Open access

Introductory Chapter: Surfactants – Bridging Fundamental Concepts with Emerging Perspectives

Written By

Olasehinde Owoseni

Submitted: 12 October 2023 Published: 17 January 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.113784

From the Edited Volume

Surfactants - Fundamental Concepts and Emerging Perspectives

Edited by Olasehinde Owoseni

Chapter metrics overview

56 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Surfactants are amphiphilic molecules with hydrophilic head and hydrophobic tail groups (Figure 1). The amphiphilicity of these surfactant molecules drives their assembly into a wide range of structures including micelles, reverse micelles, liquid crystalline mesophases, and vesicles [1]. These surfactant assemblies have been exploited as templates for nanostructured-materials synthesis [2, 3]. Surfactants are applied in a wide range of applications including the formulation of detergents, medicines, vaccines, paints, cosmetics, oil spill dispersants, enhanced oil recovery agents, and agrochemicals products. This book provides an overview of the fundamentals, emerging perspectives, and applications of surfactants.

Figure 1.

Surfactant self-assembly and microstructures.

Typical considerations in the study and application of surfactant systems are built on their fundamental assembly and physicochemical properties (Figure 2). For effectiveness in technological applications, surfactant is typically applied as mixed systems including mixtures of multiple surfactants, particles, and polymers [1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. The novelty of research efforts on surfactant can include synergism with nanomaterials, process scalability and environmental impacts (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

General considerations in the study and application of surfactant systems.

The first two chapters of this book present a fundamental review of surfactant systems. These introductory chapters should be an excellent introduction to the fundamental phenomena of surfactants. Chapter 1 covers a broad scope of the structure and application of surfactants. However, concerns about the potential impacts of surfactant in our everyday lives has stimulated recent research efforts in the development and application of environmentally benign surfactant systems [10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. Thus, Chapter 2 provides a more-tailored perspective on the development and application of eco-benign surfactants.

Chapter 3 presents an interesting topic of combining surfactants with clay minerals. The combination of surfactant and clay minerals such as halloysite clay nanotubes has attracted significant attention in environmental remediation applications [15, 16]. The unique hollow geometry of the interfacially adherent particles allows for surfactant encapsulation and delivery to the oil-water interface. Surfactant release lowers the interfacial tension and facilitates oil dispersion [15]. In general, the synergistic combination of surfactant and clay minerals in organoclays can provide significant benefits in several practical applications beyond oil spill remediation. The characteristics of the organoclays formed from the clay-surfactant interactions are determined by the individual characteristics of the surfactant and clay mineral as well as the method of preparation. Thus, the chapter starts with a fundamental discussion on surfactants including their classification, physicochemical, and interfacial adsorption characteristics. This is followed by a section focused on clay minerals. The classification of clay minerals, chemical structure, and fundamental properties such as swelling capacity, cation exchange capacity, surface area, and charge are presented. The interaction of surfactant and clay minerals is then discussed with critical details on the preparation methods and prevailing physicochemical mechanisms. The chapter also provides insights into the structure of the resulting surfactant-modified clay minerals (organoclays) and their practical applications.

The use of Ionic Liquid-Based Surfactants in Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery (CEOR) is presented in Chapter 4. Surfactants play a critical role in reducing the Interfacial tension (IFT) [15] and altering surface wettability [17]. However, the tunability and stability of ionic liquids in harsh environmental conditions make them attractive for CEOR [18, 19]. The fundamental characteristics of ionic-liquid-based surfactants and their relevance to Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery (CEOR) mechanisms are first discussed in the chapter. The discussion includes the critical physical properties and chemical structure of Ionic Liquid-based surfactants. The chapter briefly introduces the various enhanced oil recovery methods including gas injection, thermal methods, chemical methods, and new emerging methods in the field. The next section in the chapter then provides a deep dive into the chemical methods spanning surfactant flooding, micellar flooding, and alteration of reservoir rock wettability from oil-wet to water-wet. The efficacy of surfactant systems in CEOR is strongly dependent on IFT reduction. The last section discusses the effectiveness of Ionic Liquid-Based Surfactants relative to conventional surfactants in CEOR. These are key considerations that are relevant in surfactant screening for CEOR applications [20].

Surfactants have found application in microheterogeneous catalysis with superior properties for catalytic reactions and process tunability relative to homogeneous reactions [21, 22]. This is especially relevant in reactions where all the reactants cannot be solubilized in a single solvent [21]. These reaction systems are complex with the presence of reactants; multiple to effectively understand the surfactant mechanisms in complex microheterogenous catalysis applications, combining experimental and modeling techniques is beneficial [23, 24]. The last chapter in this book provides a unique perspective on the models that have been developed to explain the surfactant effects on reaction rates. Overall, this book bridges the fundamental concepts and emerging applications of surfactant systems.

References

  1. 1. Olasehinde Owoseni YZ. Microstructural characteristics of surfactant assembly into a gel-like mesophase for application as an oil spill dispersant. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2018;524:279-288
  2. 2. Holmberg K. Surfactant-templated nanomaterials synthesis. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 15 Jun 2004;274(2):355-364
  3. 3. Su Y, Wang Y, Owoseni O, Zhang Y, Gamliel DP, Valla JA, et al. A bottle-around-a-ship method to generate hollow thin-shelled particles containing encapsulated iron species with application to the environmental decontamination of chlorinated compounds. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 25 Apr 2018;10(16):13542-13551. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b14308. Epub 2018 Apr 12. PMID: 29620856
  4. 4. Maestro A, Santini E, Zabiegaj D, Llamas S, Ravera F, Liggieri L, et al. Particle and particle-surfactant mixtures at fluid interfaces: Assembly, morphology, and rheological description. Advances in Condensed Matter Physics. 2015;2015:17. Article ID 917516. DOI: 10.1155/2015/917516
  5. 5. Francesca Ravera MF. Liquid–liquid interfacial properties of mixed nanoparticle–surfactant systems. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2008;323(1-3):99-108
  6. 6. Olasehinde Owoseni YS. Hydrophobically modified chitosan biopolymer connects halloysite nanotubes at the oil-water interface as complementary pair for stabilizing oil droplets. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2022;620:135-143
  7. 7. Olasehinde Owoseni YZ. Tuning the wettability of halloysite clay nanotubes by surface carbonization for optimal emulsion stabilization. Langmuir. 2015;31(51):13700-13707
  8. 8. Pal JY. Investigation of surfactant-polymer interactions using rheology and surface tension measurements. Polymers. 2020;12(10):2302
  9. 9. Ritacco HA. Polyelectrolyte/surfactant mixtures: A pathway to smart foams. ACS Omega. 2022;7(41):36117-36136
  10. 10. Bhadani A, Kafle A, Ogura T, Akamatsu M, Sakai K, Sakai H, et al. Current perspective of sustainable surfactants based on renewable building blocks. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science. 2020;45:124-135. DOI: 10.1016/j. cocis.2020.01.002. ISSN 1359-0294
  11. 11. Farias CBB, Almeida FCG, Silva IA, Souza TC, Meira HM, Soares da Silva RCF, et al. Production of green surfactants: Market prospects. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 2021;51:28-39
  12. 12. Giwa A, Chalermthai B, Shaikh B, Taher H. Green dispersants for oil spill response: A comprehensive review of recent advances. Marine Pollution Bulletin. Aug 2023;193:115118
  13. 13. John V, Arnosti C, Field J, Kujawinski EB, MacCormick A. The Role of Dispersants in Oil Spill Remediation: Fundamental Concepts, Rationale for Use, Fate, and Transport Issues. 2016. DOI: 10.17615/epc8-d024
  14. 14. Athas JC, Jun K, McCafferty C, Owoseni O, John VT, Raghavan SR. An effective dispersant for oil spills based on food-grade amphiphiles. Langmuir. 12 Aug 2014;30(31):9285-9294. DOI: 10.1021/la502312n. Epub 2014 Jul 29. PMID: 25072867
  15. 15. Olasehinde Owoseni EN. Release of surfactant cargo from Interfacially-active Halloysite clay nanotubes for oil spill remediation. Langmuir. 2014;30(45):13533-13541
  16. 16. Owoseni O, Nyankson E, Zhang Y, Adams DJ, He J, Spinu L, et al. Interfacial adsorption and surfactant release characteristics of magnetically functionalized halloysite nanotubes for responsive emulsions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 1 Feb 2016;463:288-298. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.10.064. Epub 2015 Oct 30. PMID: 26555959
  17. 17. Achinta Bera HB. Ionic liquids as alternatives of surfactants in enhanced oil recovery—A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2016;224(Part A):177-188
  18. 18. Somoza A, Arce A, Soto A. Oil recovery tests with ionic liquids: A review and evaluation of 1-decyl-3-methylimidazolium triflate. Petroleum Science. 2022;19(4):1877-1887. DOI: 10.1016/j.petsci.2021.10.025. ISSN 1995-8226
  19. 19. Nandwani S, Malek N, Chakraborty M, Gupta S. Insight into the application of surface-active ionic liquids in surfactant based enhanced oil recovery processes–a guide leading to research advances. Energy & Fuels. 2020. DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00343
  20. 20. Benzagouta MS, AlNashef IM, Karnanda W, Al-Khidir K. Ionic liquids as novel surfactants for potential use in enhanced oil recovery. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2013;30(11):2108-2117
  21. 21. Schwarze M, Pogrzeba T, Volovych I, Schomäcker R. Microemulsion systems for catalytic reactions and processes. Catalysis Science & Technology. 2015;5:24-33
  22. 22. Lin J-M, Yamada M. Microheterogeneous systems of micelles and microemulsions as reaction media in chemiluminescent analysis. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2003;22(2):99-107. ISSN 0165-9936
  23. 23. Bravo-Díaz C, Romsted LS, Liu C, Losada-Barreiro S, Pastoriza-Gallego MJ, Gao X, et al. To model chemical reactivity in heterogeneous emulsions, think homogeneous microemulsions. Langmuir. 25 Aug 2015;31(33):8961-8979. DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00112. Epub 2015 Apr 16. PMID: 25805058
  24. 24. Kovalchuk VI, EV. Surfactant adsorption layers: Experiments and modeling. Langmuir. 2023;39(10):3537-3545

Written By

Olasehinde Owoseni

Submitted: 12 October 2023 Published: 17 January 2024