Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Operation of Photovoltaic Panels in Stand-alone Applications

Written By

Ali Lamkaddem, Hajar Chadli, Khalid Salmi, Rachid Malek, Olivier Deblecker, Khalil Kassmi and Najib Bachiri

Submitted: 18 December 2022 Reviewed: 01 February 2023 Published: 31 March 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.110326

From the Edited Volume

Solar PV Panels - Recent Advances and Future Prospects

Edited by Basel I. Ismail

Chapter metrics overview

151 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

In this chapter, we propose the analysis of the maximum power point (MPP) of photovoltaic panels (PV) in a renewable energy application. From the current–voltage characteristics, we deduced the MPP of a PV panel and specified the use of a power block (DC/DC converter) controlled by an MPPT control. In the case of an MPPT control of type perturb and observe, we realized the photovoltaic system that heats a photovoltaic solar cooker, taking into account this MPPT command. The experimentation of this application, during a sunny day, shows that the MPPT control carries out its role correctly, such as optimal operation of the PV panels and heating of the cooker by the maximum power supplied by the PV panels. The analysis of all the results shows an excellent agreement between the experiment and the simulation of the operation of the photovoltaic system which made it possible to operate the photovoltaic panels around their MPP, over the course of the sun. Under these conditions, the efficiency of the proposed DC/DC converter, with a power of 500 Wp, is of the order of 97%.

Keywords

  • energy
  • photovoltaic panels
  • maximum power point
  • MPPT command
  • DC/DC converter
  • efficiency

1. Introduction

Solar photovoltaic is the most widely used renewable energy source with relatively high accessibility in many parts of the world [1, 2, 3, 4]. In recent years, the development of the solar PV market and the use of this technology worldwide has been increasing at annual rates of 35–40%. This rapid expansion has developed rapidly due to a sharp decline in PV prices and increased attention to the importance of sustainable energy [4, 5, 6, 7, 8].

In addition, the market development of solar photovoltaic (PV) applications is increasing, due to their contributions to environmental protection, and use as an alternative sustainable solution to the energy crisis. In the short and long term, PV technology is considered the main source of electricity generation in various applications such as [9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16] solar desalination, solar cookers, solar cooling, and air conditioning. In PV technology, the problem that arises is the operation of PV panels around their maximum power points (MPP). Regardless of the applications used, stand-alone or grid-connected, the design of a power matching system (DC/DC converter) of the PV panels with its MPPT control (maximum power point tracking) [17, 18] is necessary to produce the maximum electrical energy during the operation of these applications [19]. In the literature, several MPPT controls are proposed [20, 21]. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages. Currently, in the context of PV energy applications that we are developing in the framework of national and international projects, we use the perturb and observe control [21, 22, 23, 24], due to its ease of implementation and accuracy of convergence to the maximum power point of the PV panels.

In this chapter, we analyze the maximum power point (MPP) of PV panels and the PV systems that maximize this power during the operation of an application. Particular attention is paid to the description of the MPPT control, the perturb and observe type, and its application in PV solar cookers, with a power of 600 Wp.

Advertisement

2. Optimization of the operation of photovoltaic (PV) panels

2.1 Electrical model of a PV panel cell

Figure 1 shows the equivalent electrical circuit of a cell (Junction P/N) of a PV panel, illuminated by radiation of intensity “Le” [25]. This circuit is formed by a diode (D), a current source (ICC), a contact series resistance (Rs), and a parallel resistance (Rsh), which represents the leakage current of the cell. From this diagram, the current of the PV cell (I) is expressed as a function of the voltage V according to the expression [25, 26, 27, 28, 29]:

Figure 1.

The diagram of the electrical circuit of a cell of a PV panel.

I=ICCIsexpqV+IRsA·K·T1V+IRsRshE1

where

Is: Reverse saturation current of the diode (A),

q: Electric charge of an electron = 1602 × 10−19 Coulomb,

A: The diode ideality factor,

K: Boltzmann constant 1.381 × 10−23 J/K,

T: Cell temperature (°C).

In this expression, the current ICC depends very little on the temperature and varies with the intensity of the illumination according to the equation [30, 31]:

ICC=A.Le+BE2

where

A and B are two constant factors [30, 31].

As part of our application, we used PV panels that have cells, where A = 0.00932; B = 0.0055; very low contact resistance and very high parallel resistance. Under these conditions, the current I is written as a function of the voltage V according to the expression:

I=A.Le+BIsexpqVA·K·T1E3

2.2 Electrical characteristics of PV panels

As part of our experiment, we used PV panels (Figure 2), 300 Wp, formed by Ns=80 identical cells in series. The expression of the current of the IPV panels is written according to the intensity of the illumination (Le) and the voltage VPV according to the equations:

Figure 2.

Photos of 600 Wp photovoltaic panels (Type 1) installed in the laboratory.

IPV=0.00932Le+0.0055IsexpqVPV80.A·K·T1E4

The typical experimental electrical characteristics (current–voltage and power—voltage) of the PV panels (Figure 2), each with a power of 300 Wp, for illuminations ranging from 300 W/m2 to 900 W/m2, are shown in Figure 3. From these characteristics, we have determined and represented in Table 1 the optimal electrical values: voltage, current, maximum power point (MPP), and optimal resistance. Therefore, we can deduce, when the illuminance varies from 300 to 900 W/m2, the optimal power and resistance vary from 72.9 to 218.7 W and from 8.85 to 95 Ω, respectively. In a PV application, to ensure the production of optimal electrical energy and reduce the cost of kWh, the operation of PV panels, over the sun, must follow these variations.

Figure 3.

Current–voltage-power characteristics of the photovoltaic panel used (Type 1), for three illuminations (300, 500, and 900 W/m2). Ambient temperature = 25°C.

Le (W/m2)Vopt (V)Iopt (A)Ropt (Ω)Popt (W)
Panel PV (305 W):Type 130025.42.878.8572.9
50025.54.785.33121.9
90025.48.612.95218.7

Table 1.

Optimal electrical values of a PV panel, from Figure 2, as a function of illuminations. Temperature = 25°C.

Moreover, in the design of PV system blocks, these optimal values allow for determining the size of each electrical component of the power, and the nature of the MPPT control that optimizes the operation of the PV panels, during the operation of the applications throughout the day.

2.3 MPPT command: perturb and observe

In this section, we describe the basic functioning of the MPPT command type perturb and observe that we used in all the applications developed in the laboratory. To do this, the PV panel adaptation block (Figure 3) generates a PWM signal of frequency f and duty cycle α, following the execution of an MPPT algorithm (Figure 4), which controls the DC/DC converters. The basic principle of the P&O method consists in disturbing the voltage of the PV panels (Vpv) and observing its impact on the variation of the output power of the PV panel, following the steps:

  • Acquire and store the electrical quantities of the converter: voltages, currents, powers, efficiency, and duty cycle.

  • Once all the quantities have been acquired, the microcontroller generates the PWM signals with a variable duty cycle α.

  • At each cycle, Vpv and Ipv are measured to calculate Ppv (k). This value of Ppv (k) is compared to the value of Ppv (k-1) calculated in the previous cycle. When the output power has increased, Vpv is adjusted in the same direction as in the previous cycle. If the output power has decreased, Vpv is adjusted in the opposite direction as in the previous cycle. When the maximum power point is reached, this means that Vpv is around the optimal value.

Figure 4.

PV panel adaptation system.

Advertisement

3. Application: Photovoltaic solar cooker

In this section, we have analyzed the optimization of the PV panels by the system of Figure 4 powered by two PV panels of Figure 2 in series. The PV application consists of heating a cooker with 600 Wp PV energy. In the following sections, we present the model and the optimization of the PV panels used, then the operation and the validation of the PV system of Figure 4 in the case of a cooker with PV energy.

3.1 Model of PV panels

In the case of our 600 Wp application, the expression of the current Igene as a function of the voltage Vgene of the PV generator, formed by two panels of Figure 2 in series, is written for a given illumination according to the expression:

IPV=0.00932Le+0.0055IsexpqVPV160.A·K·T1E5

As previously (Section 2.2) mentioned, experimentation with this generator when the intensity of the illumination varies from 300 to 900 W shows optimal voltages, currents, resistances, and powers, which vary from 50.8 to 51.0 V; 2.87 to 8.61 A; 17.7 to 25.8 Ω, and 145.8 to 437.4 W.

3.2 Operation of the cooker

We experimented, during 1 day, the PV system of Figure 3 in the case of the heating of 1 liter of water of a photovoltaic solar cooker. The principle of operation of this cooker is the supply of thermal resistance by optimal energy supplied by the PV panels, via a DC/DC converter, controlled by an MPPT command “perturb and observe” (Figure 4). We recorded the meteorological electrical quantities (intensity of illumination and ambient temperature), the electrical quantities (voltage, current, and power) at the input and output of the DC/DC converter, and the heating temperatures of the water and thermal resistance (Figure 5). The results obtained show:

  • Intensity of illumination and ambient temperature, respectively, reach maximum values of around 998 W/m2 and 22°C.

  • The voltages and currents at the input of the converter are, respectively, around 52.4 V and 9.1 A and at the output around 96.9 V and 4.8 A.

  • The powers at the input and there at the output of the converter are, respectively, of the order of 476.8 W and 465.1 W, that is, an efficiency of 97%.

  • The temperature of the thermal resistance reaches the value of 300°C after 5 seconds of heating (i.e., 60°C/s), and the maximum value reached 660°C after 20 seconds.

  • During 5 minutes of heating, the water temperature varies from 24–49°C, that is, 3.8°C/min. In this case, the thermal efficiency is around 75%.

  • After 18 minutes of heating, the water reaches the maximum boiling temperature, which is 98°C.

Figure 5.

MPPT command flowchart Perturb and Observe.

All the results obtained on the PV system, controlled by the MPPT command, show that the proposed MPPT command plays its role correctly, and the solar cooker is heated by the maximum power provided by the PV panels (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Experimentation of the cooker (hot plate) (Figure 3) during the heating of 1 liter of water. A: Illumination and external temperature. B: Duty cycle of the DC/DC converter. C: Input and output voltage of the DC/DC converter. D: Input and output current of the DC/DC converter. E: Power of Photovoltaic generator and heating resistor. F: Efficiency of the DC/DC converter. G: Temperature of the heating resistor and water.

Advertisement

4. Conclusion

In this chapter, we have analyzed the operation of photovoltaic (PV) panels around their maximum power points (MPP). We recalled the equations and electrical models that govern the operation of these panels and showed that knowledge of their electrical quantities, over the sun, is essential to design the different blocks of the PV system, which control their operation in a PV application. As part of our experiment, when the intensity of the illumination varies from 300 to 900 W, the optimum voltages, currents, powers, and resistances of a PV panel (300 Wp), vary, respectively, from 25.4 to 25, 5 V; 2.87 to 8.61 A; 72.9 to 218.7 W and 8.85 to 2.95 Ω. Then, we showed that these electrical quantities are fixed through a power block (DC/DC converter), controlled by an MPPT command, which generates a variable duty cycle PWM signal. We specified that the most established MPPT command is that of perturb and observe since it presents the stability and the precision of convergence toward the MPP. In the case of a solar photovoltaic application (solar cooker), we have followed the role of this control in the optimization of the operation of the 600 Wp PV panels (two PV panels in series). We have shown that, during a sunny day, where the intensity of the illumination varies from 950 to 1000 W/m2, the duty cycle of the PWM signal varies from 0.42 to 0.45, and the operation of the PV panels converges toward their optimum electrical quantities (voltage, current, optimum resistance, and power of the order of: 51.17 V, 9.2 A, 5.56 Ω, and 470 W), and the temperature of a liter of water has reached the boiling temperature of 90°C after 23 min of heating. All the results obtained show the role of the power unit and its perturb and observe type command to optimize the operation of PV panels, in a PV application, over the sun.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This research is supported within the framework of the projects:

  • Morocco-Wallonie Brussels Cooperation Program (2018–2022), Wallonie-Bruxelles-International (Belgium), project 4, n°2.

  • Europe-Africa Research and Innovation call on Renewable Energy LEAP-RE, Project No 963530: SoCoNexGen, Solar Indoor Cooking Systems of the Next Generation, 2022–2025.

  • National Initiative for Human Development INDH, Berkane Province, Morocco, project 2017/29.

References

  1. 1. Hernández-Callejo L, Gallardo-Saavedra S, Alonso-Gómez V. A review of photovoltaic systems: Design, operation and maintenance. Solar Energy. 2019;188:426-440
  2. 2. Husain AA, Hasan WZW, Shafie S, Hamidon MN, Pandey SS. A review of transparent solar photovoltaic technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018;94:779-791
  3. 3. Al-Shahri OA, Ismail FB, Hannan MA, Lipu MH, Al-Shetwi AQ, Begum RA, et al. Solar photovoltaic energy optimization methods, challenges and issues: A comprehensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;284:125465
  4. 4. Khodayar M, Khodayar ME, Jalali SMJ. Deep learning for pattern recognition of photovoltaic energy generation. The Electricity Journal. 2021;34(1):106882
  5. 5. Song Z, Liu J, Yang H. Air pollution and soiling implications for solar photovoltaic power generation: A comprehensive review. Applied Energy. 2021;298:117247
  6. 6. Sampaio PGV, González MOA. Photovoltaic solar energy: Conceptual framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;74:590-601
  7. 7. Mbungu NT, Naidoo RM, Bansal RC, Siti MW, Tungadio DH. An overview of renewable energy resources and grid integration for commercial building applications. Journal of Energy Storage. 2020;29:101385
  8. 8. Hemeida AM, El-Ahmar MH, El-Sayed AM, Hasanien HM, Alkhalaf S, Esmail MFC, et al. Optimum design of hybrid wind/PV energy system for remote area. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2020;11(1):11-23
  9. 9. Talbi S, Atmane I, Elmoussaoui N, Kassmi K, Deblecker O. Feasibility of a box-type solar cooker powered by photovoltaic energy. In: 2019 7th International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC). Agadir, Morocco; IEEE; 2019. pp. 1-4. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9078275; http://www.med-space.org/irsec19/
  10. 10. Atmane I, El Moussaoui N, Kassmi K, Deblecker O, Bachiri N. Development of an innovative cooker (hot plate) with photovoltaic solar energy. Journal of Energy Storage. 2021;36:102399
  11. 11. Lamkaddem A, Moussaoui NE, Rhiat M, Malek R, Kassmi K, Deblecker O, et al. System for powering autonomous solar cookers by batteries. Scientific African. 2022;17:e01349
  12. 12. Anand B, Shankar R, Murugavelh S, Rivera W, Prasad KM, Nagarajan R. A review on solar photovoltaic thermal integrated desalination technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021;141:110787
  13. 13. Mito MT, Ma X, Albuflasa H, Davies PA. Reverse osmosis (RO) membrane desalination driven by wind and solar photovoltaic (PV) energy: State of the art and challenges for large-scale implementation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2019;112:669-685
  14. 14. Xu H, Ji X, Wang L, Huang J, Han J, Wang Y. Performance study on a small-scale photovoltaic electrodialysis system for desalination. Renewable Energy. 2020;154:1008-1013
  15. 15. Shafaghat AH, Eslami M, Baneshi M. Techno-enviro-economic study of a reverse osmosis desalination system equipped with photovoltaic-thermal collectors. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2023;218:119289
  16. 16. Calise F, Cappiello FL, Vanoli R, Vicidomini M. Economic assessment of renewable energy systems integrating photovoltaic panels, seawater desalination and water storage. Applied Energy. 2019;253:113575
  17. 17. Ali A, Almutairi K, Padmanaban S, Tirth V, Algarni S, Irshad K, et al. Investigation of MPPT techniques under uniform and non-uniform solar irradiation condition–A retrospection. IEEE Access. 2020;8:127368-127392
  18. 18. Yap KY, Sarimuthu CR, Lim JMY. Artificial intelligence based MPPT techniques for solar power system: A review. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy. 2020;8(6):1043-1059
  19. 19. Yatimi H, Ouberri Y, Aroudam E. Enhancement of power production of an autonomous pv system based on robust mppt technique. Procedia Manufacturing. 2019;32:397-404
  20. 20. Saha A, Sultana F, Haque MA, Nasif SS. Design of MPPT mounted solar based double coil DC electric cooker with smart temperature control device. In: 2019 5th International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering (ICAEE). IEEE; 2019. pp. 212-217
  21. 21. Mohapatra A, Nayak B, Saiprakash C. Adaptive perturb & observe MPPT for PV system with experimental validation. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies and Systems (ICSETS). Bhubaneswar, India: IEEE; 2019. pp. 257-261. DOI: 10.1109/ICSETS.2019.8744819
  22. 22. Mohammed R, Moussaoui NE, Kassmi K, Malek R, Deblecker O, Bachiri N. Autonomous solar cooker with photovoltaic energy. Institut Marocain de l’Information Scientifique et Technique IMIST, Revues Scientifiques Marocaines. New Journal for Science Vulgarization. 2021;1(2):54-62. ISSN: 2028-7181. Available from: www.supmit.org, https://revues.imist.ma/index.php/NJSV/
  23. 23. Hafeez MA, Naeem A, Akram M, Javed MY, Asghar AB, Wang Y. A novel hybrid MPPT technique based on Harris Hawk optimization (HHO) and perturb and observer (P&O) under partial and complex partial shading conditions. Energies. 2022;15(15):5550
  24. 24. Mousa HH, Youssef AR, Mohamed EE. State of the art perturb and observe MPPT algorithms based wind energy conversion systems: A technology review. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2021;126:106598
  25. 25. Yu K et al. A performance-guided JAYA algorithm for parameters identification of photovoltaic cell and module. Applied Energy. 2019;237:241-257
  26. 26. Cuce E, Cuce PM, Bali T. An experimental analysis of illumination intensity and temperature dependency of photovoltaic cell parameters. Applied Energy. 2013;111:374-382
  27. 27. Al-Subhi A. Parameters estimation of photovoltaic cells using simple and efficient mathematical models. Solar Energy. 2020;209:245-257
  28. 28. AbdElminaam DS et al. An efficient heap-based optimizer for parameters identification of modified photovoltaic models. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2022;13(5):101728
  29. 29. Ben Hmamou D et al. Particle swarm optimization approach to determine all parameters of the photovoltaic cell. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2022;52:7-12
  30. 30. Mrabti T, El Ouariachi M, Tidhaf B, Kassmi K. Caractérisation et modélisation fine du fonctionnement électrique des panneaux photovoltaïques. Revue des Energies Renouvelables. 2009;12(3):489-500
  31. 31. Mrabti T, El Ouariachi M, Tidhaf B, Kassmi K, Chadli E, Kassmi K. Modélisation des propriétés électriques et caractérisation des panneaux photovoltaïques. Journal of Renewable Energies. 2009;12(1):105-116

Written By

Ali Lamkaddem, Hajar Chadli, Khalid Salmi, Rachid Malek, Olivier Deblecker, Khalil Kassmi and Najib Bachiri

Submitted: 18 December 2022 Reviewed: 01 February 2023 Published: 31 March 2023