels. Bio-chemical conversion includes anaerobic digestion, alcoholic fermentation, transesterification, and so on. Compared to bio-chemical conversion methods, thermochemical process has superior qualities. The final product obtained from thermochemical process has higher carbon content, lower volatile matter, and reduced contaminants. Also, it is more energy-efficient method and can mitigate the release of harmful emissions and pollutants. Hence, the subsequent categories in thermochemical conversion technique are discussed as follows.

Advertisement

2. Value addition technologies

2.1 Pyrolysis

In pyrolysis, the organic material and volatiles present in the biomass undergo an irreversible thermochemical decomposition reaction to produce biofuels. Pyrolysis technologies can be classified as slow, flash, and fast [1]. The fast heating rate and short vapor residence times result in rapid exit of the volatile hydrocarbon vapors from the reactor and condensation into bio-oil, whereas slow pyrolysis results in greater biochar production due to increasing of carbonization of biomass due to slow heating rate and longer vapor residence time [11]. However, slow pyrolysis is the prominent technique than others to produce biochar. The remaining pyrolysis techniques enable the production of bio-oil and gases. A flow chart of pyrolysis is present in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A simple flow chart of pyrolysis process.

2.2 Torrefaction

Torrefaction is the one of the clean thermal treatments of biomass. Further, torrefaction actively removes the moisture content from biomass, however, similarly improves the efficiency of subsequent thermochemical conversion methods [12]. Biomass that has been torrefied has a number of superior quality over raw biomass, including higher grindability, lower hydrophobicity, higher heating value, and pelletization properties [13]. In the process of torrefaction, several factors influence their performance, such as, torrefaction temperature, holding time, heating rate, environment, moisture content, particle size [14]. Figure 3 illustrates general flow chart of torrefaction process.

Figure 3.

Illustration of torrefaction process.

2.3 Gasification

Gasification is another of the thermochemical conversion method, used to produce gaseous material from OSR [11]. Gasification flow diagram can be observed in Figure 4. Though, the produced gaseous material can be used for heat, electricity, methane and hydrogen generation [15]. However, gasification not only produces gaseous products but also produces bio-chemical liquids. In general, gasification occurs at high temperature value, tar content in the gas is very low, and the cleaning process is very simple [16].

Figure 4.

Process flow diagram of gasification.

2.4 Liquefaction

Other than torrefaction, pyrolysis, gasification, an alternative thermochemical process for converting biomass to biofuel is liquefaction [17]. In order to form bio-crude oil, biomass must be hydrogenated and thermally disintegrated at high pressures. In the process of hydrothermal liquefaction, solid waste contains lots of moisture and it is transformed into bio-crude oil in the presence of some catalysts [18]. The temperature and pressure ranges for liquefaction generally fall within the ranges of 240–380°C and 5–30 MPa, respectively [11]. In Figure 5, a view of liquefaction process is reported.

Figure 5.

Simple flow diagram of liquefaction.

Advertisement

3. Role of bio-polymeric compounds in characteristics of the oil seed formed

Lignocellulosic materials (oilseed residue) generally consist of several intrinsic bio-polymeric components [19]. Among others, lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose play a vital role in composition of pyrolytic products. When the lignocellulosic material undergoes heat treatment, the degradation trends of each bio-polymer decompose differently [20]. Moreover, the percentage of total carbon also depends on the degradation of these bio-polymers. Briefly, hemicellulose is susceptible to lower temperatures of torrefaction or pyrolysis, average range of the temperature for hemicellulose is 150–300°C. However, cellulose also gets volatized at slighter high temperatures than the hemicellulose. Lignin is a complex long chain bio-polymer and it starts to decompose partially at the temperature of cellulose and hemicellulose, however, it gets decomposed at higher temperature i.e., > 500°C [21].

Table 1 reports that the liquid production from safflower seed cake (residue) is more, when the average percentages of cellulose and hemicellulose are 40% and 16%, respectively [30]. However, in another study, the authors suggested that if the mustard oilseed residue contains an average percentage of cellulose and hemicellulose at 52.21% and 10.85%, respectively, the residue is potentially suitable for bio-fuel production [8]. In the same way, a comparative study of African star apple seed (ASA) and silk cotton seed residue (SCS), bio-oil production is more in ASA because of its high lignin content at optimum temperature of 400°C [23]. Kinetic studies of Jatropha de-oiled cake residue were conducted to examine the utilization of Jatropha residue for bio-fuel production [25]. Withal, bio-polymeric compositions in OSR affect the yield of outcome of pyrolysis. The further studies of variations with heat treatment could have great scope in future [31, 32]. In addition, proximate and ultimate analysis also plays a key role in pyrolysis. Here, elucidation of their role and importance is not mentioned, as they are mentioned in many literatures [30, 33].

ResidueLignin (%)Cellulose (%)Hemicellulose (%)Reference
Safflower seed press cake26.74016[22]
Mustard oil residue15.2752.2110.85[8]
African star apple seed cake10.016.2114.0[23]
Silk cotton seed cake4.019.1419.33
Raspberry seed cake19.342.116.9[24]
Jatropha de-oiled cake24.953.516.6[25]
Pongammia pinnata de-oiled cake21.8721.3449.66[26]
Black cumin seed cake26.7337.1410.44[27]
Raspberry Seed Cake19.342.116.9[28]
Radish seed cake5.623.894.15[29]

Table 1.

Bio-polymeric composition of oilseed residues.

Advertisement

4. Effect of process parameters on pyrolytic products

Specifically, pyrolysis reactor selection is the principal factor to decide the quality and quantity of final products [34]. From the studies, it is observed that fixed bed reactor (slow pyrolysis) is mostly used to produce biofuels as it is simple in operation and maintenance as well easy in construction. However, advanced pyrolytic techniques such as plasma pyrolysis, microwave pyrolysis, ultrasonic pyrolysis, solar-based pyrolysis are being explored and they will likely emerge as significant concepts in the future.

From tabulated studies, it is observed that biochar yield increases at slow pyrolysis rate, i.e., approximately 350–400°C at 5°C/min for 30 minutes of holding time. Whereas, bio-oil and bio-gas occur at little higher temperatures and higher heating rates (>500°C for 20°C/min). The above phenomenon clarifies that slower heating rate provides enough time to settlement of volatiles during thermal treatment, but not in higher heating rates [35]. Similarly, pyrolysis of safflower seed cake occurs at 400–600°C at 50°C interval and at 10, 30, and 50°C/min. The authors claimed that with increasing heating rates, bio-oil yield increases, but with increase in temperature from 400 to 600°C, yield of bio-oil decreases. Because, at higher temperatures, secondary reactions occur and lead to an increase in the content of gases rather than bio-oil. However, biochar yield decreases with increment in both heating rate and temperature [22]. In Table 2, the effect of different thermal process parameters and their influence on pyrolytic output are listed.

OSRReactorTemperature (°C)/Heating rate (°C/min)Time (min)Pyrolysis productsReferences
Solid (%)Liquid (%)Gas (%)
Flaxseed cakeFixed bed350–650/5, 203044.643.312.1[35]
Safflower seed cakeFixed bed400–600/10, 30, 503034.227.518.9[22]
Sesame seed cakeSemi-Batch type350–700/252958.512.4[36]
Neem seed cake--do--350–700/2551.140.28.5
Mustard seed cake--do--350–700/2529.953.216.7
Mahua seed cake--do--350–600/253341.3625.64[37]
Sunflower seed cakeHeniz retort550/734.8[38]
Mahua seed cakeFurnace400–60026.4330.9[39]
Karanja seed cake800/5, 10, 2018.11[40]

Table 2.

Process parameters of pyrolysis process.

Advertisement

5. Challenges and limitations

The conversion and utilization of oilseed residue could provide better scope for future economy. However, it encounters with several challenges and difficulties while processing the residue and those are discussed below.

5.1 Logistical challenges

Collecting oilseed waste from diverse sources presents a logistical challenge. Establishing an efficient collection system requires collaboration with local bodies and cooperatives. Optimizing biomass logistics, including transportation from collection points to processing facilities, is crucial to reduce costs and energy inputs.

5.2 Oilseed variability

OSR from different plant species exhibits significant variability in oil content due to various genetic, environmental, and agricultural factors. Understanding and managing this variability are crucial for ensuring a consistent and reliable feedstock supply. Plant breeding and selection, monitoring of crop growth, proper soil management, and suitable irrigation strategies can help mitigate the impact of environmental factors on oil yield [11].

5.3 Non-edible seed residue

The development of non-edible crops as potential feedstock for biodiesel presents unique challenges toward achieving self-reliance in energy security. These challenges include the forest origin of non-edible crops, making harvesting, collection, and transportation difficult. Additionally, lower fuel economy, seasonal availability, improper marketing channels, and high FFAs and moisture content in non-edible oils require pre-treatment before the transesterification process. The lack of post-harvest technologies further affects the oil quality of non-edible crops [41].

5.4 Seasonal nature and annual variability

The seasonal nature of oilseed cultivation results in fluctuations in feedstock supply, which can affect continuous production processes. Addressing these fluctuations requires effective planning and coordination of agricultural activities. Despite the challenges, non-edible crops offer opportunities for cultivating harsh and unused lands in developing countries, such as seashores, riverbanks, deserts, and wastelands. These crops could maximize land utilization for crop production. Implementation of advanced technology, particularly waterless extraction technology like supercritical fluids, offers potential solutions to avoid FFAs and moisture content in non-edible oil [42].

5.5 Efficient storage and self-decomposition

Proper storage of oilseed waste is essential to maintain its quality and energy potential. Prolonged on-site storage, however, can lead to self-decomposition and the release of harmful gases, posing environmental and safety risks. Developing appropriate storage techniques is critical to preserve the feedstock’s quality [43].

5.6 Environmental impact and carbon cycle

A life cycle assessment (LCA) of the entire bioenergy production process is crucial to understand the environmental implications and carbon cycle. This assessment helps in identifying potential areas for improvement in terms of sustainability [44].

5.7 Acceptance and demand

Market and community acceptance of biochar and biofuels derived from oilseed waste are vital for sustainable production. Promoting sustainable agriculture practices and establishing standards can enhance demand and acceptability in the local market.

Overcoming the challenges in producing biochar and biofuels from oilseed waste requires collaborative efforts from researchers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders. By addressing these obstacles, we can unlock the full potential of oilseed waste as a valuable feedstock for bioenergy production, contributing to a more sustainable and environmentally friendly future. However, careful consideration is necessary to balance the use of agricultural crops and edible oils for biodiesel production to avoid potential conflicts between “food vs. fuel” [41, 45].

Advertisement

6. Conclusion

Different technologies such as pyrolysis, liquefaction, gasification, torrefaction are reported to convert oilseed residues as high-valued products. Withal, in terms of “waste-to-energy” technology, pyrolysis is considered one of the most cost-effective and environmentally benign techniques. In order to reduce GHG emissions, pollution, global warming, and fossil fuel dependence, bio-fuel products can be used as drop-in alternatives to fossil fuels or blended with fossil fuels. An idea on importance of bio-polymer compositions in preparation of pyrolytic products is reported. The different process parameters and their role in production process are reported. However, this article highlighted the selection of pyrolysis method and bio-polymer compositions in preparation of pyrolytic products. It critically explained the difference between process parameters depending on final product requirement. Yet, the research needs to establish toward the adaption of new methods of pyrolysis such as plasma, ultrasonic, microwave-assisted pyrolysis etc.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The authors are sincerely thankful to Director (ICAR-CIAE, Bhopal); Dean (IARI, New Delhi) for their support and encouragement.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Advertisement

Author contribution

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, initial draft preparation, conceptualization were performed by Mattaparthi Lakshmi Durga, Aseeya Wahid. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Mattaparthi Lakshmi Durga, Aseeya Wahid, Lalita.

References

  1. 1. Rajpoot L, Tagade A, Deshpande G, Verma K, Geed SR, Patle DS, et al. An overview of pyrolysis of de-oiled cakes for the production of biochar, bio-oil, and pyro-gas: Current status, challenges, and future perspective. Bioresources Technology Reports. 2022;19:101205. DOI: 10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101205
  2. 2. Gangil S, Bhargav VK. Influence of torrefaction on intrinsic bioconstituents of cotton stalk. Energy. 2018;142:1066-1073. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.128
  3. 3. Chandrasekaran A, Ramachandran S, Subbiah S. Determination of kinetic parameters in the pyrolysis operation and thermal behavior of Prosopis juliflora using thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresource Technology. 2017;233:413-422. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.119
  4. 4. Gangil S. Positive transformations in intrinsic bioconstituents due to briquetting of soybean crop residues, energy. Sustainable Development. 2015;27:112-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2015.05.005
  5. 5. Durga ML, Gangil S, Bhargav VK. Thermal influx induced biopolymeric transitions in paddy straw. Renewable Energy. 2022;199:1024-1032. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.09.054
  6. 6. Song M, Jin B, Xiao R, Yang L, Wu Y, Zhong Z, et al. The comparison of two activation techniques to prepare activated carbon from corn cob. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2013;48:250-256. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.11.007
  7. 7. Volli V, Singh RK, Murugan S. The use of mustard cake pyrolytic oil blends as fuel in a diesel engine. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 2014;5:661-668. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-013-9270-7
  8. 8. Singh RK, Patil T, Pandey D, Sawarkar AN. Bioresource technology pyrolysis of mustard oil residue: A kinetic and thermodynamic study. Bioresource Technology. 2021;339:125631. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125631
  9. 9. Mirpoor SF, Giosafatto CVL, Porta R. Biorefining of seed oil cakes as industrial co-streams for production of innovative bioplastics. A review. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2021;109:259-270. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.014
  10. 10. Lee SY, Sankaran R, Chew KW, Tan CH, Krishnamoorthy R. Energy waste to bioenergy: A review on the recent conversion technologies. BMC. 2019;2019:1-22
  11. 11. Jha S, Nanda S, Acharya B, Dalai AK. A review of thermochemical conversion of waste biomass to biofuels. Energies. 2022;15:1-23. DOI: 10.3390/en15176352
  12. 12. Chen WH, Kuo PC. Torrefaction and co-torrefaction characterization of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin as well as torrefaction of some basic constituents in biomass. Energy. 2011;36:803-811. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.12.036
  13. 13. Tumuluru JS, Ghiasi B, Soelberg NR, Sokhansanj S. Biomass Torrefaction process, product properties, reactor types, and moving bed reactor design concepts. Frontier in Energy Research. 2021;9:1-20. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.728140
  14. 14. Gan YY, Ong HC, Ling TC, Chen WH, Chong CT. Torrefaction of de-oiled Jatropha seed kernel biomass for solid fuel production. Energy. 2019;170:367-374. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.026
  15. 15. Centi G, Perathoner S. Chemistry and energy beyond fossil fuels. A perspective view on the role of syngas from waste sources. Catalysis Today. 2020;342:4-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.04.003
  16. 16. Makwana JP, Pandey J, Mishra G. Improving the properties of producer gas using high temperature gasification of rice husk in a pilot scale fluidized bed gasifier (FBG). Renewable Energy. 2019;130:943-951. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.011
  17. 17. Gollakota ARK, Kishore N, Gu S. A review on hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018;81:1378-1392. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.178
  18. 18. Zhang S, Yang X, Zhang H, Chu C, Zheng K, Ju M, et al. Liquefaction of biomass and upgrading of bio-oil: A review. Molecules. 2019;24:1-30. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24122250
  19. 19. Mandal S, Haydary J, Gangil S, Husar J, Jena PC, Bhattacharya TK. Inferences from thermogravimetric analysis of pine needles and its chars from a pilot-scale screw reactor. Chemical Papers. 2020;74:689-698. DOI: 10.1007/s11696-019-00998-1
  20. 20. Gangil S. Distinct splitting of polymeric cellulosic signals in cashew shell: A TG-diagnosis. Cellulose. 2014;21:2913-2924. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-014-0309-0
  21. 21. Amalina F, Razak ASA, Krishnan S, Sulaiman H, Zularisam AW, Nasrullah M. Biochar production techniques utilizing biomass waste-derived materials and environmental applications – A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advance. 2022;7:100134. DOI: 10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100134
  22. 22. Şensöz S, Angın D. Pyrolysis of safflower (Charthamus tinctorius L.) seed press cake: Part 1. The effects of pyrolysis parameters on the product yields. Bioresource Technology. 2008;99(13):5492-5497. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.10.046
  23. 23. Abdullahi M, Biswas B, Kumar J, Bhaskar T. Slow pyrolysis of Defatted Seeds Cakes of African star apple and silk cotton for production of bio-oil. Renewable Energy. 2020;146:1710-1716. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.145
  24. 24. Smets K, Schreurs S, Carleer R, Yperman J. Valorization of raspberry seed cake by flash and slow pyrolysis: Product yield and characterization of the liquid and solid fraction. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 2014;107:289-297. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2014.03.014
  25. 25. Sharma R, Sheth PN, Gujrathi AM. Kinetic modeling and simulation: Pyrolysis of Jatropha residue de-oiled cake. Renewable Energy. 2016;86:554-562. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.08.066
  26. 26. Kumar D, Pant KK. Production and characterization of biocrude and biochar obtained from non-edible de-oiled seed cakes hydrothermal conversion. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 2015;115:77-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2015.06.014
  27. 27. Şen N, Kar Y. Pyrolysis of black cumin seed cake in a fixed-bed reactor. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2011;35:4297-4304. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.07.019
  28. 28. Schedler M, Ortner-Pichler A, Reitbauer E, Mahringer G, Landschützer C. Interdisciplinary system simulation of a tracked compost turner. Procedia Manufacturing. 2020;51:1005-1013. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.141
  29. 29. Silvestre WP, Pauletti GF, Baldasso C. Industrial crops & products Fodder radish (Raphanus sativus L.) seed cake as a feedstock for pyrolysis. Industrial Crops and Products. 2020;154:112689. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112689
  30. 30. Amalina F, Syukor A, Razak A, Krishnan S, Sulaiman H, Zularisam AW, et al. Advanced techniques in the production of biochar from lignocellulosic biomass and environmental applications. Cleaning Materials. 2022;6:100137. DOI: 10.1016/j.clema.2022.100137
  31. 31. Thers H, Djomo SN, Elsgaard L, Knudsen MT. Science of the Total environment biochar potentially mitigates greenhouse gas emissions from cultivation of oilseed rape for biodiesel. Science Total Environment. 2019;671:180-188. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.257
  32. 32. Myounghoon M, Park WK, Lee SY, Hwang KR, Lee S, Kim MS, et al. Utilization of whole microalgal biomass for advanced biofuel and biorefinery applications. Renewable Sustainale Energy. 2022;160:112269. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112269
  33. 33. Komandur J, Vinu R, Mohanty K. Pyrolysis kinetics and pyrolysate composition analysis of Mesua ferrea L: A non-edible oilseed towards the production of sustainable renewable fuel. Biotechnology. 2022;351:126987
  34. 34. Jahirul MI, Rasul MG, Chowdhury AA, Ashwath N. Biofuels production through biomass pyrolysis: A technological review. Energies. 2012;5:4952-5001. DOI: 10.3390/en5124952
  35. 35. Sun Y, Li C, Li Q , Zhang S, Xu L, Gholizadeh M, et al. Pyrolysis of flaxseed residue: Exploration of characteristics of the biochar and bio-oil products. Journal of the Energy Institute. 2021;97:1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.joei.2021.03.020
  36. 36. Volli V, Singh RK. Production of bio-oil from de-oiled cakes by thermal pyrolysis. Fuel. 2012;96:579-585. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.01.016
  37. 37. Volli V, Singh RK. Production of bio-oil from mahua de-oiled cake by thermal pyrolysis. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy. 2012;4(1). DOI: 10.1063/1.3676074
  38. 38. Yorgun SAİT, Şensöz S, Koçkar ÖM. Characterization of the pyrolysis oil produced in the slow pyrolysis of sunflower-extracted bagasse. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2001;20(2):141-148. DOI: 10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00064-7
  39. 39. Mulimani HV, Navindgi MC. Production of solid fuel biochar from de-oiled seed cake by pyrolysis. Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering. 2017;14:57-61. DOI: 10.9790/1684-1402035761
  40. 40. Muktham R, Ball AS, Bhargava SK, Bankupalli S. Study of thermal behavior of deoiled karanja seed cake biomass: thermogravimetric analysis and pyrolysis kinetics. Energy Science & Engineering. 2016;4(1):86-95. DOI: 10.1002/ese3.109
  41. 41. Shaah MAH, Hossain MS, Allafi FAS, Alsaedi A, Ismail N, Ab Kadir MO, Ahmad MI. A review on non-edible oil as a potential feedstock for biodiesel: physicochemical properties and production technologies. RSC advances. 2021;11(40):25018-25037. DOI: 10.1039/D1RA04311K
  42. 42. Demirbas A. Competitive liquid biofuels from biomass. Applied Energy. 2011;88:17-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.07.016
  43. 43. Antizar‐Ladislao B, Turrion‐Gomez JL. Second‐generation biofuels and local bioenergy systems. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining: Innovation for a Sustainable Economy. 2008;2(5):455-469. DOI: 10.1002/bbb.97
  44. 44. Demirbas A. Political, economic and environmental impacts of biofuels: A review. Applied Energy. 2009;86:S108-S117. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.04.036
  45. 45. Cerón Ferrusca M, Romero R, Martínez SL, Ramírez-Serrano A, Natividad R. Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil: A Perspective on Catalytic Processes. Processes. 2023;11(7):1952. DOI: 10.3390/pr11071952

Written By

Mattaparthi Lakshmi Durga, Lalita Pal and Aseeya Wahid

Submitted: 02 August 2023 Reviewed: 27 September 2023 Published: 04 April 2024