Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Microbial Mitigation of Drought Stress in Plants: Adaptations to Climate Change

Written By

Mohammad Sayyar Khan and Irba Zulfiqar

Submitted: 12 December 2022 Reviewed: 22 December 2022 Published: 06 March 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.109669

From the Edited Volume

Abiotic Stress in Plants - Adaptations to Climate Change

Edited by Manuel Oliveira and Anabela Fernandes-Silva

Chapter metrics overview

218 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The global temperature is constantly increasing due to the phenomenon of climate change. Plants have developed various mechanisms to defend themselves against environmental stresses including drought stress. Apart from indigenous biochemical, physiological, and molecular mechanisms of adaptation to stress, the plant-associated microbes may also play a crucial role in plant drought tolerance. The endophytic and rhizospheric microbes perform various functions and produce different enzymes and compounds that play an important role in plants’ adaptation to various environmental stresses including drought stress. Some of the key mechanisms include production of growth hormones, siderophores, organic acids, induction of the ROS scavenging system, phosphate solubilization, and nitrogen fixation. However, the production of ACC deaminase in the plant-associated microbes has vital roles in reduction of ethylene levels under drought stress, resulting in improved plant growth and stress tolerance. Owing to the complex nature of drought tolerance, a multi-pronged approach would have to be adapted to further enhance the microbial-mediated drought tolerance in plants.

Keywords

  • microbial functions
  • rhizospheric microbes
  • ROS scavenging
  • ACC deaminase
  • osmolytes

1. Introduction

Climate change is the long-term shift in temperatures and weather patterns. These changes may be natural, such as through variations in the solar cycle or man-made activities. Different studies reveal that it mainly occurs due to anthropogenic activities taking place in a huge amount these days. Also, many other factors such as greenhouse effect, deforestation, urbanization, global warming, fossil fuels combustion, increased livestock farming, excessive use of fertilizers, and nitrous oxide emissions are included, which has resulted in increasing incidence of different abiotic and biotic stresses [1]. Currently, climate change is known to be the most serious contemporary challenge for humanity. The global climate conditions have been adversely affected due to different natural and unnatural activities, which have stimulated the rise in average temperature and carbon dioxide level. During the last century, the average global temperature soared up by 1.5 F, and it has been estimated that within a period of 100 years that it might surge higher by additional 0.5–8.6 F [2]. These changes in climatic conditions have led to erratic events such as increase in rainfall and snowfall worldwide, excessive release of greenhouse gases, increase in air temperature, which renders soil dry and decreases its moisture content forming drought-like conditions, water scarcity, severe fires, rising sea levels, flooding, melting polar ice, catastrophic storms, declining biodiversity and an increase in pollution due to excessive CO2 emissions, air pollutants, ground-level ozone, aerosols, methane, and others. By altering wind patterns, it also induces seasonal variations. In other words, it involves the altering of climatic or weather patterns that occur by emission of greenhouse gases, which are likely to be more erratic and extreme in the forthcoming years [3]. Moreover, these climate-changing parameters are known to affect different terrestrial macroorganisms such as plants. However, according to recent studies, other organisms and ecosystems may be impacted as well [4]; that is, it affects human health, their ability to grow food, housing, safety, and work; for example, some people living in small islands in developing states are already more vulnerable to climate impacts.

As a result of ever-growing population, there is an increased demand of food, which has resulted in intensive agricultural practices including excessive use of agro-chemicals, livestock generation (for meat and other source of income), and exploitation of water resources, which have further worsen the situation by release of GHG (due to agricultural activities) and resulting in pollution of natural resources. The uncontrolled deforestation mainly for development and agriculture has created imbalance in the natural process of carbon cycle, which has led to a rise in the concentration of carbon footprint and brought uneven pattern of climate causing a variety of adverse effects that have huge effect on agricultural production. Due to climate change, a very high rate of land degradation has been observed causing enhanced desertification and nutrient-deficient soil, which is characterized as a major global threat. According to Global Assessment of Land Degradation and Improvement (GLADA), a quarter of land area around the globe can now be marked as degraded. Lives of 1.5 billion people have been adversely affected by land degradation caused by anthropogenic activities and climate change, and also 15 billion tons of fertile soil is lost every year, which results in mass migrations. According to a report published by United Nations Environment Programme in 2017, about 500 million hectares of farmland has been abandoned due to drought and desertification resulting in major social and environmental constraints [5].

The climate alterations highly influence the growth behavior of different crop species. For example, it has a huge impact on mineral accumulation and nutrient acquisition in the plants. Changes in morphology, physiology, and plant productivity are the direct effects observed on the plants body. The organs and membranes of plants are impaired due to different stress conditions. Due to increased oxidative stress, the production of carbohydrates, proteins, and secondary metabolite in the plants is adversely influenced. Furthermore, it also highly affects soil fertility, irrigation measures, occurrence of pests and diseases, and also, stress incidence such as heat and drought are detected. Other ill effects of climate change on production strategies observed are effects on food demand, trade opportunities, and unequal distribution of products [6]. These variations thus cause a very damaging impact on plant growth, and their developmental patterns also significantly impact the diversity and activities of different plant-associated microbial communities as they possess a huge variety of microbiomes in phyllosphere and endophytes from surrounding soil and air [7]. This beneficial microbiome present in the plants plays a vital role in regulating plant immunity, production of metabolites, nutrient uptake and acquisition, disease, and insect-pest management along with several other functions. The different microbes living in soil system comprise numerous PGPR, fungi, actinomycetes, algae, yeasts, cyanobacteria, and many more [8]. They help in transforming different organic substance into simpler form that can be assimilated by plants. Different microbiomes especially filamentous fungi and some bacterial species secrete a wide range of secondary metabolites, which are essential for plant development and many phenological responses [9]. Consequently, the microorganisms that are known for their positive effects on plant development and health might also be compromised due to climate change, in terms of exhibiting their desirable properties and their colonization capacity under certain conditions. Therefore, microorganisms present in the soil hold great importance in this regard, as they are vital constituent of nitrogen and carbon cycles and are also involved in the emission and removal of greenhouse gases such as CO2 and CH4, which in turn are mostly responsible for the climate change.

Advertisement

2. Drought stress effects on agricultural production

In nature, plants are exposed to various environmental stresses due to their sessile lifestyle. These different unfavorable factors negatively impact plant growth, productivity, and their geographic distribution. Plants may face many diverse stresses (e.g., drought, salinity, and pathogens) under field conditions individually or in combination, which might have a devastating effect on crop yield [10]. Water is the most essential resource for plants, and all the plant organs need to maintain 60–90% water content for sustainable activity. However, global climate change, caused by different anthropogenic activities and greenhouse gas emissions, has become more thoughtful worldwide, leading to drought conditions all over the world [11]. In agricultural technology, it is considered one of the main environmental stresses for plants. Due to the frequent changes in climate observed throughout the world, it has increased the severity of drought events for plants [12]. Important cereal crops are increasingly diminishing by over 10% yield due to drought stress, and it is still the main limiting factor of food production in numerous countries [13]. Decrease in plant metabolism and electrolyte disturbances in plant cells are major symptoms of drought stress, which automatically lead to their death. Because of inhibiting various morphological, physiological, and biochemical processes such as changes in leaf, root length, biomass photosynthesis, respiration, translocation, carbohydrate synthesis, nutrient metabolism, ion uptake, and growth promoters of plants are affected [14]. Also, it primarily prevents the photosynthesis system by causing an imbalance between light capture and utilization, due to which Rubisco activity is reduced and the amount of photosynthetic pigments, inhibiting leaf area and damaging the photosynthetic apparatus [15]. Similarly, it reduces the rate of carbon fixation by inhibiting metabolism or limiting carbon dioxide input into leaves. It also leads to various biochemical changes, such as an excessive accumulation of ROS including O2−, and H2O2, inside the host, which can further damage various tissues and cellular constituents such as nucleic acids and other biomolecules, resulting in cell death [16]. Furthermore, drought also lowers seedling vigor and affects germination by reducing water intake. Wilting, yellowing, discoloration, and leaf burning are the phenotypic signs observed in plants under drought condition [17]. Also, leaf senescence, drooping, leaf rolling, brittleness, scorching, limp leaves, premature fall, etiolation, wilting, turgidity, flower sagging are the other symptoms observed [18]. Drought stress also alters carbon permeability and transport networks by lowering cation (Ca2+, K+, and Mg2+) absorption by roots. They later can also limit development by preventing the activity of several critical enzymes that take part in nutrient digestion, uptake, translocation, and metabolism of plants [19]. It also has a negative impact on biogeochemical cycles, such as the nitrogen and carbon cycles, which further reduce the decomposition of organic matter that considerably lowers the uptake of water and minerals by the root system, thus increasing soil fertility. For instance, many drought-triggered plants decreasing in macronutrient absorption and translocation (K, N, and P) are found [20]. Many vital characteristics representing plant water relations in plants include relative water content (RWC), leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, leaf, and canopy temperatures [21]. These traits have also been found to be affected considerably during drought stress in plants [22]. So the above information shows that water scarcity affects plants at all growth stages but causes maximum damage during critical growth phases, such as during the seed development stage or reproductive phase, thereby reducing seed size, number, and quality, which are primarily responsible for substantial yield losses [23].

Advertisement

3. Potential strategies to mitigate drought stress in plants

Plants incorporate a wide range of morphological, physiological, and molecular defense responses contrary to drought, which prevents water loss, maintaining cellular water content, and water supply to vital parts [24]. Drought stress can be reduced through breeding, mass screening, and exogenous phytohormone production. Different strategies are used by plants to minimize stress, for example, by producing phytohormones (e.g., abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellins) and low-molecular-weight osmolytes (e.g., amino acids and polyols) and by modifying succulent leaves to reduce transpiration loss [25]. Also, a significant plant defense strategy in response to drought is the transcriptional and translational reprogramming of key genes and proteins that are involved in signal perception and transduction, transcription factors, and upregulation of drought tolerant genes, all of which drive drought resilience [26]. Plants protect themselves from drought-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) and other radicals owing to their efficient antioxidant system. During extended drought stress, they also synthesize an array of osmoprotectants such as prolines, soluble sugars, betaine, and spermines, to maintain cell turgor pressure. Over the past two decades, researchers have focused on transgenic approaches and other molecular breeding tools to increase drought resilience in different crops [27]. For instance, various biotechnological tools, such as CRISPR/Cas, RNAi, and transgenics, have made significant contributions to improving drought-resilient traits in both model and crop plants. But due to their high costs, complexity, ethical considerations, and toxicity concerns, their accessibility to farmers has been limited [27]. Furthermore, adaptive responses in plants are driven by complex genetic features involving several pathways, which have proven to be major impediments to long-term drought-tolerant crop improvement. Furthermore, the development of climate-resilient crops is required by integrating modern technological methods. The use of next-generation breeding approaches (genomic selection and genomic editing) and high-throughput phenotyping is desirable to develop crops that are exposed to different stresses [28]. Also, different bioinformatics tools have also been reported to overcome stress responses [29]. The recent advancement in genomics and genome editing technologies has been coming across various approaches of genetic study to produce climate-resilient crops [30]. Many other strategies are incorporated to grow climate-resilient/smart crop including SNP genotype, trait mapping, and plant breeding methods. The CRISPR/Cas technology has also been efficiently used in enhancing productivity in rice crop in fluctuating climatic conditions [31].

Advertisement

4. Microbial mechanisms governing drought stress tolerance

Microbes have the potential to promote plant growth directly and indirectly through several mechanisms. The indirect activation of plant growth involves a series of events by which microbes prevent the inhibition of plant growth and development induced by pathogens [32]. During direct activation, microbes biosynthesize bacterial compounds that promote the uptake of nutrients from the soil and stimulate plant growth and development [33]. Microbes trigger local or systemic stress mitigation response mechanisms that enable plants to survive and overcome the negative effects of abiotic stress conditions. The mechanisms governing microbial-mediated stress tolerance may include such as drought stress and help plants sustain growth and development through the production, mobilization of nutrients, and induction of the levels of hormones and organic phytostimulants [34]. Below are the fundamental mechanisms governing drought stress tolerance in plants.

4.1 Microbial production of aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase

Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) is a precursor of ethylene, and its production increases in plants during stress conditions. Plants enhance their ethylene production under drought stress, which inhibits plant growth by affecting root enlargement and seed germination. The production of higher ACC levels in plants is a strategy to combat severe drought stress [35]. A group of beneficial microbes have the potential to produce ACC deaminase that regulates plant growth and development by sequestering the plant-produced ACC, responsible for ethylene production in plants. A large number of microorganisms have been reported to produce ACC deaminase that in turn reduces ACC, thereby lowering the increased ethylene levels in plants under stress conditions [36]. These microbes play a vital role in plants’ adaptation to stress conditions. In particular, drought stress tolerance has been achieved in several plants through the production of ACC deaminase. Some of the prominent examples of the microbial production of ACC deaminase and its mitigation effects on drought stress in several plants have been summarized (Table 1). The ACC deaminase production by Bacillus subtilis Rhizo SF 48 strain conferred maximum seed and plant growth promotion in tomato plants under drought stress [37]. The underlying biochemical mechanisms for this improved drought stress tolerance included induction in the proline, SOD, and APX activities, whereas reduction in the MDA and H2O2 contents. The maize plant-associated rhizospheric microbial species; that is, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, Achromobacter xylosoxidans, and Leclercia adecarboxylata were reported to produce ACC deaminase that resulted into enhanced drought stress tolerance. The plants showed improved grain yield plant−1, photosynthetic rate, and stomatal conductance, enhanced chlorophyll a, total chlorophyll, and carotenoid contents under drought stress [38, 42]. Chandra et al. [40] reported ACC deaminase production in the wheat-associated microbes, that is, Variovorax paradoxus RAA3, Pseudomonas spp. Achromobacter spp. and Ochrobactrum anthropi DPC9 that improved plant growth and foliar nutrient concentrations in the wheat plants subjected to drought stress under glasshouse conditions. The plants also showed positive changes in the antioxidant properties under drought stress. Similarly, the rhizospheric Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas sp. conferred drought stress tolerance to wheat plants, which showed improved harvest index, water status, reactive oxygen species scavenging, osmolyte accumulation, chlorophyll and carotenoid content [40]. Moreover, the rhizospheric Ochrobactrum pseudogrignonense RJ12, Pseudomonas sp. RJ15, and B. subtilisRJ46 exhibited increased seed germination percentage, root length, shoot length, and dry weight of treated plants, Vigna mungo L. and Pisum sativum L under drought stress. The ACC deaminase production triggered the induction of ROS scavenging enzymes and cellular osmolytes, and higher leaf chlorophyll content. The microbial production of ACC deaminase showed growth improvement and drought stress tolerance in other plants such as Capsicum anum, Vitis vinifera, and Cyamopsis tetragonoloba [39, 41, 43].

Plant typeMicrobeEffects on growthBiochemical changesReference
Solanum lycopersicumBacillus subtilis Rhizo SF 48.Maximum seed (laboratory) and plant growth promotion (greenhouse)Increased Proline, SOD and APX activity.
Decrease in MDA, H2O2 contents
Gowtham et al. [37]
Zea maysLeclercia adecarboxylataEnhanced shoot and root length, shoot fresh and dry weight and root fresh and dry weight in maize seedlings under axenic conditionsDanish et al. [38]
Capsicum anumBulkhorderia cepacia, Citrobacter feurendiiPlant growth promotion under stress conditionsMaxton et al. [39]
Triticum aestivumVariovorax paradoxus RAA3; Pseudomonas spp. Achromobacter spp. Ochrobactrum anthropi DPC9Improved wheat plant growth and foliar nutrient concentrations under glasshouse experimentPositive changes in antioxidant propertiesChandra et al. [40]
grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)Strains of Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, and AchromobacterIncreased plant height, biomass of shoot and root organs, relative water contents, and net photosynthetic rate of leavesSignificant changes in IAA, abscisic acid, and malondialdehydeDuan et al. [41]
Z. maysPseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, Achromobacter xylosoxidans and L. adecarboxylataGrain yield plant-1, photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductanceEnhanced chlorophyll a, total chlorophyll and carotenoids contents under drought stressDanish et al. [42]
T. aestivumSerratia marcescens and Pseudomonas sp.Improved harvest indexImproved water status, reactive oxygen species, osmolyte accumulation, chlorophyll and carotenoids contentKhan and Singh [43]
Cyamopsis tetragonolobaStrains of Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, and StenotrophomonasGoyal et al. [44]
Vigna mungo L. and Pisum sativum L.Ochrobactrum pseudogrignonenseRJ12, Pseudomonas sp.RJ15 and B. subtilisRJ46increase seed germination percentage, root length, shoot length, and dry weight of treated plantsAn elevated production of ROS scavenging enzymes and cellular osmolytes; higher leaf chlorophyll contentSaikia et al. [45]

Table 1.

Microbial ACC deaminase production confers drought stress tolerance in plants.

4.2 Microbial production of phytohormone

Phytohormones such as indole acetic acid (IAA), gibberellins, ABA, ethylene, and cytokinin are organic chemical messengers that coordinate cellular events in plants and, therefore, play a crucial role in plant development and drought stress tolerance [44]. These phytohormones are generally produced by plants; however, they also produced by some plant-associated microorganisms. Phytohormones such as auxins indirectly regulate drought stress through modification of root growth and root hairs in a manner that enable plants to absorb maximum water and nutrients from the soil. In plants, auxins are produced through the tryptophan-dependent pathways [46]. Downward in the tryptophan pathway, indole-3-acetamide is produced that is converted into indole-3-acetaldoxime and tryptamine that further give indole-3-pyruvic acid, the final product [47]. The role of IAA in drought stress mitigation through inducing the drought signaling pathways has been reported in several studies [48]. Auxin production has the potential to induce the elongation of stems and coleoptiles of plants under stress conditions; thus, its production in the microbe-treated plants may trigger such modifications [49]. In a similar passion, plant-associated microbes also induce the production of plant gibberellins. These are diterpeniods and are responsible for the hyperactive elongation of stems under stress conditions. Gibberellins are in association with carotenes and isoprene, bioactive compounds [50]. Carotenes protect the plant cells from harmful photodynamic reactions through triggering the photosynthesis, whereas isoprene regulates the turgor pressure that provides stability to the cell membranes [51]. In plants, the cytokinin biosynthesis increases in association with auxin and regulation of developmental responses under abiotic stress conditions. Cytokinin mediates in the phosphorylation of sugars leading to cellular accumulation in cells and also helps to prevent the reverse diffusion of sugars [52]. This cytokinin-mediated competitive phosphorylation enables plant cells to adapt to stress and provides protection against the damaging effects of oxidative stress [53]. Abscisic acid is generally known as a universal stress hormone because of its very important in plant adaptation to stress condition. In plants, the stomatal closure and inhibitor of stomatal opening are the underling mechanisms of the ABA-mediated stress tolerance [54]. The ABA production also confers desiccation tolerance through regulation of gene expression [55].

The ethylene production in plants plays a significant role in regulation of plant growth and senescence. In interaction with other hormones, ethylene serves as a messenger hormone that regulates developmental processes, ranging from seed germination to the plant vegetative and reproductive stages [56].

The plant-associated microbes have the potential to produce phytohormones, which in turn help plants to adapt to the stress condition. Phytohormones mitigate stress through triggering a complex signaling network of genes and production of metabolites, which protect the inner cellular machinery and function as a response to environmental stress condition. The underlying mechanisms may include hormone regulation, and production of osmolytes and antioxidant enzymes.

4.3 Osmotic adjustment

Plants experience a sudden osmotic shock upon exposure to abiotic stresses. However, the plant-associated microbial communities and their interactions assist in osmotic adjustments. In response to drought stress, the plant-microbe interactions are governed by a series of biochemical and molecular changes leading to secretion of metabolites such as glycine, proline, organic acids, sugars, betaine, trehalose, calcium, chloride, and potassium ions. Proline is one of the most important osmolytes that is accumulated in plants and provides maintenance and protection to vital cellular organs as an adaptation to osmotic stress. Proline production has been reported in several rhizospheric bacteria [57]. Trehalose, a non-reducing sugar, is produced in plants under stress condition. Trehalose contains two glucose molecules that store energy for utilization under stress conditions. Trehalose biosynthesis in microbes is accelerated through the TPS/trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatases (TPS/TPP) pathway. Trehalose stabilizes turgor pressure and maintains osmotic adjustment in plant cells [58]. Production of organic acids has been one of the key mechanisms that microbes utilize to benefit the associated plants. Microbial inoculation of plants triggers the secretion of organic acids such as oxalic acid, malic acid, citric acid, and minerals, for example, chlorine, potassium, and sodium. These are very important for metabolic reactions, maintenance of osmoregulation, and nutrient availability in plant cells [59].

4.4 Microbial production of exopolysaccharides for drought stress mitigation

Exopolysaccharides are long-chain polymers of repeating sugar units (e.g., glucose, galactose, and rhannose) [60]. Exopolysaccharides play a crucial role by forming hydrophilic biofilms, which provide protection against aridness during osmotic stress. Exopolysaccharides enhance the water-retaining potential and regulate the distribution of biological carbon sources in the soil. Microbes protect the roots from dehydration and maintain the moisture content by forming sheaths of exopolysaccharides [61]. Microbes release exopolysaccharides in the soil as slime ingredients comprising van der Waals linkages, anion adsorption interactions, and cation hydrogen bridges, which improve the biological properties of the soil [62]. The vital microbe-plant interaction regulates the production of biofilms, which facilitate microbial attachment to the plant roots, and imparts a strong root adhering capability. In conclusion, the microbial production of exopolysaccharide is one of the important strategies that protect plants against the damaging effects of abiotic stresses including drought stress [63].

4.5 Effects of microbial volatile organic compounds against osmotic stress

The plant growth-promoting microbes produce volatile compounds, which increase plant growth and development, iron uptake, photosynthesis, and overall crop productivity. Organic acid production helps plants against disease-causing pathogens. The stress-induced organic compounds such as 2-pentylfuran, 3-hydroxy-2-butanone, and 2,3-butanediol play an important role in plant growth and development [64]. These compounds regulate stomatal closure and impart systemic stress resistance, and thus ensure plant growth and development under abiotic stress conditions [65]. These volatile compounds help boost plant growth by acting as insect repellents owing to their strong odor. The microbial production of these compounds triggers stress tolerance in the associated plants through inducing the biosynthesis of ROS scavengers and gene expression.

4.6 Microbial induction of antioxidant machinery in plants

The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is induced in plants under osmotic stress. These include hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide, singlet oxygen, radicals, alkoxy radicals, and superoxide anion radicals. The ROS production triggers irreversible damages to lipids, proteins, and DNA, affecting the redox regulation [66]. Plants induce antioxidant defense systems involving enzymatic and non-enzymatic pathways to protect against the oxidative damage during osmotic stress. Several enzymes (e.g., glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, and ascorbate peroxidase) and non-enzymatic components (e.g., ABA, cysteine, and glutathione) catalyze the biosynthetic pathways of antioxidant pathways [67, 68]. The microbial inoculation of plants triggers the antioxidant biosynthetic pathways in the soil and, thus, confers drought stress tolerance. Kaushal and Wani [69] and Ilyas et al. [70] reported the secretion of phenolic components by various microbes (e.g., algae, zatinomycetes, and fungi) upon exposure of plants to stress condition. The microbe-plant interaction confers stress tolerance through regulating the ROS biosynthesis and maintaining a homeostatic balance between ROS and their removal. Overall, the ROS scavenging ability of PGPR regulates the antioxidant enzymes and may provide a solid barrier against abiotic stress.

4.7 Stimulation of stress-response genes by plant-microbe interactions

The microbial inoculation of plants confers stress tolerance by triggering the expression of genes involved in plant defense against abiotic stresses. Under drought stress in plants, the expression of stress-responsive genes is modulated, which is necessary for optimization of plant growth and development. There are numerous stress-responsive genes and proteins, which are involved in plant-microbe interactions and the resulting stress tolerance. These include sHSP, CaPR-10, dehydrin-like protein (Cadhn), 11-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase (P5CR), pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase (P5CDH), and vacuolar ATPases [71]. Depending on the role of the encoded proteins, the expression of these stress-responsive genes can be categorized into functional or regulatory proteins as revealed by microarray studies. The stress-responsive functional proteins include water channel transporters, detoxification enzymes, osmolyte biosynthesis enzymes, macromolecule protection factors, and proteases [71, 72]. The stress-responsive genes encoding regulatory proteins include transcription factors, ABA biosynthetic factors, and phosphate kinases. The microbial-plant interaction-based expression and upregulation of stress-responsive genes can be harnessed as a powerful tool for enhancing plant drought stress tolerance.

Advertisement

5. Microbes and drought stress mitigation

5.1 Plant growth-promoting rhizospheric bacteria

The plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) have the potential to mitigate drought stress and alleviate the negative effects of climate change on plant growth and development in a sustainable way [73]. These microbes trigger the onset of biochemical changes, which enable the plant to set a response to alleviate drought stress [74]. The underlying mechanisms include optimization of exopolysaccharides and phytohormone production, antioxidant defense system, and cyclic metabolic pathways, involved in the deposition of sugars, polyamines, amino acids, and heat-shock protein synthesis [75]. Several studies have reported the positive effects of PGPR on plant growth and development under drought stress (Table 2). Particularly in wheat, the inoculation of PGPR mitigated drought stress. In one study, Li et al. [76] reported growth improvement in wheat plants upon inoculation with the Actinomycetes, Streptomyces pactum Act12. The bacterial inoculation significantly increased the overexpression of several genes including P5CS, EXPA6, SnRK2, and EXPA2. Overall, the root length, shoot length, and fresh biomass were significantly increased. Enhanced levels of sugars and antioxidant enzymes were detected in the exposed seedlings under stress condition. Inoculation of wheat plants with Pseudomonas libanensis EU-LWNA-33 increased the root length and biomass under drought stress [77]. The biochemical analysis revealed an increased production of osmolytes, that is, proline and glycine betaine. At the cellular level, proline and glycine betaine production regulates osmotic homeostasis, as well as the phosphorus solubilization and uptake. Phosphorus availability is a crucial factor in the overall growth and development of plants. In this study, the inoculated strains showed solubilization of phosphorus. In previous studies, Jochum et al. [79] reported drought stress tolerance in wheat and maize plants when inoculated with Bacillus sp. 12D6 and Enterobacter sp. 16i. The inoculation improved root length, surface area, and plant productivity. The study further revealed that Bacillus sp. 12D6 was comparatively more effective in countering drought stress. This enhanced drought stress mitigation was possible due to the production of phytohormones such as IAA and salicylic acid. In another study, Raheem et al. [80] isolated and investigated the impact of PGPR, namely Bacillus, Moraxella, Enterobacter, and Pseudomonas, on wheat plants under drought stress. Biochemical analysis of the inoculated stressed plants revealed production of increased levels of auxin that obviously helped plants to avoid the negative impact of drought stress. It was further concluded that the enhanced auxin production triggered by the Bacillus species improved the field capacity by 10% and crop yield by 34%. The drought stress mitigation effects of the plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB), Azospirillum were investigated in wheat plants [78]. The stressed plants showed drought tolerance, which was attributed to the microbial-mediated production of phytohormones, solutes, ACC deaminase, exopolysaccharides, chlorophyll synthesis, and increased mineral solubilization.

Host plantMicrobeUnderlying mechanismReference
Triticum aestivumStreptomyces pactum Act12Increased overexpression of EXPA2, EXPA6, P5CS, and SnRK2, increased root length, shoot length, sugar content, MDA, and ABALi et al. [76]
T. aestivumPseudomonas libanensis EU-LWNA-33Increased ACC deaminase, osmolytes, and P solubilizationKour et al. [77]
T. aestivumAzospirillumIncreased phytohormone, solute formation, and exopolysaccharide productionPriyanka et al. [78]
T. aestivum and Zea maysBacillus sp. (12D6) and Enterobacter sp. (16i)Increased IAA and SAJochum et al. [79]
T. aestivumPGPR (Bacillus, Enterobacter, Moraxella, and Pseudomonas)Increased auxinRaheem et al. [80]
Setaria italicaAcinetobacter calcoaceticus EU-LRNA-72 and EU-FTF-6Increased glycine betaine, chlorophyll a and b, proline, and sugars, decreased LPOKour et al. [81]
Mentha piperitaPseudomonas fluorescens WCS417”r and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (GB03)Increased phenolic compounds and antioxidant defenseChiappero et al. [82]
Glycine maxBacillus strains UFGS1, UFGS2, UFGRB2, and UFGRB3Expression of Gmdreb1a, increased stomatal conductance, transpiration and Fv/FmMartins et al. [83]
Cicer arietinumPseudomonas putida and B. amyloliquefaciensIncreased chlorophyll, antioxidant enzymes, and protein contentKumar et al. [84]

Table 2.

Rhizospheric plant-growth-promoting bacteria and drought stress mitigation in plants.

Drought stress imposes osmotic and oxidative stresses, which negatively affect the crops’ growth and productivity. Microbial inoculation has been the most preferred strategy to reduce stress-associated losses in crop plants. In this connection, Kour et al. [81] investigated the effects of bacterial inoculation on foxtail millet crop subjected to drought stress. Inoculation of plants with Acinetobacter calcoaceticus EU-LRNA-72 and Penicillium sp. EU-FTF-6 showed drought stress tolerance. The drought stress mitigation was mainly due to the accumulation of osmolytes (proline and glycine betaine) and increased levels of chlorophyll a and b contents. In this study, the increased proline and glycine betaine levels improved osmotic adjustment and membrane integrity, while the increased chlorophyll content resulted in plant growth and development.

In one study, Chiappero et al. [82] investigated the positive impact of PGPR inoculation on peppermint subjected to drought stress. Two rhizospheric bacteria, Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS417r and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens GB03, were used in the inoculation and drought experiment. The results revealed a significant improvement in drought stress tolerance, which was attributed mainly to the upregulation of the antioxidant defense system and phenolic components.

The effects of bacterial inoculation on drought stress were further tested in soybean plants [83]. The plants were inoculated with Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacillus cereus, and B. subtilis strains. The inoculation of plants with these strains resulted into an improved efficiency of the photosystem II (PS-II) and maintained the overall photosynthetic rates of the plants, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance, which in turn improved the overall growth of inoculated plants compared with that of control plants. In addition, the genomic analysis revealed that the overexpression of Gmdreb1a might partly be responsible for drought stress mitigation.

The PGPBs have proven their potential as ecofriendly biofertilizers that can alleviate the negative effects of drought stress on plants. In a previous study, the PGPR strains, Pseudomonas putida and B. amyloliquefaciens, were isolated from alkaline soils and then were used in the inoculation of chickpea plants under drought stress in the greenhouse and in vitro experiments [84]. The inoculation of plants with the strains in combination showed increased chlorophyll content, osmolyte production, and improved photosynthesis and biomass compared with plants inoculated with a single strain. In conclusion, the PGPR enhances the overall growth and development, as well as the biotic and abiotic stress tolerance of plants through a wide range of mechanisms.

5.2 Endophytic bacteria and fungi

Endophytes bacteria and fungi reside in different organs and tissues of plants and establish symbiotic relationship. The endophytes get their prepared food, while plants are benefited in different ways such as access to limited nutrients in the soil and biotic and abiotic stress tolerance. Endophytes have been specifically focused due to their crucial role in abiotic stress tolerance of plants [85]. It was previously reported that endophytes assist their host plants to increase their biomass under stress conditions [86]. However, different plant species showed variable levels of endophytic-mediated biomass accumulation under stress condition. For example, eudicots and C4 plants exhibited increased biomass accumulation compared with C3 and monocots [87].

Endophytic microbes play a very important role in reducing the damaging effects of abiotic stresses on plants. Several studies have demonstrated the drought stress mitigation in plants with endophytic bacterial inoculation (Table 3). Previously, Singh et al. [88] investigated the inoculation effects of endophytic bacterial strains, Trichoderma T42 and Pseudomonas on the growth and metabolic alterations in rice plants subjected to drought stress. The inoculated plants showed significantly improved metabolic activity such as induction of the antioxidant enzymes, and increases in the total polyphenolic content, which in turn, conferred oxidative stress tolerance. In another study, rice seedlings were treated with Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus strain Pal5, and the drought stress tolerance was tested in the inoculated and uninoculated plants [89]. The plants were subjected to various drought stress levels for 15 days. The inoculated plants showed increased levels of proline and glycine betaine, which conferred the plants drought stress tolerance. Molecular analysis revealed relative expression of several genes such as cat, gor, sod, BADH, and P5CR. In conclusion, inoculation with G. diazotrophicus mitigated the effects of drought stress on rice plants.

Microbe typeHostUnderlying mechanismReference
Endophytic bacteriaOryza sativa L.Trichoderma T42 and PseudomonasPAL expression, polyphenolsSingh et al. [88]
O. sativa L.Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus Pal5Expression of gor, cat, P5CR, sod, and BADH
Increased proline and glycine betaine production
Filgueiras et al. [89]
Glycine maxEndophytes (LHL10 and LHL06)Expression of GmHsp90A2 and GmHsp90A1 increased SOD and decreased LPOBilal et al. [90]
Foxtail milletEU- LRNA-72 and EU-FTF-6Increased glycine betaine, chlorophyll a and b, proline, and sugarsKour et al. [81]
Sorghum bicolor L.Streptomyces laurentii EU-LWT3–69 and Penicillium sp. strain EU-DSF-10Increased osmolytes, ACC and deaminase, solubilize P and reduced LPOKour et al. [91]
Lactuca sativaCAM4Reduced MDA, and increased proline, chlorophyll a and b and carotenoidsSilambarasan et al. [92]
Endophytic fungiBroccoliYNA59Increased sugar, protein, chlorophyll content, ABA, JA, and SAKim et al. [93]
Lolium Arundinaceum, Nicotiana benthamianaNeotyphodium coenophialumIncreased gaseous exchange and antioxidant enzyme production, altered gene expression and osmotic balanceDastogeer et al. [94]
MycorrhizaeG. maxArbuscular mycorrhizal fungusIncreased proline, glycine, and soluble sugars, reduced MDA contentGrümberg et al. [95]
Fragaria ananassa Duch.Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungusIncreased Zn, AA enzyme and water uptakeMoradtalab et al. [96]
Trifoliate orangeFunneliformis mosseaeIncreased phenolic contents, terpenes, root exudates and coumarins, reduced alkanes, ester, and amidesCheng et al. [97]
Triticum spp.Glomus mosseaeDecreased 6-SFT, SOD and sulfur metabolism; increased genetic diversityBernardo et al. [98]
Ephedra foliata BoissAMF (Glomus etunicatum, Glomus intraradices, and Glomus mosseae)Increased gene expression, mineral solubilization, hormone production, expression, osmolytes and antioxidant enzymesAl-Arjani et al. [99]

Table 3.

Microbial mitigation of drought stress in plants.

The effects of bacterial inoculation on the growth of Glycine max were evaluated under drought stress [90]. Inoculation with bacterial strains, LHL10 and LHL06, produced positive improvement in plant growth under stress condition. The inoculated plants showed increased roots, shoot length, leaf area, and dry biomass. The underlying mechanisms included an increase in HSP90 expression levels: lipid peroxidation, increased calcium levels, and phosphate solubilization. In a study, Kour et al. [91] investigated the effects of Streptomyces laurentii EU-LWT3–69 and Penicillium sp. EU-DSF-10 on sorghum plants subjected to drought stress. Bioavailability of phosphorus to plants is reduced under drought stress. However, the plant-associated microbes contain the active form of phosphate that is provided to plants to counter the stress effects. Both the strains used in the study might solubilize phosphate and ensure its availability to the plants. The biochemical alterations mediated by bacterial inoculation included an increase in the proline and glycine betaine levels and chlorophyll content, while a decrease in the lipid peroxidation. Overall, the study suggested that bacterial inoculation enabled the plants to grow better under the drought stress.

Microbial inoculation confers drought stress tolerance to the plants partly by an induction in the growth hormone levels and acquisition to soil mineral content. This was demonstrated in a study conducted by Kang et al. [100], in which the alfalfa plants were inoculated with two Enterobacter ludwigii strains, namely AFFR02 and Mj1212. The inoculated plants were assessed under drought stress for hormones and mineral concentrations. The results showed that the inoculated plants were more drought-tolerant than the uninoculated plants. Growth attributes such as fresh and dry biomass, root/shoot elongation, and stalk diameter were significantly higher in the inoculated plants than in the uninoculated plants. It was also observed that the treated plants accumulated higher levels of flavonoids, minerals, and ABA than those of untreated plants. In a previous study, Silambarasan et al. [92] used Rhodotorula mucilaginosa strain CAM4 in the inoculation of Lactuca sativa subjected to drought stress. The inoculated plants showed drought tolerance at various developmental stages. The treated plants showed a clear increase in the growth, dry biomass, root proliferation, and stem elongation as compared with the untreated plants. The inoculation caused a significant increase in the content of chlorophyll, carotenoids, and proline, while a decrease in the malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, indicating lipid peroxidation.

Fungal endophytic species have been extensively studied for their positive effects on plant growth, stress tolerance, and disease resistance. They exert their positive effects through production of growth hormones, siderophores, secondary metabolites, and phosphate solubilization. Several studies have demonstrated the drought stress-mitigating effects of fungal inoculation on plants (Table 3). Fungal endophytes, specifically isolated from desert plants, have shown promising results when used for stress mitigation in crop plants. Desert plants are usually exposed to high magnitudes of drought conditions and thus may harbor fungal endophytes that may confer drought and salt stress tolerance under arid environments. Jain et al. [101] used halotolerant fungal endophytic strains, namely Neocamarosporium chichastianum, Neocamarosporium goegapense, and Periconia macrospinosa in the inoculation of tomato and cucumber seedlings. The treated plants showed stress tolerance, which was evident from the increased plant growth, chlorophyll content, proline, and antioxidant enzyme levels.

Osmotic adjustment is one of the key physiological mechanisms, which have been observed in the drought-tolerant plants. Endophytic fungal strains confer drought tolerance in plants by maintaining osmotic balance and water uptake efficiency. In one study, Dastogeer et al. [94] investigated the role of the fungal endophyte Neotyphodium coenophialum in the drought tolerance of Lolium arundinaceum. The results revealed that the treated plants had high drought tolerance than the untreated plants. The underlying mechanism of this enhanced tolerance was dependent on the osmotic balance and improved water uptake efficiency, which in turn enhanced the gene expression and photosynthesis rate. In addition, drought tolerance was achieved in Nicotiana benthamiana, when inoculated with fungal endophytes isolated from a Nicotiana plant. Overall, the fungal endophytes contribute to the drought tolerance trait mainly by increasing the water-use efficiency, nutrient uptake and maintaining the ion homeostasis to induce stress tolerance in the associated plants.

5.3 Mycorrhizae

Mycorrhizae are fungal species that establish a symbiotic relationship with higher plants and play a significant role in plant growth, nutrient acquisition, soil fertility, and biotic and abiotic stress tolerance. They have interspecific functionality and are generally host-specific [102]. The endophytic microbes induce stress tolerance in the associated plants mainly through producing phytohormones and induction of the synthesis of secondary metabolites. On the contrary, arbuscular mycorrhizae confer stress tolerance to host plants by maintaining a steady flow of water and nutrient absorption from the soil [103].

The role of arbuscular mycorrhizae in drought stress tolerance of plants has been documented in several previous studies (Table 3). In one study, the impact of inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal strains, namely Septoglomus constrictum, Glomus sp., and Glomus aggregatum was studied in soybean, which is highly sensitive to abiotic stress [95]. The plants were subjected to drought stress after inoculation, and the biochemical, physiological, and molecular attributes were investigated. The treated plants showed increased levels of soluble sugars, proline, and glycine betaine and reduced MDA levels. The increased osmolyte levels in the treated plants conferred increased protection against the drought stress, while the lowered MDA content reduced the osmotic stress. The induction of phenolic compounds is one of the key mechanisms through which plants generate a response not only to infectious diseases but also to drought stress. In one study, Cheng et al. [97] used Funneliformis mosseae in the inoculation of trifoliate orange. The inoculated plants exhibited a marked increase in several growth attributes such as stem elongation, leaf number, leaf area, and root architecture. Biochemical analysis revealed induction in the contents of coumarin, terpene, and phenolic contents in the root exudates of the treated plants as compared with those of untreated plants. The drought stress tolerance in the inoculated plants was attributed to the induction of phenolic components, as they reduce oxidative stress in plants. In a similar study, a mycorrhizal fungal strain, Glomus mosseae was used to inoculate bread and durum wheat cultivars, and the plants were then exposed to drought stress [98]. The drought stress tolerance mechanism was evaluated through measurement of growth parameters and proteomics analysis. The inoculated plants showed increased dry weight, and the two genotypes responded differently to the fungal inoculation in terms of stress tolerance. A significant upregulation in the osmolytes concentrations was observed. Moreover, the inoculated plants accumulated lower ethylene levels an indication of stress tolerance.

Oxidative stress triggers the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which further causes irreversible damages to the macromolecules and key enzymes. Microbes have an ameliorating impact on oxidative stress in plants. Drought stress imposes oxidative stress on plants with associated growth and yield reduction. Plants respond to ROS generation by triggering the induction of ROS scavengers, which protect the cellular machinery. In one study, Zou et al. [104] used Gigaspora margarita and Glomus intraradices strains in the inoculation of host plants subjected to drought stress. Molecular analysis revealed upregulation of the expression of GintSOD, GmarCuZnSOD, GintPDX1, and GintMT1 in the inoculated plants. Moreover, it was concluded that the drought stress tolerance mechanism also involved reduction in the cytoplasmic protein levels and regulation of redox status through synthesis of pyridoxamine. The drought-associated secondary stresses negatively impact both quality and quantity of crop plants. However, these negative effects can be efficiently mitigated through inoculation of various AMF strains. In one study, Al-Arjani et al. [99] isolated three AMF strains, namely Glomus mosseae, Glomus etunicatum, and Glomus intraradices from the rhizosphere of Acacia gerrardii. These strains were used to inoculate the Ephedra foliata Boiss plants, subjected to drought stress. Compared with the untreated plants, the treated plants showed a significant increase in the chlorophyll and carotenoid contents. In addition, the treated plants showed increased levels of sucrose-phosphate synthase and osmolyte levels, which might be responsible for the enhanced drought stress tolerance. In another study, Moradtalab et al. [96] inoculated strawberry seedlings with AMF and silicon to evaluate their combined effects against drought stress. It was observed that the AMF and silicone inoculation caused a marked increase in the water uptake, mineral content, and overall biomass. The antioxidant defense system was also triggered, which reduced the drought-associated damages and conferred stress tolerance.

Advertisement

6. Conclusion and prospects

Climate change tends to increase the global temperatures, which have devastated impacts on agricultural production. Furthermore, the rapid industrialization and increase in the world population have put a lot of burden on agriculture to produce more food and feed from the existing crop varieties, and land and water resources. Drought tolerance in plants is a multigenic trait and can be enhanced in a meaningful way by adoption of multi-pronged strategy. Endophytic and rhizospheric microbes have well-established mechanisms to support plants in nutrient acquisition, stress tolerance, and disease resistance. In this connection, microbes with high potential of osmolytes and siderophore production, phosphate solubilization, and nitrogen assimilation should be selected for plant inoculation. Also, the microbial induction of the genes involved in ROS scavenging may help plants to overcome the negative effects of drought stress. Inoculation experiments should involve mixtures or consortium of microbes rather than individual microbial strains. Some recent experiments have used mixtures of diverse microbial strains, and it was suggested that a microbial consortium would have broad impacts on the plant growth and productivity under drought stress. Furthermore, the modern and state-of-the-art gene sequencing and editing tools could be used in genomic studies, which would involve identification, cloning, and functional characterization of target genes in the selected microbes with high potential of conferring drought stress tolerance. These efforts could be combined with approaches of system biology studies, which would further explore the microbial-mediated alterations in metabolic profiles under drought stress. An important consideration would be to combine the complex genetic networks with those of metabolic events, which are lying at the core of plant-microbe interaction under environmental stresses including drought stress.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Fatma, Amelia, Zaran, and Zartasha for their precious time and patience in the accomplishment of this project.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Bastiaansen R, Doelman A, Eppinga MB, Rietkerk M. The effect of climate change on the resilience of ecosystems with adaptive spatial pattern formation. Ecology Letters. 2020;23(3):414-429
  2. 2. Makridakis S, Bakas N. FORTHCOMING: Risk and decision analysis journal forecasting and uncertainty: A survey. Risk and Decision Analysis. 2016;6(1):37-64
  3. 3. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate change and land: An IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. 2019. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/download/
  4. 4. Le Houérou HN. Climate change, drought and desertification. Journal of Arid Environments. 1996;34(2):133-185
  5. 5. Arora NK. Impact of climate change on agriculture production and its sustainable solutions. Environmental Sustainability. 2019;2:95-96. DOI: 10.1007/s42398-019-00078-w
  6. 6. Raza A, Razzaq A, Mehmood SS, Zou X, Zhang X, Lv Y, et al. Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome: A review. Plants. 2019;8(2):34
  7. 7. Finkel OM, Castrillo G, Paredes SH, González IS, Dangl JL. Understanding and exploiting plant beneficial microbes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2017;38:155-163
  8. 8. Manzar N, Singh Y, Kashyap AS, Sahu PK, Rajawat MV, Singh A, et al. Biocontrol potential of native Trichoderma spp. against anthracnose of great millet (sorghum bicolour L.) from Tarai and hill regions of India. Biological Control. 2021;152:104474
  9. 9. Egamberdieva D, Wirth SJ, Alqarawi AA, Abd_Allah, Elsayed F, & Hashem, Abeer. Phytohormones and beneficial microbes: Essential components for plants to balance stress and fitness. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:2104
  10. 10. Teshome DT, Zharare GE, Naidoo S. The threat of the combined effect of biotic and abiotic stress factors in forestry under a changing climate. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020;11:601009. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.601009
  11. 11. Shen M, Huang W, Chen M, Song B, Zeng G, Zhang Y. (micro) plastic crisis: Un-ignorable contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;254:120138
  12. 12. Canarini A, Schmidt H, Fuchslueger L, Martin V, Herbold CW, Zezula D, et al. Ecological memory of recurrent drought modifies soil processes via changes in soil microbial community. Nature Communications. 2021;12(1):1-14
  13. 13. Lau JA, Lennon JT. Rapid responses of soil microorganisms improve plant fitness in novel environments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(35):14058-14062
  14. 14. Kapoor D, Bhardwaj S, Landi M, Sharma A, Ramakrishnan M, Sharma A. The impact of drought in plant metabolism: How to exploit tolerance mechanisms to increase crop production. Applied Sciences. 2020;10(16):5692
  15. 15. Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA. Plant Drought Stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. In: Lichtfouse E, Navarrete M, Debaeke P, Veronique S, Alberola S, editors. Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht; 2009. pp. 153-188. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_12
  16. 16. Gill SS, Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2010;48(12):909-930
  17. 17. Ullah A, Sun H, Yang X, Zhang X. Drought coping strategies in cotton: Increased crop per drop. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2017;15(3):271-284
  18. 18. Khan A, Pan X, Najeeb U, Tan DK, Yuen F, Shah Z, et al. Coping with drought: Stress and adaptive mechanisms, and management through cultural and molecular alternatives in cotton as vital constituents for plant stress resilience and fitness. Biological Research. 2018;51:47. DOI: 10.1186/s40659-018-0198-z
  19. 19. Hussain SS, Mehnaz S, Siddique KHM. Harnessing the plant microbiome for improved abiotic stress tolerance. In: Egamberdieva D, Ahmad P, editors.Plant Microbiome: Stress Response. Microorganisms for Sustainability. Vol 5. Singapore: Springer; 2018. pp. 21-43. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-5514-0_2
  20. 20. Suriyagoda L, De Costa WAJM, Lambers H. Growth and phosphorus nutrition of rice when inorganic fertiliser application is partly replaced by straw under varying moisture availability in sandy and clay soils. Plant and Soil. 2014;384(1):53-68
  21. 21. Farooq M, Aziz T, Wahid A, Lee D-J, Siddique KHM. Chilling tolerance in maize: Agronomic and physiological approaches. Crop and Pasture Science. 2009;60(6):501-516
  22. 22. Naylor D, Coleman-Derr D. Drought stress and root-associated bacterial communities. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2018;8:2223
  23. 23. Queiroz MS, Oliveira CES, Steiner F, Zuffo AM, Zoz T, Vendruscolo EP, et al. Drought stresses on seed germination and early growth of maize and sorghum. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2019;11(2):310-318
  24. 24. Gupta A, Rico-Medina A, Caño-Delgado AI. The physiology of plant responses to drought. Science. 2020;368(6488):266-269
  25. 25. Siddique MRB, Hamid AIMS, Islam MS. Drought stress effects on water relations of wheat. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica. 2000;41:35-39
  26. 26. Rahdari P, Hoseini SM. Drought stress: A review. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production. 2012;3(10):443-446
  27. 27. Fang Y, Xiong L. General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2015;72(4):673-689
  28. 28. Qaim M. Role of new plant breeding technologies for food security and sustainable agricultural development. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 2020;42(2):129-150
  29. 29. Varshney RK, Singh VK, Kumar A, Powell W, Sorrells ME. Can genomics deliver climate-change ready crops? Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2018;45:205-211
  30. 30. Laha A, Chakraborty P, Banerjee C, Panja AS, Bandopadhyay R. Application of Bioinformatics for Crop Stress Response and Mitigation. In: Roychowdhury R, Choudhury S, Hasanuzzaman M, Srivastava S, editors. Sustainable Agriculture in the Era of Climate Change. Springer, Cham; 2020. pp. 589-614. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-45669-6_25
  31. 31. Scheben A, Yuan Y, Edwards D. Advances in genomics for adapting crops to climate change. Current Plant Biology. 2016;6:2-10
  32. 32. Biswal AK, Mangrauthia SK, Raghurami Reddy M, Yugandhar P. CRISPR mediated genome engineering to develop climate smart rice: Challenges and opportunities. Seminars in Cell Developmental Biology. 2019;96:100-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.04.005
  33. 33. Ahmad A, Aslam Z, Naz M, Hussain S, Javed T, Aslam S, et al. Exogenous salicylic acid-induced drought stress tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under hydroponic culture. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0260556. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260556
  34. 34. Choudhary DK, Varma A, Tuteja N. Plant-Microbe Interaction: An Approach to Sustainable Agriculture. Berlin: Springer; 2016
  35. 35. Kour D, Yadav AN. Microbe mediated mitigation of drought stress in crops. Agricultural Letters. 2020;1:79-82
  36. 36. Houda T, Issam BS, Naïma KB. Effectiveness of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pantoea sp. Soil Science. 2013;158:442-453
  37. 37. Gowtham HG, Brijesh SS, Murali M, Shilpa N, Prasad M, Aiyaz M, et al. Induction of drought tolerance in tomato upon the application of ACC deaminase producing plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus subtilis Rhizo SF 48. Microbiological Research. 2020;234(2020):126422
  38. 38. Danish S, Zafar-Ul-Hye M, Hussain S, Riaz M, Qayyum MF. Mitigation of drought stress In maize through inoculation with drought tolerant ACC deaminase containing PGPR under axenic conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2020;52(1):49-60
  39. 39. Maxton A, Singh P, Masih SA. ACC deaminase-producing bacteria mediated drought and salt tolerance in Capsicum annuum. 2017. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2018;5:574-583. DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2017.1392574
  40. 40. Chandra D, Srivastava R, Gupta VVSR, Franco CMM, Sharma AK. Evaluation of ACC-deaminase-producing rhizobacteria to alleviate water-stress impacts in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 2019;65(5):387-403. DOI: 10.1139/cjm-2018-0636
  41. 41. Duan B, Li L, Chen G, Su-Zhou C, Li Y, Merkeryan H, et al. 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase-producing plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria improve drought stress tolerance in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021;12:706990. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.706990
  42. 42. Danish S, Zafar-Ul-Hye M, Mohsin F, Hussain M. ACC-deaminase producing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and biochar mitigate adverse effects of drought stress on maize growth. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0230615. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230615
  43. 43. Khan A, Singh AV. Multifarious effect of ACC deaminase and EPS producing pseudomonas sp. and Serratia marcescens to augment drought stress tolerance and nutrient status of wheat. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2021;37:198
  44. 44. Goyal D, Kumar S, Meena D, Swaroop SS, Pandey J. Selection of ACC deaminase positive, thermohalotolerant and drought tolerance enhancing plant growth-promoting bacteria from rhizospheres of Cyamopsis tetragonoloba grown in arid regions. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2021;74(4):519-535. DOI: 10.1111/lam.13633
  45. 45. Saikia J, Sarma RK, Dhandia R, Yadav A, Bharali R, Gupta VK, et al. Alleviation of drought stress in pulse crops with ACC deaminase producing rhizobacteria isolated from acidic soil of Northeast India. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:3560. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21921-w
  46. 46. Jogawat A, Yadav B, Lakra N, Singh AK, Narayan OP. Crosstalk between phytohormones and secondary metabolites in the drought stress tolerance of crop plants: A review. Physiologia Plantarum. 2021;172:1106-1132. DOI: 10.1111/ppl.13328
  47. 47. Zhao Y. Auxin biosynthesis and its role in plant development. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2010;61:49-64. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112308
  48. 48. Skubacz A, Daszkowska-Golec A, Szarejko I. The role and regulation of ABI5 (ABA-insensitive 5) in plant development, abiotic stress responses and phytohormone crosstalk. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7:1884. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01884
  49. 49. Fahad S, Nie L, Chen Y, Wu C, Xiong D, Saud S, et al. Crop plant hormones and environmental stress. In: Lichtfouse E, editor. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews. Cham: Springer; 2015. pp. 371-400. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09132-7_10
  50. 50. Ullah A, Nisar M, Ali H, Hazrat A, Hayat K, Keerio AA, et al. Drought tolerance improvement in plants: An endophytic bacterial approach. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2019;103:7385-7397. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-019-10045-4
  51. 51. Alagoz Y, Nayak P, Dhami N, Cazzonelli CI. Cis-carotene biosynthesis, evolution and regulation in plants: The emergence of novel signaling metabolites. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2018;654:172-184. DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2018.07.014
  52. 52. Mollah A, Pratiwi E. Application of various types of local microorganisms to the growth and production of two rice varieties. IOP Conference Series: Earth Environmental Science. 2020;575:012148. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/575/1/012148
  53. 53. Mok DW, Mok MC. Cytokinin metabolism and action. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2001;52:89-118. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.89
  54. 54. Wybouw B, De Rybel B. Cytokinin–a developing story. Trends in Plant Science. 2019;24:177-185. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.10.012
  55. 55. Bright J, Desikan R, Hancock JT, Weir IS, Neill SJ. ABA induced NO generation and stomatal closure in Arabidopsis are dependent on H2O2 synthesis. The Plant Journal. 2006;45:113-122. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02615.x
  56. 56. Sakata Y, Komatsu K, Takezawa D. ABA as a universal plant hormone. In: Lüttge U, Beyschlag W, Cushman J, editors. Progress in Botany. Berlin: Springer; 2014. pp. 57-96. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38797-5_2
  57. 57. Wen C-K. Ethylene in Plants. Berlin: Springer; 2014
  58. 58. Mohammadkhani N, Heidari R. Drought-induced accumulation of soluble sugars and proline in two maize varieties. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2008;3:448-453
  59. 59. Kahraman M, Sevim G, Bor M. The role of proline, glycinebetaine, and trehalose in stress-responsive gene expression. In: Hossain M, Kumar V, Burritt D, Fujita M, Mäkelä P, editors. Osmoprotectant- Mediated Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. Cham: Springer; 2019. pp. 241-256. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-27423-8_11
  60. 60. Chen H, Jiang J-G. Osmotic adjustment and plant adaptation to environmental changes related to drought and salinity. Environmental Reviews. 2010;18:309-319. DOI: 10.1139/a10-014
  61. 61. Bhagat N, Raghav M, Dubey S, Bedi N. Bacterial exopolysaccharides: Insight into their role in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2021;31:1045-1059. DOI: 10.4014/jmb.2105.05009
  62. 62. Nadeem SM, Ahmad M, Tufail MA, Asghar HN, Nazli F, Zahir ZA. Appraising the potential of EPS-producing rhizobacteria with ACCdeaminase activity to improve growth and physiology of maize under drought stress. Physiologia Plantarum. 2021;172:463-476. DOI: 10.1111/ppl.13212
  63. 63. Ilyas N, Mumtaz K, Akhtar N, Yasmin H, Sayyed R, Khan W, et al. Exopolysaccharides producing bacteria for the amelioration of drought stress in wheat. Sustainability. 2020;12:8876. DOI: 10.3390/su12218876
  64. 64. Naseem H, Ahsan M, Shahid MA, Khan N. Exopolysaccharides producing rhizobacteria and their role in plant growth and drought tolerance. Journal of Basic Microbiology. 2018;58:1009-1022. DOI: 10.1002/jobm.201800309
  65. 65. Ali F, Bano A, Fazal A. Recent methods of drought stress tolerance in plants. Plant Growth Regulation. 2017;82:363-375. DOI: 10.1007/s10725-017-0267-2
  66. 66. Mohammadipanah F, Zamanzadeh M. Bacterial mechanisms promoting the tolerance to drought stress in plants. In: Singh HB, Keswani C, Reddy MS, Sansinenea E, García-Estrada C, editors. Secondary Metabolites of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizomicroorganisms. Singapore: Springer; 2019. pp. 185-224. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-5862-3_10
  67. 67. Ahmad P, Jamsheed S, Hameed A, Rasool S, Sharma I, Azooz M, et al. Drought stress induced oxidative damage and antioxidants in plants. In: Ahmad P, editor. Oxidative Damage to Plants. New York, NY: Elsevier; 2014. pp. 345-367
  68. 68. Li B, Feng Y, Zong Y, Zhang D, Hao X, Li P. Elevated CO2-induced changes in photosynthesis, antioxidant enzymes and signal transduction enzyme of soybean under drought stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2020;154:105-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.05.039
  69. 69. Kaushal M, Wani SP. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria: Drought stress alleviators to ameliorate crop production in drylands. Annales de Microbiologie. 2016;66:35-42. DOI: 10.1007/s13213-015-1112-3
  70. 70. Ilyas M, Nisar M, Khan N, Hazrat A, Khan AH, Hayat K, et al. Drought tolerance strategies in plants: A mechanistic approach. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2021;40:926-944
  71. 71. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2007;58:221-227. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erl164
  72. 72. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Molecular Responses to Drought Stress. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1998
  73. 73. Aslam MM, Idris AL, Zhang Q , Weifeng X, Karanja JK, Wei Y. Rhizosphere microbiomes can regulate plant drought tolerance. Pedosphere. 2022;32:61-74. DOI: 10.1016/s1002-0160(21)60061-9
  74. 74. Ansari FA, Ahmad I. Alleviating drought stress of crops through PGPR: Mechanism and application. In: Singh DP, Gupta VK, Prabha R, editors. Microbial Interventions in Agriculture and Environment. Singapore: Springer; 2019. pp. 341-358. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-8383-0_11
  75. 75. Sinha D, Mukherjee S, Mahapatra D. Multifaceted potential of plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): An overview. In: Ahmad Malik J, editor. Handbook of Research on Microbial Remediation and Microbial Biotechnology for Sustainable Soil. Pennsylvania: IGI Global; 2021. pp. 205-268. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-7062-3.ch008
  76. 76. Li H, Guo Q , Jing Y, Liu Z, Zheng Z, Sun Y, et al. Application of Streptomyces pactum Act12 enhances drought resistance in wheat. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2020;39:122-132. DOI: 10.1007/s00344-019-09968-z
  77. 77. Kour D, Rana KL, Sheikh I, Kumar V, Yadav AN, Dhaliwal HS, et al. Alleviation of drought stress and plant growth promotion by Pseudomonas libanensis EU-LWNA-33, a drought-adaptive phosphorussolubilizing bacterium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences India Section B Biology Sciences. 2020b;90:785-795. DOI: 10.1007/s40011-019-01151-4
  78. 78. Priyanka JP, Goral RT, Rupal KS, Saraf M. Rhizospheric microflora: A natural alleviator of drought stress in agricultural crops. In: Sayyed RZ, editor. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria for Sustainable Stress Management. Singapore: Springer; 2019. pp. 103-115. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-6536-2_6
  79. 79. Jochum MD, Mcwilliams KL, Borrego EJ, Kolomiets MV, Niu G, Pierson EA, et al. Bioprospecting plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria that mitigate drought stress in grasses. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;10:2106. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb. 2019.02106
  80. 80. Raheem A, Shaposhnikov A, Belimov AA, Dodd IC, Ali B. Auxin production by rhizobacteria was associated with improved yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought stress. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2018;64:574-587. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2017.1362105
  81. 81. Kour D, Rana KL, Yadav AN, Sheikh I, Kumar V, Dhaliwal HS, et al. Amelioration of drought stress in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) by P-solubilizing drought-tolerant microbes with multifarious plant growth promoting attributes. Environmental Sustainability. 2020c;3:23-34. DOI: 10.1007/s42398-020-00094-1
  82. 82. Chiappero J, Del Rosario Cappellari L, Alderete LGS, Palermo TB, Banchio E. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria improve the antioxidant status in Mentha piperita grown under drought stress leading to an enhancement of plant growth and total phenolic content. Industrial Crops and Products. 2019;139:111553. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111553
  83. 83. Martins SJ, Rocha GA, De Melo HC, De Castro Georg R, Ulhôa CJ, De Campos Dianese É, et al. Plant-associated bacteria mitigate drought stress in soybean. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018;25:13676-13686. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-1610-5
  84. 84. Kumar M, Mishra S, Dixit V, Kumar M, Agarwal L, Chauhan PS, et al. Synergistic effect of pseudomonas putida and bacillus amyloliquefaciens ameliorates drought stress in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2016;11:e1071004. DOI: 10.1080/15592324.2015.1071004
  85. 85. Verma H, Kumar D, Kumar V, Kumari M, Singh SK, Sharma VK, et al. The potential application of endophytes in management of stress from drought and salinity in crop plants. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1729. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9081729
  86. 86. Barman J, Samanta A, Saha B, Datta S. Mycorrhiza. Resonance. 2016;21:1093-1104
  87. 87. Strobel GA. Endophytes as sources of bioactive products. Microbes and Infection. 2003;5:535-544. DOI: 10.1016/s1286-4579(03)00073-x
  88. 88. Singh DP, Singh V, Gupta VK, Shukla R, Prabha R, Sarma BK, et al. Microbial inoculation in rice regulates antioxidative reactions and defense related genes to mitigate drought stress. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:4818. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61140-w
  89. 89. Filgueiras L, Silva R, Almeida I, Vidal M, Baldani JI, Meneses CHSG. Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus mitigates drought stress in Oryza sativa L. Plant and Soil. 2020;451:57-73. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-019-04163-1
  90. 90. Bilal S, Shahzad R, Imran M, Jan R, Kim KM, Lee I-J. Synergistic association of endophytic fungi enhances Glycine max L. resilience to combined abiotic stresses: Heavy metals, high temperature and drought stress. Industrial Crops and Products. 2020;143:111931. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111931
  91. 91. Kour D, Rana KL, Kaur T, Sheikh I, Yadav AN, Kumar V, et al. Microbe-mediated alleviation of drought stress and acquisition of phosphorus in great millet (sorghum bicolour L.) by drought-adaptive and phosphorussolubilizing microbes. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology. 2020a;23:101501
  92. 92. Silambarasan S, Logeswari P, Cornejo P, Abraham J, Valentine A. Simultaneous mitigation of aluminum, salinity and drought stress in Lactuca sativa growth via formulated plant growth promoting Rhodotorula mucilaginosa CAM4. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2019;180:63-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.05.006
  93. 93. Kim Y-N, Khan MA, Kang S-M, Hamayun M, Lee I-J. Enhancement of drought-stress tolerance of Brassica oleracea var. italica L. by newly isolated Variovorax sp. YNA59. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2020;30:1500-1509. DOI: 10.4014/jmb.2006.06010
  94. 94. Dastogeer KMG, Chakraborty A, Sarker MSA, Akter MA. Roles of fungal endophytes and viruses in mediating drought stress tolerance in plants. International Journal of Agricultural Biology. 2020;24:1497-1512
  95. 95. Grümberg BC, Urcelay C, Shroeder MA, Vargas-Gil S, Luna CM. The role of inoculum identity in drought stress mitigation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soybean. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2015;51:1-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00374-014-0942-7
  96. 96. Moradtalab N, Hajiboland R, Aliasgharzad N, Hartmann TE, Neumann G. Silicon and the association with an arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungus (Rhizophagus clarus) mitigate the adverse effects of drought stress on strawberry. Agronomy. 2019;9:41. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy9010041
  97. 97. Cheng H-Q , Zou Y-N, Wu Q-S, Kuča K. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate drought stress in trifoliate Orange by regulating H+-ATPase activity and gene expression. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021;12:659694. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.659694
  98. 98. Bernardo L, Morcia C, Carletti P, Ghizzoni R, Badeck FW, Rizza F, et al. Proteomic insight into the mitigation of wheat root drought stress by arbuscular mycorrhizae. Journal of Proteomics. 2017;169:21-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2017.03.024
  99. 99. Al-Arjani A-BF, Hashem A, Abd Allah EF. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi modulates dynamics tolerance expression to mitigate drought stress in Ephedra foliata Boiss. Saudi Journal of Biological Science. 2020;27:380-394. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.10.008
  100. 100. Kang S-M, Khan M-A, Hamayun M, Kim L-R, Kwon E-H, Kang Y-S, et al. Phosphate-solubilizing Enterobacter ludwigii AFFR02 and bacillus megaterium Mj1212 rescues Alfalfa’s growth under post-drought stress. Agriculture. 2021;11:485. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11060485
  101. 101. Jain D, Phurailatpam L, Mishra S. Microbes-mediated mitigation of drought stress in plants: Recent trends and future challenges. In: Yadav A, Rastegari A, Yadav N, Kour D, editors. Advances in Plant Microbiome and Sustainable Agriculture. Singapore: Springer; 2020. pp. 199-218. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-3204-7_9
  102. 102. Sheteiwy MS, Ali DFI, Xiong Y-C, Brestic M, Skalicky M, Hamoud YA, et al. Physiological and biochemical responses of soybean plants inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Bradyrhizobium under drought stress. BMC Plant Biology. 2021;21:195. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-021-02949-z
  103. 103. Agapitos A, Togelius J, Lucas SM, Schmidhuber J, Konstantinidis A. Generating diverse opponents with multiobjective evolution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games, 2008. CIG’08. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE; 2008. pp. 135-142
  104. 104. Zou YN, Wu QS, Kuèa K. Unravelling the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in mitigating the oxidative burst of plants under drought stress. Plant Biology. 2021;23:50-57. DOI: 10.1111/plb.13161

Written By

Mohammad Sayyar Khan and Irba Zulfiqar

Submitted: 12 December 2022 Reviewed: 22 December 2022 Published: 06 March 2023