Abstract
Following the chlamydial exposure, a series of events occur in the host belonging to the innate and adaptive immune systems. The first line of defense against chlamydial infections is mucosal secretions contain various antimicrobial peptides. The complement system that can be part of defense is triggered by elementary bodies of Chlamydiae. Chlamydiae that escape from the complement system infect the epithelial cells. Chlamydiae are protected from phagolysosome fusion by generating inclusion formation. However, they are recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRR), mainly Toll-like receptor 2. Chlamydia-PRR interaction can be resulted by cytokine/chemokine secretion. The first innate immune cells that reach the infection site are natural killer (NK) cells and neutrophils. The most important contribution of NK cells to this pathogen is the production of high levels of IFNγ. Neutrophils are effective in reducing the load of Chlamydia and shortening the duration of infection. The relationship of neutrophils with pathology is also discussed. Recognition of MHC class II-restricted Chlamydia peptides presented by dendritic cells via CD4 T cells initiates an adaptive immune response. IFNγ-mediated Th1 immune response is essential for Chlamydia clearance. CD8 T cells, which are fewer in numbers, have been suggested that they are the main cause of infection-related immunopathology. B cells and antibodies were found to be particularly effective in preventing reinfection.
Keywords
- chlamydial infections
- innate immunity
- adaptive immunity
- chlamydial immunology
- immune response
1. Introduction
2. Innate immune response
2.1 Physical barriers
Mucosal barriers are physical barriers that form the first line of defense against Chlamydial invasion. They are formed by epithelial cells and the substances they secrete. Mucosal secretions contain various antimicrobial peptides [14].
2.2 Complement system
The complement system, which forms the humoral arm of native immunity, is activated by being stimulated by the EBs. While opsonins such as C3b, which are formed as a result of complement activation, contribute to the removal of EBs, it has been shown that C3a has an immune modulatory effect [15].
Chlamydia that escapes the effect of complement infects epithelial cells. Thanks to the inclusion, they escape phagolysosome fusion, but they cannot avoid being recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) [16]. The PRRs are an important part of the innate immune response against chlamydia. PRRs are proteins that recognize conserved motifs associated with pathogens called pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). More than 20 types of PRRs have been identified in humans, found in epithelial cells as well as innate and adaptive immune cells. PRRs can be located in the cytoplasm or surface of cells [17]. Chlamydial PAMPs are recognized by both intracellular and extracellular PRRs since chlamydia is found in the host cell in the form of reticulate body (RB) and released out of the cell in the form of EB. After PRR activation, soluble antimicrobials, chemokines, and proinflammatory cytokines are secreted from the related cells. The prominent PRRs in chlamydial infections are TLRs, especially Toll-like receptors 2 (TLR2) [18], nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors or NOD-like receptors (NLRs) [19], stimulator of interferon genes (STING) [20] and CD14 [21].
TLRs recognize chlamydial components such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), lipoprotein, Heat Shock Proteins (HSP) [22, 23]. TLR2 is located around inclusion during chlamydial infection. Intracellular signal transmission occurs after recognition of its ligand (LPS, HSP60). In a study demonstrating the role of TLR2 and its adapter myeloid differentiation primary response protein 88 (MYD88), LPS isolated from
Where TLR2 is most common in the female genital tract in the uterine tubes and inside the cervix. TLR4 is frequently encountered in the uterine tubes and endometrium [27]. In the study by Bulut et al., it was shown that TLR4-mediated recognition of chlamydial LPS and chlamydial HSP60 during
CD14, a PRR found in monocytes and macrophages, acts as a receptor for bacterial LPS [21] and mediates the secretion of proinflammatory cytokine during infection with
NOD-like receptors interact with the LPS and PGN of intracellular bacteria [19]. In a study using HEK293 cells, it was shown that dead
2.3 Innate immune cells
2.3.1 Neutrophils
Neutrophils are the first immune cells to reach the site of infection [32]. Although they cannot clear the infection on their own, it is predicted that they have effects that reduce the burden of Chlamydia and limit the spread in the initial period of the infection [33]. Studies reporting that neutrophils inactivate
The relationship of neutrophils with pathology has also been the subject of research. In animal model studies, neutrophils are found to be associated with the development of tissue damage as well as contributing to the development of adaptive immune response [36, 37].
Neutrophils are very short-lived cells compared to other immune cells. They survive for about 5 hours before spontaneous apoptosis. How Chlamydia can persist in such a short-lived cell has been the subject of research. Although uninfected granulocytes become apoptotic within 10 hours, survival of infected granulocytes for up to 90 hours has revealed that Chlamydia can delay neutrophil apoptosis [38]. In a study in which primary human neutrophils were infected with
It is thought that the prolongation of neutrophil lifespan may have a negative effect on the outcome of chlamydial infection due to the cytokines they secrete causing tissue damage [41]. In a study performed with human fallopian tube tissue culture, the addition of an IL-1 receptor antagonist prevented tissue damage due to
One of the many mechanisms that Chlamydia spp. uses to break innate immune responses and ensure their persistence is that it causes neutrophil dysfunction. The chlamydial protease-like activity factor (CPAF) affects defense mechanisms such as oxidative burst and formation of extracellular traps by targeting the neutrophil surface receptor formyl peptide receptor 2 [43]. As a result, it is suggested that neutrophils with prolonged lifespans but weakened functions contribute to the pathogenesis of chronic chlamydial infections.
2.3.2 Natural killer cells
Natural killer (NK) cells are a group of innate cells involved in the response against cancer, viral infections, and intracellular bacteria [44]. Their role during chlamydial infection has been studied in various studies [32]. In mice inoculated intravaginally with
NK cells produce high levels of interferon-γ (IFN-γ). Hook and colleagues showed that interleukin-18 released from human epithelial and IL-12 produced by dendritic cells after being stimulated by
2.3.3 Macrophages
Studies show that macrophages migrate to sites of chlamydial infection [48]. They are attracted to the infection site by chemokines and cytokines secreted from infected epithelial cells [49, 50]. They recognize chlamydial PAMPs through the PRRs they carry, primarily TLR and NOD-like receptors. Chlamydia enters macrophages
2.3.4 Mast cells and eosinophils
After infection of mast cells with Chlamydia, cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-4 are released. As a result of these cytokines opening tight junctions, infiltration of the airways with immune cells occurs. This situation has a negative effect on the spread of Chlamydia [60, 61].
Eosinophils secrete IL-4 in the upper genital tract during genital
2.4 Cytokines of the innate immune response
In various animal and human studies, it has been shown that proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α IL-8, IL-1, and GM-CSF are associated with the development of tissue damage during the innate immune response to
2.5 Dendritic cell
The DCs, which are professional antigen presenting cells (APC), have been shown to activate both CD4 and CD8 T cells through MHC class I/II presentation in Chlamydial infections [63, 64]. In a murine model, DCs appear to harbor infectious
3. Adaptive immune response
3.1 T cell
Research by Rank et al. in athymic mice demonstrated the importance of T lymphocytes for chlamydial immunity. In this study, after inoculation of
T cells cannot recognize pathogen antigens without MHC molecules. MHC II molecules are only found on professional antigen presenting cells, including DC, macrophage, B cell, while MHC I molecules are expressed on the surface of all nucleated cells. CD4 T cells recognize antigens presented in MHC class II and CD8 T cells are activated by MHC class I antigen complexes [72]. In fact, both T cell subsets have been shown to recognize
4. CD4 t cell
CD4 T cells recognize extracellular antigens from proteins endocytosed by APCs and degraded by endosome proteases. During chlamydial infection, APCs such as DCs and macrophages acquire exogenous chlamydial antigens by phagocytizing EBs in the extracellular space or by capturing infected cells harboring RBs. After phagocytosis, APC cleaves chlamydial components and the peptide-MHC II complex is assembled. This complex is then transferred to the cell surface, where it is recognized by the TCR in CD4 T cells [72].
T cells are detected at the site of infection in mice and humans. The recruitment of CD4 T cells to the infection site occurs by the release of various chemokines as well as the regulation of some surface and adhesion molecules [49, 73, 74, 75]. Post-infection APCs also migrate to regions of CD4 T cells. Here, clonal expansion of CD4 T cells recognizing chlamydial antigens is achieved (S. G. [48]).
CD4 T cells play a critical role during chlamydial infection. Evidence from murine non-MHC II models has demonstrated the importance of CD4 T cells in clearing the disease (R. P. [76]). Gondek et al., in their study of murine upper genital
When the cellular immune response against
CD4 T cells differentiate into subtypes as a result of upregulation of transcription factors that increase the production of specific cytokines after antigen recognition [79]. For example, Th1 cells, which are characterized by the production of large amounts of proinflammatory cytokines, especially IFN-γ, are particularly important for clearance of viral infections and intracellular bacteria [80]. In the context of infection by intracellular bacteria such as Chlamydia, the predominant T cell subset expected to be present is Th1 cells. As stated earlier in the relevant section of this article, Th1 subtype differentiation in CD4+ cells occurs following the production of IFN-γ and IL-12 by innate immune cells early during infection [47, 81].
4.1 T-helper1 responses
Evidence from mouse models indicates that the Th1 subtype is of particular importance in Chlamydia clearance [48]. Observation of increased susceptibility to chlamydial infection in the absence of IL-12 [82, 83] or IFN-γ receptor [84] emphasizes that IFN-γ-producing CD4 T cells are protective against Chlamydia. However, some evidence suggests that a polyfunctional response involving IFN-γ as well as TNF-α can increase immunity [85].
Th1 cells not only activate phagocytic macrophages, but also direct humoral immunity. At the end of the process in which B cells are activated, Th1-related antibodies such as IgG2a and IgG3 are secreted by plasma cells [25, 86, 87]. In addition, the cytotoxic effect of CD4 T cells has also been demonstrated [84].
Th1 responses against
4.2 Other T-helper responses
Although the predominant CD4 cells are Th1 in chlamydial infection, other T-helper types such as Th2, Th17, Th22, and Th9 have also been detected. However, the role they play during chlamydial infection cannot be definitively determined [80]. For example, the production of IgG1 antibodies is induced by Th2 cells. However, there is evidence that the Th2 response is not protective and even associated with pathology. The Th2 response during human ocular infection has been associated with disease progression and pathology [89]. Transfer of chlamydia-specific Th2 clones failed to protect mice from genital infection [90]. Another T-helper (Th17) is thought to contribute to the formation of Th1 immunity, but has been associated with both protection and pathogenesis in the mouse model [91, 92].
4.3 Memory CD4 T cells
Memory CD4 T cells are traditionally grouped into two groups: central memory (Tcm) and effector memory (Tem), while CD4 Tcm cells are primarily found in the circulation and lymphatic tissues; peripheral, non-lymphoid tissues host CD4 Tem cells [93]. Therefore, CD4 Tem cells are thought to play a dominant role in clearing genital chlamydial infections. Recently, it has been discovered that a third subset of memory T cells is important in tissue-specific immune responses. Unlike TEM, which recirculates into the lymphatics and blood after pathogen clearance, these cells that remain in non-lymphoid peripheral tissue after pathogen clearance are called tissue resident memory T cells (Trms). Even in the absence of persistent antigen, Trms persist in peripheral tissues for a long time [93]. These cells are found in epithelial tissues in areas that interface with the environment, such as the gut, lungs, skin, reproductive system [94]. They act as the first line of defense when re-exposure to pathogens. They can respond to pathogenic attack faster than other subsets of memory T cells that need tissue traffic.
During secondary
5. CD8 T cells
CD8 T cells are associated with MHC I. MHC I is expressed in all nucleated cells. Cytosolic proteins, which may originate from intracellular pathogens, are degraded by the proteasome. The degradation product peptides are loaded into the binding groove of MHCI at the end of the process involving TAP and a chaperone protein, tapasin. The MHC I-peptide complex is then exported to the surface of the cell [72]. TCRs on CD8 T cells recognize the endogenous antigen presented on MHC I. The results of this recognition are the expression of various effector cytokines, including IFN-γ, and the release of cytotoxic granzyme and perforin molecules that can lead to target cell death [97]. Because they can kill infected cells, CD8 T cells are thought to play an important role in the immune response to intracellular pathogens.
The role of CD8 T cells in chlamydial infections is controversial. While a broader CD8 T cell response was expected against Chlamydia, an intracellular pathogen, it was determined that the CD8 T cell response against
During
5.1 Memory CD8 T cells
The memory T cell population formation process of CD8 T cells during
Differential programming of memory CD8 T cells when stimulated by agents such as
On the other hand, there are studies suggesting that
5.2 Interferon-gamma
IFN-γ, which is released from both innate cells such as macrophages and NK cells and CD4 and CD8 T cells in response to chlamydial infection, is a critical cytokine for inhibiting chlamydial growth [104]. Gamma interferon is responsible for the upregulation of some interferon-induced genes that may help control intracellular bacterial replication in infected epithelial cells [110]. As a result, some protective mechanisms emerge in infected cells. Iron metabolism, a critical mineral for Chlamydia, is blocked [111, 112]. Expression of the tryptophan-decyclizing enzyme indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is induced, which breaks down tryptophan necessary for the survival of most Chlamydia species. Also, IFN-γ enhances the phagocytic abilities of macrophages and also ingestion and destruction of
The effect of IFN-γ on tryptophan metabolism was reviewed by Vasilevsky et al. during
6. B cells and antibodies
B cells support the immune response in a variety of ways. Effector mechanisms such as antibody-mediated neutralization and opsonization [117], antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) [118], induction of phagocytosis, and antigen presentation to CD4 T cells by binding of antigen-antibody complexes to Fc receptors in APC [102] have been identified.
The role of B cells in the immune response against Chlamydia has been the subject of many studies. It is known that many
The effects elicited by the response to HSP60 during
Antibodies against
References
- 1.
Bastidas RJ, Elwell CA, Engel JN, Valdivia RH. Chlamydial intracellular survival strategies. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine. 2013; 3 (5):a010256. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a010256 - 2.
Dautry-Varsat A, Subtil A, Hackstadt T. Recent insights into the mechanisms of chlamydia entry. Cellular Microbiology. 2005; 7 :1714-1722. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00627.x - 3.
Elwell C, Mirrashidi K, Engel J. Chlamydia cell biology and pathogenesis. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2016; 14 (6):385-400. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.30 - 4.
Grieshaber S, Grieshaber N, Yang H, Baxter B, Hackstadt T, Omsland A. Impact of active metabolism on chlamydia trachomatis elementary body transcript profile and infectivity. Journal of Bacteriology. 2018; 200 (14):e00065-e00018. DOI: 10.1128/JB.00065-18 - 5.
Cheong HC, Lee CYQ , Cheok YY, Tan GMY, Looi CY, Wong WF. Chlamydiaceae: Diseases in primary hosts and zoonosis. Microorganisms. 2019; 7 (5):146. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7050146 - 6.
Zhong G. Chlamydial plasmid-dependent pathogenicity. Trends in Microbiology. 2017; 25 (2):141-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.09.006 - 7.
Porritt RA, Crother TR. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection and inflammatory diseases. Forum on Immunopathological Diseases and Therapeutics. 2016; 7 (3-4):237-254. DOI: 10.1615/ForumImmunDisTher.2017020161 - 8.
Hu VH, Holland MJ, Burton MJ. Trachoma: Protective and pathogenic ocular immune responses to chlamydia trachomatis. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2013; 7 (2):e2020. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002020 - 9.
Bébéar C, de Barbeyrac B. Genital chlamydia trachomatis infections. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2009; 15 (1):4-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02647.x - 10.
Sarier M, Kukul E. Classification of non-gonococcal urethritis: A review. International Urology and Nephrology. 2019; 51 (6):901-907. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-019-02140-2 - 11.
Schust DJ, Ibana JA, Buckner LR, Ficarra M, Sugimoto J, Amedee AM, et al. Potential mechanisms for increased HIV-1 transmission across the Endocervical epithelium during C. trachomatis infection. Current HIV Research. 2012; 10 (3):218-227. DOI: 10.2174/157016212800618093 - 12.
Stoner BP, Cohen SE. Lymphogranuloma Venereum 2015: Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2015; 61 (Suppl. 8):S865-S873. DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ756 - 13.
Sarıer M, Duman İ, Göktaş Ş, Demirorcid.org M, Kukul E. Results of multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay to identify urethritis pathogens. Journal of Urological Surgery. 2017; 4 (1): 18-22. DOI: 10.4274/jus.1328 - 14.
Madanchi H, Shoushtari M, Kashani HH, Sardari S. Antimicrobial peptides of the vaginal innate immunity and their role in the fight against sexually transmitted diseases. New Microbes and New Infections. 2020; 34 :100627. DOI: 10.1016/j.nmni.2019.100627 - 15.
Rattan A, Pawar SD, Nawadkar R, Kulkarni N, Lal G, Mullick J, et al. Synergy between the classical and alternative pathways of complement is essential for conferring effective protection against the pandemic influenza a(H1N1) 2009 virus infection. PLoS Pathogens. 2017; 13 (3):e1006248. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006248 - 16.
Wong WF, Chambers JP, Gupta R, Arulanandam BP. Chlamydia and its many ways of escaping the host immune system. Journal of Pathogens. 2019; 2019 :1-9. DOI: 10.1155/2019/8604958 - 17.
Li D, Wu M. Pattern recognition receptors in health and diseases. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2021; 6 (1):291. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-021-00687-0 - 18.
Yang X, Joyee A. Role of toll-like receptors in immune responses to chlamydial infections. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2008; 14 (6):593-600. DOI: 10.2174/138161208783885344 - 19.
Zou Y, Lei W, He Z, Li Z. The role of NOD1 and NOD2 in host defense against chlamydial infection. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2016; 363 (17):fnw170. DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnw170 - 20.
Wen Y, Li Z. The STING pathway in response to chlamydial infection. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2020; 140 :103950. DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103950 - 21.
Kol A, Lichtman AH, Finberg RW, Libby P, Kurt-Jones EA. Cutting edge: Heat shock protein (HSP) 60 activates the innate immune response: CD14 is an essential receptor for HSP60 activation of mononuclear cells. The Journal of Immunology. 2000; 164 (1):13-17. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.1.13 - 22.
Bas S, Neff L, Vuillet M, Spenato U, Seya T, Matsumoto M, et al. The Proinflammatory cytokine response to chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in human macrophages is partly mediated by a lipoprotein, the macrophage infectivity Potentiator, through TLR2/TLR1/TLR6 and CD14. The Journal of Immunology. 2008; 180 (2):1158-1168. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.2.1158 - 23.
Bulut Y, Faure E, Thomas L, Karahashi H, Michelsen KS, Equils O, et al. Chlamydial heat shock protein 60 activates macrophages and endothelial cells through toll-like receptor 4 and MD2 in a MyD88-dependent pathway. The Journal of Immunology. 2002; 168 (3):1435-1440. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.3.1435 - 24.
Erridge C, Pridmore A, Eley A, Stewart J, Poxton IR. Lipopolysaccharides of Bacteroides fragilis, chlamydia trachomatis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa signal via toll-like receptor 2. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2004; 53 (8):735-740. DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.45598-0 - 25.
O’Connell CM, Ingalls RR, Andrews CW, Scurlock AM, Darville T. Plasmid-deficient chlamydia muridarum fail to induce immune pathology and protect against oviduct disease. Journal of Immunology. 2007; 179 (6):4027-4034. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.6.4027 - 26.
Darville T, O’Neill JM, Andrews CW, Nagarajan UM, Stahl L, Ojcius DM. Toll-like Receptor-2, but not toll-like Receptor-4, is essential for development of oviduct pathology in chlamydial genital tract infection. The Journal of Immunology. 2003; 171 (11):6187-6197. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.11.6187 - 27.
Hafner LM. Pathogenesis of fallopian tube damage caused by chlamydia trachomatis infections. Contraception. 2015; 92 (2):108-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.004 - 28.
Barker JR, Koestler BJ, Carpenter VK, Burdette DL, Waters CM, Vance RE, et al. STING-dependent recognition of cyclic di-AMP mediates type I interferon responses during chlamydia trachomatis infection. MBio. 2013; 4 (3):e00018-e00013. DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00018-13 - 29.
Nagarajan UM, Sikes JD, Yeruva L, Prantner D. Significant role of IL-1 signaling, but limited role of Inflammasome activation, in oviduct pathology during chlamydia muridarum genital infection. The Journal of Immunology. 2012; 188 (6):2866-2875. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103461 - 30.
Poston TB, Lee DE, Darville T, Zhong W, Dong L, O’Connell CM, et al. Cervical cytokines associated with chlamydia trachomatis susceptibility and protection. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2019; 220 (2):330-339. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiz087 - 31.
Opitz B, Förster S, Hocke AC, Maass M, Schmeck B, Hippenstiel S, et al. Nod1-mediated endothelial cell activation by Chlamydophila pneumoniae. Circulation Research. 2005; 96 (3):319-326. DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.0000155721.83594.2ci - 32.
Rank RG, Lacy HM, Goodwin A, Sikes J, Whittimore J, Wyrick PB, et al. Host chemokine and cytokine response in the Endocervix within the first developmental cycle of chlamydia muridarum. Infection and Immunity. 2010; 78 (1):536-544. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00772-09 - 33.
Barteneva N, Theodor I, Peterson EM, de la Maza LM. Role of neutrophils in controlling early stages of a chlamydia trachomatis infection. Infection and Immunity. 1996; 64 (11):4830-4833. DOI: 10.1128/iai.64.11.4830-4833.1996 - 34.
Register KB, Morgan PA, Wyrick PB. Interaction between chlamydia spp. and human polymorphonuclear leukocytes in vitro. Infection and Immunity. 1986; 52 (3):664-670. DOI: 10.1128/iai.52.3.664-670.1986 - 35.
Rodriguez N, Fend F, Jennen L, Schiemann M, Wantia N, da Costa CUP, et al. Polymorphonuclear neutrophils improve replication of chlamydia pneumoniae In vivo upon MyD88-dependent attraction. The Journal of Immunology. 2005; 174 (8):4836-4844. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.8.4836 - 36.
Lacy HM, Bowlin AK, Hennings L, Scurlock AM, Nagarajan UM, Rank RG. Essential role for neutrophils in pathogenesis and adaptive immunity in chlamydia caviae ocular infections. Infection and Immunity. 2011; 79 (5):1889-1897. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01257-10 - 37.
Shah AA, Schripsema JH, Imtiaz MT, Sigar IM, Kasimos J, Matos PG, et al. Histopathologic changes related to fibrotic oviduct occlusion after genital tract infection of mice with chlamydia muridarum. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2005; 32 (1):49-56. DOI: 10.1097/01.olq.0000148299.14513.11 - 38.
van Zandbergen G, Gieffers J, Kothe H, Rupp J, Bollinger A, Aga E, et al. Chlamydia pneumoniae multiply in neutrophil granulocytes and delay their spontaneous apoptosis. The Journal of Immunology. 2004; 172 (3):1768-1776. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.3.1768 - 39.
Sarkar A, Möller S, Bhattacharyya A, Behnen M, Rupp J, van Zandbergen G, et al. Mechanisms of apoptosis inhibition in chlamydia pneumoniae-infected neutrophils. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2015; 305 (6):493-500. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2015.04.006 - 40.
Lehr S, Vier J, Häcker G, Kirschnek S. Activation of neutrophils by chlamydia trachomatis-infected epithelial cells is modulated by the chlamydial plasmid. Microbes and Infection. 2018; 20 (5):284-292. DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2018.02.007 - 41.
Lee HY, Schripsema JH, Sigar IM, Murray CM, Lacy SR, Ramsey KH. A link between neutrophils and chronic disease manifestations of chlamydia muridarum urogenital infection of mice. FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology. 2010; 59 (1):108-116. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00668.x - 42.
Hvid M, Baczynska A, Deleuran B, Fedder J, Knudsen HJ, Christiansen G, et al. Interleukin-1 is the initiator of fallopian tube destruction during chlamydia trachomatis infection. Cellular Microbiology. 2007; 9 (12):2795-2803. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00996.x - 43.
Rajeeve K, Das S, Prusty BK, Rudel T. Chlamydia trachomatis paralyses neutrophils to evade the host innate immune response. Nature Microbiology. 2018; 3 (7):824-835. DOI: 10.1038/s41564-018-0182-y - 44.
Montaldo E, Zotto G, Del Chiesa, Della, Mingari M, Moretta MC, Maria A, et al. Human NK cell receptors/markers: A tool to analyze NK cell development, subsets and function. Cytometry Part A. 2013; 83A (8):702-713. - 45.
Tseng C-TK, Rank RG. Role of NK cells in early host response to chlamydial genital infection. Infection and Immunity. 1998; 66 (12):5867-5875. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.12.5867-5875.1998 - 46.
Hook CE, Matyszak MK, Gaston JSH. Infection of epithelial and dendritic cells by chlamydia trachomatis results in IL-18 and IL-12 production, leading to interferon-Î3 production by human natural killer cells. FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology. 2005; 45 (2):113-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.femsim.2005.02.010 - 47.
Jiao L, Gao X, Joyee AG, Zhao L, Qiu H, Yang M, et al. NK cells promote type 1 T cell immunity through modulating the function of dendritic cells during intracellular bacterial infection. The Journal of Immunology. 2011; 187 (1):401-411. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002519 - 48.
Morrison SG, Morrison RP. In situ analysis of the evolution of the primary immune response in murine chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection. Infection and Immunity. 2000; 68 (5):2870-2879. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.5.2870-2879.2000 - 49.
Belay T, Eko FO, Ananaba GA, Bowers S, Moore T, Lyn D, et al. Chemokine and chemokine receptor dynamics during genital chlamydial infection. Infection and Immunity. 2002; 70 (2):844-850. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.2.844-850.2002 - 50.
Shi C, Pamer EG. Monocyte recruitment during infection and inflammation. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2011; 11 (11):762-774. DOI: 10.1038/nri3070 - 51.
Beagley K, Huston WM, Hansbro PM, Timms P. Chlamydial infection of immune cells: Altered function and implications for disease. Critical Reviews™ in Immunology. 2009; 29 (4):275-305. DOI: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v29.i4.10 - 52.
Nans A, Ford C, Hayward RD. Host-pathogen reorganisation during host cell entry by chlamydia trachomatis. Microbes and Infection. 2015; 17 (11-12):727-731. DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2015.08.004 - 53.
Yilma AN, Singh SR, Fairley SJ, Taha MA, Dennis VA. The anti-inflammatory cytokine, Interleukin-10, inhibits inflammatory mediators in human epithelial cells and mouse macrophages exposed to live and UV-inactivated chlamydia trachomatis. Mediators of Inflammation. 2012; 2012 :1-10. DOI: 10.1155/2012/520174 - 54.
Al-Zeer MA, Al-Younes HM, Lauster D, Abu Lubad M, Meyer TF. Autophagy restricts chlamydia trachomatis growth in human macrophages via IFNG-inducible guanylate binding proteins. Autophagy. 2013; 9 (1):50-62. DOI: 10.4161/auto.22482 - 55.
Yasir M, Pachikara ND, Bao X, Pan Z, Fan H. Regulation of chlamydial infection by host autophagy and vacuolar ATPase-bearing organelles. Infection and Immunity. 2011; 79 (10):4019-4028. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.05308-11 - 56.
Sun HS, Eng EWY, Jeganathan S, Sin AT-W, Patel PC, Gracey E, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis vacuole maturation in infected macrophages. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2012; 92 (4):815-827. DOI: 10.1189/jlb.0711336 - 57.
Crotzer VL, Blum JS. Autophagy and its role in MHC-mediated antigen presentation. The Journal of Immunology. 2009; 182 (6):3335-3341. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803458 - 58.
Vasilevsky S, Colino J, Puliaev R, Canaday DH, Snapper CM. Macrophages pulsed with Streptococcus pneumoniae elicit a T cell-dependent antibody response upon transfer into naive mice. The Journal of Immunology. 2008; 181 (3):1787-1797. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.3.1787 - 59.
Cao H, Wolff RG, Meltzer MS, Crawford RM. Differential regulation of class II MHC determinants on macrophages by IFN-gamma and IL-4. Journal of Immunology. 1989; 143 (11):3524-3531 - 60.
Chiba N, Shimada K, Chen S, Jones HD, Alsabeh R, Slepenkin AV, et al. Mast cells play an important role in chlamydia pneumoniae lung infection by facilitating immune cell recruitment into the airway. The Journal of Immunology. 2015; 194 (8):3840-3851. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402685 - 61.
Oksaharju A, Lappalainen J, Tuomainen AM, Pussinen PJ, Puolakkainen M, Kovanen PT, et al. Pro-atherogenic lung and oral pathogens induce an inflammatory response in human and mouse mast cells. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2008; 13 (1):103-113. DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00285.x - 62.
Vicetti Miguel RD, Quispe Calla NE, Dixon D, Foster RA, Gambotto A, Pavelko SD, et al. IL-4–secreting eosinophils promote endometrial stromal cell proliferation and prevent chlamydia -induced upper genital tract damage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017; 114 (33):E6892-E6901. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1621253114 - 63.
Jiang X, Shen C, Rey-Ladino J, Yu H, Brunham RC. Characterization of murine dendritic cell line JAWS II and primary bone marrow-derived dendritic cells in chlamydia muridarum antigen presentation and induction of protective immunity. Infection and Immunity. 2008; 76 (6):2392-2401. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01584-07 - 64.
Matyszak MK, Young JL, Gaston JSH. Uptake and processing of chlamydia trachomatis by human dendritic cells. European Journal of Immunology. 2002; 32 (3):742. DOI: 10.1002/1521-4141(200203)32:3<742::AID-IMMU742>3.0.CO;2-9 - 65.
Shaw JH, Grund VR, Durling L, Caldwell HD. Expression of genes encoding Th1 cell-activating cytokines and lymphoid homing chemokines by chlamydia-pulsed dendritic cells correlates with protective immunizing efficacy. Infection and Immunity. 2001; 69 (7):4667-4672. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.7.4667-4672.2001 - 66.
Labuda JC, McSorley SJ. Diversity in the T cell response to chlamydia-sum are better than one. Immunology Letters. 2018; 202 :59-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2018.08.002 - 67.
He Q , Moore TT, Eko FO, Lyn D, Ananaba GA, Martin A, et al. Molecular basis for the potency of IL-10-deficient dendritic cells as a highly efficient APC system for activating Th1 response. The Journal of Immunology. 2005; 174 (8):4860-4869. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.8.4860 - 68.
Lu H, Zhong G. Interleukin-12 production is required for chlamydial antigen-pulsed dendritic cells to induce protection against live chlamydia trachomatis infection. Infection and Immunity. 1999; 67 (4):1763-1769. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.67.4.1763-1769.1999 - 69.
Ibana JA, Schust DJ, Sugimoto J, Nagamatsu T, Greene SJ, Quayle AJ. Chlamydia trachomatis immune evasion via downregulation of MHC class I surface expression involves direct and indirect mechanisms. Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011; 2011 :1-8. DOI: 10.1155/2011/420905 - 70.
Dong F, Pirbhai M, Zhong Y, Zhong G. Cleavage-dependent activation of a chlamydia-secreted protease. Molecular Microbiology. 2004; 52 (5):1487-1494. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04072.x - 71.
Zhong G, Fan P, Ji H, Dong F, Huang Y. Identification of a chlamydial protease–like activity factor responsible for the degradation of host transcription factors. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2001; 193 (8):935-942. DOI: 10.1084/jem.193.8.935 - 72.
Neefjes J, Jongsma MLM, Paul P, Bakke O. Towards a systems understanding of MHC class I and MHC class II antigen presentation. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2011; 11 (12):823-836. DOI: 10.1038/nri3084 - 73.
Davila SJ, Olive AJ, Starnbach MN. Integrin α4β1 is necessary for CD4+ T cell-mediated protection against genital chlamydia trachomatis infection. Journal of immunology. 2014; 192 (9):4284-4293. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1303238 - 74.
Kelly KA, Wiley D, Wiesmeier E, Briskin M, Butch A, Darville T. ORIGINAL ARTICLE: The combination of the gastrointestinal integrin (α4β7) and selectin ligand enhances T-cell migration to the reproductive tract during infection with chlamydia trachomatis. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2009; 61 (6):446-452. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2009.00705.x - 75.
Olive AJ, Gondek DC, Starnbach MN. CXCR3 and CCR5 are both required for T cell-mediated protection against C. trachomatis infection in the murine genital mucosa. Mucosal Immunology. 2011; 4 (2):208-216. DOI: 10.1038/mi.2010.58 - 76.
Morrison RP, Feilzer K, Tumas DB. Gene knockout mice establish a primary protective role for major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted responses in chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection. Infection and Immunity. 1995; 63 (12):4661-4668. DOI: 10.1128/iai.63.12.4661-4668.1995 - 77.
Gondek DC, Olive AJ, Stary G, Starnbach MN. CD4+ T cells are necessary and sufficient to confer protection against chlamydia trachomatis infection in the murine upper genital tract. The Journal of Immunology. 2012; 189 (5):2441-2449. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103032 - 78.
Halme S, Latvala J, Karttunen R, Palatsi I, Saikku P, Surcel HM. Cell-mediated immune response during primary chlamydia pneumoniae infection. Infection and Immunity. 2000; 68 (12):7156-7158. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.12.7156-7158.2000 - 79.
O’Shea JJ, Paul WE. Mechanisms underlying lineage commitment and plasticity of helper CD4+ T cells. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2010; 327 (5969):1098-1102. DOI: 10.1126/science.1178334 - 80.
Zhu J. T helper cell differentiation, heterogeneity, and plasticity. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2018; 10 (10):a030338. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a030338 - 81.
Chen L, Lei L, Zhou Z, He J, Xu S, Lu C, et al. Contribution of Interleukin-12 p35 (IL-12p35) and IL-12p40 to protective immunity and pathology in mice infected with chlamydia muridarum. Infection and Immunity. 2013; 81 (8):2962-2971. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00161-13 - 82.
Perry LL, Feilzer K, Caldwell HD. Immunity to chlamydia trachomatis is mediated by T helper 1 cells through IFN-gamma-dependent and -independent pathways. Journal of Immunology. 1997; 158 (7):3344-3352 - 83.
Wang S, Fan Y, Brunham RC, Yang X. IFN-gamma knockout mice show Th2-associated delayed-type hypersensitivity and the inflammatory cells fail to localize and control chlamydial infection. European Journal of Immunology. 1999; 29 (11):3782-3792. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199911)29:11<3782::AID-IMMU3782>3.0.CO;2-B - 84.
Johnson RM, Kerr MS, Slaven JE. Plac8-dependent and inducible NO synthase-dependent mechanisms clear chlamydia muridarum infections from the genital tract. The Journal of Immunology. 2012; 188 (4):1896-1904. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102764 - 85.
Yu H, Karunakaran KP, Kelly I, Shen C, Jiang X, Foster LJ, et al. Immunization with live and dead chlamydia muridarum induces different levels of protective immunity in a murine genital tract model: Correlation with MHC class II peptide presentation and multifunctional Th1 cells. The Journal of Immunology. 2011; 186 (6):3615-3621. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002952 - 86.
Bancroft GJ, Schreiber RD, Bosma GC, Bosma MJ, Unanue ER. A T cell-independent mechanism of macrophage activation by interferon-gamma. Journal of Immunology. 1987; 139 (4):1104-1107 - 87.
Olivares-Zavaleta N, Whitmire W, Gardner D, Caldwell HD. Immunization with the attenuated plasmidless chlamydia trachomatis L2(25667R) strain provides partial protection in a murine model of female genitourinary tract infection. Vaccine. 2010; 28 (6):1454-1462. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.11.073 - 88.
Penttilä JM, Anttila M, Puolakkainen M, Laurila A, Varkila K, Sarvas M, et al. Local immune responses to chlamydia pneumoniae in the lungs of BALB/c mice during primary infection and reinfection. Infection and Immunity. 1998; 66 (11):5113-5118. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.11.5113-5118.1998 - 89.
Holland MJ, Bailey RL, Conway DJ, Culley F, Miranpuri G, Byrne GI, et al. T helper type-1 (Th1)/Th2 profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC); responses to antigens of chlamydia trachomatis in subjects with severe trachomatous scarring. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. 2003; 105 (3):429-435. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1996.d01-792.x - 90.
Hawkins RA, Rank RG, Kelly KA. A chlamydia trachomatis-specific Th2 clone does not provide protection against a genital infection and displays reduced trafficking to the infected genital mucosa. Infection and Immunity. 2002; 70 (9):5132-5139. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.9.5132-5139.2002 - 91.
Frazer LC, Scurlock AM, Zurenski MA, Riley MM, Mintus M, Pociask DA, et al. IL-23 induces IL-22 and IL-17 production in response to chlamydia muridarum genital tract infection, but the absence of these cytokines does not influence disease pathogenesis. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2013; 70 (6):472-484. DOI: 10.1111/aji.12171 - 92.
Scurlock AM, Frazer LC, Andrews CW, O’Connell CM, Foote IP, Bailey SL, et al. Interleukin-17 contributes to generation of Th1 immunity and neutrophil recruitment during chlamydia muridarum genital tract infection but is not required for macrophage influx or Normal resolution of infection. Infection and Immunity. 2011; 79 (3):1349-1362. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00984-10 - 93.
Mueller SN, Gebhardt T, Carbone FR, Heath WR. Memory T cell subsets, migration patterns, and tissue residence. Annual Review of Immunology. 2013; 31 :137-161. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095954 - 94.
Clark RA. Resident memory T cells in human health and disease. Science Translational Medicine. 2015; 7 (269):269rv1. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3010641 - 95.
Stary G, Olive A, Radovic-Moreno AF, Gondek D, Alvarez D, Basto PA, et al. A mucosal vaccine against chlamydia trachomatis generates two waves of protective memory T cells. Science. 2015; 348 (6241):aaa8205. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa8205 - 96.
Whitmire JK, Eam B, Whitton JL. Tentative T cells: Memory cells are quick to respond, but slow to divide. PLoS Pathogens. 2008; 4 (4):e1000041. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000041 - 97.
Halle S, Halle O, Förster R. Mechanisms and dynamics of T cell-mediated cytotoxicity In vivo. Trends in Immunology. 2017; 38 (6):432-443. DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2017.04.002 - 98.
Wizel B, Nyström-Asklin J, Cortes C, Tvinnereim A. Role of CD8+T cells in the host response to chlamydia. Microbes and Infection. 2008; 10 (14-15):1420-1430. DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2008.08.006 - 99.
Fling SP, Sutherland RA, Steele LN, Hess B, D’Orazio SE, Maisonneuve J, et al. CD8+ T cells recognize an inclusion membrane-associated protein from the vacuolar pathogen chlamydia trachomatis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001; 98 (3):1160-1165. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.98.3.1160 - 100.
Starnbach MN, Loomis WP, Ovendale P, Regan D, Hess B, Alderson MR, et al. An inclusion membrane protein from chlamydia trachomatis enters the MHC class I pathway and stimulates a CD8+ T cell response. Journal of Immunology. 2003; 171 (9):4742-4749. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.9.4742 - 101.
Murthy AK, Li W, Chaganty BKR, Kamalakaran S, Guentzel MN, Seshu J, et al. Tumor necrosis factor alpha production from CD8 + T cells mediates oviduct pathological sequelae following primary genital chlamydia muridarum infection. Infection and Immunity. 2011; 79 (7):2928-2935. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.05022-11 - 102.
Igietseme JU, Eko FO, He Q , Black CM. Antibody regulation of T-cell immunity: Implications for vaccine strategies against intracellular pathogens. Expert Review of Vaccines. 2004; 3 (1):23-34. DOI: 10.1586/14760584.3.1.23 - 103.
Van Voorhis WC, Barrett LK, Sweeney YT, Kuo CC, Patton DL. Repeated chlamydia trachomatis infection of Macaca nemestrina fallopian tubes produces a Th1-like cytokine response associated with fibrosis and scarring. Infection and Immunity. 1997; 65 (6):2175-2182. DOI: 10.1128/iai.65.6.2175-2182.1997 - 104.
Rottenberg ME, Gigliotti Rothfuchs AC, Gigliotti D, Svanholm C, Bandholtz L, Wigzell H. Role of innate and adaptive immunity in the outcome of primary infection with chlamydia pneumoniae, as analyzed in genetically modified mice. Journal of Immunology. 1999; 162 (5):2829-2836 - 105.
Fankhauser SC, Starnbach MN. PD-L1 limits the mucosal CD8+ T cell response to chlamydia trachomatis. The Journal of Immunology. 2014; 192 (3):1079-1090. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301657 - 106.
Francisco LM, Sage PT, Sharpe AH. The PD-1 pathway in tolerance and autoimmunity. Immunological Reviews. 2010; 236 (1):219-242. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00923.x - 107.
Manam S, Nicholson BJ, Murthy AK. OT-1 mice display minimal upper genital tract pathology following primary intravaginal chlamydia muridarum infection. Pathogens and Disease. 2013; 67 (3):221-224. DOI: 10.1111/2049-632X.12032 - 108.
Vlcek KR, Li W, Manam S, Zanotti B, Nicholson BJ, Ramsey KH, et al. The contribution of chlamydia-specific CD8+ T cells to upper genital tract pathology. Immunology and Cell Biology. 2016; 94 (2):208-212. DOI: 10.1038/icb.2015.74 - 109.
Peng B, Lu C, Tang L, Yeh I-T, He Z, Wu Y, et al. Enhanced upper genital tract pathologies by blocking Tim-3 and PD-L1 signaling pathways in mice intravaginally infected with chlamydia muridarum. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2011; 11 (1):347. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-347 - 110.
Helble DJ, Starnbach MN. T cell responses to chlamydia. Pathogens and Disease. 2021; 79 (4):ftab014. DOI: 10.1093/femspd/ftab014 - 111.
Al-Younes HM, Rudel T, Brinkmann V, Szczepek AJ, Meyer TF. Low iron availability modulates the course of chlamydia pneumoniae infection. Cellular Microbiology. 2001; 3 (6):427-437. DOI: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2001.00125.x - 112.
Ryu SY, Jeong KS, Kang BN, Park SJ, Yoon WK, Kim SH, et al. Modulation of transferrin synthesis, transferrin receptor expression, iNOS expression and NO production in mouse macrophages by cytokines, either alone or in combination. Anticancer Research. 2000; 20 (5A):3331-3338 - 113.
Fernandez-Boyanapalli R, McPhillips KA, Frasch SC, Janssen WJ, Dinauer MC, Riches DWH, et al. Impaired phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by macrophages in chronic granulomatous disease is reversed by IFN-γ in a nitric oxide-dependent manner. The Journal of Immunology. 2010; 185 (7):4030-4041. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001778 - 114.
Beatty WL, Belanger TA, Desai AA, Morrison RP, Byrne GI. Tryptophan depletion as a mechanism of gamma interferon-mediated chlamydial persistence. Infection and Immunity. 1994; 62 (9):3705-3711. DOI: 10.1128/iai.62.9.3705-3711.1994 - 115.
Beatty WL, Byrne GI, Morrison RP. Morphologic and antigenic characterization of interferon gamma-mediated persistent chlamydia trachomatis infection in vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1993; 90 (9):3998-4002. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.9.3998 - 116.
Aiyar A, Quayle AJ, Buckner LR, Sherchand SP, Chang TL, Zea AH, et al. Influence of the tryptophan-indole-IFNÎ3 axis on human genital chlamydia trachomatis infection: Role of vaginal co-infections. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2014; 4 :72. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00072 - 117.
Bartolini E, Ianni E, Frigimelica E, Petracca R, Galli G, Berlanda Scorza F, et al. Recombinant outer membrane vesicles carrying chlamydia muridarum HtrA induce antibodies that neutralize chlamydial infection in vitro. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles. 2013; 2 (1):20181. DOI: 10.3402/jev.v2i0.20181 - 118.
Moore T, Ananaba GA, Bolier J, Bowers S, Belay T, Eko FO, et al. Fc receptor regulation of protective immunity against chlamydia trachomatis. Immunology. 2002; 105 (2):213-221. DOI: 10.1046/j.0019-2805.2001.01354.x - 119.
Finco O, Frigimelica E, Buricchi F, Petracca R, Galli G, Faenzi E, et al. Approach to discover T- and B-cell antigens of intracellular pathogens applied to the design of chlamydia trachomatis vaccines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011; 108 (24):9969-9974. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1101756108 - 120.
Ramsey KH, Soderberg LS, Rank RG. Resolution of chlamydial genital infection in B-cell-deficient mice and immunity to reinfection. Infection and Immunity. 1988; 56 (5):1320-1325. DOI: 10.1128/iai.56.5.1320-1325.1988 - 121.
Su H, Feilzer K, Caldwell HD, Morrison RP. Chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection of antibody-deficient gene knockout mice. Infection and Immunity. 1997; 65 (6):1993-1999. DOI: 10.1128/iai.65.6.1993-1999.1997 - 122.
Morrison SG, Morrison RP. Resolution of secondary chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection in immune mice with depletion of both CD4 + and CD8 + T cells. Infection and Immunity. 2001; 69 (4):2643-2649. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.4.2643-2649.2001 - 123.
Morrison SG, Morrison RP. A predominant role for antibody in acquired immunity to chlamydial genital tract reinfection. The Journal of Immunology. 2005; 175 (11):7536-7542. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.11.7536 - 124.
Brady LJ. Antibody-mediated immunomodulation: A strategy to improve host responses against microbial antigens. Infection and Immunity. 2005; 73 (2):671-678. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.73.2.671-678.2005 - 125.
Russell AN, Zheng X, O’Connell CM, Taylor BD, Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, et al. Analysis of factors driving incident and ascending infection and the role of serum antibody in chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2016; 213 (4):523-531. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiv438 - 126.
Linhares IM, Witkin SS. Immunopathogenic consequences of chlamydia trachomatis 60 kDa heat shock protein expression in the female reproductive tract. Cell Stress and Chaperones. 2010; 15 (5):467-473. DOI: 10.1007/s12192-010-0171-4 - 127.
von Hertzen LC. Role of persistent infection in the control and severity of asthma: Focus on chlamydia pneumoniae. European Respiratory Journal. 2002; 19 (3):546-556. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.02.00254402 - 128.
Dowell SF, Peeling RW, Boman J, Carlone GM, Fields BS, Guarner J, et al. Standardizing chlamydia pneumoniae assays: Recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USA) and the Laboratory Centre for Disease Control (Canada). Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2001; 33 (4):492-503. DOI: 10.1086/322632