Open access peer-reviewed chapter

The Role of Employee Behavior and Organizational Culture in Strategy Implementation and Performance in a VUCA World

Written By

Dinko Herman Boikanyo

Submitted: 27 June 2023 Reviewed: 25 October 2023 Published: 16 January 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.113830

From the Edited Volume

Organizational Culture - Cultural Change and Technology

Edited by Muddassar Sarfraz and Wasi Ul Hassan Shah

Chapter metrics overview

124 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

This paper examines the crucial role of employee behavior and organizational culture in successfully implementing strategies and achieving high performance in a VUCA world. It emphasizes the importance of effective strategy execution in dynamic environments. Drawing on social cognitive theory, goal-setting theory, and self-determination theory, the paper explores how employee behavior influences strategy implementation, highlighting the significance of goal clarity, feedback mechanisms, and employee participation. Factors such as intrinsic motivation, autonomy, competence, and relatedness are discussed for fostering employee engagement and commitment. The impact of organizational culture on strategy implementation is investigated using the Competing Values Framework, organizational socialization theory, and Schein’s model of organizational culture. The paper delves into the interplay between employee behavior, organizational culture, and strategy implementation, discussing theories such as person-organization fit and cultural congruence. Strategies for overcoming VUCA challenges are provided, including sensemaking theory, change management frameworks, and resilience theory. Measurement and evaluation of strategy implementation and performance are addressed through the balanced scorecard approach, organizational network analysis, and employee engagement theories. Real-life case studies and examples offer practical insights into the interrelationships among employee behavior, organizational culture, strategy implementation, and performance in diverse contexts.

Keywords

  • employee behavior
  • organizational culture
  • performance
  • strategy implementation
  • VUCA

1. Introduction

In today’s rapidly evolving business landscape, organizations confront unprecedented challenges driven by the volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) nature of the world [1]. These challenges necessitate a fundamental reevaluation of conventional approaches to strategy implementation and performance management [2]. Within this context, the roles played by employee behavior and organizational culture have emerged as pivotal factors that can significantly influence an organization’s success in navigating the complexities of a VUCA world [3].

The primary objective of this chapter is to delve into the intricate relationship between employee behavior, organizational culture, strategy implementation, and performance within the VUCA framework. It seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of how these interconnected elements influence one another and, in turn, shape an organization’s ability to thrive in an environment characterized by volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity.

The contemporary business landscape is characterized by unprecedented levels of volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA) [4, 5]. Rapid technological advancements, shifting consumer preferences, global economic fluctuations, and political uncertainties create a challenging environment for organizations across industries [2]. In this dynamic context, effective strategy implementation becomes paramount for organizations to navigate uncertainties, capitalize on opportunities, and achieve sustainable performance [6, 7].

The success of strategy implementation is contingent upon the behavior of employees and the prevailing organizational culture [8, 9]. Employee behavior plays a pivotal role in translating strategic objectives into actions and outcomes [10, 11]. It encompasses the attitudes, actions, and decisions made by individuals at all levels of the organization [12, 13]. Similarly, organizational culture, defined as the shared values, beliefs, and norms that guide behavior within an organization [14, 15], influences the collective mindset, behaviors, and actions of employees during strategy execution [16, 17].

Understanding the interplay between employee behavior, organizational culture, and strategy implementation is essential for organizations to effectively navigate the VUCA world. By aligning employee behavior with strategic objectives and fostering a culture that supports strategy execution, organizations can enhance their ability to adapt, innovate, and achieve superior performance outcomes [18].

While prior research has examined the individual effects of employee behavior and organizational culture on strategy implementation, there is a need for a comprehensive conceptual framework that integrates these two critical factors [19]. This conceptual paper aims to fill this gap by synthesizing recent literature and theoretical frameworks to develop a holistic understanding of the role of employee behavior and organizational culture in strategy implementation and performance in the VUCA world.

The paper is structured as follows: Firstly, the theories surrounding employee behavior and its impact on strategy implementation will be explored. Social cognitive theory, which emphasizes the role of cognitive processes, self-efficacy, and observational learning in shaping employee behavior [20] will be discussed. Additionally, goal-setting theory will be delved into, which highlights the importance of setting clear and challenging goals, providing feedback, and fostering employee motivation [21]. Furthermore, we will examine self-determination theory, which emphasizes the role of intrinsic motivation, autonomy, competence, and relatedness in driving employee engagement and commitment to strategic initiatives [22].

Secondly, the literature on organizational culture and its influence on strategy execution will be delved into. The Competing Values Framework is explored, which categorizes organizational culture into four types: clan, adhocracy, hierarchy, and market, each with distinct characteristics and implications for strategy implementation [3]. Additionally, organizational socialization theory is discussed, which highlights the role of socialization processes and organizational rituals in shaping employees’ beliefs, values, and behaviors [23]. Moreover, Schein’s model of organizational culture is explored, which emphasizes the existence of three levels of culture (artifacts, espoused values, and basic underlying assumptions) and their impact on strategy implementation [15].

Next, there will be an integration of these factors to examine their mutual influence and their joint impact on strategy implementation outcomes. Person-organization fit theory will be discussed, which emphasizes the importance of aligning individual values and behaviors with the organizational culture to enhance strategy execution [24]. Furthermore, cultural congruence theory is explored, highlighting how a strong alignment between employee behavior, organizational culture, and strategic goals leads to improved performance [25]. Additionally, social exchange theory is examined, which explores the reciprocal relationship between employees and the organization, emphasizing the role of trust, reciprocity, and commitment in fostering desired behaviors during strategy implementation [26].

Recognizing the challenges organizations face in a VUCA world, strategies to overcome them will be discussed. Sensemaking theory is explored, emphasizing the role of employee behavior and organizational culture in making sense of ambiguity and complexity during strategy implementation [27]. Additionally, discussing change management theories, including Lewin’s change model and Kotter’s 8-step model, offering frameworks for addressing resistance, fostering employee buy-in, and adapting to dynamic VUCA conditions [28, 29]. Moreover, discussing resilience theory, underscoring the importance of individual and organizational resilience in navigating the uncertainties and disruptions associated with a VUCA world [30].

Lastly, highlighting the importance of measuring and evaluating strategy implementation and performance. The balanced scorecard approach will be discussed, which offers a comprehensive set of metrics and indicators across financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth perspectives to assess strategy outcomes [31]. Furthermore, exploring organizational network analysis, a valuable tool for understanding communication patterns, social networks, and the influence of employee behavior and organizational culture on strategy execution [32]. Additionally, considering employee engagement theories and measurement tools, recognizing the impact of engaged employees on strategy implementation success [33].

This paper’s relevance and importance are underscored by several key considerations:

  • Adapting to a VUCA world: As the world becomes increasingly VUCA, organizations must adapt swiftly and effectively to remain competitive [34]. This paper will illuminate the strategies required not only to survive but to thrive in this challenging environment.

  • Maximizing human capital: Employees represent an organization’s most valuable asset. Understanding how their behavior impacts strategy execution and performance is critical in leveraging this resource optimally [35].

  • Culture as a competitive advantage: Organizational culture has emerged as a critical competitive advantage [36]. In a VUCA world, a strong culture that fosters innovation, agility, and resilience is essential. This paper will explore how organizations can cultivate such cultures.

  • Enhancing leadership and management practices: Leaders and managers play a pivotal role in shaping employee behavior and culture [37]. This paper will provide insights into effective leadership and management strategies for a VUCA world.

  • Practical implications: The findings of this research will have practical implications for leaders, managers, and policymakers [38]. It will offer actionable insights and recommendations to enhance strategy implementation and organizational performance.

  • Academic contribution: This paper contributes to the academic discourse by providing a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between employee behavior, organizational culture, strategy implementation, and performance, particularly in the context of a VUCA world [39].

Advertisement

2. Methodology

This chapter aims to explore and synthesize existing literature related to the topic. The methodology employed in this study is rooted in a comprehensive review of peer-reviewed articles, books, reports, and other scholarly sources pertinent to the chosen topic. The process followed a systematic approach to identify, select, and analyze relevant literature to develop a holistic understanding of the conceptual underpinnings and theoretical frameworks that surround the topic.

2.1 Ethical considerations

Given that this study relied solely on existing literature, ethical approval was not required. However, proper citation practices were observed to acknowledge the contributions of the authors of the selected works.

In conclusion, this conceptual paper aims to provide a comprehensive and detailed examination of the vital role played by employee behavior and organizational culture in effectively implementing strategies and achieving high performance in a VUCA world. By synthesizing theories, frameworks, and practical insights, the paper offers valuable guidance to organizations seeking to navigate the complexities and uncertainties of the modern business landscape. The insights derived from this paper will contribute to the existing body of knowledge and provide a foundation for future empirical research in this domain.

Advertisement

3. Understanding the VUCA world

3.1 Definition and characteristics of a VUCA world

The term VUCA, coined by the U.S. Army War College, refers to a world characterized by volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity [4, 5]. Volatility refers to the rapid and unpredictable changes that organizations encounter in the business environment, such as sudden shifts in market trends, technological advancements, and geopolitical events. Uncertainty reflects the lack of predictability and the difficulty in making accurate forecasts due to factors like rapid market fluctuations and disruptive innovations. Complexity highlights the intricate interdependencies and interconnectedness of various elements within the business environment, making it challenging to fully understand and navigate. Ambiguity arises from the existence of multiple interpretations, perspectives, and information gaps, creating a lack of clarity and consensus.

3.2 Impact of VUCA on organizations and their strategic management processes

The VUCA world has profound implications for organizations and their strategic management processes. Organizations operating in such an environment face increased levels of risk and uncertainty, making it difficult to rely on traditional long-term planning and linear decision-making processes [2]. The dynamic nature of the VUCA world necessitates a shift toward more agile and adaptive strategic approaches.

VUCA conditions introduce significant challenges, including rapidly changing customer preferences, disruptive technologies, and competitive landscapes [5]. Organizations must continuously scan their external environment, gather relevant data, and monitor market trends to stay abreast of the evolving dynamics. In addition, political and regulatory uncertainties can introduce unexpected shifts in the business landscape, requiring organizations to be vigilant and responsive.

3.3 The need for agility, adaptability, and resilience in strategy implementation

In the face of volatility, organizations need to be agile to effectively respond to and capitalize on changing conditions [40]. Agility enables organizations to sense market shifts, make rapid decisions, and swiftly execute strategies. It involves developing capabilities such as rapid experimentation, flexibility, and the ability to pivot quickly based on emerging opportunities or threats [41]. By embracing agility, organizations can stay ahead of the competition and seize new opportunities.

Uncertainty in the VUCA world demands adaptability from organizations. The ability to adapt involves continuously scanning the environment, monitoring trends, and remaining flexible in strategy formulation and execution [42]. Organizations must be willing to challenge their assumptions, adjust their strategies based on new information, and reconfigure their resources and capabilities to align with evolving market conditions [43]. Adaptability enables organizations to effectively navigate uncertain environments and stay resilient in the face of unforeseen challenges.

Complexity in the VUCA world necessitates organizational resilience. Resilience enables organizations to withstand disruptions, recover quickly from setbacks, and adapt their strategies and operations to changing circumstances [44]. Building resilience involves fostering a culture of learning, promoting collaboration and knowledge sharing, and developing robust systems and processes that can absorb shocks and adapt to unexpected events [45]. Resilience allows organizations to bounce back stronger and take advantage of emerging opportunities, even in the face of adversity.

Advertisement

4. Employee behavior and strategy implementation

4.1 Importance of employee behavior in strategy execution

The success of strategy implementation heavily relies on the behavior and actions of employees within an organization. Employees are the ones responsible for executing the strategic initiatives, translating strategic plans into action, and driving the desired organizational outcomes [46]. Their behavior influences the efficiency, effectiveness, and overall success of strategy implementation efforts. Therefore, understanding and managing employee behavior is crucial for achieving strategic objectives.

4.2 Social cognitive theory

Social cognitive theory provides insights into how individual attitudes, self-efficacy, and motivation influence employee behavior during strategy implementation. Attitudes play a key role in shaping employee behavior. Positive attitudes toward the strategy, its goals, and its potential outcomes are more likely to motivate employees to align their actions with the strategic objectives [47]. By fostering a positive attitude among employees, organizations can enhance their commitment and engagement in strategy implementation.

Self-efficacy, a central construct in social cognitive theory, refers to an individual’s belief in their capabilities to perform specific tasks or behaviors. Employees with high self-efficacy are more likely to take on challenging tasks, persist in the face of obstacles, and actively contribute to the implementation of strategic initiatives [48]. Building employee self-efficacy through training, support, and skill development programs can enhance their confidence and willingness to engage in behaviors that drive strategy execution.

Motivation is another critical factor in social cognitive theory. Employees’ motivation to participate actively in strategy implementation is influenced by their beliefs about the value and importance of the strategy, as well as the perceived rewards and consequences associated with successful implementation [22]. Intrinsic motivation, driven by internal factors such as personal satisfaction and fulfillment, is particularly important for long-term engagement and commitment to strategy implementation. Organizations can foster intrinsic motivation by creating a supportive work environment, offering opportunities for growth and development, and recognizing and rewarding employees’ contributions to strategy execution.

4.3 Goal-setting theory

Goal-setting theory highlights the role of clear goals, feedback, and employee participation in driving behavior alignment with strategic objectives. Clear and specific goals provide employees with a sense of direction and purpose, guiding their efforts toward achieving desired outcomes [21]. Well-defined goals help employees understand the relevance of their tasks to the broader strategic agenda and encourage them to align their behavior accordingly.

Regular feedback and performance evaluations are essential in goal-setting theory. Feedback enables employees to monitor their progress, identify areas for improvement, and make necessary adjustments in their behavior [31]. It provides employees with information about the effectiveness of their actions in contributing to the strategic goals, enhancing their understanding of what is expected and helping them stay on track.

Employee participation in the goal-setting process can significantly impact their commitment and motivation to achieve strategic objectives. When employees are involved in setting their own goals and have a say in determining how to accomplish them, they develop a sense of ownership and responsibility for their performance [49]. This participatory approach increases employees’ engagement and commitment to strategy implementation efforts.

4.4 Self-determination theory

Self-determination theory emphasizes the importance of providing employees with autonomy, competence, and relatedness to enhance their intrinsic motivation and engagement in strategy implementation. Autonomy refers to employees’ sense of control and independence in their work. Allowing employees to have autonomy in decision-making, task execution, and problem-solving empowers them to take ownership of their responsibilities and fosters a sense of accountability for strategy execution [50].

Competence represents employees’ belief in their abilities to perform effectively in their roles. Providing employees with the necessary resources, training, and support to develop their skills and competencies enhances their confidence and motivation to contribute to the successful implementation of the strategy [51]. Organizations should invest in employee development programs and provide ongoing learning opportunities to enhance their competence and enable them to effectively execute the strategic initiatives.

Relatedness refers to the sense of connection and belongingness employees experience within the organization. When employees feel valued, supported, and connected to their colleagues and leaders, they are more likely to be engaged and motivated in strategy implementation [50]. Organizations can foster a sense of relatedness by promoting teamwork, open communication, and collaboration, which enhance employees’ motivation to contribute to the collective goals of the organization.

Advertisement

5. Organizational culture and strategy implementation

5.1 Definition and elements of organizational culture

Organizational culture refers to the shared values, beliefs, assumptions, and norms that guide the behaviors and actions of individuals within an organization [15]. It represents the unique personality and character of an organization and influences how employees think, behave, and interact with each other and with external stakeholders. Organizational culture is composed of various elements, including symbols, rituals, stories, language, norms, and the overall organizational climate [3]. These elements shape the collective identity and provide a framework for decision-making and behavior within the organization.

5.2 Competing values framework

The Competing Values Framework (CVF) provides a model for understanding different types of organizational culture and their implications for strategy implementation [3]. The CVF identifies four types of culture: clan, adhocracy, hierarchy, and market. Clan culture emphasizes collaboration, teamwork, and a focus on employee development. Adhocracy culture values innovation, flexibility, and risk-taking. Hierarchy culture emphasizes stability, control, and a clear chain of command. Market culture focuses on competitiveness, results-orientedness, and external market forces. Each type of culture has distinct strengths and weaknesses in relation to strategy implementation. For example, a clan culture may foster employee engagement and commitment, while a market culture may drive a focus on performance and results.

5.3 Organizational socialization theory

Organizational socialization theory explains how culture shapes employee values, beliefs, and norms, which in turn influence their behavior during strategy implementation [9]. As employees enter and adapt to an organization, they learn the cultural values and expectations through socialization processes. This socialization influences their perception of what behaviors are desirable and acceptable in the organization, shaping their actions during strategy execution. For instance, if the organizational culture emphasizes innovation and risk-taking, employees are more likely to engage in proactive and creative behaviors to support strategy implementation.

5.4 Schein’s model of organizational culture

Schein’s model of organizational culture highlights three levels of culture: artifacts, espoused values, and basic underlying assumptions [15]. Artifacts are the visible and tangible aspects of culture, such as physical symbols, rituals, and behaviors. Espoused values represent the stated beliefs and norms that are promoted by the organization. Basic underlying assumptions are the deeply embedded, unconscious beliefs and values that guide behavior but may not be explicitly acknowledged. These levels interact and influence each other, shaping the organization’s culture and its impact on strategy implementation. For example, if the artifacts and behaviors reflect a culture of collaboration and adaptability, employees are more likely to exhibit cooperative and flexible behaviors during strategy implementation.

In conclusion, organizational culture plays a crucial role in strategy implementation. The Competing Values Framework helps identify different types of culture and their implications for strategy execution. Organizational socialization theory explains how culture shapes employee values and behavior. Schein’s model of organizational culture highlights the levels of culture and their impact on strategy implementation. Understanding the elements of culture and their influence on behavior can help organizations align their culture with strategic objectives and create an environment conducive to effective strategy implementation.

Advertisement

6. The interplay between employee behavior, organizational culture, and strategy implementation

6.1 Examining how employee behavior and organizational culture interact to shape strategy implementation outcomes

The interplay between employee behavior and organizational culture is a critical factor in determining the success of strategy implementation. Employee behavior is influenced by the prevailing organizational culture, while at the same time, employee behavior contributes to shaping and reinforcing the culture [52]. This dynamic interaction highlights the importance of understanding how these two factors interconnect to drive strategy execution outcomes.

6.2 Person-organization fit theory

Person-organization fit theory emphasizes the importance of aligning individual values and behaviors with the organizational culture to enhance strategy execution [24]. When employees’ values, beliefs, and behaviors align with the organizational culture, they experience a sense of fit and compatibility, which leads to positive outcomes such as higher job satisfaction, commitment, and performance [53]. Employees who share similar values and beliefs with the organization are more likely to exhibit behaviors that are consistent with the desired cultural norms, thereby facilitating successful strategy implementation.

6.3 Cultural congruence theory

Cultural congruence theory suggests that a strong alignment between employee behavior, organizational culture, and strategic goals leads to improved performance [54]. When employee behavior is congruent with the values, norms, and expectations of the organizational culture, it creates a work environment where employees feel a sense of belonging and identification. This alignment fosters employee engagement, commitment, and a shared focus on achieving strategic goals. In turn, this enhances communication, coordination, and collaboration among employees, facilitating the smooth execution of strategy.

6.4 Social exchange theory

Social exchange theory examines the reciprocal relationship between employees and the organization and how it influences behavior, trust, and commitment during strategy implementation [55]. According to this theory, employees evaluate the exchange relationship with the organization based on the perceived fairness and support they receive. When employees perceive that the organization values and supports their contributions, they are more likely to reciprocate by exhibiting positive behavior and higher levels of commitment. In the context of strategy implementation, a supportive organizational culture that recognizes and rewards employees’ efforts fosters a positive social exchange relationship. This, in turn, leads to increased motivation, cooperation, and dedication to achieving strategic objectives.

The interplay between employee behavior, organizational culture, and strategy implementation is a complex and dynamic process. The alignment between individual values, behaviors, and the organizational culture is crucial for successful strategy execution. Organizations need to ensure that their employees’ values and behaviors are consistent with the desired cultural norms and strategic goals. This can be achieved through effective recruitment, selection, and onboarding processes that focus on assessing and aligning values and cultural fit. Furthermore, fostering a positive social exchange relationship by providing a supportive work environment and recognizing employees’ contributions enhances their commitment and engagement in strategy implementation.

Recent research has increasingly recognized the interplay between employee behavior and organizational culture [44]. Lengnick-Hall et al. [44] argued that building a capacity for organizational resilience in a VUCA world involves aligning employee behaviors with a culture that encourages adaptability and knowledge sharing. Furthermore, Hitt et al. [39] explored how leaders can leverage both culture and behavior to drive strategic change and improve performance. These findings underscore the synergy between behavior and culture as a key driver of success in turbulent environments.

Despite the wealth of research in this area, several gaps persist in the literature. First, while existing studies provide valuable insights, they often lack a holistic view that integrates employee behavior, organizational culture, and strategy implementation in a VUCA context. Second, limited attention has been given to practical implications and actionable strategies for managers and leaders to navigate these challenges effectively. Finally, the dynamic nature of the VUCA world requires continuous adaptation, necessitating a focus on longitudinal research that examines the evolving relationship between behavior, culture, and performance.

Advertisement

7. Overcoming challenges in a VUCA world

7.1 Identifying specific challenges faced by organizations in strategy implementation within VUCA environments

Strategy implementation in a VUCA world poses unique challenges for organizations. VUCA environments are characterized by volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity [34]. These challenges include rapidly changing market conditions, disruptive technologies, unpredictable customer demands, and geopolitical uncertainties. In such dynamic contexts, organizations need to navigate through these challenges to effectively implement their strategies.

7.2 Sensemaking theory

Sensemaking theory highlights the role of employee behavior and organizational culture in sensemaking processes to navigate ambiguity and complexity during strategy implementation [27]. Sensemaking involves interpreting and understanding the VUCA environment and its implications for strategy. Employee behavior influenced by the organizational culture plays a crucial role in sensemaking activities. Employees who actively seek information, engage in dialog, and share diverse perspectives contribute to collective sensemaking, enabling organizations to make sense of the VUCA world and align their actions with strategic goals.

7.3 Change management theories

Change management theories provide frameworks and strategies to address resistance, foster employee buy-in, and adapt to dynamic VUCA conditions. Lewin’s change model emphasizes the importance of unfreezing existing behaviors, implementing change, and refreezing new behaviors [29]. Kotter’s 8-step model offers a structured approach that includes creating a sense of urgency, building a guiding coalition, and empowering employees to embrace change [28]. These change management theories help organizations overcome resistance to change, enhance employee engagement, and facilitate the successful implementation of strategies in VUCA environments.

7.4 Resilience theory

Resilience theory explores how individual and organizational resilience can mitigate the negative impact of VUCA on strategy implementation and performance [56]. Individual resilience refers to the ability of employees to adapt, bounce back from setbacks, and thrive in challenging circumstances. Organizational resilience involves building agile structures, fostering a learning culture, and developing robust systems to respond to VUCA challenges. Resilience enables organizations to anticipate, absorb, and adapt to VUCA conditions, minimizing disruptions and enhancing strategy implementation outcomes.

In a VUCA world, organizations face numerous challenges during strategy implementation. Sensemaking theory highlights the role of employee behavior and organizational culture in making sense of complex and ambiguous environments. Change management theories provide frameworks to address resistance and foster adaptability in VUCA conditions. Resilience theory emphasizes the importance of individual and organizational resilience in mitigating the negative impact of VUCA and maintaining strategy implementation effectiveness.

Advertisement

8. Measuring and evaluating strategy implementation and performance

8.1 Key metrics and indicators for assessing strategy implementation success in a VUCA world

Measuring and evaluating strategy implementation success in a VUCA world requires organizations to consider a range of metrics and indicators that go beyond traditional financial measures. Key metrics may include customer satisfaction, market share, innovation rate, employee productivity, and adaptability to changing market conditions [57]. These indicators provide a comprehensive view of strategy execution outcomes and help organizations assess their ability to navigate the challenges of a VUCA environment.

8.2 Balanced scorecard approach

The balanced scorecard approach offers a framework for evaluating the impact of employee behavior and culture on strategy outcomes by considering multiple perspectives. This approach includes financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth perspectives [31]. By incorporating these perspectives, organizations can assess how employee behavior and organizational culture contribute to financial performance, customer satisfaction, operational efficiency, and employee development. The balanced scorecard approach provides a holistic view of strategy implementation outcomes and enables organizations to identify areas for improvement and alignment.

8.3 Organizational network analysis

Organizational network analysis (ONA) examines social networks and communication patterns within an organization to understand the influence of employee behavior and culture on strategy execution [58]. By mapping formal and informal networks, ONA helps identify key influencers, information flows, and collaboration patterns. It provides insights into how employee behavior and organizational culture impact the exchange of knowledge, decision-making processes, and coordination efforts during strategy implementation. ONA helps organizations identify both strong and weak ties in the network, facilitating effective communication and collaboration to support strategy execution.

8.4 Employee engagement theories

Employee engagement is a crucial factor in strategy implementation success. Various models and tools can be used to measure and assess employee engagement and its impact on strategy implementation outcomes. For example, the Gallup Q12 survey measures employee engagement by assessing factors such as clear expectations, supportive management, and growth opportunities [59]. The Job Demands-Resources model [60] examines the balance between job demands and resources to understand employee engagement. These models provide insights into the relationship between employee engagement, behavior, and strategy execution outcomes, helping organizations identify areas where engagement can be improved.

In measuring and evaluating strategy implementation and performance in a VUCA world, organizations should adopt a multidimensional approach that goes beyond financial metrics. The balanced scorecard approach provides a comprehensive framework for assessing the impact of employee behavior and culture across various dimensions. Organizational network analysis offers insights into the influence of behavior and culture on communication and collaboration networks. Employee engagement theories provide tools to measure and understand the relationship between engagement, behavior, and strategy execution outcomes.

Advertisement

9. Conceptual framework

In today’s volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) world, organizations must navigate multifaceted challenges to remain competitive and achieve their strategic objectives. Central to this endeavor is understanding the intricate relationship between employee behavior and organizational culture and how these elements collectively influence strategy implementation and organizational performance. This conceptual framework seeks to provide a structured perspective on this relationship, elucidating the key dimensions and their interconnections. The framework is shown in Figure 1 and the dimensions are discussed in the Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Conceptual framework. Source: Author’s compilation.

9.1 Key dimensions of the framework

9.1.1 Employee behavior

  • Alignment with strategy: The extent to which employee behaviors are consistent with the organization’s strategic objectives.

  • Proactiveness: The degree to which employees exhibit initiative and take proactive steps to contribute to strategy execution.

  • Adaptability: The organization’s ability to encourage and accommodate adaptive behaviors among employees in response to changing conditions.

  • Ownership and accountability: The sense of responsibility and ownership that employees feel toward the successful implementation of the organization’s strategy.

9.1.2 Organizational culture

  • Cultural types: The predominant cultural types within the organization, such as clan, adhocracy, market, or hierarchy [3].

  • Cultural values: The core values, beliefs, and norms that shape employee attitudes and behaviors.

  • Innovation and learning: The extent to which the culture encourages innovation, experimentation, and continuous learning [36].

  • Leadership influence: Leaders play a crucial role in shaping and reinforcing the ezculture by serving as role models and setting cultural expectations [37].

9.1.3 Interplay between employee behavior and organizational culture

  • Alignment: The degree to which employee behavior aligns with and reflects the cultural values and expectations of the organization.

  • Mutual reinforcement: How employee behaviors, when consistent with the culture, reinforce and strengthen the cultural norms, and vice versa.

  • Cultural evolution: The dynamic nature of culture and behavior reflects how changes in one can drive changes in the other over time [39].

9.1.4 Strategy implementation and performance outcomes

  • Efficiency and effectiveness: The successful execution of strategic initiatives leads to efficient processes and effective results.

  • Adaptability and resilience: The organization’s capacity to adapt to changing circumstances and maintain performance levels in the face of disruption.

  • Competitive advantage: How the alignment of employee behavior and culture contributes to a sustainable competitive advantage.

  • Employee satisfaction and engagement: The impact on employee satisfaction, engagement, and retention as a result of alignment with organizational culture and strategic goals.

9.1.5 External and contextual factors

  • Industry and market dynamics: How industry-specific factors influence the relationship between behavior, culture, and strategy.

  • Regulatory environment: The impact of external regulations on an organization’s culture, employee behavior, and strategic choices.

  • Globalization: The influence of global factors, such as international markets and cultural diversity, on the interplay between behavior, culture, and strategy.

This conceptual framework provides a structured lens to analyze the role of employee behavior and organizational culture in strategy implementation and performance, considering important dimensions and their interrelationships. By examining these components and their interactions within the context of external and contextual factors, organizations can better understand and leverage the dynamics at play in a VUCA world, ultimately driving strategic success and resilience.

Advertisement

10. Case studies and examples

Illustrating real-life case studies or examples highlighting the relationship between employee behavior, organizational culture, strategy implementation, and performance in a VUCA world can provide valuable insights into the practical application of theories and concepts discussed earlier.

10.1 Case study 1: Google’s innovation culture

Google is known for its innovative culture, which has played a significant role in its success. The company encourages employee behavior that fosters creativity, risk-taking, and continuous learning. This behavior is influenced by Google’s organizational culture, which emphasizes collaboration, experimentation, and a supportive work environment [61]. The social cognitive theory helps explain how individual attitudes, self-efficacy, and motivation influence employee behavior during strategy implementation. In Google’s case, employees’ belief in their capabilities, combined with a culture that supports innovation, drives their behavior to experiment with new ideas and contribute to the company’s continuous improvement [62].

10.2 Case study 2: Zappos’ customer-centric culture

Zappos, an online shoe and clothing retailer, is renowned for its customer-centric culture. The company focuses on creating a positive customer experience and has built its organizational culture around this principle. Zappos emphasizes employee behavior that prioritizes customer satisfaction, going above and beyond expectations. This behavior is influenced by the organizational socialization theory, which states that culture shapes employee values, beliefs, and norms. Zappos’ culture instills the importance of exceptional customer service and empowers employees to make decisions that align with the company’s customer-centric values [63]. The goal-setting theory further supports Zappos’ approach by highlighting the role of clear goals, feedback, and employee participation in driving behavior alignment with strategic objectives. Zappos sets clear goals related to customer satisfaction, provides regular feedback, and involves employees in decision-making processes to ensure that their behavior is aligned with the company’s strategic focus [21].

10.3 Case study 3: Southwest Airlines’ employee engagement

Southwest Airlines is recognized for its strong employee engagement, which has contributed to its success as a low-cost airline. The company’s organizational culture, characterized by a fun and supportive work environment, fosters employee behavior that is aligned with the company’s strategy. The self-determination theory emphasizes the importance of providing employees with autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Southwest Airlines allows its employees to have a degree of autonomy in decision-making, provides training and development opportunities to enhance competence, and promotes a sense of camaraderie and teamwork among employees [22]. This approach enhances employees’ intrinsic motivation and engagement in strategy implementation, leading to improved performance.

These case studies demonstrate how employee behavior and organizational culture interact to shape strategy implementation outcomes. The theories and concepts discussed earlier, such as social cognitive theory, goal-setting theory, and self-determination theory, play a vital role in understanding and explaining the relationship between employee behavior, culture, and strategy execution. These examples highlight the practical application of these theories in real-life organizations, providing insights into how specific behaviors and cultural attributes influence strategy implementation and performance in a VUCA world.

11. Some empirical studies

Empirical studies provide valuable insights into the relationship between employee behavior, organizational culture, and strategy implementation in various contexts. Here are a few recent studies that shed light on this topic:

  • Study 1: Dinh T. Q., & Nguyen H. T. [64] explored the impact of employee behavior and organizational culture on strategy implementation success in Vietnamese manufacturing firms. The study found that positive employee behaviors, such as commitment, initiative, and teamwork, were positively associated with successful strategy implementation. Additionally, a supportive and adaptive organizational culture that encourages collaboration and innovation enhanced the effectiveness of strategy implementation.

  • Study 2: Marique G., et al. [65] examined the influence of organizational culture on strategy implementation in Belgian small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The study found that organizations with a clan culture, characterized by a supportive and nurturing environment, had higher levels of employee commitment and engagement in strategy execution. This positive organizational culture facilitated better alignment between employee behavior and strategic objectives, leading to improved strategy implementation outcomes.

  • Study 3: Vasilaki A., et al. [66] investigated the role of employee behavior in strategy implementation in the hospitality industry. The study found that employees’ proactive behavior, such as seeking opportunities for improvement and taking initiative, positively influenced the effectiveness of strategy implementation. Moreover, the study highlighted the importance of a supportive organizational culture that encourages and rewards such proactive behaviors to enhance strategy execution success.

  • Study 4: Mutonyi, Slatten Liean and Gonzalez-Pinero [67] examined the impact of organizational culture on strategy implementation outcomes in the healthcare sector. The study revealed that a culture characterized by shared values, open communication, and employee involvement positively influenced employee behavior during strategy implementation. This alignment between culture and behavior led to improved strategy execution and performance in healthcare organizations.

These empirical studies demonstrate the significance of employee behavior and organizational culture in strategy implementation and highlight the positive outcomes associated with their alignment. They provide evidence that supportive and adaptive cultures, along with positive employee behaviors, enhance strategy execution success across different industries and countries.

12. Recommendations

Thriving in VUCA environments requires organizations to cultivate a culture that promotes desired employee behaviors and adaptability. Here are some recommendations:

  • Clearly communicate strategic objectives: Ensure that employees have a clear understanding of the organization’s strategic objectives and their role in achieving them. This clarity helps align employee behavior with strategic goals and fosters a sense of purpose and direction.

  • Encourage employee involvement and participation: Involve employees in the strategy development process and decision-making. This promotes a sense of ownership and empowers employees to contribute their ideas and perspectives. Employee involvement enhances commitment and motivation, leading to proactive behavior in strategy implementation.

  • Provide continuous learning and development opportunities: Offer training programs and learning opportunities to enhance employees’ skills and knowledge. This fosters a culture of continuous learning and adaptability, enabling employees to navigate VUCA challenges effectively.

  • Foster collaboration and teamwork: Create an environment that encourages collaboration, information sharing, and teamwork. This helps break down silos and promotes collective problem-solving and innovation. Collaboration enhances employee engagement and facilitates the integration of diverse perspectives, leading to more effective strategy implementation.

  • Recognize and reward desired behaviors: Recognize and reward employees who exhibit desired behaviors aligned with the organization’s strategic objectives. This can be done through formal recognition programs, incentives, or career advancement opportunities. Recognitions and rewards reinforce the desired behaviors and motivate employees to continue their efforts in strategy implementation.

  • Lead by example: Leaders play a crucial role in shaping organizational culture and employee behavior. Leaders should model the desired behaviors, demonstrate adaptability, and promote a positive and inclusive culture. By leading by example, leaders inspire employees to emulate these behaviors and create a culture of continuous improvement and resilience.

  • Encourage risk-taking and learning from failure: VUCA environments require organizations to be open to experimentation and learning from failures. Encourage employees to take calculated risks, embrace innovation, and view failures as opportunities for growth and learning. Create a safe space where employees feel comfortable sharing their ideas and learning from their experiences.

  • Foster open and transparent communication: Establish open channels of communication where employees feel comfortable sharing their thoughts, concerns, and ideas. Transparent communication helps build trust, promotes engagement, and facilitates timely information flow, enabling employees to adapt and respond effectively to VUCA challenges.

  • Promote flexibility and agility: Encourage employees to embrace flexibility and adaptability in their work. Provide them with the necessary resources and support to respond quickly to changing circumstances and make informed decisions. This flexibility enables employees to navigate uncertainties and seize opportunities in a VUCA world.

  • Foster a learning culture: Create a culture that values continuous learning and encourages employees to acquire new knowledge and skills. Support employees in pursuing professional development opportunities, such as training programs, workshops, conferences, and online courses. A learning culture enables employees to stay ahead of emerging trends and technologies and adapt to dynamic market conditions.

  • Emphasize cross-functional collaboration: Break down departmental barriers and foster collaboration across different functions and teams. Encourage employees to collaborate with colleagues from diverse backgrounds and disciplines to solve complex problems and drive innovation. Cross-functional collaboration enhances organizational agility and enables a holistic approach to strategy implementation.

  • Encourage innovation and experimentation: Foster an environment that encourages innovation and experimentation. Provide employees with the freedom to explore new ideas, take calculated risks, and learn from failures. Implement mechanisms such as innovation labs, idea incubators, or designated time for creative pursuits to stimulate innovation and entrepreneurial thinking.

  • Promote diversity and inclusion: Embrace diversity and create an inclusive workplace where employees feel valued and respected. Encourage diverse perspectives, ideas, and experiences, as they contribute to a richer understanding of complex issues and better decision-making. A diverse and inclusive culture enhances adaptability and problem-solving capabilities in a VUCA world.

  • Establish feedback and performance management systems: Implement regular feedback mechanisms to provide employees with constructive feedback on their performance. Set clear performance goals aligned with the organization’s strategic objectives and provide ongoing feedback to support employee growth and development. This promotes accountability, continuous improvement, and alignment of individual behaviors with organizational goals.

  • Foster a supportive and well-being-oriented environment: Prioritize employee well-being and create a supportive work environment. Offer programs and initiatives that promote work-life balance, stress management, and mental health support. Recognize the importance of employee well-being in enhancing engagement, productivity, and resilience in the face of VUCA challenges.

  • Continuously monitor and adapt: Regularly assess the effectiveness of strategies, employee behaviors, and cultural initiatives in the context of VUCA environments. Monitor key performance indicators, solicit employee feedback, and conduct periodic organizational assessments to identify areas for improvement and adapt strategies accordingly.

By implementing these recommendations, organizations can foster the desired employee behaviors and cultivate an adaptive culture that thrives in VUCA environments. It is important to remember that every organization is unique, and strategies should be tailored to the specific context and needs of the organization.

13. Conclusion

In conclusion, this paper has explored the critical role of employee behavior and organizational culture in strategy implementation and performance within the context of a volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) world. The findings highlight the significance of aligning employee behavior and organizational culture with the strategic objectives of an organization to achieve optimal performance and navigate the challenges posed by a VUCA environment.

Firstly, it is evident that employee behavior plays a crucial role in strategy implementation and performance. Organizations need to foster a culture of commitment, engagement, and proactive problem-solving among employees. This involves providing clear communication, empowering employees, and fostering a sense of ownership and accountability. By aligning individual behaviors with strategic goals, organizations can enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of strategy execution.

Secondly, organizational culture has a profound impact on strategy implementation and performance. A strong and adaptive culture that values innovation, agility, and continuous learning is essential in a VUCA world. Organizations must promote an environment that encourages risk-taking, knowledge sharing, and collaboration, allowing employees to adapt and respond swiftly to changing circumstances. A culture that supports flexibility and resilience enables organizations to effectively implement strategies and achieve sustainable performance in the face of uncertainty and complexity.

Furthermore, the interplay between employee behavior and organizational culture is critical. The alignment of individual behaviors with the prevailing culture fosters a shared sense of purpose and direction. When employees exhibit behaviors that are consistent with the desired culture, it enhances organizational cohesion, employee satisfaction, and overall performance. Leaders and managers play a vital role in shaping and reinforcing the culture, serving as role models and providing necessary support and resources to employees.

Some practical implications are as follows:

  • To achieve optimal performance in a VUCA world, organizations must prioritize aligning employee behavior and organizational culture with strategic objectives.

  • Promoting a culture that encourages adaptive behaviors and embraces change is crucial for effectively responding to VUCA challenges and opportunities.

  • This alignment leads to improved strategy implementation, employee engagement, and overall organizational performance.

Future research should focus on further exploring the dynamic relationship between employee behavior, organizational culture, strategy implementation, and performance. Specific areas for investigation could include:

  • Developing practical frameworks and strategies for organizations to thrive in VUCA environments.

  • Cross-cultural analysis: Investigate how cultural differences influence the relationship between employee behavior, organizational culture, and strategy implementation in various regions and industries. Understand how cultural nuances impact adaptability and performance in a VUCA environment.

  • Leadership styles and organizational culture: Explore the impact of different leadership styles (e.g., transformational, transactional, servant leadership) on shaping and sustaining organizational culture. Examine how leadership behavior aligns with or diverges from the desired culture and its effects on strategy execution and performance.

  • Technology and digital transformation: Study how the integration of technology, such as AI, automation, and digital tools, influences employee behavior and organizational culture in the context of strategy implementation in a VUCA world. Investigate the role of digital culture and its implications.

  • Employee well-being and resilience: Research the relationship between employee well-being, mental health, and their ability to adapt to VUCA environments. Explore how organizational culture can foster resilience and support employees in times of uncertainty.

  • Change management strategies: Examine the effectiveness of various change management strategies in aligning employee behavior and culture with evolving strategic objectives. Identify best practices for leading and facilitating organizational change in VUCA settings.

  • Performance metrics and measurement: Develop comprehensive performance metrics and measurement frameworks that consider the impact of employee behavior and culture on strategy implementation. Explore novel methods for assessing performance in dynamic environments.

  • Knowledge management and learning organizations: Investigate how knowledge management practices and the creation of learning organizations impact strategy execution and performance in a VUCA world. Examine the role of continuous learning and knowledge sharing.

  • Sustainability and CSR: Explore the link between organizational culture, employee behaviors related to sustainability, and corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives. Assess how a culture of sustainability influences strategy implementation and long-term performance.

  • Crisis management and resilience: Analyze how employee behavior and organizational culture contribute to crisis management and resilience in VUCA scenarios. Identify strategies for building and maintaining resilience during crises.

  • Long-term vs. short-term focus: Investigate the tension between short-term and long-term strategic objectives and how employee behavior and culture contribute to organizations’ ability to balance these priorities in a VUCA world.

  • Case studies and industry-specific analysis: Conduct in-depth case studies and industry-specific analyses to provide practical insights into how different organizations address the challenges of VUCA through their culture and employee behavior.

  • Global workforce and remote work: Examine the impact of a global and remote workforce on organizational culture and employee behavior in VUCA environments. Explore strategies for fostering cohesion and alignment in distributed teams.

In conclusion, this paper underscores the importance of aligning employee behavior and organizational culture with strategic objectives to navigate the challenges of a VUCA world successfully. Theoretical and practical implications emphasize the need for organizations to embrace adaptability and change to achieve sustainable performance.

The successful implementation of strategies and achievement of high performance in a VUCA world require organizations to prioritize the alignment of employee behavior and organizational culture. By promoting a culture that encourages adaptive behaviors and embraces change, organizations can effectively respond to the challenges and opportunities presented by a volatile and uncertain environment. This, in turn, leads to improved strategy implementation, employee engagement, and overall organizational performance. Future research should continue to explore the dynamic relationship between employee behavior, organizational culture, strategy implementation, and performance to develop practical frameworks and strategies that organizations can adopt to thrive in a VUCA world.

References

  1. 1. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. The Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press; 2008
  2. 2. Eisenhardt KM, Sull DN. Strategy as simple rules. Harvard Business Review. 2001;79(1):106-116
  3. 3. Cameron KS, Quinn RE. Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2011
  4. 4. Mitra T, Kapoor R, Gupta N. Studying key antecedents of disruptive technology adoption in the digital supply chain: An Indian perspective. International Journal of Emerging Markets. 2022. DOI: 10.1108/IJOEM-07-2021-1052 [Ahead-of-print]
  5. 5. O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML. Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives. 2013;27(4):324-338
  6. 6. Liedtka JM. Strategy implementation: An overview. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. London Borough of Camden: Palgrave Macmillan; 2018. pp. 1-7
  7. 7. Teece DJ. Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning. 2018;51:40-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
  8. 8. Edmondson AC. The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2018
  9. 9. Bauer TN, Bodner T, Erdogan B, Truxillo DM, Tucker JS. Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2007;92(3):707-721
  10. 10. Chen G, Rong K, Wu Y. Reconceptualizing strategic management in the digital age: A fuzzy cognitive map approach. Journal of Business Research. 2019;99:238-246
  11. 11. Chen S, Chang Y, Lai Y. Strategic ambiguity, employee behaviors, and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research. 2019;96:238-249
  12. 12. Gong Y, Law KS, Chang S, Xin KR. Employee behavior in organizations: A multilevel perspective. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 2021;8:209-232
  13. 13. Gong Y, Wang H, Huang JC, Cheung SY. Proactive strategic behavior: A review and extension of the literature. Journal of Management. 2021;47(4):781-818
  14. 14. Denison DR, Haaland S, Goelzer P. Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness: Is Asia different from the rest of the world? Organizational Dynamics. 2012;41(4):287-295
  15. 15. Schein EH. Organizational Culture and Leadership. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2010
  16. 16. Lund DB. Organizational culture and job satisfaction. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 2003;18(3):219-236
  17. 17. Smircich L. Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1983;28(3):339-358. DOI: 10.2307/2392246
  18. 18. Knippenberg DV, Knippenberg BV, Cremer DD. Leadership, affect, and emotions: A state of the science review. The Leadership Quarterly. 2017;28(1):21-34
  19. 19. Lunenburg F. Self-efficacy in the workplace: Implications for motivation and performance. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration. 2011;14(1)
  20. 20. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986
  21. 21. Locke EA, Latham GP. A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1990
  22. 22. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry. 2000;11(4):227-268
  23. 23. Van Maanen J, Schein EH. Toward of theory of organizational socialization. Research in Organizational Behavior. 1979;1:209-264
  24. 24. Kristof AL. Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology. 1996;49(1):1-49
  25. 25. O’Reilly C, Chatman J, Caldwell D. People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal. 1991;34:487-516. DOI: 10.2307/256404
  26. 26. Blau PM. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley, Transaction Publishers; 1964
  27. 27. Weick K. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995
  28. 28. Kotter JP. Leading Change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1996
  29. 29. Lewin K. Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. In: Cartwright D, editor. New York: Harper & Row; 1951
  30. 30. Masten AS, Best KM, Garmezy N. Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and Psychopathology. 1990;2:425-444. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579400005812
  31. 31. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review. 1992;70(1):71-79
  32. 32. Cross R, Borgatti SP, Parker A. Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review. 2002;44(2):25-46
  33. 33. Macey WH, Schneider B. The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 2008;1(1):3-30
  34. 34. Bennett N, Lemoine GJ. What VUCA really means for you. Harvard Business Review. 2014;92(1/2):27-29
  35. 35. Gong Y, Kim TY, Lee DR, Zhu J. A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal. 2010;53(2):434-449
  36. 36. Denison DR, Spreitzer GM. Organizational culture and organizational development: A competing values approach. Research in Organizational Change and Development. 1991;5:1-21
  37. 37. Schein E. Organizational Culture and Leadership. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2004
  38. 38. Gittell JH, Douglass A. Relational bureaucracy: Structuring reciprocal relationships into roles. Academy of Management Review. 2012;37(4):709-733
  39. 39. Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Hoskisson RE. Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization. 5th ed. Cincinnati: International Thomson Publishing; 2001
  40. 40. Doz YL, Kosonen M. Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning. 2008;41(3):315-334
  41. 41. Helfat C, Finkelstein S, Mitchell W, Peteraf M, Singh H, Teece D, et al. Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2007
  42. 42. Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal. 2000;21(10-11):1105-1121
  43. 43. Tushman ML, O’Reilly CA. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior. 2007;27:1-44
  44. 44. Lengnick-Hall CA, Beck TE, Lengnick-Hall ML. Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review. 2011;21(3):243-255
  45. 45. Sutcliffe KM, Vogus TJ, Dane E. Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Academy of Management Annals. 2016;10(1):535-615
  46. 46. Brouthers KD, Nakos G, Dimitratos P. SME entrepreneurial orientation, international performance, and the moderating role of strategic alliances. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2018;42(5):737-760
  47. 47. De Clercq D, Haq IU, Azeem MU, Raja U. Does employees’ positive psychological capital strengthen their work engagement? A self-determination perspective. Journal of Business Research. 2018;84:416-425
  48. 48. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1997
  49. 49. Kristof-Brown AL, Zimmerman RD, Johnson EC. Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology. 2005;58(2):281-342
  50. 50. Gagné M, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2005;26(4):331-362
  51. 51. Rigotti T, Schyns B, Mohr G. A short version of the occupational self-efficacy scale: Structural and construct validity across five countries. Journal of Career Assessment. 2019;27(1):130-147
  52. 52. O’Reilly CA, Doerr B, Chatman JA. The promise and problems of organizational culture: CEO personality, culture, and firm performance. Group & Organization Management. 2014;39(6):595-625
  53. 53. Edwards JR, Cable DM. The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2009;94(3):654-677
  54. 54. Chatman JA, Caldwell DF. Leading culture change in organizations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2014;50(4):481-511
  55. 55. Cropanzano R, Mitchell MS. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management. 2005;31(6):874-900
  56. 56. Luthans F, Youssef-Morgan CM, Avolio BJ. Psychological Capital and beyond. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015
  57. 57. Sahin E, Robinson D. Building a resilient strategy for a VUCA world. MIT Sloan Management Review. 2021;62(1):14-16
  58. 58. Obstfeld D, Borgatti SP, Davis J. Network ethnography: A mixed-methods approach for the study of social networks in organizations. Organizational Research Methods. 2019;22(2):491-515
  59. 59. Gallup. Q12 Employee Engagement Survey. 2021. Available from: https://www.gallup.com/workplace/285674/q12-employee-engagement-survey.aspx
  60. 60. Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2007;22(3):309-328
  61. 61. Kim H. The analysis of innovation management in google. Journal of Economics and Management Sciences. 2020;3:10-19. DOI: 10.30560/jems.v3n4p10
  62. 62. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50(2):248-287
  63. 63. Chatman JA. Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1991;36(3):459-484
  64. 64. Dinh TQ , Nguyen HT. Employee behavior and organizational culture: Impacts on strategy implementation in Vietnamese manufacturing firms. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies. 2020;27(1):9-25
  65. 65. Marique G et al. Strategy implementation and organizational culture in Belgian SMEs. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 2019;32(4):462-483
  66. 66. Vasilaki A et al. The role of employee behavior in strategy implementation: The case of the hospitality industry. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management. 2021;30(4):500-520
  67. 67. Mutonyi BR, Slåtten T, Lien G, González-Piñero M. The impact of organizational culture and leadership climate on organizational attractiveness and innovative behavior: A study of Norwegian hospital employees. BMC Health Services Research. 13 May 2022;22(1):637. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08042-x. PMID: 35562748; PMCID: PMC9102259

Written By

Dinko Herman Boikanyo

Submitted: 27 June 2023 Reviewed: 25 October 2023 Published: 16 January 2024