Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST
Abstract
Many conventional farming approaches in developing nations segregate livestock and crop production, ignoring the synergistic advantages and sustainable land management possibilities that may be gained by combining the two. In order to increase agricultural output and foster grassland conservation, this chapter investigates the idea of merging livestock and crop systems. By highlighting the advantages and challenges of the approach, this chapter draws attention to the potential benefits of integration, including enhanced soil fertility, efficient resource use, increased productivity, and better protection of grassland ecosystems. The importance and viability of a variety of integrated agricultural methods, including agro-pastoral, mixed, and silvopastoral systems, in a variety of geographical settings, are explored. The purpose of this chapter is to educate policymakers, academics, and practitioners on the need of integrating livestock and crop production for achieving long-term agricultural sustainability in low-income nations.
Keywords
- grass land
- conservation
- climate change
- livestock crop
- developing countries
1. Introduction
1.1 Background
Agriculture is the lifeline of many developing nations, sustaining millions of people by providing them with employment and an essential income [1]. However, poor production, soil erosion, and inefficient use of resources are common problems for conventional farming in these areas. The need for sustainable agriculture techniques is becoming more urgent as the world’s population is expected to rise to roughly 9.7 billion by 2050 and climate change offers greater dangers [2]. Innovative solutions are needed to meet the challenge of increasing food production while reducing environmental consequences and protecting scarce resources. Among them, integrating livestock and agricultural systems stands out as a method with the potential to help developing nations overcome obstacles and advance sustainable land management [3, 4]. This progressive kind of farming takes into account all aspects of food production, rather than just the crops and cattle [5]. Instead, it promotes cooperation between these two agricultural pillars in order to maximize gains in production, grassland ecosystem preservation, and rural community prosperity [4].
Instead of keeping crop farming and animal farming separate, as is common in traditional farming approaches, integrated farming takes a more holistic and creative approach [6]. To solve the problems of contemporary agriculture, it takes into account the symbiotic relationship between crop production and animal husbandry [6]. The goal of this method is to increase agricultural output while also protecting grassland ecosystems and improving the quality of life in rural areas [4]. Traditional and indigenous agricultural traditions have long acknowledged the advantages of reciprocal interactions between crops and animals, therefore the idea of integrating livestock and crop systems is not new [7]. These time-tested methods have always known the need of coordinating the ecological roles of crops and livestock within a single system [8]. Industrialization and the Green Revolution, which prioritized specialized and intensive farming, led to the widespread replacement of these integrated techniques with more standardized and simpler ways [3, 4].
Recent years, however, have seen a resurgence in interest in these integrated systems and their promotion as a long-term answer to the problems plaguing contemporary agriculture [9, 10, 11]. Integrating livestock and agricultural systems has the potential to overcome many of the drawbacks of conventional farming [6]. New methods that improve resource use and nitrogen cycling might slow the decline of agricultural productivity and soil quality [12]. Including livestock in agricultural systems has the potential to help farmers due to the nutrient-rich manure created by animals [13]. Cattle may be given crop scraps in return, which is good for both parties [14]. Furthermore, this approach offers the possibility of safeguarding grassland ecosystems and preserving biodiversity [7]. Protecting grassland biodiversity, halting soil erosion, and improving ecosystem health may all be possible via the use of sustainable grazing practices within integrated systems [15].
Integrating livestock and crop production allows for more diversity and stability. Having many streams of income may help farmers weather economic storms and improve their financial stability [16]. Having additional food alternatives is one way in which a diverse agricultural system contributes to food security [17]. Although there is much to be gained by implementing integrated agricultural systems, there are a number of challenges that must be overcome before they can be implemented on a large scale. Raising awareness and educating the public may help increase the adoption of integrated systems [18]. It is critical to give farmers with knowledge, training, and extension services to aid in their transition to more sustainable and integrated practices [18].
Agricultural techniques may also be affected by sociocultural issues. Encouraging farmers to adopt new methods requires an appreciation for, and an understanding of, traditional knowledge and beliefs [19]. Creating an enabling environment for the broad adoption of integrated agricultural methods requires supportive policies, incentives, and institutional structures. The promise of integrated systems must be acknowledged by policymakers, who must then enact enabling legislation to encourage farmers to embrace this sustainable method [20]. Technology and infrastructure play critical roles in making integrated systems more practical. Integrated agricultural approaches are more likely to be adopted successfully when farmers have access to better seed varieties, animal types, and market connections [21].
Consequently, the issues experienced by conventional agricultural methods in poor countries may be mitigated by the integration of livestock and crop systems [22]. Farmers may increase output, protect ecosystems, and better the lives of people in rural areas by understanding the interdependence of crops and animals and using this knowledge to their advantage [3, 4]. Integrated livestock and crop systems may lead the way towards a more resilient, productive, and environmentally aware agricultural future in developing nations via joint efforts and a commitment to sustainable practices [10]. Food security, economic prosperity, and ecological preservation may all be ensured for future generations by adopting and promoting integrated farming techniques in developing nations [23].
The primary objectives of this chapter are to perform a thorough research and analysis of traditional agricultural methods in developing countries and to emphasize the limitations and hazards that these practices provide to sustainable agriculture and food security. In order to stress the need of combining livestock and agricultural systems as a sustainable and successful approach to land management in developing countries, this chapter highlights potential benefits such as higher productivity, improved soil health, and grassland conservation. Different types of integrated farming will be examined, including agro-pastoral systems, mixed farming, and silvopastoral systems, and their relative relevance and feasibility in different types of environments. This chapter will also cover the issues and methods necessary to implement integrated livestock and agricultural systems, such as land management practices, animal waste management, and the incorporation of technology. Integration’s social and economic implications, such as its impact on rural residents’ incomes, food security, and climate change adaptation preparedness, will also be examined. The purpose of this chapter is to contribute to the existing body of knowledge on sustainable agricultural approaches in developing countries by assisting policymakers, researchers, and farmers in supporting integrated livestock and crop systems for greater productivity and grassland conservation.
2. Advantages and challenges of integrating livestock and crop systems
2.1 Advantages of integrating livestock and crop systems
2.1.1 Enhanced nutrient cycling
One of the primary advantages of integrating livestock and crop systems is the efficient nutrient cycling it facilitates [12]. Livestock produces organic matter in the form of manure, which can be utilized as natural fertilizers for crops [24]. This reduces the dependence on synthetic chemical fertilizers, closing nutrient loops, and promoting sustainable soil health and fertility [24]. In return, crop residues and by-products can serve as feed and forage for livestock, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization [25] (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Nutrient cycle in crop-livestock systems [
2.1.2 Improved soil health
The integration of livestock and crop systems contributes to improved soil health [27]. Livestock grazing can help break up compacted soils, improve soil aeration, and stimulate biological activity [28]. Additionally, the organic matter from livestock manure enriches the soil, enhancing its water-holding capacity and nutrient content. Healthy soils support better crop growth and resilience to environmental stresses [27].
2.1.3 Grassland conservation
Sustainable grazing practices within integrated systems can play a vital role in grassland conservation [15]. Properly managed rotational grazing allows for rest and recovery periods for pastures, preventing overgrazing and maintaining biodiversity [29]. By preserving natural habitats and avoiding grassland conversion, integrated systems contribute to the conservation of grassland ecosystems and the wildlife they support [30].
2.1.4 Diversification of income streams
Integrating livestock and crop systems offers farmers the opportunity to diversify their income streams. Relying on both crops and livestock provides multiple sources of revenue, reducing the vulnerability to market fluctuations and ensuring economic stability for rural communities [4].
2.1.5 Resilience to climate change
Integrated systems can enhance resilience to climate change impacts. Diversification of production and income sources, as well as improved soil health, can make farms more adaptable to changing climatic conditions, such as altered rainfall patterns and extreme weather events [31].
2.1.6 Efficient resource utilization
By combining crops and livestock, farmers can optimize resource utilization. For instance, livestock can graze on crop residues and cover crops, reducing the need for feed supplements. In turn, crop residues and by-products can be used as supplementary feed for livestock [32] (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Advantages of crop live integration.
2.2 Challenges of integrating livestock and crop systems
2.2.1 Knowledge and awareness
The requirement for knowledge and awareness among farmers is a major obstacle to integrating livestock and agricultural systems. Adopting new integrated techniques in farming involves access to knowledge, training, and extension services [33, 34]. Many traditional agricultural practices have been handed down from generation to generation.
2.2.2 Socio-cultural factors
Agricultural methods may be affected by cultural and social norms. Engaging with local people and respecting their traditional knowledge is vital since introducing new techniques may be met with hostility if they disagree with deeply ingrained practices or beliefs [6].
2.2.3 Policy and institutional support
The adoption of integrated agricultural methods relies heavily on enabling policies and institutional structures. To fully realize integration’s potential, governments must acknowledge its value and reward it, empowering farmers with the means they need to implement and maintain such systems [4].
2.2.4 Technology and infrastructure
It might be difficult to develop integrated livestock and agricultural systems in areas with limited access to necessary technologies and infrastructure. Facilitating the adoption of integrated techniques requires better access to improved crops, animal breeds, and market links [35].
2.2.5 Land management and space constraints
In order to meet the demands of both crops and cattle, land must be managed carefully in an integrated system. Proper rotational grazing may be difficult in areas with limited acreage, necessitating creative land use planning to maximize output [36].
2.2.6 Animal waste management
Animal waste must be properly managed to avoid pollution and protect public health. When incorporating animals into agricultural systems, it is crucial to develop effective and sustainable waste management procedures [37].
3. Integrated farming approaches
Integrated farming approaches encompass various systems that combine crop cultivation and livestock rearing in a synergistic manner [38]. These approaches aim to optimize resource utilization, enhance productivity, and promote sustainable land management [38]. Each integrated farming system adapts to the specific ecological, social, and economic context of a region, offering flexibility in implementation [39]. Some of the key integrated farming approaches include:
4. Agro-pastoral systems
Agro-pastoral systems integrate crop production and livestock grazing in the same area [40]. Livestock, such as cattle, sheep, or goats, are allowed to graze on fallow or harvested crop fields, consuming crop residues and weeds [40]. The manure from livestock returns nutrients to the soil, benefiting subsequent crop growth. This system fosters a balanced nutrient cycle, conserves grassland ecosystems, and promotes biodiversity by alternating between grazing and crop production [12].
4.1 Mixed farming
Mixed farming involves combining both crops and livestock on the same farm, but in distinct areas [41]. Farmers allocate specific plots for crop cultivation and maintain separate areas for livestock grazing or raising [41]. The integration occurs at the farm level, with complementary interactions between crops and livestock. For example, crop residues and by-products can be used as animal feed, while manure enriches the soil for crop cultivation [42].
4.2 Silvopastoral systems
Silvopastoral systems combine trees or agroforestry components with livestock grazing. In these systems, farmers plant trees or shrubs on grazing lands, providing shade and shelter for livestock [43]. The trees also contribute to soil improvement through their root systems and enhance biodiversity. Livestock, in turn, contribute to tree management by pruning and seed dispersal, aiding in natural regeneration [44]. Silvopastoral systems promote carbon sequestration, mitigate climate change impacts, and improve the overall ecological resilience of the farming landscape [45].
4.3 Integrated aquaculture-agriculture systems
This approach combines fish or aquatic organism farming with crop production. Farmers integrate fish ponds or aquaculture tanks within their agricultural fields or in proximity to them [46]. Fish wastes serve as natural fertilizers for crops, while the crops provide shade and natural food sources for the fish. This system enhances overall farm productivity and diversifies income streams [47].
4.4 Integrated crop-livestock-forest systems
This system integrates crop cultivation, livestock rearing, and forest components within the same agricultural landscape. Farmers cultivate crops, raise livestock, and maintain forests or agroforestry areas. The system maximizes resource utilization, conserves biodiversity, and offers economic and environmental benefits [48].
Integrated farming approaches offer numerous advantages for enhancing productivity and promoting sustainable land management in developing countries. By optimizing resource utilization, conserving biodiversity, and promoting resilience to climate change, these systems pave the way towards a more sustainable and prosperous agricultural future [4]. Addressing challenges through knowledge dissemination, institutional support, and socio-cultural awareness will be critical in facilitating the widespread adoption of integrated farming approaches [49].
5. Socio-economic implications
5.1 Rural livelihoods
Communities who depend substantially on agriculture as a source of income may feel the greatest effects of integrated agricultural systems [16]. Increasing economic stability and decreasing reliance on changes in any one sector [16] is possible for rural communities by combining several agricultural activities, such as crop agriculture, livestock husbandry, aquaculture, and agroforestry.
5.1.1 Diversification of income streams and poverty alleviation
Monoculture, in which farmers only engage in one kind of farming, is common in conventional agriculture. This may be dangerous if the crop fails because of things like pests, illnesses, or bad weather [50]. However, farmers that use integrated systems might increase their revenue by diversifying their sources of income. Farmers may multitask by tending to many fields, herds, and tanks at once [4]. By reducing the possibility of total income loss and spreading the risk, diversification may help relieve poverty in rural areas [51].
5.1.2 Enhancing livelihood resilience through integrated practices
The resilience of rural lifestyles is boosted by integrated systems as well. Farmers who engage in a variety of endeavors are better able to respond to unexpected changes. They have many revenue streams to fall back on in the event of crop failure [52]. Furthermore, sustainable and regenerative methods are commonly emphasized in integrated systems, which assist conserve natural resources and sustain land productivity over the long term, ensuring future generations’ ability to make a living [52].
5.2 Food security
5.2.1 Contributing to food production and availability
Integrated systems contribute significantly to food production and availability. By combining different agricultural practices, farmers can optimize land use and resource allocation [33]. For instance, they can use animal manure as fertilizers for crops, and crop residues can be fed to livestock, creating a closed-loop system that maximizes productivity [33]. This efficient use of resources helps increase food production and availability, reducing the risk of food shortages in rural areas.
5.2.2 Strengthening food security in vulnerable regions
Integrated systems can play a crucial role in enhancing food security in vulnerable regions, particularly those prone to environmental and climate-related challenges [53]. By adopting climate-resilient practices, farmers can mitigate the impact of adverse conditions like droughts, floods, or extreme temperatures on their crops and livestock. Moreover, diversification of crops and livestock provides a buffer against food crises caused by localized crop failures or diseases [54].
5.2.3 Promoting dietary diversity and nutrition
Through integrated systems, farmers can grow a diverse range of crops and rear different types of livestock. This diversity extends to the local food supply and promotes dietary diversity among rural communities [55]. Consuming a varied diet with a mix of fruits, vegetables, grains, and animal products can significantly improve nutrition and overall health, reducing the prevalence of malnutrition and diet-related health issues [55].
5.3 Climate change resilience
5.3.1 How integrated systems can enhance resilience to climate change?
Climate change poses a significant threat to agricultural productivity, with increased occurrences of extreme weather events and shifting climatic patterns [56]. Integrated systems are more resilient to these changes because they offer flexibility and adaptability. By combining various farming practices, farmers can adjust their operations in response to changing conditions. For instance, during droughts, they can focus on drought-resistant crops and reduce water-intensive practices [57].
5.3.2 Mitigating climate-related risks through diversified production
Integrated systems also mitigate climate-related risks by reducing dependence on a single crop or livestock species. If one element of the system is affected by a climate-related hazard, other components can still provide income and sustenance [58]. This reduces the vulnerability of farmers to the adverse effects of climate change, such as crop failures or livestock losses [33].
5.3.3 Carbon sequestration potential of integrated farming
One important aspect of climate change resilience is the potential to sequester carbon dioxide from the atmosphere [59]. Integrated farming practices, especially agroforestry and cover cropping, can enhance carbon sequestration in the soil and vegetation. Trees and cover crops capture carbon, mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and contributing to climate change mitigation efforts [60].
6. Case studies
6.1 Case studies from Africa
Examples of Successful Integration in African Countries:
Case Study 1: In Zambiya, a farming community successfully implemented an integrated farming system that combined crop cultivation with fish farming (aquaponics). They used the nutrient-rich water from fish ponds to fertilize the crops, while the crops filtered the water for the fish. This integration led to increased crop yields and fish production, improving food security and providing additional income streams for the community [61].
Case Study 2: In Ethiopia, a project focused on integrating agroforestry with traditional crop cultivation. Farmers planted trees alongside their crops, providing shade and windbreaks, which reduced soil erosion and water loss. The trees also contributed fruits, nuts, and timber, adding to the farmers’ income. This sustainable approach improved soil fertility, enhanced climate resilience, and empowered the local communities economically [62].
6.2 Case studies from Asia
Integrating Livestock and Crop Systems in Asian Nations:
Case Study 1: In India, a dairy cooperative introduced an integrated model where crop residues and by-products were utilized as animal feed. This reduced the pressure on natural resources and minimized waste while increasing milk productivity. The cooperative also promoted organic farming practices, enhancing the overall sustainability of the system [63].
Case Study 2: In Vietnam, the combination of rice farming with duck rearing has proven successful. Ducks forage in rice paddies, consuming insects and weeds, which reduces the need for chemical pesticides and manual weeding. The ducks also provide an additional income source through egg and meat production [64].
6.3 Case studies from Latin America
Experiences of Integrating Systems in Latin American Countries:
Case Study 1: In Brazil, a cooperative of small-scale farmers adopted an integrated system that combined cattle ranching with silvopastoral practices. They planted trees and forage crops in pasture areas, providing shade and nutritious fodder for the cattle. This approach reduced deforestation, improved livestock health, and increased the overall productivity of the land [65].
Case Study 2: In Colombia, coffee farmers integrated beekeeping into their coffee plantations. Bees enhanced coffee pollination, leading to higher coffee yields. Additionally, the farmers could sell honey and beeswax, diversifying their income sources and promoting biodiversity [66].
6.4 Challenges unique to the region and potential solutions
Land Fragmentation: Many Asian countries face land fragmentation due to inheritance laws. Integrated systems might require larger land areas, which can be challenging to assemble. Land consolidation programs or community-based land-sharing arrangements could be potential solutions [67].
Water Management: In regions with water scarcity, managing water resources becomes critical for integrated systems. Implementing water-saving irrigation techniques, rainwater harvesting, and efficient water use can address this challenge [68].
Traditional Practices: Convincing farmers to shift from traditional practices to integrated systems can be challenging. Demonstrating the economic and environmental benefits through pilot projects and on-farm trials can help build confidence and encourage adoption [69].
7. Policy and institutional support
7.1 Policy frameworks
Analyzing Existing Agricultural Policies and their Impact on Integration:
Before promoting integrated farming, it is crucial to assess the existing agricultural policies to understand their impact on integration. Some policies may inadvertently hinder the adoption of integrated systems due to their focus on monoculture or specific agricultural sectors [70]. Additionally, subsidies and incentives may favor conventional farming practices, making it challenging for farmers to transition to integrated approaches [71]. An in-depth analysis can help identify gaps and areas where policy adjustments are needed to encourage integration.
7.2 Policy recommendations to support integrated farming
Incentives for Diversification: Governments can introduce financial incentives, such as subsidies or tax breaks, to encourage farmers to adopt integrated farming practices. These incentives could target crop-livestock integration, agroforestry, aquaponics, or other sustainable practices that enhance resilience and productivity [72].
Research and Development Funding: Governments should allocate funds for research and development specific to integrated systems. This investment can support the creation of best practices, improved technologies, and knowledge dissemination to farmers through extension services [73].
Land Tenure Security: Secure land tenure is essential for farmers to invest in integrated systems, as many practices involve long-term planning. Governments can provide land tenure guarantees and clarify land rights to instill confidence in farmers to adopt integrated approaches [74].
Market Access and Value Chains: Strengthening market linkages for integrated farming products can incentivize farmers to adopt such practices. Governments can facilitate access to markets, promote fair trade practices, and support value addition initiatives to increase the profitability of integrated systems [75].
Sustainable Agriculture Standards: Integrate sustainable agriculture standards into policy frameworks to encourage the adoption of ecologically friendly and socially responsible practices. These standards can guide farmers towards integrated approaches and promote environmentally friendly production [76].
7.3 The way forward for policymakers, researchers, and farmers
The role of policymakers in facilitating integrated farming is vital [77]. They need to give sustainable farming more weight in legislative frameworks, incentivize the use of integrated systems, fund studies on their efficacy, and bolster extension services for farmers [77].
Scientists should keep looking for new ways to improve the efficiency and scalability of integrated agricultural methods. Context-specific and implementable solutions may be found via collaborative research initiatives including stakeholders from academics, governments, and agricultural communities [73].
The use of integrated systems by farmers should be promoted and supported. Farmers may make a smooth shift to sustainable methods with the support of training programs, extension services, and access to capital and markets [78].
Food security, climate change, and poverty may all be combated via sustainable agriculture if livestock and agricultural systems are integrated. Agriculture and rural communities may have a more secure and sustainable future if governments, academics, and farmers all adopt this strategy.
7.4 Institutional capacity building
Strengthening Institutions for Promoting Integrated Systems:
Promoting integrated farming in developing countries requires a tailored approach that addresses the unique challenges and opportunities in these regions. Several studies and reports highlight the importance of strengthening institutions, providing training and extension services, and creating supportive policy frameworks to foster integrated farming practices.
Strengthening Institutions : The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) emphasizes the significance of strengthening agricultural institutions in developing countries to promote integrated farming. Creating specialized departments or units within existing agricultural agencies can enhance the focus on integrated systems. These units can provide technical support, facilitate research, and coordinate with relevant stakeholders [79].Training and Extension Services : The International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) recognizes the importance of training and extension services for smallholder farmers in developing countries. Organizing workshops, training programs, and demonstration farms can effectively showcase the benefits of integrated farming and teach farmers best practices [80].Farmer-to-Farmer Knowledge Exchange Programs : Research conducted by the International Journal of Agricultural Extension highlights the effectiveness of farmer-to-farmer knowledge exchange programs in developing countries. Such programs enable successful adopters of integrated farming systems to share their experiences and knowledge with neighboring farmers, leading to higher adoption rates and stronger community support [81].Leveraging Digital Technologies : In the context of developing countries, the World Bank emphasizes the potential of digital technologies and online platforms to disseminate agricultural information. Access to information through digital means can empower farmers in remote areas with knowledge about integrated farming practices [82].Supportive Policy Frameworks : The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) stresses the importance of supportive policy frameworks for integrated farming in developing countries. Governments need to analyze existing policies, make necessary adjustments, and introduce new incentives to create an enabling environment for farmers to adopt integrated approaches [83].
By implementing these strategies in a developing country context, governments and relevant stakeholders can foster the adoption of integrated farming practices, leading to increased agricultural productivity, improved environmental sustainability, and enhanced livelihoods for smallholder farmers.
8. Future perspectives and conclusions
8.1 Future prospects of integration
8.1.1 Potential for scaling up integrated systems in developing countries
There is great potential for expanding integrated agricultural systems in underdeveloped regions. The strain on agricultural systems to increase food production while being environmentally friendly will only increase as the world’s population rises. Meeting this need while also resolving environmental and social issues is possible via the use of integrated techniques. Food security, poverty reduction, and rural development are all aided by integrated systems because they encourage diversity, resource efficiency, and resilience [4].
Governments, international organizations, and the corporate sector are more likely to support sustainable agriculture if public opinion shifts in its favor. Knowledge sharing and the use of lessons gained from regional case studies may also help with the scaling up of integrated systems [84].
8.1.2 Integrating new technologies and ideas into agriculture
Recent technological developments have been essential in spreading the word about integrated farming. Farms may be monitored and managed more effectively with the use of precision agricultural technology including remote sensing, drones, and sensor-based systems. These advancements allow for more precise input distribution, which in turn leads to less waste and higher output [85].
In addition, best practices, weather predictions, market pricing, and financial services are all more easily accessible to farmers thanks to digital platforms and mobile apps. With this knowledge, smallholder farmers will be better able to manage their resources and make educated agricultural decisions [86].
8.2 Conclusion
Integrating livestock and crop systems holds significant promise for advancing grassland conservation and environmental sustainability in developing nations. This approach offers multifaceted benefits, including heightened resource efficiency, amplified production, resilience to climate change, and preservation of biodiversity. By capitalizing on the synergies between livestock and crop production, farmers can optimize nutrient recycling, minimize waste, and reduce reliance on external inputs, resulting in increased yields, efficient land use, and sustainable resource management. This integrated model not only bolsters income stability for farmers by diversifying revenue sources but also fortifies resilience against climatic fluctuations and fosters adaptable production strategies. Overcoming hurdles like limited knowledge and institutional support remains essential for widespread adoption. Empowering farmers through educational initiatives, knowledge-sharing platforms, and tailored policies can bolster their confidence and competence in implementing integrated methods. Policymakers must champion sustainable practices, foster supportive frameworks, and enhance institutions to facilitate this transition and ensure equitable access to capital, inputs, and markets. In this collaborative endeavor, integrated livestock and agricultural systems emerge as a transformative solution to address pressing challenges, steering developing nations towards a sustainable and ecologically harmonious agricultural future.
References
- 1.
Jana NC, Singh A, Singh RB, editors. Livelihood Enhancement Through Agriculture, Tourism and Health. Singapore: Springer; 2022 - 2.
Kumar L, Chhogyel N, Gopalakrishnan T, Hasan MK, Jayasinghe SL, Kariyawasam CS, et al. Climate change and future of agri-food production. In: Future Foods. United States: Academic Press; 2022. pp. 49-79 - 3.
Leite FFGD, Nobrega GN, Baumgärtner LC, Alecrim FB, da Silveira JG, Cordeiro RC, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration associated with integrated crop-livestock-forestry (ICLF) systems. Environmental Reviews. 2023; 2023 :2-18 - 4.
Sekaran U, Lai L, Ussiri DA, Kumar S, Clay S. Role of integrated crop-livestock systems in improving agriculture production and addressing food security–a review. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 2021; 5 :100190 - 5.
Franzluebbers AJ, Sulc RM, Russelle MP. Opportunities and challenges for integrating North-American crop and livestock systems. Grassland Productivity and Ecosystem Services. 2011; 2011 :208-218 - 6.
Muhie SH. Novel approaches and practices to sustainable agriculture. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 2022; 2022 :100446 - 7.
Kremsa VŠ. Sustainable management of agricultural resources (agricultural crops and animals). In: Sustainable Resource Management. United States: Elsevier; 2021. pp. 99-145 - 8.
Capra F. Sustainable living, ecological literacy, and the breath of life. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE). 2007; 2007 :9-18 - 9.
Horlings LG, Marsden TK. Towards the real green revolution? Exploring the conceptual dimensions of a new ecological modernisation of agriculture that could ‘feed the world’. Global Environmental Change. 2011; 21 (2):441-452 - 10.
Lykogianni M, Bempelou E, Karamaouna F, Aliferis KA. Do pesticides promote or hinder sustainability in agriculture? The challenge of sustainable use of pesticides in modern agriculture. Science of the Total Environment. 2021; 795 :148625 - 11.
Trivedi P, Mattupalli C, Eversole K, Leach JE. Enabling sustainable agriculture through understanding and enhancement of microbiomes. New Phytologist. 2021; 230 (6):2129-2147 - 12.
Rao KPC, Verchot LV, Laarman J. Adaptation to climate change through sustainable management and development of agroforestry systems. Journal of SAT Agricultural Research. 2007; 4 (1):1-30 - 13.
Tarawali SA, Larbi A, Fernández-Rivera S, Bationo A. The contribution of livestock to soil fertility. Sustaining Soil Fertility in West Africa. 2001; 58 :281-304 - 14.
Gupta V, Rai PK, Risam KS. Integrated crop-livestock farming systems: A strategy for resource conservation and environmental sustainability. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education. 2012; 2 :49-54 - 15.
Dong S, Shang Z, Gao J, Boone RB. Enhancing sustainability of grassland ecosystems through ecological restoration and grazing management in an era of climate change on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2020; 287 :106684 - 16.
Sneessens I, Sauvée L, Randrianasolo-Rakotobe H, Ingrand S. A framework to assess the economic vulnerability of farming systems: Application to mixed crop-livestock systems. Agricultural Systems. 2019; 176 :102658 - 17.
Mustafa MA, Mayes S, Massawe F. Crop diversification through a wider use of underutilised crops: A strategy to ensure food and nutrition security in the face of climate change. Sustainable Solutions for Food Security: Combating Climate Change by Adaptation. 2019; 2019 :125-149 - 18.
Rose DC, Sutherland WJ, Barnes AP, Borthwick F, Ffoulkes C, Hall C, et al. Integrated farm management for sustainable agriculture: Lessons for knowledge exchange and policy. Land Use Policy. 2019; 81 :834-842 - 19.
Ilieva RT, Cohen N, Israel M, Specht K, Fox-Kämper R, Fargue-Lelièvre A, et al. The socio-cultural benefits of urban agriculture: A review of the literature. Land. 2022; 11 (5):622 - 20.
OECD. Adoption of Technologies for Sustainable Farming Systems. United States: OECD; 2001. p. 149 - 21.
Swaminathan MS. Can science and technology feed the world in 2025? Field Crops Research. 2007; 104 (1-3):3-9 - 22.
Kirchmann H, Thorvaldsson G. Challenging targets for future agriculture. European Journal of Agronomy. 2000; 12 (3-4):145-161 - 23.
Scialabba N. Factors influencing organic agriculture policies with a focus on developing countries. In: IFOAM 2000 Scientific Conference. Basel, Switzerland; 2000. pp. 28-31 - 24.
Vanlauwe B, Wendt J, Diels J. Combined application of organic matter and fertilizer. Sustaining Soil Fertility in West Africa. 2001; 58 :247-279 - 25.
Jayasuriya MCN. Use of crop residues and agro-industrial by-products in ruminant production systems in developing countries. BSAP Occasional Publication. 1993; 16 :47-55 - 26.
Ndambi OA, Pelster DE, Owino JO, De Buisonje F, Vellinga T. Manure management practices and policies in sub-Saharan Africa: Implications on manure quality as a fertilizer. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2019; 3 :29 - 27.
Kumari VV, Balloli SS, Ramana DBV, Kumar M, Maruthi V, Prabhakar M, et al. Crop and livestock productivity, soil health improvement and insect dynamics: Impact of different fodder-based cropping systems in a rainfed region of India. Agricultural Systems. 2023; 208 :103646 - 28.
Sheoran V, Sheoran AS, Poonia P. Soil reclamation of abandoned mine land by revegetation: A review. International Journal of Soil, Sediment and Water. 2010; 3 (2):13 - 29.
Grandin T. Grazing cattle, sheep, and goats are important parts of a sustainable agricultural future. Animals. 2022; 12 (16):2092 - 30.
Sanderson MA, Archer D, Hendrickson J, Kronberg S, Liebig M, Nichols K, et al. Diversification and ecosystem services for conservation agriculture: Outcomes from pastures and integrated crop–livestock systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 2013; 28 (2):129-144 - 31.
Altieri MA, Nicholls CI, Henao A, Lana MA. Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2015; 35 (3):869-890 - 32.
Oosting S, van der Lee J, Verdegem M, de Vries M, Vernooij A, Bonilla-Cedrez C, et al. Farmed animal production in tropical circular food systems. Food Security. 2022; 14 (1):273-292 - 33.
Gomez-Zavaglia A, Mejuto JC, Simal-Gandara J. Mitigation of emerging implications of climate change on food production systems. Food Research International. 2020; 134 :109256 - 34.
Bhatt R, Kaur R, Ghosh A. Strategies to practice climate-smart agriculture to improve the livelihoods under the rice-wheat cropping system in South Asia. Sustainable Management of Soil and Environment. 2019; 2019 :29-71 - 35.
Garrett RD, Niles MT, Gil JD, Gaudin A, Chaplin-Kramer R, Assmann A, et al. Social and ecological analysis of commercial integrated crop livestock systems: Current knowledge and remaining uncertainty. Agricultural Systems. 2017; 155 :136-146 - 36.
Tiemann T, Douxchamps S. Opportunities and challenges for integrated smallholder farming systems to improve soil nutrient management in Southeast Asia. World Development Sustainability. 2023; 2023 :100080 - 37.
Hajam YA, Kumar R, Kumar A. Environmental waste management strategies and Vermi transformation for sustainable development. Environmental Challenges. 2023; 2023 :100747 - 38.
Gurjar GN, Swami S. Integrated farming systems of valley regions: Food and nutritional security. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 2019; 7 (2):773-778 - 39.
Bonaudo T, Bendahan AB, Sabatier R, Ryschawy J, Bellon S, Leger F, et al. Agroecological principles for the redesign of integrated crop–livestock systems. European Journal of Agronomy. 2014; 57 :43-51 - 40.
Ayantunde AA, De Leeuw J, Turner MD, Said M. Challenges of assessing the sustainability of (agro)-pastoral systems. Livestock Science. 2011; 139 (1-2):30-43 - 41.
Devendra C, Thomas D. Crop–animal interactions in mixed farming systems in Asia. Agricultural Systems. 2002; 71 (1-2):27-40 - 42.
Martin G, Barth K, Benoit M, Brock C, Destruel M, Dumont B, et al. Potential of multi-species livestock farming to improve the sustainability of livestock farms: A review. Agricultural Systems. 2020; 181 :102821 - 43.
Cubbage F, Balmelli G, Bussoni A, Noellemeyer E, Pachas AN, Fassola H, et al. Comparing silvopastoral systems and prospects in eight regions of the world. Agroforestry Systems. 2012; 86 :303-314 - 44.
Broom DM. Components of sustainable animal production and the use of silvopastoral systems. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2017; 46 :683-688 - 45.
Aryal DR, Morales-Ruiz DE, López-Cruz S, Tondopó-Marroquín CN, Lara-Nucamendi A, Jiménez-Trujillo JA, et al. Silvopastoral systems and remnant forests enhance carbon storage in livestock-dominated landscapes in Mexico. Scientific Reports. 2022; 12 (1):16769 - 46.
Ahmed N, Wahab MA, Thilsted SH. Integrated aquaculture-agriculture systems in Bangladesh: Potential for sustainable livelihoods and nutritional security of the rural poor. Aquaculture Asia. 2007; 12 (1):14 - 47.
Lazur AM, Leteux F. Integrated aquaculture systems for nutrient reduction in agricultural wastewater: Potential and challenges. Bulletin-Fisheries Research Agency Japan. 2004; 2004 :143-152 - 48.
Ferreira JML, Maurício RM, Madureira AP. Opportunities and challenges in crop-livestock-forest integration. Informe Agropecuario. 2010; 31 (257):112-120 - 49.
Dione MM, Traoré I, Kassambara H, Sow AN, Touré CO, Sidibé CAK, et al. Integrated approach to facilitate stakeholder participation in the control of endemic diseases of livestock: The case of Peste des Petits Ruminants in Mali. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2019; 6 :392 - 50.
Behera UK, France J. Integrated farming systems and the livelihood security of small and marginal farmers in India and other developing countries. Advances in Agronomy. 2016; 138 :235-282 - 51.
Ellis F. Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. The Journal of Development Studies. 1998; 35 (1):1-38 - 52.
Shaffril HAM, Krauss SE, Samsuddin SF. A systematic review on Asian's farmers' adaptation practices towards climate change. Science of the Total Environment. 2018; 644 :683-695 - 53.
Islam MS, Kieu E. Tackling regional climate change impacts and food security issues: A critical analysis across ASEAN, PIF, and SAARC. Sustainability. 2020; 12 (3):883 - 54.
Raza A, Razzaq A, Mehmood SS, Zou X, Zhang X, Lv Y, et al. Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome: A review. Plants. 2019; 8 (2):34 - 55.
Qaim M. Globalisation of agrifood systems and sustainable nutrition. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2017; 76 (1):12-21 - 56.
Duchenne-Moutien RA, Neetoo H. Climate change and emerging food safety issues: A review. Journal of Food Protection. 2021; 84 (11):1884-1897 - 57.
Munang R, Thiaw I, Alverson K, Mumba M, Liu J, Rivington M. Climate change and ecosystem-based adaptation: A new pragmatic approach to buffering climate change impacts. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2013; 5 (1):67-71 - 58.
Godde CM, Mason-D’Croz D, Mayberry DE, Thornton PK, Herrero M. Impacts of climate change on the livestock food supply chain; a review of the evidence. Global Food Security. 2021; 28 :100488 - 59.
Tefera Y, Hailu Y, Siraj Z. Potential of agroforestry for climate change mitigation through carbon sequestration. Agricultural Research Technology Open Access Journal. 2019; 22 :556196 - 60.
Mutuo PK, Cadisch G, Albrecht A, Palm CA, Verchot L. Potential of agroforestry for carbon sequestration and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from soils in the tropics. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 2005; 71 :43-54 - 61.
Hasimuna OJ, Maulu S, Nawanzi K, Lundu B, Mphande J, Phiri CJ, et al. Integrated agriculture-aquaculture as an alternative to improving small-scale fish production in Zambia. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2023; 7 :1161121 - 62.
Negash D, Abegaz A, Smith JU, Araya H, Gelana B. Household energy and recycling of nutrients and carbon to the soil in integrated crop-livestock farming systems: A case study in Kumbursa village, Central Highlands of Ethiopia. GCB Bioenergy. 2017; 9 (10):1588-1601 - 63.
Kumar S, Singh SS, Dey A. Integrated farming systems for eastern India. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 2011; 56 (4):297-304 - 64.
Phong LT, Udo HM, van Mensvoort ME, Bosma RH, Tri LQ , Nhan DK, et al. Integrated agriculture-aquaculture systems in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam: An analysis of recent trends. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development. 2007; 4 :51-66 - 65.
Latawiec AE, Strassburg BB, Valentim JF, Ramos F, Alves-Pinto HN. Intensification of cattle ranching production systems: Socioeconomic and environmental synergies and risks in Brazil. Animal. 2014; 8 (8):1255-1263 - 66.
Siles P, Cerdán CR, Staver C. Smallholder coffee in the global economy—A framework to explore transformation alternatives of traditional agroforestry for greater economic, ecological, and livelihood viability. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2022; 6 :808207 - 67.
Niroula GS, Thapa GB. Impacts and causes of land fragmentation, and lessons learned from land consolidation in South Asia. Land Use Policy. 2005; 22 (4):358-372 - 68.
Zhang D, Sial MS, Ahmad N, Filipe AJ, Thu PA, Zia-Ud-Din M, et al. Water scarcity and sustainability in an emerging economy: A management perspective for future. Sustainability. 2020; 13 (1):144 - 69.
Kristensen E, Jakobsen EB. Challenging the myth of the irrational dairy farmer; understanding decision-making related to herd health. New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 2011; 59 (1):1-7 - 70.
Stringer LC, Fraser ED, Harris D, Lyon C, Pereira L, Ward CF, et al. Adaptation and development pathways for different types of farmers. Environmental Science & Policy. 2020; 104 :174-189 - 71.
Hayden J, Rocker S, Phillips H, Heins B, Smith A, Delate K. The importance of social support and communities of practice: Farmer perceptions of the challenges and opportunities of integrated crop–livestock systems on organically managed farms in the northern US. Sustainability. 2018; 10 (12):4606 - 72.
Hegland SJ. FAO-IPCC Expert Meeting on Climate Change, Land Use and Food Security: Final Meeting Report. 2017 - 73.
Schut M, Klerkx L, Sartas M, Lamers D, Mc Campbell M, Ogbonna I, et al. Innovation platforms: Experiences with their institutional embedding in agricultural research for development. Experimental Agriculture. United Kingdom. 2016; 52 (4):537-561 - 74.
Mubvami T, Mushamba S, De Zeeuw H. Integration of agriculture in urban land use planning. Cities farming for the future: Urban agriculture for green and productive cities. In: RUAF, IIRR and IDRC. Silang, the Philippines; 2006. pp. 54-74 - 75.
Devaux A, Torero M, Donovan J, Horton D. Agricultural innovation and inclusive value-chain development: A review. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies. 2018; 8 (1):99-123 - 76.
Dessart FJ, Barreiro-Hurlé J, Van Bavel R. Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: A policy-oriented review. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 2019; 46 (3):417-471 - 77.
Ehlers MH, Finger R, El Benni N, Gocht A, Sørensen CAG, Gusset M, et al. Scenarios for European agricultural policymaking in the era of digitalisation. Agricultural Systems. 2022; 196 :103318 - 78.
Rodriguez JM, Molnar JJ, Fazio RA, Sydnor E, Lowe MJ. Barriers to adoption of sustainable agriculture practices: Change agent perspectives. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 2009; 24 (1):60-71 - 79.
Mekouar MA. 15. Food and agriculture organization (FAO). Yearbook of International Environmental Law. 2013; 24 (1):587-602 - 80.
Gebremedhin B, Hoekstra D, Tegegne A. Commercialization of Ethiopian Agriculture: Extension Service from Input Supplier to Knowledge Broker and Facilitator. International Livestock Research Institute; 2006 - 81.
Sousa F, Nicolay G, Home R. Information technologies as a tool for agricultural extension and farmer-to-farmer exchange: Mobile-phone video use in Mali and Burkina Faso. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology. Burkina Faso. 2016; 12 (3):19-36 - 82.
Lajoie-O'Malley A, Bronson K, van der Burg S, Klerkx L. The future (s) of digital agriculture and sustainable food systems: An analysis of high-level policy documents. Ecosystem Services. 2020; 45 :101183 - 83.
Saito N. Mainstreaming climate change adaptation in least developed countries in South and Southeast Asia. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 2013; 18 :825-849 - 84.
Shiferaw B, Hellin J, Muricho G. Improving market access and agricultural productivity growth in Africa: What role for producer organizations and collective action institutions? Food Security. 2011; 3 :475-489 - 85.
Mushi GE, Di Marzo Serugendo G, Burgi PY. Digital technology and services for sustainable agriculture in Tanzania: A literature review. Sustainability. 2022; 14 (4):2415 - 86.
Kos D, Kloppenburg S. Digital technologies, hyper-transparency and smallholder farmer inclusion in global value chains. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2019; 41 :56-63