Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Liquid Crystal Dispersions of Carbon Nanotubes: Dielectric, Electro-Optical and Structural Peculiarities

Written By

L. Dolgov, O. Kovalchuk, N. Lebovka, S. Tomylko and O. Yaroshchuk

Published: March 1st, 2010

DOI: 10.5772/39439

Chapter metrics overview

4,611 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Liquid crystals (LCs) turn out to be excellent hosts for carbon nanotubes (CNTs). Having molecular structure similar to CNTs, LCs perfectly incorporate CNTs into own structure. Particularly, the liquid crystalline orientational order can be imposed on CNTs so that aligned ensembles of these particles can be attained (Dierking et al., 2004). This alignment can be patterned by pattering alignment of LC host. Furthermore, the alignment axis of CNTs can be easily driven by the LC reorientation in the external field (Dierking et al., 2008); CNTs follow reorientation of LC director demonstrating guest-host effect known for molecular solutions and dispersions of anisotropic nanoparticles in LC hosts (Blinov & Chigrinov, 1996). Finally, LC can be removed and thus pure aligned CNTs can be obtained (Lynch & Patrick, 2002). This altogether means that LC gives unique opportunity for controllable alignment of CNTs.

On the other hand, CNTs bring a number of improvements to LC layers used in electro-optic devices (Qi & Hegmann, 2008). The LC doping by CNTs reduces response time (Huang et al., 2005, Chen et al., 2007, Lee et al., 2008) and driving voltage (Lee et al., 2004), suppresses parasitic back flow and image sticking typical for LC cells (Lee et al., 2004, Baik et al., 2005, Chen & Lee, 2006).

The LC-CNTs systems are not limited to nematic matrices. A series of unique LC-CNTs composites based on thermotropic and lyotropic materials with different LC mesophases is developed and characterized (Weiss et al., 2006, Lagerwall et al., 2006, Lagerwall et al., 2007, Cervini et al., 2008, Podgornov et al., 2009).

A symbiosis of LC and CNTs rouses rapidly increasing interest. The number of publications on this subject grows in geometrical progression. The major results of these studies are summarized in several recent reviews (Lagerwall & Scalia, 2008, Rahman & Lee, 2009).

A present chapter is focused on remarkable dielectric, electro-optical and micro-structural peculiarities of LC-CNTs dispersions, their correlation and mutual influence. It is mainly based on authors’ original results obtained within recent years. The structure of this chapter is the following. The introductory part (section 1) gives short introduction to LC-CNTs composites and elucidates benefit of combination of LC and CNTs. It also outlines a field of questions further considered. A section 2 gives details of our samples and experimental methods. The next three sections correspondingly consider dielectric, electro-optical and structural peculiarities of LC-CNTs composites. Each of these topical sections starts with a short review and lasts with the authors’ original results. The final, conclusion part (Section 6), summarizes most interesting properties of LC-CNTs suspensions, their application perspectives and mention some exciting problems for further investigations.


2. Materials and methods

2.1. Liquid crystalline media and chiral dopant

Nematic LCs EBBA (Reakhim, Russia), 5CB, MLC6608, and MLC6609 (Merck, Germany) were used as LC hosts. EBBA was purified by fractional crystallization from the n-hexane solution, 5CB, MLC6608, MLC6609 were used as obtained. Some characteristics of these LCs are presented in Table 1.

LCNematic mesophasedielectric anisotropy , optical anisotropy nReference
EBBA308.9 - 350.6 K= -0.13, n =0.25 at 313 KGoncharuk et al., 2009
5CB295.5 - 308.3 K= 13 , n =0.177 at 298 KBlinov & Chigrinov, 1996
MLC6608clearing point at 363 K= -4.2 , n = 0.0830 at 293 KLicristal , 2002
MLC6609clearing point at 364.5 K= -3.7 , n = 0.0777 at 293 KLicristal , 2002

Table 1.

Characteristics of LC media.

S811 (Merck, Germany) was used as chiral dopant.

2.2. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes

The multiwalled carbon nanotubes (SpetsMash Ltd., Ukraine) were prepared from ethylene by the chemical vapor deposition method (Melezhyk et. al., 2005). Typically, these CNTs have an outer diameter of about 12–20 nm and the length of about 5-10 μm. The specific electric conductivity of the powder of compressed CNTs was about 103 S/m along the compression axis.

2.3. Preparation of LC-CNTs composites

The all LC-CNTs composites were prepared by 20 min stirring of LC and CNT mixtures using the ultrasonic mixer equipped with a cup horn, at the frequency of 22 kHz and the output power of 150 W. The concentration of CNTs, c,was varied in the range 0-2 wt %. Doping of CNTs has not influenced essentially the phase transition temperatures of LC-CNTs composites.

2.4. Cells

The cells for electro-optical and dielectric measurements were made from glass substrates containing patterned ITO electrodes and aligning layers of polyimide. The polyimides AL2021 (JSR, Japan) and SE5300 (Nissan Chemicals, Japan) were used for homeotropic alignment of LC EBBA, MLC6608 and MLC6609, while the polyimide SE150 (Nissan Chemicals, Japan) was utilized for planar alignment of LC 5CB. The polyimide layers were rubbed by a fleecy cloth in order to provide a uniform planar alignment of LC in either field-on state (EBBA, MLC6608 and MLC6609) or a zero field (5CB). The cells were assembled so that the rubbing directions of the opposite aligning layers were antiparallel. A cell gap was maintained by the glass spacers of appropriate size (16 m, if not otherwise stated). Finally, these cells were filled capillary with neat or CNTs doped liquid crystals heated to isotropic state. In some dielectric measurements the cells without alignment layers were utilized. The structure of LC-CNTs composites was monitored by observation of the filled cells placed between crossed polarizers, both by naked eye and in an optical polarizing microscope.

2.5. Electro-optical measurements

The electro-optical measurements were carried out using the experimental setup described in (Koval’chuk et al., 2001a). The cell was set between two crossed polarizers so that the angle between the polarizer axes and the rubbing direction was 45 .

The sinusoidal voltage 0-60 V (at frequency f=2 kHz) was applied to the cell. The voltage was stepwise increased from 0 to 60 V and then decreased back to 0; the total measuring time, i.e., time of voltage application, was about 1 min. The transmittance of the samples was calculated as=(I out/I in)*100%, where I inand I outare intensities of the incident and transmitted light, respectively.

2.6. Dielectric measurements

The dielectric spectra in the frequency region between 510-2 and 106 Hz were recorded by measurement of the frequency f dependences of resistance R and capacitance C using the oscilloscopic method (Twarowski & Albrecht, 1979, Koval'chuk, 1998). The voltage signal applied to the tested cell had a triangle form with amplitude of 0.25 V. The parallel connected R-C circuit was used as an equivalent scheme of the cell and the values of the real (capacitive) and imaginary (ac conductance) components of the permittivity =+i of a composite were then calculated. Based on data the sample conductivity σ was determined using a formula:

σ= 2pεoεfE1

where ε 0is a dielectric constant.

The ac electrical conductivity was also measured by a LCR meter 819 (Instek, 12 Hz–100 kHz) in the non-relaxation frequency range preliminarily determined from the dielectric spectra. All the measurements were repeated at least 5 times in order to calculate the average values and errors.


3. Dielectric studies of LC composites doped with carbon nanotubes

The interest to the electrophysical behavior of LC composites doped with carbon nanotubes is continuously growing (Lebovka et al., 2008, Lu & Chien, 2008, Koval’chuk et al., 2008). Dispersed nanotubes essentially influence the concentration and spatial distribution of charges in LC cells and thus determine the actual electric field applied to the composites and their electro-optic response (Lee et al., 2004, Huang et al., 2005). These composites demonstrate huge changes in electrical conductivity with a small change of CNT concentration c (c<0.5 wt %) (Lisetski et al., 2007, Dierking et al., 2008, Lisetski et al., 2009, Zhao et al., 2009). Besides, the vs. c curve shows clear percolation behavior (Lebovka et al., 2008, Koval’chuk et al., 2008, Goncharuk et al., 2009). The huge conductivity increase may result in dielectric breakdown and local heating effects (Jayalakshmi & Prasad, 2009). Monitoring of electrical conductivity identified two time scales in reorientation dynamics of liquid crystal–nanotubes dispersions. These scales are associated with the reorientation of the liquid crystal texture (the short time scale) and with the reorientation of the carbon nanotubes (the long time scale) (Dierking et al., 2008). The electrical conductivity and the dielectric constant of LCs doped with carbon nanotubes demonstrate exctraordinary large changes in electric and magnetic field driven reorientation experiments (Dierking et al., 2004; Jayalakshmi & Prasad, 2009). In spite of these extensive studies, many aspects of LC-CNTs composites remained unclear. In particular, it was not well clarified the nature of electrical conductivity and charge transfer in different phase states of LC, at different concentrations of CNTs and in relations with the magnitude of applied voltage and frequency. The present paragraph is focused on these problems.

3.1. Dielectric spectra

Figure 1 presents typical dielectric spectra of 5CB-CNTs (a) and EBBA-CNTs (b) composites.

The measurements were done at the temperatures falling within nematic phase of LC medium, T=297 K (5CB) and T=313 K (EBBA). The LC alignment is planar in case of 5CB and homeotropic in case of EBBA. According to Fig. 1, three frequency ranges, namely, f<102 Hz (A), 102 Hz<f<105 Hz (B) and f>105 Hz (C) can be distinguished. As is commonly accepted (Craig, 1995), the frequency range (A) reflects the near electrode barrier layers processes, the frequency range (B) corresponds to the bulk polarization and charge transfer and the frequency range (C) reflects the relaxation process caused by transition from the electronic and dipole polarization to only electronic polarization of LC phase.

In (A) and (C) ranges, the noticeable dispersions of the real and imaginary components were observed. The data analysis has shown that Cole-Cole approximation (Haase & Wrobel, 2003, Chelidze et al., 1977) can be applied for estimation of corresponding low- and high-frequency times of dielectric relaxation, Aand C:


Here, * is a complex dielectric permittivity, oand are the limiting values for the frequencies = 0 and = .

Fig. 1 demonstrates that CNT dopant substantially modifies dielectric spectra of LC. These changes in different frequency ranges are further analyzed.

Figure 1.

Complex permittivity components and versus frequency f for pure LC and LC-CNTs composites of 5CB (a) and EBBA (b). The concentration of СNTs c is 0.25 wt % (a) and 0.5 wt % (b). Chemical formulas of 5CB and EBBA are given on corresponding ε″(f) graphs.

3.2. Electrical conductivity: Intermediate frequency range

We begin with the intermediate frequency range (B). In this range, large active resistances of the double electric layers (DEL) formed near the cell electrodes are shunted by their capacitance diminishing with a field frequency f (Koval’chuk, 1998, Koval’chuk, 2000, Barbero & Olivero, 2002, Koval’chuk, 2001b). Because of this, the range (B) characterizes volume properties of samples.

Based on formula (1), alternating current conductivity of the composite bulk can be estimated. In a general case, the alternating current conductivity σ of LC-CNTs samples can be represented as a sum of the frequency-independent ionic conductivity σ iassociated with LC, and the frequency-dependent electronic hopping conductivity σ e, associated with CNTs, σ=σ i e. These two contributions to the electric conductivity can be easily separated because of considerable frequency dependence of σ e. The σ ecomponent becomes essential at CNT concentrations comparable and higher than a threshold concentration c ccorresponding to conductivity percolation discussed in the next subsection. The frequency-independent component σ iis typical for ionic conductivity of liquids (Frenkel, 1955).

3.2.1. Percolation behavior

Different composites filled with CNTs typically demonstrate percolating behavior of the electrical conductivity , when sharp transition from the prevailing ionic to the prevailing charge hopping conductivity occurs at some threshold concentration c c(Grossiord et al., 2006, Mamunya et al., 2008). At this concentration, the CNTs form a percolation network or cluster that spans the whole system (Stauffer & Aharony, 1992, Torquato, 2002). A theory predicts an inverse proportionality between c cand the aspect ratio r of the conductive filler particles, c c~1/r (Balberg et al., 1984, Foygel et al., 2005).

For CNTs with very high aspect ratio, typically, r500-1000, this theoretical estimation results in extremely low values of the percolation threshold, c c<0.1 wt %, which is in full correspondence with available experimental data (Lisunova et al., 2007, Mamunya et al., 2008, Lebovka et al., 2009).

The percolation behavior of electrical conductivity in different LC-CNTs composites was recently reported (Lisetski et al., 2007, Lebovka et al., 2008, Koval’chuk et al., 2008, Lisetski et al., 2009, Goncharuk et al., 2009). Fig. 2 demonstrates electrical conductivity versus filler concentration c curve for 5CB-CNTs samples, which is typical for the LC-CNTs composites. Here, the 5CB is planar oriented in a 16 m cell. The measurements were carried out at 100 Hz, when frequency dependence of was practically absent and thus the ionic contribution to was dominating. The threshold increase of was observed for the values of CNT concentration c between 0.02 and 0.2 wt %. The experimental data were analyzed using the least-square fitting to scaling equation (Stauffer & Aharony, 1992)


As a result, the percolation threshold concentration c cand conductivity transport exponent t were determined. The insert in Fig. 2 shows c cand t versus temperature dependencies. There are evident the considerable temperature dependencies for both c cand t.

Figure 2.

Electrical conductivity versus concentration of nanotubes c in 5СВ-CNTs composites for different temperatures T. Insert shows the conductivity exponent t and percolation threshold concentration ccversus temperature T. The samples were planar oriented in a 16 m cell, f=100 Hz.

Increase of the percolation threshold c cwith a temperature T is inessential within nematic mesophase (T<T NI308 K), however, it becomes noticeable in isotropic phase. At T=325 K the threshold concentration reaches c c0.2 wt %. Such character of c c(T) curve may be caused by number of effects such as change in the Brownian motion intensity, degree of the orientational order of nanotubes, etc. These factors influence degree of connectedness between the nanotubes and, as result, the percolation threshold (Kyrylyuk & van der Schoot, 2008). The effects of nanotubes’ alignment on the percolation behavior were discussed recently, however, they still are not completely clear (Du et al., 2005, Behnam et al., 2007, Kyrylyuk & van der Schoot, 2008). More perfect alignment of CNTs inside the nematic phase is expected. However, it can be assumed that highly aligned nanotubes practically don’t intersect each other and fail to create percolation paths. The highest electrical conductivity was experimentally observed for slightly aligned, rather than isotropic, composites (Du et al., 2005). Recent Monte Carlo simulations have also demonstrated that conductivity may be strongly dependent on the measurement direction and the degree of nanotube alignment (Behnam et al., 2007). Along with inducing alignment, nematic LC host stabilizes structure of CNTs damping their Brownian motions. Together with imperfect orientational order of CNTs it may explain the lower concentration threshold of CNTs in the nematic phase comparing with that in the isotropic state (see inset in Fig. 2).

Temperature decrease in the conductivity exponent t (see formula (3)), possibly, reflects changes in the conductivity mechanism and structure of the percolating clusters. The values of conductivity transport exponents t4/3 and t2 are characteristic for the ordinary 2d (two-dimensional) and 3d (three-dimensional) random percolations, respectively. Note that for the studied systems the 2d-3d crossover percolation behavior (Muller et al., 2003; Lebovka et al., 2002) with 4/3<t<2 was expected, because the restricted width of the cell (d16 m) was comparable with the length of CNTs (l5-10 m). Moreover, it was found that for the 3d composite filled with anisotropic particles t decreases substantially with increase in the aspect ratio (Foygel et al., 2005). The noticeable deviations from predictions of the standard percolation theory were also observed for systems with diverging local conductances, when distances between adjacent particles are broadly distributed (Johner et al., 2007). The reported transport exponent t often exceeds its classical values, reaching even the values as large as t=5–10 (Johner et al., 2008). Generally, the value of t extracted from the percolation data for CNT-filled composites may be dependent on the distribution function of distances between adjacent conducting particles (Mdarhri et al., 2008).

Note that c c(T) and t(T) behave discontinuously in the vicinity of nematic-isotropic transition, T NI308 K. It reflects strong dependence of the percolating characteristics on the phase state of LC host.

3.2.2. Temperature dependence and energy of activation

In the investigated range of temperature the electrical conductivity of the LC-CNTs composites increases with a temperature that is characteristic for the nonmetallic behavior. Moreover, temperature dependence of can be satisfactorily described by Arrhenius relationship (Lebovka, 2008):


where W is the activation energy, k is Boltzman’s constant.

Figure 3 shows typical Arrhenius plots for 5CB-CNTs (a) and EBBA-CNTs (b) composites corresponding to different concentrations of nanotubes, c.

Figure 3.

Relative conductivity /oversus inverse temperature 1/T for planar oriented 5CB-CNTs (a) and unoriented EBBA-CNTs (b) composites at different concentrations of nanotubes c. Here, ocorresponds to the electrical conductivity at some reference temperature, which was 323 K in case (a) and 363 K in case (b). The cell gap d was 16 m (a) and 500 m (b), the frequency f was 100 Hz (a) and 1000 Hz (b). Arrows mark direction of temperature change.

In these experiments, the conductivity data were recorded in the cooling regimes accounting for the possible influence of the thermal pre-history. The obtained Arrhenius plots of σ(T) curves were rather linear within the temperature ranges corresponding to nematic or isotropic phase; however, some deviations from linear behavior were observed near nematic-to-isotropic transition points. Moreover, the slopes were always larger in nematic phase than in isotropic phase; it corresponds to higher activation energy of the electrical conductivity in nematic phase. This can be explained by the restriction of the charge mobility in the nematic phase that is related to distortion of the LC director field in the vicinity of charge carriers (Belotskii et al., 1980). This distortion sphere surrounding the charged particle arises as a result of LC molecule orientation in the electric field generated by this particle.

Figure 4 presents examples of concentration dependencies of the activation energies determined from the Arrhenius plots in nematic phases of 5CB-CNTs and EBBA-CNTs composites.

Figure 4.

Activation energy W of electrical conductivity versus concentration of CNTs с for planar oriented 5CB-CNTs and unoriented EBBA-CNTs composites. The values of W were determined from data corresponding to temperature ranges of nematic phases of 5CB and EBBA. The cell gap d was 16 m (5CB) and 500 m (EBBA), the frequency f was 100 Hz (5CB) and 1000 Hz (EBBA), the measuring voltage U was 0.25 V (5CB) and 1 V (EBBA).

Though values of W were determined for different LC media, for planar oriented (5CB) and unoriented (EBBA) composites, using different cell gaps and different protocols for measurements, similar tendencies were observed in W(c) dependencies: W was constant at small concentrations below the percolation threshold and started to decrease above the percolation threshold approaching W0 kJ/mol at c 2 wt %.

This behavior reflects the dominating role of ionic transport mechanism at concentrations below the percolation threshold with activation energy W i47 kJ/mol (5CB) and W i15 kJ/mol (EBBA). So, below the percolation threshold, the conducting LC-CNTs composites behave as semiconductors. This behavior is also typical for polymer-CNTs composites, where electrical conductivity is an increasing function of temperature, which was explained by thermally assisted hopping or charge tunneling between the conducting particles (Barrau et al., 2003). The decrease of W above the percolation threshold might be explained by the increasing role of charge transport through the CNT structure. Comparing with ionic conductivity of LC, electronic conductivity of CNTs is characterized by low temperature coefficient (Eletskii, 2009). This might decrease the apparent activation energy W of LC-CNTs composites and this tendency should essentially enhance with concentration of CNTs.

3.2.3. Hysteretic behavior and effect of positive temperature coefficient

It was previously demonstrated that temperature affects the spatial arrangement of CNTs in the LC matrix and changes percolation characteristics. The LC-CNTs composite typically displays also the electrical conductivity heating–cooling hysteresis and the pronounced effect of positive temperature coefficient of resistivity (PTC effect) (Lebovka et al., 2008, Goncharuk et al., 2009). Figure 5 presents examples of the electrical conductivity heating–cooling hysteresis for EBBA-CNTs unoriented composites in the thick cell (d500 m). In these experiments, the composites that were initially solid were heated from room temperature up to 363 K and then cooled. The total time of the heating–cooling cycle was about 1 h. The hysteretic loops were most pronounced for CNT concentrations in the vicinity of the percolation transition (c≈0.1 wt %) and became inessential at higher values of c (figure 5).

The heating–cooling hysteretic behavior of electrical conductivity reflects strong agglomeration and rearrangement of nanotubes during the thermal curing. The abrupt decrease of the σ(T) curve in the vicinity of melting point T SNmay be caused by several factors. Firstly, CNTs align within the nematic domains. It lowers degree of connectivity of the nanotubes. Besides, the initial network is also partially damaged by thermal expansion of the host EBBA matrix (Lebovka et al., 2008, Lebovka et al., 2009). At high concentration of CNTs the network formed in LC is rather strong because of high density of connectedness between the nanotubes. This strong network cannot be easily destroyed by the Brownian motion and LC reorientation intensified by heating and phase transitions. This explains weakening of hysteretic and PTC effects at c>c c. Note that these effects are especially strong in thick cells, when the length of individual nanotubes, l5-10 m, is small comparing with a cell gap d. In this case, the Brownian motion of individual nanotubes is unrestricted by nanoparticle interaction with the cell walls and so the Brownian motion and the LC orientational rearrangement are dominating factors in the observed reconstruction of CNTs network during thermal processing.

Figure 5.

Heating–cooling hysteresis of electrical conductivity for unoriented EBBA-CNTs composites. The measurements were made in a thick 500 m cell, f=1 kHz, U=1V. The arrows show directions of temperature changes.

3.3. Frequency and voltage dependence

The frequency dependent contribution of electrical conductivity is common for disordered and/or highly alloyed solids (Gantmaher, 2005, Shklovskii & Efros, 1984). It was explained by correlated barrier hopping, tunneling or percolation model (Shklovskii & Efros, 1984, Mott & Davis, 1971, Pike, 1972). Typically, the power law dependences


were observed. Here, m is a frequency exponent.

In the hopping transport model, the current carrier is assumed to hop over a potential barrier between neighboring localized sites and this model predicts that m is slightly lower than 1 and it decreases with rise of temperature. It is different from the tunneling model where the charge carrier is assumed to tunnel across the potential barrier. The tunneling model predicts smaller values of the frequency exponent (0.4<m<0.8) and temperature independent value of m. In the percolation theory, the critical exponent m is considered to be universal and determined only by statistical properties of the percolation clusters. The values of m obtained from numerical studies of random composites were in the range of 0.6–0.8 (Straley, 1977). The experimentally found m values near the percolation threshold were reported to be about 0.8–0.9 for carbon black composites (Jager et al., 2001), and 0.66 (Kim et al., 2003) or 0.85-0.9 (Liu et al., 2007) for carbon nanotube dispersions in polymers.

The studied dispersions of CNTs on the base of LCs demonstrated (f) curves strongly depending on CNT concentration and temperature (Koval’chuk et al., 2008). The value of σ was practically independent on f at small concentrations of CNTs (c<0.1 wt % for 5CB) and became a power function of the frequency f at larger c. Examples of (f) dependences for 5CB-CNTs composites are presented in the insert in Fig. 6a. It is evident that increase of CNT concentration c above c cresults in increase of both ionic σ iand electronic σ econtributions, while below c c0.1 wt % the ionic contribution is dominating. The increase of the ionic contribution σ iwith c can be partially caused by the increased concentration of ions introduced with impurities presented in CNTs. However, this factor is hardly a dominating one because of thorough purification of CNTs used in our studies. The more likely reason is facilitation of ionic transport through the charge exchange mechanism assisted by nanotubes. Such mechanism may be efficient due to the large dielectric constant of the CNTs, which results in strong attraction between impurity ions and nanotube surface (Jagota et al., 2005). This conclusion is supported by presence of double electric layer (DEL) shunting effect assisted by CNTs (see section 3.5). At CNTs concentrations between 0.1 and 0.35 wt %, i=const and е=f m, which means that iand еcan be easily separated. Above c=0.35 wt %, the component еbecomes frequency independent that complicates its separation. The frequency independence of еmay be the evidence of the transition from the hopping charge transfer to the quasimetallic electronic transfer typical for CNTs. This implies very tight network with direct connections between the nanotubes so that the conductivity barrier between them is rather low.

Figure 6a also presents frequency exponent m vs. the concentration c at 297K. The m(c) dependence is a non-monotonic function with a maximum m 0.32 near the concentration c0.25 wt %. Increase of m with c at c < 0.25 wt % reflects initial process of CNT cluster formation. In this interval of concentrations, the mechanism of electrical transport is mixed: electrical transport is governed by electron hopping/tunneling mechanism inside CNT clusters and by ionic mechanism between clusters. Above the percolation threshold, at high concentrations of CNTs (c>0.25 wt %), agglomeration of different clusters occurs and contacts between them are multiple. This results in formation of homogeneous ohmic conducting structure, when electron hopping/tunneling mechanism is inessential and electrical conductivity becomes frequency independent.

Figure 6.

Frequency exponent m versus (a) CNT concentration (T=297 K) and (b) temperature for planar oriented 5CB-CNTs composites. Insert shows the conductivity versus frequency f plots for different concentrations of CNTs c.

The temperature dependencies of frequency exponents m for 5CB-CNTs composites are presented in Fig. 6b. The value of m is an increasing function of temperature. The evident changes in slope of m(T) curves can be observed in the vicinity of nematic-isotropic transition, T NI308 K. The obtained data evidence a noticeable influence of the phase state of LC matrix on the charge transport mechanism. This effect can be easily explained accounting for the expected alignment of CNTs inside the nematic matrix (Dierking et al., 2004).

Note that observed behavior of the frequency exponent (rather small values of m (m<0.3) and positive thermal coefficient (dm/dT>0)) contradict with the classical hopping and tunnelling transport theories, predicting dm/dT<0 (Mott & Devis, 1971, Pike, 1972). The percolation theory also predicts rather high values of m, in the range of 0.6–0.8 (Straley, 1977). Note that critical exponent m may vary significantly depending on peculiarities of microstructure and morphology of the composite (Liu et al., 2007). However, at the moment, there is no theory available for explanation of the anomalously small values of m observed in 5CB-CNTs composites.

Large positive thermal coefficient dm/dT>0 obtained for nematic mesophase indicates enhancing of the frequency dependent contribution to electrical conductivity . This behavior, possibly, reflects the temperature changes in the percolating CNT networks inside the LC-CNTs composites. As was earlier discussed, temperature increase results in damage of the connectivity in percolation structures and, hence, in decrease of the “effective” filling concentration. Naturally, it resulted in increase of m with temperature T for concentrations above 0.25 wt % (Fig. 6b). This conclusion supports also the observed increase of the percolation threshold concentration c cwith temperature T (insert in Fig. 2).

A noticeably nonlinear behavior was also observed for current–voltage characteristics of LC-CNTs composites (Lebovka et al., 2008). Figure 7 presents voltage dependencies of electrical conductivity / 0for EBBA-CNTs composites at different values of temperature T and concentration of nanotubes c.

Figure 7.

Relative electrical conductivity /oversus measuring voltage U for composite EBBA-CNTs at different values of temperature T and concentration of nanotubes c. Here, ois electrical conductivity in the limit of U=0 V. The samples were randomly aligned in the 500 m cells, f=1 kHz.

Such nonlinear behavior can be explained on the basis of hopping-tunneling model of transport disruption across the insulating LC regions between the CNTs, which predicts the following field dependence for electrical conductivity (Mott & Davis, 1971)


where e is the elementary charge, his the average hopping distance, E is the applied electric field, and k is the Boltzmann constant.

The theory predicts weakening of the non-linear behavior with temperature T in full correspondence with experimental observations (Fig. 7). The most pronounced non-linear behavior was observed in the vicinity of the percolation threshold (c c0.05-0.1 wt %). It was becoming less explicit above the percolation threshold, where multiple direct contacts between different CNTs were formed. The observed weakening of the current–voltage nonlinear behavior above the percolation threshold (Fig. 7) correlates with decrease of electrical conductivity activation energy (Fig. 4).

3.4. Dielectric relaxation and near-electrode processes: Low frequency range (A)

The dielectric spectra in the most low frequency range (A) (f<102 Hz) are mainly determined by the near-electrode processes and electron exchange between electrodes and ions (Koval'chuk, 1998, Koval’chuk, 2000, Barbero & Olivero, 2002, Koval'chuk, 2001c). In this range, the most important changes, provoked by presence of CNTs, were observed for the imaginary (ac conductance) component , while changes for real (capacitive) component were smaller. At low frequencies (f<0.5 Hz), increase of the component was observed by doping LC (both 5CB and EBBA) with CNTs (Fig. 1).

This behavior can be explained by enhancement of the electron component in electrical transport through the near-electrode layers, governed by the presence of CNTs in a composite. In fact, the CNTs serve as shunts of the double electrical layers providing paths for the electron exchange between electrodes and impurity ions inside LC.

The shunting effect observed at low frequencies (f<0.5 Hz) and related with the presence of CNTs was characterized in terms of the dielectric loss tangent, tan s,which is given by


Note that tan scharacterizes dielectric loses in the near electrod layers and thus is a surface parameter.

Figure 8 presents tan sas a function of CNT concentration c for 5CB-CNTs composites.

Figure 8.

Dielectric loss tangent tan sversus CNTs concentration c for planar oriented 5CB-CNTs composites in a 16 m cell at T=293 K, f=0.1 Hz.

At small concentrations of CNTs (c<0.05 wt %), tan sis rather small and dielectric parameters of the near-electrode layers are determined by the properties of 5CB itself. However, the abrupt rise of tan sin the interval of c values between 0.05 and 0.1 wt % evidences about formation of effective shunting paths as elements of a percolation network of CNTs characterized by the same concentration threshold.

The width of the near-electrode layers scan be estimated (Koval'chuk, 2001a; Koval'chuk, 2001c):


whereεoAandεoCare the limiting values ofεfor the frequency ranges (A) and (C). For example, for pure EBBA, the estimated width of near-electrode layer sis about 0.3 m and it is practically independent from the cell thickness d (Fig. 9). The doping of EBBA by CNTs (0.5 wt %) results in a noticeable increase of s. This might be caused by increased concentration of ionic impurities or structural modification of DELs in presence of CNTs.

The low-frequency relaxation process characterized by the time Awe assign to dipolar polarization relaxation of LC molecules. These molecules can be anchored to the surfaces of the cell and to a skeleton of CNTs acting as a spatially distributed surface in LC host. For pure EBBA, Ais an increasing linear function of a cell gap d. The linear increase of the dipole relaxation time with d in the near-electrode zone Awas also observed for the planar oriented LC media (Yaroshchuk et al., 2005). It was established that value of Adecreases with the increase of electric conductivity. The similar tendency observed for EBBA doped with CNTs (Fig. 9) may be explained by high shunting efficiency of CNTs in the near-electrode zones and the ionic impurities introduced in LC together with CNTs.

Figure 9.

Near-electrode layer width sand low-frequency relaxation timeAvs. a cell gap d for pure EBBA (open symbols) and EBBA-CNTs composite (c=0.5 wt %) (filled symbols). The EBBA media was homeotropically oriented.

3.5. High frequency dielectric relaxation: High frequency range C

The high frequency dielectric relaxation time Cwas practically independent of d for pure EBBA ( C0.67 s), and doping by CNTs (0.5 wt %) resulted in increase of C( C2.5 s). The similar tendency of Cto increase was observed also for 5CB-based composites, where C0.56 s for pure 5CB and C0.94 s for 5CB-CNTs (0.5 wt %) composite.


4. Electro-optic studies of LC-CNTs composites

Electrically controlled birefringence is a major property of LCs utilized in liquid crystal displays (LCDs), optical shutters, LC lenses and other LC devices. The present section considers influence of CNTs on the electro-optic properties of LC layers. It consists of three subsections. Subsection 4.1 refers to recent improvements of reversible LC response achieved owing to CNT addition. Subsection 4.2 is based on our original results concerning the irreversible electro-optical response of the LC-CNTs systems named as electro-optic memory (Dolgov et al., 2008; Dolgov et al., 2008a). At last, subsection 4.3 describes enhancement of the memory effect in the systems with induced chirality (Yaroshchuk et al., 2010).

4.1. Reversible electro-optic response

Generally, nematic LC devices utilize reversible response of LC layers on the applied voltage (Blinov & Chigrinov, 1996). The characteristics of this response, such as controlling voltage, switching on and off times, contrast ratio, etc., are quite important operational parameters of the LC devices. The major trend in improvement of these parameters is associated with synthesis of new mesogenic compounds and development of new eutectic LC mixtures on their base. The other direction recently arose due to intensive development of nanotechnologies. Some types of nanoparticles turned out to be very useful fillers fundamentally expanding the range of mechanical, dielectric, magnetic, and optical characteristics of LCs (Qi & Hegmann, 2008).

Among nanoparticles as fillers for LCs, carbon nanotubes take special place. Due to strong shape anisotropy they possess strong anisotropy of polarizability. Therefore embedding even small amount of CNTs (c<0.05 wt %) into liquid crystal host may essentially increase (case of LC with >0) (Lee et al., 2004) or decrease (case of LC with <0) (Huang et al., 2005) dielectric anisotropy. Driving voltage is inversely proportional to the module of ()1/2 and so it may be essentially influenced by carbon nanotubes.

As it was mentioned in section 3.2.1, carbon nanotubes (at c0.01 wt %) generally enhance conductivity of LCs. However, at minute amount of nanotubes (~0.001 wt %), this effect is inessential. At the same time, the nanotubes may affect significantly the number of free-moving ions and their distribution within the cell by means of ion adsorption and shunting of double electric layers (see section 3). As a result, a minute doping by carbon nanotubes allows to suppress a number of parasitic ionic effects peculiar to LC electro-optic devices, such as a field screening (Lee et al., 2004), image sticking (Baik et al., 2005), transient current (Chen & Lee, 2006), back flow (Huang et al., 2005, Chen et al., 2007) and hysteresises of capacitance and transmittance (Lee et al., 2004, Baik et al., 2005). This results in lowering of driving voltage (Lee et al., 2004) and shortening of response times (Chen et al., 2007). Along with nematic LCs, CNT dopant may improve properties of LCDs based on ferroelectric LCs. Specifically, it fastens response of the deformed helix ferroelectric liquid crystal displays (Prakash et al., 2009). The changes in structure and resistivity of double electric layers and the composite’s rotational viscosity due to carbon nanotubes are discussed as the possible reasons of such speeding-up of the electro-optic response.

4.2. Irreversible electro-optic response: effect of electro-optical memory

The irreverible response is not typical for nematic LCs commonly used in LC devices. However, the embedded nanoparticles grant this property to LCs (Kreuzer et al., 1992, Glushchenko et al., 1997). Regarding LCs filled with CNTs, interesting memory effect has been recently observed in isotropic phase of LC material (Basu & Iannacchione, 2008). It consists in irreversible change of dielectric constant of LC-CNTs composite under the applied voltage and is explained by formation of pseudonematic domains near the CNTs reorienting in the electric field. Since there is no restoring force in the isotropic phase, after the field is off, these domains keep the orientation induced in the electric field.

In what follows, a different memory effect is considered. It is peculiar only to the nematic mesophase of LCs with <0 homeotropically aligned before the action of the electric field. Besides, to realize this effect, the concentration of CNTs in the LCs should be considerably higher (c>0.01 wt %) then in the case of composites with the reversible electro-optic response (c0.005 wt %).

To elucidate this memory effect, let us consider transmittance of the samples placed between pair of crossed polarizers as a function of the applied voltage U. The (U) curves for the EBBA-CNTs samples are presented in Fig. 10.

In these experiments the voltage was smoothly increased to 60 V and then decreased to 0 V. One can notice that the (U) curves have oscillating character. The (U) oscillations mean that optical phase incursion during the switching of LC is much more higher than /2. The saturation of this curve implies that, together with the bulk, the surface fraction of LC is reoriented in the field. It is evident that the neat LC demonstrates reversible electro-optic response (Fig. 10a). A small hysteresis (1–2 V) can be explained by screening of the applied field with the DELs formed near the cell electrodes (Baik et al., 2005). A very similar character of (U) curves is observed for the LC-CNTs composites with a small content of CNTs (c<0.01 wt %).

Figure 10.

Dependences of light transmittance on applied voltage U for EBBA doped with different concentrations of CNTs: a) 0 wt %; b) 0.05 wt %. Arrows indicate the increase and drop of voltage.

The situation, however, changes with a further increase of c. In this case, the oscillations are less pronounced for the reverse part of (U) curve. In addition, transmittance of the sample after the voltage decrease to zero, m, is sufficiently higher than the initial transmittance 0(Fig. 10b). This means that, to some extent, the cell memorizes transmittance realized in the electric field. This effect named as the effect of electro-optical memory can be characterized by the memory efficiency parameter M (Dolgov et al., 2008, Dolgov et al., 2009):


where maxis the maximal value of light transmittance (Fig. 10).

For the EBBA-CNTs composites under consideration, dependence of the memory parameter M on concentration of CNTs c is nonmonotonic. The M(c) curve rapidly grows, reaches maximum at nanotube concentrations 0.02-0.05 wt % and then gradually decreases (Fig. 11, curve 1).

The initial rapid growth of this curve has percolation origin, which will be discussed below. The decay is apparently connected with a decrease in the effective voltage applied to the composite layer due to a marked increase in conductivity of the sample at high concentrations of carbon nanotubes.

Figure 11.

Memory efficiency M as a function of the weight concentration of nanotubes c for the mixtures based on different liquid crystals: (1) EBBA-based series; (2) MLC6608-based series. The curves (1) and (2) are measured at temperatures 313 K and 297 K, respectively.

Generally, the memory efficiency M grows and reaches saturation with voltage application time . The memory reaches the state of saturation slower at lower driving voltages. For instance, at U=50 V the saturation time is 60 s, while at U=20 V it is 270 s. No electro-optical memory is observed at voltages U<10 V.

The effect of electro-optical memory is so pronounced that can be easily seen with a naked eye by sample observation through crossed polarizers (Fig. 12).

Figure 12.

Photographs of cells placed between the crossed polarizers and filled with neat EBBA (row 1) and EBBA doped with 0.02 wt % (row 2) of carbon nanotubes: a) initial off-state; b) U=60 V, f=2 kHz; c) off-state after field application. Voltage was applied to the central rectangular area of the sample.

One can see that neat LC cell switches homogeneously from the initial homeotropic to the planar state under the applied voltage. After the voltage switch-off LC returns to the initial state with homeotropic alignment. Similar behaviour is observed for the LC with minute (<0.01 wt %) concentrations of CNTs. LC suspensions with higher amount (c>0.01 wt %) of CNTs switch in the field to the random planar state. This state remains after switching off the voltage and causes high residual transmittance of the sample, i. e. electro-optical memory. Note that the memory can be completely or partially erased by applying to the sample mechanical stress, low frequency voltage (f = 10–50 Hz, U > 30 V) or by the transition of a system to crystalline or isotropic states with subsequent return to the mesophase.

It was further found that, besides EBBA, the described memory is peculiar to MLC6608 and MLC6609, LC mixtures with <0 and nematic mesophase at room temperatures. So there is no need in keeping samples at elevated temperatures during electro-optic tests. It simplifies measuring process in comparison with the EBBA-based mixtures. Below we present results for the MLC6608-based suspensions, but the results for the MLC6609-based samples are quite similar.

The (U) curves for the neat MLC6608 and MLC6608-based suspension are presented in Fig. 13. It is evident that these curves have smaller number of pulsations than the corresponding curves for EBBA-CNTs samples. This is caused by a smaller value of birefringence of MLC6608 (n=0.083 vs. n=0.25 for EBBA, Table 1).

Figure 13.

Transmittance vs. the voltage U curves for the MLC6608-CNTs composites with different concentrations of nanotubes: (a) 0 wt %; (b) 0.05 wt %. Arrows mark the plots obtained for the increasing and decreasing voltages.

The absolute value of dielectric anisotropy is much higher for MLC6608 than for EBBA (-4.2 vs. -0.13, Table 1). This results in much smaller values of saturation voltages for MLC6608-based mixtures (4–5 V) comparing with those for EBBA-based samples (35–40 V).

The maximal memory efficiency for MLC6608-based suspensions is similar to that for the EBBA-based samples (M=55-60 %). At the same time, the concentration dependences of M are essentially different. While the M(c) curve for EBBA-CNTs series goes through the maximum (Fig. 11, curve 1), the corresponding curve for MLC6608-CNTs series rapidly grows and saturates at c~0.1 wt % (Fig. 11, curve 2). As discussed later, this is caused by different concentrations of ionic impurities and different structuring of CNTs in these LCs.

According to Fig. 14b, the appearance of the cells filled with MLC6608-CNTs composites is similar to that of analogous EBBA-based samples (Fig. 12); they contain areas with uniform homeotropic alignment not subjected to electric field and areas with the random planar alignment realized after the field cycle application. The memorized alignment state typically consists of islets of LC in a random planar state surrounded by the aggregates of CNTs.

It is important to note that for the suspensions based on LCs with >0, particularly for the 5CB, the memory effect is absent. The dependence of memory on a sign of dielectric anisotropy of LC will be elucidated in subsection 5.3.

4.3. Enhancement of memory effect by chiral dopant

The electro-optic memory effect described above is of considerable interest for applications. It suggests new principle for information displaying and storage in the LC based systems and thus can be designed for application in erasable memory cells, bistable displays, etc. These applications require essential improvements of the operational characteristics of LC-CNTs composites, first of all memory efficiency, erasure and recording times.

Figure 14.

The cells filled with LC MLC6608 (a), MLC6608-CNTs (c=0.02 wt %) (b) and MLC6608-ChD-CNTs (c=0.02 wt %, cch=0.1 wt %) (c) composites viewed between a pare of crossed polarizers. A cycle of electric field (30 V, 1 min) was applied to rectangular areas in the middle of the cells.

This paragraph describes the method of essential improvement of the memory efficiency M. The improvement is achieved by inducing chirality in LC host. This chirality causes additional force stabilizing the state of planar alignment realized in the electric field. Using this principle, efficiency of electro-optic memory can be practically doubled.

In our experiments the chirality of LC MLC6608 was induced by doping it with a small amount of chiral dopant (ChD) S811 from Merck. These studies were carried out in two stages. First stage was aimed at an optimization of chiral dopant concentration, c ch.The increase of c chstrengthens twisting tensions in the MLC6608. It was revealed that at c ch0.1 wt % anchoring forces satisfactorily balance these twisting tensions thus stabilizing homeotropic alignment. At c ch0.15 wt %, the anchoring forces can not restrain the twisting forces anymore that leads to a formation of various helical structures; at c ch=0.15 wt % the filamentary texture is formed, which transforms in the fingerprint texture at higher concentrations. The concentration c ch=0.1 wt % was selected for further preparation of LC-ChD-CNTs samples. It was the maximal value at which a uniform homeotropic alignment was preserved.

The (U) characteristics for the LC-ChD-CNTs sample, as well as for the reference LC-ChD sample are given in Fig. 15.

As is evident, the LC-ChD sample demonstrates reversible response. In turn, transmittance of LC-ChD-CNTs sample changes irreversibly showing high residual value in a zero field. The memory parameter estimated according to (9) is M=82 %. The corresponding value estimated for the LC-CNTs counterpart with the (U) curve presented in Fig. 13b is 0.44. This means that chiral dopant increases memory efficiency almost by factor 2. The strengthening of the memory effect in the samples containing chiral dopant can be seen even by naked eye (Fig. 14). The observation in polarizing microscope demonstrates that the planar state has an islet structure in the LC-CNTs samples, and a continuous structure in the LC-ChD-CNTs samples. This explains the increased memory efficiency of LC-ChD-CNTs samples.

The enhanced affinity of LC-ChD-CNTs samples to planar alignment might be explained by the enhancement of forces resulting in planar alignment. In the LC-ChD-CNTs samples, the force associated with a CNT network is magnified by a twisting force, which eventually destroys homeotropic alignment.

Figure 15.

The transmittance vs. applied voltage U curves for the cells filled with MLC6608-ChD (cch=0.1 wt %) (a) and MLC6608-ChD-CNTs (c=0.02 wt %, cch=0.1 wt %) (b) compositions. The arrows point directions of voltage ramping up and down.

It worth mentioning that, in spite of the memory enhancement of LC-CNTs samples, the twisting force by itself does not cause a memory effect (the case of LC-ChD samples, Fig. 15a). This suggests that the described memory effect is an intrinsic feature of samples containing CNTs.


5. Structural peculiarities of LC-CNT composites and structural transformation under the applied field

This paragraph consists of three subsections. Subsection 5.1 is introductory. It briefly refers to structuring of CNTs in LC hosts and methods of stabilization of CNTs in the LCs. In addition, several known effects connected with the influence of electric field on the CNT aggregates are reviewed. Subsection 5.2 is based on original results and considers microstructuring of the memory type LC-CNTs composites. Particularly it is shown how the electrohydrodynamic flows developed in LC host change the structure of CNTs and promote formation of the memory state. Finally, in subsection 5.3, physical model of electro-optic memory is suggested based on the microstructural observations and results of electro-optical and dielectric measurements.

5.1. Structural transformations in LC-CNTs composites without electrohydrodynamic flows

CNTs strongly attract with each other by van der Waals forces. Therefore they form more or less developed system of aggregates in a liquid host. Weak aggregation of CNTs is observed in the polar aprotic solvents like dimethylformamide (Liu et al., 1999), N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (Giordani et al., 2006), the chlorinated hydrocarbon dichloroethane (Baik et al., 2005), and the polar protic compound ethyl alcohol (Huang & Pan, 2006).

In LC matrices the nanotubes aggregate quite intensively. This is a challenge for the majority of applications demanding LC-CNTs composites with high and uniform dispersion of CNTs. To achieve this, several methods are proposed.

In one of these methods strong aggregation of CNTs was prevented by their initial dispersion in organic solvents with next addition of LC (Baik et al., 2005). After evaporation of solvent one can obtain CNTs dispersed in LC medium. However, one of the drawbacks of this dispersion technique is the undesired residual solvent effect, which may influence quality of LC phase.

Another method lies in modification of CNT surface for enhanced compatibility with LCs. In this case CNTs bear on their surface small molecules, polymers or inorganic species (Trushkevych et al., 2008). But such modification can affect intrinsic mechanical, electrical and optical properties of CNTs (Bahr et al., 2001).

The more simple technique is just ultrasonication of CNTs in LCs without special dispersing agents. Centrifugation and decantation separate the suspension from big aggregates and may be used as additional methods after ultrasonication of CNTs (Chen et al., 2007).

Influence of electric field on CNT aggregates dispersed in LCs turned out to be quite manifold. The electric field may influence structure of CNTs directly or indirectly. One of examples of direct action is a drift of individual CNTs in LC under strong electric fields due to electrophoretic forces (Baik et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2008a). Movement of CNTs in the uniformly aligned LC may be traced due to specific light scattering appearing from the moving nanotube. It was also revealed that the internal forces appearing due to polarization of nanotubes in the electric field may cause structural changes of CNT aggregates. For example, the in-plane electric field of 5.67 V/m at 60 Hz causes reversible four times elongation of CNT aggregates in the superfluorinated nematic LC (Jeong et al., 2007).

A striking example of the indirect action is the control of CNTs alignment by LC reorientation in electric field (Dierking et al., 2004, Dierking et al., 2008). As a rule, this mechanism does not involve essential LC flows. At the same time, at certain experimental conditions, the electrohydrodynamic (EHD) flows are highly intensive in LC cells (Blinov & Chigrinov, 1996). They can also be realized in the LCs doped by CNTs (Chen et al., 2008b). The next section elucidates structural reconstruction of CNT aggregates under the EHD flows resulting in effect of electro-optic memory. It is based on our recent results published in (Dolgov et al., 2008, Dolgov et al., 2009).

5.2. Structural transformations in the LC-CNT composites with electrohydrodynamic flows

Similarly to other LC-CNTs composites (Dierking et al., 2004; Jeong et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2004; Baik et al., 2005), the memory type EBBA-CNTs composites contain CNTs in aggregated state. Big aggregates are clearly visible in a polarizing microscope. The size of aggregates increases up to tens and even hundreds of microns with increase in the CNT concentration. The single aggregates observed at c<0.02 wt % are assembled into a continuous network, when c>0.1 wt %.

The evolution of the samples structure under the action of the high frequency electric field (f=2 kHz) depends essentially on the concentration of nanotubes. In the neat EBBA and EBBA doped with a very small amount of CNTs (c<0.002 wt %), the initial homeotropic alignment state (Fig. 16a) switches to the uniform planar state (Fig. 16b) at voltages ~10 V. At higher voltages, the classical electrohydrodynamic instabilities develop in these samples. Laminar flows, revealing itself in the form of the Kapustin-Williams domains, arise at U=80 V (Fig. 16c) (Blinov & Chigrinov, 1996). As the voltage increases, the flow patterns become complicated and transform to turbulence patterns at voltages 110–120V (Fig. 16d). The EBBA samples return to the initial homeotropic state after switching off the field (Fig. 16a). In the samples with higher concentrations of nanotubes (c~0.02–0.05 wt %), the development of EHD instabilities is different. At U~10 V, LC switches from the homeotropic to the planar state (Figs. 17a, b). As the voltage increases, EHD flows appear near the aggregates of CNTs. The further increase in the voltage leads to the broadening of flow areas (Fig. 17c), which overlap (at U~40 V) and finally occupy the whole volume of the sample. In this process, the Kapustin-Williams domains appear in some areas of the sample.

Figure 16.

Microphotographs of the EBBA layer subjected to alternating voltage (f=2 kHz): (a) initial state (U=0 V); (b) U=10 V; (c) U=80 V; (d) U=120 V. The sample is viewed between a pair of crossed polarizers. The photographs show development of electrohydrodynamic flows in the layer of pure EBBA.

However, regular structure of these domains was not observed. It is evident from Figure 17 that the turbulence results in the grinding of aggregates and the effective dispersion of CNTs.

Note that in samples with higher concentration of nanotubes (c>0.1 wt %) hydrodynamic motions arose too, but they did not influence essentially the morphology of aggregates. This is caused by lowering of the actual voltage and sample heating due to the essentially increased conductivity (Shah et al, 2008).

Figure 17.

Microphotographs of the layer of EBBA-CNTs composite (c=0.05 wt %) subjected to alternating voltage (f=2 kHz): (a) initial state (U=0 V); (b) U=10 V; (c) U=20 V; (d) after removing the field (U=0 V). The sample is viewed between a pair of crossed polarizers. The photographs show development of electrohydrodynamic flows in the layer of EBBA-CNTs composite.

The grinding of CNT aggregates and their motion in the EHD flows differs from the earlier described effects of the CNT structure reorganization related to the electrostatic and electrophoretic forces (Jeong et al., 2007; Baik et al., 2006). The dispersion process described above was observed only in the LCs with pronounced EHD instabilities.

In contrast to samples with c<0.002 wt %, the samples with 0.02<c<0.5 wt % remain in the random planar state and have the schlieren microscopic texture after the field switch-off (Fig. 17d). This texture caused the residual transmittance T mand thus the memory effect.

Comparing with EBBA-based samples development of EHD instabilities in MLC6608 based samples has some differences. In contrast to EBBA, MLC6608 does not reveal any hydrodynamic flows up to 100 V. This is caused by the fact that the ionic conductivity of MLC6608 is one order of magnitude less than that of EBBA. It is well known (Blinov & Chigrinov, 1996), that the sufficient amount of ionic impurities in LC is needed for the development of hydrodynamic instabilities.

The EHD flows in MLC6608 appear only after addition of carbon nanotubes. As in EBBA-based composites, two steps of the LC response to the applied field can be selected: at first, at U=4–9 V, the Friedericksz transition occurs, and then, at higher voltages, hydrodynamic flows develop. In contrast to EBBA-based composites, hydrodynamics in MLC6608-based samples occurs in the form of turbulent flows without the stage of Kapustin-Williams domains. These flows begin to develop just after the Friedericksz transition in the vicinity of CNT aggregates. The areas of turbulence grow with the applied voltage and occupy the whole volume of the sample at 20–40 V. The developed flows result in the grinding of the aggregates of nanotubes. This effect can be considered as a practical method for in situ dispergation of CNTs in a LC medium.

5.3. Percolation structures of CNTs and mechanism of electro-optic memory

According to results of dielectric studies (section 3), the conductivity of LC-CNTs composites demonstrates pronounced percolation behavior. A steep increase of conductivity with concentration of CNTs is caused by self organization of these conductive particles resulting in formation of continuous spatial network percolating through the LC layer.

The results of structural studies of LC-CNTs composites with EHD instabilities (subsection 5.2) lead us to conclusion that the networks of CNTs formed before and after the application of an electric field are different. Before switching on the field, CNTs agglomerate in big clusters forming a network structure at high concentrations (c>0.5 wt %). A much finer structure occurs after the application of an electric field. The massive aggregates of nanotubes crushed in the EHD flows are assumed to form a fine network stabilizing the planar state of LC. This is confirmed by the two-order increase of sample conductivity after development of EHD instabilities.

The decisive role of hydrodynamic flows in the formation of the fine CNT network and thus the memory is confirmed by other experiments. First, the memory effect was not obtained in the composites based on LC 5CB (>0), in which EHD effects are not realized. Second, the memory effect was not observed neither in EBBA- nor in MLC6608-and MLC6609- based composites reoriented from the homeotropic to the planar state by the magnetic field. It is well known that a magnetic field causes no hydrodynamic flows in LC.

The formation of fine CNT network is closely related to memory effect. As was clarified above, the electro-optic memory is caused by the metastable planar LC alignment formed after the field is off. This alignment is stabilized by the network of CNTs acting as a spatially distributed alignment surface for LC. The alignment force of this network overcomes corresponding force of the aligning substrates restricting suspension layer. The analogous mechanism was earlier considered for LC-aerosil composites (Kreuzer et al., 1992, Glushchenko et al., 1997). It is known that such a system is characterized by the pronounced electro-optical memory effect caused by orientational LC transition from the spatially random to oriented state. The oriented state was metastable in a zero field because it was maintained by the network of aerosil particles.

To resist elastic tensions and so maintain planar alignment of LC phase in the LC-CNTs composites, the CNT network should be sufficiently strong. In view of this, the mechanical rigidity percolation should be considered additionally to conductivity percolation. Generally, the rigidity percolation, corresponding to the sol–gel transition, is characterized by a threshold concentration c mhigher than c c. According to rough estimations, c m1.6c c(Sahimi, 1998). Assuming that this correlation is valid for the studied system and that c c0.05 wt %, one can obtain that c m0.08 wt %. Note that this value is by one order of magnitude lower than the value c m1 wt % estimated for LC-aerosil suspensions (Glushchenko et al., 1997). This might be caused by extremely high aspect ratio of CNT particles capable to form connected structures at so low concentrations.

In summary, the following mechanism is responsible for the effect of electro-optical memory. Initially, LC is homeotropically aligned and CNTs are well aggregated. Electric field application leads to homeotropic-to-planar reorientation and development of electro-hydrodynamic flows in the LC phase. These flows crush bulky CNT aggregates, thus opening way for formation of fine CNT network supporting the planar LC alignment after the turning off the electric field. This mechanism is effective in the limited range of CNT concentrations. On the one hand, c should be higher than rigidity percolation threshold c m. On the other hand, it should not be rather high to prevent high electric conductivity of a system which causes critical lowering of the actual voltage applied to suspension and its essential heating.


6. Conclusions

Combination of liquid crystals and carbon nanotubes gives a class of unique composites with fascinating electrical, optical, electro-optical, nonlinear optical and structural properties. The present chapter describes a number of new-found interesting features of these composite materials. In general, a strong correlation between structural, electrical and electro-optic characteristics of LC-CNTs composites is observed.

It is shown that the CNTs shunt double electric layers in the LC cells and, in this way, change essentially a spatial distribution of the electric field applied to the cells. This explains reduction of controlling voltage and response time of LC layers doped by CNTs.

Same as in other liquids and polymers, CNTs demonstrate percolation behavior in LC hosts. At concentration of CNTs c<0.01 wt % in the LC-CNTs composites, the nanotubes exist in the form of individual aggregates. The further increase of c results in connection of isolated aggregates and, finally, in formation of continuous network of CNTs permeating LC matrix. The formed CNT network radically increases conductivity of LC samples and changes conductivity mechanism. At c<0.01 wt % ionic conductivity, typical for neat LCs, prevails. At 0.01<c<0.4 wt %, the ionic charge transport is essentially enhanced by a charge hopping transport associated with a CNTs’ skeleton. At higher CNT concentration, the conductivity mechanism typical for highly connected CNTs fully dominates. This change in the charge transport mechanisms with the CNTs concentration results in decay of conductivity activation energy from 10 kJ/mol to 0 kJ/mol.

The LC-CNTs composites based on the LCs with <0 demonstrate effect of electro-optic memory. It is connected with a metastable alignment state of LC phase stabilized by the network of CNTs acting as a spatially distributed alignment surface. This effect suggests new operation mode for LC devices and can be employed in the systems of information displaying and storage.

It is shown that the electrohydrodynamic flows developing in the LC phases may essentially influence structure of CNTs. Specifically, they crush aggregates of CNTs promoting formation of their finer structure. This suggests a unique method for in situ dispergation of CNTs in LCs. It is especially important for the CNTs non-grafted with special hydrophobic fragments facilitating dispergation of CNTs inside the LC matrix.

We strongly believe that the next studies will open new marvelous effects in these composites and their intriguing applications. Among the problems worthy of future investigation is influence of CNTs on the specific properties of LC materials, such as electrical, optical, thermal and mechanical anisotropy, molecular ordering and variety of phase transitions. It would be interesting to study fundamentally the peculiarities of structuring and percolation of CNTs in mesophases of different symmetry and origin, in the areas of phase transitions. Finally, it is worthwhile to investigate composites based on nanotubes with unusual properties and structure intensively generated by modern nanoscience and nanotechnology.



These studies were supported by European Social Fund grant GLOFY0102J, NAS of Ukraine (grant 10-07-Н) and “Dnipro” program of Ukrainian-French scientific cooperation (grant M/16-2009).


  1. 1. BahrJ. L.YangJ.KosynkinD. V.BronikowskiM. J.SmalleyR. E.TourJ. M.2001Functionalization of carbon nanotubes by electrochemical reduction of aryl diazonium salts: a bucky paper electrode.J. Am. Chem. Soc.,12327June 2001,65366542,DOI:10.1021/ja010462s.
  2. 2. BaikIn-SuJeonSang. YounLeeSeung. HeeParkK. AhJeongS. H.AnK. H.LeeY. H.2005Electrical-field effect on carbon nanotubes in a twisted nematic liquid crystal cell.Appl. Phys. Lett.,8726December 2005,263110263113DOI: 10.1063/1.2158509.
  3. 3. BaikIn-SuJeonSang. YounLeeSeung. HeeParkK. AhJeongS. H.AnK. H.LeeY. H.2006Local deformation of liquid crystal director induced by translational motion of carbon nanotubes under in-plane field.J. Appl. Phys.,1007October 2006,074306074305DOI:10.1063/1.2355535.
  4. 4. BalbergI.AndersonC. H.AlexanderS.WagnerN.1984Excluded volume and its relation to the onset of percolation.Phys. Rev. B,307October 1984,39333943,DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.30.3933.
  5. 5. BarberoG.OliveroD.2002Ions and nematic surface energy: belong the exponential approximation for the electric field of ionic origin.Phys. Rev. E,65February 2002,031701031705DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.031701.
  6. 6. BarrauS.DemontP.PeigneyA.LaurentC.LacabanneC.2003DC and AC conductivity of carbon nanotubes-polyepoxy composites.Macromolecules,36Iss. 14, June 2003,51875194,DOI: 10.1021/ma021263b.
  7. 7. BasuR.IannacchioneG. S.2008Carbon nanotube dispersed liquid crystal: A nano electromechanical system.Appl. Phys. Lett.,9318November 2008,183105183103DOI: 10.1063/1.3005590.
  8. 8. BehnamA.GuoJ.UralaA.2007Effects of nanotube alignment and measurement direction on percolation resistivity in single-walled carbon nanotube films.J. Appl. Phys.,102Iss. 4, August 2007,044313044311)-(044313-7),DOI:10.1063/1.2769953.
  9. 9. BelotskiiE. D.LevB. I.TomchukP. M.1980Effective ion mass in a liquid crystal.JETP Lett.,3110May 1980,539541.
  10. 10. BlinovL. M.ChigrinovV. G.1996Electrooptic Effects in Liquid Crystal Material, Springer,0-38794-708-6York.
  11. 11. CerviniR.SimonG.Ginic-MarkovicM.MatisonsJ.HuynhC.HawkinsS.2008Aligned silane-treated MWCNT/liquid crystal polymer films.Nanotechnology,19March 2008,175602175610DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/19/17/175602.
  12. 12. ChelidzeT. L.DerevyankoA. I.KurilenkoO. D.1977Electric Spectroscopy of Heterogeneous Systems, Naukova Dumka, Kiev (in russian).
  13. 13. Chen-YH.LeeW.2006Suppression of field screening in nematic liquid crystals by carbon nanotubes.Appl. Phys. Lett.,8822May 2006,222105222113DOI: 10.1063/1.2208373.
  14. 14. Chen-YH.LeeW.ClarkN. A.2007Faster electro-optical response characteristics of a carbon-nanotube-nematic suspension.Appl. Phys. Lett.,903January 2007,033510033513DOI: 10.1063/1.2432294.
  15. 15. Chen-NY.Wu-JJ.Ke-LH.2008aThe Transverse Motions of Charged Nano-Particles under an AC Electric Field in a Nematic Liquid Crystal Cell.Jap. J. Appl. Phys.,478631-8634.
  16. 16. Chen,Yi Ning;Wu,Jin-Jei,KeHung-Lin2008bElectrohydrodynamic behaviors in the multiwalled carbon nanotubes doped optically compensated bend polymer-dispersed nematic liquid crystal cell.Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.,4711July 2008,84878490,DOI: 10.1143/JJAP.47.8487.
  17. 17. CraigD.Q.M.1995Dielectric Analysis of Pharmaceutical Systems, Taylor & Francis Ltd.,020-3-30257-50-13-210279-X, London.
  18. 18. DierkingI.ScaliaG.MoralesP.Le ClereD.2004Aligning and Reorienting Carbon Nanotubes with Nematic Liquid Crystals.Adv. Mat.,1611June 2004,865869,DOI: 10.1002/adma.200306196.
  19. 19. DierkingI.CassonK.HampsonR.2008Reorientation Dynamics of Liquid Crystal-Nanotube Dispersions.Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.,47April 2008,63906393,DOI: 10.1143/JJAP.47.6390.
  20. 20. DolgovL.YaroshchukO.LebovkaM.2008Effect of electro-optical memory in liquid crystals doped with carbon nanotubes.Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst.,496January 2008,212229,1542-1406DOI: 10.1080/15421400802451816.
  21. 21. DolgovL.LebovkaN.YaroshchukO.2009Effect of electrooptical memory in suspensions of carbon nanotubes in liquid crystals.Colloid. J.,715August 2008,603611,DOI: 10.1134/S1061933X09050044.
  22. 22. DuF.FischerJ. E.WineyK. I.2005Effect of nanotube alignment on percolation conductivity in carbon nanotube/polymer composites.Phys. Rev. B,72September 2005,121404121401)-(121404-4),DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.121404.
  23. 23. EletskiiA. V.2009Transport properties of carbon nanotubes.Phys. Usp.,523March 2009,209224,DOI: 10.3367/UFNe.0179.200903a.0225.
  24. 24. FoygelM.MorrisR. D.AnezD.FrenchS.SobolevV. L.2005Theoretical and computational studies of carbon nanotube composites and suspensions: Electrical and thermal conductivity. Phys. Rev. B,71March 2005,104201104201)-(104201-6),DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.104201.
  25. 25. FrenkelJ.1955Kinetic Theory of Liquids. Dover, New York.
  26. 26. GantmaherV. F.2005Electrons in disordered matters. Fizmatlit,5-92210-578-7in russian).
  27. 27. GiordaniS.BerginS.NicolosiV.LebedkinS.KappesM.BlauW.ColemanJ.2006Debundling of single-wall nanotubes by dilution: observation of large populations of individual nanotubes in amide solvent dispersions.J. Phys. Chem. B,11032July 2006,1570815718,DOI: 10.1021/jp0626216.
  28. 28. GlushchenkoA.KresseH.ReshetnyakV.ReznikovYu.YaroshchukO.1997Memory effect in filled nematic liquid crystals.Liq. Cryst.,232March 1997,241246.
  29. 29. GoncharukA. I.LebovkaN. I.LisetskiL. N.MinenkoS. S.2009Aggregation, percolation and phase transitions in nematic liquid crystal EBBA doped with carbon nanotubes.J. Phys. D : Appl. Phys.,42July 2009,165411165418DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/16/165411.
  30. 30. GrossiordN.LoosJ.RegevO.KoningC. E.2006Toolbox for dispersing carbon nanotubes into polymers to get conductive nanocomposites.Chem. Mater.18January 2006,10891099,DOI: 10.1021/cm051881h.
  31. 31. HaaseW.WrobelS.2003Relaxation Phenomena: liquid crystals, magnetic systems, polymers, high-tc superconductors, metallic glasses,Springer,3-54044-269-3Heidelberg New York.
  32. 32. Huang-YC.Hu-YC.Pan-CH.Lo-YK.2005Electrooptical Responses of Carbon Nanotube-Doped Liquid Crystal Devices.Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.,4411November 2005,80778081,DOI: 10.1143/JJAP.44.8077.
  33. 33. Huang-YC.Pan-CH.2006Comment on "Electric-field effect on carbon nanotubes in a twisted nematic liquid crystal cell" [Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 263110 (2005)]Appl. Phys. Lett.,895July 2006,056101056102DOI: 10.1063/1.2243544.
  34. 34. JagerK. M.Mc QueenD. H.TchmutinI. A.RyvkinaN. G.KluppelM.2001Electron transport and ac electrical properties of carbon black polymer composites.J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.,34Iss. 17, August 2001,26992707,DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/34/17/319.
  35. 35. JagotaA.DinerB. A.BoussaadS.ZhengM.2005Carbon nanotube-biomolecule interactions: Applications in carbon nanotube separation and biosensing, In:Applied Physics of Carbon Nanotubes. Fundamentals of Theory, Optics and Transport Devices, Rotkin, S. V. & Subramoney S., (Ed.),253271, Springer,978-3-54023-110-3Berlin-Heidelberg.
  36. 36. JayalakshmiV.PrasadS. K.2009Understanding the observation of large electrical conductivity in liquid crystal-carbon nanotube composites.Appl. Phys. Lett.94May 2009,202106202101)-(202106-3),DOI: 10.1063/1.3133352.
  37. 37. JeongS. J.ParkK. A.JeongS. H.JeongH. J.AnK. H.NahC. W.PribatD.LeeS. H.LeeY. H.2007Electroactive superelongation of carbon nanotube aggregates in liquid crystal medium.Nano Lett.,7May 2007,21782182,DOI: 10.1021/nl070116u.
  38. 38. JohnerN.RyserP.GrimaldiC.BalbergI.2007Piezoresistivity and tunneling-percolation transport in apparently nonuniversal systems.Phys. Rev. B,75Iss. 10, March 2007,104204104209DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.104204.
  39. 39. JohnerN.GrimaldiC.BalbergI.RyserP.2008Transport exponent in a three-dimensional continuum tunneling-percolation model,Phys. Rev. B,77Iss. 17, May 2008,174204174211DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.174204.
  40. 40. KimB. K.LeeJ.YuI.2003Electrical properties of single-wall carbon nanotube and epoxy composites.J. Appl. Phys.,94Iss. 10, November 2003,67246728,DOI: 10.1063/1.1622772.
  41. 41. Koval’chukA. V.1998Low-frequency spectroscopy as an investigation method of the electrode-liquid interface.Functional Materials,53426430.
  42. 42. Koval’chukA. V.2000Mechanism of charge exchange at the liquid crystal-electrode interface.JETP Lett.,727October 2000,377380,DOI: 10.1134/1.1331150.
  43. 43. Koval’chukA. V.ZakrevskaS. S.YaroshchukO. V.MaschkeU.2001aElectrooptical properties of three-component compositions “liquid crystal-aerosil-photopolymer”Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst.,368August 2001,129136,DOI: 10.1080/ 10587250108029939.
  44. 44. Koval’chukA. V.2001bRelaxation processes and charge transport across liquid crystal- electrode interface.J. Phys.: Condens. Matter,13November 2001,1033310345,DOI: 101088/0953-8984/13/46/306.
  45. 45. Koval’chukA. V.2001cLow-frequecy dielectric relaxation at the tunnel charge transfer across the liquid/electrode interface.Functional Materials,84October 2001,690693.
  46. 46. Koval’chukA. V.DolgovL.YaroshchukO.2008Dielectric studies of dispersions of carbon nanotubes in liquid crystals 5CB.Semiconductor Physics, Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics,11337341.
  47. 47. KreuzerM.TschudiT.EidenschinkR.1992Erasable optical storage in bistable liquid crystal cells.Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst.,223January 1992,219227,DOI: 10.1080/15421409208048253.
  48. 48. KyrylyukA. V.van der SchootP.2008Continuum percolation of carbon nanotubes in polymeric and colloidal media.PNAS,10524June 2008,82218226,DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0711449105.
  49. 49. LagerwallJ. P. F.ScaliaG.HaluskaM.Dettlaff-WeglikowskaU.GiesselmannF.RothS.2006Simultaneous alignment and dispersion of carbon nanotubes with lyotropic liquid crystals.Phys. Stat. Sol. (b),24313August 2006,30463049,DOI: 10.1002/pssb.200669146.
  50. 50. LagerwallJ. P. F.DabrowskiR.ScaliaG.2007Antiferroelectric liquid crystals with induced intermediate polar phases and the effects of doping with carbon nanotubes.J. Non-Cryst. Solids,353October 2007,44114417,DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.01.094.
  51. 51. LagerwallJ.ScaliaG.2008Carbon nanotubes in liquid crystals.J. Mater. Chemistry,18Iss. 25, July 2008,28902898.DOI: 10.1039/b802707b.
  52. 52. LebovkaN. I.MannaS. S.TarafdarS.TeslenkoN.2002Percolation in Models of Thin Film Depositions.Phys. Rev. E,66Iss. 6, December 2002,066134066131)-(1066134-4),DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.066134.
  53. 53. LebovkaN.DadakovaT.LysetskiyL.MelezhykO.PuchkovskaG.GavrilkoT.BaranJ.DrozdM.2008Phase transitions, intermolecular interactions and electrical conductivity behavior in carbon multiwalled nanotubes/nematic liquid crystal composites.J. Mol. Struct.,877Iss. 1-3, January 2008,135143,DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2007.12.038.
  54. 54. LebovkaN. I.GoncharukA.MelnykV. I.PuchkovskaG. A.2009Interface interactions in benzophenone doped by multiwalled carbon nanotubes.Physica E,41Iss. 8, August 2009,15541560,DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2009.04.038.
  55. 55. LeeW.Wang-YuChun.Shih-ChengYu.2004Effects of carbon nanosolids on the electro-optical properties of a twisted nematic liquid-crystal host.Appl. Phys. Lett.,854July 2004,513515,DOI: 10.1063/1.1771799.
  56. 56. LeeW.Chen-YH.Shih-CY.2008Reduced dc offset and faster dynamic response in a carbon-nanotube-impregnated liquid-crystal display.J. Soc. Info. Display,167May 2008,733741,DOI:10.1889/1.2953480.
  57. 57. Licristal2002Liquid crystal mixtures for electro-optic displays catalogue. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
  58. 58. LisetskiL. N.LebovkaN. I.SidletskiyO.TsPanikarskayaV. D.KasianN. A.KositsynS. S.LisunovaM. O.MelezhykO. V.2007Spectrophotometry and electrical conductivity studies of multiwalled dispersed in nematic liquid crystals.Functional Materials,142January 2007,233237.
  59. 59. LisetskiL. N.MinenkoS. S.FedoryakoA. P.LebovkaN. I.2009Dispersions of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in different nematic mesogens: The study of optical transmittance and electrical conductivity,Physica E,41Iss. 3, October 2008,431435,DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2008.09.004.
  60. 60. LisunovaM. O.MamunyaYe. P. .LebovkaN. I.MelezhykA. V.2007Percolation behaviour of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene/multi-walled carbon nanotubes composites.Eur. Pol. J.,43Iss. 3, March 2007,949958,DOI: 10.1016/j.europolymj.2006.12.015.
  61. 61. LiuJ.CasavantM. J.CoxM.WaltersD. A.BoulP.LuW.RimbergA. J.SmithK. A.ColdertD. T.SmalleyR. E.1999Controlled deposition of individual single-walled carbon nanotubes on chemically functionalized templates.Chem. Phys. Lett.3031-2, April 1999,125129,DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00209-2.
  62. 62. LiuL.MatitsineS.GanY. B.ChenL. F.KongL. B.RozanovK. N.2007Frequency dependence of effective permittivity of carbon nanotube composites.J. Appl. Phys.,101Iss. 9, May 2007,094106094106DOI: 10.1063/1.2728765.
  63. 63. LuS. Y.ChienL. C.2008Carbon nanotube doped liquid crystal OCB cells: Dielectric and electro-optical properties.Digest of Technical Papers- SID International Symposium,39Iss. 3, 1853-1856.
  64. 64. LynchM. D.PatrickD. L.2002Organizing carbon nanotubes with liquid crystal solvents.Nano Lett.,211September 2002,11971201,DOI: 10.1021/nl025694j.
  65. 65. MamunyaYe. P. .LebovkaN. I.LisunovaM. O.LebedevE. V.BoiteuxG.2008Conductive polymer composites with ultralow percolation threshold containing carbon nanotubes.J. Nanostruct. Pol. & Nanocompos.,4Iss. 1, January 2008,2127,1790-4439
  66. 66. MdarhriA.CarmonaF.BrosseauC.DelhaesP.2008Direct current electrical and microwave properties of polymer-multiwalled carbon nanotubes composites.J. Appl. Phys.,103Iss. 5, March 2008,054303054301)-(054303-9),DOI: 10.1063/1.2841461.
  67. 67. MelezhykA. V.SementsovYu. I.YanchenkoV. V.2005Synthesis of porous carbon nanofibers on catalysts fabricated by the mechanochemical method.Rus. J. Appl. Chem.,786August 2005,924930,DOI: 10.1007/s11167-005-0421-x.
  68. 68. MottN. F.DavisE. A.1971Electronic processes in Non-Crystalline Materials, Clarendon Press,0-19851-259-7
  69. 69. MullerK.H.WeiG.RaguseB.MyersJ.2003Three-dimensional percolation effect on electrical conductivity in films of metal nanoparticles linked by organic molecules.Phys. Rev. B,68Iss. 15, October 2003,155407155406DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.155407.
  70. 70. PikeG. E.1972ac Conductivity of scandium oxide and a new hopping model for conductivity.Phys Rev. B,6Iss. 4, January 1972,15721580,DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.6.1572.
  71. 71. PodgornovF. V.SuvorovaA. M.LapanikA. V.HaaseW.2009Electrooptic and dielectric properties of ferroelectric liquid crystal/single walled carbon nanotubes dispersions confined in thin cells.Chem. Phys. Lett.,479Iss. 4-6, August 2009,206210,DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.08.005.
  72. 72. PrakashJ.ChoudharyA.MehtaD. S.BiradarA. M.2009Effect of carbon nanotubes on response time of ferroelectric liquid crystals.Phys. Rev. E,80Iss. 1, July 2009,012701012704DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.012701.
  73. 73. QiH.HegmannT.2008Impact of nanoscale particles and carbon nanotubes on current and future generations of liquid crystal displays.J. Mater. Chem.,1828July 2008,32883294,DOI: 10.1039/b718920f.
  74. 74. RahmanM.LeeW.2009Scientific duo of carbon nanotubes and nematic liquid crystals. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.,426January 2009,063001063012DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/6/063001.
  75. 75. SahimiM.1998Non-linear and non-local transport processes in heterogeneous media: from long-range correlated percolation to fracture and materials breakdown.Phys. Rep.,306Iss. 4-6, November 1998,213395,DOI: 10.1016/S0370-1573(98)00024-6.
  76. 76. ShahH. J.FontecchioA. K.MattiaD.GogotsiYu.2008Field controlled nematic-to-isotropic phase transition in liquid crystal-carbon nanotube composite.J. Appl. Phys.,103December 2007,064314064315DOI: 10.1063/1.2844384.
  77. 77. ShklovskiiB. I.EfrosA. L.1984Electronic Properties of Doped Semiconductors, Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences,45Springer-Verlag,0-38712-995-2
  78. 78. StaufferD.AharonyA.1992Introduction to Percolation Theory, Taylor & Francis,0-74840-253-5
  79. 79. StraleyJ. P.1977Critical exponents for the conductivity of random resistor lattices.Phys. Rev. B,15Iss. 12, June 1977,57335737,DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.15.5733:.
  80. 80. TorquatoS.2002Random Heterogeneous Materials: Microstructure and Macroscopic Properties, Springer,0-38795-167-9York.
  81. 81. TrushkevychO.CollingsN.HasanT.ScardaciV.FerrariA. C.WilkinsonT. D.CrosslandW. A.MilneW. I.GengJ.JohnsonB. F. G.MacaulayS.2008Characterization of carbon nanotube-thermotropic nematic liquid crystal composites.J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.,41May 2008,125106125111DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/41/12/125106.
  82. 82. TwarowskiA. J.AlbrechtA. C.1979Depletion layer in organic films: Low frequency measurements in polycrystalline tetracene.J. Chem. Phys.205March 1979,22552261,DOI: 10.1063/1.437729.
  83. 83. WeissV.ThiruvengadathanR.RegevO.2006Preparation and characterization of a carbon nanotube-lyotropic liquid crystal composite.Langmuir,223November 2005,854856,DOI: 10.1021/la052746m.
  84. 84. YaroshchukO.Koval’chukO.KravchukR.2005The interfacial dipole-to-dipole interaction as a factor of polar anchoring in the cells with planar liquid crystal alignment.Mol. Gryst. Liq. Cryst.,438June 2005, 195 [1759]- 204/[1768],DOI: 10.1080/15421400590958151.
  85. 85. YaroshchukO.TomylkoS.DolgovL.SemikinaT.KovalchukO.2010Carbon nanotubes doped liquid crystals: robust composites with a function of electro-optic memory.Diamond & Related Materials. In print.DOI:10.1016/j.diamond.2010.01.022
  86. 86. ZhaoW.WangJ.HeJ.ZhangL.WangX.LiR.2009Preparation and characterization of carbon nanotubes/monotropic liquid crystal composites. Appl. Surface Sci.,255Iss. 13-14, April 2009,65896592,DOI: 10.1016/ j.apsusc.2009.02.048.

Written By

L. Dolgov, O. Kovalchuk, N. Lebovka, S. Tomylko and O. Yaroshchuk

Published: March 1st, 2010