1. Introduction
Humans are known hosts for two well-known
2. Taenia life cycles
Figure 1 depicts the human
The scolex of the parasite will evaginate and attach to the mucosa of the duodenum-jejunum if an individual eats uncooked or semi-cooked pork or beef with live cysticerci. Gravid proglottids are passed naturally or via bowel movements 8–12 weeks after infection. Eggs consumed by pigs or cattle are broken down into their embryophoric structures, and the oncospheral membrane is digested by bile and enzymes. It takes around 12 weeks for cysticerci to develop in a pig’s skeletal muscle, heart muscle, and brain. These cysticerci will continue reproducing until the pigs are slaughtered for at least a year.
Morphological features | |||
---|---|---|---|
Mature proglottid | |||
Testis (number) | 375–575 | 800–1200 | 324–1216 |
Ovary (number of lobes) | 3 | 2 | 2 |
Vaginal sphincter | + | + | |
Gravid proglottid | |||
Uterine branches (each side number) | 7–16 | 14–32 | 11–31 |
Pattern of uterine branching | Dendritic | Dichotomous | Dichotomous |
Posterior protuberance | + | + | |
Size (length × width; mm) | 3.1–10 × 3.8–8.7 | 10–20 × 6.5–9.5, longer than wide | 4–22 × 3–12 |
Scolex | |||
Shape | Globular | Quadrilateral | Quadrilateral |
Rostellum | + | + | |
Number of hooks | 22–32 | ||
Diameter (mm) | 0.6–1.0 | 1.5–2.0 | 0.8 |
Adult tapeworm | |||
Length (m) | 1–5 | 4–12 | 1–8 |
Number of proglottids | 700–1000 | 1000–1500 | 200–1200 |
Oncosphere | |||
Tissue tropism | Musculotropism and neurotropism | Musculotropism | Viscerotropism |
Cysticercosis/neurocysticercosis | Metacestode, | Metacestode, | |
Cysticercus | |||
Size (mm) | 5–8 × 3–6 | 6–10 × 4–6 | 2 × 2 |
Hooks in scolex | + | Rudimentary | |
Genomic features | |||
Assembly size (Mb) | 131 | 169 | 168 |
GC content (%) | 43.5 | 43.5 | 43.2 |
Coding gene number | 11,902 | 13,161 | 13,323 |
Average gene length (Kb) | 4.6 | 6.0 | 5.9 |
Protein length (aa) | 444 | 464 | 466 |
Gene density (genes per Mb) | 90.9 | 77.9 | 79.3 |
No. of exons/gene | 6.6 | 6.2 | 6.2 |
Exon mean length (bp) | 237 | 237 | 244 |
Intron no./gene | 5.6 | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Intron mean length (bp) | 775 | 864 | 831 |
Exon GC content (%) | 50.2 | 49.7 | 49.6 |
Intron GC content (%) | 40.8 | 41.5 | 41.2 |
Repeat content (%) | 18.1 | 10.4 | 10.9 |
tRNA number | 162 | 339 | 353 |
3. Taenia egg survival and dispersal
Taeniid eggs can survive for up to a year in moderate temperatures and are commonly found on vegetables, soil, and water samples, posing a risk to consumers. Invertebrates may serve as transport hosts for taeniid eggs, and wastewater treatment systems are not completely effective in removing them, making access to surface water and using sewage sludge as pasture fertilizer significant risk factors for bovine cysticercosis [5, 6]. However, flies and dung beetles play no significant role in transmitting
4. Risk factors for bovine cysticercosis (BCC)
Bovine cysticercosis is a disease that affects cattle and is caused by a parasite called
5. Risk factors for porcine cysticercosis
Pigs may get infected with
6. Risk factors for human taeniasis and cysticercosis
One of the risk factors is eating undercooked pork, which can contain the larvae of the tapeworms. Another risk factor is living in a household with infected pigs. Pigs can act as intermediate hosts for the tapeworms, and their meat can be contaminated with the larvae. In addition, humans can shed tapeworm eggs in their feces, which can contaminate the environment and infect both pigs and humans. The risk of infection is higher in females aged 10–39 years, although the reasons for this are not clear. It could be due to differences in dietary habits, hygiene practices, or hormonal factors. The presence of
7. Livestock cysticercosis vaccinations
Researchers have developed subunit vaccines against echinococcosis and cysticercosis based on ovine and bovine protective immune responses after egg challenge or immunization with taeniid oncosphere antigen extracts. In 1989, the first recombinant subunit anti-parasite vaccine (To45W) was generated to fight
8. Conclusion
A standardized detection instrument is needed to understand the epidemiology of
Acknowledgments
The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research, Kind Saud University for funding Through Vice Deanship of Scientific Research Chairs, Research Chair of Vaccine against infectious Diseases.
References
- 1.
Galán-Puchades MT, Fuentes MV. Lights and shadows of the Taenia asiatica life cycle and pathogenicity. Tropical Parasitology. 2013;3 (2):114-119 - 2.
Wang S, Wang S, Luo Y, Xiao L, Luo X, et al. Comparative genomics reveals adaptive evolution of Asian tapeworm in switching to a new intermediate host. Nature Communications. 2016; 7 :12845 - 3.
Flisser A. State of the art of Taenia solium as compared toTaenia asiatica . The Korean Journal of Parasitology. 2013;51 (1):43-49 - 4.
Victor B. Proteomic analysis of Taenia spp. excretion/secretion proteins: the search forTaenia solium -specific diagnostic antigens; 2014 - 5.
Jansen F et al. The survival and dispersal of Taenia eggs in the environment: what are the implications for transmission? A systematic review. Parasites & Vectors. 2021;14 (1):88 - 6.
Malkamäki S et al. Dispersal of taeniid eggs: Experimental faecal contamination of forest environment followed by DNA detection in wild berries. Food and Waterborne Parasitology. 2022; 27 :e00152 - 7.
Saelens G, Robertson L, Gabriël S. Diagnostic tools for the detection of taeniid eggs in different environmental matrices: A systematic review. Food and Waterborne Parasitology. 2022; 26 :e00145 - 8.
Gonzales-Gustavson E et al. Evaluating the role of corrals and insects in the transmission of porcine cysticercosis: A cohort study. Pathogens. 2023; 12 (4):597 - 9.
Blagojevic B et al. Bovine cysticercosis in the European Union: Impact and current regulations, and an approach towards risk-based control. Food Control. 2017; 78 :64-71 - 10.
Samorek-Pieróg M, Karamon J, Cencek T. Identification and control of sources of Taenia solium infection - the attempts to eradicate the parasite. Journal of Veterinary Research. 2018;62 (1):27-34 - 11.
Macrelli M et al. Bovine cysticercosis outbreak in an indoor beef finisher farm in the North of England. Veterinary Record Case Reports. 2020; 8 (3):e001178 - 12.
Dixon MA et al. Taenia solium taeniasis/cysticercosis: From parasite biology and immunology to diagnosis and control. Advances in Parasitology. 2021;112 :133-217 - 13.
Mendlovic F, Fleury A, Flisser A. Zoonotic Taenia infections with focus on cysticercosis due toTaenia solium in swine and humans. Research in Veterinary Science. 2021;134 :69-77 - 14.
Thomas LF et al. Prevalence of Taenia solium cysticercosis in pigs entering the food chain in western Kenya. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2016;48 (1):233-238 - 15.
Chaisiri K et al. Gastrointestinal helminths and Taenia spp. in parenteral tissues of free-roaming pigs (Sus scrofa indicus ) from hilltribe village at the western border of Thailand. Tropical Biomedicine. 2017;34 (2):464-470 - 16.
Oleleu A-M et al. Seroprevalence of porcine cysticercosis and influence of some associated risk factors in Northwestern Romania. Acta Veterinaria Brno. 2016; 85 :121-126 - 17.
Nguyen TTM et al. Occurrence of Taenia species in pigs in slaughterhouses in Phu Tho province, northern Vietnam. Journal of Helminthology. 2020;94 :e201 - 18.
Trevisan C et al. Epidemiology of taeniosis/cysticercosis in Europe, a systematic review: eastern Europe. Parasites & Vectors. 2018; 11 (1):569 - 19.
Kabululu ML et al. Aggregation of Taenia solium cysticerci in pigs: Implications for transmission and control. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2023;22 :e00307 - 20.
Meester M et al. A quantitative risk assessment for human Taenia solium exposure from home slaughtered pigs in European countries. Parasites & Vectors. 2019;12 (1):82 - 21.
Abuseir S. Meat-borne parasites in the Arab world: A review in a one health perspective. Parasitology Research. 2021; 120 (12):4153-4166 - 22.
Pinilla M et al. Anti-cysticercus antibodies in pigs and pig breeders in María La Baja, Colombia. Global Journal of Health Science. 2018; 10 :1 - 23.
Galán-Puchades MT, Fuentes MV. About people, pig movements and pork 'tapeworms'. Veterinary Parasitology. 2015; 214 (1-2):229-230 - 24.
Shonyela SM et al. An epidemiological survey of porcine cysticercosis in Nyasa District, Ruvuma Region, Tanzania. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2017; 2 (4):35-41 - 25.
Donadeu M et al. A hyperendemic focus of porcine cystic echinococcosis in the Banke District of Nepal. Acta Tropica. 2020; 201 :105203 - 26.
Singh SP et al. Prevalence and distribution of Taenia solium cysticercosis in naturally infected pigs in Punjab, India. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2018;12 (11):e0006960 - 27.
Lightowlers MW, Rolfe R, Gauci CG. Taenia saginata : Vaccination against cysticercosis in cattle with recombinant oncosphere antigens. Experimental Parasitology. 1996;84 (3):330-338 - 28.
Hewitson JP, Maizels RM. Vaccination against helminth parasite infections. Expert Review of Vaccines. 2014; 13 (4):473-487 - 29.
Claerebout E, Geldhof P. Helminth vaccines in ruminants: From development to application. The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Food Animal Practice. 2020; 36 (1):159-171 - 30.
Jazouli M et al. Immunological responses and potency of the EG95NC(−) recombinant sheep vaccine against cystic echinococcosis. Parasitology International. 2020; 78 :102149 - 31.
Wang YY et al. Optimized codon usage enhances the expression and immunogenicity of DNA vaccine encoding Taenia solium oncosphere TSOL18 gene. Molecular Medicine Reports. 2015;12 (1):281-288 - 32.
Burgess ST et al. A recombinant subunit vaccine for the control of ovine psoroptic mange (sheep scab). Veterinary Research. 2016; 47 :26 - 33.
Zhou BY et al. Analysis of immune responses in mice orally immunized with recombinant pMG36e-SP-TSOL18/ Lactococcus lactis and pMG36e-TSOL18/Lactococcus lactis vaccines ofTaenia solium . Journal of Immunology Research. 2018;2018 :9262631