Open access

Introductory Chapter: Updates on Hemodialysis

Written By

Ayman Karkar

Submitted: 20 February 2023 Published: 27 September 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.110839

From the Edited Volume

Updates on Hemodialysis

Edited by Ayman Karkar

Chapter metrics overview

56 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Despite the significant improvements in hemodialysis (HD) techniques over the past 40 years, patients on this therapy still suffer from the burden of HD-associated symptoms, vascular access-related issues, acute and chronic complications, poor quality of life, and the mortality rate remains unacceptably elevated [1, 2]. The European Renal Association (ERA) and the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) showed that the 5-year survival rate for patients on HD is close to only 50%, which is worse than patients with breast cancer, prostate cancer and almost like or worse than colon cancer [3, 4, 5, 6].

The retention of large-size uremic toxins (e.g., proinflammatory cytokines, alpha 1-microglobulin, YKL-40, and kappa and lambda free light chains) has been associated with inflammation, atherosclerosis and vascular calcification, cardiovascular disease, and increased risk of mortality [7]. These uremic toxins have also been associated with poor quality of life, such as late recovery time post-HD session, impaired physical function, moderate-to-severe pruritus, and restless legs syndrome [8]. These drawbacks of HD treatment demonstrate the unmet needs in the current or conventional HD modalities.

Advertisement

2. Uremic toxins and hemodialysis techniques

The new medium cut-off membrane/dialyzer, with its larger pore size, lower wall thickness, and smaller inner diameter of hollow fibers, has significantly improved the clearance of the large-size uremic toxins in safe, simple, and effective technique, especially when compared to conventional hemodialysis techniques [9]. For example, the low-flux HD can remove small soluble solutes less than 500 Dalton (Da), such as urea and creatinine, whereas high-flux HD is capable of efficiently removing molecules less than 15,000 Da. Diffusion is the major contributor to the clearance of small-size molecules, but convection, as in online hemodiafiltration (HDF), is required for the efficient removal of large-size molecules, especially those above 25,000 Da [7]. Randomized controlled trials have shown the effectiveness of online HDF not only in its ability to remove large-size uremic toxins but to improve the quality of life [10] and to significantly reduce the cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, especially if the used prescribed convection volume equals to or exceeds 23 liters/1.73 m2/session [11]. However, successful implementation of online HDF is demanding. For example, it requires a special HD machine that has the ability to mix solutions online, a powerful high-flux dialyzer, functional vascular access with a blood flow rate of 350–400 ml/minute (difficult with central venous catheters or not properly functioning arteriovenous fistula or graft), consumption of large volume of water (almost double what is needed for conventional HD), ultrapure water (free from bacteria and endotoxin), frequent monitoring of water quality, training of medical and nursing staff (especially when the turnover is frequent) and achievement of the prescribed convective volume [12].

The actual value of the medium cut-off membrane/dialyzer is its ability to perform diffusion and convection with fluid replacement (internal filtration) internally simulating, and probably more effective than, online HDF, without the need for external replacement fluids [13], using a basic HD machine with a blood flow rate of 250–300 ml/minute [14], and standard water quality (ISO11663 or ANSI/AAMI RD62) [15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21] for conventional HD over the 4-hours dialysis session. This modality of HD is referred to as HDx or expanded hemodialysis [9]. HDx therapy has been shown to remove effectively larger-size uremic toxins [22], improvement of quality of life [23, 24, 25, 26], reduction in HD-related medications (e.g., erythropoietin and iron) [27, 28], and a significant decrease in hospitalization rate [29, 30] and nonfatal cardiovascular disease [18].

Advertisement

3. Complications of hemodialysis

The technique of hemodialysis, especially with the recent developments in the technology of HD machines, is still associated with several acute and chronic complications, such as intradialytic hypotension, hypertension, fluid retention, risk of bleeding (among other hematological complications), muscle cramps, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. “Updates on Hemodialysis” reviews and updates the reader on these complications, and some iatrogenic errors such as hypernatremia, iron overload, pseudoaneurysm, and air embolism. Hemodialysis patients also suffer from and are affected by different psychological stresses upon starting dialysis and during the course of treatment, which affect different lifestyle changes. The “Updates on Hemodialysis” describes the most common psychosocial issues among patients on hemodialysis treatment.

Advertisement

4. Vascular access

There are three types of vascular access. These are arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous graft, and central venous catheters. Each of these has its uses and advantages and disadvantages. Vascular access is the lifeline for patients in need of hemodialysis. “Updates on Hemodialysis” reviews the basics of perioperative anesthetic management, including the choice of anesthesia method, pre-anesthesia preparation, intraoperative and postoperative management, and the effect of choice of anesthesia on the outcomes. In addition, “Updates on Hemodialysis” updates the reader on recent innovations in central venous catheter’s tip and coating designs, newer arteriovenous fistula access techniques, including a percutaneous endovascular method, innovations in arteriovenous graft, including drug-eluting devices that may reduce neointimal hyperplasia and bioengineered blood vessels, and arteriovenous graft/central venous catheter device, which enables bypassing vessel stenoses.

The “Updates on Hemodialysis” book aims at reviewing and updating the reader on understanding type, source, classification of uremic toxins, and ways of their monitoring, HD-related complications, hypertension in HD, errors in HD practices, and psychological status of HD patients, management and innovation of vascular access techniques, resistance to erythropoietin and its prescription, and extracorporeal management of liver failure. “Updates on Hemodialysis” book has also focused on the recent innovation in dialysis membranes/dialyzers, particularly the medium cut-off membrane and its ability to remove the larger-size uremic toxins more efficiently in a HD modality known as expanded hemodialysis (HDx).

References

  1. 1. Zhang JC, El-Majzoub S, Li M, Ahmed T, Wu J, Lipman ML, et al. Could symptom burden predict subsequent healthcare use in patients with end stage kidney disease on hemodialysis care? A prospective, preliminary study. Renal Failure. 2020;42(1):294-301. DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2020.1744449
  2. 2. Ashuntantang G, Osafo C, Olowu WA, Arogundade F, Niang A, Porter J, et al. Outcomes in adults and children with end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. The Lancet Global Health. 2017;5(4):e408-e417. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30057-8
  3. 3. Collins AJ, Foley RN, Herzog C, Chavers B, Gilbertson D, Ishani A, et al. United States renal data system 2008 annual data report. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2009;53(1 Suppl):S1-S374. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.10.005
  4. 4. ERA-EDTA Registry: ERA-EDTA Registry Annual Report 2012.EUROCARE-5 database. Available from: http://www.eurocare.it/Eurocare5/tabid/64/Default.aspx [Accessed: February 18, 2023]
  5. 5. United States Renal Data System. 2018 USRDS Annual Data Report: End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2018
  6. 6. Noone AM, Cronin KA, Altekruse SF, Howlader N, Lewis DR, Petkov VI, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2015, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. Based on November 2017 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER website April 2018;3. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2015/
  7. 7. Rosner MH, Reis T, Husain-Syed F, Vanholder R, Hutchison C, Stenvinkel P, et al. Classification of uremic toxins and their role in kidney failure. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2021;16:1918-1928. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.02660221
  8. 8. Sapa H, Gutierrez OM, Shlipak MG, Katz R, Ix JH, Sarnak MJ, et al. Association of uremic solutes with cardiovascular death in diabetic kidney disease. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 80(4):502-512. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.02.016
  9. 9. Ronco C. The rise of expanded hemodialysis. Blood Purification. 2017;44(2):I-VIII. DOI: 10.1159/000476012
  10. 10. Karkar A, Abdelrahman M, Locatelli F. A randomized trial on health-related patients satisfaction level with high-efficiency online hemodiafiltration versus high-flux hemodialysis. Blood Purification. 2015;40:84-91. DOI: 10.1159/000381255
  11. 11. Peters SAE, Bots ML, Canaud B, Davenport A, Grooteman MPC, Kircelli F, et al. Haemodiafiltration and mortality in end-stage kidney disease patients: A pooled individual participant data analysis from four randomized controlled trials. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2016;31:978-984. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfv349
  12. 12. Karkar A. Chapter: Introduction to hemodiafiltration. In: Karkar A, editor. Advances in Hemodiafiltration. London, UK: INTECH Hemodiafiltration Book; 2016. ISBN 978-953-51-2562-4
  13. 13. Lorenzin A, Golino G, de Cal M, Pajarin G, Savastano S, Lupi A, et al. Flow dynamic analysis by contrast-enhanced imaging techniques of medium cutoff membrane hemodialyzer. Blood Purification. 2022;51:138-146. DOI: 10.1159/000516411
  14. 14. Kim TH, Kim SH, Kim TY, Park HY, Jung KS, Lee MH, et al. Removal of large middle molecules via haemodialysis with medium cut-off membranes at lower blood flow rates: An observational prospective study. BMC Nephrology. 2020;21:2. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-019-1669-3
  15. 15. Schepers E, Glorieux G, Eloot S, Hulko M, Boschetti-de-Fierro A, Beck W, et al. Assessment of the association between increasing membrane pore size and endotoxin permeability using a novel experimental dialysis simulation set-up. BMC Nephrology. 2018;19(1):1. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-017-0808-y
  16. 16. Hulko M, Dietrich V, Koch I, Gekeler A, Gebert M, Beck W, et al. Pyrogen retention: Comparison of the novel medium cut-off (MCO) membrane with other dialyser membranes. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):6791. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43161-2
  17. 17. Weiner DE, Falzon L, Skoufos L, Bernardo A, Beck W, Xiao M, et al. Efficacy and safety of expanded hemodialysis with the theranova 400 dialyzer: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2020;15(9):1310-1319. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.01210120
  18. 18. Molano AP, Hutchison CA, Sanchez R, Rivera AS, Buitrago G, Dazzarola MP, et al. Medium cutoff versus high-flux hemodialysis membranes and clinical outcomes: A cohort study using inverse probability treatment weighting. Kidney Medicine. 2022;4(4):100431. DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100431
  19. 19. European Best Practice Guidelines for Hemodialysis. Section IV. Dialysis fluid purity. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation. 2002;17:45-62
  20. 20. AAMI Renal Disease and Detoxification Committee. Dialysate for Hemodialysis. Arlington, VA: AAMI; 2004. pp. 24-27
  21. 21. American National Standard Institute, American Association for medical Instrumentation, International Standard Organization 13959. 2014: Water for Hemodialysis and Related Therapies
  22. 22. Kirsch AH, Lyko R, Nilsson LR, Beck W, Amdahl M, Lechner P, et al. Performance of hemodialysis with novel medium cut-off dialyzers. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2017;32:165-172. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfw310
  23. 23. Alarcon JC, Bunch A, Ardila F, Zuñiga E, Vesga JI, Rivera A, et al. Impact of medium cut-off dialyzers on patient-reported outcomes: COREXH registry. Blood Purification. 2021;50:110-118. DOI: 10.1159/000508803
  24. 24. Bolton S, Gair R, Nilsson LG, Matthews M, Stewart L, McCullagh N. Clinical assessment of dialysis recovery time and symptom burden: Impact of switching hemodialysis therapy mode. Patient Related Outcome Measures (Dovepress). 2021;12:315-321. DOI: 10.2147/PROM.S325016
  25. 25. Penny JD, Jarosz P, Salerno FR, Lemoine S, McIntyre CW. Impact of expanded hemodialysis using medium cut-off dialyzer on quality of life: Application of dynamic patient-reported outcome measurement tool. Kidney Medicine. 2021;3(6):992-1002. DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2021.05.010
  26. 26. Lim JH, Park Y, Yook JM, Choi SY, Hee-HY, Choi JY, et al. Randomized controlled trial of medium cut-off versus high-flux dialyzers on quality of life outcomes in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:7780. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64622-z
  27. 27. Lim JH, Jeon Y, Yook JM, Choi SY, Jung HY, Choi JY, et al. Medium cut‑off dialyzer improves erythropoiesis stimulating agent resistance in a hepcidin‑independent manner in maintenance hemodialysis patients: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:16062. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73124-x
  28. 28. Hadad-Arrascue F, Nilsson LG, Rivera AS, Bernardo AA, Romero JBC. Expanded hemodialysis as effective alternative to on-line hemodiafiltration: A randomized mid-term clinical trial. Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis. 2021:1-8. DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.13700
  29. 29. Blackowicz MJ, Falzon L, Beck W, Tran H, Weiner DE. Economic evaluation of expanded hemodialysis with the Theranova 400 dialyzer: A post hoc evaluation of a randomized clinical trial in the United States. Hemodialysis International. 2022:1-7. DOI: 10.1111/hdi.13015
  30. 30. Sanabria RM, Hutchison CA, Vesga JI, Ariza JG, Sanchez R, Suarez AM. Expanded hemodialysis and its effects on hospitalizations and medication usage: A cohort study. Nephron. 2021;145:179-187. DOI: 10.1159/000513328

Written By

Ayman Karkar

Submitted: 20 February 2023 Published: 27 September 2023