Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Chlamydia and the Gastrointestinal System

Written By

Erhan Alkan

Submitted: 10 February 2023 Reviewed: 12 February 2023 Published: 15 March 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.110485

From the Edited Volume

Chlamydia - Secret Enemy From Past to Present

Edited by Mehmet Sarier

Chapter metrics overview

148 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Chlamydiae are intracellular, gram-negative, and prokaryotic microorganisms. Capable of causing disease in many mammalian and avian species, there are three types that cause disease in humans: Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Chlamydia psittaci. Among the chlamydia species, C. trachomatis is the most studied and encountered type because it is a leading cause of trachoma and sexually transmitted diseases. C. trachomatis, a known pathogen of the genital tract, can also be routinely detected in the human gastrointestinal tract. It can infect the enteroendocrine cells of the gastrointestinal tract. The best-known manner for C. trachomatis to enter the gastrointestinal tract is through oral and anal sex. Most of them are dormant, without causing any infection in the infected person. Chlamydia proctitis is the most well-known disease caused by C. trachomatis in the gastrointestinal tract. In this section, we evaluated the often-overlooked Chlamydia and the gastrointestinal system findings within the gastroenterology practice, the diseases it causes, and the treatments for these diseases.

Keywords

  • chlamydia
  • gastrointestinal system
  • oropharyngitis
  • proctitis
  • Chlamydia trachomatis

1. Introduction

Among the diseases caused by chlamydia, trachoma is the most widely known. The earliest known information about trachoma is found in Egyptian papyrus and Ancient Chinese inscriptions [1, 2, 3]. Intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies of Chlamydia trachomatis were first demonstrated by the researchers Halberstaedter and Von Prowazek [4]. In 1907, Halberstaedter and Von Prowazek applied a sample from a patient with trachoma to the conjunctiva of a monkey and, after the infection emerged, were able to show the intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies by staining the mucopurulent exudate sample with Giemsa. They defined these bodies as protozoa and named them Chlamidozoa [5]. The role of C. trachomatis in genital infections was evidenced by the same researchers in 1909 when they showed inclusion bodies in the conjunctival cells of babies with non-gonococcal ophthalmia neonatorum, in the cervical epithelial cells of the mothers of babies, and in the urethral epithelial cells of male patients with non-gonococcal urethritis. In 1910, Lindner showed how the mother and father of a baby with inclusion conjunctivitis showed inclusion bodies in the mother’s cervical and father’s urethral specimens [5]. Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) was first described in the late 1700s [3] and was reported by Durand, Nicolas, and Favre in 1913. Gamma and Favre showed inclusion bodies in the cytoplasm of mononuclear cells in an infected lymph node in 1924 [5]. Psittacosis was first described in humans by Ritter in 1879. Later, outbreaks were reported in many European countries. In the 1950s, attention was drawn to contamination, especially from poultry [3]. Chlamydia pneumonia was first isolated in 1965 during trachoma vaccine studies in Taiwan. It was later isolated from throat cultures of children with pharyngitis in the United States in 1983 [3, 6]. C. trachomatis was produced in the yolk sac of embryonated eggs by T’ang et al. in 1957 and isolated from cell culture by Gordon and Quan in 1965. In 1970, the microimmunofluorescence technique started being used in diagnosis, and Direct Fluorescent Antibody (DFA) and Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) tests were developed in the 1980s [3, 7]. After the 1990s, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), ligase chain reaction (LCR), and nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) have been used in diagnosis [8, 9].

Chlamydiae are gram-negative, cocci-shaped, immobile, and obligate intracellular microorganisms that cause many diseases in humans. Although they have many enzymes and limited metabolic activities, they have been studied among viruses for many years due to their lack of mechanisms for providing metabolic energy and their inability to generate their own energy (Adenosine Triphosphate). However, they are distinguished from viruses by the fact that they contain both DNA and RNA, reproduce by dividing in the middle, have a similar cell wall structure to gram-negative bacteria, have ribosomes, have various enzymes that provide metabolic activity, and are sensitive to various antibiotics [1]. Unlike other bacteria, chlamydia has a biphasic life cycle. During their life cycles, they appear in two forms, which are called elementary bodies and reticular bodies, with different metabolic activity characteristics, sizes, and morphological appearances. Elementary body is the infective form that is resistant to environmental conditions and is not metabolically active. Reticular body, on the other hand, is the metabolically active form that has no infective properties but has the ability to proliferate within the host cell. Because chlamydia are compulsory intracellular parasites, they cannot be grown in artificial media [10]. They require live cell environments for their reproduction [2].

Chlamydias belong to the Chlamydiaceae family, which is under the order Chlamydiales. In the taxonomic classification according to their phenotypic characteristics, there are four species in the genus Chlamydia, namely C. trachomatis, C. psittaci, C. pneumoniae, and C. pecorum. Among these four species, only C. pecorum does not cause disease in humans [5]. Apart from this classification, two different genera were proposed based on 16S rRNA and 23S rRNA sequence analyses. There are three species within the genus Chlamydia, C. trachomatis, C. suis, and Chlamydia muridarum, and six species within the genus Chlamydophila, C. pneumonia, C. psittaci, C. pecorum, C. felis, Chlamydophila caviae, and C. abortus. However, since this classification is not accepted by many researchers, both classifications are used in the literature today [1, 8, 11, 12]. There are three biovars within the species C. trachomatis. These are Trachoma biovar associated with oculogenital diseases, Lymphogranuloma biovar, and rat pneumonia causative biovar. Wang and Grayston determined 15 serotypes according to antigenic structures in trachoma and LGV agents [13]. Three of these serotypes (L1–3) determined by the microimmunofluorescence method were associated with LGV, and the other 12 were associated with oculogenital diseases. The rat pneumonia-causing agent does not infect humans [8, 13, 14]. The L1, L2, and L3 serotypes of C. trachomatis are associated with Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) and are sexually transmitted. The A, B, Ba, and C serotypes cause endemic trachoma and are transmitted by hand-eye contact and flies. The D, E, F, G, H, I, J, and K serotypes cause inclusion conjunctivitis, nongonococcal urethritis, cervicitis, salpingitis, proctitis, epididymitis, neonatal pneumonia, and conjunctivitis and are transmitted sexually, perinatally, and by hand-eye contact. Today, C. trachomatis is one of the most important causes of sexually transmitted diseases [15]. C. trachomatis usually infects epithelial cells lining the mucous membranes. These are columnar cells in the cervix, cells of the urethra, rectum, conjunctiva, and cells of the newborn’s respiratory system [16]. C. trachomatis is the cardinal pathogen of non-gonococcal urethritis [17]. Sexually transmitted C. trachomatis infection can sometimes be asymptomatic [18]. In this case, accurate and early diagnosis is important since patients will continue to transmit the infection [19]. Undiagnosed and untreated C. trachomatis infections cause diseases such as pelvic inflammatory disease and may result in ectopic pregnancy and tubal infertility. It has also been reported that C. trachomatis infections seen during pregnancy may be associated with pregnancy complications such as postpartum endometritis, premature rupture of membranes, premature birth, stillbirth, and low birthweight. C. trachomatis is also one of the important causes of reactive arthritis [8].

Cytological examination, cell culture, antigen determination, DFA, EIA, and NAAT are used in the diagnosis of C. trachomatis. The sensitivity of the cell culture method varies from 50 to 85%. For DFA and EIA, the sensitivity is given as 45.5–85% and 52–84.4%, respectively. Various studies have shown that the sensitivity for NAAT is from 80 to 100%. The specificity of all tests varies from 90 to 100% [20].

Advertisement

2. Gastrointestinal chlamydial infections in humans

York and Baker reported for the first time in cattle that Chlamydia was present in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract but did not cause a pathological response [21]. Later, Storz and Thornley reported that sheep have low levels of complement-fixing antibodies despite being infected. Antibody levels were found to be high in some sheep with positive fecal isolation but were observed as returning to low levels in the follow-up [22]. Cordy, Storz, and Dungworth stated that the presence of chlamydia in the intestine does not create a resistance against parenteral and respiratory tract infections [23, 24, 25]. Perry and Hughes observed that genital chlamydial infection may be somewhat protective against respiratory tract infections, but it does not prevent infection in the GI tract [26]. The reason why chlamydial GI infection could not be eliminated is the inability of the gastrointestinal tract to produce an adequate immune response. However, there are also data showing that oral infection is a potent immunization. Oral infection with live chlamydia has been shown to elicit a strong systemic immune response and a partial protective response in the genital area in both rat and guinea pig models [27, 28]. Nichols et al. showed that oral infection may be somewhat protective against conjunctival infection in the guinea pig [29]. Although these data suggest that GI chlamydial infection may trigger immunity, this immune response is insufficient. The absence of pathological findings may also indicate the complete absence of a local host response to chlamydial GI infection. In addition to the lack of pathology seen at various times after oral infection with C. muridarum, Igietsme et al. were unable to detect expression of VCAM-1 associated with the inflammatory response after oral infection and did not observe an increase in the number and density of intraepithelial lymphocytes. Hyperplasia of Peyer’s patches was the only finding for a local immune response [30, 31]. Yeruv L et al. examined whether a local and systemic response developed as a result of C. muridarum gastrointestinal infection in rats. They showed that IgG was produced at a level similar to the serum IgG level that occurs in chlamydia genital infection and remained high during the 75-day observation period, while anti-chlamydia IgA appeared in the intestine 2–3 weeks after the infection, peaking on the 50th day and decreasing on the 75th day [32]. Since it has been determined that the natural site of infection for chlamydia in many animal hosts is the gastrointestinal tract, it comes to mind that the natural site of infection in humans is the gastrointestinal tract as well. Apart from direct infection with anal intercourse, there are indications that both men and women can be infected orally. There is evidence that chlamydia can pass through the stomach and small intestine and settle in the large intestine after oral infection of rats [32]. Dunlop et al. found that both cervical and rectal cultures were positive in 5 (13.2%) of 38 women who had intercourse with men with ocular chlamydial infection or urethritis [33, 34]. Rectal cultures were also positive in 7 of 11 women with ocular infection only, and rectum and cervix were infected simultaneously in 6 of them. LGV serotypes were not found in rectal isolated cases. For this reason, it was thought that the rectum also serves as a reservoir, same as the genital tract, for chlamydial infection in women [34]. It has been shown by Jones et al. that men and women can be orally infected. They took pharyngeal samples from 706 heterosexual men and 686 women and rectal samples from 1223 women at risk for chlamydia infection. C. trachomatis was isolated in the pharynx of 3.7% of men and 3.2% of women. C. trachomatis was also isolated in the rectal culture of 5.2% of women at risk. However, they could not find a statistical relationship between positive rectal isolation and anal intercourse [35]. A strong correlation was found between positive genital and rectal cultures. While 11% of genital culture-positive women were positive in the rectum, rectal swab was positive in only 2.7% of genital culture-negative women. Positive rectal cultures having been detected in homosexual men were not surprising. Stamm et al. found a positive rectal culture in 33 of 155 heterosexual women with STDs. A high percentage of these women were having anal intercourse. However, 16 of 29 asymptomatic women with positive rectal cultures did not report anal intercourse [36]. Another source of information on persistent gastrointestinal chlamydia infection comes from studies on neonates exposed to chlamydia infection at birth. A 5-year prospective study by Schachter et al. followed 131 infants born to mothers infected with chlamydia. Inclusion conjunctivitis was confirmed by culture in 18% of infants and chlamydial pneumonia in 16%. Serological response was present in 60% of the infants. Interestingly, asymptomatic rectal and vaginal infections were detected in 14% of infants at risk. Conjunctival infections were detected in the first 22 days of life, while rectal cultures were positive after 2–3 months, and vaginal cultures after 70–154 days. This suggested that the vaginal infection was due to possible fecal contamination. A high titer IgM increase was also detected in positive rectal cultures [37].

Advertisement

3. Chlamydial oropharyngitis–tonsillitis

C. trachomatis can be transmitted after oral sex. Many patients with C. trachomatis in the oropharyngeal region are asymptomatic. Rarely, it can cause oropharyngitis and tonsillitis. In this case, it can lead to symptoms such as sore throat, difficulty swallowing, and fever. Swab samples taken from this region are used for diagnosis. NAATs are one of the most sensitive tests used in the examination of samples and are recommended for use in diagnosing C. trachomatis. Its specificity and sensitivity are quite high [38]. Although the clinical significance of oropharyngeal C. trachomatis infection is unclear and oropharyngeal sampling is not routinely recommended during screening for chlamydia infection, existing evidence has shown that oropharyngeal chlamydia infection can be transmitted sexually to the genital areas [39]. Therefore, if C. trachomatis is detected in the oropharyngeal sample, the patient should be treated with azithromycin and doxycycline. There is not enough clinical information to compare the efficacy of antimicrobials in oropharyngeal C. trachomatis infection. In a double-blind randomized controlled study, no significant difference was found in terms of treatment success of urogenital C. trachomatis infection in men and women between the use of a delayed release 200 mg doxycycline tablet for 7 days and a 100 mg doxycycline tablet twice a day for 7 days, although gastrointestinal side effects were less in the group that received a single dose of 200 mg. On the other hand, the cost of a single-dose 200 mg tablet is higher [40].

Advertisement

4. Rectal C. trachomatis infection

C. trachomatis is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection in the world. There were an estimated 4 million cases of chlamydia in the United States in 2018 [41]. This has made it the most frequently reported condition nationally. Despite public health chlamydia control programs, its frequency has increased over the past 20 years [42]. Chlamydial infections are more common in young women (<25 years), especially Black, Hispanic, and Native American women, and homosexual men [43]. C. trachomatis infects epithelial cells of the oropharynx, genitourinary tract, and gastrointestinal tract. The rectum is increasingly recognized as a common anatomical site of C. trachomatis infection in humans. C. trachomatis is a common cause of symptomatic proctitis and proctocolitis, especially in homosexual men [8]. While 10–15% of homosexual men who apply to sexual health clinics have a positive rectal chlamydia test, this rate is 8–9% in cisgender women. Despite the high prevalence of rectal chlamydial infections, there is a lack of knowledge about the biological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects of these infections. Asymptomatic rectal carriage of C. trachomatis can occur in infants and adults. 85% of rectal C. trachomatis infections are asymptomatic. However, rectal infection is known to cause proctitis. Infection with the L1, L2, and L3 serotypes of C. trachomatis can cause lymphogranuloma venorum syndrome. The most common clinical manifestation of rectal LGV is proctocolitis, while urogenital LGV is inguinal and femoral painful and tender lymphadenopathies [44]. Despite the prevalence of L serotype C. trachomatis among homosexual men, 25–50% of these infections are asymptomatic [45]. Although there is a high prevalence of chlamydia among women in sexual health clinics, this has no clinical significance. It is not clear whether rectal C. trachomatis is auto-inoculated from the rectum to the genital tract, and if so, how often. Such auto-inoculation has been demonstrated in animal models [32, 46]. However, this auto-inoculation has not been proven in humans. Along with that, in several epidemiological studies, it has been emphasized that undiagnosed or inadequately treated rectal C. trachomatis infection may be the source of recurrent urogenital chlamydia infection in women [47, 48]. Rectal C. trachomatis has been described in many ways. The primary means of acquiring rectal C. trachomatis among homosexual men are through receptive anal sex. Apart from this, there are several articles showing that oral-anal sex, use of sex toys, fingering, and use of saliva as a lubricant may lead to rectal C. trachomatis acquisition [49, 50]. Considering that the prevalence of rectal chlamydia in women is similar between those who report and do not report anal sex, it is unlikely that anal sex is the primary route of acquiring of rectal C. trachomatis in women [51]. Considering the anatomical proximity of the vagina and anus, toilet hygiene practices, and the positive rectal C. trachomatis test in most (70%) women with urogenital C. trachomatis, many women can get rectal chlamydia from urogenital C. trachomatis infection. There are articles showing that up to 87% of rectal C. trachomatis infections in women are acquired from urogenital infections [52]. Several researchers have suggested that oral ingestion of C. trachomatis infection (through penile-oral sex) may lead to rectal chlamydia. In this case, in order for C. trachomatis to colonize and infect the large intestine, it must survive passing through the upper gastrointestinal tract. This has been demonstrated in animal models [30, 53, 54]. In humans, this has not been demonstrated experimentally, although is supported by some epidemiological evidence [55, 56]. We have stated that asymptomatic rectal carriage of C. trachomatis can be seen in infants and adults. However, we also emphasize that C. trachomatis is a common cause of symptomatic proctitis and proctocolitis [8]. Both LGV serotypes and D to K serotypes can cause these clinical presentations. The severity and prevalence of the infection also vary accordingly. Infection with agents other than LGV serotypes usually occurs by direct inoculation of the agent during anal intercourse. It remains as a limited superficial inflammation in the rectum. Its main symptoms include anal itching and mucus rectal discharge. LGV serotypes, on the other hand, come to the infection site by lymphatic spread and cause ulcers, granulomas, and cryptic abscesses in the rectum and colon mucosa. They cause symptoms such as rectal pain, tenesmus, rectal bleeding, and fever. Perirectal abscesses, rectovesical fistulas, strictures due to fibrous tissue formation in the intestinal wall, and lymphoid tissue accumulation similar to hemorrhoids due to obstruction of lymphatic drainage may occur in untreated individuals, and the infection may be confused with inflammatory bowel diseases [8]. Methods used in diagnosis include cytological examination, isolation in cell culture, antigen determination, serological examinations, and molecular methods in which nucleic acid of the agent is detected [8, 57, 58]. NAATs are one of the most sensitive tests used in the examination of samples [59, 60] and are recommended for use in diagnosing chlamydia infection [38]. C. trachomatis culture has been generally abandoned. Since there is no significant difference in the outcome between the samples taken by the clinician and the samples taken by the patient themself, the patient’s sampling themself can be used for rectal chlamydia infection detection [61, 62]. In chlamydia screening by NAAT, especially in cases where it is difficult to reach the clinician, the patient’s own samples can be an alternative to the samples taken by the clinician.

4.1 Treatment

Treating people infected with C. trachomatis and their partners is of great importance in preventing reproductive health-related complications, stopping the transmission of the disease to individuals, and preventing re-infection. Doxycycline and azithromycin are the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of rectal chlamydia. Before 2020, the treatment guidelines for sexually transmitted infections recommended azithromycin 1 g orally as a single dose or doxycycline 100 mg orally 2x1 for 7 days for the treatment of rectal chlamydia infection. As alternative treatments, erythromycin base 500 mg orally 4x1 for 7 days or erythromycin 800 mg orally for 4x1 7 days or levofloxacin 500 mg orally 1x1 for 7 days or ofloxacin 300 mg 2x1 for 7 days can be used. Many clinicians prefer to use azithromycin because of the ease of use of single-dose therapy and the possibility of treatment under direct supervision. In the gonorrhea treatment guideline, which was renewed in 2020, it is recommended to use doxycycline for treatment in cases where rectal chlamydial infection is not excluded. In the sexually transmitted diseases guide published in 2021, doxycycline was presented as a revised recommendation as the treatment of choice for chlamydia treatment [44, 63]. Recommendations for the treatment of rectal chlamydia have long been derived from studies of urogenital chlamydia. However, in some observational studies, it has been shown that azithromycin is less effective than doxycycline, and the difference in effectiveness in the rectum is greater than in the urogenital region [64, 65]. Two randomized controlled trials have recently been published on the treatment of rectal chlamydia among homosexual men. These studies compared azithromycin with doxycycline. While microbiological cure was achieved at a rate of 74–76% in the azithromycin group, this rate was found to be 97–100% in the doxycycline group [48, 66]. Results showing that doxycycline is superior to azithromycin in the treatment of rectal chlamydia in cisgender women have been suggested [67]. In light of this information, doxycycline treatment may be the first choice in the treatment of rectal chlamydia. In patient groups where treatment compliance may be low, direct single dose azithromycin may be preferred for treatment. If possible, it can be ensured that the patient is taking the drug under the supervision of the physician. Again, in cases where 7-day treatment with doxycycline will be given, the first dose can be given immediately and under the supervision of a physician. In order to minimize the transmission of the disease to sexual partners, it should be recommended that the patient abstain from sexual activity for the next 7 days if they received a single dose of treatment, and if they received 7 days of treatment, to abstain during the treatment and until the symptoms completely regress. To minimize the risk of re-infection, it is important for people with multiple sexual partners to avoid intercourse until all partners have completed their treatment.

4.2 Sexual partner management during treatment

All partners who have had sexual intercourse with the patient up to 60 days before the onset of symptoms of the disease should be tested for chlamydia infection. Although the frequency of intercourse and the time elapsed since the last intercourse affect the risk of transmission of the disease, the last sexual intercourse partner (even if more than 60 days have passed since the last sexual intercourse) must be treated. In cases where the partners cannot reach the doctor and medical services directly, sending the prescription or the drugs themselves to the patient’s partner can also be considered as an option. It has been shown that such practices significantly reduce the risk of persistent or recurrent infections [68, 69, 70]. In homosexual individuals, since chlamydial infection is likely to be accompanied by other sexually transmitted diseases (especially undiagnosed HIV infection), partners should be thoroughly evaluated by a physician before being treated. Suggesting that patients come with their partners during follow-up visits may also make partner treatment more effective. To prevent re-infection, patients’ partners should be advised to abstain from sexual intercourse until the disease is completely cured (within 7 days after a single dose treatment or until the end of treatment in 7 days of treatment) and until the symptoms have completely receded.

4.3 Post-treatment follow-up

Re-testing 3–4 weeks after the end of treatment is not recommended except in cases where there is doubt about the patient’s compliance with treatment, when symptoms persist, or when re-infection is suspected. Performing the NAAT test earlier than 3 weeks after the end of the treatment may lead to false positive results since non-viable microorganisms can still be found in the body. Therefore, in cases where recovery is uncertain and retesting is required, at least 3 weeks should have passed since the first treatment before the test [38, 71].

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

C. trachomatis is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection in the world. It can cause significant health problems in both men and women. C. trachomatis, a known pathogen of the genital tract, can also be routinely detected in the human GI tract. Its entry into the GI tract has risen due to increased oral-anal sex. Most remain dormant in infected people. Chlamydia proctitis is the most well-known disease caused by C. trachomatis in the GI tract. Rarely, it can cause oropharyngitis and tonsillitis. Due to these infections, the frequency of which is increasing day by day, and the possibility of patients to apply to gastroenterology outpatient clinics is also increasing. It is important to consider this situation, which is often overlooked in gastroenterology practice.

References

  1. 1. Ertem E. Klamidyaların Genel Özellikleri, Chlamydia trachomatis. In: Topçu AW, Söyletir G, Doğanay M, editors. Enfeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Mikrobiyolojisi (s.1945-1964). İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri Ltd. Şti; 2008
  2. 2. Mabey DCW, Solomon AW, Foster A. Trachoma. Lancet. 2003;362:223-229
  3. 3. Schachter J. Chlamydial infections. The Western Journal of Medicine. 1990;153:523-534
  4. 4. McGregor JA, French JI. Chlamydia trachomatis infection during pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1991;164(6):1782-1789
  5. 5. Schachter J. In: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Mardh PA, Lemon MS, editors. Biology of Chlamydia trachomatis, Sexually Transmitted Diseases (s.391-405). Third ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999
  6. 6. Mardh, P., Domeika, M. (1994), Pneumonia and Allied Conditions Caused by Chlamydia psittaci and Chlamydia pneumoniae
  7. 7. Barnes RC. Laboratory diagnosis of human chlamydial infections. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 1989;2(2):119-136
  8. 8. Stamm WE, Jones RB, Batteiger BE. Introduction to chlamydial diseases and chlamydia trachomatis. In: Mandell GL, Benett JE, Dolin R, editors. Mandell, Douglas and Benett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 6th. ed. Philadelphia: Churcill Livingstone; 2005. pp. 2236-2268
  9. 9. Schachter J. DFA, EIA, PCR, LCR and other technologies: What tests should be used for diagnosis of chlamydia infections? Immunological Investigations. 1997;26(1&2):157-161
  10. 10. Sarier M, Duman İ, Göktaş Ş, Demir M, Kukul E. Results of multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay to identify urethritis pathogens. Journal of Urological Surgery. 2017;1:18-22. DOI: 10.4274/jus.1328
  11. 11. Brooks GF, Butel JS, Ornston LN. Chlamydiae. In: Jawetz E, Melnick JL, Adelberg EA, editors. Jawetz, Melnick & Adelberg’s Medical Microbiology. Twentieth ed. Prentice-Hall International Inc.; 1995. pp. 294-302
  12. 12. Everett KDE, Bush RM, Andersen AA. Emended description of the order Chlamydiales, proposal of Parachlamydiaceae fam. Nov. and Simkaniaceae fam. Nov., each containing one monotypic genus, revised taxonomy of the family Chlamydiaceae, including a new genus and five new species, and standards for the identification of organisms. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 1999;49:415-440
  13. 13. Holmes KK. The chlamydia epidemic. JAMA. 1981;245(17):1718-1723
  14. 14. Guaschino S, De Seta F. Update on chlamydia trachomatis. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2000;900:293-300
  15. 15. Sarier M, Sepin N, Duman I, et al. Microscopy of gram-stained urethral smear in the diagnosis of urethritis: Which threshold value should be selected? Andrologia. 2018:e13143. DOI: 10.1111/and.13143
  16. 16. Kelly KA. Cellular immunity and chlamydia genital infection: Induction, recruitment and effector mechanisms. International Reviews of Immunology. 2003;22:3-41
  17. 17. Sarier M, Kukul E. Classification of non-gonococcal urethritis: A review. International Urology and Nephrology. 2019;51(6):901-907. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-019-02140-2
  18. 18. Sarier M, Demir M, Turgut H, et al. New approach to microscopy of gram-stained urethral smear: The kissing slide method. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2020;47(10):712-715. DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001228
  19. 19. Sarier M, Sepin N, Emek M, et al. Evaluating the utility of the a.F. genital system test for pathogen diagnosis in acute male urethritis. Andrologia. 2022;54(4):e14377. DOI: 10.1111/and.14377
  20. 20. Watson EJ, Templeton A, Russell I, Paavonen J, Mardh PA, Stary A, et al. The accuracy and efficacy of screening tests for chlamydia trachomatis: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2002;51:1021-1031
  21. 21. York CJ, Baker JA. A new member of the psittacosislymphogranuloma group of viruses that causes infection in calves. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 1951;93:587-604. DOI: 10.1084/jem.93.6.587
  22. 22. Storz J, Thornley WR. Serological and etiological studies on the intestinal psittacosis-lymphogranuloma infection of sheep. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin. Reihe B. 1966;13:14-24 (In German.)
  23. 23. Dungworth DL, Cordy DR. The pathogenesis of ovine pneumonia. II. Isolation of virus from faeces; comparison of pneumonia caused by faecal, enzootic abortion and pneumonitis viruses. Journal of Comparative Pathology. 1962;72:71-79
  24. 24. Storz J. Intestinal infections of ruminants. In: Storz J, editor. Chlamydia and Chlamydia-Induced Diseases. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas; 1971. pp. 146-154
  25. 25. Storz J. Superinfection of pregnant ewes latently infected with a psittacosis-lymphgranuloma agent. The Cornell Veterinarian. 1963;53:469-480
  26. 26. Perry LL, Hughes S. Chlamydial colonization of multiple mucosae following infection by any mucosal route. Infection and Immunity. 1999;67:3686-3689
  27. 27. Kelly KA, Robinson EA, Rank RG. Initial route of antigen administration alters the T-cell cytokine profile produced in response to the mouse pneumonitis biovar of chlamydia trachomatis following genital infection. Infection and Immunity. 1996;64:4976-4983
  28. 28. Rank RG, Batteiger BE, Soderberg LSF. Immunization against chlamydial genital infection in Guinea pigs with UV-inactivated and viable chlamydiae administered by different routes. Infection and Immunity. 1990;58:2599-2605
  29. 29. Nichols RL, Murray ES, Nisson PE. Use of enteric vaccines in protection against chlamydial infections of the genital tract and the eye of Guinea pigs. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1978;138:742-746. DOI: 10.1093/infdis /138.6.742
  30. 30. Igietseme JU, Portis JL, Perry LL. Inflammation and clearance of chlamydia trachomatis in enteric and nonenteric mucosae. Infection and Immunity. 2001;69:1832-1840. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.3.1832-1840.2001
  31. 31. Perry LL, Feilzer K, Portis JL, Caldwell HD. Distinct homing pathways direct T lymphocytes to the genital and intestinal mucosae in chlamydia-infected mice. Journal of Immunology. 1998;160:2905-2914
  32. 32. Yeruva L, Spencer N, Bowlin AK, Wang Y, Rank RG. Chlamydial infection of the gastrointestinal tract: A reservoir for persistent infection. Pathogens and Disease. 2013;68:88-95. DOI: 10.1111/2049 -632X.12052
  33. 33. Darougar S, Kinnison JR, Jones B. Chlamydial isolates from the rectum in association with chlamydial infection of the eye or genital tract. I. Laboratory aspects. In: Nichols RL, editor. Trachoma and Related Disorders. Princeton, NJ: Excerpta Medica; 1970. pp. 501-506
  34. 34. Dunlop EMC, Hare MJ, Darougar S, Jones B. Chlamydial isolates from the rectum in association with chlamydial infection of the eye or genital tract. II. Clinical aspects. In: Nichols RL, editor. Trachoma and Related Disorders. Princeton, NJ: Excerpta Medica; 1970. pp. 507-512
  35. 35. Jones RB, Rabinovitch RA, Katz BP, Batteiger BE, Quinn TS, Terho P, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis in the pharynx and rectum of heterosexual patients at risk for genital infection. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1985;102:757-762. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-102-6-757
  36. 36. Stamm W, Quinn ETC, Mkrtichian E, Wang SP, Schuffler MD, Holmes KK. Chlamydia trachomatis proctitis. In: Mardh P-A, Holmes K, Oriel JD, Piot P, Schachter J, editors. Chlamydial Infections. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Biomedical Press; 1982. pp. 111-114
  37. 37. Schachter J, Grossman M, Sweet RL, Holt J, Jordan C, Bishop E. Prospective study of perinatal transmission of chlamydia trachomatis. JAMA. 1986;255:3374-3377. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1986.03370240044034
  38. 38. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for the laboratory-based detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae—2014. MMWR - Recommendations and Reports. 2014;63:1-19
  39. 39. Marcus JL, Kohn RP, Barry PM, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae transmission from the female oropharynx to the male urethra. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2011;38:372-373
  40. 40. Geisler WM, Koltun WD, Abdelsayed N, et al. Safety and efficacy of WC2031 versus vibramycin for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital chlamydia trachomatis infection: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multicenter trial. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2012;55:82-88
  41. 41. World Health Organization. Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs). 2016. Available from: https://www.who.int/newsroom/fact-sheets/detail/sexually-transmitted-infections-(stis). Updated 14 June 2019. [Accessed: September 17, 2020]
  42. 42. Kreisel KM, Weston EJ, St Cyr SB, Spicknall IH. Estimates of the prevalence and incidence of chlamydia and gonorrhea among US men and women, 2018. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2021;48(4):222-231
  43. 43. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2018. Atlanta, Georgia: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2019
  44. 44. Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. MMWR - Recommendations and Reports. 2021;70(4):1-187
  45. 45. De Vrieze NH, van Rooijen M, Schim van der Loeff MF, de Vries HJ. Anorectal and inguinal lymphogranuloma venereum among men who have sex with men in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Trends over time, symptomatology and concurrent infections. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2013;89(7):548-552
  46. 46. Craig AP, Kong FY, Yeruva L, et al. Is it time to switch to doxycycline from azithromycin for treating genital chlamydial infections in women? Modelling the impact of autoinoculation from the gastrointestinal tract to the genital tract. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2015;15:200
  47. 47. Whittington WL, Kent C, Kissinger P, et al. Determinants of persistent and recurrent chlamydia trachomatis infection in young women: Results of a multicenter cohort study. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2001;28(2):117-123
  48. 48. Dombrowski JC, Wierzbicki MR, Newman LM, et al. Doxycycline versus azithromycin for the treatment of rectal chlamydia in men who have sex with men. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2021;2:19. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab153
  49. 49. Cornelisse VJ, Fairley CK, Read TRH, et al. Associations between anorectal chlamydia and Oroanal sex or saliva use as a lubricant for anal sex: A cross-sectional survey. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2018;45(8):506-510
  50. 50. Heiligenberg M, Rijnders B, Schim van der Loeff MF, et al. High prevalence of sexually transmitted infections in HIV-infected men during routine outpatient visits in the Netherlands. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2012;39(1):8-15
  51. 51. Lau A, Kong FYS, Huston W, et al. Factors associated with anorectal chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae test positivity in women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2019;95(5):361-367
  52. 52. Heijne JCM, van Liere G, Hoebe C, et al. What explains anorectal chlamydia infection in women? Implications of a mathematical model for test and treatment strategies. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2017;93(4):270-275
  53. 53. Rank RG, Yeruva L. An alternative scenario to explain rectal positivity in chlamydia-infected individuals. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2015;60(10):1585-1586
  54. 54. Zhu C, Lin H, Tang L, et al. Oral chlamydia vaccination induces transmucosal protection in the airway. Vaccine. 2018;36(16):2061-2068
  55. 55. Batteiger TA, Jordan SJ, Toh E, et al. Detection of rectal chlamydia trachomatis in heterosexual men who report cunnilingus. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2019;46(7):440-445
  56. 56. Khosropour CM, Soge OO, Suchland R, et al. Recurrent/intermittent vaginal and rectal chlamydial infection following treatment: A prospective cohort study among female sexually transmitted disease clinic patients. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2019;220(3):476-483
  57. 57. Essig A. Chlamydia and Chlamydophila; manual of clinical microbiology. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Pfaller MA, editors. 9th ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2007. pp. 1021-1035
  58. 58. Sarier M, Sepin N, Guler H, et al. Prevalence of sexually transmitted disease in asymptomatic renal transplant recipients. Experimental and Clinical Transplantation. 2018;(1). DOI: 10.6002/ect.2017.0232
  59. 59. Sarier M. Polymerase chain reaction assay in acute urethritis. Andrologia. 2019;51(8):e13366. DOI: 10.1111/and.13366), 10.1111/and.13366)
  60. 60. Sarier M. Prevalence of Polymicrobial infection in urethritis. Journal of Urological Surgery. 2019;6(3):180-183. DOI: 10.4274/jus.galenos.2019.2405
  61. 61. Sexton ME, Baker JJ, Nakagawa K, et al. How reliable is self-testing for gonorrhea and chlamydia among men who have sex with men? The Journal of Family Practice. 2013;62:70-78
  62. 62. Dodge B, Van Der Pol B, Reece M, et al. Rectal self-sampling in non-clinical venues for detection of sexually transmissible infections among behaviourally bisexual men. Sexual Health. 2012;9:190-191
  63. 63. St Cyr S, Barbee L, Workowski KA, et al. Update to CDC's treatment guidelines for gonococcal infection, 2020. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2020;69(50):1911-1916
  64. 64. Khosropour CM, Dombrowski JC, Barbee LA, et al. Comparing azithromycin and doxycycline for the treatment of rectal chlamydial infection: A retrospective cohort study. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2014;41(2):79-85
  65. 65. Kong FY, Tabrizi SN, Fairley CK, et al. The efficacy of azithromycin and doxycycline for the treatment of rectal chlamydia infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2015;70(5):1290-1297
  66. 66. Lau A, Kong FYS, Fairley CK, et al. Azithromycin or doxycycline for asymptomatic rectal chlamydia trachomatis. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;384(25):2418-2427
  67. 67. Dukers-Muijrers N, Wolffs PFG, De Vries H, et al. Treatment effectiveness of azithromycin and doxycycline in uncomplicated rectal and vaginal chlamydia trachomatis infections in women: A multicenter observational study (FemCure). Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2019;69(11):1946-1954
  68. 68. Golden MR, Whittington WL, Handsfield HH, et al. Effect of expedited treatment of sex partners on recurrent or persistent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;352:676-685
  69. 69. Schillinger JA, Kissinger P, Calvet H, et al. Patient-delivered partner treatment with azithromycin to prevent repeated chlamydia trachomatis infection among women: A randomized, controlled trial. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2003;30:49-56
  70. 70. Kissinger P, Mohammed H, Richardson-Alston G, et al. Patient-delivered partner treatment for male urethritis: A randomized, controlled trial. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2005;41:623-629
  71. 71. Renault CA, Israelski DM, Levy V, et al. Time to clearance of chlamydia trachomatis ribosomal RNA in women treated for chlamydial infection. Sexual Health. 2011;8:69-73

Written By

Erhan Alkan

Submitted: 10 February 2023 Reviewed: 12 February 2023 Published: 15 March 2023