Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Exploring the Potential of Calotropis procera in Pharmacological Approaches

Written By

Poonam Bansal, Sunayna Choudhary, Tanvi Taneja, Sonali Sangwan, Bhupesh Gupta, Soniya Goyal, Raman Kumar and Pooja Sharma

Submitted: 02 September 2023 Reviewed: 11 September 2023 Published: 14 November 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.113161

From the Edited Volume

Medicinal Plants - Chemical, Biochemical, and Pharmacological Approaches

Edited by Mozaniel Santana de Oliveira, Eloisa Helena de Aguiar Andrade, Ravendra Kumar and Suraj N. Mali

Chapter metrics overview

54 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Medicinal plants have been a source of treatments for many ailments for thousands of years. The WHO estimates that 80% of worldwide population use traditional medicines to treat common health issues. Plant derived bioactive substances constitute 50% of Western medications. The increase in incidents of emerging medical challenges, including post-COVID syndrome, rising multidrug-resistant (MDR), and many more, has raised annual fatalities. To address these issues, novel medications and strategic approaches are urgently required. Designing novel drugs relies on exploring medicinal plants, which have great scope in combating diseases. Calotropis procera is a medicinal plant belongs to Apocynaceae family and subfamily Asclepiadoideae that have been exploring for developing novel drugs. C. procera consists of numerous phytochemicals including flavonoids, terpenoids, cardenolides, steroids and oxypregnanes. Therefore, its phytoconstituents have been used to treat a variety of conditions including cancer, asthma, epilepsy and snake bite. C. procera is reported to have anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, anthelmintic, antibacterial, antinociceptive and antimalarial properties. Roots, leaves and flower of C. procera have been used in wide range of ethnomedicinal and pharmacological actions including leukoderma, malaria and eczema. Recent ongoing techniques including computational tools using the phytoconstituents of C. procera against various diseases will open up avenues for developing novel drugs.

Keywords

  • Calotropis procera
  • anti-inflammatory
  • antibacterial
  • antimalarial
  • drugs

1. Introduction

For thousands of years, plants have been the only source of treatments to treat both human and animal illnesses [1]. Medicinal plants (MPs) are the primary source of basic healthcare in underdeveloped nations [23]. According to World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 80% of the world’s population relies on traditional medicines, primarily on MPs, for their everyday health problems. Also, 50% of Western medications contain bioactive substances derived from plants [4]. A dramatic increase in fungal diseases over the past few decades has caused the dispersion of fungal spores across the soil and the environment. As a result of excessive fungal spore exposure, numerous illnesses, such as sinusitis, lung infections, and skin infections, are reported to be increased in people with impaired immune systems [5]. Similar to fungal diseases, microbial diseases have historically been the leading cause of mortality [6]. Currently, multidrug-resistant (MDR is solely to blame for about 230,000 of the 700,000 annual deaths caused by resistant infections. By 2050, drug-resistant illnesses will result in 10 million annual fatalities [6].

To address antibiotic resistance, new medications and alternative therapies (like traditional plant-based medicines, bacteriophage therapies, and combinational therapies) are urgently required [78]. World Health Organization strongly emphasizes developing novel antibiotics to combat resistant diseases [9]. Since the dawn of civilization, phytochemicals such as alkaloids, terpenoids, tannins, steroids, coumarins, and flavonoids derived from medicinal plants have a great scope to combat diseases. Essential oils and phenolic acids from Petroselinum crispum, Levisticum officinale Koch, Ocimum basilicum, Thymus vulgaris, Syzygium aromaticum alter the physiology of bacteria such as Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella by increasing cell permeability, altering the bacterial cell wall and membrane integrity, losing ATP, and inhibiting protein synthesis.

Compared to synthetic antimicrobials, medicinal plants are thought to have fewer side effects and exhibit varying degrees of efficacy against microbial infections [51011]. Co-administration of antibiotics and non-antibiotic substances breaks down resistance and is a successful strategy for enhancing or restoring antibiotic efficacy [7]. This chapter describes the morphological description of C. procera and its phytochemical constituents or pharmacological properties described briefly.

Advertisement

2. Calotropis procera

The plants Calotropis procera referred to as “Raktha Arka”, in traditional Ayurvedic medicine. It serves a variety of functions. The plant fibers are used to make baskets, ropes, bags, and nets. The wood serves as both fuel and building material. The leaves of the plant serve as the animal’s food. The plant’s latex is a crucial component of many folk medicines. The common names [12] of the plant are summarized in Table 1. The taxonomic classification of C. procera is tabulated in Table 2.

CountryNames
IndiaSanskrit- Arka, Ganarupa, Mandara, Vasuka, Svetapushpa, Sadapushpa, Alarka, Pratapass
Hindi- Aak, Madar
Kannada- Ekka
Tamil and Malayalam- Erukku
Telugu- Jilledi, Puvvu
MalaysiaRemiga, Rembega, Kemengu
IndonesiaSundanese and Madurese- Bidhuri
Javanese- Sidaguri
Aceh- Rubik
PhilippinesTagalog- Kapal-kapal
LaosKok May, Dok Kap, Dok Hak
ThailandNorthern- Po Thuean, Paan Thuean
Central- Rak
VietnamBootng, Lashen, Nam Tit Bat
FrenchFaux arbre de soie, Mercure vegetal
EnglishGiant Indian milked weed, Madar and Sodom apple
TurkeyIpekag
ArabOshar or Ushar
PersiaKharak
PushtoSpalmai

Table 1.

Vernacular names of C. procera.

Taxonomic classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Subkingdom: Tracheobionta
Super division: Spermatophyta
Division: Magnoliophyta
Class: Magnoliopsida
Order: Gentianales
Family: Asclepiadaceae
Genus: Calotropis
Species: C. procera

Table 2.

Taxonomic classification of C. procera.

Advertisement

3. Distribution

Calotropis procera is a perennial plant belonging to the family Apocynaceae. The plant is abundant in Asia, America, Africa, Afghanistan, Algeria, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Cote d’Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Pakistan, and India. It thrives as a wild shrub across Punjab, especially on plain pastures and roads [13]. Calotropis grows wild up to 900 meters (msl) throughout the nation [14] and is tolerant to salt, and likes disturbed environments. It readily establishes as a weed along deteriorated roadways, lagoon edges, and overgrazed native grasslands and is propagated by seeds spread by wind and animals. It prefers abandoned agriculture sites and frequently predominates there, especially in places with disturbed sandy soils and little rainfall. It is believed to be a sign of overcrowding. It is the first vegetation to grow on arid soil and is tolerant of drought [15]. The xerophytic adaptations include the presence of latex, a profoundly branching root system, and thick leaves covered with wax.

The vegetative characteristics of plant are summarized in Table 3 [16].

Vegetative charactersDescription
HabitShrub or a small tree up to 2.5 m (max.6 m) height.
RootsSimple, branched, woody at base and covered with a fissured; corky bark; branches somewhat succulent and densely white tomentose; early glabrescent. All parts of the plant exude white latex when cut or broken.
LeavesOpposite-decussate, simple, sub sessile, extipulate; blade-oblong obovate to broadly obovate, 5–30 × 2.5–15.5 cm, apex abruptly and shortly acuminate to apiculate, base cordate, margins entire, succulent, white tomentose when young, later glabrescent and glacouse.
FlowersBracteate, complete, bisexual, actinomorphic, pentamerous, hypogynous, pedicellate, pedicel 1–3 cm long.
Floral characteristicsInflorescence- A dense, multiflowered, umbellate, peducled cymes, arising from the nodes and appearing axillary or terminal.
CalyxSepal five, Polysepalous, five lobed, shortly united at the base, glabrescent, quincuncial aestivation.
CorollaPetals five, gamopetalous, five lobed, twisted aestivation.
AndroeciumStamens five, gynandrous, anther dithecous, coherent.
GynoeciumBicarpellary, apocarpus, styles are united at their apex, peltate stigma with five lateral stigmatic surfaces. Anthers adnate to the stigma forming a gynostegium.
FruitA simple, fleshy, inflated, subglobose to obliquely ovoid follicle up to 10 cm or more in diameter.
SeedsMany, small, flat, obovate, 6 × 5 mm, compressed with silky white pappus, 3 cm or more long.

Table 3.

Vegetative characters of C. procera.

Advertisement

4. Phytochemistry of C. procera

C. procera contains cardenolide, triterpenoids, alkaloids, resins, anthocyanins, and other compounds. In addition to this it also contains hydrocarbons, saturated and un saturated fatty acids. Different phytoconstituents isolated from different parts of C. procera were tabulated in Table 4.

Plant partCompounds presentReferences
Leavesa-amyrin[17]
a-amyrin-acetate
β-sitosterol
Urosolic acid
Cardenolide[18]
Calotropin[19]
Calotropagenin[20]
LatexCaoutchouc[18]
Calotoxin[18]
Calactin[21]
Uscharin
Trypsin[21]
Voruscharin
Uzariginin
Syrioginin[21]
Proceroside[22]
FlowerQueretin-3-ratinoside[22]
Sterol[23]
D-arabinose[22]
Glucosamine[23]
L-rhamnose[23]
BarkTriterpenes[24]
Pentacyclic triterpinoides[25]
Calotropursenyl acetate[26]
Apundarol isovalerate[24]
Querecetin-3-rutinoside[25]

Table 4.

Phytoconstituents of C. procera.

Advertisement

5. Traditional uses

Ancient Egyptians utilized C. procera as a medicinal plant throughout the Neolithic period in Egypt. The plant is a part of Greco-Arab medicine [27] and is traditionally used across 21 nations worldwide. The plant is also used in Ayurveda, Siddha, Unani, and Sudanese traditional systems of medicine. It is important to note that C. procera has been used more commonly to treat a variety of infectious disorders that may be generally divided into five categories:

  1. Leprosy, boils, carbuncles, scabies, leishmaniasis, and infections of the skin, mouth, and teeth are examples of skin and dermal infections.

  2. Respiratory infections include pneumonia, bronchitis, bronchial asthma, cough.

  3. GIT infections include dysentery, diarrhea, cholera, gastritis, colitis, and worms.

  4. GU infections include chronic renal failure and leucorrhea.

  5. Systemic infections include malaria and both internal (oral) and external (topical) preparations have used C. procera.

However, given its increased usefulness in treating cutaneous infections, external or topical applications are more prevalent. Ethnomedicinal uses of Calotropis procera are summarized in Table 5.

PartsUses
LeavesIn leukoderma (skin disease); an antidote for rabies; prompt healing; applied for a poultice; treat migraine, fever, eczema, leprosy, elephantiasis, asthma, cough, and rheumatism).
FlowerTreat skin and gum infections; used in dysentery and antidote for scorpion bite.
RootUsed as a digestive; to treat body pain, malaria, eczema, leprosy elephantiasis, asthma, cough, and rheumatism.

Table 5.

Ethnomedicinal uses of C. procera.

Advertisement

6. Medicinal activity

This highly effective shrub is used in numerous widespread and traditional medicines to treat various illnesses like fever, leprosy, eczema, diarrhea, dysentery, and jaundice [2829]. The plant has reported anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, anthelmintic, hepatoprotective, antioxidant, anticonvulsant, antibacterial, oestrogenic, antinociceptive, and antimalarial properties (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Health benefits of C. procera.

Advertisement

7. Antioxidant activity

The anti-inflammatory and anti-hyperglycemic effects of Calotropis procera’s dry latex (DL) were demonstrated in rats that had been given an alloxan-induced diabetes model. In daily oral treatment of DL at dosages of 100 and 400 mg/kg, a dose-dependent drop in blood sugar and an increase in hepatic glycogen content were seen. Additionally, DL slowed the loss of body weight in diabetic animals and decreased their daily water intake to levels comparable to those of rodents without diabetes. Additionally, in rats with alloxan-induced diabetes, DL reduced the levels of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) while increasing the levels of endogenous antioxidants like catalase, glutathione, and superoxide dismutase (SOD). Comparable to glibenclamide, a popular anti-diabetic drug, DL proved effective as an antioxidant and an anti-diabetic agent [16].

The antioxidant activity (free radical scavenging capacity) of the methanolic extract of C. procera roots was evaluated by the in-vitro DPPH scavenging assays. The IC50 value was found below 100 μg/ml, indicating the plant’s potent antioxidant activity.

Advertisement

8. Antimicrobial activity

Calotropis procera seeds were extracted using chloroform and methanol and have been tested on a paper disc for possible in vitro antibacterial activity. The chloroform extract of the seeds showed superior antibacterial action [30]. The stems, fruit, leaves, and flowers of C. procera, as well as its n-hexane, ether, chloroform, and water fraction, were extracted with 70% methanol and water, and their antibacterial activity was investigated. The antibacterial and antifungal effects of the plant fractions were evaluated using Klebsiella pneumoniae and Aspergillus niger, respectively. The test extracts with a concentration of 10 mg/mL were used in the study. On Muller Hinton agar for bacteria and Yeast Peptone Glucose (YPG) agar for fungi, which had previously been seeded with the microbial inocula of 0.5 MacFarland density, a volume of 10 L of each examined extract sample was detected. The inhibition zones on the inoculation plates were measured in mm after a 24-hour period of 37°C incubation. The plant’s flower extract showed the greatest antibacterial activity in the n-hexane and ether fractions.

Advertisement

9. Anti-inflammatory activity

The anti-inflammatory impact of C. procera was tested using the various acute and chronic models of inflammation. Oral administration of dried latex of C. procera significantly inhibited edema formation induced by carrageenan and Freund’s Adjuvant [31]. The plant also has potent anti-inflammatory effects against cotton pellets and carrageenan-induced granulomas in albino Wistar rats. The methanolic extracts (180 mg/kg, p.o.) of the roots of C. Procera can reduce subacute inflammation by interrupting the metabolism of arachidonic acid in both the cotton pellet and paw edema models [32].

Advertisement

10. Antipyretic activity

Calotropis procera may become a more widely available and effective antipyretic medication, according to the study. In contrast to aspirin, C. procera’s ethanolic extract of the aerial parts, aqueous extract of the flower, and aqueous solution of the dry latex have all demonstrated potent antipyretic effects in animal models [33].

11. Anticancer activity

Cardenolide, a novel compound present in C. procera. According to Quaquebeke [34]. C. procera has strong anti-tumor properties in vitro and a high level of tolerance in vivo. Similar to this, di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) isolated from C. procera demonstrated anti-tumor activity, and copper nanoparticles synthesized using an aqueous extract of C. procera latex demonstrated cytotoxic [35] and cytostatic activity against tumor cells and cell lines [36].

12. Antimalarial activity

The alcoholic extract of C. procera flower extract exhibited a higher level of mosquito repellent activity against the female Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito as compared to the petroleum ether and chloroform extracts [37]. This study suggests the role of C. procera as a natural biocide for mosquito control. The aqueous extract of CG leaves at 125, 250, 500, and 1000 ppm exhibited larvicidal, mosquito-repellent, and ovicidal activity against Culex gelidus and C. tritaeniorhynchus mosquitoes. The extract showed dose-dependent larvicidal activity with a motility rate of 86 ± 1.42% (LC50 = 137.90) against C. gelidus and 94 ± 1.31% (LC50 = 110.05) against C. tritaeniorhynchus.

13. Anti-obesity activity (pancreatic lipase inhibitory activity)

The purified di-terpenoid fraction from the root extract of C. procera inhibits pancreatic lipase (PL) with an IC50 of 9.47 mg/mL. The purified di-terpenoid fraction was shown to have a considerably lower inhibition constant (Ki) than the positive control (Orlistat; IC50: 0.15 μM). The inhibition was determined to be competitive based on kinetic data. This explains the plant’s antihyperlipidemic actions [38].

14. Antiviral activity

Globally, viral illnesses are regarded as one of the most significant hazards to people, animals, and plants. The outbreaks of deadly viral diseases like COVID-19, which pose a serious threat to human survival on a global scale, also call for the development of vaccines or other anti-toxin treatments. This is in addition to the challenges brought on by the emergence of antiviral resistance and the negative side effects of currently available antiviral drugs [39]. Research has shown the potential role of medicinal plants and their bioactive compounds as antiviral agents [4041].

15. Toxicity

In addition to its well-documented traditional uses across many nations, C. procera is categorized as a weed, a toxic plant and a poisonous plant [42, 43, 44]. The herb was formerly employed as an abortifacient. The plant leaves also cause ocular toxicity if splashed/entered accidentally. It causes ocular Keratouveitis accompanied by inflammations, corneal edema, irreversible endothelial cell damage and vision deterioration [304546]. Ruminants have experienced harmful effects after consuming C. procera leaves (CPL) [47].

The leading cause of the plant’s toxicity is the presence of poisonous substances like toxic cardenolides in its latex. Similar to those of Digitalis, the cardiac glycosides of C. procera severely increase heartbeat and finally result in animal mortality. CPL’s pH is 5.2, which is harmful to the animal’s mucous membranes [45]. Additionally, C. procera thrives in various soils, including those contaminated with heavy metals and found along roadsides. As a result of the plant’s remarkable capacity to absorb diverse chemical components, such as heavy metals, it bioaccumulates more significant levels of dangerous heavy metals like lead (Pb), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni) and cadmium (Cd) as well as other environmental contaminants which increase the plant’s toxicity [48].

16. Conclusion

The C. procera is one of the globally distributed medicinal plants. Despite of having pharmacological and traditional uses this is the plant that is forgotten as the time passes. But now many scientists have worked to evaluate its phytochemicals and pharmacological property. The pharmacology, traditional uses, toxicology and use of secondary metabolites has been discussed in this chapter. C. procera is the richest source of phytochemicals and screening its phytoconstituents will give a new avenue to investigate its therapeutic role. In vivo and in vitro study of C. procera was well documented in literature but human safety and efficacy yet to be done and clinical trials need to be done to confirm its standard dosage.

References

  1. 1. El-Seedi HR, Khalifa SA, Taher EA, Farag MA, Saeed A, Gamal M, et al. Cardenolides: Insights from chemical structure and pharmacological utility. Pharmacological Research. 2019;141:123-175
  2. 2. Fatima A, Ahmad M, Zafar M, Yaseen G, Khan MPZ, Butt MA, et al. Ethnopharmacological relevance of medicinal plants used for the treatment of oral diseases in Central Punjab-Pakistan. Journal of Herbal Medicine. 2018;12:88-110
  3. 3. Khan IH, Javaid A. Antifungal activity and GC-MS analysis of n-butanol extract of quinoa leaves. Bangladesh Journal of Botany. 2020b;49(4):1045-1051
  4. 4. Gupta A, Pandey AK. Antibacterial lead compounds and their targets for drug development. In: Phytochemicals as Lead Compounds for New Drug Discovery. Elsevier; 2020. pp. 275-292
  5. 5. Vidyasagar GM. Plant-derived antifungal agents: Past and recent developments. Recent Trends in Antifungal Agents and Antifungal Therapy. 2016;2016:123-147
  6. 6. Biharee A, Sharma A, Kumar A, Jaitak V. Antimicrobial flavonoids as a potential substitute for overcoming antimicrobial resistance. Fitoterapia. 2020;146:104720
  7. 7. Khameneh B, Iranshahy M, Soheili V, Fazly Bazzaz BS. Review on plant antimicrobials: A mechanistic viewpoint. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control. 2019;8(1):1-28
  8. 8. Mulat M, Khan F, Muluneh G, Pandita A. Phytochemical profile and antimicrobial effects of different medicinal plant: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Current Traditional Medicine. 2020;6(1):24-42
  9. 9. World Health Organization. 2019 Antibacterial Agents in Clinical Development: An Analysis of the Antibacterial Clinical Development Pipeline. 2019
  10. 10. Pathania S, Bansal P, Gupta P, Rawal RK. Genus Calotropis: A hub of medicinally active phytoconstituents. Current Traditional Medicine. 2020;6(4):312-331
  11. 11. Konaté K, Mavoungou JF, Lepengué AN, Aworet-Samseny RR, Hilou A, Souza A, et al. Antibacterial activity against β-lactamase producing Methicillin and Ampicillin-resistants Staphylococcus aureus: Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index (FICI) determination. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials. 2012;11:1-12
  12. 12. Breckle SW, Hedge I, Rafiqpoor M. Vascular Plants of Afghanistan. Bonn: Scientia Bonnensis; 2013
  13. 13. Azhar MF, Siddiqui MT, Ishaque M, Tanveer A. Study of ethnobotany and indigenous use of Calotropis procera (Ait.) in cholistan desert, Punjab, Pakistan. Journal of Agricultural Research. 2014;52(1):117-126
  14. 14. Sharma AP, Tripathi BD. Assessment of atmospheric PAHs profile through Calotropis gigantea R. Br. leaves in the vicinity of an Indian coal-fired power plant. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2009;149:477-482
  15. 15. Smith NM. Weeds of the Wet/Dry Tropics of Australia-a Field Guide. USA: Environment Centre NT. Inc Darwin North Territ; 2002
  16. 16. Kumar VL, Padhy BM, Sehgal R, Roy S. Antioxidant and protective effect of latex of Calotropis procera against alloxan-induced diabetes in rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2005a;102:470-473
  17. 17. Bryce TA, Eglinton G, Hamilton RJ, Martin-Smith M, Subramanian G. Triterpenoids from New Zealand plants-II.: The triterpene methyl ethers of Cortaderia toetoe Zotov. Phytochemistry. 1967;6(5):727-733
  18. 18. Chopra RN, Nayar SL. Glossary of Indian Medicinal Plants. Vol. 46. New Delhi: Council of Scientific and Industrial Research; 1956. p. 29
  19. 19. Yelne MB, Sharma PC, Dennis TJ. Database on medicinal plants used in ayurveda. Central Council for Research in Ayurveda & Siddha, New-Delhi. 2000;2:69-73
  20. 20. Singh B, Rastogi RP. Structure of asclepin and some observations on the NMR spectra of Calotropis glycosides. Phytochemistry. 1972;11(2):757-762
  21. 21. Baquar SR, Tasnif M. Medicinal plants of southern west Pakistan. Vivek Vihar, Delhi: Periodical Expert Book Agency, D-42; 1984. p. 30
  22. 22. Grieve MM. A Modern Herbal. Vol. 10. London: Tigers Book International; 1994. p. 154
  23. 23. Hanna AG, Elgamal MHA, Morsy NA, Duddeck H, Kovács J, Tóth G. Two cardenolides from Calotropis procera. Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry. 1999;37(10):754-757
  24. 24. Ansari SH, Ali M. New oleanene triterpenes from root bark of Calotropis procera. Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Sciences. 1999;21(4):978-981
  25. 25. Ansari SH, Ali M. Norditerpenic ester and pentacyclic triterpenoids from root bark of Calotropis procera (Ait) R. Br. Die Pharmazie. 2001;56(2):175-177
  26. 26. Hamidi JA, Ismaili NH, Ahmadi FB, Lajisi NH. Antiviral and cytotoxic activities of some plants used in Malaysian indigenous medicine. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science. 1996;19(2/3):129-136
  27. 27. Hassan LM, Galal TM, Farahat EA, El-Midany MM. The biology of Calotropis procera (Aiton) WT. Trees. 2015;29:311-320
  28. 28. Meena AK, Yadav AK, Niranjan US, Singh B, Nagariya AK, Sharma K, et al. A review on Calotropis procera Linn and its ethnobotany, phytochemical, pharmacological profile. Drug Invent Today. 2010;2(2):185-190
  29. 29. Verma SK, Singh SK, Mathur A. In vitro cytotoxicity of Calotropis procera and Trigonella foenum-graecum against human cancer cell lines. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research (JOCPR). 2010;2(4):861-865
  30. 30. Bhaskar VH, Ajay SS. Antimicrobial activity of Calotropis procera seeds. Asian Journal of Chemistry. 2009;21(7):5788-5790
  31. 31. Kumar S, Dewan S, Sangraula H, Kumar VL. Anti-diarrhoeal activity of the latex of Calotropis procera. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2001;76(1):115-118
  32. 32. Saba AB, Oguntoke PC, Oridupa OA. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities of ethanolic leaf extract of Calotropis procera. African Journal of Biomedical Research. 2011;14(3):203-208
  33. 33. Dewan S, Kumar S, kumar VL. Antipyretic effect of latex of Calotropis procera. Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 2000;32(3):252
  34. 34. Quaquebeke VE, Simon G, Andre A, Dewelle J, Yazidi ME, Bruyneel F. Identification of a novel cardenolide (2-oxovoruscharin) from Calotropis procera and the hemisynthesis of novel derivatives displaying potent in vitro antitumor activities and high in vivo tolerance: Structure-activity relationship analyses. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2005;48:849-856
  35. 35. Harne S, Sharma A, Dhaygude M, Joglekar S, Kodam K, Hudlikar M. Novel route for rapid biosynthesis of copper nanoparticles using aqueous extract of Calotropis procera L. latex and their cytotoxicity on tumor cells. Colloids and Surfaces. B, Biointerfaces. 2012;15:284-288
  36. 36. Taylor P, Arsenak M, Abad MJ, Fernández A, Milano B, Gonto R. Screening of Venezuelan medicinal plant extracts for cytostatic and cytotoxic activity against tumor cell lines. Phytotherapy Research. 2013;27(4):530-539
  37. 37. Larhsini M, Bousaid M, Lazrek HB, Jana M, Amarouch H. Evaluation of antifungal and molluscicidal properties of extracts of Calotropis procera. Fitoterapia. 1997;68(4):371-373
  38. 38. Patil SG, Patil MP, Maheshwari VL, Patil RH. In vitro lipase inhibitory effect and kinetic properties of di-terpenoid fraction from Calotropis procera (Aiton). Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology. 2015;4(4):579-585
  39. 39. Bagla VP, McGaw LJ, Eloff JN. The antiviral activity of six South African plants traditionally used against infections in ethnoveterinary medicine. Veterinary Microbiology. 2012;155(2-4):198-206
  40. 40. Mohanraj R, Rakshit J, Nobre M. Anti HIV-1 and antimicrobial activity of the leaf extracts of Calotropis procera. International Journal of Green Pharmacy (IJGP). 2010;4(4):242-246
  41. 41. Mukhtar M, Arshad M, Ahmad M, Pomerantz RJ, Wigdahl B, Parveen Z. Antiviral potentials of medicinal plants. Virus Research. 2008;131(2):111-120
  42. 42. Gracia A, Rangel-Buitrago N, Castro-Barros JD. Non-native plant species in the Atlantico department coastal dune systems, caribbean of Colombia: A new management challenge. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2019;141:603-610. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.03.009
  43. 43. Al-Zuhairi AH, Al-Ani JMK, Ibrahim SN. Toxicological effects of aqueous extract of calotropis procera leaves in experimentally poisoned rabbits. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2020;44(1):46-56
  44. 44. Tossou ML, Ballogou B, Maina J, Gicheha M. Effect of Calotropis procera on the proximate composition and potential toxicity of Wagashi (traditional cheese) in Benin. Food Science and Quality Management. 2018;74:30
  45. 45. Al-Mezaine HS, Al-Amry MA, Al-Assiri A, Fadel TS, Tabbara KF, Al-Rajhi AA. Corneal endothelial cytotoxicity of the Calotropis procera (ushaar) plant. Cornea. 2008;27(4):504-506
  46. 46. Lakhtakia S, Dwivedi PC, Choudhary P, Chalisgaonkar C, Rahud J. Ocular toxicity of Calotropis-missing links. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010;58(2):169
  47. 47. Ahmed OM, Fahim HI, Boules MW, Ahmed HY. Cardiac and testicular toxicity effects of the latex and ethanolic leaf extract of Calotropis procera on male albino rats in comparison to abamectin. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1-21
  48. 48. Naz A, Chowdhury A, Chandra R, Mishra BK. Potentialhuman health hazard due to bioavailable heavy metal exposure viaconsumption of plants with ethnobotanical usage at the largest chromite mine of India. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 2020;42(12):4213-4231

Written By

Poonam Bansal, Sunayna Choudhary, Tanvi Taneja, Sonali Sangwan, Bhupesh Gupta, Soniya Goyal, Raman Kumar and Pooja Sharma

Submitted: 02 September 2023 Reviewed: 11 September 2023 Published: 14 November 2023