Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Non-Timber Forest Products: Diversity, Utilization, and Dependency in Fringe Areas of Jaldapara National Park in Indian Sub-Himalayan Region

Written By

Lakpa Doma Lepcha, Biplov Ch. Sarkar, Gopal Shukla and Sumit Chakravarty

Submitted: 23 June 2022 Reviewed: 25 September 2023 Published: 02 November 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.113271

From the Edited Volume

Floristic Diversity - Biology and Conservation

Edited by Gopal Shukla, Jahangir A. Bhat, Sumit Chakravarty, Adel W. Almutairi and Mei Li

Chapter metrics overview

61 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) greatly contribute to livelihood, development, and poverty alleviation across the tropics. We also assumed that the fringe communities inhabiting Jaldapara National Park (JNP) of Indian eastern sub-Himalayan region largely rely on the NTFPs for their livelihood due to its remote and isolated location with no physical infrastructure and facilities. Multistage sampling technique was used for the study. The sample size was 205 households selected randomly from a sample frame of 10 villages. Descriptive statistics was employed to analyze and summarize the data. A total of 146 NTFP species was documented. The communities relied on their NTFP collection/harvest for food, medicine, firewood, fodder, and other socio-cultural items for household use and cash income. The documented species were further categorized into plant, fish, fungus, and insect. The relative frequency of citation (RFC), value ranged from 0.2 to 0.96 for all categories of NTFPs with average 0.78. Income from NTFPs contributed on an average 45% of the total annual household income of the households. NTFPs provided a natural insurance to households especially during the periods of scarcity. Focused interventions with technical and financial support are recommended to uplift the livelihood of the communities in JNP.

Keywords

  • forest fringe community
  • NTFP
  • livelihood
  • sustainable development
  • eastern Himalayas

1. Introduction

Any biological products and services collected mainly from forests and other associated tree-based land use systems are known as non-timber forest products (NTFPs) [1, 2, 3, 4]. Most of the rural and indigenous communities residing in and around forests rely for their livelihood on NTFPs socioeconomically and culturally [2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) along with the tradition of plants-based knowledge is distributed among the vast number of indigenous and rural communities [15, 16]. NTFPs provide natural insurance against hunger and malnutrition during scarcity and even during famines [5]. NTFPs are thus vital for the social development of the indigenous/forest fringe and rural communities [17]. In spite of the “right of ownership, i.e., access to collect, use and dispose of minor forest produce by the ‘Forest Rights Act, 2006’” to the indigenous communities dependent on forest or forest dwellers, they still remain underprivileged and impoverished [18]. Having potential to address poverty, sustainable development, and tropical forest conservation without competing with agricultural activity, NTFPs is now receiving more academic and policy attention [2, 3, 19, 20].

The dependency of the indigenous forest and rural people on NTFP continues today because of their poor economic conditions and non-empowerment toward socioeconomic development [21] through its use in food, medicine, fiber, fuelwood and sale [2, 3, 4]. Plant and animal resources and their value as NTFPs are rich among the ethno-cultural groups [22, 23], but potentialities of many of these resources and valuable plants are yet to be explored [2, 3]. Unfortunately, till now, there are no serious efforts either to document the NTFP resources or to analyze their utilization and socioeconomic aspects [5]. Additionally, due to deforestation, modernization, unsustainable development, and ignorance of younger generation toward NTFPs, the traditional knowledge associated with them and their utilization is gradually eroding through acculturation and the loss of plant biodiversity [24, 25, 26]. Awareness, research, and education are needed to protect this diminishing knowledge of NTFPs and conserve bioresources for the benefit of our future generations [27].

Dependence on NTFP collection and utilization is still a crucial livelihood strategy for forest dwellers in the Terai foothills of eastern Himalayas in West Bengal [11, 24, 28, 29, 30, 31]. Unfortunately, now the traditional knowledge associated with NTFPs in these regions is found mostly confined to the older generation of these communities, which is consequently in the verge of extinction [24]. Hence, identifying and documenting the diversity of NTFP resources with their utilization is important to conserve and manage these resources sustainably while also being helpful for restoration and preservation of their associated traditional knowledge [25, 26, 32, 33, 34]. More importantly, promoting the NTFPs-based activities has now become a crucial policy action of any developmental strategy for uplifting and empowering the rural and indigenous communities [35]. Such documentation will provide baseline data and information for conservation and sustainable utilization of the NTFP resources. Additionally, these documentations will be a proper testimony from specialists, which will also popularize the NTFPs to be introduced into the present-day farming systems and also get acceptance for utilization by the urban population [25, 26, 35, 36]. Therefore, the present study was conducted in the forest fringe villages in the Terai region of West Bengal with the following objectives:

  • Documentation/enlistment of NTFPs used by forest fringe communities.

  • Traditional uses and utilization pattern of NTFPs by these communities.

Advertisement

2. Methods and materials

2.1 Study area

JNP is a part of Himalayan Biodiversity Hotspot [15]. It is situated on the foothills of the eastern Himalayas, India [37]. The park is mainly savannah, containing giant grasses along with mixed deciduous, wet monsoon, tropical moist deciduous, tropical semievergreen, and riverine forests [38]. The region is subtropical, receiving average annual rainfall of 250–300 cm from south–west monsoon of which 80% is received from June to August. The summer and winter temperatures are mild with 34°C as the highest in the month of May, while the lowest temperature is 7.5°C in the month of January. The study area as measured by GPS (Germin- 72) was between 250 58 N and 270 45 N latitudes and 890 08′ E and 890 55′ E longitudes with an elevation of 47 m above mean sea level.

The forest is inhabited by divergent Indo-Mongoloid communities of Mech, Ravas, Totos, Uraons, Tamang, Toppo, Lepcha, Rajbangsi, and Mundas, making it bioculturally diverse with varied socioeconomic conditions. These indigenous people are permanently settled in and around the national park. Each indigenous community has its own distinct culture and beliefs (www.alipuarduar.gov.in). The primary livelihood activity of these communities is subsistence farming and NTFP collection. Their standing crop is frequently decimated by wild elephants. Further, the habitations are remotely located and isolated with no physical infrastructure and facilities like limited accessibility by good roads, making the whole area underdeveloped. The inhabitants of the area thus depend on NTFPs to meet their income and daily needs. The forest resources are locally managed by Forest Protection Committees under the Joint Forest Management Scheme controlled by the State Forest Department [39].

2.2 Sampling procedure

Multistage sampling procedures were applied in this study. JNP and the villages were selected purposively, while the respondents were selected randomly. The selection of the study area was purposive because it is a national park important for its rhinoceros conservation and inhabited by the indigenous communities depending on it for NTFP resources. The villages were located in the designated forest area and are termed as forest villages. The Indian Forest Act permits the inhabitants of these villages access and resource use rights over the collection of NTFPs from the park as the country is a signatory of the United Nation Convention on Biological Diversity of 1992 [40]. Major ten villages located in and around the national park that has more than 50 households were also selected purposively and from the each village; one tenth of the total households (205) were randomly selected [3].

2.3 Data collection

The data were collected from the sampled households by the lead author assisted by a trained enumerator with the help APRE-tested structured questionnaire through personal interviews and focus group discussions (FGD) guided by a checklist of questions [41, 42, 43]. The questionnaire was pretested for elimination, addition, and alteration with non-sample respondents of the study area. In pretesting, care was taken not to include respondents who were selected as sample for final interview. On the basis of experiences in pretesting, appropriate changes in the construction of item and their sequence were made. Prior to starting the interviews, a few days were devoted in each selected village to establish rapport with the respondents. The questionnaire was administered to the respondent in the local language, and the responses were recorded in English. On the basis of the objectives of study, the questionnaire was designed with two sections. The first section was on socioeconomic attributes of the respondents like literacy, occupation, and total monthly household income, while the second section was on the collection and utilization including processing of NTFPs, value of NTFPs consumed and sold by the households, and contribution of NTFPs to total monthly household income.

Occupation indicates the economic activity of a household and thus is a source of income. We hypothesized that as our study villages are remotely located and isolated with no or very little basic infrastructure facilities, there will be limited or no livelihood options except dependency on forest resources or subsistence farming as was also reported in earlier studies [44]. The limitations of our study area mentioned above also led us to hypothesize that the inhabitants will be mostly illiterate and thus will have no other livelihood options except for relying on subsistence farming or on forest resources. Studies have shown that education results in lesser dependency on forest or farming activity and more inclination toward alternative employment opportunities [45]. Our last hypothesis was that the study area would have very low or marginal total household monthly income because of illiteracy and limited livelihood options rendering the inhabitants with no other livelihood options other than to depend on subsistence farming and NTFP collection from the forest [46].

Generally, the head of the household was taken as the respondent. The society of the study area is patriarchal, so the husband is the head of the family. In case when the husband is absent, the wife, eldest son, or the daughter was interviewed on behalf of the head. A total of 10 FGDs were conducted, one in each selected village. There were about 15–20 participants in the discussions, which included the village chief, senior citizens of the village, some prominent NTFP collectors, members of Forest protection committee, and representatives of the State Forest Department. The information gathered from these discussions supplemented the household surveys, which were finally used for interpretations of the results.

2.4 Data analysis

Data collected were statistically analyzed using a descriptive technique (frequency, percent and bar chart). We classified our respondents as literates and illiterates. According to Indian standards, a person who has only basic “3Rs” knowledge, that is, can read and write his/her name and can perform simple arithmetic, is literate and otherwise not. Literacy of the respondents is expressed as per cent of the total respondents. Monthly total household income is calculated as the sum total of income a household was earning from different sources (if any). Generally, the total household income (THI) is the summation of agricultural (AI), nonagricultural (NAI), and forest income (FI) or THI = AI + NAI + FI [5]. The households were classified as low-, medium-, and high-income group [47] based on their total monthly household income and then expressed as per cent of the total respondents. USD to Indian rupee exchange rate during the study period was USD1 = INR60.

2.5 Relative frequency of citation (RFC)

Relative frequency of citation (RFC) implies in this study to finding out the most collected NTFPs by the forest fringe people [48]. The RFC value is “0” when no one refers to the plant as being useful and “1” when all the participants refer to the plant as being useful. RFC is calculated as

RFC=FCN

Where “FC” denotes the number of participants who mention the collection and use of the species, and N denotes the total number of participants.

Advertisement

3. Results

3.1 Socioeconomic attributes

The main occupation of the indigenous communities of the sampled villages in and around JNP is subsistence farming and collecting/harvesting NTFPs supplemented with some temporary activities like daily paid manual labor or petty business. According to our classification made on the basis of total monthly household income, there were only two income groups. Almost all the respondents, that is, 95.33%, were in the low-income group living on USD 2–10 daily, and the rest were in the medium-income group living on 10–20 USD daily. The contribution of NTFP toward the total monthly household income varied widely in the range of 1–70% with an average of 45%. Around 60% of the respondents in the study area were literate, had spent at least two years in formal education, and had a tendency to search for an alternate occupation other than farming or collecting NTFP.

3.2 NTFPs diversity/richness

Documented NTFPs were listed as plant, fungus, and animal origin. A total of 146 NTFP species representing 126 genera and 76 families were documented, which were used by the indigenous communities of JNP (Figure 1; Table 1). Of these documented species, 95 were collected from the wild, 24 were cultivated, and 27 were either collected from the wild or cultivated (Table 1). Out of these documented NTFP species, 125 were plants, 14 animals, and seven fungi. Among the plants, trees dominated the list with 70 species, followed by herbs with 32 species, shrubs with 16 species, and climbers the least with seven species. Fishes with 13 species dominated the list of animals with one species of honeybee. Family Fabaceae among plants dominated the list with six species and six genera followed by Euphorbiaceae and Malvaceae each with five genera and five species. In animals, family Cyprinidae dominated with five genera and five species. In fungus, Pleurotaceae and Lyophyllaceae dominated with two species each.

Figure 1.

NTFP diversity/richness used by fringe communities of JNP.

Sl. No.Sn/Vn/F/LfIsToc/PuMouRFC
Animal origin- fish
1Channastriatus (Bloch)
Sole; Channidae
NAWyCooked and consumed0.73
2Catlacatla (F. Hamilton)
Katlay; Cyprinidae
NAWyCooked and consumed0.94
3Cirrhinusmrigala (Hamilton)
Mrigal; Cyprinidae
LCWyCooked and consumed0.94
4Clariasbatrachus (L.)
Magur; Clariidae
LCWyCooked and consumed0.76
5Garragotyla (Gray.)
Buduna; Cyprinidae
LCWyCooked and consumed0.86
6Gudusiachapra (F. Hamilton)
Chipla; Clupeidae
LCWyCooked and consumed0.87
7Heterepneutesfossiles (Bloch)
Sangri; Heteropneustidae
LCWyCooked and consumed0.94
8Penaeusmonodon
Chingri; Clupeidae
NAWyCooked and consumed0.94
9Labeo rohita F. Hamilton
Rahu; Cyprinidae
LCWyCooked and consumed0.94
10Mystusvittatus (Bloch)
Tangra; Bagridae
LCWyCooked and consumed0.92
11Psilorhynchussucatio (Ham.)
Chepti; Psilorhynchidae
LCWyCooked and consumed0.91
12Pethiaticto (Hamilton)
Punti; Cyprinidae
LCWyCooked and consumed0.88
13Rita rita (Ham.)
Rita; Bagridae
LCWyCooked and consumed0.93
Animal origin- insect
14Trigona Sp.
Putka; Apidae
Sep-Jan/ HoCooked and consumed as medicine.0.92
Plant origin- climber
15Coccinia grandis (L.) Voigt
Telakucha; Cucurbitaceae
NAMay-Aug/ L, FrCooked as vegetable0.82
16Cissusrepanda Vahl.
Panilahara; Vitaceae
NAWy/TwWhole plant is used to make rope and as fodder.0.88
17Dioscorea bulbifera L.
Githa; Dioscoreaceae
NAWy/B, LDried powder of tuber is applied to cure ulcer and cooked as vegetable.0.73
18Dioscorea pentaphylla L.
Bhegur; Dioscoreaceae
NAJun-Jan/ RhExtract is applied on infected portion to cure boil and cooked as vegetable.0.73
19Momordicadioica Roxb. Ex willd.
Ban karela; Cucurbitaceae
NAMay-Jul/ Fr, RFruits cooked as vegetable and also consumed to cure stomach disorder. Leaf extract administered orally (250 ml) twice a day for two days during fever.0.72
20Piper thomsonii Linn.
Pipla; Piperaceae
NANov-Mar/ FrFruits are boiled in water with salt. This mixture is consumed to cure cough & cold.0.96
21Plumbagozeylanica L.
Chita; Plumbaginaceae
NAWy/L, R, BLeaf extracts are mixed with rice for making rice beer. Rhizomes are crushed and boiled and consumed empty stomach during early morning to treat fever.0.71
Plant origin- herb
22Achyranthusarpera L.
Apang; Amaranthaceae
NAJan-Dec/R, SdRoot powder mixed with black salt or root and seed crushed together and consumed with water to get relief from indigestion and dysentery.0.44
23Ageratum conyzoides L.
Bhusuri; Asteraceae
NAWy/LFresh leaf extracts are applied on cut and wound and bandaged to stop bleeding and for healing.0.82
24Artemisia vulgaris L.
Titepate; Asteraceae
NAWy/L, Fl, RLeaves, flowers, and roots are crushed together with fresh water and consumed to control dysentery.0.20
25Asparagus racemosus Willd.
Satamuli; Asparagaceae
NAJan-Dec/Fl, RDried root powder is consumed to get relief from diabetes and dysentery. Leaves are eaten to get relief from fever.0.60
26Bambusa bamboos (L.) Voss
Bans; Poaceae
NAWy/WpUsed for fencing and making small bridge and ladder.0.83
27Bambusa vulgaris Schrad ex J.C Wendl.
Baans; Poaceae
NAWy/Ys, L, StYoung and tender shoots are cooked as vegetable and processed as pickle. Leaves are used as fodder and clumps as fencing.0.09
28Basella alba L.
Pui sag; Basellaceae
NAMay-Jul/LDecoction of root relieves vomiting. Tender twigs are used as vegetables.0.22
29Bryophyllumpinnatum (Lam.) Oken
Partharkurchi; Crassulaceae
NAWy/L, WpLeaf paste is applied on burnt skin and on swelling for relief. Whole plant is used for decoration.0.10
30Calamusrotang L.
Bet; Palmae
NAOct-Jan/L, FrLeaves are used for home decoration, and fruits are edible.0.49
31Cardamine hirsute L.
Simrayo sag; Brassicaceae
NAOct- Feb/LLeaves with small twigs are cooked and used as vegetable0.16
32Cassia tora L.
Chakunda; Caesalpiniaceae
NAJul-Dec/L, SdLeaf extract is applied against rashes and allergies. Seeds are consumed to get relief against cough and cold.0.61
33Centellaasiatica Linn.
Gortapre; Apiaceae
LCJan-Dec/LLeaves are consumed as vegetables, which also ease body pain and fever. Leaf extract in water solution is also administered orally during early morning in empty stomach to heal wounds.0.48
34Chenopodium album L.
Bethusaag; Chenopodiaceae
NASep-Jan/LTender leaves are cooked as vegetable.0.35
35Cissusquadrangularis L.
Harjora; Vitaceae
NAJan-Dec/WpThe plant is grinded and fried in mustard oil along with onion and then applied and messaged to get relief from fracture.0.40
36Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott
Ban-Kuchu; Araceae
LCMay-Aug/ RhCooked as vegetable.0.19
37Cynodondactylon (L.)
Dubbaghass; Poaceae
NAJan-Dec/ShShoot extract is applied externally to cure skin disease and taken orally to cure vomiting and leprosy. Entire plant is fed to cattle for increasing lactation.0.19
38Cyprus rotundus L.
Mutha; Poaceae
LCJun-Nov/RhPowdered and administered orally against dysentery, fever, and ulcer.0.46
39Daturametel L.
Dhutra; Solanaceae
NAWy/L, Fl, SdFlowers and fruits are offered during religious ceremony. Mixture of leaf and seed is used to treat asthma, cold, and cough.0.12
40Dendrocalamus strictus (Roxb.) Nees
Male bans; Poaceae
NAWy/WpLeaves are used as fodder for goat. Clumps are used as pole.0.84
41Desmodiumgangeticum (L.) DC
Salpani; Fabaceae
NASep-Dec/ WpPlant extract is consumed to get relief from rheumatism. Root is fed to post-labor woman.0.53
42Dichroafebrifuga Lour
Vasak Hydrangeaceae
NAWy/L, RRoot extract consumed to control cough & cold. Fresh leaf and root exudates are consumed to control vomiting and blood pressure.0.35
43Diplazium- esculentum (Retz.) Sw.
Dhenkisaag; Athyriaceae
LCApr-Oct/ Ys, LTender leaves are used as vegetable and whole plant as fodder.0.96
44Drymariavillosa Cham &Schlecht
Abijalo; Caryophyllaceae
NADec-Feb/LWhole plant is consumed to cure jaundice and cold.0.36
45Euphorbia thymifolia Linn.
Dhudiya; Euphorbiaceae
NAWy/BrLeaf and tender stem decoction is consumed to treat cystitis and kidney problems.0.38
46Ficuscunia Buch. -Ham. Ex Roxb.
Khaniyun; Moraceae
NAMay-Nov/ WpUsed as green fodder.0.70
47Fumaria indica Pugsley
Ban dhania; Fumariaceae
NAMar-Jul/LLeaves are used as spice.0.41
48Hedyotisscandens Roxb.
Koaru;Rubiaceae
NAMay-Aug/LTender leaves with twigs are cooked as vegetable.0.18
49Lycopodiumclavatum L.
Nagbeal; Lycopodiaceae
NAWy/R, LYoung root and leaves are consumed to treat sexual disorder and also used for decoration.0.82
50Phyllanthus fraternus G.L Webster
Bhuiamala; Phyllanthaceae
NAWy/WpPlant extract is externally applied to cure skin infections. Plant exudates are externally applied on sores and ulcers or mixed with oil to cure conjunctivitis0.17
51Saussurealappa C. B. Clarke
Kur; Compositae
NAWy/R, FlDried roots are powdered with black pepper and administered orally to cure asthma, cold and cough. Flowers are used during religious ceremony.0.40
52Solanum nigrum L.
Kakmachi; Solanaceae
NAWy/Fl, Fr, ShAnimal feed, leaves with flower are cooked as vegetable and ripe fruits as dessert.0.51
53Vernoniacinerea (L) Less.
Chotokuksima; Asteraceae
NAWy/WpFever, hiccups, nerve disorders, kidney disease, and stomach discomfort.0.26
Plant origin- shrub
54Abroma augusta (L.) L. f.
UlatKambal; Sterculiaceae
NAJan-Dec/R, LRoot powder is used to control urine infection. Leaf extract is useful for diabetes.0.04
55Ageratina Adenophora (Spreng.) R. King & H. Rob.
Banmara; Asteraceae
NAWy/LLeaves soaked in water for bathing to cure skin infection.0.14
56Capsicum annum L.
Jeray chili; Solanaceae
NAApr-Jul/FrUsed as spice.0.02
57Cinchona officinalis L.
Cinchona; Rubiaceae
NAWy/B, RRoot and bark decoction is orally administered against malaria and dysentery. Bark is also used as spice.0.86
58Dendrocnide sinuate (Blume) Chew
Moringe; Urticaceae
NAApr-Oct/YsYoung shoot cooked as vegetable.0.31
59Lantana camara L.
Ban-tulshi; Verbenaceae
NAWy/ShLeaf extract is applied on ring worm and administered orally to get relief from cold and cough. Used as fencing and fuel wood.0.27
60Melastomamalabathricum L.
Dantrangi; Melastomataceae
NAAug-Feb/Fl, LConsumed to cure cholera, diarrhea, fever and dysentery.0.10
61Meyna spinosa Roxb. Ex Link
Kalomaney; Rubiaceae
NAMay-Jun/L, Tu, FrFruit are used as vegetable. Tuber and leaves are consumed to cure boil, dysentery and indigestion.0.21
62Mussaendatreutleri Stapf.
Tamba; Rubiaceae
NAWy/YsCooked as vegetable.0.85
63Rauvolfiaserpentina (L.) Kurz.
Sarpagandha; Apocynaceae
NAOct-May/R, LHalf teaspoon root and leaf powder is consumed thrice a day to get relief from hypertension and control blood pressure. Root extract is taken orally to cure jaundice.0.16
64Sida cordifolia Wight &Arnott
Berela; Malvaceae
NAWy/WpConsumed as energy vitalizer.0.10
65Sidafallax L.
Sida; Malvaceae
NAWy/BrUsed as fuel wood.0.12
66Tetracerasarmentosa (L.) Vahl
Rikang; Dilleniaceae
NAWy/RConsumed to control diarrhea. Paste is applied to get relief from burn. Extract is applied to cure mouth ulcers.0.35
67Urticadioica L.
Sisnoo; Urticaceae
LCWy/L, Fl, YsCooked as vegetable.0.66
68Vitexheterophylla Roxb.
Panchpattay; Lamiaceae
NAWy/LUsed as fodder.0.51
69Vitexnegundo L.
Nisinda; Verbenaceae
NAWy/WpConsumed during morning to cure rheumatism and fever.0.36
Plant origin- tree
70Acacia catechu (L. f) Wild.
Khayer; Mimosaceae
NAWy/Br, Hw, BBranches and twigs are used for fuel wood. Heartwood is processed as Khatta and consumed with betel leaf to cure indigestion. Bark powder is consumed to cure rheumatism.0.30
71Aeglemarmelos (L.) Corr.
Bel; Rutaceae
NADec-May/ Fr, LPulp is used to make health drink as body coolant during summer and to cure dysentery. Leaves are used during religious ceremony.0.29
72Aglaiahiernii Visal. Ramach
Lali; Meliaceae
NAMar-May/ Br, Ds, LBranches are used as fuel wood. Dry seeds are decorative. Fresh leaves used as fodder during summer.0.30
73Albizia lebbeck (L.) Benth.
Siris; Mimosaceae
NAJan-Dec/Br, Sd, B, LSeed powder is administered orally to get relief from pile and body pain. Bark is boiled and extract is consumed orally to control cold. Leaves are used a fodder and twigs as fuel wood.0.41
74Alstoniascholaris (L.) R. Br.
Chhatian; Apocynaceae
NAJan-Dec/BBark paste is applied to cure skin disease. One tea spoon of bark extract is administered orally during early morning once a day to in empty stomach to cure jaundice and get rid of stomach worms.0.32
75Amoorarohituk (Roxb.) Wight &Arn.
Lasuney; Meliaceae
NAWy/BrTwigs are used as fuel wood.0.55
76Anthocephalus cadamba (Roxb.) Wight &Arn.
Kadam; Rubiaceae
NAWy/BrTwigs are used as fuel wood and to make agriculture implements. Fresh leaves are used as fodder.0.16
77Artocarpus chama Buch-Ham. Ex. Wall
Latore; Moraceae
NAJan-Dec/LFresh leaves are used as goat fodder during lean period.0.21
78Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.
Kanthal; Moraceae
NAJan-Dec/Fr, L LtFruit consumed as dessert and processed to pickle. Leaf is goat fodder, and latex is used as gum.0.89
79Artocarpus lakoocha Buch-Ham
Bore; Moraceae
NAJul-Dec/Fr, L, BFruits consumed as dessert. Leaf and bark are used against skin disease.0.29
80Azadirachta indica A. Juss.
Neem; Meliaceae
LCApr-Dec/L, Sd, BFried leaves are consumed to cure mouth ulcers mouth. Leaves are boiled in water for bathing to cure small pox. Leaf extract is consumed orally to cure pneumonia and also used as appetizer. Twigs are used as tooth brush.0.40
81Baccaureasapida (Roxb.) Mull. Arg.
Latka; Euphorbiaceae
NAJul- Sep/FrFruit are eaten as dessert.0.91
82Bauhinia malabarica Roxb.
Tanki; Fabaceae
NAWy/L, F, ShLeaves are boiled and cooled solution is consumed daily to get relief from stomach pain. Fresh leaves are used as fodder. Flowers are cooked as vegetable. Branches are used as fuel wood.0.72
83Bauhinia purpurea L.
Devakanchan; Caesalpiniaceae
NAWy/L, Fl, B, RLeaf is boiled and solution is consumed to control jaundice. Bark paste is applied to heal wounds. Flower is used as vegetable and for decoration. Root paste is consumed to control ulcer.0.76
84Bauhinia variegata (L.) Benth.
Raktokanchan; Caesalpiniaceae
LCJan-Dec/Fl, B, RDecoction of bark and root is applied to cure mouth ulcer and skin disease. Flowers are used as vegetable.0.69
85Beischimedia roxburghii Nees.
Tarsing; Lauraceae
NAWy/LLeaves are used as fodder during lean season.0.80
86Bombax ceiba L.
Simul; Bombacaceae
NAWy/Br, Fr, R, Sd,Roots extract is consumed to treat diarrhea. Twigs are used as fuel wood. Seed and fruit floss is used to make pillow and blanket.0.90
87Bridelia- retusa (L.) A. Juss.
Gayo; Euphorbiaceae
NAMay-Nov/LFresh leaves and small twigs are used as fodder.0.76
88Buteamonosperma (Lam.) O. Kuntze
Palash; Papilionaceae
NAWy/B, Sd, L, FlFlower and leaf infusion is orally administered against diarrhea. Seed powder is consumed to kill stomach worms.0.21
89Careya arborea Roxb.
Kumbhi; Lecythidaceae
NAMay-Dec/ Fr, L, B, FlBark extract is consumed in empty stomach to cure dysentery. Flowers are used for decoration and branches are used as fuel wood.0.61
90Cassia fistula L.
Bandarlathi; Caesalpiniaceae
NAWy/Fr, Fl, R, BDried Fruit and fresh flower are used to decorate the household. Root and bark are used to control asthma, fever, and cold & cough. Root is also used to control skin disease.0.20
91Castanopsis indica (Roxb.exLindl.) A. DC
Kattus; Fagaceae
NAWy/Sd, L, BrFruits & seed are cooked as vegetables and also to control blood pressure. Leaf paste in solution form is consumed to cure gastric problems. Twigs are used as fuel wood.0.83
92Chukrasiatabularis Juss.
Chikrashi; Meliaceae
LCJun-Jan/BrBranches are used as fuel wood, agriculture implements, and for construction purposes.0.18
93Cinnamomum camphora (L.) J. Presl
Dalchini; Lauraceae
NAWy/B, R, TwDried bark is used for aroma in tea or hot water. Dried barks or leaves are consumed for stomach disorder and diabetes and to check reduced body weight. Root is burnt with fuel wood to repel mosquito.0.21
94Cinnamomum tamala (Ham.) Nees & Eberm.
Tejpata; Lauraceae
NAJan-Dec/L, BLeaf and bark is consumed with food to control hypertension and diarrhea.0.21
95Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. Ex DC
Sissoo; Fabaceae
NAWy/L, BrLeaves are used as fodder and branches as fuel wood and handles of agricultural implements.0.40
96Delonixregia (Hook.) Raf
Gulmohar; Caesalpiniaceae
NADec-Feb/PDried pods are used to decorate home.0.44
97Dillenia indica L.
Chalta; Dilleniaceae
NAJan-Feb/Fr, LLeaves and fruits are elephant feed. Raw fruits are processed to pickle.0.41
98Dilleniapentagyna Roxb.
Tantari; Dilleniaceae
NASep-Nov/LLeaves are used as fodder, decoration, and making plates.0.50
99Elaeocarpussikkimensis Roxb.
Bandarey; Elaeocarpaceae
NAWy/BrBraches are used as fuel wood.0.53
100Elaeocarpus sphaericus (Gaertn.) K. Schum.
Rudraksh; Elaeocarpaceae
NAMay-Jul/Fr, SdFruit and seed are consumed to control blood pressure and diabetes.0.19
101Emblica officinalis Gaerth
Amlakhi; Euphorbiaceae
NAAug-Feb/FrRipe fruits are consumed as dessert and with sugar to get relief from cold and stomach pain. Fruits are also processed to make pickle and candy.0.84
102Erythrinastricta Roxb.
Faledo; Fabaceae
NAWy/L, BBark paste is consumed to cure liver problems, fever, and rheumatism.0.55
103Ficuselastica Roxb.
Laberay; Moraceae
NAJun-Oct/L, LtFresh leaves are used as goat fodder. Fruit latex is used in making gum.0.23
104Ficusracemosa L.f
Dumri; Moraceae
NAFr, LLeaves are used to cure mouth disease of domestic animals and as fodder. Ripe fruits are used as dessert.0.19
105Ficus religiosa L.
Peepal; Moraceae
NAMay-Nov/ L, WpSacred and religious plant.0.22
106Garungapinnata Roxb.
Dabdebay; Burseraceae
NASep-Dec/L, FrUsed as fodder0.28
107Gmelina arborea Roxb.
Ghamari; Verbenaceae
NAMay-Oct/L, R, FrUsed as fodder during summer.0.24
108Lagerstroemia parviflora L.
Jarul; Lythraceae
LCWy/Br, Sh, F, FrSmall branches are used as fuel wood and to make handles of agriculture equipment. Flowers are used for decoration.0.60
109Litsea monopetala (Roxb.) Pers.
Kutmero; Lauraceae
NAWy/B, R, TwLeaves cure arthritis. Bark and root powder is applied externally against bruises and pains. Tender twigs with leaves are used as fodder.0.55
110Mallotus philipensis (Lam.) Muell. Arg
Sindure; Euphorbiaceae; T
NAJun-Sep/LUsed as fodder.0.18
111Mangifera indica L.
Aam; Anacardiaceae
DDWy/Fr, Br, LRipe fruits are consumed as dessert, and raw fruits are processed to pickle and drinks. Leaf is sacred. Branches are used for agri. Implements and as fuel wood.0.58
112Magnolia pterocarpa Roxb.
Patpatay; Magnoliaceae
DDWy/L, BrFodder and fuel wood.0.46
113Michelia champaca L.
Champ; Magnoliaceae
LCMay-Dec/L, Sd, FlLeaf and seed are consumed to control fiver and eye disease; fuel wood; flowers are used for decoration.0.51
114Murrayakoenigii (L.) Sprengel
Karipata; Rutaceae
NAWy/LLeaf extract is consumed to control black fever and diarrhea. Leaves are used as spice and aroma or consumed in empty stomach to cure gastroenteritis.0.14
115Oroxylum indicum (L.) Benth.
Totola; Bignoniaceae
NANov-Feb/Fl, Sd, Fr, BBark is boiled with sugar, and the solution is consumed thrice a day to control jaundice. Flowers are cooked as vegetable to maintain blood pressure and also used as house decoration.0.74
116Phanera variegata (L.) Benth
Koinar; Fabaceae
NAWy/Fr, BrBark and fruits are consumed to treat diarrhea and indigestion.0.30
117Pongamiapinnata L.
Karanj; Fabaceae
LCMay-Jun/ Br, FAs tooth brush to cure dental pain and small ones as fuel wood.0.25
118Premnabengalensis C.B. Clarke
Gidary; Lamiaceae
NAWy/LUsed as fodder.0.33
119Pterospermumacerifolium (L.) Wild
Parari; Sterculiaceae
NAOct-Nov/L, BrUsed as fodder and fuel wood.0.64
120Pterygotaalata (Roxb.) R.Br
Narkeli; Sterculiaceae
NAJan-Mar/Fr, LFruits with leaves are used for decoration.0.72
121Sapindus rarak DC.
Ritha; Sapindaceae
NAOct-Dec/FrUsed as soap and shampoo.0.60
122Schimawallichii (DC.) Korth.
Chilaune; Theaceae
LCWy/Br, BBranches as firewood and bark for dyeing and treating urine infection.0.53
123Schleicheraoleosa (Lour.) Oken
Kusum; Sapindaceae
NAApr-May/ Br, FrRipe fruits are consumed as desserts, and branches are used as fuel wood.0.77
124Shorea robusta Gaertn. f.
Sal; Diterocarpaceae
LCApr-Oct/Br, L, Rs, SBark powder is applied on burns; leaves are used in plate-making; flower, bark, and leaves are used during festivities, and branches are used as fuel wood.0.19
125Spondias mangifera Willd.
Amara; Anacardiaceae
NAApr-Jun/FrFruits are used as vegetable and processed to make chutneys and pickles.0.57
126Sterculiavillosa Smith
Odal; Sterculiaceae
NAFeb-Mar/Fr, FlUsed for decoration.0.81
127Syzygium cumini (L.) Skeels
Jam; Myrtaceae
NAJul-Dec/Fr, Sd, L, BBranches are used as fuel wood, fruits as dessert, and leaves as goat fodder. Seed powder mixed with table salt is consumed with water to control indigestion and dysentery.0.63
128Tectona grandis L.f.
Shegun; Lamiaceae
NAWy/Br, LConstruction, furniture, agriculture equipment. Branch and leaves are used as fuel wood.0.55
129Tremaorientalis (L.) Biume
Kuail; Ulmaceae
LCWy/LUsed as fodder.0.15
130Terminaliachebula Retz.
Harra; Combretaceae
NAJan-Mar/Br, L, Fr, SdFruits, seed extract, and flowers are consumed with water against cold and cough. Flowers vegetable, branches, fuel wood and leaves fodder.0.86
131Terminaliaalata Roth.
Panisaj; Combretaceae
NAMay-Jul/FrFruit are used for house decoration during marriage.0.16
132Terminaliaarjuna (Roxb.) Wight &Arn
Arjun; Combretaceae
NAWy/B, Br, LBark extract in water solution is consumed to cure heart problem and powder to control diabetes. Leaves and branches are used as fuel wood.0.14
133Terminalia belerica Roxb.
Barra; Combretaceae
NAWy/Br, L, Fr, SdFruits and seed are used consumed to cure cough and stomach ailments. Leaves are used as fodder and branches as fuel wood.0.88
134Terminaliapaniculata Roth
Kainjal; Combretaceae
NAWy/L, BBark and leaf decoction controls diabetes. Leaves are fodder.0.19
135Tetramelesnudiflora R.Br
Maina; Tetramelaceae
LCWy/BrUsed as fuel wood and handles for agriculture implements.0.12
136Tinospora cordifolia (Willd)
Gulancha; Menispermaceae
NAWy/B, Sh, LRoots in water solution after overnight soaking are consumed empty stomach in early morning to cure diabetes and stomach pain.0.89
137Toonaciliata Roem.
Toon; Meliaceae
LCWy/L, FrHut construction, furniture, fuel wood, & agriculture equipment.0.33
138Trewianudiflora L.
Pitali; Euphorbiaceae
NAWy/Br, LShoot and leaf decoction controls excessive bile and leaf paste applied on wounds. Leaves are fodder and branches are collected for fuel wood.0.24
139Ziziphus- mauritiana Lam.
Kul; Rhamnaceae
NAJan-Mar/Fr, L,Leaf is goat fodder. Fruit and seed with salt control vomiting.0.96
Fungus
140Pleurotusostreatus (Jacq.) P. Kumm.
Chamray Chew; Pleurotaceae
NAJun-Sep/MuConsumed as vegetable and processed to pickle.0.94
141Pleurotus sp.
Kaney; Pleurotaceae
Jun-Sep/MuConsumed as vegetable0.86
142Armillariamellea (Vahl) P. Kumm.
Cheplay chew; Phylsalacriaceae
NAJul-Nov/MuBoiled mushroom is consumed directly.0.74
143Cantharelluscibarius Fr.
Girolle; Cantharellaceae
NAJul-Oct/MuConsumed as vegetable and processed to pickle and snacks.0.78
144Lentinussquarrosulus Mont.
Kath chattu; Polyporaceae
NAJun-Nov/ MuConsumed as vegetable.0.73
145Termitomycesclypeatus R. Heim
Kalunge Chew; Lyophyllaceae
NAJun-Sep/ MuConsumed as vegetable.0.64
146Termitomycesmammiformis R. Heim
Jauri Chew; Lyophyllaceae
NAJun-Sep/ MuConsumed as vegetable and processed to pickle.0.80

Table 1.

Utilization pattern of NTFP species in JNP.

Sn- scientific name; Vn- vernacular name; F- family; Lf- life form (C- climber; Fi- fish; Fu- fungus; H- herb; I- insect; S- shrub; T- tree); Is- IUCN status (DD-Data deficient; NA-Not yet assessed; LC-Least concern); Toc- time of collection (Whole year- Wy); Pu- part used (B- bark; Br- branch; Ds- dry seed; Fl-flower; Fr-fruit; Ho- honey; Hw-Hardwood; L-leaf; Lt-latex; Mu- mushroom; P- pod; R- root; Rh- rhizome; Rs- resin; Sd- seed; Sh-shoot; St-stem; Tu-Tuber; Tw-twigs; Wp- whole plant; Ys- young shoot); Mou- mode of utilization; RFC- Relative Frequency citation.

3.3 Relative frequency citation

The RFC value ranged from 0.2 to 0.96 for all categories of NTFPs with an average of 0.78. In overall categories, the NTFP species collected most were Piper thomsonii, Diplazium esculatum, and Ziziphus mauritiana. All most all of the respondents (96%) cited these species. This is because these plant species have higher sale value in the local market. Among the 13 fish species, the RFC value ranged from 0.73 to 0.94 and the most collected fish species were Heterepneutesfossiles, Penaeus monodon, and Labeorohitaand Catla- catla (0.94) and the least collected species was Channa strictus (0.73). Among fungus, the value ranged from 0.64 to 0.94 and the most collected species was Pleurotusostreatus and and the least was Termitomycesclypeatus, while the RFC value for single species of Bee Trigona Sp. was 0.92 (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Mode of NTFP use.

3.4 Parts used, harvesting pattern, and time

Plant parts of NTFPs used by the indigenous communities of JNP and their mode of harvesting and utilization pattern are presented in Table 1 and Figure 3. It was recorded that leaves/foliage were the most used plant part harvested/collected from 70 species, followed by fruits of 36 species, branches of 30 species, barks of 23 species, roots and rhizomes of 21 species, flowers of 17 species, seeds of 16 species, and shoots, twigs, and tender stem of 10 species. Latex and resin were extracted from three plant species. More than 60% of the documented NTFP species were collected or harvested throughout the year, and prominent among these is fuel wood. About 25% species were collected or harvested during the rainy season, which include fodder, wild vegetable, medicinal plants, mushroom, honey, and fish. Fourteen species were collected or harvested during winter season, and the rest of the species were collected or harvested during the summer season. Generally, leaves were harvested during the profuse growth period of plant, that is, rainy season, which included fodder and leafy vegetable.

Figure 3.

Plant parts used.

3.5 Utilization

The various uses of the NTFP species are for medicine, food, fruit, vegetables, spice, fodder, fuel wood, decoration/craft, fencing, and religious purposes as well as for construction, agriculture implements, soap/shampoo, rope, furniture, plate, and mosquito repellent (Table 1 and Figure 4). The maximum number of species were documented with single use (75 species), and Mangifera indica is used for six purposes.

Figure 4.

Relative frequency citation (RFC) value.

3.6 Medicine

Of the total documented NTFPs, 73 species were used for ethnomedicinal purposes, and among these species, 28 species were solely used for medicinal purpose (Table 1). The important species used as medicine are Acacia catechu, Azadirachta indica, Aegle marmelos, Artocarpus lakoocha, Bauhinia malabarica, Bauhinia purpurea, Bombax ceiba, Castanopsis indica, Oroxylum indicum, Syzygium cuminii, Terminalia chebula, Terminalia bellerica, Trewianudiflora, and Ziziphus mauritiana, which are usually administered against bleeding, urine infection, indigestion/stomach disorder, diarrhea/dysentery, diabetes, ulcer, gastroenteritis, rheumatism, fever, control body temperature, skin disease, allergy, stomach pain, jaundice, cuts/wound, could, cough, vomiting, nausea, and blood pressure. Azadirachta indicawas is used round the year for treating various diseases like eye infection, allergy, and skin infection and also used as tooth stick. Oroxylum indicum is also used round the year to control jaundice and blood pressure.

The indigenous communities of JNP were rich in ethnopharmacological knowledge to properly use NTFPs. A total of 49 diseases/ailments were cured with the help of locally available plant resources. Fever, cough, and cold were documented as the most common disease suffered by the community. For remedy, the community used 12 different plant species. Another common disease was dysentery, and 10 plant species were used for its treatment. Skin and stomach problems were treated with eight and seven species, respectively. Diabetes, vomiting, and diarrhea were treated with five species each, while four species each were used for treating indigestion, mouth ulcer, rheumatism, and blood pressure. Similarly, three species each were used to treat asthma and allergy, while two species each were used as remedy for urine infection, jaundice, kidney problem, heart problem, eye problem, and burns. Treatment of cut and wound, snake bite, fracture, swelling/pain, body pain, arthritis, pneumonia, loss of appetite, liver aliments, stomach worm, cholera, gastroenteritis, ring worm, boil, sexual disorder, hypertension, conjunctivitis, tooth pain, small pox, reducing weight, leprosy, bleeding control, cystitis, hiccup, and nerve disorder was done by using only one plant species. Young twigs of Azadirachta indica and Pongamia pinnata are used for dental care. Honey secreted by Trigona spp. is mixed with black pepper powder and consumed for relief against cold and cough. Even mouth disease of domestic animals was documented to be treated, and Ficus racemosa was used for it.

Proper selection of species, parts, as well as preparation and administration methods was very important in traditional healthcare systems. Generally, fresh part of the plant is used for the preparation of medicine except for the underground parts, which were used in dried form. Ethnomedicinal formulations were administered both externally (skin, nasal, eye, and dental) and internally as oral doses. Most of the preparations were a mixture of different plant species, and in a few cases, only one plant species was used. Different parts of a single species were also used to cure different diseases. Almost all plant parts were used to prepare different medicinal formulations: roots, rhizomes, tubers, bark, leaves, flowers, fruits, seeds, young shoots, whole plants, and gum and latex. Doses of these preparations were not standardized but administered on the basis of age, physical appearance, and intensity of the illness. Children were usually administered with smaller doses than adults. The course of frequency of treatment is decided by the type of disease and its severity. The majority of formulations were prepared as juice followed by paste and decoction. The mode of preparation included juice, paste, decoction, powder, infusion, and chewing raw plant parts. The administration of the therapy is done as a raw, dried form in small pieces or powder, solution, or mixed with water/milk/honey and paste/lotion. Roots and rhizomes were preferred to prepare traditional remedies.

3.7 Food and nutrition

Many plant-, animal- and fungus-based NTFPs were collected by the indigenous communities from JNP for food and nutrition (Table 1). Plant-based resources used for food and nutrition was represented by 42 species. Animal-based resources used for food were represented by fish with 13 species and a honey bee species. Fruiting bodies of seven species of fungus were also used as food. Among the plant resources, more than 50% of the species were used as vegetable and fruits. Honey and fungus collected were mostly used for food and medicine purposes. All the mushrooms were used for culinary purposes and sometimes as snacks and added value to pickle as well. Fish supplements protein in the diets of the collectors. Leaves/foliage, root, rhizome, tuber, fruit, and flower/inflorescence of the plants were collected from the forest and either cooked or consumed fresh. The communities were collecting these plant resources round the year or when available. Fruits are also consumed ripe as dessert or as vegetable and also processed as pickle or chutney. Herbs are generally consumed as leafy vegetables. Some tubers, rhizomes, pods, and fruits are also consumed as vegetable. Edible plants are generally important for both humans and domestic animals during the time of scarcity.

The indigenous communities of JNP were collecting different type of wild edible and cultivated fruits from the forest for both self-consumption and sale for cash income. The community collects fruits of 17 species for food, vegetable, and spice and also add value to products like pickles (Table 1). The maximum amount of fruits collected were consumed directly either raw or ripe. Fruits of Artocarpus hetrophyllus were either used as vegetable and pickle or consumed ripe. Fruits of Mangifera indica were also consumed as both ripe and raw after preparation of chutney. Fruits of Syzygium cuminii, Baccaureasapida, Aegle marmelos, and Artocarpus lakoocha were consumed as ripe only, whereas Ziziphus mauritiana and Dillenia indica were used for the preparation of pickle or “chutney”.

Wild vegetables were collected for self-consumption and also sold in the local market to earn cash income. A total of 26 NTFP species were used as vegetable (Table 1). Among these, 19 were plants and seven mushrooms. NTFPs for vegetable purpose were daily collected for household needs. Leafy parts of the species were mostly preferred by the communities as vegetable and collected round the year from the forest. Some of the common species used as vegetable for both home consumption and sale were Diplazium esculentum, Basella alba, Mussaendatreutleri, and Colocasia esculenta. Rhizome and tender shoots of the Colocasia and Basella were collected during the rainy season for self-consumption, and a bulk of the amount was sold at the local market. Flower of Mussaendatreutleri is used for culinary purposes and consumed with rice. This cuisine is locally known as “Mocha” and consumed for supplementing the iron deficiency. Tender upper leafy part of Chenopodium album is cooked as vegetable and consumed with “chapatti” during winter season. Young shoots of Bambusa vulgaris were either consumed as vegetable or processed as pickle.

Products from six species of plants were used as spices or aroma for the preparation of locally made pickles for either self-consumption or sale (Table 1). These species are Capsicum annum, Cinchona officinalis, Cinnamomum camphora, Cinnamomum tamala, Flumaria indica, and Murrayakoenigii. Leaves of C. tamala and bark of C. camphora are used for making black tea and also used with rice. Leaves of M. koenigii were used for aroma and as condiment. Fish and mushroom were collected for both self-consumption and sale. Fishes like Cirrhinamrigala, Labeorohita, Mystusvittatus, and Puntius ticto were caught from the river, ponds, and other perennial water sources round the year except Catlacatla, which is caught during the rainy season only. The species is costly and used generally during ceremonial occasions. The fringe communities are highly dependent on these fishes for nutrition and energy along with cash income from sale in the local market. Seven types of mushrooms were also collected from the forest during the rainy season to prepare different culinary items for consumption with rice.

3.8 Animal feed

Plant leaves/foliage, fern, herb, and leaves of shrubs are collected from the forest as a supplement to the conventional fodder for domestic animals, and for this purpose, 36 plant species were used (Table 1). Some of the preferred species as fodder were Artocarpus, Ficus, and Dillenia sp. as these species are available almost round the year. Leaves of Ziziphus mauritiana and Syzygium cuminii were also used as fodder, especially for goat. Leaves and foliage were mainly collected as fodder during summer and winter seasons when there is acute shortage of normal fodder. Fruits of Dillenia indica were also collected as feed for animals.

3.9 Other uses

The inhabitants of JNP largely depend for their domestic energy consumption on fuel wood collection from the forest, and they mainly use dead and dried wood of 26 species collected from the forest (Table 1). Apart from using it as domestic energy, firewood is sold in the local market and is a major contributor in the household income. The maximum consumption of firewood was documented during winter and rainy seasons as compared to during summer season. The area experiences cold temperature during the winter season, which necessitates firewood burning for heat. The firewood species preferred were Albizia lebbeck, Anthocephalus cadamba, Pongamia pinnata, Schima wallichii, Lagerstroemia parviflora, and Mangifera indica as compared to other documented species. Dried leaves of Tectona grandis are also collected during summer and used as fuel.

The fringe communities also make different types of craft and decorative items from the plant resources for decorating houses during festival, marriages, and other traditional rituals. Eighteen plant species were listed that were in use for this purpose (Table 1). The decorative or craft items were also sold in the local market for earning money. Some of the common species for this purpose are Cassia fistula, Delonix regia, Oroxylum indicum, and Sterculia villosa. Leaves, foliage, flowers, fruits, and twigs of six plant species were used for religious purposes (Table 1). Leaves of Aegle Marmelos and Mangifera indica were sacred and used as offering to God during rituals. Fruits of Datura metal, Saussurealappa flower, and seeds of Elaeocarpus sphaericus were also used while performing a religious ritual. Ficus religiosa is considered sacred by the fringe community. Three plant species were used to fence the homestead for protection against stray animals (Table 1). Bambusa vulgaris and Bambusa bamboos and Lantana camara were used for fencing around the animal shed and in crop fields. Bamboo thatching is also commonly used for fencing the house and animal shed.

NTFPs were also used for other purposes like agricultural implements, construction work (bridge, house, and animal shed), furniture, flosses, gum, honey, katha, ladder, pole, mosquito repellent, plate, rope, soap, and shampoo (Table 1). The branches of Tetramelesnudiflora and Anthocephalus kadamba were used for making small agricultural implements (handle of spade, plow). Shorea robusta is used for furniture and house construction, while its dried leaves are burned as mosquito repellent. Its leaves are also used for making plates. Small root pieces of C. camphora are also burned along with firewood as mosquito repellent. Bambusa bamboos and Dendrocalamus strictus are used for making ladder and construction of small temporary bridge. Twigs of Cissus repanda are used for making rope, heart wood of Acacia catechu for katha, and leaves of Dilleniapentagyna for plate, Ficus elastica for gum, Bombax ceiba for floss (floss of Bombax is locally known as “Tula”), and Sapindus rarak for soap and shampoo.

Advertisement

4. Discussions

4.1 Socioeconomic attributes

Socioeconomic profiling of forest-dependent communities helps in understanding their dependency on NTFP resources [2, 3, 13, 49, 50]. The settlement of the villages is in the designated forest area of JNP for past many generations with marginal land holding granted to the settlers in recognition of their traditional right to natural resources by the Forest Department. The villagers do not have any additional land to till except for the land around homestead where subsistence farming is practiced, that is, homegarden agroforestry. Rural livelihood is linked to socioeconomic characteristics of households as well as physical factors [51, 52]. Literacy level of the respondents indicates their progressiveness [3], and more than half of the respondents in this study were literates, ranging from illiterates to graduates. The total monthly income of the households surveyed in the study varied from INR ₹ 1000 to ₹ 30,000. The contribution of NTFP toward household income also varied widely from 1–70%.This is because the households earn income from NTFPs after their household needs are fulfilled [3, 53]. Similar variations in income from NTFPs were also reported by many earlier studies [21, 54, 55, 56]. Earnings from NTFPs vary from region to region [57, 58] depending on ecological settings, income level, and caste/community [59]. The entire household also had alternate income options. A majority of the households were engaged in daily paid manual labor and as vendors. NTFPs ensure year-round income to the households, and thus, the reliance of the households is more on them than on other livelihood options. This indicates that NTFPs are satisfying multiple needs of food, shelter, medicines, fibers, energy, and cultural artifacts and thus supporting the well-being of the indigenous people of JNP [2, 3, 39, 60].

Due to the availability of limited livelihood options to earn for a decent living and low development in the study area, the indigenous communities living in and around JNP were collecting NTFPs from the forest to meet their daily needs though their cash income varied widely from NTFPs. The cash income from NTFP sale is highly skewed because only the NTFPs that remain unused after satisfying their needs are subjected to sale in the local market and very less to the traders or vendors. It was reported that 43 NTFP species were sold by the fringe communities of JNP but in unprocessed form [3] and thus were undervalued, fetching only the collection charges of NTFPs to the collectors [3, 56]. Deprived of the fair prices of their product, the community is forced to spend more time on its collection, leading to unsustainable harvesting [61]. An absence of fair price mechanism and regulated market links in JNP was reported to be the cause of deprival of fair prices of NTFPs to its fringe communities [3].

Moreover, remoteness and absence of good roads make it very rare to approach the study area by the traders/vendors from outside for trading NTFPs. Several other studies though had also reported a wider range (10–60%) in the contribution of NTFPs to the total household income but ascertained that NTFPs do ensure a permanent source of income year-round [3, 62]. Distribution, collection, and contribution in household economy of these NTFPs vary from region to region and forest to forest due to change in locality factors including sociocultural domains [1]. Studies have also indicated that due to poorly developed market network, transportation absence of quality assurance, price-fixing mechanism and processing, most of the NTFPs are consumed in household to satisfy daily needs [63]. It is reported that the more isolated and remotely located the area is, the higher is the contribution of NTFPs to noncash income [5]. The economic, livelihood, and ecological benefits of NTFPs can only be realized when their collectors are benefitted fully [5, 12, 13, 17].

4.2 Relative frequency of citation (RFC)

The relative frequency of citation (RFC) indicates that most cited species were collected abundantly in their respective season for the household consumption or marketing. Several studies suggested that a marketing of NTFPs leads to their competitive exploitation, followed by biological degradation [3, 64, 65]. Therefore, to study the diversity of NTFPs, the time of collection, utilization, and marketing channel are pivotal for the sustainability.

4.3 NTFP diversity

Documentation of 146 NTFP species indicates that the JNP is a rich reservoir of NTFP species of immense potential for human well-being. This documentation of NTFP species from JNP may play a pivotal role in the utilization and conservation of this natural wealth. Further studies on phytochemical principles including extraction of different active constituents on a scientific scale will lead to the recognition and preservation of the NTFP species unknown to the outer world. Among the enlisted 146 NTFP species, 116 were not assessed or not evaluated, 26 species falls under least concern and two species were under data deficit category in the IUCN priority list of species, [66]. Enlisting the species compared with the IUCN priority list indicates the status of the population of a particular species in an area. Such documentation will ensure future conservation of these species in the wild through their sustainable utilization and promote their domestication. The IUCN status of the JNP NTFP species warrants more vigorous and systematic research to gather accurate and complete information on the population status of the species in the area for their sustainable management and conservation for their continuous exploitation.

The ethnobotanical plant species that were documented as cultivated (24 species) or both cultivated and wild (27 species) were actually been planted by the respondents in their home garden, and it was found during the survey that almost all the respondents were maintaining a home garden contributing to the conservation of the species they were using. Indigenous people of JNP domesticating/cultivating ethnobotanical plants in their home gardens clearly indicate the community consciousness on the conservation values of these ethnobotanical species. This means that the inhabitants of JNP have switched to sustainable harnessing their valuable natural resource through domestication of some valuable wild species and leaving these species intact in the wild. There is a need to plant and domesticate the NTFP species of JNP through formulating local missions supporting indigenous strategies of food security. Similar report on home gardens maintaining rich biodiversity of ethnobotanical plants was also reported in earlier studies [11, 67]. There is relevance of man-made environments as a prominent source of ethnobotanical plants for both indigenous and non-indigenous agricultural societies for their conservation [68]. Home gardens serve as refuge for legacy species, with forces of family tradition and bonds that promote knowledge transmission and conservation [67, 69].

4.4 Plant part use/harvesting time

Most of the species were harvested year-round, while those used as fruits, vegetables, and fodder were harvested during the rainy season. Destructive harvesting was done in case of whole plants, roots, tubers, and rhizomes. Harvesting bark and seeds was also destructive as this can affect the survival of the plants. Harvesting patterns of leaves or foliage, root, rhizomes, and tubers indicate their possibility of vulnerability for becoming endangered and ultimately extinction [11]. Earlier studies also documented similar time of harvest or collection of NTFPs [4, 13]. The uses of various plant parts of these documented NTFP species in traditional uses were similarly reported by many workers [29, 70]. Genetic biodiversity of NTFP species gets threatened or vulnerable because of destructive harvesting techniques mainly done for commercial exploitation along with other causes like grazing, loss of habitat, and unmonitored trade [71]. NTFPs are freely harvested by users either for their own use or for trade [72]. The harvesting of these multiple-use species can put them under threat [73] but can also lead to better chances for their conservation [74], especially through home gardens.

4.5 Utilization

The acquaintance of forest flora and fauna and their importance are rich among the indigenous communities as they are traditionally integrated in the traditional lifestyle of these people, and this traditional knowledge system was accumulated and passed on from one generation to the other orally [4]. NTFPs collected were of multipurpose nature and were mostly used to supplement daily food and nutritional and health requirements of the households and domestic animals as well [1, 13, 24, 28, 29, 30, 50, 75, 76, 7727]. There is much documentation of use ethnobotanical plants other than medicines and food [70, 71, 78].

Generally, NTFPs collected were consumed fresh either as food or for treating ailments traditionally [79] except for underground parts, which when used for medicinal purposes were dried [80]. Rarely the collected NTFPs were value added with exceptions for domestic consumptions that too very crudely [4, 81, 82]. Using roots and rhizomes to prepare traditional medicinal formulations has an advantage that these underground organs generally contain high concentrations of bioactive compounds [83]. Many studies also have made such observations [5, 12]. Proper selection of species, parts, as well as preparation and administration methods was very important in traditional healthcare systems [29, 30, 77].

Identification, documentation, collection/extraction, and conservation of indigenous traditional knowledge about the plants are very essential to be used in the near future for the ever-increasing population to ensure food and nutritional security [84]. No new food, particularly the wild food, will be accepted by the urban population without proper testimony from specialists. It will be no wonder if some plants used by the indigenous community as food may on analysis prove rich in nutrition. Others however may come out to poorer or even nutritionally almost useless. But that too would not minimize the utility of recording whatever information can be gathered on the botanical folklore of these fast-disappearing cultures [5].

Information generated from this study will be helpful to understand the human–forest relationship in terms of livelihood options and scheduling sustainable harvest procedures for the indigenous communities and thereby increasing their participation in the conservation and sustainable management of these natural resources [14, 84]. Such documentation will also aid in the preservation of traditional conservation practices and framing management strategies, whereas utilization pattern can be helpful in transferring the traditional knowledge to younger generations and appreciating its value for human welfare and thus conservation of these ethnobotanical plant species. However, for the development of indigenous people and to conserve their knowledge under intellectual property right, a vast effort is needed [85].

Revitalizing the principles of traditional and religious practices where modern conservation programs could integrate traditional knowledge systems of indigenous communities into their conservation and management activities of natural resources is needed [86]. Ethnobotanical studies have reported resource management by the local people utilizing the principles of traditional knowledge in light of today’s modern conservation principles [25, 26, 27, 87]. Institutional intervention was recommended to protect the rights and empower the JNP fringe community to access information on policy, market, and value addition of their products with capacity-building, financial, and infrastructural support [3]. Additionally, such missions will rejuvenate the sociocultural heritage and traditional food market circuits of JNP, which will conserve and replenish the NTFP resource to uplift the socioeconomic status and livelihood of indigenous communities at JNP [87, 88, 89, 90, 91].

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

The indigenous fringe communities of JNP with their traditional lifestyle relied on NTFPs for their daily subsistence needs and also for permanent source of cash income. The sale of NTFP was contributing 45% on an average to the total annual household income. NTFPs also provided a safety net particularly during the periods of scarcity and filled the gap of food deficit, especially when their subsistence standing crops were destroyed by wild elephants. We documented 146 NTFP species from our study area. In this list, 95 were wild, 24 were cultivated, and 27 species were both wild and cultivated. Some wild plant species were also grown in home gardens, thus aiding the conservation of these species. However, there is very less or no information available for these documented species as 116 species were not assessed or not evaluated, 26 were least concern, and two species were under the data deficit category in the IUCN priority list of species. More research is required to update information on the population status of these NTFP species. Systematic accounting the volume of NTFPs collected/harvested along with cash and noncash income should be initiated. Policies supporting ex situ conservation programs through capacity building the communities with improved cultivation techniques of commercially viable NTFP species and value addition of NTFP products will enhance their income and relieve pressure from the forest. Storage, grading, processing, and value addition through linking with existing development schemes should be created or promoted. Institutional intervention is required to empower the communities with information on policy, finance, markets, and products to enable them to trade NTFPs with better returns. Diversification of livelihood options along with education, skill, and basic infrastructure development is also recommended.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

Authors sincerely acknowledge the local communities for sharing the uses of the NTFPs, and they are also thankful to the Forest Department of Jaldapara National Park authorities for granting the permission for the study. This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial or personal interests that could have appeared to influence the work presented in this paper.

Advertisement

Authorship contribution

Lakpa D. Lepcha: Data collection, analysis of data, and writing first draft; Gopal Shukla: Conceptualization of study and finalizing the draft MS; Biplov Ch. Sarkar: Data Collection and analysis; and Sumit Chakravarty: Conceptualization of study and final editing of MS.

Advertisement

Data availability

All the data are included in the paper.

References

  1. 1. Bauri T, Palit D, Mukherjee A. Livelihood dependency of rural people utilizing non-timber forest product (NTFPs) in a moist deciduous forest zone, West Bengal, India. International Journal of Advanced Research. 2015;3:1030-1040
  2. 2. Lepcha LD, Vineeta SG, Chakravarty S. Livelihood dependency on NTFPs among Forest dependent communities. Indian Forester. 2020;146:603-612
  3. 3. Lepcha LD, Shukla G, Pala NA, Vineeta, Pal PK, Chakravarty S. Contribution of NTFPs on livelihood of forest-fringe communities in Jaldapara National Park, India. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 2018;38:213-229
  4. 4. Saha G, Biswas R, Das AP. Survey for NTFP plants of the Gorumara National Park in the Jalpaiguri district of West Bengal (India). Pleione. 2014;8:367-373
  5. 5. Endamana D, Angu KA, Akwah GN, Shepherd G, Ntumwe BC. Contribution of non-timber forest products to cash and non-cash income of remote forest communities in Central Africa. International Forestry Review. 2016;20:1-16
  6. 6. Mahapatra AK, Tewari DD. Importance of non-timber forest products in the economics valuation of dry deciduous forests of India. Forest Policy and Economics. 2005;7:455-467
  7. 7. Marshall E, Newton AC, Schreckenberg K. Commercialization of non-timber forest products: First steps in analyzing the factors influencing success. International Forestry Review. 2005;5:128-137
  8. 8. Marshall E, Rushton J, Schreckenberg K, Arancibia E, Edouard F, Newton A. Practical Tools for Researching Successful NTFP Commercialization: A Methods Manual. UK: Department for International Development; 2006
  9. 9. Marshall E, Schreckenberg K, Newton A. Commercialization of Non-timber Forest Products. Factors Influencing Success: Lessons Learned from Mexico and Bolivia and Policy Implications for Decision Makers. Cambridge: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre; 2006
  10. 10. Pandey A, Tripathi Y, Kumar A. Non timber forest products (NTFPs) for sustained livelihood challenges and strategies. Research Journal of Forestry. 2016;10:1-7
  11. 11. Shukla G, Chakravarty S. Ethnobotanical plant use of Chilapatta reserved Forest in West Bengal. Indian Forester. 2012;138:1116-1124
  12. 12. Suleiman MS, Wasonga VO, Mbau JS, Suleiman A, Elhadi YA. Non-timber Forest Products and their Contribution to household’s Income around Falgore Game Reserve in Kano. Nigeria: Ecological Processes; 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s13717-017-0090-8
  13. 13. Verma SK, Paul SK. Sustaining the non-timber forest products (NTFPs) based rural livelihood of tribal’s in Jharkhand: Issues and challenges. Jharkhand Journal of Development and Management Studies XISS Ranchi. 2016;14:1
  14. 14. Yadav M, Dugaya D. Non-timber Forest products certification in India: Opportunities and challenges. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2013;15:567-586
  15. 15. Myers N, Mittermeier RA. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000;403:853-854
  16. 16. Siva R. Status of natural dyes and dye-yielding plants in India. Current Science. 2007;92:916-925
  17. 17. Demie G. Contribution of non-timber forest products in rural communities’ livelihoods around Chilimo forest, West Shewa, Ethiopia. Journal of Natural Sciences Research. 2017;9:25-37
  18. 18. Sharma JV, Gokhale Y, Jain NA, Lele Y, Tyagi A, Bhattacharya S. Methodology for determining minimum support price for minor forest produce in India. Indian Forester. 2018;144:604-610
  19. 19. Chilalo M, Wiersum KF. The role of non-timber forest products for livelihood diversification in Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiopian e-Journal for Research and Innovative Foresight. 2011;3:44-59
  20. 20. Wunder S, Angelsen A, Belcher B. Forests, livelihoods and conservation: Broadening the empirical base. World Development. 2014;64:1-11
  21. 21. Alex A, Vidyasagaran K, Prema A, Kumar AVS. Analyzing the opportunities among the tribes of the Western Ghats in Kerala. Studies on Tribes and Tribals. 2016;14:11-17
  22. 22. Mahanta D, Tiwari SC. Natural dye-yielding plants and indigenous knowledge on dye preparation in Arunachal Pradesh, Northeast India. Current Science. 2005;88:1474-1480
  23. 23. Negi CS, Palyal VS. Traditional uses of animal and animal products in medicine and rituals by the Shoka tribes of district Pithoragarh, Uttaranchal, India. Ethno-Medicine. 2007;1:47-54
  24. 24. Bose D, Roy JG, Das Mahapatra S, Datta T, Mahapatra DS, Biswas H. Medicinal plants used by tribals in Jalpaiguri district, West Bengal, India. Journal of Medicinal Plants Studies. 2015;3:15-21
  25. 25. Suresh CP, Bhutia KD, Shukla G, Pradhan K, Chakravarty S. Free listed wild edible fruit species of Sikkim Himalayas and their uses. In: Full Paper Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Minor Fruits and Medicinal Plants. Sri Lanka: Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ruhuna; 2013. pp. 17-37
  26. 26. Suresh CP, Bhutia KD, Shukla G, Pradhan K, Chakravarty S. Wild edible tree fruits of Sikkim Himalayas. Journal of Tree Sciences. 2014;33:43-48
  27. 27. O’Neill AR, Badola HK, Dhyani PP, Rana SK. Integrating ethnobiological knowledge into biodiversity conservation in the eastern Himalayas. Journal of Ethnobiological and Ethnomedicine. 2017;13:21-25
  28. 28. Biswakarma S, Sarkar BC, Shukla G, Pala NA, Chakravarty S. Traditional application of ethno-medicinal plants in Naxalbari area of West Bengal, India. International Journal of Usufructus Management. 2015;16:36-42
  29. 29. Raj AJ, Biswakarma S, Pala NA, Shukla G, Vineeta, Kumar KM, et al. Indigenous uses of ethnomedicinal plants among forest-dependent communities of northern Bengal, India. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2018;14:8-36
  30. 30. Sarkar BC, Biswakarma S, Shukla G, Pala NA, Chakravarty S. Documentation and utilization pattern of Ethnomedicinal plants in Darjeeling Himalayas, India. International Journal of Usufructus Management. 2015;16:3-11
  31. 31. Sundriyal M, Sundriyal RC, Sharma E. Dietary use of wild plant resources in the Sikkim Himalaya, India. Economic Botany. 2003;58:626-638
  32. 32. Kar A, Borkataki S, Borthakur SK. Wild edible fruits of the Karbi’s of Karbi Anglong district of Assam, India. Pleione. 2008;2:175-181
  33. 33. Kar A, Goswami NK, Saharia D. Wild edible plants sold in the local market of Garo hills, Meghalaya. Journal of Frontline Research in Arts and Science. 2012;2:69-78
  34. 34. Sathyavathi R, Janardhanan K. Wild edible fruits used by Badagas of Nilgiri District, Western Ghats, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research. 2014;8:128-132
  35. 35. Jeyaprakash K, Ayyanar M, Geetha KN, Sekar T. Traditional uses of medicinal plants among the tribal people in Theni districts (Western Ghats), southern India. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 2011;1:S20-S25
  36. 36. Dutta BK, Dutta PK. Potential of ethnobotanical studies in north East India: An overview. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge. 2005;4:7-14
  37. 37. Das AP, Ghosh C, Bhowmick D. Project Report on Estimation of Palatable Biomass in Jaldapara Wildlife Sanctuary with Special Reference to Rhinoceros unicornis L. India: Department of Botany, University of North Bengal; 2003
  38. 38. Champion HG, Seth SK. A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. New Delhi: Manager of Publications; 1968. 404 p
  39. 39. Pandey AK, Bhargava P, Negi MS. Sustainable management of non-timber forest produce through joint forest management. Indian Forester. 2011;137:105-113
  40. 40. CBD. The Convention on Biological Diversity. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations Environment Programme; 1992. Available from: https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf
  41. 41. Dey T, Pala NA, Shukla G, Pal PK, Chakravarty S. Perceived perception on impact of climate change on forest ecosystem in protected area of West Bengal. Journal of Forest and Environmental Science. 2017b;33:1-7
  42. 42. Dey T, Pala NA, Shukla G, Pal PK, Das G, Chakravarty S. Climate change perceptions and response strategies of forest fringe communities in Indian eastern Himalaya. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2017a;20:925-938
  43. 43. Frechtling J, Sharp L. User-Friendly Handbook for Mixed Method Evaluations. Arlington, VA: Directorate for Education and Human Resources, Division of Research, Evaluation and Communication, National Science Foundation; 1997. Available from: http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/EHR/REC/pubs/NSF97-153/START.HTM#TOC
  44. 44. Ullah S, Noor RS, Abid A, Mendako RK, Waqas MM, Shah AN, et al. Socio-economic impacts of livelihood from fuelwood and timber consumption on the sustainability of forest environment: Evidence from Basho Valley, Baltistan, Pakistan. Agriculture. 2021;11:596-615
  45. 45. Newton P, Miller DC, Byenkya MAA, Agrawal A. Who are forest-dependent people? A taxonomy to aid livelihood and land use decision-making in forested regions. Land Use Policy. 2016;57:388-395
  46. 46. Vedeld P, Angelsen A, Sjaastad E. Counting on the Environment: Forest Incomes and the Rural Poor, Paper #98. Washington, DC: The World Bank Environment Department; 2004
  47. 47. Kochhar R. A Global Middle Class is More Promise than Reality. Pew Research Centre, Global Attitudes & Trends. 2015. Available from: http://www.pewglobal.org/2015/07/08/appendix-methodology-and-data-sources
  48. 48. Tardío J, Pardo-de-Santayana M. Cultural importance indices: A comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of southern Cantabria (northern Spain). Economic Botany. 2008;62(1):24-39
  49. 49. Baudron F, Duriaux Chavarría YJ, Remans R, Yang K, Sunderland T. Indirect contributions of forests to dietary diversity in southern Ethiopia. Ecology and Society. 2017;22(2):28. DOI: 10.5751/ES-09267-220228
  50. 50. Ghosal S, Liu J. Community forest dependency: Dose distance matter? Indian Forester. 2017;143:397-404
  51. 51. Kamanga P, Vedeld P, Sjaastad E. Forest incomes and rural livelihoods in Chiradzulu District, Malawi. Ecological Economics. 2009;68:613-624
  52. 52. Timko JA, Waeber PO, Kozak RA. The socio-economic contribution of non-timber forest products to rural livelihoods in sub-Saharan Africa: Knowledge gaps and new directions. International Forestry Review. 2010;12:284-294
  53. 53. Prasad BN. Regional Non-Wood Forest Product Industries. Kualalampur: Forest Industries Development Group. Asia Pacific Region, FAO; 1985
  54. 54. Behera MC, Nath MR. Financial valuation of non-timber forest productsflow from tropical dry deciduous forests in Boudh district, Orissa. International Journal of Farm Sciences. 2012;2:83-94
  55. 55. Dolui G, Chatterjee G, Chatterjee S, Das N. The importance of non-timberforest products in tribal livelihood: A case study of Santal Community in Purulia District, West Bengal. Indian Journal of Geography and Environment. 2014;13:110-120
  56. 56. Sharma D, Tiwari BK, Chaturvedi SS, Diengdoh E. Status, utilization and economic valuation of non-timber forest products of Arunachal Pradesh. India Journal of Forest and Environmental Science. 2015;31:24-37
  57. 57. Murthy IK, Bhat PR, Ravindranath NH, Sukumar R. Financial valuation of non-timber forest product flows in Uttara Kannada district, Western Ghats, Karnataka. Current Science. 2005;88:1573-1579
  58. 58. Stark M, Min D. Eco-certification of non-timber forest products in China: Addressing income generation and biodiversity conservation needs. Ecological Economy. 2008;4:24-34
  59. 59. Mahapatra AK, Alloers HJ, Robinson EJZ. The impact of NTFP sales on rural households’ cash income in India’s dry deciduous forest. Environment Management. 2005;35:258-265
  60. 60. Shackleton CM, Pandey AK, Ticktin T. Ecological Sustainability for Non-timber Forest Products: Dynamics and Case Studies of Harvesting. London, UK: Routledge; 2015. 295 p
  61. 61. Prasad R, Das S, Sinha S. Value addition options for non-timber forest products at primary collector ‘s level. International Forestry Review. 1999;1:17-21
  62. 62. Asfaw A, Lemenih M, Kassa H, Ewnetu Z. Importance, determinants and gender dimensions of forest income in eastern highlands of Ethiopia: The case of communities around Jelo Afromontane. Forest Policy and Economics. 2013;28:1-7
  63. 63. Ingram V, Bongers G. Valuation of Non-Timber Forest Product Chains in the Congo Basin: A Methodology for Valuation. Yaounde, Cameroon: FAOCIFOR-SNV-World Agroforestry Center-COMIFAC; 2009. p. 80
  64. 64. Delang CO. Not just minor forest products: The economic rationale for the consumption of wild food plants by subsistence farmers. Ecological Economics. 2005;59:64-73
  65. 65. Pandit BH, Thapa GB. A tragedy of non-timber forest resources in the mountain commons of Nepal. Environmental Conservation. 2003;30(3):283-292
  66. 66. IUCN. IUCN Red List Categories. Version 2017-3. 2017. Available from: http://www.iucnredlist.org
  67. 67. Mekonen T, Giday M, Kelbessa E. Ethnobotanical study of home garden plants in Sebeta-Awas District of the Oromia region of Ethiopia to assess use, species diversity and management practices. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2015;11:64-76
  68. 68. Heckler SL. Herbalism, home gardens and hybridization. Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 2007;21:41-63
  69. 69. Kujawska M, Pardo-de-Santayana M. Management of medicinally useful plants by European migrants in South America. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2015;172:347-355
  70. 70. Shiracko N, Owuor BO, Gakuubi MM, Wanzala W. A survey of ethnobotany of the AbaWanga people in Kakamega county, western province of Kenya. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge. 2016;15:93-102
  71. 71. Hamid A, Raina AK. Ethnobotanical uses of plants in and around kanji wildlife sanctuary, north west Himalaya. International Journal of Science and Research. 2014;3:538-545
  72. 72. Giday M, Asfaw Z, Woldu Z, Teklehaymanot T. Medicinal plant knowledge of the bench ethnic group of Ethiopia: An ethnobotanical investigation. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2009;5:34-43
  73. 73. Dhillion SS, Shrestha PM. Conservation needs and regulations for locally managed forests in the highlands of Dolakha district, Nepal. In: Salleh H, Aziz S, editors. Environmental and Development Aspects of Natural Resource Management in Mountains. Singapore: Pelanduk Press; 2005
  74. 74. Etkin NL. Local knowledge of biotic diversity and its conservation in rural Hausaland, northern Nigeria. Economic Botany. 2002;56:73-88
  75. 75. Biswakarma S, Pala NA, Shukla G, Vineeta C, S. Plants for liver and jaundice treatment: A case study from forest fringe communities in North Bengal, India. Forestry Ideas. 2017;23:145-151
  76. 76. Biswakarma S, Pala NA, Shukla G, Vineeta C, S. Ethnomedicinal plants used to cure stomach disorders in forest fringe communities in northern part of West Bengal. Indian Journal of Natural Products and Resources. 2017;8:370-380
  77. 77. Vineeta PNA, Shukla G, Chakravarty S. Traditionally used medicinal plants for treatment of stomach disorders in West Bengal, India: A scrutiny and analysis from secondary literature. Ethnomedicine. 2018;12:163-183
  78. 78. Łuczaj L, Stawarczyk K, Kosiek T, Pietras M, Kujawa A. Wild food plants and fungi used by Ukrainians in the western part of the Maramureş region in Romania. Acta Societatis Botanicorum-Poloniae. 2015;84:339-346
  79. 79. Ignacimuthu S, Ayyanar M, Sankara Sivaraman K. Ethnobotanical investigations among tribes in Madurai District of Tamil Nadu (India). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2006;2:25-31
  80. 80. Rokaya MB, Uprety Y, Poudel RC, Timsina B, Münzbergová Z, Asselin H, et al. Traditional uses of medicinal plants in gastrointestinal disorders in Nepal. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2014;158:221-229
  81. 81. Malla S, Shukla G, Chakravarty S. Utilization and conservation of wild plants by the tribal communities of Tripura. Indian Forester. 2012;138:1002-1007
  82. 82. Shukla G, Kumar R, Subba M, Kumari A, Chakravarty S. Wild vegetable biodiversity in Ranchi district of Jharkhand. Life Sciences Leaflets. 2013;11:23-30
  83. 83. Moore PD. Trials in bad taste. Nature. 1994;370:410-411
  84. 84. Basumatary N, Teron R, Saikia M. Ethnomedicinal practices of the Bodo-Kachari tribe of Karbi Anglong District of Assam. International Journal of Life Sciences Biotechnology and Pharma Research. 2014;3:161-167
  85. 85. Mondal T, Samanta S. An ethnobotanical survey on medicinal plants of Ghatal block, west Midnapur District, West Bengal, India. International Journal of Current Research in Bioscience and Plant Biology. 2014;1:35-37
  86. 86. Eneji CVO, Ntamu GU, Unwanade CC, Godwin A, Bassey JE, Willaims JJ, et al. Traditional African religion in natural resources conservation and Management in Cross River State, Nigeria. Environment and Natural Resources Research. 2012;2:45-53
  87. 87. Hong H, Zhuo J, Lei Q, Zhou J, Ahmed S, Wang C, et al. Ethnobotany of wild plants used for starting fermented beverages in Shui communities of Southwest China. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2015;11:42-62
  88. 88. Ahmad K, Pieroni A. Folk knowledge of wild food plants among the tribal communities of Thakht-e-Sulaiman Hills, north-West Pakistan. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2016;12:17-31
  89. 89. Bhutia KD, Pala NA, Shukla G, Pradhan K, Suresh CP, Chakravarty S. Informant’s consensus and knowledge on the use of wild edible fruits from Sikkim, India. Journal of Hill Agriculture. 2015;6:207-212
  90. 90. Bhutia KD, Suresh CP, Pala NA, Shukla G, Chakravarty S. Nutraceutical potential of some wild edible fruits of Sikkim Himalaya, India. Ethnomedicine. 2018;12:106-112
  91. 91. Chakravarty S, Bhutia KD, Suresh CP, Shukla G, Pala NA. A review on diversity, conservation and nutrition of wild edible fruits. Journal of Applied and Natural Science. 2016;8:2346-2353

Written By

Lakpa Doma Lepcha, Biplov Ch. Sarkar, Gopal Shukla and Sumit Chakravarty

Submitted: 23 June 2022 Reviewed: 25 September 2023 Published: 02 November 2023