Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Combined Effects of Earthworms and Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) on the Phytoremediation Efficiency of Acacia mangium in Polluted Dumpsite Soil in Bonoua, Côte d’Ivoire

Written By

Bongoua-Devisme Affi Jeanne, Kouakou Sainte Adélaïde Ahya Edith, Hien Marie Paule, Ndoye Fatou, Guety Thierry and Diouf Diégane

Submitted: 22 September 2022 Reviewed: 31 October 2022 Published: 11 January 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.108825

From the Edited Volume

Heavy Metals - Recent Advances

Edited by Basim A. Almayyahi

Chapter metrics overview

164 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The impact of earthworms and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on the remediation in polluted dumpsite soil was performed in a greenhouse pot culture with Acacia mangium inoculated or not (control: T0) with Pontoscolex corethrurus (T1) and with Bradyrhizobium (T2); and inoculated with Pontoscolex corethrurus and Bradyrhizobium (T3). Our results showed the presence of Bradyrhizobium and/or earthworms significantly increase (P < 0.05) in the height (2-fold), total dry biomass weight (7- to 15-fold) and metal uptake of the plant (2 to 10-fold), as compared with the non-inoculated plant. The presence of both inoculants (Bradyrhizobium and earthworm) enhanced soil Pb/Ni/Cr mobility and bioavailability in metal-contaminated soil, and increased 15-fold the total plant biomass and 10-fold metal accumulation in plant biomass, as compared with plant inoculated with earthworms or Bradyrhizobium. In addition, the presence of earthworms and/or Bradyrhizobium promoted the phytoimmobilization process of Ni, Cr and Pb preferentially in Acacia mangium roots than in shoot tissue. Our experiments highlight the importance of soil organisms on the phytoremediation efficiency. It appears that earthworms and/or Bradyrhizobium have the potential to enhance the phytoextraction efficiency of plants in metal-contaminated soil.

Keywords

  • acacia
  • phytoremediation
  • inoculation
  • phytoimmobilization
  • bioavailability

1. Introduction

Acacia mangium Wild. is a tropical plant, which has the capacity to improve soil fertility [1], to interact with soil bacteria and soil fauna, particularly in the rhizosphere [2], and to extract metal from polluted soils [3, 4]. In fact, A.mangium can accumulate 93.5 mg kg−1 of copper (Cu) and 79 mg kg−1 of zinc (Zn) in its biomass, was able to tolerate high concentration of cadmium (Cd) [3], and can require 5 and 17 years to remove 79.8 kg ha−1 of Zn and 47 kg ha−1 of Cu, respectively [4]. So, the phytoremediation efficiency of A.mangium has been reported in numerous studies [5, 6] in which it has been demonstrated that the success of phytoremediation may not solely depend on the plant itself but also on the interaction of plant roots with soil microorganism and soil fauna and the availability of heavy metals accumulated in soil [2, 7], because the interaction between plants and beneficial rhizosphere bacteria can enhance biomass production and the tolerance of plants to heavy metals.

It has recently been shown that rhizosphere bacteria may improve metal solubility and availability by decreasing the soil pH or by producing chelators and siderophores [8, 9]. Rhizosphere bacteria such as Bradyrhizobium allorhizobium stimulate plant growth either directly or indirectly and have been successfully used to reduce plant stress in metal-contaminated soils and to increase phytoremediation efficiency [6, 7, 10]. Moreover, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are known to affect heavy metal mobility and availability to the plant through the release of chelating agents, acidification, phosphate solubilization, and redox changes; therefore, they have the potential to enhance phytoremediation processes [2, 11, 12].

Hence, an alternative method to enhance phytoextraction efficiency and to improve plant growth is by using rhizosphere bacteria such as PGPR and rhizobia [7].

However, in recent studies, the action of earthworms, particularly Pontoscolex corethrurus to improve plant metal uptake during phytoremediation in contaminated soils, has been demonstrated [13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. Furthermore, the beneficial effects of P. corethrurus earthworms on A. mangium growth and its Pb, Ni, and Cr uptake have also been showed [5]. It was noted that in the presence of P. corethrurus, A. mangium promoted the phytoimmobilization process for Ni, Cr, and Pb, but its effectiveness depends on the nature of the plant, its behavior toward metals, rhizosphere function, and metal speciation in different soil compartments involved in the phytoremediation process [5].

Thus, it is of interest to study the conjugated actions of P. corethrurus earthworm, symbiotic bacteria (Bradyrhizobium), and of a metal tolerant plant such as A. mangium in the remediation of metal-contaminated dumpsite soil of M’Plouessoue Park at Bonoua, where the previous studies [18, 19] have demonstrated that the concentration of Cr (130 mg.kg−1), Cd (81 mg.kg−1), Pb (118 mg.kg−1), and Ni (119 mg.kg−1) are far above the permissible limits such as Canadian environmental quality criteria for contaminated sites (CEPA) recommendation [20] and World Health Organization limit (WHO-limit) recommendation [21].

The principal aims of this research were to evaluate the effects of P. corethrurus and/or Bradyrhizobium on lead, chromium, and nickel phytoextraction by A. mangium in polluted dumpsite soil metal-contaminated soil.

Advertisement

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Soil sampling and analysis

The metal-contaminated soils were sampled from the abandoned dumping site located in M’Ploussoue Park, Bonoua, Ivory Coast, at latitude 5°16′N and longitude 3°36′W. Soil samples were collected at 18 different points from the surface horizon (0–30 cm) to cover the entire study area according to the random sampling technique.

The metal-contaminated soil samples were air-dried, sieved to 2 mm, and then were mixed and homogenized to obtain a composite sample. The composite sample was transferred to the laboratory for various analyses and their used for the pot experiment. Some properties of this metal-contaminated soil, which has been previously described by [18], are summarized in Table 1. The concentrations of Cd (81 mg kg−1), Cr (130 mg.kg−1), Pb (118 mg kg−1), and Ni (119 mg kg−1) in dumpsite soil are greater than limit values recommended for agricultural soil. However, previous studies performed in pot experiment with polluted soil and A. mangium5 have revealed that only lead, chromium, and nickel concentrations in plant biomass were above the detection limit. Thus, cadmium was not detectable in plant biomass. This stipulates that in the soil, Cd is neither mobile nor exchangeable and is therefore not bioavailable for plants. While for Pb, Ni, and Cr, these metals are bioavailable for plants [5] justifying the choice of the three metals used in this study.

Soil propertiesvalues
pH6.9 ± 0.2
Particle Size (%)Clay21.3 ± 2
Silt1.6 ± 0.3
Sand77.1 ± 5
Organic matter (mg.kg−1 dry soil)C22,600 ± 90
N2400 ± 16
MO38,872 ± 155
Metal (mg.kg−1 dry soil)Ni119 ± 13
Cd81 ± 11
Pb118 ± 19
Cr130.1 ± 16

Table 1.

Physicochemical and chemical properties of the contaminated soil used in the pot experiment. ± standard errors.

2.2 Biological material

Seeds of A. mangium were obtained from the CNRA (Centre National of Research Agronomy) at Oume, Ivory Coast). Seeds were treated with concentrated sulfuric acid (95%) to break hard seed dormancy before germination, as described by [22]. The treated seeds were pregerminated in a Petri dish containing 0.8% water-agar medium (w/v) and sterilized for 30 min at 110°C. Then, the Petri dish was stored at room temperature (30°C) in the dark for 72 hours, after packing with aluminum paper. Before germination in the Petri dish, three pregerminated seedlings were transplanted into polyethylene plastic nursery bags (15×40×150 cm) filled with polluted soil sieved at 2 mm. One month after transplantation in the plastic nursery bags, one seedling of uniform size was transferred into perforated pots filled with 5 kg of dry polluted soil.

Bradyrhizobium ORS strains were obtained from the collection of the Laboratory of Soil Microbiology by Institute Research Senegal Agricultural (IRSA), Dakar. Bradyrhizobium ORS strains immobilized in an alginate ball were suspended in sterile buffer solution (23 g K2HPO4, 14.6 g KH2PO4, and adjusted at 1liter of distilled water). Five milliliters of Bradyrhizobium solution was introduced around the roots of the seedlings after transplantation into plastic pots and then after 1 week. The uninoculated treatment (plant uninoculated with Bradyrhizobium) received a similar amount of buffer solution with sterilized inoculum to minimize any possible variation in soil properties.

Earthworms (P. corethrurus) were hand-collected from Felix Houphouet-Boigny University, Cocody, Abidjan, Ivory Coast, in not metal-polluted soil. The earthworms were then kept in plastic boxes filled with water for 1 week to monitor their health before starting the experiment. For the treatment with earthworms, five adult earthworms with 5 g as of weight biomass were placed in the perforated pot after transplantation of the seedling.

2.3 Experimental design

A greenhouse pot culture experiment was conducted at Felix Houphouet-Boigny University, Cocody, Abidjan, Ivory Coast, to study the effect of Bradyrhizobium ORS and earthworms (P. corethrurus) on the growth and phytoremediation capacity of A. mangium. The average temperatures in the greenhouse were 26, 38, and 32°C for morning, afternoon, and evening, respectively. The experiment was carried out using four treatments:

  • Non-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium and/or earthworms (P. corethrurus), control treatment (T0);

  • Inoculated with P. corethrurus earthworms (T1);

  • Inoculated with Bradyrhizobium ORS (T2);

  • Co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium ORS and P. corethrurus earthworms (T3).

The experiment was conducted for 90 days, and each treatment was carried out in triplicate. Before filling the pot, it was perforated to allow aeration and then covered with a perforated filet to prevent the earthworms from escaping. The pots were placed in a factorial arrangement based on a completely randomized bloc design. The seedlings were watered daily with deionized water to maintain the moisture content at approximately 60% water-holding capacity of the soil.

2.4 Plant harvest and analysis

At the end of the experiment (90 days), three plants for each treatment were harvested. The rhizosphere soil (RS) and the drilosphere soil (DS) were collected. The soil that remained attached to the roots after gentle shaking was collected as rhizospheric soil (RS). Drilospheric soil is earthworm’s structure (casts). The remaining bulk soil was the rest after collecting rhizospheric soils and drilospheric soils [23].

Growth parameters such as shoot length, fresh weight, and dry weight of the plants were measured. The height of acacia was measured for each treatment and each replicate. Shoots (leaves and stems) were harvested, and roots were carefully removed from the soil, rinsed with tap water, and washed three times with deionized water; nodules were detached and counted. The fresh weight of plant was determined for each plant part (shoots and roots) and then the plant part was dried at 60°C for 72 h, weighed, and stored for analysis. The total dry weight of biomass (shoots + roots) of each plant per pot was determined. Rhizobial infection was evaluated by counting the number of nodules per plant. All the different soil compartments were air-dried and stored prior to the analyses. The earthworms were hand-collected, counted, and weighed. Ni, Cr, and Pb concentrations in plant shoots (leaves and stems), roots, and the different soil compartments (RS and DS) were dosed by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES, Spectroblue) after total digestion of plant or soil samples.

The ability of the plant to accumulate metals from the soil and transfer metals from the roots to the shoots was estimated by the bioconcentration factor (BCF) and translocation factor (TF), respectively, as described by [3]. BCF is the ratio of the metal concentration in the total plants biomass to that in the soil used to fill into pot experiment. TF is the ratio of the metal concentration in the shoots to that in the roots of plants.

Bioconcentration FactorBCF:BCFETM=ETMtotalPlantbiomassmg/kgdrymaterialETMsoilusedtofilledintopotmg/kgdrysoilE1
Translocation FactorTF:FTETM=ETMinShootsmg/kgdrymaterialETMinRootsmg/kgdrymaterialE2

According to [24], plants with both factors (TF and BCF) > 1 are suitable for phytoextraction while, plants with both factors <1 are suitable for phytoimmobilization. Plants with TF > 1 promote the phytoextraction process, while plants with TF < 1 are suitable for phytoimmobilization process [3]. Moreover, plants with BCF > 1 are qualified as a hyperaccumulator [3].

The phytoextraction efficiency (PEE) by acacia under different treatments was calculated as suggested in studies [25]:

PEE%=ETMin plant tissuemgkg1xWplantdryweightgETMin soilmgkg1xWsoil used to fill intopotgx100.E3

where:

ETMin plant tissue= metal (Pb, Ni or Cr) concentration in plant tissue (mg kg−1).

Wplantdryweight= total plant dry biomass (g).

ETMinsoil= metal (Pb, Ni or Cr) concentration in polluted soil for pot experiment (mg.kg−1).

W soil used to fill intopotg = Weight of soil used to fill the pot (g).

2.5 Statistical analysis

The data were subjected to statistical analysis using 7.1 Statistica software. Significant differences between different treatments (non-inoculated, Control, (C); inoculated with P. corethrurus earthworms (IE); inoculated with Bradyrhizobium ORS (IB); co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium ORS and P. corethrurus earthworms (Ci EB) in terms of height, biomass production, nodule numbers, and heavy metal contents in plant biomass, shoot tissue, root tissue, and different compartment RS and DS were performed using the Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) test at 0.05 probability level.

Advertisement

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Earthworm mortality

After 90 days of exposure in the metal-polluted dumping soil, no mortality was observed throughout the experimental period (Table 2). The fresh weight of the earthworms remained stable, and no mortality was noted in each treatment throughout the experimental period. Active burrowing and surface casting were apparent in each treatment.

TreatmentsTimes (days)Earthworms parameters
NumberWeight
non-inoculated, control (T0)0n.dn.d
90n.dn.d
inoculated with earthworm (T1)055
9055.3
inoculated with Bradyrhizobium (T2)0n.dn.d
90n.dn.d
co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium and earthworm (T3)055
9055.6

Table 2.

Evolution of number and weight of earthworm during 90 days. n.d: none determined.

3.2 Plant growth performance under different treatments

Throughout the experimental period (90 days), regardless of the treatment applied, no visible heavy metal morphological toxicity symptoms, such as leaf chlorosis and root browning, appeared when A. mangium was planted in heavy metal-polluted dumping soil under greenhouse conditions (Figure 1). This result revealed that A. mangium is able to grow in metal-contaminated soils and is a metal-tolerant plant species, as suggested by [3, 4].

Figure 1.

A. mangium growth performance (number of leaves, length of stem, root system development) under different treatments: non-inoculated, control (T0); inoculated with earthworms (T1); inoculated with Bradyrhizobium ORS (T2); co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium ORS and earthworms (T3).

The significantly (P < 0.05) lowest height (Figure 2a) and total dry weight biomass (Figure 2b) were obtained under the non-inoculated (T0) treatment, with 25.7 cm and 11 g, respectively (Figure 2a and b). The greatest height and total dry weight biomass were observed when A. mangium was co-inoculated with P. corethrurus and Bradyrhizobium (T3), at 54.5 cm and 141.7 g, followed by T1 (A. mangium inoculated with earthworm) at 51.5 cm and 101 g, by T2 (A. mangium inoculated with Bradyrhizobium) at 45.8 cm and 77 g (Figure 2a and b). Ours results indicated, for respective effect of P. corethrurus earthworms, Bradyrhizobium and of both inoculants, a growth stimulation of A. mangium by approximately twofold and 10-fold for the biomass under T1 treatment, by approximately 1.5-fold and sevenfold for the biomass under T2 treatment and by approximately twofold and 14-fold for the biomass under T3 treatment. This phenomenon was probably due to the action of P. corethrurus earthworms, which have the potential to modify edaphic parameters such as soil structure, organic matter decomposition and indirectly improve soil microorganisms proliferation and activities, facilitate the uptake of many important nutrients by plant, and consequently promote plant growth [26, 27]. Our results are consistent with the well-known fact that earthworms enhance plant growth and biomass [28]. Because, by bioturbation, earthworms stabilize organic matter in soil, form soil aggregates, modify the structure and chemical composition of soil [29]. Such changes generally increase soil water holding capacity, soil nutrient content, and plant productivity [28, 29, 30]. Most previous studies justified this better enhancement of acacia growth performance in the presence of earthworm by the fact that in metal-contaminated soil, some earthworms species (Eisenia fetida, Lumbricus terrestris, P. corethrurus) can decrease the content of potential toxic elements (PTEs) in metal contaminated soil through the accumulation potential toxic elements (PTEs) in their tissues and consequently promote plant growth [31, 32, 33]. A similar finding has been documented by [16], who showed that the presence of P. corethrurus could enhance the biomass of Lantana camara L. by approximately 1.5–2-fold under Pb stress.

Figure 2.

Effect of different treatments (non-inoculated, control (T0); inoculated with earthworms (T1); inoculated with Bradyrhizobium (T2); co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium and earthworms (T3) on average plant height (a), total dry weight biomass (roots and shoots) (b), number of nodules (c), concentrations (mg.kg−1 dry weight) of Chromium (Cr) (d), Nickel (Ni) (e), and Lead (Pb) (f), in Acacia manguim total biomass. Histograms with the same letters (a, b, c) indicated no significant differences between treatments at 0.05 probability level according to Student–Newman–Keuls test. **very highly significant at 0.01 probability level, *significant at 0.05 probability level according to Student–Newman–Keuls test.

The lower increase of acacia growth and biomass under inoculated with Bradyrhizobium treatment, compared with inoculated with P. corethrurus treatment (T1), may be due to the competitive effects that may occur between autochthonous soil microorganisms and exogenous strains (Bradyrhizobium). Because, several studies have demonstrated that inoculation of seedlings such as A. mangium with rhizobial strains results in the change of root morphology, that is, increases in nodules, lateral roots, root hairs, root surface area, and total root length [34] and thus improve plant growth [22, 35] in unpolluted soil and in metal-contaminated sites.

In comparison to the control treatment (T0) or single inoculated (T1 or T2), the presence of P. corethrurus earthworms and Bradyrhizobium strain significantly (P < 0.05) increases better plant growth stimulation. This positive effect might be due to the additive action of the two bioinoculants, which are recognized to promote plant growth and biomass production in metal-contaminated soil [36, 37]. So, ours findings showed that A. mangium exhibited better growth and high biomass production when both bioinoculants were present.

However, the greatest number of nodules per plant was obtain when A. mangium was inoculated with Bradyrhizobium (T2), at 12 nodules/plant, followed by T1 (A. mangium inoculated with earthworm) at 9 nodules/plant, by T0 (A. mangium non-inoculated) at 5 nodules/plant (Figure 2c). The lowest number of nodules (two nodules/plant) was observed when A. mangium was inoculated with the two bioinoculants. The presence of nodules in all the treatments, especially under non-inoculated control treatment, suggested that the soil contained autochthonous strains that were able to colonize the root system of A. mangium and to form symbiotic structures (nodules). Moreover, the lowest rate of nodules noted when A. mangium was co-inoculated with the two bioinoculants might be due to the interactions between the activities of Bradyrhizobium strain and P. corethrurus earthworms. In fact, by ingesting soil, P. corethrurus earthworms increased organic matter mineralization and nutrient availability, which indirectly stimulated the soil microorganisms. Therefore, the competitive action between autochthonous soil microorganisms and exogenous strains (Bradyrhizobium) could affect the capacity of exogenous symbionts (Bradyrhizobium) to colonize plant roots and to form symbiotic structures (nodules).

The presence of P. corethrurus appeared to reduce the positive effect of Bradyrhizobium on A. mangium nodulation. This result was in agreement with the findings of [38], who noted that the presence of earthworms (Allolobophora chlorotica) can reduce the positive effect of Glomus intraradices on the Allium porrum L roots biomass.

It was concluded that the interaction between P. corethrurus and Bradyrhizobium could promote growth and biomass production, but not nodulation, of A. mangium.

3.3 Effect of inoculation on metal uptake by A. mangium

In the control treatment (T0), when A. mangium was non-inoculated, the concentrations of chromium, nickel, and lead were 1.33 mg.kg−1; 1.98 mg.kg−1, and 3.8 mg.kg−1, respectively (Table 3). In addition, Cr and Ni contents were very highly significant (P < 0.001), three to fourfold greater in roots tissue, with 1.04 mg.kg−1 for Cr and 1.6 mg.kg−1 for Ni, than in shoot tissue, with 0.3 mg.kg−1 for Cr and 0.44 mg.kg−1 for Ni (Figure 3). Whereas, the concentration for Pb in roots tissue was lower (1.5 mg.kg−1) than in shoots tissue (2.3 Cr mg.kg−1) (Figure 3). Our results indicated that in the absence of inoculation, acacia preferentially uptake Cr and Ni in its roots and Pb in its shoots (Figure 3).

Heavy metalDifferent CompartmentsTreatments
(T0)(T1)(T2)(T3)
Chromium (Cr)Rhizosphere soil (RS)13.828.612.511.9
Drilosphere soil (DS)nd17.8nd23.2
Plant1.332.405.2311.2
Lead (Pb)Rhizosphere soil (RS)8.44.914.716.4
Drilosphere soil (DS)nd4.7nd3.6
Plant3.753.47.212.7
Nickel (Ni)Rhizosphere soil (RS)2.64.713.412.7
Drilosphere soil (DS)nd5.6nd2.9
Plant1.982.55.246.97

Table 3.

Content of chromium, nickel, and lead (mg.kg−1 dry material) in different compartments: Rhizosphere Soil (RS), Drilosphere Soil (DS), and in Acacia biomass after pot experiment under different treatments: non-inoculated, control (T0); inoculated with earthworms (T1); inoculated with Bradyrhizobium (T2); co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium and earthworms (T3). n.d (none determined).

Figure 3.

Accumulation of Cr, Ni and Pb in Acacia mangium shoot and root tissues under different treatments: non-inoculated, control (T0); inoculated with earthworms (T1); inoculated with Bradyrhizobium (T2); co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium and earthworms (T3). Histogram with the same letters (a, b) indicated no significant differences between Cr, Ni, or Pb concentrations in shoot and root tissues under. *** very highly significant at 0.001 probability level, **highly significant at 0.01 probability level, * significant at 0.05 probability level according to Student–Newman–Keuls test.

Moreover, the translocation factors ([metal]shoot/[metal]root), indicator of the effectiveness of the plant to translocate metals from roots to shoots of Acacia specie, were TF < 1 for Cr and Ni, and TF > 1 for Pb under non-inoculated treatment but under inoculated treatment, whatever metal dosed TF < 1 (Table 4). This emphasizes that acacia may possess metal exclusion strategy, which probably depended to the nature of the metal. The bioconcentration factors (BCF) ([metal]plant biomass/[metal]soil) were BCF <0.1 under non-inoculated and inoculated treatments (Table 4), which were indicated that acacia are not hyperaccumulator plant as demonstrated [39]. Our findings did not differ from those of various studies that observed a higher accumulation of Pb in the shoots of A. mangium compared with the roots, indicating that acacia is able to tolerate and uptake heavy metal in its tissues and therefore could be suitable for phytostabilization of metal-contaminated sites [3, 4, 40]. Furthermore, Cr, Ni, and Pb phytoextraction efficiency (PEE) of A. mangium non-inoculated was PEE <1 (Table 4) whatever the nature of metal, which could be attributed to the form of the metal in the soil rhizosphere. Thus, it appeared that, according to the nature of the metal in soil, acacia could have different phytoremediation processes (phytoimmobilization and phytoextraction) when it was non-inoculated. But, this phytoremediation process of acacia seems to depend on the nature and the mobile form of metal in the rhizosphere soil.

FactorsHeavy metalTreatments
non-inoculated, control (T0)inoculated with earthworm (T1)inoculated with Bradyrhizobium (T2)co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium and earthworm (T3)Probability (Pr)
BCFCr0.01d0.02c0.04b0.08a0.05
Pb0.03c0.03c0.06b0.11a
Ni0.02c0.02c0.04b0.06a
TFCr0.3b0.5a0.13c0.08d0.05
Pb1.6a0.1b0.07c0.06c
Ni0.3a0.3a0.1c0.2b
PEE (%)Cr0.2d1c6.4b9a0.01
Pb1d7c8b18a
Ni1.7d5c6b13a

Table 4.

Bioaccumulator (BCF), translocation factors (TF) and phytoextraction efficiency (PEE) of Cr, Ni and Pb in Acacia mangium biomass in metal-contaminated soil under different treatments: non-inoculated, control (T0); inoculated with earthworms (T1); inoculated with Bradyrhizobium (T2); co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium and earthworms (T3). Values with the same letters (a, b, c, d) indicated no significant differences between treatments according to Student–Newman–Keuls test.

However, the inoculation of A. mangium with P. corethrurus earthworms, Bradyrhizobium or with both inoculants, significantly (P < 0.05) increased the concentrations of chromium, nickel, and lead taken up in the plant biomass, which ranged from 2.4 to 11.2 mg.kg−1 for Cr, 2.5 to 7 mg.kg−1 for Ni, and 3.4 to 12.7 mg.kg−1 for Pb compared to the control treatment with 1.98 mg.kg−1, for Ni, 1.33 mg.kg−1 for Cr, and 3.8 mg.kg−1 for Pb (Table 3). The respective effect of P. corethrurus earthworms, Bradyrhizobium or of both inoculants, for Cr uptake by plant, was increased around twofold under T1 treatment (2.41 mg.kg−1), four-fold under T2 treatment (5.23 mg.kg−1) and 10-fold under T3 treatment (11.2 mg.kg−1) (Figure 2d,e, and f). For Ni uptake by plant, the effect of P. corethrurus earthworms, Bradyrhizobium or both inoculants was enhanced by 1.3-fold under T1 (2.48 mg.kg−1), threefold under T2 treatment (5.24 mg.kg−1), and fourfold under T3 treatments (7 mg.kg−1) (Figure 2d,e, and f). P. corethrurus earthworms decreased the Pb uptake by plant ranging from 3.8 to 3.4 mg.kg−1. Bradyrhizobium individually or the combined P. corethrurus earthworms and Bradyrhizobium enhanced twofold (7.2 mg.kg−1) and fourfold (12.7 mg.kg−1), respectively. Pb uptake by A. mangium as compared with non-inoculated plants (Figure 2d,e and f). In addition, under inoculated with earthworm treatment (T1), Cr, Ni, and Pb contents were very highly significant (P < 0.001), 2–10-fold greater in roots tissue, with 1.6 mg.kg−1 for Cr, 1.9 mg.kg−1 for Ni and 3.1 mg.kg−1 for Pb, than in shoot tissue, with 0.8 mg.kg−1, 0.63 mg.kg−1, and 0.3 mg.kg−1, respectively (Figure 3). Furthermore, under inoculated with Bradyrhizobium treatment (T2), Cr, Ni, and Pb contents were very highly significant (P < 0.001), 8–15-fold greater in roots tissue, with 4.6 mg.kg−1 for Cr, 4.7 mg.kg−1 for Ni, and 6.8 mg.kg−1 for Pb, than in shoot tissue, with 0.6 mg.kg−1; 0.5 mg.kg−1, and 0.4 mg.kg−1, respectively (Figure 3). In the presence of P. corethrurus earthworms and Bradyrhizobium, Cr, Ni, and Pb contents were very highly significant (P < 0.001), 4–20-fold greater in roots tissue, with 10.4 mg.kg−1 for Cr, 5.7 mg.kg−1 for Ni, and 12 mg.kg−1 for Pb, than in shoot tissue, with 0.8 mg.kg−1; 1.3 mg.kg−1, and 0.7 mg.kg−1, respectively (Figure 3). The phytoextraction efficiency (PEE) of A. mangium was much greater under inoculation treatments with 1–9% for Cr, 5–13% for Ni, and 7–18% for Pb (Table 3). Irrespective of the heavy metal dosed (Table 4), the significantly higher PEE (P < 0.05) was obtained when A. mangium was inoculated with P. corethrurus earthworms and Bradyrhizobium with PEE >9% (Table 4). This finding indicated that the inoculation of A. mangium with P. corethrurus earthworms, Bradyrhizobium, or with both inoculants significantly increased the bioavailability of Cr, Pb and Ni in soil, then their uptake by A. mangium in biomass particularly in its roots tissue. In the presence of these organisms, the phytoextraction efficiency of A.mangium was significantly (P < 0.05) improved. The accumulation of potential toxic elements in acacia biomass may have been caused by the different soil organisms (Bradyrhizobium and/or earthworm), as demonstrated in previous studies in the presence of earthworms [5, 27, 31, 33] and of Bradyrhizobium [36, 41] only and also in presence of combined soil organisms such as earthworm and PGPR [42]. The metal uptake-stimulating effect of both inoculants was much greater than that of individual inoculated organism.

Moreover, under earthworm treatment, only the content of Cr at 29 mg.kg−1 dry soil and Pb at 4.9 mg.kg−1 dry soil was higher in the rhizosphere soil (RS) than in Drilosphere soil (DS) at 18 mg.kg−1 Cr dry soil and 4.7 mg.kg−1 Pb dry soil (Table 3). The lower content of Cr in the DS than in the RS compartment with earthworm treatment and the highest content of Cr (68 μg Cr/plant) in plant shoots suggested that Cr mobilized by earthworm in their structures (burrows and casts) was temporarily stored in these structure, which acted as sinks for the element [43], and transferred Cr to the RS compartment and subsequently to plant tissue. In contrast, despite the highest content of lead in the RS compartment, lead content was lowest in the plant shoots (25.2 μg Pb/plant). This phenomenon could be linked to the physiological behavior of A. mangium, which behaves as a Pb-excluder plant in the presence of bioinoculants. Likewise, despite the highest content of Ni in the DS (5.6 mg.kg−1 Ni dry soil) under earthworm treatment, the content of Ni was higher in the shoot parts than in the root part, which suggested that Ni mobilized in the DS compartment was transferred to plants. Here, the DS compartment was used by the plant as a sink for the element [43].

3.4 P. corethrurus earthworm and A. mangium interaction on phytoremediation processes

Previous studies have been reported the interactive role of earthworms in improving plant growth in non-contaminated soils [26]. In addition to this, the benefit effect of earthworms in the remediation of metal contaminated soil has been very well demonstrated in numerous research studies [5, 27, 31, 33, 44], but only few studies have been conducted to assess their role in improving plant metal uptake during phytoremediation in contaminated soils [45].

Our findings have shown that the inoculation of acacia with P. corethrurus resulted a highly to very highly significant increase (P < 0.01) in plant height, total dry weight biomass, and metal concentration in plant biomass (Figure 2), as compared with the uninoculated treatment. Thus, acacia appeared to exhibit rapid growth and high biomass production when earthworms were present. For instance, the phytoextraction efficiency of the plant inoculated with P. corethrurus was enhanced by fivefold for Cr, twofold for Ni, and sevenfold for the Pb, as compared with non-inoculated plant (Table 4). This increase of growth-stimulating and of the amount of Cr, Ni in A. mangium biomass could be caused by the earthworms through their burrowing and casting activities, as suggested by [31], because the earthworms can facilitate metal conversion from the stable to the available form by changing physicochemical and biological status of the soil such as soil pH decreases, production of organic acids, and stimulation of microbial activity, contributing to the increase of Ni, Pb, and Cr availability in soil and as a result increased their bioavailability for plants. Furthermore, the increase of metal accumulation in plant biomass could be due to the interactive action between A. mangium and P. corethrurus. In fact, some species such as Acacia secrete different types and quantities of organic acids into the rhizosphere [46], which were the main source of organic matter used by P. corethrurus earthworms in the rhizosphere, according to [13]. So, by decomposing different types of root exudates and organic acids secreted by A. mangium into the rhizosphere, P. corethrurus can probably reduce the stable form of metal while increasing its mobile form in the rhizosphere, enhancing Cr and Ni bioavailability for plant [31]. However, the higher significant (P < 0.05) content of Pb in plant non-inoculated than in plant inoculated with earthworm (Figure 2) could be attributed to the metal speciation in rhizosphere or drilosphere [44]. justified the decrease of Pb concentration in plant inoculated with earthworm, as compared with earthworm inoculation, by the fact that earthworm can also reduce the amount of Pb associated with the soluble and exchangeable fraction and subsequently plant uptake.

In addition, the higher content of Cr (29 mg.kg−1) and Pb (4.9 mg.kg−1) in RS and Ni in DS (5.6 mg.kg−1) (Table 3) than in plant biomass could be related to the physiological character of Acacia species, which here seems to exclude a metal in its shoot tissue as demonstrated in previous studies [3, 4, 39, 46].

These results suggest that, although earthworms have the potential to improve the efficiency of plant phytoremediation in metal-contaminated soils, its effectiveness depends on the nature of the plant, its behavior toward metals, metal speciation in soil, rhizosphere function involved in the phytoremediation process.

3.5 Bradyrhizobium and A. mangium interaction on phytoremediation processes

Symbiosis between leguminous and rhizobacteria improves plant growth, nutrition and reduces the stress of plants, facilitating their development in metal-contaminated areas [47, 48]. Previous studies, specially studies from symbiotic microorganism, have demonstrated that rhizobia contribute to plant adaptation to multiple biotic and abiotic stresses, especially under metal-contaminated soils [41, 47, 49]. Among the rhizobacteria obtained from areas contaminated with different metals, there are strains of the genus Rhizobium sp., Sinorhizobium, Mesorhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, and Azorhizobium [48]. These strains are recognized as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria [50].

Our findings have shown that the inoculation of acacia with Bradyrhizobium (T2) resulted a highly to very highly significant increase (P < 0.01) in plant height, total dry weight biomass, and metal concentration in plant biomass (Figure 2), as compared with the non-inoculated plant. Thus, acacia appeared to exhibit rapid growth performance (seven-fold) when Bradyrhizobium was present. This growth stimulation could be attributed to the interactive action between A. mangium and with symbiotic rhizobia such as Bradyrhizobium, which have the capacity to form symbiotic association with A. mangium. and consequently influence positively plant P nutrition and growth and then soil microbial activities [51, 52].

Furthermore, positive effects from inoculation with Bradyrhizobium on metal uptake by A. mangium in metal-contaminated soil have been observed. The inoculation of A. mangium with Bradyrhizobium (T2) increased very highly significant (P < 0.001) Cr, Ni, and Pb amounts by four-, three-, and twofold, respectively, as compared with the control treatment (T0). In addition, the phytoextraction efficiency of the plant inoculated with Bradyrhizobium was enhanced by 32-fold for Cr, 4-fold for Ni, and 8-fold for the Pb, as compared with non-inoculated plant (Table 4). This positive effect may attribute to Bradyrhizobium Sp., which can increase the availability of soil metal through the production of metal chelating, agents siderophores, and organic acid [47, 53], and can also modify heavy metals speciation and metal/organic matter interaction by transformation of organic compounds [42], consequently increasing their bioavailability for plants. Ours findings showed that Bradyrhizobium effectively enhances A.mangium growth, its metal uptake, and also their accumulation in root than shoot tissues. Ours results indicated also that Bradyrhizobium improves metal bioavailability in soil and subsequently for plant. So, according to [47], this is possible because Bradyrhizobium can decrease the toxicity of metal contamination in plant by transforming pollutants into nontoxic or less toxic form and also by enhancing antioxidant defense in plants exposed to metal-contaminated soils. Similar reports also demonstrated that the inoculation with Bradyrhizobium higher increases Cu concentrations in soybean and especially in white lupin in inoculated plants [53, 54], showed that Methylobacterium sp. notably enhances the bioaccumulation of As in Acacia farnesiana biomass mainly in shoots. In contrast [55], showed that Bradyrhizobium Sp. reduced Ni and Zn uptake by Greengrass plants, which was probably due to the ability of Bradyrhizobium to protect plants against the inhibitory toxic effects of Ni and Zn.

Ours results demonstrated that under inoculated with Bradyrhizobium treatment (T2), Cr, Ni, and Pb amounts were very highly significant (P < 0.001), 8, 10, to 15-fold greater in roots tissue than in shoot tissue (Figure 3). Likewise, the bioaccumulation factors (BCFs) and the translocation factors (TFs) of Cr, Ni, and Pb, which were < 1 respectively, revealed that the presence of Bradyrhizobium improved better the uptake of Cr and Ni mainly in roots. While for Pb, the presence of Bradyrhizobium improved Pb accumulating in roots. The presence of Bradyrhizobium modified the phytoextractor potential of non-inoculated plant to act as Pb phytoexcluders. Thus, in the presence of Bradyrhizobium, A. mangium is considered to have great potential for the phytoimmobilization of Cr, Ni, and Pb. A similar effect has been observed by [56], which after inoculation with Cupriavidus taiwanensis, Mimosa pudica showed higher capacity of metal uptake and improved Pb, Cu, and Cd accumulating mainly in roots.

These findings supported the ability of Bradyrhizobium to protect A. mangium plants against the inhibitory toxic effects of Ni, Cr, and Pb, as demonstrated by [57].

3.6 P. corethrurus earthworms and Bradyrhizobium interactions on Pb, Ni, and Cr uptake by A. mangium

Earthworms and rhizobacteria are essential for nutrient cycling and organic matter dynamics in terrestrial ecosystems. In soils, they tightly interact especially in the rhizosphere. In our experiment, we tested the effects of earthworm P. corethrurus and Bradyrhizobium on the growth performance of A. mangium and also its metal uptake in metal-contaminated soil. We observed a significant (P < 0.05) positive effect of both inoculants (earthworm P. corethrurus and Bradyrhizobium) on A. mangium growth and total biomass, as compared with plant non-inoculated and also with plant inoculated with earthworm P. corethrurus or Bradyrhizobium only (Figure 2), as demonstrated in numerous reports [26, 51, 52]. This growth stimulation in the presence of both inoculants could be related to [1] earthworm P. corethrurus activity, which by increasing the mineralization of soil organic matter enhances nutrient availability, stimulates microbial activities [2]; the production of plant growth regulator substances through the stimulation of microbial activity [3, 58]; the stimulation of plant symbionts in the soil rhizosphere [4]; the plant genotype A.mangium, a leguminous, which used as symbiont Bradyrhizobium recognized as a plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPR) [50], and [4] to the bio-control of metal stress by earthworm [27, 31, 33, 44] and by Bradyrhizobium [41, 47, 48, 59] only and also by the combined action with both inoculants [45]. This synergistic interaction is probably due to the stimulation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, such as Bradyrhizobium, population in the presence of earthworms [60].

Furthermore, a significant (P < 0.05) greater amounts of Cr, Ni, and Pb in total biomass of plant have been observed in the presence of both inoculants, which was increased by 2–10-fold for Cr, 2–3-fold for Ni, and 2–4-fold for the Pb, as compared with non-inoculated and individual inoculated plants (Figure 2). Likewise, the phytoextraction efficiency of the plant inoculated with both inoculants was enhanced by 2–9-fold for Cr, 2–3-fold for Ni, and 2-fold for the Pb, as compared with individual inoculation (Table 3). This increase could be attributed to the combined activities of the two inoculants that have the ability to enhance metal uptake in plant tissues and to protect plants against toxic effects have been demonstrated in previous studies [31, 42]. The improvement of metal uptake by A. mangium inoculated with both inoculants, as compared with its inoculation with Bradyrhizobium or earthworm individually, could be linked to the relationship between earthworm and rhizobacteria (Bradyrhizobium). This finding suggests that combined inoculants consisting of Bradyrhizobium and earthworms have potential for enhancing metal uptake by A. mangium, confirming our hypothesis. The results indicate that metal uptake by this tolerant plant species was greatly facilitated by the interactions among these organisms, most likely due to the concomitant stimulation of metal immobilization and biomass production, as demonstrated by [13, 42].

In the presence of both inoculants (P. corethrurus earthworms and Bradyrhizobium), A. mangium preferentially accumulated Pb, Cr, and Ni in the roots than in shoots tissue (Figure 3) with TF < 1 (Table 3) and BCF < 1, indicating that for Pb, Ni, and Cr, A. mangium promotes the phytoimmobilization process.

In addition, the content of Cr was higher in the DS compartment (23 mg.kg−1 dry soil) than in the RS (12 mg.kg−1 dry soil) in the presence of both inoculants (earthworms and Bradyrhizobium) (Table 4). Our results also showed that the concentration of Cr was higher in the root (12 mg.kg−1) than in the shoot tissue (0.7 mg.kg−1). This finding suggested that Cr mobilized in the DS compartment (23.2 mg.kg−1 dry soil), was preferentially transferred to RS compartment and then to the plant root tissue. While, the content of Pb and Ni was significantly higher in the RS compartment, ranging from 16.4 and 12.7 mg.kg−1 dry soil, respectively (Table 4), than in the DS compartment (range 3–4 mg.kg−1 dry soil). Despite the highest content of Pb and Ni in the RS compartment, the concentrations of Pb and Ni were lower in the plant shoot biomass. The translocation of Pb and Ni from the root to the shoot tissue was weak. This phenomenon could be linked to the behavior of A. mangium, which, in the presence of both bioinoculants, behaved as Pb, Cr, and Ni-excluder plant and promoted the phytoimmobilzation process for Cr, Pb, and Ni.

Efficiency of the different phytoremediation treatments applied.

Our results showed that inoculation of A. mangium with Bradyrhizobium or earthworms only and with both inoculants significantly increased (P < 0.05) in the height (twofold), total dry biomass weight (7–15-fold), and metal uptake of the plant (2–10-fold), as compared with the non-inoculated plant. However, the presence of Bradyrhizobium and earthworms increases twofold the total plant biomass and two- to fivefold metal accumulation in plant biomass, as compared with inoculated with earthworms or Bradyrhizobium.

Furthermore, irrespective of the heavy doses, the phytoextraction efficiency (PEE) percentage rank was in the order T3 > T2 > T1 > T0 (Table 3). The PEE percentage of A. mangium increased significantly in the presence of earthworms and Bradyrhizobium, demonstrating values of 18% for Pb, 9% for Cr, and 12.6% for Ni, followed by T2 (when A. mangium was inoculated with Bradyrhizobium only) with 8% for Pb, 6.4% for Cr, and 6% for Ni and by T1 with 7% for Pb, 1% for Cr, and 5% for Ni (Table 3). We found strong evidence that the inoculation of plant with PGPR and earthworm enhanced soil Pb/Ni/Cr mobility and bioavailability in metal-contaminated soil, facilitating their transfer and absorption by plant.

This result indicated that the phytoremediation capacity of A. mangium was improved in response to the inoculation and optimally improved in the presence of both inoculants. So, our finding reveled that it is possible to use the combination of metal-tolerant plant and soil organisms (Bradyrhizobium and earthworms) as a potential bioaugmentation tool to accelerate metal phytoremediation efficiency in metal-contaminated soils.

Advertisement

4. Conclusion and recommendation

Beneficial effects of combined inoculation with P. corethrurus earthworms and Bradyrhizobium and of individual inoculation with P. corethrurus earthworms or Bradyrhizobium on A. mangium growth and its Pb, Ni, and Cr uptake in metal-contaminated soil have been observed in this study. Ours results revealed that the concomitant stimulation of metal immobilization and biomass production in the presence of these organisms and also that the inoculation of plant with PGPR (Bradyrhizobium) and earthworm enhanced soil Pb/Ni/Cr mobility and bioavailability in metal-contaminated soil, facilitating their transfer and absorption by plant. However, the growth stimulation and the metal accumulation in plant were increase twofold for the total plant biomass and two- to fivefold for metal amount in plant biomass, as compared with inoculated with earthworms or Bradyrhizobium. In addition, the presence of these organisms promoted the phytoimmobilization process of Ni, Cr, and Pb preferentially in A. mangium roots than in shoot tissue. Our experiments highlight the importance of soil organisms on the phytoremediation efficiency. It appears that earthworms and/or PGPR (Bradyrhizobium) have the potential to enhance the phytoextraction efficiency of plants in metal-contaminated soil.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the Education and Research Ministry of the Ivory Coast, as part of the Debt Reduction-Development Contracts (C2Ds) managed by IRD, for the financial support rendered to carry out the project on ReSiPol research. We also thank Bonoua City Hall for permission to carry out the studies at the dumpsites.

Advertisement

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. 1. Koutika L-S. Afforesting savannas with Acacia mangium and eucalyptus improves P availability in Arenosols of the Congolese coastal plains. Geoderma Regional. 2019;15:e00207. DOI: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2019.e00207
  2. 2. Ma Y, Oliveira RS, Nai F, Rajkumar M, Luo Y, Rocha I, et al. The hyperaccumulator sedum plumbizincicola harbors metal-resistant endophytic bacteria that improve its phytoextraction capacity in multi-metal contaminated soil. Journal of Environmental Management. 2015;156:62-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.024
  3. 3. Majid NM, Islam MM, Mathew L. Heavy metal uptake and translocation by mangium (Acacia mangium) from sewage sludge contaminated soil [online]. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2012;6(8):1228-1123 Available from: http://www.cropj.com/islam_6_8_2012_1228_1235.pdf
  4. 4. Mohd SN, Majid NM, Shazili NAM, Abdu A. Growth performance, biomass and phytoextraction efficiency of Acacia mangium and Melaleuca cajuputi in remediating heavy metal contaminated soil. American Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2013;9(4):310-316 Available from: http://www.thescipub.com/ajes.toc
  5. 5. Bongoua-Devisme AJ, Akotto OF, Guety T, Kouakou SAAE, Ndoye F, Diouf D. Enhancement of phytoremediation efficiency of Acacia mangium using earthworms in metal-contaminated soil in Bonoua, Ivory Coast. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2019;18(27):622-631. DOI: 10.5897/AJB2019.16852
  6. 6. Bongoua-Devisme AJ, Koffi AL, Kouadio KP, Diouf D, Ndoye F, Kouadio K-KH. Response of Acacia mangium to inoculation with symbiotic microorganisms in the remediation of metal-contaminated soil at Bonoua, Ivory Coast. Journal of Chemical, Biological and Physical Sciences. 2019;9(4):544-560. DOI: 10.5897/AJB2019.16852
  7. 7. Mohammadzadeh A, Tavakoli M, Motesharezadeh B, Chaichi MR. Effects of plant growth-promoting bacteria on the phytoremediation of cadmium-contaminated soil by sunflower. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2016;63(6):807-816. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2016.1235781
  8. 8. Ojuederie O, Babalola O. Microbial and plant-assisted bioremediation of heavy metal polluted environments: A review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017;14(12):1504. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14121504
  9. 9. Wood JL, Liu W, Tang C, Franks AE. Microorganisms in heavy metal bioremediation: Strategies for applying microbial-community engineering to remediate soils. AIMS Bioengineering. 2016;3(2):211-223. DOI: 10.3934/bioeng.2016.2.211
  10. 10. Kamran MA, Eqani S, Bibi S, Xu R-K, Monis MFH, Katsoyiannis A, et al. Bioaccumulation of Nickel by E. Sativa and role of plan growth promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPRs) under Nickel stress. Ecotox Environ Safe. 2016;126:256-263. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.01.002
  11. 11. Fan M, Xiao X, Guo Y, Zhang J, Wang E, Chen W, et al. Enhanced phytoremediation of Robinia pseudoacacia in heavy metal-contaminated soils with rhizobia and the associated bacterial community structure and function. Chemosphere. 2018;197:729-740. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.01.102
  12. 12. Khan N, Bano A. Role of PGPR in the Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals and Crop Growth Under Municipal Wastewater Irrigation. In: Ansari A, Gill S, Gill R, R. Lanza G, Newman L, editors. Phytoremediation. Cham: Springer; 2018. pp. 135-149. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99651-6_5
  13. 13. De Novais CB, De Oliveira JR, Siqueira JO, De Faria SM, Da Silva EMR, et al. Trophic relationships between the earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus and three tropical arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species. Applied Soil Ecology. 2019;135:9-15 Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139318301410
  14. 14. Taheri S, Pelosi C, Dupont L. Harmful or useful? A case study of the exotic peregrine earthworm morpho-species Pontoscolex corethrurus. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2018;116:277-289. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.10.030
  15. 15. Duarte AP, Melo VF, Brown GG, Pauletti V. Earthworm (Pontoscolex corethrurus) survival and impacts on properties of soils from a lead mining site in Southern Brazil. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2014;50(5):851-860. DOI: 10.1007/s00374-014-0906-y
  16. 16. Jusselme MD, Poly F, Lebeau T, Rouland-lefèvre C, Miambi E. Effects of earthworms on the fungal community and microbial activity in root-adhering soil of Lantana camara during phytoextraction of lead. Applied Soil Ecology. 2015;96:151-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.07.011
  17. 17. Buch AC, Brown GG, Niva CC, Sautter KD, Sousa JP. Toxicity of three pesticides commonly used in Brazil to Pontoscolex corethrurus (Müller, 1857) and Eisenia andrei (Bouché, 1972). Applied Soil Ecology. 2013;69:32-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.12.011
  18. 18. Bongoua-Devisme AJ, Gueable YKD, Balland Boloun Bi C, Bolou Bi BE, Kassin KE, Adiaffi B, et al. Hazardous impacts of open dumpsite of municipal solid wastes on soil: Case of M’Ploussoue Park dump at Bonoua in Ivory Coast. International Journal of Sciences. 2018;7(5):32-38. DOI: 10.18483/ijSci.1653
  19. 19. Bongoua-Devisme AJ, Bolou Bi BE, Kassin KE, Bolou B, Bi C, Gueable YKD, et al. Assessment of heavy metal contamination degree of municipal open-air dumpsite on surrounding soils: Case of dumpsite of Bonoua, Ivory Coast. International Journal Of Engineering Research and General Science. 2008;6(5):28-42 Available from: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01891039/file/Bongoua2_2018.pdf
  20. 20. CEPA. Canadian soil quality guidelines for the protection of environmental and human health. Quebec, Canada: National Guidelines and Standards Office; 2007 Available from: https://ccme.ca/en/res/polychlorinated-dioxins-and-furans-pcdd_fs-canadian-soil-quality-guidelines-for-the-protection-of-environmental-and-human-health-en.pdf
  21. 21. WHO. Guidelines for assessing quality for herbal medecines with references to contaminants and residus, WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. 2007. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43510/?sequence=1
  22. 22. Diouf D, Duponnois R, Tidiane BA, Neyra M, Lesueur D. Symbiosis of Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia mangium with mycorrhizal fungi and Bradyrhizobium spp. improves salt tolerance in greenhouse conditions. Functional Plant Biology. 2005;32(12):1143-1152. DOI: 10.1071/fp04069
  23. 23. Tan Y, Cui Y, Li H, Kuang A, Li X, Wei Y, et al. Rhizospheric soil and root endogenous fungal diversity and composition in response to continuous Panax notoginseng cropping practices. Microbiological Research. 2017;194:10-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2016.09.009
  24. 24. Buscaroli A. An overview of indexes to evaluate terrestrial plants for phytoremediation purposes (Review). Ecological Indicators. 2017;82:367-380. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.003
  25. 25. Yang Y, Yichen G, Hongyuan Z, Xihong Z, Liang P, Qingru Z. Phytoextraction of cadmium-contaminated soil and potential of regenerated tobacco biomass for recovery of cadmium. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:7210. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05834-8
  26. 26. Braga LP, Yoshiura CA, Borges CD, Horn MA, Brown GG, Drake HL, et al. Disentangling the influence of earthworms in sugarcane rhizosphere. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:38923. DOI: 10.1038/srep38923
  27. 27. Lv B, Xing M, Yang J. Speciation and transformation of heavy metals during vermicomposting of animal manure. Bioresource Technology. 2016;209:397-401. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.015
  28. 28. Mudrák O, Frouz J. Earthworms increase plant biomass more in soil with no earthworm legacy than in earthworm-mediated soil, and favour late successional species in competition. Functional Ecology. 2017;32(3):626-635. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12999
  29. 29. Bottinelli N, Jouquet P, Capowiez Y, Podwojewski P, Grimaldi M, Peng X. Why is the influence of soil macrofauna on soil structure only considered by soil ecologists? Soil and Tillage Research. 2015;146:118-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2014.01.007
  30. 30. Wu J, Zhang W, Shao Y, Fu S. Plant-facilitated effects of exotic earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus on the soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics and soil microbial community in a subtropical field ecosystem. Ecology and Evolution. 2017;7(21):8709-8718. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3399
  31. 31. Lemtiri A, Liénard A, Alabi T, Brostaux Y, Cluzeau D, Francis F, et al. Earthworms Eisenia fetida affect the uptake of heavy metals by plants Vicia faba and Zea mays in metal-contaminated soils. Applied Soil Ecology. 2016;104:67-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.11.021
  32. 32. Sizmur T, Palumbo-Roe B, Watts MJ, Hodson ME. Impact of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris (L.) on As, Cu, Pb and Zn mobility and speciation in contaminated soils. Environmental Pollution. 2011;159(3):742-748. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.11.033
  33. 33. Boughattas I, Hattab S, Boussetta H, Banni M, Navarro E. Impact of heavy metal contamination on oxidative stress of Eisenia andrei and bacterial community structure in Tunisian mine soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017;24(22):18083-18095. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9449-8
  34. 34. Lee J-T, Tsai S-M, Li C-H. The nitrogen-fixing Bradyrhizobium elkanii significantly stimulates root development and pullout resistance of Acacia confuse. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2017;16(18):1067-1077. DOI: 10.5897/AJB2017.15971
  35. 35. Tajini F, Mustapha T, Jean-Jacques D. Combined inoculation with Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium tropici CIAT899 increases phosphorus use efficiency for symbiotic nitrogen fixation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2012;19(2):157-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2011.11.003
  36. 36. Seneviratne M, Gunaratne S, Bandara T, Weerasundara L, Rajakaruna N, Seneviratne G, et al. Plant growth promotion by Bradyrhizobium japonicum under heavy metal stress. South African Journal of Botany. 2016;105:19-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.02.206
  37. 37. Reichman SM. Probing the plant growth-promoting and heavy metal tolerance characteristics of Bradyrhizobium japonicum CB1809. European Journal of Soil Biology. 2014;63:7-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2014.04.001
  38. 38. Milleret R, Le Bayon RC, Gobat JM. Root, mycorrhiza and earthworm interactions: Their effects on soil structuring processes, plant and soil nutrient concentration and plant biomass. Plant and Soil. 2009;316:1-12. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-008-9753-7
  39. 39. Cipriani HN, Dias LE, Costa MD, Campos NV, Azevedo AA, Gomes RJ, et al. Arsenic toxicity in Acacia mangium willd and mimosa Caesalpiniaefolia benth. seedlings. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. 2013;37(5):1423-1430. DOI: 10.1590/s0100-06832013000500031
  40. 40. Ang LH, Tang LK, Ho WM, Hui TF, Theseira GW. Phytoremediation of Cd and Pb by four tropical timber species grown on an Ex-tin mine in peninsular Malaysia. International Journal of Environmental, Chemical, Ecological, Geological and Geophysical Engineering. 2010;4(2):70-74
  41. 41. Sobariu DL, Fertu DIT, Diaconu M, Pavel LV, Hlihor R-M, Drăgoi EN, et al. Rhizobacteria and plant symbiosis in heavy metal uptake and its implications for soil bioremediation. New Biotechnology. 2017;39:125-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2016.09.002
  42. 42. Mahohi A, Raiesi F. Functionally dissimilar soil organisms improve growth and Pb/Zn uptake by Stachys inflata grown in a calcareous soil highly polluted with mining activities. Journal of Environmental Management. 2019;247:780-789. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.130
  43. 43. Brown G, Edwards CA, Brussaard L. How earthworm affect plant growth: burrowing into the mechanisms. In: Edwards CA, editor. Earthworm Ecology. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press; 2004, ch2. pp. 13-49. DOI: 10.1201/9781420039719
  44. 44. Boughattas I, Hattab S, Alphonse V, Livet A, Giusti-Miller S, Boussetta H, et al. Use of earthworms Eisenia andrei on the bioremediation of contaminated area in north of Tunisia and microbial soil enzymes as bioindicator of change on heavy metals speciation. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 2018;19(1):296-309. DOI: 10.1007/s11368-018-2038-8
  45. 45. Kaur P, Bali S, Sharma A, Vig AP, Bhardwaj R. Effect of earthworms on growth, photosynthetic efficiency and metal uptake in Brassica juncea L. plants grown in cadmium-polluted soils. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017;24(15):13452-13465. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-8947-z
  46. 46. Kabas S, Saavedra-Mella F, Huynh T, Kopittke PM, Carter S, Huang L. Metal uptake and organic acid exudation of native Acacia species in mine tailings. Australian Journal of Botany. 2017;65:357-367. DOI: 10.1071/BT16189
  47. 47. Vilela LAF, Teixeira AFS, Lourenço FMO, Souza MD. Symbiotic Microorganisms Enhance Antioxidant Defense in Plants Exposed to Metal/Metalloid-Contaminated Soils. In: Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Fujita M, editors. Plants Under Metal and Metalloid Stress. Singapore: Springer; 2018. pp. 337-366. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-2242-6_13
  48. 48. Hao X, Taghavi S, Xie P, Orbach MJ, Alwathnani HA, Rensing C, et al. Phytoremediation of heavy and transition metals aided by legume-rhizobia symbiosis. International Journal of Phytoremediation. 2014;16(2):179-202. DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2013.773273
  49. 49. Bruneel O, Mghazli N, Sbabou L, Héry M, Casiot C, Filali-Maltouf A. Role of microorganisms in rehabilitation of mining sites, focus on Sub Saharan African countries. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 2019;205:106327. DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2019.06.009
  50. 50. Bharti A, Agnihotri R, Maheshwari HS, Prakash A, Sharma MP. Bradyrhizobia-Mediated Drought Tolerance in Soybean and Mechanisms Involved. In: Choudhary D, Kumar M, Prasad R, Kumar V, editors. In Silico Approach for Sustainable Agriculture. Singapore: Springer; 2018. pp. 121-139. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0347-0_7
  51. 51. Egamberdieva D, Jabborova D, Wirth SJ, Alam P, Alyemeni MN, Ahmad P. Interactive Effects of Nutrients and Bradyrhizobium japonicum on the Growth and Root Architecture of Soybean (Glycine max L.). Frontier in Microbiology. 2018;9:1000. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01000. PMID: 29875740; PMCID: PMC5974200
  52. 52. Masciarelli O, Llanes A, Luna V. A new PGPR co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum enhances soybean nodulation. Microbiological Research. 2014;169(7–8):609-615. DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2013.10.001
  53. 53. Sánchez-Pardo B, Zornoza P. Mitigation of Cu stress by legume–Rhizobium symbiosis in white lupin and soybean plants. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2014;102:1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.01.016
  54. 54. Alcántara-Martínez N, Figueroa-Martínez F, Rivera-Cabrera F, Gutiérrez-Sánchez G, Volke-Sepúlveda T. An endophytic strain of Methylobacterium sp. increases arsenate tolerance in Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd: A proteomic approach. Science of the Total Environment. 2018;625:762-774. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.314
  55. 55. Wani PA, Khan MS, Zaidi A. Effect of metal tolerant plant growth promoting Bradyrhizobium sp. (vigna) on growth, symbiosis, seed yield and metal uptake by greengram plants. Chemosphere. 2007;70(1):36-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.07.028
  56. 56. Brígido C, Glick BR, Oliveira S. Survey of plant growth-promoting mechanisms in native portuguese chickpea Mesorhizobium isolates. Microbial Ecology. 2017;73:900-915. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-016-0891-9
  57. 57. Baharlouei J, Pazira E, Solhi M. Evaluation of inoculation of plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria on cadmium uptake by canola and barley. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2011;5(14):1747-1754. DOI: 10.5897/AJMR10.625
  58. 58. Castellanos SDE, Gigon A, Puga-Freitas R, Lavelle P, Velasquez E, Blouin M. Combined effects of earthworms and IAA-producing rhizobacteria on plant growth and development. Applied Soil Ecology. 2014;80:100-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.04.004
  59. 59. Rangel WM, Thijs S, Janssen J, Oliveira LSM, Bonaldi DS, Ribeiro PRA, et al. Native rhizobia from Zn mining soil promote the growth of Leucaena leucocephalaon contaminated soil. International Journal of Phytoremediation. 2016;19(2):142-156. DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2016.1207600
  60. 60. Jusselme MD, Poly F, Miambi E, Mora P, Blouin M, Pando A, et al. Effect of earthworms on plant Lantana camara Pb-uptake and on bacterial communities in root-adhering soil. Science of the Total Environment. 2012;416:200-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.10.070

Written By

Bongoua-Devisme Affi Jeanne, Kouakou Sainte Adélaïde Ahya Edith, Hien Marie Paule, Ndoye Fatou, Guety Thierry and Diouf Diégane

Submitted: 22 September 2022 Reviewed: 31 October 2022 Published: 11 January 2023