Abstract
Avian Typhoid, worldwide spread, is one of the principal diseases that devastate industrial poultry, causing serious economic losses to the poultry sector. The present study investigated the effectiveness of the fallowing technique, applied for a 149 days period, to a commercial poultry farm with a history of Salmonella Gallinarum isolation. Phenotypic detection of the pathogen in specific cultures was carried out from drag swabs collected from poultry facilities and equipment after the fallowing. An epidemiological inquiry was also carried out to verify the conditions of applied fallowing and to subsidize the laboratory tests. The bacteriological findings suggested that the fallowing technique in the period considered was not effective, for Salmonella spp. was isolated in 65% of the environmental samples. It was possible to infer that the sanitary-hygienic measures adopted in the fallow period were not effective, which requires new disinfection procedures and new bacteriological monitoring, besides an even longer fallow period. It was further concluded that the epidemiological inquiry is a valuable tool that ought to be adopted to investigate the relations between the epidemiological triad formed by Salmonella, the host, and the environment, while also being useful to support complementary exams, such as isolation in bacterial cultures.
Keywords
- gallinarum
- bacteriology
- swabs
- environment
- epidemiological triad
1. Introduction
Salmonellosis of poultry are caused by bacteria of the
Starting from the increasing attention to the health of commercial poultry, public and private sectors have fomented the development of diagnostic and prevention instruments to reduce or eliminate
The poultry industry has been constantly challenged by bacterial and viral pathogens, with serious economic losses. Among the infectious agents that challenge poultry production, the major responsible for losses in the sector is
Gastroenteritis and septicemia accompanied by elevated mortality in young birds are typically caused by the serotypes
Other
Over the years, the mechanisms and transmission pathways of salmonellosis in poultry have been a constant concern for the poultry industry. Given the epidemiological importance of poultry within the chain of transmission of
In commercial farms, fallowing is one of the most commonly employed techniques to combat
Salmonellae are highly resistant bacteria in the environment and survive in poultry equipment and facilities for more than a thousand days [11]. Since this bacterium is responsible for great losses to the poultry sector and damage to public health, the present study is justified by the economic, social, and medical relevance of
Considering the resistance in the environment and the survival in poultry equipment and facilities for long periods, it was questioned in this work the possibility of isolating
This study’s overall objective was to investigate the environmental presence of
2. Methodology
The environmental investigation of
To perform the diagnosis through bacterial isolation, the collected samples were submitted to isolation in broths and culture means highly selective for
3. Results and discussion
In the bacteriological isolation on plates, out of 80 samples of drag swabs submitted to diagnosis by plating, 52 samples showed growth of colonies with phenotypic characteristics suggestive of
It is important to consider that the quantity of samples of drag swabs used in this study was defined based on Normative Instruction no. 78 from November 3, 2003 [12], with some modifications. The legislation in question recommends the use of 100 samples of swabs; however, only 80 were submitted to bacterial isolation. The modification does not seem to have influenced the bacteriological diagnosis results.
The isolation of
From a sanitary point of view, Payment and Riley [19] recommend that the longer the fallow period, the better the effectiveness of disinfection protocols. They also point out that the processes of cleaning and disinfection of poultry houses associated with fallowing between flocks have shown to be extremely efficient in reducing the environmental persistence of
Naturally,
According to Jaenisch [9], fallowing is a period that extends from the process of cleaning and disinfection of poultry facilities until the housing of the subsequent flock. The authors also state that the fallow period should be applied in a complementary way to the procedures for cleaning and disinfection of the facilities in order to enhance them, being determinant to achieve success in disinfection processes, especially the technical protocols related to the elimination of
The results obtained from the epidemiological inquiry presented important information related to the
It becomes relevant to point out that in the poultry houses with birds primodiagnosed with
In this way, it is important to choose disinfectants that are ideal and compatible with the needs, taking into account the type of microorganism that one intends to control, the place and the object to be disinfected. For the disinfection of the poultry houses analyzed in this study, Farmasept® Plus was the disinfectant used in the recommended dosage in the datasheet of the laboratory producer. Sesti [11] points out that the chemical bases of these disinfectants are indicated for the elimination of bacteria of the
Bannow [15] points out that the epidemiological investigation by inquiry in poultry production units is essential, for this practice has the purpose of performing an epidemiological triage pertinent to salmonellosis that affects poultry production and that can also affect public health. Through the epidemiological inquiry tool, it was observed that the birds affected by
The clinical manifestations of Avian Typhoid are usually observed in the adult stage of the host [23]. At this age, the birds show somnolence, with prostration, anorexia, diarrhea with yellow to greenish coloration, and a drop in egg laying, evolving to death in a few days. However, Bannow [15] describes the clinical occurrence of Avian Typhoid with isolation of
According to Fernandes [7], the lack of hygiene involving the environment and facilities favors the approach of synanthropic animals, such as flies, birds, vultures, and rodents, which may contribute to dispersing
Studies carried out by Silva [14] for the control of
4. Conclusion
The laboratory findings suggest that fallowing, applied for a period of 149 days to poultry facilities and equipment on a farm with a history of previous isolation of
References
- 1.
Penha GA et al. Diagnóstico da salmonelose e sua importância para a avicultura: revisão de literatura. Revista Científica Eletrônica de Medicina. Veterinária. 2008; 10 :169-177 - 2.
Berchieri Júnior A, Freitas Neto OC. Salmoneloses aviárias. In: Berchieri Júnior A, Silva EN, Di Fábio J, Sesti L, Zuanaze MAF. Doenças das aves, 2° ed. Campinas: FACTA; 2009. pp. 435-471 - 3.
Franchin PR. Comparação de metodologias alternativas para detecção de Salmonella spp. eListeria monocytogenes em carne e produtos cárneos. Tese para obtenção de título de Doutor em Ciências dos Alimentos. Santa Catarina; 2008. p. 104 - 4.
Pereira CG, Santos BM, Gómez SYM, Abreu TGM. Prevenção e controle de doenças infecciosas nas aves de produção. Viçosa: Editora UFV; 2013 - 5.
Berchieri JRA, Macari MS. Doença das aves. Facta: Campinas; 2000. pp. 185-196 - 6.
Salmonella CLC, Trabulsis LR, Alterthum F, Gomperz OF, Candeias JAN. Microbiologia. 3rd ed. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2002. pp. 229-234 - 7.
Oliveira GH, Fernandes AC, Berchieri Júnior A. Experimental infection of laying hen with Salmonella Gallinarum. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, Rio de Janeiro. 2005; 36 (1):51-56 - 8.
Boxstael SV, Dierick K, Van Huffel X, Uyttendaele M, Berkvens D, Herman L, et al. Comparison of antimicrobial resistance patterns and phage types of Salmonella Typhimurium isolated from pigs, pork and human in Belgium between 2001 and 2006. Food Research International, Barking. 2012; 45 :913-918 - 9.
Jaenisch FRF, Coldebella A, Machado HGP, Abreu PG, Abreu VMN, Santiago V. Importância da Higienização na Produção Avícola. Normative Instruction (law) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply of Brazil; 2004 - 10.
Andreatti Filho RL, Patrício IS. Biosseguridade na Granja de Frangos de Corte. In: Mendes AA, Naas IA, Macari M, editors. Produção de Frangos de Corte. 1st ed. Campinas: FACTA; 2004. pp. 169-177 - 11.
Sesti L. Competitive exclusivo Salmonella ssp. in poltry-30 years of research. Food Control. 2011; 16 (8):657-667 - 12.
Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e do Abastecimento. Instrução Normativa n° 56 de 04 de dezembro de 2003, que estabelece sobre os procedimentos para registro, fiscalização e controle de estabelecimentos avícolas de reprodução e comerciais. 2003 - 13.
Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e do Abastecimento. Portaria n° 126, de 03 de novembro de 1995. Estabelece Normas de Credenciamento e Monitoramento de Laboratórios de Diagnóstico das Salmoneloses Aviárias (S. Enteritidis, S. Gallinarum, S. Pullorum e S. Typhimurium). 1995 - 14.
Silva SEL, Tomaz LD, Miranda VS, Ferreira NL, Silva VS, Silva KS. Avaliação bacteriológica da técnica de vazio sanitário aplicada por 790 dias a uma granja com diagnóstico positivo de Tifo Aviário. Brazilian Journal of Development. 2021a; 7 (2):14669-14684 - 15.
Bannow B. Epidemiology survey of the viral diseases. Korean Journal of Veterinary Service. 2008; 31 (1):43-55 - 16.
Leotta G et al. Prevalence of Salmonella Spp. in Backyard Chickens in Paraguay. International Journal of Poultry Science. 2010; 9 (6):533-536 - 17.
Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e do Abastecimento. Portaria n° 126, de 03 de novembro de 1994. Estabelece Normas de Credenciamento e Monitoramento de Laboratórios de Diagnóstico das Salmoneloses Aviárias (S. Enteritidis, S. Gallinarum, S. Pullorum e S. Typhimurium). 1994 - 18.
Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e do Abastecimento. Instrução Normativa n° 56 de 04 de dezembro de 2013, que estabelece sobre os procedimentos para registro, fiscalização e controle de estabelecimentos avícolas de reprodução e comerciais. 2013 - 19.
Payment P, Riley MS. Resolving the Global Burden of Gastrointestinal Illness: A Call to Action. DC: American Academy of Microbiology; 2002 - 20.
Rodrigues DP. Ecologia e prevalência de Salmonella spp. em aves e material avícola no Brasil. In: Conferência Apinco 2005 de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, 2005. Santos, Anais…Santos: FACTA; 2005. pp. 223-228 - 21.
Gast RK. Salmonella infectious. In: Calnek BW, Barnes HJ, Beard CW, Mcdoulgald LR, Saif YM, editors. Diseases of Poultry. 10th ed. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 1997. pp. 89-129 - 22.
Salle CTP, Silva AB. Prevenção de Doenças/Manejo Profilático/Monitoria. In: Berchieri A Jr, Macari M, editors. Doenças das Aves, FACTA. Campinas – SP; 2000. pp. 01-12 - 23.
Oliveira SD, Rodenbusch CR, Cé MC, Rocha SLS, Canal CW. Evaluation of selective and non-selective enrichment PCR procedures for salmonella detection. Letters in Applied Microbiology, Porto Alegre, RS. 2003;36 :217-221 - 24.
Penha Filho RAC, Paiva JB, Silva MD, Almeida AM, Berchieri Junior A. Control of Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Gallinarum in birds by using live vaccine candidate containing attenuated Salmonella Gallinarum mutant strain. Vaccine, Amsterdam. 2010; 28 (16):2853-2858 - 25.
Miranda VS, Ferreira NL, Tomaz LD, Silva VS, Silva KS, Silva SEL. Isolamento e identificação bioquímica de Salmonella spp. em frangos de corte. Brazilian Journal of Development. 2020;6 (11):89982-89993 - 26.
Ferreira NL, Tomaz LD, Miranda VS, Silva VS, Silva KS, Silva SEL. Comparação entre Soroaglutinação Rápida e Plaqueamento na detecção de Salmonella spp. na cadeia produtiva de frango de corte. Brazilian Journal of Development. 2020; 6 (12):93728-93744 - 27.
Rocha SLS, Oliveira SD, Rodenbusch CR, Cé MC, Canal CW. Evalution of selective and non-selective enrichment PCR procedures for Salmonella detection. Letters in Applied Microbiology, Porto Alegre, RS. 2003;36 :217-221 - 28.
Tessari ENC, Cardoso ALSP, Castro AGM, Zanatta GF. Prevalência de Salmonella Enteritidis em carcaças industrialmente processadas. Revista Higiene Alimentar. 2003; 17 (107):52-55