Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Study on the Impact of Diseases and Medical Treatments on Bone Mineral Density

Written By

Imane Ait Oumghar, Abdelwahed Barkaoui and Patrick Chabrand

Submitted: 22 August 2022 Reviewed: 31 January 2023 Published: 02 March 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.110318

From the Edited Volume

Biomechanical Insights into Osteoporosis

Edited by Abdelwahed Barkaoui

Chapter metrics overview

74 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Several diseases and medical treatments have been found to affect bone quality over decades. Bone mass characteristics summarized in bone mineral density (BMD), geometry, microarchitecture, and mechanical properties are the main parameters permitting to assess the quality of bone. Clinically, the diagnosis of bone diseases and the prediction of bone fracture are largely based on the BMD values. Thus, the investigation of how diseases and treatments alter the BMD value is primordial to anticipate additional treatment for the patient. In this chapter, we summarize the main research studies investigating diseases and treatments’ effects on bone quality and more specifically on BMD.

Keywords

  • bone mineral density
  • osteoporosis
  • bone diseases
  • medical treatments
  • bone remodeling

1. Introduction

Bone quality depends on the structural and material properties of the bone. By increased mortality and healthcare costs due to bone fractures, bone fragility becomes a major health concern [1]. In order to assess bone fragility, the integration of quantity, quality, and turnover of bone factors is necessary. The BMD, quantified using the clinical imaging technique called X-ray radiography, namely, the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is one of the most important bone factors reflecting the quality of bone in terms of quantity to assess bone fracture risk in osteoporotic patients [2]. Osteoporosis is a biochemical problem characterized by a decrease in bone mass, a deterioration and an alteration of bone tissue microarchitecture, which increases the risk of fractures. Old bone fracture, oxidative stress, age, and menopause are among the main causes of osteoporosis. Giving its various causes, osteoporosis could affect any gender at any age. For women and men, for example, osteoporosis is associated with aging and more specifically, for women, with hormonal deficiency caused by menopause [3]. Meanwhile for children, BMD loss is generally related to diseases’ or treatments’ use.

A wide variety of diseases and treatments containing toxic agents for bone cause or contribute to osteoporosis development [4]. In this chapter, we will discuss the diseases and treatments inducing BMD abnormal loss or gain and report different studies’ findings concerning diseases and treatment association with osteoporosis. Our work would be subdivided into three main parts: (i) BMD generalities; (ii) osteoporosis in women, men, and children; and (iii) diseases and clinical interventions to limit osteoporosis development.

Advertisement

2. BMD overview

2.1 Bone mineral density

Bone mineral density is the most-used parameter for the prediction of fracture risk in adults. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), bone could be subdivided into four groups based on the BMD values’ variation. BMD values are obtained based on DXA images. Based on the calculation of T-score, which represents the number of standard deviation (SD) between studied BMD value and the average value of normal bone of adults of the same sex, the quality of bone can be determined. As far as adults are considered, there are some categories that are more susceptible to get osteoporosis than others; hence, physicians highly recommend them to undergo frequent BMD screenings. By way of illustration, we mention men above 50 years of age who have a historical fracture [5, 6, 7, 8], women over 65 years of age, and sometimes the younger women who have an elevated risk of fracture [9]. Based on the fact that osteoporosis is a silent disease and since fragile bones are not painful until the occurrence of fracture, an early screening is always beneficial to detect this disease emergence [10].

For adults, a normal BMD value can be easily determined relative to a specific population. Nevertheless, BMD’s use remains difficult for children because of the variation of their bone density and structure during growth. Generally, in this period, bone size and mass grow to reach 90% of the peak bone mass at 18 years of age [11]. Therefore, researchers cannot find a particular normal BMD value to evaluate the bone mineral density levels. In addition to age for children, several variables can also influence the BMD normal value, such as gender, body size, pubertal stage, skeletal maturation, and ethnicity [12]. All these limitations make a diagnosis of osteoporosis more complex [13].

2.2 Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

DXA imaging technic consists of sending x-rays through the human body, which allows the creation of interior body images based upon the variations of material absorption. Among the many advantages of this technic, we can note its short scanning time, its low radiation dose, and its low cost compared to other imaging technics. DXA provides 2D images of the scanned bone, which can help to extract areal bone mineral density (aBMD) in addition to the hip fracture index (HFRI), and to create a 2D model of the zone of interest, which can be used during finite element modeling. DXA-based finite element models arrive to some extent to determine bone strength and bone behavior vis à vis the mechanical loads. According to [14], DXA-based FE models permit to provide up to 74–77% of experimental femoral strength results. However, despite its advantages, DXA has a poor resolution of images, reducing their quality, which makes the distinction between cortical and trabecular bone impossible. Moreover, DXA 2D images avoid bone structure, which affects the accuracy of obtained a BMD values.

Advertisement

3. Osteoporosis associated BMD alteration

Every human being is susceptible to develop osteoporosis especially by living long. The maximum humans’ BMD is reached by 20 years of age; then, it starts decreasing naturally and gradually by approximatively 1%/year. The rate of this decrease variates depending on gender and can be accelerated by the use of steroid, lack of calcium and vitamin D, smoking, high alcohol consumption, and cancer treatments [15].

3.1 Osteoporosis in women

Majority of osteoporosis patients are women because of menopause. During the menopausal transition period, levels of estrogen drop, causing a big disruption in the bone remodeling process. This process is a biological event permitting to renew the old bone matrix by resorbing the old one and replacing it with a new one. Specific bone cells are involved in this process, where their behavior is controlled by numerous biochemical substances, including estrogen. Indeed, estrogen stimulates bone formation and inhibits bone resorption; thus, by its drop, bone resorption rate becomes higher, inducing bone loss. Based on this fact, other factors related to hormonal disturbance also induce osteoporosis. For instance, the problem of oligomenorrhea and taking high doses of glucocorticoids may cause the declination of bone density and increase the fracture risk for women [16, 17]. The assessment of osteoporosis in premenopausal women is not based on BMD value alone because of its high dependency to age. Therefore, there are other signs beyond BMD value, like the exposure of glucocorticoid, parathyroidism, hypogonadism, and eating disorder [18], which make osteoporosis diagnosis easier. Moreover, fractures’ occurrence in this period can be also an index of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women [19].

3.2 Osteoporosis in men

In contrary to women, the cause of osteoporosis in men is unknown. However, many studies have associated this disease appearance with age and more specifically with low testosterone production [20]. In the studied population of [21], it has been shown that 22% of male over 50 years old has had a T-score equal to or under −2.5 in femoral neck, indicating that elderly men are more susceptible to develop osteoporotic fractures. However, men are less affected by osteoporosis compared to women. As reported by [22], only 6% of the male population over 50 years have a T-score under −2.5 in femoral neck. For men as well as women, testosterone plays an important role in maintaining a healthy bone. It contributes to stimulating bone-forming cell functioning and estrogen production, which, as aforementioned, contribute to bone formation and inhibit bone resorption. Based on this fact, we can conclude that steroid hormone dysregulation is the most influencing factor on bone health, whether for women or men, especially estrogen that induces serious bone degradation for women during menopause.

3.3 Osteoporosis in children

In addition to adults, the risk of developing osteoporosis or having bone fractures is also important in younger patients.

For girls between 11 and 13 years old and boys between 13 and 15 years old, the occurrence of fractures is totally normal. Indeed, bone grows rapidly before the attainment of the peak bone mineral density; thus, during puberty, bone is undermineralized, which explains the occurrence of fractures in this period independent of developing any bone disease [23, 24]. However, repeated fractures in early age could be one of the causes inducing osteoporosis and the occurrence of frequent fractures in future. In addition to osteoporosis in children, the decrease of BMD can be related to the appearance of some chronic diseases suchlike cerebral palsy and celiac disease [25] or undergoing treatments such as chemotherapy used for children with lymphoblastic leukemia cancer [26, 27].

As shown before, in women’s case, estrogen level is one of the biggest promoters of the bone formation phase in the remodeling process. Estrogen level increases due to its secretion by ovaries during the puberty phase for girls, while it circulates in low concentration for boys and girls before their sexual maturity. Thus, the augmentation of estrogen induces longitudinal bone growth during the puberty period [28]. However, a disturbance of estrogen levels could cause critical bone problems as shown by [29], who found that decreasing concentration of estrogen for girls could induce a sideways curvature of the spine known as scoliosis disease.

Advertisement

4. Disease- and treatment-associated bone deterioration

There are several diseases and treatments that destabilize the bone remodeling process and induce abnormal bone deterioration (Figure 1) [30]. Each disease and treatment act differently on hormones, which conducts various bone problems. In this section, we are summarizing the most-known diseases and treatments affecting bone and their effect on BMD.

Figure 1.

Illustration of diseases and medical treatments’ effect on BMD, bone matrix, and architecture.

4.1 Disease-associated bone deterioration

Paget disease of bone (PDB): It is a chronic bone disease, considered as the second-most common bone disease after osteoporosis. It is defined as a skeletal growth disorder, leading to bone pain, deformities, deafness, and fractures usually found in the pelvis, spine, femur, and skull [31]. PDB is most common among men than women, and by 50 years of age, the preponderance of being affected by the disease reaches 1 to 5% [32]. The real cause of PDB appearance is not well known. However, many researchers have found a causal relationship between PDB and mutation of the gene encoding sequestosome 1 SQSTM1/p62 that plays an important role in bone-resorbing cell differentiation, activity, and survival [31]. Given this disruption of bone-resorbing cell functioning, the whole bone remodeling process is perturbed, leading to fragile bones and disorganized bone architecture. Otherwise, this disruption causes increased BMD in areas affected by PDB, whether in cortical or trabecular compartments [33].

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI): Also known as brittle bone disease, OI is a group of rare bone diseases characterized by heterogeneous disturbance of the cognitive tissue. All these diseases are associated with bone mass diminution, increased bone fragility, bone disfigurement, and bone formation insufficiency [34]. OI etiology differs from one disease to another as it depends mainly on the onsets and intensity of each one. Genetic, phenotypic, and functional classifications have been adopted to find out the new causative mutation of OI onset [35]. The most-known OI diseases are X-linked hyposphantaemia, characterized by a mutation of phosphate-regulating endopeptidase that affects vitamin D concentration in the body and consequently bone quality; hypoparathyroidism, characterized by low levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) that regulates calcium homeostasis; and hypophosphatasia, resulting from the mutation of a responsible gene encoding alkaline phosphatase. The dysregulation of the enzyme disrupts its function to prompt adequate mineralization at an appropriate time in bone tissue. In terms of BMD, OI has been found to be associated with low BMD and also with high BMD in patients with a pathogenic variant of COL1A2, as recently proved by [36].

Myeloma disease (MM): It is a clonal plasma cell proliferative disorder that affects bones by causing bone pain, fractures, and hypercalcemia. It is ranked as the second most-frequent hematological malignancy, with a percentage of 10% [37, 38] in elderly population. This blood cancer is characterized by renal impairment (creatinine >2 mg/dL), hypercalcemia (calcium >11 mg/dL), anemia (hemoglobin <10 mg/dL), the infiltration of clonal plasma with 60% of the bone marrow, and end organ damage such as lytic lesions in the bone [39, 40]. Because of MM cancer, bone-resorbing cell differentiation is stimulated, and bone-forming cell functioning is suppressed [31]. Due to calcium levels perturbation in blood and bone in addition to bone marrow infiltration, the BMD value is affected.

Breast cancer (BC): It consists of a group of biologically and molecularly heterogeneous diseases that originate from the breast and manifests particularly in the mammary glands. It is the most common type of cancer affecting women worldwide [41]. Whether in its primary state or after metastasizing into the bone, BC affects bones. In a recent research study [42], authors have mimicked bone adaptation during the breast cancer premetastatic state by analyzing the effect of the tumor conditioned media (TCM) of the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 on mice bone. Based on their experiments, they found that TCM injection into mice induced an increase of bone formation characterized by increased bone mineral apposition and altered bone quality such as high mineralization rate, less bone matrix with more carbonate substitution, and disoriented deposition of minerals. Those findings could explain the results of [43] that found a higher BMD in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Otherwise, metastatic BC causes osteolytic lesions due to their stimulation of bone-resorbing cell functioning and repression of the forming cell functioning. The tumor cell and bone cell interactions cause a decrease in bone mass, which leads to less bone mineral density in the matrix [44].

Prostate cancer (PC): This disease consists of a cancer that starts in the gland cells of the prostate. The prostate is a small glandular organ where the seminal fluid is produced. PC has a tendency to spread in surrounding organs such as rectum and seminal vesicles and also to distant organs such as bones through lymphatic and hematogenous routes [45]. Its characterization is tightly related to androgenic hormone signaling such as testosterone [46]. As well as estrogen, testosterone plays an important role in bone remodeling regulation. By its exposure in men with PC, it acts on the bone remodeling process directly or indirectly via aromatization to estradiol, leading to enhanced bone formation and repressed resorption [47]. Probably, because of testosterone increased action, PC patients frequently develop osteoblastic lesions [48]. However, PC is still a risk factor for osteoporosis development, leading to decrease BMD value as shown in the retrospective study of Kwon et al. [49].

Lung cancer (LC): This cancer refers to tumors originating in the lung, which is a spongy organ located in the chest. It is caused due to genetic mutations and disruption in protein synthesis resulting generally from individual cigarette smoking. Those DNA mutations disrupt cells’ cycle and promote carcinogenesis [50]. In addition to lung complications, patients with this type of carcinoma develop skeletal complications and fractures. In the work of [51] studying the effect of lung cancer cells on bone cells in mice, authors have found that lung tumor cells secrete inhibitory factors that act on bone-reforming cells and inhibit their mineralization, which induce bone loss and decreased BMD.

Cushing disease: It is an endocrine disorder characterized by a hypersecretion of the adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) by the anterior pituitary, leading to an excessive production of cortisol by the adrenal glands [52]. As well as the abovementioned diseases, Cushing disease is linked with bone degradation. Different factors contribute to bone loss and decreased BMD in patients with Cushing syndrome, including a direct effect of the high secreted glucocorticoids on bone cells, enhanced bone resorption, impaired bone formation, and limited calcium absorption [53].

Hypogonadism: It refers to a failure in the gonads’ functioning activity. The gonads are testes for men and ovaries for women; both are the principle organs producing sexual hormones such like testosterone, estrogen, and progesterone and gametes, notably eggs and sperm [54]. This disease could arise from Klinefelter syndrome, Kallman syndrome, pituitary disorders, cancer treatment, obesity, aging, and stress [55]. Given that hypogonadism is related to a failure in sexual hormone synthesis, it is also associated with reduction of BMD, especially if sex steroid deficiency occurs at a young age [56]. For males, for example, a low testosterone level is the main cause of low BMD and increased bone fracture risk for patients with primary and secondary hypogonadism [57].

Hyperparathyroidism: It refers to an endocrine disorder characterized by an abnormal elevation of PTH production by parathyroid glands. This causes hypercalcemia by inducing a loss of calcium from the bones and an excessive gain of calcium in the blood. For that reason, hyperparathyroidism induces serious renal and skeletal problems [58]. Due to calcium deficiency in the bone, hyperparathyroidism has been shown to be associated with increased osteoporosis risk and significantly reduced BMD [58].

4.2 Medical treatment-associated bone deterioration

Glucocorticoids: They are a sort of drugs composed of primary stress hormones that regulate various physiological processes [59]. They are used as anti-inflammatory, antiallergic, and immunosuppressive to treat different disease types and more often inflammatory skin disorders such like allergic contact eczema and toxic-irritative eczema [60, 61]. Given its nature, an excess of glucocorticoids leads to reduced calcium intestinal absorption and calcium renal excretion and sex steroid level decrease, which affects bone remodeling by stimulating bone repression and inhibiting formation, leading to bone loss, low BMD, and elevated risk of fracture [62].

Radiotherapy: It consists of using X-rays or subatomic particles directly on tumor cells in curative and palliative settings [63]. Thanks to this procedure, cancer cells shrink, and the local cancer recurrence is reduced [64]. However, RT noticeably affects bone quality, leading to fragility in the zones surrounding the treated tumor area. Indeed, RT decreases cellularity; affects bone-forming cell differentiation, proliferation, and production; and stimulates bone-resorbing cell differentiation using low radiation doses [65]. This explains the significant decrease in BMD value in the area treated with RT as noticed in [66] study investigating RT effect on lumbar vertebrae in women with cervical cancer [66].

Chemotherapy: It involves the use of chemical agents capable of destroying cancer cells by either affecting their macromolecular synthesis by interfering with their DNA or affecting the appropriate functioning of the preformed molecule. This limits cell proliferation and consequently their invasion. Besides their good efficacy on cancer cells, chemotherapy has toxic effects on normal cells, including bone cells, which affects bone quality [67]. Ovarian failure and negative and positive effects on osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis, respectively, due to chemotherapy induce bone loss [68, 69] in addition to loss of bone mineral density as found in (Bone mineral density change during adjuvant chemotherapy in pediatric osteosarcoma), where children under chemotherapy have shown a decrease of BMD in lumbar spine and femoral neck especially at the end of the therapy [70].

Aromatase Inhibitors (AIs): These are medications used for the treatment of breast cancer, notably estrogen receptor positive, by blocking estrogen synthesis [71]. Because of their action on estrogen, women undergoing AI develop osteoporosis, which induces bone fractures and leads to up to 2.6% loss of BMD per year in lumbar spine [69].

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT): As well as AIs, ADT is also a treatment controlling sex hormone synthesis, more precisely suppressing or blocking the production or action of male hormones, notably testosterone. Given the important role of testosterone already mentioned, ADT induces osteoporosis. Its effect is much higher than that of AIs as it has been found that ADT causes 4.6% loss of BMD per year in lumbar spine, while AIs induce approximatively 2.6% of BMD decrease [69].

Bone marrow transplant: It is a procedure in which heathy hematopoietic stem cells are administrated into the patient to replace the depleted bone marrow with dysfunctional cells that have been destroyed by treatments such as radiation or high doses of chemotherapy. This permits to supplement bone marrow functioning and to destroy treated malignant tumor cells. The healthy stem cells come from the bone marrow of the patient or from a donor [72]. The hematopoietic cell transplantation has also been identified as one of the medical procedures causing reduced BMD. The major causes of this loss are low sexual hormones notably estrogen and testosterone, secondary hyperparathyroidism due to reduced calcium concentration, and posttransplant steroid therapy—50–60% of patients undergoing this therapy undergo bone loss [73]. In the work of [74], authors have noticed a significant loss in BMD value in the hip, reaching 4.2% for men and women under observation over 1 year of treatment.

Advertisement

5. Medical treatments and dietary recommendation for BMD alteration

The goal of pharmacological therapy is to reduce the risk of fractures by acting on the main agents controlling bone remodeling, which has been affected by osteoporosis. The majority of osteoporosis treatment is antiresorptive (e.g., denosumab, bisphosphonates, estrogen agonist and antagonist, estrogens, and calcitonin), which reduces bone resorption. Otherwise, some anabolic treatments have been developed (e.g., teriparatide), which are dedicated for stimulating bone formation instead of repressing bone-resorbing cell functioning [75]. Both antiresorptive and anabolic agents improve BMD but with variated intensities and can be used for the treatment of one patient. In the work of [76], authors found that the treatment sequence played an important role in osteoporosis treatment. Based on their observation, they have concluded that initiating a treatment by anabolic treatment first followed by a potent antiresorptive treatment is more effective in improving BMD value. In contrary, using antiresorptive agents first, then when the BMD does not sufficiently increase, clinicals suggest to switch to teriparatide, which is not optimal utilization of anabolic treatments.

Besides medications, dietary habits contribute also to improve or deteriorate the bone. Vitamin D and calcium form part of the bone mineral matrix, assuring its strength, and one of the best ways to reach adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D is through healthy eating habits [77]. In a recent meta-analysis of the influence of foods rich in vitamin D on serum 25(OH)D levels, results have shown that those aliments lead to significant increase in serum 25(OH)D as well as BMD [78]. Together with vitamin D, increased calcium intake has been proven to improve BMD by 0.6–1% over 1 year [79]. However, in a recent study [80], dietary calcium intake has not show any association with BMD values in normal participants over 50 years of age, while it has shown a positive change in BMD in women undergoing osteoporosis medical treatment.

Advertisement

6. Conclusion

To maintain its multiple functions, bone is renewed periodically, assuring resorption of old bones and formation of new matrix. However, naturally with age, the process of bone renewing is altered with higher bone resorption and decreased matrix deposition, which lead to decreased BMD and increased fracture occurrence. Several diseases and treatments contribute to or engender osteoporosis or other bone problems. Those diseases and treatments generally affect hormones or bone mineral levels. The most important hormones for a normal bone remodeling process are: (i) estrogen, (ii) testosterone, and (iii) cortisol. And the most important mineral disturbed is calcium. When the absorption of calcium by the bones is inhibited, bones deteriorate easily and undergo fractures. In order to limit the side effects of treatments and additional bad impacts of diseases, using anabolic and antiresorptive treatment is mandatory accompanied by good dietary habits.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Partenariat Hubert Curien Franco-Moroccan TOUBKAL (PHC Toubkal) and by the International University of Rabat (UIR).

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Fonseca H, Moreira-Gonçalves D, Coriolano HJA, Duarte JA. Bone quality: The determinants of bone strength and fragility. Sports Medicine. 2014;44(1):37-53. DOI: 10.1007/S40279-013-0100-7
  2. 2. Barkaoui A, Ait Oumghar I, Ben Kahla R. Review on the use of medical imaging in orthopedic biomechanics: Finite element studies. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Imaging & Visualization. 2021;9(5):535-554. DOI: 10.1080/21681163.2021.1888317
  3. 3. Watts NB. Postmenopausal osteoporosis: A clinical review. Journal of Women's Health (2002). 2018;27(9):1093-1096. DOI: 10.1089/JWH.2017.6706
  4. 4. Rockville. Bone health and osteoporosis: A report of the surgeon general. 2004
  5. 5. Camacho PM et al. American association of clinical endocrinologists and American college of endocrinology clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis - 2016. Endocrine practice: Official Journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. 2016;22(Suppl 4):1-42. DOI: 10.4158/EP161435.GL
  6. 6. Cosman F et al. Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis international: A Journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA; 2014;25(10):2359-2381. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2
  7. 7. Jeremiah MP, Unwin BK, Greenawald MH, Casiano VE. Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. American Family Physician. 2015;92(4):261-268. DOI: 10.1093/innovait/ins123
  8. 8. Bonnick SL, Harris ST, Kendler DL, McClung MR, Silverman SL. Management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: 2010 position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause: The journal of the North American Menopause Society. 2010;17(1):25-54. DOI: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181c617e6
  9. 9. U. S. P. S. T. Force and others. Final recommendation statement: Osteoporosis: Screening. April 2016. 2017
  10. 10. Barr RJ, Stewart A, Torgerson DJ, Reid DM. Population screening for osteoporosis risk: A randomised control trial of medication use and fracture risk. Osteoporosis international: A Journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2010;21(4):561-568. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-1007-x
  11. 11. Bailey DA, McKay HA, Mirwald RL, Crocker PRE, Faulkner RA. A six-year longitudinal study of the relationship of physical activity to bone mineral accrual in growing children: The university of Saskatchewan bone mineral accrual study. Journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 1999;14(10):1672-1679. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.10.1672
  12. 12. Bianchi ML. Osteoporosis in children and adolescents. Bone. 2007;41(4):486-495. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.07.008
  13. 13. Jones G, Ma D, Cameron F. Bone density interpretation and relevance in Caucasian children aged 9-17 years of age: Insights from a population-based fracture study. Journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. 2006;9(2):202-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.02.004
  14. 14. Dall’Ara E, Eastell R, Viceconti M, Pahr D, Yang L. Experimental validation of DXA-based finite element models for prediction of femoral strength. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2016;63:17-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.004
  15. 15. Wilson DJ. Osteoporosis and sport. European Journal of Radiology. Jan 2019;110:169-174. DOI: 10.1016/J. EJRAD.2018.11.010
  16. 16. Cohen S et al. Risedronate therapy prevents corticosteroid-induced bone loss: a twelve-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1999;42(11):2309-2318. DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(199911)42:11<2309::AID-ANR8>3.0.CO;2-K
  17. 17. Saag KG et al. Alendronate for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis Intervention Study Group. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1998;339(5):292-299. DOI: 10.1056/nejm199807303390502
  18. 18. Leib E. Diagnosis of osteoporosis in men, premenopausal women, and children. Journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. 2004;7(1):17-26. DOI: 10.1385/JCD:7:1:17
  19. 19. Wu F et al. Fractures between the ages of 20 and 50 years increase women’s risk of subsequent fractures. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2002;162(1):33-36. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.162.1.33
  20. 20. Mohamad NV, Soelaiman IN, Chin KY. A concise review of testosterone and bone health. Clinical Interventions in Aging. Sep 2016;11:1317. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S115472
  21. 21. Melton LJ, Atkinson EJ, O’Connor MK, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL. Bone density and fracture risk in men. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 1998;13(12):1915-1923. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.12.1915
  22. 22. Looker AC et al. Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. adults from NHANES III. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 1997;12(11):1761-1768. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.11.1761
  23. 23. Landin LA. Fracture patterns in children. Analysis of 8,682 fractures with special reference to incidence, etiology and secular changes in a Swedish urban population 1950-1979. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum. 1983;202:1-109. DOI: 10.3109/17453678309155630
  24. 24. Bailey DA, Wedge JH, McCulloch RG, Martin AD, Bernhardson SC. Epidemiology of fractures of the distal end of the radius in children as associated with growth. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American. 1989;71(8):1225-1231. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198971080-00016
  25. 25. Schmidt OS. Pathologic fractures in children with cerebral palsy. Orthopedic Management of Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Comprehensive Approach. 2015;26(5):303-310
  26. 26. Van Der Sluis IM, Van Den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Hählen K, Krenning EP, De Muinck Keizer-Schrama SMPF. Bone mineral density, body composition, and height in long-term survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood. Medical and Pediatric Oncology. 2000;35(4):415-420. DOI: 10.1002/1096-911X(20001001)35:4<415::AID-MPO4>3.0.CO;2-9
  27. 27. Van Der Sluis IM, Van Den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Hählen K, Krenning EP, De Muinck Keizer-Schrama SMPF. Altered bone mineral density and body composition, and increased fracture risk in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2000. DOI: 10.1067/mpd.2002.125728
  28. 28. Szyska-Skrobot D et al. Free and bioavailable fractions of sex steroids may influence bones in young men, depending on age and oestradiol level. Endokrynologia Polska. 2014;65(5):357-364. DOI: 10.5603/EP.2014.0049
  29. 29. Kulis A et al. Participation of sex hormones in multifactorial pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. International Orthopaedics. 2015;39(6):1227-1236. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2742-6
  30. 30. Ait Oumghar I, Barkaoui A, Chabrand P. Mechanobiological behavior of a pathological bone. In: Biomechanics and Functional Tissue Engineering. London, UK: Intechopen; Nov 2021. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.97029
  31. 31. Ait Oumghar I, Barkaoui A, Chabrand P. Toward a mathematical modeling of diseases’ impact on bone remodeling. Technical Review, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2 Nov 2020;8(584198):1236. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.584198
  32. 32. Appelman-Dijkstra NM, Papapoulos SE. Paget’s disease of bone. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2018;32(5):657-668. DOI: 10.1016/j.beem.2018.05.005
  33. 33. Cherian RA, Haddaway MJ, Davie MWJ, McCall IW, Cassar-Pullicino VN. Effect of Paget’s disease of bone on areal lumbar spine bone mineral density measured by DXA, and density of cortical and trabecular bone measured by quantitative CT. The British Journal of Radiology. 2000;73(871):720-726. DOI: 10.1259/BJR.73.871.11089462
  34. 34. Forlino A, Marini JC. Osteogenesis imperfecta. The Lancet. (London, England) 2016;387(10028):1657-1671. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00728-X
  35. 35. Bacon S, Crowley R. Developments in rare bone diseases and mineral disorders. Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease. 2018;9(1):51-60. DOI: 10.1177/2040622317739538
  36. 36. Graves LE et al. High bone mineral density osteogenesis imperfecta in a family with a novel pathogenic variant in COL1A2. Hormone Research in Pædiatrics. 2020;93(4):263-271. DOI: 10.1159/000510463
  37. 37. Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 2000, CA: A cancer. Journal for Clinicians. 2000;50(1):7-33. DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.50.1.7
  38. 38. Palumbo A, Rajkumar SV. Treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma. Leukemia. 2009;23(3):449-456. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2008.325
  39. 39. Rajkumar SV, Kumar S. Multiple myeloma: Diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2016;91(1):101-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.11.007
  40. 40. Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2009;23(1):3-9. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2008.291
  41. 41. Feng Y et al. Breast cancer development and progression: Risk factors, cancer stem cells, signaling pathways, genomics, and molecular pathogenesis. Genes and Diseases. 2018;5(2):77-106. DOI: 10.1016/J.GENDIS.2018.05.001
  42. 42. Chiou AE, Liu C, Moreno-Jiménez I, Tang T, Wagermaier W, Dean MN. et al. Breast cancer-secreted factors perturb murine bone growth in regions prone to metastasis. Science advances. 2021;7(12):eabf2283. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf2283
  43. 43. Fraenkel M et al. Bone mineral density in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer: A prospective cohort study. NPJ Breast Cancer. 17 Feb 2022;8(1):21. DOI: 10.1038/S41523-022-00388-Z
  44. 44. Gregory LS, Choi W, Burke L, Clements JA. Breast cancer cells induce osteolytic bone lesions in vivo through a reduction in osteoblast activity in mice. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e68103. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068103
  45. 45. Rosario E, Rosario DJ. Localized Prostate Cancer - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf, 2022. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK563248/. [accessed Aug. 22, 2022]
  46. 46. Murray TBJ. The pathogenesis of prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer. May 2021:29-42. DOI: 10.36255/exonpublications.prostatecancer.pathogenesis.2021
  47. 47. Clarke BL, Khosla S. Androgens and bone. Steroids. 2009;74(3):296. DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2008.10.003
  48. 48. Lin SC, Yu-Lee LY, Lin SH. Osteoblastic factors in prostate cancer bone metastasis. Current Osteoporosis Reports. 2018;16(6):642. DOI: 10.1007/S11914-018-0480-6
  49. 49. Kwon T et al. Bone mineral density in prostate cancer: A comparative study of patients with prostate cancer and healthy controls using propensity score matching. Urology. 2014;83(2):385-392. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.08.045
  50. 50. Siddiqui F, Vaqar S, Siddiqui AH. Lung Cancer. In: Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine. 2nd ed. StatPearls, StatPearls Publishing. 5 Dec 2022. pp. 605-606. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511543579.138
  51. 51. Berent TE, Dorschner JM, Craig TA, Drake MT, Westendorf JJ, Kumar R, Lung tumor cells inhibit bone mineralization and osteoblast activity. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. Nov 2019;519(3):566. DOI: 10.1016/J. BBRC.2019.09.045
  52. 52. Kairys N, Schwell A, Haddad LM. Cushing disease (nursing), StatPearls. 2021. [Accessed: Aug. 19, 2022]. [Online]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33760467
  53. 53. Lodish MB et al. Effects of cushing disease on bone mineral density in a pediatric population. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2010;156(6):1001. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.12.027
  54. 54. Kumar P, Kumar N, Thakur DS, Patidar A. Male hypogonadism: Symptoms and treatment. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research. 2010;1(3):297. DOI: 10.4103/0110-5558.72420
  55. 55. Sizar O, Schwartz J. Hypogonadism. In: Urology at a Glance. StatPearls, StatPearls Publishing; 27 Jun 2022. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54859-8_21
  56. 56. Da Costa JV, Pereira-Lima JFS, Da Costa Oliveira M. Bone mineral density in early-onset hypogonadism and the effect of hormonal replacement. Journal of Clinical Densitometry. 2004;7(3):334-340. DOI: 10.1385/JCD:7:3:334
  57. 57. Golds G, Houdek D, Arnason T. Male hypogonadism and osteoporosis: the effects, clinical consequences, and treatment of testosterone deficiency in bone health. International Journal of Endocrinology. 2017;2017. DOI: 10.1155/2017/4602129
  58. 58. Pokhrel B, Leslie SW, Levine SN. Primary hyperparathyroidism, StatPearls. Jun 2022 [Accessed: Aug. 19, 2022]. [Online]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441895/
  59. 59. Hodgens A, Sharman T. Corticosteroids - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf. StatPearls, StatPearls Publishing; 26 Jul 2022. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554612/. [Accessed Aug. 22, 2022]
  60. 60. Chourpiliadis C, Aeddula NR. Physiology, glucocorticoids, StatPearls. Jul 2022. [Online]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560897/. [Accessed: Aug. 19, 2022]
  61. 61. Niculet E, Bobeica C, Tatu AL. Glucocorticoid-induced skin atrophy: The old and the new. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology. 2020;13:1041. DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S224211
  62. 62. Manelli F, Giustina A. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2000;11(3):79-85. DOI: 10.1016/S1043-2760(00)00234-4
  63. 63. E. V. Maani and C. V. Maani, Radiation therapy - StatPearls - NCBI bookshelf. StatPearls, StatPearls Publishing; 24 Oct 2021. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537036/. [Accessed Aug. 19, 2022]
  64. 64. Jonathan Yang T, Ho AY. Radiation therapy in the management of breast cancer. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2013;93(2):455-471. DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2013.01.002
  65. 65. Donaubauer AJ, Deloch L, Becker I, Fietkau R, Frey B, Gaipl US. The influence of radiation on bone and bone cells—Differential effects on osteoclasts and osteoblasts. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(17):1-19. DOI: 10.3390/IJMS21176377
  66. 66. Wu J et al. Bone mineral density changes within and outside of RT fields used to treat cervical cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2021;111(3):e625-e626. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1662
  67. 67. Amjad MT, Chidharla A, Kasi A. Cancer Chemotherapy - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf. 2022. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK564367/. [accessed Aug. 22, 2022]
  68. 68. Wissing MD. Chemotherapy- and irradiation-induced bone loss in adults with solid tumors. Current Osteoporosis Reports. 2015;13(3):140. DOI: 10.1007/S11914-015-0266-Z
  69. 69. Drake MT. Osteoporosis and cancer. Current Osteoporosis Reports. 2013;11(3):163. DOI: 10.1007/S11914-013-0154-3
  70. 70. Ahn JH, Cho WH, Lee JA, Kim DH, Seo J-H, Lim JS. Bone mineral density change during adjuvant chemotherapy in pediatric osteosarcoma. Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2015;20(3):150-154. DOI: 10.6065/apem.2015.20.3.150
  71. 71. Dhankhar R, Vyas SP, Jain AK, Arora S, Rath G, Goyal AK. Advances in novel drug delivery strategies for breast cancer therapy. Artificial Cells, Blood Substitutes, and Biotechnology. 2010;38(5):230-249. DOI: 10.3109/10731199.2010.494578
  72. 72. Khaddour K, Hana CK, Mewawalla P. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf. StatPearls, StatPearls Publishing; 27 Jun 2022. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536951/. [Accessed Aug. 22, 2022]
  73. 73. Weilbaecher KN. Mechanisms of osteoporosis after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2000;6(2A):165-174. DOI: 10.1016/S1083-8791(00)70039-5
  74. 74. Stern JM et al. Bone density loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A prospective study. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2001;7(5):257-264. DOI: 10.1053/bbmt.2001.v7.pm11400947
  75. 75. Tu KN et al. Osteoporosis: A review of treatment options. P T. 2018;43(2):92-104
  76. 76. Cosman F, Nieves JW, Dempster DW. Treatment sequence matters: Anabolic and antiresorptive therapy for osteoporosis. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2017;32(2):198-202. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3051
  77. 77. Muñoz-garach A, García-fontana B, Muñoz-torres M. Nutrients and dietary patterns related to osteoporosis. Nutrients. 2020;12(7):1-15. DOI: 10.3390/nu12071986
  78. 78. Tangestani H, Djafarian K, Emamat H, Arabzadegan N, Shab-Bidar S. Efficacy of vitamin D fortified foods on bone mineral density and serum bone biomarkers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2020;60(7):1094-1103. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1558172
  79. 79. Tai V, Leung W, Grey A, Reid IR, Bolland MJ. Calcium intake and bone mineral density: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;351. DOI: 10.1136/BMJ.H4183
  80. 80. Bristow SM, Bolland MJ, Gamble GD, Leung W, Reid IR. Dietary calcium intake and change in bone mineral density in older adults: A systematic review of longitudinal cohort studies. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2022;76(2):196-205. DOI: 10.1038/S41430-021-00957-8

Written By

Imane Ait Oumghar, Abdelwahed Barkaoui and Patrick Chabrand

Submitted: 22 August 2022 Reviewed: 31 January 2023 Published: 02 March 2023