IntechOpen

Home > Books > The Global Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemic - Innovative Approaches and Cutting-Edge Solutions

Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Efflux Pumps among Urinary E. coli and K. pneumoniae Local Isolates in Hilla City, Iraq

Written By

Hussein Al-Dahmoshi, Sahar A. Ali and Noor Al-Khafaji

Submitted: 03 March 2022 Reviewed: 08 March 2022 Published: 09 May 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.104408

The Global Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemic IntechOpen
The Global Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemic Innovative Approaches and Cutting-Edge Soluti... Edited by Guillermo Téllez-Isaías

From the Edited Volume

The Global Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemic - Innovative Approaches and Cutting-Edge Solutions

Edited by Guillermo Tellez-Isaias

Book Details Order Print

Chapter metrics overview

181 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics
Advertisement

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are the most common bacterial infections affecting humans. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were common enterobacteria engaged with community-acquired UTIs. Efflux pumps were vital resistance mechanisms for antibiotics, especially among enterobacteria. Overexpression of an efflux system, which results in a decrease in antibiotic accumulation, is an effective mechanism for drug resistance. The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, small multidrug resistance (SMR), and multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) families, the major facilitator superfamily (MFS), and the resistance-nodulation- cell division (RND) family are the five superfamilies of efflux systems linked to drug resistance. This chapter highlights the results of studying the prevalence of efflux pump genes among local isolates of E. coli and K. pneumoniae in Hilla City, Iraq. class RND AcrAB-TolC, AcrAD-TolC, and AcrFE-TolC genes detected by conventional PCR of E. coli and K. pneumoniae respectively. The result revealed approximately all studied efflux transporter were found in both E. coli and K. pneumoniae in different percentages. Biofilm formation were observed in 50(100%) of K. pneumoniae and 49(98%) of E. coli isolates were biofilm former and follow: 30(60%), 20(40%) were weak, 12(24%), 22(44%) were moderate and 7(14%) and 8(16%) were Strong biofilm former for E. coli and K. pneumoniae, respectively.

Keywords

  • UTIs
  • AcrAB-TolC
  • AcrAD-TolC
  • AcrFE-TolC
  • EmrAB-TolC
  • EmrD
  • MdfA
  • EmrE
  • YnfA
  • MacAB-TolC
  • MdlAB-TolCTehA

1. Introduction

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are the most common bacterial infections affecting humans (Zhanel et al. [1]). They may be simple or complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), with the latter occurring in patients with urinary tract anatomic or functional abnormalities or major comorbidities [2]. UTIs may be categorized as either population- or hospital-acquired. In community-acquired UTIs, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus are the most common bacteria, while in hospital-acquired UTIs, bacteria like Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus spp., Proteus spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp., and Candida spp. are more common [1, 3], UTIs are disproportionately prevalent in women, approximately half of them experiencing a UTI during their lifetimes. Although UTIs are prevalent in all age groups, they tend to be more common in postmenopausal and elderly women, because it is more susceptible to infection under this situation [4]. Three-quarters of all UTIs in outpatients are caused by E. coli [5]. However, some E. coli lineages are more likely to induce UTI than others [6]. Antibiotic resistance is more common in uropathogenic E. coli than in commensal E. coli, and one uropathogenic lineage [7] sequence type131 (ST131), especially sublineage ST131:O25b:H30, is linked to multidrug resistance [8].

In addition to being a clinically significant pathogen, K. pneumoniae is a common cause of both hospital-acquired (HA) and community-acquired (CA) urinary tract infections (UTI). Limited therapeutic options have been created due to the enlarged resistance of this pathogen [9]. Enterobacteriaceae that produce extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenemase are frequently multidrug resistance, posing significant therapeutic challenges [10]. K. pneumoniae strains that produce ESBL/carbapenemase are widely recorded around the world, and their spread is critical [11]. Quinolone resistance among K. pneumoniae clinical isolates has become a serious problem in both developing and developed countries since quinolones are commonly prescribed as broad spectrum antimicrobial agents for the treatment of UTI induced by ESBL-producing K. pneumonia. Efflux pumps are present in all major types of bacterial membrane transporters, and increased efflux levels are thought to cause MDR. The most important types for the maintenance of E. coli in the human gut are AcrAB-TolC, EmrAB-TolC, and MdtM for extruding bile salts, mammalian steroids, and different antibiotics [12]. The influx of antimicrobial agents is reduced when the outer membrane’s permeability is reduced. As a result, resistance develops in a number of essential clinical microorganisms. The first discovered efflux pump system was the tetracycline efflux pump by Stuart Levy et al. in E. coli [13].

Several studies indicate that efflux pumps can play at least four roles in biofilm formation efflux of EPSs and/or QS and quorum quenching (QQ) molecules to promote biofilm environment creation and regulate QS, correspondingly; indirect regulation of genes engagement in biofilm formation; abolition of harmful particles such as antibiotics and metabolic intermediates; and efflux of harmful molecules such as antibiotics and metabolic intermediates and by encouraging or preventing adhesion to surfaces and other cells, aggregation can be influenced [14]. Overexpression of an efflux system, which results in a decrease in antibiotic accumulation, is an effective mechanism for drug resistance [15, 16].

1.1 Efflux pumps

Efflux pumps are membrane proteins that are involved in the export of noxious substances from within the bacterial cell into the external environment. Efflux proteins are found in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria as well as in eukaryotic organisms [17]. The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily [18], the resistance-nodulation-division (RND) family [19], the small multidrug resistance (SMR) family [20], the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) [21], and the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) [22] family. The ABC family uses ATP hydrolysis to power substrate export, while the other families depend on the proton motive force for energy. The MFS, ABC, SMR, and MATE families are found in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively, while the RND superfamily is only found in Gram-negative bacteria. Members of the RND family are often found as part of a three-part complex that spans Gram-negative bacteria’s two membranes [23].

1.1.1 Resistance-nodulation-division (RND) efflux pump

This type of pump is occupied as a tripartite complex constituting the RND protein (the inner membrane component), membrane fusion protein (the periplasmic compartment), and the outer membrane protein. These three proteins form a constitute channel crossways the Gram-negative cell envelope guaranteeing that the molecule, taken from the outer leaflet of the inner membrane bilayer, is replied directly transversely to the periplasm and the outer membrane into the exterior medium with the assistance of the proton-gradient as an energy source. RND family shows a significant role in the intrinsic resistance of Gram-negative bacteria [24, 25]. The most frequent member of RND family in enterobacteria include AcrAB-TolC, AcrAD-TolC, and AcrFE-TolC.

AcrAB-TolC, one of the efflux systems, constitutively expressed in E. coli, is composed of the outer membrane protein TolC, the inner membrane transporter AcrB, and the periplasmic adaptor protein AcrA [26]. Overexpression of the AcrABTolC efflux pump is an intrinsic mechanism of multidrug resistance in Gram-negative bacteria [27]. AcrA, a highly elongated protein, is thought to bring the outer and inner membranes closer. It composed a trimer that interacts with a monomeric AcrB, which was shown by in vitro reconstitution to be a proton antiporter [28]. Efflux pumps, such as AcrAB-TolC and MexAB-OprM, are essential for bacteria survival and virulence/colonization, especially during the course of infection when the pathogen is attacked by toxic substances or adherence to the host [29]. The resistance mechanism by efflux pumps is the most important antibiotic resistance type because the efflux pump is able to remove more than one antibiotic such as B-lactam, erythromycin fluoroquinolones, and chloramphenicol [30]. Ruzin et al. [31] showed up that the resistance to quinolones related to the overexpression of the AcrAB efflux pump of K. pneumoniae was associated with resistance to other antibiotics, including erythromycin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and also tigecycline, a recently commercialized molecule.

AcrD is a component of an efflux pump that mediates the export of aminoglycosides and a few amphiphilic compounds such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), deoxycholate, and novobiocin, AcrA is a periplasmic fusion protein that also exports aminoglycosides in association with the cytoplasmic membrane protein AcrD [30]. Despite increased acrA expression, the mutant strain showed no increase in resistance, suggesting that the deletion of acrD contributes to adaptive resistance directly, rather than indirectly via mechanisms like control of other efflux components. As a result, the previously reported adaptive cross-resistance to non-aminoglycoside antibiotics cannot be due to the development of the AcrAB-TolC complex as shown by an acrD mutant that showed significantly reduced biofilm formation and expression of key biofilm proteins encoded by csgBD, the AcrD efflux pump has an effect on biofilm formation, and appears to play a special biological function, according to Buckner et al. [32] findings. The transcriptome showed major changes, which supported this theory. The transcriptomes of the acrD mutant were compared to the transcriptome of the acrB mutant, which had previously been released AcrD is not a “backup” efflux pump, but serves a physiological function in the cell, as shown by the fact that the effect was quite distinct. This comparison found 232 major gene expression changes that were only caused by the inactivation of acrD and not by the disruption of acrB. Both the acrB and acrD mutant transcriptomes had 169 genes that were differentially expressed as compared to the acrB mutant transcriptome. Experiments have shown that the AcrB and AcrD efflux pumps have different substrate profiles when it refers to aminoglycoside antibiotics [33]. AcrEF-TolC pump is known to exhibit higher expression levels in quinolone-resistant E. coli. AcrEF shares high homology (65–77%) with AcrAB and so AcrEF-TolC expression complement the activity of AcAB-TolC. Overexpression of acrEF restores resistance to acriflavine, erythromycin, novobiocin, and crystal violet. Additionally, AcrEF is responsible for increased resistance for compounds such as dyes, detergents, and antibiotic substrates like that of AcrAB especially levofloxacin [34].

1.1.2 ATP-binding cassette (ABC) efflux pump

There is a variety of transport systems in E. coli, including ABC-type transporters as well as substrate-binding proteins, outer membrane receptors, and a number of transporters with various functions. We have gained a better understanding of the molecular basis of transport through recent structures of ATPases, substrate-binding proteins, and full-length transporters [35]. Specialized ABC transporter types transport a diverse range of substrates, ranging from small molecules such as ions, sugars, or amino acids to larger compounds such as antibiotics, drugs, lipids, and oligopeptides [36]. The most important ABC family efflux pumps in E. coli include MAcAB-TolC and MdlAB-TolC.

The MacA-MacB-TolC assembly of E. coli is a transmembrane machine that spans the cell envelope and actively extrudes substrates, including macrolide antibiotics and polypeptide virulence factors. These transport processes are energized by the ATPase MacB, a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily. A hexamer of the periplasmic protein MacA bridges between a TolC trimer in the outer membrane and a MacB dimer in the inner membrane, generating a quaternary structure with a central channel for substrate translocation. A gating ring found in MacA is proposed to act as a one-way valve in substrate transport. The MacB structure features an atypical transmembrane domain with a closely packed dimer interface and a periplasmic opening that is the likely portal for substrate entry from the periplasm, with subsequent displacement through an allosteric transport mechanism [37].

In a macrolide-susceptible AcrAB deficient E. coli strain, only overexpression of MacAB may increase resistance to macrolide antibiotics. MacAB, on the other hand, has recently been linked to the secretion of an E. coli heat-stable enterotoxin [38]. MacA is the MFP in the MacA–MacB–TolC pump, and due to high sequence similarity, it is predicted to share structural similarities with AcrA (44%) [39]. The C-terminal periplasmic membrane-proximal domain of MacA is required for these MacA–MacB interactions [40]. By modifying the conformation of MacA’s membrane-proximal domain and disrupting the proper assembly of the MacA–MacB complex, a single G353A substitution in this domain impaired MacAB–TolC function [41]. In the E. coli genome, five putative open reading frame (ORF) clusters, mdlAB, ybjYZ, yddA, yojHI, and yhiH, have been assumed to be possible genes for ABC drug efflux transporters. MdlAb-TolC is multidrug efflux transporter with few studies concerned it is a function [42].

1.1.3 Small multidrug resistance (SMR) efflux pump

Small multidrug resistance transporters (SMR) systems provide to study the minimal requirements for active transport [43]. They are also small multidrug transporters, with four transmembrane helices and no significant extra membrane domain, although they function as dimers the minimum functional unit is a bundle of eight α-helices [44]. SMR transporter exports a broad class of polyaromatic cation substrates, thus conferring resistance to drug compounds matching this chemical description. Genes encoding SMR proteins (variously annotated emrE, ynfA and tehA) are frequently found in mobile drug resistance gene arrays, and provide a broad selective advantage by conferring resistance to ubiquitous environmental pollutants with low-grade toxicity to microbes [45]. The SMR family consists of small hydrophobic proteins of about 100 amino acid residues with four transmembrane α-helical spanners [46].

SMR family includes more than 40 proteins in eubacteria, a few of which have been studied in detail. One of them, EmrE, is an E. coli multidrug transporter (MDT), that utilizes proton gradients as an energy source to drive substrate translocation and confers resistance to a wide variety of toxicants by actively exchanging them with hydrogen ions [47]. EmrE is the smallest ion-coupled transporter known; it functions as an oligomer and each monomer comprises four transmembrane segments [48]. EmrE is a tetramer comprised of two conformational heterodimers related by a pseudo-two-fold symmetry axis perpendicular to the cell membrane. Based on the structure and biochemical evidence, we propose a mechanism by which EmrE accomplishes multidrug efflux by coupling conformational changes between two heterodimers with proton gradient [49]. The overexpression of EmrE causes bacteria to become resistant to a wide variety of toxic cationic hydrophobic compounds such as ethidium bromide, methyl viologen, tetracycline, and tetraphenylphosphonium, as well as other antiseptics and intercalating dyes [50].

The gene, ynfA of E. coli is the newest member of the small multidrug resistance (SMR) gene family, identified in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial species. It might be involved alone or with tolC or any other way by complex regulation in which the initial susceptible bacteria become resistant. The level of ynfA gene expression was observed between 2 and 6 folds equivalent to tolC gene [51].

1.1.4 Major facilitator superfamily (MFS) efflux pump

The major facilitator superfamily (MFS) is the largest known superfamily of secondary active transporters. MFS transporters are responsible for transporting a broad spectrum of substrates, either down their concentration gradient or uphill using the energy stored in the electrochemical gradients. The major facilitator transporters form a superfamily that composed a number of subfamilies; of these subfamilies, transporters of sugars and drugs are by far the most numerous [52].

These MFS transporters are typically composed of approximately 400 amino acids that are putatively arranged in 12 membrane-spanning helices, with a large cytoplasmic loop among helices six and seven [43]. The MFS family of drug transporters is made up of two domains that are centered around a central pore and two domains that transfer conformations from the cytoplasmic to the periplasmic side of the membrane in response to a Na + or H+ ion gradient [53]. The MFS drug transporters are classified into subfamilies −12-helix and 14-helix transporters (e.g., TetA(B) and TetA(K), class two and class K tetracycline transporters from E. coli and S. aureus respectively [54]. E. coli have many MFS transporter-like EmrAB-TolC, EmrD, MdfA.

EmrAB–TolC from E. coli is such a tripartite system, comprised of EmrB an MFS transporter, EmrA, a membrane fusion protein, and TolC, an outer membrane channel. The whole complex is predicted to form a continuous channel allowing direct export from the cytoplasm to the exterior of the cell [55]. The components of EmrAB-TolC were identified in E. coli for the first time more than a decade ago resistance to hydrophobic toxins like carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl-hydrazone (CCCP). Its overexpression causes increased resistance to nalidixic acid, thiolactomycin, nitroxoline, hydrophobic proton uncouplers [56].

EmrD is a multidrug transporter from the Major Facilitator Superfamily that expels amphipathic compounds across the inner membrane of E. coli. It can transport detergents such as benzalkonium and sodium dodecylsulfate [57]. EmrD may have vital role in biofilm formation via the efflux of arabinose, which promotes cell aggregation and biofilm formation [58]. MdfA is drug/proton antiporter consisting of 410 amino acid long membrane protein responsible for resistance to a diverse group of cationic or zwitterionic lipophilic compounds such as ethidium bromide, tetraphenylphosphonium, rhodamine, daunomycin, benzalkonium, rifampin, tetracycline, and puromycin. Surprisingly, however, MdfA also confers resistance to chemically unrelated, clinically important antibiotics such as chloramphenicol, erythromycin, and certain aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones. Synergistic overexpression of mdfA along with acrAB leads to increases in quinolone resistance [59].

1.1.5 Multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) efflux pump

Export of substrates and toxins by the cell is a fundamental life process and members of the MATE family represent the last class of multidrug resistance (MDR) transporters to be structurally characterized. MATE transporters involved a variety of important biological functions across all kingdoms of life [60]. MATE transporters are very similar in size to the MFS transporters and are typically composed of approx. 450 amino acids which are putatively arranged into 12 helices however, they do not have any sequence similarity to members of the MFS transporters [61]. MdtK is one of the important MATE inner membrane transporter in E. coli conferring resistance to quinolone and fluoroquinolone when overexpressed [62].

1.2 Antibiotic resistance and efflux pumps

The study include antibiotic susceptibility profile (for 20 antibiotics) according to CLSI-2021 [63] and efflux pumps gene profile for (19 genes) for 50 isolates of E. coli and 50 isolates of K. pneumoniae isolated from patients with UTIs. The results revealed high level of resistance to β-lactams and cephalosporin and low level of resistance to piperacillin, aminoglycosides and carbapenem (Table 1). Multidrug resistance for more than 3 antibiotics (at least one for each class) were studied and the results revealed that 68% of E. coli and 90% of K. pneumoniae were MDR (Table 2). Results of biofilm formation shown that, approximately all isolates were biofilm former (Table 3). Concern presence of efflux pump genes, the results of polymerase chain reaction revealed that: acrA 50 (100%), 48 (96%)–acrB 43 (86%), 44 (88%)–acrD 48 (96%), 46(92%)–acrF 33 (66%), 32 (64%)–acrE 50 (100%), 46 (92%)–and tolC 50 (100%), 50 (100%), while class MFS pumps (EmrAB-TolC, EmrD and MdfA) were investigated for E. coli and K. pneumonia the results emrA 50 (100%), 48 (96%)–emrB 50 (100%), 49 (98%)–emrD 50 (100%), 50 (100%)–and mdfA 49 (98%), 50 (100%), class SMR pumps (EmrE, YnfA and TehA) genes were distributed as follow:: emrE 48 (96%), 35 (70%)–ynfA 50 (100%), 33 (66%)–tehA 49 (98%), 38 (76%), Two class ABC pumps (MacAB-TolC and MdlAB-TolC) The result revealed that the: macA 50 (100%), 38 (76%), macB 49 (98%), 48 (96%)–mdlA 50 (100%), 38 (765%)–and mdlB 49 (98%), 50 (100%), Two MATE pumps (MdtK and DinF) genes were studies and the results revealed that: mdtK and dinF genes were present in all E. coli isolates while K. pneumoniae revealed 50 (100%), 43 (86%) of MdtK and DinF respectively (Table 4).

AntibioticResistance %
E. coliK. pneumoniae
Amoxicillin100%92%
Piperacillin14%16%
Ceftriaxone54%92%
Ceftazidime100%98%
Cefepime58%80%
Cefixime52%84%
Cefotaxime100%92%
Cefoxitin42%46%
Nitrfuraniton38%58%
streptomycin36%78%
Gentamycin4%40%
Kanamycin42%50%
Tobramycin20%44%
Amikacin14%10%
Netlimicin2%4%
Imipenem0%12%
Meropenem6%8%
Aztreonam20%58%
Azithromycin10%24%
Nalidixic acid26%16%

Table 1.

Antibiotic resistance among E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Classes of MDRE. coliK. pneumoniae
MDR-8 classes0%4%
MDR-7 classes4%8%
MDR-6 classes12%20%
MDR-5 classes2%22%
MDR-4 classes24%28%
MDR-3 classes20%8%
non-MDR38%10%
Total100%100%

Table 2.

Classes of MDR among E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Biofilm Formation PatternE. coliK. pneumoniae
non-biofilm former2%0%
weak biofilm former60%40%
moderate biofilm former24%44%
strong biofilm former14%16%
Total100%100%

Table 3.

Biofilm formation patterns among E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Efflux pumps genePresence %
E. coliK. pneumoniae
acrA10096
acrB8688
acrD96100
tolC10092
acrF6664
acrE10092
mdfA98100
emrD100100
emrA10096
emrB10098
emrE9670
ynfA10066
tehA9876
macA10076
macB9896
mdlA10076
mdlB98100
mdtK100100
dinF10086

Table 4.

Efflux pump genes among E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.

1.3 Coexisted genotypes of efflux pumps

Concern results of coexisted pumps in the same E. coli or K. pneumoniae isolate the results were shown in Tables 5 and 6.

GenotypeNo.%
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/EmrE/YnfA/TehA/ MacAB-TolC/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF3264
AcrAB-TolC/ AcrAD-TolC/ AcrFE-TolC/ MdfA/ EmrD/ EmrAB-TolC/ YnfA/ TehA/ MacAB-TolC/ MdlAB-TolC/ Mdtk/ DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/ AcrAD-TolC/ MdfA/ EmrD/ EmrAB-TolC/ EmrE/ YnfA/ TehA/ MacAB-TolC/ MdlAB-TolC/ Mdtk/ DinF1632
AcrAB-TolC/ AcrAD-TolC/ MdfA/ EmrD/ EmrAB-TolC/ EmrE/ YnfA/ MacAB-TolC12

Table 5.

Co-existed efflux pump genes among E. coli.

GenotypesNo.%
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/EmrE/YnfA/TehA/MacAB-TolC/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF816
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/YnfA/TehA/MacAB-TolC/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF36
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/EmrE/TehA/MacAB-TolC/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF24
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/EmrE/YnfA/TehA/MacAB-TolC/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk24
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/EmrE/ YnfA/TehA/MacAB-TolC/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF816
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/EmrE/YnfA/MacAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF36
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/EmrE/YnfA/TehA/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk24
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/YnfA/TehA/MacAB-TolC/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/YnfA/TehA/MacAB-TolC/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/EmrE/TehA/MacAB-TolC/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/EmrE/YnfA/MacAB-TolC/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/EmrE/MacAB-TolC/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/EmrE/YnfA/TehA/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/EmrE/TehA/MacAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/EmrE/ TehA/MacAB-TolC/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/EmrE/TehA/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/MacAB-TolC/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/YnfA/TehA/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/TehA/ MacAB- TolC/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/YnfA/TehA/ MacAB-TolC/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/TehA/ MacAB- TolC/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/EmrE/ MacAB-TolC/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/MacAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/EmrE/TehA/MacAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/YnfA/TehA/ MdlAB-TolC/ Mdtk/ DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrE/ YnfA/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/AcrAD-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/MacAB-TolC/Mdtk/DinF12
AcrAB-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/EmrE/TehA/MacAB-TolC/Mdtk12
AcrFE-TolC/MdfA/EmrD/EmrAB-TolC/YnfA/MdlAB-TolC/Mdtk/ DinF12

Table 6.

Co-existed efflux pump genes among Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Advertisement

2. Conclusion

There is a strong correlation between antibiotic resistance, especially to β-lactams, and the presence of efflux pump genes, which may be reflected in biofilm formation in both E. coli and K. pneumoniae.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest for this work.

References

  1. 1. Zhanel GG, Walkty AJ, Karlowsky JA. Fosfomycin: A first-line oral therapy for acute uncomplicated cystitis. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology. 2016;2016:2082693. DOI: 10.1155/2016/2082693
  2. 2. Bader MS, Hawboldt J, Brooks A. Management of complicated urinary tract infections in the era of antimicrobial resistance. Postgraduate Medicine. 2010;122(6):7-15. DOI: 10.3810/pgm.2010.11.2217
  3. 3. Liu HY, Lin HC, Lin YC, Yu SH, Wu WH, Lee YJ. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of urinary extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae to fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin in a teaching hospital in Taiwan. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology, and Infection. 2011;44(5):364-368. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmii.2010.08.012
  4. 4. Neugent ML, Hulyalkar NV, Nguyen VH, Zimmern PE, De Nisco NJ. Advances in understanding the human urinary microbiome and its potential role in urinary tract infection. MBio. 2020;11(2):e00218-e00220. DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00218-20
  5. 5. Foxman B. Urinary tract infection syndromes: Occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. 2014;28(1):1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2013.09.003
  6. 6. Lo Y, Zhang L, Foxman B, Zöllner S. Whole-genome sequencing of uropathogenic Escherichia coli reveals long evolutionary history of diversity and virulence. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2015;34:244-250. DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.06.023
  7. 7. Dang TND, Zhang L, Zöllner S, Srinivasan U, Abbas K, Marrs CF, et al. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli are less likely than paired fecal E. coli to have CRISPR loci. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2013;19:212-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.07.017
  8. 8. Graham SE, Zhang L, Ali I, Cho YK, Ismail MD, Carlson HA, et al. Prevalence of CTX-M extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and sequence type 131 in Korean blood, urine, and rectal Escherichia coli isolates. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2016;41:292-295. DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.04.020
  9. 9. Caneiras C, Lito L, Melo-Cristino J, Duarte A. Community- and hospital-acquired Klebsiella pneumoniae urinary tract infections in Portugal: Virulence and antibiotic resistance. Microorganisms. 2019;7(5):138. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7050138
  10. 10. Marques C, Menezes J, Belas A, Aboim C, Cavaco-Silva P, Trigueiro G, et al. Klebsiella pneumoniae causing urinary tract infections in companion animals and humans: Population structure, antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2019;74(3):594-602. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky499
  11. 11. Ewers C, Stamm I, Pfeifer Y, Wieler LH, Kopp PA, Schønning K, et al. Clonal spread of highly successful ST15-CTX-M-15 Klebsiella pneumoniae in companion animals and horses. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2014;69(10):2676-2680. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dku217
  12. 12. Chetri S, Dolley A, Bhowmik D, Chanda DD, Chakravarty A, Bhattacharjee A. Transcriptional response of AcrEF-TolC against fluoroquinolone and carbapenem in Escherichia coli of clinical origin. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2018;36(4):537-540. DOI: 10.4103/ijmm.IJMM_18_308
  13. 13. Kumar S, Varela MF. Molecular mechanisms of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents. Chemotherapy. 2013;14:522-534
  14. 14. Alav I, Sutton JM, Rahman KM. Role of bacterial efflux pumps in biofilm formation. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2018;73(8):2003-2020. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky042
  15. 15. Nikaido H, Takatsuka Y. Mechanisms of RND multidrug efflux pumps. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2009;1794(5):769-781. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2008.10.004
  16. 16. Kumar S, Varela MF. Biochemistry of bacterial multidrug efflux pumps. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2012;13(4):4484-4495. DOI: 10.3390/ijms13044484
  17. 17. Saier MH. A functional-phylogenetic classification system for transmembrane solute transporters. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2000;64(2):354-411. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.64.2.354-411.2000
  18. 18. Lubelski J, Konings WN, Driessen AJ. Distribution and physiology of ABC-type transporters contributing to multidrug resistance in bacteria. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2007;71(3):463-476. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00001-07
  19. 19. Anes J, McCusker MP, Fanning S, Martins M. The ins and outs of RND efflux pumps in Escherichia coli. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2015;6:587. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00587
  20. 20. Chung YJ, Saier MH Jr. SMR-type multidrug resistance pumps. Current Opinion in Drug Discovery & Development. 2001;4(2):237-245
  21. 21. Law CJ, Maloney PC, Wang DN. Ins and outs of major facilitator superfamily antiporters. Annual Review of Microbiology. 2008;62:289-305. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.micro.61.080706.093329
  22. 22. Kuroda T, Tsuchiya T. Multidrug efflux transporters in the MATE family. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2009;1794(5):763-768. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2008.11.012
  23. 23. Nikaido H. Structure and mechanism of RND-type multidrug efflux pumps. Advances in Enzymology and Related Areas of Molecular Biology. 2011;77:1-60. DOI: 10.1002/9780470920541.ch1
  24. 24. Nikaido H, Pagès JM. Broad-specificity efflux pumps and their role in multidrug resistance of gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2012;36(2):340-363. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00290.x
  25. 25. Zgurskaya HI. Multicomponent drug efflux complexes: Architecture and mechanism of assembly. Future Microbiology. 2009;4(7):919-932. DOI: 10.2217/fmb.09.62
  26. 26. Shi X, Chen M, Yu Z, Bell JM, Wang H, Forrester I, et al. In situ structure and assembly of the multidrug efflux pump AcrAB-TolC. Nature Communications. 2019;10(1):2635. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10512-6
  27. 27. Blair JM, Webber MA, Baylay AJ, Ogbolu DO, Piddock LJ. Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 2015;13(1):42-51. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro3380
  28. 28. Nikaido H, Zgurskaya HI. AcrAB and related multidrug efflux pumps of Escherichia coli. Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2001;3(2):215-218
  29. 29. Zgurskaya HI, Nikaido H. Multidrug resistance mechanisms: Drug efflux across two membranes. Molecular Microbiology. 2000;37(2):219-225. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01926.x
  30. 30. Elkins CA, Nikaido H. Substrate specificity of the RND-type multidrug efflux pumps AcrB and AcrD of Escherichia coli is determined predominantly by two large periplasmic loops. Journal of Bacteriology. 2002;184(23):6490-6498. DOI: 10.1128/JB.184.23.6490-6499.2002
  31. 31. Ruzin A, Keeney D, Bradford PA. AcrAB efflux pump plays a role in decreased susceptibility to tigecycline in Morganella morganii. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2005;49(2):791-793. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.2.791-793.2005
  32. 32. Buckner MM, Blair JM, La Ragione RM, Newcombe J, Dwyer DJ, Ivens A, et al. Beyond antimicrobial resistance: Evidence for a distinct role of the AcrD efflux pump in Salmonella biology. mBio. Nov 22, 2016;7(6):1-10. DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01916-16. PMID: 27879336
  33. 33. Kobayashi N, Tamura N, van Veen HW, Yamaguchi A, Murakami S. β-Lactam selectivity of multidrug transporters AcrB and AcrD resides in the proximal binding pocket. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2014;289(15):10680-10690. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.547794
  34. 34. Kobayashi K, Tsukagoshi N, Aono R. Suppression of hypersensitivity of Escherichia coli acrB mutant to organic solvents by integrational activation of the acrEF operon with the IS1 or IS2 element. Journal of Bacteriology. 2001;183(8):2646-2653. DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.8.2646-2653.2001
  35. 35. Moussatova A, Kandt C, O’Mara ML, Tieleman DP. ATP-binding cassette transporters in Escherichia coli. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2008;1778(9):1757-1771. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.06.009
  36. 36. Fuellen G, Spitzer M, Cullen P, Lorkowski S. Correspondence of function and phylogeny of ABC proteins based on an automated analysis of 20 model protein data sets. Proteins. 2005;61(4):888-899. DOI: 10.1002/prot.20616
  37. 37. Fitzpatrick AWP, Llabrés S, Neuberger A, Blaza JN, Bai XC, Okada U, et al. Structure of the MacAB–TolC ABC-type tripartite multidrug efflux pump. Nature Microbiology. 2017;2(7):17070. DOI: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.70
  38. 38. Yamanaka H, Kobayashi H, Takahashi E, Okamoto K. MacAB is involved in the secretion of Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin II. Journal of Bacteriology. 2008;190(23):7693-7698. DOI: 10.1128/JB.00853-08
  39. 39. Zgurskaya HI, Yamada Y, Tikhonova EB, Ge Q , Krishnamoorthy G. Structural and functional diversity of bacterial membrane fusion proteins. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2009;1794(5):794-807. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2008.10.010
  40. 40. Modali SD, Zgurskaya HI. The periplasmic membrane proximal domain of MacA acts as a switch in stimulation of ATP hydrolysis by MacB transporter. Molecular Microbiology. 2011;81(4):937-951. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07744.x
  41. 41. Yum S, Xu Y, Piao S, Sim SH, Kim HM, Jo WS, et al. Crystal structure of the periplasmic component of a tripartite macrolide-specific efflux pump. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2009;387(5):1286-1297. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.02.048
  42. 42. Foo JL, Jensen HM, Dahl RH, George K, Keasling JD, Lee TS, et al. Improving microbial biogasoline production in Escherichia coli using tolerance engineering. MBio. 2014;5(6):e01932. DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01932-14
  43. 43. Kroeger JK, Hassan K, Vörös A, Simm R, Saidijam M, Bettaney KE, et al. Bacillus cereus efflux protein BC3310 - a multidrug transporter of the unknown major facilitator family, UMF-2. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2015;6:1063. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01063
  44. 44. Higgins CF. Multiple molecular mechanisms for multidrug resistance transporters. Nature. 2007;446(7137):749-757. DOI: 10.1038/nature05630
  45. 45. Kermani AA, Macdonald CB, Burata OE, Ben Koff BB, Koide A, Denbaum E, et al. The structural basis of promiscuity in small multidrug resistance transporters. Nature Communications. 2020;11(1):6064. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19820-8
  46. 46. Schuldiner S, Granot D, Steiner SS, Ninio S, Rotem D, Soskin M, et al. Precious things come in little packages. Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2001;3(2):155-162
  47. 47. Tal N, Schuldiner S. A coordinated network of transporters with overlapping specificities provides a robust survival strategy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106(22):9051-9056. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0902400106
  48. 48. Gottschalk KE, Soskine M, Schuldiner S, Kessler H. A structural model of EmrE, a multi-drug transporter from Escherichia coli. Biophysical Journal. 2004;86(6):3335-3348. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.103.034546
  49. 49. Ma C, Chang G. Structure of the multidrug resistance efflux transporter EmrE from Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(9):2852-2857. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0400137101
  50. 50. Yerushalmi H, Schuldiner S. A model for coupling of H(+) and substrate fluxes based on “time-sharing” of a common binding site. Biochemistry. 2000;39(48):14711-14719. DOI: 10.1021/bi001892i
  51. 51. Sarkar SK, Bhattacharyya A, Mandal SM. YnfA, a SMR family efflux pump is abundant in Escherichia coli isolates from urinary infection. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2015;33(1):139-142. DOI: 10.4103/0255-0857.148415
  52. 52. Drew D, North RA, Nagarathinam K, Tanabe M. Structures and general transport mechanisms by the major facilitator superfamily (MFS). Chemical Reviews. 2021;121(9):5289-5335. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00983
  53. 53. Reddy VS, Shlykov MA, Castillo R, Sun EI, Saier MH Jr. The major facilitator superfamily (MFS) revisited. FEBS Journal. 2012;279(11):2022-2035. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08588.x
  54. 54. Lynch AS. Efflux systems in bacterial pathogens: An opportunity for therapeutic intervention? An industry view. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2006;71(7):949-956. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.10.021
  55. 55. Tanabe M, Szakonyi G, Brown KA, Henderson PJ, Nield J, Byrne B. The multidrug resistance efflux complex, EmrAB from Escherichia coli forms a dimer in vitro. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2009;380(2):338-342. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.01.081
  56. 56. Puértolas-Balint F, Warsi O, Linkevicius M, Tang PC, Andersson DI. Mutations that increase expression of the EmrAB-TolC efflux pump confer increased resistance to nitroxoline in Escherichia coli. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2020;75(2):300-308. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkz434
  57. 57. Yin Y, He X, Szewczyk P, Nguyen T, Chang G. Structure of the multidrug transporter EmrD from Escherichia coli. Science. 2006;312(5774):741-744. DOI: 10.1126/science/1125629
  58. 58. Koita K, Rao CV. Identification and analysis of the putative pentose sugar efflux transporters in Escherichia coli. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43700. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043700
  59. 59. Lewinson O, Adler J, Poelarends GJ, Mazurkiewicz P, Driessen AJ, Bibi E. The Escherichia coli multidrug transporter MdfA catalyzes both electrogenic and electroneutral transport reactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100(4):1667-1672. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0435544100
  60. 60. He X, Szewczyk P, Karyakin A, Evin M, Hong WX, Zhang Q , et al. Structure of a cation-bound multidrug and toxic compound extrusion transporter. Nature. 2010;467(7318):991-994. DOI: 10.1038/nature09408
  61. 61. Jack DL, Yang NM, Saier MH Jr. The drug/metabolite transporter superfamily. European Journal of Biochemistry. 2001;268(13):3620-3639. DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2001.02265.x
  62. 62. Eshaghi E, Shahvaroughi Farahani A, Mousaei S, Khalifeh-Gholi M, Adnani Sadati J, Fateh R. Detecting efflux pumps genes in the fluoroquinolones resistant and sensitive strains of Escherichia coli in patients with urinary tract infection in Qom, Iran. Qom University of Medical Sciences Journal. 2021;15(3):210-221. DOI: 10.52547/qums.15.3.210
  63. 63. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 31st. CLSI Supplement M100-S31. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2021

Written By

Hussein Al-Dahmoshi, Sahar A. Ali and Noor Al-Khafaji

Submitted: 03 March 2022 Reviewed: 08 March 2022 Published: 09 May 2022

© 2022 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Continue reading from the same book

View All
Chapter 1 Introductory Chapter: The Antibiotic Resistance Ep...

By Guillermo Tellez-Isaias

62 downloads

Chapter 2 Honey as a Natural Product Worthy of Re-Considerat...

By Cynthia Ayefoumi Adinortey, Michael Wilson and Sam...

203 downloads

Chapter 3 Unlocking the Potential of Ghost Probiotics in Com...

By Abigarl Ndudzo, Sakhile Ndlovu, Nesisa Nyathi and ...

169 downloads