Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Ataxia in Multiple Sclerosis: From Current Understanding to Therapy

Written By

Bilal El-Mansoury, Jawad Laadraoui, Abdelaati El Khiat, Omar El Hiba, Arumugam R. Jayakumar, Abdessalam Ferssiwi and Abdelali Bitar

Submitted: 05 May 2023 Reviewed: 29 May 2023 Published: 10 July 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.112013

From the Edited Volume

Ataxia - Practice Essentials and Interventions

Edited by Patricia Bozzetto Ambrosi

Chapter metrics overview

193 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Ataxia is a type of neurological disorder that affects the ability to coordinate voluntary movements, such as walking, balance, and speech. In people with multiple sclerosis (MS), ataxia is a common symptom, affecting around 80% of people with the condition. The cause of ataxia in MS is still unknown; however, it is thought to be due to damage to the part of the central nervous system (CNS) that controls balance, coordination, and movement, especially the cerebellum. Symptoms of ataxia in people with MS can range from mild to severe, and can include a lack of coordination, difficulty speaking, difficulty walking, and gait. Ataxia management in MS typically involves pharmacotherapy to improve coordination, physiotherapy to enhance strength and balance, surgical procedures to alleviate tremor as well as occupational therapy to help with everyday activities.

Keywords

  • ataxia
  • tremor
  • multiple sclerosis
  • neurodegeneration
  • treatment

1. Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS), which primary affects young adults [1, 2, 3]. The large immune response to putative CNS antigens is thought to be driven by an interplay between environmental and genetic factors [4]. There are four different forms of MS that can be distinguished based on the clinical disease pattern, namely: relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS), primary progressive MS (PPMS), and progressive relapsing MS (PRMS) [5]. Clinically, RRMS is the most common form of MS, with more than 85% of patients initially present with such form.

Multiple sclerosis is believed to be associated with a wide range of neurological abnormalities, which often interact to cause mobility difficulties, while the impairment in balance is thought to be significant factor in these mobility difficulties [6]. A body line of evidence shows that 85% of MS patients may experience mild ataxia at some point in time, while 32% of MS patients exhibits a severe form that can decline their functional abilities [7, 8, 9]. The word ataxia (from the Greek) literally means the absence of order, disorder, or confusion and is characterized by a loss of coordination of the body’s limbs, the trunk, and the gait and it can be brought on by sensory system’s dysfunction (sensory ataxia), cerebellum’s dysfunction (cerebellar ataxia), or dysfunction of the vestibular system (vestibular ataxia) [10, 11], which may also arise from thalamic and parietal- and frontal-lobe injuries [8].

Clinically, ataxia refers to a collection of abnormal movements, of which tremor is the main symptom. Other clinical manifestations include dysmetria, dysdiadochokinesia, incoordination, and movement delays [8]. It is rarely seen as a single symptom and usually occurs with muscle weakness and spasticity [7]. Nevertheless, severe ataxia may occur alone but it is usually combined with brainstem signs [12]. A range of interventions aimed at enhancing balance in standing and walking are used in clinical practice, including pharmacotherapy, surgical therapies, and the most common is physiotherapy. This chapter provides an overview of different types of ataxia, the current understanding of ataxia in MS, and the currently available therapeutic approaches.

Advertisement

2. Clinical features of cerebellar dysfunction in MS

Cerebellar dysfunction is a typical feature of MS, which results in a wide range of neurological manifestations. The clinical signs of cerebellar involvement in MS include gait ataxia, dysmetria when performing the finger-to-nose and heel-to-shin tests, and the inability to perform tandem gait [4]. Cerebellar involvement in MS results from both vermian and hemispheric lesions. Up to 50% of MS patients may experience intention tremor and limb ataxia [4]. Indeed, MS frequently causes coordination issues, which are mostly brought on by pathology in the cerebellum itself or dysfunction in cerebellar connections, including proprioceptive afferent inputs. Depending on the exact location of the lesion, cerebellar dysfunction can cause limb, gait, and truncal ataxia as well as other cerebellar characteristics including dysarthria, and tremor [13]. MS patients exhibit signs of either chronic cerebellar abnormalities in a progressing disease or acute cerebellar impairment related to an acute relapse [13]. A higher incidence of cerebellar involvement during successive relapses appears to be linked to cerebellar relapse in the early stages of the disease [14].

It is believed that injury to the anterior lobe of the cerebellum is the primary cause of gait ataxia [15]. Cerebellar dysarthria is a rare symptom at disease initiation but is common in people with secondary progressive diseases that have worsened [13]. Although paroxysmal MS symptoms are rare, paroxysmal dysarthria with ataxia has been documented in MS and is thought to be related to midbrain pathology [16, 17]. Sensory evaluation (sensory ataxia) based on as scoring from 0 to 4, shows minimal sensory impairment in MS patients. The minimal sensory impairment detected clinically was found to be more prominent in the electrophysiological studies [7].

A recent database research of over 15,000 patients found that there were nearly 50,000 total relapses. Cerebellar relapses made up about 10% of those, and they were more common in men and in people who had had the disease for a longer period of time [18]. Poor relapse recovery is also linked to cerebellar/brainstem relapses, which are linked to an earlier onset of progressive disease [13].

Likewise, tremor is a common symptom of MS and has been found in more than half of MS patients who visit specialized clinics [11]. Clinical studies have revealed that tremor was clinically detected in 18 MS patients and absent in 14 patients. While MS patients who had a visible tremor had an ataxia score that was more severe and showed clinical symptoms of cerebellar dysfunction [19]. It is worth mentioning that cerebellar ataxia is generally associated with tremor, which typically happens during voluntary movements or while maintaining a position [11]. MS tremor is believed to be mostly brought on by cerebellar and/or thalamic dysfunction [20]. Otherwise, tremor can occur in the head, limbs, vocal cords, and trunk. Though rest and rubral tremors are uncommon, intention and postural tremors are the most prevalent types [21, 22]. Whereas, severe tremor, which is thought to affect 3% of MS patients, is a very uncommon but severely debilitating MS complication [22]. The pathophysiology of tremor in MS is complex and is thought to involve connections between the cerebellum, cerebral cortex, and basal ganglia [13]. Given the significance of cerebellar connections in motor control, it may not be surprising that the involvement of the cerebellum is associated with higher impairment and a worse prognosis.

Advertisement

3. Classification of ataxia

Based on the location, there are different forms of ataxia: cerebellar, sensory, and vestibular ataxia. It can be further divided into three categories: acquired (caused by structural or demyelinating conditions, toxicity, paraneoplastic, inflammatory or infectious diseases, and autoimmune conditions), hereditary (caused by a gene defect and manifesting in childhood), and sporadic (patients have no family history of ataxia and present in adulthood) [23]. The most prevalent of the genetic types of ataxias is Friedreich’s ataxia (FRDA), which is autosomal recessive.

3.1 Primary ataxia

Ataxias that affect the primary cerebellum can also be considered as sporadic and inherited. The latter includes episodic ataxias, X-linked cerebellar ataxias, mitochondrial ataxias, autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias, also known as spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs), and autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxias (ARCAs). The cerebellar variant of multiple system atrophy (MSA-C) and idiopathic late-onset cerebellar ataxias are examples of idiopathic degenerative cerebellar ataxias [24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31].

3.2 Congenital ataxia

Cerebellar malformations or pontocerebellar hypoplasia can produce congenital ataxias, which manifest as cerebellar ataxias. The uncommon autosomal recessive condition, Joubert’s syndrome, whose most well-known manifestation is the “molar tooth sign” on MRI, is defined by a congenital hind-brain abnormality. The clinical picture includes multiple organ involvement, cerebellar ataxia, respiratory dysregulation, ocular motor apraxia, and neonatal hypotonia. Till now, more than 20 causal genes have been found, the majority of which encode proteins for the main cilium, and an organelle found within cells that plays a key role in many cellular processes. The genetic condition known as ciliopathies, which is a new class, includes Joubert’s syndrome (Figure 1) [32, 33].

Figure 1.

T2-weighted, axial image of a brain MRI in a patient presenting Joubert’s syndrome and the molar tooth sign [23].

3.3 Inherited ataxia

The vast set of clinically and genetically diverse, complicated neurodegenerative disorders known as inherited cerebellar ataxias is brought on by several genetic abnormalities. There are two X-linked ataxias, more than 30 ARCAs, almost 40 SCA forms, and several mitochondrial ataxias among the hereditary cerebellar ataxias [24, 25, 31, 34].

3.4 Mitochondrial ataxia

Cerebellar and sensory ataxias, which are caused by defects in mitochondrial DNA, are frequently coupled with additional symptoms in mitochondrial ataxias [35]. These ataxias include maternally inherited hereditary ataxias caused by deletions or duplications of mitochondrial DNA or point mutations in the genes encoding for RNAs and respiratory chain components [35, 36]. A mutation in the mitochondrial DNA polymerase subunit gamma (POLG) gene results in mitochondrial recessive ataxia syndrome [35, 36]. With cerebellar and afferent/sensory ataxia, POLG-related ataxia is a mixed ataxia that manifests with a variety of non-ataxia symptoms, including sensory neuropathy, external ophthalmoplegia, ptosis, epilepsy, and hyperkinetic movement abnormalities [35, 36].

3.5 Idiopathic degenerative ataxia

As well as being referred to as sporadic adult-onset ataxia (SAOA) of unknown etiology or even idiopathic sporadic cerebellar ataxia, MSA-C and idiopathic late-onset cerebellar ataxia are two examples of the diseases with unknown etiology that fall within the category of idiopathic cerebellar degeneration [26, 27, 29, 30, 37, 38].

3.6 Secondary ataxia

Ataxias caused by exogenous or endogenous nongenetic factors, such as those that are toxic, paraneoplastic, immune-mediated, nutritional, and infectious in character, as well as localized damage to the cerebellum, fall under the category of secondary or acquired ataxias [26, 29, 30]. When characterizing localized lesions in the cerebellum and its connections due to conditions including neoplastic, inflammatory, demyelinating, and vascular illnesses, neuroimaging investigations are crucial [26, 29, 30]. The unfavorable effects of some medications might also cause ataxia [39]. Whereas, antiepileptic drugs like oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, and phenytoin, benzodiazepines like nitrazepam and triazolam, and antineoplastic/immunosuppressive medications like cytarabine, tacrolimus, and cyclosporine are the most prevalent causes of drug-induced cerebellar ataxia [39]. Ataxia can also be brought on by chemicals including alcohol, lithium, and toluene [39, 40]. Otherwise, cerebellar ataxia can result from a number of infectious diseases, including syphilis, Whipple’s disease, the mumps, and infectious mononucleosis [26, 29, 30]. It can also be a symptom of endocrine disorders, notably hypothyroidism. Hashimoto’s encephalopathy, also known as a steroid-responsive encephalopathy, is associated with autoimmune thyroiditis (Thomas [26, 29, 30]). Whereas, it has been reported that people who do not get enough vitamins including thiamine, tocopherol, and cobalamin may develop cerebellar and afferent/sensory ataxias [26, 29, 30]. While antibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), which were first identified in individuals with stiff-person syndrome, have also been linked to cerebellar ataxia [26, 29, 30, 41, 42]. A body of evidence sustain a sex dimorphism of such immune-mediated cerebellum condition, with women being more likely to have anti-GAD ataxia, which can also coexist with thyroid disorders and insulin-dependent diabetic mellitus. While intravenous immunoglobulins and steroids have varying effects on anti-GAD ataxia. Otherwise, gluten ataxia is another immune-mediated condition brought on by gluten consumption in people with a genetic predisposition [43]. The disease is characterized by adult-onset, progressive gait ataxia with gaze-evoked nystagmus and peripheral neuropathy symptoms. In all cases, the anti-gliadin antibody is positive and an anti-gluten diet can enhance gluten ataxia [43].

3.7 Autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia

Autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxias (ARCAs) are a part of the diverse category of hereditary ataxias. They often start young and are marked by degeneration of the cerebellum and spinal cord [24, 26, 29, 30, 31]. Table 1 displays the most typical ARCAs that have been genetically identified, wherein we note that ataxia telangiectasia and FRDA are the two most prevalent forms in white children [24, 31, 44, 45].

Autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia typesLocusGeneProtein
Friedreich’s ataxia9q13FXNFrataxin
Ataxia with vitamin E deficiency8q12.3TTPAα-Tocopherol transfer protein
Autosomal recessive spastic cerebellar ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay13q12SACSSacsin
Ataxia telangiectasia11q22.3ATMSerine protein kinase
Ataxia telangiectasia-like disorder11q21MRE11Meiotic recombination 11
Ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 19p13APTXAprataxin
Ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 29q34SETXSenataxin
Mitochondrial recessive ataxia syndrome15q25POLG1DNA polymerase subunit g-1
Marinesco-Sjogren syndrome5q31SIL1Nucleotide exchange factor SIL1
Autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia type 16q25SYNE1Nesprin-1
Autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia type 21q42.2CABC1Chaperone activity of bc1 complex like
Autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia type 33p22.1ANO10Anoctamin-10

Table 1.

The most prevalent kinds of autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxias with genetic definition.

3.8 Friedreich’s ataxia

Since the identification of the FRDA gene and the GAA trinucleotide expansion that causes FRDA, phenotypic variants of this ataxia have been regularly reported in individuals with pathogenic mutations [44, 46]. Some of these variations do not correspond to how this sickness is usually described. Atypical phenotypes include movement abnormalities, pyramidal signals, preserved reflexes, late-onset and very-late-onset ataxia, minor GAA expansions, and ataxia [47, 48].

Friedreich’s ataxia is largely an ataxia of the efferent and sensory nerves where neuropathological investigations and more recent neuroimaging studies have both verified the existence of a cerebellar component (Figure 2) [44, 46, 49]. Nevertheless, antioxidants like coenzyme Q10 and its derivatives, such as idebenone, have been employed, despite the lack of agreement on a cure. Although it is ineffective for neurological disorders, idebenone has demonstrated notable advantages for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [50, 51]. Deferiprone and epigenetic treatment for Friedreich’s ataxia have both recently undergone testing, as have other novel medications [52, 53].

Figure 2.

Sagittal image of a T2-weighted MRI of the spinal cord of patient presenting Friedreich’s ataxia with cervical spinal cord atrophy [23].

3.9 Ataxia telangiectasia

More than 200 potentially harmful mutations affecting virtually all of the ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) gene’s coding exons have been identified since the ATM gene was initially characterized [54]. In addition to the typical phenotype with cerebellar ataxia and oculocutaneous telangiectasia, many instances of ataxia telangiectasia with milder phenotypes have been documented (Figure 3). These phenotypes involve later diagnosis, lower progression of the disease, longer life expectancy, an affinity for movement disorders such as dystonia, myoclonus, and chorea instead of cerebellar ataxia, an absence of ocular telangiectasia, decreased levels of chromosomal instability and cellular radiosensitivity, as well as the absence of ocular telangiectasia [45, 54]. Actually, ataxia telangiectasia is a multisystem disorder with a range of neurological and systemic symptoms. A more appropriate name for this condition has been suggested: as ATM syndrome.

Figure 3.

A patient with ataxia telangiectasia with conjunctival telangiectasia [23].

3.10 Spinocerebellar ataxia

Spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are a sizable and intricate collection of diverse autosomal dominant degenerative illnesses that affect several parts of the neurological system, including the cerebellum and its efferent and afferent connections [25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 55, 56, 57]. Table 2 lists the most common SCA subtypes along with the genetic locations, mutations, and proteins linked to each condition from SCA type 1 through SCA type 40. The most prevalent form of SCA is type 3, while types 1, 2, 6, and 7 have significantly different prevalence depending on the racial makeup of the population [25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 34, 57]. The genetic etiology of illness is still unknown in roughly 40–50% of ARCAs, despite great progress in the discovery of ARCA genes [58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64]. With the exception of ataxia brought on by a vitamin E shortage and a set of ataxias linked to a coenzyme Q10 deficiency, there is no known therapy for these ataxias [26, 29, 30, 58, 63].

EntityLocusGeneMutationPotential identifying clinical characteristics
SCA1 (spinocerebellar ataxia type 1)6p22–23ATXN1CAG expansionHypermetric saccades, corticospinal tract signs
SCA212q23–24.1ATXN2CAG expansionSlow saccades, areflexia
SCA3 (Machado-Joseph diseases)14q32.1ATXN3/DMJCAG expansionBulging eyes, fasciculations
SCA416q22.1SCA4
SCA511q13.2SPTBN2Deletion, point mutationDownbeat nystagmus
SCA619p13CACNA1ACAG expansionCoarse nystagmus and saccadic intrusions
SCA73p21.1-p12ATXN7CAG expansionVisual loss due to retinal degeneration
SCA813q21ATXN8OSCAG/CTG expansionReduced penetrance
SCA1022q13.31ATXN10ATTCT expansionSeizures
SCA1115q15.2TTBK2DeletionDownbeat nystagmus
SCA125q32PPP2R2BCAG expansionAction tremor in midlife
SCA1319q13.33KCNC3Point mutationAbsent eye findings
SCA1419q13.4PRKCGDeletion, point mutationTremor, myoclonus, facial myokymia
SCA15/ SCA163p26.1ITPR1DuplicationPostural and kinetic tremor, psychiatric symptoms or dementia
SCA176q27TBPCAGHuntington’s disease like (dysarthria before gait ataxia)
SCA2011p11.2-q13.3SCA20Multiple gene duplicationSpasmodic dysphonia, palatal tremor
SCA2713q34FGF14Point mutationMental retardation and tremor
SCA2818p11AFG3L2Point mutation
SCA293p26.1ITPR1Allelic to SCA15, 16Congenital nonprogressive ataxia
SCA304q34.3-q35.1SCA30
SCA3116q22SCA31TGGAA
SCA327q32-q33SCA32
SCA346q12.3-q16.1AFG3L2Point mutationErythrokeratodermia
SCA3520p13TGM6
SCA3620p13NOP56GGCCTG expansionMyoclonus, choreoathetosis, dementia (Huntington’s disease like)
SCA371p32SCA37
SCA386p12.1ELOVLE5
SCA4014q32CCDC88C
Dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA)12p13.31ATN1CAG expansionHyperkeratosis, multiple system atrophy-cerebellar type-like (Huntington’s disease like)
Episodic ataxia type 1KCNA1Episodic, lasts seconds to minutes, interictal fasciculations
Episodic ataxia type 1CACNA1QEpisodic, lasts from hours to days, interictal nystagmus

Table 2.

Genetic characteristics of spinocerebellar ataxias.

Other SCAs cover a wide range of clinical symptoms. As opposed to the normal phenotype, which comprises of cerebellar ataxia and epilepsy, the major phenotype seen in the latter is pure cerebellar [29, 30]. It is worth mentioning that several additional SCAs with novel loci and gene mutations have been described more recently and SCA patients have a relatively high number of mutations, however, many patients (30–40%) still lack a genetic or molecular diagnosis [34, 57].

3.11 Secondary ataxias

Secondary or acquired ataxias include ataxias arising from exogenous or endogenous nongenetic origins, including those naturally caused toxins, paraneoplastic, immune-mediated agents, and infections, as well as focal injury to the cerebellum [26, 65, 66]. In MS, inflammation attacks and damages nerve fibers and myelin, a protective tissue around the nerves of the brain and spinal cord. Eventually, nerve cells that control body movements by sending and receiving electrical signals are damaged, which leads to abnormalities in body movement. In patients with MS, three types of ataxias are cerebellar, sensory (proprioceptive ataxia), and vestibular ataxia. Cerebellar ataxia is a syndrome that encompasses gait ataxia, nystagmus, dysarthria, tremor, and cognitive dysfunction, among others [67]. It is caused by damage to the cerebellum, leading to disruptions in the actions of different nerves that control muscle and movements on one or both sides of the body. Vestibular ataxia causes loss of balance, vertigo, dizziness, nausea, and vomiting, among others. Some people with MS develop vestibular ataxia slowly, so they just have a loss of balance or equilibrium, not other severe symptoms. Vestibular ataxia is caused by damage to the vestibular system (i.e., inner ear structures and fluid-filled ear canals that control the sense of balance) and it might also be caused by lesions in the brainstem, or if MS pathology affects nerves that connect tiny organs in the inner ear that control balance. In this setting, neuroimaging studies are of great importance in determining focal lesions in the cerebellum and its connections as well as other affected parts of the brain [67].

Advertisement

4. Diagnosing patients with ataxia

The history should provide information on the kind of ataxia or vestibular dysfunction, the body areas affected, any concomitant signs, and the underlying etiology. Neurologists will be able to anticipate the results of the physical examination with a high degree of accuracy if they take a thorough history. Any unexpected physical discoveries should be cause for rethinking the past.

Numerous concomitant signs and symptoms of ataxia may appear, allowing the neurologist to focus on the differential diagnosis. Postural problems in case of cerebellar ataxia can be assessed objectively and subjectively. An accurate assessment of clinical symptoms serves as the foundation for qualitative evaluations. Cerebellar ataxia is indicated by postural instability and a stumbling, jerky gait. Since instruction regarding gait and gait disorders is rarely given much attention in medical colleges, an accurate examination of clinical symptoms is frequently overlooked [68].

  • Mental status examination: There is growing understanding of the cerebellum’s function in cognition. Along with being the location of motor coordination, the cerebellum also interacts closely with the cerebrum to perform higher-order cortical tasks, such as frontal executive functions, spatial orientation, motor memory, language skills, and the ability to recognize and express emotions [68].

  • Cranial nerve examination: Examining extraocular movements typically shows aberrant pursuit and saccades, ocular dyskinesia such as square-wave jerks, ocular flutter, and opsoclonus in a variety of cerebellar illnesses. A cerebellar mass lesion may cause papilledema, particularly in people with hydrocephalus. The ipsilateral loss of the corneal reflex and impairment of the eighth cranial nerve may be signs of a cerebellopontine angle tumor. SCA3 symptoms include facial and tongue fasciculations, and SCA36 symptoms include significant tongue atrophy and fasciculations.

  • Vestibular signs: The majority of the time, ataxia from the vestibular system is accompanied by vertigo and sluggish nystagmus with or without change in posture. When trying to walk straight, affected patients frequently deviate to the ipsilateral side. To rule out problems with the inner ear, hearing loss should be further assessed.

  • Cerebellar signs: Often, the gait is impacted first. They are unable to stand with their feet together. Walking or adopting a tandem posture is a more sensitive test. Patients frequently lean in the same direction. With titubation, the gait is wide based. A localized cerebellar lesion frequently causes dysmetria of the limbs, intention tremor, loss of control, hypotonia, and dorsal spooning (hyperextension of interphalangeal joints) of the hand, in addition to dysarthria and nystagmus. In addition to appendicular ataxia, which should be assessed by looking at limb movements, and upright ataxia, which should be assessed by looking at posture, gait, and truncal ataxia, physical examinations should also look for ocular dyskinesias, speech abnormalities, proprioceptive loss, and vestibular dysfunction.

  • Extrapyramidal symptoms: It is typical for extrapyramidal symptoms to be accompanied by persistently increasing ataxia. Extrapyramidal symptoms are frequently a clue that a neurodegenerative process is moving beyond the cerebellum and brainstem in inherited ataxias. For instance, whereas MSA and certain SCAs may also have linked Parkinsonism, most SCAs often impact gait first. Levodopa frequently alleviates the symptoms of Parkinsonism in SCA2, SCA3, and SCA17; however, when the striatum is affected, patients frequently have Parkinsonism and are not sensitive to levodopa. In these individuals receiving levodopa medication, dyskinesia can be brought on; nevertheless, involuntary movements, including dystonia, may be a symptom of SCAs. To find them, the inspection may need careful attention.

  • Strength: It is critical to determine whether muscular weakness may account for the severity of ataxia. The examiner might ask the patient to rise up from a sitting posture and to stand on their toes and heels in order to assess the functional proximal and distal muscular strength while compensating for ataxia. Myopathy is suggested by symmetrically proximal muscle weakness. Generalized neuropathy is suggested by distal muscular weakness. In addition to ataxia, muscular weakness may also be indicated by abnormal gait. For instance, waddling gait, which should not be confused with ataxic gait, is caused when the hip girdle is weak owing to myopathy, which causes the pelvis to have a tendency to move toward the side.

  • Proprioceptive sensory system: Sensory ataxia may result from a loss of sensory information from spinocerebellar pathways to the cerebellum. Any proprioceptive pathway impairment, including Friedreich’s ataxia, ataxia with vitamin E deficiency, acquired sensory ataxias linked to ataxic polyneuropathies (e.g., paraneoplastic sensory neuronopathy), Sjögren’s syndrome, diabetes mellitus, vitamin B6 toxicity, and Miller Fisher syndrome, may result in sensory loss. Proprioception and vibration at the great toe can be used to evaluate this. In contrast to cerebellar ataxia, where there is no change in the severity of ataxia with and without the eyes closed, the ataxia often gets worse when the visual signals are removed. Additionally, these individuals struggle to stand with their feet together and their eyes closed (Romberg sign).

Advertisement

5. Neuroanatomy and neuropathology of ataxia

Ataxia is a condition that affects the cerebellum and its afferent and efferent connections, the vestibular system, and the proprioceptive sensory pathway (Figure 4). The cerebellum is often divided into the cerebellar hemispheres and the midline cerebellum. A separate form of ataxia may manifest after lesions in any of these areas. For instance, injury to the unilateral cerebellar hemisphere typically results in ipsilateral cerebellar ataxia, whereas damage to the midline cerebellar structures typically manifests as gait impairment and truncal ataxia.

Figure 4.

The cerebellum’s afferent and efferent connections. Climbing fibers from the inferior olives pass through the inferior cerebellar peduncles to link to the cerebellum, whereas pontine mossy fibers pass through the middle cerebellar peduncles. The superior cerebellar peduncles receive cerebellar outputs from the dentate nucleus and other deep cerebellar nuclei.

A lesion that disrupts the sensory transmission to the cerebellum may be the cause of ataxia. Spinal ataxia or sensory ataxia may result from this disease. Cerebellar ataxia is brought on by a break in the cerebellum’s cortical impulses. Both of the aforementioned disorders can lead to spinocerebellar ataxias. They are caused by chromosomal CAG repetition and are autosomal dominant. Characteristic findings vary depending on where the lesion is located and include:

  • Diffuse lesions result in widespread symptoms, whereas lesions in the lateral cerebellum only induce symptoms on the side of the lesion (ipsilateral).

  • Ataxia of the limbs is brought on by cerebellar hemisphere lesions.

  • Truncal, gait ataxia is caused by vermis lesions that spare the limbs.

  • Vertigo, imbalance, and gait ataxia are all symptoms of vestibulo-cerebellar lesions, chromosomes [69].

Localization can be aided by comprehension of this neuroanatomy and its relationship to coordination. Despite the fact that there is considerable clinical overlap among them, the relationships are presented in Table 3.

NeuroanatomyFunctionAtaxia or ataxia-like presentation arising from damage of the region
Cerebellar hemisphere, including dentate nucleicombining motor planning with sensory information to coordinate difficult tasksIpsilateral limb ataxia, dysdiadochokinesia, dysmetria, intention tremor, and scanning speech
Midline cerebellar structures (vermis, fastigial and interposed nuclei, the vestibulocerebellum, and the paravermis)Balance, coordination of the lower extremities, fast and slow eye movements, and vestibular functionGait ataxia and imbalance, truncal ataxia, dysmetria, ocular findings, head bobbing, and vertigo
Posterior lobe (flocculonodular lobe)including information on vestibular nucleiNystagmus, postural instability, and gait ataxia
Cerebral cortex (frontal lobe)Planning and initiating gaitFrontal ataxia (Bruns apraxia), magnetic gait (not the same as ataxic gait), although damage in this area that is related to the ataxia might make it worse.
Brainstem (vestibular nuclei, inferior olivary nuclei, pontine nuclei, and cerebellar peduncles)Relay signals in and out of the cerebellumAtaxia associated with cranial nerve dysfunction and motor-sensory deficits
Spinal cord (cuneate fasciculus, gracile fasciculus, and spinocerebellar tracts [mossy fibers])Sensory pathways conductionSensory ataxia
Musculoskeletal system (gluteal muscles)Stabilizing the weight-bearing hipWaddling gait rather than ataxia, however disease in this area that is connected to it can make ataxia worse
Peripheral sensation system and visual systemProprioception, visual cuesSensory ataxia with Romberg sign, can worsen cerebellar ataxia
Vestibular system (labyrinth of the inner ear, vestibular nerve, and vestibular nuclei)Sense of balance and special orientation, equilibriumUnsteadiness, loss of balance brought on by vertigo, and a feeling of heaviness, tinnitus, and hearing loss, as well as nystagmus

Table 3.

Clinical characteristics and neuroanatomical relationships in ataxia.

Advertisement

6. Management of ataxia in MS

Management of ataxia and tremor encompasses a variety of available treatments, ranging from pharmacological approaches, surgical strategies to neurorehabilitation [10, 70]. The effectiveness and safety of treatments for ataxia in MS are not well understood; however, neurosurgery and rehabilitation procedures may be at least somewhat helpful [8]. Ataxia and tremor are challenging symptoms for management and treatments are supportive only [10, 11, 71]. Broadly speaking, the management of MS is based either on symptomatic treatments for established symptoms and/or disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), which aim to alleviate the impact of this condition [13].

Surgical procedures like deep brain stimulation (DBS) may be useful for some patients and prior to invasive procedures, a team examination of each individual is necessary [10]. The most popular non-pharmacological treatment for MS ataxia is physiotherapy, which is used frequently. Exercises designed specifically for balance that facilitate somatosensory and motor strategies are typically used, albeit to various degrees [72]. Task-oriented training also improves ambulation and postural control in MS patients by fostering motor learning [73]. Combinations of these physiotherapy techniques are generally considered to be highly beneficial for MS patients [74].

Finding new treatment approaches will be aided by a better understanding of the pathophysiology of cerebellar disease in MS which will help to treat its related ataxia and tremor. Hence, treating cerebellar disorders and offering neuroprotection inside the cerebellum are urgently needed while newer treatments are being tested, like stem cell therapy. The possibility of stem cell therapies for MS cerebellar pathology is particularly alluring, given the revelation that Purkinje cell fusion is a potential neurorestorative mechanism [13]. A summary of treatment modalities and options for the ataxia of MS patients is provided in Table 4 [75, 76, 77].

Treatment ModalityOptions
PhysicalBalance-based torso weighting, task oriented, and core-stability exercises
Pharmacologic therapyCarbamazepine, topiramate, Isoniazide, levetracetam, phenytoin, acetazolamide, lacosamide, fingolimod#
Surgical approches*Deep brain stimulation, thalamotomy

Table 4.

Treatment modalities and options for the ataxia of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.

Adverse effects such as dysarthria and ataxia disability scores not improved.


To be used with caution as it has significant immunosuppressive effects.


6.1 Pharmacological treatment

Pharmacological treatment for cerebellar ataxia also remains challenging. Case report studies and small studies offer little support for certain treatments. Although recommendations are difficult to make for the treatment of ataxia and tremor, a variety of medications have been shown to have advantages in small open-label studies or case reports. Several treatments have been used including propranolol [78], isoniazid [76, 77], topiramate [79], carbamazepine [80], clonazepam, and levetiracetam [81] and reported only little success [10]. In a small pilot research involving 14 MS patients, levetiracetam was also found to dramatically lessen tremor and ataxia [82]. Moreover, topiramate has shown significant functional improvement in a sustained, dose-dependent manner [79]. Additionally, fingolimod may have added benefits in MS patients with ataxia [75]. Other drugs tested including glutethimide [83], cannabinoids [84], and dolasetron mesylate [85]. Cannabis extracts have been the subject of several randomized controlled trials, and the results have shown that cannabinoids do not seem to reduce MS tremor [84, 86, 87]. There is some evidence that paroxysmal ataxia and dysarthria may respond to carbamazepine in a manner comparable to other paroxysmal symptoms of MS, such as tonic spasm [88].

Although isoniazid, propranolol, and levetiracetam have been investigated, the findings are inconclusive, and these drugs are not frequently used (the patients included in these trials were typically very small, allowing for few generalizations) [76, 78, 81, 89, 90, 91]. Whereas, isoniazide in high doses, carbamazepine, propranolol, glutethimide, 4-aminopyridine, and topiramate have been reported to provide some benefit in the treatment of ataxia and tremor [20, 79, 92]. As ataxia constitutes a difficult symptom to treat, medications like isoniazid and carbamezepine must be used in high amounts for the treatment to be effective. Since these medications have hepatotoxic effects, many patients are unable to receive the maximum dosage, which limits their ability to be used for extended periods of time [7]. Indeed, pharmacological approaches used to improve ataxic symptoms are generally disappointing, necessitating the need for innovative treatments. In a meta-analysis study performed by Mills et al. [70], the authors have reviewed six randomized placebo-controlled trials (pharmacotherapy) of treatments for ataxia in MS. They concluded that there is insufficient information regarding absolute and comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacotherapies [70]. As a result, no recommendations could be given to guide in prescribing these medications [70].

It is worth mentioning that a patient-centered strategy is critical to the efficacy of pharmacological treatment, which is a crucial part of managing MS symptoms. To maximize compliance, particularly with invasive interventions, doctors must properly inform patients, discuss their priorities and expectations, and assist them in making the right treatment decisions [11]. With oral medications, the first dose should be low and gradually increased based on response and tolerability. If one medication is insufficient due to its ineffectiveness or unacceptable side effects, it is advised to combine several medications—possibly at lower doses [11].

6.2 Surgical interventions

Tremors can be both kinetic and postural, and they can be very challenging to manage. In case of tremor resistance to treatment, thalamotomy or thalamic stimulation has been tried to some degree of success [93]. Carefully selected patients with localized tremor with minimum disability could benefit from stereotactic thalamotomy, which targets the nucleus ventralis lateralis and nucleus ventralis intermedius, or DBS, which targets the nuclei ventralis lateralis and nucleus ventralis intermedius, ventralis oralis posterior nucleus, and zona incerta [94, 95, 96]. Tremor was abolished by both thalamotomy and thalamic stimulation in all patients immediately postsurgery [97]. However, tremor returned in almost all MS patients after 6 months, albeit of less severity than preoperative levels. Stereotactic thalamotomy seems to be more effective for intractable tremor, but the consequent functional improvement is variable and the intervention is associated with a higher risk of neurological deficit [11].

It is believed that distal tremor with good proximal stability and limb function are particularly responsive to DBS [11]. Successful alleviation of tremor in patients with MS has been achieved using DBS of the ventralis intermedius (VIM) thalamic nucleus [98]. Indeed, DBS is likely to improve tremor, but the effect might be reduced over time. Functional improvement is more often reported after DBS than after stereotactic thalamotomy, and DBS can be better tolerated. It has been reported that both procedures initially suppressed tremor in over 90% of patients, although functional improvement was seen only in 47.8% of those who underwent thalamotomy as opposed to 85.2% of those who had DBS [99]. However, the choice between interventions should be made on an individual basis in consultation with the specialist neurosurgical team [11], and larger trials that compare these two interventions and assess the efficacy are needed.

6.3 Rehabilitation approaches

Beyond pharmacological and surgical approaches, many physiotherapy approaches are used in balance therapy and tremor. Physiotherapy, orthoses, and limb cooling may be beneficial [20]. Indeed, in MS, rehabilitation programs may be helpful to enhance core stability in individuals with balance issues, lumbar stabilization exercises that strengthen the core trunk muscles and have an impact on postural control, ambulation, and skilled motor function [100]. A systemic review of trials with physical therapies showed some beneficial effect [101]. Additionally, Armutlu et al. [72] reported that physiotherapy approaches were effective to decrease the ataxia [7]. There is some evidence, according to a systematic review of research looking into the benefits of treadmill or robot-assisted training, that people with severe disabilities can see improvements in their quality of life and gait [102]. Two of the eight studies that were considered were modest single-group studies that only included individuals with progressing MS in their sample [103104]. Using weights and heavy walkers may decrease ataxic movements; however, they may increase fatigue [7, 105, 106, 107]. Patients with MS who were randomly assigned to physiotherapy showed improved scores on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the Rivermead Mobility Index [7, 108]. An improvement in the Rivermead Mobility Index was seen in a different study on 42 randomly selected patients when home and outpatient therapy groups were compared to no therapy. However, mobility returned to pretreatment levels after 2 months of follow-up [109]. In MS patients, balance-based torso-weighting has been shown to improve cerebellar ataxia patients [110]. In 45 ataxic relapsing–remitting MS patients, the addition of core stability exercises and task-oriented training to typical balance training was found to potentially enhance stability [111]. Similar to this, task-oriented training and lumbar stabilization enhanced the efficacy of balance therapy in a group of 42 MS patients [74], exhibiting a considerable improvement in the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale and composite balance scores. As measured by the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale, the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, the smoothness of movement on both sides in a 5-m walk, and balance in a step-to-stand task before and after the intervention, a targeted ballet program aimed at reducing MS-associated ataxia and improving balance in women demonstrated significant clinical improvement [112]. These studies collectively demonstrate the positive effects of physiotherapy in MS-related ataxia [75]. In another study, it was determined that physiotherapy approaches were effective to decrease ataxia and that the combination of suitable physiotherapy techniques is effective in MS rehabilitation [7]. Even though physiotherapy has been shown to improve function in ataxia modestly, its long-term benefits in MS patients remain unclear.

Following task-specific rehabilitation, neural plasticity is enhanced [113, 114]. Thus, it is believed that balance and mobility interventions offer the proper task-specific stimuli to promote neural reorganization of central sensory integration, resulting in improved stability [6]. Despite the fact that neuroplasticity and motor learning are commonly considered to be more beneficial in the initial stages of MS, they seem to remain even in those with more severe disability [114]. Future research should establish whether or not those with progressive MS, and at different levels of disability, respond differently to these interventions, and if so whether and when interventions should be refocused on compensatory rather than restorative strategies.

Advertisement

7. Conclusion

Ataxia is a common symptom of MS that can dramatically impact the patient’s quality of life. The underlying pathophysiology of ataxia in MS is not fully understood, but it is believed to be related to demyelination and neurodegeneration in specific areas of the brain. There are currently no specific therapies approved for the treatment of ataxia in MS; however, several promising therapeutic approaches are being investigated, including the use of disease-modifying therapies, rehabilitative interventions, and symptomatic treatments.

Advertisement

8. Final remarks

This study demonstrates the complexity of understanding and targeting ataxia in MS. It provides a comprehensive overview of the most recent research and the current therapeutic strategies for managing ataxia in individuals with MS. It also highlights the multifactorial nature of the complex involvement of various brain regions, such as the cerebellum, brainstem, and spinal cord, in motor incoordination and impaired balance which might make their diagnosis and management difficult. There is still a lack of appropriate strategy in the treatment of ataxia in MS and in order to treat the complex character of ataxia, a multimodal strategy is urgently required. Finally, in order to better understand ataxia in MS and develop more effective treatments for this condition, ongoing research efforts and collaborative initiatives are of great importance.

References

  1. 1. Dobson R, Giovannoni G. Multiple sclerosis–a review. European Journal of Neurology. 2019;26(1):27-40
  2. 2. Frohman EM, Racke MK, Raine CS. Multiple sclerosis—The plaque and its pathogenesis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2006;354(9):942-955
  3. 3. Wingerchuk DM, Lucchinetti CF, Noseworthy JH. Multiple sclerosis: Current pathophysiological concepts. Laboratory Investigation. 2001;81(3):263-281
  4. 4. Maghzi A, Borazanci A, Mcgee J. 1 multiple sclerosis : Pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and management. In: Neuroinflammation. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-384913-7.00001-0
  5. 5. Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: Results of an international survey. Neurology. 1996;46(4):907-911
  6. 6. Feinstein A, Freeman J, Lo AC. Progressive multiple sclerosis 2 treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis : What works, what does not , and what is needed. The Lancet Neurology. 2015;14(2):194-207. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70231-5
  7. 7. Armutlu K, Karabudak R. Physiotherapy approaches in the treatment of ataxic multiple sclerosis : A pilot study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2001;15:203-211
  8. 8. Correia de Sa JC, Airas L, Bartholome E, Grigoriadis N, Mattle H, Oreja-guevara C, et al. Symptomatic therapy in multiple sclerosis : A review for a multimodal approach in clinical practice. Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders. 2011;4:139-168. DOI: 10.1177/1756285611403646
  9. 9. Mills RJ, Yap L, Young CA. Treatment for ataxia in multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007;1:1-19
  10. 10. Ben-zacharia AB, Ben-zacharia AB. Therapeutics for multiple sclerosis symptoms. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine. 2011;59:176-191. DOI: 10.1002/MSJ
  11. 11. Thompson AJ, Toosy AT, Ciccarelli O. Pharmacological management of symptoms in multiple sclerosis : Current approaches and future directions. The Lancet Neurology. 2010;9(12):1182-1199. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70249-0
  12. 12. Petajan JH, White AT. Recommendations for physical activity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Sports Medicine. 1999;27(3):179-191
  13. 13. Wilkins A. Cerebellar dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Frontiers in Neurology. 2017;8(June):1-6. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00312
  14. 14. Christensen H, Boysen G, Christensen AF, Johannesen HH. Insular lesions, ECG abnormalities, and outcome in acute stroke. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2005;76(2):269-271
  15. 15. D’Ambrosio A, Pagani E, Riccitelli GC, Colombo B, Rodegher M, Falini A, et al. Cerebellar contribution to motor and cognitive performance in multiple sclerosis: An MRI sub-regional volumetric analysis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2017;23(9):1194-1203
  16. 16. Valentino P, Nisticò R, Pirritano D, Bilotti G, Del Giudice F, Sturniolo M, et al. Lamotrigine therapy for paroxysmal dysarthria caused by multiple sclerosis: A case report. Journal of Neurology. 2011;258:1349-1350
  17. 17. Weier K, Till C, Fonov V, Yeh EA, Arnold DL, Banwell B, et al. Contribution of the cerebellum to cognitive performance in children and adolescents with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2016;22(5):599-607
  18. 18. Kalincik T, Buzzard K, Jokubaitis V, Trojano M, Duquette P, Izquierdo G, et al. Risk of relapse phenotype recurrence in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2014;20(11):1511-1522
  19. 19. Ayache SS, Chalah MA, Al-ani T, Farhat WH, Zouari HG, Créange A, et al. Journal of the neurological sciences tremor in multiple sclerosis : The intriguing role of the cerebellum. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2015;358(1-2):351-356. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.09.360
  20. 20. Koch M, Mostert J, Heersema D, De Keyser J. Tremor in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology. 2007;254:133-145
  21. 21. Alusi SH, Worthington J, Glickman S, Bain PG. A study of tremor in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2001;124(4):720-730
  22. 22. Pittock SJ, McClelland RL, Mayr WT, Rodriguez M, Matsumoto JY. Prevalence of tremor in multiple sclerosis and associated disability in the Olmsted County population. Movement Disorders. 2004;19(12):1482-1485
  23. 23. Klockgether T. Ataxias: Diagnostic procedure and treatment. Der Nervenarzt. 2005;76:1275-1285
  24. 24. Anheim M, Tranchant C, Koenig M. The autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxias. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;366(7):636-646
  25. 25. Durr A. Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias: Polyglutamine expansions and beyond. The Lancet Neurology. 2010;9(9):885-894
  26. 26. Klockgether T. Acquired cerebellar ataxias and differential diagnosis. In: Blue Books of Neurology. Vol. 31. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007a. pp. 61-77
  27. 27. Klockgether T. Update on degenerative ataxias. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2011;24(4):339-345
  28. 28. Perlman SL. Spinocerebellar degenerations. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 2011;100:113-140
  29. 29. Teive HAG, Munhoz RP, Arruda WO, Raskin S, Werneck LC, Ashizawa T. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 10–a review. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 2011a;17(9):655-661
  30. 30. Teive HAG, Munhoz RP, Ashizawa T. Inherited and sporadic ataxias. In: Hyperkinetic Movement Disorders: Differential Diagnosis and Treatment. Hoboken, New Jersey (United States): Wiley-Blackwell; 2011b. pp. 279-295
  31. 31. Vermeer S, van de Warrenburg BPC, Willemsen M, Cluitmans M, Scheffer H, Kremer BP, et al. Autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxias: The current state of affairs. Journal of Medical Genetics. 2011;48(10):651-659
  32. 32. Parisi MA. Clinical and molecular features of Joubert syndrome and related disorders. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics. 2009;151(4):326-340
  33. 33. Romani M, Micalizzi A, Valente EM. Joubert syndrome: Congenital cerebellar ataxia with the molar tooth. The Lancet Neurology. 2013;12(9):894-905
  34. 34. Shakkottai VG, Fogel BL. Clinical neurogenetics: autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia. Neurologic Clinics. 2013;31(4):987-1007
  35. 35. Horvath R, Hudson G, Ferrari G, Fütterer N, Ahola S, Lamantea E, et al. Phenotypic spectrum associated with mutations of the mitochondrial polymerase γ gene. Brain. 2006;129(7):1674-1684
  36. 36. Synofzik M, Srulijes K, Godau J, Berg D, Schöls L. Characterizing POLG ataxia: Clinics, electrophysiology and imaging. The Cerebellum. 2012;11:1002-1011
  37. 37. Klockgether T. Sporadic adult-onset ataxia of unknown etiology. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 2012;103:253-262
  38. 38. Lin DJ, Hermann KL, Schmahmann JD. Multiple system atrophy of the cerebellar type: Clinical state of the art. Movement Disorders. 2014;29(3):294-304
  39. 39. Van Gaalen J, Kerstens FG, Maas R, Härmark L, van de Warrenburg BPC. Drug-induced cerebellar ataxia: A systematic review. CNS Drugs. 2014;28:1139-1153
  40. 40. Manto M. Toxic agents causing cerebellar ataxias. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 2012;103:201-213
  41. 41. Ariño H, Gresa-Arribas N, Blanco Y, Martínez-Hernández E, Sabater L, Petit-Pedrol M, et al. Cerebellar ataxia and glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies: Immunologic profile and long-term effect of immunotherapy. JAMA Neurology. 2014;71(8):1009-1016
  42. 42. Demarquay G, Honnorat J. Clinical presentation of immune-mediated cerebellar ataxia. Revue Neurologique. 2011;167(5):408-417
  43. 43. Hadjivassiliou M, Aeschlimann P, Sanders DS, Mäki M, Kaukinen K, Grünewald RA, et al. Transglutaminase 6 antibodies in the diagnosis of gluten ataxia. Neurology. 2013;80(19):1740-1745
  44. 44. Koeppen AH. Friedreich’s ataxia: Pathology, pathogenesis, and molecular genetics. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2011;303(1-2):1-12
  45. 45. Méneret A, Ahmar-Beaugendre Y, Rieunier G, Mahlaoui N, Gaymard B, Apartis E, et al. The pleiotropic movement disorders phenotype of adult ataxia-telangiectasia. Neurology. 2014;83(12):1087-1095
  46. 46. Koeppen AH, Mazurkiewicz JE. Friedreich ataxia: Neuropathology revised. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology. 2013;72(2):78-90
  47. 47. Hou J-GG, Jankovic J. Movement disorders in Friedreich’s ataxia. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2003;206(1):59-64
  48. 48. Parkinson MH, Boesch S, Nachbauer W, Mariotti C, Giunti P. Clinical features of Friedreich’s ataxia: Classical and atypical phenotypes. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2013;126:103-117
  49. 49. Solbach K, Kraff O, Minnerop M, Beck A, Schöls L, Gizewski ER, et al. Cerebellar pathology in Friedreich’s ataxia: Atrophied dentate nuclei with normal iron content. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2014;6:93-99
  50. 50. Lynch DR, Perlman SL, Meier T. A phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of idebenone in friedreich ataxia. Archives of Neurology. 2010;67(8):941-947
  51. 51. Rinaldi C, Tucci T, Maione S, Giunta A, De Michele G, Filla A. Low-dose idebenone treatment in Friedreich’s ataxia with and without cardiac hypertrophy. Journal of Neurology. 2009;256:1434-1437
  52. 52. Pandolfo M, Arpa J, Delatycki MB, Le Quan Sang KH, Mariotti C, Munnich A, et al. Deferiprone in F riedreich ataxia: A 6-month randomized controlled trial. Annals of Neurology. 2014;76(4):509-521
  53. 53. Soragni E, Miao W, Iudicello M, Jacoby D, De Mercanti S, Clerico M, et al. Epigenetic therapy for F riedreich ataxia. Annals of Neurology. 2014;76(4):489-508
  54. 54. Verhagen MMM, Abdo WF, Willemsen M, Hogervorst FBL, Smeets D, Hiel JAP, et al. Clinical spectrum of ataxia-telangiectasia in adulthood. Neurology. 2009;73(6):430-437
  55. 55. Hekman KE, Gomez CM. The autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxias: Emerging mechanistic themes suggest pervasive Purkinje cell vulnerability. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2015;86(5):554-561
  56. 56. Matilla-Dueñas A, Ashizawa T, Brice A, Magri S, McFarland KN, Pandolfo M, et al. Consensus paper: Pathological mechanisms underlying neurodegeneration in spinocerebellar ataxias. The Cerebellum. 2014;13:269-302
  57. 57. Rossi M, Perez‐Lloret S, Doldan L, Cerquetti D, Balej J, Millar Vernetti P, et al. Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias: A systematic review of clinical features. European Journal of Neurology. 2014;21(4):607-615
  58. 58. Balreira A, Boczonadi V, Barca E, Pyle A, Bansagi B, Appleton M, et al. ANO10 mutations cause ataxia and coenzyme Q 10 deficiency. Journal of Neurology. 2014;261:2192-2198
  59. 59. Demos MK, van Karnebeek CDM, Ross CJD, Adam S, Shen Y, Zhan SH, et al. A novel recurrent mutation in ATP1A3 causes CAPOS syndrome. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2014;9(1):1-9
  60. 60. Heimdal K, Sanchez-Guixé M, Aukrust I, Bollerslev J, Bruland O, Jablonski GE, et al. STUB1 mutations in autosomal recessive ataxias–evidence for mutation-specific clinical heterogeneity. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2014;9(1):1-12
  61. 61. Liu Y-T, Hersheson J, Plagnol V, Fawcett K, Duberley KEC, Preza E, et al. Autosomal-recessive cerebellar ataxia caused by a novel ADCK3 mutation that elongates the protein: Clinical, genetic and biochemical characterisation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2014;85(5):493-498
  62. 62. Nanetti L, Cavalieri S, Pensato V, Erbetta A, Pareyson D, Panzeri M, et al. SETX mutations are a frequent genetic cause of juvenile and adult onset cerebellar ataxia with neuropathy and elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2013;8(1):1-9
  63. 63. Renaud M, Anheim M, Kamsteeg E-J, Mallaret M, Mochel F, Vermeer S, et al. Autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia type 3 due to ANO10 mutations: Delineation and genotype-phenotype correlation study. JAMA Neurology. 2014;71(10):1305-1310
  64. 64. Synofzik M, Soehn AS, Gburek-Augustat J, Schicks J, Karle KN, Schüle R, et al. Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix Saguenay (ARSACS): Expanding the genetic, clinical and imaging spectrum. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2013;8(1):41
  65. 65. Albanese A, Jankovic J. Hyperkinetic Movement Disorders: Differential Diagnosis and Treatment. Hoboken, New Jersey (United States): Wiley-Blackwell; 2012
  66. 66. Klockgether T. Chapter 2 acquired cerebellar ataxias and differential diagnosis. In: Blue Books of Neurology. Vol. 31. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007b. DOI: 10.1016/S1877-184X(09)70076-0
  67. 67. Teive HAG, Ashizawa T. Primary and secondary ataxias. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2015;28(4):413-422. DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000227
  68. 68. Pérennou D, Thomas E-N, Blain H. Do French medical schools provide appropriate training on gait and gait disorders? Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2011;54(1):36-47
  69. 69. Ashizawa T, Xia G. Ataxia. Continuum: Lifelong Learning in Neurology. Movement Disorders. 2016;22(4):1208-1226
  70. 70. Mills RJ, Yap L, Young CA. Treatment for ataxia in multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009;1:1-18
  71. 71. Shah P. Symptomatic management in multiple sclerosis. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. 2015;18:35-42. DOI: 10.4103/0972-2327.164827
  72. 72. Armutlu K, Karabudak R, Nurlu G. Physiotherapy approaches in the treatment of ataxic multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2001;15(3):203-211
  73. 73. Straudi S, Martinuzzi C, Pavarelli C, Sabbagh Charabati A, Benedetti MG, Foti C, et al. A task-oriented circuit training in multiple sclerosis: A feasibility study. BMC Neurology. 2014;14(1):1-9
  74. 74. Salcı Y, Fil A, Armutlu K, Yildiz FG, Kurne A, Aksoy S, et al. Effects of different exercise modalities on ataxia in multiple sclerosis patients: A randomized controlled study. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2017;39(26):2626-2632
  75. 75. Dubey S, Benito-león J. Movement disorders in multiple sclerosis : An update. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2022;12(1):1-20. DOI: 10.5334/tohm.671
  76. 76. Duquette P, Pleines J, du Souich P. Isoniazid for tremor in multiple sclerosis: A controlled trial. Neurology. 1985;35(12):1772
  77. 77. Hallett M, Lindsey JW, Adelstein BD, Riley PO. Controlled trial of isoniazid therapy for severe postural cerebellar tremor in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 1985;35(9):1374
  78. 78. Koller WC. Pharmacologic trials in the treatment of cerebellar tremor. Archives of Neurology. 1984;41(3):280-281
  79. 79. Schroeder A, Linker RA, Lukas C, Kraus PH, Gold R. Successful treatment of cerebellar ataxia and tremor in multiple sclerosis with topiramate: A case report. Clinical Neuropharmacology. 2010;33(6):317-318
  80. 80. Sechi GP, Zuddas M, Piredda M, Agnetti V, Sau G, Piras ML, et al. Treatment of cerebellar tremors with carbamazepine: A controlled trial with long-term follow-up. Neurology. 1989;39(8):1113
  81. 81. Feys P, D’hooghe MB, Nagels G, Helsen WF. The effect of levetiracetam on tremor severity and functionality in patients with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2009;15(3):371-378
  82. 82. Striano P, Coppola A, Vacca G, Zara F, Brescia Morra V, Orefice G, et al. Levetiracetam for cerebellar tremor in multiple sclerosis: An open-label pilot tolerability and efficacy study. Journal of Neurology. 2006;253:762-766
  83. 83. Vahlberg B, Lindmark B, Zetterberg L, Hellström K, Cederholm T. Body composition and physical function after progressive resistance and balance training among older adults after stroke: An exploratory randomized controlled trial. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2017;39(12):1207-1214
  84. 84. Fox P, Bain PG, Glickman S, Carroll C, Zajicek J. The effect of cannabis on tremor in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2004;62(7):1105-1109
  85. 85. Monaca-Charley C, Stojkovic T, Duhamel A, De Seze J, Ferriby D, Vermersch P. Double-blind crossover study with dolasetron mesilate, a 5-HT 3 receptor antagonist in cerebellar syndrome secondary to multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology. 2003;250:1190-1194
  86. 86. Wade DT, Makela P, Robson P, House H, Bateman C. Do cannabis-based medicinal extracts have general or specific effects on symptoms in multiple sclerosis? A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study on 160 patients. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2004;10(4):434-441
  87. 87. Zajicek J, Fox P, Sanders H, Wright D, Vickery J, Nunn A, et al. Cannabinoids for treatment of spasticity and other symptoms related to multiple sclerosis (CAMS study): Multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet. 2003;362(9395):1517-1526
  88. 88. Twomey JA, Espir ML. Paroxysmal symptoms as the first manifestations of multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 1980;43(4):296-304
  89. 89. Francis DA, Grundy D, Heron JR. The response to isoniazid of action tremor in multiple sclerosis and its assessment using polarised light goniometry. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 1986;49(1):87-89
  90. 90. Morrow J, McDowell H, Ritchie C, Patterson V. Isoniazid and action tremor in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 1985;48(3):282
  91. 91. Sabra AF, Hallett M, Sudarsky L, Mullally W. Treatment of action tremor in multiple sclerosis with isoniazid. Neurology. 1982;32(8):912
  92. 92. Schniepp R, Jakl V, Wuehr M, Havla J, Kümpfel T, Dieterich M, et al. Treatment with 4-aminopyridine improves upper limb tremor of a patient with multiple sclerosis: A video case report. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2013;19(4):506-508
  93. 93. Torres CV, Moro E, Lopez-Rios A-L, Hodaie M, Chen R, Laxton AW, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus for tremor in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(3):646-651
  94. 94. Bittar RG, Hyam J, Nandi D, Wang S, Liu X, Joint C, et al. Thalamotomy versus thalamic stimulation for multiple sclerosis tremor. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2005;12(6):638-642
  95. 95. Schuurman PR, Bosch DA, Bossuyt PMM, Bonsel GJ, Van Someren EJW, De Bie RMA, et al. A comparison of continuous thalamic stimulation and thalamotomy for suppression of severe tremor. New England Journal of Medicine. 2000;342(7):461-468
  96. 96. Schuurman PR, Bosch DA, Merkus MP, Speelman JD. Long-term follow-up of thalamic stimulation versus thalamotomy for tremor suppression. Movement Disorders. 2008;23(8):1146-1153
  97. 97. Zirh A, Reich SG, Dougherty PM, Lenz FA. Stereotactic thalamotomy in the treatment of essential tremor of the upper extremity: Reassessment including a blinded measure of outcome. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 1999;66(6):772-775
  98. 98. Wishart HA, Roberts DW, Roth RM, McDonald BC, Coffey DJ, Mamourian AC, et al. Chronic deep brain stimulation for the treatment of tremor in multiple sclerosis: Review and case reports. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2003;74(10):1392-1397
  99. 99. Yap L, Kouyialis A, Varma TRK. Stereotactic neurosurgery for disabling tremor in multiple sclerosis: Thalamotomy or deep brain stimulation? British Journal of Neurosurgery. 2007;21(4):349-354
  100. 100. Freeman JA, Gear M, Pauli A, Cowan P, Finnigan C, Hunter H, et al. The effect of core stability training on balance and mobility in ambulant individuals with multiple sclerosis: A multi-Centre series of single case studies. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2010;16(11):1377-1384
  101. 101. Fonteyn EMR, Keus SHJ, Verstappen CCP, Schöls L, de Groot IJM, van de Warrenburg BPC. The effectiveness of allied health care in patients with ataxia: A systematic review. Journal of Neurology. 2014;261:251-258
  102. 102. Swinnen E, Beckwée D, Pinte D, Meeusen R, Baeyens J-P, Kerckhofs E. Treadmill training in multiple sclerosis: Can body weight support or robot assistance provide added value? A systematic review. Multiple Sclerosis International. 2012;2012:240274
  103. 103. Giesser B, Beres-Jones J, Budovitch A, Herlihy E, Harkema S. Locomotor training using body weight support on a treadmill improves mobility in persons with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2007;13(2):224-231
  104. 104. Pilutti LA, Lelli DA, Paulseth JE, Crome M, Jiang S, Rathbone MP, et al. Effects of 12 weeks of supported treadmill training on functional ability and quality of life in progressive multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2011;92(1):31-36
  105. 105. De Souza L. Multiple Sclerosis: Approaches to Management. Vol. 18. New York, NY: Springer; 2013
  106. 106. Erickson HP, Lie MR, Wineinger MA. Rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1989;64(7):818-828
  107. 107. Morgan MH. Ataxia and weights. Physiotherapy. 1975;61(11):332-334
  108. 108. Lord SE, Wade DT, Halligan PW. A comparison of two physiotherapy treatment approaches to improve walking in multiple sclerosis: A pilot randomized controlled study. Clinical Rehabilitation. 1998;12(6):477-486
  109. 109. Wiles CM, Newcombe RG, Fuller KJ, Shaw S, Furnival-Doran J, Pickersgill TP, et al. Controlled randomised crossover trial of the effects of physiotherapy on mobility in chronic multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2001;70(2):174-179
  110. 110. Widener GL, Conley N, Whiteford S, Gee J, Harrell A, Gibson-Horn C, et al. Changes in standing stability with balance-based torso-weighting with cerebellar ataxia: A pilot study. Physiotherapy Research International. 2020;25(1):e1814
  111. 111. Ali AS, Darwish MH, Shalaby NM, Abbas RL, Soubhy HZ. Efficacy of core stability versus task oriented trainings on balance in ataxic persons with multiple sclerosis. A single blinded randomized controlled trial. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 2021;50:102866
  112. 112. Scheidler AM, Kinnett-Hopkins D, Learmonth YC, Motl R, López-Ortiz C. Targeted ballet program mitigates ataxia and improves balance in females with mild-to-moderate multiple sclerosis. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0205382
  113. 113. Morgen K, Kadom N, Sawaki L, Tessitore A, Ohayon J, McFarland H, et al. Training-dependent plasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2004;127(11):2506-2517
  114. 114. Tomassini V, Johansen-Berg H, Leonardi L, Paixao L, Jbabdi S, Palace J, et al. Preservation of motor skill learning in patients with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2011;17(1):103-115

Written By

Bilal El-Mansoury, Jawad Laadraoui, Abdelaati El Khiat, Omar El Hiba, Arumugam R. Jayakumar, Abdessalam Ferssiwi and Abdelali Bitar

Submitted: 05 May 2023 Reviewed: 29 May 2023 Published: 10 July 2023