Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Biochar Application for Soil Quality Improvement: An Overview

Written By

Hassan Ali, Shahzaib Ali, Sadia Baloch, Fahmeeda Naheed, Emaan Amjad, Qudsia Saeed, Muhammad Naveed and Adnan Mustafa

Submitted: 12 January 2023 Reviewed: 11 January 2024 Published: 05 February 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.114192

From the Edited Volume

Soil Contamination - Recent Advances and Future Perspectives

Edited by Adnan Mustafa and Muhammad Naveed

Chapter metrics overview

74 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Soil as a renewable resource has a key role to play in sustainable crop production, soil management, and combating food insecurity. The overapplication of fertilizers in this regard has resulted in decreased soil health and productivity. Biochar application in this respect has received increasing attention of the scientific community due to its role in soil quality improvement. This is especially true in the face of global climate change and to the nature of biochar being a carbon (C)-rich compound. In this chapter, the potential of biochar to enhance soil quality attributes, particularly those pertaining to soil’s physical, chemical, and biological properties, is comprehensively reviewed. Special attention is directed toward the distinctive properties of biochars sourced from various feedstocks, elucidating their subsequent effects on soil quality. This sheds light on potential directions for future studies in this field.

Keywords

  • biochar
  • soil health
  • sustainable environment
  • soil improvement
  • soil quality

1. Introduction

Climate change negatively impacts crop growth. Salinized, weak alkaline soils; temperature fluctuations; and latitudinal factors require urgent scientific attention [1, 2]. Soil, a complex ecosystem, plays a vital role in agriculture, ecosystem services, climate change mitigation, landscape protection, and human development [3, 4]. Long-term cultivation can lead to degradation, resulting in reduced soil organic matter, severe erosion, and diminished aggregate stability [5, 6]. Soil quality directly impacts ecosystems, affecting crop production, biota, and human well-being, contributing to a healthy environment [7, 8]. Various factors, including pollution levels, bacterial activity, climate, and land use, can alter soil characteristics [9]. Green approaches, like soil amendment, offer effective means to reduce salinity by enhancing physical and chemical properties and nutrient distribution. These approaches also promote microorganism growth and restore soil health [10, 11, 12, 13]. The application of additives is a promising method to enhance soil characteristics. In recent years, biochar (B) has gained significant interest as a versatile soil fertilizer, owing to its high porosity, abundant surface functional groups, strong adsorption capacity, and recalcitrant carbon content [14].

Biochar (BC) is plant-derived charcoal used to absorb carbon dioxide when incorporated into soil [15, 16]. It plays a crucial role in long-term climate change mitigation [17] and enhances soil biochemical properties [18]. BC also facilitates large-scale disposal of waste biomass [19]. Studies highlight its significance as a carbon source and soil enhancer, sequestering pollutants and enhancing fertility [20]. Its elemental composition includes essential elements like C, N, and H, alongside lower-nutrient elements [21]. Adding BC improves soil properties such as porosity, bulk density, and water availability [22]. Pyrolysis releases volatile compounds, increasing BC’s surface area and creating pores akin to honeycombs, enhancing water and nutrient retention [23, 24].

BC incorporation enhances soil structure, aeration, nutrient availability, and alters microbial communities, fostering crop growth and yield [25, 26, 27]. It raises soil pH and enhances cation exchange capacity [28, 29]. Amended soils exhibit heightened fertility and nutrient retention [30], with significantly boosted extractable nutrient levels [31]. BC increases hydraulic conductivity, base saturation, and nutrient levels and reduces erosion rate [32, 33]. It halts the leaching of nitrate nitrogen from soils [34]. The diverse pore sizes of BC influence microorganism habitats, promoting beneficial bacterial survival and enhancing bacterial structure [35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41]. BC’s effects on soil microorganisms are influenced by nutrient availability, microbial community composition, plant–microbe signaling, and habitat creation [42].

Climate change disrupts the vital carbon storage in soil, impacting global food production and greenhouse gas emissions [43, 44, 45, 46]. Methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), potent greenhouse gases, primarily from agricultural land, have a significant warming effect [47]. Biochar is pivotal in curbing emissions and averting climate change by enhancing soil quality, reducing pollution, and stabilizing carbon [48, 49, 50]. It is technically and economically feasible for carbon capture and storage [51], disrupting the carbon cycle and preventing emissions from reentering the atmosphere [52, 53]. This fosters soil health, lowers emissions, and boosts carbon sequestration [54, 55, 56].

Advertisement

2. Literature review methodology

A set of thematic keywords were used for exploring the relevant research articles and review papers, such as biochar, feedstock, soil quality, soil fertility, soil pH, soil physicochemical properties, biochar amendments, soil organic matter, carbon sequestration, the role of biochar amendment, plant growth and yield attributes, crop performance, and so forth. In this regard, five different databases were used, namely, Research Gate, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Scopus. These databases comprise extensively used huge collections of related mainstream research articles. Following this, multiple research and review articles were selected within the era 2000–2022. Furthermore, related research articles referenced in the abovementioned papers were also reviewed.

Advertisement

3. Application of biochar in soil quality improvement

Biochar is considered as a potential soil amendment, as its addition improves the C accumulation (60–80%) in the soil, which is central to the enhancement in the soil properties, and hence, biochar technology could be very effective for soils having low organic matter contents (OM) [22]. The following sections discuss the role of biochar as a potential amendment to enhance soil quality.

3.1 Improvement in soil bulk density

Soil bulk density, a critical indicator of soil physical properties, is closely linked to soil tightness [57]. It reflects soil compaction and health and influences crucial aspects of the plant life cycle [58]. Enhanced soil porosity and aeration, facilitated by biochar, lead to reduced bulk density [59]. Biochar’s lower bulk density contributes to decreased soil bulk density and improved water holding capacity due to its larger surface area [60, 61, 62]. Numerous studies have reported a significant negative impact of biochar addition on soil bulk density [63, 64]. Głąb et al. [65] found a 35% reduction in bulk density with the incorporation of 4% biochar. Similarly, Qin et al. [66] documented a decrease in bulk density with an increase in overall soil porosity after introducing biochar. The influence of biochar on soil bulk density is closely tied to soil texture; coarser-textured soils experience more pronounced reductions compared to finer-textured soils [67]. This may be attributed to the higher bulk density of coarse-textured soils (~1.6 g cm−3) compared to biochar (~ 0.6 g cm−3), allowing interactions between the biochar and soil particles, resulting in a decline in the final bulk density of the soil. Additionally, biochar’s high porosity and sandy soils’ lower porosity contribute to decreased bulk density [68]. Furthermore, the nature of feedstock material and pyrolysis temperature significantly influence bulk density, with higher pyrolysis temperatures leading to lower bulk density [69]. The rate of biochar application also affects bulk density, generally showing a negative correlation with application rate [58].

3.2 Improvement in surface area and soil porosity

Biochar significantly influences soil porosity through its pore distribution, particle size, and connectivity [57]. Studies have reported an increase in soil porosity following biochar addition, ranging from 14% to 64% [22]. Higher pyrolysis temperatures enhance soil porosity, potentially due to organic matter decomposition and the formation of micropores [70, 71]. The impact of biochar on soil porosity depends on soil texture and type, with coarse-textured soils showing a greater increase compared to fine-textured soils, likely due to their lower inherent porosity [72]. In sandy soils, biochar improves porosity by enhancing mechanical interactions with soil particles, leading to notable improvements [73]. Increased porosity positively affects soil microbial activities, and different pore size distributions may influence specific microbial species [74]. Additionally, Seyedsadr et al. [75] found that biochar addition increased total porosity and reduced bulk density compared to compost. They suggested several mechanisms for improved soil porosity, including direct pore effects within biochar, accommodation pores formed between soil aggregates and biochar, and enhanced persistence of soil pores through increased aggregate stability [76].

3.3 Improvement in soil aggregate stability

Soil aggregate stability is crucial for resisting mechanical stresses like surface runoff, water erosion, and precipitation effects [58, 77]. Disintegration of aggregates leads to fine particles susceptible to erosion, potentially forming a soil crust upon re-sedimentation [78]. Biochar application significantly impacts aggregate stability through interactions with soil mineral surfaces, facilitated by oxidized carboxylic groups on biochar particles [79]. This interaction fosters aggregate formation, creating stable microaggregates and larger pores, ultimately enhancing stability and structure [80]. Studies have reported an increase in soil aggregate stability ranging from 6 to 217% after biochar addition [32, 81]. This improvement may be attributed to the high carbon content of biochar, forming bonds with various oxides, and organic matter providing a food source for microorganisms. This leads to increased microbial activity and the secretion of mucilage, contributing to stable aggregates [82]. Additionally, biochar may enhance aggregate resistance against clay swelling and slaking [83].

3.4 Improvement in soil consistency

Soil consistency attributes, such as plastic limit, liquid limit, and plasticity index, are crucial for designing stable slope systems [84]. Understanding soil consistency is vital for engineering applications and agronomic contexts, including tillage operations and compaction. Additionally, biochar application can enhance soil consistency by increasing organic carbon concentrations [85]. Different types of biochar applied to sandy soils at various rates resulted in significant improvements in plasticity index (48–99%) and liquid limits (8–22%) [85]. This improvement is primarily attributed to biochar’s larger surface area and increased porosity [86, 87]. Laboratory experiments by Choudhary et al. [88] showed that biochar addition improved soil consistency limits up to a specific weight limit, leading to enhanced physical properties of the soil.

3.5 Improvement in cation exchange capacity (CEC)

The CEC indicates the ability of soil to absorb, retain, and exchange cations, and enhancing the number of exchange sites for cations can augment the soil CEC contents. Soils having a high CEC can readily absorb K+, NH4+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ and improve the utilization of nutrient ions in soils [89]. The CEC is largely pH-dependent particularly on tropical soils, and some biochars can raise the pH of the soil as well as soil CEC [90, 91, 92]. Use of peanut shell-derived biochars in an acidified soil increased the soil pH, CEC, SOM, as well as plant biomass [93]. Biochar application increases soil charge and cation exchange capacity (CEC) by 20–40% compared to control conditions [94]. Non-wood feedstock biochar exhibits higher CEC than wood-derived biochars [95, 96]. Feedstock type, application rate, and pyrolysis temperature are crucial factors influencing soil CEC regulation [97].

3.6 Biochar application on soil EC and pH modulation

Soil acidity is a significant challenge for upland agriculture, affecting approximately 30% of potential arable lands globally [98]. Factors such as aluminum (Al) toxicity, as well as deficiencies in calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and phosphorus (P), act as constraints on crop production in acidic soils [99]. The alkaline properties of specific biochars play a crucial role in enhancing crop productivity in acidic and highly weathered soils [100]. However, the addition of pine sawdust biochar in sandy desert soil has been observed to decrease soil pH [101]. Hence (Figure 1), it is imperative to exercise caution in selecting the appropriate acidic or alkaline biochar capable of modifying the soil rhizosphere accordingly for optimal plant growth. Electrical conductivity (EC) is closely related to the concentration of salts dissolved in water and is a critical factor influencing upland crop growth (Table 1). Biochar derived from agricultural waste and woody feedstock typically exhibits low to moderate EC, while manure-derived biochar tends to have higher EC [116, 117, 118]. Biochar application has been shown to improve the growth and yield of crops in saline conditions, attributed to higher concentrations of essential ions in the biochar [118]. Most biochars have higher soluble salt content and, consequently, higher EC compared to agricultural soils [119]. However, excessive salt content is detrimental to plants due to reduced osmotic potential. Therefore, maintaining low soil EC is crucial for optimal nutrient availability and plant growth. It is worth noting that the EC of soil may increase with higher application rates of biochar [102, 103, 120, 121]. Rice husk biochar, however, did not significantly impact soil EC [122]. Biochar pH ranges from 4 to 12 and directly influences soil pH upon application. Biochar interacts with aluminum ions (Al3+) and hydrogen ions (H+) in soil, leading to reduced ion concentrations [123]. Higher pyrolytic temperatures can result in biochar with alkaline pH [124]. In acidic soils, biochar additions raise soil pH to varying degrees [92, 125, 126]. The pH increases gradually with higher biochar application rates, but the impact on alkali soils is less pronounced [94]. Biochar additions lead to a 25% increase in crop yield in tropical regions, attributed to lower acidity, whereas effects are less significant in temperate zones [127]. Biochar addition also affects soil pH and the activity of essential ions involved in phosphorus (P) complexation and sorption [128]. Research by Lu et al. [129] demonstrated that various types of biochars enhance soil pH and buffering capacity, correlating with improved soil pH buffering capacity.

Figure 1.

Conceptual scheme on the effect of biochar amendment on the physicochemical, biological properties, and greenhouse gas emissions (adapted from Li et al. [102, 103]).

ExperimentFeedstockTemperature (° C)Application ratePlantEffect on soil propertiesReferences
PotRice husk7500, 2, and 4% w/wOryza sativaImproved soil properties observed[104]
PotWoodchip biochar, straw biochar, and vineyard-pruning biochars5253% w/wSinapis alba, Hordeum vulgare, and Trifolium pratenseLowered bulk density and enhanced aggregate stability[63]
FieldPoultry manure4505 t ha−1Zeya maysIncreased water retention (3.3–31.3%) after biochar application[105]
PotCoffee ground and coffee husk5304, 8, 12, and 16 Mg ha−1Zeya maysImproved nutrient and water retention, boosting water use efficiency by 50% and enhancing carbon content[106]
PotSludge and straw biochars5002 and 4% w/wTriticumaestivumDecreased bulk density by 17–18%, tensile strength, and soil surface cracks and increased shear strength.[107]
FieldBarley straw40010 t ha−1Brassica rapaDecreased the bulk density, enhanced soil porosity and s pH, total N, CEC, and available P[108]
FieldCattle manure6000, 1.5, 2.5, and 5% w/wSpinacia oleraceaIncreased total porosity by 2–12%, and water use efficiency[109]
PotWood, bamboo, rice straw, and Chinese walnut shell5005% w/wPhyllostachy pubescensImproved the soil EC, and decreased the soil pH.[110]
PotSoft wood biochar made by gasification procedure500 and 6004 and 10% w/wLollium perenne and Eruca sativaIncreased water retention decreased in the pH[111]
FieldPeanut shell2205 t ha−1Nicotiana tabacumDecline the bulk density, increased total N, total porosity, water contents, and nutrient holding capacity[112]
GreenhouseWheat straw350–5500, 25, and 50 t ha−1Solanum lycopersicum L.Decreased the bulk density, enhanced soil porosity, and improved soil 3-phase composition[44, 45, 46]
GreenhouseSouthern yellow pine4005, 10, 15, and 20% w/wVitis rotundifoliaDecreased the bulk density (40%), increased soil porosity (50%) and soil pH buffering capacity[113]
FieldRice husk0 and 2 t ha−1Brassica oleraceaImproved infiltration rate, hydraulic conductivity, maximum water holding capacity, and aggregate stability.[114]
PotMaize residues450–9500, 2.1, 4.2, and 8.3 g kg−1 w/wPhaseolusmultiflorusImproved the soil aggregation (188%) and soil water retention (128.9%)[115]

Table 1.

Effect of biochar addition on soil physicochemical properties and plant growth.

3.7 Improvement in soil organic matter (SOM)

Soil organic matter (SOM) is a vital factor reflecting soil fertility and providing nutrients for soil life [130]. Biochar application increases SOM, with effectiveness dependent on biochar quantity and stability [131, 132]. Biochar contains essential plant nutrients, enriching soil nutrient levels upon application [57]. It also catalyzes the formation of soil organic matter from small organic molecules [82, 133]. Biochar enhances soil fertility and crop yields by boosting SOM content [134]. Elevated SOM content improves crop growth and productivity due to increased soil porosity and nutrient availability [135]. In coastal regions, biochar.

addition increases corn yields while reducing soil salinity [136]. It also enhances root microbe activity and organic matter uptake by plant roots. Chen et al. [133] found that applying biochar at 15 and 30 t ha−1 increased SOM content. Additionally, Liu et al. [137] showed that biochar application reduced organic matter mineralization by inhibiting the β-glucosidase enzyme.

3.8 Improvement in soil biological properties

The effects of biochar application on soil microbial biomass are diverse, with some studies indicating positive impacts [138] and others showing no significant changes [139]. Additionally, biochar can enhance soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, C-mineralization, and enzyme activities [140, 141]. Barman et al. [142] observed an increase in different enzyme types with freshly prepared biochar. Moreover, biochar has been found to mitigate toxic contaminants and modify soil enzymes [143]. Furthermore, biochar application has been associated with increased root colonization and spore germination of mycorrhizal fungus, attributing to improvements in soil properties [144, 145]. It has also shown potential to enhance biological nitrogen fixation in various crops [146, 147, 148]. Shifts in microbial community structures and functions after biochar supplementation are influenced by physicochemical attributes of biochar, organic matter content, nutrient availability, and water retention capacity [149]. Additionally, dominant bacterial groups like Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Proteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Rubrobacteridae have been reported to increase after biochar addition [150]. Tang et al. [151] observed that soil microorganisms, including those in the rhizosphere, utilize various carbon sources after biochar amendment. In a 30-month experiment, Somerville et al. [152] found that the addition of organic matter, including biochar, improved soil biological properties, attributing it to increased porosity supporting microbial biomass, particularly mycorrhiza [153]. Kolton et al. [154] noted that biochar has the potential to enhance the diversity and metabolic potential of microbiota in the tomato rhizosphere. Pei et al. [155] reported that biochar amendment increased C mineralization, microbial respiration, and microbial communities. Additionally, nutrient-enriched biochar stimulated microbial activities responsible for pesticide degradation [156, 157], indicating a close interaction between microbial activities and pesticides in soils [158]. Biochar application also enhanced the alpha diversity of various microbial communities, particularly fungal species [159]. While numerous studies have focused on improving soil biological attributes with biochar application (see Table 2), there is still much to learn about the dynamics of soil microbial communities and the enhancement of soil biological properties in relation to biochar application.

ExperimentFeedstockTemperature (° C)Application ratePlantEffect on biological propertiesReferences
Pot trialPine needle and Lantana biochar2 and 5 t C ha−1Triticumaestivum and Oryza sativaIncrement in the soil biological activities[160]
FieldRed gram, Maize stalk, cotton stalk, and mesquite wood350–4002.5 and 5 t ha−1ArachishypogaeaIncrement in the population of actinomycetes, bacteria, and fungi[161]
FieldPoultry litter3002.25 and 5 t DM ha−1Pasture grassReduced soil toxicity to Heterocyprisincongruensand Vibrio fischeri[162]
PotMixture of maple, oak and birch woody biomass1 t ha−1Zea maysIncrement in the soil potential microbial activities[163]
Field and white peatHolm oak6503% w/wLactuca sativa and FragariaananassaIn strawberry grown in white peat, biochar application altered the rhizosphere microbiology[164]
FieldLocal timber harvest450–55020 t ha−1Cucurbita maximaIncreased microbial biomass C, enzyme activities, and phosphatase enzyme[165]
PotOrchard pruning biomass50065 g kg−1Lactuca sativaBiochar in combination with compost enhanced the population and diversity of microorganisms[166]
FieldWood biochar450–55020 t ha−1A shift in the bacterial dominated microbial communities was observed after the biochar addition for 3 months[167]
PotHardwood lumber scraps500–55020% w/wSolanum melongenaBiochar alone and in combination with compost altered the soil microbial communities and their functional diversity[168]
Growth chamber/Pot trialMaize210 and 6002% w/vCicer arietinumImproved the symbiotic relationship with Mesorhizobiumciceriand improved the nodule number by 52%[169]
FieldRice straw4501500 kg ha−1 a−1Oryza sativaImproved the microbial biomass C and microbial biomass N[170]
FieldWaste eucalypt wood55010% v/vCorymbia maculataImproved microbially mediated OM decomposition, increased microbial activities[152]
PotPlatanus orientalis derived6500, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4% w/wBrassica chinensisIncreased sucrase, urease, and catalase activities[171]
FieldYellow pine35011.2 and 22.4 t ha−1Paspalum distichumCompost amendment delivered more promising results as compared to biochar amendments in terms of microbial biomass[172]
Pot trialCherrywood, wood, and maize450, 600, and 8502% w/wLactuca sativaImproved soil enzyme activities (N and P cycling) and plant interaction with microbial inoculants[173]
FieldSenna siamea4852000 kg ha−1Zeya maysImprovement in the dehydrogenase activities, fungal, bacterial population and microbial biomass C[174]

Table 2.

Effect of biochar prepared from different sources on the soil biological properties.

Advertisement

4. Effect of biochar amendment on soil fertility

Soil fertility refers to a soil’s ability to provide essential plant nutrients for sustained crop productivity [175]. Modern agricultural practices often lead to soil degradation and nutrient depletion [175]. Biochar addition improves soil properties by increasing organic carbon and crucial mineral nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, and sulfur [176]. However, biochar’s nutrient composition depends on raw material source and pyrolysis conditions, which may not always meet diverse soil requirements [177]. Biochar also enhances nutrient retention and utilization in soil. After incorporation, nitrate and ammonium nitrogen retention increases significantly [178]. Additionally, biochar treatment leads to substantial increases in grain biomass and nitrogen and phosphorus utilization efficiency compared to using nitrogen fertilizer alone [45]. Research on biochar production and applications is rapidly expanding [179, 180]. While carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling influences soil microbial activity, other essential elements like sulfur, potassium, magnesium, and calcium are crucial for soil fertility and quality [181, 182]. Biochars rich in exchangeable base cations support plant growth [183], and a strong correlation exists between oilseed rape yield and soil potassium content [184]. Comprehensive assessment of soil fertility considers interconnected interactions, with integrative indicators like soil pH, electrical conductivity, and cation exchange capacity providing a more holistic understanding [181, 182].

Advertisement

5. Improvement in carbon (C) sequestration

The rise in ambient temperature due to anthropogenic activities has led to a 0.88°C increase in global surface temperature since the nineteenth century [185, 186]. Biochar application offers an eco-friendly solution for soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration [11, 187, 188, 189]. It enhances SOC recalcitrance under warming conditions, promoting carbon sequestration [190]. Biochar also inhibits SOC mineralization by increasing biochemical recalcitrance or microbial activity [191, 192]. Field experiments over three years demonstrate significant improvements in soil carbon sequestration with biochar addition [193]. Various studies confirm biochar’s efficacy in enriching the SOC pool and reducing GHG emissions in agricultural soils [194, 195, 196, 197, 198]. Feedstock and pyrolysis conditions are critical factors influencing biochar’s effectiveness [199]. Zhang et al. [200] found that biochar addition increases recalcitrant carbon in soil, reducing carbon cycling enzyme activity while enhancing phosphorus, nitrogen cycling enzyme, and oxidase activities. They suggest combining biochar with nitrogen fertilization for enhanced carbon sequestration. Rahman et al. [201] report that biochar application from sugarcane bagasse improves SOC retention and other soil quality parameters. Han et al. [38] demonstrate significant increases in carbon sequestration and reductions in net global warming potential with apple wood-derived biochar application, offering promise for mitigating global warming concerns related to apple production.

References

  1. 1. Bai L, Wang C, Zang S, Wu C, Luo J, Wu Y. Mapping Soil alkalinity and salinity in northern Songnen Plain, China with the HJ-1 hyperspectral imager data and partial least squares regression. Sensors. 2018;18:3855. DOI: 10.3390/s18113855
  2. 2. Panwar NL, Pawar A, Salvi BL. Comprehensive review on production and utilization of biochar SN. Applied Sciences. 2019;1:168. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-019-0172-6
  3. 3. Hou D, Bolan NS, Tsang DCW, Kirkham MB, O’Connor D. Sustainable soil use and management: An interdisciplinary and systematic approach. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;729:138961
  4. 4. Priit T, Ana Catarina B, Simon J, Fr’ed’eric R, Jürgen K, Ellen RG, et al. Biochars in soils: Towards the required level of scientific understanding. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management. 2017;25:2
  5. 5. Annabi M, Le Bissonnais Y, Le Villio-Poitrenaud M, Houot S. Improvement of soil aggregate stability by reported applications of organic amendments to a cultivated silty loam soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2011;144:382-389
  6. 6. De Meyer A, Poesen J, Isabirye M, Deckers J, Rates D. Soil erosion rate in tropical villages: A case study from Lake Victoria Basin, Uganda. Catena. 2011;84:89-98
  7. 7. Drobnik T, Greiner L, Keller A, Grˆet-Regamey A. Soil quality indicators – From soil functions to ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators. 2018;94:151-169
  8. 8. Gupta UC, Gupta SC. Quality of animal and human life as affected by selenium management of soils and crops. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2002;33(15-18):2537-2555
  9. 9. Khalid S, Shahid M, Murtaza B, Bibi I, Naeem MA, Niazi NK. A critical review of different factors governing the fate of pesticides in soil under biochar application. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;711:134645
  10. 10. Agyarko-Mintah E, Cowie A, Van Zwieten L, Singh BP, Smillie R, Harden S, et al. Biochar lowers ammonia emission and improves nitrogen retention in poultry litter composting. Waste Management. 2017;61:129-137
  11. 11. Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D. Biochar effects on soil biota–A review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2011;43(9):1812-1836
  12. 12. Obia A, Cornelissen G, Martinsen V, Smebye AB, Mulder J. Conservation tillage and biochar improve soil water content and moderate soil temperature in a tropical Acrisol. Soil and Tillage Research. 2020;197:104521
  13. 13. Yan Q , Dong F, Li J, Duan Z, Yang F, Li X, et al. Effects of maize straw-derived biochar application on soil temperature, water conditions and growth of winter wheat. European Journal of Soil Science. 2019;70:1280-1289
  14. 14. Xiao X, Chen B, Chen Z, Zhu L, Schnoor JL. Insight into multiple and multilevel structures of biochar sand their potential environmental applications: A critical review. Environmental Science & Technology. 2018;52(9):5027-5047
  15. 15. Hafeez A, Pan T, Tian J, Cai K. Modified biochars and their effects on soil quality: A review. Environments. 2022;9(5):60
  16. 16. Lehmann JA. Handful of carbon. Nature. 2007;447:143-144
  17. 17. Nair VD, Nair P, Dari B, Freitas AM, Chatterjee N, Pinheiro FM. Biochar in the agroecosystem–climate-change–sustainability nexus. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8:2051
  18. 18. Hairani A, Osaki M, Watanabe T. Effect of biochar application on mineral and microbial properties of soils growing different plant species. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition. 2016;62:519-525
  19. 19. Jeffery S, Verheijen FG, Kammann C, Abalos D. Biochar effects on methane emissions from soils: A meta-analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2016;101:251-258
  20. 20. Xia S, Song Z, Jeyakumar P, Bolan N, Wang H. Characteristics and applications of biochar for remediating Cr(VI)-contaminated soils and wastewater. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 2020;42(6):1543-1567
  21. 21. Zhang H, Voroney R, Price G. Effects of temperature and processing conditions on biochar chemical properties and their influence on soil C and N transformations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2015;83:19-28
  22. 22. Blanco-Canqui H. Biochar and soil physical properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2017;81(4):687-711
  23. 23. Rawat J, Saxena J, Sanwal P. Biochar: A sustainable approach for improving plant growth and soil properties. In: Biochar—An Imperative Amendment for Soil and the Environment. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2019. p. 10
  24. 24. Shakya A, Agarwal T. Potential of biochar for the remediation of heavy metal contaminated soil. In: Biochar Applications in Agriculture and Environment Management. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2020. pp. 77-98
  25. 25. Yu H, Zou W, Chen J, Chen H, Yu Z, Huang J, et al. Biochar amendment improves crop production in problem soils: A review. Journal of Environmental Management. 2019;232:8-21
  26. 26. Zheng H, Wang X, Chen L, Wang Z, Xia Y, Zhang Y, et al. Enhanced growth of halophyte plants in biochar-amended coastal soil: Roles of nutrient availability and rhizosphere microbial modulation. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2018;41(3):517-532
  27. 27. Zheng H, Wang X, Luo X, Wang Z, Xing B. Biochar-induced negative carbon mineralization priming effects in a coastal wetland soil: Roles of soil aggregation and microbial modulation. Science of the Total Environment. 2018;610:951-960
  28. 28. Safadoust A, Feizee P, Mahboubi AA, Gharabaghi B, Mosaddeghi MR, Ahrens B. Least limiting water range as affected by soil texture and cropping system. Agricultural Water Management. 2014;136:34-41
  29. 29. Tormena CA, Karlen DL, Logsdon S, Cherubin MR. Corn Stover harvest and tillage impacts on near-surface soil physical quality. Soil and Tillage Research. 2017;166:122-130
  30. 30. Alkharabsheh HM, Seleiman MF, Battaglia ML, Shami A, Jalal RS, Alhammad BA, et al. Biochar and its broad impacts in soil quality and fertility, nutrient leaching and crop productivity: A review. Agronomy. 2021;11(5):993
  31. 31. Wang Y, Yin R, Liu R. Characterization of biochar from fast pyrolysis and its effect on chemical properties of the tea garden soil. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 2014;110:375-381
  32. 32. Jien SH, Wang CS. Effects of biochar on soil properties and erosion potential in a highly weathered soil. Catena. 2013;110:225-233
  33. 33. Jones DL, Rousk J, Edwards-Jones G, DeLuca TH, Murphy DV. Biochar-mediated changes in soil quality and plant growth in a three year field trial. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2012;45:113-124
  34. 34. Jia Y, Hu Z, Ba Y, Qi W. Application of biochar-coated urea controlled loss of fertilizer nitrogen and increased nitrogen use efficiency. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture. 2021;8(1):1-11
  35. 35. Berisso FE, Schjønning P, Keller T, Lamandé M, Etana A, De Jonge LW, et al. Persistent effects of subsoil compaction on pore size distribution and gas transport in a loamy soil. Soil and Tillage Research. 2012;122:42-51
  36. 36. de Lima RP, da Silva AP, Giarola NF, da Silva AR, Rolim MM. Changes in soil compaction indicators in response to agricultural field traffic. Biosystems Engineering. 2017;162:1-10
  37. 37. Emmet-Booth JP, Holden NM, Fenton O, Bondi G, Forristal PD. Exploring the sensitivity of visual soil evaluation to traffic-induced soil compaction. Geoderma Regional. 2020;20:e00243
  38. 38. Han L, Zhang B, Chen L, Feng Y, Yang Y, Sun K. Impact of biochar amendment on soil aggregation varied with incubation duration and biochar pyrolysis temperature. Biochar. 2021;3(3):339-347
  39. 39. Hannet G, Singh K, Fidelis C, Farrar MB, Muqaddas B, Bai SH. Effects of biochar, compost, and biochar-compost on soil total nitrogen and available phosphorus concentrations in a corn field in Papua New Guinea. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021;28(21):27411-27419
  40. 40. İlay REMZİ, Kavdır Y, Memici M, Ekinci K. Grain size-induced changes in carbon and nitrogen concentrations and characteristics of tomato harvest residue biochar. International journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2020;17(9):3917-3926
  41. 41. Wang YP, Liu YL, Tian SQ , Yang JJ, Wang L, Ma J. Straw biochar enhanced removal of heavy metal by ferrate. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2021;416:126128
  42. 42. Ding Y, Liu Y, Liu S, Li Z, Tan X, Huang X, et al. Biochar to improve soil fertility. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2016;36(2):1-18
  43. 43. Lal R. Soil health and carbon management. Food and Energy Security. 2016;5:212-222
  44. 44. Zhang C, Li X, Yan H, Ullah I, Zuo Z, Li L, et al. Effects of irrigation quantity and biochar on soil physical properties, growth characteristics, yield and quality of greenhouse tomato. Agricultural Water Management. 2020;241:106263
  45. 45. Zhang Q , Song Y, Wu Z, Yan X, Gunina A, Kuzyakov Y, et al. Effects of six-year biochar amendment on soil aggregation, crop growth, and nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies in a rice-wheat rotation. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;242:118435
  46. 46. Zhang Q , Xiao J, Xue J, Zhang L. Quantifying the effects of biochar application on greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils: A global meta-analysis. Sustainability. 2020;12:3436
  47. 47. IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC; 2014. ISBN 9789291691432
  48. 48. Bolan N, Hoang SA, Beiyuan J, Gupta S, Hou D, Karakoti A, et al. Multifunctional applications of biochar beyond carbon storage. International Materials Reviews. 2022;67(2):150-200
  49. 49. Kwon G, Bhatnagar A, Wang H, Kwon EE, Song H. A review of recent advancements in utilization of biomass and industrial wastes into engineered biochar. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2020;400:123242
  50. 50. Lehmann J, Cowie A, Masiello CA, Kammann C, Woolf D, Amonette JE, et al. Biochar in climate change mitigation. Nature Geoscience. 2021;14(12):883-892
  51. 51. Osman AI, Hefny M, Abdel Maksoud MIA, Elgarahy AM, Rooney DW. Recent advances in carbon capture storage and utilisation technologies: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2021;19(2):797-849
  52. 52. Brassard P, Godbout S, Raghavan V. Soil biochar amendment as a climate change mitigation tool: Key parameters and mechanisms involved. Journal of Environmental Management. 2016;181:484-497
  53. 53. Qambrani NA, Rahman MM, Won S, Shim S, Ra C. Biochar properties and eco-friendly applications for climate change mitigation, waste management, and wastewater treatment: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;79:255-273
  54. 54. Stewart CE, Zheng J, Botte J, Cotrufo MF. Co-generated fast pyrolysis biochar mitigates greenhouse gas emissions and increases carbon sequestration in temperate soils. GCB Bioenergy. 2013;5(2):153-163
  55. 55. Windeatt JH, Ross AB, Williams PT, Forster PM, Nahil MA, Singh S. Characteristics of biochars from crop residues: Potential for carbon sequestration and soil amendment. Journal of Environmental Management. 2014;146:189-197
  56. 56. Zhang X, Xia YS, Shang YJ, Zhao QQ , Shi J. Effects of biochar (BC) on microbial diversity of cadmium (Cd) contaminated soil. China Environmental Science. 2017;37(1):252-262
  57. 57. Zhang Y, Wang J, Feng Y. The effects of biochar addition on soil physicochemical properties: A review. Catena. 2021;202:105284
  58. 58. Alghamdi AG. Biochar as a potential soil additive for improving soil physical properties—A review. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2018;11(24):1-16
  59. 59. Ahmad Bhat S, Kuriqi A, Dar MUD, Bhat O, Sammen SS, Towfiqul Islam ARM, et al. Application of biochar for improving physical, chemical, and hydrological soil properties: A systematic review. Sustainability. 2022;14(17):11104
  60. 60. Jain S, Singh A, Khare P, Chanda D, Mishra D, Shanker K, et al. Toxicity assessment of Bacopamonnieri L. grown in biochar amended extremely acidic coal mine spoils. Ecological Engineering. 2017;108:211-219
  61. 61. Liu Y, Zhu J, Ye C, Zhu P, Ba Q , Pang J, et al. Effects of biochar application on the abundance and community composition of denitrifying bacteria in a reclaimed soil from coal mining subsidence area. Science of the Total Environment. 2018;625:1218-1224
  62. 62. Villagra-Mendoza K, Horn R. Effect of biochar addition on hydraulic functions of two textural soils. Geoderma. 2018;326:88-95
  63. 63. Burrell LD, Zehetner F, Rampazzo N, Wimmer B, Soja G. Long-term effects of biochar on soil physical properties. Geoderma. 2016;282:96-102
  64. 64. Chen C, Zhu H, Lv Q , Tang Q. Impact of biochar on red paddy soil physical and hydraulic properties and rice yield over 3 years. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 2022;22(2):607-616
  65. 65. Głąb T, Palmowska J, Zaleski T, Gondek K. Effect of biochar application on soil hydrological properties and physical quality of sandy soil. Geoderma. 2016;281:11-20
  66. 66. Qin X, Wang H, Liu C, Li J, Wan Y, Gao Q , et al. Long-term effect of biochar application on yield-scaled greenhouse gas emissions in a rice paddy cropping system: A four-year case study in South China. Science of the Total Environment. 2016;569:1390-1401
  67. 67. Verheijen FG, Zhuravel A, Silva FC, Amaro A, Ben-Hur M, Keizer JJ. The influence of biochar particle size and concentration on bulk density and maximum water holding capacity of sandy vs sandy loam soil in a column experiment. Geoderma. 2019;347:194-202
  68. 68. Hina K, Bishop P, Arbestain MC, Calvelo-Pereira R, Maciá-Agulló JA, Hindmarsh J, et al. Producing biochars with enhanced surface activity through alkaline pretreatment of feedstocks. Soil Research. 2010;48(7):606-617
  69. 69. Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abu-Lail NI, Fortuna AM, Dallmeyer I, Garcia-Pérez M. The role of biochar porosity and surface functionality in augmenting hydrologic properties of a sandy soil. Science of the Total Environment. 2017;574:139-147
  70. 70. Bonelli PR, Buonomo EL, Cukierman AL. Pyrolysis of sugarcane bagasse and co-pyrolysis with an Argentinean subbituminous coal. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 2007;29(8):731-740
  71. 71. Tomczyk A, Sokołowska Z, Boguta P. Biochar physicochemical properties: Pyrolysis temperature and feedstock kind effects. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology. 2020;19(1):191-215
  72. 72. Wani I, Kushvaha V, Garg A, Kumar R, Naik S, Sharma P. Review on effect of biochar on soil strength: Towards exploring usage of biochar in geo-engineering infrastructure. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 2022:1-32. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-022-02795-5
  73. 73. Yang C, Liu J, Ying H, Lu S. Soil pore structure changes induced by biochar affect microbial diversity and community structure in an Ultisol. Soil and Tillage Research. 2022;224:105505
  74. 74. Negassa WC, Guber AK, Kravchenko AN, Marsh TL, Hildebrandt B, Rivers ML. Properties of soil pore space regulate pathways of plant residue decomposition and community structure of associated bacteria. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0123999
  75. 75. Seyedsadr S, Šípek V, Jačka L, Sněhota M, Beesley L, Pohořelý M, et al. Biochar considerably increases the easily available water and nutrient content in low-organic soils amended with compost and manure. Chemosphere. 2022;293:133586
  76. 76. Hardie M, Clothier B, Bound S, Oliver G, Close D. Does biochar influence soil physical properties and soil water availability? Plant and Soil. 2014;376(1):347-361
  77. 77. Cañasveras JC, Barrón V, Del Campillo MC, Torrent J, Gómez JA. Estimation of aggregate stability indices in Mediterranean soils by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Geoderma. 2010;158(1-2):78-84
  78. 78. Yan FL, Shi ZH, Li ZX, Cai CF. Estimating interrill soil erosion from aggregate stability of Ultisols in subtropical China. Soil and Tillage Research. 2008;100(1-2):34-41
  79. 79. Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W. Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal–A review. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2002;35(4):219-230
  80. 80. Sun F, Lu S. Biochars improve aggregate stability, water retention, and pore-space properties of clayey soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 2014;177(1):26-33
  81. 81. Wang D, Fonte SJ, Parikh SJ, Six J, Scow KM. Biochar additions can enhance soil structure and the physical stabilization of C in aggregates. Geoderma. 2017;303:110-117
  82. 82. Liang B, Lehmann J, Sohi SP, Thies JE, O’Neill B, Trujillo L, et al. Black carbon affects the cycling of non-black carbon in soil. Organic Geochemistry. 2010;41(2):206-213
  83. 83. Yuan Z, Song Y, Li D, Huang B, Chen Y, Ge X, et al. Effects of biochar application on the loss characteristics of Cd from acidic soil under simulated rainfall conditions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022;30(2):1-12
  84. 84. Wang H, She D, Fei Y, Tang S. Synergic effects of biochar and polyacrylamide amendments on the mechanical properties of silt loam soil under coastal reclamation in China. Catena. 2019;182:104152
  85. 85. Zong Y, Xiao Q , Lu S. Acidity, water retention, and mechanical physical quality of a strongly acidic Ultisol amended with biochars derived from different feedstocks. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 2016;16(1):177-190
  86. 86. Mukome FN, Zhang X, Silva LC, Six J, Parikh SJ. Use of chemical and physical characteristics to investigate trends in biochar feedstocks. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2013;61(9):2196-2204
  87. 87. Safari N, Aliasgharzad N, Asghari S. The effects of polyacrylamide on the parameters of physical quality in a clay loam soil selected from semiarid region. Journal of Soil Environment. 2015;1(1):10-17
  88. 88. Choudhary MP, Charan HD, Acharya B. Experimental investigation on biochar production and application: Solution to air pollution due to stubble burning as well as amending soil consistency. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A. 2021;102(3):705-712
  89. 89. Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Grossman J, O'Neill BJOJFJJEG, et al. Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2006;70(5):1719-1730
  90. 90. Hossain MK, Strezov V, Chan KY, Ziolkowski A, Nelson PF. Influence of pyrolysis temperature on production and nutrient properties of wastewater sludge biochar. Journal of Environmental Management. 2011;92(1):223-228
  91. 91. Melo LC, Coscione AR, Abreu CA, Puga AP, Camargo OA. Influence of pyrolysis temperature on cadmium and zinc sorption capacity of sugar cane straw–derived biochar. BioResources. 2013;8(4):4992-5004
  92. 92. Novak JM, Lima I, Xing B, Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Das KC, et al. Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Annals of Environmental Science. 2009;3(2):195-206
  93. 93. Wang ZY, Chen L, Sun FL, Luo XX, Wang HF, Liu GC, et al. Effects of adding biochar on the properties and nitrogen bioavailability of an acidic soil. European Journal of Soil Science. 2017;68(4):559-572
  94. 94. Chintala R, Schumacher TE, McDonald LM, Clay DE, Malo DD, Papiernik SK, et al. Phosphorus sorption and availability from biochars and soil/B iochar mixtures. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water. 2014;42(5):626-634
  95. 95. Carrier M, Hardie AG, Uras Ü, Görgens J, Knoetze JH. Production of char from vacuum pyrolysis of South-African sugar cane bagasse and its characterization as activated carbon and biochar. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 2012;96:24-32
  96. 96. Murtaza G, Ahmed Z, Usman M. Feedstock type, pyrolysis temperature and acid modification effects on physiochemical attributes of biochar and soil quality. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2022;15(3):1-30
  97. 97. Domingues RR, Sánchez-Monedero MA, Spokas KA, Melo LC, Trugilho PF, Valenciano MN, et al. Enhancing cation exchange capacity of weathered soils using biochar: Feedstock, pyrolysis conditions and addition rate. Agronomy. 2020;10(6):824
  98. 98. Fageria NK, Baligar VC. Ameliorating soil acidity of tropical Oxisols by liming for sustainable crop production. Advances in Agronomy. 2008;99:345-399
  99. 99. Zheng SJ. Crop production on acidic soils: Overcoming aluminium toxicity and phosphorus deficiency. Annals of Botany. 2010;106(1):183-184
  100. 100. Lehmann J, Rondon M. Bio-char soil management on highly weathered soils in the humid tropics. Biological Approaches to Sustainable Soil Systems. 2006;113(517):e530
  101. 101. Laghari M, Mirjat MS, Hu Z, Fazal S, Xiao B, Hu M, et al. Effects of biochar application rate on sandy desert soil properties and sorghum growth. Catena. 2015;135:313-320
  102. 102. Li C, Xiong Y, Qu Z, Xu X, Huang Q , Huang G. Impact of biochar addition on soil properties and water-fertilizer productivity of tomato in semi-arid region of Inner Mongolia, China. Geoderma. 2018;331:100-108
  103. 103. Li Y, Hu S, Chen J, Müller K, Li Y, Fu W, et al. Effects of biochar application in forest ecosystems on soil properties and greenhouse gas emissions: A review. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 2018;18(2):546-563
  104. 104. Pratiwi EPA, Shinogi Y. Rice husk biochar application to paddy soil and its effects on soil physical properties, plant growth, and methane emission. Paddy and Water Environment. 2016;14(4):521-532
  105. 105. Are KS, Adelana AO, Fademi IO, Aina OA. Improving physical properties of degraded soil: Potential of poultry manure and biochar. Agriculture and Natural Resources. 2017;51(6):454-462
  106. 106. de Sousa Lima JR, de Moraes Silva W, de Medeiros EV, Duda GP, Corrêa MM, Martins Filho AP, et al. Effect of biochar on physicochemical properties of a sandy soil and maize growth in a greenhouse experiment. Geoderma. 2018;319:14-23
  107. 107. Malik Z, Yutong Z, ShengGao L, Abassi GH, Ali S, Kamran M, et al. Effect of biochar and quicklime on growth of wheat and physicochemical properties of Ultisols. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2018;11(17):1-12
  108. 108. Kang SW, Kim SH, Park JH, Seo DC, Ok YS, Cho JS. Effect of biochar derived from barley straw on soil physicochemical properties, crop growth, and nitrous oxide emission in an upland field in South Korea. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018;25(26):25813-25821
  109. 109. Gavili E, Moosavi AA, MoradiChoghamarani F. Cattle manure biochar potential for ameliorating soil physical characteristics and spinach response under drought. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2018;64(12):1714-1727
  110. 110. Wang Y, Zhong B, Shafi M, Ma J, Guo J, Wu J, et al. Effects of biochar on growth, and heavy metals accumulation of moso bamboo (Phyllostachy pubescens), soil physical properties, and heavy metals solubility in soil. Chemosphere. 2019;219:510-516
  111. 111. Teodoro M, Trakal L, Gallagher BN, Šimek P, Soudek P, Pohořelý M, et al. Application of co-composted biochar significantly improved plant-growth relevant physical/chemical properties of a metal contaminated soil. Chemosphere. 2020;242:125255
  112. 112. Wang H, Yan S, Ren T, Yuan Y, Kuang G, Wang B, et al. Novel environmental factors affecting microbial responses and physicochemical properties by sequentially applied biochar in black soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020;27(30):37432-37443
  113. 113. Chang Y, Rossi L, Zotarelli L, Gao B, Shahid MA, Sarkhosh A. Biochar improves soil physical characteristics and strengthens root architecture in muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia L.). Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture. 2021;8(1):1-11
  114. 114. Sharma P, Abrol V, Sharma V, Chaddha S, Rao CS, Ganie AQ , et al. Effectiveness of biochar and compost on improving soil hydro-physical properties, crop yield and monetary returns in inceptisol subtropics. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2021;28(12):7539-7549
  115. 115. Kang MW, Yibeltal M, Kim YH, Oh SJ, Lee JC, Kwon EE, et al. Enhancement of soil physical properties and soil water retention with biochar-based soil amendments. Science of the Total Environment. 2022;836:155746
  116. 116. Cely P, Gascó G, Paz-Ferreiro J, Méndez A. Agronomic properties of biochars from different manure wastes. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 2015;111:173-182
  117. 117. Masto RE, Ansari MA, George J, Selvi VA, Ram LC. Co-application of biochar and lignite fly ash on soil nutrients and biological parameters at different crop growth stages of Zea mays. Ecological Engineering. 2013;58:314-322
  118. 118. Usman ARA, Al-Wabel MI, Abdulaziz AH, Mahmoud WA, El-Naggar AH, Ahmad M, et al. Conocarpus biochar induces changes in soil nutrient availability and tomato growth under saline irrigation. Pedosphere. 2016;26(1):27-38
  119. 119. Igalavithana AD, Mandal S, Niazi NK, Vithanage M, Parikh SJ, Mukome FN, et al. Advances and future directions of biochar characterization methods and applications. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2017;47(23):2275-2330
  120. 120. El-Naggar A, Lee SS, Awad YM, Yang X, Ryu C, Rizwan M, et al. Influence of soil properties and feedstocks on biochar potential for carbon mineralization and improvement of infertile soils. Geoderma. 2018;332:100-108
  121. 121. Prapagdee S, Tawinteung N. Effects of biochar on enhanced nutrient use efficiency of green bean, Vigna radiata L. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017;24:9460-9467
  122. 122. Jatav HS, Singh SK, Singh Y, Kumar O. Biochar and sewage sludge application increases yield and micronutrient uptake in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2018;49(13):1617-1628
  123. 123. Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan KY, Downie A, Rust J, et al. Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant and Soil. 2010;327(1):235-246
  124. 124. Yuan JH, Xu RK, Zhang H. The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresource Technology. 2011;102(3):3488-3497
  125. 125. Hossain MK, Strezov V, Chan KY, Nelson PF. Agronomic properties of wastewater sludge biochar and bioavailability of metals in production of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Chemosphere. 2010;78(9):1167-1171
  126. 126. Nielsen S, Joseph S, Ye J, Chia C, Munroe P, van Zwieten L, et al. Crop-season and residual effects of sequentially applied mineral enhanced biochar and N fertilizer on crop yield, soil chemistry and microbial communities. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2018;255:52-61
  127. 127. Jeffery S, Abalos D, Prodana M, Bastos AC, Van Groenigen JW, Hungate BA, et al. Biochar boosts tropical but not temperate crop yields. Environmental Research Letters. 2017;12(5):053001
  128. 128. Ghodszad L, Reyhanitabar A, Oustan S, Alidokht L. Phosphorus sorption and desorption characteristics of soils as affected by biochar. Soil and Tillage Research. 2022;216:105251
  129. 129. Lu HL, Li KW, Nkoh JN, He X, Hong ZN, Xu RK. Effects of the increases in soil pH and pH buffering capacity induced by crop residue biochars on available Cd contents in acidic paddy soils. Chemosphere. 2022;301:134674
  130. 130. Cookson WR, Abaye DA, Marschner P, Murphy DV, Stockdale EA, Goulding KW. The contribution of soil organic matter fractions to carbon and nitrogen mineralization and microbial community size and structure. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2005;37(9):1726-1737
  131. 131. Glaser B, Haumaier L, Guggenberger G, Zech W. The ‘TerraPreta’ phenomenon: A model for sustainable agriculture in the humid tropics. Naturwissenschaften. 2001;88(1):37-41
  132. 132. Zygourakis K. Biochar soil amendments for increased crop yields: How to design a “designer” biochar. AICHE Journal. 2017;63(12):5425-5437
  133. 133. Chen H, Yang X, Wang H, Sarkar B, Shaheen SM, Gielen G, et al. Animal carcass-and wood-derived biochars improved nutrient bioavailability, enzyme activity, and plant growth in metal-phthalic acid ester co-contaminated soils: A trial for reclamation and improvement of degraded soils. Journal of Environmental Management. 2020;261:110246
  134. 134. Shaaban M, Van Zwieten L, Bashir S, Younas A, Núñez-Delgado A, Chhajro MA, et al. A concise review of biochar application to agricultural soils to improve soil conditions and fight pollution. Journal of Environmental Management. 2018;228:429-440
  135. 135. Akhtar SS, Li G, Andersen MN, Liu F. Biochar enhances yield and quality of tomato under reduced irrigation. Agricultural Water Management. 2014;138:37-44
  136. 136. Huang M, Zhang Z, Zhu C, Zhai Y, Lu P. Effect of biochar on sweet corn and soil salinity under conjunctive irrigation with brackish water in coastal saline soil. Scientia Horticulturae. 2019;250:405-413
  137. 137. Liu M, Zhu J, Yang X, Fu Q , Hu H, Huang Q. Biochar produced from the straw of common crops simultaneously stabilizes soil organic matter and heavy metals. Science of the Total Environment. 2022;828:154494
  138. 138. Sheng Y, Zhu L. Biochar alters microbial community and carbon sequestration potential across different soil pH. Science of the Total Environment. 2018;622:1391-1399
  139. 139. Ma H, Egamberdieva D, Wirth S, Li Q , Omari RA, Hou M, et al. Effect of biochar and irrigation on the interrelationships among soybean growth, root nodulation, plant P uptake, and soil nutrients in a sandy field. Sustainability. 2019;11(23):6542
  140. 140. Das SK, Das SK. Acid sulphate soil: Management strategy for soil health and productivity. Popular Kheti. 2015;3(2):2-7
  141. 141. Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe R. Application of biochar in agriculture and environment, and its safety issues. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 2020;13:1-11
  142. 142. Barman H, Das SK, Roy A. Future of nano science in technology for prosperity: A policy paper. Nanoscience & Technology. 2018;5(1):1-5
  143. 143. Das SK, Mukherjee I, Roy A. Flubendiamide as new generation insecticide in plant toxicology: A policy paper. Advance in Clinical Toxicology. 2017;2:100-122
  144. 144. Das SK, Avasthe RK, Singh M, Yadav A. Soil health improvement using biochar application in Sikkim: A success story. Innovative Farming. 2018;3(1):48-50
  145. 145. Singh NS, Mukherjee I, Das SK, Varghese E. Leaching of clothianidin in two different Indian soils: Effect of organic amendment. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2018;100(4):553-559
  146. 146. Barman H, Das SK, Roy A. Zinc in soil environment for plant health and management strategy. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research. 2018;6(5):149-154
  147. 147. Das SK, Avasthe RK. Livelihood improvement of rural tribal farmers through soil health management, input support system and training-a success story. Innovative Farming. 2017;2(3):171-173
  148. 148. Roy A, Singh NU, Tripathi AK, Yumnam A, Sinha PK, Kumar B, et al. Dynamics of pulse production in north-east region of India-a state-wise analysis. Economic Affairs. 2017;62(4):655-662
  149. 149. Ma H, Egamberdieva D, Wirth S, Bellingrath-Kimura SD. Effect of biochar and irrigation on soybean-rhizobium symbiotic performance and soil enzymatic activity in field rhizosphere. Agronomy. 2019;9(10):626
  150. 150. Abujabhah IS, Bound SA, Doyle R, Bowman JP. Effects of biochar and compost amendments on soil physicochemical properties and the total community within a temperate agricultural soil. Applied Soil Ecology. 2016;98:243-253
  151. 151. Tang J, Zhang S, Zhang X, Chen J, He X, Zhang Q. Effects of pyrolysis temperature on soil-plant-microbe responses to Solidago canadensis L.-derived biochar in coastal saline-alkali soil. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;731:138938
  152. 152. Somerville PD, Farrell C, May PB, Livesley SJ. Biochar and compost equally improve urban soil physical and biological properties and tree growth, with no added benefit in combination. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;706:135736
  153. 153. Warnock DD, Lehmann J, Kuyper TW, Rillig MC. Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil–concepts and mechanisms. Plant and Soil. 2007;300(1):9-20
  154. 154. Kolton M, Graber ER, Tsehansky L, Elad Y, Cytryn E. Biochar-stimulated plant performance is strongly linked to microbial diversity and metabolic potential in the rhizosphere. New Phytologist. 2017;213(3):1393-1404
  155. 155. Pei J, Zhuang S, Cui J, Li J, Li B, Wu J, et al. Biochar decreased the temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition in a paddy field. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2017;249:156-164
  156. 156. Egamberdieva D, Jabbarov Z, Arora NK, Wirth S, Bellingrath-Kimura SD. Biochar mitigates effects of pesticides on soil biological activities. Environmental Sustainability. 2021;4(2):335-342
  157. 157. Qiu Y, Pang H, Zhou Z, Zhang P, Feng Y, Sheng GD. Competitive biodegradation of dichlobenil and atrazine coexisting in soil amended with a char and citrate. Environmental Pollution. 2009;157(11):2964-2969
  158. 158. Irfan M, Hussain Q , Khan KS, Akmal M, Ijaz SS, Hayat R, et al. Response of soil microbial biomass and enzymatic activity to biochar amendment in the organic carbon deficient arid soil: A 2-year field study. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2019;12(3):1-9
  159. 159. Meng L, Sun T, Li M, Saleem M, Zhang Q , Wang C. Soil-applied biochar increases microbial diversity and wheat plant performance under herbicide fomesafen stress. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2019;171:75-83
  160. 160. Bhattacharjya S, Chandra R, Pareek N, Raverkar KP. Biochar and crop residue application to soil: Effect on soil biochemical properties, nutrient availability and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and wheat (Triticumaestivum L.). Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2016;62(8):1095-1108
  161. 161. Pandian K, Subramaniayan P, Gnasekaran P, Chitraputhirapillai S. Effect of biochar amendment on soil physical, chemical and biological properties and groundnut yield in rainfedAlfisol of semi-arid tropics. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2016;62(9):1293-1310
  162. 162. Mierzwa-Hersztek M, Gondek K, Baran A. Effect of poultry litter biochar on soil enzymatic activity, ecotoxicity and plant growth. Applied Soil Ecology. 2016;105:144-150
  163. 163. Dil M, Oelbermann M, Xue W. An evaluation of biochar pre-conditioned with urea ammonium nitrate on maize (Zea mays L.) production and soil biochemical characteristics. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 2014;94(4):551-562
  164. 164. Caroline A, Debode J, Vandecasteele B, D’Hose T, Cremelie P, Haegeman A, et al. Biological, physicochemical and plant health responses in lettuce and strawberry in soil or peat amended with biochar. Applied Soil Ecology. 2016;107:1-12
  165. 165. Gao S, Hoffman-Krull K, DeLuca TH. Soil biochemical properties and crop productivity following application of locally produced biochar at organic farms on Waldron Island, WA. Biogeochemistry. 2017;136(1):31-46
  166. 166. Trupiano D, Cocozza C, Baronti S, Amendola C, Vaccari FP, Lustrato G, et al. The effects of biochar and its combination with compost on lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) growth, soil properties, and soil microbial activity and abundance. International Journal of Agronomy. 2017;2017:1-13
  167. 167. Gao S, DeLuca TH. Wood biochar impacts soil phosphorus dynamics and microbial communities in organically-managed croplands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2018;126:144-150
  168. 168. Edenborn SL, Johnson LM, Edenborn HM, Albarran-Jack MR, Demetrion LD. Amendment of a hardwood biochar with compost tea: Effects on plant growth, insect damage and the functional diversity of soil microbial communities. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture. 2018;34(2):88-106
  169. 169. Egamberdieva D, Li L, Ma H, Wirth S, Bellingrath-Kimura SD. Soil amendment with different maize biochars improves chickpea growth under different moisture levels by improving symbiotic performance with Mesorhizobiumciceri and soil biochemical properties to varying degrees. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;10:2423
  170. 170. Zheng Y, Han X, Li Y, Yang J, Li N, An N. Effects of biochar and straw application on the physicochemical and biological properties of paddy soils in Northeast China. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):1-11
  171. 171. Chen S, Qi G, Ma G, Zhao X. Biochar amendment controlled bacterial wilt through changing soil chemical properties and microbial community. Microbiological Research. 2020;231:126373
  172. 172. Hale L, Curtis D, Azeem M, Montgomery J, Crowley DE, McGiffen ME Jr. Influence of compost and biochar on soil biological properties under turfgrass supplied deficit irrigation. Applied Soil Ecology. 2021;168:104134
  173. 173. Ma H, Shurigin V, Jabborova D, dela Cruz JA, dela Cruz TE, Wirth S, et al. The integrated effect of microbial inoculants and biochar types on soil biological properties, and plant growth of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Plants. 2022;11(3):423
  174. 174. Phares CA, Amoakwah E, Danquah A, Akaba S, Frimpong KA, Mensah TA. Improved soil physicochemical, biological properties and net income following the application of inorganic NPK fertilizer and biochar for maize production. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2022;42(4):289-295
  175. 175. Suzuki K, Matsunaga R, Hayashi K, Matsumoto N, Tabo R, Tobita S, et al. Effects of traditional soil management practices on the nutrient status in Sahelian sandy soils of Niger, West Africa. Geoderma. 2014;223:1-8
  176. 176. Hossain MZ, Bahar B, Sarkar B, Donne S, Ok YS, Bolan N. Biochar and its importance on nutrient dynamics in soil and plant. Biochar. 2020;2:379-420
  177. 177. Guo XX, Liu HT, Zhang J. The role of biochar in organic waste composting and soil improvement: A review. Waste Management. 2020;102:884-899
  178. 178. Gao S, Hoffman-Krull K, Bidwell AL, DeLuca TH. Locally produced wood biochar increases nutrient retention and availability in agricultural soils of the San Juan Islands, USA. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2016;233:43-54
  179. 179. Abhishek K, Shrivastava A, Vimal V, Gupta AK, Bhujbal SK, Biswas JK, et al. Biochar application for greenhouse gas mitigation, contaminants immobilization and soil fertility enhancement: A state-of-the-art review. Science of the Total Environment. 2022;853:158562
  180. 180. Yaashikaa PR, Kumar PS, Varjani S, Saravanan A. A critical review on the biochar production techniques, characterization, stability and applications for circular bioeconomy. Biotechnology Reports. 2020;28:e00570
  181. 181. Amoah-Antwi C, Kwiatkowska-Malina J, Thornton SF, Fenton O, Malina G, Szara E. Restoration of soil quality using biochar and brown coal waste: A review. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;722:137852
  182. 182. Yang M, Mouazen A, Zhao X, Guo X. Assessment of a soil fertility index using visible and near-infrared spectroscopy in the rice paddy region of southern China. European Journal of Soil Science. 2020;71(4):615-626
  183. 183. Gondek K, Mierzwa-Hersztek M, Kopeć M, Sikora J, Lošák T, Grzybowski P. Sewage sludge biochar effects on phosphorus mobility in soil and accumulation in plant. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S. 2019;26(2):367-381
  184. 184. Zhu D, Zhang J, Wang Z, Muhammad RK, Lu J, Li X. Soil available potassium affected by rice straw incorporation and potassium fertilizer application under a rice–oilseed rape rotation system. Soil Use and Management. 2019;35(3):503-510
  185. 185. Change OC. Intergovernmental panel on climate change. World Meteorological Organization. 2007;52:1-43
  186. 186. IPCC. 2007 Climate Change. Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability; Working Group II. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC; 2007
  187. 187. Han L, Sun K, Yang Y, Xia X, Li F, Yang Z, et al. Biochar’s stability and effect on the content, composition and turnover of soil organic carbon. Geoderma. 2020;364:114184
  188. 188. Ippolito JA, Cui L, Kammann C, Wrage-Mönnig N, Estavillo JM, Fuertes-Mendizabal T, et al. Feedstock choice, pyrolysis temperature and type influence biochar characteristics: A comprehensive meta-data analysis review. Biochar. 2020;2(4):421-438
  189. 189. Li S, Wang S, Fan M, Wu Y, Shangguan Z. Interactions between biochar and nitrogen impact soil carbon mineralization and the microbial community. Soil and Tillage Research. 2020;196:104437
  190. 190. Fang Y, Singh B, Singh BP. Effect of temperature on biochar priming effects and its stability in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2015;80:136-145
  191. 191. Chen G, Fang Y, Van Zwieten L, Xuan Y, Tavakkoli E, Wang X, et al. Priming, stabilization and temperature sensitivity of native SOC is controlled by microbial responses and physicochemical properties of biochar. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2021;154:108139
  192. 192. Chen J, Chen D, Xu Q , Fuhrmann JJ, Li L, Pan G, et al. Organic carbon quality, composition of main microbial groups, enzyme activities, and temperature sensitivity of soil respiration of an acid paddy soil treated with biochar. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2019;55(2):185-197
  193. 193. Chen J, Sun X, Zheng J, Zhang X, Liu X, Bian R, et al. Biochar amendment changes temperature sensitivity of soil respiration and composition of microbial communities 3 years after incorporation in an organic carbon-poor dry cropland soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2018;54(2):175-188
  194. 194. Dissanayake PD, You S, Igalavithana AD, Xia Y, Bhatnagar A, Gupta S, et al. Biochar-based adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2020;119:109582
  195. 195. El-Naggar A, El-Naggar AH, Shaheen SM, Sarkar B, Chang SX, Tsang DC, et al. Biochar composition-dependent impacts on soil nutrient release, carbon mineralization, and potential environmental risk: A review. Journal of Environmental Management. 2019;241:458-467
  196. 196. El-Naggar A, Lee MH, Hur J, Lee YH, Igalavithana AD, Shaheen SM, et al. Biochar-induced metal immobilization and soil biogeochemical process: An integrated mechanistic approach. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;698:134112
  197. 197. Jing F, Sun Y, Liu Y, Wan Z, Chen J, Tsang DC. Interactions between biochar and clay minerals in changing biochar carbon stability. Science of the Total Environment. 2022;809:151124
  198. 198. Saffari N, Hajabbasi MA, Shirani H, Mosaddeghi MR, Mamedov AI. Biochar type and pyrolysis temperature effects on soil quality indicators and structural stability. Journal of Environmental Management. 2020;261:110190
  199. 199. Mandal S, Sarkar B, Bolan N, Novak J, Ok YS, Van Zwieten L, et al. Designing advanced biochar products for maximizing greenhouse gas mitigation potential. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2016;46(17):1367-1401
  200. 200. Zhang X, Zhang Q , Zhan L, Xu X, Bi R, Xiong Z. Biochar addition stabilized soil carbon sequestration by reducing temperature sensitivity of mineralization and altering the microbial community in a greenhouse vegetable field. Journal of Environmental Management. 2022;313:114972
  201. 201. Rahman MA, Jahiruddin M, Kader MA, Islam MR, Solaiman ZM. Sugarcane bagasse biochar increases soil carbon sequestration and yields of maize and groundnut in charland ecosystem. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2022;68(10):1338-1351

Written By

Hassan Ali, Shahzaib Ali, Sadia Baloch, Fahmeeda Naheed, Emaan Amjad, Qudsia Saeed, Muhammad Naveed and Adnan Mustafa

Submitted: 12 January 2023 Reviewed: 11 January 2024 Published: 05 February 2024