Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Nutrients Deficit and Water Stress in Plants: New Concept Solutions Using Olive Solid Waste

Written By

Samir Medhioub, Slah Bouraoui, Ali Ellouze and Hassen Sabeur

Submitted: September 18th, 2021 Reviewed: November 5th, 2021 Published: January 24th, 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.101523

Plant Defense Mechanisms Edited by Josphert N. Kimatu

From the Edited Volume

Plant Defense Mechanisms [Working Title]

Prof. Josphert N. Kimatu

Chapter metrics overview

76 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Great efforts were deployed by researchers to mobilize water resources while is becoming rarer and to control with efficiency the water besides nutrient needs for the plant. Autonomous water and nutritional anti-stress device for plants (AWANASD) based on the recovery of rainwater patented by Medhioub et al. fits into this general framework. Scientific efforts were also dedicated to preserve the environment and minimize energy consumption through using agricultural waste materials in different fields. This chapter provides a new concept based on the use of the olive solid waste in AWANASD as water storage and nutrient elements for plants giving rise to the new system called AWANASD-OSW.


  • stress
  • water
  • nutrient
  • olive solid waste
  • device

1. Introduction

Climate change and the excessive needs of human activities impact the water resource [1] and consequently its availability notably for the big water use of agriculture sector activity [2]. It accounts for 69% of global withdrawals [3], 2021. The irregularity of rainfall distribution and the faster and increasing water demand by 50% by 2030 [4] threat considerably some regions in the world. So, it is important to realize that in arid environments, challenges of preserving and saving water are crucial for achieving the Millennium Development Goals [5]. As the agriculture sector is the largest consumer of water, several researches and achievements aim to save water and ensure the minimum nutrient requirements for optimal growth of crops.

Reference to [3], Table 1 resumes some irrigation systems based on saving water use. In fact, these irrigation methods have their advantages and disadvantages but all of them require water sources, storage tanks, installation, etc. and incorporating nutrients under different forms.

Clay pot irrigationA clay pot is buried and filled up with water to irrigate the plants placed around it. Water seeped through its wall, will be absorbed by the roots of the plants.[6]
Drip irrigationWater and nutrients are delivered to the field in pipes called “drip system lines” containing smaller units called “drip systems.” Each drip system emits drops containing water and fertilizer, which allows a uniform application of water and nutrients directly to the root zone of each plant, over an entire field.[7]
Continuous irrigationIt uses a porous tube qualified as a semipermeable membrane (SPM). It delivers slowly and continuously water directly into the plant root zone.[8]
Hydrophilic polymers or hydrogelsHydrophilic polymers or hydrogels were small granules that function like sponges: They retain water up to 500 times their weight with rain or watering then it will be released later slowly and in very small quantities when it is incorporated into the soil.[9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]

Table 1.

Overview of some irrigation methods.

Agricultural sector activity is on the other side a source of renewable and valuable waste. Many research works were carried out to enhance this green waste in the different fields enjoying their specific performances mainly thermal, lightness, and its organic material characteristic. In France, regarding the fight against climate change and the strengthening of resilience in the face of these effects, deputies adopted an amendment (No. 7012) relating to the use of bio-based materials in construction. It indicates that from January 1, 2028, bio-based materials must be used in at least 25% of renovations and constructions ordered by the public institute [16]. All green waste can be used as well in agriculture. It can be turned into humus and nutrients, which are essential for soil life and plant development.

Our contribution in this chapter will be divided into three sections—the first one will review the new concept of irrigation method based on the recovery of rainwater given by [3], called autonomous water and nutritional anti-stress device (AWANASD) for plants; the second section is reserved to introduce the process of obtaining the olive solid waste (OSW), its fields of application and its physical and chemical characteristics. The last section gives a new vision to improve AWANASD by the use of OSW as the main component to respond at the same time to the minimum of water and nutrients required to the plant.


2. Autonomous water and nutritional anti-stress device (AWANASD)

The new concept of AWANASD, given by [3] (Video 1:, is a genius new concept inspired by the ancient clay pot method of irrigation. The bottom line of AWANASD is collecting rainwater then storing them temporarily with soluble nutrients enrichment and delayed water transfer to the plant. It’s a regular cyclical of water storage and transfer in order to overcoming the water stress of the plant in drought periods taking advantage of the rainy season (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Simplified AWANASD function.

AWANASD is made up of three compartments—the first one is a rainwater receiver exposed to open air and designed to filter and convey the collected water to the second compartment; the latter is buried in the soil near the maximum root density of the plant and in which the temporary storage water is enriched by nutrients. This water will forward to the last compartment which is the key piece of AWANASD. It has a defined permeability to ensure a deferred daily volume rainwater outflow and consequently, it will fill the lack of water needed to plant survival in the dry season. The calculated permeability is related to multiple parameters mainly the climate of the target crops region.

AWANASD will be able to spare the underground water tables from intensive exploitation and eventually from the poor-quality water [17]. It also reduces water consumption [18] and water loss by evaporation and deep percolation [19] and consequently improper management of water resources [20].

The analytical model of AWANASD is based on the next water balance equation:


More numerical details were shown in Ref. [3].


3. Olive solid waste: origin, valorization, and characterization

3.1 Introduction

According to the International Olive Council, the olive sector takes great importance in the economics of a large number of countries (Figure 2) and had tripled its production in the last 30 years [22]. The annual production of table olive for the period 2018–2019 was closed at 3 million tons [22]. This would indicate that the sector is expanding. As a consequence of the activity of this sector, large volumes of waste and by-products are generated. Among these agriculture wastes, those resulting from classic pressure processes, batch processes (super press), and continuous processes (centrifugation).

Figure 2.

World olive oil production, 2018/19 crop year [21].

3.2 Oil extraction process

3.2.1 Classic or traditional process

In classic (traditional) extraction units, the oil extraction process consists of the following different steps (Figure 3):

  • Grinding: It is carried out by granite stone grindstones, which rotate in a tank whose floor is also made of stone. This grinding is carried out manually or through an animal. This step, therefore, makes it possible to obtain a paste that contains solid matter and fluids (oil and water from vegetation).

  • Phase separation: The pulp produced is placed on scourtins (fiber discs plants). Then, oil extraction is carried out by pressure. The pressing generates a solid by-product called olive pomace. These olives pomaces are the residues solids recovered following the first pressing or centrifugation. They are made up of residues of the skin, pulp, almond, and fragments of olive pits.

  • A separation by settling of the liquid phases (oil and vegetation water) is performed. This separation takes place in the open air in cement, earthenware, or clay containers. A liquid by-product was generated at the end of this step, called vegetable waters. It is the brown aqueous liquid residue that separated from the oil by sedimentation after pressing or centrifugation. This liquid has a pleasant smell but a bitter taste. This effluent relatively rich in organic matter constitutes a pollution factor that creates a real problem for the olive industry.

Figure 3.

Classic press and super press extraction systems.

3.2.2 Batch process or super press system

The olives received in the traditional oil mills go directly through the following steps:

  • Grinding: It is carried out by grinding wheels. The grinding wheels used for grinding are slightly off-center with respect to the axis of rotation, which increases the possibility of crushing olives.

  • Mixing: This step releases as much oil as possible. Raclettes bring back permanently the dough under the grindstones which then play the role of kneading machines. The dough is obtained after about half an hour.

  • Phase separation: The dough is then placed in a layer approximately 2 cm thick on nylon fiber discs (the mats), themselves stacked on top of each other around a central pivot (called a needle) mounted on a small carriage. The set is placed on a hydraulic press piston which allows the dough to be subjected to a pressure of the order of 100 bars. The liquid phase flows into a tank. The pomace stays on the scourtins. This operation takes approximately 45 minutes. Then, each scourtin is cleared of its pomace by tapping it as when cleaning a carpet.

  • Decantation: The oil, having a lower density than that of water, goes back to the area. This is the natural settling. However, this method is almost no longer used, due to its slowness and the difficulty in separating the oil from the water vicinity of the interface between the two fluids. These are vertical plate centrifuges that today make it possible to separate olive oil from vegetable waters (Figure 3).

3.2.3 Continuous process

There are two types of the continuous extraction process—three-phase centrifuge system and two-phase centrifuge system. Three-phase centrifugal extraction system

The olives, once received, undergo preliminary treatments, such as stripping, stone removal, and washing to have good oil quality.

  • Grinding: This is carried out by mechanical disc or hammer grinders. These grinders can work continuously; the dough is obtained almost instantly.

  • Mixing: The dough is poured into a stainless-steel tank moderately thinned with water lukewarm, in which a spiral or worm turns, also in stainless steel.

  • Phase separation: This consists of separating the solid part (pomace) from the fluid (vegetable waters). The kneaded paste is injected by a pump into a centrifuge whose axis is horizontal (horizontal settling tank).

  • Decantation: Vertical centrifuges with plates are used which make it possible to separate olive oil from vegetable waters [23]. This extraction process is illustrated in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Three-phase centrifugal extraction system. Two-phase centrifugal extraction system

The olives undergo the same stages of stripping, stone removal, washing and grinding, mixing, and settling as those of the previous three-phase system. However, this olive oil extraction process works with a new decanter with two-phase centrifugation (oil and moist olive pomace) which does not require the addition of water for the separation of oil and solid phases containing pomace and the vegetable waters. This two-phase decanter allows for slightly higher oil yields than those obtained by the conventional three-phase decanter and the press system. In addition, it does not increase the volume of vegetable waters.

Figure 5 shows the different stages of olive oil extraction by a two-phase centrifugal extraction system.

Figure 5.

Two-phase centrifugal extraction system.

3.3 Valorization of olive pomace

As a renewable by-product source further its high added-value, the olive solid waste was valued in different areas. Table 2 summarizes the most important uses. Each of these uses will be detailed succinctly later in the text.

ApplicationRaw materialPretreatmentApplication sectorReferences
CombustionStone and seedDriedAll industries residential and commercial[24, 25, 26]
Activated carbonStone and seedPyrolysis activationFood, chemical, petroleum, nuclear, mining, pharmacological industry[27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32]
Bio-oilStone and seedPyrolysisWide field of industries[33]
FurfuralStone and seedAcid hydrolysisWide field of industries as solvent[34]
Plastic filledStoneGrindingPlastic and construction[35, 36, 37, 38]
CosmeticStoneGrindingCosmetic[40, 41, 42]
Animal feedStone and seedGrindingFood[43]
ResinsStone and seedPyrolysis or liquefactionElectrochemical[44, 45]

Table 2.

Overview of some OSW uses.

3.3.1 Combustion of stone and whole stone

The olive stone is a biomass fuel that has low N and S percentages [24] with a minimum environmental impact. The important power heating combustion is converted to electrical sector and for heating buildings [25]. Rodrıguez et al. [34] and Arvanitoyannis et al. [46] detailed more in their study the thermal treated olive stone used.

3.3.2 Activated carbon from olive stone

Activated carbon was used in many fields (mining, pharmaceutical industries, food, etc.) [27, 28]. Activated carbon from olive stone is mainly used for the removal of contaminants, such as arsenic [47] or aluminum [48], odors, unwanted colors, and tastes [49].

3.3.3 Liquid and gas products from olive stone pyrolysis

Olive stone pyrolysis gives interesting bio-oil and gas products [33].

3.3.4 Furfural production

There are many processes to produce furfural such as acid hydrolysis of xylose and some of which present the olive stone. Several industrial uses of furfural are performed, such as solvent or as a base for synthesizing its derived solvent [34].

3.3.5 Olive stone as a plastic filled

The olive stone as a natural and biodegradable raw material [35, 36] was already studied to prepare a friendly environment product then a certain plastic structure by mixing it with a certain polypropylene to produce a new thermoplastic polymer [37].

3.3.6 Olive stone as an abrasive

The interested proprieties of olive stone in terms of resistance to rupture and deformation confers an abrasive quality that let it wide use in the industrial sector [39].

3.3.7 Olive stone in cosmetic

Olive stone is incorporated as a component in many products to aid in skin exfoliation [40, 41].

3.4 Characterization

3.4.1 Composition of the olive

The olive composition depends on its variety (Figure 6), soil, and climate [23]. The contents olive is composed of epicarp (2–2.5% of weight) which is in fact the skin of the olive. It is covered with a waxy material, the cuticle, which is waterproof, then, the mesocarp (71.5–80.5% of weight) [50] which is the pulp of the fruit. It is made up of cells in which the drops of fat that will form olive oil will be stored, during the “lipogenesis” phase and finally, the endocarp or the stone (17.3–23% of weight).

Figure 6.

Olive composition.

3.4.2 Physical proprieties of olive solid waste

The olive solid waste (OSW) used in the tests reported in this chapter (Figure 7(a) and Table 3) was obtained from a three-phase centrifugal extraction process from “Botria oil” Tunisian company mills. After a centrifugal separation of the husk residue, the extracted olive solid waste (OSW) underwent a natural drying process in an open shelter.

Figure 7.

Olive stone. (a) Sample used for testing. (b) Grain size distribution.

t (mn)01530609012018024036014402880
M0 (g)178178178177171182178179177175177
Mf (g)178257272293.1295318319324325330336
V0 (ml)279279279279279279279279279279279
Vf (ml)279338345351360369373.5376379383390
W (%)044536673757981848990
f (%)021242629323435363740

Table 3.

Water and profusion of OSW as a function of the immersion time.

The tested OSW showed 605 and 1490 kg/m3, respectively to bulk and relative density and 24-hour water absorption capacity of 11.5%. Figure 7(b) shows its particle-size distribution.

3.4.3 Olive solid waste behavior in water

The organic nature and the porous structure of solid waste cores have been the subject of a specific study of their behavior in the presence of water and as a function of the immersion time. The following procedure has been adopted while not losing sight of RILEM recommendations [51]:

  • Weigh 200 g of a raw OSW

  • Dry the OSW sample in a 105°C oven and for 24 hours (until a constant mass of less than 0.1% is reached)

  • Weigh the dried sample (M0)

  • Place it in a graduated test tube and note the corresponding volume (V0)

  • Fill the test tube with water and put the dried OSW sample in it until a given time t.

  • Net volume (Vf) and weight (Mf) of wetted OSW corresponding to time t

  • Repeat the above operations for each time t equals to 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360, 1440, and 2880 mn)

Table 3 shows all measured values.

The water content W is given by Eq. (2).


The volume occupied by a given weight of dry OSW material increases at the same time as its humidity. This phenomenon is, therefore, called profusion. This is characterized by expansion coefficient f (expressed in %; Eq. (3)) as the increase in the volume corresponding to a given humidity compared to the volume occupied by the same quantity of bio-sourced but in the dry state [52]:


Figure 8 shows by using regression equation the approximation curves and their equations of the water content and profusion function of time. We note that, according to correlations coefficients R2, the two equations reflect well the tendency of W and f with time. We note as well that water saturation and the maximum profusion of OSW begin after 4 hours. In addition, we deduce the relation between w and f shown in Figure 9.

Figure 8.

Water content and profusion function of time of OSW.

Figure 9.

Profusion function of the water content of OSW.

3.4.4 Chemical proprieties of olive solid waste

ICP technique, short for “Inductively Coupled Plasma” was used for measuring the content of an inorganic element in a sample. This technique is applicable to all types of elementary chemical elements.

The results of ICP sample analysis of OSW for two samples (A and B) were given in Table 4.

UnitRaw OSWABMeanOSW after dissolving in waterABMean
Mineral matter%4.725.24.961.0611.03

Table 4.

Elementary chemical elements in the raw and dissolving OSW.




4. Olive solid waste used in AWANASD: a new concept for nutrients deficit and water stress

Adding to its organic material, the physical and chemical proprieties of OSW let confer it a potential and interesting material not only for its ability to stock water on it around the double of its weight but it is a useful nutrient element for plants even not with a big quantity but it can be required to thwart certain nutrition deficit. Medhioub et al. [3] gave a design of AWANASD for the governorate of Sfax (Tunisia). This design consists of filling the third compartments of AWANASD with grains sand of 3 mm in diameter to reach permeability equal to 10–7 m s1 to give a water flow of 0.4 L day1 at a depth of about 1 m. Nevertheless, the authors did not specify which and how the nutrient should be done. So, our proposed device concept named “AWANASD-OSW” is a new version of AWANASD which can be applied to the same location. AWANASD-OSW includes the same number of compartments of AWANASD (Figure 10) and ensures the goal of delayed water transfer to the roots of plants. However, the third compartment which is a cylinder (32 cm height; 16 cm of diameter) will be filled by a specific volume of OSW (VOSW) having a similar sand particular diameter. This is given by equation Eq. (4):

Figure 10.



where Vs is the sand volume equal to 6410−3(m3); f is the profusion of OSW taken for the maximum of water content (40%).


5. Conclusion

As it is a living organ, a plant’s need is nutrition and a water supply. Different technical methods have been developed and applied to meet this need. The reliability of these methods varies in degree of performance. The recent one called AWANASD is given by Medhioub et al. [3], ensuring the minimum water flow and nutrition during drought months at the level of the maximum concentration of roots.

AWANASD applied for Sfax governate concluded the use of grain sand with a specific diameter to ensure the objective of delayed water transfer but it did not mention the nutrition issue. Our AWANASD-OSW new concept fully incorporates the said system but replaces the grain sand with olive solid waste with the same granulometry.

This renewable agriculture waste material has interesting physical and chemical properties besides its characteristic as a biodegradable organic material. It allows the release in the presence of water of nutrients for plants in addition to its role of water store.

A full-scale experimental device must be set up not only to ensure the expected theoretical performances but also to assess its longevity.



We are really grateful because we managed to complete our chapter assignment within the encouragement and the given time by Mrs. Jasna Bozic. This chapter could not be completed without the efforts and the cooperation of Mr. Slim Makhloufi, Mr. Dhia Hachicha, and Mrs. Abir Guesmi. Thanks for all. We also thank Botrial oil and Alfa group companies for their constant support.


  1. 1. UN Water. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2018: Nature-Based Solutions for Water. Paris: UNESCO; 2018. p. 139
  2. 2. Peragón JM, Pérez-Latorre FJ, Delgado A, Tóth T. Best management irrigation practices assessed by a GIS-based decision tool for reducing salinization risks in olive orchards. Agricultural Water Management. 2018;202:33-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.02.010
  3. 3. Medhioub S, Euchi J, Makhloufi S. Autonomous water and nutritional anti-stress device to solve a plant irrigation problem based on harvested rainwater: A Tunisian case study. Irrigation and Drainage. 2021;70(4):705-718. DOI: 10.1002/ird.2580
  4. 4. Mallek M, Euchi J, Jerbi Y. A review on optimization modeling of hybrid energy systems. In: Transportation, Logistics, and Supply Chain Management in Home Healthcare. Emerging Research and Opportunities. USA: IGI Global; 2020. pp. 29-62
  5. 5. Omri A, Euchi J, Hasaballah AH, Al-Tit A. Determinants of environmental sustainability: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Science of the Total Environment. 2019;657:1592-1601. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.111
  6. 6. Bainbridge DA. Buried clay pot irrigation: A little known but very efficient traditional method of irrigation. Agricultural Water Management. 2001;48(2):79-88. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-3774(00)00119-0
  7. 7.[Accessed: 01 August 2021]
  8. 8. Lima V, Keitel C, Sutton B, Leslie G. Improved water management using subsurface membrane irrigation during cultivation ofPhaseolus vulgaris. Agricultural Water Management. 2019;223:105730. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105730
  9. 9. Farrell C, Ang XQ, Rayner JP. Water-retention additives increase plant available water in green roof substrates. Ecological Engineering. 2013;52:112-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.098
  10. 10. Kazemi F, Mohorko R. Review on the roles and effects of growing media on plant performance in green roofs in world climates. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2017;23:13-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.02.006
  11. 11. Sivapalan S. Benefits of treating a sandy soil with a crosslinked-type polyacrylamide. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 2006;46(4):579-584. DOI: 10.1071/EA04026
  12. 12. Al-Jabari M, Ghyadah RA, Alokely R. Recovery of hydrogel from baby diaper wastes and its application for enhancing soil irrigation management. Journal of Environmental Management. 2019;239:255-261. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.087
  13. 13. Palanisamy G, Jung HY, Sadhasivam T, Kurkuri MD, Kim SC, Roh SH. A comprehensive review on microbial fuel cell technologies: Processes, utilization, and advanced developments in electrodes and membranes. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;221:598-621. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.172
  14. 14. Hüttermann A, Zommorodi M, Reise K. Addition of hydrogels to soil for prolonging the survival ofPinus halepensisseedlings subjected to drought. Soil and Tillage Research. 1999;50(3-4):295-304. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00023-9
  15. 15. Al-Humaid AI, Moftah AE. Effects of hydrophilic polymer on the survival of buttonwood seedlings grown under drought stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2007;30(1):53-66. DOI: 10.1080/01904160601054973
  16. 16.
  17. 17. Singh A. Managing the water resources problems of irrigated agriculture through geospatial techniques: An overview. Agricultural Water Management. 2016;174:2-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.04.021
  18. 18. Olad A, Zebhi H, Salari D, Mirmohseni A, Tabar AR. Slow-release NPK fertilizer encapsulated by carboxymethyl cellulose-based nanocomposite with the function of water retention in soil. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2018;90:333-340. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.04.083
  19. 19. Maghchiche A, Haouam A, Immirzi B. Use of polymers and biopolymers for water retaining and soil stabilization in arid and semiarid regions. Journal of Taibah University for Science. 2010;4(1):9-16. DOI: 10.1016/S1658-3655(12)60022-3
  20. 20. Saha A, Rattan B, Sekharan S, Manna U. Quantifying the interactive effect of water absorbing polymer (WAP)—Soil texture on plant available water content and irrigation frequency. Geoderma. 2020;368:114310. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114310
  21. 21.
  22. 22. International Olive Council (IOC); 2019
  23. 23. Chouchene A. Etude expérimentale et théorique de procédés de valorisation de sous-produtis oléicoles par voies thermique et physico-chimique. Alimentation et Nutrition. Français: Université de Haute Alsace—Mulhouse; 2010 [NNT: 2010MULH4891]
  24. 24. González JF, González-Garcıa CM, Ramiro A, González J, Sabio E, Gañán J, et al. Combustion optimisation of biomass residue pellets for domestic heating with a mural boiler. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2003;27:145-154
  25. 25. Durán CY. Propiedades termoquımicas del orujo de aceituna. Poder calorıfico. Grasas y Aceites. 1985;36(45):47
  26. 26. European Bioenergy. 2003. Available from:
  27. 27. El-Sheikh A, Newman AP, Al-Daffaee HK, Phull S, Cresswell N. Characterization of activated carbon prepared from a single cultivar of Jordanian olive stone by chemical and physicochemical techniques. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 2004;71:151-164
  28. 28. Stavropoulos GG, Zabaniotou AA. Production and characterization of activated carbons from olive-seed waste residue. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2005;82:79-85
  29. 29. Ubago-Pérez R, Carrrasco-Marın F, Fiaren-Jiménez D, Moreno-Castilla C. Granular and monolithic activated carbons from KOH-activation of olive stones. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2006;92:64-70
  30. 30. Molina-Sabio M, Sánchez-Montero MJ, Juarez-Galán JM, Salvador F, Rodrıguez-Reinoso F, Salvador A. Development of porosity in a char during reaction with steam or supercritical water. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 2006;110:12360-12364
  31. 31. Sánchez MLD, Macıas-Garcıa A, Dıaz-Dıez MA, Cuerda-Correa EM, Ganan-Gómez J, Nadal-Gisbert A. Preparation of activated carbons previously treated with hydrogen peroxide: Study of their porous texture. Applied Surface Science. 2006;252:5984, 5987
  32. 32. Martınez ML, Torres MM, Guzmán CA, Maestri DM. Preparation and characteristics of activated carbon from olive stones and walnut shells. Industrial Crops and Products. 2005;23:23-28
  33. 33. Pütün AE, Burcu B, Apaydin E, Pütün E. Bio-oil from olive oil industry waste: Pyrolysis of olive residue under different conditions. Fuel Processing Technology. 2005;87:25-32
  34. 34. Rodrıguez G, Lama A, Rodrıguez R, Jimenez A, Guillén R, Fernandez-Bolanos J. Olive stone an attractive source of bioactive and valuable compounds. Bioresource Technology. 2008;99:5261-5269
  35. 35. Natraplast. 2007. Available from:
  36. 36. Flextron. 2007. Available from:
  37. 37. Siracusa G, La Rosa AD, Siracusa V, Trovato M. Eco-compatible use of olive huso as filler in thermoplastic composites. Journal of Polymers and the Environment. 2001;9:157-161
  38. 38. Cristofaro D. A process for the realization of plates and panels consisting of exhausted olive husks of crushed olive stones and polypropylene, and derived product [Patent]. International Publication Number: WO 9738834. 1997
  39. 39. Dawson D. 2006. Available from:
  40. 40. Cosmoliva. 2007. Available from:
  41. 41. Korres. 2007. Available from:
  42. 42. Mohammadi FF, Harrison JT, Czarnota A, Leonard C. Nonabrasive sensory exfoliating system [Patent]. National Publication Number: US 20050169868. 2005
  43. 43. Carraro L, Trocino A, Xiccato G. Dietary supplementation with olive stone meal in growing rabbits. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2005;4:88-90
  44. 44. Tejeda-Ricardez J, Vaca-Garcıa C, Borredon ME. Design of a batch solvolytic liquefaction reactor for the vaporization of residues from the agricultural foodstuff. Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2003;81:1066-1070
  45. 45. Theodoropoulou S, Papadimitriou D, Zoumpoulakis L, Simitzis J. Optical properties of carbon materials formed by pyrolysis of novolac-resin/biomass composites. Diamond and Related Materials. 2004;13:371-375
  46. 46. Arvanitoyannis IS, Kassaveti A, Stefanatos S. Current and potential uses of thermally treated olive oil waste. Food Science and Technology. 2007;42:852-867
  47. 47. Budinova T, Petrov N, Razvigorova M, Parra J, Galiatsatou P. Removal of arsenic(III) from aqueous solution by activated carbons prepared from solvent extracted olive pulp and olive stones. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2006;45:1896-1901
  48. 48. Ghazy SE, Samra SE, May AEM, El-Morsy SM. Removal of aluminium from some water samples by sorptive-flotation using powdered modified activated carbon as a sorbent and oleic acid as a surfactant. Analytical Sciences. 2006;22:377-382
  49. 49. Najar-Souissi S, Ouederni A, Ratel A. Adsorption of dyes onto activated carbon prepared from olive stones. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China). 2005;17:998-1003
  50. 50. Nefzaoui A. Importance de la production oléicole et des sous-produits de l’olivier. In: Etude de l’utilisation des sous-produits de l’olivier en alimentation animale en Tunisie. Rome: Étude FAO production et santé animales; 1984. p. 43
  51. 51. Amziane S, Collet F, Lawrence M, Magniont C, Picandet V, Sonebi M. Recommendation of the RILEM TC 236-BBM: The characterisation testing of hemp shiv to determine initial water content, water absorption, dry density, particle size distribution and thermal conductivity. Materials and Structures. 2017;50:167. DOI 10.1617/s11527-017-1029-3
  52. 52. Dreux G, Festa J. Nouveau guide du béton et de ses constituants. Edition Eyrolle, 61, bd Saint Germain, 75240 Pris Cedex 05; 1998.

Written By

Samir Medhioub, Slah Bouraoui, Ali Ellouze and Hassen Sabeur

Submitted: September 18th, 2021 Reviewed: November 5th, 2021 Published: January 24th, 2022