Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Perspective Chapter: Theoretical Foundations of the Extraction Process

Written By

Shokhista Usmonovna Mirzaeva and Bakhodir Timurovich Muxamadiev

Submitted: 21 August 2023 Reviewed: 14 October 2023 Published: 26 February 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1004032

Sulfur Dioxide Chemistry and Environmental Impact IntechOpen
Sulfur Dioxide Chemistry and Environmental Impact Edited by Anandhavelu Sanmugam

From the Edited Volume

Sulfur Dioxide Chemistry and Environmental Impact [Working Title]

Dr. Anandhavelu Sanmugam and Dr. Vishnu Vardhan Palem

Chapter metrics overview

16 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The goal of the research is to create an environmentally friendly, resource-efficient technology for the production of ingredients from plant raw materials using liquefied gases. To a certain extent, this scientific research serves to fulfill the tasks specified in the decrees and decisions adopted in this direction and other normative documents: No. 63 of 27.01.2018 “Cultivation and industrialization of licorice and other medicinal plants in the Republic of Uzbekistan on the measures to further develop the processing method.” Decision of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan, President of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated January 7, 2022 No. PF-60 “Development Strategy of New Uzbekistan for 2022-2026 and the announced Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. “On measures to further accelerate work on systematic support of families and women” PF dated March 7, 2022 – The competition organized together with the Family and Women’s Committee under the Ministry of Poverty Alleviation and Employment within the framework of priority tasks defined in Clause 5.2 of Decree No. 87. In addition, experimental studies of the process of extracting ingredients from plant raw materials using diluted carbon dioxide in the example of namatak, chamomile grapes, pumpkin and melon seeds, fruit seeds, pomegranate peel, as well as beech root (other local raw materials) will be held. Experiments were conducted to determine the influence of the main factors on the extraction of vegetable oils (extracts) based on the developed plan of experiments, mathematical models of the process were obtained as a result of mathematical-statistical processing of the experimental results, rationalization of the influencing factors parameters (pressure in the extractor, process temperature and duration) values are determined.

Keywords

  • extraction
  • biologically active substances
  • temperature
  • pressure
  • extraction time
  • ingredients from plant raw materials

1. Introduction

Solid–liquid extraction is the extraction of one or more components from a complex solid by selective solubility. Extraction – extraction from a complex solid or liquid substance of one or more of its components using a solvent with selective solubility ([1, 2, 3], рp. 520–550; [4], р. 256; [5], р. 256; [6], р. 186; [7], p. 146).

The extraction process includes the following processes: diffusion, dialysis, dissolution, desorption, osmosis, and mechanical washing.

Diffusion is the process of gradual mutual penetration of substances that border on each other.

The extraction process goes as follows:

  1. The solvent diffuses into particles of raw materials, gets to the surface of the cell through intercellular pathways, and penetrates into the cell through the cell membrane.

  2. In the interior of the cell, following desorption, biologically active substances are dissolved in a solvent.

  3. Due to unequal concentrations, dialysis occurs – the transfer of ingredients from the cell through the cell wall.

  4. As a result of dialysis, a fixed diffusion part is formed on the outside of the plant material. The diffusion part is the countermeasure for extracting the ingredients, as inhibits the extraction of ingredients from the material.

  5. After passing through the diffusion part, the ingredients spread throughout the entire volume of the solvent according to the laws of free convective diffusion.

Extraction is based on experimental provided and production skills, which generalizes the concept of the influence of various factors on the extraction process ([8], рp. 11–34; [9], р. 416; [10], рp. 894–913).

The significance of extraction is explained by its ability to provide an almost exhaustive separation of dissolved components at low temperatures, which is the key to obtaining high-quality extracted substances ([3], рp. 520–550; [8], рp. 11–34). Traditional physical processing methods in oil and fat production are crushing, pressing, mixing, settling, filtering and thermal influence. Electrophysical and acoustic and other methods are considered non-traditional ([8], рp. 11–34; [11], рp. 40–42; [12], рp. 322–327).

Solvent extraction is the most widely used method in plant extraction. The principle is based on the transfer of a compound from a sample to an organic solvent ([13], рp. 169–198). These are very important operations in many industries such as chemical, biochemical, food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical industries ([14], рp. 37–70).

Solvents used as an extractant must be selective, readily available, low cost, and harmless.

Of the common methods for extracting extracts from plant materials with solvents, the following can be cited.

Maceration describes the soaking of solid plant material in a solvent at room temperature for a specified time. Thus, the solid is simply in contact with the solvent without any movement.

Usually, the extraction time is long and the efficiency is low. This can be explained by the fact that maceration is a process in which there is an equilibrium between the concentration of the extractable component in the plant material and the extraction solvent. This means that the extraction occurs until the equilibrium concentration of the extractable components in the solvent is reached. However, depending on the properties of the solvent, a significant amount of the desired components may remain in the plant material. Complete recovery requires repeated addition of fresh solvent, resulting in high specific solvent consumption.

If maceration is carried out at a constant elevated temperature, the method is called assimilation (Figure 1) ([15], рp. 310–314; [16], рp. 517–554; [17], рp. 377–387; [18], рp. 8615–8627; [19], рp. 136–137).

Figure 1.

Schematic diagram of maceration with extractant circulation. (1 - maceration tank; 2 - false perforated bottom; 3 - filter material; 4 – Pump).

Disadvantages of the method: duration of the process; insufficient depletion of raw materials, low yield of biologically active substances.

A further extraction technique is infusion. Here, the solid is immersed in a heated solvent, and the process proceeds without boiling, followed by cooling of the suspension. The most striking example of an infusion is the preparation of tea. In the case of a boiling solvent, the extraction method is called decoction. However, these methods are only applicable to thermostable compounds. However, it is a very fast and sometimes unavoidable extraction method ([14], рp. 37–70).

Unlike previously described techniques, percolation is a method of exhaustive coupling by extraction from plant material. For this, solid plant material is used, and the solvent passes through the fixed layer. As a rule, this process occurs under the action of gravity from top to bottom. In addition, adequate extraction efficiency can be achieved by recycling the extraction solvent and passing it through the plant multiple times. The advantage of this method is the relatively low mechanical stress on the hard material. Moreover, additional filtration is not required as the extract contains no particulate solids. The most striking example of percolation is the preparation of coffee in a coffee machine ([14], рp. 37–70; [15], рp. 310–314). Disadvantages of the method: energy consumption when supplying the extractant to the percolator (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Scheme of percolators-extractors. 1 - false bottom (perforated mesh); 2 - filtering material (burlap, linen, etc.).

The percolation method includes three consecutive stages: wetting of raw materials (swelling of raw materials), infusion, and percolation itself.

Another comprehensive method for extracting compounds using a suitable solvent is the Soxhlet method.

Typically, this method is performed in a laboratory setting to determine the total amounts of compounds that can be dissolved in the solvent used. The Soxhlet installation is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Soxhlet laboratory setup for the extraction of plant material. 1 – Hotplate; 2 - solvent; −; 3 – Extraction thimble with sample; 4 – Sealing valve 5 - steam riser pipe– 6 – Condenser.

The previously extracted solid plant material is placed in a porous extraction thimble. It mainly consists of cellulose fibers. After that, the vessel is placed in the chamber of the Soxhlet extractor. The solvent in the lower flask is then heated to boiling. The steam vapor passes through the ascending pipe to the condenser. There, the pure solvent condenses, enters the extraction vessel, and comes into contact with the plant material. A certain amount of solvent, the chamber is emptied through a special siphon. Decomposition of components can also occur in the bottom flask, as the solvent is kept at its boiling point for several hours ([15], pp. 310–314; [16], pp. 517–554; [19], pp. 136–137; [20], pp. 169–198).

Disadvantages of the method: relative high cost of equipment, increased consumption of the extractant, high energy costs, the threat of atmospheric pollution with a volatile organic solvent.

There are various methods to speed up and improve the extraction methods described above. The use of microwaves and ultrasound as a stimulator-intensifier of the process [21].

When using ultrasound in the extraction process in the “solid-liquid” system, the main mechanism is the destruction of the surface structure of the material ([20], pp. 68–87; [22], pp. 10–23), diffusion intensification ([23], pp. 124–130), capillary sound effects, and exposure to acoustic microwaves ([24], pр. 231–255), their passage through the cells ([25, pр. 134–149) and local thermal effects ([22], pp. 10–23; [24], pр. 231–255; [26], pр. 656–659).

Disadvantages of the extraction method using ultrasound: high cost of equipment, increased energy costs, indifferent to active substances, target components.

In recent years, extraction with the help of microwaves has been intensively studied and successfully applied in the “solid-liquid” method of extraction of plant materials. Microwave radiation can be used to rapidly extract certain classes of plant compounds ([27], pр. 1–14). Microwaves directly affect the water in the plant matrix cells. These cells are destroyed by the high pressure generated by the microwaves, releasing the plant compound. The substance is dissolved in an organic solvent and then fed for processing ([14], pp. 37–70; [28], pp. 530–554; [29], pp. 708–716).

The extraction can also be carried out with a microwave-absorbing solvent. However, high heat should be avoided to prevent thermal decomposition of plant compounds ([15], pр. 310–314). Microwave extraction has a number of advantages over traditional methods. First of all, compounds can be extracted more selectively and faster. At the same time, the consumption of energy and organic solvents is reduced ([13], pp. 517–554; [14], pр. 37–70; [15], pр. 310–314; [30], pр. 105–113).

Advertisement

2. Features of technological parameters and factors of the extraction process

During the extraction of biologically active substances from plant materials with supercritical fluids, various individual compounds are involved, which raises the question of the effect of these or other components of the initial raw materials during the extraction process ([31], pр. 47–65; [32], pр. 101–105).

The general patterns of extraction by liquefied gases have been studied for raw materials with a variety of textures. To date, under different conditions, scientists have extracted more than a hundred different biologically active substances from plant materials, of various histological structures ([32], рp. 47–65; [33], рp. 101–105).

Factors affecting the extraction with liquefied gases are: temperature and pressure, viscosity of the solvent, grinding and moisture content of the material, infusion time, duration, and hydrodynamics of the process ([31], рp. 47–65; [33], pр. 55–62; [34], pр. 23–32). Modification of important parameters of the extraction process - provides an opportunity to obtain products of the desired composition ([35], pр. 259–262; [36], pр. 70–93; [37], pр. 50–55).

Influence of temperature and pressure. Supercritical extraction is based on diffusion processes, where the rate of the final mass transfer, in particular, is determined by the values of the diffusion coefficients at each stage, otherwise depends on their diffusion resistances. The total resistance to mass transfer (Rtot.) is the sum of internal resistance (Rint.), resistance of the diffusion layer (sub-layer) (Rdif. layer.), and convective resistance (Rconv.):

Rtot.=Rint.+Rdif.layer.+Rconv.E1

Values Rdif. layer. and Rconv. (the second and third stages of extraction) are small and depend on the hydrodynamic conditions of the medium. On the efficiency of extraction at the first stage, the viscosity of the extractant, temperature, internal structure of the material, particle size of the extracted material and other factors are of decisive importance ([31], рp. 47–65).

Liquefied gases, having a low viscosity (1–2 orders of magnitude less than that of alcohol and water), excellent wetting and permeability, to a greater extent than other liquid extractants, affect the diffusion rate and solubility of the intracellular content contained in the material. This dependence is explained by the fact that with a decrease in viscosity, the diffusion coefficient (D) in the Einstein equation increases proportionally:

D=k·T6·π·η·rE2

whereat k – Boltzmann’s constant, 13805, Dj/К; T – absolute temperature, °К; π – 3,14; η – fluid viscosity, Pа·s; r – diffusing particle radius, m.

Temperature and pressure during the extraction of liquid CO2 in saturation, determine the chemical composition and quantitative yield.

Effect of temperature: Increasing the temperature at constant pressure leads to a decrease in the density of the liquefied CO2, thus reducing the solubility of the solvent ([31], pp. 47–65).

With an increase in the pressure of the CO2 extraction process, the extract yield increases.

The dependence of the increase in extraction efficiency on the increase in the temperature of the process is known, when the thermal movement of molecules is accelerated and the viscosity of the liquid components of the system decreases ([38], pp. 56–73).

Based on the position of thermodynamics that the critical point of a binary mixture is characterized by the vanishing of the first and second derivatives of the chemical potentials of the components, and from the fact that they are the driving force of isothermal molecular diffusion, the preferred development at this point is a significant slowdown in the extraction process.

Influence of the degree of grinding of raw materials. With flow extraction at a rate corresponding to the independent flow of the solvent through the plant material, the yield of components, other things being equal, was increased by 1.5–3 times and reduced in time as a result of a decrease in the particle size of the raw material ([38], pp. 56–73; [39], pp. 80–84; [40], pp. 23–40).

The larger the contact surface of the phases, the faster the extraction. But very fine powders for extraction cannot be used:

  1. A large amount of heavy substances, insoluble particles, and colloids pass from plant powders (destroyed cells) - a cloudy liquid that is difficult to clean is obtained;

  2. The fine powder forms a thick mass with the solvent, which resists the passage of the solvent (Table 1).

grass, leaves, flowersstems, roots and barkfruits and seeds
3–5 mm1–3 mm0.3–0.5 mm

Table 1.

The degree of grinding in different plant materials.

Influence of extraction duration. All production processes are efficient if they are short-term. The concentration of the obtained components is influenced not only by the level of crushing of the material but also by the duration of the extraction. For each type of plant material, under all other identical conditions, this value is characteristic. The study of the kinetic regularities of the extraction process with liquefied gases gives an idea of the rate of extraction of biologically active substances from plant materials.

Analyzing the dependence of the change in the content of extractable substances in the raw material on the duration of extraction, two periods of the extraction process can be distinguished. The first is the period of fast extraction, during which the process proceeds at the highest speed, and the second is the period of slow extraction, the speed of which is much lower ([40], pp. 23–40).

The time of the second extraction period is 35–40 minutes, characterized by the extraction of biologically active substances contained in microcapillaries and in the interior of intact cells. During this time, 5–10% of the components remaining in the plant material are removed. Diffusion of substances from whole cells of the material takes a long time, because of this, the duration of extraction is set by the diffusion coefficient.

Influence of persistence. The quantitative yield of the sum of extractive substances or an individual substance is influenced not only by the degree of grinding of raw materials but also by the time of the process. For each type of raw material, with all other conditions being equal, this value is individual. The low viscosity of the extractant, a large number of destroyed cells (due to the fact that in most cases the degree of grinding of raw materials is 0.25–0.50 mm) leads to the fact that with an increase in the time of infusion, not pure extractant penetrates into the cells, but a concentrated thick solution of cellular contents ([31], pp. 47–65).

Influence of humidity of extracted raw materials. The concentration of biologically active substances during extraction with liquefied gases significantly affects the moisture content of the plant material. How low the moisture content of the material, the more the concentration of the output of biologically active substances. By crushing plant material on a roller crusher with a moisture content of more than 10%, the extraction of substances from this material is difficult.

Influence of the speed of movement of the solvent on the yield of extracted substances. The significance of the coefficient of numerical mass transfer of the components is determined by the hydrodynamic conditions of the extraction process. As high as the speed of movement of the solvent, so much more concentrations of the substance pass due to convection diffusion (Table 2).

extraction time,
min
The yield of extractable substances (%) at
personal movement speed (cm3)
510
453.733.79

Table 2.

Yield of extractable substances at different speeds.

An analysis of the effect of the ratio of raw materials: extractant showed that the amount of fresh solvent does not have a significant effect on the residual content of extractives in the raw materials, in contrast to, for example, the degree of grinding of the raw materials.

The density of the raw material layer in the extractor is also of great importance; with an increase, the transverse unevenness of the transition of the extractant to stagnant zones increases, where the solvent either does not move at all, or moves at a low speed, which slows down the extraction in such places.

Mixing significantly reduces the thickness of the boundary layer, increases the coefficient of external diffusion, and the volumetric velocity of the liquefied gas.

The limiting factor for the widespread introduction of the extraction of plant materials with liquefied and compressed gases is the underestimation of the biological value of the products obtained and the lack of specially designed standard equipment, control systems and safety of these processes ([31], pp. 47–65).

Advertisement

3. Analysis of the process and design of extraction plants using CO2

The development of methods of energy-saving technologies that allow obtaining new high-quality products in the pharmaceutical, perfumery, cosmetology and food industries is due to the acute social need for high-quality medicines and food products, as well as in environmentally friendly industries ([41], pp. 16–27).

The determining factor in the production of high-grade food products is the enrichment of their composition with the missing natural ingredients.

Analysis of scientific, technical and patent literature shows, on the one hand, the prospects of using liquefied and compressed inert gases as extractants of valuable components from vitamin-containing plant materials, on the other hand, the absence of a unified system of scientifically based use in the food industry – carbon dioxide.

In addition to technological advantages, the use of carbon dioxide as a solvent is economically beneficial, since it is a relatively cheap and readily available volatile solvent.

Despite significant advances in the field of subcritical CO2 extraction, there is today a large gap between research and development and the speed of their implementation in industry. A number of studies have been carried out on the extraction of biologically active components from raw materials with carbon dioxide in a pre- and supercritical state ([42], pp. 251–253; [43], pp. 26–29; [44], pp. 108–114; [45], pp. 136–148; [46], p. 324; [47], p. 207). Within the framework of the second industrialization of industry, the prospects for the extraction of target substances from raw materials with gases in various phase states are determined ([48]; pp. 368–371; [49], pp. 36–41; [50]; [51], p. 106, pp. 196–199; [52], pp. 35). The analysis of the combinatorial algorithm of the CO2-extraction process was carried out ([53], pp. 100–102; [54], pp. 124–125; [55], pp. 217–223). Much attention is paid to the technical equipment of extraction gas-liquid enterprises ([56], pp. 1354–1365; [57], p. 445). Over the past decade, several examples of pilot large-scale projects have been reported to implement a technological and economic strategy for the production and use of CO2 extracts ([54], pp. 124–125; [58], pp. 260–269; [59], pp. 74–77; [60], pp. 8–33; [61], p. 43).

In general, pure chemicals can be in various states of aggregation depending on pressure and temperature. On Figure 4 shows the phase diagram of carbon dioxide (CO2). Using this diagram, you can understand what state a substance is in at a given pressure and temperature. In particular, there are four different regions in which the substance is in one phase: solid (t), liquid (l), gaseous (g), and supercritical (SC) ([62]; pp. 119–134).

Figure 4.

Phase diagram of carbon dioxide.

The point at which the evaporation curve ends is called the “critical point.” It is characterized by a critical temperature Tc and a critical pressure Pc ([62], p. 119–134; [63], pp. 1766–1778). The critical point of carbon dioxide is at Tc = 31,1°C и Pc = 7,38 МPа ([64], [65], pp. 15–16).

For the development of extraction technology, PVT data (specific volume depending on pressure and temperature), viscosity, diffusion coefficients, solubility, density dependence on V and T are of great importance.

At 40°C, the gas density changes sharply within the limits of up to 20 MPa, it increases to 785.13 kg/m3, i.e. exceeds the density of liquid carbon dioxide (at 20°С and Р = 5.9 MPa). At a pressure above 30 MPa, the gas density increases more smoothly (at 40 MPa 924.05, kg/m3, at 60 MPa 1000 kg/m3) ([66], pp. 8–12). The density of a gas depends not only on pressure but also on temperature. At a pressure of 20 MPa and a temperature of 40°C, the gas density is ρ = 785.13 kg/m3, at 100°C - ρ = 481.3 kg/m3, at 200°C - ρ = 258.15 kg/m3 (Figure 4).

Supercritical extraction technology finds its application in food, cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries ([64], [67], pp. 977–982; [68, 69], pp. 1–106.).

Extraction with supercritical carbon dioxide is used to extract volatile (e.g. essential oil) and/or non-polar (e.g. fats, waxes) compounds from plant materials. There are many variables that must be considered in order to optimize the extraction yield and selectivity of supercritical extraction ([29], pp. 708–716; [70], pp. 771–782; [71], pp. 2–24; [72], pp. 1–37). However, in most cases of extraction from plant materials, the diffusion of the target compound from the matrix is usually the rate-limiting step ([73], pp. 320–325). This can be avoided either by increasing the temperature and hence the volatility of the compound, or by using high solvent densities. To achieve good selectivity of SC extraction, the density of the solvent must be carefully controlled ([16], pp. 517–554; [70], pр. 771–782; [74], [75], pp. 1–15, [76], pp. 143–149, [77], pр. 1–5; [78], pр. 58–69; [79], pp. 27–51).

Modifiers are used to improve the extraction ability of supercritical – CO2, among which methanol is the most commonly used co-solvent for supercritical extraction due to its polar properties and good miscibility with CO2 ([70], рp. 771–782). Longer extraction times increase the extraction yield of most compounds. A distinction should be made between static and dynamic extraction. It has been shown that a preliminary static extraction step can increase the yield as the contact of the sample with the solvent is improved ([71], pр. 2–24; [76], pр. 143–149). The flow rate of supercritical carbon dioxide through the extraction vessel also has a strong influence on the extraction efficiency ([71], pр. 2–24; [72], р. 1–37). Reducing the particle size of the plant material leads to an increase in surface area and facilitates the process. However, excessive grinding of the solid can make extraction difficult due to re-adsorption of the target compounds on the surface of the matrix. ([71], рp. 2–24; [76], рp. 143–149; [80], рp. 22–26).

Our country is very rich in plant raw materials for the production of food biologically active substances, pharmaceutical substrates, as well as perfumery raw materials. But so far no thorough research has been conducted on this topic in Uzbekistan.

Improving the technique and technology of extraction of plant raw materials with carbon dioxide is possible on the basis of research on both the extraction process itself, focused on local raw materials, and the operation of the entire complex of apparatuses of the extraction plant is very important in terms of obtaining high-quality products at a relatively low cost ([81], pp. 87–95).

The criteria for choosing a new extraction technology with liquefied CO2 are: separation by traditional methods is impossible or expensive or unsatisfactory; − at least one of the properties of liquefied and compressed gases solves the problem, the value of the resulting target product justifies the economic costs.

Liquid CO2 does not support the vital activity of microorganisms and molds, which makes it possible to obtain sterile products even when using raw materials contaminated with microorganisms, liquid CO2 is thermally stable at normal temperatures, and is chemically inert. The separation of the solvent from the extract is possible either by lowering the pressure or by heating, which converts liquid CO2 into a gaseous state, while CO2 is released - extracts ([80], pp. 22–26).

The use of liquefied carbon dioxide as an environmentally friendly solvent is one of the rapidly developing areas in the development of the latest state-of-the-art gas-liquid technologies.

In the supercritical state, gases are substances used as solvents at temperatures and pressures exceeding the critical value. Many gases have a critical temperature close to room temperature and a critical pressure in the range of 5.0–8.0 MPa, which makes them very convenient and inexpensive to use in industry.

The extensive formation of technologies using supercritical gases is associated with the use of their unique properties. This is a combination of the properties of gases at high pressures (low viscosity, high diffusion coefficient) and liquids (high dissolving power). With this, the dissolving power of supercritical gases is very sensitive to changes in pressure or temperature ([82], pp. 47–49).

Very prominent is the possibility of carrying out a rapid mass transfer, carried out due to the low viscosity and high diffusion coefficient; the combination of low interfacial intergrowth with low viscosity and high diffusion coefficient, which makes it easier for supercritical gases to penetrate porous media compared to liquid solvents. The main condition is the easy decomposition of liquefied gases and substances extracted in them by pressure reduction.

Depending on the method of phase contact, extractors can be divided into three groups: stepped or sectional, differential-contact, and mixing-settlement ([5], p. 256; [83], p. 388).

  • In international technological practice, installations for carrying out CO2 - extraction are known, which can be cited as an example:

  • for extraction with liquefied gases at doktric parameters of pressure and temperature;

  • for extraction with liquid gases at a pressure above and a temperature below the critical one;

  • for extraction with compressed supercritical gases;

  • with mixed processes – multi-stage ([60], pp. 8–33; [84], pp. 21–26; [85], pp. 394–399; [86], pp. 166; [87], pp. 388–389).

At present, CO2 extraction plants have a number of disadvantages. For example, in the extraction shop of the Yuventa company (Krasnodar), extraction modules manufactured in the last century were installed. Part of the equipment of the modules is not made of stainless steel but of ferrous metal. There is no installation for mixing raw materials with solvents ([46], p. 324; [88], pp. 43–46).

The most advanced equipment is installed in the extraction shop of Caravan LLC (Krasnodar). It provides for the delivery of liquid carbon dioxide in tank trucks with a capacity of up to 8 tons, high-pressure extractors with a capacity of up to 150 liters, and the possibility of quickly removing CO2 vapor from the evaporator to the condenser. The disadvantage of the workshop equipment is an irrational system for loading and unloading raw materials into extractors ([89], p. 152; [90], pp. 94–97).

The universal extraction module of Caravan Company LLC [91] is designed for the extraction of biologically active substances from plant raw materials with liquid CO2.

In the experimental plant of the Research Institute “Mir-Prod-Mash” (Moscow), extracting modules were produced, which include 2 extractors of 10 liters each, an evaporator and a condenser. However, the design of the module does not provide for intensive mass transfer in the “solid-liquid” system; as a result, the extraction of components from the raw material lasts 8 hours.

The formation of effective equipment samples is associated with the primary development of extraction modes and designs of individual units at laboratory facilities.

A schematic diagram of the installation for the extraction of ingredients from tea and medicinal raw materials with liquid CO2 is shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Schematic diagram of the installation for extraction with liquid carbon dioxide.

A feature of the improved laboratory setup is the inclusion of a vacuum pump 13 in the circuit, which allows air to be evacuated from the extractor and plant material weighed (Figure 6). Placement of miscello-receivers outside the body of the sealed apparatus makes it possible to select fractions of extractive substances depending on the duration of the process of extracting plant materials.

Figure 6.

Improved batch extraction plant.

Distinctive features include lining the internal surfaces of equipment with ceramic, metal-ceramic and carbon-plastic coatings, improving the drainage system of extractors due to drainage ceramic tubes, increasing the heat exchange surface of the evaporator and condenser ([89], p. 152; [90], pp. 94–97).

Figure 6 shows the hardware-technological scheme for the production of CO2 extracts, created in the conditions of the extraction shop of Caravan Company LLC (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Hardware-technological scheme for the production of CO2 extracts.

The developed devices ensure the achievement of results in the field of CO2 - the extraction of significant ingredients from plant material.

The patterns of interaction, functioning and development of technological processes based on the interaction of food products with CO2 in stable or changing phase states have been established, which made it possible to develop the scientific foundations of engineering solutions in the field of engineering and technology of CO2 - processing of plant material [92].

Apparatus and equipment for carbon dioxide extraction are classified in the following works ([79], pp. 27–51; [92], [93], p. 495; [94], [95], p. 390).

The following scientific study describes a multi-stage (subcritical / supercritical) pilot plant (Figure 8) from Separeco S.r.l. (Italy) ([96], pp. 358–363).

Figure 8.

Combined scheme of sub- and supercritical extraction of valuable components from plant materials.

According to the principle of operation, the devices can be divided into laboratory, experimental (desk or pilot) and industrial ([97], pp. 6–42; [98], p. 240).

The scientific work [98] describes in detail the process of assembling an apparatus for supercritical fluid extraction, created and manufactured at the Technical University Hamburg Harburg (TUHH) ([99], pp. 210–247).

In the construction of the following work, a greater porosity and porosity of plant raw materials is achieved, which contributes to a higher product yield and intensifies the process, reducing the extraction time [90, 91].

And the following study shows the installation (Figure 9) equipped with a device for superheating the solvent and a high-pressure pump, which makes it possible to extract the ingredients sequentially in the sub- and supercritical states of the solvent ([100], pp. 13–21).

Figure 9.

Scheme of the modernized installation for studying the process of CO2 extraction in the pre- and supercritical state of carbon dioxide.

Extracts obtained from plant materials using carbon dioxide are used in the food, perfume and pharmaceutical industries, as they are more environmentally friendly than extracts extracted by other traditional methods.

Advertisement

4. Licorice root and its chemical composition

Currently, reforms are being carried out in Uzbekistan in the field of protection of medicinal plants, rational use of natural resources, creation of plantations for growing medicinal plants and their processing [101].

In Uzbekistan, 4.3 thousand plants, of which 750 varieties are medicinal, 112 varieties are registered for use in scientific medicine, 70 species are used in the pharmaceutical industry.

By presidential decree No. 4670, reproductive organs, that is, seedlings, typical gray soils suitable for flat lands, moisture-loving, saline (cryptohalophytic) plant - licorice or licorice root (Glycyrrhiza glabra L.) are recommended for planting in all regions of the Republic of Karakalpakstan, Syrdarya, Khorezm areas [101].

There are about 13 types of licorice root (licorice) in the world. The most common species are: licorice naked (Glycyrrhiza glabra), Ural licorice (Glycyrrhizauralensis Fisch) and Korzhinsky licorice (Glycyrrhizaе KorshinskyiGrig). Licorice is the most popular among them, its roots contain the largest amount of biologically active substances (BAS) ([102], pp. 11–13; [103], p. 314).

Licorice root is a rather high-calorie product, 100 g contains 375 kcal. It contains no proteins, almost no fat (0.05 g), a small amount of fiber (0.2 g) and a lot of carbohydrates (94 g). Dried licorice roots have been widely used since ancient times as a food flavoring agent, sweetener, and for various medicinal purposes [104, 105].

The art of healing with the help of licorice root extracts, developed by Eastern medieval medicine, is summarized by Avicenna. Avicenna considered the nature of the licorice root to be balanced ([106], pp. 150–155).

Licorice root, as well as biologically active substances isolated from them, has a wide range of pharmacological properties ([107], pp. 13–26). To date, the results of more than 2 thousand scientific studies on the licorice root and its biologically active substances have been published, which confirms the great interest of pharmacologists in plants of this genus in many countries of the world. To date, licorice root in all countries is widely used in the food, pharmacological, cosmetology industries ([108], p. 210; [109], pp. 189–191; [110], pp. 108–114; [111], pp. 21–27).

Not to mention the fact that interest in licorice root has grown incredibly sharply over the past 20 years and it is in first place among herbal preparations ([112], p. 378).

Pharmacological and chemical properties of licorice root have been comprehensively studied by I. A. Muravyov, K. Z. Zakirov, V. I. Litvinenko ([113], p. 191).

In ([102]; With. 11–13) for the first time studied the chemical composition of the roots of licorice growing in the Samara region. Glycyrrhizic acid (triterpene saponin) and flavonoids - licurazid, liquiritin, liquiritigenin (flavonones) were isolated and identified from the roots of the licorice root using UV, 1H-NMR spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry, the results of chemical transformations; isoliquiritin, isoliquiritigenin (chalcones); ononin, formononetin (isoflavones).

A processed product, that is, licorice root extract, is very popular. Experts are unanimous that the global demand for finished products made from licorice root will constantly increase ([114], p. 466).

The scientific literature describes about 80 triterpenoids and over 300 individual phenolic compounds, several dozen polysaccharides, amino acids and many other substances that have a variety of pharmacotherapeutic properties found in the licorice root ([107], pp. 13–26; [115], pp. 16–19; [116], p. 83; [117], pp. 152–158; [118], pp. 1954–1969).

The main active ingredients and biologically active components of licorice root are triterpene glycosides (the most important of them is glycyrrhizic acid), the content of which can reach 25% by weight of dry material, various phenolic compounds, which account for 3–5%, glabridin and carbohydrates. The total content of extractive substances can reach 40% ([119], pp. 55–59).

The quality of the licorice root is standardized by the State Pharmacopeia (GF): the content of extractable components extracted by 0.25% ammonium hydroxide solution must be at least 25%, moisture not more than 14%, ash not more than 8%, glycyrrhizic acid – not less than 6% ([107], pp. 13–26; [120], pp. 11–13).

The licorice root contains biologically active substances such as: flavonoids up to 5.0%, carbohydrates up to 34.0%, proteins - up to 10.1%, amino acids up to 12.71%, including asparagine up to 4.0%, lipids up to 4.7%, vitamin C up to 3.1% ([107], pp. 13–26; [121], p. 175).

Glycyrrhizic acid with high-intensity sweetness (about 50 times more than sucrose), widely used in all countries as a biological additive in the food, beverage, cosmetic, pharmaceutical and tobacco industries ([122], p. 271; [123], pp. 55–72). The content of glycyrrhizic acid in licorice roots varies in the range of 2–24% ([124], pp. 166–168). Glycyrrhizic acid is highly soluble in ethanol and hot water, insoluble in cold ([120], pp. 145–158; [125], pp. 87–94; [126], pp. 32–34). Melting point (Tm) of glycyrrhizic acid is 220° C). The UV spectrum of glycyrrhizic acid shows that its maximum absorption peak is in the region of 254 nm ([127], p. 1331; [128], pp. 100–104; [129], pp. 87–91).

Glycyrrhizic acid was first extracted from the licorice root by the French scientist Pierre Jean Robiquet in 1809 and gave the name glycyrrhizin. After Z. Russin named glycyrrhizic acid in 1876 (Figure 10) ([107], pp. 13–26).

Figure 10.

Structural formula of glycyrrhizic acid.

Glycyrrhizic acid is active against a wide range of viruses, including herpes, corona, alpha, and flaviviruses, human immunodeficiency virus, type I poliovirus, vesicular stomatitis virus, and influenza A virus ([128], pp. 100–104; [130], pp. 1256–1259; [131], p. 333; [132], pp. 199–206).

Nowadays, the following phenolic compounds have been isolated and established from the licorice root: simple phenols (phenol, resorcinol, pyrogallol), phenolcarboxylic acids, hydroxycinnamic acids (ferulic acid, cinnamic acid, synapic acid).

To date, over 50 different flavonoids have been extracted and identified from licorice root. ([131], p. 333; [133], pp. 6–8; [134], pp. 34–80; [135], pp. 1027–1030).

The content of flavonoids in licorice roots is 3–6%. The work 136 presents the main flavonoids of liquorice root and their characteristics ([134], pp. 34–80).

Carbohydrates extracted from licorice root: established ([124], pp. 166–171; [135], pp. 1027–1030) that the carbohydrate content in the licorice root reaches up to 40%.

In ([136], pp. 10–24), the author studied the properties and chemical composition of various morphological organs of liquorice collected from the northern regions of the Republic of Uzbekistan. The chemical composition of licorice root is presented in Table 3.

Name of substancesContent, %
Substances extractable with a mixture of alcohol / benzene13.45
Easily hydrolysable substances11.20
Substances that are difficult to hydrolyze57.60
Reducing sugars15.50
Cold water extractable44.90
hot water extractable49.40
Cellulose according to Kirchner29.60
Nitrogen0.97

Table 3.

Chemical composition of licorice root.

Traditionally, licorice root is most actively (due to climatic features) grown in the north-west of Uzbekistan - in Karakalpakstan and the Khorezm region [137].

The president of the Japanese company, Naomasa Yoshida, emphasizes that the laboratories of Cokey Systems Co. Ltd. regularly test samples of licorice root from many countries, while licorice root from Uzbekistan is recognized as the best in the world in terms of its composition, thickness, smell and color and other quality attributes [138].

In Ref. ([139], pp. 1338–1340), the chemical characteristics of licorice root collected from Uzbekistan are given. A study of Glycyrrhiza glabra L. was carried out in Uzbekistan in August 2001 and above and below ground parts of the plant were collected from a site near Yangiyer, 100 km south of Tashkent. Licorice, which grows in Uzbekistan, contains glycyrrhizin up to 6.1% of dry weight.

In the study ([140], pp. 677–680), the author also identified flavonoids glycionide A and B - glucose (up to 15.2%), sucrose (up to 11%), starch, resinous substances, gums. There are many organic acids in the licorice root – salicylic, synapic, ferulic, caffeic and others. Coumarins, alkaloids, tannins, steroids, estradiol, vitamins C, B were also determined. K, Ca, Fe, Si, Sn salts are concentrated in the licorice root.

According to the literature, licorice root contains a number of biologically active substances, such as triterpene saponins, flavonoids, coumarins and other phenols, in accordance with Table 4 ([141], pp. 30–51; [142], pp. 1868–1886). The total volume of extractive biologically active substances isolated from licorice roots reaches 40% of the mass of the feedstock ([143], pp. 55–59).

Name of substancesContent, %
Extractives22.8–44.1
Triterpenoids7.3–23.6
Carbohydrates (glucose, sucrose, starch)18.2–34.0
Flavonoids3.0–4.0
Steroids1.5–2.0
Ascorbic acid1.1–3.1
Essential oils1.5–2.0
Asparagine1.0–4.0
Resinous substances1.7–4.1
Fats and fat-like substances0.2–4.7
Protein6.2–10.1
Comedy1.5–6.5
Bitterness insoluble (in water)1.8–4.0
Ash (total)4.9–9.7

Table 4.

The main biologically active substances of licorice root.

Most medicinal products based on licorice root require the introduction of modern methods of quality control into the regulatory documentation for the standardization of pharmacological substances of plant materials “Licorice Roots” ([107], pp. 23–31).

A solid extract is obtained by further evaporation of the thick extract to a solid state ([102], pp. 11–13; [144], [145], pp. 35–41). Tables 5 and 6 show the characteristics of licorice root.

Development phaseBiologically active substances
glycyrrhizin acidsugarflavonoids
regrowth7.67 ± 1.307.80 ± 2.121.15 ± 0.50
8.49 ± 1.354.92 ± 1.503.60 ± 0.22
bloom10.82 ± 1.819.19 ± 1.053.41 ± 0.85
6.85 ± 1.605.64 ± 1.000.92 ± 1.00
fruiting14.76 ± 0.506.65 ± 1.402.62 ± 0.46
10.96 ± 2.008.59 ± 0.351.05 ± 0.35

Table 5.

The content of glycyrrhizic acid, sugars, flavonoids in licorice roots depending on the vegetation phase, % of absolutely dry weight.

regrowthNPKCaMgCuMnZn
%g/kgmg/kg
bloom3.380.230.3212.375.229.6323.5020.63
2.670.230.3912.644.546.1311.5014.50
fruiting3.080.320.3513.621.915.5614.7520.50
2.880.380.3914.020.844.699.6311.25

Table 6.

The content of mineral elements in licorice root, in terms of absolute dry weight (averaged data).

In the licorice root, an important structure is glycyrrhetinic acid, which is found in a natural compound – glycyrrhizin.

The main pentacyclic triterpenoid isolated from licorice root extracts, glycyrrhetic (glycyrrhetic) acid, is active against test microbes of staphylococcal, intestinal, and spore-forming groups ([146], p. 311). Glycyrrhetic acid has shown a protective effect against C. albicans fungal infection in mouse models ([147], pp. 310–315), as well as staphylococcal pneumonia caused by bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (Figure 11) ([148]; pp. 201–206; [149], pp. 241–248).

Figure 11.

Structural formula of glycyrrhetic acid.

The antibacterial activity of sulfonamide GLA derivatives against gram-positive (S. aureus, Bacillus anthracis, Corynebacterium bovis) and gram-negative (Klebsiella pheumonie, Proteus vulgaris, Escherichia coli) bacteria has been established ([146], p. 311). However, the use of glycyrrhetic acid as a basic structure (scaffold) for the synthesis of its biologically active derivatives, as well as the study of the structure–activity dependence, is still a poorly studied direction ([148], pp. 201–206).

Phenolic compounds of licorice root have been sufficiently studied and widely presented in domestic and foreign publications ([147], pp. 1–158; [150], pp. 705–709; [151], pp. 4267–4272). Interest in licorice flavonoids is associated with their biological properties used in the production of medicines, food, technical and other products [152]. Interest in licorice flavonoids has especially increased over the past 20 years ([107], pp. 13–26; [116], p. 83; [153], pp. 7408–7414).

Essential oil (0,03%) ([154], pp. 5–14), it contains aldehydes, ketones, alcohols and their derivatives: ([155], pp. 1238–1241; [156], pp. 1179–1182); organic acids and their derivatives: propionic, phenylpropionic, caproic, caprylic, pelargonic acids and other compounds ([157], pp. 1179–1182); aromatic compounds ([154], pp. 5–14), tetramethylpyrazine ([156], pp. 1179–1182); higher aliphatic hydrocarbons: tetradecane; esters of higher fatty acids: ethyl talmitate, ethyl linoleate, ethyl linolenoate ([155], pp. 1238–1241); phenolcarboxylic acids and their derivatives: ferulic, synapic ([153]; p. 193), salicylic, salicylic acid acetate ([158], pp. 259–269); higher aliphatic hydrocarbons and alcohols (in the hydrolyzate): nonacosan, tetracosanol, octacosanol ([159], pp. 620–621); higher fatty acids (in the hydrolyzate): palmitic, oleic, etc. ([107], pp. 13–26; [160], pp. 159–162).

Licorice roots contain ash – 7.88%. Table 7 shows the macro and micro elements of the root.

macro elements, mkg/gmicro elements, mkg/g
КCaMnFeМgCuZnCrAlВаVSeNiSrPbВ
14.511.52.40.70.150.30.330.070.50.40.312.10.61.010.0354.8

Table 7.

Macro- and microelements of licorice root.

Licorice root is widely used in the food industry - extracts, syrups, as a sugar substitute and foam-forming drug in soft drinks (licorice extract is one of the main parts of Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola), beer, kvass, many drinks, are used in food preparation such as: coffee, cocoa, marinades, compotes, kissels, flour and whipped products, sweets, halvahs. They are added as a flavor additive - in the production of fish and as a bioadditive to long leaf and green tea. In Kyrgyzstan, they replace tea. In Japan – as a dietary antioxidant supplement; in Japan and Egypt – among component additives with bactericidal and fungicidal properties for food and drinks [157].

References

  1. 1. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On the development strategy of New Uzbekistan for 2022 – 2026” Presidential Decree −60 dated January 7, 2022
  2. 2. Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated May 16, 2017 No. PP-2970 “On measures to increase production and industrial processing of licorice root (licorice) in the Republic of Uzbekistan”
  3. 3. Kasatkin AG. Basic processes and apparatus of chemical technology. Chemistry. 1973:520-550
  4. 4. Romankov PG, Kurochkina MI. Extraction from solid materials. L.: 18 Chemistry. 1983:256
  5. 5. Akselrud GA, Lysyansky VM. Extraction (solid-liquid system). L.: Chemistry. 1974:256
  6. 6. Akselrud GA. Mass Transfer in the Solid-Liquid System. Lvov: Publishing house. Leningrad State University; 1970. 186 p
  7. 7. Beloborodov VV, Voronenko BA. Mass and Heat Transfer in Solid Porous Bodies. St. Petersburg; 1999. 146 p
  8. 8. Shortsky IA. Improving the process of extracting oilseeds based on the use of electrophysical influence. Dissertation for the degree of candidate of technical sciences. Krasnodar; 2016. pp. 11-34
  9. 9. Kopeikovsky VM, Danilchuk SI, Garbuzova GI. Technology of production of vegetable oils. M.: Light and Food Industry. 1982. 416 p
  10. 10. Koshevoy EP. Process of extraction of food media. In: V.A. Panfilov Theoretical Foundations of Food Technologies. Book 2. M.: KolosS; 2009. pp. 894-913
  11. 11. Shorstky IA, Koshevoy EP. Extraction with the application of a pulsed electric field. News from universities. Food Technology. 2015;(4):40-42
  12. 12. Amarni F, Kadi H. Kinetics study of microwave-assisted solvent extraction of oil from olive cake using hexane: Comparison with the conventional extraction. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 2010;11(2):322-327
  13. 13. Rowe DJ. Chemistry and Technology of Flavors and Fragrances. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2005. pp. 169-198
  14. 14. Chemat F, Strube J. Green Extraction of Natural Products: Theory and Practice. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2015. pp. 37-70
  15. 15. Bart HJ, Pilz S. Industrial Scale Natural Products Extraction. Wiley.Р; 2011. pp. 310-314
  16. 16. Sticher O. Natural Product Reports. 2008;25:517-554
  17. 17. Kassing M, Jenelten U, Schenk J, Strube J. Chemical Engineering and Technology. 2010;33:377-387
  18. 18. Chemat F, Vian MA, Cravotto G. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2012;13:8615-8627
  19. 19. List PH, Schmidt PC. Technologie pflanzlicher Arzneizubereitungen. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft; 1984. pp. 136-137
  20. 20. Galanakis CM. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2012;26(2):68-87
  21. 21. Rozzi N, Singh R. Supercritical fluids and the food industry. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2002
  22. 22. Shirsath SR, Sonawane SH, Gogate PR. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification. 2012;53:10-23
  23. 23. Yue L, Zhang F, Wang Z. Separation Science and Technology. 2012;47(1):124-130
  24. 24. Hamida T. Transport in Porous Media. 2007;70(2):231-255
  25. 25. Roselló-Soto E, Galanakis CM, Brnčić M, Orlien V, et al. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2015;42(2):134-149
  26. 26. Kaddur K, Tranquart F, Midoux P, Pichon C, et al. Proceedings IEEE Ultrasonics Symp. NY: IEEE; 2007. pp. 656-659
  27. 27. Chemat F, Cravotto G. Microwave-assisted extraction for bioactive compounds: Theory and practice. In: Chapter I: Microwave-Assisted Extraction: An Introduction to Dielectric Heating. Springer US; 2012. pp. 1-14
  28. 28. Rombaut N, Tixier A-S, Bily A, Chemat F. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. 2014;8:530-544
  29. 29. Luque de Castro MD, Jiménez-Carmona MM, Fernández-Pérez V. Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 1999;18:708-716
  30. 30. Kaufmann B, Christen P. Recent extraction techniques for natural products: Microwave-assisted extraction and pressurised solvent extraction. Phytochemical Analysis. 2002;13:105-113
  31. 31. Zilfikarov IN, Chelombitko VA, Aliev AM. Processing of Medicinal Plant Raw Materials with Liquefied Gases and Supercritical Fluids. Pyatigorsk; 2007. pp. 47-65
  32. 32. Aliev AM, Stepanov GV. Study of the influence of pressure on the process of supercritical extraction of biologically active substances from plant raw materials. Supercritical Fluids: Theory and Practice. 2006;1(1):101-105
  33. 33. Molchanov GI. Intensive processing of medicinal raw materials/G.I. Molchanov. M.: Medicine. 1981:55-62
  34. 34. Zhunusova MA. Pharmaceutical development of medicines from plant raw materials Scabiosa ochroleuca L. and Scabiosa isetensis L. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philology (PhD). Karaganda; 2019. pp. 23-32
  35. 35. Muhammadiev BT, Gafurov KK, Mirzaeva SU. Kinetics of supercritical CO2 extraction with a co-solvent of fat-containing materials from melon seeds. Collection of scientific papers: Modern problems of chemical technology of biologically active substances. Russian Chemical-Technological University named after. DI. Mendeleeva, M, 2016, pp. 259-262
  36. 36. Gafurov K, Muhamadiev B, Mirzaeva SU. Production Ingredients from Plant Raw Materials by CO2 Extruction. Lambert Academic Publishing, Monograph; 2018. pp. 70-93
  37. 37. Juraev HF, Gafurov KK, Muhammadiev BT, Kuldosheva FS, Mirzaeva SU. Determination of parameters for pre- and supercritical extraction of plant raw materials with carbon dioxide, Development of science and technology Bukhara Engineering and Technology Institute No. 1, 2018, B. 50-55.
  38. 38. Ponomarev VD. Extraction of medicinal raw materials/V.D. Ponomarev. M.: Medicine. 1976:56-73
  39. 39. Djuraev KF, Gafurov KH, Muhammadiev BT, Mirzaeva SU, Kuldosheva FS. The influence of the degree of grinding of plant raw materials on the rate of supercritical CO2 extraction, Development of science and technology Bukhara Engineering and Technology Institute No. 4, 2017, 80-84.
  40. 40. Mukhamedzhanova DM. Study of a complex of biologically active substances of various types of rose hips and the creation of medicines based on waste-free technology: dis. Dr. Pharmac. Sciences/Mukhamedzhanova D.M. M.: NIIF; 1995. pp. 23-40
  41. 41. Malashenko NL, Silinskaya SM, Korobitsyn VS. Highly Efficient Gas-Liquid and Sonochemical Technologies in the Food Industry, Monograph. Krasnodar; 2013. pp. 16-27
  42. 42. Biktashev SA, Yarullin LY, Gumerov F. Extraction of biologically active fatty acids from microalgae using a supercritical fluid CO2 extraction process. Bulletin of the Kazan Technological University. 2011:251-253
  43. 43. Zanin DE, Marchenko LA. Preparative subcritical and fluid CO2 extraction. In: On Sat. Mater. Intl. Scientific-Practical Conf. Innovative Technologies, Equipment and Additives for Processing Raw Materials of Animal Origin. 2018. pp. 26-29
  44. 44. Muhammadiev BT, Gafurov KH, Mirzaeva SU. Supercritical [SC]-CO2 extraction of glycyrrhizic acid from licorice roots. Butlerov Communications. 2017;T. 49(1):108-114
  45. 45. Herrero M, Cifuentes A, Ibañez E. Sub- and supercritical fluid extraction of functional ingredients from different natural sources: Plants, foodby-products, algae and microalgae. Food Chemistry. 2006;98:136-148
  46. 46. Stasyeva ON, Latin NN, Kasyanov GI. CO2 Extracts from the Karavan Company Are a New Class of Natural Food Additives. KNIIHP; 2005. 324 p
  47. 47. Gafurov KH, Mirzaeva SU. Supercritical CO2 extraction of glycyrrhizic acid from licorice roots. In: XI International Scientific and Technical Conference Engineering and Technology of Food Production Abstracts; Mogilev. 2019. p. 207
  48. 48. Borodikhin AS, Korobitsyn VS. Prospects for subcritical CO2 extraction. In: On Sat. Mater. Intl. Scientific-Practical Conf. Achievements and Problems of Modern Trends in the Processing of Agricultural Raw Materials: Technologies, Equipment, Economics. 2016. pp. 368-371
  49. 49. Koshevoy EP. Assessment of the properties of phases interacting in the process of CO2 extraction and determining hydrodynamic instability/Koshevoy E.P., Kosachev V.S., Rudich E.M., Shalyakhov A.A., Chundyshko V.Yu. New Technologies. 2013;(3):36-41
  50. 50. Lipin AB, Lipin VA. Phase Diagrams. St. Petersburg: State Technological University of Plant Polymers; 2015. 106 p
  51. 51. Mirzaeva SU, Mirzaev JV. The technological performance CO2 in supercritical fluids state. In: Innovations in the Food Industry and Service Electronic Collection of Materials from the IY International Scientific and Practical Conference; Krasnodar. 2020. pp. 196-199
  52. 52. Potekhin NA, Potekhin VN. The Concept of Innovative Development of Social Production - The Implementation of the Second Industrialization of Russia for the Period 2017–2022. Ekaterinburg: Sputnik; 2017. 35 p
  53. 53. Perov AG, Kosachev VS, Koshevoy EP. Analysis of a combinatorial algorithm in problems of scheduling the operation of a group of CO2 extraction plants. Izvestiya VuZov Food Technology. 2008;(5–6):100-102
  54. 54. Silinskaya SM. Combination of pre- and supercritical CO2 extraction processes in a single extraction module. Izvestiya VuZov Food Technology. 2005;(5–6):124-125
  55. 55. Silinskaya SM, Innochkina EV. Economic and mathematical method of pulsed CO2 extraction. Scientific Works of Kuban State Technical University. 2017;5:217-223
  56. 56. Silinskaya SM, Naryzhnaya NY, Tkachenko VV. Methods and means for assessing the effectiveness of technical equipment for the CO2 extraction system of plant raw materials. Polythematic Network Electronic Scientific Journal of KubSAU. 2017;132:1354-1365
  57. 57. Meretukov ZA, Koshevoy EP. Increase of efficiency of process of extraction of oil from vegetative raw material with application of dioxide of carbon. In: 21st International Congress of Chemical and Process Engineering, Chisa 2014 and 17th Conference on Process Integration, Modelling and Optimisation for Energy Saving and Pollution Reduction, PRES 2014 21. 2014. p. 445
  58. 58. Malashenko NL. Technological and economic strategy for the production and use of CO2 extracts. Polythematic Network Electronic Scientific Journal of KubSAU. 2012;(81):260-269. Scientific works of KubSTU, No. 1, 2019. Available from: http://ntk.kubstu.ru/file/2445374
  59. 59. Filippova EA. Application of CO2 extracts in the food industry. Bulletin of Michurinsk State Agrarian University. 2017;56(1):74-77
  60. 60. Kasyanov GI, Korobitsyn VS. Extraction of valuable components from plant raw materials by methods of pre- and supercritical CO2 extraction Monograph Krasnodar. 2010. pp. 8-33
  61. 61. Mirzaeva SU, Polyakova T. Production of environmentally friendly extracts from plant raw materials. In: XI International Scientific and Technical Conference Equipment and Technology of Food Production Abstracts; Mogilev. 2017. p. 43
  62. 62. Atkins P, de Paula J. Physical Chemistry. New York: W.H.Freeman and company; 2006. pp. 119-134
  63. 63. Moldover M. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1974;61:1766-1778
  64. 64. ChemicaLogic, Carbon Dioxide Phase Diagram - Sublimation, Saturation and Melting Line. Available from: http://www.chemicalogic.com/Pages/DownloadPhaseDiagrams.aspx [Accessed: February 06, 2016]
  65. 65. Supercritical fluid extraction—Technology of the 21st century. Storage and processing of agricultural waste. Household raw materials. N 1. 2005. pp. 15-16
  66. 66. Silinskaya CM, Malashenko NL. Theoretical foundations of pre- and supercritical extraction, news of universities. Food Technology. 2007;(3):8-12
  67. 67. Grace JD, Kennedy GC. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids. 1967;28:977-982
  68. 68. Armstrong ASB, de Reuck KM. International Thermodynamic Tables of the Fluid State- Carbon Dioxide. Vol. 3. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press Ltd.; 1976
  69. 69. Jessop PG, Leither W, editors. Chemical Syntehesis Using Supercritical Fluids. Weinhein, New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto: Willey-VCH; 1999. pp. 1-106
  70. 70. Lang Q, Wai CM. Talanta. 2001;53:771-782
  71. 71. Pourmortazavi SM, Hajimirsadeghi SS. Journal of Chromatography. A. 2007;1163:2-24
  72. 72. Reverchon E. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 1997;10:1-37
  73. 73. Modey WK, Mulholland DA, Raynor MW. Journal of Chromatographic Science. 1996;34:320-325
  74. 74. Brunner G. Gas Extraction: An Introduction to Fundamentals of Supercritical Fluids and the Application to Separation Processes. Steinkopff: Darmstadt; 1994
  75. 75. Modey WK, Mulholland DA, Raynor MW. Phytochemical Analysis. 1996;7:1-15
  76. 76. Bartle KD, Clifford AA, Hawthorne SB, Langenfeld JJ, Miller DJ, Robinson R. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 1990;3:143-149
  77. 77. Mohamed RS, AliMansoori G. The Use of Supercritical Fluid Extraction Technology in Food Processing. Food Technology Magazine. London, UK: The World Markets Research Centre; 2002. pp. 1-5
  78. 78. Vodyanik AR, Shadrin AY, Sinev MY. Supercritical fluid extraction of natural raw materials: World experience and the situation in Russia. Supercritical Fluids: Theory and Practice. 2008;3(2):58-69
  79. 79. Zalepugin DY, Tilkunova NA, Chernyshova IV, Polyakov VS. Development of technology based on the use of supercritical fluids. Supercritical Fluids: Theory and Practice. 2006;1(1):27-51
  80. 80. Gafurov KK, Mukhamadiev BT, Mirzaeva SU. CO2 extraction: Problems and prospects, “Development of science and technology” scientific and technical journal, Bukhara 2014, pp. 22-26
  81. 81. Safarov AF, Gafurov KK. The use of liquefied carbon dioxide as a solvent for the production of extracts from plant raw materials (review) Monograph Bukhara. 2014. pp. 87-95
  82. 82. Kasyanov GI, Korobitsyn VS, Rokhman SV. Installations for supercritical CO2 extraction. In: Sub- and Supercritical Fluid Technologies in the Food Industry, Proceedings of the International Scientific and Technical Internet Conference; Krasnodar. 2012. pp. 47-49
  83. 83. Romankov PG. Mass transfer processes of chemical technology. Systems with a dispersed solid phase [text]/P.G.Romankov, V.F.Frolov. L.: 75 Chemistry. 1990. 388 p
  84. 84. Gafurov KK, Safarov AF, Mirzaeva SU. Energy saving in an installation for extraction with supercritical carbon dioxide. Scientific Bulletin of BSU Scientific and Technical Journal. 2016;(1):21-26
  85. 85. Gafurov KH, Muhammadiev BT, Mirzaeva SU. Hardware design of the supercritical CO2 extraction process, modern aspects of production and processing of agricultural products. In: Collection of Articles Based on the Materials of the Y International Scientific and Practical Conference Dedicated to the 15th Anniversary of the Department of Technology for Storage and Processing of Livestock Products of Kuban State Agrarian University. Krasnodar; 2019. pp. 394-399
  86. 86. Gafurov KK, Artykov AA, Muhammadiev BT, Sh M. Obtaining Ingredients from Local Plant Raw Materials by CO2 Extraction. Monograph. Bukhara: Publishing house “Bukhara”; 2017. 166 p
  87. 87. Muhammadiev BT, Mirzaeva SU, Kuldosheva FS. Fluid extraction is a resource-energy-saving technology of the 21st century. In: XIII International Scientific and Technical Conference Engineering and Technology of Food Production Abstracts; Mogilev. 2020. pp. 388-389
  88. 88. Kasyanov GI, Korobitsyn VS, Zaporozhsky AA, Karamzin VA. Installation for supercritical CO2 extraction. In: International. Scientific-Practical Conf. Theory and Practice of Sub- and Supercritical Fluid Processing of Agriculture. Raw Materials. Krasnodar: KubSTU, Ecoinvest; 2009. pp. 43-46
  89. 89. Kasyanov GI, Latin NN, Banashek VM. Working mixture of liquefied gases for extraction. In: Materials of the International. Scientific-Practical Conf. Food Industry of the South of Russia. Krasnodar: KNIIHP; 2000. p. 152
  90. 90. Myakinnikova EI. Myakinnikova improving technological equipment for CO2 extraction. News of Universities. Food Technology No. 4, 2011, pp. 94-97
  91. 91. Available from: http://kuban-karawan.ru
  92. 92. Kasyanov GI. Extraction Capabilities of Carbon Dioxide in the Sub- and Supercritical State. Available from: http://docplayer.ru/72949506-Ekstrakcionnaye-vozmozhnosti-dioksida-ugleroda-v-sub-i-verhkriticheskom-sostoyanii.html
  93. 93. Koshevoy EP. Extraction with carbon dioxide in food technology/E.P. Koshevoy, Kh.R. Blagoz. Maykop, 2000. p. 495.
  94. 94. Kasyanov GA. Theory of Gas-Liquid Technologies. Available from: http://krkgi.ru/glav/co2tech/extraction.htm
  95. 95. Blagoz HR. Development of the scientific basis and development of processes and techniques for carbon dioxide extraction in the food industry. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Technical Sciences. Krasnodar; 2002. 390 p
  96. 96. Babova O, Occhipinti A, et al. Extraction of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) antioxidants using supercritical/subcritical CO2 and ethanol as co-solvent. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2016;107:358-363
  97. 97. Siyukhov HR. Improving the process of extracting plant materials with liquid carbon dioxide. Diss. On sois. uch. ut. Ph.D. Maykop; 2001. pp. 6-42
  98. 98. Beloglazov IN. Solid-phase extractors. L.: Chemistry. 1985. 240 p.
  99. 99. Johner JCF, de Almeida Meireles MA. Construction of a supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) equipment. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2016;36(2):210-247
  100. 100. Silinskaya CM. Development of intensive technology for obtaining blended CO2 extracts from plant raw materials using pre- and supercritical extraction methods, Abstract of thesis. on sois. account Ph.D. Krasnodar; 2006. pp. 13-21
  101. 101. Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. 4670 dated April 10, 2020. On Measures for the Protection, Cultivation, Processing of Wild Medicinal Plants and the Rational Use of Available Resources. Available from: https://lex.uz/docs/-4785256
  102. 102. Munir KS. Composition and properties of biologically active substances of glycyrrhizaeradices meal. Dissertation for the degree of candidate of Chemical Sciences. Kazan; 2017. pp. 11-13
  103. 103. Tolstikov GA. Licorice: Biodiversity, Chemistry, Medical Applications/G.A. Tolstikov, G.A. Baltina, L.A. Grankina, R.M. Kondratenko, T.G. Tolstikov. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of the Novosibirsk Institute of Organic Chemistry; 2007. p. 314
  104. 104. Makhlayuk VP. Medicinal Plants in Folk Medicine. Available from: https://www.oum.ru/literature/zdorovje/azbuka-trav-solodka
  105. 105. Available from: https://pryanalavka.com/liquorice.html
  106. 106. Avicenna. Canon of Medical Science. Tashkent: FAN; 1956. pp. 150-155
  107. 107. Brovchenko BV. Improving methods for quality control of crushed raw materials and licorice preparations. Diss. Ph.D. pharm. Sci. Moscow; 2020. pp. 13-26
  108. 108. Mirzaeva SU, Muhammadiev BT, Kuldosheva FS. Chemical composition of licorice (licorice). In: XI International Scientific and Technical Conference Equipment and Technology of Food Production Abstracts; Mogilev. 2019. p. 210
  109. 109. Mirzaeva SU, Mirzaev ZV. Study of supercritical CO2 - extracts of licorice leaves. In: Innovations in the Food Industry and Service Electronic Collection of Materials of the IY International Scientific and Practical Conference; Krasnodar. 2020. pp. 189-191
  110. 110. Gafurov KH, Muhammadiev BT, Mirzaeva SU. Supercritical [SC] CO2 extraction of glycyrrhizic acid from licorice roots. Butlerov Communications. 2017. Tatarstan;49(1):108-114
  111. 111. Juraev HF, Muhammadiev BT, Mirzaeva SU, Kuldosheva FS. Study of supercritical CO2 extracts of licorice leaves. In: International Scientific and Practical Correspondence Conference Biotechnological, Environmental and Economic Aspects of Creating Safe Food Products for Specialized Purposes; Krasnodar. 2020. pp. 21-27
  112. 112. Kondratenko RM. Glycyrrhizic acid and related triterpenoids of licorice root in the synthesis of promising biologically active compounds. Diss. doc. chem. Sci. Ufa2006. p. 378
  113. 113. Kuznetsova MA. Medicinal plant raw materials and preparations.
  114. 114. Litvinenko VI Licorice: taxonomy, chemistry, technology, standardization, pharmacology, clinic/V.I. Litvinenko, V.P. Georgievsky, A.S. Ammosov. T.P. Popova, N.S. Fursa - Yaroslavl: Avers Plus, 2014. - p. 466 (scientific edition)
  115. 115. Ermakova VA, Samylina IA, Kovaleva TY, Brovchenko BV, Dorovskikh EA, Bobkova NV. Licorice roots: Analysis of pharmacopoeial requirements. Pharmacy. 2019;6(68):16-19
  116. 116. Ammosov AS, Litvinenko VI, Popova TP. The Use of Licorice in World Practice: A Review of Patent Sources/Chemical-Pharmaceutical Production: Review Information. No. 1. M.: NIIEMP; 1998. p. 83
  117. 117. Tolstikov GA, Baltina GA, Grankin VP, et al. Licorice. Biodiversity, Chemistry, Medical Applications. Novosibirsk: ed. “GEO”; 2007. p. 152
  118. 118. Zhang Q, Ye M. Chemical analysis of the Chinese herbal medicine Gan-Cao (licorice). Journal of Chromatography A. 2009;1216:1954-1969
  119. 119. Rybalchenko AS. Study of licorice root extraction/A.S. Rybalchenko, V.P. Golitsyn, L.F. Komarova. Chemistry of Plant Raw Materials. 2002;(4):55-59
  120. 120. Egorov MV Standardization of raw materials and preparations of licorice: dis. ...cand. pharm. Sciences: 15.00.02/Egorov Maxim Valerievich. – Perm, 2005. – 11-13, 145-158 pp.: ill
  121. 121. Rezenkova OV Study of the influence of licorice extract on the processes of adaptation of the body: dis. ...cand. biol. Sciences: 03.00.13/Rezenkova Olga Vladimirovna. Stavropol. 2003. 175 p
  122. 122. Lvovna ME. Medicinal plants on a personal plot: textbook. allowance/E.L. Malankina. - M.: Fiton+, 2005 (JSC Yarosl. Polygraphic Comb.). 271 p. : tab., color. ill.; 22 cm; ISBN 5-93457-099-4 (translated)
  123. 123. Djuraev HF, Gafurov KK, Muhammadiev BT, Mirzaeva SU. Supercritical CO2 extraction of glycyrrhizic acid from licorice root: Optimization of extraction conditions using RSM (response surface methodology). Science News of Kazakhstan, Scientific and Technical Journal, Kazakhstan. 2019;(4):55-72
  124. 124. Denisova SB. Liquid-solid-phase extraction of the main classes of biologically active substances of licorice root: dis. ...cand. chem. Sciences: 02.00.04/Denisova Svetlana Borisovna. – Ufa, 2000. – 166-168 pp.: ill.
  125. 125. Tarasenko NA. Natural sweeteners and sweeteners for the prevention of diabetes mellitus/N.A. Tarasenko, N.R. Tretyakova. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2015;(2–2):87-94
  126. 126. Dorohovich AN. Natural (natural) sweeteners: Advantages and disadvantages from the perspective of use in the production of confectionery products/A.N. Dorohovich, O.M. Yaremenko, V.V. Dorohovich. Products & Ingredients. 2007;(4):32-34
  127. 127. German Pharmacopoeia, DAB 9, P.1331.
  128. 128. Abzhalelov BB. Preparation of glycyrrhizic acid from licorice root/B.B. Abzhalelov, S.Zh. Kuzhamberdieva, A.B. Asemov, A.T. Mustafa. International Journal of Experimental Education. 2016;(5–1):100-104
  129. 129. Brovchenko BV, Ermakova VA, Bokov DO, Samylina IA, Lazareva NB. Assessment of the content of glycyrrhizic acid in licorice roots and their processed products using HPLC-UV. Development and Registration of Medicines. 2019;8(2):87-91. DOI: 10.33380/2305-2066-2019-8-2-87-91
  130. 130. Hoever G, Baltina L, Michaelis M, Kondratenko R, Baltina LGAT, HWD; Cinatl, J. Antiviral activity of glycyrrhizic acid derivatives against SARS−coronavirus. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2005;48(4):1256-1259
  131. 131. Georgievsky VP. Biologically Active Substances of Medicinal Plants/V.P. Georgievsky, N.F. Komissarenko, SE. Dmitruk. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 1990. 333 p
  132. 132. Zarubaev VV, Anikin VB, Smirnov VS. Antiviral activity of glycerretic and glycyrrhizic acids. Infection and Immunity. 2016;6(3):199-206
  133. 133. Akhtanova NK. Analysis of liquiritone and chalcorine by HPLC/N.K. Akhtanova, N.A. Tyukavkina, Yu.A. Kolesnik, V.E. Ruchkin, I.A. Rulenko, V.I. Litvinenko. In: Collection of Abstracts of Reports of the Scientific and Practical Conference Reserves for Improving the Drug Supply of the Population of the RSFSR; Vladimir. 1991. pp. 6-8
  134. 134. Ammosov AS Phenolic Compounds of the Genera Licorice (Glycyrrhiza L.) and Licorice (Meristotropis Fisch. etMey.) (Review)/A.S. Ammosov, V.I. Litvinenko. No. 2. Farmakom; 2003. pp. 34-80.
  135. 135. Application 2225491 Japan, MKI S 07 H 15/256, and 61 K 35/78. Method for extracting glycyrrhizin/F. Yasuo, Y. Hiroshi, T. Hidetoshi, T. Ku-nio, I. Susumu. – No. 1-46954; application 02/28/89; publ. 09/07/90. // Kokai tokkyo, koho. - Ser. 3(2). – 1990. – 79. – P. 1027-1030. – RJ Chem. –1992:110208P
  136. 136. Yesemurat S. Abstract of the Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Chemical Sciences on the Topic “Study of Polysaccharides, Glycosidecoumarins and Related Substances of some Plants of Karakalpakstan”. Tashkent; 1993. pp. 10-24
  137. 137. Saitova A. Processing medicinal plants in the republic of karakalpakstan. Economy and Society. 2017;6(37):227-230
  138. 138. Available from: http://udasa.uz/news/news-block-183/?lang=ru
  139. 139. Hayashi H, Hattori S, Inoue K, Khodzhimatov O, Ashurmetov O, Ito M, et al. Field survey of Glycyrrhiza plants in Central Asia (3). Chemical haracterization of G. Glabra collected in Uzbekistan. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2003;51(11):1338-1340
  140. 140. Li JR, Wang YQ, Deng ZZ. Two new compounds from Glycyrrhiza glabra. Journal of Asian Natural Products Research. 2005;7(4):677-680
  141. 141. Koshkina AV, Fedotova YO. Licorice naked. Phytochemical composition and biological effects, Orbital Magazine, Yalta theorbital.ru No. 2 (3), 2018, pp. 30-51
  142. 142. Hosseinzadeh H, Nassiri-Asl M. Pharmacological effects of Glycyrrhiza spp. and it’s bioactive constituents: Update and review. Phytotherapy Research. 2015;12(29):1868-1886
  143. 143. Rybalchenko AS, Golitsyn VP, Komarova LF. Licorice root extraction study. Chemistry of Plant Materials. 2002;4:55-59
  144. 144. Available from: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200022899
  145. 145. Alekseeva TB. Ecological, cenotic and biochemical features of licorice (glycyrrhizaglabral.) in Kalmykia, abstract of the dissertation for an academic degree Candidate of biological sciences, Saratov, 2007. pp. 35-41
  146. 146. Tolstikov GA, Baltina LA, Grankina VP, Kondratenko RM, Tolstikova TG. Licorice: Biodiversity, Chemistry, Medicinal Uses. Novosibirsk: Acad. Publishing house “Geo”; 2007. 311 p
  147. 147. Nomura T, Fukai T. Phenolic constituents of licorice (Glycyrrhiza species). Fortshritte der Chemie Organischer Naturschtoffe. 1998;73:1-158
  148. 148. Baltina LA, Kondratenko RM, Bulgakov AK. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of glycyrrhetic acid benzylidene hydrazides. Bioorganic Chemistry. 2020;46(2):201-206
  149. 149. Li H-E, Qiu J-Z, Yang Z-Q, Dong J, Wang J-F, Luo M-J, et al. Fitoterapia. 2012;83:241-248
  150. 150. Liu Q, Liu YL. Flavonoids from Glycyrrhiza genus. Zhongguo Jaoxue Zazhi. 1989;24(12):705-709 (Chem.Abstrs.1989.Vol.113, N 3, 20844)
  151. 151. Kuroda M, Mimaki Y, Sashida Y, et al. Phenolics with PPAR-ligandbinding activity obtained from licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis roots) and ameliorative effects of glycyrin on genetically diabetic KK-Ay mice. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2003;13:4267-4272
  152. 152. Fu B, Li H, Wang X, Lee FSC, Cui S. Isolation and identification of flavonoids in licorice and a study of their inhibitory effects on tyrosinase. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2005;53:7408-7414
  153. 153. Reiners W. Cumarine und Hydroxyzimtsäuren aus Süssholzwurzel. Naturwiss. 1964. Jg.51, N 8. S.193
  154. 154. Muravyov IA, Sokolov VS. State and prospects for studying and use of licorice in the national economy of the USSR. Questions of studying and using licorice in the USSR. M. L.: Nauka, 1966, p. 5-14
  155. 155. Frattini C, Bicchi C, Barettini C, Nano GM. Volatile flavor components of licorice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1977;25:1238-1241
  156. 156. Toulemonde B, Mazza M, Bricout J. Composition of the aroma of Glycyrrhiza glabra L. rhizome. Ind. Aliment. Agric. 1977;94(11):1179-1182
  157. 157. Available from: https://guruzap.ru/tips/koren-solodki-rastenie-koren-solodki-lechebnye-svoistva-i/
  158. 158. Mitscher LA, Park YH, Clark D, Beal JL. Antimicrobial agents from higher plants. Antimicrobial isoflavanoids and related substances from Glycyrrhiza glabra L. var. typical. Journal of Natural Products. 1980;43(2):259-269
  159. 159. Van Hulle C. Über die östrogene Wirkung der Süssholzwurzel. Pharmazie. 1970. Jg.25, H.10. S.620-621
  160. 160. Kononikhina NF, Ponomarev VD, Muravyov IA. Study of the fatty steroid complex of licorice root. Questions of the study and use of licorice in the USSR. M.L.: Science, 1966. p. 159-162

Written By

Shokhista Usmonovna Mirzaeva and Bakhodir Timurovich Muxamadiev

Submitted: 21 August 2023 Reviewed: 14 October 2023 Published: 26 February 2024