Open access peer-reviewed chapter

The Niger Delta Mangrove Ecosystem and Its Conservation Challenges

Written By

Anthony E. Ogbeibu and Blessing J. Oribhabor

Submitted: 01 February 2023 Reviewed: 13 July 2023 Published: 22 November 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.112543

From the Edited Volume

Mangrove Biology, Ecosystem, and Conservation

Edited by Orlex Baylen Yllano

Chapter metrics overview

96 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The Niger Delta region of Nigeria is a biodiversity hotspot, rich in fauna and flora, with robust ecological processes that drive the economy of the local communities. However, the area has not been formally recognized as a global biodiversity hotspot by international agencies such as the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The Niger Delta abounds in several species of mangroves, but the most dominant ones are the red (Rhizophora racemosa), black (Laguncularia racemosa), and white (Avicennia germinans) mangroves. The mangrove ecosystem in the Niger Delta is fast being replaced by Nipa palm (Nypa fruticans), yet no result-oriented action plan has been put in place to conserve the mangrove. The serious menace of oil pollution and overexploitation of fisheries and mangrove resources, in addition to environmental pressures, as well as poor recognition of brackish water bodies and aquaculture, causes serious danger to the sustainability of Nigeria’s brackish water and the various fish resources, wildlife, and, inevitably, the coastal communities of the nation. This chapter provides essential information on the rich Niger Delta mangrove ecosystem and current conservation challenges and recommends strategies for sustainable management.

Keywords

  • Niger Delta
  • mangroves
  • biodiversity
  • water quality
  • conservation

1. Introduction

Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa. Since the attainment of independence in 1960, it has continuously grown in both size and influence, with an approximate population of 203 million people, accounting for 47% of the total West African population [1]. It hosts a variety of terrain and climate. The seven main ecological zones are the Mangrove Swamp and Coastal Vegetation, Freshwater Swamp Forest, Lowland Rain Forest, Derived Savanna, Guinea Savanna, Sudan Savanna, and Sahel Savanna [2]. The Niger Delta geographic basin is defined by the many tributaries of the lower River Niger, as it enters the Atlantic Ocean through its many tributaries and estuaries. It is a region with very high biodiversity as well as a dense human population. At the base of the Niger Delta, formed by a network of many creeks, is Africa’s largest mangrove forest, the third largest in the world.

The Niger Delta is located on the Atlantic coast of Southern Nigeria, which extends between latitudes 4o 2′ and 60 2′ north of the equator and is 50 2′ east of the Greenwich meridian [3, 4] and bordered by the Atlantic Ocean in the south, and Cameroon in the East. It occupies a surface area of about 112,110 km2. It represents about 12% of Nigeria’s total surface area and is almost two-thirds of the entire population of Nigeria (i.e., 200 million). The region is made up of nine of Nigeria’s constituent states (Table 1) [5]. The region has a yearly rainfall of 3000–4500 mm and an average temperature of 27°C. The wet season is relatively long, occurring from March to October, and the dry season from November to February [6, 7].

StateLand area (km2)PopulationCapital
Abia4,8775,106,000Umuahia
Akwa Ibom6,8065,285,000Uyo
Bayelsa1,1072,703,000Bayelsa
Cross River21,9304,325,000Calabar
Delta17,1635,681,000Asaba
Edo19,6984,871,000Benin City
Imo5,1655,283,000Owerri
Ondo15,0864,782,000Akure
Rivers10,3787,679,000Port Harcourt
Total112,11045,715,000

Table 1.

Niger Delta states of Nigeria, their land areas, population, and capitals [5].

The Niger Delta floodplain occupies 7.5% of Nigeria’s total land mass and is her largest wetland. It is the third largest drainage basin in Africa. The Delta’s environment includes four ecological zones: coastal barrier islands, mangrove swamp forests, freshwater swamps, and lowland rainforests. This vastly well-endowed ecosystem contains one of the Earth’s highest concentrations of biodiversity. Apart from supporting abundant flora and fauna, arable terrain that sustains a wide variety of crops, lumber, or agricultural trees, it also harbors more freshwater fish species than any other ecosystem in West Africa.

The biodiversity of the Niger Delta is of regional and global significance. Barrier islands, estuaries, mangroves, creeks, and freshwater swamps characterize the Niger Delta ecosystem. The Niger Delta region, considered a “Biodiversity Hotspot” by biodiversity experts, abounds in many locally and globally endangered species with robust ecological processes that drive the economy of the local communities.

Despite the importance of forest resources, there has been a rapid decrease recently due to the demand from an ever-increasing population. Drivers of forest loss in the different forest types are complex, including illegal logging from commercial loggers, due to high timber demand and communal logging of firewood for domestic cooking [8]. Mangrove ecosystems in the Niger Delta are fast being replaced by Nipa palm (Nypa fruticans). Yet no result-oriented action plan has been put in place to conserve the dwindling mangrove. The serious menace of oil pollution and overexploitation of fisheries and mangrove resources, in addition to other environmental pressures, as well as poor interest and recognition of brackish water bodies and aquaculture, cause serious danger to the sustainability of Nigeria’s brackish water and the various fish resources, wildlife, and, inevitably, the coastal communities of the nation [9].

The importance of mangroves as nurseries has been one of the reasons to support their conservation and management [10]. Many African, Latin American, and Asian countries are now estimated to have lost at least 50% of their original mangrove area [11]. The current wave of global concern for the maintenance of essential ecological processes and life support systems, preservation of genetic diversity, and the sustainable utilization of species and ecosystems has led to the intensive survey of nature reserves for their ecological descriptions, biodiversity, and conservation status [12]. According to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) report [13] on the global status of mangrove ecosystems, 18 countries have established mangrove reserves to safeguard the habitat and associated species. The mangrove zone of the Niger Delta is said to traverse parallel to the coast and reaches between 15 and 45 km inland. This deep belt of mangrove forest protects the freshwater wetlands in the Inner Delta [14].

The Niger Delta mangrove ecosystem, a fragile ecosystem increasingly being threatened by Nipa palm (Nypa fruticans) encroachment and industrial/oil pollution, is presently receiving urgent national and international attention for sustainable management and conservation. The problem is that the area has not been formally recognized as a global biodiversity hotspot by international agencies such as the IUCN. This Book Chapter provides essential information on the rich Niger Delta mangrove ecosystem and its conservation challenges and recommends strategies for sustainable management.

Advertisement

2. Terrestrial ecosystems of Nigeria and mangrove ecosystems of the Niger Delta

Nigeria has many regions with rich biodiversity serving as home to critical ecosystems. Among these regions are the Cross River basin rainforest, mountains along the Cameroon border with Nigeria, and the Niger Delta coastal creeks (Figure 1) [15, 16]. The Niger Delta mangrove is Africa’s largest mangrove ecosystem and the world’s third largest after India and Indonesia, the third largest drainage basin in Africa, and Africa’s largest river delta [17, 18].

Figure 1.

Nigeria’s terrestrial ecoregions [15].

The coastal region of Nigeria extends from Benin Republic/Nigeria border in the west to the Cameroun/Nigeria border in the east, a distance of 800 km but with a coastline of 853 km [19]. This coastline has interfered with a series of estuaries that empty into the extensive lagoon system in Lagos and Ondo State. At least twenty-two (22) estuaries exist between the Benin River in Delta State coastal region and the Cross River in Akwa Ibom State. In the Delta and River State areas, the estuaries join with tributaries and distributaries of the lower Niger River/Benue system to form an anastomosing system of fresh and brackish water creeks, backwaters, and flood plains in what is better described as the Niger Delta basin swamps [20]. The creeks, floodplains, lagoons, and rivers in Lagos State account for approximately 22% of the 790 km2 land mass [21].

The brackish water sector consists of estuaries, beach ridges, intertidal mangrove swamps, intersecting rivers, and winding saline creeks. The exact area of the brackish water for the entire Nigerian coastline is unknown except for the Niger Delta portion, the area of which has been estimated [22] and includes the constant saline creeks that form an area of about 1000 km2 and the intertidal mangrove swamps consisting an area of about 5048 km2. In addition, there are intersecting rivers and estuaries plus beach ridges with an area of about 679 km2 and 688 km2, respectively. The total brackish water area of the Niger Delta is therefore approximately 7415 km2. The inland area of the mangrove swamp fairly delimits the brackish water area. The brackish water region of Nigeria’s coastal zone between the Benin River and Cross River has been adequately delineated [23].

Mangrove forests could be cleared for aquaculture ponds, salt pans, agricultural use, including rice fields, airport and road construction, port and industrial development, resettlement, and village development [24]. They are, however, important factors in stabilizing the shoreline (http://www.panda.org). Some endangered and potentially vulnerable species are endemic in this area. The mangrove swamps and adjoining freshwater swamps in the Niger Delta provide critical habitats for many endangered animal species, important wildlife, and migratory and resident aquatic reptiles, birds, and mammals. These include crocodiles, Nile monitor lizards, parrots, duikers and antelopes, monkeys, bush pigs, bush cow or buffalos, sitatungas, hippopotamus, diving pelicans, and deep swimming shags [25]. The subtidal prop root of mangrove habitats serves as nurseries for fishes of economic importance [26]. The interest in protecting mangroves worldwide is due to their purported importance to fisheries and a number of rare and endangered species [27]. However, because the same mangrove species can often occur under marine, estuarine, and freshwater conditions, a wide variety of fish assemblages can be found among their inundated “mangrove habitats.” As such, mangrove habitats likely play a variety of roles in the lives of associated fishes, feeding areas for some species or life stages, daytime refugia for others, and nursery and/or nesting areas for yet more. Mangroves of the Atlantic coast of Africa, including the Niger Delta, on account of their gentle gradient of sediment, are sensitive/fragile [28]. The rich biodiversity and high aquatic productivity of the West African coastal waters are constantly undergoing bio-modification due to the adverse impact of human activities [29].

2.1 Mangrove flora of the Niger Delta

The most symbolic mangrove species in Nigeria consists of six species in three families, namely: Rhizophoraceae (Rhizophora racemosa, R. harrisonii, and R. mangle), Avicenniaceae (Avicennia africana), and Combretaceae (Laguncularia racemosa and Conocarpus erectus). In terms of biodiversity, the Niger Delta mangrove ecosystem is one of the richest wetlands globally by researchers.

There are several species of mangroves in the Niger Delta, with the most dominant ones being red (Rhizophora racemosa), black (Laguncularia racemosa), and white (Avicennia germinans) mangroves. They provide highly productive habitats and ecological niches for reptiles, monkeys, birds, fishes, shrimps, mollusks, and other wildlife species, and a number of other ecological services [30]. Also prominent but less studied and uncommon around core mangrove forests are Button wood mangroves (Conocarpus erectus). They are common in inland sandy soil areas [5]. The following eight true West African mangrove species are found in Nigeria, particularly in the Niger Delta region: Avicennia germinans, Rhizophora mangle, Rhizophora racemosa, Rhizophora harrisonii, Laguncularia racemosa, Conocarpus erectus, Nypa fruticans, and Acrostichum aureum. The Families Rhizoporaceae, Avicenniaceae, and Combretaceae, such as Rhizophora racemosa, Rhizophora harrisonii, Rhizophora mangle, Avicennia africana (White mangrove), Laguncularia racemosa, and Conocarpus erectus and a few other stunted shrubs and woody species are the most dominant plant species.

Most locations in the Niger Delta have similar mangrove species composition [5]. The floristic composition of the plants and family distribution in the Mangrove Swamp Forest of Anantigha in Calabar South Local Government Area (LGA), Cross River State, Nigeria, is shown in Table 2 [30]. The plant population consisted of Rhizophora racemosa, Nypa fruticans, Avicennia germinans, Acrostichum aureum, Drepanocarpus lanatus, Lagunicularia racemosa, Hibiscus tiliaceus, Thespesia populnea, Pandanus candelabrum, Carapa procera, Raphia hookeri, Conocarpus erectus, and Chrysobalanus spp. [30]. The most abundant species in the area are Rhizophora racemosa, Nypa fruticans, Avicennia germinans, and Acrostichum aureum. Rhizophora racemosa had the highest species importance value (SIV), followed by Nypa fruticans, an exotic palm that encroaches on the mangrove and dominates the indigenous oil palm, Elaeis guineensis [30]. For the grass species, Dalbergia ecastaphyllum is reported to have the highest diversity (Table 3). Species distribution from seaward to landward areas indicates that core mangrove species were found on the seaward side, whereas the non-mangrove species were found in the landward direction [5].

S/NPlant SpeciesFamiliesSpecies density (Individuals/ Ha)Siv
1Rhizophora racemosaRhizophoraceae4534.892
2Nypa fruticansArecaceae2319.245
3Avicennia germinansAvicenniaceae1815.468
4Acrostichum aureumPteridaceae1513.309
5Drepanocarpus lanatusFabaceae109.892
6Laguncularia racemosaCombretaceae88.273
7Hibiscus tiliaceusMalvaceae78.094
8Thespesia populneaMalvaceae56.295
9Pandanus candelabrumPandanaceae45.935
10Carapa proceraMeliaceae33.957
11Raphia hookeriPalmaceae23.777
12Conocarpus erectusCombretaceae11.799
13Chrysobalanus spp.Chrysobalanaceae11.439

Table 2.

Plants found in Anantigha mangrove swamp forest with their species density, relative density, and species importance value (SIV) [30].

S/No.Scientific nameCommon nameGrowth formUses
1Acrostichum aureumMangrove fernHerbCrayfish trap
2Alchornea cordifoliaChristmas treeShrubMedicinal
3Alstonia booneiStool woodTimber, medicinal
4Allanblackia floribundaTreeTimber
5Ananas comosusPineappleHerbEdible fruit
6Anthostema aubryanumTreeTimber
7Artocarpus communisBreadfruitTreeEdible fruit
8Bulbophyllum oreonastesEpiphyteOrnamental
9Carapa proceraTreeTimber
10Calamus decratusRattan palmBasket, mat, rope, fish trap
11Cathormion altissimumTree-
12Dalbergia ecastaphyllumScramblerRope, erosion control
13Elaeis guineensisOil palmTreeWine, edible oil, thatch, kernel
14Ficus trichopodaFig treeTree
15Fimbristylis sp.Herb-
16Fleurya ovalifoliaTropical stinging nestleHerbWeed
17Hallea ciliateAburaTreeTimber, joinery, flooring board, canoe, pestle, mortar, pestle, barrel
18Lycopodium cernumEpiphyte-
19Mariscus ligularisSeaside sedgeSedgeErosion control
20Mucuna sloaneiHorse eye beanClimberSoup condiment
21Musa sapientiumPlantainFruit
22Pandanus togoensisScrewpineMat, basket
23Pentadesma butyraceaTreeTimber, canoe, margarine, comb
24Piptadeniastrum africanumTimber, canoes, railway sleeper, furniture
25Raphia hookeriWine palmWine, gin
26Raphia viniferaBamboo palmThatch
27Rhizophora mangleDwarf red mangroveTreeTannin
28Rhizophora racemosaTall red mangroveTreeTannin, timber, fuel wood, prop, railway sleepers
29Sacciolepis africanaHerb-
30Sphenoclea zeylanicaHerb-
31Spondias mombinHog plumTreeEdible fruit,
32Symphonia globuliferaTreeTimber
33Syzygium guineensisTreeTimber
34Uapaca heudelottiiTreeTimber, edible fruit
35Vitex grandifolioalaBlack plumTreeEdible fruit

Table 3.

Plant species list in Tunu field in south Forcados [31].

A related study documented the common plant species in Tunu and Kanbo in South Forcados of the Niger Delta ecosystem. The predominant vegetation type within the Tunu/Kanbo field is the mangrove swamp forest type, attested to by the floral composition (Table 3) [31].

The dominant plant with the highest frequency of occurrence is the dwarf red mangrove, Rhizophora mangle. The tall red mangrove R. racemosa was confined to the edge of the creeks and rivers. Herbaceous grasses, fern, and sedges such as Acrostichum aureum, Paspalum vaginatum, and Fimbristylis spp. occurred on the forest floor below the mangrove canopy. Epiphytes were abundant on the tree trunks. The commonest species include Bulbophyllum oreonastes and the moss Ocoblepharum sp. The mangroves are admirably adapted to the brackish environment. They have stilt roots that are covered with lenticels. The latter serves as passages for gaseous exchange. Oxygen and carbon dioxide are channeled through these structures. The superficial roots are thus sensitive. The trees can easily die if the ventilating organs (lenticels) are blocked. Mangroves grow best where there is regular tidal flushing. Changes in hydrology resulting from dredging or blockage of natural tidal channels can severely reduce their growth and may result in death (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Mangrove vegetation in Tunu field (Note: Nymphaea lotus floating around the mangrove roots) [31].

Some parts of the barrier forests, common along the Nigerian shoreline, occur within the field. They appear as small forest islands within the “sea” of mangroves. Typical plants within these forests include the breadfruit tree (Artocarpus communis), Abura (Hallea ciliata), Allanblackia floribunda, Fig tree (Ficus trichopoda), Uapaca heudelottii, and Symphonia globulifera. These species are typical of freshwater swamp forest. These forest islands within the sea of mangrove forests are analogous to oasis within the desert. They are the only places the coastal communities get their potable water from. They are thus sensitive ecosystems with a unique function. Salt-water intrusion can easily kill the vegetation within these islands as the plants inhabiting them are not salt tolerant. The coastal communities also utilize the forest islands for agricultural purposes. Breadfruit and plantain are cultivated within these forests. The forests thus allow them to get staple food in an otherwise nonarable environment (Table 4).

Scientific nameCommon nameAbundanceProportion (%)
Dalbergia ecastophylumCorn vine624
Chrysobalanus icocoCoco plum416
Paspalum sp.Silt grass28
Scleria verrucosaBush knife14
Combretum racemosumChristmas rose312
Osbeckia tubulosaMelastomatacea14
Mariscus longibracteatusSedge14
Acrostichum aureumAquatic fern14
Scleria naumannianaBush knife14
Lycopodium cernuumFern14
Alchornea laxifloraChristmas bush14
Syzygtium guineenseMyrtaceae312
Total abundance25100
Number of species12
Abundance25
Dominance index (D)0.1296
Shannon Wiener (H1)2.248
Margalef index (d)3.417
Equitability (J)0.9046

Table 4.

Abundance and diversity of weed species commonly found around mangrove forests in the Niger Delta, Nigeria [5].

Indices based on the proportional abundance of species provide a simplified approach to diversity measurement. These heterogeneity indices take into account both evenness and species richness to produce a single value, the Shannon Index of diversity (H1). The diversity was analyzed using the Shannon diversity index (H1), Margalef index of species richness (d), Equitability or Evenness index (J), and Dominance index (D).

The Shannon diversity index is a measure of community stability or ecological robustness that makes any community able to withstand external perturbation with minimal disruption. Diversity values of <1.00 indicate heavily polluted, 1–3 indicate moderate pollution, while values > 3 indicate clean and unperturbed habitats. The equitability index measures how evenly distributed the individuals are among the species, while the Dominance index is the opposite of equitability, that is, when individuals are not evenly distributed among the species, but rather, only a few species have a concentrated number of individuals. The environment belongs to the category of moderate perturbation or pollution.

2.2 Mangrove fauna of the Niger Delta

The highest concentration of aquatic organisms in Africa is found in Nigeria’s Niger Delta mangrove forest zones (Figure 3). The species include from plankton (phytoplankton and zooplankton), aquatic invertebrates (bivalves, crabs, mussels, periwinkles, hermit crabs, etc.), and land insects (beetles, butterflies, mosquitoes, ants, and termites) to vertebrates (monkeys, manatee, pygmy hippopotamus, python, etc.) (Figures 4 and 5) [32]. The enigma is that the region is yet to be formally recognized as a global biodiversity hotspot by international agencies like the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Biodiversity hotspots in Africa have commonly grouped together without recognizing the rich biodiversity across different locations. For example, the entire forest biodiversity in West Africa was grouped as “West African forests” [34], whereas individual countries in this region have a diverse and rich supply of biodiversity.

Figure 3.

Some species found within the Niger Delta mangrove forest: (A) Senilia senilis, Anadara; (B) Crassostrea gasar, oyster; (C) Tympanotonus fuscatus, periwinkle; and (D) Uca tangeri, male crab [32].

Figure 4.

Heslops pygmy hippo, Hexaproton (syn-Choeropsis), liberiensis heslopi.

Figure 5.

Protected python seen close to a residential building in Brass Island [33].

The Nigerian mangrove swamps harbor a great diversity of macro in- and epi-faun of which crabs and mollusks form the great majority in terms of biomass. The fauna faces severe water and salt balance, siltation, desiccation, oxygen availability, weight, and temperature limitations, especially when attempting to invade the adjacent land. Presently, few quantitative estimates of Niger Delta mangrove swamp fauna exist, perhaps due to the difficulty of sampling among thickets of mangroves, deep mud banks, and semi-stagnant lagoons, in addition to the difficulty in obtaining reliable estimates of fauna, which spend much of their time in burrows or very active when on the ground. In many cases, the seasonal occurrence and distribution of most macrofauna in the swamp are related to the characteristic fluctuations in environmental parameters associated with the dry and wet seasons as well as stress from anthropogenic activities. Besides, the influence of substratum on faunal species distribution in the Nigerian mangrove swamp of Nigeria has been reported [35].

There are presently few quantitative estimates of Niger Delta mangrove swamp fauna in the literature. Studies of Buguma Creek, a mangrove creek in Rivers State, Nigeria, resulted in the documentation of Zooplankton made up of 37 taxa in the Phyla Arthropoda, which was the most dominant: Coelenterata (Cnidaria); Ctenophora; Annelida; Chaetognatha; and Chordata. Macrobenthic invertebrates comprised 68 taxa in the Phyla Arthropoda and Annelida (the most dominant), Nematoda, and Mollusca. Fish species made up of 20 taxa in the families Sciaenidae (the most dominant), Elopidae, Ariidae, Gobiidae, Serranidae, Carangidae, Lutjanidae, Haemulidae, Monodactylidae, Sphyraenidae, Polynemidae, Trichiuridae, Cynoglossidae, and Dasyatidae (these excluded members of the family Cichlidae (Tilapia guineensis and Sarotherodon melanotheron), Mugilidae (Liza facipinnis, Mugilcephalus, and Mugil curema), and Sardinella maderensis (Clupeidae), which the baited hooks and lines could not catch) [9].

Table 5 shows the macrofaunal distribution and abundances in a study area that extends from the Cross River Estuary (which is relatively less perturbed and therefore used as a control swamp) to Takwa Bay in Lagos, approximately 870 km stretch and encompassing Imo River, Bonny River, Brass River, and Forcados and Escravos river estuaries. The preponderance of polychaetes in the upper ranks can be seen with Capitella capitata, Chaetozone setosa, and Magelona filiformis dominating. Echinocardium was ranked 65th with a density of 5/m2. The coefficient of variation for each species is also presented in the table. This index (standard deviation ÷ mean density) indicates the spatial evenness in the abundance of the species, with numbers much less than one indicative of a uniform distribution [35].

RankSpecimenNo/m2Coefficient of variation
1Capitella capilata620.20
2Chaetozone setosa560.26
3Megalona filiformis450.32
4Exogone lebes410.46
5Nemetina380.54
6Abra alba250.42
7Uca tangeri210.85
8Ampellisca180.83
9Nematoda160.67
10Nephthys sp.150.64
11Glycera90.38
12Scoloplos armiger80.62
13Polydora sp.70.56
14Turritella communis60.63
15Notomastus filiformis51.08
16Cirratulus cirratulus51.1
17Neries sp.50.68
18Marphysa belli41.32
19Hydrobia40.52
20Tellina sp.30.86
30Pectinaria50.65
35Pchygrapsus gracillis50.72
40Sesamaelegans150.68
48Sesarina alberti120.65
55Metagrapsus curratus120.65
60Littonia sp.21.21
62Mya arenaria11.02
65Echinocardium sp.11.23

Table 5.

Rank and abundance of dominant macrobenthic Fauna in the Niger Delta mangrove ecosystem during 1985–2005 [35].

Advertisement

3. Ecosystem services of Niger Delta mangroves

The four categories of ecosystem services that have been identified are: regulating services, provisioning services, cultural services, and supporting services.

The Niger Delta mangroves perform almost all the services listed above, such as from atmospheric and climate regulation, flood and erosion control, wood and timber for cooking fuel and construction to benefits such as esthetic value, sacred sites, traditional medicine, and supporting services such as nutrient cycling and habitat for fish nursery [18].

In addition to the aforementioned ecosystem services, the Niger Delta mangrove provides niche types that support the existence of a diverse fauna of all developmental stages. Several burrows contain diverse species of polychaetes, crabs, shrimps, and fishes supported by the rich food sources peculiar to the mangrove. Stilt roots of Mangrove plants provide substrate for the attachment of edible epifaunal organisms such as the oysters Crassostrea spp. (Figure 6) [18].

Figure 6.

Prop roots providing attachment sites for oyster Crassostrea gazar [18].

The mangrove trees conserve water resources and serve as windbreaks in many communities. Specifically, in the Niger Delta, other uses of mangroves by the indigenous people include building materials, food baskets, fishing tools, and so on [5].

Advertisement

4. Threats to mangroves of the Niger Delta

The mangrove forests of the Niger Delta are undergoing gradual but steady loss, resulting from uncontrolled deforestation for sand dredging and canalization. The mangrove forest is also cut to recover stems, which are used in producing firewood and wood for the construction of houses. Numerous oil and gas exploratory activities all over the Niger Delta area also open up the forests to further exploitation of resources [34]. Invasion by foreign species, such as nipa palms (Nypa fruticans), also threatens the existence of the rich indigenous mangrove species. Habitat loss is one of the three factors responsible for the recent extinction of species. Overexploitation and the introduction of exotic species are the other two. The consequence of the loss of mangrove habitat is the loss of ecosystem services it renders to society [34].

Oil exploration and extraction activities constitute Nigeria’s most severe threat to the mangrove forest ecosystem. Nigeria’s Oil Industry is located mostly in the mangrove forest ecosystem. The activities of various oil exploration companies have resulted in fragmentation, deforestation, and degradation of the mangrove forest ecosystem. The Nigerian Oil Industry has deforested mangrove ecological zones for drilling purposes and further deteriorated the health of the surrounding mangrove areas through oil spillages. Oil spill kills plants and animals in the estuarine zone, endangers fish hatcheries in coastal waters, and contaminates the flesh of commercially valuable fish. The oil that settles on beaches decimates the inhabiting organisms, while that settling on the ocean floor smothers and kills benthic (bottom-dwelling) organisms like crabs and disrupt major food chains. Oil also submerges birds, impairing their flight or reducing the insulating property of their feathers [36].

Advertisement

5. Management and conservation of the Niger Delta mangrove ecosystem

5.1 Mangrove forests

The Niger Delta mangrove forest requires urgent protection due to the adverse impact of anthropogenic activities resulting in the decimation of their populations in many regions. Incessant destruction of the mangrove forest will result in the local extinction of these species. Therefore, to reduce the anthropogenic impact on mangroves, there is an urgent need to establish protection and restrict human entry into the forest. Based on the importance of the biodiversity hotspots to the environment, it is pertinent to protect them for future generations [34].

In the past, the conservation of biodiversity hotspots was mainly focused on species richness, but now it considers ecosystem integrity, water quality, climate impacts, unique adaptations, ecosystem services, intact fauna and flora, specialized/unique habitat, and ecological processes.

Mangrove forest protection should follow the principles of reserve design, which include: the protection of entire habitats (because the more protected habitat, the better it is); avoidance of reserve fragmentation by anthropogenic activities such as the construction of highways through mangrove forests; establishment of the clumped reserve, which is far better than linear, for easy migration of species within the mangrove forests; and establishment of a circular reserve to minimize edge effects.

A damaged mangrove ecosystem could also be repaired through ecological restoration, the process of repairing damage caused by humans to the diversity, and dynamics of the indigenous ecosystem. This process includes erosion control, reforestation, removal of non-native species such as N. fruticans and weeds, revegetation of disturbed areas, daylighting streams, reintroduction of native species, and range improvement for targeted species. Hydrological links to natural restoration sites are also significant in allowing saline water inflow and mangrove seeds. The inflow of water also cleans the site from oil spillage and other pollutants [37].

There is an urgent need for a long-term management plan for the sustainable use of mangrove ecosystems. Monitoring, research, and evaluation constitute vital components of a successful conservation strategy for natural, managed, and man-made mangrove forests.

Conservation of existing mangrove forests is often more effective than planting new forests. When a decision for planting has been made, there is a need to emphasize the careful selection of appropriate sites and species and an ecosystem-based approach to mangrove planting and management, which utilizes and supports natural regeneration and other natural processes. In the process of any rehabilitation intervention work, planting should be done only when absolutely necessary. Local communities must be engaged in mangrove management to effectively maintain and enhance the protective function of the mangrove forest while providing a livelihood for local people and contributing to better assessment and governance of natural resources. Continuous assessment of mangrove forest status through research, economic assessment, and valuation is important for better conservation, planning, and management [38].

As a result of the current threat to forest resources, forest reserves have been created by the Nigerian government in the swamp/mangrove ecosystems of some Niger Delta States (Table 6).

StateSwamp/Mangrove (ha)High forest (ha)Derived savannah (ha)Total (ha)
Abia2,870.004,949.601,302.509,122.10
Akwa Ibom31,080.00777.00-31,857.00
Delta29,345.426,608.00-35,953.42
Edo-565,035.00-565,035.00
Imo-1,345.30211.811,557.11
Rivers-121,440.00-121,440.00
Total forest type63,295.42700,154.901,514.31764,964.63
%8.27429491.527748150.197958172

Table 6.

Forest reserves according to vegetation type.

Source: Federal Department of Forestry, 1998.


5.2 Game reserves/wildlife sanctuary

Most of the Protected Areas are Forest Reserves. A few have been designated at one time or the other Game reserves (Table 7). None has the legal instrument for the designation as Game Reserve. They were recognized as having rich faunal compliments but never transited legally into Game Reserves.

S/NNameHabitatArea (ha)Remarks
AbiaNANone-No designated game reserves
Akwa IbomStubbs CreeksSwamp forest21,000Stubbs creek is not managed as a game reserve
BayelsaTaylor CreekSwamp forest30,000PA shared between Bayelsa & Rivers States. The larger part of Bayelsa state
DeltaKwaleDegraded340Cassava farming and cattle trespass
EdoGele-GeleDegraded36,200Retained as Forest Reserve. Lack of political will to transform FR to Game Reserve.
OhosuDegraded47,100Never transformed to Game Reserve
OkomuMoist forest11,200Most of the original Okomu forest reserve has been sold to tree crop plantation developers. The core of the reserve has been preserved as a National Park and ceded to the Federal Government of Nigeria
OlogboDegraded19,440Converted to an oil palm plantation
Orle RiverConverted5,440De-reserved
ImoNA--No game reserve
RiversTaylor GreekSwamp forest30,000Split between Bayelsa and Rivers states. No management regime in place

Table 7.

Existing and proposed game reserves/wildlife sanctuaries in the zone.

Source: Federal Department of Forestry, 1998.


A Preliminary Assessment of the Context for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) in Nigeria commissioned by the Federal Ministry of Environment, the Cross River State’s Forestry Commission, and UNDP Strict Nature Reserve (SNR) remarked that:

These former forest reserves have been specifically designated for conservation, management, and propagation of wild animals in addition to the protection and management of the critical habitats on which they depend. In practice, almost all the game reserves in the country (except for Yankari, which was formerly a National Park) are highly degraded due to poor management; they best be described as “paper” game reserves.

Advertisement

6. Surface water and sediment quality in mangrove ecosystem

The Escravos Beach within the Niger Delta Mangrove was used as a case study [39]. The mean values of all physicochemical parameters investigated during the wet and dry seasons are summarized in Table 8. The water bodies sampled in the location had slightly alkaline pH in the wet season and slightly acidic in the dry season, high conductivity and dissolved solids, slightly high turbidity and color, and moderate dissolved oxygen and Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) level. The water was brackish with higher salinity values in the dry than in the wet season. The cations were dominated by sodium and potassium, followed by calcium, truly reflecting the brackish nature of the water body. The nutrient level was higher in the wet than the dry season, probably due to the influx of allochthonous organic materials and ions into the water body. The parameters were all within the normal range stipulated by the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) (now called Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission, NUPRC) and Federal Ministry of Environment (FMEnv), except in a few cases such as turbidity, color, and total dissolved solids (TDS), where the limits were exceeded. The turbidity and color were expected to be higher in the wet season due to the input of organic materials from the terrestrial environment. The high total dissolved solids followed the electrical conductivity pattern, which was greatly influenced by the high salt content. The hydrocarbon pollution indicators, like the total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene), and phenols, were all very low in concentrations and fell within the recommended limits by DPR and FMEnv. The low concentrations of heavy metals indicate no serious pollution from petroleum and other anthropogenic activities at the study location.

ParameterUnitDry seasonWet seasonDPR, FMEnv limits
MinMaxMeanMinMaxMean
Physical
Temp0C29.6034.5032.87121.229.627.62925,35
ColorPt. Co15.3020.9017.75725.15036.9147
TurbidityNTU7.2011.208.90010.33620.30010,-
TSSmg/L8.0015.0011.000103619.28630,30
TDS11872.014687.013233.617137801564.002000,-
pH7.317.807.6535.67.46.6436.5–8.5,
ECμS/cm22400.027710.025174.336275803135.3
Salinity10.1312.5311.3860.23.41.429
DO4.34.904.5863.64.74.171-,5
BOD52.84.403.4711.73.92.50010,10
COD61.675.2067.54355.2528134.74310,40
HCO3171281.00222.42973.2201.3108.057
Na334.4467.90438.04310.9221.6100.45720,-
K371.6551.10491.5293.398.160.286
Ca122188.00153.14358946523.429
Mg87134.00117.14323722319.57175,-
Hardness213320.00270.2868129601285.429
Cl-69908320.007587.14363198129.429600,200
PO40.462.371.5205.39.26.8005,-
NH4N2.43.693.0746.17.46.7710.2,0.2
NO2-N1.073.602.1591.210.45.357
NO3-N2.174.173.0392.5199.92920,-
SO4336.1377.2361.050.5253123.7200,-
H2S00.00001,20
THC0.220.490.3000.060.360.189
TOC%0.591.200.8040.391.190.860
TPHmg/l0.0790.150.1120.0590.1370.094
PAHμg/l0.020.100.0470.0170.0890.037
Benzene0.0020.060.01300.0130.002
Toluene0.0010.000.002000.000
Ethylbenzene0.0010.010.00300.0020.001
Xylene0.0010.000.0020.0010.0030.002
Phenol0.0040.020.0090.0020.0120.006
Heavy Metals
Femg/L0.0610.250.1230.020.170.066
Cu0.0510.160.1120.040.140.107
Mn0.0160.100.0590.010.090.056
Zn0.0120.190.0660.010.050.026
Cd0.0020.000.0030.010.050.021
Cr0.04491.0015.2250.040.090.073
Pb0.0260.050.0390.020.080.049
Ni0.030.050.0440.010.060.026
V0.0110.040.0270.010.020.012
Hg00.0000
Ba00.0000
As00.0000
CN00.0000

Table 8.

Summary of physicochemical characteristics of surface waters in the Escravos Beach study area [39].

Microorganisms are responsible for forming various sediment and mineral deposits and dominating secondary waste treatment. Microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi act as living catalysts enabling numerous chemical processes in water and soil. Most significant chemical reactions in water, especially those involving organic matter and oxidation-reduction processes, occur through bacterial intermediaries.

The bacterial and fungal counts of the surface water samples from the study area were low. The total heterotrophic bacteria counts ranged between 0.7 × 103 cfu/ml and 2.4 × 103 cfu/ml. The total heterotrophic fungal counts ranged from nil to 1.0 × 103 cfu/ml. The hydrocarbon-utilizing bacterial and fungal counts were absent for most surface water samples.

The summary of sediment quality parameters is presented in Table 9. The sediment was moderately acidic (<7.0). The nutrient concentrations were higher in the sediment than in the surface water. The earth metals (cations) were low in concentration, with calcium dominating in the wet season. The heavy metals were low in concentration in all the stations. The higher sediment concentration is expected since the bottom sediment typically serves as a reservoir for heavy metals in the water. The recorded values are all below the intervention values. Concentrations above the intervention values corresponded to severe contamination. The target values indicated the soil quality levels ultimately aimed for [39].

ParameterUnitDry seasonWet season
MinMaxMeanMinMaxMean
pH3.435.374.573.36.95.029
ECμS/cm219076503952.86107019601660.00
Organic carbon%0.472.571.811.43.051.921
Total nitrogen%0.221.230.860.120.280.174
TOC%1.377.635.364.29.065.714
Nameq/100 g5.848.477.230.861.261.023
K3.985.014.500.130.30.191
Ca2.113.212.591.64.642.377
Mg2.443.953.141.12.721.556
CEC14.8519.317.323.698.765.147
EA1.63.12.310.91.61.214
CL-mg/kg48.513282.3913.620.217.357
PO412.217.514.2016.223.719.557
NH4N15.628.522.801121.116.243
NO2-N7.812.49.877.914.310.500
NO3-N9.914.211.9311.620.716.043
SO445.492.160.6715.227.622.443
Silt%3.36.44.072.53.22.971
Clay3.36.35.376.89.48.043
Sand90.291.290.5687.690.288.986
THCmg/kg15.866.945.142348.839.200
TPH0.10.3570.190.10.3570.214
PAH0.0150.0790.040.1790.3430.265
Benzeneμg/kg00.0070.0000.0070.003
Toluene000.0000.0010.000
Ethylbenzene000.00000.000
Xylene00.0070.000.0020.0080.005
Phenol<0.001<0.001
Heavy Metals
Femg/kg407453.71230554381.143
Cu0.622.421.0014.615.715.100
Mn0.160.240.2028.634.631.214
Zn3.62314.7340.155.948.829
Cd0.040.070.061.22.21.757
Cr0.62.060.971.23.61.957
Pb1.863.823.321.15.92.829
Ni0.210.750.3912.51.657
V0.1440.510.270.61.81.143
HgNDND00
BaNDND0.0030.0150.009
AsNDND0.0010.0040.002

Table 9.

Comparison of the characteristics of sediment samples from the study area during the dry and wet seasons [39].

There was no adverse effect of anthropogenic activities on the water and sediment of the study area.

The microbial load in the sediment was low for both the heterotrophic and the hydrocarbon-utilizing bacteria and fungi, indicating no serious hydrocarbon contamination.

The mean values of physical and chemical parameters for surface water and sediment are true reflections of the typical mangrove quality unless there is gross contamination from oil exploration and production activities by oil companies.

Advertisement

7. Conclusion

The coastal areas of West Africa contain some of the world’s richest ecosystems, including extensive mangrove forests, lagoons, and estuaries that support wide biodiversity with significant economic benefits to the coastal populations. Wetlands are important buffers for adjacent marine ecosystems, trapping sediments, nutrients, and many anthropogenic chemical contaminants. Mangrove ecosystems, for instance, serve as sinks for heavy metals because mangrove sediments’ physical and chemical properties allow them to sequester large quantities of metals. There is wide variability in the ability of mangrove plants to absorb heavy metals because the sediment conditions vary widely. Different species of mangrove trees have different sediment-trapping root systems adapted to combating the anoxic conditions in the peat, including the pores or lenticels on the prop roots of Rhizophora spp. or on the pneumatophores (peg roots) of Avecinnia germinans.

Ineffective planning and management of coastal zone, the absence of environmental impact assessment, inadequate incorporation of environmental issues into feasibility projects, population pressures, as well as economic expansion are threatening the integrity of natural ecosystems. The main types of human activities that damage coastal ecosystems are (1) overexploitation, (2) physical alterations and habitat loss, (3) pollution, (4) introduction of alien species, and (5) global climatic change. In many coastal areas of Africa, vast areas of coastal wetlands and beaches have been cleared to make way for coastal development, industrialization, aquaculture, and agriculture. It destroys rich mangrove and estuarine fisheries and many commercially valuable species that depend on these coastal habitats as nursery grounds. Continuous examination of the relationship between man, the coastal environment, and its resources (human impacts) is clearly needed to avoid the risk of depletion and damage.

The rich ecosystem services of the Niger Delta mangrove, which is currently threatened by anthropogenic influence, require urgent protection and conservation attention. There is an urgent need for policymakers, development planners, and other stakeholders to arouse public consciousness for the restoration, rehabilitation, and conservation of mangrove ecosystems in Nigeria to achieve sustainable utilization.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This contribution contains information gathered from our Ph.D. research and environmental consultancy reports carried out for some oil and gas industries operating in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. This is in addition to the cited literature. The authors wish to particularly acknowledge MacGill Engineering and Technical Services Limited, an environmental consultancy outfit that funded the Environmental Impact Assessment studies for South Forcados Development Project and the Escravos Beach Project carried out for SPDC.

References

  1. 1. World Bank. Overview. Available from: www.worldbank.org/en/country/nigeria/overview#1 [Accessed: October 13, 2019]
  2. 2. FDF and FMEnv. National Forest Reference Emission Level for the Federal Republic of Nigeria. 2019. Available from: https://redd.unfccc.int/files/2019_submission_frel_nigeria.pdf
  3. 3. Davies RM, Davies OA, Abowei JFN. The status of fish storage technologies in Niger Delta Nigeria. American Journal of Scientific Research. 2009;21:55-63
  4. 4. Olalekan A, Gordon M. The Niger Delta wetlands: Threats to ecosystem services, their importance to dependent communities and possible management measures. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management. 2011;1:1-19
  5. 5. Numbere AO. Mangrove species distribution and composition, adaptive strategies and ecosystem services in the Niger River Delta, Nigeria. In: Sharma S, editor. Mangrove Ecosystem and Ecology Function. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2018. pp. 1-24. DOI: 10.5772/intechOpen.79028
  6. 6. World Bank. Defining an Environmental Strategy for the Niger Delta. Nigeria: World Bank Industry and Energy Operations Division, West Central Africa Department; 1995. p. 76
  7. 7. Okonkwo CNP, Kumar L, Taylor S. The Niger Delta wetland ecosystem: What threatens it and why should we protect it? African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2015;95:451-463
  8. 8. Ayanlade S, Drake N. Forest loss in different ecological zones of the Niger Delta, Nigeria: Evidence from remote sensing. GeoJournal. 2015;81(5):717-735. DOI: 10.1007/s/10708-015-9658-y
  9. 9. Oribhabor BJ, Ogbeibu AE. Brackish Water Ecology of a Tidal Creek: Physical, Chemical and Biological Characteristics of a Tidal Creek. Germany: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing; 2012. p. 273. DOI: 978-3-659-28820-3
  10. 10. Sheridan P, Hays C. Are mangroves nursery habitat for transient fishes and decapods? Wetlands. 2003;23(2):449-458
  11. 11. Burke L, Kura Y, Kassem K, Revenga C, Spalding M, McAtlister D. Pilot Analysis of Global Cosystems: Coastal Ecosystems. Washington, D.C. USA: World Resources Institute; 2001
  12. 12. IUCN-UNEP-WWF. World Conseration Strategy. Living Resources for Sustainable Development. IUCN–UNEP–WWF; 1980. p. 72
  13. 13. IUCN. Global Status of Mangrove Ecosystems. Commission on Ecology Paper No. 3, Reprinted from the Environmentalist 3, Supplement No. 3. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources; 1983. p. 88
  14. 14. Niger Delta Biodiversity Project (NDBP). A United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and Global Environment Facility (GEF) Funded Project. Nigeria: UNDP-GEF; 2012. p. 172
  15. 15. USAID/Nigeria. Foreign Assistance Act 118/119 Tropical Forest and Biodiversity Analysis. USA: The Cadmus Group LLC and ICF; 2020. Available from: Publications/Categorvid/930.aspx
  16. 16. Itehm U. Wildlife Conservation Society Cross River National Park (Oban Division) Annual Report: January–December 2018. Wildlife Conservation Society; 2019. Available from: https://nigeria.wcs.org/About-Us/
  17. 17. Ajibola MO, Awodiran OO. Assessing wetland services in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 2015;5(1):268-277
  18. 18. Akanni A, Onwuteaka J, Mulwa R, Uwagbae MA, Elegbede IO. The values of mangrove ecosystem services in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. In: Ndimele EE, editor. The Political Ecology of Oil and Gas Activities in the Nigerian Aquatic Ecosystem. Academic Press; 2018. pp. 387-437. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-809399-3.00025-2
  19. 19. Ibe AC. Coastline Erosion in Nigeria. Ibadan Nigeria: Ibadan University Press; 1998
  20. 20. Egborge ABM. Biodiversity of Aquatic Fauna of Nigeria. Abuja: Natural Resources Conservation Council; 1993. p. 173
  21. 21. Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research (NIOMR). Diagnostic Survey of Small Scale Capture and Culture Fisheries in Lagos State, Nigeria. NIOMR Technical Paper no. 56. Nigeria: NIOMR; 1989
  22. 22. Scott JS. Report on the Fisheries of the Niger Delta Special Area. Port Harcourt: Niger Delta Development Board; 1966. p. 109
  23. 23. Nduaguba DC. Utilization of Remote Sensing Data for Mapping Aquatic Ecosystems of the Nigerian Coastal Area. A Report Prepared for the Artisanal and Inshore Fisheries Development Project. Rome: FAO; FI: DP/NIR/77/001, Field Document 1; 1963. p. 24
  24. 24. IPIECA. Biological Impacts of Oil Pollution, Mangroves. IPIECA Report Series. Vol. 4. London: International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association; 1993. p. 20
  25. 25. Odiete WO. Environmental Physiology of Animals and Pollution. Lagos: Diversified Resources Ltd; 1999. p. 205
  26. 26. Faunce CH, Serafy JE. Mangroves as fish habitat: 50 years of field studies. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2006;318:1-18
  27. 27. Baran E, Hambrey J. Mangrove conservation and coastalmanagement in Southeast Asia: What impact on fishery resources? Marine Pollution Bulletin. 1998;37:431-440
  28. 28. Blasco F, Saenger P, Janodet E. Mangroves as indicators of coastal change. Catena. 1996;1996(27):167-178
  29. 29. Edokpayi CA, Lawal MO, Okwok NA, Ogunwenmo CA. Physico-chemical and macrobenthic faunal characteristics of Kuramo water, Lagos, Southern Nigeria. African Journal of Aquatic Science. 2004;29(2):235-241
  30. 30. Asuk AS, Offiong EE, Ifebueme MN, Akpaso OE. Species composition and diversity of mangrove swamp forest in Southern Nigeria. International Journal of Avian & Wildlife Biology. 2018;3(2):159-164. DOI: 10.15406/ijawb.2018.03.00078
  31. 31. SPDC. Environmental Impact Assessment Study (EIA) of South Forcados Development Project. Report submitted by MacGill Engineering and Technical Services Ltd. Nigeria: SPDC; 1995
  32. 32. Numbere AO. Mangrove habitat loss and the need for the establishment of conservation and protected areas in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. In: Carmelo Maria Musarella CM, Ortiz AC, Canas RQ, editors. Habitats of the World-Biodiversity and Threats. IntechOpen; 2019. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.89623
  33. 33. Ogbeibu AE. Biodiversity Status and Concerns (Fauna). Biodiversity Study of the Brass LNG Project Area. Nigeria: Brass LNG Limited; 2009
  34. 34. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GA, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000;403:853
  35. 35. Ewa-Oboho I, Asuquo FE, Edet P, Emeh EJ, Oladimeji S. Mangrove ecosystem of the Niger Delta–distribution and dynamics. Journal of Environmental Systems. 2005-2006;32(2):145-172. DOI: 10.2190/ES.32.2.e
  36. 36. Aju PC, Aju JA. Mangrove forests in Nigeria: Why their restoration, rehabilitation and conservation matters. African Journal of Environmental and Natural Science Research. 2021;4(1):84-93
  37. 37. Numbere AO. Mangrove restoration under different disturbances regime in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. In: Sharma S, editor. Mangrove Ecosystem Restoration. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2021. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.96127
  38. 38. Schmitt K, Duke NC. Mangrove management, assessment, and monitoring. In: Pancel L, Köhl M, editors. Tropical Forestry Handbook. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54601-3_126
  39. 39. SPDC. Environmental Impact Assessment Study (EIA) of Escravos Beach Location Project. Report Submitted by MacGill Engineering and Technical Services Ltd. Nigeria: SPDC; 2013

Written By

Anthony E. Ogbeibu and Blessing J. Oribhabor

Submitted: 01 February 2023 Reviewed: 13 July 2023 Published: 22 November 2023