Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Extraction of Boron from Tourmaline Ore: Mechanism of Thermal Analysis of the Schorl

Written By

Sneha Dandekar, Kavita Pande and Dilip Peshwe

Submitted: 10 February 2023 Reviewed: 13 April 2023 Published: 05 May 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.111595

From the Edited Volume

Extraction Metallurgy - New Perspectives

Edited by Swamini Chopra and Thoguluva Vijayaram

Chapter metrics overview

54 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Tourmaline is the chief boron-bearing mineral on the earth and is present in an excess amount in the crustal rocks. However, schorl is an iron-rich alkali that forms a solid solution with the magnesium-rich, alkali tourmaline, dravite. In this work, tourmaline (schorl variety) was treated along with soda ash, and its behavior was analyzed using electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), x-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope, and energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM-EDS) analyses, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential thermal analysis (DTA), in order to annotate the soda-ash activation of boron within the tourmaline ore. To extract boron from the sample, sodium carbonate powder was mixed with the schorl in 20% of the total weight of schorl powder. When the sample was treated with sodium carbonate, the sodium gets combined with the boron to form sodium borate at 566°C along with aegirine and aluminum oxides. This sodium borate can be treated with hydrochloric acid to get boron-oxide along with NaCl.

Keywords

  • boron
  • tourmaline
  • sodium carbonate
  • sodium borate
  • boron-oxide
  • extraction

1. Introduction

Tourmaline is an important and complex boron-bearing mineral on the earth and is present in an excess amount in the crustal rocks. It is not a single mineral, but a group of isomorphs minerals with identical crystal lattices. The general formula of the tourmaline group is very complex: X1Y3Al6B3Si4O27 (OH) 4 where X = Na, K, Ca and Y = Li, Fe, Mg, Mn, Al, Cr, Ti; some of the OH– ions are generally substituted by F. The boron concentration in the tourmaline has been found 3.40 ± 1% within the normal range (2.5–3.8%) reported worldwide [1]. Whereas, schorl is an iron-rich alkali tourmaline that forms a solid solution with the magnesium-rich, alkali tourmaline, dravite. It is reported that, economically sustainable deposits of borax have not been established in India so far. The only deposit of little economic importance is reported from Puga Valley in Leh district, Jammu & Kashmir. As per National Mineral Inventory data, based on the UNFC system, the total reserves/resources of borax as of 1.4.2015, have been estimated at 74,204 tons in Jammu & Kashmir. Occurrences are also reported from Surendranagar district, Gujarat, and Jaipur district, Rajasthan [2].

Boron does not occur in free state in nature. It occurs mainly in the form of the salts of boric acid. It mainly occurs in the form of boric acid (H3BO3) and borax (Na2B4O7.10H2O). Element boron and its compounds are widely used in the industrial and agricultural sectors due to their properties such as high hardness, wear resistance, high strength, fire inhibitor, heat resistance, high strength, wear resistance, and catalytic performance. In general, boron–iron separation and dissolution activity of boron-bearing minerals in alkaline liquor are the two key issues in the utilization of tourmaline ore, governing the boron recovery as well as operating cost [3]. On a large scale, boron is extracted from its minerals, borax Na2B4O7 or colemanite Ca2B6O11. The latter is first converted to borax by boiling with a solution of sodium carbonate in the requisite proportion. In the present study, attempt has been made to extract boron by thermal analysis method.

Advertisement

2. Materials and methodology

Tourmaline (Schorl) was obtained from the Kyanite, Sillimanite mine of Girola area, Sakoli tehsil, Bhandara. The samples were collected, crushed, ground, and separated to 80% passing through 200 sieve size (0.074 mm). The XRD analysis of the sample was completed on Panalytical X’Pert Pro (model-PW 3040/60) diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å) produced at a voltage of 45 kV and current of 40 mA. Scanning was done at the 2θ angle of 10 to 100° with a scan step size and time per step of 0.01° and 15 seconds, respectively. The surface morphology was examined using a Scanning Electron microscope (SEM-JEOL 6830A). Before the study of surface morphology, to make the material electron-conducting it was coated with a thin platinum coat using an auto sputter (JOEL-JFC 1600 auto fine coater). Whereas, the elemental composition was studied using Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS).

Electron-probe microanalysis (EPMA) of the sample was executed at the National Centre of Excellence in Geoscience Research, GSI, Bangalore using a CAMECA SX-100 electron microprobe analyzer. The spectra were collected for each sample with a wavelength-dispersive spectrometer (WDS) and with WDS 1 (TAP crystal), WDS 4 (TAP crystal), WDS 3 (LPET crystal), WDS 2 (PET crystal), and WDS 5 (LIF crystal) spectrometers. The spectra were collected using column condition of an acceleration voltage of 15 keV, beam current of 15 nA, and beam size of 1 μm. Calibration, quantification, and overlap correction were executed using CAMECA SX- 100 Peak Sight-Geo Quanta software package.

However, to extract boron from the sample, sodium carbonate powder was mixed with the schorl in 5, 10, 15, and 20% of the total weight of schorl powder. The virgin, as well as prepared samples, were roasted to 1000°C using a tubular furnace [4], and analyses were done. However, suitable boron reach compound was found to be in 20% proportion of sodium carbonate powder, hence further analysis was done of this composition by leaching out with HCl (Figure 1). In order to achieve the boron in pure form, acid leaching was done multiple times. However, by further synthesis iron can be removed from the compound, followed by the recovery of aluminum.

Figure 1.

Flow chart showing the extraction process.

Advertisement

3. Results

3.1 EPMA

The EPMA study was carried out for the extracted sample. From the EPMA study of the sample (Table 1), the mineral shows the highest content of Al2O3 of 25.88 to 61.9 wt. %, SiO2 ranges from 30.01 to 44.89 wt. %, TiO2 ranges from 0 to 1.82 wt. %, MnO content is 0 to 9.59 wt. %, MgO ranges from 0 to 14.07 wt. %, CaO ranges from 0 to 6.92%, Na2O content is 0 to 0.95 wt. %, and K2O ranges from 0 to 0.93 wt. %. The mineral shows a high percentage of Al and considerable x-site vacancy, an intermediary between schorl, dumortierite, and dravite.

12345678910
SiO230.7432.7333.5832.9233.1334.0436.537.2237.6831.43
TiO202.871.630.542.190.3900.070.030.02
Al2O31.416.2630.6230.723.3827.3340.0738.0333.1446.53
Fe2O343.8914.780.8612.375.447.630000
FeO2.6911.2412.655.988.664.910.220.11.950.05
MnO00.10.060.110.0703.074.0600.02
MgO6.454.662.690.167.87.3400.189.710
CaO00.0400.23.30.990.22.630.031.74
Na2O2.122.712.842.491.162.352.151.41.421.33
K2O1.040.190.060.070.05000.0200
B2O39910101010.8311.560016.2
H2O2.5633133.183.133.1703.25
Total100.198.1698.57197.59498.6699100.832101.859100.434101.849
Unit formula normalized to 31 anions
Si5.8785.9565.7855.6445.7715.7925.8775.9415.9955.149
Ti00.3930.2110.070.2870.0500.0080.0040.002
Al0.3163.4876.2176.2044.85.4817.6047.1546.2148.984
Fe3+6.3152.0240.1111.5960.7130.9770000
Fe2+0.431.7111.8230.8571.2620.6990.030.0130.2590.007
Mn00.0150.0090.0160.0100.4190.54900.003
Mg1.8391.2640.6910.0412.0261.86200.0432.3030
Ca00.00800.0370.6160.180.0350.450.0050.305
Na0.7860.9560.9490.8280.3920.7750.6710.4330.4380.422
Li00.0040.022000.0031.0411.19400.369
B3.02733.0813.0013.1213.1813.213334.581
NameSchorlSchorlOxy-SchorlDumortieriteDumortieriteDraviteSchorlSchorlDumortieriteSchorl

Table 1.

Showing the composition of virgin sample.

However, the EPMA analysis of the extracted sample (Table 2) shows the highest range of SiO2 from 41.75 to 42.8 wt. %, MgO ranges from 14.3 to 15.27 wt. %, CaO 11.15 to 11.19 wt. %, and Al2O3 9.33 to 9.49 wt. %. The content shows the presence of aegirine mineral [5].

Oxides12345678
SiO242.6342.8342.841.7542.8342.842.6341.75
TiO21.211.121.11.231.121.11.211.23
Al2O39.499.399.339.399.399.339.499.39
Fe2O37.247.157.27.247.157.27.247.24
FeO7.067.17.137.17.17.137.067.1
MgO14.3214.2714.315.2714.2714.314.3215.27
CaO11.1911.1511.1711.1511.1511.1711.1911.15
Na2O1.351.251.291.251.251.291.351.25
K2O0.110.160.190.160.160.190.110.16
H2O (+)4.874.694.74.894.694.74.874.89
H2O (−)0.120.170.20.150.170.20.120.15
Total99.5999.2899.4199.5899.2899.4199.5999.58
Fe2O3/FeO1.03111.01111.031.01
Fe2O3/Al2O30.760.760.770.770.760.770.760.77
NameAegirineAegirineAegirineAegirineAegirineAegirineAegirineAegirine

Table 2.

Showing the composition of extracted sample.

3.2 XRD

In order to explain borate formation, an XRD analysis of the samples was done. Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of the untreated and treated samples. In Figure 2a, peak of schorl (NaFe2+3Al6 (Si6O18) (BO3)3(OH) 3(OH)) [6], dumortierite (Al7 BO3 (SiO4)3O3) [7] and SiO2 [8] was found. However, after the extraction (Figure 2b), the identified peaks correspond to sodium borate (Na2B4O7) [9], aegirine (NaFeSi2O5) [10], and Al2CO3 [11]. However, after multiple times acid leaching of the extracted sample, boron oxide was recovered (Figure 2c).

Figure 2.

XRD graph of (a) virgin (K- Kyanite, D-Dumortierite, S-Schorl) (b) extracted sample (A-Aegirine, T-sodium borate, C- Aluminum oxide) (c) boron recovery sample.

3.3 SEM

The surface morphology of the sample has been shown in Figure 3. The formation of orthorhombic-shaped dumortierite crystals [12] has been observed in SEM (Figure 3a). However, schorl is found in well-crystallized hexagonal-shaped along with kyanite (Figure 3b). The dumortierite crystals are formed after the disintegration of the tourmaline grain. However, in the extracted sample, the formation of sodium borate along with aegirine was observed. From this, it can be stated that, at a particular temperature, schorl along with sodium carbonate can form sodium borate [13] (Figure 3c) and aegirine ((Figure 3d). The acid leaching helps in the extraction of boron oxide from the mineral (Figure 3e and f), as the sodium borate reacts with HCl forming salts and boron-oxide. The Fe and Al residue gets dissolved in the solute, which can be extracted by further synthesis.

Figure 3.

SEM images of (a, b) virgin sample (c, d) extracted sample, where S- schorl, D- dumortierite, T- sodium borate, and A- aegirine, and (e, f) extracted BO3.

3.4 TGDTA

Three major weight losses are seen in Figure 4a. The first weight loss up to 85°C accounts for the dehydration of the untreated sample, which produced an endothermic peak. The second weight loss and an exothermic peak are seen at 320°C. This exothermic peak corresponded to the crystallization of FeAlO3, oxidation of Fe3+, and oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+. Further, an increase in temperature also triggered the decomposition of the anhydrous salt, contributing to the second weight loss. The third weight loss up to 857°C accounts for the decomposition of residual nitrate and the phase transformation of tourmaline. Therefore, the temperature of 650°C was selected as the heat-treatment temperature to protect the crystalline structure and improve the far-infrared emission of the tourmaline [14].

Figure 4.

TGDTA graph of (a) virgin (b) extracted sample.

However, the TGDTA peak of a treated sample (Figure 4b). First exothermic peak at 566°C was due to the crystallization of anhydrous sodium borate (Na2 O (B2O3)2) from the amorphous phase [9, 15]. Another endothermic peak observed at 742°C was due to the melting of the crystalline anhydrous sodium borate phase.

Advertisement

4. Discussion

In order to extract boron from the tourmaline sample, it was treated with 20% of sodium carbonate power, in order to form a boron compound that will ease the element to get out of the complex tourmaline structure. On heating, the virgin, as well as extracted samples up to 1000°C following conclusions, were observed:

  1. On heating the virgin sample, iron-aluminum oxides were formed at 320°C, and at the higher temperature, a transformation of tourmaline was observed. Hence, no liberation of the boron compound was found in this case.

  2. Whereas, for the extracted sample, following reactions 1 and 2 were observed, which can state the formation of sodium borate and boron oxides, respectively.

Fe2+3Al6(Si6O18)(BO3)3(OH)3(OH)+2Na(CO3)3Na2B4O58H2O+NaFeSi2O6+AlCO3E1
Na2B4O58H2O+NaFeSi2O6+AlCO3+4HCl4B(OH)3+4NaCl+8H2O+FeCO3+Al2O3SiO2+4HE2

As, when the sample was treated with sodium carbonate, the sodium gets combined with the boron to form sodium borate at 566°C along with aegirine and aluminum carbonate (Eq. (1)). Moreover, the sodium borate when treated with hydrochloric acid forms boron-oxide along with NaCl (Eq. (2)). However, further synthesis process can be followed to remove the Fe and Al recovery from the leachate.

Advertisement

5. Concluding remarks

In order to extract boron from the tourmaline sample, it was treated with 20% NaCO3 and heated up to 1000°C. It was found that the sodium from the NaCO3 powder gets combined with the boron and forms sodium borate. However, the boron-oxide can be extracted by treating the sodium borate with hydrochloric acid. Extraction of boron by this method is cost-effective and can fulfill the need for boron elements in various industries.

References

  1. 1. Qureshi AA, Akram M, Khan MA, Khattak NU, Qureshi IE, Khan HA. Boron determination in tourmaline by neutron induced radiography. Radiation Measurements. 2001;34(1-6):345-348. DOI: 10.1016/S1350-4487(01)00183-4
  2. 2. Bhavan I. Indian Minerals Yearbook 2020 59th Edition Boron Minerals (Advance Release) Government of India Ministry of Mines Indian Bureau of Mines. 2022. www.ibm.gov.in
  3. 3. Chen J, Liu S, Zhang X. Study of carbonate alkaline leaching boron-rich slag for borax preparation. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science). 1996;17(5):508-511
  4. 4. Zou C, Tang Z, Xie W, Fu H, Kuang J, Deng Y, et al. Effects of sodium roasting on the leaching rate of boron-bearing tailings and its mechanism analysis. Royal Society Open Science. 2018;5(8):172342. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.172342
  5. 5. Watanabe T. Aegirine-augite and sodic augite from the Sambagawa and the Chichibu belts in the Oshika District, Central Japan, with special reference to Na-Metasomatism, journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University. Geology and Mineralogy. 1975;16(4):519-532
  6. 6. Bloodaxe ES, Hughes JM, Dyar MD, Grew ES, Guidotti CV. Linking structure and chemistry in the schorl-dravite series. American Mineralogist. 1999;84:922-928
  7. 7. Moore PB, Araki T. Dumortierite, Si3 B[Al6.75 0.25O17.25(OH)0.75]: A detailed structure analysis. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Abhandlungen. 1978;132:231-241
  8. 8. Joni IM, Nulhakim L, Vanitha M, Panatarani C. Characteristics of crystalline silica (SiO2) particles prepared by simple solution method using sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) precursor. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018;1080(1):012006. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1080/1/012006
  9. 9. Lim KY, Kim YW, Song IH. Porous sodium borate-bonded SiC ceramics. Ceramics International. 2013;39(6):6827-6834. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.02.014
  10. 10. Sebakhy KO, Vitale G, Pereira-Almao P. Dispersed Ni-doped Aegirine Nanocatalysts for the selective hydrogenation of Olefinic molecules. ACS Applied Nano Materials. 2018;1(11):6269-6280. DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.8b01472
  11. 11. Ansari SA, Husain Q. Immobilization of Kluyveromyces lactis β galactosidase on concanavalin A layered aluminium oxide nanoparticles - its future aspects in biosensor applications. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic. 2011;70(3-4):119-126. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2011.02.016
  12. 12. Sabzehei M. Dumortierite from Iran: A first record. Mineralogical Magazine. 1971;38(296):526-527. DOI: 10.1180/minmag.1971.038.296.19
  13. 13. Guo J, Chen X, Zhang Y. Improving the mechanical and electrical properties of ceramizable silicone rubber/halloysite composites and their ceramic residues by incorporation of different borates. Polymers. 2018;10(4):388. DOI: 10.3390/polym10040388
  14. 14. Zhu D, Wang L. Effect of tourmaline modified with La-doped nano-CeO2 on consumption of liquefied petroleum gas Antibacterial Behavior of Ag-Ce-TiO 2 Composite Films in the Different Irradiations View project. Journal of Rare Earths. 2007;25:150 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295727316
  15. 15. Hawthorne FC, Henry DJ. Classification of the minerals of the tourmaline group. European Journal of Mineralogy. 1999;11:201-215

Written By

Sneha Dandekar, Kavita Pande and Dilip Peshwe

Submitted: 10 February 2023 Reviewed: 13 April 2023 Published: 05 May 2023