Open access

Introductory Chapter: Climate Change and Climate-Smart Greenhouses

Written By

Ahmed A. Abdelhafez, Mohamed H.H. Abbas, Shawky M. Metwally, Hassan H. Abbas, Amera Sh. Metwally, Khaled M. Ibrahim, Aya Sh. Metwally, Rasha R.M. Mansour and Xu Zhang

Published: 07 February 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.113212

From the Edited Volume

Climate Smart Greenhouses - Innovations and Impacts

Edited by Ahmed A. Abdelhafez and Mohamed H.H. Abbas

Chapter metrics overview

64 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

World is, nowadays, facing one of its most pressing ecological challenges — climate change. This phenomenon is characterized by significant and enduring shifts in weather patterns. It is mainly attributed to anthropogenic activities that increase the emissions of greenhouse gases [1] such as CO2, CH4, N2O, O3, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), CCl4 [2], and H2O [3]. Probably, CO2 is the most important heat-trapping greenhouse gas (GHG) [4]. These gases absorb outgoing thermal (infrared) radiation, which is emitted by the surface of the Earth [5] and trap it within the atmosphere [6], thus increases the temperature of Earth’s surface [7]. These gases also increase the temperature of troposphere while decreased stratosphere temperature [8]. In addition to GHGs, 5–15% of the organic carbon is found as aerosols that persist in the atmosphere for long time periods [9] and serve as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) [10], which absorbs visible solar radiation (approximately 20% of total absorbed light) [11]. This is known by brown carbon, which are particulate matters containing chromophores that increase global warming threats [10]. The repercussions of climate change span a vast spectrum from altering weather patterns to impact human health and exacerbating disparities. This chapter delves into the intricate relationship between climate change and agriculture while spotlighting the innovative concept of climate-smart greenhouses as a promising solution.

Advertisement

2. Climate change: causes, impacts, and effects on human health

Climate change, a lasting alteration in weather patterns spanning decades to millions of years [6], results mainly from escalating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions linked to activities such as fossil fuel combustion, deforestation, and industrial processes [12]. Carbon dioxide stands as the primary GHG from human activities [13], with methane and nitrous oxide trailing closely [14]. These gases trap heat in the Earth’s atmosphere, elevating average global temperatures by 1–2% [15, 16]. These GHGs hasten the Earth’s water cycle [8], leading to amplified evaporation from water surfaces [16], resulting in heightened drought frequency and intensity in various regions [17]. In contrast, other areas experience increased precipitation [16], leading to rising sea levels [12], expanding regional tides, and intensifying extreme events, such as hurricanes and floods [12]. Climate change exerts profound impacts on food and water supplies, human habitation, public health, and economic activities [1819]. The World Health Organization predicts that climate change may contribute to roughly 250,000 additional annual deaths by 2050, primarily due to malnutrition, malaria, diarrhea, and heat stress [20]. Vulnerable populations, including children, the elderly, low-income communities, and individuals with chronic illnesses, bear a disproportionate burden [19]. Heatwaves pose risks of heat exhaustion and heat stroke, exacerbating cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. Altered temperature and precipitation patterns also affect disease-carrying insects, increasing the transmission of illnesses, such as malaria and dengue fever [20]. Furthermore, climate change exerts adverse effects on mental health. The growing frequency and severity of extreme weather events and natural disasters contribute to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues [21]. Health disparities worsen with climate change, particularly impacting vulnerable populations with limited resources to adapt [22]. Addressing climate change necessitates a concerted global effort to reduce GHG emissions and adapt to ongoing changes [6].

Advertisement

3. The impact of climate change on agriculture

Climate change poses significant challenges to global agriculture and food security [12]. Rising temperatures, driven by the Industrial Revolution, have increased by 0.9°C since the nineteenth century and are projected to reach 2°C by 2100 [23, 24]. This warming can accelerate crop respiration and evapotranspiration [7], alter pest and disease distribution, and shorten the reproductive period in crops, such as wheat and rice [24, 25]. Wheat yields may decrease by 20–45%, and rice yields by 20–30% by 2100 [24]. Heat stress can cause post-heading carbon deficits in wheat [26]. Irregular precipitation patterns also impact agriculture [24], with some regions experiencing increased rainfall and others facing more frequent and severe droughts [7]. Both flooding and drought have adverse effects on crop yields, limiting growth, causing damage, and influencing the prevalence of pests and diseases [27, 28].

Climate change further challenges natural resource management in agriculture. Higher temperatures lead to increased evaporation rates, depleting water resources, and particularly affecting irrigation-dependent agriculture. Rising sea levels and increased salinity can degrade arable land, especially in coastal and delta regions [29]. To ensure agricultural sustainability in a changing climate, it is crucial to develop and implement adaptive strategies, including climate-resilient crop varieties, improved pest and disease management, and efficient water resource utilization [12].

Advertisement

4. Adaptation and mitigation strategies for climate change

Climate change presents significant challenges that require a comprehensive response. In 2015, an agreement was held in Paris to lessen the rise in global temperature by 2°C in 2100 [30]. Two primary strategies were adapted to attain this aim, which are adaptation and mitigation [31]. While mitigation focuses on reducing the causes of climate change, adaptation involves adjusting to its impacts [12]. Adaptation, therefore, is essential to manage unavoidable impacts, while mitigation is needed to limit the long-term changes in climate. The optimal mix of adaptation and mitigation measures will depend on local and regional factors, including climate change impacts, economic structures, and societal values.

Advertisement

5. Adaptation

Adaptation strategies mitigate global warming impacts [32] for future food security [33]. They involve altering processes, practices, and structures to reduce potential damage and capitalize on climate change opportunities [34]. Adaptation spans individual actions to institutional policies and includes financial adjustments [35]. In agriculture, strategies encompass crop enhancements, food waste reduction [33], water conservation policies [36], adjusted planting schedules to avoid extreme weather, and adopting resilient crop varieties [37]. Biodiversity enhancement can also aid climate mitigation [38]. Organic extracts, such as humic and fulvic acids or compost tea, promote plant growth, sequestering more CO2 in plant tissues [39, 40, 41]. In the health sector, adaptation focuses on enhancing public health infrastructure to manage heatwaves and disease outbreaks, incorporating early warning systems, and improving air and water quality [42]. Urban areas should adapt by bolstering infrastructure resilience, implementing heat-wave action plans, creating cooling urban green spaces, and efficient water resource management [43].

Despite adaptation’s importance in mitigating global warming’s negative effects, maladaptation can occur [44]:

  1. Infrastructural Maladaptation: For instance, sea walls in Fiji designed to combat rising sea levels hindered stormwater drainage. In Bangladesh, flood control measures reduced soil fertility and livelihood security.

  2. Institutional Maladaptation: Farmers alter land use planning by growing cash crops, intercropping, and adopting moisture conservation techniques to address climate risks.

  3. Behavioral Maladaptation: In northern Ghana, farmers migrate in search of employment, causing labor shortages.

Advertisement

6. Mitigation

Mitigation involves strategies to lessen or even stabilize emission of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere via adopting three strategies mentioned by Fawzy et al. [30] which are:

  1. Switch to clean energy (renewable energy and nuclear power) or low carbon fuel to generate electricity and get heat rather than the burning of fossil fuels (conventional mitigation efforts). According to this approach, emissions of GHGs should be reduced by 45% in 2030 versus their levels in 2010 levels then reach finally to net-zero emissions by 2050.

  2. Increasing the capability of sinks (oceans, soil, and forests) to capture and sequester GHGs gases (negative emissions technology).

  3. Applying new techniques to managing solar and terrestrial radiation such as “stratospheric aerosol injection, marine sky brightening, cirrus cloud thinning, space-based mirrors and surface-based”; yet these methods are still theoretical.

Probably, energy production is the major source of greenhouse gas emissions, so applying new technologies to improve energy efficiency in buildings, transportations, and industrial processes might reduce effectively GHGs emissions [45]. In the agricultural sector, mitigation strategies include improving crop and livestock management practices to reduce methane and nitrous oxide emissions, protecting and restoring forests to sequester carbon, and managing soils to increase their carbon storage capacity [46, 47].

Advertisement

7. Climate-smart greenhouses: a sustainable approach to agriculture

The global agricultural sector faces climate change challenges, impacting crop yields and food security [12]. Climate-smart greenhouses, part of controlled environment agriculture (CEA), use advanced technologies to optimize plant growth and reduce environmental impact. They prioritize increasing productivity, adapting to climate change, and minimizing emissions [48, 49]. These greenhouses employ precision irrigation to conserve water and ensure ideal moisture levels, automated climate control to optimize growth and energy use, and energy-efficient lighting, such as LED, with minimal energy and water consumption [50, 51, 52]. Integrated pest management reduces reliance on chemical pesticides, benefiting crop health and sustainability [48].

Renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power, further reduce environmental impact, and water conservation practices are employed [48]. Climate-smart greenhouses offer a promising solution to climate-related agricultural challenges, integrating technology and sustainable practices for increased productivity and reduced environmental impact [49].

Advertisement

8. Design and structure

Climate-smart greenhouses are designed to optimize the use of natural resources and energy. Sensors and devices (Internet of Things, IOT) can be used to monitor precisely, and then efficiently control all indoor parameters [52]. Greenhouses are often constructed with materials that maximize light transmission while provide insulation to reduce energy use for heating or cooling. Their structure and orientation allow maximizing natural light and regulating temperature [48]. Roofs and/or sides may be covered by an impermeable transparent plastic film to allow natural ventilation [53]. Android mobile applications are sometimes used to monitor and send warning messages about the state of plants.

Advertisement

9. Climate control systems

One of the key features of climate-smart greenhouses is to lessen energy consumption while increasing plant productivity [54]. This may take place via applying automated climate control systems that use different sensors to collect data continuously [50] and then use mathematical models for calculating solar irradiation, photosynthesis, and evapotranspiration [55]. These schemes can, therefore, regulate temperature, humidity, and light levels to create optimal growing conditions needed for plants at each growth stage to get high-yield production [56]. Ventilation and shading can also be adjusted to control the internal climate and reduce the need for artificial heating or cooling. In tropical and subtropical climates, covering materials are used for shading and cooling in greenhouses [56]. Some systems even include CO2 enrichment to enhance plant growth [48].

Advertisement

10. Water and nutrient management

Climate-smart greenhouses often incorporate precision irrigation and fertigation (fertilizer + irrigation) systems [57] using a combination of sensors and nutrient delivery schemes [58]. These systems deliver water and nutrients directly to the plant roots, reducing wastes, and ensuring that plants receive the optimal amount of moisture and nutrients. Some greenhouses also capture and reuse water through rainwater harvesting or condensation capture systems, contributing to water conservation efforts [48]. The emission of N gases from high-tech greenhouses that follow efficient recirculation systems is thought to be very low [59].

11. Energy efficiency and renewable energy

Energy efficiency is the key aspect of climate-smart greenhouses. Many climate-smart greenhouses use renewable energy sources, such as solar or wind power [48]. Using photovoltaic-thermal collectors of solar energy can produce both heat and electricity, with less shading [60]. Also, using energy-efficient lighting, such as LED lights, provides specific light spectrum needed for photosynthesis while using less electricity (40%) than traditional lighting systems and also less heat (9–49%) [61]. In cold regions, minimizing heating cost is another challenge. Thus, isolating greenhouses and/or using geothermal energy may help to lessen these costs [62].

12. Integrated pest management

Climate-smart greenhouses often use integrated pest management strategies to reduce the need for chemical pesticides. These strategies include the use of beneficial insects to control pests, use of physical barriers or traps, and the careful monitoring of pest populations to determine when control measures are needed [63, 64]. Microbial pesticides can also be used if natural enemies are not sufficient for pest control [65]. Moreover, solar ultraviolet-B lamps can provide a physical control for spider mites [66]. Climate-smart greenhouses represent a promising solution to the challenges posed by climate change in the agricultural sector. By integrating advanced technologies and sustainable practices, these greenhouses increase agricultural productivity, adapt to changing climate conditions, and reduce environmental impacts.

13. The role of greenhouse cultivation in climate change mitigation

Greenhouse cultivation, particularly when implemented with climate-smart practices, can play significant roles in mitigating climate change. This can be achieved via applying more efficient techniques in resource management, reducing wastes, and carbon sequestration. Generally, there are two methods to control greenhouse conditions (i) a passive method that depends on a natural phenomenon “hot air rises and cold air sinks,” so it requires minimum energy while (ii) the active method needs fans for and heaters to control the environment inside greenhouses [67]. By means of thermal energy storage (TES) systems, heat can be successfully stabilized within greenhouses for plants [68]. These systems analyze the complex thermal processes within this indoor microclimate area and contribute toward efficient usage of this energy [69]. On the other hand, CO2 enrichment environment inside greenhouses can boost plant growth by approximately 35% [69, 70] via sequestrating CO2 from ambient air rather than being emitted to the atmosphere to increase the emissions of GHGs [71].

14. Efficient use of resources

Managing agricultural resources to meet rising food demands due to population growth is crucial [69], but natural resource limitations challenge food production [72]. Agricultural activities also contribute significantly to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [68], emphasizing the need for ecological considerations. Controlled environment agriculture (CEA), such as greenhouses, offers year-round food production possibilities [67]. Utilizing intelligent shading systems, smart glass, sensors, IoT, and AI [68], greenhouses precisely control conditions such as temperature, light, and humidity [73], increasing yield per unit area compared to traditional methods and conserving water through precision irrigation [48]. Some greenhouses capture and reuse water, further reducing water use [48]. Bioagents in greenhouses enhance horticultural yields and environmentally friendly pest and disease control, reducing GHG emissions related to agrochemicals [64, 74]. Greenhouses, by growing crops near consumption points, reduce transportation-related carbon emissions, especially in urban agriculture [75].

15. Carbon sequestration

Greenhouse gases can be reduced via a process known by phytosequestration [6]. In this method, plants absorb carbon dioxide gas from the atmosphere, change it to organic forms via Calvin cycle then sequester large amounts of C in their biomasses [76]. Herbaceous plants, which have relatively low planting-environment requirements, exhibit more capability to sequester C in their tissues than woody plants[77]. Surprisingly, sequestration of CO2 by microalgae is deemed as a net zero GHG emissions [78]. On the other hand, amounts of carbon sequestered via this process are relatively slow versus CO2 release due to anthropogenic activities [79]. Also, this process lasts for relatively short time periods because when plants decay and sequestered C returns back to air [6]. Weighing up pros and cons of phytosequestration, reforesting, and managing ecosystems are still effective ways to mitigate the global warming threat [79].

16. Reduced waste and emissions

The terrestrial carbon pool is four times larger than the atmospheric carbon pool [4]. Recycling agricultural waste can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, with over 5.6 billion mega grams of carbon potentially sequestered from the 18 billion wasted annually worldwide [80]. This can be achieved by converting organic residues into biochar, produced under limited oxygen conditions [81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86]. Biochar reduces easily oxidized carbon content, decreasing microbial metabolic activity by 47% [87], leading to longer soil retention when used as a soil amendment [88, 89, 90] or organic fertilizer [91, 92]. Its porous structure enhances soil CO2 adsorption via physisorption and chemisorption [93], sequestering carbon instead of releasing it into the atmosphere [87]. Scientists have devised a method to capture smoke emissions during biochar pyrolysis, using them for soil injection to improve seed germination and potentially achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions [94, 95]. Using biochar as a soil amendment can reduce CO2 emissions by about 1/8 [95], while converting residues to charcoal may cut GHG emissions by 80% within 8.5 years [96]. The potential for carbon sequestration in greenhouses remains an ongoing research topic, with outcomes depending on various factors, including greenhouse type, crop varieties, and management practice.

In conclusion, climate-smart greenhouse can contribute to climate change mitigation through more efficient use of resources, reduced waste and emissions, and potentially through carbon sequestration. However, it is important to note that not all greenhouses are the same, and the climate impact will depend on the specific design and management practices used.

References

  1. 1. Kabir M, Habiba U, Iqbal MZ, Shafiq M, Farooqi ZR, Shah A, et al. Impacts of anthropogenic activities & climate change resulting from increasing concentration of Carbon dioxide on environment in 21st Century; A Critical Review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2023;1194:012010. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1194/1/012010
  2. 2. Sonwani S, Saxena P. Introduction to greenhouse gases: Sources, sinks and mitigation. In: Sonwani S, Saxena P, editors. Greenhouse Gases: Sources, Sinks and Mitigation. Singapore: Springer; 2022. pp. 1-7
  3. 3. Thacker I, Sinatra GM. Visualizing the greenhouse effect: Restructuring mental models of climate Change through a guided online simulation. Education Sciences. 2019;9:14
  4. 4. Yadav S, Sonkar V, Malyan SK. Soil carbon sequestration strategies: Application of biochar an option to combat global warming. In: Pandey VC, editor. Bio-Inspired Land Remediation. Environmental Contamination Remediation and Management. Cham: Springer; 2023
  5. 5. Mosa A, Mansour MM, Soliman E, El-Ghamry A, El Alfy M, El Kenawy AM. Biochar as a soil amendment for restraining greenhouse gases emission and improving soil carbon sink: Current situation and ways forward. Sustainability. 2023;15:1206
  6. 6. Jansson C, Wullschleger SD, Kalluri UC, Tuskan GA. Phytosequestration: Carbon biosequestration by plants and the prospects of genetic engineering. Bioscience. 2010;60:685-696. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.9.6
  7. 7. Malhi GS, Kaur M, Kaushik P. Impact of climate Change on agriculture and its mitigation strategies: A review. Sustainability. 2021;13:1318
  8. 8. Manabe S. Role of greenhouse gas in climate change. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography. 2019;71(1):1620078. DOI: 10.1080/16000870.2019.1620078
  9. 9. Lopatka A. Brown carbon aerosols warm the air more than previously thought. Physics Today. 2023. DOI: 10.1063/PT.6.1.20230810a
  10. 10. Shiraiwa M. Facing global climate and environmental change. ACS Environmental. 2023;3:121-122. DOI: 10.1021/acsenvironau.3c00014
  11. 11. Wu G, Wan X, Ram K, Li P, Liu B, Yin Y, et al. Light absorption, fluorescence properties and sources of brown carbon aerosols in the southeast Tibetan plateau. Environmental Pollution. 2020;257:113616. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113616
  12. 12. IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA, editors. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2014
  13. 13. Anwar MN, Fayyaz A, Sohail NF, Khokhar MF, Baqar M, Yasar A, et al. CO2 utilization: Turning greenhouse gas into fuels and valuable products. Journal of Environmental Management. 2020;260:110059. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110059
  14. 14. Kumar A, Singh P, Raizada P, Hussain CM. Impact of COVID-19 on greenhouse gases emissions: A critical review. Science Total Environment. 2022;806:150349. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150349
  15. 15. Hoegh-Guldberg O, Jacob D, Taylor M, Guillén Bolaños T, Bindi M, Brown S, et al. The human imperative of stabilizing global climate change at 1.5°C. Science. 2019;365:eaaw6974. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw6974
  16. 16. Giorgi F, Raffaele F, Coppola E. The response of precipitation characteristics to global warming from climate projections. Earth System Dynamics. 2019;10:73-89. DOI: 10.5194/esd-10-73-2019
  17. 17. Zandalinas S, Mittler R. Global warming, climate change, and environmental pollution: Recipe for a multifactorial stress combination disaster. Trends in Plant Science. 2021;26:588-599. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.02.011
  18. 18. Lin S, Zhang S, Yang Q , Cai Y, Li X, Ren Z. Rapid urbanization and global warming significantly impact tidal dynamics in the Pearl River estuary, China. Watershed Ecology and the Environment. 2023;5:100-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.wsee.2023.03.001
  19. 19. Ahima RS. Global warming threatens human thermoregulation and survival. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2020;130:559-561. DOI: 10.1172/JCI135006
  20. 20. WHO. Quantitative Risk Assessment of the Effects of Climate Change on Selected Causes of Death, 2030s and 2050s. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2014
  21. 21. Clayton S, Manning CM, Krygsman K, Speiser M. Mental Health and Our Changing Climate: Impacts, Implications, and Guidance. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 2020
  22. 22. Watts N, Amann M, Arnell N, Ayeb-Karlsson S, Belesova K, Berry H, et al. The 2018 report of the lancet countdown on health and climate change: Shaping the health of nations for centuries to come. The Lancet. 2018;392:2479-2514. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32594-7
  23. 23. Lobell DB, Gourdji SM. The influence of climate change on global crop productivity. Plant Physiology. 2012;160:1686-1697. DOI: 10.1104/pp.112.208298
  24. 24. Arora NK. Impact of climate change on agriculture production and its sustainable solutions. Environmental Sustainability. 2019;2:95-96. DOI: 10.1007/s42398-019-00078-w
  25. 25. Skendžić S, Zovko M, Živković IP, Lešić V. The impact of climate change on agricultural insect pests. Insects. 2021;12:440. DOI: 10.3390/insects12050440
  26. 26. Shao L, Liu Z, Li H, Zhang Y, Dong M, Guo X, et al. The impact of global dimming on crop yields is determined by the source–sink imbalance of carbon during grain filling. Global Change Biology. 2021;27:689-708. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15453
  27. 27. Trenberth KE, Dai A, van der Schrier G, Jones PD, Barichivich J, Briffa KR, et al. Global warming and changes in drought. Nature Climate Change. 2014;4:17-22. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2067
  28. 28. Bebber DP, Ramotowski MA, Gurr SJ. Crop pests and pathogens move polewards in a warming world. Nature Climate Change. 2013;3:985-988. DOI: 10.1038/nature.2013.13644
  29. 29. Knox J, Hess T, Daccache A, Wheeler T. Climate change impacts on crop productivity in Africa and South Asia. Environmental Research Letters. 2012;7:034032. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034032
  30. 30. Fawzy S, Osman AI, Doran J, Rooney D. Strategies for mitigation of climate change: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2020;18:2069-2094. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-020-01059-w
  31. 31. Abbass K, Qasim MZ, Song H, Murshed M, Mahmood H, Younis I. A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022;29:42539-42559. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6
  32. 32. Aryal JP, Sapkota TB, Khurana R, Khatri-Chhetri A, Lat ML. Climate change and agriculture in South Asia: Adaptation options in smallholder production systems. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2020;22:5045-5075. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-019-00414-4
  33. 33. Anderson R, Bayer PE, Edwards D. Climate change and the need for agricultural adaptation. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2020;56:197-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2019.12.006
  34. 34. Neil Adger W, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL. Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change. 2005;15:77-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005
  35. 35. Berrang-Ford L, Siders AR, Lesnikowski A, Fischer AP, Callaghan MW, Haddaway NR, et al. A systematic global stocktake of evidence on human adaptation to climate change. Nature Climate Change. 2021;11:989-1000. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-021-01170-y
  36. 36. Gruda N, Bisbis M, Tanny J. Influence of climate change on protected cultivation: Impacts and sustainable adaptation strategies - a review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;225:481-495. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.210
  37. 37. Howden SM, Soussana J-F, Tubiello FN, Chhetri N, Dunlop M, Meinke H. Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104:19691-19696. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701890104
  38. 38. Malhi Y, Franklin J, Seddon N, Solan M, Turner MG, Field CB, et al. Climate change and ecosystems: Threats, opportunities and solutions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2020;375:20190104. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0104
  39. 39. Farid IM, Abbas MH, et al. Organic materials and their chemically extracted humic and fulvic acids as potential soil amendments for Faba bean cultivation in soils with varying CaCO3 contents. Horticulturae. 2021;7:205
  40. 40. Farid I, Abbas M, El-Ghozoli A. Wheat productivity as influenced by integrated mineral, organic and biofertilization. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science. 2023;63:287-299. DOI: 10.21608/ejss.2023.192023.1590
  41. 41. Farid IM, Abbas MHH, El-Ghozoli A. Implications of humic, fulvic and K—Humate extracted from each of compost and biogas manure as well as their teas on faba bean plants grown on Typic Torripsamments and emissions of soil CO2. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science. 2018;58:275-293. DOI: 0.21608/ejss.2018.4232.1183
  42. 42. Ebi KL, Semenza JC. Community-based adaptation to the health impacts of climate change. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2008;35:501-507. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.018
  43. 43. Rosenzweig C, Solecki WD, Hammer SA, Mehrotra S, editors. Climate Change and Cities: First Assessment Report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network. Kingdom of England: Cambridge University Press; 2011
  44. 44. Schipper ELF. Maladaptation: When adaptation to climate change goes very wrong. On Earth. 2020;3:409-414. DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.09.014
  45. 45. Clarke L, Jiang K, Akimoto K, Babiker M, Blanford G, Fisher-Vanden K, et al. Assessing transformation pathways. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate, C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. pp. 413-510
  46. 46. Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen H, Kumar P, et al. Agriculture in climate Change 2007: Mitigation. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA, editors. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2007
  47. 47. Memarbashi P, Mojarradi G, Keshavarz M. Climate-smart agriculture in Iran: Strategies, constraints and drivers. Sustainability. 2022;14:15573. DOI: 10.3390/su142315573
  48. 48. Kozai T, Niu G, Takagaki M. Plant Factory: An Indoor Vertical Farming System for Efficient Quality Food Production. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2015
  49. 49. FAO. Climate-Smart Agriculture Sourcebook. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2013
  50. 50. Bersani C, Ruggiero C, Sacile R, Soussi A, E., Z. Internet of things approaches for monitoring and control of smart greenhouses in industry 4.0. Energies. 2022;15:3834. DOI: 10.3390/en15103834
  51. 51. Cecchetti G, Ruscelli AL. Monitoring and automation for sustainable smart greenhouses. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP). Helsinki, Finland; 2022. pp. 381-386. DOI: 10.1109/SMARTCOMP55677.2022.00084
  52. 52. Bersani C, Ouammi A, Sacile R, E., Z. Model predictive control of smart greenhouses as the path towards near zero energy consumption. Energies. 2020;13:3647. DOI: 10.3390/en13143647
  53. 53. Gruda N, Bisbis M, Tanny J. Impacts of protected vegetable cultivation on climate change and adaptation strategies for cleaner production – A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;225:324-339. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.295
  54. 54. Maher A, Kamel E, Enrico F, Atif I, Abdelkader M. An intelligent system for the climate control and energy savings in agricultural greenhouses. Energy Efficiency. 2016;9:1241-1255. DOI: 10.1007/s12053-015-9421-8
  55. 55. Aaslyng JM, Lund JB, Ehler N, Rosenqvist E. IntelliGrow: A greenhouse component-based climate control system. Environmental Modelling & Software. 2003;18:657-666. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00052-5
  56. 56. Choab N, Allouhi A, El Maakoul A, Kousksou T, Saadeddine S, Jamil A. Review on greenhouse microclimate and application: Design parameters, thermal modeling and simulation, climate controlling technologies. Solar Energy. 2019;191:109-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.08.042
  57. 57. Gallardo M, Elia A, Thompson RB. Decision support systems and models for aiding irrigation and nutrient management of vegetable crops. Agricultural Water Management. 2020;240:106209. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106209
  58. 58. Massa D, Magán JJ, Montesano FF, Tzortzakis N. Minimizing water and nutrient losses from soilless cropping in southern Europe. Agricultural Water Management. 2020;241:106395. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106395
  59. 59. Zhou D, Meinke H, Wilson M, Marcelis LFM, Heuvelink E. Towards delivering on the sustainable development goals in greenhouse production systems. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2021;169:105379. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105379
  60. 60. Gorjian S, Calise F, Kant K, Ahamed MS, Copertaro B, Najafi G, et al. A review on opportunities for implementation of solar energy technologies in agricultural greenhouses. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;285:124807. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124807
  61. 61. Katzin D, Marcelis LFM, van Mourik S. Energy savings in greenhouses by transition from high-pressure sodium to LED lighting. Applied Energy. 2021;281:116019. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116019
  62. 62. Ahamed MS, Guo H, Tanino K. Energy saving techniques for reducing the heating cost of conventional greenhouses. Biosystems Engineering. 2019;178:9-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.10.017
  63. 63. Daughtrey M, Buitenhuis R. Integrated Pest and disease Management in Greenhouse Ornamentals. In: Gullino ML, Albajes R, Nicot PC, editors. Integrated Pest and Disease Management in Greenhouse Crops. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 625-679
  64. 64. Dhawan AK, Peshin R. Integrated Pest management: Concept, opportunities and challenges. In: Peshin R, Dhawan AK, editors. Integrated Pest Management: Innovation-Development Process. Vol. 1. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2009. pp. 51-81
  65. 65. van Lenteren JC, Alomar O, Ravensberg WJ, Urbaneja A. Biological control agents for control of pests in greenhouses. In: Gullino ML, Albajes R, Nicot PC, editors. Integrated Pest and Disease Management in Greenhouse Crops. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 409-439
  66. 66. Osakabe M. Biological impact of ultraviolet-B radiation on spider mites and its application in integrated pest management. Applied Entomology and Zoology. 2021;56:139-155. DOI: 10.1007/s13355-020-00719-1
  67. 67. Fox JA, Adriaanse P, Stacey NT. Greenhouse energy management: The thermal interaction of greenhouses with the ground. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;235:288-296. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.344
  68. 68. Maraveas C, Karavas C-S, Loukatos D, et al. Agricultural greenhouses: Resource management technologies and perspectives for zero greenhouse gas emissions. Agriculture. 2023;13:1464. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture13071464
  69. 69. Iddio E, Wang L, Thomas Y, McMorrow G, Denzer A. Energy efficient operation and modeling for greenhouses: A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2020;117:109480. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109480
  70. 70. Gamage D, Thompson M, Sutherland M, Hirotsu N, Makino A, Seneweera S. New insights into the cellular mechanisms of plant growth at elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2018;41:1233-1246. DOI: 10.1111/pce.13206
  71. 71. Bao J, Lu W-H, Zhao J, Bi XT. Greenhouses for CO2 sequestration from atmosphere. Carbon Resources Conversion. 2018;1:183-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.crcon.2018.08.002
  72. 72. Wang X. Managing land carrying capacity: Key to achieving sustainable production systems for food security. Land. 2022;11:484. DOI: 10.3390/land11040484
  73. 73. Tawalbeh M, Aljaghoub H, Alami AH, Olabi AG. Selection criteria of cooling technologies for sustainable greenhouses: A comprehensive review. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress. 2023;38:101666. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsep.2023.101666
  74. 74. Li H, Wyckhuys KAG, Wu K. Hoverflies provide pollination and biological pest control in greenhouse-grown horticultural crops. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023;14:1118388. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1118388
  75. 75. Despommier D, editor. The Vertical Farm: Feeding the World in the 21st Century. New York City, United States: Macmillan-London, United Kingdom and Equitable Building; 2010
  76. 76. Lehmann J. A handful of carbon. Nature. 2007;447:143-144. DOI: 10.1038/447143a
  77. 77. Deng L, Yuan H, Xie J, Ge L, Chen Y. Herbaceous plants are better than woody plants for carbon sequestration. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2022;184:106431. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106431
  78. 78. Ma Z, Cheah WY, Ng I-S, Chang J-S, Zhao M, Show PL. Microalgae-based biotechnological sequestration of carbon dioxide for net zero emissions. Trends in Biotechnology. 2022;40:1439-1453. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.09.002
  79. 79. Baldocchi D, Penuelas J. The physics and ecology of mining carbon dioxide from the atmosphere by ecosystems. Global Change Biology. 2019;25:1191-1197. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14559
  80. 80. Marxsen CS. Potential world garbage and waste carbon sequestration. Environmental Science & Policy. 2001;4:293-300. DOI: 10.1016/S1462-9011(01)00035-1
  81. 81. Lalarukh I, Amjad SF, Mansoora N, Al-Dhumri SA, Alshahri AH, Almutari MM, et al. Integral effects of brassinosteroids and timber waste biochar enhances the drought tolerance capacity of wheat plant. Scientific Reports. 2022;12:12842. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16866-0
  82. 82. Asaad AA, El-Hawary AM, Abbas MHH, Mohamed I, Abdelhafez AA, Bassouny MA. Reclamation of wastewater in wetlands using reed plants and biochar. Scientific Reports. 2022;12:19516. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24078-9
  83. 83. Farid IM, Siam HS, Abbas MHH, Mohamed I, Mahmoud SA, Tolba M, et al. Co-composted biochar derived from rice straw and sugarcane bagasse improved soil properties, carbon balance, and zucchini growth in a sandy soil: A trial for enhancing the health of low fertile arid soils. Chemosphere. 2022;292:133389. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133389
  84. 84. Khalil FW, Abdel-Salam M, Abbas MHH, Abuzaid AS. Implications of acidified and non-acidified biochars on N and K availability and their uptake by maize plants. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science. 2023;63:101-112. DOI: 10.21608/ejss.2023.184654.1560
  85. 85. Bassouny M, Abbas M. Role of biochar in managing the irrigation water requirements of maize plants: The pyramid model signifying the soil hydro-physical and environmental markers. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science. 2019;59:99-115. DOI: 10.21608/ejss.2019.9990.1252
  86. 86. Tolba M, Farid I, Siam H, Abbas M, Mohamed I, Mahmoud S, et al. Integrated management of K -additives to improve the productivity of zucchini plants grown on a poor fertile sandy soil. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science. 2021;61:355-365. DOI: 10.21608/ejss.2021.99643.1472
  87. 87. Liu H, Wang X, Song X, Leng P, Li J, Rodrigues JLM, et al. Generalists and specialists decomposing labile and aromatic biochar compounds and sequestering carbon in soil. Geoderma. 2022;428:116176. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116176
  88. 88. Abdelhafez AA, Abbas MHH, Li J. Biochar: the black diamond for soil sustainability, contamination control and agricultural production. In: Engineering Applications of Biochar. London, UK, London, UK: IntechOpen; 2017. pp. 7-27
  89. 89. Abdelhafez AA, Zhang X, Zhou L, Zou G, Cui N, Abbas MHH, et al. Introductory Chapter: Is Biochar Safe? Vol. 2020. London, UK, London, UK: IntechOpen; 2020. pp. 1-6
  90. 90. Zhang X, Zou G, Chu H, Shen Z, Zhang Y, Abbas MHH, et al. Biochar applications for treating potentially toxic elements (PTEs) contaminated soils and water: A review. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2023;11. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1258483
  91. 91. Lehmann J, Cowie A, Masiello CA, Kammann C, Woolf D, Amonette JE, et al. Biochar in climate change mitigation. Nature Geoscience. 2021;14:883-892. DOI: 10.1038/s41561-021-00852-8
  92. 92. Elshony M, Farid I, Alkamar F, Abbas MHH, Abbas H. Ameliorating a sandy soil using biochar and compost amendments and their implications as slow release fertilizers on plant growth. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science. 2019;59:305-322. DOI: 10.21608/ejss.2019.12914.1276
  93. 93. Ben Salem I, El Gamal M, Sharma M, Hameedi S, Howari FM. Utilization of the UAE date palm leaf biochar in carbon dioxide capture and sequestration processes. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021;299:113644. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113644
  94. 94. Abdelhafez AA, Zhang X, Zhou L, Cai M, Cui N, Chen G, et al. Eco-friendly production of biochar via conventional pyrolysis: Application of biochar and liquefied smoke for plant productivity and seed germination. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 2021;22:101540. DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101540
  95. 95. Kurniawan TA, Othman MHD, Liang X, Goh HH, Gikas P, Chong K-K, et al. Challenges and opportunities for biochar to promote circular economy and carbon neutrality. Journal of Environmental Management. 2023;332:117429. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117429
  96. 96. Thakkar J, Kumar A, Ghatora S, Canter C. Energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions from the production and sequestration of charcoal from agricultural residues. Renewable Energy. 2016;94:558-567. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.087

Written By

Ahmed A. Abdelhafez, Mohamed H.H. Abbas, Shawky M. Metwally, Hassan H. Abbas, Amera Sh. Metwally, Khaled M. Ibrahim, Aya Sh. Metwally, Rasha R.M. Mansour and Xu Zhang

Published: 07 February 2024