Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Biomarkers in Gingival Diseases: Current Insights and Future Perspectives

Written By

Annie Kitty George, Sankari Malaiappan, Betsy Joseph and Sukumaran Anil

Submitted: 23 August 2023 Reviewed: 01 February 2024 Published: 25 April 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.114267

Advances in Gingival Diseases and Conditions IntechOpen
Advances in Gingival Diseases and Conditions Edited by Irina-Georgeta Sufaru

From the Edited Volume

Advances in Gingival Diseases and Conditions [Working Title]

Dr. Irina-Georgeta Sufaru and Prof. Sorina Mihaela Solomon

Chapter metrics overview

18 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Periodontal diseases represent a spectrum of gingival disorders with multifaceted etiologies. Identifying and utilizing biomarkers in these conditions are essential for early detection, risk stratification, and personalized therapeutic interventions. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of biomarker research in gingival diseases, emphasizing clinical applications, detection methods, and the potential of saliva and gingival crevicular fluid as diagnostic vehicles. We also delve into emerging research areas such as microbiome-associated, epigenetic, and metagenomic biomarkers. The chapter underscores the challenges associated with biomarker validation, the promise of multi-marker panels for improved accuracy, and the potential of longitudinal studies to predict disease progression. As point-of-care technologies and wearables pave the way for future diagnostics, innovative solutions like biosensors and micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) are highlighted. This chapter encapsulates the importance of advancing biomarker discovery and its pivotal role in reshaping gingival disease management.

Keywords

  • periodontal diseases
  • gingival disorders
  • biomarkers
  • early detection
  • saliva
  • gingival Crevicular fluid
  • disease progression

1. Introduction

In a state of health, gingival tissues withstand a persistent microbial onslaught proficiently countered by an efficient immune surveillance mechanism. Any deviation from this equilibrium engenders gingival diseases. Alarmingly, the worldwide prevalence of gingivitis exceeds 80% [1]. Transformations in gingival hue, shape, consistency, location, and superficial texture clinically characterize gingivitis. The most definitive clinical indicator of gingivitis is bleeding upon probing.

Gingival diseases can be dichotomized into dental plaque biofilm-induced gingivitis and non-dental plaque-induced gingival diseases. Dental plaque-induced gingivitis can be characterized at the site-specific level as “an inflammatory lesion, engendered by the dynamic interplay between dental plaque biofilm and the host’s immune-inflammatory reaction [2]. Importantly, this inflammation remains confined within the gingival domain without transgressing into the periodontal attachment. This localized inflammatory response remains restrained, never exceeding the mucogingival boundary, and is fully reversible upon mitigating levels of dental plaque proximal and below the gingival border. Although dental plaque microbes are the primary etiological agents, the pathogenesis of the disease is intrinsically modulated by myriad factors. Local determinants such as plaque-retentive anomalies and oral xerostomia, along with systemic modulators like tobacco use, hyperglycemia, malnutrition, pharmaceuticals, endocrinological fluctuations, especially during puberty, pregnancy, or due to oral contraceptive intake, and hematological anomalies act as key contributors. Moreover, environmental, systemic, genetic, and epigenetic factors further modulate the disease mechanism. From a clinical perspective, a case is earmarked as gingivitis when over 10% of sites demonstrate bleeding and possess a probing pocket depth of less than 3 mm [3].

Contrastingly, gingival diseases that are non-plaque induced do not ameliorate upon plaque eradication. These maladies can either be exclusively oral manifestations or symptomatic of systemic ailments. Gingival diseases that are not plaque-induced present a unique challenge as they do not improve upon plaque removal. These conditions may manifest in the oral cavity or indicate underlying systemic issues. They encompass a spectrum: genetic variations, infections caused by specific pathogens such as bacteria, viruses, or fungi, to immune-inflammatory issues, including hypersensitivity reactions, skin and mucosal autoimmune conditions, and granulomatous and reactive lesions [4]. Additionally, there are neoplastic lesions, disorders arising from hormonal, metabolic, or nutritional imbalances, trauma-related lesions, and even unusual gingival pigmentation. This chapter is dedicated to a deeper exploration of biomarkers within these gingival disease contexts, providing a contemporary understanding and suggesting future research directions.

Advertisement

2. Biomarkers in diseases

With their inherent molecular specificity, Biomarkers occupy a cardinal position in periodontics, serving as pivotal tools in disease diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic monitoring. Within the ambit of periodontics, biomarkers can be delineated based on their inherent stability: while biochemical and microbiological markers are static, encapsulating a point-in-time depiction of disease processes, histopathological and genetic markers are dynamic, reflecting continuous and evolving changes in tissue or genetic configurations [5].

Biomarkers are further segregated based on their functional relevance from physiological health to pathological disease state. Such stratifications are elucidated as follows:

Susceptibility Biomarkers: These markers occupy the earliest echelon of biomarker relevance, identifying individuals who may be predisposed to the onset of the disease at a subsequent temporal juncture. These are invaluable in public health frameworks, wherein early interventions can be directed toward susceptible populations, possibly averting disease onset [6].

Risk Stratification Biomarkers: A notch higher in specificity, these biomarkers earmark individuals at augmented risk of disease manifestation. Their identification enables clinicians to prioritize interventions among high-risk cohorts.

Disease Screening Biomarkers: These markers emerge before the clinical manifestations of the disease, even before the first signs or symptoms, providing a preliminary indication of pathological changes, thus serving as early warning systems.

Diagnostic Biomarkers: These are the bulwarks of clinical practice, delineating the presence or absence of disease. Diagnostic biomarkers are pivotal in establishing clinical case definitions and facilitating systematic disease classifications.

Prognostic Biomarkers: With a forward-looking perspective, these biomarkers prognosticate the eventual trajectory of the disease, irrespective of therapeutic interventions. They are instrumental in forecasting potential disease recurrences or prognosticating the progression curve.

Predictive Biomarkers: These are quintessential in personalized medicine, enabling the demarcation of patients based on their predicted response to therapeutic regimens. Their primary function is to guide therapeutic decisions by distinguishing responders from non-responders within a diseased cohort [7].

Monitoring Biomarkers: Operating in a longitudinal capacity, these markers are evaluated serially to decipher the disease’s status under the influence of a specific therapeutic, device, or environmental agent [8].

In summation, elucidating and validating periodontal biomarkers signify a quantum leap in contemporary periodontics, promising transformative changes in diagnostic precision, prognostic accuracy, and therapeutic efficacy.

Advertisement

3. Role of biomarkers in gingival diseases

Gingival diseases are precursors to irrevocable degradation of periodontal tissues, manifesting the host’s immune inflammatory response that remains unchecked and unremedied against pathobionts. Diagnosing these diseases in their incipient stages and discerning active disease sites is paramount. Although the conventional methodology of periodontal screening and recording with a graduated periodontal probe remains the linchpin of diagnosis, its limitations are evident. For instance, full mouth gingival bleeding scores remain the archetypal metric to delineate a ‘Gingivitis Case.’ However, an over-reliance on bleeding scores poses challenges, given the low sensitivity of bleeding on probing.

Furthermore, probing inflamed or ulcerated tissues is not infrequently discomforting for both patient and clinician. The metrics denoting periodontal degradation, such as probing pocket depth and clinical attachment loss, only reflect antecedent periodontal destruction, offering no insights into contemporary disease dynamics. The quintessence of disease management lies in discerning susceptible individuals and sculpting patient-centric therapeutic strategies. A profound comprehension of the disease’s type, severity, and potential trajectory is instrumental for efficacious treatment planning and long-term management [7].

Current monitoring paradigms for gingival disease progression employ longitudinal evaluations encompassing bleeding indices, visual appraisals, and screenings to detect amplified probing pocket depth, attachment loss measures, and radiographic bone diminution. The intricate association between periodontal diseases and a panoply of systemic afflictions necessitates a precise quantification of periodontally inflamed surface areas and the systemic ramifications of the inflammatory burden engendered by these diseases at the individual patient echelon. A burgeoning field of research is gravitating toward discovering facile, economical, non-intrusive, and dependable biomarkers. The raison d’être for these biomarkers lies in identifying susceptible individuals, early diagnostic precision, disease progression assessment, oral inflammatory load quantification, therapeutic response evaluation, and the formulation of patient-tailored regimes for supportive periodontal therapy [9].

A contemporary shift in treatment paradigms has been observed, transitioning from traditional strategies where patients were mere passive care recipients to the more evolved ‘Precision Dental Medicine. This approach accentuates individualized diagnostic, therapeutic, and outcome metrics. The seminal 2017 AAP-EFP workshop underscored the exigency for the evolution and validation of minimally invasive diagnostic apparatus and the discernment of genetic predispositions or resistance factors [1, 10]. The Biomarker’s Definitions Working Group 2001 describes biomarkers as “alterations at the cellular, biochemical, molecular, or genetic levels which can highlight or differentiate between normal, abnormal, or specific biological processes [11]. Academically speaking, a biomarker is often understood as a uniquely characterized characteristic used to indicate typical biological processes, pathological processes, or responses to exposure or treatments [12].

Advertisement

4. Biomarkers in gingival and periodontal diseases

4.1 Microbial biomarkers in gingival diseases

Gingival diseases arise from the complex interplay between the host and the resident oral microbiota. A disruption in this delicate balance can precipitate disease onset and progression. Historically, the identification of microbes relied heavily on culture-based techniques. However, the advent of advanced molecular biology methods has marked a transition to more sophisticated molecular identification strategies, thereby increasing the precision of bacterial identification [13].

As gingival health deteriorates, there is a notable microbial shift. This involves transitioning from a mainly gram-positive environment in health to a predominantly gram-negative environment during gingivitis. Using advanced methods like 454-pyrosequencing, researchers have identified specific bacterial taxa associated with gingivitis, such as Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. polymorphum and Lautropia sp. HOTA94, among others. Moreover, there has been a rigorous investigation into potential periodontal pathogens like Porhyromonas gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, to name a few [14].

The clinical relevance of microbial biomarkers in gingival diseases is manifold. These biomarkers can pinpoint pathogens linked to particular gingival diseases and guide treatments by determining antimicrobial susceptibilities [15]. Moreover, they offer insights into the ongoing activity of the disease, allowing for site-specific and individualized assessments. However, it is crucial to approach microbial biomarkers with caution. The current evidence has gaps, with some questioning the efficacy of these biomarkers in diagnosing and treating gingival diseases. The era of attributing gingival disease to a single microbial entity is fading. Contemporary research seeks to understand broader microbial community shifts during dysbiosis, considering microbial dynamics and host responses.

4.2 Inflammatory biomarkers in gingival Crevicular fluid (GCF)

Gingival diseases arise from complex interplays between host immune responses and microbial challenges. In this context, Gingival Crevicular Fluid (GCF) emerges as an invaluable diagnostic tool (Table 1). Originating as an exudate from gingival tissues, GCF provides a unique glimpse into the ongoing inflammatory processes at the site of periodontal disease [97]. Its composition, teeming with blood derivatives, tissue breakdown products, and microbial metabolites, underscores its diagnostic potential. Furthermore, the non-invasive method of GCF collection renders it a practical choice for clinicians.

BiomarkersReferences
Acute-phase proteins
Lactoferrin, Transferrin,α2-Macroglobulin,α1-Proteinase inhibitor, C-reactive protein
Pradeep et al. [16]; Fujita et al. [17]; Kumar et al. [18]; Keles et al. [19]; Kinney et al. [20]; Kumari et al. [21]
Antibacterial Antibodies:
IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4,IgM, IgA
Brajovic et al. [22]; Guentsch et al. [23]
Anti-Hsp70 (heat shock protein family A)Takai et al. [24]
Aspartate aminotransferaseShimada et al. [25]
Beta-N-acetyl-hexosaminidaseBuchmann et al. [26]
Calgranulin A (MRP-8)Andersen et al. [27]
CalprotectinBecerik et al. [28]; Kaner et al. [29]
Cathepsin G, D, BGarg et al. [30]
CD14Jin and Darveau. [31]
ChemerinDoğan et al. [32]
Chitinase-3-like protein 1(YKL-40)Kumar et al. [33]
Chondroitin 4-sulfateKhongkhunthian et al. [34]
Chondroitin 6-sulfateKhongkhunthian et al. [34]
Creatinine kinaseNomura et al. [35]
CystatinsSharma et al. [36]
Cytokines:
Interleukin - 1α, Interleukin - 1β, Interleukin -1ra, Interleukin-2,Interleukin - 6, Interleukin – 8
de Campos et al. [37]; Shaker and Ghallab [38]; Darabi et al. [39]; Fu et al. [40]; Lagdive et al. [41]; Shimada et al. [42]; Shivaprasad and Pradeep [43]; Keles et al. [19]
Cytokines: 1 L-4,1 L-17’ IFN-γStadler et al. [44]
Dipeptidyl peptidases, Alkaline phosphatase, β-Glucuronidase, Stromyelysins, Lactate dehydrogenase
Arylsulfatase, Lysozyme, Dipeptidylpeptidase, Creatine kinase
Immunoglobulin-degrading enzymes
β-Glucuronidase, Trypsin - like Enzymes
Lamster and Ahlo [45]; Buduneli and Kinane. [46]
ElastaseCox et al. [47]
Fibronectin fragmentsBrajovic et al. [22]; Feghali and Grenier. [48]
GingipainGuentsch et al. [49]
Glycosaminoglycans (GAG’s):Yan et al. [50]
GlycosidasesSoder et al. [51]
Hemoglobin β-chain peptidesNgo et al. [52]; Kido et al. [53]
Hepatocyte growth factorAnil et al. [54]
Human beta-defensinsPereira et al. [55]
Hypoxia-inducible factor-1αZorina et al. [56]
LamininEmingil et al. [57]
LeptinKarthikeyan & Pradeep [58]
Leukotriene B4Pradeep et al. [59]
Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA)Hashimura et al. [60]
Matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1)
Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2)
Matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3)
Matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8)
Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9)
Matrix metalloproteinase-13 (MMP-13)
Sorsa et al. [61]; Tuter et al. [62]; Kushlinskii et al. [63]; Konopka et al. [64]; Khongkhunthian et al. [65]
MCP-4Kumari et al. [21]
MelatoninGhallab et al. [66]
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP)Anil et al. [67]; Gupta et al. [68]; Kumari et al. [21]
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1(MCP-1)Gupta et al. [68]
MyeloperoxidasesBuchmann et al. [26, 69]
NeopterinPradeep et al. [59]
Neurokinin ALundy et al. [70]
Neutral proteaseBader and Boyd. [71]
OsteocalcinBecerik et al. [28]
Osteonectin, Hyaluronic acid, Hydroxyproline,Buduneli and Kinane [46]
OsteopontinSharma and Pradeep. [72, 73]
PA inhibitor-2 (PAI-2)Tuter et al. [74]
Pentraxin-3Pradeep et al. [16]
PeriostinKumaresan et al. [75]
PlasminogenYin et al. [76]
Plasminogen activator (PA)Buduneli et al. [77]; Kardesler et al. [78]; Tuter et al. [74]
Platelet-Activating FactorChen et al. [79]
ProgranulinPriyanka et al., [80]
Prostaglandin E2Buduneli et al. [81]
Pyridinoline crosslinks (ICTP)Jepsen et al. [82]
RANTES (chemoattractant and activator of macrophages and lymphocytes)Emingil et al. [83]
Receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB-ligand (RANK-L) and Osteoprotegerin (OPG)Bostanci et al. [84]
ResistinGokhale et al. [85]
Substance POzturk et al. [86]
Tissue inhibitor of MMP-1 (TIMP-1)Kardesler et al. [87]; Marcaccini et al. [88]
Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β)Kuru et al. [89]
Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF -a). Interferon αBastos et al. [90]
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)Sakallioglu et al. [91]
Vasoactive intestinal peptideLinden et al. [92]
VaspinBozkurt Doğan et al. [93]
VisfatinPradeep et al. [94]
α1-Proteinase inhibitorNakamura-Minami et al. [95]
α2-MacroglobulinKnofler et al. [96]

Table 1.

GCF biomarkers.

GCF’s cellular and molecular components paint a detailed picture of the local immune response. For instance, the cellular milieu of GCF includes neutrophils, which act as the vanguard against microbial invaders, epithelial cells, and various blood cells. On a molecular front, GCF is a reservoir of immunoglobulins (IgG, IgM, IgA), complement components, cytokines, and markers of tissue degradation, offering a comprehensive insight into the immune response at the periodontal site [98].

Delving deeper into its contents, GCF presents a suite of inflammatory biomarkers. Cytokines, the molecular sentinels of our immune system, have been extensively studied in GCF, with certain ones like IL-1β and IL-8 implicated in gingivitis. Their levels can offer insights into disease severity and therapeutic outcomes. Chemokines, another class of signaling molecules, are also represented, with molecules like MCP-1 correlating with disease severity. Furthermore, prostaglandins such as PGE2, synthesized by macrophages and fibroblasts, play pivotal roles in processes like collagen degradation, making them potential therapeutic targets [99]. Another fascinating aspect of GCF is the presence of adipokines, cytokines derived from fat cells. Notable adipokines such as resistin and leptin have associations with disease progression, with leptin potentially playing a protective role.

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in GCF, crucial for tissue remodeling, offer another layer of diagnostic potential. MMP-8, for instance, stands out as a reliable indicator of periodontal disease [100, 101]. Furthermore, GCF contains markers of bone remodeling, such as RANKL and OPG, which provide insights into alveolar bone turnover, a critical aspect of periodontal disease progression.

The broad spectrum of other biomolecules in GCF, ranging from enzymes like ALP and LDH to proteins like periostin and PTX-3, cements its importance in periodontal diagnostics. GCF is a treasure trove of biomarkers, presenting a promising avenue for disease diagnosis, therapeutic assessment, and prognosis in gingival diseases [102]. The intricate molecular pathways illuminated by studying GCF could spearhead targeted therapeutic strategies, heralding an era of precision medicine in periodontology. As our understanding deepens, future research promises to further refine the use of GCF in routine periodontal care.

4.3 Biomarkers in the saliva

As a diagnostic medium, saliva offers a promising and non-invasive approach to unearthing potential biomarkers in periodontal diseases [103]. Although it may not depict the intricate site-specific disease activity, saliva mirrors the overarching oral inflammatory scenario (Table 2).

BiomarkersReferences
8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG)Sezer et al. [104]
Alanine aminopeptidaseAemaimanan et al. [105]
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP):Dabra and Singh. [106]
AminotransferaseNomura et al. [107]
AmylaseSanchez et al. [108]
ArginasePereira et al. [109]
AscorbateSculley and Langley-Evans Sculley and Langley-Evans. [110]
Calcium (Ca):Kiss et al. [111]
ChitinaseVan Steijn et al. [112, 113]
CortisolRefulio et al. [114]
C-reactive proteinShojaee et al. [115]
Cystatins C, S, A, SNvan Gils et al. [116]
Cytokines, IL1-βKim et al. [117]
Dipeptidyl peptidaseAemaimanan et al. [105]
ElastasePauletto et al. [118]
EsteraseBimstein et al. [119]
HemoglobinIto et al. [120]
Hepatocyte growth factor – HGFLonn et al. [121]
Immunoglobulins (G, A, M, SIgA)Olayanju et al. [122]
Interleukin 6 (IL-6)Costa et al. [123]
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)Nomura et al. [107]
LactoferrinRocha Dde et al. [124]
LysozymeSurna et al. [125]
Matrix metalloproteinase-1(MMP-1)Yildirim et al. [126]
Matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MP-8)Yildirim et al. [126]
MCP-1Nisha et al. [127]
MelatoninAlmughrabi et al. [128]
MMP 3Kim [129]
MyeloperoxidaseMeschiari et al. [130]
NeopterinOzmeric et al. [131]
Nitric oxide (NO)Sundar et al. [132]
OsteoprotegerinTabari et al. [133]
Platelet activating factor (PAF)McManus and Pinckard, [134]
S100A8Kim et al. [135]
Tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase (TIMP)Isaza-Guzman et al. [136]
TNF-αKibune et al. [137]
UrateSculley and Langley-Evans. [110]
α-1-antitrypsin, Keratin, Complement C3
Fibronectin, Albumin, Epidermal growth factor (EGF), Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)
Nomura et al. [107]
α-2-macroglobulinOzmeric et al. [131]
β-GlucuronidaseLamster et al. [138]

Table 2.

Salivary biomarkers in periodontal diseases.

Host Inflammatory Mediators form the crux of the salivary biomarkers. MMP-8 is a crucial biomarker, aligning closely with periodontal disease severity, progression, and therapeutic outcomes [100]. Other members, such as MMPs-2,3,9,13, too, hold their ground in this context. Neutrophilic Mediators, with members like Cathepsin G, elastase, lysozyme, lactoferrin, and myeloperoxidase, directly associate with escalating periodontal disease severity [139]. Additionally, cytokines such as IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 resonate with the gravity of periodontal ailments and their response to treatments.

Venturing into Chemotactic Cytokines, MCPs, namely MCP-1 (CCL2) and MCP-4 (CCL13), see a marked rise with the advancing periodontal tissue damage but showcase a decline post-intervention. MIP1-α, too, holds promise as a salivary biomarker [140]. One should also note that the cell surface molecule CD 44 plays a pivotal role in neutrophil recruitment and presents elevated levels in periodontal afflictions.

Growth Factors add another dimension. The Hepatocyte Growth Factor, for instance, is on the radar as a prospective biomarker gauging periodontal disease activity. Several other growth factors, such as platelet-activating factor, platelet-derived growth factor, TGF-α, and TGF-β, have been detected in saliva, underscoring their potential significance [141].

The realm of antioxidants and neuropeptides offers melatonin, celebrated for its antioxidant attributes. Remarkably, its levels wane in the face of periodontal diseases but recover post-treatment. Neuropeptides, specifically VIP and NPY, demonstrate connections with bleeding scores among periodontal patients [142].

Adipokines, notably visfatin, with its heightened levels, align with periodontal disorders, yet these levels recede after therapeutic measures. Another adipokine, chemerin, is currently scrutinized for its diagnostic prowess [143].

Diving into Biochemical Markers, enzymes such as Aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphate, and lactate dehydrogenase manifest heightened salivary levels in periodontal ailments. Various other enzymes, from Alpha-glucosidase to trypsin, have also been examined in this context [144].

Lastly, the Immunoglobulins domain brings forth IgA, IgG, and IgM titers, which have been evaluated to discern their dynamics in periodontal diseases [145].

Saliva is a treasure trove of information, offering a panoramic view of periodontal diseases. Its components can adeptly signal disease severity, evolution, and the efficacy of treatments, cementing its role in periodontal diagnostics. Yet, a clinician’s proficiency in harnessing these biomarkers remains paramount for optimal patient care.

4.4 Genetic and molecular biomarkers in periodontal diseases

Genetic predisposition plays a pivotal role in determining individual susceptibility to gingival diseases. Biomolecular markers, particularly genetic markers, map inherited differences among subjects to their DNA profile. The TNF-α and IL-1 gene polymorphisms have been shown to influence levels of inflammatory mediators in biofluids. Additionally, studies have noted differential responses in individuals to plaque accumulation, suggesting that genetic control primarily determines this [146, 147].

Interestingly, children with Down’s syndrome developed rapid and profound gingival inflammation upon exposure to dental plaque over 21 days. Twin studies have further reinforced the idea of genetic control over clinical expression patterns in periodontal diseases, with a significant 82% of population variance in gingivitis attributed to genetic susceptibility [148]. Dominant pathways of gene expression, particularly immune response, were identified in gingival biopsy samples from an experimental gingivitis study [149].

Modern genetic research integrates whole-genomic arrays with a specific mapping of candidate genes. These genes, identified for their biological significance in disease etiopathogenesis or supported by genomic studies, are examined for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) that could indicate susceptibility.

4.5 Key points

  • Polymorphisms at the promoter region of IL-6, IL-10, and IL-18 play crucial roles in gingival disease etiology [150].

  • A potential risk factor for children’s gingival diseases is the interaction between IL-18 and MMP-9 genes.

  • IL-1Ra gene polymorphisms indicate genetic susceptibility to gingival diseases.

4.6 Genes and periodontal disease susceptibility

Several candidate genes have been under investigation for their association with periodontal disease. Some key candidates include:

  • IL-1: A pro-inflammatory cytokine, divided into subfractions IL-1α and IL-1β, encoded by the IL-1 gene cluster at locus 2q13–21. IL-1α acts as an ‘alarming from necrotic cells, while IL-1β is crucial for innate immune response [151, 152, 153].

  • TNF-α: Another pro-inflammatory cytokine encoded at locus 6p21.3. Research has been inconclusive regarding its association with periodontal disease [154].

  • IL-6 and IL-10: These cytokines are in MMP activation and inflammation regulation, respectively. Their SNPs have been explored as potential genetic markers.

  • IFN-γ and TGF-β encoded on different chromosomes have been researched for their SNP’s potential relation to periodontal diseases.

  • MMP and TIMP: Key proteins in matrix degradation and inhibition, respectively, with their polymorphisms evaluated as potential biomarkers. No significant associations have been found.

  • Vitamin D: Significant in bone homeostasis and immune function, with polymorphisms in its receptor gene explored for their potential association with periodontal disease [154].

4.7 Proteomic and Metabolomic biomarkers

Proteomic studies provide a snapshot of the protein array within specific biological contexts. Periodontal research typically derives these from GCF, saliva, serum, and tissues from gingival regions using LC-MS/MS tools. Key findings include upregulated proteins like S100 proteins, MMP-8, and MMP-9 and downregulated ones like cystatins and cytokeratin [155]. Metabolomics, on the other hand, reflects enzymatic and metabolic pathways. Identified metabolites in periodontal diseases include products of microbial metabolism, host immune responses, and tissue degradation. Studies have noted a range of potential metabolite biomarkers from various sources like saliva and GCF [156].

4.8 Systemic inflammatory markers

The relationship between oral and systemic inflammation provides the rationale for exploring systemic inflammatory markers in periodontal inflammation. Although C-reactive protein is the most studied marker, its specificity for periodontal inflammation remains debatable [157]. Understanding genetic, proteomic, and metabolomic markers can revolutionize our approach to diagnosing and treating periodontal diseases. As we unravel these biomarkers, there is hope for more targeted and personalized treatments in periodontal care.

Advertisement

5. Clinical applications of gingival disease biomarkers

5.1 Diagnosis and screening

Early Detection: The significance of early detection in gingival diseases is analogous to its importance in systemic conditions like cancer. Just as detecting cancer at an initial stage enhances survival rates, identifying gingival diseases early can prevent irreversible tissue damage and bone loss. Biomarkers, sensitive indicators of molecular and cellular changes, are perfectly poised to detect diseases before clinical signs and symptoms appear [158]. Utilizing these markers leads to pre-symptomatic interventions involving less invasive procedures and yielding better outcomes.

Differential Diagnosis: The oral cavity presents many conditions, many of which can manifest with similar clinical signs. Biomarkers can help navigate this complexity. For instance, the elevated levels of specific inflammatory cytokines might suggest an active gingival disease, whereas other biomarkers might indicate non-inflammatory conditions [15]. This precision ensures that patients are not subjected to unnecessary or harmful treatments.

Risk Prediction: Traditionally, patient history and clinical assessments were the primary tools to gauge disease risk. A molecular understanding of a patient’s vulnerability to gingival diseases is possible with biomarkers. It is analogous to using cholesterol levels to predict heart disease risk. Such predictions can lead to proactive strategies, such as more frequent dental check-ups for high-risk individuals [159].

Site-Specific Assessment: Gingival diseases do not always affect the oral cavity uniformly. Some sites can be more susceptible to plaque retention, occlusion, or tooth anatomy. GCF biomarkers offer a glimpse into the molecular health of specific gingival sites. Although their utility in site-specific diagnosis is still debated, they undeniably provide another layer of diagnostic detail [160].

5.2 Prognosis and disease progression

Disease Severity: Biomarkers can act as quantitative measures of disease intensity. For example, elevated matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) levels in the GCF might correlate with increased tissue destruction [161]. Such molecular insights can help clinicians decide between conservative or aggressive treatment approaches.

Disease Progression: Biomarkers can be dynamic indicators that chart the disease’s progression or regression. For instance, a decline in inflammatory cytokines post-treatment might suggest a favorable response, while a surge could indicate disease exacerbation [162]. Such real-time feedback can inform the need for treatment modifications.

5.3 Treatment monitoring

Treatment Response: Imagine if clinicians could predict how a patient would respond to treatment before initiating it. Specific biomarkers can provide this foresight. Tracking these markers during treatment can also give clinicians a sense of whether the chosen intervention works at the molecular level, even if overt clinical signs have yet to change [146].

Therapeutic Efficacy: Biomarkers can be likened to gauges that help fine-tune treatments. For instance, persistent elevation of certain biomarkers post-treatment might suggest the need for a more extended therapeutic course or the addition of adjunctive treatments [163].

5.4 Risk assessment and personalized medicine

Personalized Periodontics: Everyone has a unique genetic, microbial, and environmental footprint. Biomarkers provide a window into these individualized factors, enabling tailored treatments. For instance, genetic biomarkers might suggest a hereditary susceptibility to aggressive periodontitis, guiding therapeutic and preventive strategies [164].

Preventive Care: Biomarkers can shift the treatment paradigm from reactive to proactive. Recognizing an individual’s heightened susceptibility to gingival diseases can lead to early interventions, which can be as simple as lifestyle modifications or as specific as targeted pharmacological prophylaxis.

Biomolecular Insights: The advent of omics technologies (genomics, proteomics, microbiomics) has expanded the horizon of potential biomarkers. Understanding the host-microbial interactions at the molecular level can unravel novel therapeutic targets and even pave the way for microbiome-modulating therapies.

5.5 Precision periodontics

Precision medicine is reshaping healthcare. Within periodontics, this translates to treatments based not just on clinical presentation but also on a patient’s genetic, microbial, and biomolecular profile. This evolution ensures that each patient receives the most effective, least invasive, cost-effective care tailored to them. The vast potential of biomarkers in periodontics is gradually coming to fruition [165]. As research progresses and more biomarkers are identified and validated, the future of periodontal care looks increasingly personalized, precise, and promising.

Advertisement

6. Methods for biomarker detection and analysis in gingival diseases

6.1 Collection methods

Gingival Crevicular Fluid (GCF) Collection: Absorbent paper strips or microcapillary tubes: The ease of collecting GCF using these tools makes them popular. Paper strips are typically made of cellulose material, ensuring effective fluid absorption [161]. Once inserted into the gingival sulcus, these strips wick up the fluid. It is important to ensure that blood contamination does not occur, as it can dilute and alter the sample’s composition. Microcapillary tubes, on the other hand, use capillary action to draw in the GCF. The volume collected is often directly read off the calibrated tubes [166].

Salivary Collection: Passive drool: This method involves asking the patient to pool saliva at the bottom of the mouth and then drool it into a collection vessel. While simple, it ensures a clean, uncontaminated sample ideal for various analyses [167].

Salivary swabs or sponges: These swabs, typically made of polyurethane foam or other absorbent materials, are placed in the mouth, allowing them to soak up saliva [168]. They are subsequently centrifuged or squeezed to extract the salivary sample.

6.2 Biochemical analyses

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): ELISA operates on an antigen-antibody reaction. When the biomarker (antigen) of interest is present, it will bind to specific antibodies, either directly attached to a plate or added during a test [169]. A secondary antibody linked to an enzyme is added; if binding occurs, a substrate will produce a color change proportional to the biomarker concentration.

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR): PCR is a molecular biology technique that amplifies targeted DNA sequences. In the context of gingival diseases, it’s essential for detecting specific bacterial pathogens [170]. Real-time PCR (qPCR) offers the advantage of quantifying the amount of DNA, giving insights into the bacterial load.

Mass Spectrometry: This technique identifies and quantifies molecules by measuring their mass-to-charge ratio. Protein analysis in GCF or saliva offers high sensitivity and specificity [161].

Advertisement

7. Advanced genomic and proteomic techniques

Microarrays are arrays where DNA probes are attached to a solid surface. When a complementary DNA or RNA sample has flowed over the array, it binds to the probes, allowing for the simultaneous analysis of thousands of sequences [171]. It can detect gene expression patterns, potentially identifying disease susceptibility or progression genes.

Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS): Unlike traditional sequencing methods that analyze one DNA fragment at a time, NGS can simultaneously sequence millions of fragments, giving a comprehensive genetic overview. It is invaluable in analyzing the complex oral microbiota involved in gingival diseases [172].

Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS): LC-MS combines liquid chromatography’s physical separation capabilities with mass spectrometry’s mass analysis capabilities [173]. It is particularly effective for proteomics, allowing for detailed sample protein profiling.

7.1 Imaging techniques

Immunohistochemistry: This technique uses antibodies tagged with a detectable marker, often a colored dye or a fluorescent compound, to visualize specific proteins in tissue sections. Analyzing tissue samples from gingival pockets allows localizing and quantifying protein biomarkers directly within the disease site [15].

Flow Cytometry: This method analyzes the light-scattering properties of cells (or particles) in a fluid as they pass through a laser beam. Detectors capture the scattered light, allowing for the identification and quantification of cellular biomarkers. In gingival disease research, it is especially useful in analyzing inflammatory cells in GCF [174].

With the advancement of these methods, the realm of periodontal research and diagnosis is rapidly evolving. These techniques allow for precise identification and quantification of biomarkers and a deeper understanding of disease mechanisms, paving the way for better therapeutic strategies.

Advertisement

8. Novel biomarkers and emerging research

As periodontal research advances, numerous novel biomarkers are being identified and explored for their potential in diagnosing, prognosis, and managing gingival diseases [15]. These developments shift the traditional understanding of gingival diseases toward more precise and individualized care.

Microbiome-Associated Biomarkers: Microbiome-associated biomarkers are gaining traction in periodontal research, offering a nuanced lens through which the intricate dynamics of the oral microbial ecosystem can be understood [175]. The very essence of the oral microbiome is its intricate mosaic of microorganisms, each playing a pivotal role in maintaining oral health. Yet, disturbances in this delicate balance, known as dysbiotic shifts, can herald the onset or progression of periodontal diseases. Researchers have harnessed the power of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) to decipher this intricate microbial tapestry, focusing mainly on the bacterial 16S rRNA genes [176]. This approach furnishes a panoramic view of bacterial communities, unearthing the breadth of microbial diversity. Yet, the path to crystallizing these insights into definitive predictive microbial biomarkers poses formidable challenges, underscoring the complexity of the task at hand and the intricacies of the oral microbiome itself.

Epigenetic Biomarkers: Epigenetic biomarkers represent a burgeoning frontier to enhance our diagnostic and prognostic capabilities in periodontal diseases [177]. Fundamentally, epigenetics pertains to the heritable shifts in gene activity that occur independent of alterations in the DNA sequence itself. The allure of epigenetic markers lies in their potential to furnish invaluable insights into the onset, trajectory, and even the therapeutic responses of diseases. At the heart of contemporary epigenetic research are phenomena like DNA methylation and histone modifications, notably acetylation and methylation. For instance, the spotlight has been cast on genes such as TNF, IFNG, PTGS2, SOCS1, IL-6, and IL-6R, assessing their pertinence to gingivitis and periodontitis [178]. Moreover, the scientific community is progressively venturing into the intricate tapestry of genome-wide methylation patterns, aiming to unravel the deeper epigenetic underpinnings of periodontal afflictions.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs): MicroRNAs (miRNAs) stand as an intriguing facet of biomarker research, serving as diminutive, non-coding RNA fragments that are pivotal in regulating gene expression [179]. Intriguingly, miRNAs are deeply embedded in myriad biological pathways, most notably in inflammatory processes, positioning them as prospective biomarkers for periodontal diseases. Many miRNAs, including miR-146a, miR-20a, and miR-32, have been thrust into the limelight for their potential diagnostic implications [180]. While their inherent stability underscores their promise as reliable biomarkers, the road to their widespread clinical adoption is challenging. Notably, the diversity in research findings and the financial constraints associated with their deployment remain pertinent challenges. As such, while miRNAs hold significant potential, a more concerted effort is required to streamline their integration into routine clinical settings.

Transcriptomics: Transcriptomics, an innovative approach in biomarker research, centers around cataloging the entire suite of RNA transcripts generated by an organism’s genome [181]. Within the scope of periodontal diseases, transcriptomics plays an instrumental role. It pinpoints alterations in gene expression profiles and sheds light on the underlying mechanisms driving the disease’s progression. Doing so provides a roadmap for researchers and clinicians to identify potential therapeutic targets. In essence, including transcriptomic analyses in periodontal research offers a more granular insight into disease pathways, paving the way for personalized and targeted treatment strategies [182].

Metagenomics: Metagenomics holds a pivotal role in understanding the microbial landscape of the oral environment. Metagenomics offers a holistic snapshot of the microbial community by analyzing the collective DNA from the microorganisms present in each sample, highlighting their genetic compositions and potential functions [183]. As noted by third-party researchers, one of the primary strengths of this approach is its ability to bypass the traditional and often time-consuming methods of individual microbial culturing. Instead, it provides an undiluted, comprehensive view of microbial community dynamics. As external experts in the field emphasized, this shift in methodology could pave the way for unprecedented insights into gingival diseases, potentially revolutionizing diagnostic procedures, risk assessments, and therapeutic strategies [184]. As metagenomic techniques continue to refine and become more accessible, many in the scientific community believe they stand at the precipice of a new era in periodontal research and treatment.

Advertisement

9. Challenges and future directions

The pursuit of definitive biomarkers for periodontal diseases is both exciting and challenging. The potential rewards of early diagnosis, risk stratification, and personalized therapeutic interventions make it a vibrant area of research. However, there are significant challenges to be surmounted.

Standardization and Validation: The robustness of biomarkers in clinical applications hinges on rigorous standardization and validation. At the crux of this is the biomarker’s sensitivity and specificity, which, together with its positive and negative predictive values, dictate its reliability and efficacy. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve is an indispensable tool in this assessment. Researchers can determine a biomarker’s discriminative prowess by analyzing the ROC and the Area under the curve (AUC) values [185]. Beyond these metrics, a thorough validation process spanning analytical and clinical domains is paramount. This ensures the biomarker’s consistent performance across varied settings and populations and its apt reflection of the underlying disease pathology.

Biomarker Panels and Algorithms: In the context of periodontal diseases, the intricate etiology necessitates a multi-dimensional approach to diagnosis and prognosis. Rather than relying on a singular biomarker, the amalgamation of clinical, microbial, and immunological markers offers a nuanced and comprehensive insight into the disease’s manifestation and progression [146]. Algorithms crafted for interpreting such data from an ensemble of biomarkers hold the promise of superior diagnostic precision. This perspective is underscored by investigative trials highlighting the heightened sensitivity and specificity yielded by biomarker panels. For instance, the convergence of markers such as Porphyromonas gingivalis, Taneralla forsythia, and MMP-8 indicates severe periodontitis [186]. The collective strength of such biomarkers, integrated with clinical parameters, has markedly enhanced the sensitivity in predicting disease progression [187].

Longitudinal Studies and Predictive Models: Longitudinal studies play a pivotal role in periodontal disease research by offering a dynamic perspective on disease progression. By observing patients over extended periods, these studies facilitate the identification of biomarkers that serve dual roles: detecting the current state of the disease and forecasting its future trajectory [188]. Beyond mere identification, the evolution of these biomarkers in response to therapeutic interventions can be charted, thereby providing invaluable insights into the efficacy of treatments. Consequently, these studies deepen our understanding of disease pathways and refine our approach to patient-specific treatments, ensuring that current conditions and potential future outcomes inform therapeutic decisions.

Point-of-Care and Wearable Technologies: The future of periodontal diagnostics is rapidly shifting toward more accessible, point-of-care, and wearable technologies. The modern emphasis on immediate, on-site diagnostic results is paving the way for innovative technologies like biosensors and micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) [189]. These tools, capable of decentralizing the diagnostic processes, are the harbingers of a new era in patient care. Integrating diagnostics with daily life, such as embedding biosensors in mouthguards or enamel, holds the potential to provide real-time data. This immediate feedback facilitates prompt decision-making, ensuring timely interventions tailored to individual patient needs.

Furthermore, the rise of ‘Lab on a Chip’ (LOC) technology is set to usher in a paradigm shift [190]. By combining laboratory precision with portability, LOC enables accurate diagnostics right at the patient’s side, minimizing delays and maximizing efficiency. As we stand on the brink of these technological advancements, it becomes evident that biomarker research in gingival diseases is evolving and redefining how we approach periodontal conditions. The confluence of biomarker panels, wearable diagnostic tools, and predictive algorithms heralds a future where treatments are more individualized, timely interventions, and optimized outcomes. However, realizing this potential requires sustained research efforts, collaborative approaches across disciplines, and a relentless drive to push the boundaries of technological possibilities. The overarching aim remains unwavering: to elevate patient care standards, reduce disease impact, and ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes in periodontology.

Advertisement

10. Conclusion

Biomarkers have emerged as invaluable tools in gingival diseases, offering insights far beyond traditional clinical observations. Their potential spans early detection, prognosis, treatment monitoring, and tailored therapeutic approaches, indicating a significant shift toward precision periodontics. Advanced techniques, ranging from ELISA to Next-Generation Sequencing, have expanded the toolkit for biomarker detection, ensuring enhanced specificity and sensitivity. The non-invasive diagnostic potential of Saliva and Gingival Crevicular Fluid (GCF) promises more accessible screenings and regular monitoring, poised to revolutionize early interventions. As periodontal research delves deeper into microbiome-associated biomarkers, epigenetics, transcriptomics, and metagenomics, new avenues for more specific and reliable indicators of gingival health and disease are unveiled. However, the journey to integrating these findings into clinical practice is fraught with challenges, particularly the need for rigorous standardization and validation. Amalgamating multiple biomarkers could redefine diagnostic accuracy, while longitudinal studies may lay the foundation for robust predictive models. The emergence of point-of-care technologies, wearable devices, and MEMS heralds an era of real-time monitoring and detection. These advancements underscore the essence of collaborative efforts in the scientific community. At this juncture, integrating technology and biology suggests a future where gingival disease management is increasingly predictive, personalized, and efficient.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Trombelli L, Farina R, Silva CO, Tatakis DN. Plaque-induced gingivitis: Case definition and diagnostic considerations. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2018;45(Suppl. 20):S44-S67. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12939
  2. 2. Murakami S, Mealey BL, Mariotti A, Chapple ILC. Dental plaque-induced gingival conditions. Journal of Periodontology. 2018;89(Suppl. 1):S17-S27. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.17-0095
  3. 3. Nunn ME. Understanding the etiology of periodontitis: An overview of periodontal risk factors. Periodontology 2000. 2003;32:11-23. DOI: 10.1046/j.0906-6713.2002.03202.x
  4. 4. Holmstrup P, Plemons J, Meyle J. Non-plaque-induced gingival diseases. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2018;45(Suppl. 20):S28-S43. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12938
  5. 5. Gursoy UK, Kantarci A. Molecular biomarker research in periodontology: A roadmap for translation of science to clinical assay validation. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2022;49:556-561. Epub 20220403. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13617
  6. 6. Shaw AK, Garcha V, Shetty V, Vinay V, Bhor K, Ambildhok K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of salivary biomarkers in detecting early Oral squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2022;23:1483-1495. Epub 20220501. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.5.1483
  7. 7. Slots J. Periodontology: Past, present, perspectives. Periodontology 2000. 2013;62:7-19. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12011
  8. 8. Melguizo-Rodriguez L, Costela-Ruiz VJ, Manzano-Moreno FJ, Ruiz C, Illescas-Montes R. Salivary biomarkers and their application in the diagnosis and monitoring of the most common oral pathologies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21:1-17. Epub 20200721. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21145173
  9. 9. Ghallab NA. Diagnostic potential and future directions of biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid and saliva of periodontal diseases: Review of the current evidence. Archives of Oral Biology. 2018;87:115-124. Epub 20171223. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.12.022
  10. 10. Schwendicke F. Tailored dentistry: From “one size fits all” to precision dental medicine? Operative Dentistry. 2018;43:451-459. DOI: 10.2341/18-076-L
  11. 11. Biomarkers Definitions Working G. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2001;69:89-95. DOI: 10.1067/mcp.2001.113989
  12. 12. Strimbu K, Tavel JA. What are biomarkers? Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS. 2010;5:463-466. DOI: 10.1097/COH.0b013e32833ed177
  13. 13. Franco-Duarte R, Cernakova L, Kadam S, Kaushik KS, Salehi B, Bevilacqua A, et al. Advances in chemical and biological methods to identify microorganisms-from past to present. Microorganisms. 2019;7:1-32. Epub 20190513. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7050130
  14. 14. Kistler JO, Booth V, Bradshaw DJ, Wade WG. Bacterial community development in experimental gingivitis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e71227. Epub 20130814. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071227
  15. 15. Barros SP, Williams R, Offenbacher S, Morelli T. Gingival crevicular fluid as a source of biomarkers for periodontitis. Periodontology 2000. 2016;70:53-64. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12107
  16. 16. Pradeep AR, Kathariya R, Raghavendra NM, Sharma A. Levels of pentraxin-3 in gingival crevicular fluid and plasma in periodontal health and disease. Journal of Periodontology. 2011;82:734-741. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.100526. Epub 20101116
  17. 17. Fujita Y, Ito H, Sekino S, Numabe Y. Correlations between pentraxin 3 or cytokine levels in gingival crevicular fluid and clinical parameters of chronic periodontitis. Odontology. 2012;100:215-221. DOI: 10.1007/s10266-011-0042-1. Epub 20110920
  18. 18. Kumar S, Shah S, Budhiraja S, Desai K, Shah C, Mehta D. The effect of periodontal treatment on C-reactive protein: A clinical study. Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine. 2013;4:379-382. DOI: 10.4103/0976-9668.116991. Epub 2013/10/02
  19. 19. Keles ZP, Keles GC, Avci B, Cetinkaya BO, Emingil G. Analysis of YKL-40 acute-phase protein and interleukin-6 levels in periodontal disease. Journal of Periodontology. 2014;85:1240-1246. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2014.130631. Epub 20140317
  20. 20. Kinney JS, Morelli T, Oh M, Braun TM, Ramseier CA, Sugai JV, et al. Crevicular fluid biomarkers and periodontal disease progression. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2014;41:113-120. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12194. Epub 20131212
  21. 21. Kumari M, Pradeep AR, Priyanka N, Kalra N, Naik SB. Crevicular and serum levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-4 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in periodontal health and disease. Archives of Oral Biology. 2014;59:645-653. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2014.03.012. Epub 20140401
  22. 22. Brajovic G, Stefanovic G, Ilic V, Petrovic S, Stefanovic N, Nikolic-Jakoba N, et al. Association of fibronectin with hypogalactosylated immunoglobulin G in gingival crevicular fluid in periodontitis. Journal of Periodontology. 2010;81:1472-1480. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.100053. Epub 2010/05/11
  23. 23. Guentsch A, Hirsch C, Pfister W, Vincents B, Abrahamson M, Sroka A, et al. Cleavage of IgG1 in gingival crevicular fluid is associated with the presence of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Journal of Periodontal Research. 2013;48:458-465. DOI: 10.1111/jre.12027. Epub 20121101
  24. 24. Takai H, Furuse N, Ogata Y. Anti-heat shock protein 70 levels in gingival crevicular fluid of Japanese patients with chronic periodontitis. Journal of Oral Science. 2020;62:281-284. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.19-0159. Epub 20200604
  25. 25. Shimada K, Mizuno T, Ohshio K, Kamaga M, Murai S, Ito K. Analysis of aspartate aminotransferase in gingival crevicular fluid assessed by using PocketWatch: A longitudinal study with initial therapy. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2000;27:819-823. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027011819.x
  26. 26. Buchmann R, Hasilik A, Van Dyke TE, Lange DE. Resolution of crevicular fluid leukocyte activity in patients treated for aggressive periodontal disease. Journal of Periodontology. 2002;73:995-1002. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.9.995
  27. 27. Andersen E, Dessaix IM, Perneger T, Mombelli A. Myeloid-related protein (MRP8/14) expression in gingival crevice fluid in periodontal health and disease and after treatment. Journal of Periodontal Research. 2010;45:458-463. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2009.01257.x. Epub 20100309
  28. 28. Becerik S, Afacan B, Ozturk VO, Atmaca H, Emingil G. Gingival crevicular fluid calprotectin, osteocalcin and cross-linked N-terminal telopeptid levels in health and different periodontal diseases. Disease Markers. 2011;31:343-352. DOI: 10.3233/DMA-2011-0849. Epub 2011/12/21
  29. 29. Kaner D, Bernimoulin JP, Dietrich T, Kleber BM, Friedmann A. Calprotectin levels in gingival crevicular fluid predict disease activity in patients treated for generalized aggressive periodontitis. Journal of Periodontal Research. 2011;46:417-426. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2011.01355.x. Epub 20110413
  30. 30. Garg G, Pradeep AR, Thorat MK. Effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy on crevicular fluid levels of Cathepsin K in periodontitis. Archives of Oral Biology. 2009;54:1046-1051. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2009.08.007. Epub 20090926
  31. 31. Jin L, Darveau RP. Soluble CD14 levels in gingival crevicular fluid of subjects with untreated adult periodontitis. Journal of Periodontology. 2001;72:634-640. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.5.634. Epub 2001/06/08
  32. 32. Dogan SB, Balli U, Dede FO, Sertoglu E, Tazegul K. Chemerin as a novel Crevicular fluid marker of patients with periodontitis and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Periodontology. 2016;87:923-933. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2016.150657. Epub 20160318
  33. 33. Kumar PA, Kripal K, Chandrasekaran K, Bhavanam SR. Estimation of YKL-40 levels in serum and gingival Crevicular fluid in chronic periodontitis and type 2 diabetes patients among south Indian population: A clinical study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2019;10:304-310. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_629_18
  34. 34. Khongkhunthian S, Srimueang N, Krisanaprakornkit S, Pattanaporn K, Ong-Chai S, Kongtawelert P. Raised chondroitin sulphate WF6 epitope levels in gingival crevicular fluid in chronic periodontitis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2008;35:871-876. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01312.x. Epub 20080824
  35. 35. Nomura Y, Tamaki Y, Tanaka T, Arakawa H, Tsurumoto A, Kirimura K, et al. Screening of periodontitis with salivary enzyme tests. Journal of Oral Science. 2006;48:177-183. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.48.177
  36. 36. Sharma A, Pradeep AR, Raghavendra NM, Arjun P, Kathariya R. Gingival crevicular fluid and serum cystatin c levels in periodontal health and disease. Disease Markers. 2012;32:101-107. DOI: 10.3233/DMA-2011-0864. Epub 2012/03/02
  37. 37. de Campos BO, Fischer RG, Gustafsson A, Figueredo CM. Effectiveness of non-surgical treatment to reduce il-18 levels in the gingival crevicular fluid of patients with periodontal disease. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2012;23:428-432. DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402012000400020. Epub 2012/12/05
  38. 38. Shaker OG, Ghallab NA. IL-17 and IL-11 GCF levels in aggressive and chronic periodontitis patients: Relation to PCR bacterial detection. Mediators of Inflammation. 2012;2012:174764. DOI: 10.1155/2012/174764. Epub 20121126
  39. 39. Darabi E, Kadkhoda Z, Amirzargar A. Comparison of the levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-17 in gingival crevicular fluid of patients with peri-implantitis and a control group with healthy implants. Iranian Journal of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. 2013;12:75-80. DOI: 012.01/ijaai.7580. Epub 2013/03/05
  40. 40. Fu QY, Zhang L, Duan L, Qian SY, Pang HX. Correlation of chronic periodontitis in tropical area and IFN-gamma, IL-10, IL-17 levels. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2013;6:489-492. DOI: 10.1016/S1995-7645(13)60080-2. Epub 2013/05/29
  41. 41. Lagdive SS, Marawar PP, Byakod G, Lagdive SB. Evaluation and comparison of interleukin-8 (IL-8) level in gingival crevicular fluid in health and severity of periodontal disease: A clinico-biochemical study. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2013;24:188-192. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.116675. Epub 2013/08/24
  42. 42. Shimada Y, Tabeta K, Sugita N, Yoshie H. Profiling biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid using multiplex bead immunoassay. Archives of Oral Biology. 2013;58:724-730. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.11.012. Epub 20130208
  43. 43. Shivaprasad BM, Pradeep AR. Effect of non-surgical periodontal therapy on interleukin-29 levels in gingival crevicular fluid of chronic periodontitis and aggressive periodontitis patients. Disease Markers. 2013;34:1-7. DOI: 10.3233/DMA-2012-120944. Epub 2012/11/16
  44. 44. Stadler AF, Angst PD, Arce RM, Gomes SC, Oppermann RV, Susin C. Gingival crevicular fluid levels of cytokines/chemokines in chronic periodontitis: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2016;43:727-745. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12557. Epub 20160623
  45. 45. Lamster IB, Ahlo JK. Analysis of gingival crevicular fluid as applied to the diagnosis of oral and systemic diseases. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2007;1098:216-229. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1384.027. Epub 2007/04/17
  46. 46. Buduneli N, Kinane DF. Host-derived diagnostic markers related to soft tissue destruction and bone degradation in periodontitis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2011;38(Suppl. 11):85-105. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01670.x. Epub 2011/02/26
  47. 47. Cox SW, Rodriguez-Gonzalez EM, Booth V, Eley BM. Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor and its potential interactions with elastase and cathepsin B in gingival crevicular fluid and saliva from patients with chronic periodontitis. Journal of Periodontal Research. 2006;41:477-485. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2006.00891.x. Epub 2006/09/07
  48. 48. Feghali K, Grenier D. Priming effect of fibronectin fragments on the macrophage inflammatory response: Potential contribution to periodontitis. Inflammation. 2012;35:1696-1705. DOI: 10.1007/s10753-012-9487-9. Epub 2012/06/15
  49. 49. Guentsch A, Kramesberger M, Sroka A, Pfister W, Potempa J, Eick S. Comparison of gingival crevicular fluid sampling methods in patients with severe chronic periodontitis. Journal of Periodontology. 2011;82:1051-1060. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2011.100565. Epub 20110114
  50. 50. Yan F, Marshall R, Wynne S, Xiao Y, Bartold PM. Glycosaminoglycans in gingival crevicular fluid of patients with periodontal class II furcation involvement before and after guided tissue regeneration. A pilot study. Journal of Periodontology. 2000;71:1-7. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.1.1. Epub 2000/03/01
  51. 51. Soder B, Jin LJ, Wickholm S. Granulocyte elastase, matrix metalloproteinase-8 and prostaglandin E2 in gingival crevicular fluid in matched clinical sites in smokers and non-smokers with persistent periodontitis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2002;29:384-391. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290502.x
  52. 52. Ngo LH, Veith PD, Chen YY, Chen D, Darby IB, Reynolds EC. Mass spectrometric analyses of peptides and proteins in human gingival crevicular fluid. Journal of Proteome Research. 2010;9:1683-1693. DOI: 10.1021/pr900775s
  53. 53. Kido J, Bando M, Hiroshima Y, Iwasaka H, Yamada K, Ohgami N, et al. Analysis of proteins in human gingival crevicular fluid by mass spectrometry. Journal of Periodontal Research. 2012;47:488-499. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2011.01458.x. Epub 20120103
  54. 54. Anil S, Vellappally S, Preethanath RS, Mokeem SA, AlMoharib HS, Patil S, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor levels in the saliva and gingival crevicular fluid in smokers with periodontitis. Disease Markers. 2014;2014:146974. DOI: 10.1155/2014/146974. Epub 20141015
  55. 55. Pereira AG, Costa LCM, Soldati KR, Guimaraes de Abreu MHN, Costa FO, Zandim-Barcelos DL, et al. Gingival Crevicular fluid levels of human Beta-defensin 2 and 3 in healthy and diseased sites of individuals with and without periodontitis. Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology. 2020;22:90-99. Epub 20200701
  56. 56. Zorina OA, Amkhadova MA, Abaev ZM, Khamukova AA, Demidova AA. Hypoxia-dependent transcriptional control of activity of destructive inflammatory and malignant periodontium changes. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2020;99:32-36. DOI: 10.17116/stomat20209903132
  57. 57. Emingil G, Kuula H, Pirila E, Atilla G, Sorsa T. Gingival crevicular fluid laminin-5 gamma2-chain levels in periodontal disease. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2006;33:462-468. Epub 2006/07/06. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00933.x
  58. 58. Karthikeyan BV, Pradeep AR. Leptin levels in gingival crevicular fluid in periodontal health and disease. Journal of Periodontal Research. 2007;42:300-304. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2006.00948.x
  59. 59. Pradeep AR, Kumar MS, Ramachandraprasad MV, Shikha C. Gingival crevicular fluid levels of neopterin in healthy subjects and in patients with different periodontal diseases. Journal of Periodontology. 2007;78:1962-1967. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.070096. Epub 2007/12/07
  60. 60. Hashimura S, Kido J, Matsuda R, Yokota M, Matsui H, Inoue-Fujiwara M, et al. A low level of lysophosphatidic acid in human gingival crevicular fluid from patients with periodontitis due to high soluble lysophospholipase activity: Its potential protective role on alveolar bone loss by periodontitis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids. 2020;1865:158698. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2020.158698. Epub 20200313
  61. 61. Sorsa T, Hernandez M, Leppilahti J, Munjal S, Netuschil L, Mantyla P. Detection of gingival crevicular fluid MMP-8 levels with different laboratory and chair-side methods. Oral Diseases. 2010;16:39-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01603.x. Epub 20090708
  62. 62. Tuter G, Serdar M, Kurtis B, Walker SG, Atak A, Toyman U, et al. Effects of scaling and root planing and subantimicrobial dose doxycycline on gingival crevicular fluid levels of matrix metalloproteinase-8, −13 and serum levels of HsCRP in patients with chronic periodontitis. Journal of Periodontology. 2010;81:1132-1139. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.090694. Epub 2010/04/08
  63. 63. Kushlinskii NE, Solovykh EA, Karaoglanova TB, Bayar U, Gershtein ES, Troshin AA, et al. Content of matrix metalloproteinase-8 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 in oral fluid of patients with chronic generalized periodontitis. Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2011;152:240-244. DOI: 10.1007/s10517-011-1498-2. Epub 2012/07/19
  64. 64. Konopka L, Pietrzak A, Brzezinska-Blaszczyk E. Effect of scaling and root planing on interleukin-1beta, interleukin-8 and MMP-8 levels in gingival crevicular fluid from chronic periodontitis patients. Journal of Periodontal Research. 2012;47:681-688. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2012.01480.x. Epub 20120418
  65. 65. Khongkhunthian S, Techasatian P, Supanchart C, Bandhaya P, Montreekachon P, Thawanaphong S, et al. Elevated levels of a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 8 in gingival crevicular fluid of patients with periodontal diseases. Journal of Periodontology. 2013;84:520-528. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2012.120262. Epub 20120521
  66. 66. Ghallab NA, Hamdy E, Shaker OG. Malondialdehyde, superoxide dismutase and melatonin levels in gingival crevicular fluid of aggressive and chronic periodontitis patients. Australian Dental Journal. 2016;61:53-61. DOI: 10.1111/adj.12294
  67. 67. Anil S, Preethanath RS, Alasqah M, Mokeem SA, Anand PS. Increased levels of serum and gingival crevicular fluid monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in smokers with periodontitis. Journal of Periodontology. 2013;84:e23-e28. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2013.120666. Epub 20130131
  68. 68. Gupta M, Chaturvedi R, Jain A. Role of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) as an immune-diagnostic biomarker in the pathogenesis of chronic periodontal disease. Cytokine. 2013;61:892-897. DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2012.12.012. Epub 20130130
  69. 69. Buchmann R, Hasilik A, Van Dyke TE, Lange DE. Amplified crevicular leukocyte activity in aggressive periodontal disease. Journal of Dental Research. 2002;81:716-721. DOI: 10.1177/154405910208101012. Epub 2002/09/28
  70. 70. Lundy FT, Mullally BH, Burden DJ, Lamey PJ, Shaw C, Linden GJ. Changes in substance P and neurokinin a in gingival crevicular fluid in response to periodontal treatment. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2000;27:526-530. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027007526.x
  71. 71. Bader HI, Boyd RL. Neutral proteases in crevicular fluid as an indicator for periodontal treatment intervention. American Journal of Dentistry. 2001;14:314-318. Epub 2002/01/24
  72. 72. Sharma CG, Pradeep AR. Gingival crevicular fluid osteopontin levels in periodontal health and disease. Journal of Periodontology. 2006;77:1674-1680. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2006.060016
  73. 73. Sharma CG, Pradeep AR. Plasma and crevicular fluid osteopontin levels in periodontal health and disease. Journal of Periodontal Research. 2007;42:450-455. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2007.00968.x
  74. 74. Tuter G, Ozdemir B, Kurtis B, Serdar M, Yucel AA, Ayhan E. Short term effects of non-surgical periodontal treatment on gingival crevicular fluid levels of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor 2 (PAI-2) in patients with chronic and aggressive periodontitis. Archives of Oral Biology. 2013;58:391-396. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.08.008. Epub 20120911
  75. 75. Kumaresan D, Balasundaram A, Naik VK, Appukuttan DP. Gingival crevicular fluid periostin levels in chronic periodontitis patients following nonsurgical periodontal treatment with low-level laser therapy. European Journal of Dentistry. 2016;10:546-550. DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.195179
  76. 76. Yin X, Bunn CL, Bartold PM. Detection of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor 2(PAI-2) in gingival crevicular fluid from healthy, gingivitis and periodontitis patients. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2000:27 149-56. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027003149.x. Epub 2000/04/01
  77. 77. Buduneli N, Becerik S, Buduneli E, Baylas H, Kinnby B. Gingival status, crevicular fluid tissue-type plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor-2 levels in pregnancy versus post-partum. Australian Dental Journal. 2010;55:292-297. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01237.x. Epub 2010/10/05
  78. 78. Kardesler L, Buduneli N, Cetinkalp S, Lappin D, Kinane DF. Gingival crevicular fluid IL-6, tPA, PAI-2, albumin levels following initial periodontal treatment in chronic periodontitis patients with or without type 2 diabetes. Inflammation Research. 2011;60:143-151. DOI: 10.1007/s00011-010-0248-7. Epub 20100917
  79. 79. Chen H, Zheng P, Zhu H, Zhu J, Zhao L, El Mokhtari NE, et al. Platelet-activating factor levels of serum and gingival crevicular fluid in nonsmoking patients with periodontitis and/or coronary heart disease. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2010;14:629-636. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-009-0346-5. Epub 20091014
  80. 80. Priyanka N, Kumari M, Kalra N, Arjun P, Naik SB, Pradeep AR. Crevicular fluid and serum concentrations of progranulin and high sensitivity CRP in chronic periodontitis and type 2 diabetes. Disease Markers. 2013;35:389-394. DOI: 10.1155/2013/803240. Epub 20130926
  81. 81. Buduneli N, Buduneli E, Cetin EO, Kirilmaz L, Kutukculer N. Clinical findings and gingival crevicular fluid prostaglandin E2 and interleukin-1-beta levels following initial periodontal treatment and short-term meloxicam administration. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy. 2010;11:1805-1812. DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2010.490555. Epub 2010/06/04
  82. 82. Jepsen S, Springer IN, Buschmann A, Hedderich J, Acil Y. Elevated levels of collagen cross-link residues in gingival tissues and crevicular fluid of teeth with periodontal disease. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2003;111:198-202. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00019.x. Epub 2003/06/06
  83. 83. Emingil G, Atilla G, Huseyinov A. Gingival crevicular fluid monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and RANTES levels in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2004;31:829-834. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00584.x
  84. 84. Bostanci N, Ilgenli T, Emingil G, Afacan B, Han B, Toz H, et al. Gingival crevicular fluid levels of RANKL and OPG in periodontal diseases: Implications of their relative ratio. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2007;34:370-376. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01061.x. Epub 20070313
  85. 85. Gokhale NH, Acharya AB, Patil VS, Trivedi DJ, Setty S, Thakur SL. Resistin levels in gingival crevicular fluid of patients with chronic periodontitis and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Periodontology. 2014;85:610-617. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2013.130092. Epub 20130627
  86. 86. Ozturk A, Bilgici B, Odyakmaz S, Konas E. The relationship of periodontal disease severity to serum and GCF substance P levels in diabetics. Quintessence International. 2012;43:587-596. Epub 2012/06/07
  87. 87. Kardesler L, Biyikoglu B, Cetinkalp S, Pitkala M, Sorsa T, Buduneli N. Crevicular fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8, −13, and TIMP-1 levels in type 2 diabetics. Oral Diseases. 2010;16:476-481. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01659.x. Epub 20100309
  88. 88. Marcaccini AM, Meschiari CA, Zuardi LR, de Sousa TS, Taba M Jr, Teofilo JM, et al. Gingival crevicular fluid levels of MMP-8, MMP-9, TIMP-2, and MPO decrease after periodontal therapy. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2010;37:180-190. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01512.x. Epub 20091207
  89. 89. Kuru L, Griffiths GS, Petrie A, Olsen I. Changes in transforming growth factor-beta1 in gingival crevicular fluid following periodontal surgery. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2004;31:527-533. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2004.00521.x
  90. 90. Bastos MF, Lima JA, Vieira PM, Mestnik MJ, Faveri M, Duarte PM. TNF-alpha and IL-4 levels in generalized aggressive periodontitis subjects. Oral Diseases. 2009;15:82-87. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2008.01491.x. Epub 20080929
  91. 91. Sakallioglu EE, Sakallioglu U, Lutfioglu M, Pamuk F, Kantarci A. Vascular endothelial cadherin and vascular endothelial growth factor in periodontitis and smoking. Oral Diseases. 2015;21:263-269. DOI: 10.1111/odi.12261. Epub 20140625
  92. 92. Linden GJ, Mullally BH, Burden DJ, Lamey PJ, Shaw C, Ardill J, et al. Changes in vasoactive intestinal peptide in gingival crevicular fluid in response to periodontal treatment. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2002;29:484-489. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290602.x. Epub 2002/09/26
  93. 93. Bozkurt Dogan S, Ongoz Dede F, Balli U, Sertoglu E. Levels of vaspin and omentin-1 in gingival crevicular fluid as potential markers of inflammation in patients with chronic periodontitis and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Oral Science. 2016;58:379-389. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.15-0731
  94. 94. Pradeep AR, Raghavendra NM, Prasad MV, Kathariya R, Patel SP, Sharma A. Gingival crevicular fluid and serum visfatin concentration: Their relationship in periodontal health and disease. Journal of Periodontology. 2011;82:1314-1319. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2011.100690. Epub 20110210
  95. 95. Nakamura-Minami M, Furuichi Y, Ishikawa K, Mitsuzono-Tofuku Y, Izumi Y. Changes of alpha1-protease inhibitor and secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor levels in gingival crevicular fluid before and after non-surgical periodontal treatment. Oral Diseases. 2003;9:249-254. DOI: 10.1034/j.1601-0825.2003.02884.x. Epub 2003/11/25
  96. 96. Knofler G, Purschwitz R, Jentsch H, Birkenmeier G, Schmidt H. Gingival crevicular fluid levels of aspartate aminotransferase and alpha2-macroglobulin before and after topical application of metronidazole or scaling and root planing. Quintessence International. 2008;39:381-389. Epub 2008/12/18
  97. 97. Subbarao KC, Nattuthurai GS, Sundararajan SK, Sujith I, Joseph J, Syedshah YP. Gingival Crevicular fluid: An overview. Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences. 2019;11:S135-S1S9. DOI: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_56_19
  98. 98. Krutyholowa A, Strzelec K, Dziedzic A, Bereta GP, Lazarz-Bartyzel K, Potempa J, et al. Host and bacterial factors linking periodontitis and rheumatoid arthritis. Frontiers in Immunology. 2022;13:980805. Epub 20220825, 10.3389/fimmu.2022.980805
  99. 99. Cheng H, Huang H, Guo Z, Chang Y, Li Z. Role of prostaglandin E2 in tissue repair and regeneration. Theranostics. 2021;11:8836-8854. Epub 20210813. DOI: 10.7150/thno.63396
  100. 100. Al-Majid A, Alassiri S, Rathnayake N, Tervahartiala T, Gieselmann DR, Sorsa T. Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 as an inflammatory and prevention biomarker in periodontal and Peri-implant diseases. International Journal of Dentistry. 2018;2018:7891323. Epub 20180916. DOI: 10.1155/2018/7891323
  101. 101. Checchi V, Maravic T, Bellini P, Generali L, Consolo U, Breschi L, et al. The role of matrix Metalloproteinases in periodontal disease. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17:1-13. Epub 20200708. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17144923
  102. 102. González-Ramírez J, Serafín-Higuera N, Concepción Silva Mancilla M, Martínez-Coronilla G, Famanía-Bustamante J, Laura López López A. In: Ahmed YNM, editor. Periodontal Disease - Diagnostic and Adjunctive Non-surgical Considerations. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2020. p. 2. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.85394
  103. 103. Patil PB, Patil BR. Saliva: A diagnostic biomarker of periodontal diseases. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2011;15:310-317. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.92560
  104. 104. Sezer U, Cicek Y, Canakci CF. Increased salivary levels of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine may be a marker for disease activity for periodontitis. Disease Markers. 2012;32:165-172. DOI: 10.3233/dma-2011-0876. Epub 2012/03/02
  105. 105. Aemaimanan P, Sattayasai N, Wara-aswapati N, Pitiphat W, Suwannarong W, Prajaneh S, et al. Alanine aminopeptidase and dipeptidyl peptidase IV in saliva of chronic periodontitis patients. Journal of Periodontology. 2009;80:1809-1814. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.090233. Epub 2009/11/13
  106. 106. Dabra S, Singh P. Evaluating the levels of salivary alkaline and acid phosphatase activities as biochemical markers for periodontal disease: A case series. Dental Research Journal (Isfahan). 2012;9:41-45. DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.92942. Epub 2012/03/01
  107. 107. Nomura Y, Shimada Y, Hanada N, Numabe Y, Kamoi K, Sato T, et al. Salivary biomarkers for predicting the progression of chronic periodontitis. Archives of Oral Biology. 2012;57:413-420. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.09.011. Epub 2011/10/28
  108. 108. Sanchez GA, Miozza VA, Delgado A, Busch L. Relationship between salivary mucin or amylase and the periodontal status. Oral Diseases. 2013;19:585-591. DOI: 10.1111/odi.12039. Epub 2012/11/23
  109. 109. Pereira AL, Cortelli SC, Aquino DR, Franco GC, Cogo K, Rodrigues E, et al. Reduction of salivary arginine catabolic activity through periodontal therapy. Quintessence International. 2012;43:777-787. Epub 2012/10/09
  110. 110. Sculley DV, Langley-Evans SC. Periodontal disease is associated with lower antioxidant capacity in whole saliva and evidence of increased protein oxidation. Clinical Science (London, England). 2003;105:167-172. DOI: 10.1042/CS20030031. Epub 2003/03/26
  111. 111. Kiss E, Sewon L, Gorzo I, Nagy K. Salivary calcium concentration in relation to periodontal health of female tobacco smokers: A pilot study. Quintessence International. 2010;41:779-785. Epub 2010/09/02
  112. 112. Van Steijn GJ, Amerongen AV, Veerman EC, Kasanmoentalib S, Overdijk B. Effect of periodontal treatment on the activity of chitinase in whole saliva of periodontitis patients. Journal of Periodontal Research. 2002;37:245-249. Epub 2002/08/31
  113. 113. Van Steijn GJ, Amerongen AV, Veerman EC, Kasanmoentalib S, Overdijk B. Chitinase in whole and glandular human salivas and in whole saliva of patients with periodontal inflammation. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 1999;107:328-337. Epub 1999/10/09
  114. 114. Refulio Z, Rocafuerte M, de la Rosa M, Mendoza G, Chambrone L. Association among stress, salivary cortisol levels, and chronic periodontitis. Journal of periodontal & implant science. 2013;43:96-100. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2013.43.2.96. Epub 2013/05/17
  115. 115. Shojaee M, Fereydooni Golpasha M, Maliji G, Bijani A, Aghajanpour Mir SM, Mousavi Kani SN. C - reactive protein levels in patients with periodontal disease and normal subjects. International Journal of Molecular and Cellular Medicine. 2013;2:151-155. Epub 2014/02/20
  116. 116. van Gils PC, Brand HS, Timmerman MF, Veerman EC, van der Velden U, van der Weijden GA. Salivary cystatin activity and cystatin C in experimental gingivitis in non-smokers. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2003;30:882-886. Epub 2004/01/09
  117. 117. Kim JY, Kim KR, Kim HN. The potential impact of salivary IL-1 on the diagnosis of periodontal disease: A pilot study. Healthcare (Basel). 2021:9. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9060729. Epub 20210613
  118. 118. Pauletto NC, Liede K, Nieminen A, Larjava H, Uitto VJ. Effect of cigarette smoking on oral elastase activity in adult periodontitis patients. Journal of Periodontology. 2000;71:58-62. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.1.58. Epub 2000/03/01
  119. 119. Bimstein E, Small PA, Jr. and Magnusson I. Leukocyte esterase and protein levels in saliva, as indicators of gingival and periodontal diseases in children. Pediatric Dentistry. 2004;26:310-315. Epub 2004/09/04
  120. 120. Ito H, Numabe Y, Hashimoto S, Uehara S, Wu YH, Ogawa T. Usefulness of hemoglobin examination in gingival crevicular fluid during supportive periodontal therapy to diagnose the pre-symptomatic state in periodontal disease. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2021;25:487-495. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03396-0. Epub 20200615
  121. 121. Lonn J, Johansson CS, Nakka S, Palm E, Bengtsson T, Nayeri F, et al. High concentration but low activity of hepatocyte growth factor in periodontitis. Journal of Periodontology. 2014;85:113-122. Epub 2013/04/19. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2013.130003
  122. 122. Olayanju OA, Rahamon SK, Joseph IO, Arinola OG. Salivary immunoglobulin classes in Nigerians with periodontitis. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2012;13:163-166. Epub 2012/06/06
  123. 123. Costa PP, Trevisan GL, Macedo GO, Palioto DB, Souza SL, Grisi MF, et al. Salivary interleukin-6, matrix metalloproteinase-8, and osteoprotegerin in patients with periodontitis and diabetes. Journal of Periodontology. 2010;81:384-391. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.090510. Epub 2010/03/03
  124. 124. Rocha Dde M, Zenobio EG, Van Dyke T, Silva KS, Costa FO, Soares RV. Differential expression of salivary glycoproteins in aggressive and chronic periodontitis. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2012;20:180-185. Epub 2012/06/06
  125. 125. Surna A, Kubilius R, Sakalauskiene J, Vitkauskiene A, Jonaitis J, Saferis V, et al. Lysozyme and microbiota in relation to gingivitis and periodontitis. Medical Science Monitor. 2009;15:CR66-CR73. Epub 2009/01/31
  126. 126. Yildirim E, Kormi I, Basoglu OK, Gurgun A, Kaval B, Sorsa T, et al. Periodontal health and serum, saliva matrix metalloproteinases in patients with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of Periodontal Research. 2013;48:269-275. DOI: 10.1111/jre.12004. Epub 2012/09/13
  127. 127. Nisha KJ, Suresh A, Anilkumar A, Padmanabhan S. MIP-1α and MCP-1 as salivary biomarkers in periodontal disease. The Saudi Dental Journal. 2018;30:292-298. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.07.002. Epub 20180706
  128. 128. Almughrabi OM, Marzouk KM, Hasanato RM, Shafik SS. Melatonin levels in periodontal health and disease. Journal of Periodontal Research. 2013;48:315-321. DOI: 10.1111/jre.12010. Epub 2012/10/05
  129. 129. Kim HN. Changes in salivary matrix metalloproteinase-3, −8, and −9 concentrations after 6 weeks of non-surgical periodontal therapy. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22:175. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02185-3. Epub 20220513
  130. 130. Meschiari CA, Marcaccini AM, Santos Moura BC, Zuardi LR, Tanus-Santos JE, Gerlach RF. Salivary MMPs, TIMPs, and MPO levels in periodontal disease patients and controls. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2013;421:140-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.03.008. Epub 2013/03/19
  131. 131. Ozmeric N, Baydar T, Bodur A, Engin AB, Uraz A, Eren K, et al. Level of neopterin, a marker of immune cell activation in gingival crevicular fluid, saliva, and urine in patients with aggressive periodontitis. Journal of Periodontology. 2002;73:720-725. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.7.720. Epub 2002/07/31
  132. 132. Sundar NM, Krishnan V, Krishnaraj S, Hemalatha VT, Alam MN. Comparison of the salivary and the serum nitric oxide levels in chronic and aggressive periodontitis: A biochemical study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2013;7:1223-1227. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5386.3068. Epub 2013/08/02
  133. 133. Tabari ZA, Azadmehr A, Tabrizi MA, Hamissi J, Ghaedi FB. Salivary soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand/osteoprotegerin ratio in periodontal disease and health. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science. 2013;43:227-232. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2013.43.5.227. Epub 2013/11/16
  134. 134. McManus LM, Pinckard RN. PAF, a putative mediator of oral inflammation. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine. 2000;11:240-258. Epub 2002/05/11
  135. 135. Kim HD, Karna S, Shin Y, Vu H, Cho HJ, Kim S. S100A8 and S100A9 in saliva, blood and gingival crevicular fluid for screening established periodontitis: A cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21:388. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01749-z. Epub 20210809
  136. 136. Isaza-Guzman DM, Arias-Osorio C, Martinez-Pabon MC, Tobon-Arroyave SI. Salivary levels of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1: A pilot study about the relationship with periodontal status and MMP-9(-1562C/T) gene promoter polymorphism. Archives of Oral Biology. 2011;56:401-411. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.10.021. Epub 2010/11/26
  137. 137. Kibune R, Muraoka K, Morishita M, Ariyoshi W, Awano S. Relationship between dynamics of TNF-alpha and its soluble receptors in saliva and periodontal health state. Dentistry Journal (Basel). 2022:10. DOI: 10.3390/dj10020025. Epub 20220208
  138. 138. Lamster IB, Kaufman E, Grbic JT, Winston LJ, Singer RE. Beta-glucuronidase activity in saliva: Relationship to clinical periodontal parameters. Journal of Periodontology. 2003;74:353-359. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.3.353. Epub 2003/04/25
  139. 139. Shamamian P, Schwartz JD, Pocock BJ, Monea S, Whiting D, Marcus SG, et al. Activation of progelatinase a (MMP-2) by neutrophil elastase, cathepsin G, and proteinase-3: A role for inflammatory cells in tumor invasion and angiogenesis. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2001;189:197-206. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.10014
  140. 140. Nisha KJ, Suresh A, Anilkumar A, Padmanabhan S. MIP-1alpha and MCP-1 as salivary biomarkers in periodontal disease. The Saudi Dental journal. 2018;30:292-298. Epub 20180706. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.07.002
  141. 141. Ohshima M, Sakai A, Ito K, Otsuka K. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) in periodontal disease: Detection of HGF in gingival crevicular fluid. Journal of Periodontal Research. 2002;37:8-14. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0765.2002.00660.x
  142. 142. Haririan H, Andrukhov O, Bottcher M, Pablik E, Wimmer G, Moritz A, et al. Salivary neuropeptides, stress, and periodontitis. Journal of Periodontology. 2018;89:9-18. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2017.170249
  143. 143. Deschner J, Eick S, Damanaki A, Nokhbehsaim M. The role of adipokines in periodontal infection and healing. Molecular Oral Microbiology. 2014;29:258-269. Epub 20140927. DOI: 10.1111/omi.12070
  144. 144. Dabra S, China K, Kaushik A. Salivary enzymes as diagnostic markers for detection of gingival/periodontal disease and their correlation with the severity of the disease. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2012;16:358-364. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.100911
  145. 145. Giuca MR, Pasini M, Tecco S, Giuca G, Marzo G. Levels of salivary immunoglobulins and periodontal evaluation in smoking patients. BMC Immunology. 2014;15:5. Epub 20140206. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2172-15-5
  146. 146. Taba M Jr, Kinney J, Kim AS, Giannobile WV. Diagnostic biomarkers for oral and periodontal diseases. Dental Clinics of North America. 2005;49:551-71, vi. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2005.03.009
  147. 147. Trombelli L, Tatakis DN, Scapoli C, Bottega S, Orlandini E, Tosi M. Modulation of clinical expression of plaque-induced gingivitis. II. Identification of "high-responder" and "low-responder" subjects. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2004;31:239-252. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2004.00478.x
  148. 148. Michalowicz BS, Aeppli D, Virag JG, Klump DG, Hinrichs JE, Segal NL, et al. Periodontal findings in adult twins. Journal of Periodontology. 1991;62:293-299. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1991.62.5.293
  149. 149. Offenbacher S, Barros SP, Paquette DW, Winston JL, Biesbrock AR, Thomason RG, et al. Gingival transcriptome patterns during induction and resolution of experimental gingivitis in humans. Journal of Periodontology. 2009;80:1963-1982. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.080645
  150. 150. Shao MY, Huang P, Cheng R, Hu T. Interleukin-6 polymorphisms modify the risk of periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B. 2009;10:920-927. DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B0920279
  151. 151. Kornman KS, Crane A, Wang HY, di Giovine FS, Newman MG, Pirk FW, et al. The interleukin-1 genotype as a severity factor in adult periodontal disease. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1997;24:72-77. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb01187.x
  152. 152. Prakash P, Victor D. Interleukin-1b gene polymorphism and its association with chronic periodontitis in south Indian population. International Journal of Genetics and Molecular Biology. 2010;2:179-183
  153. 153. Ma L, Chu WM, Zhu J, Wu YN, Wang ZL. Interleukin-1beta (3953/4) C-->T polymorphism increases the risk of chronic periodontitis in Asians: Evidence from a meta-analysis of 20 case-control studies. Archives of Medical Science. 2015;11:267-273. Epub 20150423. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2015.50961
  154. 154. Majumder P, Thou K, Bhattacharya M, Nair V, Ghosh S, Dey SK. Association of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) gene promoter polymorphisms with aggressive and chronic periodontitis in the eastern Indian population. Bioscience Reports. 2018;38:1-14. Epub 20180731. DOI: 10.1042/BSR20171212
  155. 155. Rizal MI, Soeroso Y, Sulijaya B, Assiddiq BF, Bachtiar EW, Bachtiar BM. Proteomics approach for biomarkers and diagnosis of periodontitis: Systematic review. Heliyon. 2020;6:e04022. Epub 20200604. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04022
  156. 156. Tsuchida S, Nakayama T. Metabolomics research in periodontal disease by mass spectrometry. Molecules. 2022;27:1-14. Epub 20220430. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092864
  157. 157. Bansal T, Pandey A, Deepa D, Asthana AK. C-reactive protein (CRP) and its association with periodontal disease: A brief review. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2014;8:ZE21-ZE24. Epub 20140720. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8355.4646
  158. 158. Cekici A, Kantarci A, Hasturk H, Van Dyke TE. Inflammatory and immune pathways in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease. Periodontology 2000. 2014;64:57-80. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12002
  159. 159. Zardawi F, Gul S, Abdulkareem A, Sha A, Yates J. Association between periodontal disease and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: Revisited. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2020;7:625579. Epub 20210115. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.625579
  160. 160. Mariotti A, Hefti AF. Defining periodontal health. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15(Suppl. 1):S6. Epub 20150915. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-15-S1-S6
  161. 161. Fatima T, Khurshid Z, Rehman A, Imran E, Srivastava KC, Shrivastava D. Gingival Crevicular fluid (GCF): A diagnostic tool for the detection of periodontal health and diseases. Molecules. 2021;26:1-16. Epub 20210224. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26051208
  162. 162. Delenclos M, Jones DR, McLean PJ, Uitti RJ. Biomarkers in Parkinson's disease: Advances and strategies. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 2016;22(Suppl. 1):S106-S110. Epub 20150930. DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.09.048
  163. 163. Guo L, Shi W. Salivary biomarkers for caries risk assessment. Journal of the California Dental Association. 2013;41:107-118
  164. 164. Takahashi K, Yamazaki K, Yamazaki M, Kato Y, Baba Y. Personalized medicine based on the pathogenesis and risk assessment of endodontic-periodontal lesions. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022;12:1-14. Epub 20221010. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12101688
  165. 165. Ko TJ, Byrd KM, Kim SA. The chairside periodontal diagnostic toolkit: Past, present, and future. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11:932. Epub 20210522. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11060932
  166. 166. Preiano M, Savino R, Villella C, Pelaia C, Terracciano R. Gingival Crevicular fluid Peptidome profiling in healthy and in periodontal diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21:1-29. Epub 20200724. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21155270
  167. 167. Fernandes A, Skinner ML, Woelfel T, Carpenter T, Haggerty KP. Implementing self-collection of biological specimens with a diverse sample. Field Methods. 2013:25. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X12453526
  168. 168. Bruijns BB, Tiggelaar RM, Gardeniers H. The extraction and recovery efficiency of pure DNA for different types of swabs. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2018;63:1492-1499. Epub 20180611. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13837
  169. 169. Hamlet SM. Quantitative analysis of periodontal pathogens by ELISA and real-time polymerase chain reaction methods. Molecular Biology. 2010;666:125-140. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60761-820-1_9
  170. 170. Castillo Y, Delgadillo NA, Neuta Y, Iniesta M, Sanz M, Herrera D, et al. Design and validation of a quantitative polymerase chain reaction test for the identification and quantification of uncultivable bacteria associated with periodontitis. Archives of Oral Biology. 2023;154:105758. Epub 20230704. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2023.105758
  171. 171. Jeon YS, Shivakumar M, Kim D, Kim CS, Lee J. Reliability of microarray analysis for studying periodontitis: Low consistency in 2 periodontitis cohort data sets from different platforms and an integrative meta-analysis. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science. 2021;51:18-29. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2002120106
  172. 172. Zhang Y, Qi Y, Lo ECM, McGrath C, Mei ML, Dai R. Using next-generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: A systematic review. Oral Diseases. 2021;27:1073-1089. Epub 20200526. DOI: 10.1111/odi.13405
  173. 173. Liu J, Yang J, Wang S, Sun J, Shi J, Rao G, et al. Combining human periodontal ligament cell membrane chromatography with online HPLC/MS for screening osteoplastic active compounds from Coptidis Rhizoma. Journal of Chromatography. B, Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences. 2012;904:115-120. Epub 20120804. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.07.031
  174. 174. Fageeh HN, Fageeh HI, Khan SS, Maganur PC, Vyas N, Patil VR, et al. Gingival crevicular fluid infiltrating CD14+ monocytes promote inflammation in periodontitis. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2021;28:3069-3075. Epub 20210221. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.049
  175. 175. Na HS, Kim SY, Han H, Kim HJ, Lee JY, Lee JH, et al. Identification of potential Oral microbial biomarkers for the diagnosis of periodontitis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020;9:1-17. Epub 20200520. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051549
  176. 176. Santibáñez P, García-García C, Portillo A, Santibáñez S, García-Álvarez L, de Toro M, et al. What does 16S rRNA gene-targeted next generation sequencing contribute to the study of infective endocarditis in heart-valve tissue? Pathogens. 2022;11:34. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11010034
  177. 177. Faulkner E, Mensah A, Rodgers AM, McMullan LR, Courtenay AJ. The role of epigenetic and biological biomarkers in the diagnosis of periodontal disease: A. Systematic Review Approach. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12:1-29. Epub 20220407. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12040919
  178. 178. Noh MK, Jung M, Kim SH, Lee SR, Park KH, Kim DH, et al. Assessment of IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-alpha levels in the gingival tissue of patients with periodontitis. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2013;6:847-851. Epub 20130715. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2013.1222
  179. 179. Wang J, Chen J, Sen S. MicroRNA as biomarkers and diagnostics. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2016;231:25-30. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.25056
  180. 180. Santonocito S, Polizzi A, Palazzo G, Isola G. The emerging role of microRNA in periodontitis: Pathophysiology, clinical potential and future molecular perspectives. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22:1-17. Epub 20210521. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22115456
  181. 181. Lowe R, Shirley N, Bleackley M, Dolan S, Shafee T. Transcriptomics technologies. PLoS Computational Biology. 2017;13:e1005457. Epub 20170518. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005457
  182. 182. Sengupta A, Uppoor A, Joshi MB. Metabolomics: Paving the path for personalized periodontics - A literature review. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2022;26:98-103. Epub 20220301. DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_267_21
  183. 183. Martin R, Miquel S, Langella P, Bermudez-Humaran LG. The role of metagenomics in understanding the human microbiome in health and disease. Virulence. 2014;5:413-423. DOI: 10.4161/viru.27864. Epub 20140211
  184. 184. Pihlstrom BL. Periodontal risk assessment, diagnosis and treatment planning. Periodontology 2000. 2001;25:37-58. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0757.2001.22250104.x
  185. 185. Janes H, Pepe MS, McShane LM, Sargent DJ, Heagerty PJ. The fundamental difficulty with evaluating the accuracy of biomarkers for guiding treatment. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2015:107. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv157. Epub 20150624
  186. 186. Malinowski B, Wesierska A, Zalewska K, Sokolowska MM, Bursiewicz W, Socha M, et al. The role of Tannerella forsythia and Porphyromonas gingivalis in pathogenesis of esophageal cancer. Infectious Agents and Cancer. 2019;14:3. DOI: 10.1186/s13027-019-0220-2. Epub 20190130
  187. 187. Steigmann L, Maekawa S, Sima C, Travan S, Wang CW, Giannobile WV. Biosensor and lab-on-a-chip biomarker-identifying Technologies for Oral and Periodontal Diseases. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2020;11:588480. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.588480. Epub 20201109
  188. 188. Dahlen G, Fejerskov O, Manji F. Current concepts and an alternative perspective on periodontal disease. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20:235. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01221-4. Epub 20200826
  189. 189. He W, You M, Wan W, Xu F, Li F, Li A. Point-of-care periodontitis testing: Biomarkers, current technologies, and perspectives. Trends in Biotechnology. 2018;36:1127-1144. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.05.013. Epub 20180702
  190. 190. Dawson H, Elias J, Etienne P, Calas-Etienne S. The rise of the OM-LoC: Opto-microfluidic enabled lab-on-Chip. Micromachines (Basel). 2021;12:1467. DOI: 10.3390/mi12121467. Epub 20211128

Written By

Annie Kitty George, Sankari Malaiappan, Betsy Joseph and Sukumaran Anil

Submitted: 23 August 2023 Reviewed: 01 February 2024 Published: 25 April 2024