Date-palm accessions studied, their origin, accession numbers, and their variation in length, GC and AT contents of the
Abstract
Date palm is present among the vital crops of arid and semiarid countries of North Africa and the Middle East. Chloroplast DNA is the best molecule for finding the evolutionary history of plant species. In the present study, cpDNA variation in date palm was estimated using the trnL-trnF intergenic spacer and psbZ-psbC region. The high AT values in both molecular markers may clarify the high proportion of transversions observed in this species. The neutrality tests, expansion parameter estimation (mismatch distribution), and haplotype network patterns proposed that demographic expansion had occurred in recent times. Furthermore, the taxa distribution is not related to geographical origins; neighbor-joining trees are clustered independently either from their geographic origin or from the sex of trees, suggesting a common genetic basis between different cultivars. Statistical analysis of chloroplast germplasm provides a means of assessing cytoplasmic gene flow, which occurred in Tunisian Phoenix dactylifera L. In fact, Nm was important between Tunisia and Eastern Arabic region (Nm = 2.57), which reflects high levels of connectivity between these population pairs. In conclusion, genomic studies prove date palm domestication happened in the Arabian Peninsula and showed an important gene flow with North African palm populations.
Keywords
- Phoenix dactylifera L.
- trnL-trnF spacer
- psbC-psbZ region
- population expansion
- molecular evolution
- gene flow
1. Introduction
Date palms (
Understanding the population genetics and domestication history of cultivated species is certainly important for the genetic improvement of crops relying on the conservation and usage of the germplasm [9]. In order to contribute to the varietal improvement of date palms and to offer novel perceptions on the influence of geographic origins and human action on the genetic structure of the date palm, this study investigated the diversity of the species using chloroplast DNA.
The small, sensibly constant size, and conservative evolution of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) make it an ultimate molecule for finding the evolutionary history of plant species. In angiosperm, the use of chloroplast DNA sequences for intra-specific phylogenetic research is now routine [10]. These investigations have been simplified by the abundant number of whole chloroplast genome sequences that are accessible from an extensive variety of angiosperms and the development of universal PCR primers in conserved coding as well as noncoding regions.
Commonly, in terms of its size, organization, and sequence, cpDNA is the most recognized conservatively evolving genome. It has been used for genetic analysis in plants and provides an accessible and well-characterized source of comparative sequence data. Moreover, identifying the footmark of positive selection is an imperative assignment in evolutionary genetic studies [11]. Otherwise, different modes of selection may result in divergent patterns of the nature and extent of genetic variation. The neutral theory affirms that all observable mutations in populations have little or no effect on an organism’s fitness, and their evolutionary dynamics are entirely measured by genetic drift [12, 13]. For such mutations, the evolution continues as equilibrium among the forces of mutation pressure, natural selection, and genetic drift. New molecular techniques based on single and combined sequences data sets have provided a vast understanding of the evolution of flowering plants [14]. Noncoding regions are usually less sensitive to natural selection than coding regions and then may be more beneficial for studying plant evolution.
The chloroplast genome can be classified into three functional categories: (1) protein-coding genes, (2) introns, and (3) intergenic spacers. It has greater phylogenetic potential than nuclear DNA because it is sufficient variable but conserves to be less variable within than between species [15]. The noncoding regions are leading systematic molecular, phylogeographic, and DNA barcoding studies for plants [16, 17]. Chloroplast DNA markers are used for systematic studies of plant species [18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23] and are particularly used to study phylogeny.
In
The date palm chloroplast genome is a typical circular double-stranded DNA molecule, and it shares a common quadri-partite structure: a pair of IRs (27.276 bp) separated by the LSC region (86.198 bp) and the SSC regions (17.712 bp) [26]. An important set of primer pairs improved for PCR amplification and covering sequencing in monocotyledons were optimized, which are distributed throughout the whole chloroplast genome, including exons, introns, and intergenic spacers (IGS).
Thus, in the present study, we undertake to find out the level of cpDNA variation in date palm using the
2. Material and methods
2.1 Plant material and DNA extraction
Twenty-four accessions (20 cultivars and four male trees) of Tunisian date palm, listed in Table 1, were used in this study. Each cultivar was represented by one tree. Five varieties accommodated in Tunisian plantations (“Ghars Mettig” and “Tantabecht” from Algeria, “Berhi” and “Khadhraoui” from Iraq, and “Abou Meaan” from the United Arabic Emirates) were used in this survey. Young leaves were frozen until their use for DNA purification. Extraction of the total DNA was determined as stated by Dellaporta et al. [27] protocol. DNA concentration and integrity were checked by 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis according to Sambrook et al. [28].
Origin | Ecotype | Label | Combined | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Length | %GC | Total length | %GC | |||
Tunisia | Lagou | Lg | 953 | 39.7 | 1353 | 37.88 |
BesserHelou | Bh | 951 | 40.1 | 1356 | 38.14 | |
Gasbi | Gb | 967 | 40.1 | 1347 | 38.21 | |
Boufeggous | Bf | 960 | 40.1 | 1360 | 38.21 | |
Hamra | Hm | 971 | 40.0 | 1370 | 38.14 | |
Tazerzit Safra | Ts | 952 | 39.8 | 1335 | 37.91 | |
Goundi | Gd | 962 | 39.2 | 1358 | 38.18 | |
Menakher | Mk | 967 | 40.0 | 1350 | 37.76 | |
Ammari | Am | 969 | 39.9 | 1372 | 38.11 | |
Deglet Nour | Dn | 971 | 40.0 | 1374 | 38.06 | |
Kentichi | Kt | 964 | 39.3 | 1372 | 38.44 | |
Oum Laghlez | Ol | 965 | 40.1 | 1359 | 38.14 | |
Arichti | Ar | 973 | 40.1 | 1373 | 38.14 | |
Guelb Jemel | Gj | 973 | 39.8 | 1355 | 37.91 | |
Kharroubi | Kb | 967 | 39.7 | 1382 | 38.06 | |
Algeria | Tantabecht | Tb | 976 | 40.2 | 1357 | 38.18 |
Ghars Mettigue | Gm | 952 | 39.9 | 1352 | 37.99 | |
Iraq | Berhi | Br | 962 | 40.1 | 1345 | 38.11 |
Khadhraoui | Kd | 971 | 39.8 | 1373 | 37.99 | |
UEA | Abou Meaan | Ab | 969 | 40.2 | 1364 | 38.18 |
Male trees | ||||||
Tunisia | Borhane2 | B2 | 967 | 39.9 | 1368 | 38.02 |
Borhane3 | B3 | 963 | 39.9 | 1348 | 38.06 | |
CRPh1 | C1 | 966 | 40.0 | 1354 | 38.21 | |
CRPh5 | C5 | 962 | 40.0 | 1362 | 38.14 |
2.2 Amplification and DNA sequencing
Chloroplastic DNA was sequenced for the
The total volume of PCR reaction was 25 μL, which contained 25 mM of MgCl2, 2 mM of dNTP mix, 1.6 mM of each primer and 1 unit of DNA Taq polymerase, and 20 ng of DNA. Agarose-gel electrophoresis (1.5%) was used to check the PCR products.
The purified PCR products for the
2.3 Sequence analysis
The identity of both sequenced regions was confirmed through a BLASTN search in NCBI database [30]. Nucleotide sequences were aligned by Mega 5.2.2 [31]. Several genetic parameters were determined with DnaSP program [32]. Haplotype diversity (Hd) [33] and genetic diversity (Pi) [34] were calculated to evaluate genetic diversity. The average of nucleotide differences (k), the minimum number of recombination events (Rm), and the average number of nucleotide differences among cultivars were also detected. By means of selective neutrality tests, we checked the hypothesis of the mutation/drift equilibrium for a supposedly neutral polymorphism. Selection neutrality for the detected mutations was tested by both Tajima’s D [35] and Fu and Li’s D* and F* methods [36], using the DNAsp program. Demographic parameters were assessed using the distribution of pairwise sequence differences (mismatch distribution) of Rogers and Harpending [37] and site-frequency spectra of Tajima [35]. Moreover, Fu’s Fs statistics [38] was used to confirm the assumption of population growth and range expansion as revealed by the mismatch distribution of Rogers and Harpending [37]. In addition, we calculated the Harpending’s raggedness index (r) corresponding to an estimate of the fluctuation in the frequency of differences between haplotype pairs [39]. In a complementary way, the R2 statistic [40] was calculated based on the differences between the number of singleton-type mutations and the average of the nucleotide differences. These analyses were executed using coalescent simulations implemented in DnaSP software, with 1000 simulated resampling replicates.
To study the genetic relationships between the studied sequences (haplotypes), we used the reduced median network analysis available in the NETWORK software [41]. The phylogenetic relationships between the studied chloroplast haplotypes were reconstructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method [42]. NJ builds a tree from a matrix of pairwise evolutionary distances relating to the set of taxa being studied. Gene flow (
3. Results
3.1 Sequences variation in the psbC-psbZ region
The DNA sequencing of the generated bands has been successfully performed and the blast search allowed confirming the identity of the sequences. DNA sequence varied from 951 bp for “
The polymorphism pattern of the
Combined sequence | ||
---|---|---|
Number of accessions (N) | 24 | 24 |
Lengths (pb) (Average) | 964 | 1360 |
GC (%) (Average) | 40 | 37.38 |
AT(%) (Average) | 60 | 62.66 |
Number of polymorphic sites (S) | 55 | 69 |
Parsimony informative sites (Pis) | 22 | 31 |
Number of haplotypes (H) | 22 | 24 |
Nucleotide diversity (Pi) | 0.00862 | 0.00861 |
Haplotype diversity (Hd) | 0.989 | 1 |
Average of pairwise nucleotide differences (k) | 8.264 | 11.471 |
Tajima’s D | −1.96519 (0.10 > P > 0.05) | −1.74847 (0.10 > P > 0.05) |
Fu and Li’s D* | −2.345430 (0.10 > P > 0.05) | −1.97901 (0.10 > P > 0.05) |
Fu and Li’s F* | −2.61261 (0.10 > P > 0.05) | −2.23846 (0.10 > P > 0.05) |
Fu’s Fs | −12.927 (0.10 > P > 0.05) | −15.474 (0.10 > P > 0.05) |
R2 (Ramos-Onsins and Rozas’s test) | 0.000 P < 0.05 | 0.000 P < 0.05 |
Raggedness (r) | 0.000 P < 0.05 | 0.000 P < 0.05 |
A phylogenetic tree was constructed using
In a complementary way, a genetic network based on the
3.2 The combined region trnL-trnF and psbC-psbZ spacers
The combined sequence varied from 1347 bp for “
Mismatch distributions within the species were generally unimodal for markers, suggesting population expansions (or past selective sweeps) (Figure 2b). Numerous significant negative values of
For gene flow estimation,
Genetic relationships among date palm cultivars are investigated, also, using the variation observed in the combined (
The remaining cultivars are ranged in the unique cluster, which is divided into four subgroups. In fact, genotypes’ clustering is independent of the sex of trees, and it is not structured according to geographical origin. Indeed, with the exception of the foreign cultivar “
4. Discussion
In the present survey, we tested the reliability of the noncoding chloroplast markers to identify date palm cultivars. Therewith, we sought an indication of the level of genetic variation and genetic classification within the date palm cultivars grown in Tunisia.
In this object, we represented the evolution of the
The use of coalescent theory [51, 52] for the
Furthermore, there was no geographical structure in the relationships among the haplotypes; neighbor-joining trees are clustered independently either from their geographic origin or from the sex of trees, indicating a common genetic basis between different cultivars. A low genetic structure is usually related to natural habitat change or to human activities that increase gene flow between populations [55]. Human impact on these regions may be the reason for these findings. Actuality, in Tunisian localities, cultivars are manipulated by farmers after continuous selection, cloning, and exchange of varieties. Similar results have been observed using other molecular markers, where
Statistic analysis of chloroplast germplasm provides a means of assessing cytoplasmic gene flow, which occurred in Tunisian
In addition, genomic studies prove date palm domestication has happened in the Arabian Peninsula and that the North African population has mixed ancestry with components from Middle Eastern
In addition, the mean number of migrants per generation between Tunisia and Algeria (
In conclusion, environmental change, over-exploitation of water reserves, and an increasing tendency toward
Abbreviations
cpDNA | chloroplast DNA |
dNTP | deoxynucleoside triphosphate |
Hd | Haplotype diversity |
IR | inverted repeats |
IGS | Intergenic Spacers |
k | average of nucleotide differences |
LSC | large-single-copy region |
MgCl2 | magnesium chloride |
Nm | Gene flow |
PCR | polymerase chain reaction |
Pi | genetic diversity |
Rm | minimum number of recombination events |
SSC | small-single-copy regions |
ti/tv | transition/ transversion |
References
- 1.
Pintaud JC, Ludena B, Aberlenc-Bertossi F, Zehdi S, Gros-Balthazard M, Ivorra S. Biogeography of the date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L., Arecaceae): Insights on the origin and on the structure of modern diversity. Acta Horticulturae. 2013;994 :19-38 - 2.
Barrow S. A monograph of Phoenix L. (Palmae: Coryphoideae). Kew. Bulletin. 1998; 53 :513-575 - 3.
Makhlouf-gafsi I, Mokni-ghribi A, Bchir B, Razafindralambo H, Danthine S, Attia H, et al. Foamability and foam stability of male and female date palm sap ( Phoenix dactylifera L.) during the collection period. Food Biophysics. 2015;10 (3):360-367 - 4.
Santoro A, Venturi M, Ben Maachia S, Benyahia F, Corrieri F, Piras F, et al. Agroforestry heritage systems as agrobiodiversity hotspots. The case of the mountain oases of Tunisia. Sustainability. 2020; 12 (10):4054 - 5.
Rhouma A. Le palmier dattier en Tunisie. Le patrimoine génétique Vol I. Tunis, Tunisie: Arabesques Editions et Créations; 1994 - 6.
Rhouma A. Le palmier dattier en Tunisie. Rome, Italy: IPGRI; 2005 - 7.
Doebley John F, Brandon S, Bruce Smith D. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell. 2006:1309-1321 - 8.
Zohary D, Hopf M, Weiss E. Domestication of Plants in the Old World: The Origin and Spread of Domesticated Plants in Southwest Asia, Europe, and the Mediterranean Basin. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199549061.001.0001 - 9.
Zehdi-Azouzi S, Cherif E, Moussouni S, Gros-Balthazard M, Abbas Naqvi S, Ludeña B, et al. Genetic structure of the date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera ) in the Old World reveals a strong differentiation between eastern and western populations. Annals of Botany. 2015;116 (1):101-112 - 10.
Shaw J, Lickey EB, Beck JT, Farmer SB, Liu W, Miller J, et al. The tortoise and the hare II: Relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. American Journal of Botany. 2005; 92 (1):142-166 - 11.
Zeng K, Fu YX, Shi S, Wu CI. Statistical tests for detecting positive selection by utilizing high-frequency variants. Genetics. 2006; 174 :1431-1439 - 12.
Kimura M. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature. 1968; 217 :624-626 - 13.
King JL, Jukes TH. Non-darwinian evolution. Science. 1969; 164 (3881):788-798 - 14.
Shen P, Wang F, Underhill PA, Franco C, Yang WH, Roxas A, et al. Population genetic implications from sequence variation in four Y chromosome genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2000; 97 (13):7354-7359 - 15.
Filiz E. Phylogeny of some Solanum species (Solanaceae ) based on complete chloroplast genomes (cpDNA) and individual chloroplast genes. Research in Biotechnology. 2012;3 (6):33-41 - 16.
Rhouma-Chatti S, Choulak S, Zehdi-Azzouzi S, Chatti K, Said K. Molecular polymorphism and phylogenetic relationships within Tunisian date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.): Evidence of non-codingtrn L-trn F regions of chloroplast DNAs. Scientia Horticulturae. 2014;170 :32-38 - 17.
Shew J, Lickfy BE, Schilling EE. Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms. American Journal of Botany. 2007; 94 (3):275-288 - 18.
Al-Qurainy F, Khan S, Al-Hemaid FM, Ali MA, Tarroum M, Ashraf M. Assessing molecular signature for some potential date ( Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars from Saudi Arabia, based on chloroplast DNA sequences rpoB and psbA-trnH. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2011;12 :6871-6880 - 19.
Ahmed A, Enan RM. DNA barcoding based on plastid matK and RNA polymerase for assessing the genetic identity of date ( Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars. Genetics and Molecular Research. 2014;13 (2):3527-3536 - 20.
Ahmed A, Enan RM. Cultivar-level phylogeny using chloroplast DNA barcode psbK-psbI spacers for identification of Emirati date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.) varieties. Genetics and Molecular Research. 2016;15 (3) - 21.
Chase MW, Salamin N, Wilkinson M, Dunwell JM. Land plants and DNA barcodes: Short-term and long-term goals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2005; 360 :1889-1895 - 22.
Chen S, Yao H, Han J, Liu C. Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS One. 2010; 5 :e8613 - 23.
Hagar-A H, Gadalla EG, Haggag-S Z, Abu El-Maaty S, Mona HH. Identification of some cultivars of Egyptian date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.) using DNA barcoding. Plant Archives. 2020;20 :1807-1181 - 24.
Song Y, Wang S, Ding Y, Xu J, Li MF, Zhu S, et al. Chloroplast genomic resource of Paris for species discrimination. Scientific Reports. 2017;7 (1):3427 - 25.
Balfourier F, Imbert C, Charmet G. Evidence for phylogeographic structure in Lolium species related to the spread of agriculture in Europe. A cpDNA study. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2000; 101 (1):131-138 - 26.
Yang M, Zhang X, Liu G, Yin Y, Chen K, Yun Q , et al. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.). PLoS One. 2010;5 (9):e12762 - 27.
Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB. A plant DNA mini preparation: Version II. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 1983; 1 :19-21 - 28.
Sambrook J, Frithsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. second ed. Cold Spring: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1989 - 29.
Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 1977; 74 (12):5463-7. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463 - 30.
Altschul SF, Thomas LM, Alejandro AS, Jinghui Z, Zheng Z, Webb M, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acid Research. 1997; 25 :3389-3402 - 31.
Kumar S, Dudley J, Nei M, Tamura K. MEGA: A biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinformatics. 2008; 9 :299-306 - 32.
Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25 :1451-1452 - 33.
Nei M, Tajima F. Maximum likelihood estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions from restriction sites data. Genetics. 1983; 105 :207-217 - 34.
Jukes TH, Cantor CR. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munroled HN, editor. Mammalian Protein Metabolism. New York: Academy Press; 1996. pp. 31-132 - 35.
Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989; 123 :585-595 - 36.
Fu YX, Li WH. Maximum likelihood estimation of population parameters. Genetics. 1993; 133 :693-709 - 37.
Rogers AR, Harpending H. Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 1992; 9 :552-569 - 38.
Fu YX. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 1997; 147 :915-925 - 39.
Harpending HC. Signature of ancient population growth in a low-resolution mitochondrial DNA mismatch distribution. Human Biology. 1994; 1994 :591-600 - 40.
Ramos-Onsins SE, Rozas J. Statistical properties of new neutrality tests against population growth. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2002; 23 (8):1642 - 41.
Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Rohl A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 1999; 16 :37-48 - 42.
Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2007; 24 :1596-1599 - 43.
Boivin T, Bouvier JC, Beslay D, Sauphanor B. Variability in diapause propensity within populations of a temperate insect species: Interactions between insecticide resistance genes and photoperiodism. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2004; 83 (3):341-351 - 44.
Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S. Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2004; 101 :11030-11035 - 45.
Bakker FT, Culham A, Gomez Martinez R, Carvalho J, Compton J, Dawtrey R, et al. Patterns of nucleotide substitution in angiosperm cpDNA trn L (UAA)-trn F (GAA) regions. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2000;17 :1146-1155 - 46.
Choulak S, Marzouk Z, Chatti K, Rhouma-Chatti S, Ouni R, Chatti N. Genetic diversity, phylogeography and population gene flow of Tunisian Pistacia vera L. Turkish Journal of Botany. 2019;43 (6):737-748 - 47.
Choulak S, Rhouma-Chatti S, Marzouk Z, Said K, Chatti N, Chatti K. Chloroplast DNA analysis of Tunisian pistachio ( Pistacia vera L.): Sequence variations of the introntrn L (UAA). Scientia Horticulturae. 2015;191 :57-64 - 48.
Hoot SB, Douglas AW. Phylogeny of the Proteaceae based on atp B andatp B-rbc L intergenic spacer region sequences. Australian Systematic Botany. 1998;11 :301-320 - 49.
Manen JF, Natali A. Comparison of the evolution of ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase ( rbc L) andatp B-rbc L non-coding spacer sequences in a recent plant group, the tribuRubieae (Rubiaceae). Journal of Molecular Evolution. 1995;41 :920-927 - 50.
Morton BR, Clegg MT. Neighboring base composition in strongly correlated with base substitution bias in a region of the chloroplast genome. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 1995; 41 :597-603 - 51.
Kingman JFC. The coalescent. Stochastic Processes and their Applications. 1982a; 13 :235-248 - 52.
Kingman JFC. On the genealogy of large populations. Journal of Applied Probability. 1982b; 19 :27-43 - 53.
Slatkin M, Hudson RR. Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in stable and exponentially growing populations. Genetics. 1991; 129 :555-562 - 54.
Harpending H, Rogers A. Genetic perspectives on human origins and differentiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2000; 96 :10597-10602 - 55.
Zhang LJ, Cai WZ, Luo JY, Zhang S, Wang CY, Lv LM, et al. Phylogeographic patterns of Lyguspratensis (Hemiptera: Miridae): Evidence for weak genetic structure and recent expansion in Northwest China. PLoS One. 2017;12 (4):e0174712 - 56.
Rhouma S, Dakhlaoui-Dkhil S, Ould Mohamed Salem A, Zehdi-Azouzi S, Rhouma A, Marrakchi M, et al. Genetic diversity and phylogenic relation-ships in date palms ( Phoenix dactylifera L.) as assessed by Random Amplified Microsatellite Polymorphism markers (RAMPOs). Scientia Horticulturae-Amsterdam. 2008;117 :53-57 - 57.
Rhouma S, Zehdi S, Ould Mohamed Salem A, Rhouma A, Marrakchi M, Trifi M. Genetic diversity in ecotypes of Tunisian date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.) assessed by AFLP markers. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 2007;82 (6):929-933 - 58.
Sakka H, Baraket G, Dakhlaoui Dkhil S, Zehdi-Azzouzi S, Salhi-Hannachi A. Chloroplast DNA analysis in Tunisian date-palm cultivars ( Phoenix dactylifera L.): Sequence variations and molecular evolution oftrn L (UAA) intron andtrn L (UAA)trn F (GAA) intergenic spacer. Scientia Horticulturae. 2013;164 :256-269 - 59.
Sakka H, Zehdi S, Ould Mohamed SA, Rhouma A, Marrakchi M, Trifi M. Genetic polymorphism of plastid DNA in Tunisian date-palm germplasm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) detected with PCR-RFLP. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 2004; 51 (5):479-487 - 60.
Zehdi S, Cherif E, Rhouma-Chatti S, Santoy S, Salhi Hannachi A, Pintaud JC. Molecular polymorphism and genetic relationships in date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.): The utility of nuclear microsatellite markers. Scientia Horticulturae- Amsterdam. 2012;148 :255-263 - 61.
Saboori S, Noormohammadi Z, Sheidai M, Marashi S. Date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivar relationships based on chloroplast genotyping. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science. 2021;45 (3):833-840 - 62.
Flowers JM, Hazzouri KM, Gros-Balthazard M, Mo Z, Koutroumpa K, Perrakis A, et al. Cross-species hybridization and the origin of North African date palms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019; 116 (5):1651-1658 - 63.
Gros-Balthazard M, Newton C, Ivorra S, Pierre MH, Pintaud JC, Terral JF. The domestication syndrome in Phoenix dactylifera seeds: Toward the identification of wild date palm populations. PLoS One. 2016;11 :e0152394 - 64.
Hamza H, Jemni M, Benabderrahim MA, Mrabet A, Touil S, Othmani A, et al. Date palm status and perspective in Tunisia. In Date Palm Genetic Resources and Utilization. 2015; 2015 :193-221 - 65.
Kearney TH. Date Varieties and Date Culture in Tunisia. Washington: USDA Bureau of Plant Industry Bulletin; 1906 - 66.
Moussouni S, Pintaud JC, Vigouroux Y, Bouguedoura N. Diversity of Algerian oases date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L., Arecaceae): Heterozygote excess and cryptic structure suggest farmer management had a major impact on diversity. PLoSONE. 2017;12 (4):e0175232