Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Impact of Physical Activity on Physical and Cognition Function among Community-Living Older Adults

Written By

Milan Chang Gudjonsson

Submitted: 23 June 2023 Reviewed: 11 December 2023 Published: 17 January 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.114091

Advances in Geriatrics and Gerontology - Challenges of the New Millennium IntechOpen
Advances in Geriatrics and Gerontology - Challenges of the New Mi... Edited by Sara Palermo

From the Edited Volume

Advances in Geriatrics and Gerontology - Challenges of the New Millennium [Working Title]

Ph.D. Sara Palermo

Chapter metrics overview

50 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The aging population presents unique challenges to healthcare systems worldwide, particularly in terms of maintaining physical function and cognitive abilities in old age. Physical activity (PA) is emerging as a potent intervention to enhance the well-being and functional independence of older individuals. The current review chapter will focus on the effect of PA on physical and cognitive function to provide comprehensive understanding of the interplay among community-dwelling older adults. The review (1) overviews the positive impact of PA on physical functions, including muscle strength, endurance, balance, and cardiovascular health, elucidating how these benefits contribute to improved mobility and reduced risk of falls among older adults, and (2) explores also how regular PA is associated with the cognitive benefits, including its preventive or delaying effect of cognitive decline, enhancements in memory, attention, executive function, and overall cognitive vitality. It emphasizes the critical role of PA in enhancing the overall capacity on managing daily living of older adults and offers insights into effective strategies for promoting active and healthy aging. These knowledge and insights can also guide healthcare practitioners, policymakers, and researchers in developing and implementing effective strategies to promote PA and support healthy aging in older populations.

Keywords

  • physical activity
  • cognitive function
  • lifestyle
  • aging
  • physical function

1. Introduction

Aging is an inevitable process that every individual undergoes as they progress through life. The global demographic changes show a significant shift that the proportion of older adults (aged 60 and above) steadily increasing [1]. This demographic transition has caused a growing interest in healthy aging and age-related health challenges [2, 3]. This phenomenon is attributed to a combination of factors, including declining birth rates and advancements in healthcare, resulting in extended life expectancies [4]. This review chapter underscores the significant role of PA in enhancing the quality of life and functional independence of community-living older adults, illuminating the pathways through which it positively impacts both physical and cognitive functions. It calls for continued research and targeted interventions to harness the potential of PA as a cornerstone of healthy aging. This perspective sheds light on the following impact of an aging population on our society. The potential impact of an aging population on our society are followings:

  1. Healthcare challenges: A significant increase in the older population presents various challenges for healthcare systems worldwide. There is a higher demand for healthcare services, particularly for age-related diseases and conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, and cardiovascular problems.

  2. Economic implications: The aging population can also have economic implications. As the older population grows, it may affect economic productivity and labor markets. Governments need to address these challenges to maintain economic stability.

  3. Social considerations: An aging population can lead to changes in family structures and caregiving dynamics. The responsibility of caring for elderly family members often falls on the younger generation, impacting their work-life balance and overall well-being.

Advertisement

2. Understanding factors contributing to the increase of older population

Chronological aging refers to the passage of time as measured by one’s date of birth [5], commonly used to determine an individual’s age, wherein each passing year contributes to one’s chronological age. Life expectancy (LE) is an important indicator for measuring the growth of the aging population [6], which is increasing globally as a result of reduced mortality among the older individuals [7]. Another significant factor contributing to the growth of the older population is the decline in birth rates observed in many countries [7, 8], resulting in a phenomenon known as “population aging.” With fewer young people being born, the proportion of older individuals in the population naturally increases. Enhanced healthcare and medical advancements have also played a pivotal role in extending LE [9]. Medical conditions that were once fatal are now manageable or treatable, allowing individuals to lead longer and healthier lives. Improved accessibility to healthcare services and preventive measures has further contributed to this trend [10]. Moreover, economic stability and social welfare programs have provided support for older individuals [11], enabling them to lead more comfortable lives during their later years.

Advertisement

3. Impacts of PA on physical and cognitive function among older population

Physical and cognitive function are two fundamental aspects of an individual’s well-being, influencing their ability to live independently and maintain a high quality of life (M. [12, 13, 14]). Aging-related functional decline can result in numerous health issues, reduced autonomy, decreased independence, and heightened pressure on healthcare systems [15, 16]. Given the importance of physical function and cognition in the lives of older adults, understanding how PA impacts these domains is crucial. The present chapter explores the current body of evidence on the topic, highlighting the potential benefits of regular PA on the physical and cognitive function of older adults.

Muscular strength declines 3% every year, and muscle mass reduces about 2% after 40 [17, 18, 19, 20]. These phenomena of decline in both muscular strength and muscle mass with aging are well-known, and it is important to consider that the cause of this decline may not solely be attributed to the aging process itself but could also be linked to the reduction in PA that typically accompanies the aging process. Reduction in PA accelerated myoatrophy, which causes the loss of muscle mass and eventually lower basal metabolism [21, 22]. These changes lead to surplus energy increases and the accumulation of lipids [23, 24], which may further cause health problems, including higher blood pressure or blood glucose levels [25, 26, 27]. The significance of PA in maintaining our health has been long acknowledged. Regular PA offers numerous benefits, including (1) improving cardiovascular health, (2) enhancing or preserving cognitive and physical function [28, 29], and (3) reducing the risk of cognitive decline and major neurocognitive disorder among older adults [30, 31].

Clear evidences suggest that PA is beneficial for maintaining cognitive function, reducing risk of major neurocognitive disorder, and brain atrophy among older adults [30, 32]. While obesity and overweight were found to increase risk of major neurocognitive disorder [33], brain volumes (total brain tissue volume and gray matter and white matter volumes) are also strongly related to atherosclerosis [34], as well as to vascular risk factors such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure [35] or diabetes [36, 37]. The effect of regular PA and obesity on brain health may reflect lifestyle factors [32] or underlying modulation of neurotrophic and vascular risk factors as demonstrated in clinical and experimental research [38, 39].

Advertisement

4. Impact of PA on mobility and associated cognitive function

Those with low physical performance have a significantly higher risk of future institutionalization and disability onset [40, 41, 42]. While regular PA participation is linked with positive health outcomes, lack of PA has been also associated with increased disability and poor physical function among older adults [43]. Particularly, the mobility disability has been shown its predictive value for future institutionalization, mortality, and disability onset [40, 44]. Therefore, mobility function of older adults is often used as a clinical screening tool for the older population [43]. On the other hand, it is also suggested that those with low cognitive function have a lower mobility function compared with those with normal cognitive function (M. [12, 45, 46]). As the ability to move from one location to another is closely linked to factors such as attention, body coordination, and adaptability to one’s surroundings [12, 47], older adults may need to maintain a higher level of cognitive function in order to sustain their independence in daily life.

Advertisement

5. Cognitive impairment among older adults

It is crucial to prioritize efforts to prevent or postpone cognitive decline in older adults [48]. Nevertheless, a substantial number of major neurocognitive disorder patients also experience damage from other vascular brain diseases, including mini-strokes, which are ranked as the fifth leading cause of death in the United States [49]. Earlier research has suggested that this major neurocognitive disorder could potentially rank as the third leading cause of death for older individuals, trailing only behind heart disease and cancer [50]. Memory problems are typically one of the first signs of cognitive impairment [51]. Some people with more memory problems than normal for their age may also have mild cognitive impairment (MCI), but their symptoms do not interfere with their everyday lives [52]. Movement difficulties and problems with the sense of smell have also been linked to MCI [53, 54].

While the impact of PA on cognitive functions is evident, several limitations need to be considered when interpreting the results. First, most studies had PA data collected close to the time at which cognitive function was assessed or major neurocognitive disorder diagnosed. With the short time intervals between PA and major neurocognitive disorder, it is difficult to determine whether the reported PA acts as a risk factor for cognitive decline or serves as an indicator of incipient disease. Second, most previous studies have examined either the relationship between PA and global cognitive performance or major neurocognitive disorder, but not both simultaneously. Third, studies that investigated the relationship between midlife PA and the risk of major neurocognitive disorder were mixed, and there is limited information on the association between levels of PA earlier in life and brain atrophy among older adults. At last, most studies investigating age-related changes in cerebral volume were cross-sectional and utilized small sample sizes of healthy older individuals or larger samples with all age groups. Further, longitudinal research on the impact of long-term PA on brain health is vital for a comprehensive understanding of these relationships.

While older people with MCI are at greater risk for developing major neurocognitive disorder, some may go back to normal cognition [53]. Researchers are studying biomarkers (biological signs of disease found in brain images, cerebrospinal fluid, and blood) to detect early sign in the brains of people with MCI and people with normal cognition who may be at greater risk for the major neurocognitive disorder [55]. Previous studies indicated that early detection is possible, but more research is needed before these medical techniques are available for the everyday medical practice to diagnose AD [48].

Advertisement

6. Effective PA intervention to prevent functional decline

Numerous exercise intervention studies have demonstrated that exercise improves physical performance in old age [12, 56, 57]. Further, regular PA or exercise also has a positive association with cognitive performance in the short- or long-term period [12, 58, 59]. Among various types of exercise for older adults, resistance exercise is one of the most feasible types of exercise to increase muscle mass and strength [59, 60, 61]. Particularly for the prevention of mobility disability and sarcopenia, the strength training is suggested as the most effective training method for older adults [59, 62, 63], even for those with limited mobility or cardiovascular fitness [64].

Cross-sectional studies have also shown that PA and physical performance are strongly associated with cognitive function [65, 66, 67], while it is possible that the improvement of physical performance by the exercise intervention may vary by baseline cognitive status [12]. Exercise intervention studies have primarily focused on investigating the improvement of physical performance and cognitive function among older adults following the intervention period [12, 13, 56, 62]. The specific findings related to the influence of various types of physical activity on cognitive function are as follows.

  1. Engaging in regular aerobic exercises, such as running, swimming, or cycling, has been associated with improved cognitive functions, especially memory and attention, and has been correlated with increased hippocampal volume, contributing to memory enhancement and reduced cognitive decline risk [68, 69, 70].

  2. Strength training, such as weightlifting or resistance exercises, has been found to benefit cognitive functions such as attention and memory [71]. Research suggests that resistance training can positively affect cognitive tasks and memory performance [59, 72, 73].

  3. Activities, such as dance and coordination exercises, including tai chi, have been associated with improved cognitive functions related to praxis and visuospatial skills. Studies have shown that these activities can positively impact cognitive performance, particularly in the area of visuospatial abilities [74, 75]. Yoga and meditation practices have demonstrated significant benefits for attention and memory, with studies indicating that regular yoga practice can improve cognitive functions, including memory, attention, and processing speed [76, 77].

  4. Certain cognitive training programs and brain games have been designed to target specific cognitive functions, including memory, attention, and language. Research suggests that engaging in these activities can lead to improvements in cognitive performance and function [78, 79, 80].

Advertisement

7. Other potentially modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline

Although age is the strongest risk factor for cognitive decline, major neurocognitive disorder may not be an inevitable consequence of aging [81, 82]. Several recent studies have shown that lifestyle-related risk factors, including physical inactivity, tobacco use, unhealthy diets, and harmful use of alcohol, are strongly associated with cognitive impairment and major neurocognitive disorder [83]. Hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, obesity, and depression are all associated with an elevated risk of experiencing cognitive decline or developing major neurocognitive disorder [84, 85]. Other potentially modifiable risk factors, such as social isolation and cognitive inactivity, were also linked to the development of major neurocognitive disorder [48]. The risk reduction guidelines for cognitive decline and major neurocognitive disorder from WHO provide evidence-based guidance for a public health response to major neurocognitive disorder. These modifiable risk factors suggest that prevention of cognitive decline or major neurocognitive disorder is possible through a public health approach. Several evidence-based research have investigated whether reducing modifiable risk factors decrease the risk for major neurocognitive disorder [14, 86].

Advertisement

8. Types of intervention to prevent cognitive decline

Cognitive impairment and major neurocognitive disorder are complex, multifactorial disorders, and multi-domain interventions targeting several risk factors and disease mechanisms simultaneously could be needed for optimum preventive effects [85]. Previous prevention trials for cognitive impairment and major neurocognitive disorder have reported positive associations with cognition for PA, cognitive training, or both in smaller and shorter intervention studies [87, 88, 89]. Few prevention trials for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes have emphasized the importance of a multi-domain approach [37, 87]. Multicomponent randomized controlled trials in individuals at risk of major neurocognitive disorder have been also recommended as an effective and feasible approach [85, 90]. Previous findings suggest that a risk factors other than genetics play a role in the development of AD [84]. One of a great deal of interest could be the relationship between cognitive decline and vascular conditions such as heart disease, stroke, and high blood pressure, as well as metabolic conditions, such as diabetes and obesity [91]. In general, a nutritious diet, PA, social engagement, and mentally stimulating pursuits have all been associated with helping people stay healthy as they age [90, 92]. These factors help in reducing the risk of cognitive decline [85]. However, evidence that short-term and single-component PA interventions promote cognitive function and prevent cognitive decline or major neurocognitive disorder in older adults is largely insufficient. Various forms of PA and exercise interventions have provided compelling evidence in countering sedentary habits and encouraging PA. These interventions include the followings (Table 1).

Multimodal intervention programs: Implementing a long-term multicomponent program that combines various types of intervention including PA, cognitive training, social activity, and nutritional and cardiovascular counseling, has been shown to be effective in improving overall fitness, reducing sedentary behavior, and preventing a major neurocognitive disorder [85, 93].
Aerobic exercise programs: Implementing structured aerobic exercise programs, such as walking, jogging, or cycling, has shown significant effectiveness in reducing sedentary behavior and improving overall physical health. These programs are often tailored to individual fitness levels and can be conducted in group settings or individually [94, 95, 96].
Strength training interventions: Incorporating strength training interventions, including resistance exercises and weightlifting, has been found to be effective in promoting muscle strength, improving overall fitness, and combating the negative effects of a sedentary lifestyle, particularly in older adults [97].
Mind–body with flexibility and balance exercise programs: Interventions that integrate mind–body exercises, flexibility, and balance include tai-chi, yoga, and Pilates have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing sedentary behavior and promoting PA, while also providing benefits for mental well-being and stress reduction [74, 75, 77].

Table 1.

Effective types of intervention on cognition for older adults.

Advertisement

9. Impact of preventive intervention in adults with MCI

For cognitive outcomes in adults with MCI, evidence is still insufficient to indicate that PA interventions have a positive effect on cognition [31, 91]. However, these benefits are not consistent across all cognitive domains. This clinical trial proposal tests the efficacy and additive/synergistic effects of an exercise and cognitive training intervention on cognition with other risk factor management (social activity, nutrition, alcohol, and metabolic syndrome) in older adults who are diagnosed with MCI. Exercise and cognitive training are two promising interventions for preventing major neurocognitive disorders. Exercise increases fitness, which, in turn, improves brain structure and function, while cognitive training improves selective neural function intensively [48]. Various studies that tested cognitive training effects have reported discrepant findings due to varying programs [79, 98]. Hence, combined exercise and cognitive training may very well have an additive or synergistic effect on cognition by complementary strengthening of different neural functions. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials revealed a moderate effect of PA, with the most significant effect size observed for executive control processes [69, 99]. Optimal cognitive benefits were observed when aerobic training was combined with strength and flexibility training. Those review studies emphasized that a minimum of 30 minutes of PA training for over 6 months appeared necessary to establish stable cognitive effects in older adults. Moreover, the study suggested that engaging in moderate-intensity exercise, with an average duration of 1 hour per session, at least three times per week, could yield more pronounced cognitive and brain effects.

Advertisement

10. Conclusion

The impact of PA and exercise on physical function and cognition among community-living older adults is substantial. Regular PA and exercise have been proven to boost muscular strength, balance, mobility, cognitive function, and overall well-being in older population. The mechanisms underlying the positive impact of PA on physical function and cognition in older adults are multifaceted. Factors, such as increased blood flow to the brain, the release of neurotrophic factors, and reduced inflammation, contribute to these benefits. It is crucial for healthcare professionals, policymakers, and community organizations to facilitate initiatives that promote regular PA among older adults. This includes providing accessible exercise programs, educating about the benefits of PA and exercise, and establishing age-friendly environments. While existing literature highlights the positive relationship between PA, physical function, and cognition, further research is needed to fully understand this complex association. Long-term randomized controlled trials and investigations into the most effective types and intensities of exercise for different older adult populations can offer valuable insights.

Highlighting PA as an essential component of healthy aging is crucial, and continuous research in this area will further inform strategies aimed at improving the lives of older adults globally. As societies age, investing in older adults’ health through PA initiatives will help to promote a healthier and more dynamic future for all.

References

  1. 1. United Nations. World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Multimedia Library. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs; 2017. pp. 1-8. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/world-population-prospects-the-2017-revision.html
  2. 2. Beard JR, Officer A, de Carvalho IA, Sadana R, Pot AM, Michel J-P, et al. The world report on ageing and health: A policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet (London, England). 2016;387(10033):2145-2154. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4
  3. 3. World Health Organization. Risk Reduction of Cognitive Decline and Dementia: WHO Guidelines. WHO; 2019b:12-43. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550543
  4. 4. Knudsen AK, Allebeck P, Tollånes MC, Skogen JC, Iburg KM, McGrath JJ, et al. Life expectancy and disease burden in the Nordic countries: Results from the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors study 2017. The Lancet Public Health. 2019;4(12):e658-e669. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30224-5
  5. 5. Han LK, Verhoeven JE, Tyrka AR, Penninx BW, Wolkowitz OM, Månsson KN, et al. Accelerating research on biological aging and mental health: Current challenges and future directions. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019;106:293-311. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.04.004
  6. 6. Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW. Ageing populations: The challenges ahead. Lancet. 2009;374(9696):1196-1208. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61460-4
  7. 7. Ouellette N, Barbieri M, Wilmoth JR. Period-based mortality change: Turning points in trends since 1950. Population and Development Review. 2014;40(1):77-106. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00651.x
  8. 8. United Nations. The Problem with ‘Too Few’. United Nations Population Fund; 2023. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org/swp2023/too-few
  9. 9. World Health Organization. Healthy Life Expectancy (HALE) at Age 60 (Years). The Global Health Observatory Explore a World of Health Data. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/gho-ghe-hale-healthy-life-expectancy-at-age-60
  10. 10. Hao L, Xu X, Dupre ME, Guo A, Zhang X, Qiu L, et al. Adequate access to healthcare and added life expectancy among older adults in China. BMC Geriatrics. 2020;20(1):129. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01524-9
  11. 11. World Health Organization. Health and social care near the end of life: can policies reduce costs and improve outcomes? Economics of Ageing. WHO; 2019a. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/349803/Policy-brief-1997-8073-2021-1-eng.pdf?sequence=1
  12. 12. Chang M. The effect of cognitive function on mobility improvement among community-living older adults: A 12-week resistance exercise intervention study. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition. 2019;27(3):385-396. DOI: 10.1080/13825585.2019.1623167
  13. 13. Chang M, Geirsdottir OG, Eymundsdottir H, Thorsdottir I, Jonsson PV, Ramel A. Association between baseline handgrip strength and cognitive function assessed before and after a 12-week resistance exercise intervention among community-living older adults. Aging and Health Research. 2022;2(3):100092. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahr.2022.100092
  14. 14. Komulainen P, Tuomilehto J, Savonen K, Männikkö R, Hassinen M, Lakka TA, et al. Exercise, diet, and cognition in a 4-year randomized controlled trial: Dose-responses to exercise training (DR’s EXTRA). The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2021;113(6):1428-1439. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab018
  15. 15. Oude Voshaar RC, Jeuring HW, Borges MK, van den Brink RHS, Marijnissen RM, Hoogendijk EO, et al. Course of frailty stratified by physical and mental multimorbidity patterns: A 5-year follow-up of 92,640 participants of the LifeLines cohort study. BMC Medicine. 2021;19:29. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-01904-x
  16. 16. Wang T, Wu Y, Li W, Li S, Sun Y, Li S, et al. Weak grip strength and cognition predict functional limitation in older Europeans. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2019;67(1):93-99. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15611
  17. 17. Chiles Shaffer N, Fabbri E, Ferrucci L, Shardell M, Simonsick EM, Studenski S. Muscle quality, strength, and lower extremity physical performance in the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. The Journal of Frailty & Aging. 2017;6(4):183-187. DOI: 10.14283/jfa.2017.24
  18. 18. Goodpaster BH, Park SW, Harris TB, Kritchevsky SB, Nevitt M, Schwartz AV, et al. The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: The health, aging and body composition study. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2006;61(10):1059-1064. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/61.10.1059
  19. 19. Visser M, Goodpaster BH, Kritchevsky SB, Newman AB, Nevitt M, Rubin SM, et al. Muscle mass, muscle strength, and muscle fat infiltration as predictors of incident mobility limitations in well-functioning older persons. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2005;60(3):324-333
  20. 20. von Haehling S, Morley JE, Anker SD. An overview of sarcopenia: Facts and numbers on prevalence and clinical impact. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle. 2010;1(2):129-133. DOI: 10.1007/s13539-010-0014-2
  21. 21. Liu CK, Leng X, Hsu F-C, Kritchevsky SB, Ding J, Earnest CP, et al. The impact of sarcopenia on a physical activity intervention: The lifestyle interventions and independence for elders pilot study (LIFE-P). The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging. 2014;18(1):59-64. DOI: 10.1007/s12603-013-0369-0
  22. 22. Steffl M, Bohannon RW, Sontakova L, Tufano JJ, Shiells K, Holmerova I. Relationship between sarcopenia and physical activity in older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2017;12:835-845. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S132940
  23. 23. Biolo G, Cederholm T, Muscaritoli M. Muscle contractile and metabolic dysfunction is a common feature of sarcopenia of aging and chronic diseases: From sarcopenic obesity to cachexia. Clinical Nutrition. 2014;33(5):737-748. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.03.007
  24. 24. Botoseneanu A, Chen H, Ambrosius WT, Allore HG, Anton S, Folta SC, et al. Effect of metabolic syndrome on the mobility benefit of a structured physical activity intervention—The lifestyle interventions and Independence for elders randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2017;65, 6:1244-1250. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14793
  25. 25. Kowal P, Charlton K. Joint effect of mid- and late-life blood pressure on the brain: The AGES-Reykjavik study. Neurology. 2015;84(3):329. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000460552.36620.a9
  26. 26. Schubert CM, Rogers NL, Remsberg KE, Sun SS, Chumlea WC, Demerath EW, et al. Lipids, lipoproteins, lifestyle, adiposity and fat-free mass during middle age: The Fels longitudinal study. International Journal of Obesity. 2006;30(2):251-260. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803129
  27. 27. Zhou B, Perel P, Mensah GA, Ezzati M. Global epidemiology, health burden and effective interventions for elevated blood pressure and hypertension. Nature Reviews. Cardiology. 2021;18(11):785-802. DOI: 10.1038/s41569-021-00559-8
  28. 28. Best JR, Davis JC, Liu-Ambrose T. Longitudinal analysis of physical performance, functional status, physical activity, and mood in relation to executive function in older adults who fall. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2015;63(6):1112-1120. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13444
  29. 29. Pahor M, Guralnik JM, Ambrosius WT, Blair S, Bonds DE, Church TS, et al. Effect of structured physical activity on prevention of major mobility disability in older adults: The LIFE study randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311(23):2387-2396. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.5616
  30. 30. Bherer L, Erickson KI, Liu-Ambrose T. A review of the effects of physical activity and exercise on cognitive and brain functions in older adults. Journal of Aging Research. 2013;2013:657508. DOI: 10.1155/2013/657508
  31. 31. Brasure M, Desai P, Davila H, Nelson VA, Calvert C, Jutkowitz E, et al. Physical activity interventions in preventing cognitive decline and Alzheimer-type dementia: A systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2018;168(1):30-38. DOI: 10.7326/M17-1528
  32. 32. Hopstock LA, Deraas TS, Henriksen A, Martiny-Huenger T, Grimsgaard S. Changes in adiposity, physical activity, cardiometabolic risk factors, diet, physical capacity and well-being in inactive women and men aged 57-74 years with obesity and cardiovascular risk – A 6-month complex lifestyle intervention with 6-month follow-up. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0256631. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256631
  33. 33. Lee CM, Woodward M, Batty GD, Beiser AS, Bell S, Berr C, et al. Association of anthropometry and weight change with risk of dementia and its major subtypes: A meta-analysis consisting 2.8 million adults with 57 294 cases of dementia. Obesity Reviews. 2020;21(4):e12989. DOI: 10.1111/obr.12989
  34. 34. Miyashita M, Stensel DJ, Burns SF, Sasai H, Tanaka K. The effects of 30 min of exercise on cardiovascular disease risk factors in healthy and obese individuals. Atherosclerosis. 2011;216(2):496-497. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.02.001
  35. 35. Sasai H, Sairenchi T, Irie F, Otaka E, Iso H, Tanaka K, et al. Long-term exposure to elevated blood pressure and mortality from cardiovascular disease in a Japanese population: The Ibaraki prefectural health study. Hypertension Research. 2011;34(1):139-144. DOI: 10.1038/hr.2010.173
  36. 36. Francois ME, Durrer C, Pistawka KJ, Halperin FA, Little JP. Resistance-based interval exercise acutely improves endothelial function in type 2 diabetes. American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2016;311(5):H1258-H1267. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00398.2016
  37. 37. Gæde P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving H-H, Pedersen O. Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine. 2008;358(6):580-591. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706245
  38. 38. Arai AE. New insights from major prospective cohort studies with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Current Cardiology Reports. 2015;17(6):46. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-015-0599-3
  39. 39. Heitmann KA, Welde B, Løchen M-L, Stylidis M, Schirmer H, Morseth B. Longitudinal associations between cumulative physical activity and change in structure and function of the left side of the heart: The Tromsø study 2007-2016. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2022;9:882077. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.882077
  40. 40. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF, Leveille SG, Markides KS, Ostir GV, et al. Lower extremity function and subsequent disability consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2000;55(4):M221-M231. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/55.4.M221
  41. 41. Ostir GV, Berges IM, Ottenbacher KJ, Fisher SR, Barr E, Hebel JR, et al. Gait speed and dismobility in older adults. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2015;96(9):1641-1645. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.05.017
  42. 42. Vita AJ, Terry RB, Hubert HB, Fries JF. Aging, health risks, and cumulative disability. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1998;338(15):1035-1041. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199804093381506
  43. 43. Studenski SA, Peters KW, Alley DE, Cawthon PM, McLean RR, Harris TB, et al. The FNIH sarcopenia project: Rationale, study description, conference recommendations, and final estimates. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A. 2014;69(5):547-558. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glu010
  44. 44. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Salive ME, Wallace RB. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. New England Journal of Medicine. 1995;332(9):556-562. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199503023320902
  45. 45. Eggermont LH, Gavett BE, Volkers KM, Blankevoort CG, Scherder EJ, Jefferson AL, et al. Lower-extremity function in cognitively healthy aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2010;91(4):584-588. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.020
  46. 46. Raji MA, Al Snih S, Ostir GV, Markides KS, Ottenbacher KJ. Cognitive status and future risk of frailty in older Mexican Americans. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A. 2010;65A(11):1228-1234. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glq121
  47. 47. Buchman AS, Boyle PA, Leurgans SE, Barnes LL, Bennett DA. Cognitive function is associated with the development of mobility impairments in community-dwelling elders. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2011;19(6):571-580. DOI: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181ef7a2e
  48. 48. Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the lancet commission. Lancet (London, England). 2020;396(10248):413-446. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6
  49. 49. Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures, Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 2023;19(4):1598-1695. DOI: 10.1002/alz.13016
  50. 50. Weuve J, Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Evans DA. Deaths in the United States among persons with Alzheimer’s disease (2010-2050). Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association. 2014;10(2):e40-e46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.01.004
  51. 51. Ryu SY, Lee SB, Kim TW, Lee TJ. Subjective memory complaints, depressive symptoms and instrumental activities of daily living in mild cognitive impairment. International Psychogeriatrics. 2016;28(3):487-494. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610215001945
  52. 52. Lenehan ME, Klekociuk SZ, Summers MJ. Absence of a relationship between subjective memory complaint and objective memory impairment in mild cognitive impairment (MCI): Is it time to abandon subjective memory complaint as an MCI diagnostic criterion? International Psychogeriatrics. 2012;24(9):1505-1514. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610212000695
  53. 53. Butler M, McCreedy E, Nelson VA, Desai P, Ratner E, Fink HA, et al. Does cognitive training prevent cognitive decline?: A systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2018;168(1):63-68. DOI: 10.7326/M17-1531
  54. 54. Farias ST, Lau K, Harvey D, Denny K, Barba C, Mefford AN. Early functional limitations in cognitively normal older adults predicts diagnostic conversion to mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2017;65(6):1152-1158. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14835
  55. 55. Liang J-H, Xu Y, Lin L, Jia R-X, Zhang H-B, Hang L. Comparison of multiple interventions for older adults with Alzheimer disease or mild cognitive impairment: A PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis. Medicine. 2018;97(20):e10744. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010744
  56. 56. Eriksen CS, Garde E, Reislev NL, Wimmelmann CL, Bieler T, Ziegler AK, et al. Physical activity as intervention for age-related loss of muscle mass and function: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the LISA study). BMJ Open. 2016;6(12):e012951. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012951
  57. 57. Gill TM, Pahor M, Guralnik JM, McDermott MM, King AC, Buford TW, et al. Effect of structured physical activity on prevention of serious fall injuries in adults aged 70-89: Randomized clinical trial (LIFE study). BMJ. 2016;352:i245. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i245
  58. 58. Chang M. The effect of midlife physical activity on cognitive function among older adults: AGES—Reykjavik study. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A. 2010;65(12):1369-1374. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glq152
  59. 59. Chang Y-K, Pan C-Y, Chen F-T, Tsai C-L, Huang C-C. Effect of resistance-exercise training on cognitive function in healthy older adults: A review. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. 2012a;20(4):497-517
  60. 60. Mavros Y, Gates N, Wilson GC, Jain N, Meiklejohn J, Brodaty H, et al. Mediation of cognitive function improvements by strength gains after resistance training in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: Outcomes of the study of mental and resistance training. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2017;65(3):550-559. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14542
  61. 61. Snijders T, Leenders M, de Groot LCPGM, van Loon LJC, Verdijk LB. Muscle mass and strength gains following 6 months of resistance type exercise training are only partly preserved within one year with autonomous exercise continuation in older adults. Experimental Gerontology. 2019;121:71-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2019.04.002
  62. 62. Aartolahti E, Lönnroos E, Hartikainen S, Häkkinen A. Long-term strength and balance training in prevention of decline in muscle strength and mobility in older adults. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. 2020;32(1):59-66. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-019-01155-0
  63. 63. Reid KF, Martin KI, Doros G, Clark DJ, Hau C, Patten C, et al. Comparative effects of light or heavy resistance power training for improving lower extremity power and physical performance in mobility-limited older adults. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2015;70(3):374-380. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glu156
  64. 64. Billot M, Calvani R, Urtamo A, Sánchez-Sánchez JL, Ciccolari-Micaldi C, Chang M, et al. Preserving mobility in older adults with physical frailty and sarcopenia: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for physical activity interventions. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2020;15:1675-1690. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S253535
  65. 65. Boisvert-Vigneault K, Payette H, Audet M, Gaudreau P, Bélanger M, Dionne IJ. Relationships between physical activity across lifetime and health outcomes in older adults: Results from the NuAge cohort. Preventive Medicine. 2016;91:37-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.07.018
  66. 66. Gu Y, Beato JM, Amarante E, Chesebro AG, Manly JJ, Schupf N, et al. Assessment of leisure time physical activity and brain health in a multiethnic cohort of older adults. JAMA Network Open. 2020;3(11):e2026506. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.26506
  67. 67. Jang JY, Kim J. Association between handgrip strength and cognitive impairment in elderly Koreans: A population-based cross-sectional study. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2015;27(12):3911-3915. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.27.3911
  68. 68. Erickson KI, Voss MW, Prakash RS, Basak C, Szabo A, Chaddock L, et al. Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(7):3017-3022. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1015950108
  69. 69. Kramer AF, Erickson KI, McAuley E. Effects of physical activity on cognition and brain. In: Cognitive Neurorehabilitation. Vol. 417. Cambridge University Press; 2008. pp. 417-434
  70. 70. Yu F, Vock DM, Zhang L, Salisbury D, Nelson NW, Chow LS, et al. Cognitive effects of aerobic exercise in Alzheimer’s disease: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2021;80(1):233-244. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-201100
  71. 71. Venezia AC, Barney P, Spagnoli D, Greco-Hiranaka C, Piepmeier AT, Smith JC, et al. The effects of acute resistance exercise on memory, processing speed, and mood state after a cognitive challenge. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2023;37(9):1738-1745. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004455
  72. 72. Cassilhas RC, Viana VAR, Grassmann V, Santos RT, Santos RF, Tufik S, et al. The impact of resistance exercise on the cognitive function of the elderly. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2007;39(8):1401-1407. DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e318060111f
  73. 73. Loprinzi PD, Frith E, Edwards MK, Sng E, Ashpole N. The effects of exercise on memory function among young to middle-aged adults: Systematic review and recommendations for future research. American Journal of Health Promotion: AJHP. 2018;32(3):691-704. DOI: 10.1177/0890117117737409
  74. 74. Zhang Y, Li C, Zou L, Liu X, Song W. The effects of mind-body exercise on cognitive performance in elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018;15(12):2791. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15122791
  75. 75. Zou L, Loprinzi PD, Yeung AS, Zeng N, Huang T. The beneficial effects of mind-body exercises for people with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2019;100(8):1556-1573. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.03.009
  76. 76. Chobe S, Chobe M, Metri K, Patra SK, Nagaratna R. Impact of yoga on cognition and mental health among elderly: A systematic review. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2020;52:102421. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102421
  77. 77. Gothe N, Pontifex MB, Hillman C, McAuley E. The acute effects of yoga on executive function. Journal of Physical Activity & Health. 2013;10(4):488-495. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.10.4.488
  78. 78. Anguera J, Boccanfuso J, Rintoul J, Claflin O, Faraji F, Janowich J, et al. Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature. 2013;501:97-101. DOI: 10.1038/nature12486
  79. 79. Hill NTM, Mowszowski L, Naismith SL, Chadwick VL, Valenzuela M, Lampit A. Computerized cognitive training in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Psychiatry. 2017;174(4):329-340. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16030360
  80. 80. Lampit A, Hallock H, Valenzuela M. Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers. PLoS Medicine. 2014;11(11):e1001756. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756
  81. 81. Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Bennett DA, Craft S, Fagan AM, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s & Dementia. 2011;7(3):280-292. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.003
  82. 82. Winblad B, Amouyel P, Andrieu S, Ballard C, Brayne C, Brodaty H, et al. Defeating Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: A priority for European science and society. The Lancet Neurology. 2016;15(5):455-532. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00062-4
  83. 83. Jack CR, Albert MS, Knopman DS, McKhann GM, Sperling RA, Carrillo MC, et al. Introduction to the recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s & Dementia. 2011;7(3):257-262. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.004
  84. 84. Frankish H, Horton R. Prevention and management of dementia: A priority for public health. The Lancet. 2017;390(10113):2614-2615. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31756-7
  85. 85. Ngandu T, Lehtisalo J, Solomon A, Levälahti E, Ahtiluoto S, Antikainen R, et al. A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2015;385(9984):2255-2263. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60461-5
  86. 86. Kivipelto M, Solomon A, Ahtiluoto S, Ngandu T, Lehtisalo J, Antikainen R, et al. The Finnish geriatric intervention study to prevent cognitive impairment and disability (FINGER): Study design and progress. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association. 2013;9(6):657-665. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.09.012
  87. 87. Fiatarone Singh MA, Gates N, Saigal N, Wilson GC, Meiklejohn J, Brodaty H, et al. The study of mental and resistance training (SMART) study—Resistance training and/or cognitive training in mild cognitive impairment: A randomized, double-blind, double-sham controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2014;15(12):873-880. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.09.010
  88. 88. O’Hara R, Brooks JO, Friedman L, Schröder CM, Morgan KS, Kraemer HC. Long-term effects of mnemonic training in community-dwelling older adults. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2007;41(7):585-590. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.04.010
  89. 89. Smith PJ, Blumenthal JA, Hoffman BM, Cooper H, Strauman TA, Welsh-Bohmer K, et al. Aerobic exercise and neurocognitive performance: A meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2010;72(3):239-252. DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181d14633
  90. 90. Williams JW, Plassman BL, Burke J, Benjamin S. Preventing Alzheimer’s disease and cognitive decline. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment. 2010;193:1-727
  91. 91. Horr T, Messinger-Rapport B, Pillai JA. Systematic review of strengths and limitations of randomized controlled trials for non-pharmacological interventions in mild cognitive impairment: Focus on Alzheimer’s disease. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging. 2015;19(2):141-153. DOI: 10.1007/s12603-014-0565-6
  92. 92. Sink KM, Espeland MA, Castro CM, Church T, Cohen R, Dodson JA, et al. Effect of a 24-month physical activity intervention vs health education on cognitive outcomes in sedentary older adults: The LIFE randomized trial. JAMA. 2015;314(8):781-790. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.9617
  93. 93. Sugimoto T, Sakurai T, Akatsu H, Doi T, Fujiwara Y, Hirakawa A, et al. The Japan-multimodal intervention trial for prevention of dementia (J-MINT): The study protocol for an 18-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2021;8(4):465-476. DOI: 10.14283/jpad.2021.29
  94. 94. Baker LD, Frank LL, Foster-Schubert K, Green PS, Wilkinson CW, McTiernan A, et al. Effects of aerobic exercise on mild cognitive impairment. Archives of Neurology. 2010;67(1):71-79. DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.307
  95. 95. Kramer AF, Erickson KI. Capitalizing on cortical plasticity: Influence of physical activity on cognition and brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2007;11(8):342-348. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.009
  96. 96. Li L, Zhang S, Cui J, Chen L-Z, Wang X, Fan M, et al. Fitness-dependent effect of acute aerobic exercise on executive function. Frontiers in Physiology. 2019;10:902. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00902
  97. 97. Alfaro-Acha A, Snih SA, Raji MA, Kuo Y-F, Markides KS, Ottenbacher KJ. Handgrip strength and cognitive decline in older Mexican Americans. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2006;61(8):859-865
  98. 98. Kane RL, Butler M, Fink HA, Brasure M, Davila H, Desai P, et al. Interventions to prevent age-related cognitive decline. In: Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Clinical Alzheimer’s-Type Dementia. US: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2017. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK442425/
  99. 99. Erickson KI, Weinstein AM, Lopez OL. Physical activity, brain plasticity, and Alzheimer’s disease. Archives of Medical Research. 2012;43(8):615-621. DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2012.09.008

Written By

Milan Chang Gudjonsson

Submitted: 23 June 2023 Reviewed: 11 December 2023 Published: 17 January 2024