Abstract
Cyanobacteria are bioactive photosynthetic prokaryotes that have a superior ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen and are highly competitive in the microflora community. They also improve the physical and chemical properties of the soil and increase its water-holding capacity. Therefore, cyanobacteria are used as biofertilizers in agriculture. Cyanobacteria are able to promote plant growth by providing nutrients and producing many highly effective chemical compounds, such as enzymes and hormones, in the plant rhizosphere, giving the plant a highly competitive ability. In addition to activating plant defense responses against soil-borne pathogens, they have an effective strategy as a biocide against bacteria, fungi, and nematodes that attack plants. With multiple beneficial biological roles, the environmentally friendly cyanobacteria occupied the role of the maestro in sustainable agriculture.
Keywords
- cyanobacteria
- sustainable agriculture
- biofertilizer
- nitrogen fixation
- abiotic stress
- antimicrobial activity
1. Introduction
Given the ongoing increase in the world’s population and the depletion of food resources, our society currently needs a sustainable supply of agricultural productivity that poses no environmental risks [1]. Plants are constantly affected by abiotic stresses, such as drought, salinity, cold, heat, and nutrient deficiencies, as well as biotic stress, including pathogens and pests. In addition to climatic changes that greatly affect soil fertility, virulence of pests and diseases, and plant-producing biomass and seeds [2]. In nature, the interaction continues between biotic stress and plants, causing dynamic changes in their activities and composition under changing environmental conditions. Beneficial microorganisms play an effective role in maintaining the balance of this interaction in a way that is in the interest of the plant at the expense of biotic stress. Furthermore, plants can more effectively withstand abiotic stress, enhance nutrient uptake and utilization, and increase photosynthetic activity by virtue of the mechanisms carried out by beneficial microorganisms, which leads to higher yield [3].
Beneficial microorganisms can act as biopesticides by attacking phytopathogens directly and limiting their population by competition for space, nutrients, and the production of antimicrobial compounds [4]. Furthermore, beneficial microorganisms can induce plants to pre-activate the defensive responses controlled by plant hormones in order to combat infections more rapidly and successfully. This is referred to as systemic acquired resistance [5]. Among beneficial microorganisms are cyanobacteria. Cyanobacteria are photosynthetic prokaryotic organisms, extremely varied groups that can be found in practically all of the world’s ecosystems.
Cyanobacteria occur in unicellular, colonial, or multicellular filamentous forms. They are considered a subset of the bacterial kingdom. This subset is responsible for a significant amount of N2 fixation, reduction of the level of CO2, solubilization of phosphate, and the production of plant growth regulators by releasing phytohormones, polypeptides, amino acids, polysaccharides, and siderophores [6]. Cyanobacteria are composed of numerous organic inclusion units capable of carrying out a wide range of specialized functions, which give cyanobacteria their unique tasks and applications in sustainable agriculture [7]. The components that make up the structure of cyanobacteria are light-harvesting antennae, phycobilisomes, polyphosphate bodies, cyanophycin granules, polyhydroxyalkanoate granules, carboxysomes, lipid bodies, thylakoids, DNA-containing areas, and ribosomes [8] (Figure 1). Cyanobacteria have chlorophyll-a, which engages it in oxygenic photosynthesis, carotenoids that protect chlorophyll-a from oxidative degradation, and specific pigments called phycobilins that are bound to water-soluble proteins [9]. Flagella are not present in cyanobacteria [10].
Some kinds of cyanobacteria contain specialized cells called heterocytes and akinetes that are morphologically distinct from vegetative cells. The position, amount, and distribution of heterocytes and akinetes are significant morphological characteristics of cyanobacteria species and genera. Heterocytes are specialized cells that allow nitrogenase to fix atmospheric nitrogen by reducing it to ammonium, a process known as diazotrophy [11]. Akinetes contain granules of glycogen and cyanophycin but no polyphosphate granules and have a multilayered cell wall [9].
2. Characterization of cyanobacteria
Cyanobacteria are distinguished from most other microalgae by their lack of a cell nucleus and other cell organelles. They lack chloroplasts and have instead simple thylakoids, which are the location of the light-dependent processes necessary for photosynthesis. Cyanobacteria exhibit a variety of traits that can be utilized for microscopic analysis and identification, including the size and form of the cells, the presence of subcellular structures, and the presence of specialized cells. Flagella, which are present in many other bacterial or phytoplankton taxa, are absent in cyanobacteria. However, many cyanobacteria, especially filamentous varieties, exhibit gliding movement. Cyanobacteria have not been shown to reproduce sexually. The division of vegetative cells is their unique asexual method of reproduction. Cyanobacterial cells can be spherical, cylindrical, barrel-shaped, ellipsoid, conical, or disc-shaped. The critical abiotic parameters that determine the success of cyanobacterial growth are light, pH, temperature, water, CO2, and nutrient supplements [9, 12].
3. Symbiotic association between plant and cyanobacteria
In a symbiotic relationship, both organisms can benefit from each other in various ways. The filamentous cyanobacteria live in symbiosis with a wide range of eukaryotic hosts, including plants and fungi [13]. The cyanobacteria that will form symbiotic relationships with the plants are called cyanobionts, which can grow inside the host or more or less firmly attach themselves to the host [14]. The plants provide cyanobacteria with carbon sources, for example, sucrose. Cyanobacteria have the ability to fix nitrogen from the air in heterocysts, which benefits plants by supplying them with nitrogen (Figure 2). Therefore, the symbiotic cyanobacteria are mostly heterocyst-forming strains. They are virtually entirely associated with the genera Nostoc and Anabaena [15]. Cyanobacteria provide plants with about 88% of the fixed nitrogen in the form of NH3 and keep only 12% for themselves [16]. In addition to a symbiotic relationship between cyanobacteria and whole plants, there is also a symbiotic relationship between cyanobacteria and plant tissues. Cyanobacteria were found to have colonized different areas of wheat, where they were abundantly present around the root, in the spaces between root epidermal cells and cortex, and as single cells within the stem or on the surface of leaves [17]. Due to the symbiotic relationship between Gunnera and Nostoc, the number of heterocysts formed increased by up to 80%. This is evidence that the symbiotic relationship has different effects on the growth and development of cyanobacteria. Leghemoglobin concentration in chickpea root nodules increases as a result of the simultaneous inoculation of the cyanobacterium
4. The role of cyanobacteria in plant improvement
Cyanobacteria play an important role in improving plant growth and crop production. They are good bio-fertilizers, enhance solubilization and mobility of nutrients, and increase essential microelements in soil that are necessary for ion uptake, as well as stimulate plant growth due to their ability to produce bioactive compounds, such as phytohormones and other plant growth regulator substances, such as amino acids and polysaccharides (Figure 3).
4.1 Promoting plant growth
Cyanobacteria will actively promote seed germination, plant growth, and development due to their ability to produce some of the plant hormones, such as auxins, cytokinins, and gibberellins, by the genera
4.2 Nitrogen fixation
Nitrogen is the most important element needed for plant growth and is a key ingredient for successful cultivation on reclaimed land. Biological atmospheric nitrogen fixation by microorganisms is the main source of soil nitrogen [29]. Cyanobacteria have the ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen through specific cells called heterocysts that possess the nitrogenase enzyme.
4.3 Bio fertility
In modern agriculture, microbes play a vital role in determining fertility and soil structure [36]. Cyanobacteria have potential use in agriculture as biofertilizers. Maintaining soil fertility using renewable bioresources is the main requirement of sustainable agriculture to reduce the need for synthetic fertilizers.
Among such resources, cyanobacteria are the most promising candidates. In the rhizosphere, cyanobacteria can be directly inoculated in the soil or can be used as a coating on seeds, but in both cases, their survival should be guaranteed. Although the use of agricultural chemical nitrogen fertilizers was a solution to all agricultural problems related to food production and increasing agricultural crop production, many environmental problems have arisen as a result of the excessive use of these chemical fertilizers in intensive farming systems. The high prices of chemical fertilizers have led to a decrease in the profit of agricultural crops, and the shortage of chemical fertilizers is a major problem facing farmers in developing countries, which makes researchers try to search for bio-alternatives to expensive chemical fertilizers [37]. Recently, there has been much interest in linking primary field crops in agriculture, especially cereal crops, such as wheat and rice, and organisms as a source of biofertilizers, such as cyanobacteria.
Due to the adaptation of cyanobacteria to most different environmental conditions, it is widely used in increasing soil fertility and improving soil quality and structure, so it has become one of the most important biofertilizers [38]. The effect of cyanobacteria supplementation on growth, productivity, and physical properties of sandy soil under greenhouse conditions was tested. Sood et al. [39] found that there was a lot of ecological and metabolic diversity in cyanobacteria and that their structural-functional flexibility led to even more diversity. The use of cyanobacteria is one of the inexpensive applications in agriculture, which legalizes the use of chemical fertilizers. Cyanobacteria are one of the most important improvers that increase organic matter, amino acids, vitamins, and auxins in the soil, reduce soil salinity and phosphate deposits, and increase productivity in rice crops [40].
Cyanobacteria are emerging microorganisms for sustainable agricultural development. It can contribute about 20–30 kg of N per hectare, as well as soil organic matter, which is quite important for economically weak farmers who cannot invest in expensive chemical nitrogen fertilizers. The diazotroph group is the cyanobacteria most widely used for the development of biofertilizers and is capable of controlling the nitrogen deficiency in plants and improving the aeration of the soil and the water holding capacity. The most efficient nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria are
4.4 Protection against abiotic stress
Abiotic stress on plants can be caused by a variety of factors, such as temperature, droughts, light, and soil-related factors, including salinity, presence of heavy metals, and soil acidity [41, 42]. Cyanobacteria induce diverse changes in response to elevated soil salinity by synthesis and accumulation of protective substances, maintaining low intracellular ion concentrations, and expression of so-called salt stress proteins [43].
The reduction of the harmful effect of abiotic stresses on plants was observed by cyanobacteria, which has a direct effect on the soil or an indirect effect through the activation of specific responses in plants [48]. Concerning salinity stress, the mechanisms of cyanobacteria depend on increasing the plant’s ability to tolerate salinity through nitrogen fixation; the production of extracellular polysaccharides, compatible solutes, hormones, and antioxidative enzymes; the active export of ions; and the effects on the microbial community [49]. Rice plants showed an effective response to abiotic stress after treatment of rice roots with
Plant germination under drought stress can be enhanced by the use of cyanobacteria [53], moreover, it enhances the growth and development of plants in arid lands [54].
Heavy metals can be effectively removed from agricultural soil and water by cyanobacteria [57]. Many cyanobacterial species, including
5. The role of cyanobacteria in soil resilience
Soil health is seriously threatened in many parts of the world due to salinization, groundwater pollution from acidification, and excessive use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Cyanobacteria are essential for maintaining the health of the soil by enhancing soil physicochemical properties, including aggregation, aeration, and nutrient release patterns [20]. Additionally, cyanobacteria contribute to the fixation of nitrogen, excretion of biologically active compounds, increase soil biomass and organic matter, improve water-holding soil capacity, and improve soil phosphate bioavailability, moreover, cyanobacteria are alternative low-cost and eco-friendly that ensure soil sustainability (Figure 4).
5.1 Cyanobacteria improve physical properties of soil
In the upper crust of soil, the growth of cyanobacteria produces exopolysaccharides and extracellular polymers that alter the chemical composition and improve the physical properties of soil, which in turn promote beneficial microbial growth and strengthen soil structure [56]. Some cyanobacteria secrete mucilage or slime, which increases the availability of nutrients, and enhances soil structure that creates an ideal environment for the growth of advantageous microorganisms and plays a part in enhancing soil characteristics. The cyanobacteria
5.2 Phosphorus uptake
Phosphorus is the second most important nutrient for plants after nitrogen. It is a crucial mineral for the growth and development of plants. It is one of the essential components of a live cell since it serves as the primary structural support for DNA, RNA, and ATP [68]. Phosphate is frequently supplied to the soil in the form of phosphatic fertilizers. However, plants only use a small portion of this nutrient since a large portion of it is quickly converted to insoluble complexes in the soil that plants cannot utilize. With the help of phosphatase enzymes, cyanobacteria can solubilize and mobilize the insoluble organic phosphates present in the soil, for example, ferric phosphate, aluminum phosphate, tricalcium diphosphate, and hydroxyapatite into soluble forms and improve the bioavailability of phosphorus to the plants [69]. The use of cyanobacteria in crop fields plays a significant role in the mobilization of inorganic phosphates by extracellular phosphates and the excretion of organic acids. Cyanobacteria enhanced the decomposition and mineralization of phosphate and transformed it into readily available soluble organic phosphates.
5.3 Degradation of agrochemicals
Control of agricultural pests and weeds depends on the use of agrochemicals, for example, pesticides, fungicides, bactericides, insecticides, and herbicides. This leads to maintaining global food production by killing agricultural pests, but at the same time, these pesticides pollute the environment. Biological intervention for many beneficial microorganisms, including cyanobacteria, is involved in removing the chemical residues [70]. Cyanobacteria can be used to get rid of various pollutants, such as heavy metals, pesticides, chemical fertilizers, and crude oil [71]. Cyanobacteria are also able to remove heavy metals from water bodies and can reduce the increase in nitrates and phosphates from agricultural fields [72]. Intensive use of pesticides leads to an imbalance in the environmental system, especially in soil, water, and air. Currently, the use of beneficial microorganisms, especially cyanobacteria, is considered the best way to eliminate pesticides and chemicals that pollute agricultural soil. Cyanobacteria have the ability to break down pesticides at a faster rate. This requires some processes, such as adding the necessary nutrients or organic materials, to accelerate the rate of decreasing pollutants by the cyanobacteria, which have growth activities that exceed the chemical roads in addition to being environmentally friendly [73].
Among the different compounds used for agricultural applications the phosphorous-organic pesticide category. The random use of such chemicals causes many environmental problems. It also poses a great danger to other organisms, such as birds, fish, animals, and humans. As a result, it is highly recommended that these hazardous chemicals be removed from the environment in an appropriate manner. Cyanobacteria are one of the best applications of beneficial microorganisms because it breaks down toxic chemicals into nontoxic compounds. The widespread appearance of cyanobacteria in the polluted area is a contributing factor, making them a better candidate for biological decomposition [8].
6. The role of cyanobacteria in controlling phytopathogens
Plants can be attacked by bacteria, fungi, viruses, and nematodes at different stages of growth, causing severe harm to the root system, stem, leaves, and fruits. Chemical pesticides were the best approach to decrease the damage of these diseases, but pesticides have many negative effects over time. The use of biological alternatives, for example, cyanobacteria, has become a necessity to preserve the safety of the environment and the quality of crops. The major strategies used by cyanobacteria to attack plant pathogens are antibiosis, the release of chemical compounds that may have the potential to inhibit a variety of phytopathogens, competition for space, and activation of plant defense responses. Cyanobacteria are distinguished by producing a huge number of bioactive substances (Figure 5). Thus, cyanobacteria provide a significant, safe alternative to avoid the harmful effects resulting from chemical control. It is a critical tool in sustainable agriculture [7].
Several plant fungi can be effectively controlled by cyanobacterial extracts, for example,
The presence of diisooctyl adipate, extracted from
Cyanobacteria can produce enzymes that directly act against the pathogen’s cell wall.
On the other hand, they activate the defensive responses of the plant directly against fungal pathogens, such as
The ability of cyanobacteria to combat various plant pathogenic bacteria and their ability to release compounds into the environment has been extensively studied [94]. The mechanism underlying the bactericidal action of cyanobacteria is attributed to the presence of tannins, amino acids, phenolics, alkaloids, carbohydrates, and fatty acids, which may cause bacterial membrane deterioration that eventually allows cells to leak, lowers nutrition intake, and prevents cellular respiration [95].
Cyanobacteria possess antibiosis mechanisms against plant pathogenic nematodes that include paralysis, death, accelerating egg hatching, and inhibiting gall formation against plant harmful nematodes.
7. Conclusion
The presence of cyanobacteria in the soil is a positive indicator of the availability of organic matter, the support of oxygen, and the synthesis of hormones, amino acids, and vitamins, in addition to increasing the solubility of phosphates and enhancing the efficiency of fertilizers in plants while reducing the soil content of oxidants and salinity. Additionally, it plays a crucial role in nitrogen fixation, which is a major source of plant nutrition. Moreover, cyanobacteria promote the production of plant hormones and play an important role in combating many phytopathogens as antifungal, antibacterial, antinematode, and antiviral. It is clear from the above that cyanobacteria play an integral role in the sustainability of agriculture, as they work to improve the physiology of the plant and protect it against abiotic stress and attack by phytopathogens. Therefore, cyanobacteria should be applied on a larger scale in modern agricultural systems.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the staff members of Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
All illustrations were designed and drawn by author Dr. Eman Elagamey.
References
- 1.
Pathak J, Maurya PK, Singh SP, Häder DP, Sinha RP. Cyanobacterial farming for environment friendly sustainable agriculture practices: Innovations and perspectives. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2018; 6 :7. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00007 - 2.
Dresselhaus T, Hückelhoven R. Biotic and abiotic stress responses in crop plants. Agronomy. 2018; 8 (11):267. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy8110267 - 3.
Van Oosten MJ, Pepe O, De Pascale S, Silletti S, Maggio A. The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture. 2017; 4 :5. DOI: 10.1186/s40538-017-0089-5 - 4.
Kumar VV. Biofertilizers and biopesticides in sustainable agriculture. In: Role of Rhizospheric Microbes in Soil. Singapore: Springer; 2018. pp. 377-398 - 5.
Enebe MC, Babalola OO. The impact of microbes in the orchestration of plants’ resistance to biotic stress: A disease management approach. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2019; 103 :9-25. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-018-9433-3 - 6.
Righini H, Francioso O, Martel Quintana A, Roberti R. Cyanobacteria: A natural source for controlling agricultural plant diseases caused by fungi and oomycetes and improving plant growth. Horticulturae. 2022; 8 (1):58. DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae8010058 - 7.
Poveda J. Cyanobacteria in plant health: Biological strategy against abiotic and biotic stresses. Crop Protection. 2021; 141 :105450. DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105450 - 8.
Chittora D, Mukesh M, Tansukh B, Prashant S. Cyanobacteria as a source of biofertilizers for sustainable agriculture. Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports. 2020; 22 :1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2020.100737 - 9.
Vidal L, Ballot A, Azevedo SMFO, Padisák J, Welker M. Introduction to Cyanobacteria. In: Chorus I, Welker M, editors Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water. 2nd ed. London: World Health Organization; 2021. pp. 163-211. DOI: 10.1201/9781003081449 - 10.
Read N, Connell S, Adams DG. Nanoscale visualization of a fibrillar array in the cell wall of filamentous cyanobacteria and its implications for gliding motility. Journal of Bacteriology. 2007; 189 :7361-7366. DOI: 10.1128/JB.00706-07 - 11.
Berman-Frank I, Lundgren P, Falkowski P. Nitrogen fixation and photosynthetic oxygen evolution in cyanobacteria. Research in Microbiology. 2003; 154 :157-164. DOI: 10.1016/S0923-2508(03)00029-9 - 12.
Castenholz RW. General characteristics of the cyanobacteria. Bergey's Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria. 2015; 17 :1-23. DOI: 10.1002/9781118960608.cbm00019 - 13.
Adams DG, Duggan PS. Cyanobacteria–bryophyte symbioses. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2008; 59 :1047-1058. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ern005 - 14.
Svircev Z, Tamas I, Nenin P, Drobac A. Co-cultivation of N2-fixing cyanobacteria and some agriculturally important plants in liquid and sand cultures. Applied Soil Ecology. 1997; 6 :301-308. DOI: 10.1016/S0929-1393(97)00022-X - 15.
Múnera-Porras LM, García-Londoño S, Ríos-Osorio LA. Action mechanisms of plant growth promoting cyanobacteria in crops in situ: A systematic review of literature. International Journal of Agronomy. 2020; 2020 :2690410. DOI: 10.1155/2020/2690410 - 16.
Kollmen J, Strieth D. The beneficial effects of cyanobacterial co-culture on plant growth. Life. 2022; 12 (2):223. DOI: 10.3390/life12020223 - 17.
Gantar M, Kerby NW, Rowell P. Colonization of wheat ( Triticum vulgare L.) by N2-fixing cyanobacteria: II. An ultrastructural study. The New Phytologist. 1991;118 :485-492. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03842.x - 18.
Prasanna R, Ramakrishnan B, Simranjit K, Ranjan K, Kanchan A, Hossain F, et al. Cyanobacterial and rhizobial inoculation modulates the plant physiological attributes and nodule microbial communities of chickpea. Archives of Microbiology. 2017; 199 :1311-1323. DOI: 10.1007/s00203-017-1405-y - 19.
Joseph CM, Meeks JC. Regulation of expression of glutamine synthetase in a symbiotic nostoc strain associated with Anthoceros punctatus . Journal of Bacteriology. 1987;169 :2471-2475 - 20.
Singh JS, Kumar A, Rai AN, Singh DP. Cyanobacteria: A precious bio-resource in agriculture, ecosystem, and environmental sustainability. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016; 7 :529. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.548410 - 21.
Joshi H, Shourie A, Singh A. Cyanobacteria as a source of biofertilizers for sustainable agriculture. In: Advances in Cyanobacterial Biology. Academic Press; 2020. pp. 385-396. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819311-2.00025-5 - 22.
Karthikeyan N, Radha P, Nb L, Kaushik BD. Evaluating the potential of plant growth promoting cyanobacteria as inoculants for wheat. European Journal of Soil Biology. 2007; 43 :23-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.11.001 - 23.
Yk J, Panpatte DG, Vyas RV. In: Panpatte D, Jhala Y, Vyas R, Shelat H, editors. Cyanobacteria: Source of Organic Fertilizers for Plant Growth, Microorganisms for Green Revolution. Microorganisms for Sustainability. Singapore: Springer; 2017. p. 6. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-6241-4_13 - 24.
Osman MEH, El-Sheekh MM, Metwally AM, Ismail AA, Ismail MM. Antagonistic activity of some fungi and cyanobacteria species against Rhizoctonia solani . International Journal of Plant Pathology. 2011;2 (3):101-114. DOI: 10.3923/ijpp.2011.101.114 - 25.
Mógor ÁF, Ördög V, Pereira Lima GP, Molnár Z, Mógor G. Biostimulant properties of cyanobacterial hydrolysate related to polyamines. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2018; 30 :453-460. DOI: 10.1007/s10811-017-1242-z - 26.
Supraja KV, Behera B, Balasubramanian P. Efficacy of microalgal extracts as biostimulants through seed treatment and foliar spray for tomato cultivation. Industrial Crops and Products. 2020; 151 :112453. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112453 - 27.
Toribio AJ, Suárez-Estrella F, Jurado MM, López MJ, López-González JA, Moreno J. Prospection of cyanobacteria producing bioactive substances and their application as potential phytostimulating agents. Biotechnology Reports. 2020; 26 :e00449. DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00449 - 28.
Ruffing AM. Engineered cyanobacteria: Teaching an old bug new tricks. Bioengineered Bugs. 2011; 2 :136-149. DOI: 10.4161/bbug.2.3.15285 - 29.
Mahanty T, Bhattacharjee S, Goswami M, Bhattacharyya P, Das B, Ghosh A, et al. Biofertilizers: A potential approach for sustainable agriculture development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017; 24 (4):3315-3335. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-8104-0 - 30.
Prasad RC, Prasad BN. Cyanobacteria as a source biofertilizer for sustainable agriculture in Nepal. Journal in Plant Science Botanica Orientalis. 2001; 1 :127-133 - 31.
Esteves-Ferreira AA, Cavalcanti JHF, Vaz MGMV, Alvarenga LV, Nunes-Nesi A, Araújo WL. Cyanobacterial nitrogenases: Phylogenetic diversity, regulation and functional predictions. Genetics and Molecular Biology. 2017; 40 (1):261-275. DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0050 - 32.
Chittapun S, Limbipichai S, Amnuaysin N, Boonkerd R, Charoensook M. Effects of using cyanobacteria and fertilizer on growth and yield of rice, Pathum Thani I: A pot experiment. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2018; 30 (1):79-85. DOI: 10.1007/s10811-017-1138-y - 33.
Grzesik M, Romanowska-Duda Z, Kalaji HM. Effectiveness of cyanobacteria and green algae in enhancing the photosynthetic performance and growth of willow ( Salix viminalis L.) plants under limited synthetic fertilizers application. Photosynthetica. 2017;55 (3):510-521. DOI: 10.1007/s11099-017-0716-1 - 34.
Osman MEH, El-Sheekh MM, El-Naggar AH, Gheda SF. Effect of two species of cyanobacteria as biofertilizers on some metabolic activities, growth, and yield of pea plant. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2010; 46 (8):861-875. DOI: 10.1007/s00374-010-0491-7 - 35.
Chamizo S, Mugnai G, Rossi F, Certini G, De Philippis R. Cyanobacteria inoculation improves soil stability and fertility on different textured soils: Gaining insights for applicability in soil restoration. Frontiers of Environmental Science. 2018; 6 (49):00049. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2018 - 36.
Singh S. A review on possible elicitor molecules of cyanobacteria: Their role in improving plant growth and providing tolerance against biotic or abiotic stress. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2014; 117 :1221-1244. DOI: 10.1111/jam.12612 - 37.
Abdelfattah MS, Elsadany AY, Doha N. The use of cyanobacteria as biofertilizer in wheat cultivation under different nitrogen rates. Natural Science. 2018; 16 :30-35. DOI: 10.7537/marsnsj160418.06 - 38.
Dhar DW, Prasanna R, Singh BV. Comparative performance of three carrier based blue green algal biofertilizers for sustainable rice cultivation. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 2007; 30 :41-50. DOI: 10.1300/j064v30n02_06 - 39.
Sood A, Renuka N, Prasanna R, Ahluwalia AS. Cyanobacteria as potential options for wastewater treatment. In: Phytoremediation. Cham: Springer; 2015. pp. 83-93. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10969-5_8 - 40.
Kaushik BD. Use of blue-green algae and azolla biofertilizers in rice cultivation and their influence on soil properties. In: Jain PC, editor. Microbiology and Biotechnology for sustainable development. New Delhi, India: CBS Publishers & Distributors; 2004. pp. 166-184 - 41.
Cramer GR, Urano K, Delrot S, Pezzotti M, Shinozaki K. Effects of abiotic stress on plants: A systems biology perspective. BMC Plant Biology. 2011; 11 :163. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-163 - 42.
Gr S, Yadav RK, Chatrath A, Gerard M, Tripathi K, Govindsamy V, et al. Perspectives on the potential application of cyanobacteria in the alleviation of drought and salinity stress in crop plants. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2021; 33 :3761-3778. DOI: 10.1007/s10811-021-02570-5 - 43.
Singh NK, Dhar DW. Cyanobacterial reclamation of salt-affected soil. In: Lichtfouse E, editor. Genetic Engineering, Biofertilisation, Soil Quality and Organic Farming. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2010. pp. 243-275 - 44.
Apte SK, Bhagwat AA. Salinity-stress-induced proteins in two nitrogen-fixing anabaena strains differentially tolerant to salt. Journal of Bacteriology. 1989; 171 (2):909-915. DOI: 10.1128/jb.171.2.909-915.1989 - 45.
Rodríguez AA, Stella AM, Storni MM, Zulpa G, Zaccaro MC. Effects of cyanobacterial extracellular products and gibberellic acid on salinity tolerance in Oryza sativa L. Saline Systems. 2006;2 :7. DOI: 10.1186/1746-1448-2-7 - 46.
Mutale-Joan C, Rachidi F, Mohamed HA, Mernissi NE, Aasfar A, Barakate M, et al. Microalgae-cyanobacteria-based biostimulant effect on salinity tolerance mechanisms, nutrient uptake, and tomato plant growth under salt stress. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2021; 33 :3779-3795. DOI: 10.1007/s10811-021-02559-0 - 47.
Coba de la Peña T, Redondo FJ, Manrique E, Lucas MM, Pueyo JJ. Nitrogen fixation persists under conditions of salt stress in transgenic Medicago truncatula plants expressing a cyanobacterial flavodoxin. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2010;8 (9):954-965. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00519.x - 48.
Singh JS. Cyanobacteria: A vital bio-agent in eco-restoration of degraded lands and sustainable agriculture. Climate Change and Environmental Sustainability. 2014; 2 :133-137 - 49.
Li H, Zhao Q , Huang H. Current states and challenges of salt-affected soil remediation by cyanobacteria. Science of the Total Environment. 2019; 669 :258-272. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.104 - 50.
Singh DP, Prabha R, Yandigeri MS, Arora DK. Cyanobacteria-mediated phenylpropanoids andphytohormones in rice ( Oryza sativa ) enhance plant growth and stress tolerance. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2011;100 (4):557-568. DOI: 10.1007/s10482-011-9611-0 - 51.
El Sheekh MM, Zayed MA, Elmossel FK, Hassan RS. Effect of cyanobacteria isolates on rice seeds germination in saline soil. Baghdad Science Journal. 2018; 15 (1):16-21. DOI: 10.21123/bsj.2018.15.1.0016 - 52.
Nisha R, Kiran B, Kaushik A, Kaushik CP. Bioremediation of salt affected soils using cyanobacteria in terms of physical structure, nutrient status and microbial activity. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2018; 15 :571-580. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-017- 1419-7 - 53.
Rai LC, Singh S, Pradhan S. Biotechnological potential of naturally occurring and laboratory-grown microcystis in biosorption of Ni2+ and Cd2+. Current Science. 1998; 74 :461-464 - 54.
Chua M, Erickson TE, Merritt DJ, Chilton AM, Ooi MKJ, Muñoz-Rojas M. Bio-priming seeds with cyanobacteria: Effects on native plant growth and soil properties. Restoration Ecology. 2020; 28 :S168-S176. DOI: 10.1111/rec.13040 - 55.
Muñoz-Rojas M, Chilton A, Liyanage GS, Erickson TE, Merritt DJ, Neilan BA, et al. Effects of indigenous soil cyanobacteria on seed germination and seedling growth of arid species used in restoration. Plant and Soil. 2018; 429 :91-100. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-018-3607-8 - 56.
Ibraheem IBM. Cyanobacteria as alternative biological conditioners for bioremediation of barren soil. Egyptian Journal of Phycology. 2007; 8 :99-107. DOI: 10.21608/egyjs.2007.114548 - 57.
Priyanka KC, Chatterjee A, Wenjing W, Yadav D, Singh PK. Cyanobacteria: Potential and role for environmental remediation. In: Abatement of Environmental Pollutants. Elsevier; 2020. pp. 193-202. DOI: 10.1016/ B978-0-12-818095-2.00010-2 - 58.
Kaur R, Goyal D. Heavy metal accumulation from coal fly ash by cyanobacterial biofertilizers. Particulate Science and Technology. 2018; 36 :513-516. DOI: 10.1080/02726351.2017.1398794 - 59.
Faisal M, Hameed A, Hasnain S. Chromium-resistant bacteria and cyanobacteria: Impact on Cr (VI) reduction potential and plant growth. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology. 2005; 32 :615-621. DOI: 10.1007/s10295-005-0241-2 - 60.
Seifikalhor M, Hassani SB, Aliniaeifard S. Seed priming by cyanobacteria ( Spirulina platensis ) and salep gum enhances tolerance of maize plant against cadmium toxicity. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2020;39 (3):1009-1021. DOI: 10.1007/s00344-019-10038-7 - 61.
Aminfarzaneh H, Duygu E. The effect of salicylic acid and triacontanol on biomass production and imidaclopirid removal capacity by cyanobacteria. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series C. 2010; 22 :15-31. DOI: 10.1501/Commuc_0000000174 - 62.
Osman MEH, Abo-Shady AM, El-Nagar MM. Cyanobacterial Arthrospira (Spirulina platensis ) as safener against harmful effects of fusilade herbicide on faba bean plant. Rendiconti Lincei. 2016;27 :455-462. DOI: 10.1007/s12210-015-0498-y - 63.
Khan MR, Syeed S, Nazar R, Anjum NA. An insight into the role of salicylic acid and jasmonic acid in salt stress tolerance. In: Khan NA, Nazar R, Iqbal N, Anjum NA, editors. Phytohormones and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2012. pp. 277-300. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25829-9_12 - 64.
Caire G, de Cano SM, de Mulé ZMC, Palma RM, Colombo K. Exopolysaccharides of Nostoc muscorum ag. (cyanobacteria) in the aggregation of soil particles. Journal of Applied Phycology. 1997;9 :249-253. DOI: 10.1023/A:1007994425799 - 65.
Garlapati D, Chandrasekaran M, Devanesan A, Mathimani T, Pugazhendhi A. Role of cyanobacteria in agricultural and industrial sectors: An outlook on economically important byproducts. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2019; 103 :4709-4721. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-019-09811-1 - 66.
Rossi F, Li H, Liu Y, De Philippis R. Cyanobacterial inoculation (cyanobacterisation): Perspectives for the development of a standardized multifunctional technology for soil fertilization and desertification reversal. Earth Science Reviews. 2017; 171 :28-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.05.006 - 67.
Malam Issa O, Défarge C, BissonnaisY L, Marin B, Duval O, Bruand A, et al. Effects of the inoculation of cyanobacteria on the microstructure and the structural stability of a tropical soil. Plant and Soil. 2007; 290 (1):209-219. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-006-9153-9 - 68.
Cordell D, Rosemarin A, Schröder JJ, Smit AL. Towards global phosphorus security: A systems framework for phosphorus recovery and reuse options. Chemosphere. 2011; 84 :747-758. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.032 - 69.
Rai AN, Singh AK, Syiem MB. Plant growth-promoting abilities in cyanobacteria. In: Cyanobacteria. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2019. pp. 459-476. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-814667-5.00023-4 - 70.
Subashchandrabose SR, Balasubramanian R, Mallavarapu M, Kadiyala V, Ravi N. Mixotrophic cyanobacteria and microalgae as distinctive biological agents for organic pollutant degradation. Environment International. 2013; 51 :59-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2012.10.007 - 71.
Singh R, Parul P, Madhulika S, Andrzej B, Jitendra K, Samiksha S, et al. Uncovering potential applications of cyanobacteria and algal metabolites in biology, agriculture and medicine: Current status and future prospects. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017; 8 :1-37. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00515 - 72.
Kumar D, Pandey LK, Gaur JP. Metal sorption by algal biomass: From batch to continuous system. Algal Research. 2016; 18 :95-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2016.05.026 - 73.
Verma JP, Jaiswal DK, Sagar R. Pesticide relevance and their microbial degradation: A-state-of-art. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology. 2014; 13 :429-466. DOI: 10.1007/s11157-014-9341-7 - 74.
Roberti R, Galletti S, Burzi PL, Righini H, Cetrullo S, Perez C. Induction of defence responses in zucchini ( Cucurbita pepo ) byanabaena sp. water extract. Biological Control. 2015;82 :61-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.12.006 - 75.
Righini H, Somma A, Cetrullo S, D’Adamo S, Flamigni F, Martel Quintana A, et al. Inhibitory activity of aqueous extracts from Anabaena minutissima ,Ecklonia maxima andJania adhaerens on the cucumber powdery mildew pathogen in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2020;32 :3363-3375. DOI: 10.1007/s10811-020-02160-x - 76.
Chaudhary V, Prasanna R, Nain L, Dubey SC, Gupta V, SinghR J, et al. Bioefficacy of novel cyanobacteriaamended formulations in suppressing damping off disease in tomato seedlings. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2012; 28 (12):3301-3310. DOI: 10.1007/s11274-012-1141-z - 77.
Kim J, Kim JD. Inhibitory effect of algal extracts on mycelia growth of the tomato-wilt pathogen, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.lycopersici . Mycobiology. 2008;36 (4):242-248. DOI: 10.4489/MYCO.2008.36.4.242 - 78.
Alwathnani HA, Perveen K. Biological control of fusarium wilt of tomato by antagonist fungi and cyanobacteria. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2012; 11 :1100-1105. DOI: 10.5897/AJB11.3361 - 79.
Roberti R, Righini H, Reyes CP. Activity of seaweed and cyanobacteria water extracts against Podosphaera xanthii on zucchini. Italian Journal of Mycology. 2016;45 :66-77. DOI: 10.6092/issn.2531-7342/6425 - 80.
Abdel-Monaim MF, Mazen MM, Atwa MAAM. Effect of cyanobacteria on reducing damping-off and root rot incidence in lupine plants, New Valley Governorate, Egypt. Microbiology Research Journal International. 2016; 16 :1-14. DOI: 10.9734/BMRJ/2016/27883 - 81.
Zhou Y, Bao J, Zhang D, Li Y, Li H, He H. Effect of heterocystous nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria against rice sheath blight and the underlying mechanism. Applied Soil Ecology. 2020; 153 :103580. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103580 - 82.
Bloor S, England RR. Antibiotic production by the cyanobacterium Nostoc muscorum . Journal of Applied Phycology. 1989;1 (4):367-372 - 83.
Kim JD. Screening of cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) from rice paddy soil for antifungal activity against plant pathogenic fungi. Microbiology. 2006; 34 :138-142. DOI: 10.4489/MYCO.2006.34.3.138 - 84.
Abedin RMA, Taha HM. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of cyanobacteria and green microalgae. Evaluation of medium components by Plackett-Burman design for antimicrobial activity of Spirulina platensis . Global Journal of Biotechnology & Biochemistry. 2008;3 (1):22-31 - 85.
Karthika N, Muruganandam A. Bioactive compounds and antimicrobial activity of cyanobacteria from south east coast of India. International Journal of Current Research in Life Sciences. 2019; 8 (1):3027-3030 - 86.
Prasanna R, Saxena G, Singh B, Ranjan K, Buddhadeo R, Velmourougane K, et al. Mode of application influences the biofertilizing efficacy of cyanobacterial biofilm formulations in chrysanthemum varieties under protected cultivation. Open Agriculture. 2018; 3 :478-489. DOI: 10.1515/opag-2018-0053 - 87.
Mahawar H, Prasanna R, Gogoi R. Elucidating the disease alleviating potential of cyanobacteria, copper nanoparticles and their interactions in Fusarium solani challenged tomato plants. Plant Physiology Reports. 2019;24 :533-540. DOI: 10.1007/s40502-019-00490-8 - 88.
Elagamey E, Abdellatef MAE, Arafat MY. Proteomic insights of chitosan mediated inhibition of fusarium oxysporum f. sp.cucumerinum . Journal of Proteomics. 2022;260 :104560. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2022.104560 - 89.
Gupta V, Natarajan C, Kumar K, Prasanna R. Identification and characterization of endoglucanases for fungicidal activity in Anabaena laxa (cyanobacteria). Journal of Applied Phycology. 2011;23 (1):73-81. DOI: 10.1007/s10811-010-9539-1 - 90.
Mohamed SA, Kordali Ş, Korkmaz M. Evaluation of the effect of benzoic acid on some plant pathogenic fungi. International Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences. 2018; 1 (1):3-5 - 91.
Prasanna R, Babu S, Bidyarani N, Kumar A, Triveni S, Monga D, et al. Prospecting cyanobacteria-fortified composts as plant growth promoting and biocontrol agents in cotton. Experimental Agriculture. 2014; 51 :42-65. DOI: 10.1017/S0014479714000143 - 92.
Prasanna R, Chaudhary V, Gupta V, Babu S, Kumar A, Singh R, et al. Cyanobacteria mediated plant growth promotion and bioprotection against fusarium wilt in tomato. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2013; 36 :337-353. DOI: 10.1007/s10658-013-0167-x - 93.
Attia MS, Sharaf AEMA, Zayed AS. Protective action of some bio-pesticides against early blight disease caused by Alternaria solani in tomato plant. IJISET. 2017;4 :67-94. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.12528.56322 - 94.
Shao J, Peng L, Luo S, Yu G, Gu JD, Lin S, et al. First report on the allelopathic effect of Tychonema bourrellyi (cyanobacteria) againstMicrocystis aeruginosa (cyanobacteria). Journal of Applied Phycology. 2013;25 :1567-1573. DOI: 10.1007/s10811-012-9969-z - 95.
Smith VJ, Desbois AP, Dyrynda EA. Conventional and unconventional antimicrobials from fish, marine invertebrates and micro-algae. Marine Drugs. 2010; 8 (4):1213-1262. DOI: 10.3390/md8041213 - 96.
Walker TS, Bais HP, Déziel E, Schweizer HP, Rahme LG, Fall R, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa -plant root interactions. Pathogenicity, biofilm formation, and root exudation. Plant Physiology. 2004;134 :320-331. DOI: 10.1104/pp.103.027888 - 97.
Catarina Guedes A, Barbosa CR, Amaro HM, Pereira CI, Xavier MF. Microalgal and cyanobacterial cell extracts for use as natural antibacterial additives against food pathogens. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2011; 46 :862-870. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02567.x - 98.
Mikhail MS, Hussein BA, Messiha NA, Morsy KMM, Youssef MM. Using of cyanobacteria in controlling potato brown rot disease. International Journal of Engineering Research. 2016; 7 :274-281 - 99.
Yanti Y, Hamid H, Syarif Z. Screening of indigenous rhizospheric cyanobacteria as potential growth promotor and biocontrol of Ralstonia syzygii subsp.indonesiensis on chili. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology. 2019;4 :1665-1672. DOI: 10.22161/ijeab.46.5 - 100.
Holajjer P, Kamra A, Gaur HS, Dhar DW. In vitro nematicidal activity of a terrestrial cyanobacterium,Synechococcus nidulans , towards plant-parasitic nematodes. Nemato. 2012;14 :85-92. DOI: 10.1163/138855411X578879 - 101.
Youssef MMA, Ali MS. Management of Meloidogyne incognita infecting cowpea by using some native blue green algae. Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde, Pflanzenschutz, Umweltschutz. 1998;71 :15-16. DOI: 10.1007/BF02770565 - 102.
Chandel ST. Nematicidal activity of the cyanobacterium, Aulosira fertilissima on the hatch ofMeloidogyne triticoryzae andMeloidogyne incognita . Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection. 2009;42 :32-38. DOI: 10.1080/03235400600914363 - 103.
Sharma HK, Gaur HS. Hatch inhibition of Meloidogyne incognita by aqueous extracts and exudates of five species of cyanobacteria. Nematologia Mediterranea. 2008;36 :99-102 - 104.
Hashem M, Abo-Elyousr KA. Management of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita on tomato with combinations of different biocontrol organisms. Crop Protection. 2011;30 :285-292. DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2010.12.009 - 105.
Khan Z, Park SD, Shin SY, Bae SG, Yeon IK, Seo YJ. Management of Meloidogyne incognita on tomato by root-dip treatment in culture filtrate of the blue-green alga.Microcoleus vaginatus . Bioresource Technology. 2005;96 :1338-1341. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.11.012 - 106.
Hamouda R, Al-Saman M, El-Ansary M. Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae andSpirulina platensis on suppressing root-knot nematode,Meloidogyne incognita infecting banana plants under greenhouse conditions. Egyptian Journal of Agronematology. 2019;18 :90-102. DOI: 10.21608/ejaj.2019.52593 - 107.
Sharaf AEMA, Kailla AM, Attia MS, Nofal MM. Induced resistance in tomato plants against root knot nematode using biotic and abiotic inducers. IJARBS. 2016; 3 :31-46. DOI: 10.22192/ijarbs.2016.03.11.004