Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Regulation of Plant-Microbe Interactions in the Rhizosphere for Plant Growth and Metabolism: Role of Soil Phosphorus

Written By

Anurag Yadav and Kusum Yadav

Submitted: 03 May 2023 Reviewed: 17 July 2023 Published: 31 January 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.112572

From the Edited Volume

Phosphorus in Soils and Plants

Edited by Naser A. Anjum, Asim Masood, Shahid Umar and Nafees A. Khan

Chapter metrics overview

46 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Soil phosphorus (P) plays a crucial role in regulating plant-microbe interactions in the rhizosphere. This chapter provides an in-depth analysis of the role of P in plant physiology, growth, and its availability in soil. Phosphorus acquisition and uptake, its impact on plant metabolism, and its influence on plant growth and development are reviewed in this chapter. The mechanisms by which plants acquire P from the soil, including the production of phosphatase enzymes, secretion of organic acids, mycorrhizal symbiosis, changes in root morphology, phosphorus use efficiency, and mobilization and transporters, are also reviewed. The chapter also explores the impact of P on microbial communities in the rhizosphere and its role in plant-microbe interactions. Finally, the implications of P availability in the rhizosphere for sustainable agriculture and crop production are discussed, highlighting the potential for improving P availability in the soil to enhance agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability.

Keywords

  • soil phosphorus
  • plant-microbe interactions
  • phosphorus acquisition and uptake
  • rhizosphere microbial communities
  • sustainable agriculture and crop production

1. Introduction

The rhizosphere, the region of soil surrounding plant roots, is a dynamic environment where various interactions between plants and microorganisms occur [1]. Among these interactions, the exchange of nutrients is crucial for plant growth and development. Phosphorus (P) is one of the essential macronutrients for plants known to play a vital role in several physiological processes, including photosynthesis, energy transfer, and nucleic acid synthesis [2]. However, P-availability in the soil is often limited since it is highly reactive and readily forms insoluble compounds unavailable to plants [3]. Plants have evolved various strategies to acquire P from soil to overcome this limitation. These mechanisms involve the secretion of organic acids, enzymes, and other compounds that can solubilize and mineralize P [4] through associations with beneficial microorganisms such as mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria [5].

The interactions between plants and microorganisms in the rhizosphere play a crucial role in regulating P-availability [3]. Microorganisms can contribute to the solubilization and mineralization of P and make it available to plants [6]. Conversely, some microorganisms can immobilize or compete for P and reduce its plant availability [7]. Therefore, understanding the dynamics of plant-microbe interactions in the rhizosphere is essential for improving P-acquisition and enhancing plant growth and yield [8]. Moreover, sustainable agriculture and crop production practices require minimizing chemical fertilizers and enhancing the natural processes of nutrient cycling in soil [9]. Harnessing plant-microbe interactions to optimize P-uptake can reduce the environmental impact of agriculture while improving soil health and crop productivity [10]. Therefore, studying the role of P in plant-microbe interactions in the rhizosphere is critical for developing efficient and sustainable agricultural systems.

This chapter aims to: (i) provide an in-depth analysis of the role of P in plant physiology, growth, and its availability in soil; (ii) discusses P-acquisition and -uptake, its impact on plant metabolism and its influence on plant growth and development; (iii) examines the mechanisms underlying the soil-P acquisition in plants, and the production of phosphatase enzymes, secretion of organic acids, mycorrhizal symbiosis, changes in root morphology, P-use-efficiency, and mobilization and transporters; (iv) explores the impact of P on microbial communities in the rhizosphere and the role it plays in plant-microbe interactions; and (v) highlights the significant implications of P-availability in the rhizosphere for sustainable agriculture and crop production.

Advertisement

2. The role of phosphorus in plant physiology and growth

Among the most critical essential macronutrients, P is required by plants for their proper growth and development. It plays a crucial role in plants’ physiological and biochemical processes, including photosynthesis, energy transfer, cell division, nucleic acid synthesis, and membrane transport. Therefore, understanding the role of P in plant physiology and growth is crucial for plant scientists, agronomists, and farmers to optimize crop production and improve the sustainability of agricultural systems.

2.1 Phosphorus acquisition and uptake

Phosphorus is an essential nutrient for plant growth and development, playing a crucial role in various metabolic processes such as ATP synthesis and nucleic acid formation [2]. Plants require large amounts of P, which is often the limiting factor in its growth [10]. Plants take it up as phosphate ions (H2PO4 and HPO42−) found in the soil [11]. The availability of phosphate ions in the soil is affected by soil pH, temperature, moisture, and microbial activity [3]. However, P is often present in limited amounts in soil, mainly in insoluble phosphates [12]. Therefore, plants have developed various mechanisms to acquire and uptake P from the soil [13]. One of the strategies plants use to obtain P is through production of phosphatase enzymes (Figure 1). These enzymes can hydrolyze organic phosphates in the soil, releasing inorganic phosphate ions that the plant can take up. Several studies have shown that plants can increase the production of phosphatase enzymes in response to low soil-P levels [4, 14]. Plants can also secrete organic acids, such as citrate and malate, to solubilize insoluble P compounds in the soil. These organic acids can chelate with metal ions, reducing their ability to bind with phosphates and making them more available for plant uptake [15].

Figure 1.

Representation of the major processes involved in phosphorus-aquision by plants involving organic acid secretion.

Furthermore, many plants form symbiotic associations with mycorrhizal fungi, which can enhance P-uptake and -translocation in the plant. Mycorrhizal fungi can extend their hyphae into the soil, increasing the surface area for P-uptake. They can also release phosphatase enzymes and organic acids, increasing P-availability [16].

2.2 Phosphorus and plant metabolism

Phosphorus is vital in plant metabolism as an essential macronutrient for growth and development. According to Rao and Pessarakli [17], P is absorbed by plant roots as phosphate ions and then transported to various plant tissues and organs (Figure 2). Once inside the plant, P is involved in numerous metabolic pathways, including photosynthesis and respiration. In photosynthesis, P is a fundamental component of ATP, the primary energy source for plant cells. ATP is synthesized in the thylakoid membranes of chloroplasts through the phosphorylation of ADP (adenosine diphosphate) using energy from light [10]. P also regulates photosynthetic carbon metabolism by activating specific enzymes and proteins involved in the process. P is also crucial to nucleic acids, such as DNA and RNA. Nucleic acids are involved in gene expression and protein synthesis, essential for plant growth and development. In addition, P is involved in forming phospholipids, crucial components of cell membranes [18]. Phospholipids serve as precursors for synthesizing signaling molecules, such as inositol phosphates, which are involved in various cellular signaling pathways [19]. P also plays a crucial role in regulating various metabolic processes in plants. P regulates the synthesis and activity of various carbohydrate, lipid, and protein metabolism enzymes [20].

Figure 2.

Representation of the major modes of phosphorus uptake in plants.

Understanding the role of P in plant metabolism is crucial for optimizing its availability in the soil and improving agricultural productivity and sustainability. Research into P and its plant functions can help develop strategies to enhance soil P levels, leading to healthier and more productive crops.

2.3 Phosphorus and plant growth development

Phosphorus is essential for plant growth and development [21]. It is required for cell division and elongation, which are critical processes in plant growth [2]. P deficiency can lead to stunted growth, reduced seed production, and poor fruit quality in plants [11]. P also plays a vital role in root development, crucial for nutrient and water uptake from the soil [22]. In addition, P can improve plant resistance to environmental stresses, such as drought, heat, and cold, by regulating the expression of stress-related genes and enhancing the production of stress-related proteins [23] (Figure 3). Table 1 lists the major phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms reported beneficial for plant growth.

Figure 3.

Representation of the major roles of phosphororus in plant growth, development and yield.

MicroorganismTest plantBenefit(s) to plantsReferences
Aspergillus nigerMunbeanImproved P and N uptake, heat tolerance[24]
Aspergillus nigerWheatincreased the growth and phosphate uptake[25]
Aspergillus nigerRiceRock phosphate solubilization, and improved growth[26]
Azospirillum brasilenseWheatIncreased yield[27]
Azotobacter chroococcumWheatEnhanced phosphorus uptake, symbiotic growth[28, 29]
Achromobacter piechaudiiRiceEnhanced phosphorus uptake, yield[30]
Bacillus subtilisMunbeanImproved P and N uptake, heat tolerance[24]
Bacillus circulansMunbeanImproved P and N uptake, heat tolerance[24]
B. subtilisTomatoImproved yield[31]
Bacillus megateriumWheatEnhanced phosphorus uptake, increased growth[6, 32, 33]
Burkholderia cepaciaChickpeaAlleviated glyphosate induced toxicity[34]
Enterobacter ludwigiiRiceImproved biomass and chloropohyll content[35]
Glomus sp. (mycorrhizal fungi)SorghumIncreased phosphorus uptake and biomass[36]
Penicillium bilaiiBarleyImproved phosphorus uptake and yield[37]
Pantoea agglomeransMaizeImproved phosphorus availability and yield[38, 39]
Pseudomonas fluorescensWheatIncreased growth and P levels[40]
P. fluorescensTomatoplant growth and increased total root length, surface area and volume[41]
P. fluorescensMaizeImproved phosphorus availability, yield[42]
Serratia marcescensMaizeImproved biomass and yield[43]
Pseudomonas sp.MaizeImproved biomass and yield[43]
S. marcescensWheatEnhanced phosphorus uptake, increased growth[44]
Streptomyces sp.RiceImproved plant growth by antagonizing phytopathogens[45]
Trichoderma virideCucumberImproved growth[46]
Trichoderma virideSoybeanImproved phosphorus uptake[47]

Table 1.

Major phosphate solubilizing microorganisms reported beneficial for plant growth.

Advertisement

3. Phosphorus availability in soil and mechanisms underlying its acquisition in plants

3.1 Production of phosphatase enzymes

Plants have developed a sophisticated network of mechanisms to cope with various environmental stresses, such as nutrient deficiency, drought, and high salinity. One crucial strategy plants employ is through the production of phosphatase enzymes, which play a crucial role in mobilizing P from various organic and inorganic sources in the soil [4]. The secretion of phosphatase enzymes by plant roots into the rhizosphere enables the breakdown of a wide range of organic P-based compounds, making inorganic P readily available for plant uptake [48, 49]. Under low P-conditions, plants induce the expression of genes encoding phosphatases, increasing enzyme activity in various tissues [50]. This upregulation of phosphatase activity helps plants to efficiently scavenge phosphate from the soil and maintain their growth and development. Moreover, mycorrhizal fungi can stimulate phosphatase activity, enhancing P uptake and translocation in plants [4].

The major phosphatases identified in plants include acid phosphatases, alkaline phosphatases, and purple acid phosphatases [4]. These enzymes are involved in the hydrolysis of different types of P-compounds, such as nucleotides, phospholipids, and phytate. Phosphatase enzymes have been shown to have multiple functions in plants, such as regulating iron homeostasis and improving the availability of minerals like iron, zinc, and calcium for plant uptake [4, 14].

3.2 Secretion of organic acids

Plants also secrete organic acids, such as citrate and malate, into the rhizosphere to solubilize inorganic P-compounds such as iron and aluminum phosphates [51]. These acids chelate metal ions bound to P, releasing P into the soil solution and making it available for plant uptake [52]. Through this mechanism plants cope with P deficiency and low availability in the soil [51]. The secretion of organic acids by plant roots facilitate the solubilization and uptake of essential nutrients, including P, iron, and aluminum [53]. Organic acids are low-molecular-weight compounds that chelate cations and dissolve insoluble mineral compounds, making them more available for plant uptake [51].

Plant roots, including citrate, malate, and oxalate, secrete several organic acids [15]. Citrate is the most commonly secreted organic acid, and is involved in the solubilization and uptake of various nutrients, such as iron, aluminum, and P [54]. On the other hand, malate is involved in the uptake of aluminum, while oxalate helps in the uptake of calcium and aluminum [15]. These organic acids are secreted into the rhizosphere by specialized cells in the root, known as root border cells, and root hairs [53].

Various factors, including nutrient deficiency, pH, and root exudates, regulate the secretion of organic acids in plants [55]. Under nutrient-deficient conditions, plants induce the expression of genes encoding enzymes involved in organic acid synthesis and transport, increasing their secretion [51]. Additionally, the pH of the rhizosphere can also influence organic acid secretion, with lower pH values generally leading to increased secretion [55].

Releasing organic acids by plant roots may also substantially affect the soil microbial ecology. Organic acids can act as a carbon source for soil microorganisms, promoting their growth and activity [56]. Additionally, the solubilization of nutrients by organic acids can also increase microbial activity and diversity in the rhizosphere. Several studies have reported on the secretion of organic acids by different plant species. For instance, a study by Palomo, Claassen [57] showed that maize plants secrete high citrate levels under P-deficient conditions, enhancing their P uptake. In another similar study soybean plants were reported to secrete malate and oxalate under aluminum stress conditions, which was argued to increase aluminum tolerance [58].

3.3 Mycorrhizal symbiosis

P, an essential nutrient for plant growth and development. However, it is often limited in soil due to low availability and solubility. The mycorrhizal symbiosis enables plants to overcome P-limitation by accessing P from a larger soil volume and increasing P-uptake efficiency by forming highly branched arbuscules. Mycorrhizal symbiosis is a mutually beneficial relationship between plants and fungi, where the plant provides the fungus with carbohydrates in exchange for nutrients, including P. The arbuscules provide a large surface area for P uptake and translocation from the soil to the plant.

Mycorrhizal fungi can also release enzymes and organic acids that help to solubilize P-compounds in soil, making them available for plant uptake. The release of organic acids by mycorrhizal fungi, such as citrate, malate, and oxalate, can increase the solubility of insoluble P compounds, such as calcium phosphates, by forming complexes with metal ions that bind to P, thus freeing it for plant uptake [59]. Additionally, mycorrhizal fungi can release enzymes such as acid phosphatase, which can hydrolyze organic P-compounds, such as phytate, and release inorganic P for plant take up [4].

3.4 Change in root morphology

One common strategy plants employ for increasing P-uptake is the production of longer and more branched roots, which can increase the surface area of the root system and improve the plant’s ability to explore the soil for nutrients. For example, several studies have shown that plants grown under low P-conditions produce longer and more branched roots than those grown under high P-conditions [60, 61].

In addition to changes in root length and branching, plants can also alter the distribution of root hairs, which are small projections from the root surface that increase the surface area of the root system. Under low P-conditions, some plant species produce more root hairs per unit length of root than under high P conditions [62]. Plants can also alter the morphology of their root tips to improve P-uptake. For example, some plants produce cluster roots, which are highly branched structures that form at the tips of roots and increase the surface area of the root system. These structures are prevalent in plants that grow in soils with low P-availability, such as Proteaceae and Casuarinaceae species [63]. Another strategy that plants use to increase P-uptake is the production of exudates, which are organic compounds released by plant roots that can increase P-availability in soil. For example, some plants release organic acids that can solubilize mineral-bound P and make it available for uptake [4]. In addition to these morphological changes, some plant species have also evolved symbiotic relationships with mycorrhizal fungi, which can improve P-uptake by extending the root system and increasing the surface area of the root system [5].

3.5 Phosphorus use-efficiency

Plants can increase their P use-efficiency by adopting various strategies to optimize P-metabolism in the soil. One of the primary strategies is to enhance the uptake of P from the soil, which is achieved by developing an extensive root system that allows plants to explore a larger volume of soil, and the secretion of organic acids and enzymes that solubilize and release bound P in the soil [64]. Plants can increase their P use-efficiency by recycling and reusing internal P reserves. For example, plants can remobilize P from old leaves to new growth areas during leaf senescence, improving their ability to acquire P from the soil [65]. This way the plants recycles and reuses their own internal reserves of P. Plants can remobilize P from old leaves, stems, and other tissues to support new growth, reducing their reliance on external sources of P [66]. This process is especially important under low P availability conditions, where efficiently reallocating P from senescent tissues to new growth can improve plant fitness and productivity [67].

3.6 Phosphorus mobilization and transporters

Plants can mobilize and transport P within their tissues to improve their ability to acquire P from the soil. P can be mobilized within plant tissues by phosphatase enzymes, which break down organic P-compounds into inorganic forms that are more readily available for plant uptake. Plants also have specific transporters that can uptake inorganic P from the soil and transport it into their tissues [68].

Membrane proteins are called P-transporters to facilitate P transport across plants’ plasma membranes and other intracellular membranes [69]. Several P-transporters exist in plants including the PHT1, PHT2, PHT3, PHO1 transporters [70]. The PHT1 transporter family is the most extensively studied and is involved in inorganic phosphate uptake from the soil [71]. This transporter family comprises 9 to 13 members in different plant species and is expressed in the root epidermis and cortex, where they play a crucial role in the uptake of inorganic phosphate from the soil [71]. They have been shown to have a high affinity for inorganic phosphate and can transport it against a concentration gradient [72]. PHT2 transporters are expressed in the plasma membrane of root hairs and are involved in phosphate uptake and translocation [54].

PHT3 transporters are localized in the chloroplast and are involved in phosphate transport from the cytoplasm to the chloroplast, which is required for photosynthesis [73]. PHO1 transporters translocate inorganic phosphate from the root to the shoot in plants [74, 75]. They are localized in the plasma membrane of the root endodermis and are responsible for loading inorganic phosphate into the xylem for transport to the shoot [74]. PHO1 transporters have also been shown to play a role in the secretion of phosphate-containing compounds into the rhizosphere, which can increase the availability of P in the soil [69]. The regulation of P transporters is critical for maintaining P-homeostasis in plants [2]. Several factors can influence the expression and activity of P-transporters, including P availability, plant age, and environmental stresses [76]. Under low P-conditions, plants can upregulate the expression of PHT1 transporters, leading to an increase in phosphate uptake [76]. Similarly, under drought stress, the expression of PHT1 transporters can be downregulated, leading to a decrease in phosphate uptake [76]. Table 2 lists the major transport proteins and highlights their important functions.

Protein nameFunctionReferences
PHT1 TransportersFacilitate the uptake of inorganic phosphate (Pi) from the soil into root cells[71, 77]
PHO1 TransporterTransports Pi from root cells to the xylem for long-distance transport to the shoots[69]
SPX ProteinsRegulate Pi homeostasis by inhibiting the activity of PHT1 transporters and promoting PHO1 transporter expression[78, 79]
PHR1 Transcription FactorRegulates the expression of genes involved in Pi uptake and remobilization in response to Pi deficiency[80, 81]
miR399Represses the expression of PHO2, a negative regulator of Pi uptake, under Pi-deficient conditions[82, 83]
IPS1Encodes a non-coding RNA that regulates Pi homeostasis by repressing the expression of PHO2 and promoting Pi uptake[82, 84]
Purple Acid Phosphatases (PAPs)Involved in the hydrolysis of organic phosphates in the soil, releasing Pi for plant uptake[7, 85]
NRT1.1 TransporterInvolved in the uptake of nitrate and can also transport Pi under Pi-deficient conditions[79, 86]
NLA E3 Ubiquitin LigaseRegulates the trafficking and degradation of PHT1 transporters in response to Pi availability[87, 88]
RbohD NADPH OxidaseInvolved in Pi sensing and signaling by producing reactive oxygen species (ROS)[89]

Table 2.

Major plant transport proteins involved in phosphorus uptake.

3.7 Organic phosphorus mineralization

According to Sharpley [90], organic P-compounds comprise a significant proportion of total P in many soils. However, these organic P-compounds are often not readily available to plants. Microorganisms play a crucial role in the mineralization of organic P, which is the process by which organic P-compounds are converted into inorganic P-forms. Several factors influence the rate of organic P-mineralization, including soil pH, moisture content, temperature, and the availability of nutrients such as nitrogen and P. For example, studies have shown that organic P-mineralization rates increase with increasing soil pH [91, 92]. Plants can also play a role in organic P-mineralization by releasing organic acids or other compounds that can stimulate microbial activity and increase the availability of inorganic P. For instance, in one experiment the release of root exudates by maize plants increased the mineralization of organic P in the soil [93].

Overall, organic P-mineralization is a crucial process in P-cycling in soils and is essential to plant nutrition. Understanding the factors influencing this process can help optimize fertilizer management strategies and improve crop productivity.

Advertisement

4. Phosphorus and microbial communities in the rhizosphere

The availability of P in the soil can significantly affect the composition and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere. In P-limited soils, microbial communities can be dominated by species adapted to low P-conditions, such as phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and fungi. These microorganisms can produce organic acids and enzymes that can solubilize P-compounds in soil, making them available for plant uptake. On the other hand, high P levels in soil can harm microbial communities in the rhizosphere. Excessive P can lead to the eutrophication of soil and stimulate the growth of opportunistic microorganisms that are not beneficial for plant growth. Moreover, high levels of P can decrease the diversity of microbial communities in soil, as certain species may become dominant due to their ability to tolerate high P-levels.

In addition to the direct impact of P on microbial communities, the composition of microbial communities in the rhizosphere can also affect P-cycling in soil. For example, mycorrhizal fungi in the rhizosphere can enhance P-uptake and translocation in plants, as these fungi can form symbiotic associations with plant roots and improve nutrient uptake.

The availability of P in the soil can strongly influence microbial community composition in the rhizosphere. For example, high P-levels in soil can decrease the abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) [77]. AMF play a crucial role in plant P acquisition, and their reduction can harm plant growth. In contrast, low P levels can increase the abundance of bacteria that can solubilize P [94]. These bacteria can release P from organic compounds and make them available to plants.

Moreover, the form of P in the soil can also affect microbial community composition. Inorganic P, such as phosphate, is soil’s most common form of P. However, organic P, such as phytate, is also present in the soil, and its availability is generally low [95]. Some microorganisms, such as phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) and fungi, can convert organic P into inorganic P, making it available to plants. The activity of these microorganisms can be influenced by the plant species and the management practices used in the field [96]. Figure 4 describes impact of P on microbial communities and plant.

Figure 4.

Representation of the major role of plant-microbe interaction in improving phosphorus availability to plants.

Advertisement

5. Plant-microbe interactions and phosphorus-availability in the rhizosphere

One of the most well-known plant-microbe interactions is the mycorrhizal association between plants and fungi (Figure 5). Mycorrhizal fungi form a symbiotic relationship with plant roots, where the fungi colonize the roots and extend their hyphae into the soil, increasing the surface area for nutrient uptake. In return, the fungi receive carbohydrates from the plant. Mycorrhizal fungi are particularly effective at accessing and mobilizing P in the soil, often found in low concentrations and insoluble forms. The fungi can release enzymes that break down organic forms of P and make them available for plant uptake [5].

Figure 5.

Schematic representation of the major impacts of mycorrhizal assoctiations on phosphorus uptake on plant.

Another type of microbes that can impact P availability in the rhizosphere are PSB. These bacteria convert insoluble forms of P into soluble forms, which plants can take up. PSB can release organic acids, chelating agents, and enzymes that solubilize P, making it available to the plant [97]. In addition to solubilizing P, PSB can enhance root growth and plant biomass by producing phytohormones [98].

Plant-microbe interactions in the rhizosphere can also affect the distribution of P in the soil. For example, some plant species can exude organic compounds that attract specific microbes, influencing the spatial distribution of P in the soil [99]. The presence of microbes in the rhizosphere can also alter the chemical properties of the soil, making it more favorable for plant growth and P uptake [100]. Research has also shown that PSB can interact synergistically with other soil microorganisms, such as mycorrhizal fungi, to further enhance plant growth and nutrient uptake. By promoting a diverse and healthy microbial community in the rhizosphere, PSB can help to create a more resilient and sustainable agricultural system.

Advertisement

6. Improved phosphorus-availability in soil: implications for sustainable agriculture and crop production

The PSB are known to solubilize P from organic and inorganic sources and make P more available for plant uptake [6]. When introduced into the rhizosphere, PSB can improve the availability of P in soil and enhance plant growth and development [101]. One potential implication of using PSB in sustainable agriculture is the reduced need for synthetic fertilizers. Synthetic fertilizers are commonly used to supplement soil P levels but can have negative environmental impacts such as eutrophication and groundwater pollution [102]. Using PSB, farmers can reduce their reliance on synthetic fertilizers and promote more sustainable agricultural practices. Another implication of using PSB is the potential for improved crop yields and food security. The availability of P in soil is a limiting factor for crop production. PSB can increase the amount of available P and enhance crop growth and development [103], leading to higher crop yields, improved food security, and increased farmer income.

The P resources are finite, and the increasing global demand for food has pressured this vital nutrient’s availability [104]. PSMs are group of microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes, that solubilize insoluble phosphate compounds [6]. PSMs as biofertilizers have been found to improve crop yields and P use-efficiency [32]. In addition, incorporating organic materials, such as compost and manure, can enhance soil P availability by increasing microbial activity and soil organic matter content [105]. Organic amendments can also help buffer soil pH, increasing P-availability [106]. Also, breeding plants with improved P-uptake and -utilization capabilities can produce more efficient P-use and higher yields [107]. This approach requires genetic resources and a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying plant P-uptake and -utilization [108]. Nevertheless, through precision agriculture and soil testing, farmers can better understand the P-status of their soil and tailor fertilizer applications accordingly [109]. Precision agriculture technologies, such as variable-rate fertilizer applicators, can help ensure P is applied efficiently and effectively.

Improving P-availability in soil has significant implications for sustainable agriculture and crop production. Enhanced P-availability can increase crop yields and reduce dependence on synthetic fertilizers, which can have negative environmental impacts [110]. Additionally, by optimizing P-use, the agricultural sector can better manage the depletion of finite P resources [104].

References

  1. 1. Berg G, Smalla K. Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2009;68(1):1-13
  2. 2. Raghothama KG. Phosphate Acquisition. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. 1999;50(1):665-693
  3. 3. Hinsinger P. Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: A review. Plant and Soil. 2001;237(2):173-195
  4. 4. Richardson AE et al. Acquisition of Phosphorus and Nitrogen in the Rhizosphere and Plant Growth Promotion by Microorganisms. Plant Soil. 2009;321:305-339
  5. 5. Smith S, Read D. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Cambridge, UK: Academic Press Ltd; 2008
  6. 6. Rodrı́guez, H. and R. Fraga, Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnology Advances, 1999. 17(4-5): p. 319-339.
  7. 7. Richardson AE, Hadobas PA, Hayes JE. Extracellular secretion of Aspergillus phytase from Arabidopsis roots enables plants to obtain phosphorus from phytate. The Plant Journal. 2001;25(6):641-649
  8. 8. Barea J-M et al. Microbial co-operation in the rhizosphere. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2005;56(417):1761-1778
  9. 9. Tilman D et al. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature. 2002;418(6898):671-677
  10. 10. Vance CP, Uhde-Stone C, Allan DL. Phosphorus acquisition and use: Critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytologist. 2003;157(3):423-447
  11. 11. Schachtman DP, Reid RJ, Ayling SM. Phosphorus uptake by plants: From soil to cell. Plant Physiology. 1998;116(2):447-453
  12. 12. Richardson A. Soil microorganisms and phosphorus availability. Soil Biota: Management in Sustainable Farming Systems. 1994;1994:50-62
  13. 13. Smith SE, Smith FA, Jakobsen I. Mycorrhizal fungi can dominate phosphate supply to plants irrespective of growth responses. Plant Physiology. 2003;133(1):16-20
  14. 14. Shen J et al. Phosphorus dynamics: From soil to plant. Plant Physiology. 2011;156(3):997-1005
  15. 15. Neumann G, Romheld V. The release of root exudates as affected by the plant's physiological status. In: The Rhizosphere. USA, Switzerland: CRC Press; 2000. pp. 57-110
  16. 16. Barea J-M et al. Mycorrhizal symbioses. The Ecophysiology of Plant-Phosphorus Interactions. 2008;2008:143-163
  17. 17. Rao IM, Pessarakli M. The role of phosphorus in photosynthesis. Handbook of Photosynthesis. 1996;1996:173-194
  18. 18. Marschner P. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Academic; 2012
  19. 19. Michell RH. Inositol derivatives: Evolution and functions. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2008;9(2):151-161
  20. 20. Tariq A et al. Regulation of metabolites by nutrients in plants. Plant Ionomics: Sensing, Signaling, and Regulation. 2023;2023:1-18
  21. 21. Malhotra H et al. Phosphorus nutrition: Plant growth in response to deficiency and excess. Plant Nutrients and Abiotic Stress Tolerance. 2018:171-190
  22. 22. Lynch JP. Root phenes for enhanced soil exploration and phosphorus acquisition: Tools for future crops. Plant Physiology. 2011;156(3):1041-1049
  23. 23. Ha S, Tran L-S. Understanding plant responses to phosphorus starvation for improvement of plant tolerance to phosphorus deficiency by biotechnological approaches. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 2014;34(1):16-30
  24. 24. Gaind S, Gaur AC. Thermotolerant phosphate solubilizing microorganisms and their interaction with mung bean. Plant and Soil. 1991;133(1):141-149
  25. 25. Xiao C et al. Evaluation for rock phosphate solubilization in fermentation and soil–plant system using a stress-tolerant phosphate-solubilizing Aspergillus niger WHAK1. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2013;169(1):123-133
  26. 26. Asuming-Brempong S, Anipa B. The use of rock phosphate and phosphate solubilising fungi (Aspergillus niger) to improve the growth and the yield of upland rice on typic kandiudalf. West African. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2014;22(1):27-39
  27. 27. Tahir M et al. Isolation and identification of phosphate solubilizer “Azospirillum, Bacillus” and “Enterobacter” strains by 16SrRNA sequence analysis and their effect on growth of wheat (‘Triticum aestivum’ L.). Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2013;7(9):1284-1292
  28. 28. Rajaee S, Alikhani H, Raiesi F. Effect of plant growth promoting potentials of Azotobacter chroococcum native strains on growth, yield and uptake of nutrients in wheat. Isfahan University of Technology-Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 2007;11(41):285-297
  29. 29. Kundu BS, Gaur AC. Establishment of nitrogen-fixing and phosphate-solubilising bacteria in rhizosphere and their effect on yield and nutrient uptake of wheat crop. Plant and Soil. 1980;57(2):223-230
  30. 30. Wang K et al. Improved grain yield and lowered arsenic accumulation in rice plants by inoculation with arsenite-oxidizing Achromobacter xylosoxidans GD03. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2020;206:111229
  31. 31. Khan MR, Khan SM. Effects of root-dip treatment with certain phosphate solubilizing microorganisms on the fusarial wilt of tomato. Bioresource Technology. 2002;85(2):213-215
  32. 32. Sharma SB et al. Phosphate solubilizing microbes: Sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. Springerplus. 2013;2:1-14
  33. 33. El-Komy HM. Coimmobilization of Azospirillum lipoferum and Bacillus megaterium for successful phosphorus and nitrogen nutrition of wheat plants. Food Technology and Biotechnology. 2005;43(1):19-27
  34. 34. Shahid M, Khan MS. Glyphosate induced toxicity to chickpea plants and stress alleviation by herbicide tolerant phosphate solubilizing Burkholderia cepacia PSBB1 carrying multifarious plant growth promoting activities. 3 Biotech. 2018;8(2):131
  35. 35. Lee K-E et al. Isolation and characterization of the high silicate and phosphate solubilizing novel strain Enterobacter ludwigii GAK2 that promotes growth in rice plants. Agronomy. 2019;9(3):144
  36. 36. Nakmee PS, Techapinyawat S, Ngamprasit S. Comparative potentials of native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to improve nutrient uptake and biomass of Sorghum bicolor Linn. Agriculture and Natural Resources. 2016;50(3):173-178
  37. 37. Karamanos R, Flore N, Harapiak J. Re-visiting use of Penicillium bilaii with phosphorus fertilization of hard red spring wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 2010;90(3):265-277
  38. 38. Viruel E et al. Inoculation of maize with phosphate solubilizing bacteria: Effect on plant growth and yield. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2014;14(4):819-831
  39. 39. Gond S et al. Induction of salt tolerance and up-regulation of aquaporin genes in tropical corn by rhizobacterium Pantoea agglomerans. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2015;60(4):392-399
  40. 40. Schoebitz M, Ceballos C, Ciamp L. Effect of immobilized phosphate solubilizing bacteria on wheat growth and phosphate uptake. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2013;13(1):1-10
  41. 41. Gamalero E et al. Morphogenetic modifications induced by Pseudomonas fluorescens A6RI and Glomus mosseae BEG12 in the root system of tomato differ according to plant growth conditions. New Phytologist. 2002;155(2):293-300
  42. 42. Pereira NCM et al. Corn yield and phosphorus use efficiency response to phosphorus rates associated with plant growth promoting bacteria. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2020;8:40
  43. 43. Hameeda B et al. Growth promotion of maize by phosphate-solubilizing bacteria isolated from composts and macrofauna. Microbiological Research. 2008;163(2):234-242
  44. 44. Singh RP, Jha PN. The multifarious PGPR Serratia marcescens CDP-13 augments induced systemic resistance and enhanced salinity tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0155026
  45. 45. Suárez-Moreno ZR et al. Plant-growth promotion and biocontrol properties of three Streptomyces spp. isolates to control bacterial rice pathogens. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;10:290
  46. 46. Kotasthane A et al. In-vitro antagonism of Trichoderma spp. against Sclerotium rolfsii and Rhizoctonia solani and their response towards growth of cucumber, bottle gourd and bitter gourd. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2015;141(3):523-543
  47. 47. Paul S, Rakshit A. Effect of seed bio-priming with Trichoderma viride strain BHU-2953 for enhancing soil phosphorus solubilization and uptake in soybean (Glycine max). Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2021;21:1041-1052
  48. 48. Miller SS et al. Molecular control of acid phosphatase secretion into the rhizosphere of proteoid roots from phosphorus-stressed white lupin. Plant Physiology. 2001;127(2):594-606
  49. 49. George T et al. Phosphatase activity and organic acids in the rhizosphere of potential agroforestry species and maize. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2002;34(10):1487-1494
  50. 50. López-Bucio J, Cruz-Ramırez A, Herrera-Estrella L. The role of nutrient availability in regulating root architecture. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2003;6(3):280-287
  51. 51. Lambers H et al. Plant-Microbe-Soil Interactions in the Rhizosphere: An Evolutionary Perspective. Plant Soil. 2009;321:83-115
  52. 52. Khan AA et al. Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria: Occurrence, mechanisms and their role in crop production. Journal of Agricultural Biological Science. 2009;1(1):48-58
  53. 53. Hocking, P.J., Organic Acids Exuded from Roots in Phosphorus Uptake and Aluminum Tolerance of Plants in Acid Soils. Advances in Agronomy. 2001;74:63-97
  54. 54. Jones DL. Organic acids in the rhizosphere–a critical review. Plant and Soil. 1998;205:25-44
  55. 55. Zhang C et al. The origin and composition of cucurbit “phloem” exudate. Plant Physiology. 2012;158(4):1873-1882
  56. 56. Chen S et al. Root-associated microbiomes of wheat under the combined effect of plant development and nitrogen fertilization. Microbiome. 2019;7(1):1-13
  57. 57. Palomo L, Claassen N, Jones DL. Differential mobilization of P in the maize rhizosphere by citric acid and potassium citrate. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2006;38(4):683-692
  58. 58. Jia Y et al. Identification of two chickpea multidrug and toxic compound extrusion transporter genes transcriptionally upregulated upon aluminum treatment in root tips. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022;2022:13
  59. 59. Bucher M. Functional biology of plant phosphate uptake at root and mycorrhiza interfaces. New Phytologist. 2007;173(1):11-26
  60. 60. Lynch JP. Root phenes that reduce the metabolic costs of soil exploration: Opportunities for 21st century agriculture. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2015;38(9):1775-1784
  61. 61. López-Bucio J et al. Phosphate availability alters architecture and causes changes in hormone sensitivity in the Arabidopsis root system. Plant Physiology. 2002;129(1):244-256
  62. 62. Miguel MA, Postma JA, Lynch JP. Phene synergism between root hair length and basal root growth angle for phosphorus acquisition. Plant Physiology. 2015;167(4):1430-1439
  63. 63. Lambers H et al. Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2008;23(2):95-103
  64. 64. Vance CP. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphorus acquisition. Plant nutrition in a world of declining renewable resources. Plant Physiology. 2001;127(2):390-397
  65. 65. Shi R et al. Senescence-induced iron mobilization in source leaves of barley (Hordeum vulgare) plants. New Phytologist. 2012;195(2):372-383
  66. 66. Veneklaas EJ et al. Opportunities for improving phosphorus-use efficiency in crop plants. New Phytologist. 2012;195(2):306-320
  67. 67. Aerts R, Chapin FS III. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: A re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Advances in Ecological Research. Academic Press. 1999;30:1-67
  68. 68. Wu P et al. Phosphate starvation triggers distinct alterations of genome expression in Arabidopsis roots and leaves. Plant Physiology. 2003;132(3):1260-1271
  69. 69. Poirier Y, Bucher M. Phosphate transport and homeostasis in Arabidopsis. The Arabidopsis Book/American Society of Plant Biologists. 2002;2002:1
  70. 70. Baker A et al. Replace, reuse, recycle: Improving the sustainable use of phosphorus by plants. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2015;66(12):3523-3540
  71. 71. Nussaume L et al. Phosphate import in plants: Focus on the PHT1 transporters. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2011;2:83
  72. 72. Raghothama K, Karthikeyan A. Phosphate acquisition. Plant and Soil. 2005;274:37-49
  73. 73. Guo B et al. Functional analysis of the Arabidopsis PHT4 family of intracellular phosphate transporters. New Phytologist. 2008;177(4):889-898
  74. 74. Hamburger D et al. Identification and characterization of the Arabidopsis PHO1 gene involved in phosphate loading to the xylem. The Plant Cell. 2002;14(4):889-902
  75. 75. Smith FW et al. Phosphate transport in plants. Plant and Soil. 2003;248:71-83
  76. 76. López-Arredondo DL et al. Phosphate nutrition: Improving low-phosphate tolerance in crops. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2014;65:95-123
  77. 77. Zhang L et al. Carbon and phosphorus exchange may enable cooperation between an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and a phosphate-solubilizing bacterium. New Phytologist. 2016;210(3):1022-1032
  78. 78. Lin W-Y, Huang T-K, Chiou T-J. Nitrogen limitation adaptation, a target of microRNA827, mediates degradation of plasma membrane–localized phosphate transporters to maintain phosphate homeostasis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell. 2013;25(10):4061-4074
  79. 79. Liu J et al. A vacuolar phosphate transporter essential for phosphate homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112(47):E6571-E6578
  80. 80. Chiou T-J, Lin S-I. Signaling network in sensing phosphate availability in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2011;62:185-206
  81. 81. Wang Y et al. Phosphate uptake and transport in plants: An elaborate regulatory system. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2021;62(4):564-572
  82. 82. Pant BD et al. Identification of nutrient-responsive Arabidopsis and rapeseed microRNAs by comprehensive real-time polymerase chain reaction profiling and small RNA sequencing. Plant Physiology. 2009;150(3):1541-1555
  83. 83. Lin S-I et al. Regulatory network of microRNA399 and PHO2 by systemic signaling. Plant Physiology. 2008;147(2):732-746
  84. 84. Bari R et al. PHO2, microRNA399, and PHR1 define a phosphate-signaling pathway in plants. Plant Physiology. 2006;141(3):988-999
  85. 85. Li D et al. Purple acid phosphatases of Arabidopsis thaliana: Comparative analysis and differential regulation by phosphate deprivation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002;277(31):27772-27781
  86. 86. Huang N-C et al. Cloning and functional characterization of an Arabidopsis nitrate transporter gene that encodes a constitutive component of low-affinity uptake. The Plant Cell. 1999;11(8):1381-1392
  87. 87. Wang Z et al. Rice SPX1 and SPX2 inhibit phosphate starvation responses through interacting with PHR2 in a phosphate-dependent manner. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111(41):14953-14958
  88. 88. Wang H et al. OsSIZ1, a SUMO E3 ligase gene, is involved in the regulation of the responses to phosphate and nitrogen in rice. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2015;56(12):2381-2395
  89. 89. Foreman J et al. Reactive oxygen species produced by NADPH oxidase regulate plant cell growth. Nature. 2003;422(6930):442-446
  90. 90. Sharpley AN. Soil phosphorus dynamics: Agronomic and environmental impacts. Ecological Engineering. 1995;5(2-3):261-279
  91. 91. Harrison A. Labile organic phosphorus mineralization in relationship to soil properties. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1982;14(4):343-351
  92. 92. Chepkwony C et al. Mineralization of soil organic P induced by drying and rewetting as a source of plant-available P in limed and unlimed samples of an acid soil. Plant and Soil. 2001;234:83-90
  93. 93. Wang G et al. Simulated root exudates stimulate the abundance of Saccharimonadales to improve the alkaline phosphatase activity in maize rhizosphere. Applied Soil Ecology. 2022;170:104274
  94. 94. Hinsinger P et al. Rhizosphere geometry and heterogeneity arising from root-mediated physical and chemical processes. New Phytologist. 2005;168(2):293-303
  95. 95. Bünemann EK et al. Soil organic phosphorus and microbial community composition as affected by 26 years of different management strategies. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2008;44:717-726
  96. 96. Yang J, Kloepper JW, Ryu C-M. Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress. Trends in Plant Science. 2009;14(1):1-4
  97. 97. Wei Y et al. Effect of organic acids production and bacterial community on the possible mechanism of phosphorus solubilization during composting with enriched phosphate-solubilizing bacteria inoculation. Bioresource Technology. 2018;247:190-199
  98. 98. Ahemad M, Kibret M. Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Current perspective. Journal of King saud University-Science. 2014;26(1):1-20
  99. 99. Hinsinger P et al. Origins of root-mediated pH changes in the rhizosphere and their responses to environmental constraints: A review. Plant and Soil. 2003;248:43-59
  100. 100. Marschner P, Crowley D, Rengel Z. Rhizosphere interactions between microorganisms and plants govern iron and phosphorus acquisition along the root axis–model and research methods. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2011;43(5):883-894
  101. 101. Glick BR. Plant growth-promoting bacteria: Mechanisms and applications. Scientifica. 2012;2012:1-15
  102. 102. Sharpley A et al. Kleinman, P1: CAS: 528: DC% 2BC3sXhsVygt73M: Phosphorus legacy: Overcoming the effects of past management practices to mitigate future water quality impairment. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2013;42:1308-1326
  103. 103. Kucey R. Increased phosphorus uptake by wheat and field beans inoculated with a phosphorus-solubilizing Penicillium bilaji strain and with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1987;53(12):2699-2703
  104. 104. Cordell D, Drangert J-O, White S. The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought. Global Environmental Change. 2009;19(2):292-305
  105. 105. Garg S, Bahl G. Phosphorus availability to maize as influenced by organic manures and fertilizer P associated phosphatase activity in soils. Bioresource Technology. 2008;99(13):5773-5777
  106. 106. Haynes R. Effects of liming on phosphate availability in acid soils: A critical review. Plant and Soil. 1982;68:289-308
  107. 107. Lynch JP. Roots of the second green revolution. Australian Journal of Botany. 2007;55(5):493-512
  108. 108. Wissuwa M, Gamat G, Ismail AM. Is root growth under phosphorus deficiency affected by source or sink limitations? Journal of Experimental Botany. 2005;56(417):1943-1950
  109. 109. Mallarino AP, Wittry DJ. Efficacy of grid and zone soil sampling approaches for site-specific assessment of phosphorus, potassium, pH, and organic matter. Precision Agriculture. 2004;5:131-144
  110. 110. Carpenter SR et al. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecological Applications. 1998;8(3):559-568

Written By

Anurag Yadav and Kusum Yadav

Submitted: 03 May 2023 Reviewed: 17 July 2023 Published: 31 January 2024