1. Introduction
Two views of hippocampal function have dominated the literature for the past half-century, each of which has experimental support. One view asserts that the hippocampus is primarily involved in some forms of memory, particularly episodic and long-term declarative memories (i.e., those that can be verbalized). This view was originally based upon the outcome of a surgery in the 1950s, when Scoville and Milner surgically resected a patient’s hippocampus to relieve epileptic seizures [1]; the hippocampus is critical for these forms of memory, as confirmed in subsequent human and animal studies.
A second view of hippocampal function is that it is involved in navigation by cognitively mapping our surroundings. This view followed the discovery of hippocampal place cells in rats [2]. The intensity of these cells’ activity depended on the animal’s location within a baited maze; their relevance to behavior was demonstrated through deficits in navigation following hippocampal lesions [3, 4]. The human hippocampus is similarly involved in navigation [5, 6, 7].
These two views of hippocampal function are not mutually exclusive; memory of the spatial location of stimuli is essential for navigation, and spatial locations provide contextual information that is embedded into memories. Whether these properties of the hippocampus represent different functions or different facets of the same function has been debated [8, 9, 10, 11].
With the advent of
2. Learning and memory
A hippocampal role in learning and memory was identified in the mid-twentieth century from lesion studies. Later in the century, neuroimaging methods were developed to examine differential activity between tasks that differed in memory or other cognitive function, including methods to identify neural activity during individual trials [12]. Regional increases in hippocampal activity were observed during learning and recall, and greater activity was observed during learning trials when the presented stimulus was later recalled successfully [13, 14]. The development of connectivity methods additionally allowed the influence of the hippocampus on other brain regions to be characterized during different types of memory, both during memory acquisition (learning) and recall.
2.1 Learning (memory acquisition)
Different types of memory have been identified based on the conditions in which they occur and the duration of time they may be recalled. Activity in the hippocampus has been observed for many of them; however, the hippocampus is recognized as essential or intimately involved in the acquisition of three of these: episodic, spatial, and motor memory.
2.1.1 Episodic memory
Episodic memory involves the formation and recall of a one-time unique event in one’s experiences. The hippocampus is essential for the formation of new episodic memories [15]; however, the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex are jointly involved in the formation as well as recall of episodic memory, with bidirectional flow of information between them [16, 17].
In episodic memory formation, the anterior parahippocampal gyrus (entorhinal and perirhinal cortices) encodes a single item, whereas the hippocampus encodes the relation between stimuli; relevant contextual information is selectively activated in the parahippocampal cortex [18]. A similar pattern of activation is found during episodic memory retrieval.
2.1.2 Spatial memory in navigation
Consistent with its proposed function as a cognitive spatial map [2, 19], hippocampal activity during virtual navigation experiments has been correlated with spatial cues [20, 21, 22]. The hippocampal map of space is primarily allocentric [6, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27], although other frameworks have also been reported [28, 29]. The hippocampal allocentric map interacts with brain regions that use an egocentric framework. Navigational strategies specify from memory the locations of sensory reference points, suggesting the hippocampal system organizes relational experiences in memory [30]. Functional interactions between the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex occur during goal-directed navigation [31].
2.1.3 Motor learning and memory
The hippocampus is involved in motor learning [32, 33, 34] and motor memory consolidation [35]. Connectivity analysis shows the hippocampus primarily influencing the contralateral somatosensory cortex during motor learning, differing from the pattern observed during paced repetitive movements in the absence of motor learning [36].
2.2 Memory recall
Hippocampal properties are consistent with its role in memory recall. Pattern separation and pattern completion are two such properties, localized in different regions of the hippocampus.
Pattern separation transforms similar sensory representations or memories into highly dissimilar representations, distinct from each other; this transformation occurs in the hippocampus, whose pattern of activity differs from that of its inputs [37]. Activity associated with pattern separation is most pronounced in the posterior hippocampus [38], particularly in the CA3 and dentate gyrus regions [39, 40, 41, 42]. By contrast, pattern completion reflects expectations about what distinct stimuli are likely to appear based on prior experience. The anterior hippocampus is preferentially involved in pattern completion [38]. The CA3 region supports processes involved in spatial pattern completion (as well as pattern separation), spatial pattern association, novelty detection, and short-term memory [40]. Pattern completion in the hippocampus has been linked to predictive coding in the visual cortex [43].
Some hippocampal neurons fire at successive moments during temporally structured experiences, thus representing the flow of time during specific memories; these have been dubbed 'time cells'. Time cell properties parallel those of hippocampal place cells, providing an additional dimension to be integrated with spatial mapping [44]. The CA1 region supports processes associated with temporal pattern completion, temporal pattern association and intermediate-term memory [40].
Recollection as a form of memory recall is distinct from familiarity. Studies of humans, monkeys, and rats using multiple techniques suggest that the hippocampus is critical for recollection but not familiarity [45]. Recollection can be triggered by a cue that shares one or more elements with the original memory, so by using a cue, the chronology of memory recall can be studied. Pattern completion in the hippocampus begins 500 ms after cue onset, triggering the reinstatement of the target memory in neocortex between 500 and 1500 ms; this gives rise to the subjective feeling of recollection [46]. This process engages temporal dynamics, including the reversal of perceptual processing streams and clocking by theta rhythms.
3. Context and cognition
Hippocampal properties include sensitivity to temporal and spatial relationships [47, 48, 49], which play a role in scene perception and reconstruction [50]. Some interpret these properties as contextual elements required for memory recall [9, 44, 47]; others suggest a more fundamental perceptual role, which may consequently be incorporated into memories [51, 52]. As evident from the examples below, differences between these viewpoints are often nuanced.
According to one viewpoint [53], space and time break up experiences into specific contexts; these features help organize multimodal inputs. If relevant, additional dimensions (such as emotions) can also be incorporated into an event-defined context. Conceiving of hippocampal representations as constrained by task demands, this viewpoint attempts to unify disparate findings on hippocampal representations of space, time, and other dimensions on its core function.
Another theory describes a prefrontal-hippocampal comparator for voluntary action [54, 55]. Action plans are elaborated by the prefrontal cortex, and serve to guide goal-directed behavior. The prefrontal cortex initiates its plan by transmitting an “efference copy” (corollary discharge) to the CA1 region of the hippocampus, which stores it in working memory. This efference copy includes the expected outcomes of the action plan, including the personal and subjective experience of the intended behavior, when, and in what context. The CA1 region of the hippocampus compares the response intention with the actual outcome through cortical interactions mediated through the hippocampal theta rhythm; the theta power serves as a prediction error signal during hippocampal dependent tasks. When a mismatch occurs, an error signal in the hippocampus is transmitted to the prefrontal cortex, the action plan is reformulated, and working memory is updated. When the expected and actual outcomes match, the hippocampus transmits a signal to strengthen or consolidate the action plan in prefrontal cortex.
The hippocampus and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex interact when making decisions, integrating episodic memory via the hippocampus with value-based decision-making via the ventromedial prefrontal cortex [56]. The anterior parts of the hippocampus in humans (the ventral hippocampus in rodents) may also contribute to approach-avoidance conflict decision-making [57]. Such a scenario arises when a goal stimulus is simultaneously associated with reward and punishment.
The hippocampus has been suggested to play a critical role in behavioral flexibility. Cognition and social behaviors often require flexible use of information that can result from the formation, recombination, and reconstruction of relational memory representations. By filling this function, the hippocampus may play an instrumental role in abilities as diverse as decision-making, character judgments, establishing and maintaining social bonds, empathy, social discourse, navigation, exploration, creativity, imagination, memory, and language use [58].
3.1 Cognitive deficits associated with hippocampal dysfunction
During the progression of Alzheimer’s, changes are observed in hippocampal size [59, 60], function [61], and connectivity [62, 63]. Degenerative processes result in the accretion of plaques and tangles; their presence indicates the local loss of neuronal function. Plaques and tangles first appear in the entorhinal cortex, followed shortly thereafter in the hippocampus itself [64, 65, 66].
In schizophrenia, connections between the hippocampus and prefrontal regions are dysfunctional, consistent with a dysconnection syndrome [67].
Parkinson’s, at least in some cases, may also involve the hippocampus. A gene that contributes to familial and juvenile Parkinsonism disrupts hippocampal synaptic transmission in vitro [68]; if the hippocampus plays a role in cognitive control [69], this could result in motor dysfunction. The hippocampus has also been implicated in the cognitive dysfunction observed in some Parkinson’s patients [70].
Cognitive effects of concussions may also arise, at least in part, from damage to the hippocampal system [71, 72]. During concussions, blunt force to the skull typically generates torsional forces that damage the brain. The greatest torsional forces appear in the interior of the skull, including the corpus callosum and nearby structures such as the hippocampus [73, 74, 75]. These forces stretch nerve fibers in the region, resulting in necrosis.
Alterations in hippocampus size or function have also been noted in other neurological conditions, including depression [76, 77], ADHD [78, 79], and PTSD [80, 81].
3.2 Neurogenesis and environmental enrichment
With the proliferation and differentiation of adult neural stem cells, new neurons are generated throughout adulthood in the subgranular zone of the dentate gyrus in the hippocampus [82]. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is thought to play a major role in hippocampus-dependent functions. By integrating new neurons with the structural plasticity of mature neurons, adult neurogenesis may maintain hippocampal plasticity in its circuits [83]. Adult-born neurons may play distinct physiological roles in hippocampus-dependent functions, such as memory encoding and mood regulation [84] as well as spatial learning [85]. Exercise has been suggested to increase the production of neurons, whereas environment enrichment increases the likelihood of their survival through cortical restructuring [85]. This restructuring results from a transient increase in cell activity and structural plasticity, which leads to improved cognition [86].
4. Executive function (cognitive control)
As more information about hippocampal activity has accrued, other roles for the hippocampus have also been suggested, including a role in cognitive control [28, 29, 69, 87]. Cognitive control refers to processes that organize different thoughts, separate currently-relevant and irrelevant information, and coordinate thoughts and actions. One report reviewed place cell studies that used experimental manipulations to dissociate the environment into two or more spatial frames of locations, typically to test notions of pattern separation. The ensemble discharge in the hippocampus self-organized into multiple, transiently-organized representations of space; separate representations of frame-specific positions alternated on timescales from 25 ms to several seconds. The dynamic, functional grouping of discharge predicted the animal’s behavioral needs, which suggested a hippocampal role in cognitive control [28].
A broader role in cognitive control, perhaps in conjunction with the prefrontal cortex, has been suggested based on a consistent pattern showing increased hippocampal connectivity with whichever cortical areas are required for task performance [69]. During a volitional movement task, for example, the specificity of this connectivity was pronounced, with hippocampal connectivity linked spatiotemporally to the representation of the moving finger [87].
5. Consciousness
The hippocampus has been suggested to play a role in conscious perception by integrating information that identifies an object with its spatiotemporal location, embedded within an emotional context [88, 89, 90]. In this view, the hippocampus acts via the medial prefrontal cortex, influencing prefrontal top-down attentional control of sensory processing and thus event memory formation. Citing specific functional deficits in the hippocampus and its neurochemical connections with prefrontal cortex, the authors suggest that weakly-related sensory representations within the hippocampus underlie hallucinations in schizophrenia [88].
Recently, the hippocampus has been proposed to play a central role in all features associated with the normal alert state of consciousness [91]. This state is defined by cognitive characteristics associated with consciousness in a neurologically-intact individual who is awake and alert; this includes sensory perceptions, learning, memory, attention, language, thoughts, emotional responsiveness, decision-making, and motor control. Using evidence from connectivity analyses, Burman demonstrates hippocampal influences on relevant cortical areas involved in all these cognitive processes. Details of his model (and some of his findings) reflect the joint influence from homotopic regions of the left and right hippocampus, the consistent finding that hippocampal connectivity increases in regions that execute a task, and its influence on other regions (especially prefrontal cortex and the precuneus) that support task performance. By recalling memories of self-experiences across periods of sleep and earlier periods of one’s life, the hippocampus is also noted to show characteristics consistent with the conscious sense of self.
6. Hippocampus: one function or many?
The hippocampus has been implicated in many cognitive functions and disorders. One question that arises is whether the hippocampus is functionally diverse, perhaps with different regions specialized for different functions, or whether the various functions ascribed to the hippocampus may all result from its known role in memory. Tasks that are not intended to involve memory almost invariably require a mnemonic component; even a repetitive tapping task that avoids motor learning [36] requires a subject to remember what behavior is required. Hippocampal properties that do not reflect the traditional relationship to memory or learning, such as sensitivity to time or spatial relationships, may reflect contextual elements that are essential for memory [9, 44, 49, 51]. If all properties of the hippocampus are consistent with the requirements for creating and recalling memories, however, the
Improvements in experimental methods have helped elucidate the hippocampal role in such diverse functions. Effective connectivity analysis, for example, examines the directional influence of one brain area on another; using this tool, hippocampal influences are observed to be selective for those brain areas relevant for task behavior. Depending on the task, the hippocampus inversely influences activity in sensorimotor cortex for motor tasks, the ventral occipital color region for tasks requiring attention to color (Stroop task and a conjunction task requiring attention to both color and shape), auditory association cortex when presented with annoying sounds, the temporal phonology region when making a rhyming judgment, and the temporal semantic region when making semantic judgments [69]. These influences do not reflect the activation of a specific memory, and thus is inconsistent with a direct role in recall; rather, they reflect the collective influence of memories through the hippocampus on processing in sensory and motor areas of the brain.
Similarly, the hippocampus shows bidirectional interactions with prefrontal cortex during tasks that require planning and memory recall [5, 92, 93]. The hippocampus coordinates brain functions associated with cognitive functions through theta waves and cross-frequency coupling [94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101]. Hippocampal functionality often appears to be mediated, directly or indirectly, through other brain regions.
Involvement of the hippocampus in diverse cognitive processes thus results from extensive interactions with other brain regions depending on the task at hand. Although the
7. Conclusion
The hippocampus is best known for its essential role in episodic, declarative long-term memories, yet a survey of findings indicates a much broader role in cognition. Hippocampal influences on other brain regions are extensive, but appear to be specific to the cognitive requirements of the task at hand.
References
- 1.
Scoville WB, Milner B. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 1957; 20 (1):11-21 - 2.
O'Keefe J, Dostrovsky J. The hippocampus as a spatial map: Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. Brain Research. 1971; 34 (1):171-175 - 3.
Hollup SA, Kjelstrup KG, Hoff J, Moser M-B, Moser EI. Impaired recognition of the goal location during spatial navigation in rats with hippocampal lesions. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2001; 21 (12):4505-4513 - 4.
Whishaw IQ , McKenna JE, Maaswinkel H. Hippocampal lesions and path integration. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 1997; 2 (7):228-234 - 5.
Brown TI, Carr VA, LaRocque KF, Favila SE, Gordon AM, Bowles B, et al. Prospective representation of navigational goals in the human hippocampus. Science. 2016; 352 (6291):1323-1326 - 6.
Igloi K, Doeller CF, Berthoz A, Rondi-Reig L, Burgess N. Lateralized human hippocampal activity predicts navigation based on sequence or place memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010; 107 (32):14466-14471 - 7.
Maguire EA, Burgess N, Donnett JG, Frackowiak RS, Frith CD, O’Keefe J. Knowing where and getting there: A human navigation network. [see comment]. Science. 1998; 280 (5365):921-924 - 8.
Eichenbaum H, Cohen NJ. Can we reconcile the declarative memory and spatial navigation views on hippocampal function? Neuron. 2014; 83 (4):764-770 - 9.
Eichenbaum H. On the integration of space, time, and memory. Neuron. 2017; 95 (5):1007 - 10.
Rolls ET. Functions of the Primate Hippocampus in Spatial Processing and Memory: Neurobiology of Comparative Cognition. New York: Psychology Press; 2014. pp. 359-382 - 11.
Smith DM, Mizumori SJY. Hippocampal place cells, context, and episodic memory. Hippocampus. 2006; 16 (9):716-729 - 12.
Hopfinger JB, Büchel C, Holmes AP, Friston KJ. A study of analysis parameters that influence the sensitivity of event-related fMRI analyses. NeuroImage. 2000; 11 (4):326-333 - 13.
Hannula DE, Ranganath C. Medial temporal lobe activity predicts successful relational memory binding. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2008; 28 (1):116-124 - 14.
Jenkins LJ, Ranganath C. Prefrontal and medial temporal lobe activity at encoding predicts temporal context memory. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2010; 30 (46):15558-15565 - 15.
Spiers HJ, Maguire EA, Burgess N. Hippocampal amnesia. Neurocase. 2001; 7 (5):357-382 - 16.
Rugg MD, Otten LJ, Henson RN. The neural basis of episodic memory: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 2002; 357 (1424):1097-1110 - 17.
Eichenbaum H. Prefrontal-hippocampal interactions in episodic memory. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 2017; 18 (9):547-558 - 18.
Tsukiura T. Functional neuroimaging studies of episodic memory--functional dissociation in the medial temporal lobe structures. Brain & Nerve / Shinkei Kenkyu no Shinpo. 2008; 60 (7):833-844 - 19.
O’Keefe J, Nadel L. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1978 - 20.
Hirshhorn M, Grady C, Rosenbaum RS, Winocur G, Moscovitch M. The hippocampus is involved in mental navigation for a recently learned, but not a highly familiar environment: A longitudinal fMRI study. Hippocampus. 2012; 22 (4):842-852 - 21.
Ohnishi T, Matsuda H, Hirakata M, Ugawa Y. Navigation ability dependent neural activation in the human brain: An fMRI study. Neuroscience Research. 2006; 55 (4):361-369 - 22.
Rodriguez PF. Neural decoding of goal locations in spatial navigation in humans with fMRI. Human Brain Mapping. 2010; 31 (3):391-397 - 23.
Albouy G, Fogel S, King BR, Laventure S, Benali H, Karni A, et al. Maintaining vs. enhancing motor sequence memories: Respective roles of striatal and hippocampal systems. NeuroImage. 2015; 108 :423-434 - 24.
Holdstock J, Mayes A, Cezayirli E, Isaac C, Aggleton JP, Roberts N. A comparison of egocentric and allocentric spatial memory in a patient with selective hippocampal damage. Neuropsychologia. 2000; 38 (4):410-425 - 25.
Rolls ET. Hippocampal spatial view cells for memory and navigation, and their underlying connectivity in humans. Hippocampus. 2022:1-40. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.23467 - 26.
Rolls ET, Wirth S. Spatial representations in the primate hippocampus, and their functions in memory and navigation. Progress in Neurobiology. 2018; 171 :90-113 - 27.
Zaehle T, Jordan K, Wüstenberg T, Baudewig J, Dechent P, Mast FW. The neural basis of the egocentric and allocentric spatial frame of reference. Brain Research. 2007; 1137 :92-103 - 28.
Kelemen E, Fenton AA. Coordinating different representations in the hippocampus. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 2016; 129 :50-59 - 29.
Kelemen E, Fenton AA. Dynamic grouping of hippocampal neural activity during cognitive control of two spatial frames. PLoS Biology. 2010; 8 (6):e1000403 - 30.
Eichenbaum H. The role of the hippocampus in navigation is memory. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2017; 117 (4):1785 - 31.
Ito HT. Prefrontal–hippocampal interactions for spatial navigation. Neuroscience Research. 2018; 129 :2-7 - 32.
Genzel L, Dresler M, Cornu M, Jäger E, Konrad B, Adamczyk M, et al. Medial prefrontal-hippocampal connectivity and motor memory consolidation in depression and schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry. 2015; 77 (2):177-186 - 33.
Fernandez-Seara MA, Aznarez-Sanado M, Mengual E, Loayza FR, Pastor MA. Continuous performance of a novel motor sequence leads to highly correlated striatal and hippocampal perfusion increases. NeuroImage. 2009; 47 (4):1797-1808 - 34.
Ramnani N, Toni I, Josephs O, Ashburner J, Passingham RE. Learning-and expectation-related changes in the human brain during motor learning. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2000; 84 (6):3026-3035 - 35.
Walker MP, Stickgold R, Alsop D, Gaab N, Schlaug G. Sleep-dependent motor memory plasticity in the human brain. Neuroscience. 2005; 133 (4):911-917 - 36.
Burman DD. Hippocampal connectivity with sensorimotor cortex during volitional finger movements: Laterality and relationship to motor learning. PLoS One. 2019; 14 (9):e0222064 - 37.
Kirwan CB, Stark CEL. Overcoming interference: An fMRI investigation of pattern separation in the medial temporal lobe. Learning & Memory. 2007; 14 (9):625-633 - 38.
Poppenk J, Evensmoen HR, Moscovitch M, Nadel L. Long-axis specialization of the human hippocampus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2013; 17 (5):230-240 - 39.
Bakker A, Kirwan CB, Miller M, Stark CEL. Pattern separation in the human hippocampal CA3 and dentate gyrus. Science. 2008; 319 (5870):1640-1642 - 40.
Kesner RP, Lee I, Gilbert P. A behavioral assessment of hippocampal function based on a subregional analysis. Reviews in the Neurosciences. 2004; 15 (5):333 - 41.
Yassa MA, Lacy JW, Stark SM, Albert MS, Gallagher M, Stark CEL. Pattern separation deficits associated with increased hippocampal CA3 and dentate gyrus activity in nondemented older adults. Hippocampus. 2011; 21 (9):968-979 - 42.
Rolls ET. Pattern separation, completion, and categorisation in the hippocampus and neocortex. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 2016; 129 :4-28 - 43.
Hindy NC, Ng FY, Turk-Browne NB. Linking pattern completion in the hippocampus to predictive coding in visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience. 2016; 19 (5):665-667 - 44.
Eichenbaum H. Time cells in the hippocampus: A new dimension for mapping memories. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 2014; 15 (11):732-744 - 45.
Eichenbaum H, Yonelinas AP, Ranganath C. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2007; 30 :123-152 - 46.
Staresina BP, Wimber M. A neural chronometry of memory recall. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2019; 23 (12):1071-1085 - 47.
Barnett AJ, O'neil EB, Watson HC, Lee ACH. The human hippocampus is sensitive to the durations of events and intervals within a sequence. Neuropsychologia. 2014; 64 :1-12 - 48.
Libby LA, Hannula DE, Ranganath C. Medial temporal lobe coding of item and spatial information during relational binding in working memory. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2014; 34 :14233-14242 - 49.
Olsen RK, Moses SN, Riggs L, Ryan JD. The hippocampus supports multiple cognitive processes through relational binding and comparison. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2012; 6 :146 - 50.
Zeidman P. Mullally SaL, Maguire EA. Constructing, perceiving, and maintaining scenes: Hippocampal activity and connectivity. Cerebral Cortex. 2015; 25 (10):3836-3855 - 51.
Howard MW, Eichenbaum H. Time and space in the hippocampus. Brain Research. 1621; 2015 :345-354 - 52.
MacDonald CJ. Prospective and retrospective duration memory in the hippocampus: Is time in the foreground or background? Philosophical Transaction Royal Society B. 2014; 369 (1637):20120463 - 53.
Ekstrom AD, Ranganath C. Space, time, and episodic memory: The hippocampus is all over the cognitive map. Hippocampus. 2017; 28 (9):680-687. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22750 - 54.
Numan R. A prefrontal-hippocampal comparator for goal-directed behavior: The intentional self and episodic memory. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 2015; 9 :323 - 55.
Numan R. The Prefrontal-Hippocampal Comparator: Volition and Episodic Memory. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2021; 128 (6):2421-2447 - 56.
Weilbächer RA, Gluth S. The interplay of hippocampus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in memory-based decision making. Brain Sciences. 2017; 7 (1):E4. doi: 10.3390/brainsci7010004 - 57.
Ito R, Lee ACH. The role of the hippocampus in approach-avoidance conflict decision-making: Evidence from rodent and human studies. Behavioural Brain Research. 2016; 313 :345-357 - 58.
Rubin RD, Watson PD, Duff MC, Cohen NJ. The Role of the Hippocampus in Flexible Cognition and Social Behavior. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2014; 8 :742 - 59.
Morra JH, Tu Z, Apostolova LG, Green AE, Avedissian C, Madsen SK, et al. Automated mapping of hippocampal atrophy in 1-year repeat MRI data from 490 subjects with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and elderly controls. NeuroImage. 2009; 45 (1):S3-S15 - 60.
Pennanen C, Kivipelto M, Tuomainen S, Hartikainen P, Hanninen T, Laakso MP, et al. Hippocampus and entorhinal cortex in mild cognitive impairment and early AD. Neurobiology of Aging. 2004; 25 (3):303-310 - 61.
Sperling R. Functional MRI studies of associative encoding in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2007; 1097 :146-155 - 62.
Wang L, Zang Y, He Y, Liang M, Zhang X, Tian L, et al. Changes in hippocampal connectivity in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease: Evidence from resting state fMRI. NeuroImage. 2006; 31 (2):496-504 - 63.
Zhang H-Y, Wang S-J, Liu B, Ma Z-L, Yang M, Zhang Z-J, et al. Resting Brain Connectivity: Changes during the Progress of Alzheimer Disease 1. Radiology. 2010; 256 (2):598-606 - 64.
Van Hoesen GW, Hyman BT, Damasio AR. Entorhinal cortex pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Hippocampus. 1991; 1 (1):1-8 - 65.
Coutureau E, Di Scala G. Entorhinal cortex and cognition. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry. 2009; 33 (5):753-761 - 66.
Gómez-Isla T, Price JL, McKeel DW Jr, Morris JC, Growdon JH, Hyman BT. Profound loss of layer II entorhinal cortex neurons occurs in very mild Alzheimer’s disease. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1996; 16 (14):4491-4500 - 67.
Woodcock EA, Wadehra S, Diwadkar VA. Network profiles of the dorsal anterior cingulate and dorsal prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia during hippocampal-based associative memory. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 2016; 10 :32 - 68.
Zhu M, Cortese GP, Waites CL. Parkinson’s disease-linked Parkin mutations impair glutamatergic signaling in hippocampal neurons. BMC Biology. 2018; 16 (1):1-20 - 69.
Burman DD. Hippocampal Influences on Movements, Sensory, and Language Processing: A Role in Cognitive Control?: Hippocampus-Cytoarchitecture and Diseases. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2021. pp. 57-79 - 70.
Calabresi P, Castrioto A, Di Filippo M, Picconi B. New experimental and clinical links between the hippocampus and the dopaminergic system in Parkinson's disease. The Lancet Neurology. 2013; 12 (8):811-821 - 71.
Brett BL, Savitz J, Nitta M, España L, Teague TK, Nelson LD, et al. Systemic inflammation moderates the association of prior concussion with hippocampal volume and episodic memory in high school and collegiate athletes. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2020; 89 :380-388 - 72.
Meier TB, España LY, Kirk AJ, Nader AM, Powell JE, Nelson LD, et al. Association of previous concussion with hippocampal volume and symptoms in collegiate-aged athletes. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2021; 38 (10):1358-1367 - 73.
Martin G. Traumatic brain injury: The first 15 milliseconds. Brain Injury. 2016; 30 (13-14):1517-1524 - 74.
Bigler ED. Neuropsychology and clinical neuroscience of persistent post-concussive syndrome. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2008; 14 (1):1-22 - 75.
Ng LJ, Volman V, Gibbons MM, Phohomsiri P, Cui J, Swenson DJ, et al. A mechanistic end-to-end concussion model that translates head kinematics to neurologic injury. Frontiers in Neurology. 2017; 8 :269 - 76.
Fotuhi M, Do D, Jack C. Modifiable factors that alter the size of the hippocampus with ageing. Nature Reviews. Neurology. 2012; 8 (4):189-202 - 77.
Frodl T, Schaub A, Banac S, Charypar M, Jager M, Kummler P, et al. Reduced hippocampal volume correlates with executive dysfunctioning in major depression. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience. 2006; 31 (5):316 - 78.
Rangarajan B, Suresh S, Mahanand B. Identification of potential biomarkers in the hippocampus region for the diagnosis of ADHD using PBL-McRBFN approach. In: 2014 13th International Conference on Control Automation Robotics & Vision (ICARCV). Singapore: IEEE; 2014 - 79.
Plessen KJ, Bansal R, Zhu H, Whiteman R, Amat J, Quackenbush GA, et al. Hippocampus and amygdala morphology in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2006; 63 (7):795-807 - 80.
Liberzon I, Sripada CS. The functional neuroanatomy of PTSD: A critical review. Progress in Brain Research. 2008; 167 :151-169 - 81.
Malivoire BL, Girard TA, Patel R, Monson CM. Functional connectivity of hippocampal subregions in PTSD: Relations with symptoms. BMC Psychiatry. 2018; 18 (1):129 - 82.
Boldrini M, Fulmore CA, Tartt AN, Simeon LR, Pavlova I, Poposka V, et al. Human hippocampal neurogenesis persists throughout aging. Cell Stem Cell. 2018; 22 (4):598-599 - 83.
Christian KM, Song H, Ming G. Functions and dysfunctions of adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2014; 37 :243 - 84.
Toda T, Parylak SL, Linker SB, Gage FH. The role of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in brain health and disease. Molecular Psychiatry. 2019; 24 (1):67-87 - 85.
Olson AK, Eadie BD, Ernst C, Christie BR. Environmental enrichment and voluntary exercise massively increase neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus via dissociable pathways. Hippocampus. 2006; 16 (3):250-260 - 86.
Eckert MJ, Abraham WC. Effects of environmental enrichment exposure on synaptic transmission and plasticity in the hippocampus. Neurogenesis and Neural Plasticity. 2013; 2013 :165-187 - 87.
Burman DD. Hippocampal connectivity with sensorimotor cortex during volitional finger movements. II. Spatial and temporal selectivity. bioRxiv. 2018. 10.1101/479436 - 88.
Behrendt R-P. Contribution of hippocampal region CA3 to consciousness and schizophrenic hallucinations. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2010; 34 (8):1121-1136 - 89.
Behrendt R-P. Hippocampus and consciousness. Reviews in the Neurosciences. 2013; 24 (3):239-266 - 90.
Behrendt R-P. Conscious experience and episodic memory: Hippocampus at the crossroads. Frontiers in Psychology. 2013; 4 :304 - 91.
Burman DD. Normal Alert Consciousness: A Central Executive Model of Hippocampal Function. London, UK: InTechOpen [In press] - 92.
Dagher A, Owen AM, Boecker H, Brooks DJ. The role of the striatum and hippocampus in planning. Brain. 2001; 124 (5):1020-1032 - 93.
Kaplan R, King J, Koster R, Penny WD, Burgess N, Friston KJ. The neural representation of prospective choice during spatial planning and decisions. PLoS Biology. 2017; 15 (1):e1002588 - 94.
Axmacher N, Henseler MM, Jensen O, Weinreich I, Elger CE, Fell J. Cross-frequency coupling supports multi-item working memory in the human hippocampus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010; 107 (7):3228-3233 - 95.
Backus AR, Schoffelen J-M, Szebényi S, Hanslmayr S, Doeller CF. Hippocampal-prefrontal theta oscillations support memory integration. Current Biology. 2016; 26 (4):450-457 - 96.
Battaglia FP, Benchenane K, Sirota A, Pennartz CMA, Wiener SI. The hippocampus: Hub of brain network communication for memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2011; 15 (7):310-318 - 97.
Bohbot VD, Copara MS, Gotman J, Ekstrom AD. Low-frequency theta oscillations in the human hippocampus during real-world and virtual navigation. Nature Communications. 2017; 8 :14415 - 98.
Buzsaki G, Moser EI. Memory, navigation and theta rhythm in the hippocampal-entorhinal system. Nature Neuroscience. 2013; 16 (2):130-138 - 99.
Herweg NA, Apitz T, Leicht G, Mulert C, Fuentemilla Garriga L, Bunzeck N. Theta-alpha oscillations bind the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and striatum during recollection: Evidence from simultaneous EEG-fMRI. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2016; 36 (12):3579-3587 - 100.
Piai V, Anderson KL, Lin JJ, Dewar C, Parvizi J, Dronkers NF, et al. Direct brain recordings reveal hippocampal rhythm underpinnings of language processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016; 113 (40):11366-11371 - 101.
Terada S, Sakurai Y, Nakahara H, Fujisawa S. Temporal and rate coding for discrete event sequences in the hippocampus. Neuron. 2017; 94 (6):1248-1262