Abstract
Graphene is a two-dimensional allotrope of carbon with a range of highly attractive physicochemical properties suitable for a wide variety of applications. In the context of fluorescence imaging graphene and its derivatives have recently started to gain more attention since they could assist in the enhancement of imaging of cells, tissue, or other biologically relevant samples such as cell organoids for example mitochondria as well as in the imaging of cancer cells, tumors, and various pathogens. This chapter attempts to cover the most relevant, recent advances in this growing research field. Some basic information on the physical and (photo)chemical properties of important members of the graphene family is provided. Additionally, novel approaches involving graphene-based materials (GBMs) in cellular and tissue imaging systems are reviewed. Important examples of contemporary applications of GBMs in cancer detection using fluorescence imaging are also presented. The specific role of graphene (or other GBMs) in each case is explained and analyzed. Finally, future perspectives and novel applications of fluorescent imaging techniques involving GBMs are discussed.
Keywords
- graphene
- fluorescence
- imaging
- 2D-materials
- microscopy
- cellular imaging
- cancer detection
1. Introduction
1.1 Graphene-based fluorescence imaging applications
Fluorescence imaging is a non-invasive approach that utilizes fluorescent probes to generate photons and provides more sensitivity, specificity, and less harm than other imaging methods [1]. It can be used to monitor cells, tissues, and living organisms
The following section provides a comprehensive introduction to the fluorescence imaging mechanism of graphene quantum dots and graphene oxide, as well as some reviews of current achievements in the field of graphene-based fluorescence imaging application. Fundamentally, to increase the performance of graphene and its derivatives in bioimaging applications, it is necessary to properly control their sizes, surface coatings, and components in order to maximize their photoluminescence capabilities. It is anticipated that the unique structure and exceptional capabilities of graphene and its derivatives offer new opportunities for disease detection and clinical treatments, have promising application prospects in fluorescence imaging, and play a crucial role in fostering the growth of the biomedicine industry.
2. GO, GQDs and CNDs in fluorescence imaging: why so important?
2.1 Graphene oxide
Graphene oxide is one of the most commonly used forms of the graphene-based materials (GBMs) family nowadays. This comes as no surprise since it is a very stable multifunctional material with a wide range of superior properties and hence a broad application scope [16]. GO is essentially the oxidized form of graphene which can be produced through a variety of oxidative methods [17–19]. Structurally, GO encompasses a variety of functional groups, the most important being: carboxy, hydroxy, epoxy, and keto- or aldehyde groups. Hydroxy groups can be found both at the edges and the surface of GO, epoxy on the surface areas and the rest mostly at the edges [20]. Their abundance and ratios are sensitive to the preparation method. These functional groups give rise to a quite dipolar character of this GBM and at the same time generate a range of excitation possibilities due to the presence of oxygen as the main heteroatom involving lone pairs of electrons. As a result, transitions such as
2.1.1 Excitation energy dependent fluorescence
This is a property which is also observed in GQDs. Unlike most of the conventional fluorophores, GO can result in different emission energies (i.e. a variety of colors of emitted light) when photo-excited at different wavelengths (energies) [22]. Specifically, upon increasing excitation wavelength from 325 nm to 650 nm, a red shift of the GO fluorescent band is observed [23]. This effect in terms of applications in fluorescence imaging is very important since by employing a single material it is possible to obtain a wide range of emitted light colors simply employing different laser energies for excitation.
2.1.2 Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)
FRET occurs when a donor chromophore, being in its electronically excited state, transfers energy to an acceptor chromophore
Additionally, GO can also be employed as an energy donor (ED) in FRET systems involving GO and an acceptor fluorophore. Such systems might involve either organic dyes or noble metal nanoparticles acting as EAs corresponding to GO as ED [35, 36]. A variety of bio-relevant sensor applications based on GO/EA FRET systems have been reported so far allowing for the detection of antibodies [35] pharmaceutical screening/imaging, diagnostic tools [36, 37], etc. Some more detailed examples are presented in the next paragraphs.
2.1.3 Fluorescence of GO
The fluorescence band of GO is very broad and thus not suitable for accurate sensor and fluorescence imaging applications. Nonetheless, GO exhibits NIR emission when photoexcited in the NIR region and due to this feature GO is currently finding application in TP microscopy and imaging of biological samples [38, 39]. It is noteworthy that the excitation dependent emission (
2.2 Graphene quantum dots (GQDs) and carbon nanodots (CNDs)
A very interesting family of materials belonging to the wide carbon family is the Carbon dots family. Two important classes of carbon dots are Graphene quantum dots (GQDs) and carbon nanodots (CNDs). GQDs and CNDs are currently in the forefront of research in the field of bioimaging and specifically within the research and development of novel fluorescence imaging materials and techniques. The ease of production of CNDs and GQDs, their high structural versatility and the wide range of structure-properties modulation opportunities, as well as their biocompatibility and bright fluorescence are the main reasons associated with their high relevance for bioimaging. Up to date a broad range of production methods have been published.
Several methods have been reported for producing GQDs and CNDs, with solvothermal, [42] microwave-assisted, [43] and electrochemical methods [44] being the most commonly used. The choice of the synthetic method used relies on the target batch-size and desired structure and properties of the final materials. It is currently established that for their production inert conditions e.g., heating at temperatures as low as even 120°C are adequate. As a comparison earlier methods employed drastic conditions involving laser ablation [45] or even temperatures higher than 900°C [46]. Nonetheless, it is well agreed by many researchers that milder production conditions can indeed result in very interesting properties since many of the microwave-assisted and hydrothermal methods leave parts of the molecules being subjected to heat or microwaves respectively, unaffected. Hence, the surface of the GQDs and CNDs produced by this “mild processing” can encompass a variety of functional groups [47, 48].
Up to date a wide variety of GQDs and CNDs have been synthesized
Why are GQDs and CNDs so important for fluorescence imaging is strongly associated to their outstanding photophysical properties. GQDs and CNDs exhibit photoluminescence (fluorescence emission by many authors) of often high quantum yields in a variety of media. The photoluminescence can be highly dependent on the size and even the shape of the dots [51] but mainly on the surface defects that they exhibit. In fact, without the surface passivation of carbon dots the observed photoluminescence is very limited. Post functionalization of their surface and/or incomplete “termination” reactions/partial carbonization during their production can efficiently enhance their photoluminescent properties [46]. Probably the most remarkable of the properties of GQDs and CNDs is the excitation-dependent photoluminescence [46]. This property (which also GO exhibits,
3. Cellular and tissue imaging systems involving graphene-based materials
Contemporary cell-imaging methods have facilitated the advancement of a wide range of biologically relevant assays aiming at a variety of therapeutic fields and revolutionized the R&D relating to drug design. Cellular imaging encompasses the application of a system or technology required for the visualization of a single cell, cell population, or subcellular structure. Even though a wide range of technologies, methodologies, and molecules enabling cell imaging do exist, there is a constant need for the development of novel systems of higher accuracy, fidelity, specificity, low cost, low cytotoxicity, and high photo- and chemical stability. In terms of fluorescent molecular materials, many of these requirements are fulfilled by members of the wide family of GBMs. In this section, the most recent developments falling in this area of research and technology are reported.
The fluorescence imaging of biomolecules particularly proteins and DNA is an important field of research and technology that can enable the visualization of proteins in cells and tissues with the use of fluorescent probes. Its importance is rationalized as high in terms of the various opportunities for the studies of localization and dynamics of proteins in living cells and tissues that it can offer (e.g. studies of protein–protein interactions, protein folding, and protein degradation) [55–58].
Indeed, graphene and other GBMs have been shown to act as useful platforms for fluorescent sensing of biomolecules including DNA and a variety of proteins and this opens a variety of opportunities in cell and tissue fluorescent imaging [59–62].
Bovine serum albumin (BSA) is a globular protein of animal origin (cow) that is used in a plethora of biochemical applications due to its stability and lack of interference with biological reactions [63]. Kuchlyan et al. performed a thorough study on the interactions of BSA with GO. The group employed a set of spectroscopic methods such as fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy (FILM), and Circular Dichroism (CD). For the study, BSA was labeled with the bright fluorescent Alexa Fluor 488 (AF488). They concluded that GO exhibits a pronouncedly strong interaction with BSA. GO was proved to have a drastic fluorescent quenching effect on AF488-BSA [64]. On the other hand, Yang et al. recently reported on the advancement of a highly sensitive nanosystem based on GO corresponding to microRNA (miRNA) which can be applied in living cells as well as
Very recently Reagen et al. developed a novel class of GQDs exhibiting near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence (emission centered at λ = 860 nm) derived from biomass obtained from organic source and prepared through pyrolysis. The prepared GQDs were tested for cell imaging in two distinct cell lines namely RAW 246.7 (macrophage cells) and MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. The results indicated low cytotoxicity as well as substantial internalization through endocytosis. Moreover, the GQDs exhibited a marked aptitude in detecting Hg2+ ions in biological samples enabling NIR fluorescence imaging in cells and toxic heavy metal detection
Two-photon (TP) microscopy is a fluorescence imaging technique that is particularly well-suited to image-scattering living tissue of up to about 1 millimeter in thickness. It works by shining an intense beam of near-infrared light onto a single point within a sample, inducing simultaneous absorption of two photons at the focal point, where the intensity is the highest [70]. TP microscopy has found nowadays huge applicability in bioscience. Nonetheless, a typical restriction that TP- microscopy/bioimaging techniques exhibit is that they rely on single-color fluorescence changes. Due to the special emission properties of GQDs among a range of other beneficiary properties (
In Wang et al. reported on the development of some GQDs through a hydrothermal method utilizing 1,3,6-trinitropyrene and (NH4)2SO3. The resulting GQDs encompassing amino as well as sulfate groups were evaluated in terms of their TP fluorescence efficiency in the context of cellular imaging. A very high TP absorption cross-section was observed and evaluated as significantly higher as compared to traditional/conventional fluorophores. The research group further performed tests in a cell line (HeLa cells) and found out that the GQDs were internalized in the cytoplasm providing very bright and clear cell images (see Figure 2) [72].
Earlier Sapkota et al. reported the synthesis of GQDs of tunable size and explored their capacity in fluorescence imaging. It was found that GQDs with a size between 15 and 35 nm exhibit vivid fluorescence (quantum yields of 0.64 by average) as well as high TP absorption (TPA) cross sections, which renders these GQDs excellent candidates for fluorescence imaging. Indeed, their use in cellular imaging was evaluated on living epithelial cells and even though internalization was observed, entering the nucleus was not possible [73].
Chen et al. as early as in 2015 advanced an aptameric sensor with nano dimensions based on graphene which is capable of inducing/enhancing the fluorescence activation imaging of cytochrome c (Cyt c; a major mediator in cell apoptosis released from mitochondria) [74]. In order to achieve this, Chen et al. connected a fluorophore-tagged DNA aptamer on graphene nanosheets modified with PEG polymer chains. The fluorescence of the fluorophore is inhibited due to the presence of graphene. Yet, dissociation of the a fluorophore-tagged DNA aptamer from graphene occurring immediately after cytosolic release of Cyt C, triggers the fluorescence and empowers real-time visualization of the Cyt c release kinetics. This nanosensing technology is envisioned to exhibit potential applications in visualization of key molecular factors in apoptotic signaling which are critical for cell biology and clinical theranostics.
Wang et al. on the other hand developed an innovative nanosensor employing graphene quantum dots (GQDs) which were conjugated to gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). The nanosensor was found to efficiently serve as a sensor of endogenous biological cyanide ions. This graphene-based nanomaterial further exhibits efficient TP excitation and exploits the drastic quenching efficiency of AuNPs and thus it can accomplish detection cyanide limits as low as 0.52 μM. This, combined with the potential of deep penetration depth of approx. 400 μm render this nanomaterial a perfect candidate for tissue imaging of cyanides [75].
Similarly, Hong et al. also employed a combination of AuNPs and a GBM (GO) for the development of fluorescent imaging/sensing system with specific applicability in monitoring intracellular telomerase activity. Their fluorescence imaging is applicable to a variety of living cells and it was tested toward the aptitude to distinguish normal-form cancer cells [76].
One of the pioneering works reporting GQDs-based nanosystems utilized in TP-induced fluorescence imaging was that by Liu et al. published as early as 2013. The research group produced some N-doped GQDs employing a solvothermal method in which dimethylformamide (DMF) was used both as solvent as well as N-source. The reported GQDs exhibit a marked TP absorption cross-section of nearly 48 kGM (GM: Göppert Mayer units) and were proved to function well even at imaging depth in tissue samples as large as 1800 μm. The development of these GQDs has been an early example of the immense potentials of GQDs in fluorescence bioimaging with applications in the broad biological and biomedical research fields [77].
4. GBMs in cancer detection through fluorescence imaging
Cancer currently constitutes one of the major mortality causes for humans. Ensuring enhanced cancer therapies requires improvement of cancer diagnostic techniques. In recent years, GBMs have found applicability in cancer detection. The wide range of suitable properties and attributes of this broad range of materials are considered for efficient cancer imaging.
Campbell et al. recently reported on the use of GQDs involving amino, hydroxy as well as carboxy functional groups and doped with nitrogen, nitrogen and boron or sulfur, in spectrally distinguishing among healthy and various types of cancer cells. In addition to this, the authors evaluated the pH-responsiveness of the investigated GQDs exploiting their wide range of emitted light wavelengths spanning from the visible to near-infraredred (NIR) part of the electromagnetic spectrum (Figure 3) [78].
Wu et al. on the other hand developed a new type of graphene-based nanomaterial functionalized with Anti-EpCAM antibodies and galactose-rhodamine-polyacrylamide nanoparticles with a high aptitude to recognition of hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HCC-CTCs). The presence of graphene is dual here, acting both as a nanoparticle carrier platform as well as a strong quencher of rhodamine’s fluorescence. Upon capturing and endocytosis of the aforementioned nanoparticles, fluorescence is recovered and the fluorescence imaging of HCC-CTCs can thus be efficiently achieved (Figure 4) [79].
It is important to mention that the aforementioned strategy involving graphene as a quencher of fluorophores connected to agents that can efficiently/specifically bind cancer cells or other bio-targets, has been repeatedly proposed within the context of fluorescence bio-imaging. A variety of recently published attempts towards bioimaging targets of biologically relevant analytes such as DNA [80], ions, [81] antibiotics [82], etc. have recently been reviewed [83].
Nurannabi et al. as early as 2014, developed GQDs bearing -OH and -COOH functionalities with an average size of 5 nm exhibiting significant red photoluminescence when excited at 655 nm (Figure 5). Their photoluminescence behavior was shown to enhance visualization of deep tumor tissues in experimental animals. Moreover, the described GQDs were tested
In Pramanik et al. reported on the use of aptamer-conjugated GO in TP imaging (TPI) of breast cancer cells (specifically of SK-BR-3 cells). The developed GBM displays a drastic 2-photon absorption and marked photostability after even long irradiation sessions [38].
In Narasimhan et al. reported on the use of GQDs produced through laser ablation for use in both
In Liu et al. proposed the use of graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets as a scaffold allowing for the detection of hyaluronase (HAase). Similarly to the already described strategies for cancer cell/tissue imaging, a cancer marker is targeted as an analyte (in this particular case HAase). Imaging of HAase in cancer tissues can be achieved through the activable two-photon fluorescence of the developed graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets in presence of HAase [86].
Some years earlier Park and coworkers utilized hyaluronic acid (HA) instead of HA-ase to accomplish efficient target-specific delivery of GQDs. In their strategy, the researchers tethered HA to GQDs and thus synthesized brightly fluorescent nanoparticles with an approximate size of 20 nm [87]. These interesting HA-GQD conjugates were tested and it was found that they exhibit strong fluorescence in CD44 overexpressing A549 cells as well as in
In a similar fashion, Goreham et al. investigated the role of GO modification with folic acid in fluorescence lifetime imaging of HaCaT cells. Since folate receptor is an important recognized biomarker [88] currently considered for new diagnostic tools for cancer, modification of graphene oxide with folic acid was considered in this study. The water solubility green fluorescence (upon photoexcitation at 305 nm) and the evaluated low toxicity of GO indicated the high potentials of these graphene family members in cancer fluorescence imaging and corresponding diagnostics [89].
Liu et al. also utilized GO as a perfect platform on which a molecular beacon (a type of oligonucleotide hybridization probe which is capable of specifically detecting the presence of nucleic acids) having a couple of Cyanine-5 (Cy-5) fluorophore units at its both ends. The fluorescence of Cy-5 was quenched both due to self-quenching and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) caused by GO. With this nanosystem, the researchers achieved detection of microRNAs even at concentrations a low as 30 pM. This nanoimaging technique was found to be applicable to a variety of cancer tissues and cells [65].
Additionally, Kumawat et al. reported the use of GQDs obtained
Moreover, Fan et al. investigated the use of some pH-responsive GQDs (pRF-GQDs) which were synthesized
While fluorescence can be readily used in the detection and imaging of a variety of tumor cells, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques enhanced through the use of GQDs appear to be very attractive due to the ease of production, size, easy structure modulation as well as multi-purpose character of GQDs [92]. Zhang et al. nearly a decade ago reported the use of GO-gadolinium (GO-Gd) complexes for the enhancement of and quality improvement of the MR-imaging of cancer. They showed that the developed GO-based material not only can operate as an enhancing agent for MRI but furthermore serves as a material for fluorescent imaging with anticancer-drug delivery aptitude (Figure 6). This early finding clearly showcases the immense possibilities and versatility of GBMs in bioimaging [93].
More recently and in a similar fashion, Yang et al. reported on the use of surface-modified GQDs by polyethylene glycol (PEG) which were functionalized with the Gd-DOTA complex (where DOTA stands for tetraazacyclododecanetetraacetic acid) in cancer imaging through MRI and fluorescence imaging. The research group managed to significantly increase the relaxivity by regulating the length of the PEG linkers and hence advanced a novel MR contrast agent with immense potentials within cancer-imaging [94].
5. Conclusions and future perspectives and uses of fluorescent imaging involving GBMs
There is a wide range of current and potential future applications of fluorescence imaging, two of the most promising being fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) [95] and robotic-assisted fluorescence surgery (RAFS) [96]. The applications are numerous while probably the most relevant ones lie in the field of surgical oncology [95, 97]. The idea of using tumor-targeted imaging agents in the context of this developing research and technology area is considered as a promising strategy for intraoperative cancer detection. In this regard, the broad family of GBMs and their attributes can demonstrate an important role as potent fluorescent/emissive materials of low toxicity, biocompatibility and tunable optical properties [46]. A variety of GQDs have been reported so far labelling tumor cells and tissue thus potentially facilitating tumor surgery [91, 98, 99]. Particular interest has been placed on the use on pH-responsive fluorescent GQDs (pRF-GQDs) as transition in the emitted light color depending on the pH can help distinguish healthy tissue from tumors (extracellular microenvironment of tumors exhibits lower pH) [33, 91]. Based on the so-far published research works, it becomes apparent that the multifunctional character of GBMs could facilitate tumor FGS in the future and in general bioimaging and the detection of disease [100, 101].
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Dr. K. Tzavlaki for fruitful discussions on bioimaging.
Acronyms and abbreviations
AuNPs | gold nanoparticles |
BSA | bovine serum albumin |
CNDs | carbon nanodots |
CD | circular dichroism |
CD44 | antigen is a cell-surface glycoprotein |
Cyt c | cytochrome c 1 |
DMF | dimethylformamide |
EA | energy acceptor |
ED | energy donor |
FGS | fluorescence guided surgery |
FRET | fluorescence resonance energy transfer |
FCS | fluorescence correlation spectroscopy |
FILM | fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy |
GBMs | graphene based materials |
GM | Göppert Mayer units |
GO | graphene oxide |
GQDs | graphene quantum dots |
HA | hyaluronic acid |
HAase | hyaluronase |
HaCaT | a spontaneously transformed aneuploid immortal keratinocyte cell line |
HCC-CTCs | hepatocellular carcinoma cells |
MRI | magnetic resonance imaging |
NIR | near infrared |
RAFS | robotic-assisted fluorescence surgery |
pRF-GQDs | pH-responsive fluorescent graphene quantum dots |
PEG | polyethylene glycol |
SK-BR-3 | a breast cancer cell line |
TP | two photon |
TPA | two photon absorption |
References
- 1.
Baker SN, Baker GA. Luminescent carbon nanodots: Emergent nanolights. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2010; 49 :6726-6744. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200906623 - 2.
Zhu S, Meng Q , Wang L, Zhang J, Song Y, Jin H, et al. Highly photoluminescent carbon dots for multicolor patterning, sensors, and bioimaging. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2013; 52 :3953-3957. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201300519 - 3.
Kavitha MK, Jaiswal M. Graphene: A review of optical properties and photonic applications. Asian Journal of Physics. 2016; 25 :809-831 - 4.
Xin G, Meng Y, Ma Y, Ho D, Kim N, Cho SM, et al. Tunable photoluminescence of graphene oxide from near-ultraviolet to blue. Materials Letters. 2012; 74 :71-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.01.047 - 5.
Li L, Wu G, Yang G, Peng J, Zhao J, Zhu J-J. Focusing on luminescent graphene quantum dots: Current status and future perspectives. Nanoscale. 2013; 5 :4015-4039. DOI: 10.1039/C3NR33849E - 6.
Li H, Han S, Lyu B, Hong T, Zhi S, Xu L, et al. Tunable light emission from carbon dots by controlling surface defects. Chinese Chemical Letters. 2021; 32 :2887-2892. DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.03.051 - 7.
Ai L, Shi R, Yang J, Zhang K, Zhang T, Lu S. Efficient combination of G-C3N4 and CDs for enhanced photocatalytic performance: A review of synthesis, strategies, and applications. Small. 2021; 17 :2007523. DOI: 10.1002/smll.202007523 - 8.
Li Y, Zhao Y, Cheng H, Hu Y, Shi G, Dai L, et al. Nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots with oxygen-rich functional groups. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2012; 134 :15-18. DOI: 10.1021/ja206030c - 9.
Wang G, He P, Xu A, Guo Q , Li J, Wang Z, et al. Promising fast energy transfer system between graphene quantum dots and the application in fluorescent bioimaging. Langmuir. 2019; 35 :760-766. DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03739 - 10.
Gong L, Sun J, Zheng P, Liu Y, Yang G. Yellow fluorescent nitrogen and bromine Co-doped graphene quantum dots for bioimaging. ACS Applied Nano Materials. 2021; 4 :8564-8571. DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.1c02004 - 11.
Li B, Xiao X, Hu M, Wang Y, Wang Y, Yan X, et al. Mn, B, N co-doped graphene quantum dots for fluorescence sensing and biological imaging. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2022; 15 :103856. DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.103856 - 12.
Aliyev E, Filiz V, Khan MM, Lee YJ, Abetz C, Abetz V. Structural characterization of graphene oxide: Surface functional groups and fractionated oxidative debris. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9 :1180 - 13.
Lai S, Jin Y, Shi L, Zhou R, Zhou Y, An D. Mechanisms behind excitation- and concentration-dependent multicolor photoluminescence in graphene quantum dots. Nanoscale. 2020; 12 :591-601. DOI: 10.1039/C9NR08461D - 14.
Kalluru P, Vankayala R, Chiang C-S, Hwang KC. Nano-graphene oxide-mediated In vivo fluorescence imaging and bimodal photodynamic and photothermal destruction of tumors. Biomaterials. 2016; 95 :1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.04.006 - 15.
Wang Z, Zheng L, Cheng Q , Li X, Huang L, Lu Y. Metal-enhanced fluorescence of graphene oxide sheets. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2022; 414 :3625-3630. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-022-04001-x - 16.
Razaq A, Bibi F, Zheng X, Papadakis R, Jafri SHM, Li H. Review on graphene-, graphene oxide-, reduced graphene oxide-based flexible composites: From fabrication to applications. Materials. 2022; 15 (3):1012. DOI: 10.3390/ma15031012 - 17.
Marcano DC, Kosynkin DV, Berlin JM, Sinitskii A, Sun Z, Slesarev A, et al. Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano. 2010; 4 (8):4806-4814. DOI: 10.1021/nn1006368 - 18.
Chen J, Yao B, Li C, Shi G. An improved hummers method for eco-friendly synthesis of graphene oxide. Carbon. 2013; 64 :225-229. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.07.055 - 19.
Sun L. Structure and synthesis of graphene oxide. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2019; 27 (10):2251-2260. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2019.05.003 - 20.
Dimiev AM, Eigler S, editors. Graphene Oxide: Fundamentals and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2016 - 21.
Gao W, editor. Graphene Oxide. Reduction Recipes, Spectroscopy, and Applications. Springer Cham; 2015. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-15500-5 - 22.
Li M, Cushing SK, Zhou X, Guoc S, Wu N. Fingerprinting photoluminescence of functional groups in graphene oxide. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2012; 22 :23374-23379 - 23.
Zheng P, Prof W, N. Fluorescence and sensing applications of graphene oxide and graphene quantum dots: A review. Chemistry, an Asian Journal. 2017; 12 (18):2343-2353. DOI: 10.1002/asia.201700814 - 24.
Helms V. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer. In: Principles of Computational Cell Biology. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2008. p. 202 - 25.
Schneckenburger H. Förster resonance energy transfer–what can we learn and how can we use it? Methods and Applications in Fluorescence. 2019; 8 (1):013001. DOI: 10.1088/2050-6120/ab56e1 - 26.
Bajar BT, Wang ES, Zhang S, Lin MJC, B. T. A guide to fluorescent protein FRET pairs. Sensors. 2016; 16 (9):1488. DOI: 10.3390/s16091488 - 27.
Algar WR, Hildebrandt N, Vogel SS, Medintz IL. FRET as a biomolecular research tool — Understanding its potential while avoiding pitfalls. Nature Methods. 2019; 16 :815-829. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-019-0530-8 - 28.
Kaur A, Kaur P, Ahuja S. Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) and applications thereof. Analytical Methods. 2020; 12 :5532-5550. DOI: 10.1039/D0AY01961E - 29.
Tian F, Lyu J, Shi J, Yang M. Graphene and graphene-like two-denominational materials based fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) assays for biological applications. Biosensors & Bioelectronics. 2017; 89 :123-135. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.06.046 - 30.
Prabakaran G, Velmurugan K, David CI, Nandhakumar R. Role of Förster resonance energy transfer in graphene-based nanomaterials for sensing. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12 (14):6844. DOI: 10.3390/app12146844 - 31.
Nitu FR, Savu L, Muraru S, Stoian I, Ionită M. Label-free homogeneous microRNA detection in cell culture medium based on graphene oxide and specific fluorescence quenching. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11 (2):368. DOI: 10.3390/nano11020368 - 32.
Guo Y, Xu H, Li Y, Wu F, Li Y, Bao Y, et al. Hyaluronic acid and Arg-Gly-asp peptide modified graphene oxide with dual receptor-targeting function for cancer therapy. Journal of Biomaterials Applications. 2017; 32 (1):54-65. DOI: 10.1177/0885328217712110 - 33.
Battogtokh G, Ko YT. Graphene oxide-incorporated pH-responsive folate-albumin-photosensitizer nanocomplex as image-guided dual therapeutics. Journal of Controlled Release: Official Journal of the Controlled Release Society. 2016; 234 :10-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.05.007 - 34.
Cruz SMA, Girão AF, Gonçalves G, Marques PAAP. Graphene: The missing piece for cancer diagnosis? Sensors. 2016; 16 (1):137. DOI: 10.3390/s16010137 - 35.
Kim J, Park S-J, Min D-H. Emerging approaches for graphene oxide biosensor. Analytical Chemistry, 2017; 89 (1):232-248. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04248 - 36.
Kwak S-Y, Yang J-K, Jeon S-J, Kim H-I, Yim J, Kang H, et al. Luminescent graphene oxide with a peptide-quencher complex for optical detection of cell-secreted proteases by a turn-on response. Advanced Functional Materials. 2014; 24 (32):5119-5128. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201400001 - 37.
Shi Y, Dai H, Sun Y, Hu J, Ni P, Li Z. Fluorescent sensing of cocaine based on a structure switching aptamer, gold nanoparticles and graphene oxide. The Analyst. 2013; 138 (23):7152-7156. DOI: 10.1039/c3an00897e - 38.
Pramanik A, Chavva SR, Fan Z, Sinha SS, Nellore BPV, Ray PC. Extremely high two-photon absorbing graphene oxide for imaging of tumor cells in the second biological window. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2014; 5 (12):2150-2154. DOI: 10.1021/jz5009856 - 39.
Li D, Xue L, Zhu Z, Zhao X, Qian J. Graphene oxide nanoparticles for two-photon fluorescence imaging of zebrafish. Optical and Quantum Electronics. 2016; 48 (11):519. DOI: 10.1007/s11082-016-0783-8 - 40.
Tsai M-F, Chang S-HG, Cheng F-Y, Shanmugam V, Cheng Y-S, Su C-H, et al. Au nanorod design as light-absorber in the first and second biological near-infrared windows for in vivo photothermal therapy. ACS Nano. 2013; 7 (6):5330-5342. DOI: 10.1021/nn401187c - 41.
Mei Q , Chen J, Zhao J, Yang L, Liu B, Liu R, et al. Atomic oxygen tailored graphene oxide nanosheets emissions for multicolor cellular imaging. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2016; 8 (11):7390-7395. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b00791 - 42.
Huo Y, Xiu S, Meng L-Y, Quan B. Solvothermal synthesis and applications of micro/nano carbons: A review. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2023; 451 (138572):138572. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.138572 - 43.
De Medeiros TV, Manioudakis J, Noun F, Macairan J-R, Victoria F, Naccache R. Microwave-assisted synthesis of carbon dots and their applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2019; 7 (24):7175-7195. DOI: 10.1039/c9tc01640f - 44.
Rocco D, Moldoveanu VG, Feroci M, Bortolami M, Vetica F. Electrochemical synthesis of carbon quantum dots. ChemElectroChem. 2023; 10 (3):e2022011. DOI: 10.1002/celc.202201104 - 45.
Sun Y-P, Zhou B, Lin Y, Wang W, Fernando KAS, Pathak P, et al. Quantum-sized carbon dots for bright and colorful photoluminescence. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2006; 128 (24):7756-7757. DOI: 10.1021/ja062677d - 46.
Jelinek R. Carbon Quantum Dots: Synthesis, Properties and Applications. 1st ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016 - 47.
Bhunia SK, Maity AR, Nandi S, Stepensky D, Jelinek R. Imaging cancer cells expressing the folate receptor with carbon dots produced from folic acid. Chembiochem: A European Journal of Chemical Biology. 2016; 17 (7):614-619. DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201500694 - 48.
Tang L, Ji R, Cao X, Lin J, Jiang H, Li X, et al. Deep ultraviolet photoluminescence of water-soluble self-passivated graphene quantum dots. ACS Nano. 2012; 6 (6):5102-5110. DOI: 10.1021/nn300760g - 49.
Chahal S, Macairan J-R, Yousefi N, Tufenkji N, Naccache R. Green synthesis of carbon dots and their applications. RSC Advances. 2021; 11 (41):25354-25363. DOI: 10.1039/d1ra04718c - 50.
Hill S, Galan MC. Fluorescent carbon dots from mono- and polysaccharides: Synthesis, properties and applications. Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2017; 13 :675-693. DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.13.67 - 51.
Kim S, Hwang SW, Kim M-K, Shin DY, Shin DH, Kim CO, et al. Anomalous behaviors of visible luminescence from graphene quantum dots: Interplay between size and shape. ACS Nano. 2012; 6 (9):8203-8208. DOI: 10.1021/nn302878r - 52.
Zhang Y, Zheng Y, Tomassini A, Singh AK, Raymo FM. Photoactivatable fluorophores for bioimaging applications. ACS Applied Optical Materials. 2023; 1 (3):640-651. DOI: 10.1021/acsaom.3c00025 - 53.
Qiu X, Xu J, Cardoso Dos Santos M, Hildebrandt N. Multiplexed biosensing and bioimaging using lanthanide-based time-gated Förster resonance energy transfer. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2022; 55 (4):551-564. DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00691 - 54.
Pandey S, Bodas D. High-quality quantum dots for multiplexed bioimaging: A critical review. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 2020; 278 :102137. DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2020.102137 - 55.
Zhu H, Hamachi I. Fluorescence imaging of drug target proteins using chemical probes. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2020; 10 (5):426-433. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpha.2020.05.013 - 56.
Berezin MY, Achilefu S. Fluorescence lifetime measurements and biological imaging. Chemical Reviews. 2010; 110 (5):2641-2684. DOI: 10.1021/cr900343z - 57.
Yu L, Lei Y, Ma Y, Liu M, Zheng J, Dan D, et al. A comprehensive review of fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Frontiers in Physics. 2021: 9 . DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2021.644450 - 58.
Terai T, Nagano T. Small-molecule fluorophores and fluorescent probes for bioimaging. Pflugers Archiv: European Journal of Physiology. 2013; 465 (3):347-359. DOI: 10.1007/s00424-013-1234-z - 59.
Lu C-H, Yang H-H, Zhu C-L, Chen X, Chen G-N. A graphene platform for sensing biomolecules. Angewandte Chemie (Int. Ed.). 2009; 48 (26):4785-4787. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200901479 - 60.
Coreas R, Castillo C, Li Z, Yan D, Gao Z, Chen J, et al. Biological impacts of reduced graphene oxide affected by protein corona formation. Chemical Research in Toxicology. 2022; 35 (7):1244-1256. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00042 - 61.
Yildiz G, Bolton-Warberg M, Awaja F. Graphene and graphene oxide for bio-sensing: General properties and the effects of graphene ripples. Acta Biomaterialia. 2021; 131 :62-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.06.047 - 62.
de Lázaro I, Vranic S, Marson D, Rodrigues AF, Buggio M, Esteban-Arranz A, et al. Graphene oxide as a 2D platform for complexation and intracellular delivery of siRNA. Nanoscale. 2019; 11 (29):13863-13877. DOI: 10.1039/c9nr02301a - 63.
Bovine serum albumin. Meyler’s Side Effects of Drugs. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2016. p. 1045 - 64.
Kuchlyan J, Kundu N, Banik D, Roy A, Sarkar N. Spectroscopy and fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy to probe the interaction of bovine serum albumin with graphene oxide. Langmuir: The ACS Journal of Surfaces and Colloids. 2015; 31 (51):13793-13801. DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03648 - 65.
Yang L, Liu B, Wang M, Li J, Pan W, Gao X, et al. A highly sensitive strategy for fluorescence imaging of MicroRNA in living cells and in vivo based on graphene oxide-enhanced signal molecules quenching of molecular beacon. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2018; 10 (8):6982-6990. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b19284 - 66.
Reagen S, Wu Y, Liu X, Shahni R, Bogenschuetz J, Wu X, et al. Synthesis of highly near-infrared fluorescent graphene quantum dots using biomass-derived materials for in vitro cell imaging and metal ion detection. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2021; 13 (37):43952-43962. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c10533 - 67.
Dutta Chowdhury A, Ganganboina AB, Tsai Y-C, Chiu H-C, Doong R-A. Multifunctional GQDs-concanavalin a@Fe3O4 nanocomposites for cancer cells detection and targeted drug delivery. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2018; 1027 :109-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.04.029 - 68.
Thakur M, Kumawat MK, Srivastava R. Multifunctional graphene quantum dots for combined photothermal and photodynamic therapy coupled with cancer cell tracking applications. RSC Advances. 2017; 7 (9):5251-5261. DOI: 10.1039/c6ra25976f - 69.
Yang Y, Tang S, Chen D, Wang C, Gu B, Li X, et al. Multifunctional red-emission graphene quantum dots with tunable light emissions for trace water sensing, WLEDs and information encryption. Colloids and Surfaces. A, Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2021; 622 (126593):126593. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126593 - 70.
Suan D, Hampton HR, Tomura M, Kanagawa O, Chtanova T, Phan TG. Optimizing fluorescence excitation and detection for intravital two-photon microscopy. Methods in Cell Biology. 2013; 113 :311-323. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407239-8.00014-8 - 71.
Zhao W, Li Y, Yang S, Chen Y, Zheng J, Liu C, et al. Target-activated modulation of dual-color and two-photon fluorescence of graphene quantum dots for in vivo imaging of hydrogen peroxide. Analytical Chemistry. 2016; 88 (9):4833-4840. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00521 - 72.
Wang L, Li W, Li M, Su Q , Li Z, Pan D, et al. Ultrastable amine, sulfo cofunctionalized graphene quantum dots with high two-photon fluorescence for cellular imaging. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2018; 6 (4):4711-4716. DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03797 - 73.
Sapkota B, Benabbas A, Lin H-YG, Liang W, Champion P, Wanunu M. Peptide-decorated tunable-fluorescence graphene quantum dots. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2017; 9 (11):9378-9387. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b16364 - 74.
Chen T-T, Tian X, Liu C-L, Ge J, Chu X, Li Y. Fluorescence activation imaging of cytochrome c released from mitochondria using aptameric nanosensor. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2015; 137 (2):982-989. DOI: 10.1021/ja511988w - 75.
Wang L, Zheng J, Yang S, Wu C, Liu C, Xiao Y, et al. Two-photon sensing and imaging of endogenous biological cyanide in plant tissues using graphene quantum dot/gold nanoparticle conjugate. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2015; 7 (34):19509-19515. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b06352 - 76.
Hong M, Xu L, Xue Q , Li L, Tang B. Fluorescence imaging of intracellular telomerase activity using enzyme-free signal amplification. Analytical Chemistry. 2016; 88 (24):12177-12182. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03108 - 77.
Liu Q , Guo B, Rao Z, Zhang B, Gong JR. Strong two-photon-induced fluorescence from photostable, biocompatible nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots for cellular and deep-tissue imaging. Nano Letters. 2013; 13 (6):2436-2441. DOI: 10.1021/nl400368v - 78.
Campbell E, Hasan MT, Gonzalez Rodriguez R, Akkaraju GR, Naumov AV. Doped graphene quantum dots for intracellular multicolor imaging and cancer detection. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. 2019; 5 (9):4671-4682. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00603 - 79.
Wu C, Li P, Fan N, Han J, Zhang W, Zhang W, et al. A dual-targeting functionalized graphene film for rapid and highly sensitive fluorescence imaging detection of hepatocellular carcinoma circulating tumor cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2019; 11 (48):44999-45006. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b18410 - 80.
Wang H-B, Ou L-J, Huang K-J, Wen X-G, Wang L-L, Liu Y-M. A sensitive biosensing strategy for DNA detection based on graphene oxide and T7 exonuclease assisted target recycling amplification. Canadian Journal of Chemistry. 2013; 91 (12):1266-1271. DOI: 10.1139/cjc-2013-0285 - 81.
Sharma MD, Rayalu SS, Kolev SD, Krupadam RJ. Graphene/fluorescein dye-based sensor for detecting As(III) in drinking water. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11 (1):17321. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96968-3 - 82.
Youn H, Lee K, Her J, Jeon J, Mok J, So J-I, et al. Aptasensor for multiplex detection of antibiotics based on FRET strategy combined with aptamer/graphene oxide complex. Scientific Reports. 2019; 9 (1):7659. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44051-3 - 83.
Zheng X, Zhai R, Zhang Z, Zhang B, Liu J, Razaq A, et al. Graphene-oxide-based fluoro- and chromo-genic materials and their applications. Molecules. 2022; 27 (6):2018. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27062018 - 84.
Nurunnabi M, Khatun Z, Reeck GR, Lee DY, Lee Y-K. Photoluminescent graphene nanoparticles for cancer phototherapy and imaging. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2014; 6 (15):12413-12421. DOI: 10.1021/am504071z - 85.
Narasimhan AK, Lakshmi BS, Santra TS, Rao MSR, Krishnamurthi G. Oxygenated graphene quantum dots (GQDs) synthesized using laser ablation for long-term real-time tracking and imaging. RSC. Advances. 2017; 7 (85):53822-53829. DOI: 10.1039/c7ra10702a - 86.
Liu J-W, Wang Y-M, Zhang C-H, Duan L-Y, Li Z, Yu R-Q , et al. Tumor-targeted graphitic carbon nitride nanoassembly for activatable two-photon fluorescence imaging. Analytical Chemistry. 2018; 90 (7):4649-4656. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b05192 - 87.
Nahain A-A, Lee J-E, In I, Lee H, Lee KD, Jeong JH, et al. Target delivery and cell imaging using hyaluronic acid-functionalized graphene quantum dots. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 2013; 10 (10):3736-3744. DOI: 10.1021/mp400219u - 88.
Coney LR, Tomassetti A, Carayannopoulos L, Frasca V, Kamen BA, Colnaghi MI, et al. Cloning of a tumor-associated antigen: MOv18 and MOv19 antibodies recognize a folate-binding protein. Cancer Research. 1991; 51 (22):6125-6132 - 89.
Goreham RV, Schroeder KL, Holmes A, Bradley SJ, Nann T. Demonstration of the lack of cytotoxicity of unmodified and folic acid modified graphene oxide quantum dots, and their application to fluorescence lifetime imaging of HaCaT cells. Mikrochimica Acta. 2018; 185 (2):128. DOI: 10.1007/s00604-018-2679-8 - 90.
Kumawat MK, Thakur M, Gurung RB, Srivastava R. Graphene quantum dots for cell proliferation, nucleus imaging, and photoluminescent sensing applications. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7 (1):15858. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16025-w - 91.
Fan Z, Zhou S, Garcia C, Fan L, Zhou J. pH-responsive fluorescent graphene quantum dots for fluorescence-guided cancer surgery and diagnosis. Nanoscale. 2017; 9 (15):4928-4933. DOI: 10.1039/c7nr00888k - 92.
Lu H, Li W, Dong H, Wei M. Graphene quantum dots for optical bioimaging. Small. 2019; 15 (36):e1902136. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201902136 - 93.
Zhang M, Cao Y, Chong Y, Ma Y, Zhang H, Deng Z, et al. Graphene oxide based theranostic platform for T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and drug delivery. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2013; 5 (24):13325-13332. DOI: 10.1021/am404292e - 94.
Yang Y, Chen S, Li H, Yuan Y, Zhang Z, Xie J, et al. Engineered paramagnetic graphene quantum dots with enhanced relaxivity for tumor imaging. Nano Letters. 2019; 19 (1):441-448. DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04252 - 95.
Mieog JSD, Achterberg FB, Zlitni A, Hutteman M, Burggraaf J, Swijnenburg R-J, et al. Fundamentals and developments in fluorescence-guided cancer surgery. Nature Reviews. Clinical Oncology. 2022; 19 (1):9-22. DOI: 10.1038/s41571-021-00548-3 - 96.
Lee Y-J, van den Berg NS, Orosco RK, Rosenthal EL, Sorger JM. A narrative review of fluorescence imaging in robotic-assisted surgery. Laparoscopic Surgery. 2021; 5 :31-31. DOI: 10.21037/ls-20-98 - 97.
Egloff-Juras C, Bezdetnaya L, Dolivet G, Lassalle H-P. NIR fluorescence-guided tumor surgery: New strategies for the use of indocyanine green. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2019; 14 :7823-7838. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S207486 - 98.
Chen J, Liu C, Zeng G, You Y, Wang H, Gong X, et al. Indocyanine green loaded reduced graphene oxide for in vivo photoacoustic/fluorescence dual-modality tumor imaging. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2016; 11 (1):85. DOI: 10.1186/s11671-016-1288-x - 99.
Cui F, Ji J, Sun J, Wang J, Wang H, Zhang Y, et al. A novel magnetic fluorescent biosensor based on graphene quantum dots for rapid, efficient, and sensitive separation and detection of circulating tumor cells. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2019; 411 (5):985-995. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-1501-0 - 100.
Han Q , Pang J, Li Y, Sun B, Ibarlucea B, Liu X, et al. Graphene biodevices for early disease diagnosis based on biomarker detection. ACS Sensors. 2021; 6 (11):3841-3881. DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.1c01172 - 101.
Fahmy HM, Abu Serea ES, Salah-Eldin RE, Al-Hafiry SA, Ali MK, Shalan AE, et al. Recent progress in graphene- and related carbon-nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors for early disease detection. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. 2022; 8 (3):964-1000. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00710