Open access peer-reviewed chapter

The Hidden Factor of Azoospermia: Telomere Effect

Written By

Semra Sümer Sertyel

Submitted: 09 July 2023 Reviewed: 06 August 2023 Published: 18 April 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.112784

From the Edited Volume

Population Genetics - From DNA to Evolutionary Biology

Edited by Payam Behzadi

Chapter metrics overview

27 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA), which results from defective spermatogenesis, is the absence of spermatozoa in the semen. NOA is a complex and multigenetic disorder that is caused by genetic and environmental factors. For the process of spermiogenesis to be fully completed, the functions of telomeres and their length in reproduction are crucial. In recent years, many studies have been published on how leukocyte telomere length might play an important role in the pathophysiology of azoospermia. They show that shorter leucocyte telomere length (LTL) is strongly associated with NOA and defective spermatogenesis. Telomeres preserve human gametogenesis and fertility while preventing chromosomal ends from eroding. The length of the telomere significantly determines how it functions. The proteins are unable to attach to telomeric regions and cannot perform capping at chromosomal ends once telomere shortening rises above a crucial threshold. It is important to include LTL evaluations as a precursor test in the treatment planning that can be created for azoospermic patients.

Keywords

  • leucocyte telomere length
  • telomere evaluation
  • male infertility
  • nonobstructive azoospermia
  • spermatogenetic evaluation
  • sperm telomere length
  • telomere evolution
  • azoospermia
  • semen
  • disorders

1. Introduction

1.1 Background of nonobstructive azoospermia

The World Health Organization (WHO) identifies infertility as a couple’s failure to conceive despite having regular, unprotected sexual activity for a year. According to the most recent data, more than 50 million couples worldwide (about 15%) suffer from infertility [1, 2]. Male fertility problems affect about 50% of infertile couples [2, 3, 4, 5], and 10–15% of this group are azoospermic patients [6]. A total of 40% of azoospermic patients have obstructive azoospermia (OA), and 60% have nonobstructive azoospermia. Normal spermatogenesis and endocrinological functions are present in OA patients; however, the male excurrent duct system is physiologically obstructed [7]. The NOA group is significantly more difficult and suffers from numerous genetically inherited issues. Chromosome abnormalities may involve autosomes or the sex chromosome. Several sex-specific chromosomal anomalies are more common in men who are azoospermic. Depending on the etiology, environmental factors might also be before or after testicular development [8, 9]. IVF laboratories have been developed to provide a variety of treatment choices, although it was previously unable to treat the azoospermic portion of the population. However, it is crucial that the causes and contributing aspects of this issue can be identified with great clarity. Varicocele, prior febrile illness, cryptorchidism, orchitis, chemotherapy medicines, radiation, and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism are a few of the reasons for azoospermia that have been identified [10, 11, 12] abnormal chromosomal numbers, autosomal mutations, abnormal karyotypes, or y chromosomal microdeletions [5, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. ICSI patients who are male are chromosomally defective in approximately four percent of cases [18]. The two most common chromosomal diseases, Robertsonian translocations and Klinefelter syndrome (KFS), impact between ten and 20% of azoospermic men. Y chromosomal microdeletions, the most typical cause of azoospermia, are seen in between 5 and 10% of infertile males. The azoospermic factor region (AZF) on the Y chromosome long arm (Yq) is crucial for germ cell growth and differentiation [19]. The AZF region includes the AZFa, AZFb, and AZFc gene locations [20]. Compared to AZFa 5%, AZFb 16%, or the combined 14% deletions, AZFc is the most frequently identified 60% deletion. This is due in part to AZFc’s length being four times that of AZFa [21, 22]. NOA is a result of the most typical sex chromosomal aneuploidy cause, Klinefelter syndrome (KFS). A total of 40% of azoospermic males have KFS [19, 20]. The 47, XXY chromosomal structure, smaller testicles, high levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), low levels of testosterone (T), and high levels of luteinizing hormone (LH) are characteristics of KFS. The rare aneuploidy known as the 46, XX male disease affects 1 in 20,000 live births. A total of 90% of these males have an autosome, which is often recognizable there, or a translocation of the sex-determining region (SRY) from the Y chromosome to the X chromosome. The most common structural chromosomal defect is a Robertsonian translocation (RT). A total 1 in 1000 live newborns contains them. Infertile men experience reciprocal RTs nine times more frequently than healthy males [18]. On the other hand, there are still between 40% and 60% of people who are considered to be idiopathic [23, 24, 25]. Both the definition of this group’s symptoms and the problem’s origin are still unknown. The condition is characterized as idiopathic, and sperm maturation is impossible. Lifestyle and environmental variables can affect genetic makeup, but it is first essential to identify the mechanism by which the issue causes damage [8, 25, 26, 27, 28]. These genetic developments relate to the identification of newly discovered genetic variations that cause spermatogenic failure and are used to diagnose male factor infertility [29]. The growing use of whole exome sequencing (WES) in infertility has sped studies on the telomere effect in recent years [30, 31, 32, 33, 34].

1.2 The role of telomeric length

Recent research findings suggest that some idiopathic reasons for male infertility and NOA may be related to telomeric structure [35, 36, 37]. The specialized DNA microsatellites known as telomeres are the linear eukaryotic chromosome ends that contain hexameric tandem repeats [38]. Terminologically, the terms “end” (telos) and “part” (meros) in Latin represent telomere. While working with Drosophila, Herman Muller discovered telomeres 80 years ago. The terminals of eukaryotic chromosomes include particular non-coding nucleoprotein structures. The functions of telomeres and their length in reproduction have been studied [39]. In humans, they develop from TTAGGG repeats and are connected to particular proteins. Telomeres serve as chromosomal stability structures and are complicated ribonucleoprotein structures with repetitive DNA sequences (5′-TTAGG-3′) [40, 41]. The functions of telomeres and their length in reproduction have previously been studied [42, 43, 44, 45]. Females have longer telomeres than men, and telomere length varies widely between species [46]. Studies have revealed that telomere shortening through cell divisions causes early cell degeneration, which is connected to the pathogenesis of a number of illnesses, including male infertility, especially in NOA patients [47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55].

1.3 Mechanism of the effect of telomere length on male infertility

Telomeres play significant roles in meiosis by facilitating key development of gamete stages such as chromosomal pairing, synapsis, and crossing over [56]. Telomerase is a cell-based reverse transcriptase that keeps telomere length stable [57]. Telomeres in healthy somatic cells shorten with each mitotic division until they finally reach a threshold length that triggers aging, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis [58]. Between somatic and spermatogenetic cells, there are three distinct telomere-specific changes that are known. First off, telomeres in sperm are not shortened with age, unlike those in somatic cells, ensuring that chromosomes are passed down through generations intact. Indeed, several studies have reported that increasing paternal age is actually associated with longer telomeres in spermatogenetic cells and in the leukocytes [59]. Second, numerous telomere-binding proteins have been uncovered in spermatogenetic cells [60]. Third, telomere connections are made as telomeres move toward the nuclear membrane during spermatogenesis [60].

A reverse transcriptase known as telomerase contains two structurally distinct subunits: the catalytic “telomerase reverse transcriptase” (TERT) and the human RNA matrix known as the “telomerase RNA component” (TERC). By lengthening the guanine-rich sequence and slowing the ongoing DNA loss during cell division, this ribonucleoprotein can reduce telomere shortening [61]. In contrast to stem, embryonic, and germ cells, somatic cells do not express telomerase [62, 63]. Telomere length is conserved and enhanced throughout spermatogenesis in male germ cells with active telomerase [39, 41, 45, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65]. Telomerase is present in testes from fetal to adulthood. The spermatogenetic stage (spermatogonia level compared to spermatocyte and spermatid stage) has increased telomerase activity. However, in spermatozoon, no telomerase activity was measured [46]. The role of sperm telomeres is not completely known, and recent many studies reported the relationship between male infertility and azoospermia [48, 55]. Some of these studies have been published on sperm telomere length in relation to spermatogenesis [55, 66, 67].

These studies show that sperm telomere length (STL) could affect male infertility and that it might be a potential new biomarker of sperm maturity. Many studies work on the relationship between telomere length (TL) in somatic cells, such as leukocyte telomere length (LTL) in azoospermia.

Advertisement

2. Methods for quantifying telomere length

2.1 Diagnosis of azoospermia

Azoospermia was defined as the absence of spermatozoa in the centrifuged pellet of two or three sequential specimens. These patients were further identified as OA or NOA by evaluating their medical history, physical examination, serum hormone levels (FSH, LH, total testerone, PRL, E2, and progesterone), karyotyping, Y chromosome microdeletion analysis, and imaging studies, evaluation of percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) or testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) results. Physical blockage of the male reproductive system was the definition of OA. These patients typically have normal hormone levels, indurated epididymides, and normal testicular volume. Spermatogenic dysfunction, which was used to define nonobstructive azoospermia, is characterized in these patients by aberrant hormone levels, tiny and soft testes [68].

For diagnosis of azoospermia, sequential semen samples (2 or 3) must be centrifugated after liquefication for 10 or 15 minutes at least 3.000 g, and after discarding of süpernatant, the remaining pellet (minimum 0,5 ml) must be evaluated under 400× magnification as wet preparation. At least two distinct day semen samples acquired more than 2 weeks apart should be analyzed, and evaluation should be carried out in accordance with 2010 World Health Organization standards [69, 70]. If even small amounts of sperm are found in the centrifuged material in cases where they have been labeled as cryptozoospermia, there is a chance of sperm cryopreservation for ICSI cycles. Numerous studies revealed that 35% of men who were assumed to have nonobstructive azoospermia actually had mature spermatozoa [71]. After several detailed evaluations of centrifugated sequential semen samples, if no mature sperm was found, this prognosis can be identified as azoospermia.

2.2 DNA isolation and methods for measurement of telomere length

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leucocytes by conventional kits. The length of telomere length (LTL) was then determined using some different techniques.

2.2.1 Terminal restriction fragmentation (TRF)

The first method for determining telomere length was terminal restriction fragment (TRF) analysis, which is referred to be the “gold standard” approach with a combination of frequently cutting restriction enzymes that are unable to cut telomeric DNA because genomic DNA is digested using this method as the telomeric and subtelomeric regions lack recognition sites. By a probe designed specifically for telomeric DNA, the telomeric component is then identified by southern blotting or in-gel hybridization. The undamaged telomeres from each chromosome are then separated by agarose gel electrophoresis into groups based on their size. Depending on their size and intensity, telomeres will imprint at varying lengths [72, 73]. This benefit is crucial for the implementation of this technology because it means that it does not need expensive or specialist equipment. The advantages of this method include the opportunity to compare results with those from other studies and the provision of a kilobase size evaluation for telomere length. The use of restriction enzymes results in the containment of subtelomeric DNA that is close to the telomere, which causes the genuine telomere length to be incorrectly estimated as a flaw in this approach. The polymorphisms in these subtelomeric and telomeric regions may potentially result in incorrect findings interpretation. The results may also differ according to the restriction enzymes that were used. Other limitations of the TRF test include the need for significant amounts of DNA (micrograms) and the preference for telomere length analysis in blood samples rather than other tissue types. Because very short telomeres might not be able to sufficiently bind the probe, this approach cannot detect short telomeres on a small number of chromosomes [74].

2.2.2 Polymerase chain reaction-based techniques (qPCR, MMqPCR, and aTL qPCR)

This method was created in order to address the issue of requiring a significant amount of DNA in order to evaluate telomere lengths [50]. Quantitative PCR (qPCR), monochromatic multiplex quantitative PCR (MMqPCR), and absolute telomere length quantification are employed to carry out these processes. The DNA sequence is amplified by PCR using specially designed primers over the course of 20–40 cycles, with each run doubling the amount of the PCR product (the amplicon typically), a fluorophore is employed in qPCR to quantify the quantity of the target DNA sequence. After each turn, the amount of emitted fluorescence is evaluated [75]. Seven years later, the same study group improved this technique by completing the amplification of both the telomeric and single-copy DNA regions from the same tube. Monochrome multiplex quantitative PCR (MMqPCR) is the name of this novel method [76, 77]. The underlying qPCR-based method was further modified by the other research team [78]. This group referred to it as an absolute telomere length (aTL) qPCR method. Briefly, the procedure for using this approach is the same as for using the initial qPCR experiment.

Limitations of this method

  • Differences between batches [79]

  • Insufficient reference standards [80]

  • Equipment for qPCR is required [81].

2.2.3 Single telomere length analysis (STELA)

These techniques do not offer information on individual telomere lengths; instead, they only offer evaluations of the specimen’s typical telomere length. Given that it has been proposed that one or a few short telomeres act as a marker that causes cellular senescence or death [82].

Advantages

  • Makes it possible to find telomeres that are critically short.

  • Requires no viable cells

  • Without the need for specific equipment

Limitations

  • Only it provides details for a limited number of certain chromosomal ends

  • Provides no mean telomere data

  • Does not recognize ends lacking a telomere

  • Not accurately detecting extended telomeres

  • Intense in work

2.2.4 Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization (Q-FISH)

Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization (Q-FISH) of telomeric repeats is performed by evaluating metaphase or interphase nuclei after hybridization or labeling with a fluorescent (CCCTAA) three probe [83]. The substrate for Q-FISH, in contrast to the TRF and PCR-based tests, is cells. When used for Q-FISH, cells can be fresh, frozen, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, or permeabilized. The Q-FISH approach can be used for telomeres of any size, not just average or little ones. Additionally, only by this method of evaluation will “telomere-free” endings be identified [84, 85]. For understanding how telomere length varies between chromosomes and how frequently telomere-free ends are associated with chromosomal instability, metaphase Q-FISH experiments have proved essential [86]. It is believed to be particularly helpful for figuring out the telomere length in unusual cells [87]. To correct some of its shortcomings, the use of interphase cells rather than metaphase chromosomes in these modifications is one of the Q-FISH advancements [88, 89].

Advantages

  • Single telomere alterations can be found.

  • Telomere lengths in particular cell types can be measured.

  • When applied to metaphase chromosomes, it can assess the mean telomere length, signal signal-free ends, and identify individual telomeres.

Limitations

  • Time-consuming

  • Requires a great level of ability to assess chromosomes.

  • Requires microscope (typically fluorescent)

  • Unit of relative fluorescence for length

  • When applied to metaphase chromosomes, it has the ability to recognize individual telomeres, measure end-to-end telomere length, and detect free.

Flow-FISH is another variation of the Q-FISH technique. This method combines flow cytometry with the hybridization of a pan-telomeric (binds to all telomeres) probe to cells in suspension rather than cells attached to slides, as is the case for metaphase and interphase. Cells in solution pass a laser one by one with the use of the technology known as flow cytometry. This method divides populations of cells based on their fluorescence emission or signals [90, 91, 92].

Advantages

  • Using this technique, one can ascertain the mean “length” of a particular population of cells.

  • When combined with antibodies, can offer details on particular cell types.

  • Possibility of automation

Limitations

  • Time-consuming

  • Demands a high level of skill

  • Requires flow sorting apparatus

  • Relative fluorescence units are used to express length.

Primed in place telomeres can be labeled for the Q-FISH techniques using a primed in situ (PRINS) application. The telomeric sequences on metaphase chromosomes or interphase nuclei are labeled by PRINS using fluorescently-tagged nucleotides and PCR methods with telomeric primers [93, 94].

Advantages

  • We can identify individual telomere modifications.

  • Telomere lengths in particular cell types can be measured.

  • When applied to metaphase chromosomes, it can assess the mean telomere length, signal signal-free ends, and identify individual telomeres.

Limitations

  • Time-consuming

  • Requires a great level of ability to assess chromosomes

  • Needs a microscope, usually one that is fluorescent.

  • Length as a unit of relative fluorescence

  • Variability may be impacted by PCR efficiency.

  • Requires only cells in metaphase to be mitotically active

2.2.5 Whole genome sequence

Next-generation sequencing has provided the opportunity to get genetic analysis for measuring telomere length measurement [95, 96].

Advantages

  • More uniformity and breadth of coverage, including in the exome

  • Commenting on clinically the results from genome-wide sequencing

  • Data from whole genome sequencing is precise and detailed for identification.

Limitations

  • The procedure produces a lot of data.

Advertisement

3. The role of TL and prognosis of NOA

In order to maintain genome integrity, recombination, and mitotic division, telomere length is crucial [97]. Telomere shortening has been linked to a variety of illnesses [98]. Numerous studies on male infertility with azoospermia have shown that the DNA of sperm and leucocytes from azoospermic person had shorter telomere lengths than that of males with viable sperm, indicating a potential role for telomere length in some unidentified male infertilities and azoospermia [96, 99, 100, 101]. The telomere size was evaluated in the blood leukocytes of azoospermic males [102]. In a study by Ferlin [103] on male infertility, LTL and SLT were found to be substantially associated [104, 105, 106].

Advertisement

4. Conclusion

The absence of mature spermatozoa in the pellet examination of concentrated seminal plasma after consecutive sampling at different times is called azoospermia. The azoospermia group without obstruction or duct problems after biochemical, genetic, and physical examinations is called nonobstructive azoospermia, and it has been determined that 1% of the population and ten percent of infertile men are affected by this problem [107]. Numerous infertile males have NOA that has been linked to a variety of genetic abnormalities, such as Y chromosomal microdeletions, karyotype disorders, and missense mutations in genes important in reproductive function. However, these alterations only explain around 25% of azoospermic cases, and around 75% of cases with severe spermatogenic impairment have an idiopathic origin [108, 109]. Recent researches strongly indicate that the pathogenesis of idiopathic NOA is complex and polygenic inheritance, which may affect spermatogenic function. Whereas the molecular mechanisms leading to NOA are still far from being understood, recent developments in genetic analysis have made it possible for our knowledge to increase significantly.

Although studies on this subject continue, telomere length and telomerase activity tests to be performed between indicated NOA patients and idiopathic patients will create an important database for azoospermia without any reason. That is important to fully clarify this possibility in the NOA patient group in order to decide the diagnosis of cryptozoospermia, which is seen in approximately 25–30% of azoospermic patient group patients. More clearly and most importantly, to inform the patient about their treatment.

Advertisement

5. Future trends

If it is possible to identify a target group with this type of telomere shortness for patients in the idiopathic NOA group, it may be possible to predict the rate of sperm finding in the posttreatment ejaculate or post-testicular operation procedure from these patient groups. However, there will be a need for studies to be carried out on this subject and the determination of target groups.

References

  1. 1. Ray PF, Toure A, Metzler-Guillemain C, Mitchell MJ, Arnoult C, Coutton C. Genetic abnormalities leading to qualitative defects of sperm morphology or function. Clinical Genetics. 2017;91(2):217-232
  2. 2. De Krertser DM. Male infertility. Lancet. 1997;349:787-789
  3. 3. Ribas-Maynou J, Benet J. Single and double strand sperm DNA damage: Different reproductive effects on male fertility. Genes. 2019;10(2):105
  4. 4. Cho CL, Agarwal A. Role of sperm DNA fragmentation in male factor infertility: A systematic review. Arab Journal of Urology. 2017;16(1):21-34
  5. 5. Lee JY, Dada R, Sabanegh E, Carpi A, Agarwal A. Role of genetics in azoospermia. Urology. 2011;77:598-601
  6. 6. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society for Male Reproduction and Urology. The management of infertility due to obstructive azoospermia. Fertility and Sterility. 2008;90:S121-S124
  7. 7. Hamada AJ, Esteves SC, Agarwal A. A comprehensive review of genetics and genetic testing in azoospermia. Clinics. 2013;68(Suppl 1):39-60
  8. 8. Ferlin A, Arredi B, Foresta C. Genetic causes of male infertility. Reproductive Toxicology. 2006;22:133-141
  9. 9. Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. The Journal of Urology. 1989;142:62-65
  10. 10. Wosnitzer M, Goldstein M, Hardy MP. Review of azoospermia. Spermatogenesis. 2014;31:4
  11. 11. Berookhim BM, Schlegel PN. Azoospermia due to spermatogenic failure. Urologic Clinics of North America. 2014;41(1):97-113
  12. 12. O’Flynn O’Brien KL, Varghese AC, Agarwal A. The genetic causes of male factor infertility: A review. Fertility and Sterility. 2010;93:1-12
  13. 13. Bashamboo A, Ferraz-de-Souza B, Lourenco D, Lin L, Sebire NJ, Montjean D, et al. Human male infertility associated with mutations in NR5A1 encoding steroidogenic factor 1. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2010;87:505-512
  14. 14. Wang XN, Li ZS, Ren Y, Jiang T, Wang YQ , Chen M, et al. The Wilms tumor gene, Wt1, is critical for mouse spermatogenesis via regulation of sertoli cell polarity and is associated with NOA in humans. PLoS Genetics. 2013;9:8
  15. 15. Yang F, Silber S, Leu NA, Oates RD, Marszalek JD, Skaletsky H. TEX11 is mutated in infertile men with azoospermia and regulates genome-wide recombination rates in mouse. EMBO Molecular Medicine. 2015;7:1198-1210
  16. 16. Wu H, Sun L, Wen Y, Xia L. Major spliceosome defects cause male infertility and are associated with nonobstructive azoospermia in humans. PNAS. 2016;113:4134-4139
  17. 17. Bracke A, Peeters K, Punjabi U, Hoogewijs D, Dewilde S. A search for molecular mechanisms underlying male idiopathic infertility. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2018;36(3):327-339
  18. 18. Chandley AC. The chromosomal basis of human infertility. British Medical Bulletin. 1979;35:181-186
  19. 19. Ferlin A, Raicu F, Gatta V, Zuccarello D, Palka G, Foresta C. Male infertility: Role of genetic background. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 2007;14:734-745
  20. 20. Walsh TJ, Pera RR, Turek PJ. The genetics of male infertility. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. 2009;27:124-136
  21. 21. Hopps CV, Mielnik A, Goldstein M, Palermo GD, Rosenwaks Z, Schlegel PN. Detection of sperm in men with Y chromosome microdeletions of the AZFa, AZFb and AZFc regions. Human Reproduction. 2003;18:1660-1665
  22. 22. Ferlin A, Arredi B, Speltra E, Cazzadore C, Selice R, Garolla A. Molecular and clinical characterization of Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile men: A 10-year experience in Italy. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2007;92:762-770
  23. 23. Salonia ACB, Carvalho J, Corona G. EAU Guidelines on Sexual and Reproductive Health. EAU Annual Congress Milan. Arnhem: The Netherlands: EAU Guidelines Office; 2021. pp. 106-116
  24. 24. Lopes AC, Oliveira PF, Sousa M. Shedding light into the relevance of telomeres in human reproduction and male factor infertility. Biology of Reproduction. 2019;100:318-330
  25. 25. Oates R. Evaluation of the azoospermic male. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2012;14(1):82-87
  26. 26. Matzuk MM, Lamb DJ. Genetic dissection of mammalian fertility pathways. Nature Cell Biology. 2002;4(Suppl):s41-s49
  27. 27. Nuti F, Krausz C. Gene polymorphisms/mutations relevant to abnormal spermatogenesis. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 2008;16:504-513
  28. 28. Poongothai J, Gopenath TS, Manonayaki S. Genetics of human male infertility. Singapore Medical Journal. 2009;50:336-347
  29. 29. Krausz C, Riera-Escamilla A. Genetics of male infertility. Nature Reviews. Urology. 2018;15:369-384
  30. 30. Mbango JN, Coutton C, Arnoult C. Genetic causes of male infertility: Snapshot on morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagellum. Basic and Clinical Andrology. 2019;9:2
  31. 31. Oud MS, Volozonoka L, Smits RM. A systematic review and standardized clinical validity assessment of male infertility genes. Human Reproduction. 2019;34:932-941
  32. 32. Kasak L, Laan M. Monogenic causes of non-obstructive azoospermia: Challenges, established knowledge, limitations and perspectives. Human Genetics. 2020;140(1):135-154
  33. 33. Xavier M, Salas-Huetos A, Oud M. Disease gene discovery in male infertility: Past, present and future. Human Genetics. 2020;140(1):7-19
  34. 34. O’sullivan R, Karlseder J. Telomeres: Protecting chromosome against genome instability. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2010;11:171-181
  35. 35. Thilagavathi J, Kumar M, Mishra SS, Venkatesh S, Kumar R, Dada R. Analysis of sperm telomere length in men with idiopathic infertility. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2013;287(4):803-807
  36. 36. Yuan Y, Tan Y, Qui X, Luo H, Li Y, Li R, et al. Sperm telomere length as a novel biomarker of male infertility and embriyonic development; a systematic review and meta analysis. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2022;13:1079966
  37. 37. Lin KW, Yan J. The telomere length dynamic and methods of its assessment. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2005;9(4):977-989
  38. 38. Thilagavathi J, Venkatesh S, Dada R. Telomere length in reproduction. Andrologia. 2013;45:289-304
  39. 39. Montpetit AJ, Alhareli AA, Montpetit M, Starkweather AR, Elmore LW, Filler K, et al. Telomere length: A review of methods for measurement. Nursing Research. 2014;63(4):289-299
  40. 40. Shay JW, Wright WE. Telomeres and telomerase: Implications for cancer and aging. Radiation Research. 2001;155:188-193
  41. 41. Liu L, Blasco M, Trimarchi J, Keefe D. An essential role for functional telomeres in mouse germ cells during fertilization and early development. Developmental Biology. 2002;249:74-84
  42. 42. Liu L, Franco S, Spyropoulos B, Moens PB, Blasco MA, Keefe DL. Irregular telomeres impair meiotic synapsis and recombination in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101:6496-6501
  43. 43. Factor-Litvak P, Susser E, Kezios K, McKeague I, Kark JD, Hoffman M, et al. Leukocyte telomere length in newborns: Implications for the role of telomeres in human disease. Pediatrics. 2016;137:e20153927
  44. 44. Samassekou O, Gadji M, Drouin R, Yan J. Sizing the ends: Normal length of human telomeres. Annals of Anatomy. 2010;192:284-291
  45. 45. Achi MV, Ravindranath N, Dym M. Telomere length in male germ cells is inversely correlated with telomerase activity. Biology of Reproduction. 2000;63:591-598
  46. 46. Kohlrausch FB, Wang F, Chamani I, Keefe DL. Telomere shortening and fusions: A link to aneuploidy in early human embryo development. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2021;76:429-436
  47. 47. Rocca MS, Foresta C, Ferlin A. Telomere length: Lights and shadows on their role in human reproduction. Biology of Reproduction. 2019;100:15-17
  48. 48. Herrmann M, Pusceddu I, März W, Herrmann W. Telomere biology and age-related diseases. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2018;56:1210-1222
  49. 49. Youngren K, Jeanclos E, Aviv H, Kimura M, Stock J, Hanna M, et al. Synchrony in telomere length of the human fetus. Human Genetics. 1998;102:640-643
  50. 50. Ferlin A, Rampazzo E, Rocca MS, Keppel S, Frigo AC, De Rossi A, et al. In young men sperm telomere length is related to sperm number and parental age. Human Reproduction. 2013;28:3370-3376
  51. 51. Vasilopoulos E, Fragkiadaki P, Kalliora C, Fragov D, Vakonaki E, Tsoukalas D, et al. The association of female and male infertility with telomere length. International Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2019;44(2):375-389
  52. 52. Turner S, Hartshorne GM. Telomere lengths in human pronuclei, oocytes and spermatozoa. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2013;19:510-518
  53. 53. Antunes DM, Kalmbach KH, Wang F, Dracxler RC, Seth-Smith ML, Kramer Y, et al. A single-cell assay for telomere DNA content shows increasing telomere length heterogeneity, as well as increasing mean telomere length in human spermatozoa with advancing age. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2015;32:1685-1690
  54. 54. Yang Q , Zhao F, Dai S, Zhang N, Zhao W, Bai R, et al. Sperm telomere length is positively associated with the quality of early embryonic development. Human Reproduction. 2015;30:1876-1881
  55. 55. Tiepolo L, Zuffardi O. Localization of factors controlling spermatogenesis in the nonfluorescent portion oi the human Y chromosome long arm. Human Genetics. 1976;124:119-124
  56. 56. Blacburn EH. Structure and function of telomeres. Nature. 1991;3501:569-573
  57. 57. Harley CB, Furtcher AB, Greider CW. Telomeres aging of human fibroblast. Nature. 1990;345:458-460
  58. 58. Aston KI, Hunt SC, Susser E, Kimura M, Factor-Litvak D, Carrel D, et al. Divergence of sperm and leucocyte age-dependent telomere dynamics: Implication for male driven evaluation of telomere lenghts in human. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2012;181:517-522
  59. 59. Gineitis AD, Zalenskaya IA, Yau PM, Bradbury EM, Zalensky AO. Human sperm telomere -binding complex involves histone H2B and secures telomere membrane attachment. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2000;1511:1591-1598
  60. 60. Lindsey J, McGill NI, Lindsey LA, Green DK, Cooke HJ. In vivo loss of telomeric repeats with age in humans. Mutation Research. 1991;256:45-48
  61. 61. De Lange T. Shelterin: The protein complex that shapes and safeguards human telomeres. Genes. 2005;19:2100
  62. 62. Fattet AJ, Chaillot M, Koscinki I. Telomere length, a new biomarker of male (in) fertility? A systematic review of the literature. Genes. 2023;14(2):425
  63. 63. Blackburn EH. Telomeres and telomerase: Their mechanisms of action and the effects of altering their functions. FEBS Letters. 2005;579:859-862
  64. 64. Shay JW, Wright WE, Werbin H. Defining the molecular mechanisms of human cell immortalization. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1991;1072:1-7
  65. 65. Torra-Massana M, Barragán M, Bellu E, Oliva R, Rodríguez A, Vassena R. Sperm telomere length in donor samples is not related to ICSI outcome. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2018;35:649-657
  66. 66. Zhao F, Yang Q , Shi S, Luo X, Sun Y. Semen preparation methods and sperm telomere length: Density gradient centrifugation versus the swim up procedure. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:39051
  67. 67. Eisenberg DTA, Kuzawa CW. The paternal age at conception effect on ofspering telomere length; mechanistic, comperative and adaptive perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2018;5(373):1741
  68. 68. Fujisawa M, Tanaka H, Tatsumi N, Okada H, Arakawa S, Kamidono S. Telomere activity in the testis of infertile patients with selected causes. Human Reproduction. 1998;13(6):1476-1479
  69. 69. WHO. World Health Organization: WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. 5th ed. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010
  70. 70. Schlegel PN. Causes of azoospermia and their management. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development. 2004;16(5):561-572
  71. 71. Ron-El R, Strassburger D, Friedler S, Komarovski D, Bern O, Soffer Y. Extended sperm preparation: An alternative to testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia. Human Reproduction. 1997;12(6):1222-1226
  72. 72. Allshire RC, Dempster M, Hastie ND. Human telomeres contain at least three types of G-rich repeat distributed non-randomly. Nucleic Acids Research. 1989;17:4611-4627
  73. 73. Harley CB, Futcher AB, Greider CW. Telomeres shorten during ageing of human fibroblasts. Nature. 1990;345:458-460
  74. 74. Aubert G, Hills M, Lansdorp PM. Telomere length measurement—Caveats and a critical assessment of the available technologies and tools. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis. 2012;730:59-67
  75. 75. Ding C, Cantor CR. Quantitative analysis of nucleic acids: The last few years of progress. Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2004;37:1-10
  76. 76. Cawthon RM. Telomere measurement by quantitative PCR. Nucleic Acids Research. 2002;30(10):e47
  77. 77. Cawthon RM. Telomere length measurement by a novel monochrome multiplex quantitative PCR method. Nucleic Acids Research. 2009;37:3
  78. 78. O’Callaghan NJ, Fenech M. A quantitative PCR method for measuring absolute telomere length. Biological Procedures Online. 2011;13:3
  79. 79. Cunningham JM, Johnson RA, Litzelman K, Skinner HG, Seo S, Engelman CD, et al. Telomere length varies by DNA extraction method: Implications for epidemiologic research. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention. 2013;22:2047-2054
  80. 80. Koppelstaetter C, Jennings P, Hochegger K, Perco P, Ischia R, Karkoszka H, et al. Effect of tissue fixatives on telomere length determination by quantitative PCR. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 2005;126:1331-1333
  81. 81. Aviv A, Hunt SC, Lin J, Cao X, Kimura M, Blackburn E. Impartial comparative analysis of measurement of leukocyte telomere length/DNA content by southern blots and qPCR. Nucleic Acids Research. 2011;39:20
  82. 82. Abdallah P, Luciano P, Runge KW, Lisby M, Géli V, Gilson E, et al. A two-step model for senescence triggered by a single critically short telomere. Nature Cell Biology. 2009;11:988-993
  83. 83. Kimura M, Stone RC, Hunt SC, Skurnick J, Lu X, Cao X, et al. Measurement of telomere length by the southern blot analysis of terminal restriction fragment lengths. Nature Protocols. 2010;5:1596-1607
  84. 84. Lansdorp PM, Verwoerd NP, van de Rijke FM, Dragowska V, Little M-T, Dirks RW, et al. Heterogeneity in telomere length of human chromosomes. Human Molecular Genetics. 1996;5:685-691
  85. 85. Krejci K, Koch J. Improved detection and comparative sizing of human chromosomal telomeres in situ. Chromosoma. 1998;107:198-203
  86. 86. Artandi SE, Chang S, Lee S-L, Alson S, Gottlieb GJ, Chin L, et al. Telomere dysfunction promotes non-reciprocal translocations and epithelial cancers in mice. Nature. 2000;406:641-645
  87. 87. Goldman FD, Aubert G, Klingelhutz AJ, Hills M, Cooper SR, Hamilton WS, et al. Characterization of primitive hematopoietic cells from patients with dyskeratosis congenita. Blood. 2008;111:4523-4531
  88. 88. Nettle D, Gadalla SM, Lai TP, Susser E, Bateson M, Aviv A. Measurement of telomere length for longitudinal analysis; implications of assay precision epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2021;190(7):1406-1413
  89. 89. Vera E, Blasco MA. Beyond average: Potential for measurement of short telomeres. Aging. 2012;4:379-392
  90. 90. Hultdin M, Grōnlund E, Norrack K-F, Eriksson-Lindstrōm E, Roos G, Just T. Telomere analysis by fluorescence in situ hybridization and flow cytometry. Nucleic Acids Research. 1998;26:3651-3656
  91. 91. Alter BP, Baerlocher GM, Savage SA, Chanock SJ, Weksler BB, Willner JP, et al. Very short telomere length by flow fluorescence in situ hybridization identifies patients with dyskeratosis congenita. Blood. 2007;110:1439-1447
  92. 92. Darmishonnejad Z, Kheirabadi F, Tavalaee M, Kheirabadi M, Zohrabi D, Nasr-Efehani M. Releationship between sperm telomere length and sperm quality in infertile man. Andrologia. 2020;52(5):e13546
  93. 93. Therkelsen AJ, Nielsen A, Koch J, Hindkjaer J, Kølvraa S. Staining of human telomeres with primed in situ labeling (PRINS). Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 1995;68:115-118
  94. 94. Hjelmborg JB, Dalgerd C, Moller S, Steenstrup T, Kimura M, Christengen K, et al. The heritability of leucocyte telomere length daynamics. Journal of Medical Genetics. 2014;52(5):297-302
  95. 95. Ding Z, Mangino M, Aviv A, Spector T, Durbin R. Estimating telomere length from whole genome sequence data. Nucleic Acids Research. 2014;42(9):e75
  96. 96. Salas-Huetos A, Tuttelmann FJ, Wyrwoll M, Kliesch SM, Lopez A, Concalves J, et al. Disruption of human meiotic telomere complex genes TERB1, TERB2 and MAJIN in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Human Genetics. 2021;140(1):217-227
  97. 97. Cheng EU, Chen SU, Lee TH, Pai YP, Huang LS, Huang CC, et al. Evaluation of telomere length in cumuluscells as a potential biomarker of oocyte and embryo quality. Human Reproduction. 2013;28(4):929-936
  98. 98. Calado R, Young N. Telomeres in disease. F1000 Medicine Reports. 2012;4:8
  99. 99. Fice HEF, Robeire B. Telomere dynamics throughout spermatogenesis. Genes. 2019;10(7):525
  100. 100. Heidery H, Pouresmaeili F, Mirfakhraie R, Omrani M, Ghaedi H, Fazeli Z, et al. An association study between longitudinal changes of leukocyte telomere and the risk of azoospermia in a population of Iranian infertile men. Iranian Biomedical Journal. 2018;22(4):231-236
  101. 101. Yang Q , Luo X, Bai R, Zhao F, Dai S, Li F, et al. Shorter leukocyte telomere length is associated with risk of nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertility and Sterility. 2018;110(4):648-654.e1
  102. 102. Cioppi F, Rosta V, Krausz C. Genetics of Azoospeermia. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22(6):3264
  103. 103. Ferlin A, Rampazzo E, Rocca MS, Keppel S, Frigo AC, De Rossi A, et al. In young men sperm telomere lengh is releated to sperm number and parental age. Human Reproduction. 2013;28(12):3370-3376
  104. 104. Boniewska-Bernacka E, Pańczyszyn A, Cybulska N. Telomeres as a molecular marker of male infertility. Human Fertility. 2019;22:78-87
  105. 105. Balmori C, Varela E. Should we consider telomere length and telomerase activity in male Factor infertility? Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018;30:197-202
  106. 106. Arsenis NC, You T, Ogawa EF, Tinsley GM, Ziu L. Physical activity and telomere length: Impact of aging and potential mechanisms of action. Oncotarget. 2017;8(27):45008-45019
  107. 107. Maduro MR, Lamb DJ. Understanding new genetics of male infertility. The Journal of Urology. 2002;168(21):2197-2203
  108. 108. Punab M, Poolamets O, Paju P, Vihljajev V, Pomm K, Ladva R. Causes of male infertility: A 9- year prospective monocentre study on 1737 patients with reduced total sperm counts. Human Reproduction. 2017;32:18-31
  109. 109. Cerván-Martín M, Castilla JA, Palomino-Morales RJ, Carmona FD. Genetic landscape of nonobstructive azoospermia and new perspectives for the clinic. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020;9:300

Written By

Semra Sümer Sertyel

Submitted: 09 July 2023 Reviewed: 06 August 2023 Published: 18 April 2024