Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Sustainable Built Environment and Its Implications on Real Estate Development: A Comprehensive Analysis

Written By

Amjad Almusaed, Asaad Almssad and Ibrahim Yitmen

Submitted: 14 July 2023 Reviewed: 08 December 2023 Published: 03 January 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.114078

From the Edited Volume

Integrative Approaches in Urban Sustainability - Architectural Design, Technological Innovations and Social Dynamics in Global Contexts

Edited by Amjad Almusaed, Asaad Almssad, Ibrahim Yitmen, Marita Wallhagen and Ying-Fei Yang

Chapter metrics overview

129 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The construction and real estate sectors exert significant environmental, economic, and social impacts. The implementation of environmentally friendly practices in construction offers numerous advantages. Sustainable building practices provide a morally and economically viable solution to address the issues of excessive resource consumption and adverse environmental effects. This chapter investigates the intricate interplay between eco-friendly construction and property development, exploring how integrating urban planning, architectural design, and sustainability principles can shape sustainable building practices, market trends, and future development strategies. Sustainable architecture aims to enhance individuals’ quality of life while minimizing harm to the natural world. The influence of such practices on real estate development manifests in cost savings, increased property values, and a growing demand from buyers, as extensively examined in this article. Furthermore, potential regulations, financing, and technology obstacles are thoroughly analyzed. The report substantiates its claims by presenting real-world examples of sustainable techniques applied in real estate markets. Drawing from existing patterns and emerging methodologies, the paper also forecasts the future implications of sustainable built environments on real estate development. In conclusion, the chapter emphasizes that real estate developers must adapt to evolving sustainability requirements to fulfill their environmental responsibilities and meet consumer expectations.

Keywords

  • sustainable built environment
  • real estate development
  • green buildings
  • market trend
  • sustainability standards

1. Introduction

Goubran et al. assert that adopting sustainable practices within the building industry is significantly influenced by the established green and sustainable building and real-estate standards (GSBRES) [1]. Consequently, it becomes imperative to evaluate the extent to which these standards facilitate the attainment of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This evaluation is particularly pertinent as the future viability of the real estate industry is increasingly contingent upon environmentally responsible practices in land development. Overall, there is a discernible shift in the real estate sector toward prioritizing ecological sustainability. According to Szopiska-Mularz and Lehmann’s analysis, all housing estates cause irreparable environmental harm. The promotional materials do not specify the housing estates’ ecological indicators, such as how the new development will compensate for the loss of natural ecosystems [2]. Position to build communities conscious of their impact on the environment will have an edge over their contemporaries in terms of their potential to attract buyers. This may be attributable to the growing tendency of investors to express a desire for ecologically sensitive residences, which has gained momentum in recent years. The idea of “sustainable development” may be understood differently. Still, most frequently, it refers to the practice of building buildings and other structures to reduce the amount of damage done to the natural environment around them. According to Cruz et al., implementing the most effective procedures and techniques will be necessary to accomplish this objective, ultimately leading to more sustainable development [3]. In addition to this, it necessitates the implementation of a comprehensive and long-term plan, which, in turn, ensures adherence to a methodology known as “sustainable sustainability.” This includes everything, from the components employed in the building to the running of the facility after it is finished. This considers everything. For real estate development to be called sustainable, it must first fulfill the requirements of the present while preserving future generations’ ability to meet their requirements. The whole life cycle of the project needs to be considered throughout the planning stages of sustainable real estate development [4]. It is necessary to consider a development project’s impact on the surrounding environment at each step, beginning with acquiring materials and continuing to the facility’s final demolition or decommissioning. For properties to be sustainable over the long term, they must be planned with this goal during the design phase. They must adapt to environmental changes while preserving their functioning over time. The ecologically friendly real estate market has seen substantial growth due to recent industry breakthroughs. This surge is closely connected to implementing incentive systems, as Qian, Queena K., Ke Fan, and Edwin HW Chan proposed. The legal and administrative frameworks create procedures crucial in encouraging efforts related to green building (GB). They contribute to strengthening developers’ dedication to elevated environmental standards. Nevertheless, Qian et al. emphasize a significant omission in assessing secondary expenses incurred by parties involved in green construction transactions. They promote the importance of comprehending these concealed transaction costs (TCs), which is crucial for a precise assessment of the cost–benefit dynamics of green buildings and the efficacy of associated policies [5]. In addition to these advancements, there has been a discernible rise in the accessibility of environmentally sustainable building methods and materials. According to Liu et al., this tendency is based on the increasing awareness among the population about the need for environmental conservation. The proliferation of this consciousness across several dimensions has played a crucial role in the rise and advancement of green building concepts. Liu et al. highlight the importance of sustainable practices in attaining sustainable development objectives by incorporating green construction into a broader global sustainability framework. They recognize the wide range of environmental factors that need to be considered [6]. In the past, the price of environmentally friendly building materials has often been higher than that of their more traditional equivalents. In the construction domain, attaining “net zero” energy consumption, wherein a structure generates an equivalent amount of energy to what it consumes, is becoming more and more attainable. Constructors prioritize altering existing systems as a financially efficient approach to achieve this goal, especially considering the increasing need for buildings that use no net energy. Emphasizing the importance of this pattern, academics Azhgaliyeva, Dina, Anant Kapoor, and Yang Liu underscore the crucial function of private investment in bolstering renewable energy and energy efficiency initiatives, particularly in the ASEAN area [7]. Their data shows that significant green bonds in the ASEAN region are specifically allocated to these programs. Simultaneously, there is an increasing trend toward using alternative energy sources such as solar and wind power in environmentally conscious real estate development. This indicates a more significant movement toward sustainable energy practices and a decreased dependence on fossil fuels [8]. It is typical for renewable forms of energy to have a greater cost of entry initially. However, using these sources can, over their lifetime, result in financial savings by lowering total energy costs and enhancing a building’s cost-effectiveness. There are several reasons to have a positive outlook on the future of environmentally conscious real estate development. Both the continual advancement of technology and the growing awareness of the significance of environmental problems may be credited for the rise in the number of initiatives favorable to the environment. Advocates for high-efficiency, energy-optimized buildings have considerable obstacles in providing the economic justification necessary to encourage development and investment choices among stakeholders in the commercial real estate industry. In their scientific investigation, Zhu, Cindy, and their colleagues acknowledge that while renewable energy sources may need more significant initial investment, they consistently result in long-term financial benefits by reducing overall energy costs and improving the economic efficiency of buildings [9]. Although a growing amount of evidence highlights the improved financial performance of green buildings, including lower operational costs and additional benefits such as a better workplace environment and increased employee productivity, those who support green buildings still face a challenging task in convincingly proving these profit margins. The main tactic to attract investors often highlights the possibility of higher rental fees, although this method still presents significant difficulties in the industry. Because of this discovery, both the environment and the future of the real estate industry will be able to let out a sigh of relief. The natural world, as well as human businesses, may both stand to profit from more sustainable practices. In the current climate, many people are interested in doing business with companies that positively contribute to improving society. Buildings and communities that are ecologically sustainable are one way in which real estate developers may demonstrate their commitment to making a big difference in the world. This will assist in bringing in new and existing customers and help you hold on to the customers you already have. Additionally, investors are increasingly interested in ecologically sound building practices within the real estate sector. A great number of investors look for possibilities to put their money into companies that will have an impact on the wider world. Developing financially and socially beneficial real estate is a good technique for achieving this objective, and sustainable real estate development is a great way to do it. The practice of developing real estate in a way that is both ecologically and economically sustainable is advantageous for all parties concerned. It benefits the earth’s well-being, is lucrative for companies, and is important for society. Real estate methods that are ecologically, socially, and economically sustainable may give rise to buildings and communities with these characteristics. Implementing sustainable real estate development methods is essential to address the difficulties posed by climate change and the depletion of natural resources and meet the need for resilient and dynamic environments for future generations [10]. According to Van Niekerk (year), the sustainable development goals (SDGs) constitute a huge step forward in this quest, and he emphasizes this point. However, during the last several years, there has been a marked improvement in both the understanding of inclusive economics and sustainability indicators. This has increased our capability to reduce economic exclusion, notably due to global inequities [11].

Advertisement

2. Advancing sustainable practices in real estate development within the built environment: strategies for promoting sustainability

2.1 A comprehensive analysis of sustainable development theory of sustainable real estate development

The scholarly discourse surrounding sustainable development interrogates the intricate interconnections among economic proliferation, societal progression, and environmental preservation. Within the vast realm of sustainable development, it provides an intellectual structure for understanding the cardinal principles and overarching objectives of sustainable real estate development. As articulated by Shi et al., [12] sustainable development (SD) has increasingly become a critical strategy for global socioeconomic transformation. Even with its escalating importance, misconceptions persist regarding the practical implementation of the SD theory. These misinterpretations are predominantly evident in the friction between robust and fragile sustainable development methods and the ambiguity distinguishing the concepts of intra-generational and inter-generational justice. This chapter employed an amalgamation of literary surveying, inductive reasoning, and normative analysis methodologies to elucidate the evolutionary trajectory and enhancement of the SD concept and its underlying purposes. These methods augmented a comprehensive understanding of the SD theory, thus fulfilling the outlined objectives. Sustainable development steers businesses like real estate toward ecologically and socially responsible practices. Sustainable real estate development applies this approach to creating and running communities [13]. It promotes resource efficiency, environmental sustainability, and healthy and thriving communities. Sustainable real estate development balances environmental, social, and economic sustainability. Sustainable real estate development reduces carbon emissions, conserves resources, and promotes biodiversity. Renewable energy, efficient building design, green areas, and sustainable landscaping may accomplish this. Sustainable real estate development creates welcoming, livable communities. This includes cheap housing, public transit, and health-promoting features. Sustainable real estate development also prioritizes community involvement to meet local inhabitants’ demands. Sustainable real estate development values long-term value generation economically. It recognizes that energy efficiency, tenant happiness, and maintenance savings may result from sustainable practices. Sustainable structures are also more valuable and attract environmentally concerned investors. Various methodologies and certifications, including LEED, BREEAM, WELL, DGNB, HQE, and CASBEE, bolster sustainable development in the real estate sector [14]. These frameworks, derived from industrialized nations such as the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, France, and Japan, provide explicit instructions for achieving sustainable design, construction, and operation. Although these standards assert their worldwide relevance, they often face constraints in specific local settings, primarily because of distinctive climatic, cultural, religious, and social factors that must be comprehensively addressed in their largely Western-focused methodologies. Integrating ecological, social, and economic sustainability in real estate development may establish structures and communities that exemplify these ideals. Adopting sustainable real estate practices is crucial for tackling climate change, the depletion of natural resources, and the need for robust and adaptive habitats for future generations. According to Van Niekerk, the sustainable development goals (SDGs) are a notable progress in this effort. In recent years, there has been a significant advancement in comprehending inclusive economics and sustainability indicators, which has bolstered our capacity to address economic exclusion and worldwide inequalities (Figure 1) [11, 15].

Figure 1.

Comprehensive elements of sustainable development theory in real estate.

2.2 Evaluating sustainable real estate development through the triple bottom line (TBL) approach

The triple bottom line (TBL) theory is commonly used to evaluate real estate development projects. It promotes the fusion of social justice, environmental sustainability, and economic viability to create a sustainable, constructed environment. The notion of the triple bottom line (TBL) was developed, according to Nogueira, E., Gomes, and Lopes, due to the growing importance of sustainable development. Beyond traditional financial indicators, TBL is essential for evaluating a country’s economic growth (ED). Despite its importance, little study has been done thus far to examine how TBL and ED interact fully. As a result, this bibliometric research attempts to investigate the connection between TBL, sustainability, and ED while considering business strategy elements like competitiveness, decision-making, planning, and performance [16]. This extended discussion explores the TBL theory and its influence on real estate development by emphasizing its comprehensive assessment methodology. Economic viability is central to TBL theory. Long-term real estate initiatives need revenues. TBL requires a cost–benefit analysis, return on investment assessments, and financial feasibility studies. These analyses help developers detect hazards, optimize profits, and assure economic stability. TBL theory helps real estate developers sustain economic growth by incorporating economic viability into decision-making. Social equality is another TBL tenet. Real estate projects affect local communities; thus, they must improve social well-being [17]. Social equity in decision-making fosters inclusion, diversity, and equitable resource and benefit distribution in the TBL theory. TBL developers meet with stakeholders, perform social impact analyses, and create solutions that improve quality of life. This includes affordable housing, community involvement, essential amenities, and social cohesiveness. Environmentalism is TBL’s third dimension. Sustainable real estate development must address climate change and environmental damage. The TBL theory recommends combining environmental factors into site selection, design, construction, and operation. This strategy requires sustainable site planning, energy-efficient designs, water conservation, trash reduction, and eco-friendly materials. Sustainable real estate projects reduce their carbon footprint, protect natural resources, and improve the earth. The TBL theory integrates economic viability, social equality, and environmental sustainability into real estate development, going beyond financial profitability. These factors synergistically build sustainable constructed environments [18]. Developers must collaborate with architects, urban planners, economists, sociologists, and environmental scientists to implement the TBL theory. TBL partnerships encourage creative real estate development that balances economic, social, and ecological goals. The triple bottom line approach helps evaluate real estate developments for economic viability, social equality, and environmental sustainability. By addressing these three factors, developers may build sustainable environments that promote long-term financial, social, and ecological stability. The TBL theory helps developers prioritize the triple bottom line for a more egalitarian and sustainable future as global demand for sustainable real estate grows (Table 1).

AspectDetailsReferences
Green and Sustainable Building StandardsSignificant influence of GSBRES on adopting sustainable practices in building industry; crucial for achieving SDGs.[1]
Environmental Responsibility in Real EstateGrowing trend toward ecological sustainability; recognizing the environmental impact of real estate development.[2]
Lack of Ecological Indicators in Housing EstatesMany housing estates fail to provide ecological indicators and lack of information on compensation for ecosystem loss.[3]
Lifecycle Sustainability in Real Estate DevelopmentComprehensive Life Cycle Considerations in Project Development[4, 5, 6, 7]
Sustainability in Real Estate: Assessing Environmental Impact and Sustainable PracticesIn-Depth Exploration of Sustainability Practices in Real Estate Development: Principles, Implementation, and Impact[8, 9]
Integrating Sustainable Development Theory in Real Estate PracticesApplying Sustainable Development Theory in Real Estate for Community Growth[10, 11, 12]
Sustainable Real Estate: LEED, BREEAM, WELL StandardsFrameworks and Certifications in Sustainable Real Estate: The Role of LEED, BREEAM, and WELL Standards in Promoting Sustainable Design, Construction, and Operation[13, 14]
Triple Bottom Line in Sustainable Real EstateExploring Triple Bottom Line Impact on Economic Development in Sustainable Real Estate[15]
TBL Principles in Sustainable Real EstateIntegrating TBL Principles for Sustainable Real Estate Development[16, 17]
Enhancing Real Estate Sustainability through TBL Integration[18]

Table 1.

Comprehensive synthesis of sustainable real estate concepts: Reference-based analysis and thematic interpretation.

2.3 Sustainable built environments: urban planning and design theories

Urban planning and design ideas help create sustainable built environments by guiding real estate development [19]. New Urbanism, Smart Growth, and Transit-Oriented Development emphasize walkable communities, mixed land uses, and efficient transit networks. These ideas may minimize automobile dependence and improve community livability in urban planning and design. New Urbanism promotes mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly districts that encourage community. This philosophy encourages walking and biking to adjacent facilities by integrating residential, commercial, and recreational areas. New Urbanism and Smart Growth are two growing paradigms in urban design that attempt to solve environmental problems, housing difficulties, and community welfare. Both concepts are regarded as emerging urban design paradigms [20]. These methods emphasize sustainability by reducing the detrimental effects of long-distance travel, congestion, carbon emissions, and overall energy usage. These ideas seek to protect open space by encouraging “smart development” measures such as concentrating population expansion in metropolitan regions and limiting “urban sprawl.” However, the unique context and location have a role in determining whether these planning concepts are applicable and significant. This is because the degree to which these ideas are feasible and successful varies from one place to another [21]. Compact development is an urban planning technique to optimize land use while minimizing the demand for extra infrastructure and public services. It is often recommended in many urban planning endeavors because it can give various housing alternatives, from low-cost to high-end. By implementing compact development principles, real estate developers may contribute to environmental sustainability, social equality, and community livability by assuring the availability of houses for people of all economic levels and fostering social justice. According to Bukowski and Kreissl, addressing issues of inequality as a pervasive principle throughout the sustainable development goals (SDGs) framework, particularly through the lens of power relations and exemplified by housing-related social concerns, represents a comprehensive approach to effectively address challenges and solutions within the SDG framework while being sensitive to the impact of inequality [22]. This viewpoint highlights the need to incorporate social justice principles into urban planning procedures, resulting in a fairer and more responsive environment to varied societal requirements.

It also protects natural resources and vulnerable locations. TOD theory creates lively mixed-use districts around public transit hubs. TOD emphasizes public transportation by placing residential, commercial, and recreational activities within walking distance of transit stops [23]. This decreases traffic, air pollution, and community accessibility, affordability, and social connectedness. These urban planning and design ideas help real estate developers incorporate sustainability concepts. New Urbanism allows developers to create walkable, connected, and friendly communities. Smart Growth techniques maximize land use, protect natural resources, and build inclusive communities. Transit-oriented development improves air quality and greenhouse gas emissions by creating efficient transit networks and decreasing car usage. These ideas need stakeholder engagement to be implemented. Sustainable design must be incorporated into real estate project planning and execution by architects, urban planners, politicians, community leaders, and developers [24]. This interdisciplinary approach evaluates economic viability, social equality, and environmental sustainability for more comprehensive and effective initiatives. In conclusion, New Urbanism, Smart Growth, and Transit-Oriented Development may help build sustainable cities. By adopting these beliefs, real estate developers may promote environmental sustainability, social equality, and community livability. These approaches make urban planning more inclusive and sustainable [25].

2.4 Environmental psychology theory: enhancing sustainable living environments through real estate development

Environmental Psychology Theory, which has evolved over the last four decades [26], investigates the intricate link between human behavior and the created surroundings, with a growing focus on topics relevant to sustainability. This approach emphasizes the psychological influence that design decisions have on the environment. This approach considers various factors, including the availability of natural elements, the presence of natural light, the presence of green areas, and, most importantly, the comprehensive integration of environmental characteristics both inside and outside the building [27]. This theory emphasizes the significance of developing sustainable living environments that consider hygrothermal comfort (the equilibrium of heat and moisture in the environment) [28], lighting comfort (the optimization of natural and artificial light for well-being) [24], acoustic comfort (the management of noise for mental and physical health) [29], and air quality (the guarantee of clean, breathable air) [30]. Microclimate ranges that are appropriate to improve the walkability of urban areas [31]. Mental health, productivity, and overall quality of life are all significantly impacted by these characteristics, which are crucial for the physical well-being of an individual.

It is essential to have effective microclimate management in urban areas to encourage walkability, which is an essential component of sustainable urban planning. Environmental conditions conducive to walking promote physical exercise and social connection, and they lessen the need for motorized transportation, which contributes to preserving the environment and the community’s health. Outdoor places are made more pleasant and accessible by the design of urban spaces that consider microclimate features such as shade, wind protection, and temperature management [32]. This further enhances the livability of urban environments. Through these holistic concepts, real estate developers can create living spaces that are not only kind to the environment but also beneficial to the well-being of people. Biophilic design is a design approach that uses humans’ inherent tendency to be drawn to the outdoors by incorporating elements of nature, such as indoor plants and green spaces. This technique improves mental well-being and encourages the development of sustainable habits [33]. It is vital to have large windows, skylights, and light wells to have daylighting, a fundamental component of lighting comfort. Its purpose is to enhance mood and cognitive function while simultaneously lowering energy consumption by minimizing the amount of artificial lighting required [34]. In addition, the development and maintenance of green spaces, such as parks and gardens, contribute to improving the management of temperature and moisture as well as decreasing noise. This helps preserve a wide variety of plant and animal species and reduces the effect of excessive heat in urban areas [35]. It also encourages people to participate in physical and social activities within the community. It is also essential to understand human interactions with the built environment regarding sustainable urban development strategies such as New Urbanism, Smart Growth, and Transit-Oriented Development [36]. These methods prioritize environmental sustainability, social equity, and the livability of communities, while also comprehensively considering issues of environmental comfort. The findings of Ekim et al. [29], a comprehensive literature study, highlight the necessity of understanding consumer interactions with energy-efficient solutions from a holistic perspective. This includes taking into consideration comfort components. This method allows a more thorough comprehension of the complexities of user actions and motivations. Additionally, implementing sustainable transportation choices such as bike lanes and pedestrian-friendly sidewalks, in addition to providing safe bike storage facilities, play a vital role in accomplishing wider goals connected to sustainability and improving the quality of life [37]. These features encourage travel sensitive to the environment and enhance the general quality of the outside environment in locations where people live. The Environmental Psychology Theory provides a solid basis for real estate developers by integrating psychological design principles with an in-depth understanding of the comfort levels of both the interior and outside environments. This technique makes it easier to create long-lasting habitats that impact both people and the planet, enhancing the quality of life, efficiency, and ecologically responsible behavior [38].

2.5 Institutional and policy theories in sustainable real estate development

Ohene, Eric, et al. contended that Net zero carbon buildings (NZCBs) possess significant potential as a viable approach to decarbonizing the built environment, combating climate change, and improving occupants’ well-being. Conversely, insights from institutional and policy theories shed light on the regulatory frameworks, governance structures, and stakeholder engagement mechanisms that influence sustainable real estate development in the built environment [31]. The growth of real estate, which has significant repercussions on the environment, is the primary focus of efforts designed to promote sustainable development. According to the findings of Sahoo and Goswami’s research, the primary goal of sustainable development is to fulfill the present generation’s objectives without jeopardizing future generations’ ability to meet their requirements [32]. Addressing sustainability issues requires understanding how institutions and policies shape sustainable real estate practices. Institutional and policy theories may explain how regulatory frameworks, governance structures, and stakeholder engagement mechanisms affect real estate development. Institutional theories explain how formal and informal rules, conventions, and values influence organizational and societal behavior and decision-making. Institutional approaches explore how regulatory frameworks, legal systems, and social norms affect sustainable real estate development. Institutional theorists stress property rights, land use restrictions, and planning strategies in steering developers toward sustainable building design, construction, and operation. These theories emphasize the role that institutional variable, such as government regulations, industry standards, and professional organizations, have in the behavior of real estate market participants. Policy theories investigate how acts taken by governments have an impact on society. Policy theories focus on examining the role of financial incentives, taxes, subsidies, and regulatory frameworks in fostering environmentally responsible real estate development [33]. These theories evaluate market processes, regulatory tools, and stakeholder dynamics in sustainable real estate development. Governance arrangements, such as public-private partnerships and collaborative decision-making, can influence sustainable results in policy theories. Institutional and policy approaches study sustainable real estate practices. Institutional theories explain the social, cultural, and economic conditions of policymaking. They show how government agencies, industry groups, and professional organizations influence policymaking, implementation, and enforcement. On the other hand, policy theories examine how particular policy interventions promote sustainable real estate practices and contribute to institutional approaches. By integrating these views, researchers and practitioners may better understand sustainable real estate development variables. Sustainable real estate development and institutional and policy ideas have many ramifications.

  • First, analyzing institutional and policy settings helps uncover obstacles and facilitators to sustainable behaviors, influencing successful interventions and policies.

  • Second, these ideas emphasize stakeholder participation and collaborative governance for sustainable solutions [34].

This discipline should study how institutions, policies, and stakeholder networks affect sustainable real estate development. Empirical studies are required to assess the efficiency of certain policy tools and institutional configurations in promoting real estate sustainability.

2.6 Assessing environmental impacts in real estate: the power of life cycle assessment theory

The methodological framework known as life cycle assessment (LCA) is a reliable tool for determining the ecological footprint left behind by real estate projects throughout their historical life. This evaluation includes several aspects that pertain to the project’s lifetime, such as the acquisition of raw materials, the building process, the operating stage, and the conclusion or decommissioning phase. The life cycle assessment (LCA) offers a systematic technique for evaluating the environmental repercussions of real estate projects. As a result, LCA equips stakeholders with the ability to recognize and capitalize on possibilities for sustainable practices. This theory functions as an informational compass for real estate practitioners and decision-makers, supporting them in grasping the ecological ramifications associated with their initiatives throughout each step of the life cycle of such projects [35]. This includes assessing resource consumption, energy use, and emissions from raw material extraction, production, transportation, construction, and building operation. LCA theory also considers waste creation, maintenance, and structural destruction or disposal. LCA theory helps stakeholders make informed choices and execute sustainable strategies by providing a solid and scientifically valid technique for analyzing real estate developments’ environmental performance. LCA theory recognizes the interconnectivity and interdependencies of a project’s life cycle stages, avoiding a narrow emphasis on individual phases. This broad view identifies environmental hotspots where sustainable measures reduce negative consequences and maximize resource efficiency. LCA theory allows comparative examination of different design, material, and technology options throughout a project’s life cycle. Stakeholders may evaluate environmental impacts and choose the most sustainable choices [36]. To further analyze environmental consequences, LCA theory recommends considering regional or context-specific aspects, including energy sources, waste management systems, and transportation networks. LCA theory aids real estate initiatives.

  • First, it helps stakeholders find ways to lessen the environmental impact of their projects. Energy-efficient technology, renewable materials, waste minimization, and circular economy ideas may be used.

  • Second, LCA theory facilitates stakeholder dialog and public trust by standardizing environmental performance measurement and reporting.

  • Finally, LCA theory guides real estate developments’ design, building, and management to minimize environmental consequences while satisfying social and economic goals.

Life cycle assessment theory provides a comprehensive framework for assessing real estate projects’ environmental effects throughout their life cycle. LCA theory helps stakeholders assess the ecological impact and improve sustainability by considering all phases, from raw material extraction through end-of-life. Its methodical methodology, comparative research, and geographical considerations enable informed decision-making and sustained strategy execution. LCA theory encourages environmentally responsible real estate development and sustainable development.

Advertisement

3. Real estate market trends as they relate to one’s lifestyle choice

Investors should pay attention to These Real Estate Market Trends for New Opportunities. To participate in recent investing activities, it is essential to have a high level of awareness regarding the ever-changing trends in the real estate markets, both domestically and internationally [37]. Significant adjustments in the economic and financial landscape of the globe have been brought about because of the ongoing geopolitical transformation that is occurring globally. As a direct consequence of this, investors who are seeking responsible and reliable ways through which to invest their cash are increasingly finding new investment opportunities. When rare earth markets experience supply shocks, the price of rare earths is said to positively influence the geopolitical risk index, as shown by the empirical findings obtained by Li, Zheng-Zheng, et al. Additionally, the rise in the cost of rare earth elements does not dampen global economic activity because of the many potential applications of these elements in the energy transition. As a result, policymakers should build risk early warning measures to ensure the stable price of rare earth to avoid the negative effect of geopolitical risks on the security of rare earth and economic activities related to rare earth [38]. Consequently, investors looking for safe and dependable channels to channel their wealth are rapidly coming across fresh alternatives. These investors must reevaluate their preconceived views about investing techniques that provide the maximum potential for returns to keep up with the times. According to Huang, X., and colleagues, families who have made larger investments in housing have a lower inclination to engage in agricultural entrepreneurship but a higher propensity to start new businesses. This finding contradicts the findings of other researchers who have shown that households with more investments in housing are more likely to start new businesses. In addition, families, where everyone lives in their own homes, have a much-increased likelihood of becoming company owners and entrepreneurs. On the other hand, there is not shown to be any association between different kinds of house ownership and the decision to pursue entrepreneurship. In addition, an expanded number of home loans is a barrier to pursuing entrepreneurial initiatives [39].

This shift in perspective has particular significance in real estate because, traditionally speaking, most people in Europe have associated investments in this sector with purchasing residential properties, most notably apartments, located within their own countries. This perception has been particularly prevalent in real estate. Properties like this were often rented out to create passive income over extended periods. On the other hand, build-to-rent (BTR) communities are a relatively new asset class that combines the benefits of economies of scale that are generally associated with apartment complexes with the idea of single-family houses. BTR stands for “build to rent,” which stands for “build to rent communities.” Individual and institutional investors are eagerly channeling considerable sums into BTR assets to capitalize on development prospects as soon as they become available. According to Megan Nethercote, who works at Nethercote, Inc., rental housing has developed into a primary focus of financialization, with the BTR sector being the most impacted. Building apartments constructed from the ground up specifically for renting them out to tenants is a popular investment strategy among private equity companies, pension funds, and other types of institutional investors. Consequently, BTR is increasing its presence inside existing markets and establishing itself as a significant player in the real estate business [40].

When analyzing the functioning of the real estate market, this paradigm change is of significant importance and bears close examination. As a result of the emergence of new approaches, the previously prevalent strategy can no longer be regarded as the definitive solution within the contemporary political and economic environment. According to the observations of numerous experts, the advent of the pandemic has resulted in a wide range of repercussions for various economic subfields. The real estate market saw a decrease in sales and a reduction in investment activity during the first half of 2020, mostly due to the widespread market uncertainty that existed during this time. Notably, after the economic jolt caused by the COVID-19 outbreak and the situation in Ukraine, the housing price index for residential units in Stockholm demonstrated considerable price changes. This one-of-a-kind circumstance offered a unique chance to investigate the connection between supply and demand and its effect on pricing. This topic has been the focus of research efforts consistently. Competing theories, such as retail theory and search theory, which provide conflicting viewpoints on the TOM-price connection, continue to affect the continuing discussion about the link between time on the market (TOM) and pricing. This discussion is influenced by the TOM-price relationship being an ongoing dispute [41]. However, as time passed, the prior pattern was replaced with growth as market players acquired confidence due to the timely adoption of supporting mechanisms. This was made possible because of the prompt implementation of the support measures. The continued growth of the real estate development business significantly contributes to the nation’s gross domestic product.

Advertisement

4. Academic perspective on real estate development’s challenges and opportunities

According to Kimsey and Marissa, huge organizations have shown a discernible rise in the interest in pursuing a new purpose beyond a solitary emphasis on monetary gain. This change has occurred in the direction of a revitalized commitment to the well-being of both people and the earth and a concentration on profit [42]. However, our comprehension of how businesses of this kind might successfully operate with this purpose-driven strategy is still in its infancy. The solution to management and financial issues is required for the successful growth of real estate to maximize efficiency. In the early years of the twenty-first century, our country’s economic and political leanings unambiguously reflect an unshakable dedication to building a state with a thriving economy. Our nation’s inclinations demonstrate this devotion. A thorough knowledge of a development’s financial foundations is necessary for achieving economic development firmly rooted in economic theory. This article dives into the distinctive qualities of the real estate market, as well as the current growth patterns within the business and the application of economic theory to real estate while addressing more general concerns about finances. In its most basic form, the term “development” refers to various activities involved in the socioeconomic transformation of regions. These activities include the preparation of land, the construction of buildings and infrastructure, and a wide variety of business ventures, including residential and commercial real estate [43, 44]. Askar, R., Braganca, L., and Gervásio, H. underline the rising inevitability of change in our lives, making it necessary to strengthen the adaptive capabilities of buildings so that they may react to emergent factors efficiently and developing situations for the whole of their lifecycles. This necessity results from the growing number of calls for sustainability on a worldwide scale [45]. The idea of adaptability in buildings has attracted a large amount of attention, which has inspired the investigation and presentation of regenerative solutions to solve the prevalent problem of often outdated structures [46]. Before digging into the vital economic importance of development within contemporary domestic science, performing a full financial investigation to comprehend real estate’s basic nature and distinguishing features is important. Only then can one begin to investigate current domestic science. The transformation of urban landscapes and the creation of new residential and commercial areas are both significantly impacted by real estate development. The real estate industry’s commercial sector presents many challenges and opportunities as a direct consequence of these dynamics. Real estate development encompasses various phases: acquisition, funding, planning, design, development, construction, and asset management. Among these stages, performance management emerges as a critical component. Performance management entails the collaborative efforts of managers and their employees, working together to strategically plan, monitor, and evaluate the objectives or work goals of the employees, ensuring that their contributions have an overall positive impact on the organization or firm. Performance management serves as an essential mechanism for organizations or firms to assess the outcomes of their activities, gauge the alignment of quality with established objectives, and identify areas that require improvement to enhance performance by organizational goals [46]. According to Farida and Setiawan’s research, improved business strategies boost the competitive edge of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). In addition, businesses’ performance and innovative capabilities mediate the link between business strategies and competitive advantages [47]. The company presents several obstacles that need to be carefully evaluated and planned for, even though there are huge chances for the company to expand and become more profitable. The ease of access to land and its price are significant obstacles to real estate growth. Finding adequate land for construction becomes more difficult in places experiencing population expansion. Increases in land prices, communities that are opposed to new buildings, stringent zoning restrictions, and worries about the environment are all challenges that developers need to surmount. The limited availability of land may restrict the number of new projects that can be undertaken and increase competition among developers. The acquisition of money is yet another key obstacle in real estate development. Obtaining financing for large-scale projects requires meticulous financial preparation and may prove to be a challenging endeavor. When the economy is unstable or there is uncertainty in the market, developers often require assistance acquiring finance or attracting investors. This is particularly true during these times. In addition, the feasibility of projects and the decisions that investors make regarding investments may be impacted by various factors, including interest rates, the availability of financing, and the government’s policies. In addition, the laws and regulations imposed by the government provide challenges and opportunities for expanding the real estate market [48]. Even though laws are intended to protect the environment, ensure people are safe, and maintain the standards for urban planning, these rules may sometimes produce bottlenecks and delays in the bureaucratic process. For developers, getting permits, conforming to zoning constraints, and satisfying other compliance standards may take time and effort [49]. On the other hand, good policies, like tax incentives or speedier approval procedures, could offer opportunities for developers to pursue projects aligned with the government’s objectives. The ever-shifting dynamics of the market, as well as the tastes of consumers, provide yet another barrier that must be surmounted. To succeed in real estate development, one must foresee and satisfy the target market’s requirements. Recently, several trends have seen a rise in popularity. These trends include flexible workspaces, intelligent technology, sustainable design, and mixed-use projects. The anemoscope of developers and the implementation of these trends are necessary for developers to keep their competitive edge and attract prospective buyers or renters. Suppose you need help to identify and satisfy the ever-evolving demands of the market. In that case, you risk having vacant buildings or unsuccessful initiatives.

Nevertheless, despite the difficulties, there are still enormous chances to be had in real estate development [49]. There is a need for more residential, commercial, and industrial areas because of the rapid urbanization, population increase, and economic growth that is taking place in many places. Those real estate developers who recognize underdeveloped areas, burgeoning communities, or unfilled niches can benefit from the possibilities presented here. In addition, developments in building methods and technical improvements have the potential to transform the real estate development business completely. 3D printing, modular construction, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence are all examples of innovations that have the potential to make the design and building process more streamlined, lower costs, and increase sustainability. Adopting these technologies may give developers a competitive advantage and increase their efficiency at every stage of the software development lifecycle. In addition, development practices that are sustainable and environmentally friendly offer opportunities for both prosocial responsibility and economic gain [50]. These opportunities can be found in building certifications, energy-efficient designs, the integration of renewable energy, and eco-friendly amenities, all of which can attract buyers and tenants who are environmentally conscious. Additionally, sustainable practices may contribute to cost savings by reducing energy and money spent on maintenance. The development of real estate also helps the creation of jobs and the expansion of the economy. Construction projects not only provide job possibilities, but they also help to promote local economies and attract investment. Real estate development presents a variety of challenges as well as opportunities; developers who work in collaboration with the communities in which they are developing, who participate in responsible urban planning, and who place a priority on social infrastructure can help to cultivate positive relationships and contribute to the overall well-being of the preclusion in which they are working. The need for more available land, the difficulty of obtaining funding, the laws of various governments, and the ever-changing market all provide challenges for developers (see Figure 2). Nevertheless, developers can unleash prospects for development, profitability, and good social impact when they embrace technology, sustainable practices, and emerging market trends. For a real estate development project to succeed, it is necessary to conduct thorough research and analysis, come to well-considered decisions, and have in-depth knowledge of the dynamic business environment [51].

Figure 2.

Scientific factors on real estate development’s challenges and opportunities.

Advertisement

5. Implications of sustainable built environment on real estate development

When examining the consequences of creating a sustainable built environment in today’s world, real estate development is becoming an increasingly vital aspect to consider. As a direct consequence of the continued growth in the global population and the acceleration of urbanization, it is of the highest necessity to use environmentally responsible building practices in both the construction of buildings and the day-to-day management of structures. This is something that must be done. The built environment, which includes both residential and commercial buildings, plays a significant role in determining the character of our towns and cities. There is a rising demand for sustainable methods in all sectors of life, including real estate development, as the globe continues to confront significant environmental concerns such as climate change, pollution, and habitat loss [52]. Planning, constructing, and managing buildings ecologically responsible and resource-efficiently is called “green building,” another name for sustainable real estate development. This process may also be called “sustainable real estate development.” It combines environmentally friendly building materials, energy-efficient technologies, and renewable energy sources into the construction process to lessen the structure’s negative influence on the surrounding environment and improve its sustainability. Because of this, environmentally friendly policies and methods in constructing real estate have several ramifications that have far-reaching implications not just for the real estate sector but also for the natural world. One of the most important results that can be achieved by using sustainable building techniques is a reduction in a region’s overall influence on the environment that is immediately around it [53]. To be considered sustainable, a building must have energy-efficient systems, use renewable energy sources, restrict the amount of water used, use ecologically friendly materials, and promote the reduction and recycling of waste. These actions help decrease carbon footprints, conserve resources, and minimize pollution, all contributing to a cleaner and more sustainable environment. One of the most important effects is the economic gains from environmentally friendly real estate development. The initial costs of adopting sustainable features and technologies may seem far more than they are. Despite this, a long-term financial advantage can be gained from developing environmentally responsible structures. Utilizing designs and technologies that are more energy efficient is one way to cut down on the expenses associated with operating a company [54]. The monthly electricity bill, the cost of water, and any necessary maintenance are all included in these prices. However, this list is not exhaustive. Sustainable buildings have a smaller negative effect on the environment in their immediate area, increase tenant health and productivity, and comply with green building certifications and standards [55]. As a result, sustainable buildings may typically command higher rental or selling values than traditional buildings. Investors and developers who embrace sustainability can reach long-term financial stability, gain a competitive advantage, and attract renters or purchasers who are environmentally sensitive. These benefits may be achieved by reducing the negative impacts of their business on the environment. It is also important to note the potential for large social ramifications to emerge due to establishing sustainable real estate if established settings are not sustainable [56]. This is something that should be taken into consideration. Sustainable buildings provide tenants and workers with environments that are better for their health and more joyful to spend time in. This benefits both parties. The indoor air quality, the quantity of natural light, the degree of thermal comfort, and the level of acoustic insulation all benefit the health and productivity of people who live or work in a building [57]. Other elements that have a good impact include the level of acoustic insulation. Acoustic insulation is a component that contributes to these findings, in addition to the characteristics that contribute to these results. In addition, sustainable buildings often have characteristics that are targeted toward the community that surrounds them. These characteristics may include designs favorable to pedestrians, including green areas and mixed-use complexes supporting various activities. Tenants of these venues and other individuals who utilize them benefit from an overall higher quality of life because these traits encourage social contact, participation within the community, and a feeling of place. From a legislative perspective, governments and local authorities all over the globe are steadily supporting and enforcing the adoption of environmentally responsible construction methods. This is happening in both the private and public sectors. The construction business is one that especially exemplifies this pattern of behavior. To encourage and regulate environmentally responsible real estate development, several nations have enacted legislation mandating environmentally responsible building practices, energy efficiency benchmarks, and environmental certifications [58]. If developers do not comply with these standards, they risk having fines assessed for their projects and limits being put on them. Because of this, it is essential to be aware of the many aspects associated with sustainability and include them in real estate construction to traverse the always-shifting legal and regulatory environment successfully. In a word, the consequences of a sustainable built environment on the growth of the real estate market are vast and far-reaching. This market development directly results from the sustainably built environment [59]. For several different reasons, the need to implement environmentally responsible business practices is expanding in the real estate market. These include the fact that sustainable business practices have a positive influence not only on the economy but also on the environment, that they contribute to a stronger sensation of social well-being, and that they play a part in preserving regulatory compliance. Those real estate investors and developers who emphasize environmentally responsible design, construction, and operation will be better positioned to thrive in a market undergoing rapid transformations while contributing to a more sustainable future for future generations. This is because they can reduce their negative impact on the environment while still meeting the needs of current tenants and customers. This is because the relevance of sustainable development is still increasing in the modern day.

Advertisement

6. Conclusion

This chapter thoroughly examines where sustainability and real estate development meet, providing a detailed examination of how current environmental necessities transform the physical surroundings of constructed spaces. The chapter explores and analyzes different theoretical models, including Sustainable Development Theory, the Triple Bottom Line approach, Environmental Psychology Theory, and Life Cycle Assessment. It aims to clarify the core principles that govern sustainable real estate practices and highlight their diverse advantages. This discussion’s crux is recognizing that sustainable real estate development goes beyond only environmental preservation and includes a wider range of economic and social aspects. Implementing these theoretical models showcases a fundamental change in approach from conventional development methods to ones that emphasize the long-term preservation of the environment, fairness in society, and economic sustainability. This transition is not only a reaction to ecological concerns but a calculated step toward a more robust and fairer future. The chapter examines the complicated relationship between ecological concerns, economic aims, and social requirements in the real estate industry, highlighting the delicate balance necessary for sustainable growth. The problems associated with this alignment are substantial, including governmental limitations, market forces, technology progress, and stakeholder involvement. Nevertheless, the chapter also emphasizes the profound capacity for change that arises from successfully addressing these obstacles. This includes the augmentation of asset worth, the betterment of community health and well-being, and the reduction of climate change repercussions. In addition, the chapter provides a discerning viewpoint on urban planning and design techniques, such as New Urbanism and Smart Growth. These measures are advocated as crucial for promoting urban settings that are both ecologically sustainable and socially inclusive while also being economically prosperous. The conversation encompasses the involvement of real estate developers in promoting these initiatives, highlighting the need for a cooperative strategy that includes many stakeholders, such as lawmakers, urban planners, architects, and community members. The chapter proposes potential avenues for future study, specifically focusing on comprehending the enduring effects of sustainable real estate practices on environmental quality, social dynamics, and economic development. Empirical investigations are necessary to verify the theoretical frameworks described and to investigate novel ways of sustainable real estate development. The chapter emphasizes the significance of governmental interventions and market incentives to promote the shift toward more sustainable business practices. The chapter offers a thorough and evaluative examination of sustainable real estate development, including both theoretical principles and actual observations. It promotes a comprehensive and unified strategy for real estate development that considers the urgent environmental issues of our day and the economic and social aspects of sustainability. This chapter provides a useful guide for professionals, researchers, and policymakers who want to contribute to developing sustainable, resilient, and prosperous communities in the ever-changing real estate market.

References

  1. 1. Goubran S et al. Green building standards and the United Nations’ sustainable development goals. Journal of Environmental Management. 2023;326:116552
  2. 2. Szopińska-Mularz M, Lehmann S. Balancing increased urban density with green spaces: The marketing of new housing estates in Poland. Buildings. 2023;13:777. DOI: 10.3390/buildings13030777
  3. 3. Cruz et al. On the concept of sustainable sustainability: An application to the Portuguese construction sector. Journal of Building Engineering. 2019;25:100836
  4. 4. Zhang X. Green real estate development in China: State of art and prospect agenda—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015;47:1-13
  5. 5. Qian QK, Fan K, Chan EHW. Regulatory incentives for green buildings: Gross floor area concessions. In: Building Governance and Climate Change. UK: Routledge; 2019. pp. 173-190. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2016.1181874
  6. 6. Liu T et al. Sustainability considerations of green buildings: A detailed overview on current advancements and future considerations. Sustainability. 2022;14:14393. DOI: 10.3390/su142114393
  7. 7. Azhgaliyeva D, Kapoor A, Liu Y. Green bonds for financing renewable energy and energy efficiency in South-East Asia: A review of policies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. 2020;10(2):113-140
  8. 8. Steffen B, Patt A. A historical turning point? Early evidence on how the Russia-Ukraine war changes public support for clean energy policies. Energy Research & Social Science. 2022;91:102758
  9. 9. Zhu C et al. Raising the Rent Premium: Moving Green Building Research beyond Certifications and Rent. eScholarship. USA: University of California; 2023. DOI: 10.20357/B7RG6W
  10. 10. Almusaed A, Alasadi A, Almssad A. A research on the biophilic concept upon school’s design from hot climate: A case study from Iraq. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2022;2022:12. Article ID 7994999. doi: 10.1155/2022/799499942
  11. 11. van Niekerk AJ. Inclusive economic sustainability: SDGs and global inequality. Sustainability. 2020;12:5427. DOI: 10.3390/su12135427
  12. 12. Shi L, Han L, Yang F, Gao L. The evolution of sustainable development theory: Types, goals, and research prospects. Sustainability. 2019;11:7158. DOI: 10.3390/su11247158
  13. 13. Gilchrist D, Jing Y, Zhong R. The limits of green finance: A survey of literature in the context of green bonds and green loans. Sustainability. 2021;13(2):478
  14. 14. Sánchez Cordero A, Gómez Melgar S, Andújar Márquez JM. Green building rating systems and the new framework level (s): A critical review of sustainability certification within Europe. Energies. 2019;13(1):66
  15. 15. Poveda CA, Lipsett MG. A review of sustainability assessment and sustainability/environmental rating systems and credit weighting tools. Journal of Sustainable Development. 2011;4(6):36
  16. 16. Nogueira E, Gomes S, Lopes JM. Triple bottom line, sustainability, and economic development: What binds them together? A Bibliometric Approach. Sustainability. 2023;15:6706. DOI: 10.3390/su15086706
  17. 17. Huang W et al. Relating sustainable business development practices and information management in promoting digital green innovation: Evidence from China. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13:930138
  18. 18. Pirozzi, Massimo, et al. Sustainable project management: A multidimensional value-based approach. PM World Journal. Jun 2023:XII(VI). USA. ISSN: 2330-4480
  19. 19. Almusaed A, Almssad A. Introductory chapter: Sustainable housing – Introduction to the thematic area. In: Sustainable Housing. London, UK, London, UK: IntechOpen; 2022. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.101968
  20. 20. Almusaed A, Almssad A. Lessons from the World Sustainable Housing (Past Experiences, Current Trends, and Future Strategies) [Internet]. Sustainable Housing. UK: IntechOpen; 2022. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.100533
  21. 21. Wey W-M, Hsu J. New urbanism and smart growth: Toward achieving a smart National Taipei University District. Habitat International. 2014;42:164-174
  22. 22. Bukowski M, Kreissl K. Social and climate (In-)equality perspectives within the SDGs: Introducing the inequality and poverty assessment model for a sustainable transformation of housing. Sustainability. 2022;14:15869. DOI: 10.3390/su142315869
  23. 23. Al-Kodmany K, Xue Q , Sun C. Reconfiguring vertical urbanism: The example of tall buildings and transit-oriented development (TB-TOD) in Hong Kong. Buildings. 2022;12:197. DOI: 10.3390/buildings12020197
  24. 24. Almusaed A, Almssad A, editors. Sustainable Smart Cities: A Vision for Tomorrow. UK: IntechOpen; 2023. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.100727
  25. 25. Bandauko E, Arku RN. A critical analysis of ‘smart cities’ as an urban development strategy in Africa. International Planning Studies. 2023;28(1):69-86
  26. 26. Gifford R. Environmental psychology and sustainable development: Expansion, maturation, and challenges. Journal of Social Issues. 2007;63(1):199-212
  27. 27. Rahbari F et al. Explaining the conceptual model of the effects of architecture on epigenetic changes in healthy buildings: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability. 2023;5(1):37-51
  28. 28. Almusaed A et al. Assessing the role and efficiency of thermal insulation by the “BIO-GREEN PANEL” in enhancing sustainability in a built environment. Sustainability. 2023;15(13):10418
  29. 29. Ekim et al. Assessments of users’ interactions with energy-efficient solutions: A systematic review. Building and Environment. 15 Aug 2023;242:110522. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110522
  30. 30. Almusaed A. Biophilic and Bioclimatic Architecture: Analytical Therapy for the Next Generation of Passive Sustainable Architecture. UK: Springer Science & Business Media; 2010. doi: 10.1007/978-1-84996-534-7
  31. 31. Ohene E et al. Navigating toward net zero by 2050: Drivers, barriers, and strategies for net zero carbon buildings in an emerging market. Building and Environment. 15 Aug 2023;242:110472. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110472
  32. 32. Sahoo S, Goswami S. Theoretical framework for assessing the economic and environmental impact of water pollution: A detailed study on sustainable development of India. Journal of Future Sustainability. 2024;4(1):23-34
  33. 33. Harrer T, Lehner OM, Weber C. A multi-level understanding of trust development in contexts of blurred organizational boundaries: The case of crowdfunding. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2023;39(1):101247
  34. 34. Le Gouais, Anna, et al. "Understanding how to create healthier places: A qualitative study exploring the complex system of urban development decision-making." Health & Place 81 (2023): 103023
  35. 35. Deklerck S. Life Cycle Assessment as a Decision-Making Tool within Vaccine Manufacturing–Potential and Limitations. Sweden: Uppsala University; 2023
  36. 36. Schaubroeck T, Schaubroeck S, Heijungs R, Zamagni A, Brandão M, Benetto E. Attributional & consequential life cycle assessment: Definitions, conceptual characteristics, and modelling restrictions. Sustainability. 2021;13:7386. DOI: 10.3390/su13137386
  37. 37. Brueckner JK, Kahn ME, Lin GC. A new spatial hedonic equilibrium in the emerging work-from-home economy? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 2023;15(2):285-319. DOI: 10.1257/app.20210190
  38. 38. Li Z-Z et al. How do rare earth prices respond to economic and geopolitical factors? Resources Policy. 2023;85:103853
  39. 39. Huang X et al. Housing investment and family entrepreneurship: Evidence from China. PLoS One. 2023;18(6):e0285699
  40. 40. Nethercote M. The techno-politics of rental housing Financialization: Real estate service companies and technocratic expertise in Australia’s build to rent market. Economic Geography. 2023;99(2):191-219
  41. 41. Luna Andonegui C. TOM: Measuring Liquidity in the Swedish Real Estate Market: Investigation of the Influence of the Market Conditions on the Time-on-Market and Price Relationship. Stockholm, Sweden: KTH - Royal Institute for Technology; 2023
  42. 42. Kimsey M, Gerard T, Battilana J. Walking the purpose-talk inside a large company: Sustainable product development as an instance of divergent change. Strategy Science. Jun 2023;8(2):311-321. DOI: 10.1287/stsc.2023.0197
  43. 43. Nigmadjanov U. Cardinal changes in the land fund management system during the period of updated Uzbekistan. In: E3S Web of Conferences. Vol. 386. Tashkent, Uzbekistan: EDP Sciences; 2023. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202338605003
  44. 44. Yitmen I, Al-Musaed A, Yücelgazi F. ANP model for evaluating the performance of adaptive façade systems in complex commercial buildings. Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management. 2021;29(1):431-455
  45. 45. Askar R, Bragança L, Gervásio H. Adaptability of buildings: A critical review on the concept evolution. Applied Sciences. 2021;11:4483. DOI: 10.3390/app11104483
  46. 46. Atmaja DS, Zaroni AN, Yusuf M. Actualization of performance management models for the development of human resources quality, economic potential, and financial governance policy In Indonesia ministry of education. Multicultural Education. 2023;9(01):1-15
  47. 47. Farida I, Setiawan D. Business strategies and competitive advantage: The role of performance and innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2022;8:163. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc8030163
  48. 48. Hussain S, Ali R, Emam W, Tashkandy Y, Mishra P, Fahlevi M, et al. Economic policy uncertainty, and firm value: Impact of investment sentiments in energy and petroleum. Sustainability. 2023;15:9656. DOI: 10.3390/su15129656
  49. 49. Almusaed A, Almssad A. City phenomenon between urban structure and composition [Internet]. Sustainability in Urban Planning and Design. IntechOpen; 2020. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.90443
  50. 50. Koohang A et al. Shaping the metaverse into reality: A holistic multidisciplinary understanding of opportunities, challenges, and avenues for future investigation. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 2023;63(3):735-765
  51. 51. Alsaqqa S, Sawalha S, Abdel-Nabi H. Agile software development: Methodologies and trends. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM). 2020;14(11):246-270. DOI: 10.3991/ijim.v14i11.13269
  52. 52. Almusaed A, Yitmen I, Almssad A. Enhancing smart home design with AI models: A case study of living spaces implementation review. Energies. 2023;16(6):2636
  53. 53. Fallah Shayan N, Mohabbati-Kalejahi N, Alavi S, Zahed MA. Sustainable development goals (SDGs) as a framework for corporate social responsibility (CSR). Sustainability. 2022;14:1222. DOI: 10.3390/su14031222
  54. 54. Moghayedi A, Hübner D, Michell K. Achieving sustainability in south African commercial properties: The impact of innovative technologies on energy consumption. Facilities. 2023;41(5/6):321-336
  55. 55. Almusaed A, Almssad A. Sustainable wooden skyscrapers for the future cities. In: Wood Industry-Past, Present, and Future Outlook. London, UK, London, UK: IntechOpen; 2022
  56. 56. Almusaed A, Yitmen I. Architectural reply for smart building design concepts based on artificial intelligence simulation models and digital twins. Sustainability. 2023;15(6):4955
  57. 57. Pourkiaei M, Romain A-C. Scoping review of indoor air quality indexes: Characterization and applications. Journal of Building Engineering. 15 Sep 2023;75:106703. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106703
  58. 58. Almusaed A, Almssad A, Najar K. An innovative school design based on a biophilic approach using the appreciative inquiry model: Case study Scandinavia. Advances in Civil Engineering. 2022;2022:18. Article ID 8545787. doi: 10.1155/2022/8545787
  59. 59. Dai L, Xiong Y. Does the green finance development and renewable energy affect the economic recovery in Asian economies? Renewable Energy. Nov 2023;216:118922. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.118922

Written By

Amjad Almusaed, Asaad Almssad and Ibrahim Yitmen

Submitted: 14 July 2023 Reviewed: 08 December 2023 Published: 03 January 2024