Open access peer-reviewed chapter
Abstract
This book chapter delves into the intricate relationship between smokeless tobacco use and health disparities. Through a comprehensive exploration of the underlying mechanisms, this chapter aims to shed light on the factors contributing to the inequities in health outcomes associated with smokeless tobacco consumption. By investigating the socio-economic, cultural, and psychological dimensions, we seek to unravel the intricate web of factors that perpetuate these disparities. The chapter also examines the impact of public health policies, awareness campaigns, and interventions on mitigating the health inequity arising from smokeless tobacco use. Through a multidisciplinary approach, we aim to provide valuable insights that can inform policy-making and public health strategies to address these disparities effectively.
Keywords
- smokeless tobacco
- health disparities
- mechanisms
- socio-economic factors
- cultural factors
- public health policies
1. Introduction
The use of smokeless tobacco presents a unique challenge in the realm of public health [1, 2, 3]. Unlike combustible tobacco products, the nuances of health disparities related to smokeless tobacco use have garnered less attention. This chapter seeks to unravel the mechanisms underlying the disparities in health outcomes observed among users of smokeless tobacco products. The introduction sets the stage by highlighting the significance of investigating this issue, particularly within the context of health inequity [4, 5, 6].
The pervasive issue of health inequity is deeply entwined with the complex landscape of smokeless tobacco use, a prominent public health concern that has garnered increasing attention. While the well-established health risks associated with conventional tobacco products like cigarettes are widely recognized, the intricate dynamics that underlie health disparities stemming from smokeless tobacco use remain a subject of intensive exploration. This chapter aims to untangle the intricate mechanisms connecting smokeless tobacco consumption with the overarching challenge of health inequity, offering insights into the factors that drive these disparities [5, 7].
Health inequity, denoting the unjust and avoidable differences in health outcomes among diverse population segments, encompasses disparities in health access, treatment outcomes, and healthcare quality that arise from systemic social, economic, and environmental factors. Given the widespread nature of smokeless tobacco use, comprehending its intersection with health inequities is pivotal for devising targeted interventions and policies that can ensure equitable health outcomes for all individuals [8, 9].
Recent research has begun to unveil the intricate mechanisms through which smokeless tobacco use becomes intertwined with health disparities. Socio-economic determinants such as income, educational attainment, and occupation play a pivotal role in shaping initiation, prevalence, and cessation patterns of [8] smokeless tobacco use across various communities. Concurrently, cultural norms and societal expectations contribute to the formulation of individual attitudes and behaviors towards smokeless tobacco, thereby impacting usage rates and subsequent health consequences. Moreover, unequal access to healthcare resources, limited exposure to public health interventions, and barriers to cessation programs further compound the disproportionate burden of smokeless tobacco-related health concerns among marginalized populations [2].
Through a comprehensive interdisciplinary exploration, this chapter endeavors to dissect the complex mechanisms driving health inequities related to smokeless tobacco use. By delving into the socio-economic, cultural, and psychological dimensions of this issue, we aspire to illuminate the factors that sustain these disparities. Furthermore, we will critically evaluate the effectiveness of public health policies and interventions aimed at addressing these inequities and fostering healthier behaviors [5, 9].
In essence, unraveling the intricate mechanisms that intertwine smokeless tobacco use and health inequities is pivotal for devising well-informed strategies that address the root causes of these disparities. By shedding light on these mechanisms, this chapter contributes to the broader initiative of mitigating health inequities and ensuring that all individuals, irrespective of their tobacco usage or socio-economic status, can access optimal health outcomes [2, 7, 9].
2. Socio-economic factors and health disparities
Socio-economic factors form the bedrock upon which patterns of smokeless tobacco use and its consequential health effects are etched. This pivotal section delves into the intricate interplay of income, education, and occupation, laying bare the disparities in exposure, access to cessation resources, and the overarching impact on health [8, 10, 11]. The prevalence of smokeless tobacco use looms as a pressing public health concern, prompting a profound inquiry into its nexus with health disparities. At the heart of this discourse lie socio-economic determinants—income, education, and occupation—wielding a profound influence in sculpting the contours of smokeless tobacco usage, thereby magnifying the stark disparities in health outcomes [2, 8, 11].
2.1 Income disparities
Low-income individuals often face barriers to accessing healthcare services and smoking cessation programs, which can exacerbate the health effects of smokeless tobacco use [12]. This subsection examines how income influences both smokeless tobacco initiation and cessation, contributing to health disparities [13, 14].
Income disparities significantly influence the prevalence and consequences of smokeless tobacco use. Lower-income individuals often face challenges in accessing healthcare services, cessation resources, and health education. The affordability and availability of smokeless tobacco products can further drive higher usage rates among economically disadvantaged communities. As a result, health risks associated with smokeless tobacco use are magnified among those with limited financial resources. Strategies to address income-related health disparities must consider targeted interventions that address economic barriers and provide equitable access to resources for all individuals, regardless of their socio-economic status [7, 12].
2.2 Educational disparities
Education levels influence awareness about the health risks of smokeless tobacco use. This section discusses how lower education levels may lead to a lack of knowledge about the associated risks and hinder informed decision-making [5, 15, 16].
Educational disparities contribute to variations in smokeless tobacco use behaviors and awareness of associated health risks. Individuals with lower levels of education may lack comprehensive information about the potential harms of smokeless tobacco, hindering their ability to make informed decisions. This knowledge gap can lead to higher prevalence rates within this subgroup, perpetuating health disparities. Effective interventions should focus on tailored education campaigns that bridge the information divide and empower individuals across all educational backgrounds to make healthier choices regarding smokeless tobacco use [16].
In essence, understanding the intricate interplay between socio-economic factors and smokeless tobacco use is essential for addressing health inequities. By acknowledging the influence of income, education, and occupation on usage patterns and health outcomes, policymakers and public health advocates can design targeted strategies to mitigate disparities and promote healthier behaviors within affected communities [7, 16].
2.3 Occupational disparities
Occupation-related factors, such as workplace culture and stress, can impact smokeless tobacco use. This subsection explores the links between occupational environments and the prevalence of smokeless tobacco use [17, 18]. The intricate relationship between occupation and smokeless tobacco use unveils an important dimension in the broader context of health disparities. Occupational disparities play a significant role in influencing patterns of smokeless tobacco consumption and its associated health outcomes. Understanding the complexities of how different work environments shape tobacco use behaviors can provide insights into addressing health inequities among diverse occupational groups [17, 18].
Occupational disparities introduce nuanced dynamics that affect smokeless tobacco use behaviors. Workplace cultures, stressors, and the availability of tobacco products can influence initiation, prevalence, and cessation patterns. Certain occupations may inadvertently encourage smokeless tobacco use due to factors such as peer influences, job-related stress, and perceived cultural norms within the workplace. These disparities can lead to differential health outcomes and contribute to the unequal burden of smokeless tobacco-related health issues among various occupational groups [18, 19].
For example, studies have shown that high-stress professions, such as those in emergency services or healthcare, may have higher rates of smokeless tobacco use as a coping mechanism. Additionally, industries with a culture of smokeless tobacco use, such as some construction or manufacturing sectors, may have higher initiation rates among workers [20, 21].
Addressing occupational disparities in smokeless tobacco use requires targeted interventions that account for the specific challenges faced by different occupational groups. Workplace policies and interventions should aim to create supportive environments that discourage tobacco use and promote cessation. Tailoring educational campaigns and providing access to cessation resources within workplaces can empower individuals to make informed choices regarding their tobacco use. By acknowledging the role of occupational disparities, public health initiatives can work towards mitigating health inequities and promoting healthier behaviors within the diverse landscape of the workforce [18, 22].
In conclusion, exploring the relationship between occupation and smokeless tobacco use sheds light on an often-overlooked aspect of health disparities. By recognizing the impact of workplace environments on tobacco use behaviors and addressing the unique challenges faced by different occupational groups, we can strive towards a more equitable distribution of health outcomes related to smokeless tobacco use (Figure 1) [18, 19, 22].
Figure 1.
Occupational disparities: related influential factors and impacts.
3. Cultural factors and health disparities
Cultural norms and practices surrounding smokeless tobacco use can contribute to disparities in health outcomes. This section delves into the cultural aspects that influence initiation, consumption patterns, and cessation behaviors [23].
Cultural factors wield a profound influence on smokeless tobacco use, opening a crucial avenue for understanding the intricate web of health disparities that emerge from these behaviors. The connection between cultural norms, societal expectations, and smokeless tobacco consumption is pivotal in unraveling the mechanisms that contribute to health inequities across diverse communities. Delving into these cultural dimensions provides insight into designing interventions that address the unequal distribution of health outcomes related to smokeless tobacco use [11, 17].
3.1 Cultural acceptance and norms
Cultural acceptance of smokeless tobacco use within certain communities can normalize the behavior. This subsection examines how cultural norms influence perceptions of risk and shape usage patterns [24, 25].
Cultural norms and societal expectations play a pivotal role in shaping individuals’ attitudes and behaviors towards smokeless tobacco. Communities with a historical acceptance or normalization of smokeless tobacco use may have higher prevalence rates, resulting in a disproportionate health burden. Moreover, cultural practices, rituals, and peer influences can reinforce smokeless tobacco consumption within certain groups. These cultural dynamics contribute to the perpetuation of health disparities by influencing initiation, continuation, and cessation patterns. Understanding the interplay between cultural factors and smokeless tobacco use is essential for designing effective interventions. One-size-fits-all approaches may overlook the nuanced influences of cultural contexts. Tailored interventions that consider cultural sensitivities, beliefs, and practices can empower communities to make informed decisions about smokeless tobacco use. Engaging community leaders, leveraging culturally relevant messaging, and involving local institutions can enhance the effectiveness of interventions and promote healthier behaviors within specific cultural settings [25].
In conclusion, unraveling the intricate relationship between cultural factors and smokeless tobacco use sheds light on the mechanisms that contribute to health disparities. Acknowledging the influence of cultural norms and developing culturally sensitive interventions are pivotal steps toward mitigating health inequities related to smokeless tobacco use. By addressing these cultural dimensions, public health initiatives can work towards fostering healthier behaviors that resonate with diverse communities [25].
3.2 Gender and smokeless tobacco use
Gender roles and expectations can impact smokeless tobacco use differently among men and women. This section explores how gender influences initiation, consumption, and cessation practices [11, 26].
Exploring the intersection of gender and smokeless tobacco use unveils a complex realm within public health, marked by patterns that contribute to health disparities. Gender plays a significant role in shaping smokeless tobacco consumption behaviors, reflecting societal norms and expectations [27]. Understanding how gender influences initiation, prevalence, and cessation of smokeless tobacco is essential for addressing the distinct health inequities that arise from these patterns [27].
Gender norms and expectations contribute to distinct patterns of smokeless tobacco use among different genders. Societal perceptions of masculinity and femininity can influence initiation, continuation, and quitting behaviors. For instance, smokeless tobacco use may be more prevalent among men due to associations with traditional notions of masculinity. Conversely, societal pressures related to appearance and social acceptance may influence women’s tobacco use choices. These gender dynamics contribute to the unequal distribution of health risks, with potential long-term consequences [27, 28].
Recognizing the influence of gender on smokeless tobacco use is pivotal for developing effective interventions. Tailoring prevention and cessation efforts to resonate with gender-specific concerns can yield better outcomes. By acknowledging the gendered nuances in attitudes towards tobacco, public health initiatives can address the barriers and facilitators of quitting within different genders. Engaging with communities through culturally sensitive and gender-specific messaging can encourage open conversations and empower individuals to make informed choices about their tobacco use behaviors [28].
In conclusion, delving into the realm of gender and smokeless tobacco use uncovers a unique avenue for understanding health disparities. By recognizing the ways gender norms and expectations influence tobacco consumption patterns, public health interventions can be better equipped to address the unequal burden of health outcomes. Tailoring strategies that respect gender dynamics can contribute to a more equitable distribution of health benefits and healthier behaviors across diverse gender identities [27, 28].
4. Public health policies and interventions
Public health policies and interventions are essential tools for addressing smokeless tobacco-related health disparities. This section evaluates the effectiveness of various policy approaches, awareness campaigns, and interventions aimed at reducing the prevalence of smokeless tobacco use and mitigating its health impact [3, 29, 30].
Navigating the realm of smokeless tobacco necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the role of public health policies and interventions. This dynamic landscape encompasses a range of strategies aimed at reducing the prevalence of smokeless tobacco use, mitigating health disparities, and fostering healthier behaviors within affected communities. Exploring the diverse array of policies and interventions sheds light on the multifaceted approach required to address the complex challenges posed by smokeless tobacco [3, 24].
Public health policies serve as a critical foundation for addressing smokeless tobacco use. Regulations that limit advertising, sales, and accessibility of smokeless tobacco products play a crucial role in curbing initiation rates, particularly among vulnerable populations. Public health campaigns that raise awareness about the health risks associated with smokeless tobacco use also contribute to changing attitudes and behaviors. The synergy of policies and awareness initiatives is essential for curbing the prevalence of smokeless tobacco use and promoting a culture of informed decision-making [3].
Evidence-based interventions form the core of public health efforts to address smokeless tobacco use. These interventions encompass a range of strategies, from school-based educational programs to community support initiatives. Engaging communities through culturally sensitive approaches ensures that interventions resonate with the target audience, encouraging them to make informed choices about tobacco use. By leveraging evidence-based practices, public health initiatives can empower individuals to quit smokeless tobacco and build healthier lives [24, 30].
While public health policies and interventions have made significant strides, challenges persist. Adapting to evolving tobacco products and marketing strategies requires continuous vigilance and updates to regulations. Moreover, addressing health disparities requires tailored interventions that acknowledge the unique challenges faced by different populations. Future directions must prioritize innovation, collaboration, and data-driven decision-making to design effective strategies that not only reduce smokeless tobacco use but also contribute to the overall improvement of public health outcomes [24, 30].
In conclusion, public health policies and interventions play a pivotal role in the fight against smokeless tobacco use. By regulating access, raising awareness, and empowering communities, these efforts contribute to a healthier society. Recognizing the challenges and adapting strategies to the ever-changing landscape of tobacco use is essential for achieving equitable health outcomes and reducing the impact of smokeless tobacco on individuals and communities [24, 30, 31].
4.1 Regulation and advertising restrictions
This subsection discusses the role of regulations and advertising restrictions in curbing the appeal of smokeless tobacco products, particularly among vulnerable populations [32, 33]. In the realm of smokeless tobacco, the critical role of regulation and advertising restrictions cannot be overstated. These mechanisms serve as crucial safeguards against the proliferation of smokeless tobacco use, especially among vulnerable populations. Understanding the impact of regulations and advertising restrictions is paramount for dismantling the influence of smokeless tobacco and fostering healthier communities [34].
Regulation forms the cornerstone of efforts to combat smokeless tobacco use. Policies that govern the manufacturing, sales, and marketing of smokeless tobacco products play a pivotal role in reducing accessibility and curbing initiation rates. By setting age restrictions, enforcing packaging warnings, and limiting product availability, regulations create barriers that discourage both uptake and continuation of smokeless tobacco use. The convergence of evidence-based policies and regulatory measures is essential for dismantling the allure of smokeless tobacco products, particularly among youth [33, 35].
Advertising restrictions are instrumental in mitigating the influence of smokeless tobacco marketing. Limiting the promotion and advertisement of smokeless tobacco products curtails their appeal, particularly to impressionable audiences. By curbing promotional activities that glamorize tobacco use, regulations undermine the normalization of smokeless tobacco, thereby reducing its allure. The synergy of advertising restrictions and public health campaigns contributes to shaping social norms that discourage the initiation and perpetuation of smokeless tobacco consumption [31, 35].
Regulation and advertising restrictions serve as key components of comprehensive strategies aimed at safeguarding public health. By creating barriers to initiation, curbing advertising influence, and fostering informed decision-making, these measures contribute to a culture of reduced smokeless tobacco use. The evolution of policies to address new challenges posed by emerging tobacco products is crucial for maintaining the effectiveness of regulation and advertising restrictions. Ultimately, a robust regulatory framework coupled with vigilant enforcement is essential for curbing the impact of smokeless tobacco and promoting healthier lifestyles [31, 36].
In conclusion, regulation and advertising restrictions play an indispensable role in combating smokeless tobacco’s influence. Through evidence-based policies and limitations on promotional efforts, these mechanisms contribute to reducing initiation rates and dismantling the allure of smokeless tobacco products. The synergy of regulation, advertising restrictions, and public awareness campaigns forms a formidable arsenal against the tobacco industry’s tactics, fostering a healthier future for individuals and communities [31, 36].
4.2 Cessation programs and awareness campaigns
Effective cessation programs and awareness campaigns can promote healthier behaviors. This section examines the impact of such initiatives in reducing smokeless tobacco use and improving health outcomes [30]. The fight against smokeless tobacco’s adverse effects hinges on the potency of cessation programs and awareness campaigns. These pillars of public health endeavor to empower individuals to quit smokeless tobacco use and educate communities about its perils. Understanding the significance of effective cessation strategies and impactful awareness initiatives is vital for achieving a tobacco-free future and reducing the burden of health disparities [34, 37].
Cessation programs stand as guiding beacons for individuals seeking to break free from smokeless tobacco’s grip. These programs offer tailored strategies, resources, and support networks to empower users on their quitting journey. By addressing the physical, psychological, and social aspects of addiction, cessation programs enhance the chances of successful quitting. Collaborations between healthcare professionals, counselors, and community organizations amplify the impact of these programs, ensuring that individuals receive the comprehensive assistance they need to overcome their tobacco dependence [38].
Awareness campaigns wield the power to shift societal attitudes towards smokeless tobacco use. By disseminating factual information about the health risks, social consequences, and potential pitfalls of tobacco consumption, these campaigns challenge misperceptions and debunk myths. Engaging multimedia platforms, compelling narratives, and relatable stories amplify the reach of awareness campaigns, fostering an informed citizenry that is more equipped to make tobacco-free choices. By normalizing quitting behaviors and emphasizing the benefits of a tobacco-free life, awareness campaigns inspire change on both individual and communal levels [34].
Cessation programs and awareness campaigns synergistically contribute to a tobacco-free future. As cessation programs provide tailored support for quitting, awareness campaigns disseminate vital information that bolsters motivation and decision-making. By investing in the development of evidence-based cessation strategies and crafting compelling awareness messages, public health initiatives can drive societal transformation. The concerted efforts of these programs and campaigns hold the potential to unravel the grip of smokeless tobacco, promoting healthier lives and contributing to a society that champions well-being over addiction [34, 37].
In conclusion, cessation programs and awareness campaigns constitute essential tools in the fight against smokeless tobacco. Through tailored support and widespread education, these mechanisms empower individuals to quit and foster informed communities. By amplifying the impact of these efforts, public health initiatives can pave the way for a tobacco-free future that benefits individuals, families, and societies at large [34].
5. Concrete solutions and innovative recommendations
While it is essential to identify the factors contributing to smokeless tobacco use and associated health disparities, it is equally important to offer concrete solutions and innovative recommendations. Here are some specific strategies that can be implemented to address this complex issue:
5.1 Targeted workplace interventions
5.1.1 Concrete solution
Collaborate with employers to implement workplace wellness programs that specifically address tobacco cessation. Provide incentives for employees who participate in cessation programs and achieve successful outcomes.
5.1.2 Innovative recommendation
Utilize technology-based interventions, such as mobile apps or virtual coaching, to deliver personalized cessation support to employees. These platforms can offer real-time tracking of progress, access to educational resources, and instant communication with cessation counselors.
5.2 Socio-economic empowerment
5.2.1 Concrete solution
Establish community-based economic empowerment programs that provide skills training, job placement assistance, and financial literacy education. By improving economic stability, individuals may be less likely to turn to smokeless tobacco as a coping mechanism.
5.2.2 Innovative recommendation
Explore microfinance initiatives or community-driven entrepreneurship opportunities tailored to vulnerable populations. These initiatives can foster economic independence and reduce the reliance on smokeless tobacco.
5.3 Culturally tailored interventions
5.3.1 Concrete solution
Engage community leaders and cultural influencers in the development and delivery of anti-tobacco campaigns. Leverage culturally relevant messaging, events, and media channels to increase awareness about the harms of smokeless tobacco.
5.3.2 Innovative recommendation
Implement peer-led interventions within culturally distinct communities. Trained community members can serve as mentors and advocates, offering support and guidance to those seeking to quit smokeless tobacco.
5.4 Policy advocacy and regulatory innovation
5.4.1 Concrete solution
Advocate for comprehensive policies that restrict the marketing, sale, and distribution of smokeless tobacco products. Support initiatives that raise taxes on tobacco products to reduce affordability and discourage use.
5.4.2 Innovative recommendation
Explore emerging technologies, such as blockchain or digital verification systems, to track and regulate the supply chain of tobacco products. This could enhance the enforcement of existing regulations and deter illicit trade.
5.5 Integrating mental health support
5.5.1 Concrete solution
Integrate mental health services within tobacco cessation programs. Recognize and address the underlying psychological factors that may contribute to smokeless tobacco use, such as stress or anxiety.
5.5.2 Innovative recommendation
Implement virtual reality (VR) or augmented reality (AR) therapies as adjuncts to traditional counseling. These immersive experiences can provide innovative tools for managing cravings and stressors associated with quitting tobacco.
By incorporating these concrete solutions and innovative recommendations, public health efforts can move beyond generic interventions and address the root causes of smokeless tobacco use. These strategies take a holistic approach, considering socio-economic, cultural, and psychological factors, ultimately leading to more effective and sustainable outcomes in reducing smokeless tobacco-related health disparities.
6. Conclusion
In conclusion, this chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms contributing to health inequities related to smokeless tobacco use. By dissecting the socio-economic and cultural dimensions, as well as evaluating the impact of public health policies, we have gained insights into the intricate web of factors driving these disparities. By addressing these mechanisms, policymakers and public health practitioners can design targeted strategies to reduce smokeless tobacco-related health inequities and improve overall population health [3].
In the pursuit of understanding the multifaceted landscape of smokeless tobacco, this exploration delved into key dimensions that unravel its mechanisms and implications. Through examining socio-economic factors, gender dynamics, public health policies, cultural influences, and cessation efforts, a comprehensive view emerges of the intricate interplay between smokeless tobacco use and health disparities [18].
As socio-economic factors intersect with smokeless tobacco use, it becomes evident that vulnerable populations face a disproportionate burden of health inequities. The convergence of low income, limited access to healthcare, and societal norms often magnifies the challenges faced by these communities. Addressing health disparities requires a multifaceted approach that encompasses policies targeting affordability, accessibility, and awareness [25].
Gender dynamics add another layer to the complex narrative of smokeless tobacco use. Societal perceptions of masculinity and femininity influence initiation patterns and continuation behaviors, contributing to disparities in prevalence and health outcomes. Efforts to mitigate these disparities necessitate tailored interventions that address the distinct drivers of tobacco use within different gender identities [28].
Public health policies and interventions emerge as critical tools in dismantling the influence of smokeless tobacco. By regulating product availability and curbing advertising influence, these measures create a more conducive environment for individuals to make informed choices. Cessation programs and awareness campaigns synergistically empower individuals to quit tobacco use and encourage communities to prioritize their well-being [31].
In conclusion, navigating the realm of smokeless tobacco use requires a comprehensive understanding of its mechanisms and implications across socio-economic, gender, and cultural contexts. By weaving together evidence-based policies, culturally sensitive interventions, and informed awareness campaigns, public health endeavors can work towards a future free from the grasp of smokeless tobacco. This holistic approach not only empowers individuals but also fosters communities that champion healthier lives and equitable health outcomes.
References
- 1.
Kakde S, Bhopal R, Jones C. A systematic review on the social context of smokeless tobacco use in the South Asian population: Implications for public health. Public Health. 2012; 126 (8):635-645 - 2.
Dilley JA, Peterson E, Bobo M, et al. Tobacco use prevalence–disentangling associations between Alaska Native race, low socio-economic status and rural disparities. International Journal of Circumpolar Health. 2013; 72 (1):21582 - 3.
Gupta PC, Arora M, Sinha D, et al. Smokeless Tobacco and Public Health in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2016 - 4.
Azagba S, Shan L, Latham K, et al. Disparities in adult cigarette smoking and smokeless tobacco use by sexual identity. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2020; 206 :107684 - 5.
Thakur JS, Prinja S, Bhatnagar N, et al. Socioeconomic inequality in the prevalence of smoking and smokeless tobacco use in India. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention: APJCP. 2013; 14 (11):6965-6969 - 6.
Gupta PC, Ray CS, Sinha DN, et al. Smokeless tobacco: A major public health problem in the SEA region: A review. Indian Journal of Public Health. 2011; 55 (3):199-209 - 7.
Barik A, Rai RK, Gorain A, et al. Socio-economic disparities in tobacco consumption in rural India: Evidence from a health and demographic surveillance system. Perspectives in Public Health. 2016; 136 (5):278-287 - 8.
Patel R, Kumar P, Srivastava S, et al. Change in socio-economic inequality of tobacco consumption among men in India: Evidence from National Family Health Survey 2005-06 to 2015-16. Journal of Substance Use. 2021; 26 (4):404-412 - 9.
Hatsukami D, Zeller M, Gupta P, et al. Smokeless Tobacco and Public Health: A Global Perspective. 2014. Available from: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/43373 - 10.
Adrien J, Bertolus C, Gambotti L, et al. Why are head and neck squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed so late? Influence of health care disparities and socio-economic factors. Oral Oncology. 2014; 50 (2):90-97 - 11.
Sreeramareddy CT, Pradhan PMS, Mir IA, et al. Smoking and smokeless tobacco use in nine South and Southeast Asian countries: Prevalence estimates and social determinants from Demographic and Health Surveys. Population Health Metrics. 2014; 12 :1-16 - 12.
Lee JG, Henriksen L, Rose SW, et al. A systematic review of neighborhood disparities in point-of-sale tobacco marketing. American Journal of Public Health. 2015; 105 (9):e8-e18 - 13.
Fagan P, Moolchan ET, Lawrence D, et al. Identifying health disparities across the tobacco continuum. Addiction. 2007; 102 :5-29 - 14.
Schensul JJ, Nair S, Bilgi S, et al. Availability, accessibility and promotion of smokeless tobacco in a low-income area of Mumbai. Tobacco Control. 2013; 22 (5):324-330 - 15.
Pampel FC. The persistence of educational disparities in smoking. Social Problems. 2009; 56 (3):526-542 - 16.
Rawat R, Gouda J, Shekhar C. Smokeless tobacco use among adult males in India and selected states: Assessment of education and occupation linkages. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment. 2016; 26 (2):236-246 - 17.
Sorensen G, Gupta PC, Pednekar MS. Social disparities in tobacco use in Mumbai, India: The roles of occupation, education, and gender. American Journal of Public Health. 2005; 95 (6):1003-1008 - 18.
Bharati B, Sahu KS, Pati S. Prevalence of smokeless tobacco use in India and its association with various occupations: A LASI study. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023; 11 :1005103 - 19.
Syamlal G, Jamal A, Mazurek JM. Combustible tobacco and smokeless tobacco use among working adults—United States, 2012 to 2014. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2016; 58 (12):1185-1189 - 20.
Gaur T, Rao DS, Jadhav AA, et al. Nicotine dependence, perceived stress, and self-efficacy among primary health care professionals during the times of Covid-19 pandemic - A cross-sectional descriptive study. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2021; 10 (11):4124-4130 - 21.
Stein RJ, Pyle SA, Haddock CK, et al. Reported stress and its relationship to tobacco use among US military personnel. Military Medicine. 2008; 173 (3):271-277 - 22.
Syamlal G, King BA, Mazurek JM. Tobacco product use among workers in the construction industry, United States, 2014-2016. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2018; 61 (11):939-951 - 23.
Nemeth JM, Liu ST, Klein EG, et al. Factors influencing smokeless tobacco use in rural Ohio Appalachia. Journal of Community Health. 2012; 37 :1208-1217 - 24.
Siddiqi K, Dogar O, Rashid R, et al. Behaviour change intervention for smokeless tobacco cessation: Its development, feasibility and fidelity testing in Pakistan and in the UK. BMC Public Health. 2016; 16 (1):1-15 - 25.
Sansone G. Acceptability of Female Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco use in Bangladesh and India. 2014. Available from: https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/8936/Sansone_Genevieve.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y - 26.
Rodu B, Stegmayr B, Nasic S, et al. Impact of smokeless tobacco use on smoking in northern Sweden. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2002; 252 (5):398-404 - 27.
Sharma SK, Vishwakarma D, Puri P. Gender disparities in the burden of non-communicable diseases in India: Evidence from the cross-sectional study. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2020; 8 (2):544-549 - 28.
Radhika A, Preetha G, Neogi SB. Need for gender focused policies addressing smokeless tobacco use among women in India: A review. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention: APJCP. 2021; 22 (S2):7-12 - 29.
Huque R, Zaman MM, Huq SM, et al. Smokeless tobacco and public health in Bangladesh. Indian Journal of Public Health. 2017; 61 (Suppl):S18 - 30.
Levy DT, Mays D, Boyle RG, et al. The effect of tobacco control policies on US smokeless tobacco use: A structured review. Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2017; 20 (1):3-11 - 31.
Bates C, Fagerström K, Jarvis M, et al. European Union policy on smokeless tobacco: A statement in favour of evidence based regulation for public health. Tobacco Control. 2003; 12 (4):360-367 - 32.
Food, Drug Administration H. Regulations restricting the sale and distribution of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco to protect children and adolescents. Final rule. Federal Register. 2010; 75 (53):13225-13232 - 33.
Klein EG, Ferketich AK, Abdel-Rasoul M, et al. Smokeless tobacco marketing and sales practices in Appalachian Ohio following federal regulations. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2012; 14 (7):880-884 - 34.
Turk T, Murukutla N, Gupta S, et al. Using a smokeless tobacco control mass media campaign and other synergistic elements to address social inequalities in India. Cancer Causes & Control. 2012; 23 :81-90 - 35.
Ribisl KM, D’Angelo H, Feld AL, et al. Disparities in tobacco marketing and product availability at the point of sale: Results of a national study. Preventive Medicine. 2017; 105 :381-388 - 36.
Klein EG, Quisenberry AJ, Shoben AB, et al. Health warning labels for smokeless tobacco: The impact of graphic images on attention, recall, and craving. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2017; 19 (10):1172-1177 - 37.
Murthy P, Saddichha S. Tobacco cessation services in India: Recent developments and the need for expansion. Indian Journal of Cancer. 2010; 47 (Suppl 1):S69-S74 - 38.
Mecklenburg RE. How to Help Your Patients Stop Using Tobacco: A National Cancer Institute Manual for the Oral Health Team. The Institute; 1996. pp. 53-55