Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Plant Secondary Metabolites and Abiotic Stress Tolerance: Overview and Implications

Written By

Attiqa Rahman, Ghadeer M. Albadrani, Ejaz Ahmad Waraich, Tahir Hussain Awan, İlkay Yavaş and Saddam Hussain

Submitted: 05 March 2023 Reviewed: 27 April 2023 Published: 17 May 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.111696

From the Edited Volume

Plant Abiotic Stress Responses and Tolerance Mechanisms

Edited by Saddam Hussain, Tahir Hussain Awan, Ejaz Ahmad Waraich and Masood Iqbal Awan

Chapter metrics overview

322 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Plant secondary metabolites (PSM) are one of the major sources of industrially important products such as food additives due to their distinctive tastes, smells, and flavors. Unlike primary metabolites such as carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins, these secondary chemicals are not involved in plant growth, development, and reproduction but play a significant role in ecosystem functioning. These secondary biochemicals also play a key role in plant communication and defense, particularly under different environmental stresses. Plants may exhibit a defense response to combat these abiotic environmental stressors by generating a variety of PSMs to minimize cell and tissue damage. Secondary metabolites are very diverse (almost more than 200,000) in nature, majorly classified into terpenoids, phenolic compounds, nitrogen, and sulfur-containing secondary metabolites, separated based on biosynthetic pathways (shikimate pathway, mevalonic pathway, and tricarboxylic acid cycle pathway). This chapter summarizes the stimulating effects of different abiotic stressors (heavy metals, cold and high temperature, light, salinity, and drought) on secondary metabolite production. A major focus is given on the synthesis of secondary metabolite and accumulation in plants under stressful conditions, and their role in the regulation of plant defense.

Keywords

  • secondary metabolites
  • ecosystem regulator
  • abiotic stresses
  • phenolics
  • plant defense
  • terpenoids

1. Introduction

Primary and secondary metabolites are two categories of substances synthesized by plants. Primary metabolites that directly contribute to plant growth and development include lipids, proteins, and carbohydrates. On the other hand, secondary metabolites (SMs) are multipurpose metabolites that frequently participate in plant defense and environmental communications [1]. Interspecies communication, controlling the activity of enzymes, signaling, and defense are just a few of the tasks performed by SMs [2].

The SMs play a major role in the plant’s capacity to endure abiotic stressors. The plant defense system has developed under a variety of stress detection systems, including transmembrane recognition, and the creation of SMs, which ultimately help plants to withstand these harsh or stressful conditions [3, 4].

Secondary metabolism also permits ecological interactions between plants and some other species and contributes to the capacity of plants to adjust and survive in response to environmental conditions throughout their lifecycle [5]. Plants are often at risk from a variety of abiotic stresses, such as oxidative and toxic metals, extreme cold, flooding, salinity, and drought [6]. Plants create a variety of low molecular weight chemicals known as secondary metabolites, such as anthocyanins, phenolic compounds, alkaloids, flavonoids, steroids, and terpenes. These phytochemicals are vital for a plant’s protection, adaptation, and environmental adjustment [7].

Plant secondary metabolites are distinctive sources of flavorings, food additives, and medications with significant industrial use [8]. A transition from a rapid growth period to a stationary(inactive) phase in plants is typically due to the highest amounts of SMs production. Secondary metabolism is a crucial component of organic metabolism and biological processes; it mainly relies on primary metabolism for the contribution of the necessary enzymes, ATP, and cellular machinery and has a role to make a significant contribution to the producer organism’s long-term survival. However, their manufactured organisms can grow and develop even without these secondary compounds, recommending that secondary metabolism is not necessary, at least for short-term or temporary survival [9].

Regulating plant tolerance at the cellular level is crucial for controlling stress responses and signal transduction systems [10]. For instance, the capacity of cotton to synthesize flavonoids and derivatives of cinnamic acid under drought stress tolerance indicated that they are highly effective at scavenging ROS [11], whereas the ability of reed plants to produce isoprene during heat-induced stress suggested that they have an effective antioxidant capacity that can quench oxygen [12]. There are more than 200,000 SMs known in plants [13]. Some SMs are unique to certain plant taxa, and their concentrations might differ between populations and individual plants depending on tissue type and specific plant development stage [14]. Although such SMs variations may be a result of genetic variability, their concentrations are also influenced by abiotic factors (growth circumstances) that are anticipated to get worse with climate change (such as heat stress, drought, and UV radiation) [15]. It has been believed that increased synthesis of the majority of SMs by a plants mechanism for chemical defense response is linked to their resistance to stress and that this may be one explanation for the existence of variation in the type and quantity of SMs produced by different plants taxonomic groups [16, 17].

This chapter elaborates on the sources and classification of plant secondary metabolites, their synthesis under unfavorable conditions, and their role in modulating plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance.

Advertisement

2. Sources and classification of secondary metabolites

A simple classification of plant secondary metabolites includes three main groups: terpenes (which include plant volatiles, cardiac glycosides, carotenoids, and sterols), phenolics (which include phenolic acids, coumarins, lignans, stilbenes, flavonoids, tannins, and lignin), and nitrogen-containing compounds (which include alkaloids and glucosinolates) [18].

2.1 Terpenoids

Terpenoids are the largest and most diverse collection of natural products and contain thousands of isoprene units ranging from hemiterpenes to rubber, varying in structure from linear to polycyclic molecules. Each terpene is produced by the condensed isoprene units, and all of them are classified based on the number of carbon (5C) units that make up the basic structure [19].

A monoterpene is a compound composed of two isoprene units (C10) and is found in a wide range of plants. Terpenoids were first reported in their volatile forms, where they contributed to abiotic stress tolerance and chemical communications between species [20]. Terpenes have several uses for attracting pollinators, protecting plants from herbivores [21], and also acting as deadly insecticides and insect repellents [22].

2.2 Phenolics

Phenolics are a crucial subclass of aromatic PSMs, with one or many acidic hydroxyl groups linked to phenyl-ring [23, 24]. Phenolics are a family of heterogeneous molecules made up of about 10,000 chemicals that are both soluble in water and organic solvents [25]. Plants, fungi, and bacteria can make these substances [26].

Phenolic compounds are classified based on their structural characteristics (phenols (C6), phenolic acids (C6-C1 or C6-C3), flavonoids (C6-C3-C6), and tannins (C6-C3-C6)). They can occasionally be further divided according to the degree of polymerization: (I) High molecular weight phenolic compounds, such as tannins, are water-soluble molecules that are strongly polymerized and fall under two subfamilies with distinct properties (II). The majority of saprotrophic organisms readily use low molecular weight phenolic compounds, which are discovered in most plants in glycosylated and solubilized form; however, some of them have specific biological activities such as cinnamic acids, in dicot angiosperms, the bulk of hydrolyzable tannins are present. Pro-anthocyanidins is another name for condensed tannins, which are polymers of flavan-3-ols (flavonoids) [27].

They serve significant roles in giving fruits, flowers, and seeds color, smell, and flavor, and they also have powerful antioxidant qualities because of their physical and chemical makeup [28]. Moreover, these substances have an impact on interactions between plants, such as allelopathic inhibition of targeted species growth [29].

2.3 Nitrogen-containing secondary metabolites

Glucosinolates, alkaloids, and cyanogenic glycosides make up a significant class of nitrogen-containing SMs. Alkaloids are basically alkaline compounds, which have low molecular weight and make up a large group of secondary metabolites [30]. The majority of alkaloids occur in their free state as N-oxides or mix with acids to form salts that can easily dissolve in water [24]. Alkaloids are identified due to the presence of at least one nitrogen atom, and they have a noticeable physiological impact on animal behavior; for instance, many of them have poisonous or analgesic effects (such as cocaine or morphine) [21].

Cyanogenic glucosides (CNglcs), also known as α-hydroxy nitrile glucosides, are naturally occurring bioactive plant secondary metabolites generated from amino acids and primarily composed of the sugar D-glucose [31]. According to Picmanová et al. [32], CNglcs are thought to be crucial for plant development, growth, and tolerance against different abiotic stressors [33].

2.4 Sulfur contains secondary metabolites

Phytoalexins, defensins, glutathione (GSH), and allicin are just a few of these substances that have been linked either directly or indirectly to plants’ protection against microbial diseases [34]. The GSH is one of the primary forms of organic sulfur, which is present in soluble parts of plants and is essential for controlling plant development and growth as well as working as an antioxidant in cells under stress [35].

Higher plants synthesize glucosylates (GSL), a type of low molecular weight plant glucosides containing nitrogen and sulfur to boost their resistance against predators, competitors, and parasites. These compounds degrade into toxic or repellent volatile defense chemicals, for example, allylcys sulfoxides in allium and mustard oil and glucosides in Cruciferae [36]. A typical structural characteristic of Brassica phytoalexins is an indole or closely similar ring structure. These secondary metabolites are different compared to other well-known GSLs and appear to exclusively be produced by the plant family Cruciferae. Due to their high value, multiple research teams have looked at cruciferous phytoalexins as well as their biological activities over the past few decades [37].

Advertisement

3. Production sites and biosynthesis of secondary metabolites

Within plant cells, many secondary compounds are biosynthesized from primary metabolites, and their production can be stimulated under many abiotic elicitors and signaling molecules [38]. Under stressful environments, specific SMs conditionally accumulate in different plant sections [39]. The Krebs cycle and the Shikimate pathway are run where the precursors of metabolites are formed. The important starting materials for SMs are primary metabolites. Based on their chemical makeup, intended use, and distribution in plants, primary and SMs can be separated from one another. In most plants, the basic biosynthesis routes of metabolites remain conserved and most of the primary metabolites are present in all tissue types. Several basic metabolic frameworks have emerged because of the preservation of this metabolic core. Many modifications in fundamental structures result from regular glycosylation, methylation, hydroxylation, acylation, oxidation, phosphorylation, and prenylation, as well as from fewer chemical modifications brought on by the specialized enzymes.

The three main categories of SMs can be separated based on biosynthetic pathways. Phenolic substances are synthesized through the shikimate pathway. Terpenes are synthesized through the mevalonic pathway, while the N-containing substances are synthesized through tricarboxylic acid cycle pathway [40]. The precursor of the shikimate pathway (from the pentose phosphate pathway) is shikimic acid, which is produced when erythrose 4-phosphate and phosphoenolpyruvate from the glycolytic pathway combine. Phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan are the precursors for PSMs like phenolics, and N-containing compounds are produced via the shikimate pathway and also serve as the building blocks for protein synthesis [39]. In contrast to tryptophan (which is the precursor of alkaloids, phytoalexins, indole glucosinolates, and plant hormones like auxin), tyrosine further produces isoquinoline alkaloids, pigment betalains, and quinones (such as tocochromanols and plastoquinone) [41].

Advertisement

4. Metabolomic approaches for quantifying secondary metabolites

Understanding the kinds and quantities of SMs generated by the kingdom of plants is beneficial for plant research since this production reveals how plants have evolved in nature to meet various challenges [42]. We need to use a wide range of various analysis tools to get better handling of metabolites for plant metabolomics due to the wide variety of chemical classes and characteristics as well as their enormous dynamic range of metabolite concentrations in plants.

After the organic substrate has been extracted using a non-polar solvent, the only approach for terpene analysis is through GCMS (gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy). The principle behind the technique is the specific absorption of near-infrared electromagnetic radiation by different OCs (organic compounds), which is known as near-infrared spectrometry (NIRS). This method creates spectra reflecting the material’s organic composition (nitrogen, lignin, cellulose, hemicelluloses, etc.) [43]. Another recently created comprehensive method is called “metabolomics,” which enables quantitative determination and all metabolites’ identifications in different tissue by using a variety of analytical methods such as gas/liquid chromatography (GC/LC) combined with mass spectrometry (MS) or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Metabolomics provides a full snapshot of the chemical makeup of a tissue (such as a leaf) at a specific moment, enabling somebody to focus on the least understood chemicals and evaluate or recognize metabolites that have insufficient information [44].

Folin-Ciocalteu method, used to calculate the concentration of OH phenolic compounds that are bound to the benzene ring is the method most frequently employed to examine the phenolic fraction of plants [45]. The Folin-Ciocalteu reagent reacts with phenolic groups to produce a blue complex, which is the basis for this procedure [46].

The STME (Silicone tubing microextraction) is a technique created by Mohney et al. [47] and is one of the newer techniques that open up new opportunities for studying secondary metabolites in soils. Direct placement of sorbent microtubes in the soil allows for in situ monitoring of allelochemicals released from roots [48].

Advertisement

5. Secondary metabolite accumulation under various environmental factors

The production and accumulation of PSMs in tissues are tightly regulated in a spatiotemporal way and influenced by many abiotic factors [49]. Environmental factors affect how PSMs produce and accumulate in different plants [50]. The alkaloid content of Catharanthus roseus seedlings under salt stress and water stress (drought) was significantly higher than when it is under control conditions [51]. Different abiotic stress conditions also have a substantial impact on the formation of phenolic chemicals [52]. Oryza sativa stimulates phenolics secretions in the stele and epidermis of roots in alkaline conditions, which effectively boosts ion absorption and reduces iron-deficiency reactions [53].

Polyphenols that are also called flavonoids are antioxidants and necessary for plant tolerance against different abiotic stresses [54]. In model plants, excessive accumulation of various flavonoids such as kaempferol, quercetin, and cyanidin is well known [55]. Heat and salt stress increased flavonoid accumulation in O. sativa, which enhanced tolerance in rice against these stresses [56]. Short-wavelength radiation causes a number of flavanol glycosides including quercetin and kaempferol glycosides, which strengthen plant defenses against different stresses [57]. In plants of Brassicaceae family, glucosinolates are significant precursors to several active components [58]. Strong light, high temperatures, and drought caused more accumulation of glucosinolates in Brassica rapa [59]. Brassica oleracea show strong tolerance against chilling and freezing, and it is suggested that the defensive mechanism enabling this tolerance involves the glucosinolates concentrations induced by low temperature [60].

Advertisement

6. Plant secondary metabolites and abiotic stress tolerance

Metabolic processes that lead to the accumulation of natural products are affected by the concentrations of various PSMs, which greatly affect growth conditions. Numerous typical reactions occur when abiotic stresses affect the stimulation of PSMs.

6.1 Heavy metals

Zinc, manganese, nickel, and iron are essential for the development of photosystems (I & II) and different enzymes in plant cells [61]. An excess of various metals especially toxic metals is harmful to plants; as a result, plant cells have systems in place to prevent these metals’ poisonous buildup. Recent research has focused on the development of SMs within plants under heavy metal stress [62]. The formation of different photosynthetic pigments, sugars, proteins, and non-protein thiols is affected by heavy metals at physiological and metabolic levels in plants. By altering certain parts of secondary metabolism, metals can change how bioactive molecules are produced [63].

Secondary metabolite synthesis is also regulated by metal ions (europium, silver, lanthanum, and cadmium) and oxalates [64]. Urease enzyme, which is an essential component of the trace metal nickel (Ni), is required for the development of plants [65]. It has been demonstrated that Cu2+ and Cd2+ increase the yields of secondary metabolites such as shikonin [66]. Babula and colleagues [67] examined the physiological reactions of Hypericum perforatum plants to cadmium stress in several tissues, specifically in the shoots and the roots. Their findings revealed an increase in phenolic acids (ferulic acid), and on the other hand, there was a decrease in flavonoids (epicatechin and procyanidin) in shoots as well as in roots. It is interesting to note that PAL (phenylalanine ammonia lyase), the first gene to intervene in the phenylpropanoid pathway, was found to be directly correlated with heavy metal accumulation [68]. This showed how heavy metals affect the genes that are responsible for producing phenylpropanoids and explained why phenolic acids build up in heavy metal-stressed plant cells. To conserve energy plants, produce phenolic acids (hydroxycinnamic acids), and may prefer to invest in the first steps of the pathway rather than activating the genes that would otherwise interfere with the proceeding steps (which result in the synthesis of flavonoids and anthocyanins). It was previously mentioned that phenolic compounds are produced as a defensive mechanism in response to toxic metal stress. Phenolics are powerful Cd chelators and the roots of Matricaria chamomilla produce more of these compounds than other plants [69].

In plant cells, oxidants and antioxidants coexist in a dynamic balance that prevents ROS buildup [70]. Secondary metabolites play a well-established role in reducing ROS stress [71]. The plant secondary metabolites that can combat ROS and prevent oxidative stress are polyphenols and terpenes [72]. Their scavenging abilities are also caused by these molecules, it is important to note that the antioxidant characteristic of flavonoids is determined by their OH groups that provide electrons and hydrogen to radicals to stabilize them [73]. A CdSO4 treatment led to an increase in protective soluble phenolic compounds within the woody species Populus x canescens [74]. In contrast to the wood, where ROS were created at a faster rate these chemicals were more prevalent in the bark. These findings showed that different organs of the same tree exhibit diverse responses to heavy metals and that these responses are correlated with the capability of plants to produce different SMs [75].

6.2 Temperatures (cold and high temperatures)

The temperature has a significant impact on plant ontology and metabolic activity, and extreme heat can expedite the senescence of leaves. Thermal treatments were observed to marginally reduce carotenoids in Brassicaceae, including β-carotene [76]. Temperatures and the phenological stage had an impact on the production of SMs in Rhodiola rosea clones [77], and increased levels of toxic metals boosted SMs production with a synergistic action associated [78]. Within suitable temperature ranges, plants can grow and develop more effectively. The development and production of plants may be negatively impacted by low and high temperatures [79]. Heat stress affects plants that are growing in hot environments. Stomatal conductance and net CO2 fixation drop due to heat stress are linked to decreased plant growth and yield. Heat stress in plants and SMs biosynthesis are related to one another [80]. A decrease in the photochemical efficiency of photosystem II is seen in plants developing under heat stress. A review of the literature found that plants under heat stress often produce more SMs, but some studies also showed a decrease in SMs production under elevated temperatures; ginsenoside levels were increased in Panax quinquefolius plants that were cultivated under elevated temperature stress [65].

Among the most detrimental abiotic stressors affecting temperate plants is low-temperature stress. Due to seasonal temperature changes, several species’ metabolisms have modified in the fall to contain more of a variety of cryo-protective compounds for enhancing their capacity to survive cold temperatures [81]. When a temperate plant overwinters, its metabolism is switched to the synthesis of molecules that act as cryoprotectants, such as sugar alcohols, and low molecular weight nitrogenous compounds [81]. Low-temperature stress inhibits metabolic processes, water absorption, and cellular dehydration in many plants [82]. Freezing temperatures caused photosynthesis in Capsicum annuum plants ultimately reducing the plant growth. Cold acclimation occurs when plants that are growing at low temperatures show significant changes in a variety of physiochemical and molecular mechanisms allowing plants to withstand these cold temperature stresses. Moreover, information about the decline in photosynthetic pigments and total soluble protein content in plants during cold temperatures has been documented in the literature [83]. The production and storage of SMs were noticeably decreased under low-temperature stress [80]. Phenolic synthesis is also observed to be increased by cold stress [84]. The relationship between temperature and the production of alkaloids has been observed, particularly with high temperatures being preferred to trigger alkaloid production. At low temperatures, the accumulation of the alkaloids was constrained in dry Papaver somniferum [85]. In contrast to the control, the overall phenolic acid content and isoflavonoids (genistein, daidzein, and genistin) in soybean (Glycine max) roots increased when these roots were treated at a cold temperature for 24 hours with genistin showing the greatest rise of 310% [86]. Christie et al. [87] documented the development of anthocyanins during low-temperature stress. Pinus pinaster undergoes modifications in its endogenous jasmonates because of cold and water stressors [88].

According to Lei et al. [89], melatonin protects carrot suspension cells against cold-induced apoptosis via upregulating the polyamines (putrescine and spermine). According to a recent study by Zhao et al. [90], melatonin has been shown to increase the longevity of Rhodiola crenulata cryopreserved callus. Kovacs et al. [91] observed that when wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) leaves are subjected to low temperatures putrescine accumulates (6–9 times), spermidine accumulates less, and spermine declines little. Moreover, under low-temperature stress, alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) also accumulates putrescine [92]. According to Hummel et al. [93], agmatine and putrescine levels have been linked to enhanced levels of cold tolerance, and they may serve as a useful indicator of this trait in P. antiscorbutica seedlings. Perilla frutescens suspension cultures showed a striking reduction in anthocyanin production at an elevated temperature of 28°C, which was the greatest at 25°C [94]. Similar findings on anthocyanin productivity at its maximum production level in Daucus carota cell suspension cultures were described [95]. Under the influence of various temperatures, Beta vulgaris hairy root cultures were observed and examined for a release of these pigments [96]. The ideal temperature ranges for each plant species and cultivar are unique, and any variation from those limits may have an impact on biomass and the production of SMs.

6.3 Salinity stress

Salinity stress affects plant growth and the production of bioactive compounds [9798]. Many plant species create phenolics to defend themselves against different abiotic stress conditions, including salinity, and their buildup is correlated with plant species’ antioxidant capacities [99]. Proline levels in the roots of salt-tolerant alfalfa plants increased quickly according to research by Petrusa and Winicov, the increase was gradual in salt-sensitive plants [100]. Many plants have also observed an increase in polyphenol content in various tissues under salt stress [101]. Navarro et al. [102] found that red peppers had an enhanced total phenolic content at a moderate salinity level. It has been demonstrated that plant polyamines influence how plants react to salinity. There have been reports of alterations in polyamine levels caused by salinity in Helianthus annuus L. (sunflower) roots [103]. The effects of KCl treatment on amounts of total phenolics and flavonoids in C. cardunculus and Cardunculus var. altilis leaves were more pronounced than those of the other two chloride salts (NaCl and CaCl2) [104] (Table 1).

Plant speciesSalinity levelsEffects on the concentrations of SMsReferences
Solanum nigrum0, 50, 100, & 150 mMSalinity stress increased the expression of the flavonoid genes, which in turn increased the synthesis of quercetin 3-d-glucoside and lutein. Moreover, certain carotenoid-related genes, such as phytoene synthase 2 and lycopene cyclase were just overexpressed in response to salt stress.[105]
Zea Mays0 & 100 mMSalinity stress increased the total phenolic and flavonoid levels.[106]
O. sativa0 & 25 mMGrain nutritional quality, including antioxidant activities, anthocyanins, and total phenolics, was significantly improved under salinity stress.[107]
Triticum astivum0 & 150 mMSalinity stress increased phenolics, particularly at the booting stage.[108]
Lepidium sativum30, 60, 90, & 120 mMAccumulation of flavonoids and phenolic compounds in L. sativum was increased under salinity stress.[109]
Saccharum officinarum12.5 & 6.8 dS/mSalinity stress altered the production of flavones, anthocyanins, and soluble phenolics in two sugarcane clones, CP-4333 and HSF-240.[110]
Fagopyrum esculentum0,50,100, & 200 mMCarotenoids, phenolics, and antioxidant activity changed noticeably when buckwheat plants were exposed to different salinity levels. Comparing plants grown under non-saline conditions to plants growing under various salinity doses, it is evident that the concentration of phenolic chemicals increased significantly.[111]
Salvia mirzayanii4.5, 6.8, & 9.1 dS/mS. mirzayanii’s antioxidant activity, phenolic content, and volatile compounds (Bicyclogermacrene, 1,8-cineole, and -terpinyl acetate) were increased under salinity stress.[112]

Table 1.

Influence of salinity stress on the biosynthesis and accumulation of different PSMs.

6.4 Drought stress

Drought stress is one of the major abiotic stresses that affect plant development and growth [93, 113]. Drought disrupts cellular homeostasis by affecting proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, and DNA. It has an impact on the plant’s height, root growth, and leaf area (LA) [114, 115]. Moreover, drought has a significant impact on the physiology of plants, including osmotic potential, stomatal conductance, rate of photosynthesis, pressure potential, and transpiration rates [116]. Drought stress poses a serious threat to sustainable agriculture since it has a negative impact on crop yield globally. However, in response to drought stress, plants have evolved several morphological, physiological, biochemical, and phonological mechanisms [117].

Willow (Salix) leaves were shown to contain more flavonoids and phenolic acids during a drought, which frequently results in oxidative stress [118]. Changes in the ratio of chlorophylls “a” & “b” and carotenoids were affected by the drought [119]. Cotton under drought stress was shown to have less chlorophyll [120], as was in C. roseus [121]. In Chenopodium quinoa, drought circumstances reduced the amount of saponins from 0.46% dry weight (dw) in plants growing in low water deficit settings to 0.38% in plants growing in high water deficit situations [121]. A number of SMs generated by plants are beneficial for fostering drought resistance [96, 122].

A different study found that applying drought stress improved the quality of significant SMs in Artemisia annua [80]. Similarly, Glechoma longituba grown in drought conditions showed an increase in total flavonoids [123]. Significant changes were seen in the contents of several macronutrients, proline, carbohydrates, and essential oils in Ocimum americanum and Ocimum basilicum under water-limited circumstances [124] (Table 2).

Plant speciesDrought levelsEffects on the concentrations of SMsReferences
Achillea filipendulina25, 50,75, &100% (field capacity)Drought increased total phenolic and flavonoid concentrations.[125]
Zea maysPEG-induced (0.6 MPA)Reduced phenolic compounds and decreased plant biomass occurred under drought.[126]
O. sativa25, 45, 65, & 85% Soil moistureDrought increased the production of flavonoids, phenolics particularly in tolerant genotypes.[127]
G. maxControl (−15 to −20)
Drought (−90 & -100KPA)
Total phenolics and lignin levels significantly increased under drought[128]
Carthamus tinctorius25 and 50% water deficitPlants under mild water scarcity produced more phenolic compounds, whereas plants under severe drought showed a clear drop in phenolics. Likewise, plants exposed to moderate drought had much higher levels of carotenoids.[129]
Vitis vinifera30 & 70% Soil moistureIn plants under drought stress, the amounts of the phenolic compounds significantly dropped.[130]

Table 2.

Drought-induced alterations in the biosynthesis and storage of PSMs.

6.5 Light

The physiological reactions of various plant species and even cultivars to exposure to light conditions, such as photoperiod or small durations connected to the generation of SMs [131]. Light is a physical element that is widely established to have an impact on metabolite synthesis. In Z. officinale callus cultivation, light can enhance the formation of such secondary metabolites as gingerol and zingiberene [5]. Hence, the amounts of phenolics have been found to increase in direct proportion to light intensity.

Due to shorter light duration, many plant portions have significantly lower endogenous levels of coumarins. Furthermore, the prolonged period of light markedly enhanced the number of coumarins [132]. American ginseng (P. quinquefolius) plants that were exposed to direct sunlight for a longer period produced more ginsenoside in their roots than those that were exposed for a shorter time [133].

Blue light was found to have the greatest impact on SMs in Scutellaria laterifora shoot cultures, and their connection with PGRs (Plant growth regulators) was found [134]. The effects of various light spectra from light-emitting diode sources on the production of SMs were seen when Peucedanum japonicum callus cultures were exposed to them. The red and blue light was shown to be the most effective [135]. Based on the length of the cell suspension cultures of Artemisia absinthium, light and dark incubation conditions had a significant impact on the generation of biomass [136]. Different species have different effects on how light affects plant growth and development [131].

According to Liang et al. [137], UV-B radiation may cause a decrease in chlorophyll content while increasing flavonoid content and PAL activity. Root flavonoids in Pisum sativum plants were elevated by UV light (300–400 nm) [138]. Recent research showed that photoperiod regimes influence endogenous indoleamines (serotonin and melatonin) in farmed green algae Dunaliella bardawil [139]. In primary and secondary metabolism as well as a number of plant developmental processes, light is widely known to be essential [140]. Several studies have revealed that light sources directly induced the synthesis of crucial secondary metabolites, such as anthocyanins, artemisinin, caffeic acid derivatives, and flavonoids [141]. Regvar et al. [142] compared the effects of UV irradiation on different concentrations of rutin, catechin, and quercetin in Fagopyrum esculentum and F. tataricum, and they discovered that F. esculentum was found to have more quercetin when exposed to the elevated UV irradiation. Markham et al. [143] investigated the C-glycosyl flavone content of various rice cultivars under UV-B light and discovered that C-glycosyl flavones were enriched in a UV-tolerant rice cultivar but lacking in a sensitive cultivar.

Advertisement

7. Conclusions

This chapter explains the importance of secondary metabolites in plants’ defense against abiotic stresses such as heavy metals, flooding, salinity, and drought. These metabolites are produced in response to environmental stressors and are regulated depending upon growth circumstances and developmental stage. There are three main groups of secondary metabolites: terpenoids, phenolics, and nitrogen-containing compounds. Higher plants synthesize GSL (N & S containing secondary metabolites) to boost their resistance against predators, competitors, and parasites. The biosynthetic pathways of these SMs are distinct and use different precursors, with the shikimate pathway producing phenolic substances, the mevalonic pathway producing terpenes, and the tricarboxylic acid cycle pathway producing nitrogen-containing compounds. Understanding the types and quantities of secondary metabolites in plants is important for plant research, as it reveals how plants have evolved to cope with various challenges. Metabolomics is a comprehensive method used to identify and quantify all metabolites in different tissues. Flavonoids and glucosinolates are two examples of secondary metabolites that are important for plant tolerance against different abiotic stresses. Plant breeders have the potential to develop new plant varieties with increased tolerance to various abiotic stresses by selectively incorporating specific secondary metabolites. In the context of climate change, where plants will face more extreme environmental conditions, this could be particularly valuable.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support from Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP-HC2022/4), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Jan R, Asaf S, Numan M, Kim KM. Plant secondary metabolite biosynthesis and transcriptional regulation in response to biotic and abiotic stress conditions. Agronomy. 2021;11(5):968
  2. 2. Hussain MS, Fareed S, Ansari S, Rahman MA, Ahmad IZ, Saeed M. Current approaches toward production of secondary plant metabolites. Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied sciences. 2012;4(1):10
  3. 3. Dawid C, Hille K. Functional metabolomics—A useful tool to characterize stress-induced metabolome alterations opening new avenues towards tailoring food crop quality. Agronomy. 2018;8(8):138. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy8080138
  4. 4. Ashraf MA, Iqbal M, Rasheed R, Hussain I, Riaz M, Arif MS. Environmental stress and secondary metabolites in plants: An overview. Plant Metabolites and Regulation Under Environmental Stress. 2018:153-167. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812689-9.00008-X
  5. 5. Akula R, Ravishankar GA. Influence of abiotic stress signals on secondary metabolites in plants. Plant Signaling and Behavior. 2011;6(11):1720-1731
  6. 6. Flora SJS, Shrivastava R, Saito K. Phytochemical genomics—A new trend. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2013;16(3):373-380. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2013.04.001
  7. 7. Wink M. Evolution of secondary metabolites from ecological and molecular phenological perspective. Phytochemistry. 2013;64:3-19
  8. 8. Ravishankar GA, Rao SR. Biotechnological production of phytopharmaceuticals. Journal of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics. 2000;4:73-102
  9. 9. Roze LV, Chanda A, Linz JE. Compartmentalization and molecular traffic in secondary metabolism: A new understanding of established cellular processes. Fungal Genetics and Biology. 2011;48:35-48
  10. 10. Fraire-Velázquez S, Balderas-Hernández VE. Abiotic stress in plants and metabolic responses. In: Vahdati K, Leslie C, editors. Abiotic Stress-Plant Responses and Applications in Agriculture. New York: London, UKInTech Open Science; 2013. pp. 25-48
  11. 11. Yildiz-Aktas L, Dagnon S, Gurel A, Gesheva E, Edreva A. Drought tolerance in cotton: Involvement of non-enzymatic ROS-scavenging compounds. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 2009;195(4):247-253
  12. 12. Velikova V, Pinelli P, Loreto F. Consequences of inhibition of isoprene synthesis in Phragmites australis leaves exposed to elevated temperatures. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2005;106:209-217
  13. 13. Neilson EH, Goodger JQD, Woodrow IE, Møller BL. Plant chemical defense: At what cost? Trends in Plant Science. 2013;18:250-258
  14. 14. Ritmejeryte E, Boughton BA, Bayly MJ, Miller RE. Unique and highly specific cyanogenic glycoside localization in stigmatic cells and pollen in the genus Lomatia (Proteaceae). Annals of Botany. 2020;126:387-400
  15. 15. Sampaio BL, Edrada-Ebel R, Da Costa FB. Effect of the environment on the secondary metabolic profile of Tithonia diversifolia: A model for environmental metabolomics of plants. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:1-11
  16. 16. Goyal S, Lambert C, Cluzet S, Mérillon JM, Ramawat KG. Secondary metabolites and plant defense. In: Mérillon JM, Ramawat KG, editors. Plant defense: biological control. Netherlands: Springer; 2012. pp. 109-138
  17. 17. Ngo LT, Okogun JI, Folk WR. 21st-century natural product research and drug development and traditional medicines. Natural Product Reports. 2013;30:584-592
  18. 18. Bizzo HR, Silveira D, Gimenes MA, Tânia da S, Agostini-Costa RF, Vieira HR, et al. Gimenes. Chromatography and its Applications. 2012:131
  19. 19. Mahmoud SS, Croteau RB. Strategies for transgenic manipulation of monoterpene biosynthesis in plants. Trends in Plant Science. 2002;7:366-373
  20. 20. Langenheim JH. Higher-plant terpenoids – A phytocentric overview of their ecological roles. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1994;20:1223-1280
  21. 21. Hopkins WG. Physiologie Vegetale. Bruxelles, Belgium: De Boeck & Larcier; 2003
  22. 22. Malcovska SM, Ducaiova Z, Maslaáková I, Backor M. Effect of silicon on growth, photosynthesis, oxidative status and phenolic compounds of maize (Zea mays L.) grown in cadmium excess. Water, Air Soil Pollut. 2014;225(8):1
  23. 23. Ali M, Abbasi BH, Ihsan-ul-haq. Production of commercially important secondary metabolites and antioxidant activity in cell suspension cultures of Artemisia absinthium L. Industrial Crops and Products. 2013;49:400-406
  24. 24. Evans WC. Alkaloids. In: Evans WC, editor. Trease and Evans Pharmacognosy. Edinburgh, UK: Elsevier; 2009. pp. 353-415
  25. 25. Taiz L, Zeiger E. Secondary metabolites, and plant defense. Plant Physiology. 2006;13:125
  26. 26. Hättenschwiler S, Vitousek P. The role of polyphenols in terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2000;15:238-243
  27. 27. Moreira LR, Milanezi NV, Filho EX. Enzymology of plant cell wall breakdown: an update. Routes to cellulosic ethanol. New York, NY: Springer; 2010;73-96
  28. 28. Mierziak J, Kostyn K, Kulma A. Flavonoids as important molecules of plant interactions with the environment. Molecules. 2014;19:16240-16265
  29. 29. Weston LA, Mathesius U. Flavonoids: Their structure, biosynthesis, and role in the rhizosphere, including allelopathy. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2013;39:283-297
  30. 30. Khan S, ur Rahman L. Pathway modulation of medicinal and aromatic plants through metabolic engineering using agrobacterium tumefaciens. In: Jha S, editor. Transgenesis and Secondary Metabolism. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp. 431-462
  31. 31. Møller BL. Functional diversifications of cyanogenic glucosides. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2010;13:338-347. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi. 2010.01.009
  32. 32. Pičmanová M, Neilson EH, Motawia MS, Olsen CE, Agerbirk N, Gray CJ, et al. A recycling pathway for cyanogenic glycosides is evidenced by the comparative metabolic profiling in three cyanogenic plant species. The Biochemical Journal. 2015;469:375-389
  33. 33. Hayes CM, Weers BD, Thakran M, Burow G, Xin Z, Emendack Y, et al. Discovery of a dhurrin QTL in sorghum: co-localization of dhurrin biosynthesis and a novel stay green QTL. Crop Science. 2016;56:104-112. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2015.06.0379
  34. 34. Grubb C, Abel S. Glucosinolate metabolism and its control. Trends in Plant Science. 2006;11:89-100
  35. 35. Kang SY, Kim YC. Decursinol and decursin protect primary cultured rat cortical cells from glutamate-induced neurotoxicity. The Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2007;59(6):863-870
  36. 36. Leustek T. Sulfate metabolism. In: Somerville CR, Meyerowitz EM, editors. The Arabidopsis Book. Rockville, MD: American Society of Plant Biologists; 2002. DOI: 10.1199/tab.0009
  37. 37. Pagare S, Bhatia M, Tripathi N, Pagare S, Bansal YK. Secondary metabolites of plants and their role: Overview. Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy. 2015;9(3):293-304
  38. 38. Narayani M, Srivastava S. Elicitation: A stimulation of stress in vitro plant cell/tissue cultures for enhancement of secondary metabolite production. Phytochemistry Reviews. 2018;16(6):1227-1252
  39. 39. Ahuja I, Kissen R, Bones AM. Phytoalexins in defense against pathogens. Trends in Plant Science. 2012;17:73-90
  40. 40. Jamwal K, Bhattacharya S, Puri S. Plant growth regulator mediated consequences of secondary metabolites in medicinal plants. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. 2018;9:26-38
  41. 41. Maeda H, Dudareva N. The shikimate pathway and aromatic amino acid biosynthesis in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2012;63:73-105
  42. 42. Tohge T, Watanabe M, Hoefgen R, Fernie AR. The evolution of phenylpropanoid metabolism in the green lineage. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2013;48:123-152
  43. 43. Birth GS, Hecht HG. The physics of near-infrared reflectance. In: Williams P, Norris K, editors. Near-infrared Technology in the Agricultural and Food Industries. St. Paul, MN, USA: American Association of Cereal Chemists; 1987. pp. 1-16
  44. 44. Breitling R, Ceniceros A, Jankevics A, Takano E. Metabolomics for secondary metabolite research. Metabolites. 2013;3:1076-1083
  45. 45. Bärlocher F, MAS G. Total phenolics. In: Graca MAS, Bärlocher F, Gessner MO, editors. Methods to Study Litter Decomposition: A Practical Guide. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2005. pp. 97-110
  46. 46. Everette JD, Bryant QM, Green AM, Abbey YA, Wangila GW, Walker RB. A thorough study of reactivity of various compound classes toward the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2010;58:8139-8144
  47. 47. Mohney BK, Matz T, Lamoreaux J, Wilcox DS, Gimsing AL, Mayer P, et al. In situ silicone tube microextraction: A new method for undisturbed sampling of root-exuded thiophenes from marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) in soil. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2009;35:1279-1287
  48. 48. Weidenhamer JD, Mohney BK, Shihada N, Rupasinghe M. Spatial and temporal dynamics of root exudation: How important is heterogeneity in allelopathic interactions? Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2014;40:940-952
  49. 49. Yang CQ , Fang X, Wu XM, Mao YB, Wang LJ, Chen XY. Transcriptional regulation of plant secondary metabolism. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2012;54:703-712. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01161. x
  50. 50. Gupta ML, Dutta A. Stress-mediated adaptive response leading to genetic diversity and instability in metabolite contents of high medicinal value: An overview on Podophyllum hexandrum. OMICS. 2011;15:873-882. DOI: 10.1089/omi.2011.0096
  51. 51. Hassan FAS, Ali E, Gaber A, Fetouh MI, Mazrou R. Chitosan nanoparticles effectively combat salinity stress by enhancing antioxidant activity and alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus (L.) G Don. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2021;162:291-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.03.004
  52. 52. Sharma A, Shahzad B, Rehman A, Bhardwaj R, Landi M, Zheng B. Response of the phenylpropanoid pathway and the role of polyphenols in plants under abiotic stress. Molecules. 2019;24:2452. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24132452
  53. 53. Li H, Chen H, Deng S, Cai H, Shi L, Xu F, et al. Inhibition of nitric oxide production under alkaline conditions regulates iron homeostasis in rice. Physiologia Plantarum. 2021b;172:1465-1476. DOI: 10.1111/ppl.13333
  54. 54. Laoue J, Fernandez C, Ormeno E. Plant flavonoids in Mediterranean species: A focus on flavonols as protective metabolites under climate stress. Plants. 2022;11:172. DOI: 10.3390/plants11020172
  55. 55. Nakabayashi R, Mori T, Saito K. Alternation of flavonoid accumulation under drought stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2014;9:e29518. DOI: 10.4161/psb.29518
  56. 56. Jan R, Kim N, Lee SH, Khan MA, Asaf S, Lubna, et al. Enhanced flavonoid accumulation reduces combined salt and heat stress through the regulation of transcriptional and hormonal mechanisms. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021;12:796956. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.796956
  57. 57. Rechner O, Neugart S, Schreiner M, Wu S, Poehling HM. Can narrow-bandwidth light from UV-A to green alter secondary plant metabolism and increase Brassica plant defenses against aphids? PLoS One. 2017;12:e0188522. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188522
  58. 58. Moreno DA, Carvajal M, Lopez-Berenguer C, Garcia-Viguera C. Chemical and biological characterization of nutraceutical compounds of broccoli. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2006;41:1508-1522. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2006.04.003
  59. 59. Rao SQ , Chen XQ , Wang KH, Zhu ZJ, Yang J, Zhu B. Effect of short-term high temperature on the accumulation of glucosinolates in Brassica rapa. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2021;161:222-233. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.02.013
  60. 60. Ljubej V, Radojci Redovnikovic I, Salopek-Sondi B, Smolko A, Roje S, Samec D. Chilling and freezing temperature stress differently influence glucosinolates content in Brassica oleracea var. acephala. Plants. 2021;10:1305. DOI: 10.3390/plants10071305
  61. 61. Page V, Feller U. Heavy metals in crop plants: Transport and redistribution processes on the whole plant level. Agronomy. 2015;5:447-463. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy5030447
  62. 62. Eghbaliferiz S, Iranshahi M. Prooxidant activity of polyphenols, flavonoids, anthocyanins, and carotenoids: An updated review of mechanisms and catalyzing metals. Phytotherapy Research : PTR. 2006;30:1379-1139
  63. 63. Verpoorte R, Contin A, Memelink J. Biotechnology for the production of plant secondary metabolites. Phytochemistry Reviews. 2002;1:13-25
  64. 64. Marschner H. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. London: Academic Press; 1995. p. 889
  65. 65. Jochum GM, Mudge KW, Thomas RB. Elevated temperatures increase leaf senescence and root secondary metabolite concentrations in the understory herb Panax quinquefolius (Araliaceae). American Journal of Botany. 2007;94(5):819-826. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.94.5.819
  66. 66. Ohlsson AB, Berglund T. Effect of high MnSO4 levels on ardenolide accumulation by Digitalis lanata tissue cultures in light and darkness. Journal of Plant Physiology. 1989;135:505-507
  67. 67. Babula P, Klejdus B, Kovacik J, Hedbavny J, Hlavna M. Lanthanum rather than cadmium induces oxidative stress and metabolite changes in Hypericum perforatum. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2015;286:334-342. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.060
  68. 68. Ma C, Liu H, Guo H, Musante C, Coskun SH, Nelson BC, et al. Defense mechanisms and nutrient displacement in Arabidopsis thaliana upon exposure to CeO2 and In2O3 nanoparticles. Environmental Science. Nano. 2016;3:1369-1379. DOI: 10.1039/C6EN00189K
  69. 69. Kovácik J, Klejdus B. Dynamics of phenolic acids and lignin accumulation in metal-treated Matricaria chamomilla roots. Plant Cell Reports. 2008;27:605-661
  70. 70. Lobo V, Patil A, Phatak A, Chandra N. Free radicals, antioxidants, and functional foods: Impact on human health. Pharmacognosy Reviews. 2010;4:118-112
  71. 71. Bartwal A, Mall R, Lohani P, Guru SK, Arora S. Role of secondary metabolites and brassinosteroids in plant defense against environmental stresses. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2013;32(1):216-232
  72. 72. Sharma P, Jha AB, Dubey RS, Pessarakli M. Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. Journal of Botany. 2012;9(8):681. DOI: 10.1155/2012/217037
  73. 73. Heim KE, Tagliaferro AR, Bobilya DJ. Flavonoid antioxidants: Chemistry, metabolism and structure-activity relationships. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. 2002;13:572-584
  74. 74. He J, Qin J, Long L, Ma Y, Li H, Li K, et al. Net cadmium flux and accumulation reveal tissue-specific oxidative stress and detoxification in Populus × canescens. Physiologia Plantarum. 2011;143:50-63
  75. 75. Berni R, Luyckx M, Xu X, Legay S, Sergeant K, Hausman JF, et al. Reactive oxygen species and heavy metal stress in plants: Impact on the cell wall and secondary metabolism. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2019;161:98-106
  76. 76. Morison JIL, Lawlor DW. Interactions between increasing CO2 concentration and temperature on plant growth. Plant, Cell & Environment. 1999;22:659-682
  77. 77. Thomsen MG, Galambosi B, Galambosi Z, Uusitalo M, Mordal R, Heinonen A. Harvest time and drying temperature effect on secondary metabolites in Rhodiola rosea. Acta Horticulturae. 2012;955:243-252
  78. 78. Zhao YH, Jia X, Wang WK, Liu T, Huang SP, Yang MY. Growth under elevated air temperature alters secondary metabolites in Robinia pseudoacacia L. seedlings in Cd-and Pb-contaminated soils. Science of the Total Environment. 2016;565:586-594
  79. 79. Yadav SK. Cold stress tolerance mechanisms in plants. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2010;30(3):515-527
  80. 80. Verma N, Shukla S. Impact of various factors responsible for fluctuation in plant secondary metabolites. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. 2015;2(4):105-113
  81. 81. Janska A, Marsik P, Zelenkova S, Ovesna J. Cold stress and acclimation—What is important for metabolic adjustment? Plant Biology. 2010;12:395-405
  82. 82. Chinnusamy V, Zhu J, Zhu J-K. Cold stress regulation of gene expression in plants. Trends in Plant Science. 2007;12(10):444-451. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.07.002
  83. 83. Esra K, Işlek C, Üstün AS. Effect of cold on protein, proline, phenolic compounds, and chlorophyll content of two pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) varieties. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2010;23(1):1-6
  84. 84. Griffith M, Yaish MWF. Antifreeze proteins in overwintering plants: A tale of two activities. Trends in Plant Science. 2004;9:399-405. DOI: 10.1016/j. tplants.2004.06.007
  85. 85. Bernáth J, Tétényi P. The effect of environmental factors on growth, development, and alkaloid production of poppy (Papaver somniferum L.): I. responses to day-length and light intensity. Biochemie und Physiologie der Pflanzen. 1979;174:468-478
  86. 86. Janas KM, Cvikrová M, Pałagiewicz A, Szafranska K, Posmyk MM. Constitutively elevated accumulation of phenylpropanoids in soybean roots at low temperatures. Plant Science. 2002;163:369-373
  87. 87. Christie PJ, Alfenito MR, Walbot V. Impact of low temperature stress on general phenylpropanoid and anthocyanin pathways: Enhancement of transcript abundance and anthocyanin pigmentation in maize seedlings. Planta. 1994;194:541-549
  88. 88. Pedranzani H, Sierra-de-Grado R, Vigliocco A, Miersch O, Abdala G. Cold, and water stresses produce changes in endogenous jasmonates in two populations of Pinus pinaster Ait. Plant Growth Regulation. 2003;52:111-116
  89. 89. Lei XY, Zhu RY, Zhang GY, Dai YR. Attenuation of cold-induced apoptosis by exogenous melatonin in carrot suspension cells: The possible involvement of polyamines. Journal of Pineal Research. 2004;36:126-131. DOI: 10.1046/j.1600-079X.2003.00106.x
  90. 90. Zhao Y, Qi L, Wei-Ming WW, Saxena PK, Chun-Zhao LC. Melatonin improves the survival of cryopreserved callus of Rhodiola crenulata. Journal of Pineal Research. 2011;50:83-88. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-079X.2010.00817.x
  91. 91. Kovacs Z, Simon-Sarkadi L, Szucs A, Kocsy G. Differential effects of cold, osmotic stress and abscisic acid on polyamine accumulation in wheat. Amino Acids. 2011;38:623-631. DOI: 10.1007/s00726-009-0423-8
  92. 92. Nadeau P, Delaney S, Chouinard L. Effects of cold hardening on the regulation of polyamine levels in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant Physiology. 1987;8:73-77. DOI: 10.1104/pp.84.1.73
  93. 93. Hummel I, EI-Amrani A, Gouesbet G, Hennion F, Couee I. Involvement of polyamines in the interacting effects of low temperature and mineral supply on Pringlea antiscorbutica (Kerguelen cabbage) seedlings. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2004;399:1125-1134
  94. 94. Zhong JJ, Yoshida T. Effects of temperature on cell growth and anthocyanin production in suspension cultures of Perilla frutescens. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering. 1993;76(6):530-531
  95. 95. Narayan MS, Thimmaraju R, Bhagyalakshmi N. Interplay of growth regulators during solid-state and liquid-state batch cultivation of anthocyanin producing cell line of Daucus carota. Process Biochemistry. 2005;40:351-358
  96. 96. Thimmaraju R, Bhagyalakshmi N, Narayan MS, Ravishankar GA. Kinetics of pigment release from hairy root cultures of Beta vulgaris under the influence of pH, sonication, temperature, and oxygen stress. Process Biochemistry. 2003;38:1069-1076
  97. 97. Yang L, Wen KS, Ruan X, Zhao YX, Wei F, Wang Q. Response of plant secondary metabolites to environmental factors. Molecules. 2018;23(4):E762. DOI: 10.3390/molecules23040762
  98. 98. Mahajan S, Tuteja N. Cold, salinity and drought stresses: An overview. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2005;444:139-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2005.10.018
  99. 99. Abideen Z, Qasim M, Rasheed A, et al. Antioxidant activity and polyphenolic content of Phragmites karka under saline conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2015;47(3):813-818
  100. 100. Petrusa LM, Winicov I. Proline status in salt tolerant and salt sensitive alfalfa cell lines and plants in response to NaCl. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 1997;35:303-310
  101. 101. Parida AK, Das AB. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: A review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2005;60:324-349. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.06.010
  102. 102. Navarro JM, Flores P, Garrido C, Martinez V. Changes in the contents of antioxidant compounds in pepper fruits at ripening stages, as affected by salinity. Food Chemistry. 2006;96:66-73
  103. 103. Mutiu F, Bozcuk S. Salinity-induced changes of free and bound polyamine levels in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) roots differing in salt tolerance. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2007;39:1097-1010
  104. 104. Borgognone D, Cardarelli M, Rea E, Lucini L, Colla G. Salinity source-induced changes in yield, mineral composition, phenolic acids and flavonoids in leaves of artichoke and cardoon grown in floating system. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2014;94:1231-1237
  105. 105. Ben Abdallah S, Aung B, Amyot L, Lalin I, Lachâal M, Karray-Bouraoui N, et al. Salt stress (NaCl) affects plant growth and branch pathways of carotenoid and flavonoid biosyntheses in Solanum nigrum. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2016;38(3):72. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-016-2096-8
  106. 106. Salama ZA, Gaafar AA, El-Fouly MM. Genotypic variations in phenolic, flavonoids and their antioxidant activities in maize plants treated with Zn (II) HEDTA grown in salinized media. Agricultural Sciences. 2015;6(3):397
  107. 107. Chunthaburee S, Sanitchon J, Pattanagul W, Theerakulpisut P. Effects of salt stress after late booting stage on yield and antioxidant capacity in pigmented rice grains and alleviation of the salt-induced yield reduction by exogenous spermidine. Plant Production Science. 2015;18(1):32-42. DOI: 10.1626/pps.18.32
  108. 108. Ashraf MA, Ashraf M, Ali Q. Response of two genetically diverse wheat cultivars to salt stress at different growth stages: Leaf lipid peroxidation and phenolic contents. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2010;42(1):559-565
  109. 109. Ahmed A, Gabr A. AL–Sayed H, Smetanska I, effect of drought and salinity stress on total phenolic, flavonoids and flavonols contents and antioxidant activity in in vitro sprout cultures of garden cress (Lepidium sativum). Journal of Applied Sciences Research. 2012;8(8):3934-3942
  110. 110. Wahid A, Ghazanfar A. Possible involvement of some secondary metabolites in salt tolerance of sugarcane. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2006;163(7):723-730. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.07.007
  111. 111. Lim J-H, Park K-J, Kim B-K, Jeong J-W, Kim H-J. Effect of salinity stress on phenolic compounds and carotenoids in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum M.) sprouts. Food Chemistry. 2012;135(3):1065-1070. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.05.068
  112. 112. Valifard M, Mohsenzadeh S, Kholdebarin B, Rowshan V. Effects of salt stress on volatile compounds, total phenolic content and antioxidant activities of Salvia mirzayanii. South African Journal of Botany. 2014;93:92-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2014.04.002
  113. 113. Xu Z, Zhou G, Shimizu H. Plant responses to drought and rewatering. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2010;5:649-654. DOI: 10.4161/psb.5.6.11398
  114. 114. Ibrahim W, Zhu Y, Chen Y, Qiu CW, Zhu S, Wu F. Genotypic differences in leaf secondary metabolism, plant hormones and yield under alone and combined stress of drought and salinity in cotton genotypes. Physiologia Plantarum. 2019;165:343-355
  115. 115. Davis RF, Earl HJ, Timper P. Effect of simultaneous water deficit stress and Meloidogyne incognita infection on cotton yield and fiber quality. Journal of Nematology. 2014;46(2):108
  116. 116. Farooq M, Hussain M, Wahid A, Siddique KHM. Drought stress in plants: An overview. In: Plant Responses to Drought Stress: From Morphological to Molecular Features. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. pp. 1-33. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32653-0_1
  117. 117. Ullah A, Manghwar H, Shaban M, Khan AH, Akbar A, Ali U, et al. Phytohormones enhanced drought tolerance in plants: A coping strategy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018;25:33103-33118
  118. 118. Larson RA. The antioxidants of higher plants. Phytochemistry. 1988;27:969-978
  119. 119. Anjum F, Yaseen M, Rasul E, Wahid A, Anjum S. Water stress in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). II. Effect on chemical composition and chlorophyll contents. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2003;40:45-49
  120. 120. Massacci ASM, Nabiev L, Pietrosanti SK, Nematov TN, Chernikova K. Thor, Leipner J. Response of the photosynthetic apparatus of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) to the onset of drought stress under field conditions studied by gas-exchange analysis and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2008; 46:189-195
  121. 121. Soliz-Guerrero JB, de Rodriguez DJ, Rodriguez-Garcia R, Angulo-Sanchez JL, Mendez-Padilla G. Quinoasaponins: Concentration and composition analysis. In: Janick J, Whipkey A, editors. Trends in New Crops and New Uses. Alexandria: ASHS Press; 2002. p. 110
  122. 122. Winkel-Shirley B. Flavonoid biosynthesis, a colorful model for genetics, biochemistry, cell biology, and biotechnology. Plant Physiology. 2001;26:485-493. DOI: 10.1104/pp.126.2.485
  123. 123. Zhang L, Wang Q , Guo Q , Chang Q , Zhu Z, Liu L, et al. Growth, physiological characteristics and total flavonoid content of Glechoma longituba in response to water stress. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research. 2012;6(6):1015-1024
  124. 124. Khalid KA. Influence of water stress on growth, essential oil, and chemical composition of herbs (Ocimum sp.). International Agrophysics. 2006;20(4):289-296
  125. 125. Gharibi S, Tabatabaei BES, Saeidi G, Goli SAH. Effect of drought stress on total phenolic, lipid peroxidation, and antioxidant activity of Achillea species. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2016;178(4):796-809. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-015-1909-3
  126. 126. Moharramnejad S, Sofalian O, Valizadeh M, Asgari A, Shiri M. Proline, glycine betaine, total phenolics and pigment contents in response to osmotic stress in maize seedlings. Journal of Bioscience & Biotechnology. 2015;4:313-319
  127. 127. Quan NT, Anh LH, Khang DT, Tuyen PT, Toan NP, Minh TN, et al. Involvement of secondary metabolites in response to drought stress of rice2(Oryza sativa L.). Agriculture. 2016;6(2):23
  128. 128. Nacer B. Soybean seed phenol, lignin, and isoflavones and sugars composition altered by foliar boron application in soybean under water stress. Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2012;3(4):12. DOI: 10.4236/fns.2012.3408
  129. 129. Salem N, Msaada K, Dhifi W, Sriti J, Mejri H, Limam F, et al. Effect of drought on safflower natural dyes and their biological activities. EXCLI Journal. 2014;13:1-18
  130. 130. Król A, Amarowicz R, Weidner S. Changes in the composition of phenolic compounds and antioxidant properties of grapevine roots and leaves (Vitis vinifera L.) under continuous long-term drought stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2014;36(6):1491-1499. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-014-1526-8
  131. 131. Ghosh S, Watson A, Gonzalez-Navarro OE, et al. Speed breeding in growth chambers and glasshouses for crop breeding and model plant research. Nature Protocols. 2018;13(12):2944-2963. DOI: 10.1038/s41596-018-0072-z
  132. 132. de Castro EM, Pinto JEBP, Bertolucci SKV, Malta MR, Cardoso MG, Silva FAM. Coumarin contents in young Mikania glomerata plants (guaco) under different radiation levels and photoperiod. Acta Farmaceutica Bonaerense. 2006;25(3):387-392
  133. 133. Li TSC, Mazza G, Cottrell AC, Gao L. Ginsenosides in roots and leaves of American ginseng. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1996;44(3):717-720. DOI: 10.1021/jf950309f
  134. 134. Binder BYK, Peebles CAM, Shanks JV, San K-Y. Influence of culture medium composition and light conditions on the accumulation of bioactive compounds in shoot cultures of Scutellaria laterifora L. (American skullcap) grown in vitro. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2017;183:1414-1425. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-017-2508-2
  135. 135. Chen CC, Agrawal DC, Lee MR, et al. Influence of LED light spectra on in vitro somatic embryogenesis and LC-MS analysis of chlorogenic acid and rutin in Peucedanum japonicum Thunb.: A medicinal herb. Botanical Studies. 2016;57(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1186/s40529-016-0124-z
  136. 136. Ali M, Abbasi BH. Light-induced fluctuations in biomass accumulation, secondary metabolites production, and antioxidant activity in the cell suspension cultures of Artemisia absinthium L. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 2014;140:223-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.08.008
  137. 137. Liang B, Huang X, Zhang G, Zhang F, Zhou Q. Effect of lanthanum on plants under supplementary ultraviolet-B radiation: Effect of lanthanum on flavonoid contents in soybean seedlings exposed to supplementary ultraviolet-B radiation. Journal of Rare Earths. 2006;24:613-616
  138. 138. Shiozaki N, Hattori I, Gojo R, Tezuka T. Activation of growth and nodulation in a symbiotic system between pea plants and leguminous bacteria by near-UV radiation. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 1999;50(1):33-37
  139. 139. Ramakrishna A, Dayananda C, Giridhar P, Rajasekaran T, Ravishankar GA. Photoperiod influences endogenous indoleamines in cultured green alga Dunaliella bardawil. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology. 2011;49:234-240
  140. 140. Abbasi BH, Tian C-L, Murch SJ, Saxena PK, Liu C-Z. Light-enhanced caffeic acid derivatives biosynthesis in hairy root cultures of Echinacea purpurea. Plant Cell Reports. 2007;26:1367-1372
  141. 141. Liu CZ, Guo C, Wang YC, Ouyang F. Effect of light irradiation on hairy root growth and artemisinin biosynthesis of Artemisia annua L. Process Biochemistry. 2002;38(4):581-585
  142. 142. Regvar M, Bukovnik U, Likar M, Kreft I. UV-B radiation affects flavonoids and fungal colonization in Fagopyrum esculentum and F. tataricum. Open Life Sciences. 2012;7:275-283
  143. 143. Markham KR, Tanner GJ, Caasi-Lit M, Whitecross MI, Nayudu M, Mitchell KA. A possible protective role for 30, 40-dihydroxyflavones induced by enhanced UV-B in a UV-tolerant rice cultivar. Phytochemistry. 1998;49:1913-1919

Written By

Attiqa Rahman, Ghadeer M. Albadrani, Ejaz Ahmad Waraich, Tahir Hussain Awan, İlkay Yavaş and Saddam Hussain

Submitted: 05 March 2023 Reviewed: 27 April 2023 Published: 17 May 2023