Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Mixed Adenoneuroendocrine Carcinoma in the Colon: A Case Report

Written By

Murat Can Mollaoğlu

Submitted: 19 December 2023 Reviewed: 07 March 2024 Published: 05 April 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1005028

The Global Burden of Disease and Risk Factors - Understanding and Management IntechOpen
The Global Burden of Disease and Risk Factors - Understanding and... Edited by Mukadder Mollaoğlu

From the Edited Volume

The Global Burden of Disease and Risk Factors - Understanding and Management [Working Title]

Prof. Mukadder Mollaoğlu and Dr. Murat Can Mollaoğlu

Chapter metrics overview

5 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Tumors that have both neuroendocrine and exocrine components in the gastrointestinal system are rare. One of the rarest places in the gastrointestinal system is the colon. These tumors are called mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANEC). To diagnose MANEC, the neuroendocrine and exocrine components that make up the lesion must be present at least 30%. A 70-year-old female patient with complaints of abdominal distension, malnutrition, nausea, and vomiting was admitted to our clinic from another center. The patient underwent blood tests, whole abdominal tomography, and colonoscopy. Right hemicolectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection were performed with the preliminary diagnosis of colon cancer. Histopathological diagnosis was MANEC, and tumor stage was T3N1M0. Adjuvant chemotherapy was applied. Although MANEC is rare, it is a difficult and complex cancer to diagnose due to its nonspecific features. Diagnosis is made with histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation along with clinical suspicion. Treatment is surgery and adjuvant therapy.

Keywords

  • adenocarcinoma
  • adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma
  • mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas
  • neuroendocrine tumor
  • colon cancer

1. Introduction

Colon adenocarcinomas are the most common malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract, and the frequency of cancer development according to their histological types is 2–3% in tubular adenoma, 6–8% in tubulovillous adenoma, and 29–70% in villous adenoma [1]. Colon adenocarcinomas are the most common cancer of the digestive system and more than 50% of them progress with metastasis. Ki-67: It is an antigen that responds to nuclear nonhistone protein expressed in G1, G2, M, and S proliferative phases, and there is generally a good correlation between mitotic number and Ki-67. It is associated with cell proliferation [2]. Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) includes neoplasms that contain both neuroendocrine carcinomatous and adenocarcinomatous components. Its morphology is similar to that of advanced adenocarcinoma and differs from neuroendocrine tumors (G1 or G2), which usually present as a submucosal tumor with or without delle [1, 2, 3].

The neuroendocrine system includes endocrine glands such as the pituitary, parathyroid, and neuroendocrine adrenal. Endocrine islet tissues are found scattered within the exocrine parenchyma, such as the digestive and respiratory systems, as well as within the thyroid and pancreas. The gastrointestinal tract is the region where neuroendocrine cells are commonly located and 2/3 of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are located [4]. Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are a heterogeneous group of tumors originating from neuroendocrine cells. These cells are specialized cells that have the ability to produce, store and secrete peptides, and biogenic amines. The common feature of these tumors is that they express both neural and endocrine markers, so they are called gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEP-NET). NETs are divided into two main groups: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors are called carcinoid tumors. Neuroendocrine tumors have been described in the central nervous system, respiratory system, larynx, gastrointestinal (GI) tract, thyroid, skin, breast, and urogenital tract [3, 5].

According to the WHO 2010 classification of GEP-NETs (Table 1), it provides a grading and naming system based on the morphological characteristics of tumors and cell proliferation rates, according to the criteria put forward by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) [6]. The common feature of these tumors is that they express both neural and endocrine markers, so they are called gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.

WHO 1980WHO 2000WHO 20102019
  • Carcinoid

  • Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor

  • Well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma

  • Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma /small cell carcinoma

  • Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G1

  • Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G2

  • Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) (large cell or small cell type)

  • Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G1

  • Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G2

  • Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G3

  • Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) G3 (large or small cell type)

  • Mucocarcinoid

  • Carcinoid-adenocarcinoma mixed forms

  • Pseudotumor lesions

  • Mixed exocrine-endocrine carcinoma

  • Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC)

  • Mixed neuroendocrine non-carcinoid- (MANEK) neuroendocrine neoplasia (MINEN)

  • Pseudotumor lesions

  • Tumor-like lesions

  • Hyperplastic and preneoplastic lesions

Table 1.

Classification of neuroendocrine tumors in the gastrointestinal system [6, 7, 8].

In 2019, common classification criteria for all NETs were republished by WHO (Table 1). The main feature of this new classification is to distinguish well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, previously known as carcinoid tumor of the gastrointestinal tract, from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. In general, distinguishing between well-differentiated and slow-growing neuroendocrine neoplasms and poorly differentiated and fast-growing neuroendocrine neoplasms is of great clinical importance. The two main groups, which are primarily divided into poorly differentiated and well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms according to histomorphologic features, actually differ from each other genetically, molecularly, biologically and morphologically except for neuroendocrine features. Neuroendocrine neoplasms are evaluated morphologically and grouped as neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) according to the degree of differentiation into the cells from which they originate. This distinction is supported by genetic evidence, and it is known that tumors differ clinically and prognostically [5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12].

Although colon NETs are rare, rectal NETs constitute 20% of GEP-NETs. It is seen in 5–6 Decade, and the incidence is equal in men and women. Colon NETs are histologically poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. Metastasis is usually present at the time of diagnosis. It has a severe prognosis. Abdominal pain and weight loss may occur. Carcinoid syndrome may develop in less than 5% of patients. Rectal NETs are more common and have a better prognosis than colonic ones [12, 13]. They are mostly asymptomatic, and carcinoid syndrome is not observed. Patients with symptoms usually present with rectal bleeding, pain, or constipation. Most are smaller than 1 cm. Metastases can be seen in tumors larger than 2 cm and with invasion of the muscularis propria. Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas have a poor prognosis. All neuroendocrine carcinomas are high-grade carcinomas. They show neuroendocrine differentiation both morphologically and immunohistochemically. Morphologically, they are divided into two groups: small cell and large cell. In the small cell group, cells have fine granular chromatin, and narrow cytoplasm and show morphological features, such as nuclear molding. In the large cell group, the cells have a moderate amount of cytoplasm and a round nucleus, sometimes with prominent nucleoli. NECs are aggressive tumors with high proliferative activity. The Ki67 proliferation index of tumors in this group is 20% and above. Most of the time it is above 75%. It is possible to see the Ki67 proliferation index around 20–50%, especially in cases exposed to chemotherapy. This is one of the situations confirming that the Ki67 index should not be used to differentiate neuroendocrine carcinomas and G3 neuroendocrine tumors [12, 13, 14].

Neuroendocrine tumors are rare in the colon and rectum, accounting for less than 2.0% of all colorectal malignancies. In some cases, neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma may occur together in the same tumor. According to the current classification of the World Health Organization (WHO), tumors in which neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma coexist are called “mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas” (MANEC) [15]. MANEC is a neoplasm characterized by significant histological heterogeneity. In diagnosis, both neuroendocrine and adenocarcinoma components must be present simultaneously in ≥30% of cases. Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma, newly included in the 2010 WHO classification, is a rare tumor of the gastrointestinal tract that contains at least 30% of both adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma components. A total of 87% originates from the appendix. It is a very rare tumor in the colon and other parts of the gastrointestinal tract [1, 6, 15].

MANEC can be seen in every part of the gastrointestinal tract. The most common sites for MANEC are the esophagus [16], stomach [17, 18], appendix [19], gallbladder [20, 21], and pancreas [22]. It is rarely seen outside these regions. Although rare, cases of MANEC have been reported in areas, such as the colon [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28] and duodenum [29]. The most common site of MANEC in the colon is the right colon (56%), followed by the left colon and transverse colon [27]. Colon NETs are usually EC cell NETs, while rectal NETs are usually L-cell NETs. Colon NETs form larger masses than NETs seen in other parts of the gastrointestinal tract. Rectal NETs are observed as small polyps or submucosal nodules. Most of these are in the G1 category [8, 27, 28, 29]. In this study, we present a rare case of MANEC that occurred in the ascending colon and was indistinguishable from adenocarcinoma.

Advertisement

2. Case report

A 70-year-old female patient with complaints of abdominal distension, malnutrition, nausea, and vomiting was admitted to our clinic from another center. Her clinical condition started 1 month ago and gradually worsened despite all conservative treatments. A mass was detected in the cecal region during the patient’s colonoscopy. No malignancy was found in the biopsies. In the entire abdominal tomography performed in our center, there was wall thickening starting from the cecum and extending to the ascending colon, but no other pathology was found. Colonoscopy was tried twice, but could not be reached distal to the mass. No abnormality was detected in the initial laboratory values. The patient underwent emergency laparotomy. There was a 2×3×2 cm mass, obstructing the lumen in the transverse colon. The patient underwent extended right hemicolectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Right hemicolectomy material A: Tumor B: Colon C: Appendix D: Ileum.

In the pathological examination of the sample, it was determined that there was adenocarcinoma 60% classical acinar and mucinous pattern + neuroendocrine carcinoma and 40% large cell type (Figures 2 and 3).

Figure 2.

Adenocarcinoma.

Figure 3.

Neuroendocrine tumor.

The tumor invaded the subserosal fat tissue (T3). The tumor was grade 3 (poorly differentiated) ulcerovegetan. A total of 25 lymph nodes were evaluated. There was reactive hyperplasia in 23 nodes and signs of carcinoma metastasis in two nodes (N1). Since the neuroendocrine component constituted a large part of the tumor, the pathologist had no difficulty in seeing it. Tumor markers, such as CEA, CA125, and CA19-9, were at normal levels. Distal and proximal surgical margins appeared intact. Carcinoid syndrome was not observed in the patient. In immunohistochemical examination, there was diffuse staining with neuroendocrine component CD56 and synaptophysin (Figure 4). MLH6, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS were examined by immunohistochemical method and microsatellite instability was stable.

Figure 4.

Synaptophysin, immunohistochemical marker.

Ki-67 and synaptophysin are neuroendocrine-specific markers. They were also strongly stained in our patient [16, 27]. Ki-67 proliferation index was 80%. Histopathological stage was evaluated as T3N1bM0. Although Ki-67 was 80% and cisplatin (platinum) was suitable, treatment was started with etoposide because the general condition was poor, the ECOG performance score was two, and the creatinine level was at the border. Platinum-based treatment was not considered at the first stage. It was planned that platinum could be started depending on tolerance. The patient was given four cycles of etoposide. After the treatment was completed, the patient was evaluated with full abdominal CT and PET CT. During the period when this study was carried out on the case, the general condition of the patient tended to improve. No tumor deposits were found in control radiological examinations (abdomen CT, pet CT).

Advertisement

3. Discussion

MANEC is a rare tumor in the colorectal region. Therefore, studies on this tumor are limited. There are also a limited number of studies, although they are mostly in the form of case reports. Although the limited number of studies prevents us from drawing general conclusions regarding this tumor, the prognosis of these patients is worse than that of patients with routine colorectal cancer [30].

The definitive way to diagnose MANEC is through histopathological examination. How patients with MANEC will be treated, or how this disease will be managed has not been fully determined due to the rarity of these tumors. Treatment is usually directed at the more aggressive tumor component. Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas, containing a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor component and an adenocarcinoma component, should be treated as adenocarcinomas. Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas, containing a poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma component, should be considered as neuroendocrine carcinomas and treated accordingly [31]. The case we presented was also considered as neuroendocrine carcinoma and treated accordingly.

Some studies have shown that adjuvant chemotherapy is an effective treatment option for patients with MANEC [32]. However, it is not yet clear which chemotherapy regimen is most effective in treating patients with MANEC due to limited studies. Therefore, it is currently impossible to talk about the most effective chemotherapy regimen for patients with MANEC.

The clinical course of MANEC is neither similar to neuroendocrine carcinoma nor adenocarcinoma but different from both [33]. It is difficult to diagnose MANEC in these tumors without histopathological diagnosis. It does not have a specific clinical course or finding. Therefore, they are usually found by chance [2]. MANEC is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage, so its course is aggressive. Endoscopically, it appears as a semicircular or fungal tumor, covering the lumen with deep ulceration. However, due to their structural similarities, it is often difficult to differentiate from colorectal adenocarcinoma based on endoscopic appearance alone [33]. For this reason, like every colorectal tumor detected, histopathological examination and immunohistochemical staining are the most valuable diagnostic methods for MANEC, and for this, biopsy is required [2]. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends CT and MRI with intravenous contrast for clinical staging. Contrast-enhanced thoracoabdominopelvic CT is recommended for distant metastasis screening [34]. Although the sensitivity of F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for detecting nodal involvement in neuroendocrine tumors is high, its sensitivity in colorectal adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors is considered low at 42.9% and 33%, respectively [33]. Colonoscopy and abdominal CT were performed for the diagnosis and staging of the patient we presented.

Advertisement

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, MANEC is a malignant tumor prone to distant metastases. Therefore, diagnosis is usually made in the late and metastatic stage. Although more is known about its clinicopathological features today, a consensus has not been reached regarding both its clinicopathological features and its treatment. Our patient’s clinical features and pathological features such as tumor localization, Ki-67, and tumor size were compatible with the literature. MANEC is a rare but highly aggressive disease. In this study, we aimed to present a rare colon MANEC patient to emphasize the term MANEC and to better understand the diagnosis, treatment, and management of MANEC. If the diagnosis is made in the early stages, surgical resection can be curative, but studies with a large number of patients are needed for the most appropriate treatment approach. More studies are needed to more clearly define how to manage patients with MANEC.

References

  1. 1. Dulskas A, Pilvelis A. Oncologic outcome of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC): A single center case series. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2020;46(1):105-107
  2. 2. Gonzalez HH, Skrove JL, Sharma R, Sobrado J. A rare case of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the ileocecal valve. Cureus. 2019;11:e3942
  3. 3. Brathwaite S, Rock J, Yearsley MM, Bekaii-Saab T, Wei L, Frankel WL, et al. Mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma: An aggressive clinical entity. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2016;23:2281e6
  4. 4. Jiang M, Tan Y, Li X, Fu J, Hu H, Ye X, et al. Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2017;2017:4206172
  5. 5. Kaltsas GA, Besser GM, Grossman AB. The diagnosis and medical management of advanced neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrine Reviews. 2004;25(3):458-511
  6. 6. Bosman FT, World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010
  7. 7. Aydın HA. Gastrointestinal Kanal Nöroendokrin Tümörlerinin Histopatolojisi ve Güncel Tanısal Yaklaşım (Histopathology of gastrointestinal tract neuroendocrine tumors and current diagnostic approach). Güncel Gastroenteroloji Dergisi. 2023;25(1):26-36
  8. 8. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System. 5th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2019
  9. 9. Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D, et al. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology. 2020;76:182-188
  10. 10. Staren ED, Gould VE, Warren WH, Wool NL, Bines S, Baker J, et al. Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the colon and rectum: A clinicopathologic evaluation. Surgery. 1988;104:1080-1089
  11. 11. Jesinghaus M, Konukiewitz B, Keller G, et al. Colorectal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas and neuroendocrine carcinomas are genetically closely related to colorectal adenocarcinomas. Modern Pathology. 2017;30:610-619
  12. 12. Telli TA. Gastroenteropankreatik Nöroendokrin Tümörlerin Klinikopatolojik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi İç Hastaliklari Anabilim Dali Uzmanlık Tezi; 2014
  13. 13. Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA, editors. WHO Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Digestive System. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000
  14. 14. Grabowski P, Schönfelder J, Ahnert Hilger G, et al. Expression of neuroendocrine markers: A signature of human undifferantiated carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Virchows Archiv. 2002;441:256-263
  15. 15. Rindi G, Arnold R, Bosman FT. Nomenclature and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, et al., editors. WHO Classification of Tumors of the Digestive System. Lyon: IARC Press; 2010. pp. 13-14
  16. 16. Kadhim MMK, Jespersen ML, Pilegaard HK, et al. Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma is a rare but important tumour found in the oesophagus. Case Reports in Gastrointestinal Medicine. 2016;2016:9542687
  17. 17. Yamauchi H, Sakurai S, Nakazawa N, et al. A case of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the stomach with focal intestinal metaplasia and hypergastrinemia. International Surgery. 2015;100(3):562-567
  18. 18. Kwok CM. Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the stomach. Case Reports in Gastroenterology. 2015;9(2):241-245
  19. 19. Romeo M, Quer A, Tarrats A, Molina C, et al. Appendiceal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas, a rare entity that can present as a Krukenberg tumor: Case report and review of the literature. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2015;13:325
  20. 20. Chen H, Shen YY, Ni XZ. Two cases of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2014;20(33):11916-11920
  21. 21. Lin YX, Jia QB, Fu YY, Cheng NS. Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2018;22(8):1452-1454
  22. 22. La Rosa S, Marando A, Sessa F, Capella C. Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs) of the gastrointestinal tract: An update. Cancers (Basel). 2012;4(1):11-30
  23. 23. Ito H, Kudo A, Matsumura S, et al. Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the colon progressed rapidly after hepatic rupture: Report of a case. International Surgery. 2014;99(1):40-44
  24. 24. Liu XJ, Feng JS, Xiang WY, et al. Clinicopathological features of an ascending colon mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma with clinical serosal invasion. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology. 2014;7(9):6395-6398
  25. 25. Meşină C, Vasile I, Ciobanu D, et al. Collision tumor of recto-sigmoidian junction – case presentation. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology. 2014;55(2 Suppl):643-647
  26. 26. Morais M, Pinho AC, Marques A, et al. Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma causing colonic intussusception. Case Report Surgery. 2016;2016:7684364
  27. 27. Minaya-Bravo AM, Mahillo JCG, et al. Large cell neuroendocrine – adenocarcinoma mixed tumour of colon: Collision tumour with peculiar behaviour. What do we know about these tumours? Annals of Medical Surgery (Lond). 2015;4(4):399-403
  28. 28. Shin SH, Kim SH, Jung SH, et al. High-grade mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma in the cecum: A case report. Annals of Coloproctology. 2017;33(1):39-42
  29. 29. Peng L, Schwarz RE. Collision tumor in form of primary adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma of the duodenum. Rare Tumors. 2012;4(2):e20
  30. 30. Komatsubara T, Koinuma K, Miyakura Y, Horie H, Morimoto M, Ito H, et al. Endocrine cell carcinomas of the colon and rectum: A clinicopathological evaluation. Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology. 2016;9:1-6
  31. 31. Hervieu V, Scoazec JY. Mixed endocrine tumors. Annales de Pathologie. 2005;25:511-528
  32. 32. Vanacker L, Smeets D, Hoorens A, Teugels E, Algaba R, Dehou MF, et al. Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the colon: Molecular pathogenesis and treatment. Anticancer Research. 2014;34:5517-5521
  33. 33. Tanaka T, Kaneko M, Nozawa H, et al. Diagnosis, assessment, and therapeutic strategy for colorectal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma. Neuroendocrinology. 2017;105(4):426-434
  34. 34. Shah MH, Goldner WS, Benson et al. Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 28 Jul 2021;19(7):839-868

Written By

Murat Can Mollaoğlu

Submitted: 19 December 2023 Reviewed: 07 March 2024 Published: 05 April 2024