Open access

Introductory Chapter: Current Landscape of Animal and Human Virus Treatments

Written By

Arli Aditya Parikesit

Published: 20 December 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.111733

From the Edited Volume

Antiviral Strategies in the Treatment of Human and Animal Viral Infections

Edited by Arli Aditya Parikesit

Chapter metrics overview

45 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

As the world is currently watching the COVID-19 pandemic unravel to a controlled course, there are still many instances of viral infection outbreaks that occurred. Although there is a downward trajectory, the influenza virus is still a potential threat due to its history of causing pandemics [1]. Moreover, some other viral infections such as HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis are still causing sporadic outbreaks worldwide [23]. However, the discussion about the current situation of human and animal viral outbreaks will not be complete without mentioning the COVID-19 pandemic. As a zoonosis infection, the SARS-CoV-2 virus could infect both humans and animals. Besides humans, it is known to infect cats, dogs, tigers, minks, and others [4, 5, 6]. Henceforth, zoonosis infection will continue to be a challenging research topic. In this respect, several developments in the field of biomedicine and medical biotechnology for dealing with COVID-19 pandemics should be mentioned, as they could be possibly catered to another type of viral infections as well.

Advertisement

2. Current status of COVID-19 drug and vaccine development

As soon as WHO declared the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, several repurposed drugs are prepared. One of them is remdesivir, that previously developed for treating hepatitis C, Ebola, and Marburg virus infections [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. Although there are mixed results in the clinical settings, remdesivir is currently one of the standard options in COVID-19 treatments [12]. Moreover, more drugs have been rolled out for COVID-19, namely molnupiravir and paxlovid [13, 14]. The aforementioned drugs are working by targeting specific proteins of the SARS-COV-2 virus, such as Mpro and RdRp [15]. Hence, biologics such as antibody treatment are also developed with regeneron ® as one of the examples [16]. However, one of the game changers in the COVID-19 pandemic is always the vaccine development. The successful deployment of new mRNA vaccines, as well as the existing ones such as live attenuated and vectors, have successfully slowed down the infection rate of COVID-19 [17, 18, 19]. While highly promising, some therapeutic approaches are still in their infancy. The development of lead compounds for COVID-19 from natural products is currently still ongoing, mainly in both in vitro and in vivo stages [20]. Moreover, the same condition also occurred with siRNA-based therapeutics [21]. However, the application of natural products and siRNA-based therapeutic for COVID-19 faces several challenges, such as low bioavailability, poor stability, off-target effects, and delivery barriers [2223]. Therefore, more research is needed to overcome these limitations and optimize the efficacy and safety of these potential agents. Furthermore, the development of combinatorial strategies that target multiple viral genes or pathways may enhance antiviral activity and reduce the risk of viral resistance [22, 24]. Thus, natural products and siRNA-based therapeutics could offer promising alternatives or adjuncts to conventional treatments for COVID-19 and other coronaviruses. In this regard, the current research progress for COVID-19 will eventually serve as a benchmarking trend that could be applied in other cases.

Advertisement

3. Structural bioinformatics as virology studies instrument

Structural bioinformatics is currently an integral part of the research pipeline in virology studies, as it has provided detailed information about virus’ protein and nucleic acid structures [25, 26, 27]. As such, the annotated information is useful to design drugs and vaccines and gives a push to the development of rational drug design and immunoinformatics as possible solutions for combating viral infections [28, 29, 30]. Moreover, structural bioinformatics is currently under trial for examining phages molecular mechanism [31]. Some of the structural bioinformatics methods and tools for virology research include visualization and analysis of protein structures [32], comparative protein structure analysis [33], protein–protein modeling using cryo-EM restraints [34], biological assembly comparison, and integrating molecular simulation and experimental data. These methods and tools can help to identify and characterize viral proteins and their interactions with host factors, drugs, antibodies, and other viruses. They can also facilitate the discovery of novel targets, inhibitors, and vaccines for viral diseases. However, there are still many challenges and limitations in applying structural bioinformatics to virology, such as the scarcity of experimental data, the complexity of viral dynamics and evolution, and the uncertainty of molecular interactions and mechanisms [35, 36, 37]. Therefore, more efforts are needed to improve the accuracy, efficiency, and applicability of structural bioinformatics methods and tools for virology research.

Advertisement

4. Alternative viral infection diagnostics methods

In the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, WHO has elevated NAAT (Nucleic acid amplification test) method such as RT-PCR as a standard instrument for diagnosing the disease. WHO’s stance has been enacted in several of their official documents that dictate the diagnostics protocol in the clinical setting [38, 39, 40]. Due to the limitation of RT-PCR deployment in the early phase of pandemic, WHO also provides guidelines for NAAT alternatives, such as antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests [41]. All of WHO’s guidelines on COVID-19 diagnostics are totally in line with their already published guidelines on the establishment of virology laboratory [42]. However, the WHO’s establishment of standard operating procedure (SOP) for virology diagnostics did not deter the development of alternatives method. One of them is the breath analysis by electronic nose (enose) that has been trialed in Indonesia [43, 44]. Similar technology also has been applied in the Netherlands [45]. Unlike standard NAAT and non-NAAT-based diagnostics, enose was developed to detect Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) that are produced by human cells. It is deemed as a unique and creative application of diagnostics and has huge potential [46]. The other alternative is the bioelectrochemistry-based method. It has been applied in animal viruses with nanoparticle deployment, such as with African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) [47, 48]. Moreover, it is also trialed in detecting SARS-CoV-2 as well [49]. Despite the development of alternatives, WHO has not changed its stance pertaining to its virology SOPs. In the end, the status of RT-PCR as a standard method for COVID-19 diagnostics is still unchanged up to the publication of this chapter. This condition could serve as a standing ground for more research in this area, as WHO’s SOP will serve as a benchmark for any developed method in virology.

Advertisement

5. Outlook: Bioinformatics as instrument to resolve biomedical problem

Staring in the post-COVID-19 lockdown period, there will be massive integration of Bioinformatics into biological sciences, especially in virology studies. Bioinformatics will serve as an indispensable instrument to resolve biomedical and medical biotechnology problems. Moreover, methods of structural bioinformatics such as molecular simulation is a crucial method to understand the biochemical properties of viruses ([50, 51, 52], p. 201). Thus, the COVID-19 pandemic has taught us that SARS-CoV-2 virus is indeed evolving. In order to comprehend viral evolution, a more sophisticated instrument is needed. The standard tool to do that is definitely the New Generation Sequencing (NGS) instrument. NGS is crucial in the discovery of new SARS-CoV-2 variants such as delta and omicron [53]. Moreover, portable NGS instrumentation such as Oxford Nanopore ® has made the integration of bioinformatics into wet laboratory pipelines more assured than ever. Its versatility and portability have enabled such tools to be used by any life scientist with minimal training time [54]. Sequence analysis, as an integral part of bioinformatics, also plays an important part in Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) diagnostics development [55, 56]. Both of these methods are also trialed for COVID-19 diagnostics as well [57, 58]. Lastly, phages and biologics will possibly play an important role in dealing with viral infection in general [16, 59, 60, 61, 62]. An improved and updated bioinformatics pipeline should be devised to comprehend the potential role of phages and biologics in biomedical applications.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the Research and Community Service Department (LPPM) of the Indonesia International Institute for Life Sciences (i3L) for supporting these studies. The author also declared that there is no competing interest and received no external funding to support this study. The author also declared that Bing ® AI was deployed for web searches, references citation, and editing the text.

References

  1. 1. Uyeki TM, Hui DS, Zambon M, Wentworth DE, Monto AS. Influenza. The Lancet. 2022;400(10353):693-706. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00982-5
  2. 2. WHO. World Health Organization HIV/AIDS Resource Center. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from: http://www.who.int/hiv/en/
  3. 3. WHO. Multi-Country – Acute, Severe Hepatitis of Unknown Origin in Children. 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2022-DON376
  4. 4. Oude Munnink BB, Sikkema RS, Nieuwenhuijse DF, Molenaar RJ, Munger E, Molenkamp R, et al. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on mink farms between humans and mink and back to humans. Science. 2020;2020:eabe5901. DOI: 10.1126/science.abe5901
  5. 5. Pekar JE, Magee A, Parker E, Moshiri N, Izhikevich K, Havens JL, et al. The molecular epidemiology of multiple zoonotic origins of SARS-CoV-2. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2022a, 2022:eabp8337. DOI: 10.1126/science.abp8337
  6. 6. Pekar JE et al. The molecular epidemiology of multiple zoonotic origins of SARS-CoV-2. Science (80-85). Aug 2022;377(6609):960-966. DOI: 10.1126/science.abp8337
  7. 7. Aditya Parikesit A, Nurdiansyah R. Introductory chapter: Current perspective of COVID-19 drugs. COVID-19 drug development - recent advances. New Perspectives and Applications. 2022;2022:1-11. DOI: 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.105537
  8. 8. Arba M, Wahyudi ST, Brunt DJ, Paradis N, Wu C. Mechanistic insight on the remdesivir binding to RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) of SARS-cov-2. Computers in Biology and Medicine. 2021;129:104156. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104156
  9. 9. Eastman RT, Roth JS, Brimacombe KR, Simeonov A, Shen M, Patnaik S, et al. Remdesivir: A review of its discovery and development leading to emergency use authorization for treatment of COVID-19. ACS Central Science. 2020;6(5):672. DOI: 10.1021/ACSCENTSCI.0C00489
  10. 10. Liang C, Tian L, Liu Y, Hui N, Qiao G, Li H et al. A promising antiviral candidate drug for the COVID-19 pandemic: A mini-review of remdesivir. Elsevier Masson SAS European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2020;201:1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112527
  11. 11. Parikesit AA. Introductory chapter: The emerging corner of the omics studies for rational drug design. In: Parikesit AA, editor. Drug Design: Novel Advances in the Omics Field and Applications. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2021. p. 4. DOI: 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.95544
  12. 12. Malin JJ, Suárez I, Priesner V, Fätkenheuer G, Rybniker J. Remdesivir against COVID-19 and other viral diseases. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2021;34(1):1-21. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00162-20
  13. 13. Cave JA, Phizackerley D. Molnupiravir: Evidence by press release. Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin. 2022;60(1):2-2. DOI: 10.1136/DTB.2021.000064
  14. 14. Wang Z, Yang L. In the age of omicron variant: Paxlovid raises new hopes of COVID-19 recovery. Journal of Medical Virology. 2022;94(5):1766-1767. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27540
  15. 15. Nguyen HL, Thai NQ , Truong DT, Li MS. Remdesivir strongly binds to both RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and Main protease of SARS-CoV-2: Evidence from molecular simulations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2020;124(50):11337-11348. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c07312
  16. 16. Lehman A, Muñiz VA, Chaney R, Pimentel J, Mattila J, Lawrence S. Speed and need: Twin development challenges in rapid response for a SARS-CoV-2 antibody cocktail. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2022;76:102715. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102715
  17. 17. Chen Y, Shen H, Huang R, Tong X, Wu C. Serum neutralising activity against SARS-CoV-2 variants elicited by CoronaVac. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2021;2021:1. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00287-5
  18. 18. Corbett KS, Edwards DK, Leist SR, Abiona OM, Boyoglu-Barnum S, Gillespie RA, et al. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine design enabled by prototype pathogen preparedness. Nature. 2020;586(7830):567-571. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2622-0
  19. 19. Prequalification W. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) | WHO - Prequalification of Medical Products (IVDs, Medicines, Vaccines and Immunization Devices, Vector Control). 2021. Available from: https://extranet.who.int/pqweb/vaccines/covid-19-vaccines
  20. 20. Aurora Y, Tarigan IPN, Suryanto NMM, Santosa P, Pricillia V, Parikesit AA. Identification of flavonoids of Kalanchoe Pinnata as candidate drugs for COVID-19 gamma-variant treatment. Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences. 2022;18(6):Article 6. DOI: 10.11113/mjfas.v18n6.2594
  21. 21. Parikesit AA, Ansori ANM, Kharisma VD. A computational design of siRNA in SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein gene and its binding capability toward mRNA. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry. 2022;22(5):1163. DOI: 10.22146/ijc.68415
  22. 22. Kalhori MR, Saadatpour F, Arefian E, Soleimani M, Farzaei MH, Aneva IY, et al. The potential therapeutic effect of RNA interference and natural products on COVID-19: A review of the coronaviruses infection. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2021;12:1-19. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.616993
  23. 23. Sajid MI, Moazzam M, Cho Y, Kato S, Xu A, Way JJ, et al. SiRNA therapeutics for the therapy of COVID-19 and other coronaviruses. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 2021;18(6):2105-2121. DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c01239
  24. 24. Medeiros IG, Khayat AS, Stransky B, Santos S, Assumpção P, de Souza JES. A small interfering RNA (siRNA) database for SARS-CoV-2. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):8849. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88310-8
  25. 25. Chandra N, Anand P, Yeturu K. Structural bioinformatics: Deriving biological insights from protein structures. Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences. 2010;2(4):347-366. DOI: 10.1007/s12539-010-0045-6
  26. 26. Shiloputra AF, Parikesit AA, Darmawan JT, Pricillia V, Turista DDR, Ansori ANM. An overview of the curcumin-based and Allicin bioactive compounds as potential treatment to SARS-CoV-2 with structural bioinformatics tools. Jurnal Teknologi Laboratorium. 2021;10(2):59-67. DOI: 10.29238/TEKNOLABJOURNAL.V10I2.291
  27. 27. Standley DM, Kinjo AR, Kinoshita K, Nakamura H. Protein structure databases with new web services for structural biology and biomedical research. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2008;9(4):276-285. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbn015
  28. 28. Korber B, LaBute M, Yusim K. Immunoinformatics comes of age. PLoS Computational Biology. 2006;2(6):e71. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020071
  29. 29. Lounnas V, Ritschel T, Kelder J, McGuire R, Bywater RP, Foloppe N. Current progress in structure-based rational drug design marks a new mindset in drug discovery. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. 2013;5(6):1-10. DOI: 10.5936/csbj.201302011
  30. 30. Parikesit AA. Introductory chapter: The contribution of bioinformatics as blueprint Lead for drug design. In: Glavic I, editor. Molecular Insight of Drug Design. London, UK: INTECH; 2018. p. 7. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.79664
  31. 31. Kharisma VD, Jatmiko YD, Ansori ANM, Wicaksono A, Mustafa I. Virophage: The hijacker of my hijacker is my friend. Research Journal of Biotechnology. 2021;16(10):179-185. DOI: 10.25303/1610rjbt179185
  32. 32. Gorbalenya AE, Lauber C. Bioinformatics of virus taxonomy: Foundations and tools for developing sequence-based hierarchical classification. Current Opinion in Virology. 2022;52:48-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.coviro.2021.11.003
  33. 33. Grant BJ, Skjærven L, Yao X-Q. Comparative protein structure analysis with Bio3D-web. In: Gáspári Z, editor. Structural Bioinformatics: Methods and Protocols. New York, USA: Springer US; 2020. pp. 15-28. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0270-6_2
  34. 34. Waman VP, Sen N, Varadi M, Daina A, Wodak SJ, Zoete V, et al. The impact of structural bioinformatics tools and resources on SARS-CoV-2 research and therapeutic strategies. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2020;22(2):742-768. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa362
  35. 35. Cooper S, Khatib F, Baker D. Increasing public involvement in structural biology. Structure. 2013;21(9):1482-1484. DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2013.08.009
  36. 36. Noble CG, Shi PY. Structural biology of dengue virus enzymes: Towards rational design of therapeutics. Antiviral Research. 2012;96(2):115-126
  37. 37. Vedadi M, Arrowsmith CH, Allali-Hassani A, Senisterra G, Wasney GA. Biophysical characterization of recombinant proteins: A key to higher structural genomics success. Journal of Structural Biology. 2010;172(1):107-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.05.005
  38. 38. Chandra N, Parikesit AA. Chapter 2: The S gene primer Design for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus. In: Updates in Internal Sciences for 2021. Golbasi, Turkey: Iksad Publishing House; 2021. p. 334. Available from: https://iksadyayinevi.com/home/updates-in-internal-sciences-for-2021/
  39. 39. Rahmasari R, Raekiansyah M, Azallea SN, Nethania M, Bilqisthy N, Rozaliyani A, et al. Low-cost SYBR green-based RT-qPCR assay for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in an Indonesian setting using WHO-recommended primers. Heliyon. 2022;0:e11130. DOI: 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2022.E11130
  40. 40. WHO. Diagnostic Testing for SARS-CoV-2. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2020. p. 20
  41. 41. WHO. SARS-CoV-2 Antigen-detecting Rapid Diagnostic Tests: An Implementation Guide. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2021. p. 48
  42. 42. WHO. Guidelines on Establishment of Virology Laboratory in Developing Countries. New Delhi, India: WHO South East Asia; 2008. p. 58
  43. 43. Hidayat SN, Julian T, Dharmawan AB, Puspita M, Chandra L, Rohman A, et al. Hybrid learning method based on feature clustering and scoring for enhanced COVID-19 breath analysis by an electronic nose. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 2022;129:102323. DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102323
  44. 44. Nurputra DK, Kusumaatmaja A, Hakim MS, Hidayat SN, Julian T, Sumanto B, et al. Fast and noninvasive electronic nose for sniffing out COVID-19 based on exhaled breath-print recognition. Npj Digital Medicine. 2022;5(1):1-17. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-022-00661-2
  45. 45. van Raaij BFM, Veltman JD, Hameete JF, Stöger JL, Geelhoed JJM. Diagnostic performance of eNose technology in COVID-19 patients after hospitalization. BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 2023;23:134. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-023-02407-6
  46. 46. Nurputra DK, Triyana K, Sasongko T. Riset: GeNose C19, hidung elekronik pendeteksi virus corona sensitivitasnya sebanding tes PCR. theconv. 2021. Available from: https://theconversation.com/riset-genose-c19-hidung-elekronik-pendeteksi-virus-corona-sensitivitasnya-sebanding-tes-pcr-154828
  47. 47. Rychlý O, Hosnedlová B, Parikesit AA, Hoai NV, Kepinska M, Ruttkay-Nedecký B, et al. African swine fever virus detection using supermagnetic nanoparticles. Workshop of Biophysical Chemists and Electrochemists. 2021;2021:105-107. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5715711
  48. 48. Rychly O, Hosnedlova B, Parikesit AA, JAKUBEK M, Kepinska M, Vasickova P, Kizek R. Constant Current Chronopotentiometry: Study of DNA for the Detection of African Swine Fever Virus. 2021. pp. 290-297. DOI: 10.37904/NANOCON.2021.4357
  49. 49. Yang X, Yin Z-Z, Zheng G, Zhou M, Zhang H, Li J, et al. Molecularly imprinted miniature electrochemical biosensor for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein based on Au nanoparticles and reduced graphene oxide modified acupuncture needle. Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2023;151:108375. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2023.108375
  50. 50. Larsson DSD, Liljas L, van der Spoel D. Virus capsid dissolution studied by microsecond molecular dynamics simulations. PLoS Computational Biology. 2012;8:1-8. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002502
  51. 51. Olson MA, Yeh IC, Lee MS. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Folding and Insertion of the Ebola Virus Fusion Peptide into a Membrane Bilayer. 2008. Available from: http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA501471
  52. 52. Rosmalena F, Tedjo A. Design of linear peptide as neuraminidase inhibitor Influenza A virus base on molecular docking simulation. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Mathematics and Natural Sciences (ICMNS 2010). 2010. Available from: http://icmns.fa.itb.ac.id/proceedings/SESSION-1-HEALTH-SCIENCES/69.Fadilah.pdf
  53. 53. Afiahayati B, Gunadi S, Wibawa H, Hakim MS, Marcellus AA, Dewa CK, et al. A comparison of bioinformatics pipelines for enrichment Illumina next generation sequencing Systems in Detecting SARS-CoV-2 virus strains. Genes. 2022;13(8):1330. DOI: 10.3390/genes13081330
  54. 54. Jain M, Olsen HE, Paten B, Akeson M. The Oxford Nanopore MinION: Delivery of nanopore sequencing to the genomics community. Genome Biology. 2016;17(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1186/S13059-016-1103-0
  55. 55. Ahmad A, Ashraf S, Majeed HN, Aslam S, Aslam MA, Mubarik MS, et al. Bioinformatic tools in CRISPR/Cas platform. In: Ahmad A, Khan SH, Khan Z, editors. The CRISPR/Cas Tool Kit for Genome Editing. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2022. pp. 53-111. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-6305-5_3
  56. 56. Torres C, Vitalis EA, Baker BR, Gardner SN, Torres MW, Dzenitis JM. LAVA: An open-source approach to designing LAMP (loop-mediated isothermal amplification) DNA signatures. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12(1):240. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-240
  57. 57. Broughton JP, Deng X, Yu G, Fasching CL, Servellita V, Singh J, et al. CRISPR-Cas12–based detection of SARS-CoV-2. Nature Biotechnology. 2020;38(7):870-874. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0513-4
  58. 58. Thompson D, Lei Y. Mini review: Recent progress in RT-LAMP enabled COVID-19 detection. Sensors and Actuators Reports. 2020;2(1):100017. DOI: 10.1016/j.snr.2020.100017
  59. 59. Hicks CL, Clark-Safko PA, Surjawan I, O’Leary J. Use of bacteriophage-derived peptides to delay phage infections. Food Research International. 2004;37(2):115-122. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2003.09.009
  60. 60. Julander JG, Thibodeaux BA, Morrey JD, Roehrig JT, Blair CD. Humanized monoclonal antibody 2C9-cIgG has enhanced efficacy for yellow fever prophylaxis and therapy in an immunocompetent animal model. Antiviral Research. 2014;103:32-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.12.011
  61. 61. Mitsunaka S, Yamazaki K, Pramono AK, Ikeuchi M, Kitao T, Ohara N, et al. Synthetic engineering and biological containment of bacteriophages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022;119(48):e2206739119. DOI: 10.1073/PNAS.2206739119
  62. 62. Seguritan V, Alves N, Arnoult M, Raymond A, Lorimer D, Burgin AB, et al. Artificial neural networks trained to detect viral and phage structural proteins. PLoS Computational Biology. 2012;8(8):e1002657. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002657

Written By

Arli Aditya Parikesit

Published: 20 December 2023